AU2013242826B2 - Synergistic antimicrobial composition - Google Patents

Synergistic antimicrobial composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2013242826B2
AU2013242826B2 AU2013242826A AU2013242826A AU2013242826B2 AU 2013242826 B2 AU2013242826 B2 AU 2013242826B2 AU 2013242826 A AU2013242826 A AU 2013242826A AU 2013242826 A AU2013242826 A AU 2013242826A AU 2013242826 B2 AU2013242826 B2 AU 2013242826B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
thps
biocide
alternatively
hydroxymethyl
ppm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2013242826A
Other versions
AU2013242826A1 (en
Inventor
Bei Yin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Global Technologies LLC
Original Assignee
Dow Global Technologies LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2010308421A external-priority patent/AU2010308421B2/en
Application filed by Dow Global Technologies LLC filed Critical Dow Global Technologies LLC
Priority to AU2013242826A priority Critical patent/AU2013242826B2/en
Publication of AU2013242826A1 publication Critical patent/AU2013242826A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2013242826B2 publication Critical patent/AU2013242826B2/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

A synergistic antimicrobial composition having two components. The first component is a hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound. The second component is the following biocide: ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts.

Description

SYNERGISTIC ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION The present application is a divisional application from Australian Patent Application Number 2010308421, which claims priority from United States Provisional Application No. 61/279,397, filed 20 October 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. 5 This invention relates to combinations of biocides, the combinations having greater activity than would be observed for the individual antimicrobial compounds. Use of combinations of at least two antimicrobial compounds can broaden potential markets, reduce use concentrations and costs, and reduce waste. In some cases, commercial 10 antimicrobial compounds cannot provide effective control of microorganisms, even at high use concentrations, due to weak activity against certain types of microorganisms, or relatively slow antimicrobial action, or instability under certain conditions such as high temperature and high pH. Combinations of different antimicrobial compounds are sometimes used to provide overall control of microorganisms or to provide the same level of microbial control at lower 15 use rates in a particular end use environment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,896 discloses combinations of phosphonium salts and aldehydes, but this reference does not suggest any of the combinations claimed herein. Moreover, there is a need for additional combinations of antimicrobial compounds having enhanced activity to provide effective control of the microorganisms. The problem addressed by this invention is to provide such additional 20 combinations of antimicrobial compounds. The discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles and the like is included in this specification solely for the purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It is not suggested or represented that any or all of these matters formed part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention as it existed 25 before the priority date of each claim of this application. Where the terms "comprise", "comprises", "comprised" or "comprising" are used in this specification (including the claims) they are to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, integers, steps or components, but not precluding the presence of one or more other features, integers, steps or components, or group thereof. 30 STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a synergistic antimicrobial composition -1 acomprising: (a) a hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium salts and tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine; and (b) a second biocide selected from the group consisting of (i) hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(2 hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine (HHT); (ii) 2,6-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-4-yl acetate (DXN); and (iii) 5 ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts; wherein a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl- substituted phosphorus compound to hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s triazine is from 15:1 to 1:15, a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound to 2,6-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-4-yl acetate is from 15:1 to 1:15, and a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound to ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal 10 or ammonium salts is from 15:1 to 1:5. In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a synergistic antimicrobial composition comprising: (a) a hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium salts and tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine; and (b) a second biocide consisting of ortho-phenylphenol or 1 5 its alkali metal or ammonium salts; wherein a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl- substituted phosphorus compound to ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts is from 15:1 to 1:5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 20 As used herein, the following terms have the designated definitions, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term "antimicrobial compound" refers to a compound -1 b- WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 capable of inhibiting the growth or propagation of microorganisms, and/or killing microorganisms; antimicrobial compounds include bactericides, bacteristats, fungicides, fungistats, algaecides and algistats, depending on the dose level applied, system conditions and the level of microbial control desired. The term "microorganism" includes, for example, 5 fungi (such as yeast and mold), bacteria and algae. The following abbreviations are used throughout the specification: ppm = parts per million by weight (weight/weight), mL = milliliter, Unless otherwise specified, temperatures are in degrees centigrade (C), and references to percentages are by weight (wt%). Percentages of antimicrobial compounds in the composition of this invention are based on the total weight of active ingredients in the 10 composition, i.e., the antimicrobial compounds themselves, exclusive of any amounts of solvents, carriers, dispersants, stabilizers or other materials which may be present. The hydroxymethyl- substituted phosphorus compound is selected from the group consisting of tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium salts (e.g., tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS) and tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride) and 15 tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine. More than one hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound may be present, in which case the biocide ratio is calculated from the total content of such compounds. Ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts includes lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium and ammonium salts. If more than one form of ortho-phenylphenol is present, the biocide ratio is calculated from the total content of such 20 compounds. In some embodiments of the invention, sodium o-phenylphenylate (NaOPP) is used. 2,6-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-4-yl acetate (DXN) is the same compound as reported in earlier references using the name 6-acetoxy-2,4-dimethyl-m-dioxane. In some embodiments of the invention, a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl substituted phosphorus compound to DXN is from 12:1 to 1:15, alternatively from 12:1 to 1:12, alternatively from 10:1 to 1:12, alternatively from 10:1 to 1:10, alternatively from 9:1 to 1:12, alternatively from 9:1 to 1:10, alternatively from 9:1 to 1:9, alternatively from 8.2:1 to 1:9, alternatively from 8.2:1 to 1:8.2. In some embodiments of the invention, a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl substituted phosphorus compound to ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts is from 12:1 to 1:5, alternatively from 12:1 to 1:4, alternatively from 10:1 to 1:5, alternatively from 10:1 to 1:4, alternatively from 10:1 to 1:3, alternatively from 9:1 to 1:4, alternatively from 9:1 to 1:3, alternatively from 8:1 to 1:3. In some embodiments of the invention, the antimicrobial composition is substantially free of oxazolidine compounds, i.e, it has less than 5% oxazolidine compounds relative to -9- WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 total biocide active ingredient content, alternatively less than 2%, alternatively less than I%, alternatively less than 0.5%, alternatively less than 0.1%. In some embodiments of the invention, the antimicrobial combination of this invention is useful in oil and gas field injection, produced fluids, fracturing fluids and other functional fluids, oil and gas wells, oil and gas operation, separation, storage, and transportation systems, oil and gas pipelines, oil and gas vessels, and fuel. The combination 5 is especially useful in aqueous fluids added to or produced by oil and gas well. The composition also is useful for controlling microorganisms in other industrial water and water containing/contaminated matrixes, such as cooling water, air washer, heat exchangers, boiler water, pulp and paper mill water, other industrial process water, ballast water, wastewater, metalworking fluids, latex, paint, coatings, adhesives, inks, tape joint compounds, pigment, 10 water-based slurries, personal care and household products such as detergent, filtration systems (including reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration systems), toilet bowel, textiles, leather and leather production system, or a system used therewith. Typically, the amount of the biocide combinations of the present invention to control the growth of microorganisms is from 10 ppm to 5,000 ppm active ingredient. In some 15 embodiments of the invention, the active ingredients of the composition are present in an amount of at least 20 ppm, alternatively at least 50 ppm, alternatively at least 100 ppm, alternatively at least 150 ppm, alternatively at least 200 ppm. In some embodiments, the active ingredients of the composition are present in an amount of no more than 2,000 ppm, alternatively no more than 1,000 ppm, alternatively no more than 500 ppm, alternatively no 20 more than 400 ppm, alternatively no more than 300 ppm, alternatively no more than 250 ppm, alternatively no more than 200 ppm, alternatively no more than 100 ppm, alternatively no more than 50 ppm. Concentrations mentioned above are in a liquid composition containing the biocide combinations. Biocide concentrations in a high-sulfide and high temperature environment typically will be higher than in other environments. In some 25 embodiments of the invention, active ingredient concentrations downhole in an oil well are from 30 to 500 ppm, alternatively from 50 to 250 ppm. In some embodiments of the invention, active ingredient concentrations for top side treatment at an oil well are from 10 to 300 ppm, alternatively from 30 to 100 ppm. The present invention also encompasses a method for preventing microbial growth in 30 the use areas described above, especially in oil or natural gas production operations, by incorporating the claimed biocide combination into the materials. -2- WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 EXAMPLES Example 1. Synergistic effect of THPS and HHT against sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) Inside an anaerobic chamber (Bactron anaerobic chamber), a deaerated sterile salt solution (3.1183 g of NaCl, 1.3082 mg of NaHCO 3 , 47.70 mg of KCl, 72.00 mg of CaCl2, 5 54.49 mg of MgSO 4 , 172.28 mg of Na 2
SO
4 , 43.92 mg of Na 2
CO
3 in 1 L water) was contaminated with an oil field isolated anaerobic consortium, mainly SRB, at final bacterial concentrations of 106 to 107 CFU/mL. The aliquots of this contaminated water were then treated with THPS and hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine (HHT), or the THPS /HHT combination at different active concentration levels. After the mixtures were incubated 10 at 40'C for 24 hour, the biocidal efficacy was determined by minimum tested biocide concentration for a complete bacteria kill in the aliquots (MBC). Table 1 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blend, and the Synergy Index" 1 of each combination. Table 1. Biocidal efficacy of THPS, hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine (HHT), 15 THPS /HHT combination, and Synergy Index Average MBC Ratio of (active ppm) Average p value in THPS to HHT Synergy Z 2 (active w/w) THPS HHT Index 1:0 6.1 0.0 9:1 5.2 0.6 0.88 0.00 3:1 5.0 1.7 0.87 0.00 1:1 7.0 7.0 1.26 0.00 1:3 3.3 10.0 0.69 0.00 1:9 2.4 21.5 0.69 0.00 0:1 0.0 79.0 *1 Synergy Index = Ca /CA + Cb/CB Ca: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a complete bacterial kill when used in 20 combination with Biocide B CA: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a complete bacterial kill when used alone Cb: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a complete bacterial kill when used in combination with Biocide A 25 CB: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a complete bacterial kill when used alone A Synergy Index less than 1 indicates synergy. 30 *2 P value < 0.05 means that there is significant difference between the average Synergy Index and 1.00 WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 Example 2. Evaluation of biocidal efficacy of THPS / HHT combinations, against anaerobic bacteria for a high temperature and sulfide-rich environment. 5 Inside an anaerobic chamber (BACTRON IV), biocides solutions were challenged with 10 4 to 05 CFU/mL of an oilfield SRB consortium and 10 ppm sulfide ion (added in the form of sodium sulfide). The biocide solutions were then incubated at 80'C under anaerobic condition for 7 days, with daily challenge of the SRB consortium (104 tol0 5 CFU/mL) and sulfide ion (10 ppm). The biocidal efficacy was determined by selecting the lowest testing 10 biocide dosage required for 99.999% or complete bacterial kill after both 2 hours and 7 days of heat, SRB and sulfide exposure. Synergy Index was then calculated. Table 2 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blend, and the Synergy Index of each combination. Table 2. Biocidal efficacy evaluation of THPS, HHT, and THPS / HHT combination for a 15 high temperature and sulfide-rich environment, and Synergy Index Dosage (active ppm) required for Ratio of THPS 99.999% or complete bacterial to HHT(active kill of both 2h and 7day heat, Synergy w/w) SRB, and sulfide exposure Index* 3 THPS HHT 1:0 88.9 0.0 5.1:1 59.3 11.7 0.75 2.3:1 59.3 26.3 0.86 1:1 39.5 39.5 0.74 1:2.3 17.6 39.5 0.49 1:5.1 11.7 59.3 0.58 0:1 0.0 133.3 *3 Synergy Index = Ca /CA + Cb/CB Ca: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a 99.999% bacterial kill when used in 20 combination with Biocide B CA: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a 99.999% bacterial kill when used alone Cb: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a 99.999% bacterial kill when used in combination with Biocide A 25 CB: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a 99.999% bacterial kill when used alone A Synergy Index less than 1 indicates synergy.
WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 The data above show that the THPS and HHT combination was synergistic for a high temperature and sulfide-rich environment. 5 Example 3. Synergistic effect of THPS and DXN, against sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) Inside an anaerobic chamber (Bactron III), a deaerated sterile salt solution (3.1183 g of NaCl, 1.3082 mg of NaHCO 3 , 47.70 mg of KCl, 72.00 mg of CaCl 2 , 54.49 mg of MgSO 4 , 172.28 mg of Na2SO4, 43.92 mg of Na 2
CO
3 in I L water) was contaminated with an oil field isolated 10 anaerobic SRB consortium at final bacterial concentrations of 106 to107 CFU/mL. The aliquots of this contaminated water were then treated with THPS, DXN, or the THPS / DXN combinations at different active concentration levels. After the mixtures were incubated at 40'C for 24 hour, the viable bacterial number were enumerated using a serial dilution method and the biocidal efficacy was determined by the biocide dosage required for 99.99% bacterial 15 reduction in 24 hours. Synergy Index was then calculated. Table 3 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blends, and the Synergy Index of each combination. Table 3. Biocidal efficacy of THPS, DXN, THPS / DXN combination, and Synergy Index Dosage required for Ratio of THPS to 99.99% bacterial Synergy DXN (active w/w) reduction (active ppm) Index* 4 THPS DXN 1:0 5.5 0.0 8.2:1 4.2 0.5 0.76 2.9:1 4.2 1.5 0.77 1:1 4.2 4.2 0.77 1:2.9 3.2 9.2 0.62 1:8.2 3.2 26.4 0.67 0:1 0.0 330.9 20 *4 Synergy Index Ca /CA + Cb/CB Ca: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a 99.99% bacterial kill when used in combination with Biocide B CA: Concentration of biocide A required to achieve a 99.99% bacterial kill when used 25 alone Cb: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a 99.99% bacterial kill when used in combination with Biocide A CB: Concentration of biocide B required to achieve a 99.99% bacterial kill when used alone 30 A Synergy Index less than 1 indicates synergy.
WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 Example 4. Synergistic effect of THPS and NaOPP, against sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) Inside an anaerobic chamber (Bactron anaerobic chamber), a deaerated sterile salt solution (3.1183 g of NaCl, 1.3082 mg of NaHCO 3 , 47.70 mg of KCl, 72.00 mg of CaCl2, 54.49 mg of MgSO 4 , 172.28 mg of Na 2
SO
4 , 43.92 mg of Na 2
CO
3 in 1 L water) was 5 contaminated with an oil field isolated SRB consortium, at final bacterial concentrations of 106 tol0 CFU/mL. The aliquots of this contaminated water were then treated with THPS, NaOPP, or the THPS/ NaOPP combinations at different active concentration levels. After the mixtures were incubated at 40'C for 24 hours, the viable bacteria in the aliquots were detected in culture medium. The biocidal efficacy was determined by minimum tested 10 biocide concentration for a complete bacterial kill in the aliquots (MBC). Table 4 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blends, and the Synergy Index of each combination. Table 4. Biocidal efficacy of THPS, NaOPP, THPS/ NaOPP combination, against anaerobic 15 bacteria Average MBC Ratio of THPS to (active ppm) Average value*2 NaOPP(active Synergy w/w) THPS NaOPP Index*' inst 1:0 7.9 0.0 9:1 6.1 0.7 0.77 0.04 3:1 5.1 1.7 0.66 0.00 1:1 8.5 8.5 1.10 0.51 1:3 6.4 19.1 0.86 0.00 1:9 6.1 55.1 0.94 0.62 0:1 0.0 333.3 Example 5. Synergistic effect of THPS and NaOPP, against sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) 20 Inside an anaerobic chamber (Bactron anaerobic chamber), a deaerated sterile salt solution (3.1183 g of NaCl, 1.3082 mg of NaHCO 3 , 47.70 mg of KCl, 72.00 mg of CaCl2, 54.49 mg of MgSO 4 , 172.28 mg of Na 2
SO
4 , 43.92 mg of Na 2
CO
3 in 1 L water) was contaminated with an oil field isolated anaerobic consortium, mainly SRB., at final bacterial concentrations of 107 CFU/mL. The aliquots of this contaminated water were then treated 25 with THPS, NaOPP, or the THPS/ NaOPP combinations at different active concentration levels. After the mixtures were incubated at 40'C for 24 hour, the viable bacteria were enumerated using serial dilution method. The biocidal efficacy was determined by minimum -7- WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 tested biocide concentration for 99.999% bacterial reduction in the aliquots. Table 5 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blends, and the Synergy Index of each combination. 5 Table 5. Biocidal efficacy of THPS, NaOPP, THPS/ NaOPP combination, against anaerobic bacteria Concentration (ppm active) Ratio of THPS to required for 99.999% Synergy NaOPP(active bacterial reduction Index* 3 w/w) THPS NaOPP 1:0 11.9 0.0 2.25:1 7.9 3.5 0.68 1:1 7.9 7.9 0.69 1:2.25 7.9 17.8 0.72 1:5.06 11.9 60.0 1.19 1:7.59 7.9 60.0 0.86 0:1 0.0 303.8 10 Example 6. Synergistic effect of THPS and NaOPP, against aerobic bacteria A PBS buffer (pH7) was contaminated with Psedomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 at final bacterial concentration of ~ 106 CFU/ml. The aliquots of this contaminated water were then treated with THPS, NaOPP, or the THPS/ NaOPP combinations at different active concentration levels. After the mixtures were 15 incubated at 37'C for 24 hour, the viable bacteria were enumerated using serial dilution method. The biocidal efficacy was determined by minimum tested biocide concentration for 99.999% bacterial reduction in the aliquots. Table 6 summarizes the efficacy of each biocide and their blends, and the Synergy Index of each combination.
WO 2011/049761 PCT/US2010/052010 Table 6. Biocidal efficacy of THPS, NaOPP, THPS/ NaOPP combination, against aerobic bacteria Concentration (ppm Ratio of active) required for THPS to 99.999% bacterial Synergy NaOPP(active reduction Index* 3 w/w) THPS NaOPP 1:0 26.7 0.0 2.25:1 17.8 7.9 0.70 1:1 17.8 17.8 0.75 1:2.25 17.8 40.0 0.86 1:5.06 17.8 90.0 1.11 1:7.59 17.8 135.0 1.33 0:1 0.0 202.5 5 As shown in Tables 4 to 6, THPS in combination with NaOPP showed a synergistic effect and much lower dosages were needed for good SRB control when used in combination.

Claims (2)

1. A synergistic antimicrobial composition comprising: (a) a hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound selected from the group consisting of tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium salts and tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine; and (b) a second biocide consisting of ortho-phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts; wherein a weight ratio of the hydroxymethyl-substituted phosphorus compound to ortho phenylphenol or its alkali metal or ammonium salts is from 15:1 to 1:5.
2. The composition of claim 1 in which the weight ratio is from 10:1 to 1:4. -10-
AU2013242826A 2009-10-20 2013-10-10 Synergistic antimicrobial composition Ceased AU2013242826B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2013242826A AU2013242826B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2013-10-10 Synergistic antimicrobial composition

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61/279,397 2009-10-20
AU2010308421A AU2010308421B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2010-10-08 Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2013242826A AU2013242826B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2013-10-10 Synergistic antimicrobial composition

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2010308421A Division AU2010308421B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2010-10-08 Synergistic antimicrobial composition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2013242826A1 AU2013242826A1 (en) 2013-10-31
AU2013242826B2 true AU2013242826B2 (en) 2015-11-05

Family

ID=49485849

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013242826A Ceased AU2013242826B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2013-10-10 Synergistic antimicrobial composition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2013242826B2 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5385896A (en) * 1989-03-03 1995-01-31 Albright & Wilson Limited Biocidal compositions and treatments

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5385896A (en) * 1989-03-03 1995-01-31 Albright & Wilson Limited Biocidal compositions and treatments

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2013242826A1 (en) 2013-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2010298611B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2010281595B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
US9686996B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2010298539B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2013242826B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2013242825B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
AU2010300957B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition containing glutaraldehyde and dimethoxane (2, 6 -dimethyl-1, 3 -dioxan- 4 -yl acetate)
AU2013231143B2 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition
US8613941B1 (en) Synergistic antimicrobial composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired