AU2014203601C1 - Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby - Google Patents
Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2014203601C1 AU2014203601C1 AU2014203601A AU2014203601A AU2014203601C1 AU 2014203601 C1 AU2014203601 C1 AU 2014203601C1 AU 2014203601 A AU2014203601 A AU 2014203601A AU 2014203601 A AU2014203601 A AU 2014203601A AU 2014203601 C1 AU2014203601 C1 AU 2014203601C1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- plant
- plants
- abiotic stress
- exogenous polynucleotide
- seq
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 97
- 230000036579 abiotic stress Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 97
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 97
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 97
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 125000003275 alpha amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 claims description 43
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 claims description 13
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 claims description 11
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 claims description 11
- 244000038559 crop plants Species 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000018343 nutrient deficiency Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 abstract description 9
- FWMNVWWHGCHHJJ-SKKKGAJSSA-N 4-amino-1-[(2r)-6-amino-2-[[(2r)-2-[[(2r)-2-[[(2r)-2-amino-3-phenylpropanoyl]amino]-3-phenylpropanoyl]amino]-4-methylpentanoyl]amino]hexanoyl]piperidine-4-carboxylic acid Chemical compound C([C@H](C(=O)N[C@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N1CCC(N)(CC1)C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1 FWMNVWWHGCHHJJ-SKKKGAJSSA-N 0.000 abstract description 6
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 365
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 117
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 59
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 54
- 241000209510 Liliopsida Species 0.000 description 35
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 description 34
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 28
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 26
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 25
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 25
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 23
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 23
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 22
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 18
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 16
- 108700010070 Codon Usage Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 108091060211 Expressed sequence tag Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 108091027544 Subgenomic mRNA Proteins 0.000 description 14
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 13
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 13
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 13
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 13
- 241000589158 Agrobacterium Species 0.000 description 12
- 235000007688 Lycopersicon esculentum Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 240000003768 Solanum lycopersicum Species 0.000 description 12
- 235000016383 Zea mays subsp huehuetenangensis Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 12
- 235000009973 maize Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 12
- 101710132601 Capsid protein Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 101710094648 Coat protein Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 101710125418 Major capsid protein Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 101710141454 Nucleoprotein Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 101710083689 Probable capsid protein Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 210000003763 chloroplast Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000008723 osmotic stress Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 102100021181 Golgi phosphoprotein 3 Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 9
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 230000008641 drought stress Effects 0.000 description 9
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 9
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 8
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N (+)-Abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\[C@@]1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 7
- 208000005156 Dehydration Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 6
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 241000219194 Arabidopsis Species 0.000 description 5
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N D-Mannitol Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229930195725 Mannitol Natural products 0.000 description 5
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229930027917 kanamycin Natural products 0.000 description 5
- 229960000318 kanamycin Drugs 0.000 description 5
- SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N kanamycin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229930182823 kanamycin A Natural products 0.000 description 5
- 239000000594 mannitol Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000010355 mannitol Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 5
- 108091008146 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 230000019491 signal transduction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 241000219195 Arabidopsis thaliana Species 0.000 description 4
- 108020004684 Internal Ribosome Entry Sites Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013515 script Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 3
- 108010076504 Protein Sorting Signals Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 235000011684 Sorghum saccharatum Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 108091081024 Start codon Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008642 heat stress Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000126 in silico method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010369 molecular cloning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003938 response to stress Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000006152 selective media Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005068 transpiration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000013603 viral vector Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 241000589155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens Species 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000004977 Brassica sinapistrum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000289527 Cordyline terminalis Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000009091 Cordyline terminalis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920000742 Cotton Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930182566 Gentamicin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N Gentamicin Chemical compound O1[C@H](C(C)NC)CC[C@@H](N)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](NC)[C@@](C)(O)CO2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000219146 Gossypium Species 0.000 description 2
- 102000002812 Heat-Shock Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010004889 Heat-Shock Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen peroxide Chemical compound OO MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000006142 Luria-Bertani Agar Substances 0.000 description 2
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 244000021685 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000009071 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 101000884372 Oryza sativa subsp. japonica Calcium-dependent protein kinase 7 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108700001094 Plant Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010092799 RNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108020004511 Recombinant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000062793 Sorghum vulgare Species 0.000 description 2
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 108020005202 Viral DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000035508 accumulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 108010025267 calcium-dependent protein kinase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N desoxyabscisic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=C(C)C=CC1C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000024346 drought recovery Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241001493065 dsRNA viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006353 environmental stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241001233957 eudicotyledons Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108091008053 gene clusters Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000015784 hyperosmotic salinity response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 231100000783 metal toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108010058731 nopaline synthase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003204 osmotic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003415 peat Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000029553 photosynthesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010672 photosynthesis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003976 plant breeding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013600 plasmid vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000001938 protoplast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006808 response to salt stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 2
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000002103 transcriptional effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007492 two-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009281 ultraviolet germicidal irradiation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 2
- LLQHSBBZNDXTIV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-[5-[[4-[2-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-ylamino)pyrimidin-5-yl]piperazin-1-yl]methyl]-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazol-3-yl]-3H-1,3-benzoxazol-2-one Chemical compound C1C(CC2=CC=CC=C12)NC1=NC=C(C=N1)N1CCN(CC1)CC1CC(=NO1)C1=CC2=C(NC(O2)=O)C=C1 LLQHSBBZNDXTIV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000007469 Actins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010085238 Actins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700008979 Arabidopsis RD29B Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100381335 Arabidopsis thaliana AVP1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100404726 Arabidopsis thaliana NHX7 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100194010 Arabidopsis thaliana RD29A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000017060 Arachis glabrata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000105624 Arachis hypogaea Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010777 Arachis hypogaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000018262 Arachis monticola Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000075850 Avena orientalis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007319 Avena orientalis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000007558 Avena sp Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014698 Brassica juncea var multisecta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000002791 Brassica napus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000006008 Brassica napus var napus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000006618 Brassica rapa subsp oleifera Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000188595 Brassica sinapistrum Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100297347 Caenorhabditis elegans pgl-3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100411570 Caenorhabditis elegans rab-28 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010026870 Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000019025 Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 235000002566 Capsicum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108090000565 Capsid Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000195493 Cryptophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000012410 DNA Ligases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010061982 DNA Ligases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010014303 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016928 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000004163 DNA-directed RNA polymerases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000626 DNA-directed RNA polymerases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000737786 Daucus carota Calcium-dependent protein kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000380130 Ehrharta erecta Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001058146 Erium Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000004281 Eucalyptus maculata Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091029865 Exogenous DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000006424 Flood reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101000737787 Glycine max Calcium-dependent protein kinase SK5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 244000020551 Helianthus annuus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003222 Helianthus annuus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hexa-Ac-myo-Inositol Natural products CC(=O)OC1C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C(OC(C)=O)C1OC(C)=O SQUHHTBVTRBESD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010020649 Hyperkeratosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100034343 Integrase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091006671 Ion Transporter Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000037862 Ion Transporter Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 235000014647 Lens culinaris subsp culinaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000043158 Lens esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 108060001084 Luciferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000005089 Luciferase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091054455 MAP kinase family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000004658 Medicago sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000005431 Molecular Chaperones Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010006519 Molecular Chaperones Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100027983 Molybdenum cofactor sulfurase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710132461 Molybdenum cofactor sulfurase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-benzyladenine Chemical compound N=1C=NC=2NC=NC=2C=1NCC1=CC=CC=C1 NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 244000061176 Nicotiana tabacum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000636 Northern blotting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012408 PCR amplification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006002 Pepper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000011420 Phospholipase D Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000553 Phospholipase D Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000015439 Phospholipases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010064785 Phospholipases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000045595 Phosphoprotein Phosphatases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108700019535 Phosphoprotein Phosphatases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091000080 Phosphotransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000016761 Piper aduncum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000003889 Piper guineense Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000017804 Piper guineense Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000008184 Piper nigrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010582 Pisum sativum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000004713 Pisum sativum Species 0.000 description 1
- 108020005089 Plant RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000219000 Populus Species 0.000 description 1
- ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Proline Natural products OC(=O)C1CCCN1 ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000001253 Protein Kinase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241001112090 Pseudovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091034057 RNA (poly(A)) Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700008625 Reporter Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700022176 SOS1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000057028 SOS1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101100197320 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) RPL35A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000007238 Secale cereale Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000082988 Secale cereale Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000061458 Solanum melongena Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002597 Solanum melongena Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000006394 Sorghum bicolor Species 0.000 description 1
- 101150100839 Sos1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710151717 Stress-related protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- OUUQCZGPVNCOIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Superoxide Chemical compound [O-][O] OUUQCZGPVNCOIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 108700005078 Synthetic Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- WFWLQNSHRPWKFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tegafur Chemical group O=C1NC(=O)C(F)=CN1C1OCCC1 WFWLQNSHRPWKFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010162 Tukey test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108020000999 Viral RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000036142 Viral infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108700041896 Zea mays Ubi-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012271 agricultural production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000723 ampicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N ampicillin Chemical compound C1([C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H]3SC([C@@H](N3C2=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)=CC=CC=C1 AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003484 anatomy Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004102 animal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000003963 antioxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004507 artificial chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003851 biochemical process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000030833 cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000033077 cellular process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000481 chemical toxicant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000022472 cold acclimation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008645 cold stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012272 crop production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004292 cytoskeleton Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012154 double-distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000459 effect on growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001729 effect on metabolism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001463 effect on reproduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013020 embryo development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007914 freezing tolerance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000030279 gene silencing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003365 glass fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101150054900 gus gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000013632 homeostatic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002744 homologous recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006801 homologous recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000006278 hypochromic anemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001822 immobilized cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000003018 immunoassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229960000367 inositol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- -1 inositol phosphates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000019948 ion homeostasis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003621 irrigation water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021073 macronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000442 meristematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037353 metabolic pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002906 microbiologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000520 microinjection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011859 microparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006870 ms-medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002703 mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000007899 nucleic acid hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002515 oligonucleotide synthesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003463 organelle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000065 osmolyte Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000020232 peanut Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008055 phosphate buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000020233 phosphotransferase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000019935 photoinhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035479 physiological effects, processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008121 plant development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010152 pollination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000012015 potatoes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012514 protein characterization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108020001580 protein domains Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108060006633 protein kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000001742 protein purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001243 protein synthesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003642 reactive oxygen metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010839 reverse transcription Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005070 ripening Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002786 root growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012266 salt solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N scyllo-inosotol Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007226 seed germination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013605 shuttle vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007781 signaling event Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037432 silent mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon carbide Chemical compound [Si+]#[C-] HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001415 sodium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004162 soil erosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000006354 stress signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091006106 transcriptional activators Proteins 0.000 description 1
- GPRLSGONYQIRFK-MNYXATJNSA-N triton Chemical compound [3H+] GPRLSGONYQIRFK-MNYXATJNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005740 tumor formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010455 vermiculite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052902 vermiculite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019354 vermiculite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009385 viral infection Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004383 yellowing Methods 0.000 description 1
Abstract
Isolated polynucleotides having a nucleic acid sequence at least 80% homologous to SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162-204, 206-211, 214-287 and/or encoding polypeptides having an amino acid sequence at least 80% homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63, 66-121, 141-156 or 157 are provided. Also provided are methods of 5 utilizing same for increasing the tolerance of a plant to abiotic stresses and/or increasing the biomass, vigor and/or yield of a plant.
Description
METHODS OF INCREASING ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE AND/OR BIOMASS IN PLANTS AND PLANTS GENERATED THEREBY
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a divisional of Australian application No. 2012241091 filed on 12 October 2012, which is a divisional of Australian application No. 2006281018 filed on 15 August 2006 and is related to International application No. PCT/IL2006/000947 filed on 15 August 2006, claiming priority from US Serial No. 60/707,957 filed on 15 August 2005; each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants and, more particularly, to plants expressing exogenous abiotic stress-tolerance genes.
Abiotic stress (also referred to as “environmental stress”) conditions such as salinity, drought, flood, suboptimal temperature and toxic chemical pollution, cause substantial damage to agricultural plants. Most plants have evolved strategies to protect themselves against these conditions. However, if the severity and duration of the stress conditions are too great, the effects on plant development, growth and yield of most crop plants are profound. Furthermore, most of the crop plants are very susceptible to abiotic stress (ABS) and thus necessitate optimal growth conditions for commercial crop yields. Continuous exposure to stress causes major alterations in the plant metabolism which ultimately lead to cell death and consequently yield losses. Thus, despite extensive research and the use of sophisticated and intensive crop-protection measures, losses due to abiotic stress conditions remain in the billions of dollars annually (1,2).
The following summarizes the implications of exemplary abiotic stress conditions.
Problems associated with drought. A drought is a period of abnormally dry weather that persists long enough to produce a serious hydrologic imbalance (for example crop damage, water supply shortage, etc.). While much of the weather that we experience is brief and shortlived, drought is a more gradual phenomenon, slowly taking hold of an area and tightening its grip with time. In severe cases, drought can last for many years and can have devastating effects on agriculture and water supplies. With burgeoning population and chronic shortage of available fresh water, drought is not only the number one weather related problem in agriculture, it also ranks as one of the major natural disasters of all time, causing not only economic damage, but also loss of human lives. For example, losses from the US drought of 1988 exceeded $40 billion, exceeding the losses caused by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the Mississippi River floods of 1993, and the San Francisco earthquake in 1989. In some areas of the world, the effects of drought can be far more severe. In the Horn of Africa the 1984-1985 drought led to a famine that killed 750,000 people.
Problems for plants caused by low water availability include mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular w'ater. Drought also causes plants to become more susceptible to various diseases (Simpson (1981). "The Value of Physiological Knowledge of Water Stress in Plants", In Water Stress on Plants, (Simpson, <3. M., ed.), Praeger, N.Y., pp. 235-265).
In addition to the many land regions of the world that are too arid for most if not all crop plants, overuse and over-utilization of available water is resulting in an increasing loss of agriculturally-usable land, a process which, in the extreme, results in desertification. The problem is further compounded by increasing salt accumulation in soils, as described above, which adds to the loss of available water in soils.
Problems associated with high salt levels. One in five hectares of irrigated land is damaged by salt, an important historical factor in the decline of ancient agrarian societies. This condition is only expected to worsen, further reducing the availability of arable land and crop production, since none of the top five food crops-wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and soybean—can tolerate excessive salt.
Detrimental effects of salt on plants are a consequence of both water deficit resulting in osmotic stress (similar to drought stress) and the effects of excess sodium ions on critical biochemical processes. As with freezing and drought, high saline causes water deficit; the presence of high salt makes it difficult for plant roots to extact water from their environment (Buchanan et al. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Md.). Soil salinity is thus one of the more important variables that determines where a plant may thrive. In many parts of the world, sizable land areas are uncultivable due to naturally high soil salinity. To compound the problem, salination of soils that are used for agricultural production is a significant and increasing problem in regions that rely heavily on agriculture. The Tatter is compounded, by over-utilization, over-fertilization and water shortage, typically caused by climatic change and the demands of increasing population. Salt tolerance is of particular importance early in a plant's lifecycle, since evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement, and salt accumulates in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt level in the whole soil profile.
Problems associated with excessive heat. Germination of many crops is very sensitive to temperature. A gene that would enhance germination in hot conditions would be useful for crops that are planted late in the season or in hot climates. Seedlings and mature plants that are exposed to excess heat may experience heat shock, which may arise in various organs, including leaves and particularly fruit, when transpiration is insufficient to overcome heat stress. Heat also damages cellular stinctures, including organelles and cytoskeleton, and impairs membrane function [Buchanan et al. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Md. Heat shock may produce a decrease in overall protein synthesis, accompanied by expression of heat shock proteins. Heat shock proteins function as chaperones and are involved in refolding proteins denatured by heat.
Heat stress often accompanies conditions of low water availability. Heat itself is seen as an interacting stress and adds to the detrimental effects caused by water deficit conditions. Evaporative demaud exhibits near exponential increases with increases in daytime temperatures and can result in high transpiration rates and low plant water potentials [Hall et al. (20D0) Plant Physiol. 123: 1449-1458]. High-temperature damage to pollen almost always occurs in conjunction with drought stress, and rarely occurs under well-watered conditions. Thus, separating the effects of heat and drought stress on pollination is difficult. Combined stress can alter plant metabolism in novel ways; therefore understanding the interaction between different stresses may be important for the development of strategies to enhance stress tolerance by genetic manipulation.
Problems associated with excessive chilling conditions. The term "chilling sensitivity" has been used to describe many types of physiological damage produced at low,. but above freezing, temperatures. Most crops of tropical origins, such as soybean, rice, maize, and cotton are easily damaged by chilling. Typical chilling damage includes wilting, necrosis, chlorosis or leakage of ions from cell membranes. The underlying mechanisms of chilling sensitivity are not completely understood yet, but probably involve the level of membrane saturation and other physiological deficiencies. For example, photoinhibition of photosynthesis (disruption of photosynthesis due to high light intensities) often occurs under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late summer/autumn nights. For example, chilling may lead to yield losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of maize. Another consequence of poor growth is the rather poor ground cover of maize fields in spring, often resulting in soil erosion, increased occurrence of weeds, and reduced uptake of nutrients. A retarded uptake of mineral nitrogen could also lead to increased losses of nitrate into the ground water. By some estimates, chilling accounts for monetary losses in the United States (US) behind only to drought and flooding.
Water deficit is a common component of many plant stresses. Water deficit occurs in plant cells when the whole plant transpiration rate exceeds the water uptake. In addition to drought, other stresses, such as salinity and low temperature, produce cellular dehydration (McCue and Hanson (1990) Trends Biotechnol. 8: 358-362).
Salt and drought stress signal transduction consist of ionic and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways. The ionic aspect of salt stress is signaled via the SOS pathway where a calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1. The pathway regulating ion homeostasis in response to salt stress has been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 131-139.
The osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant reactions that overlap with drought and/or cold stress responses.
Common aspects of drought, cold and salt stress response have been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra). Those include: (a) transient changes in the cytoplasmic calcium levels very early in the signaling event (Knight, (2000)· Int. Rev. Cytol. 195: 269-324; Sanders et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 691-706): (b) signal transduction via mitogen-activated and/or calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs; see Xiong et ah, 2002) and protein phosphatases (Merlot et al. . (2001) Plant J. 25: 295-303; Tahtihaiju and Palva (2001) Plant J. 26: 461-470); (c) increases in abscisic acid levels in response to stress triggering a subset of i responses (Xiong et al. (2002) supra, and references therein); (d) inositol phosphates as signal molecules (at least for a subset of the stress responsive transcriptional changes (Xiong et al. (2001) Genes Dev. 15: 1971-1984); (e) activation of phospholipases which in turn generate a diverse array of second messenger molecules, some of which might regulate the activity of stress responsive kinases (phospholipase D functions in an ABA independent pathway, Frank et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12:111-124); [0026] (f) induction of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) type genes including the CRT/DRE responsive COR/RD genes (Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra); (g) increased levels of antioxidants and compatible osmolytes such as proline and soluble sugars (Hasegawa et al. (2000) Annu. Rev. Plant Mol. Plant Physiol. 51: 463-499); and [0028] (h) accumulation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals (Hasegawa et al. (2000) supra).
Abscisic acid biosynthesis is regulated by osmotic stress at multiple steps. Both ABA-dependent and -independent osmotic stress signaling first modify constitutively expressed transcription factors, leading to the expression of early response transcriptional activators, which then activate downstream stress tolerance effector genes. . Based on the commonality of many aspects of cold, drought and salt stress responses, it can be concluded that genes that increase tolerance to cold or salt stress can also improve drought stress protection. In fact this has already been demonstrated for transcription factors (in the case of AtCBF/DREBl) and for other genes such as OsCDPK7 (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327), or AVP1 (a vacuolar pyrophosphatase-proton- pump. Gaxiola et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11444-11449).
Developing stress-tolerant plants is a strategy that has the potential to solve or mediate at least some of these problems; However,'traditional plant breeding strategies used to develop new lines of plants that exhibit tolerance to ABS are relatively inefficient since they are tedious, time consuming and of unpredictable outcome. Furthermore, limited germplasm resources for stress tolerance and incompatibility in crosses between distantly related plant species represent significant problems encountered in conventional breeding. Additionally, the cellular processes leading to ABS tolerance are complex in nature and involve multiple mechanisms of cellular adaptation and numerous metabolic pathways (4-7).
Genetic engineering efforts, aimed at conferring abiotic stress tolerance to transgenic crops, have been described in the prior art. Studies by Apse and Blumwald (Cun- Opin Biotechnol. 13:146-150, 2002), Quesada et al. (Plant Physiol. 130:951-963, 2002), Holmstrom et al. (Nature 379: 683-684, 1996), Xu et al. (Plant Physiol 110: 249-257, 1996), Pilon-Smits and Ebskamp (Plant Physiol 107: 125-130, 1995) and Tarczynski et al, (Science 259: 508-510, 1993) have all attempted at generating stress tolerant plants.
In addition, several U.S. patents and patent applications also describe polynucleotides associated with stress tolerance and their use in generating stress tolerant plants. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,296,462 and 5,356,816 describe transforming plants with polynucleotides encoding proteins involved in cold adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana, to thereby promote cold tolerance in the transformed plants. U.S. Pat. No. 6,670,528 describes transforming plants with polynucleotides encoding polypeptides binding to stress responsive elements, to thereby promote tolerance of the transformed plants to abiotic stress. U.S. Pat. No. 6,720,477 describes transforming plants with a polynucleotide encoding a signal transduction stress-related protein, capable of increasing tolerance of the transformed plants to abiotic stress. U.S Application Ser. Nos, 09/938842 and 10/342224 describe abiotic stress-related genes and their use to confer upon plants tolerance to abiotic stress. U.S. Application Ser. No. 10/231035 describes overexpressing a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase in plants to thereby increase their tolerance to abiotic stress.
Although the above described studies were at least partially successful in generating stress tolerant plants, there remains a need for stress tolerant genes which can be utilized to generate plants tolerant of a wide range of abiotic stress conditions.
While reducing the present invention to practice,· the present inventors have identified through bioinmformatic and laboratory studies several novel abiotic stress-tolerance genes, which can be utilized to increase tolerance to abiotic stress and/or biomass, vigor and yield in plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of increasing tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress, comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 90 % homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63, 66-121, 141-156 or 157 thereby increasing the tolerance of the plant to the abiotic stress.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the abiotic stress is selected from the group consisting of salinity, water deprivation, low temperature, high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency, nutrient excess, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of increasing biomass, vigor and/or yield of a plant, comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 90 % homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63, 66-121, 141-156 or 157, thereby increasing biomass, vigor and/or yield of the plant.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the expressing is effected by: (a) transforming a cell of the plant with the exogenous polynucleotide; . (b) generating a mature plant from the cell; and (c) cultivating the mature plant under conditions suitable for expressing tire exogenous polynucleotide within the mature plant.
According to still further features in tire described preferred embodiments the transforming is effected by introducing to the plant cell a nucleic acid construct including the exogenous polynucleotide and at least one promoter capable of directing transcription of the exogenous polynucleotide in the plant cell.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a nucleic acid construct, comprising a nucleic aeid sequence at least 90 % identical to a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162-204, 206-211, 214-287 and a promoter capable of directing transcription of the nucleic acid sequence in a host cell.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the promoter is a constitutive promoter.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the constitutive promoter is CaMV 35S promoter.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments tire constitutive promoter is At6669 promoter.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the promoter is an inducible promoter.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the inducible promoter is an abiotic stress inducible promoter.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the host cell is a plant cell.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the plant cell forms a part of a dicotyledonous plant cell.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the plant cell forms a part of a monocotyledonous plant cell.
According to still another aspect of the present invention there is provided an isolated polypeptide, comprising an amino acid sequence at least 90 % homologous to the amino acid sequence encoded by a polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 11, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162-204,206-211 and 214-287.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the amino acid sequence is at least 90 % homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63, 66-121, 141-156 or 157.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention there is provided a plant cell comprising an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 90 % homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63, 66-121, 141-156 or 157 thereby increasing the tolerance of the plant to the abiotic stress.
According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments the plant cell forms a part of a plant.
Definitions of the specific embodiments of the invention as claimed herein follow.
According to a first embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method of increasing an abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate of a plant, comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to SEQ ID NO :40, thereby increasing the abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate of the plant.
According to a second embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method of selecting a plant having increased abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, the method comprising: (a) providing plants transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40, (b) selecting said plants transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased biomass, and/or increased growth rate as compared to the wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, thereby selecting the plant having increased abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate as compared to the wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions.
According to a third embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40, wherein said crop plant is derived from parent plants transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide and selected for increased biomass, increased growth rate and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and said crop plant having said increased biomass, said increased growth rate and/or said increased abiotic stress tolerance, thereby producing the crop. specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for puiposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice. FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the methodology used to measure plants' - size. Digital pictures are taken using uniform illumination and a tripod set a constant distance. The digital pictures obtained are processed using a “green-based” filter that removes the “non-green parts” of the picture leaving only the plant rosette area for quantification. Following quantification of the rosette area, results are exported to a spreadsheet and analyzed using statistical software. FIGs. 2A-B are representative results of a gene (SEQ ID 158) that confers abiotic stress tolerance uncovered according to the teachings of the present invention. Figure 2A - Plants grown under non-stressing conditions for 7-10 days were transferred to high osmoticum conditions and their growth was followed for 12 days using digital imaging. Processed images of pictures taken at Day 0, Day 5 and Day 12 are shown. Note the control plants in the upper center of each plate and the independent transgenic events surrounding the control plants. Figure 2B is a graph that describes plant area growth as a function of time using the images shown in panel A. Four of the five events shown are able to grow significantly faster than the wild-type control plants under the same conditions. Statistical analysis of the results is shown further below in Table 5 rows 1-5.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is of methods of increasing plants tolerance to abiotic stress and/or biomass by utilizing novel abiotic stress tolerance genes and of plants exhibiting increased tolerance to stress conditions and/or increased capacity to accumulate biomass.
The principles and operation of the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and accompanying descriptions.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting,
Whilst reducing the present invention to practice, the present inventors while employing bioinformatic techniques, identified polynucleotide sequences winch encode putative abiotic-stress tolerance (ABST) proteins (Example 1). Selected sequences were isolated (Example 2), cloned into expression vectors (Example 3-4) and introduced into Arabidopsis thaliam plants (Example 5-6). These plants, were grown under salinity stress conditions, or under normal conditions, and checked for increased biomass as compared with similar control plants not carrying the exogenous ABST genes. As is evident from the results shown in Example 8, nucleic acid sequences selected according to the teachings of the present invention were shown to improve the tolerance of transgenic plants transfected therewith to abiotic stress as compared to control plants.
Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of increasing tolerance of a plant to an abiotic stress and/or plant biomass. The method includes expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 90 % homologous to SEQ ID NO: 2,4,6, 8,10, 12,13-56, 58-63, 66-121,141-156 or 157.
According to one preferred embodiment of this aspect of the present invention the isolated polynucleotide is as set forth is SEQ ID NO; 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 158, 159, 160,161,162-204,206-211,214-287.
Alternatively, the exogenous polynucleotide of the present invention encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence as further described hereinbelovv. at least about 70 %, at least about 75 %, at least about 80 %, at least about 81 %, at least about 82 %, at least about 83 %, at least about 84 %, at least about 85 %, at least about 86 %, at least about 87 %, at least about 88 %, at least about 89 %, at least about 90 %, at least about 91 %, at least about 92 %, at least about 93 %, at least about 93 %, at least about 94 %, at least about 95 %, at least about 96 %, at least about 97 %, at least about 98 %, at least about 99 %, or more say 100 % homologous to an amino acid sequence selected front the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-56, 58-63,66-121,141-156orl57.
The phrase "abiotic stress" used herein refers to any adverse effect on metabolism, growth, reproduction and/or viability of a plant. Accordingly, abiotic stress can be induced by suboptimal environmental growth conditions such as, for example, salinity, water deprivation, flooding, freezing, low or high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency, atmospheric pollution or UV irradiation. The implications of abiotic stress are discussed in the Background section.
The phrase “abiotic stress tolerance” as used herein refers to the ability of a plant to endure an abiotic stress without suffering a substantial alteration in metabolism, growth, productivity and/or viability. Preferably, the genetically engineered plants of the present invention exhibit at least about 2% more, 5 % more, 10 % more, 20 % more, 30 % more, 40 % more, 50 % more, 60 % more, 70 % more, 80 % more, 90 % more or even higher tolerace to abiotic stress than non-transgenic plants.
As used herein, the tenn "exogenous polynucleotide'1 refers to a nucleic acid sequence which is not naturally expressed within the plant but which, when introduced into the plant either in a stable or transient maimer, produces at least one polypeptide product.
Homology (e.g., percent .homology). can be determined using, any homology comparison software, including for example, the Blast? software of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) such as by using default parameters.
Identity (e.g., percent homology) can be determined using any homology comparison software, including for example, the BlastN software of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) such as by using default parameters. ihe polynucleotide or the present invention refers to a single or double stranded nucleic acid sequences which is isolated and provided in the form of an RNA sequence, a complementary polynucleotide sequence (cDNA), a genomic polynucleotide sequence and/or a composite polynucleotide sequences (e.g., a combination of the above),
As used herein the phrase "complementary polynucleotide sequence" refers to a sequence, which results from reverse transcription of messenger RNA using a reverse transcriptase or any other RNA dependent DNA polymerase. Such a sequence can be subsequeutly amplified in vivo or in vitro using a DNA dependent DNA polymerase.
As used herein the phrase "genomic polynucleotide sequence” refers to a sequence derived (isolated) from a chromosome and thus it represents a contiguous poition of a chromosome.
As used herein the phrase "composite polynucleotide sequence" refers to a sequence, which is at least partially complementary and at least partially genomic. A composite sequence can include some exonal sequences required to encode the polypeptide of the present invention, as well as some intronic sequences interposing therebetween. The intronic sequences can be of any source, including of other genes, and typically will include conserved splicing signal sequences. Such intronic sequences may further include cis acting expression regulatory elements.
Nucleic acid sequences of the polypeptides of the present invention may be optimized for expression. Such optimized sequences are provided in SEQ ID NOs: 158,159, 160 and 161. Examples of such sequence modifications include, but are not limited to, an altered G/C content to more closely approach that typically found in the plant species of interest, and the removal of codons atypically found in the plant species commonly referred to as codon optimization.
The phrase "codon optimization" refers to the selection of appropriate DNA nucleotides for use within a structural gene or fragment thereof that approaches codon usage within the plant of interest. Therefore, an optimized gene or nucleic acid sequence refers to a gene in which the nucleotide sequence of a native or naturally occurring gene has been modified in order to utilize statistically-preferred or statistically-favored codons within the plant. The nucleotide sequence typically is examined at the DNA level and the coding region optimized for expression in the plant species determined using any suitable procedure, for example as described in Sardana et al. (1996, Plant Cell Reports 15:677-681). In this method, the standard deviation of codon usage, a measure of codon usage bias, may be calculated by first finding the squared proportional deviation of usage of each codon of the native gene relative to that of highly expressed plant genes, followed by a calculation of the average squared deviation. The fonnula used is: 1 SDCU = n = 1 N [ ( Xn - Yn ) / Yn ] 2 / N, where Xn refers to the frequency of usage of codon n in highly expressed plant genes, where Yn to the frequency of usage of codon n in the gene of interest and N refers to the total number of codons in the gene of interest. A table of codon usage from highly expressed genes of dicotyledonous plants is compiled using the data of Murray et al. (1989, Nuc Acids Res. 17:477-498).
One method of optimizing the nucleic acid sequence in accordance with the preferred codon usage for a particular plant cell type is based on the direct use, without performing any extra statistical calculations, of codon optimization tables such as those provided on-line at the Codon Usage Database through the NIAS (National Institute of Agrobiological .. Sciences) DNA bank in Japan (http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/). The Codon Usage Database contains codon usage tables for a number of different species, with each codon usage table having been statistically determined based on the data present in Genbanlc
By using the above tables to determine the most preferred or most favored codons for each amino acid in a particular species (for example, rice), a naturally-occurring nucleotide sequence encoding a protein of interest can be codon optimized for that particular plant species. This is effected by replacing codons that may have a low statistical incidence in the particular species genome with corresponding codons, in regard to an amino acid, that are statistically more favored. However, one or more less-favored codons may be selected to delete existing restriction sites, to create new ones at potentially useful junctions (5' and 3' ends to add signal peptide or termination cassettes, internal sites. that -might be used to cut and splice segments together to produce a correct full-length sequence), or to eliminate nucleotide sequences that may negatively effect mRNA stability or expression.
The naturally-occurring encoding nucleotide sequence may already, in advance of any modification, contain a number of codons that correspond to a statistically-favored codon in a particular plant species. Therefore, codon optimization of the native nucleotide sequence may comprise determining which codons, within the native nucleotide sequence, are not statistically-favored with regards to a particular plant, and modifying these codons in accordance with a codon usage table of the particular plant to produce a codon optimized derivative. A modified nucleotide sequence may be fully or partially optimized for plant codon usage provided that the protein encoded by the modified nucleotide sequence is produced at a level higher than the protein encoded by the corresponding naturally occurring or native gene. Construction of synthetic genes by altering the codon usage is described in for example PCT Patent Application 93/07278.
Thus, the present invention encompasses nucleic acid sequences described hereinabove: fragments thereof, sequences hybridizable therewith, sequences homologous thereto, sequences encoding similar polypeptides with different codon usage, altered sequences characterized by mutations, such as deletion, insertion or substitution of one or more nucleotides, either naturally occurring or man induced, either randomly or in a targeted fashion.
The polynucleotides described above also encode previously uncharacterized polypeptides.
Thus the present invention provides a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence as further described hereinbelow. at least about 70 %, at least about 75 %, at least about 80 %, at least about SI %, at least about 82 %, at least about 83 %, at least about 84 %, at least about 85 %, at least about 86 %, at least about 87 %, at least about 88 %, at least about 89 %, at least about 90 %, at least about 91 %, at least about 92 %, at least about 93 %. at least about 93 %, at least about 94 %, at least about 95 %, at least about 96 %, at least about 97 %, at least about 98 %, at least about 99 %, or more say 100 % homologous to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2,4,6,8,10, 12,13-56,58-63, 66-121,141-156 or 157.
The present invention also encompasses fragments of the above described .. polypeptides- and..polypeptides having mutations, such as deletions, insertions or substitutions of one or more amino acids, either naturally occurring or man induced, either randomly or in a targeted fashion. A suitable plant for use with tire method of the present invention can be any monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant including, but not limited to, maize, wheat, barely, rye, oat, rice, soybean, peanut, pea, lentil and alfalfa, cotton, rapeseed, canola, pepper, sunflower, potato, tobacco, tomato, eggplant, eucalyptus, a tree, an ornamental plant, a perennial grass and a forage crop.
Expressing the exogenous polynucleotide of the present invention within the plant can be effected by transforming one or more cells of the plant with the exogenous polynucleotide, followed by generating a mature plant from the transformed cells and cultivating the mature plant under conditions suitable for expressing the exogenous polynucleotide within the mature plant.
Preferably, the transformation is effected by introducing to the plant cell a nucleic acid construct which includes the exogenous polynucleotide of the present invention and at least one promoter capable of directing transcription of the exogenous polynucleotide in the plant cell. Further details of suitable transformation approaches are provided hereinbelow.
As used herein, the term “promoter” refers to a region of DNA which lies upstream of the transcriptional initiation site of a gene to which RNA polymerase binds to initiate transcription of RNA. The promoter controls where (e.g., which poition of a plant, which organ within an animal, etc.) and/or when (e.g., which stage or condition in the lifetime of an organism) the gene is expressed.
Any suitable promoter sequence can be used by the nucleic acid construct of the present invention. Preferably the promoter is a constitutive promoter, a tissue-specific, or an abiotic stress-inducible promoter.
Suitable constitutive promoters include, for example, CaMV 35S promoter (SEQ ID NO: 122; Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812, 1985); Aiabidopsis At6669 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 123, patent No W02004/104162); maize Ubi 1 (Christensen et al., Plant Sol. Biol. 18:675-689, 1992); rice actin (McElroy et al., Plant Cell 2:163-171, 1990); pEMU (Last et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:581-588, 1991); and Synthetic Super MAS (Ni et al., The Plant Journal 7: 661-76, 1995). Other constitutive promoters include those in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,659,026, 5,608,149; 5.608,144; 5,604,121; . -.5.569,597: 5.466,785; 5,399,680; 5,268,463; and 5,608,142.
Suitable tissue-specific promoters include, but not limited to, leaf-specific promoters such as described, for example, by Yamamoto et al., Plant J. 12:255-265, 1997; Kwon et al., Plant Physiol. 105:357-67, 1994; Yamamoto et al., Plant Cell Physiol. 35:773-778, 1994; Gotor et al.. Plant J. 3:509-18, 1993; Orozco et al., Plant
Mol. Biol. 23:1129-1138, 1993: and Matsuoka et ah, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9586-9590, 1993.
Suitable abiotic stress-inducible promoters include, but not limited to, salt-inducible promoters such as RD29A (Yamaguchi-Shinozalei et ah, Mol. Gen. Genet. 236:331-340, 1993); drought-inducible promoters such as maize rabl7 gene promoter (Pla et. ah, Plant Mol. Biol. 21:259-266, 1993), maize rab28 gene promoter (Busk et. al., Plant J. 11:1285-1295, 1997) and maize Ivr2 gene promoter (Pelleschi et. al., Plant Mol. Biol. 39:373-380, 1999); and heat-inducible promoters such as heat tomato hsp80-promoter from tomato (U.S. Pat. No. 5,187,267).
The nucleic acid construct of the present invention preferably further includes an appropriate selectable marker and/or an origin of replication. Preferably, the nucleic acid construct utilized is a shuttle vector, which can propagate both in E. coli (wherein the construct comprises an appropriate selectable marker and origin of replication) and be compatible with propagation in cells. The construct according to the present invention can be, for example, a plasmid, a bacmid, a phagemid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus or an artificial chromosome. ·
The nucleic acid construct of the present invention can be utilized to stably or transiently transform plant cells. In stable trails formation, the exogenous polynucleotide of the present invention is integrated into the plant genome and as such it represents a stable and inherited trait. In transient transformation, the exogenous polynucleotide is expressed by die cell transformed but it is not integrated into the genome and as such it represents a transient trait.
There are various methods of introducing foreign genes into both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants (Potrykus, I., Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol., Plant. Mol. Biol. (1991) 42:205-225; Shimamoto et al., Nature (1989) 338:274-276).
The principle methods of causing stable integration of exogenous DNA into , .pjant genomic DNA include two main approaches: (i) Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer: Klee et al. (1987) Annu. Rev.
Plant Physiol. 38:467-486; Klee and Rogers in Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 6, Molecular Biology of Plant Nuclear Genes, eds. Schell, J., and Vasil, L. K., Academic Publishers, San Diego, Calif. (1989) p. 2-25; Gatenby, in Plant Biotechnology, eds. Kung, S. and Arntzen, C. J., Butterwortk Publishers, Boston, Mass. (1989) p. 93-112. (ii) Direct DNA uptake: Paszkowski et al., in Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 6, Molecular Biology of Plant Nuclear Genes eds. Schell, J., and Vasil, L. K., Academic Publishers, San Diego, Calif. (1989) p. 52-68; including methods for direct uptake of DNA into protoplasts, Toriyama, K. et al. (1988) Bio/Technology 6:1072-1074. DNA uptake induced by brief electric shock of plant cells: Zhang et al. Plant Cell Rep. (1988) 7:379-384. Fromm et al. Nature (1986) 319:791-793. DNA injection into plant cells or tissues by particle bombardment, Klein et al. Bio/Technology (1988) 6:559-563; McCabe et al. Bio/Technology (1988) 6:923-926; Sanford, Physiol. Plant. (1990) 79:206-209; by the use of micropipette systems: Neuhaus et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. (1987) 75:30-36; Neuhaus and Spangenberg, Physiol. Plant. (1990) 79:213-217; glass fibers or silicon carbide whisker transformation of cell cultures, embryos or callus tissue, U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,765 or by the direct incubation of DNA with germinating pollen, DeWet et al. in . Experimental Manipulation of Ovule Tissue, eds. Chapman, G. P. and Mantell, S. II. and Daniels, W. Longman, London, (1985) p. 197-209; and Ohta, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1986) 83:715-719.
The Agrobacterium system includes the use of plasmid vectors that contain defined DNA segments that integrate into the plant genomic DNA. Methods of inoculation of the plant tissue vary depending upon the plant species and the Agrobacterium delivery system. A widely used approach is the leaf disc procedure which can be performed with any tissue explant that provides a good source for initiation of whole plant differentiation. Horsch et al. in Plant Molecular Biology Manual A5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988) p. 1-9. A supplementary approach employs the Agrobacterium delivery system in combination with vacuum infiltration. The Agrobacterium system is especially viable in the creation of . transgenic dicotyledonous plants.
There are various methods of direct DNA transfer into plant cells. In electroporation, the protoplasts are briefly exposed to a strong electric field. In microinjection, the DNA is mechanically injected directly into the cells using very small micropipettes. In microparticle bombardment, the DNA is adsorbed on microprojectiles such as magnesium sulfate crystals or tungsten particles, and the microprojectiles are physically accelerated into cells or plant tissues.
Following stable transformation plant propagation is exercised. The most common method of plant propagation is by seed. Regeneration by seed propagation, however, has the deficiency that due to heterozygosity there is a lack of uniformity in the crop, since seeds are produced by plants according to the genetic variances governed by Mendelian rules. Basically, each seed is genetically different and each will glow with its own specific traits. Therefore, it is preferred that the transformed plant be produced such that the regenerated plant has the identical traits and characteristics of the parent transgenic plant. Therefore, it is preferred that the transformed plant be regenerated by micropropagation which provides a rapid, consistent reproduction of the transformed plants.
MicropiOpagation is a process of growing new generation plants from a single piece of tissue that has been excised from a selected parent plant or cultivar. This process permits the mass reproduction of plants having the preferred tissue expressing the fusion protein. The new generation plants which are produced are genetically identical to, and have all of the characteristics of, the original plant. Micropropagation allows mass production of quality plant material in a short period of time and offers a rapid multiplication of selected cultivars in the preservation of the characteristics of the original transgenic or transformed plant. The advantages of cloning plants are the speed of plant multiplication and the quality and uniformity of plants produced.
Micropropagation is a multi-stage procedure that requires alteration of culture medium or growth conditions between stages. Thus, the micropropagation process involves four basic stages: Stage one, initial tissue culturing; stage two, tissue culture multiplication; stage three, differentiation and plant formation; and stage four, greenhouse culturing and hardening. During stage one, initial tissue culturing, the tissue culture is established and certified contaminant-free. During stage two, the initial tissue culture is multiplied until a sufficient number of tissue samples are produced to meet production goals. During stage three, the tissue samples grown in stage two are divided and grown into individual plantlets. At stage four, the transformed plantlets are transferred to a greenhouse for hardening where the plants' tolerance to light is gradually increased so that it can be grown in the natural environment. rreierably, mature transformed plants generated as described above are further selected for abiotic stress tolerance. Accordingly, transformed and non-transformed (wild type) plants are exposed to an abiotic stress condition, such as water depravation, suboptimal temperature, nutrient deficiency, or preferably a salt stress condition. Salt stress can be effected in many ways such as, for example, by irrigating the plants with a hyperosmotic solution, by cultivating the plants hydroponically in a hyperosmotic growth solution (e.g., Hoagland solution), or by culturing the plants in a hyperosmotic growth medium (e.g., MS medium). Since different plants vary considerably in their tolerance to salinity, the salt concentration in the irrigation water, growth solution, or growth medium is preferably adjusted according to the specific characteristics of the specific plant cultivar or variety, so as to inflict a mild or moderate effect on the physiology and/or morphology of the plants (for guidelines as to appropriate concentration please see, Bernstein and Kafkafi, Root Growth Under Salinity Stress In: Plant Roots, The Hidden Half 3rd ed. Waisel Y, Eshel A and Kafkafi U. (editors) Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2002, and reference therein). Following exposure to the stress condition the plants are frequently monitored until substantial physiological and/or morphological effects appear in wild type plants. Subsequently, transformed plants not exhibiting substantial physiological and/or morphological effects, or exhibiting higher biomass than wild-type plants, are identified as abiotic stress tolerant plants.
Although stable transformation is presently preferred, transient transformation of leaf cells, meristematic cells or the whole plant is also envisaged by the present invention.
Transient transformation can be effected by any of the direct DNA transfer methods described above or by viral infection using modified plant viruses.
Viruses that have been shown to be useful for the transformation of plant hosts include CaMV, TMV and BV. Transformation of plants using plant viruses is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,237 (BGV), EP-A. 67,553 (TMV), Japanese Published Application No. 63-14693 (TMV), EPA 194,809 (BV), EPA 278,667 (BV); and Gluzman, Y. et al. Communications in Molecular Biology: Viral Vectors, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp. 172-189 (1988). Pseudovirus particles for use in expressing foreign DNA in many hosts, including plants, is described in WO S7/06261.
Preferably, the virus of the present invention is avirulent and thus is incapable of causing severe symptoms such as reduced growth rate, mosaic, ring spots, leaf roll, yellowing, streaking, pox formation, tumor formation and pitting. A suitable avirulent vims may be a naturally occurring avirulent virus or an artificially attenuated virus. Virus attenuation may be effected by using methods well known in the art including, but not limited to, sub-lethal heating, chemical treatment or by directed mutagenesis techniques such as described, for example, by Kurihara and Watanabe (Molecular Plant Pathology 4:259-269, 2003), Gal-on et al. (1992), Atreya et al. (1992) and Huet et al. (1994).
Suitable virus strains can be obtained from available sources such as, for example, the American Type culture Collection (ATCC) or by isolation from infected plants. Isolation of viruses from infected plant tissues can be effected by techniques well known in the art such as described, for example by Foster and Tatlor, Eds. “Plant Virology Protocols: From Virus Isolation to Transgenic Resistance (Methods in Molecular Biology (Humana Pr), Vol 81)”, Humana Press, 1998. Briefly, tissues of an infected plant believed to contain a high concentration of a suitable vims, preferably young leaves and flower petals, are ground in a buffer solution (e.g., phosphate buffer solution) to produce a virus infected sap which can be used in subsequent inoculations.
Construction of plant RNA viruses for the introduction and expression of non-viral exogenous polynucleotide sequences in plants is demonstrated by the above references as well as by Dawson, W. 0. et al, Virology (1989) 172:285-292; Takamatsu et al. EMBO J. (1987) 6:307-311; French et al. Science (1986) -231:1294-1297; and Takamatsu et al. FEBS'Letters (1990) 269:73-76.
When the virus is a DNA virus, suitable modifications can be made to the virus itself, Alternatively, the vims can first be cloned into a bacterial plasmid for ease of constructing the desired viral vector with the foreign DNA. The virus can then be excised from the plasmid. If the virus is a DNA virus, a bacterial origin -of replication can be attached to the viral DNA, which is then replicated by the bacteria. Transcription and translation of this DNA will produce the coat protein which will encapsidate the viral DNA. If the virus is an RNA virus, the virus is generally cloned as a cDNA and inserted into a plasmid. The plasmid is then used to make all of the constructions, The RNA vims is then produced by transcribing the viral sequence of luc pidiuuu cuiu utuiMauuii υι luc vuai gcucs ιυ piuuuuc uic cuai piuiciu^ vvmcu encapsidate the viral RNA.
Construction of plant KNA viruses for the introduction and expression in plants of non-viral exogenous polynucleotide sequences such as those included in tire construct of the present invention is demonstrated by the above references as well as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,316..931.
In one embodiment, a plant viral polynucleotide is provided in which the native coat protein coding sequence has been deleted from a viral polynucleotide, a nonnative plant viral coat protein coding sequence and a non-native promoter, preferably the subgenomic promoter of the non-native coat protein coding sequence, capable of expression in the plant host, packaging of the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide, and ensuring a systemic infection of the host by the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide, has been inserted. Alternatively, the coat protein gene may be inactivated by insertion of the non-native polynucleotide sequence within it, such that a protein is produced. The recombinant plant viral polynucleotide may contain one or more additional non-native subgenomic promoters. Each non-native subgenomic promoter is capable of transcribing or expressing adjacent genes or polynucleotide sequences in the plant host and incapable of recombination with each other and with native subgenomic promoters. Non-native (foreign) polynucleotide sequences may be inserted adjacent the native plant viral subgenomic promoter or the native and a nonnative plant viral subgenomic promoters if more than one polynucleotide sequence is included. The non-native polynucleotide sequences are transcribed or expressed in the host plant under control of the subgenomic promoter to produce the desired products. ..... In a second embodiment, a recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is provided as in the first embodiment except that the native coat protein coding sequence is placed adjacent one of the non-native coat protein subgenomic promoters instead of a non-native coat protein coding sequence.
In a third embodiment, a recombinant plant viral, polynucleotide is provided in which the native coat protein gene is adjacent its subgenomic promoter and one or more non-native subgenomic promoters have been inserted into the viral polynucleotide. The inserted non-native subgenomic promoters are capable of transcribing or expressing adjacent genes in a plant host and are incapable of recombination with each other and with native subgenomic promoters. Non-native polynucleotide sequences may be inserted adjacent the non-native subgenomic plant viral promoters such that the sequences are transcribed or expressed in the host plant under control of the subgenomic promoters to produce the desired product.
In a fourth embodiment, a recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is provided as in the third embodiment except that the native coat protein coding sequence is replaced by a non-native coat protein coding sequence.
The viral vectors are encapsidated by the coat proteins encoded by the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide to produce a recombinant plant virus. The recombinant plant viral polynucleotide or recombinant plant virus is used to infect appropriate host plants. The recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is capable of replication in the host, systemic spread in the host, and transcription or expression of foreign gene(s) (exogenous polynucleotide) in the host to produce the desired protein.
Techniques for inoculation of viruses to plants may be found in Foster and Taylor, eds. “Plant Virology Protocols: From Virus Isolation to Transgenic Resistance (Methods in Molecular Biology (Humana Pr), Vol SI)”, Humana Press, 1998; Maramorosh and Koprowski, eds. “Methods in Virology” 7 vols, Academic Press, New York 1967-1984; Hill, S.A. “Methods in Plant Virology”, Blackwell, Oxford, 1984; Walkey, D.G.A. “Applied Plant Virology”, Wiley, New York, 1985; and Kado and Agrawa, eds. “Principles and Techniques in Plant Virology”, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
In addition to the above, the polynucleotide of the present invention can also be introduced into a chloroplast genome thereby enabling chloroplast expression. A technique for introducing exogenous polynucleotide sequences to the genome of the chloroplasts is known. This technique involves the following procedures. First, plant cells are chemically treated so as to reduce the number of chloroplasts per cell to about one. Then, the exogenous polynucleotide is introduced via particle bombardment into the cells with the aim of introducing at least one exogenous polynucleotide molecule into the chloroplasts. The exogenous polynucleotides selected such that it is integratable into the chloroplast's genome via homologous recombination which is readily effected by enzymes inherent to the chloroplast. To this end, the exogenous polynucleotide includes, in addition to a gene of interest, at least one polynucleotide stretch which is derived from the chloroplast's genome. In addition, the exogenous polynucleotide includes a selectable marker, which serves by sequential selection procedures to ascertain that all or substantially all of the copies of the chloroplast genomes following such selection will include tire exogenous polynucleotide. Further details relating to this technique are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,050; and 5,693,507 which are incorporated herein by reference. A polypeptide can thus be produced by the protein expression system of the chloroplast and become integrated into the chloroplast's inner membrane.
Since abiotic stress tolerance in plants can involve multiple genes acting additively or in synergy (see, for example, in Quesda el ah, Plant Physiol. 130:951-063, 2002), the present invention also envisages expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant to thereby achieve superior abiotic stress tolerance.
Expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides hi a single host plant can be effected by co-introducing multiple nucleic acid constructs, each including a different exogenous polynucleotide, into a single plant cell. The transformed cell can than be regenerated into a mature plant using the methods described hereinabove.
Alternatively, expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant can be effected by co-introducing into a single plant-cell a single nucleic-acid construct including a plurality of different exogenous polynucleotides. Such a construct can be designed with a single promoter sequence which can transcribe a polycistronic message including all the different exogenous polynucleotide sequences. To enable co-translation of the different polypeptides encoded by the polycistronic message, the polynucleotide sequences can be inter-linked via an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequence which facilitates translation of polynucleotide sequences positioned downstream of the IRES sequence. In this case, a transcribed polycistronic RNA molecule encoding the different polypeptides described above will be translated from both the capped 5' end and the two internal IRES sequences of the pofycistronic RNA molecule to thereby produce in the cell all different polypeptides. Alternatively, the construct can include several promoter sequences each United to a different exogenous polynucleotide sequence.
The plant cell transformed with the construct including a plurality of different exogenous polynucleotides, can be regenerated into a mature plant, using the methods described hereinabove.
Alternatively, expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant can be effected by introducing different nucleic acid constructs, including different exogenous polynucleotides, into a plurality of plants. The regenerated transformed plants can then be cross-bred and resultant progeny selected for superior abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass traits, using conventional plant breeding techniques.
Hence, the present application provides methods of utilizing novel abiotic stress-tolerance genes to increase tolerance to abiotic stress and/or biomass in a wide range of economical plants, in a safe and cost effective manner.
Plants are subject to a range of environmental challenges. Several of these, including salt stress, general osmotic stress, drought stress and freezing stress, have the ability to impact whole plant and cellular water availability. Not surprisingly, then, plant responses to this collection of stresses are related. In a recent review, Zhu notes that “most studies on water stress signaling have focused on salt stress primarily because plant responses to salt and drought are closely related and the mechanisms overlap” (Zhu (2002) Ami. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247-273). Many examples of similar responses and pathways to this set of stresses have been documented. For example, the CBF transcription factors have been shown to condition resistance to salt, freezing and drought (Kasuga et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17: 287-291). The Arabidopsis rd29B gene is induced in response to both salt and dehydration stress, a process that is mediated largely through an ABA signal transduction process (Uno et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11632-11637), resulting in altered activity of transcription factors that bind to an upstream element within the rd29B promoter. In Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (ice plant), Patharker and Cushman have shown that a calcium-dependent protein kinase (McCDPKl) is induced by exposure to both drought and salt stresses (Patharker and Cushman (2000) Plant J. 24: 679-691). The stress-induced lrinase was also shown to phosphorylate a transcription factor, presumably altering its activity, although transcript levels of the target transcription factor are not altered in response to salt or drought stress. Similarly, Saijo et al. demonstrated that a rice salt/drought-induced calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (OsCDPK7) conferred increased salt and drought tolerance to rice when overexpressed (Saijo et al, (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327).
Exposure to dehydration invokes similar survival strategies in plants as does freezing stress (see, for example, Yelenosky (19S9) Plant Physiol 89: 444-451) and drought stress induces freezing tolerance (see, for example, Siminovitch et al. (1982) Plant Physiol 69: 250-255; and Guy et al. (1992) Planta 188: 265-270). In addition to the induction of cold-acclimation proteins, strategies that allow plants to survive in low water conditions may include, for example, reduced surface area, or surface oil or wax production.
It will be appreciated that some pathways involved in resistance to one stress (as described above), will also be involved in resistance to other stresses, regulated by the same or homologous genes. Of course, the overall resistance pathways are related, not identical, and therefore not all genes controlling resistance to one stress will control resistance to the other stresses. Nonetheless, if a gene conditions resistance to one of these stresses, it would be apparent to one skilled in the art to test for resistance to these related stresses. Methods of assessing stress resistance are further provided in the Examples section which follows.
Polynucleotide sequences of the present invention are capable of increasing a biomass of a plant. It will be appreciated that the ability of the polypeptides of the present invention to increase plant yield/biomass/vigor is inherent to their ability to promote the increase in plant cell-size (as shown in Example 8 and Figure 2).
Thus, the present invention also envisages a method of increasing a biomass/vigor/yield of a plant (coniferous plants, moss, algae, monocot or dicot, as well as other plants listed in http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/PIantae).
As used herein the phrase "plant biomass" refers to the amount or quantity of tissue produced from the plant in a growing season, which could also determine or affect the plant yield or the yield per growing area.
As used herein the phrase "plant vigor" refers to the amount or quantity of tissue produced from the plant in a given time. Hence increase vigor could determine or affect the plant yield or the yield per growing time or growing area.
As used herein the phrase "plant yield" refers to the amount or quantity of tissue produced and harvested as the plant produced product. Hence increase yield could affect the economic benefit one can obtain from the plant in a certain growing are and/or growing time.
Preferably, the genetically engineered plants of the present invention exhibit at least about 2% more, 5 % more, 10 % more, 20 % more, 30 % more, 40 % more, 50 % more, 60 % more, 70 % more, 80 % more, 90 % more or even greater biomass, vigor and/or yield than non-transgenic plants.
Methods of assaying plant vigor, yield and biomass are well known in the art (see Example 10).
Thus, the present invention is of high agricultural value for promoting the yield of commercially desired crops (e.g., biomass of vegetative organ such as poplar wood, or reproductive organ such as number of seeds or seed biomass),
As used herein the term “about” refers to ± 10 %.
Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention will become apparent to one ordinarily skilled in the art upon examination of the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting. Additionally, each of the various embodiments and aspects of the present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below finds experimental support in the following examples.
EXAMPLES
Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions illustrate the invention in a non limiting fashion.
Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory procedures utilized in the present invention include molecular, biochemical, microbiological and recombinant DNA techniques. Such techniques are thoroughly explained in the literature. See, for example, "Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual" Sambrook et al., (1989); "Current Protocols in Molecular Biology" Volumes I-III Ausubel, R. M., ed. (1994); Ausubel et al., "Current Protocols in Molecular Biology", John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Maryland (1989); Perbal, "A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning", Joint Wiley & Sons, New' York (1988); Watson et al., "Recombinant DNA", Scientific American Books, New York; Birren et al. (eds) "Genome Analysis: A Laboratory Manual Series", Vois. 1-4, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1998); methodologies as set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,666,828; 4,683,202; 4,801,531; 5,192,659 and 5,272,057; "Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook", Volumes I-III Cellis, J. E., ed. (1994); "Current Protocols in Immunology" Volumes I-III Coligan J. E., ed. (1994); Stites et al. (eds), "Basic and Clinical Immunology'" (8th Edition), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT (1994); Mishell and Shiigi (eds), "Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology", W. H. Freeman and Co.. New York (1980); available immunoassays are extensively described in the patent and scientific literature, see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,791,932; 3,839,153; 3,850,752; 3,850,57S; 3,853,9S7; 3,867,517; 3,879,262; 3,901,654; 3,935,074; 3,984,533; 3,996,345; 4,034,074; 4,098,876; 4,879,219; 5,011,771 and 5,281,521; "Oligonucleotide Synthesis" Gait, M. J., ed. (1984); “Nucleic Acid Hybridization" Hames, B. D., and Higgins S. J., eds. (1985); "Transcription and Translation" Hames, B. D., and Higgins S. J., eds. (1984); "Animal Cell Culture" Freshney, R. I., ed. (1986); "Immobilized Cells and Enzymes" IRL Press, (1986); "A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning" Perbal, B., (1984) and "Methods in Enzymology" Vol. 1-317, Academic Press; "PCR Protocols: A Guide To Methods And Applications", Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1990); Marshak et al., "Strategies for Protein Purification and Characterization - A Laboratory Course Manual" CSHL Press (1996); all of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Other general references are provided throughout this document. The procedures therein are believed to be well known in the art and are provided for the convenience of the reader.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those - described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described below, EXAMPLE 1
Identifying putative abiotic stress- tolerance genes from Monocots Abiotic stress-tolerance (ABST) genes were identified and validated in vivo as previously described W02004/104162 to the present assignee. A number of ABS genes and polypeptides encoded thereby were identified from dicot plants (SEQ ID NOs. 124-128 and 129-133, respectively). Screen for orthologous sequences was performed on monocot genomic databases, NCBI /http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and TIGR (http://www.tigr.org/) databases of Maize, Sorghum, Rice and Barley.
The expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and cDNA sequences were clustered and assembled using the LEADS™ software (Compugen) and compared to the TIGR (http://www.tigr.org/) databases of the above monocots. Overall, clustering of 372,000 maize ESTs resulted in 41,990 clusters among them 19,S70 singletones. In Sorghum about 190,000 ESTs were clustered into 39,000 clusters, while in barley 370,500 ESTs generated 50,000 different clusters each representing a different gene. Similar number of sequences and clustered genes were found in the rice genomic database. A digital expression profile summary was compiled for each cluster according to all keywords included in the sequence records comprising the cluster. Digital expression, also known as electronic northern blot, is a tool that displays virtual expression profile based on the EST sequences forming the gene cluster. The tool can provide the expression profile of a cluster in terms of plant anatomy (in what tissues/organs is the gene expressed), developmental stage (the developmental stages at which a gene can be found) and profile of treatment (provides the physiological conditions under which a gene is expressed such as drought, cold, pathogen infection, etc). Given a random distribution of ESTs in the different clusters, the digital expression provides a probability value that describes the probability of a cluster having a total of N ESTs to contain X ESTs front a certain collection of libraries. For the probability calculations are taken into consideration: a) the number of ESTs in the cluster, b) the number of ESTs of the implicated and related libraries, c) the overall number of ESTs available representing the species. Thereby clusters with low probability values are highly enriched with ESTs from the group of libraries of interest indicating a specialized expression.
The concepts of orthology and paralogy have recently been applied to .functional. characterizations and classifications on the scale of whole-genome comparisons Orthologs and paralogs constitute two major types of homologs: The first evolved from a common ancestor by specialization, and the latter are related by duplication events. It is assumed that paralogs arising from ancient duplication events are likely to have diverged in function while true orthologs are more likely to retain identical function over evolutionary time.
To further investigate and identify the ABST putative ortholog genes from monocot species, two computational methods were integrated: (i) Method for alignments of ortholog sequences - the method is effected by constructing ortholog groups across multiple eukaryotic taxa, using modifications on the Markov cluster algorithm to group putative orthologs and paralogs. These putative orthologs were further organized under Phylogram - a branching diagram (tree) assumed to be an estimate of a phylogeny of the genes. (ii) Method for generating genes expression profile “Digital Expression” -The present inventors have performed considerable work aimed at annotating sequences. Expression data was analyzed and the EST libraries were classified using a fixed vocabulary of custom terms such as experimental treatments. The annotations from all the ESTs clustered to a gene were analyzed statistically by comparing their frequency in the cluster versus their abundance in the database, allowing to construct a numeric and graphic expression profile of that gene, which is termed “digital expression”.
The rationale of using these two complementary methods is based on the assumption that true orthologs are likely to retain identical function over evolutionary time. These two methods (sequence and expression pattern) provide two different sets of indications on function similarities between two homologous genes, . similarities in the sequence level - identical amino acids in the protein domains and similarity in expression profiles.
While comparing the sequences from monocots to the tomato ABST genes, homology levels between the tomato genes and their best orthologue gene from monocot differed dramatically, ranging from 45% to 88%. Moreover, the in-silico expression profile of the monocot genes does not always fit to a gene involved in ABS tolerance. Hence, an extensive search for the monocot functional orthologue of each tomato gene (SEQ ID NO: 124-133) was effected.
In.attempt to. identify.the. best orthologues of the tomato ABST genes, two sets of analyses were performed. First, the sequences of 5 tomato ABST genes (SEQ ID NO: 124-128) and their deduced polypeptide sequences (SEQ ID NO: 129-133) were compared to all monocot putative proteins, encoded by DNA sequences of gene clusters mentioned above. The comparison was done on the protein level looking for identity higher than 45 % along the entire protein sequence.
Table 1 below shows the best homologous genes and their identity level to the tomato ABST proteins. Next, these monocot proteins originated from different monocot species (barley, sorghum and maize) were screened based on their expression pattern during the development of several monocot species. This screening was based i on digital expression of the genes, as described above. The digital expression represents the distribution of the ESTs composing each in silico gene and the deviation of the actual distribution from random distribution. The genes were selected based on three criteria: genes with higher expression in roots, roots and leaves and/or induced by treatments representing soil stress conditions (drought, salinity, soil deficiencies). 1 An increase in expression was considered only in cases were greater than 2 folds (relative to the random EST distribution) increase was evident with significance probability lower than 0.05. Table 2 below summarizes the expression profile of the genes in different organ or tissues and the treatments that set off significant elevation in their expression level.
Table 1: The level of homology between the tomato ABST genes and their homologes genes front monocot.
Table 2: The expression profile of the ABST homologous in silica genes as it _represented by statistical analysis of their ESTs distribution
I
None*- None of the treatments with significant elevation in digital expression could be considered as soil stress treatment
Combination of the above screening as it is described in Table 1 and in Table 2 above revealed the final list of five monocot genes that are predicted to be the most related to the tomato ABST genes (SEQ ID NOs. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9).
The selected polynucleotide sequences (Table 3 below) were analyzed for presence i of ORFs using Vector NTI suite (InforMax, U.K.) version 6 (Hasting Software, Inc: www.generunner.com/). ORFs identified in each of these polynucleotide sequences were compared to Genbank database sequences, using Blast (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/); the ORF displaying the highest homology to a GenBank sequence or sequences, was mapped in order to identify an ATG start codon. The position of the ATG start codon of ) this ORF was then compared with that of the identified polynucleotide sequence in order to verify that each of the five sequences described herein includes a full length ORF and an ATG start codon (thus qualifies as a “putative monocot ABST gene”).
Table 3 > Monocot ABST genes_
* - Further described in Example 2 below.
Polypeptides with significant homology to the Monocot ABST genes have been identified from the NCBI databases using BLAST software (Table 4). ) Table 4 ABST homologues
EXAMPLE 2
Generating the putative Monocot ABSTgenes DNA sequences of the monocot ABST genes were synthesized by GeneArt (http://www.geneart.com/). Synthetic DNA was designed in silico, based on the encoded amino-acid sequences of the monocot ABST genes (SEQ ID Nos 2, 4, 6, 12) and using codon-usage tables calculated from plant transcriptomes (example of such tables can be found in the Codon Usage Database available online at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/). The optimized coding sequences are designed in a way that no changes are introduced in the encoded amino acid sequence while using codons preferred for expression in dicotyledonous plants (mainly tomato and Arabidopsis) and monocotyledonous plants such as maize. At least one silent mutation per 20 nucleotide base pairs was introduced in the sequence compared to the orthologous monocot sequences to avoid possible silencing when over-expressing the gene in monocot species such as maize. To the optimized sequences the following restriction enzymes sites were added- Sail, Xbal, BamHI, Smal at the 5’ end and SacI at the 3’ end. The sequences synthesized by the supplier (GeneArt, Gmbh) were cloned in the pCR-Script plasmid. The resulting sequences are SEQ ID Nos 158, 159, 160, 161; representing the original monocot ABST SEQ ID Nos 1, 3, 5, 11 respectively, as described in Table 3, above. EXAMPLE 3
Cloning the putative ABST genes
The PCR Script plasmids harboring the synthetic, monocot-based ABST genes were digested with the restriction endonucleases Xbal and SacI (Roche). The resulting fragment was purified using Gel extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and ligated using T4 DNA ligase enzyme (Roche) into the plant expression vector pKG(NOSter), (SEQ ID NO 138), excised with the same enzymnes. pKG plasmid is based on the PCR Script backbone, with several changes in the polylinker site to facilitate the cloning of genes of interest downstream to a promoter and upstream to a terminator suitable for expression in plant cells. As a result, the inserted gene, together with the promoter and the terminator can be easily moved to a binary vector.
The resulting pKG(NOSter) harboring putative monocot ABST genes were introduced to E. coli DH5 competent cells by electroporation, using a MicroPulser electroporator (Biorad), 0.2 cm cuvettes (Biorad) and EC-2 electroporation program (Biorad). The treated cells were cultured in LB liquid medium at 37 CC for 1 hr, then plated over LB agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg/L) and incubated at 37 °C for 16 hrs. Colonies that developed on the selective medium were anafyzed by PCR using the primers of SEQ ID NO 134 and SEQ ID NO 135 which were designed to span the inserted sequence in the pKG plasmids. The resulting PCR products were separated on 1 % agarose gels and “PCR-positive” colonies labeled and further grown. DNA from positive colonies was isolated using (Qiagen) and sequenced using the ABI 377 sequencer (Amersham Biosciences Inc) to verify the lack of mutations in the final sequence.
The At6669 promoter sequence (set forth in SEQ ID NO: 123) was inserted in all the pKG(NOSter) plasmids harboring putative Monocot ABST genes using the restriction enzymes Hindlll and Sail (Roche). Colonies were analyzed by PCR using the primers SEQ ID NO: 140 and SEQ ID NO: 135. Positive plasmids were identified, isolated and sequenced as described above. EXAMPLE 4
Generating binaiy vectors comprising putative Monocot ABST genes and! plant promoters for driving expression thereof
Generating binary vectors comprising the At6669 promoter: The four pKG(At6669 +NOSter) constructs harboring putative Monocot ABST genes downstream to At6669 promoter sequence (set forth in SEQ ID NO: 123), and upstream to the Nopaline Synthase (NOS) terminator, were digested with Hindlll and EcoRI (Roche) in order to excise the expression cassettes that were ligated into pGI plasmid digested with the same restriction endonucleases. Altogether, four pGI constructs were generated, each comprising the At6669 promoter positioned upstream of a putative Monocot ABST gene having a sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1,3,5, ,11.
The plasmid pPI was constructed by inserting a synthetic poly-(A) signal sequence, originating from pGL3 basic plasmid vector (Promega, Acc No U47295; bp 4658-4811) into the Hindlll restriction site of the binary vector pBI101.3 (Clontech, Acc. No. U12640). In some cases the backbone binary plasmid used was pGI which is similar to pPI but the GUS gene was replaced by the GUS-Intron gene (Vancanneyt. G, et al MGG 220,245-50,1990).
The At6669 promoter was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana var ColO genomic DNA by PCR amplification using the primers set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 136 and 135. The PCR product was purified (Qiagen, Germany) and digested with the restriction endonucleases Hindlll and Sail (Roche). The resulting promoter sequence was introduced into the open binary pPI vector digested with the same enzymes, to produce pPI+At6669 plasmid. EXAMPLE 5
Transforming Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells with binary vectors harboring putative Monocot ABST genes
Each of the binary vectors described in Example 4 above were used to transform Agrobacterium cells. Two .additional binary constructs, having the Luciferase reporter gene replacing the Monocot ABST gene (positioned downstream of the 35S or At6669 promoter), were used as negative controls.
The binary vectors were introduced to Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV301, or LB4404 competent cells (about IO9 cells/mL) by electroporation. The electroporation was effected by using a MicroPulser electroporator (Biorad), 0.2 cm cuvettes (Biorad) and EC-2 electroporation program (Biorad). The treated cells were cultured in LB liquid medium at 28 °C for 3 hr, then plated over LB agar supplemented with gentamycin (50 mg/L; for Agrobacterium strains GV301) or streptomycin (300 mg/L; for Agrobacterium strain LB4404) and kanamycin (50 mg/L) at 28 °C for 48 hrs. Abrobac/erium colonies. which developed on the selective media were analyzed by PCR using the primers set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 134 and 135, which were designed to span the inserted sequence in the pPI plasmid. The resulting PCR products were isolated and sequenced as described in Example 4 above, to verify that the correct ABST sequences were properly introduced to the Agrobacterium cells. EXAMPLE 6
Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana plants with putative Monocot ABSTgenes
Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia plants (T0 plants) were transformed using the Floral Dip procedure described by Clough and Bent (10) and by Desfeux et al. (11), with minor modifications. Briefly, To Plants were sown in 250 ml pots filled with wet peat-based growth mix. The pots were covered with aluminum foil and a plastic dome, kept at 4° C for 3-4 days, then uncovered and incubated in a growth chamber at 18-24 °C under 16/8 hr light/dark cycles. The To plants were ready for transformation six days before anthesis.
Single colonies of Agrobacterium carrying the binary constructs, were generated as described in Example 5 above. Colonies were cultured in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 mg/L) and gentamycin (50 mg/L). The cultures were incubated at 28 °C for 48 hrs under vigorous shaking and then centrifuged at 4000 ipm for 5 minutes. The pellets comprising Agrobacterium cells were resuspended in a transformation medium containing half-strength (2.15 g/L) Murashige-Skoog (Duchefa); 0.044 μΜ benzylamino purine (Sigma); 112 pg/L B5 Gambourg vitamins (Sigma); 5% sucrose; and 0.2 ml/L Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialists, CT) in double-distilled water, at pH of 5.7.
Transformation of To plants was effected by inverting each plant into an Agrobacterium suspension, such that the above ground plant tissue was submerged for 3-5 seconds. Each inoculated To plant was immediately placed in a plastic tray, then covered with clear plastic dome to maintain humidity and was kept in the dark at room temperature for IS his, to facilitate infection and transformation. Transformed (transgenic) plants were then uncovered and transferred to a greenhouse for recovery and maturation. The transgenic To plants were grown in the greenhouse for 3-5 weeks until siliques were brown and dry. Seeds were harvested from plants and kept at room temperature until sowing. _.......
For generating Tj and T2 transgenic plants harboring the genes, seeds collected from transgenic T0 plants were surface-sterilized by soaking in 70 % ethanol for 1 minute, followed by soaking in 5 % sodium hypochloride and 0.05% triton for 5 minutes. The surface-sterilized seeds were thoroughly washed in sterile distilled water then placed on culture plates containing half-strength Murashige-Skoog (Duchefa); 2% sucrose; 0.8% plant agar; 50 mM kanamycin; and 200 mM carbenicylin (Duchefa). The culture plates were incubated at 4 °C for 48 hours then transferred to a growth room at 25 °C for an additional week of incubation. Vital Tt Arabidopsis plants were transferred to a fresh culture plates for another week of incubation. Following incubation the T] plants were removed from culture plates and planted in growth mix contained in 250 ml pots. The transgenic plants were allowed to grow in a greenhouse to maturity. Seeds harvested from Ti plants were cultured and grown to maturity as T2 plants under the same conditions as used for culturing and growing the Ti plants. EXAMPLE 7
Evaluating germination of transgenic plants cultivated under abiotic stress conditions
Tolerance to salinity or osmotic stress is aimed at identifying genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt, drought or combination of these or other environmental stresses. Plants differ in their tolerance to salt (NaCl) depending on their stage of development, therefore seed germination, seedling vigor, and plant growth responses are evaluated. # A typical salinity tolerance test is effected by taking plants at different developmental stages and irrigating them with increasing concentrations of NaCl (for example 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 400 mM). Transgenic plants are compared to control plants in their external phenotypic appearance, degree of wilting, and overall success to reach maturity and yield progeny at concentrations inhibitory to control plants. Quantitative parameters of tolerance measured are as for the previous case, the average wet and dry weight, and tire weight of the seeds yielded, the average seed size and the number of seeds produced per plant. Osmotic stress assays (including NaCl and mannitol assays) are conducted to determine if an osmotic stress tolerant phenotype is NaCl-specific or if it is a general osmotic stress related phenotype. Plants tolerant to osmotic stress are in general more tolerant to drought, salinity and freezing conditions and therefore are highly valuable in terms of agronomic traits.
Methods:
The method used to test the plants for improved abiotic stress tolerance includes the test of germination and seedling growth under adverse conditions such as high salinity and high osmoticum.
Germination assay - Germination tests compare the percentage of seeds from transgenic plants that could complete the germination process (radicle protrusion from the seed coat and complete opening of the cotyledons) to the percentage of seeds from control plants treated in the same manner. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor is conducted for three weeks after planting. To measure germination and seedling growth, seeds from T2 plants are surface sterilized and individually sown on square agar plates containing for example, solidified basal media supplemented with high salinity (for example 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 400 mM) or high osmoticum (for example 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 400 mM mannitol). The basal media is 50 % Murashige-Skoog medium (MS) + vitamins supplemented with 0.8 % plant agar as solidifying agent. After sowing, plates are transferred for 2-3 days at 4 °C for stratification and. then grown for three weeks.
To follow the germination and growth at adverse conditions plates are screened manually or automatically and plant size is determined. Five to ten independent transformation events can be analyzed from each construct. Plants expressing the genes from this invention are compared to control plants sown on the same plates under the same conditions or to the average measurement of all the constructs, seeds and events sown.
EXAMPLES
Evaluatingtrasngenic plant growth under abiotic stress conditions
Methods:
Stress resistance and analysis - A complementary experiment performed with .. seedlings follows the tolerance .of the plants, to adverse conditions. Surface sterilized seeds are sown in basal media [50 % Murashige-Skoog medium (MS) + vitamins supplemented with 0,8% plant agar as solidifying agent] in the presence of Kanamycin (for transgenic plants) or in its absence (for wild-type control plants). After sowing, plates were transferred for 2-3 days at 4 °C for stratification and then grown at 25 °C under 23-hour light 1-hour dark daily cycles for 7 to 10 days. At this time point, seedlings randomly chosen were carefully transferred to plates containing high salinity conditions (150 mM NaCl) or conditions resembling the high osmolarity found during drought (210 mM mannitol). Plant growth was followed as a function of time using digital imaging. To follow the plant growth at adverse conditions plants were photographed the day they were transferred to the stress conditions (Day 0). Pictures were subsequently taken every few days after transferring the plants to the stress condition and up to 12 days after the transfer. Plant size was determined from the digital pictures taken. ImageJ software was used for quantitate the plant size from the digital pictures fhttp://rsb.info.nih.gov/ii/). Proprietary’ scripts were designed to analyze the size of individual plants as a function of time. Figure 1 shows the methodology used for image area quantitation . Five to ten independent transformation events were analyzed from each construct and at least 6 randomly selected plants from each event were analyzed in each stress experiment. Plants expressing the genes from this invention were compared either to control plants sown on the same stress inducing plates (internal controls) or to the average measurement of all the control plants used in the same experiment (all controls).
Statistical analysis - To identify genes conferring tolerance to plants showing significant differences, plant area data was analyzed using the JMP statistics program (Version 5.2.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary. NC, USA). A one-way ANOVA (ANalysis Of VAriance) was used in order to detect the variation between the different genes (populations of independent events) and control plants and identify constructs and events showing statistically different outstanding performance. For gene versus control analysis a Students t-test was employed, using significance of p<0.05. In order to find significantly different independent transformation events with increased plant area the Tukey’s HSD (Honestly Significantly Different) test was employed using significance of p<0.05. Two-way ANOVA was used to identify events that showed significant differences in plant area at certain day points compared to the mean area of control ... .plants, growing .either in. the. same plates or in all plates of the same experiment. The Student’s t-test was utilized to compare independent transformation events to control plants.
Results:
In order to identify genes providing tolerance to salinity or osmoticum. T2 plants were generated from 5 to 10 independent transgenic events from each construct.
The seeds were collected from the T2 plants and plants produced therefrom were analyzed. As detailed above the plants were sown on a selective medium in which transgenic plants are able to strive (kanamycin) and after 7-10 days (4-6 leaves stage) the plants were transferred to a stress producing media: high salinity (150 mM) or high osmoticum (210 mM mannitol). Plants size was analyzed since the day of the transfer and up to 12 days thereon. Student's t-test and Tulcey HSD test were used to identify the events that show outstanding performance compared to wild type plants.
The results of the transgenic plants expressing SEQ ID Nos 158, 159,160,161; representing the original monocot ABST SEQ ID Nos 1, 3, 5, 11 respectively, as described in Table 4 above under the At6669 promoter (Seq ID 123) are shown. Significant differences were found in the ability of the transgenic plants to grow in the presence of a high salinity stress and/or high osmoticum stress. Table 5 below summarizes the findings of outstanding events conferring tolerance to osmotic stress in comparison to control plants. Various constructs included in this application provide the transgenic plants with an improved ability to resist to abiotic stresses.
As shown, 4 out of 5 transformation events expressing SEQ ID 158 show significantly improved tolerance to osmoticum as judged by the ability of the transgenic plants to continue developing also at high osmoticum concentration (see Table 5, rows 1-5). The results obtained for SEQ ID 158 are also shown in Figure 2. In panel A are shown processed images taken at day 0, 5 and 12 from the plate that contained the transgenic and control plants. Panel B shows the average plant area of the different events at the different time points. Events 1, 2, 3 and 4 are significantly more tolerant to osmoticum (p<0.05). Other constructs from this application also protect plants from the effects of high osmoticum. Again, four out of five independent transformation events expressing SEQ ID 161 showed significant increased capacity to gr ow under high osmoticum conditions (Table 5 below, rows 6-10). In addition, one of the events expressing SEQ ID 160 showed significantly high tolerance to high . osmoticum than its corresponding control plants. .....- -...........
Table 5
LS mean of T- transgenic Arabidopsis plants grown in the presence of 210 mM mannitol
The results of salinity tolerance tests are summarized in Table 6 below. As detailed in Table 6 (rows 1-4), three independent transgenic events with a construct containing SEQ ID 158 exhibited a significantly higher tolerance to salinity stress than the control plants in the experiment (p<0.05). Similar results were obtained with plants expressing SEQ ID 161. Also in this case, three different transgenic events showed significant increased tolerance to salinity stress compared to their matching control plants (see Table 6, rows 5-9).
Table 6 LS mean of 7) transgenic Arabidopsis plants grown in the presence of 150 mM ,_,___NaCl_______
Independent experiments that assess the ability of the constructs to provide salinity and high osmoticum tolerance were carried out as part of this study. Genes were found to protect transgenic plants against the deleterious effects of both stresses. Taken as a whole the results clearly demonstrate the ability of the genes and constructs included in this application to provide abiotic stress tolerance. EXAMPLE 9
Evaluating changes in root architecture due to the expression of monocot ABST genes
Many key traits in modem agriculture can be explained by changes in the root architecture. Root size and depth correlates with drought tolerance and fertilizer use efficiency. Deeper root systems can access water in stored in deeper soil layers. Similarly, a highly branched root system provides better coverage of the soil and therefore can effectively absorb all macro and micronutrients available resulting in enhanced fertilizer use efficiency. To test whether the transgenic plants produce a different root structure, plants are grown in agar plates placed vertically. Plates are photographed every few days and the size, length and area covered by the plant roots is assessed. From every construct created, several independent transformation events are checked. To assess significant differences between root features, it is possible to apply one and two-way ANOVA using Students t-test or Tukey HSD test to identify the events showing outstanding root features and to provide a statistical score to the findings (see Example 8 above). EXAMPLE 10
Increased Biomass of the transgenic plants of the present invention Ti or T2 transgenic plants generated as described above are individually transplanted into pots containing a growth mixture of peat and vermiculite (volume ratio 3:2, respectively). The pots are covered for 24 hr· period for hardening, then placed in the greenhouse in complete random order and irrigated with tap water (provided from the pots’ bottom every 3-5 days) for seven days. Thereafter, half of the plants are irrigated with a salt solution (100 mM NaCl and 5 mM CaCfy) to induce salinity stress (stress conditions). The other half of the plants are continued to be irrigated with tap water (normal conditions). All plants are grown in the greenhouse at 100 % RH for 28 days, then harvested (the above ground tissue) and weighted (immediately or following drying in oven at 50°C for 24 hr).
It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination.
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, patent applications and sequences identified by their accession numbers mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference into the specification, to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application or sequence identified by their accession number was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. In addition, citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention.
Any reference to publications cited in this specification is not an admission that the disclosures constitute common general knowledge in Australia. REFERENCES CITED (Additional references are cited hereinabove) 1. www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush/degrad.htm. 2. www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/watermanagement/introduc.stm 3. McCue KF, Hanson AD (1990).Drought and salt tolerance: towards understanding and application. Trends Biotechnol 8: 358-362. 4. Flowers TJ, Yeo Ar (1995). Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next? Aust J Plant Physiol 22:875-884. 5. Nguyen BD, Brar DS, Bui BC, Nguyen TV, Pham LN, Nguyen HT (2003). Identification and mapping of the QTL for aluminum tolerance introgressed from the new' source, ORYZA RUFIPOGON Griff., into indica rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 106:583-93. 6. Sanchez AC, Subudhi PK, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT (2002). Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Plant Mol Biol. 48:713-26. 7. Quesada V, Garcia-Martinez S, Piqueras P, Ponce MR, Micol JL (2002). Genetic architecture of NaCl tolerance in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol. 130:951-963. 8. Apse MP, Blumwald E (2002). Engineering salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 13:146-150. 9. Rontein D, Basset G, Hanson AD (2002). Metabolic engineering of osmoprotectant accumulation in plants.
Metab Eng 4:49-56 10. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediaced transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735-43. 11. Desfeux C, Clough SJ, Bent AF (2000). Female reproductive tissues are the primary target of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by the Arabidopsis floral-dip method. Plant Physiol 123:895-904.
Claims (20)
1. A method of increasing an abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate of a plant, comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40, thereby increasing the abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate of the plant.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said expressing is effected by: (a) transforming a cell of said plant with said exogenous polynucleotide; (b) generating a mature plant from said cell; and (c) cultivating said mature plant under conditions suitable for expressing said exogenous polynucleotide within said mature plant.
3. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, further comprising: selecting said plant expressing said exogenous polynucleotide for increased abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions.
4. A method of selecting a plant having increased abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, the method comprising: (a) providing plants transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40, (b) selecting said plants transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased biomass, and/or increased growth rate as compared to the wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, thereby selecting the plant having increased abiotic stress tolerance, biomass, and/or growth rate as compared to the wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising: (c) growing a crop of said plant transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said growing comprises sowing seeds and/or planting plantlets of said plants transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide.
7. A method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding an amino acid sequence at least 81 % identical to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40, wherein said crop plant is derived from parent plants transformed with said exogenous polynucleotide and selected for increased biomass, increased growth rate and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and said crop plant having said increased biomass, said increased growth rate and/or said increased abiotic stress tolerance, thereby producing the crop.
8. The method of any one of claims 1-7, further comprising growing the plant expressing said exogenous polynucleotide under abiotic stress.
9. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence which exhibits at least 85 % sequence identity to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40.
10. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence which exhibits at least 88 % sequence identity to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40.
11. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence which exhibits at least 90 % sequence identity to the polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO:40.
12. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:40 and 41.
13. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO :40.
14. The method of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein said exogenous polynucleotide is comprised in a nucleic acid construct which comprises a promoter capable of directing transcription of said exogenous polynucleotide in a plant cell.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein said promoter is a constitutive promoter,
16. The method of claim 14, wherein said promoter is an inducible promoter.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein said promoter is a tissue-specific promoter,
18. The method of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein said abiotic stress is selected from the group consisting of salinity, and nutrient deficiency.
19. The method of any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein said plant is a dicotyledonous plant.
20. The method of any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein said plant is a monocotyledonous plant. Date: 31 March 2016
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2014203601A AU2014203601C1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2014-07-01 | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US60/707,957 | 2005-08-15 | ||
AU2012241091A AU2012241091C1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2012-10-12 | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
AU2014203601A AU2014203601C1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2014-07-01 | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2012241091A Division AU2012241091C1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2012-10-12 | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
Publications (4)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2014203601A1 AU2014203601A1 (en) | 2014-07-17 |
AU2014203601B2 AU2014203601B2 (en) | 2016-05-19 |
AU2014203601B9 AU2014203601B9 (en) | 2016-06-30 |
AU2014203601C1 true AU2014203601C1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
Family
ID=51257754
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2014203601A Ceased AU2014203601C1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2014-07-01 | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2014203601C1 (en) |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040034888A1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2004-02-19 | Jingdong Liu | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
US20040172684A1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2004-09-02 | Kovalic David K. | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
-
2014
- 2014-07-01 AU AU2014203601A patent/AU2014203601C1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040034888A1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2004-02-19 | Jingdong Liu | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
US20040172684A1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2004-09-02 | Kovalic David K. | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2014203601A1 (en) | 2014-07-17 |
AU2014203601B2 (en) | 2016-05-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10829777B2 (en) | Methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants and plants generated thereby | |
CA2526440C (en) | Methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants and plants generated thereby | |
US10184132B2 (en) | Methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, yield and/or biomass in plants | |
AU2014203601C1 (en) | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby | |
AU2014203601B9 (en) | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby | |
AU2012241091C1 (en) | Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
SREP | Specification republished | ||
DA2 | Applications for amendment section 104 |
Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 20 JUN 2016 . |
|
DA3 | Amendments made section 104 |
Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 20 JUN 2016 |
|
FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |