AU2014203055A1 - Customer value opportunity system - Google Patents

Customer value opportunity system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2014203055A1
AU2014203055A1 AU2014203055A AU2014203055A AU2014203055A1 AU 2014203055 A1 AU2014203055 A1 AU 2014203055A1 AU 2014203055 A AU2014203055 A AU 2014203055A AU 2014203055 A AU2014203055 A AU 2014203055A AU 2014203055 A1 AU2014203055 A1 AU 2014203055A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
demand
offer
customer
bid
bids
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
AU2014203055A
Inventor
Milton Merl
Matthew John Symons
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Accenture Global Services Ltd
Original Assignee
Accenture Global Services Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2011206945A external-priority patent/AU2011206945A1/en
Application filed by Accenture Global Services Ltd filed Critical Accenture Global Services Ltd
Priority to AU2014203055A priority Critical patent/AU2014203055A1/en
Publication of AU2014203055A1 publication Critical patent/AU2014203055A1/en
Priority to AU2015203834A priority patent/AU2015203834A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Cash Registers Or Receiving Machines (AREA)

Abstract

A customer value opportunity system for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including a processor and a storage device to implement an offer receipt module to receive, via a network interface, offer information from an offerer that includes an offerer manufacturer or an offerer retailer, the offer information including a request for a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested, and create an offer based on the offer information and store the offer in an offer database, wherein the offer is viewable, via a network interface, to prospective bidders including other manufacturers and other retailers, a customer potential scoring module to determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group of the offer, and wherein the customer potential scoring module determines a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons, a bid receipt module to receive, via a network interface, and store in a bid database a plurality of bids from other manufacturers and other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each of the plurality of bids including a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offerer for use of the demand shaping tactic, a bid matching module to determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database that matches the offer based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer, and a bid determination module executed by a computer system to determine that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid based upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids, determine a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship, and accept the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect of the winning candidate bid on the customer lifetime value.

Description

1 CUSTOMER VALUE OPPORTUNITY SYSTEM BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] Retailers are investing more discreetly in strategies to gain and keep customers based on their unique behaviors and needs. Traditionally, retailers have implemented retailer loyalty and rewards programs as well as online retail channels in order to gain and keep customers. Retailers are now investing in new strategies to attract customers, while attempting to shape customer demand for specific products. Some of these strategies include learning the unique needs and behaviors of the customers with the intention of growing customer lifetime value. Customer lifetime value is the present value of the future cash flows related to a customer relationship. [0002] Manufacturers are also investing in strategies to gain and keep customers and grow customer lifetime value. Traditionally, manufacturers have relied heavily on advertisements, promotions and coupons to attract customers to their products and shape customer demand. More recently, manufacturers have started to invest in other strategies such as acquiring optimal positions on store shelves for their products, paid online search strategies and online advertisements in order to gain and keep customers as well as shape customer demand. [0003] However, retailers and manufacturers must invest heavily in these strategies without being able to ensure that these strategies are indeed influencing customer demand and customer lifetime value. Moreover, it is difficult for retailers and manufacturers to determine whether they are receiving a return on their investment when implementing these strategies since their return on investment may depend on highly variable customer behavior. Because of the difficulty retailers and manufacturers have in determining the effect of their marketing investment strategies, they may be implementing such strategies without realizing a sufficient return on investment.
2 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0004] In one aspect, the present invention provides a customer value opportunity system for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including, a processor and a storage device to implement, an offer receipt module to, receive, via a network interface, offer information from an offerer that includes an offerer manufacturer or an offerer retailer, the offer information including, a request for a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group; and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested, and create an offer based on the offer information and store the offer in an offer database, wherein the offer is viewable, via a network interface, to prospective bidders including other manufacturers and other retailers, a customer potential scoring module to determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group of the offer, and wherein the customer potential scoring module determines a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons, a bid receipt module to receive, via a network interface, and store in a bid database a plurality of bids from other manufacturers and other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each of the plurality of bids to include a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offerer for use of the demand shaping tactic, a bid matching module to determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database that matches the offer based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer, and a bid determination module executed by a computer system to, determine that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid based upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids; determine a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows 3 related to a customer relationship, and accept the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect of the winning candidate bid on the customer lifetime value. [0005] In another aspect, the present invention provides a computer implemented method for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including, receiving offer information, via a network interface, from an offerer that includes an offerer manufacturer or an offerer retailer, the offer information including, a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response, creating and storing in an offer database an offer based on the offer information, the offer viewable to prospective bidders, including other manufacturers and other retailers, the offer including the request for a demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response, determining a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group to which the offer is presented, and wherein determining a customer potential score further includes determining a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons, receiving a plurality of bids, via a network interface, from the other manufacturers and other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each of the plurality of bids to include a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offerer for use of the demand shaping tactic, storing the plurality of bids in a bid database, determining one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer in the offer database, determining, by a computer system, that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid based upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer 4 potential score in the one or more matching bids, determining a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship, and accepting the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect of the winning candidate bid on the customer lifetime value. [0006] In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a non transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer executable program for determining one or more winning candidate bids, the computer executable program, when executed causes a computer system to receive, via a network interface, offer information from an offerer that includes an offerer manufacturer or an offerer retailer, the offer information including, a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested, create an offer based on the offer information and store the offer in an offer database, wherein the offer is viewable, via a network interface, to prospective bidders including other manufacturers and other retailers, determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group to which the offer is presented, and wherein to determine a customer potential score includes determining a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons, receive, via a network interface, a plurality of bids from other manufacturers or other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each bid of the plurality of bids to include a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offerer for use of the demand shaping tactic, store the plurality of bids in a bid database, determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer in 5 the offer database, determine that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids, determine a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship, accept the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect on the customer lifetime value. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS [0007] The embodiments of the invention will be described in detail in the following description with reference to the following figures. [0008] Figure 1 illustrates a customer value opportunity system for determining one or more winning candidate bids, according to an embodiment; [0009] Figure 2 illustrates a method for determining one or more winning candidate bids, according to an embodiment; and [0010] Figure 3 illustrates a computer system configured to provide a hardware platform for the customer value opportunity system shown in figure 1, according to an embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS [0011] For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the embodiments are described by referring mainly to examples thereof. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. It will be apparent however, to one of ordinary skill in the art, that the embodiments may be practiced without limitation to these specific details. In some instances, well known methods and structures have not been described in detail so as not to 6 unnecessarily obscure the embodiments. Also, the embodiments described herein may be used with each other in various combinations. 1. Overview [0012] According to embodiments, interactions among retailers, manufacturers and customers are coordinated to generate a new revenue stream that takes advantage of customer value opportunities. A customer value opportunity is an identified opportunity to influence customer demand determined based on customer-centric modeling. Customer-centric modeling indicates a next most profitable action to take with regard to product recommendations to make to a customer based on a goal of growing customer lifetime value. Customer lifetime value is the present value of the future cash flows related to a customer relationship. An identified opportunity to influence customer demand is an opportunity to implement the next most profitable action to take in the form of demand shaping tactics such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc., for a specific type of product for a specific demand opportunity group to bring about a desired demand response. A demand opportunity group is a group of customers with similar characteristics. For example, a demand opportunity group may include customers who are between the ages of 18 to 24, prefer sweetened cereal and consume only specific brands of cereal. Retailers and manufacturers may group their customers into demand opportunity groups. A desired demand response is an action that is to be taken by the demand opportunity group that is desired by a retailer or manufacturer. For example, the desired demand response may be for the demand opportunity group to purchase a product. [0013] According to an embodiment, a bidding system is used to generate the new revenue stream. A retailer may bid against other retailers and manufacturers for a customer value opportunity in response to an offer posted by a manufacturer. Conversely, a manufacturer may bid against other manufacturers and retailers for a customer value opportunity in 7 response to an offer posted by a retailer. An offer may be an invitation to bid on the customer value opportunity and bring about a desired demand response. Therefore, the offer may be an invitation to perform the next most profitable action determined by customer-centric modeling, i.e. provide a demand shaping tactic to influence customer demand for a specific type of product for a specific demand opportunity group to bring about a desired demand response. A bid may be a response to an offer and may provide the demand shaping tactic for the specific type of product for the specific demand opportunity group requested in the offer in order to bring about the desired demand response. The bid includes an amount to be paid to the offeror if the demand shaping tactic is used by the offerer. [0014] The system provides an opportunity for retailers and manufacturers to post an offer for a customer value opportunity and permits other retailers and manufacturers to respond to the offer with a bid to influence customer demand and bring about the desired demand response as requested in the offer. The system may determine one or more winning candidate bids based on predefined criteria. Thus, the retailer or manufacturer receives the investment as revenue from the retailer or manufacturer whose bid is determined a winning candidate bid and accepted by the retailer or the manufacturer. [0015] The retailer or the manufacturer providing the bid in response to the offer may want to determine whether it is in their best interest to bid, i.e. pay the offerer to use the demand shaping tactic described in the bid, and how much to bid on the offer. Therefore, the demand opportunity group to which the offer is related may be given a customer potential score by the system, according to an embodiment. The customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from the customers in the demand opportunity group to which the offer is related and is used to determine which bid is a winning candidate bid, if any. Thus, the customer potential score varies by demand opportunity group.
8 [0016] The customer potential score for the demand opportunity group is a product of a performance objective. The performance objective is a measure tied to the desired demand response for the offer. More specifically, the retailers' or manufacturers' desire to increase performance metrics such as: (1) share of trips to the store (trip frequency and repeat rate), (2) share of categories bought (how much of the customer requirements are met at the store shopping experience), and (3) share of value received (the ratio of cost to margin received after discounts of foods bought by the customer). To increase any one of the three customer performance metrics, retailers and manufacturers may configure factors of the customer potential score for the demand opportunity group. The customer potential score is based upon a variety of factors for which weightings may be specified. An example of factors may include product category, seasonality, competitor analysis, supply chain inventory, shelf-life calculations, demand implications, etc. Retailers and manufacturers may specify a weighting for these factors for the demand opportunity group for which the offer is desired. By specifying the weightings for the factors, the customer potential score may be increased or decreased for the demand opportunity group. [0017] Thus, the customer potential score is a reflection of the customers' in the demand opportunity group potential to change behavior and the typical time that the behavior change stays in place. For example, if the demand opportunity group has a high customer potential score, the customers in the demand opportunity group are more likely to switch brands of the specific type of product in response to experiencing the demand shaping tactic in the offer. There may be a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc. The bid from the retailer or manufacturer may include a minimum customer potential score that reflects whether the bidder, e.g. the retailer or the manufacturer, will want to bid on the offer. For example, if the minimum customer potential score accepted by the bidder is 38, and the offer has a customer potential score of only 25, the 9 bidder may not accept the offer since the minimum customer potential score of the bid has not been met by the customer potential score of the offer. [0018] Moreover, the demand shaping tactic submitted in the bid may negatively affect customer lifetime value. For example, a winning candidate bid that is accepted may direct a customer to purchase from another entity. Thus, before the winning candidate bid is accepted, a determination is made whether the winning candidate bid results in more profits for the offeror, e.g., ad yield, than a potential effect on customer lifetime value in terms of profits. Once this determination is made, if the ad yield is higher than the negative effect on customer lifetime value in terms of dollars, the winning candidate bid may be accepted. [0019] According to an aspect of this disclosure, a method for obtaining, storing and viewing storing user data in an bidding environment is provided. The method includes providing a user interface on a user computer. The method further includes determining whether a bid meets the criteria of an offer which indicates whether there is synchronization between data in two databases. The method also includes obtaining user data with the user interface. In addition, the method includes storing the user data in the user database. Thus, the method may decrease the mental and physical effort required from a user in order to perform a task (e.g. storing data), since the user does not need to worry about where data is stored. In addition, the offers and bids may enable an improved, continued man-machine interaction, by facilitating the storage and synchronization of data. 2. System [0020] Figure 1 illustrates a customer value opportunity system 100, according to an embodiment. Figure 1 includes retailers 10la-n and manufacturers 102a-n that may access the customer value opportunity 10 system 100 via a network, such as Internet 103 or other type of network. The retailers 101a-n and the manufacturer 102a-n may be any entity operable to post offers and/or bids to the customer value opportunity system 100. The customer value opportunity system 100 includes a registration module 104, a retailer profile database 107, a manufacturer profile database 108, a graphical user interface 109, an offer receipt module 110, a retailer offer database 111, a manufacturer offer database 112, a customer potential scoring module 113, a bid receipt module 114, a retailer bid database 115, a manufacturer bid database 116, a bid matching module 117 and a bid determination module 118. [0021] A retailer, for example, retailer 101a, and/or a manufacturer, for example manufacturer 102a, may register with the customer value opportunity system 100 in order to access the customer value opportunity system 100. The retailer 101a or the manufacturer 102a may access the customer value opportunity system 100 in order to post an offer, to determine if a bid was placed in response to a previously posted offer, to determine one or more winning candidate bids, to post a bid in response to an offer, etc.. As described above, an offer may be an invitation to bid on a customer value opportunity, i.e. a next most profitable action, and bring about a desired demand response determined based on customer-centric modeling. Customer-centric modeling indicates a next most profitable action to take with regard to product recommendations to make to a customer based on a goal of growing customer lifetime value. Customer lifetime value is the present value of the future cash flows related to a customer relationship. Therefore, the offer may be an invitation to perform the next most profitable action determined by customer-centric modeling, which may include providing a demand shaping tactic to influence customer demand for a specific type of product for a specific demand opportunity group to bring about a desired demand response. As described above, a bid may be a response to an offer and may provide the demand shaping tactic for the specific type of product for the specific demand opportunity group requested in the offer in order to bring about the desired demand response. The bid 11 includes a minimum customer potential score. The bid includes an amount to be paid to the offeror if the demand shaping tactic is used by the offeror. [0022] To register with the customer value opportunity system 100, the retailer 101a may submit a retailer profile data 105 to the registration module 104. The retailer profile data 105 may include a retailer name, a retailer address, a login ID, a password and other information about the retailer 101 a. The registration module 104 stores the retailer profile data 105 in the retailer profile database 107. Once the retailer 101 a is registered with the customer value opportunity system 100, the retailer 101 a may access the customer value opportunity system 100. The retailer 101 a may access the customer value opportunity system 100 by providing a login ID and a password to the graphical user interface 109 that matches the login ID and the password in the retailer profile data 105 for the retailer 101 a. [0023] To register with the customer value opportunity system 100, the manufacturer 102a may submit a manufacturer profile data 106 to the registration module 104. The manufacturer profile data 106 may include a manufacturer name, a manufacturer address, a login ID, a password and other information about the manufacturer 102a. The registration module 104 stores the manufacturer profile data 106 in the manufacturer profile database 108. Once the manufacturer 102a is registered with the customer value opportunity system 100, the manufacturer 102a may access the customer value opportunity system 100. The manufacturer 102a may access the customer value opportunity system 100 by providing a login ID and a password to the graphical user interface 109 that matches the login ID and the password in the manufacturer profile data 106 for the manufacturer 102a. [0024] The offer receipt module 110 receives offer information entered into the graphical user interface 109 by the retailer 101 a or the manufacturer 102a. The offer information may include a request for a demand shaping tactic such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc.. The offer information may also include a type of product, a 12 demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested. The offer receipt module 110 may create an offer from an offer template based on the offer information. For example, the offer is created when the offer information is populated in the offer template by the offer receipt module 110. The offer information, when entered by the retailer 101a, is saved as an offer in the retailer offer database 111. When entered by the manufacturer 102a, the offer information is saved as an offer in the manufacturer offer database 112. Thus, the retailer offer database 111 includes a variety of offers from various the retailers 10la-n. The manufacturer offer database 112 includes a variety of offers from the various manufacturers 102a-n. [0025] Once the offer is saved in the retailer offer database 111 or the manufacturer offer database 112, the offer may be posted to an electronic board in the customer value opportunity system 100 or may be sent electronically to the retailers 101 a-n and the manufacturers 102a-n via text, email, automated message alert, etc. to be available for viewing. The offer may be viewable by the other retailers 101a-n and/or the other manufacturers 102a-n registered with the customer value opportunity system 100, or a subset thereof. [0026] The customer potential scoring module 113 determines a customer potential score for the offer available for viewing, based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic related to the viewable offer. The customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from the customers in the demand opportunity group of the viewable offer. The customer potential score for the demand opportunity group in the offer is a product of a performance objective. The performance objective is a measure tied to the retailers' or manufacturers' desired demand response. More specifically, the retailers' or manufacturers' desire to increase one or more customer performance metrics, such as: (1) share of trips to the store (trip frequency and repeat rate), (2) share of categories bought (how much of the customer requirements are met at the store 13 shopping experience), and (3) share of value received (the ratio of cost to margin received after discounts of foods bought by the customer). [0027] Retailers and manufacturers may configure factors of the customer potential score for the demand opportunity group to increase any one of the three customer performance metrics through the graphical user interface 109. The customer potential score is based upon a variety of factors for which weightings may be specified. An example of factors may include product category, seasonality, competitor analysis, supply chain inventory, shelf-life calculations, demand implications, etc. Retailers and manufacturers may specify a weighting for these factors for the demand opportunity group for which the offer is desired. By specifying the weightings for the factors, the customer potential score may be increased or decreased for the demand opportunity group. [0028] Thus, the customer potential score determined by the customer potential scoring module 113 may be based on weightings entered into the graphical user interface 109. If weightings are not entered into the graphical user interface 109, the customer potential score is determined by the customer potential scoring module 113 based on default weightings for the factors. Therefore, the customer potential score is a reflection of the customers' in the demand opportunity group potential to change behavior and the typical time that the behavior change stays in place. For example, if the demand opportunity group has a high customer potential score, the customers in the demand opportunity group are more likely to switch brands of the specific type of product in response to the demand shaping tactic in the offer. There may be a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc. [0029] The bid receipt module 114 receives a plurality of bids from the retailers 101a-n and/or the manufacturers 102a-n. Thus, the bid receipt module 114 receives the bids entered into the graphical user interface 109 by the retailers 101 a-n and/or the manufacturers 102a-n. The bids received 14 by the bid receipt module 114 may be in response to any of the variety of the viewable offers. The bids may include a demand shaping tactic such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc. The bids may also include a type of product, a demand opportunity group, a demand response, a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offeror if the demand shaping tactic is used by the offeror. Once the bid is created, the bid is stored. The bids received from the retailers 101 a-n are saved in the retailer bid database 115. The bids received from the manufacturers 102a-n are saved in the manufacturer bid database 116. Thus, the retailer bid database 115 includes a variety of bids from the various retailers 101a-n. The manufacturer bid database 116 includes a variety of bids from various the manufacturers 102a-n. [0030] The bid matching module 117 determines one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in either the retailer bid database 115 or the manufacturer bid database 116 for a viewable offer of the plurality of viewable offers. For instance, if the viewable offer was posted by the retailer 101 a, the one or more matching bids may be determined from the retailer bid database 115 and the manufacturer bid database 116. Conversely, if the viewable offer was posted by a manufacturer 102a, the one or more matching bids may be determined from the retailer bid database 115 and the manufacturer bid database 116. The one or more matching bids are determined based on whether the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the demand response of the bid matches the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response in the viewable offer. If these parameters match, the bid is considered a matching bid. [0031] Once one or more matching bids are determined by the bid matching module 117, the bid determination module 118 determines if the one or more matching bids are winning candidate bids. Each of the one or more matching bids are winning candidate bids if the customer potential score in the viewable offer exceeds a predetermined threshold. The 15 predetermined threshold is the minimum customer potential score in each of the one or more matching bids. [0032] The demand shaping tactic submitted in the winning candidate bid may negatively affect customer lifetime value. For example, though a retailer may receive profits, i.e. ad yield, from using the demand shaping tactic in the winning candidate bid submitted by another retailer, the retailer may lose the customer permanently to the other retailer that submitted the winning candidate bid. Thus, accepting the winning candidate bid negatively affects customer lifetime value, even thought the ad yield was received. Therefore, before the winning candidate bid is accepted, a determination is made by the bid determination module 118 whether the profits from the winning candidate bid, i.e. ad yield, are more than a potential effect on customer lifetime value in terms of profits. Once this determination is made, if the ad yield is higher than the negative effect on customer lifetime value in terms of dollars, the winning candidate bid may be accepted. The retailer 101 a or the manufacturer 102a that posted the viewable offer is notified if there is one or more winning candidate bids via email, alert, SMS, text, etc. 3. Method [0033] Figure 2 illustrates method 200 for determining one or more winning candidate bids, according to an embodiment. The method 200 is described with respect to the customer value opportunity system 100 shown in figure 1 by way of example and not limitation. The method 200 may be performed by other systems. [0034] At step 201, the customer value opportunity system 100 receives offer information. The offer information may be entered into the customer value opportunity system 100 by a retailer or by a manufacturer. The offer information may include a request for a demand shaping tactic such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc.. The offer information may also include a type of product, a demand 16 opportunity group, and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested. [0035] At step 202, the customer value opportunity system 100 creates an offer from the offer information. As described above, the offer may be an invitation to bid on a customer value opportunity, i.e. a next most profitable action, and bring about a desired demand response determined based on customer-centric modeling. Therefore, the offer may be an invitation to perform the next most profitable action determined by customer centric modeling, which may include providing a demand shaping tactic to influence customer demand for a specific type of product for a specific demand opportunity group to bring about a desired demand response. The offer may be created when the offer information is populated in an offer template and saved as an offer. There may be a variety of offers from various retailers and various manufacturer. [0036] At step 203, the offer may be posted to an electronic board (e.g., displayed on a web site) in the customer value opportunity system 100 or may be sent electronically to the retailers or the manufacturers via text, email, automated message alert, etc. to be available for viewing. The offer may be viewable by the other retailers and/or the other manufacturers registered with the customer value opportunity system 100, or a subset thereof. [0037] At step 204, the customer value opportunity system 100 determines whether weightings were received by the customer value opportunity 100 for factors of a customer potential score. A customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic related to the viewable offer. The customer potential score for the demand opportunity group may be based on a performance objective. The performance objective is a measure tied to the retailers' or manufacturers' desired demand response. For example, the retailers' or manufacturers' desire to increase one of three core customer performance metrics: (1) share of trips to the store (trip frequency and repeat rate), (2) 17 share of categories bought (how much of the customer requirements are met at the store shopping experience), and (3) share of value received (the ratio of cost to margin received after discounts of foods bought by the customer). There may be a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc. Retailers and manufacturers may configure the factors of the customer potential score for the demand opportunity group to increase any one of the three customer performance metrics through a graphical user interface. The customer potential score is based upon a variety of factors for which weightings may be specified. An example of factors may include product category, seasonality, competitor analysis, supply chain inventory, shelf-life calculations, demand implications, etc. Retailers and manufacturers may specify a weighting for these factors for the demand opportunity group for which the offer is desired. By specifying the weightings for the factors, the customer potential score may be increased or decreased for the demand opportunity group. If the weightings have not been received by the customer value opportunity system 100, the process proceeds to step 205. If the weightings have been received by the customer value opportunity system 100, the process proceeds to step 206. [0038] At step 205, default weightings are retrieved by the customer value opportunity system 100. The process then proceeds to step 206. [0039] At step 206, the customer potential score is determined by the customer value opportunity system 100 either based on the weightings received at step 205 or the default weightings received at step 206. [0040] At step 207, the customer value opportunity system 100 receives a plurality of bids from the retailers and/or the manufacturers. The bids may be entered into the customer opportunity system 100 by the retailers and/or the manufacturers in response to any of the variety of viewable offers. As described above, the bid may be a response to an offer and may provide the demand shaping tactic for the specific type of product for the specific demand opportunity group requested in the offer in order to 18 bring about the desired demand response. The bids may include a demand shaping tactic such as marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, coupons, etc.. The bids may also include a type of product, a demand opportunity group, a demand response and a minimum customer potential score. The bid includes an amount to be paid to the offeror if the demand shaping tactic is used by the offeror. There may be a variety of bids from various retailers and a variety of bids from various manufacturers. [0041] At step 208, the customer value opportunity system 100 determines one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids for a viewable offer of the plurality of viewable offers. The one or more matching bids are determined based on whether the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the demand response of the bid matches the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response in the viewable offer. If these parameters match, the bid is considered a matching bid. If there are no matching bids, the process ends at this step. If there is one or more matching bid, the process proceeds to step 210. [0042] At step 209, the customer value opportunity system 100 determines if the one or more matching bids are winning candidate bids. For example, a matching bid may be considered a winning candidate bid if the customer potential score in the viewable offer exceeds a predetermined threshold. The predetermined threshold is the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids. [0043] The demand shaping tactic submitted in the winning candidate bid may negatively affect customer lifetime value. Thus, before the winning candidate bid may be accepted, a determination is made at step 209 whether the profits from the winning candidate bid, i.e. ad yield, are more than a potential effect on customer lifetime value in terms of profits. Once this determination is made, if the ad yield is higher than the negative effect on customer lifetime value in terms of dollars, the winning candidate bid may be accepted. Of course, there may be no winning candidate bids.
19 [0044] At step 210, the retailer or manufacturer that posted the viewable offer is notified of the one or more winning candidate bids via email, alert, SMS, text, etc. For example, if there is one or more winning candidate bids determined at step 209, the retailer or manufacturer that posted the viewable offer is notified of these. If, however, at step 209, no winning candidate bids were determined, the retailer or manufacturer that posted the viewable offer is notified that no winning candidate bids were determined. 4. Computer System [0045] According to an embodiment, the customer value opportunity system 100 may also be software running on a computer system belonging to the retailer 101 or the manufacturer 102, a system accessed via the Internet, a web service, etc. Figure 3 shows a computer system 300 that may be used as a hardware platform for the customer value opportunity system 100, according to an embodiment. The computer system 300 may be used as a platform for executing one or more of the steps, methods, modules and functions described herein that may be embodied as software stored on one or more computer readable mediums, which may be non transitory, such as storage devices. The modules may be software, hardware or a combination of both software and hardware. [0046] The computer system 300 includes a processor 302, unit or processing circuitry that may implement or execute software instructions performing some or all of the methods, functions and other steps described herein. Commands and data from the processor 302 are communicated over a communication bus 304. The computer system 300 also includes a computer readable storage device 303, such as random access memory (RAM), where the software and data for processor 302 may reside during runtime. The storage device 303 may also include non-volatile data storage. The computer system 300 may include a network interface 305 for connecting to a network. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art 20 that other known electronic components may be added or substituted in the computer system 300. [0047] While the embodiments have been described with reference to examples, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the claimed embodiments. Also, the embodiments described herein may be used to determine brands or products customers may switch to, the likelihood of a customer switching brands or products, etc. [0048] Throughout this specification and claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise", and variations such as "comprises" and "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps. [0049] The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgement or any form or suggestion that the prior art forms part of the common general knowledge in Australia.

Claims (19)

1. A customer value opportunity system for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including: a processor and a storage device to implement: an offer receipt module to: receive, via a network interface, offer information from an offeror that includes an offeror manufacturer or an offeror retailer, the offer information including: a request for a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group; and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested; and create an offer based on the offer information and store the offer in an offer database, wherein the offer is viewable, via a network interface, to prospective bidders including other manufacturers and other retailers; a customer potential scoring module to determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group of the offer, and wherein the customer potential scoring module determines a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons; a bid receipt module to receive, via a network interface, and store in a bid database a plurality of bids from other manufacturers and other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each of the plurality of bids including a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offeror for use of the demand shaping tactic; a bid matching module to determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database that matches the offer based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer; and a bid determination module executed by a computer system to: 22 determine that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid based upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids; determine a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship; and accept the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect of the winning candidate bid on the customer lifetime value.
2. A customer value opportunity system according to claim 1, wherein the demand shaping tactic is a marketing material, promotion, advertisement, coupon or discount.
3. A customer value opportunity system according to either claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the demand opportunity group is a group of customers with similar characteristics.
4. A customer value opportunity system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein each of the plurality of bids includes a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response.
5. A customer value opportunity system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a bid is one of the one or more matching bids if the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer matches a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response of the bid.
6. A customer value opportunity system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the customer potential score is a measure of a potential of the customer in the specific demand opportunity group of the offer to change behavior and a time that the behavior change stays in place. 23
7. A customer value opportunity system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the desired demand response is an action desired to be taken by customers in the demand opportunity group.
8. A customer value opportunity system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the receipt module stores an offer received from a manufacturer in a manufacturer offer database, and store an offer received from a retailer in a retailer offer database; wherein the bid receipt module stores a bid received from a manufacturer in a manufacturer bid database, and store a bid received from a retailer in a retailer bid database; and wherein the bid matching module determines the one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in either the retailer bid database of the manufacturer bid database for the offer of the plurality of offers.
9. A computer-implemented method for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including: receiving offer information, via a network interface, from an offeror that includes an offeror manufacturer or an offeror retailer, the offer information including: a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product; a demand opportunity group; and a desired demand response; creating and storing in an offer database an offer based on the offer information, the offer viewable to prospective bidders, including other manufacturers and other retailers, the offer including the request for a demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response; determining a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group to which the offer is presented, and wherein determining a customer potential score further includes determining a different customer potential 24 score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons; receiving a plurality of bids, via a network interface, from the other manufacturers and other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each of the plurality of bids to include a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offeror for use of the demand shaping tactic; storing the plurality of bids in a bid database; determining one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer in the offer database; determining, by a computer system, that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid based upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids; determining a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship; and accepting the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect of the winning candidate bid on the customer lifetime value.
10. A computer-implemented method according claim 9, wherein the demand shaping tactic is a marketing material, promotion, advertisement, coupon or discount.
11. A computer-implemented method according to either claim 9 or claim 10, wherein the demand opportunity group is a group of customers with similar characteristics.
12. A computer-implemented method according to any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein each of the plurality of bids includes a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response.
13. A computer-implemented method according to any one of claims 9 to 12, wherein a bid is one of the one or more matching bids if the demand shaping tactic, the 25 type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer matches a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response of the bid.
14. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer executable program for determining one or more winning candidate bids, the computer executable program, when executed causes a computer system to: receive, via a network interface, offer information from an offeror that includes an offeror manufacturer or an offeror retailer, the offer information including: a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product; a demand opportunity group; and a desired demand response for which the demand shaping tactic is requested; create an offer based on the offer information and store the offer in an offer database, wherein the offer is viewable, via a network interface, to prospective bidders including other manufacturers and other retailers; determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer, wherein the customer potential score is an indicator of a potential return on investment from customers in the demand opportunity group to which the offer is presented, and wherein to determine a customer potential score includes determining a different customer potential score for different demand shaping tactics, including marketing materials, advertising, promotions, discounts, and coupons; receive, via network interface, a plurality of bids from other manufacturers or other retailers for a plurality of different offers including the offer, each bid of the plurality of bids to include a minimum customer potential score and an amount to be paid to the offeror for use of the demand shaping tactic; store the plurality of bids in a bid database; determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids in the bid database based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer in the offer database; 26 determine that the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid upon a determination that the customer potential score of the offer exceeds the minimum customer potential score in the one or more matching bids; determine a customer lifetime value of the winning candidate bid, wherein the customer lifetime value is a present value of further cash flows related to a customer relationship; and accept the winning candidate bid upon a determination that an ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than a negative effect on the customer lifetime value.
15. A computer readable medium according to claim 14, wherein the demand shaping tactic is a marketing material, promotion, advertisement, coupon or discount.
16. A computer readable medium according to either claim 14 or claim 15, wherein the demand opportunity group is a group of customers with similar characteristics.
17. A computer readable medium according to any one of claims 14 to 16, wherein each of the plurality of bids includes a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response.
18. A computer readable medium according to any one of claims 14 to 17, wherein a bid is one of the one or more matching bids if the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer matches a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a demand response of the bid.
19. A system according to claim 1, or a method according to claim 9, or a non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 14, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying Figures. 27 1. A customer value opportunity system for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including: an offer receipt module configured to create an offer, the offer including a request for a demand shaping tactic, a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response; a customer potential scoring module configured to determine a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer; a bid receipt module configured to receive a plurality bids for a plurality of different offers including the offer; a bid matching module configured to determine one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer; and a bid determination module executed by a computer system and configured to determine one or more winning candidate bids, wherein one or more of the matching bids is a winning candidate bid if the customer potential score of the offer exceeds a predetermined threshold and the ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than an effect on customer lifetime value. 2. A method for determining one or more winning candidate bids, including: receiving offer information including a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response; creating an offer based on the offer information, the offer including the request for a demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response; determining a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer; receiving a plurality bids for a plurality of different offers including the offer; determining one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer; and 28 determining, by a computer system, one or more winning candidate bids, wherein the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid if the customer potential score of the offer exceeds a predetermined threshold and the ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than an effect on customer lifetime value. 3. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer executable program for determining one or more winning candidate bids, the computer executable program, when executed causes a computer system to perform a method including: receiving offer information including a request for a demand shaping tactic, wherein the demand shaping tactic is for a type of product, a demand opportunity group, and a desired demand response; creating an offer based on the offer information, the offer including the request for a demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response; determining a customer potential score for the offer based on the demand opportunity group and the demand shaping tactic of the offer; receiving a plurality bids for a plurality of different offers including the offer; determining one or more matching bids of the plurality of bids based on the demand shaping tactic, the type of product, the demand opportunity group, and the desired demand response of the offer; and determining one or more winning candidate bids, wherein the one or more matching bids is a winning candidate bid if the customer potential score of the offer exceeds a predetermined threshold and the ad yield of the winning candidate bid is higher than an effect on customer lifetime value.
AU2014203055A 2010-08-10 2014-06-04 Customer value opportunity system Abandoned AU2014203055A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2014203055A AU2014203055A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2014-06-04 Customer value opportunity system
AU2015203834A AU2015203834A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2015-07-08 Customer value opportunity system

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/853,934 2010-08-10
AU2011206945A AU2011206945A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2011-08-09 Customer value opportunity system
AU2014203055A AU2014203055A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2014-06-04 Customer value opportunity system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2011206945A Division AU2011206945A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2011-08-09 Customer value opportunity system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2015203834A Division AU2015203834A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2015-07-08 Customer value opportunity system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2014203055A1 true AU2014203055A1 (en) 2014-07-03

Family

ID=51228764

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2014203055A Abandoned AU2014203055A1 (en) 2010-08-10 2014-06-04 Customer value opportunity system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2014203055A1 (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11587123B2 (en) Predictive recommendation system using absolute relevance
US11810151B2 (en) Predictive recommendation system using tiered feature data
KR20180041405A (en) Apparatus for providing sales forecasting information based on internet
Feng et al. Overbidding in electronic auctions: factors influencing the propensity to overbid and the magnitude of overbidding
US20120253910A1 (en) Group buying incentivized by risk and impact adjusted rewards
US20180341897A1 (en) Method for allocating retail resources
WO2011146888A1 (en) System and method for buying and selling goods and services via an online marketplace
Cao et al. Sniping in soft-close online auctions: empirical evidence from overstock
US20120041803A1 (en) Customer value opportunity system
US20200151762A1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically identifying digital advertisements
US20200151763A1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically identifying digital advertisements
US20140310094A1 (en) Advertising optimization for mobile telephony
US20140180782A1 (en) Techniques For Linking Consumers For Coupon Matching
AU2015203834A1 (en) Customer value opportunity system
AU2014203055A1 (en) Customer value opportunity system
KR20110002906A (en) Real time price fluctuant type on-line shopping mall operation method and system
CA2748619C (en) Ad yield arbitration engine for online retailers
US10497025B1 (en) Real-time predictive recommendation system using per-set optimization
US20210073868A1 (en) System and method for advertising sales
US20130030929A1 (en) Reserve price randomness in online advertising
Merta et al. Influential Factors of Online Shopping Decision
US20170046725A1 (en) Live Buyer Database Constructor
Azar What affects customer success when bargaining for a new car? Some empirical evidence
Gao Pricing, competition, and welfare in the supermarket retail industry: theory and empirics
US20130246191A1 (en) Bid agent pool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK5 Application lapsed section 142(2)(e) - patent request and compl. specification not accepted