TITLE: METHOD OF PREPARING A DOUGH-BASED PRODUCT The present application is a divisional application of Australian Application No. 2008258554, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. 5 SEQUENCE LISTING AND DEPOSITED MICROORGANISMS Sequence listing The present invention comprises a sequence listing. Deposit of biological material None. 10 FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to the use of anti-staling amylases in the preparation of dough or dough-based edible products with a high sucrose content. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION US 3026205 describes a process of producing baked confections and the 15 products resulting therefrom by alpha-amylase. WO 9104669 describes the use of a maltogenic alpha-amylase to retard the staling of baked products such as bread; the maltogenic alpha-amylase described therein is commercially available under the tradename Novamyl* (product of Novozymes A/S). US 6162628 describes Novamyl* variants and their use for the same 20 purpose. Three-dimensional structures of Novamyl* are published in US 6162628 and in the Protein Data Bank (available at http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/) with identifiers 1QHO and 1QHP, the structures are included herein by reference. WO 2006/032281 describes methods of preparing a dough-based product with a high sucrose content using anti-staling amylases. 25 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The inventors have found that a high sucrose content dough (such as cake dough) tends to inhibit the activity of an anti-staling amylases such as Novamyl*, making it less effective to prevent the staling of dough-based products with high sucrose content such as cakes. They have found that a good anti-staling effect in cakes 30 can be achieved by using a carefully selected anti-staling amylase with certain properties, and they have identified such amylases. 1 By analyzing a 3D structure of Novamyl*, the inventors further found that sucrose may inhibit by binding in the active site. They have found that sucrose docks into the active site of Novamyl* differently from the substrate or inhibitor in published models 1QHO and 1QHP, and 1a they have used this finding to design sucrose-tolerant variants. A selection of particularly interesting Novamyl* (SEQ ID NO:1) variants were identified comprising the two specific substitutions D261G and T288P in combination with at least one other amino acid alteration, preferably at least two other amino acid alterations, or three other amino acid alterations, or 5 most preferably in combination with at least four other amino acid alterations. Accordingly, in a first aspect the invention provides a method of preparing a dough or a dough-based edible product, comprising adding a polypeptide to the dough, wherein the dough comprises at least 10 % sucrose by weight, and the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence which is at least 70 % identical to SEQ ID NO: 1, and compared to SEQ ID NO: 1 10 comprises the two substitutions D261G and T288P and at least one additional amino acid alteration which is substitution or deletion of or insertion adjacent to Y89, W93, P191, F194, Y360, or N375. In a second aspect, the invention provides polypeptides, which have amylase activity less inhibited by sucrose than the amylase activity of SEQ ID NO: 1, which have an amino acid 15 sequence which is at least 70 % identical to SEQ ID NO: 1, and which when compared to SEQ ID NO: 1 comprises the two substitutions D261G and T288P and at least one additional amino acid alteration, which is substitution or deletion of or insertion adjacent to Y89, W93, P191, F194, Y360, or N375. The invention also provides methods of producing such novel sucrose tolerant polypeptide variants of a maltogenic alpha-amylase. 20 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS Docking of sucrose into the active site of Novamyl* (using the software GOLD version 2.1.2, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK and the protein part of the x-ray structure 1QHO.pdb) reveals a specific binding configuration as unique to sucrose. The cartesian coordinates for the sucrose atoms in this binding 25 configuration, using the coordinate system of the x-ray structure 1QHO.pdb are given in Figure 1. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Maltogenic alpha-amylase and sucrose docking A maltogenic alpha-amylase (EC 3.2.1.133) having more than 70 % identity, such as, 30 at least 75%, (particularly more than 80 % identity, such as at least 85%, or 90% identity, such as at least 95% or 96% or 97% or 98% or 99%) with the Novamy* sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 1 may be used as the parent enzyme for designing sucrose tolerant variants. Amino acid identity may be calculated as described in US 6162628. 2 For Novamyl" (SEQ ID NO: 1), a 3D structure including a substrate or inhibitor as described in US 6162628 or in the Protein Data Bank with the identifier 1QHO or 1QHP may be used. Alternatively, a Novamyl* variant may be used, such as a variant described in US 6162628 or in this specification, e.g. the variant F188L +D261G +T288P, which is used as a 5 reference enzyme in the examples below. A 3D structure of a variant may be developed from the Novamyl* structure by known methods, e.g. as described in TL. Blundell et al., Nature, vol. 326, p. 347 ff (26 March 1987); J. Greer, Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, 7:317 334 (1990); or Example 1 of WO 9623874. The inventors found that sucrose may inhibit Novamyl* by binding in the active site. 10 Docking of sucrose into the active site of Novamyl* (using the software GOLD version 2.1.2, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK and the protein part of the x-ray structure 1 QHO.pdb) reveals a specific binding configuration as unique to sucrose. The cartesian coordinates for the sucrose atoms in this binding configuration, using the coordinate system of the x-ray structure 1 QHO.pdb are given in Fig. 1. 15 Maltogenic alpha-amylase assay The activity of a maltogenic alpha-amylase may be determined using an activity assay such as the MANU method. One MANU (Maltogenic Amylase Novo Unit) is defined as the amount of enzyme required to release one micro-mole of maltose per minute at a concentration of 10 mg of maltotriose substrate per ml in 0.1 M citrate buffer at pH 5.0, 370C 20 for 30 minutes. Amino acid alterations The amino acid sequence of a maltogenic alpha-amylase may be altered to decrease the sucrose inhibition. The inventors found that the alteration may be made at an amino acid residue having at least one atom within 4 Angstroms from any of the sucrose atoms when the 25 sucrose molecule is docked in the 3D structure of the maltogenic alpha-amylase. Using the Novamyl* structure 1QHO and the sucrose docking in Fig. 1, the following residues are within 4 A: K44, N86, Y89, H90, Y92, W93, F188, T189, D190, P191, A192, F194, D372, P373, R376. Further the following two positions of SEQ ID NO: 1 have been identified as relevant: 30 Y360 and N375. Particularly preferred embodiments of the invention are amino acid alterations in the following 2 - 6 positions compared to Novamyl* (SEQ ID NO: 1) in combination with the two specific substitutions D261 G and T288P: Y89 + W93 35 Y89+ P191 Y89 + F194 3 Y89 + Y360 Y89 + N375 W93 + P191 W93 + F194 5 W93 + Y360 W93 + N375 P191 + F194 P191 + Y360 P191 + N375 10 F194+ Y360 F194 + N375 Y360 + N375 Y89 + W93 + P191 15 Y89 + W93 + F194 Y89 + W93 + Y360 Y89 + W93 + N375 Y89 + P191 + F194 Y89 + P191 + Y360 20 Y89+ P191+ N375 Y89 + F194 + Y360 Y89 + F194 + N375 Y89+ Y360+ N375 W93 + P191 + F194 25 W93 + P191 + Y360 W93 + P191 + N375 W93 + Fl 94 + Y360 W93 + F194 + N375 W93 + Y360 + N375 30 P191+ F194+ Y360 P191 + F194 + N375 P191+ Y360+ N375 F194 + Y360 + N375 35 Y89 + W93 + P191 + F194 Y89 + W93 + P191 + Y360 Y89 + W93 + P191 + N375 4 Y89 + W93 + F194 + Y360 Y89 + W93 + F194 + N375 Y89 + W93 + Y360 + N375 Y89 + P191 + F194 + Y360 5 Y89 + P191 + F194 + N375 Y89 + P191 + Y360 + N375 Y89 + F194 + Y360 + N375 W93 + P191 + F194 + Y360 W93 + P191 + F194 + N375 10 W93 + P191 + Y360 + N375 W93 + F194 + Y360 + N375 P191 + F194 + Y360 + N375 Y89 + W93 + P191 + F194 + Y360 15 Y89 + W93 + P191 + F194 + N375 Y89 + W93 + P191 + Y360 + N375 Y89 + W93 + F194 + Y360 + N375 Y89 + P191 + F194 + Y360 + N375 W93 + P191 + F194 + Y360 + N375 20 Y89 + W93 + P191 + F194 + Y360 + N375 The alteration may be a substitution or deletion of one or more of the selected residues, or one or more residues (particularly 1-4 residues or 5-6 residues) can be inserted adjacent to a selected residue. 25 The substitution may be with a smaller or larger residue. A substitution to increase the size of the residue may diminish the space obtained by the docked sucrose molecule thereby preventing the binding of sucrose. Amino acid residues are ranked as follows from smallest to largest: (an equal sign indicates residues with sizes that are practically indistinguishable): G < A=S=C < V=T < P < L=l=N=D=M < E=Q < K < H < R < F < Y < W 30 The substitution may also be such as to eliminate contacts with the sucrose molecule, in particular by moving or removing potential sites of hydrogen bonding or Van der Waals interactions. The substitution may particularly be with another residue of the same type where the type is negative, positive, hydrophobic or hydrophilic. The negative residues are DE, the 35 positive residues are K/R, the hydrophobic residues are A.C,F,G,L,M,PV,W,Y, and the hydrophilic residues are H,N,Q,ST. 5 Some particular examples of substitutions are 115T/S/L, R18K, K44R/S/T/QIN, N86Q/S/T, T87N/Q/S, G88A/S/T, Y89W/F/H, H90W/F/Y/R/K/N/Q/M, W93Y/F/M/E/GN/T/S, F188H/LII/T/G/V, D190E/Q/G, P191S/N, A192S/T, F194S/L/Y, L196F, Y360F/I/N, N371 K/R/F/Y/Q, D372E/Q/S/T/A and N375S/T/D/E/Q. 5 Most preferred embodiments of amino acid alterations in the above-listed preferred positions are the following substitutions, alone or in combination: Y89F,W W93F,Y P1918,N 10 F194Y,S,L Y360F,1,N N375S,T Examples of deletions are deletion of residue 191 or 192. An example of an insertion is Ala inserted between 192 and 193. 15 The polypeptide may include other alterations compared to Novamyl* (SEQ ID NO: 1), e.g. alterations to increase the thermostability as described in US 6162628. Particularly preferred embodiments of the invention are the following amino acid alterations compared to Novamyl* (SEQ ID NO: 1), all of which are tested in the examples below: 20 Y89F, D261G, T288P, 1290V, N375S F194Y, D261G, T288P, N375S 115T, P191S, D261G, T288P, N375S, S6401 Y89F,P191S,D261 G,T288P I15T,Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P 25 Y89F,F194YD261G,T288P Y89F,D261G,T288P,N375S Y89F,P191S,F194YD261GT288P Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P,N375S Y89F,P191SD261 G,T288P,Y360N 30 Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P,Y360F Y89F,W93YP191S,D261G,T288P Y89F,W93F,P191S,D261G,T288P Y89F,P191S,F194Y,D261G,T288P,N375S Nomenclature for amino acid alterations 35 In this specification, an amino acid substitution is described by use of one-letter codes, e.g. K44R. Slashes are used to indicate alternatives, e.g. K44R/S/T/Q/N to indicate 6 substitution of K44 with R or S etc. P191* indicates a deletion of P191. *192aA indicates insertion of one Ala after A192. Commas are used to indicate multiple alterations in the sequence, e.g. F188L, D261G, T288P to indicate a variant with three substitutions. Properties of anti-staling amylase for use with sucrose 5 The amylase for use in high-sucrose dough may be selected so as to have mainly exo-amylase activity. More specifically, the amylase hydrolyzes amylose so that the average molecular weight of the amylose after 0.44 % hydrolysis is more than 50 % (particularly more than 75 %) of the molecular weight before the hydrolysis. Thus, the amylase may hydrolyze amylose (e.g. wheat amylose or synthetic amylose) 10 so that the average molecular weight of the amylose after 0.4-4 % hydrolysis (i.e. between 0.4 4 % hydrolysis of the total number of bonds) is more than 50 % (particularly more than 75 %) of the value before the hydrolysis. The hydrolysis can be conducted in a 1.7 % amylose solution by weight at suitable conditions (e.g. 10 minutes at 60 0 C, pH 5.5), and the molecular weight distribution before and after the hydrolysis can be determined by HPLC. The test may 15 be carried out as described in C. Christophersen et al., Starch 50 (1), 3945 (1998). An exo-amylase for use in high-sucrose dough may have a specified sugar tolerance. Compared to its activity in the absence of sucrose, the amylase may have more than 20 % activity at 10 % sugar, more than 10 % activity at 20 % sucrose, or more than 4 % activity at 40 % sucrose. The sugar tolerance may be determined as described in the examples. 20 The exo-amylase may have optimum activity in the pH range 4.5-8.5. It may have sufficient thermostability to retain at least 20 % (particularly at least 40 %) activity after 30 minutes incubation at 85oC at pH 5.7 (50 mM Na-acetate, 1 mM CaCl 2 ) without substrate. The exo-amylase may be added to the dough in an amount corresponding to 1-100 mg enzyme protein per kg of flour, particularly 5-50 mg per kg. 25 The exo-amylase may be non-liquefying. This can be determined by letting the exo amylase act on a 1% wheat starch solution until the reaction is complete, i.e. addition of fresh enzyme causes no further degradation, and analyzing the reaction products, e.g. by HPLC. Typical reaction conditions are e.g. 0.01 mg enzyme per ml starch solution for 48 hours. The exo-amylase is considered non-liquefying if the amount of residual starch after the reaction is 30 at least 20 % of the initial amount of starch. The exo-amylase may have maltogenic alpha-amylase activity (EC 3.2.1.133). The exo-amylase may be the amylase described in WO 2005/066338, or it may be a Novamyl* variant described in this specification. Dough and dough-based edible product 35 The dough may have a sucrose content above 10 % by weight, particularly above 20 % or 30 %, e.g. 30-40 %. The flour content is typically 25-35 % by weight of total ingredients. 7 The dough may be made by a conventional cake recipe, typically with cake flour, sugar, fat/oil and eggs as the major ingredients. It may include other conventional ingredients such as emulsifiers, humectants, gums, starch and baking powder. It generally contains such ingredients as soft wheat flour, milk or other liquids, sugar, eggs, chemical leaveners, flavor 5 extracts and spices, as well as others that may or may not include shortening. Examples of emulsifiers include mono- or diglycerides, sugar esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of fatty acids, lactic acid esters of monoglycerides, acetic acid esters of monoglycerides, polyoxethylene stearates, or lysolecithin. Conventional emulsifiers used in making flour dough products include as examples monoglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters 10 of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, and lecithins e.g. obtained from soya. The emulsifying agent may be an emulsifier per se or an agent that generates an emulsifier in situ. Examples of emulsifying agents that can generate an emulsifier in situ include enzymes, such as, lipase or phospholipases. The dough is generally heat treated, e.g. by baking or deep frying to prepare an edible 15 product such as cakes including pound cake, yellow and white layer cakes, cakes containing chocolate and cocoa products, sponge cakes, angel food cake, fruit cakes and foam-type cakes and doughnuts. Optionally, one or more additional enzymes may be used together with the anti-staling amylase of the present invention in preparing dough and dough-based edible products. The 20 additional enzyme may be a starch degrading enzyme, such as, another amylase (e.g., an alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and/or a glucoamylase) or pullulanase, a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, a peptidase, in particular an exopeptidase, a transglutaminase, a lipase, a phospholipase, a cellulase, a hemicelluase, a protease, a glycosyltransferase, a branching enzyme (1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme), an oxidoreductase or oxidase (e.g., a 25 monosaccharide oxidase, such as, glucose oxidase, hexose oxidase, galactose oxidase or pyranose oxidase). Sources of these additional enzymes are well known in the art. The additional enzyme may be of any origin, including mammalian and plant, and preferably of microbial (bacterial, yeast or fungal) origin. For example, the amylase may be fungal or bacterial, e.g., an alpha-amylase from Bacillus, e.g. B. lichenifornis or B. 30 amyloliquefaciens, a beta-amylase, e.g. from plant (e.g. soy bean) or from microbial sources (e.g. Bacillus), a glucoamylase, e.g. from A. niger, or a fungal alpha-amylase, e.g. from A. oryzae. The hemicellulase may be a pentosanase, e.g. a xylanase which may be of microbial origin, e.g. derived from a bacterium or fungus, such as a strain of Aspergillus, in particular of 35 A. aculeatus, A. niger, A. awamori, or A. tubigensis, from a strain of Trichoderma, e.g. T. reesei, or from a strain of Humicola, e.g. H. insolens. The protease may be from Bacillus, e.g. B. amyloliquefaciens. 8 The lipase may be derived from a strain of Thermomyces (Humicola), Rhizomucor, Candida, Aspergillus, Rhizopus, or Pseudomonas, in particular from T. lanuginosus (H. ianuginosa), Rhizomucor miehei, C. antarctica, A niger, Rhizopus delemar, Rhizopus arrhizus or P. cepacia. 5 The phospholipase may have phospholipase Al or A2 or lysophospholipase activity; it may or may not have lipase activity. It may be of animal origin, e.g. from pancreas, snake venom or bee venom, or it may be of microbial origin, e.g. from filamentous fungi, yeast or bacteria, such as Aspergillus or Fusarium, e.g. A. niger, A. oryzae or F. oxysporum. Also the variants described in WO 0032578 may be used. 10 The oxidoreductase may be a peroxidase, a laccase or a lipoxygenase. The glucose oxidase may be derived from a strain of Aspergillus or Penicillium, particularly A. niger, P. notatun, P. amagasakiense or P. vitale. The hexose oxidase may be one described in EP 833563. The pyranose oxidase may be one described in WO 9722257, e.g. derived from Trametes, particularly T. hirsuta. The galactose oxidase may be one described in WO 15 0050606. EXAMPLES Example 1. Baking procedure Tegral Allegro cake Baking examples on the following Novamyl* variants are included in this example: Table 1 Variants, Mutations, Report number and Study number Variant Substitutions Ref F188L, D261G, T288P A Y89F, D261G, T288P, 1290V, N375S B F194Y, D261G, T288P, N375S C 115T, P191S, D261G, T288P, N375S, S6401 D Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P E I15T,Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P F Y89F,F194Y,D261G,T288P G Y89F,D261 G,T288P,N375S H Y89F,P191S,F194Y,D261G,T288P I Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P,N375S 9 J Y89F,P1 91 S,D261 G,T288P,Y360N K Y89F,P191S,D261G,T288P,Y36OF L Y89F,W93Y,P191S,D261G,T288P M Y89F,W93F,P191S,D261GT288P N Y89F,P191S,F194Y,D261G,T288PN375S Recipe The following recipe was used: Tegral 100 Allegro mix* Pasteurized 50 whole egg Buter 50 Enzymes According to trial, In the range 0 - 25 mg protein enzyme/kg flour. *commercially available from Puratos NV/SA, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium 5 Procedure The ingredients were scaled into a mixing bowl and mixed using an industrial mixer (e.g. Bjorn/Bear AR 5 A Varimixer*) with a suitable paddle speed. 300 g of the dough was poured into forms. The cakes were baked in a suitable oven (e.g. Sveba Dahlin deck oven) for 45 min. at 180 "C. The cakes were allowed to cool down at room temperature for 1 hour. 10 The volumes of the cakes were determined when the cakes had cooled down, using the rape seed displacement method. The cakes were packed under nitrogen in sealed plastic bags and stored at room temperature until analysis. The cakes were evaluated on day 1, 7 and 14, two cakes were used at each occasion, and three slices of cakes were analyzed from each cake. 10 The cohesiveness and hardness of the cakes was evaluated using the texture profile analysis (TPA) with TA-XTplus texture analyzer and the water mobility was characterized by low field NMR. The Texture profile analysis (TPA) was performed as described in Bourne M. C. 5 (2002) 2. ed., Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. Academic Press. The mobility of free water was determined as described by P. L. Chen, Z. Long, R. Ruan and T. P. Labuza, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of water Mobility in Bread during Storage. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie 30, 178-183 (1997). The mobility of free water has been described in literature to correlate to moistness of bread crumb. 10 Result The volume of the cakes can be found in table 2, the volume of cakes without any enzyme is set to 100%. Compared to cakes with no addition of enzymes the volume of the cakes is not 15 affected by the addition of the reference enzyme (SEQ ID NO.: 1) nor by the addition of variants hereof, i.e. the cakes did not collapse upon addition of enzyme. Table 2 Volume of cakes as a function of added enzyme 0 5 10 25 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Ref 100 98 97 A 100 95 97 C 100 96 96 E 100 98 100 0 3 4 5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg M 100 94 97 95 11 B 100 95 94 93 D 100 95 96 96 0 3 6 9 12 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg F 100 99 99 101 103 0 2 4 6 8 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg D 100 96 97 94 H 100 97 93 94 N 100 95 95 95 J 100 93 93 92 K 100 94 92 90 1 100 94 97 96 L 100 99 98 97 G 100 93 92 94 The cohesiveness of the cakes decreased with storage time. The addition of variants of Novanyl* delayed this decrease as can be seen in Table 3. 5 Table 3 Change in Cohesiveness of cakes with time measured with the TPA method Dosage 12 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 0,46 0,36 0,32 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,45 0,42 0,39 25 mg/kg 0,45 0,42 0,42 A 10 mg/kg 0,44 0,40 0,38 25 mg/kg 0,43 0,42 0,40 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 0,52 0,43 0,39 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,56 0,49 0,44 25 mg/kg 0,57 0,52 0,49 H 2 mg/kg 0,56 0,49 0,45 4 mg/kg 0,58 0,51 0,48 6 mg/kg 0,56 0,51 0,48 N 2 mg/kg 0,54 0,47 0,45 4 mg/kg 0,57 0,53 0,47 13 6 mg/kg 0,56 0,52 0,48 D 2 mg/kg 0,57 0,48 0,45 4 mg/kg 0,55 0,50 0,46 6 mg/kg 0,55 0,49 0,46 Day Day Day 1 7 15 No enzyme 0,52 0,42 0,36 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,54 0,48 0,44 25 mg/kg 0,56 0,50 0,46 J 2 mg/kg 0,54 0,46 0,41 4 mg/kg 0,53 0,47 0,42 6 mg/kg 0,54 0,49 0,44 K 2 mg/kg 0,54 0,46 0,40 4 mg/kg 0,53 0,48 0,43 6 mg/kg 0,53 0,48 0,43 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 0,50 0,47 0,43 14 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,54 0,51 0,48 25 mg/kg 0,55 0,55 0,52 2 mg/kg 0,53 0,51 0,48 4 mg/kg 0,54 0,53 0,50 6 mg/kg 0,51 0,50 0,49 L 2 mg/kg 0,52 0,49 0,47 4 mg/kg 0,54 0,51 0,49 6 mg/kg 0,53 0,52 0,51 Day Day Day 1 6 14 No enzyme 0,46 0,38 0,35 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,49 0,43 0,42 25 mg/kg 0,48 0,44 0,44 E 5 mg/kg 0,47 0,42 0,39 10 mg/kg 0,47 0,41 0,41 Day Day Day 1 7 14 15 No enzyme 0,43 0,33 0,28 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,45 0,38 0,35 25 mg/kg 0,45 0,40 0,37 G 4 mg/kg 0,46 0,36 0,34 6 mg/kg 0,45 0,40 0,37 8 mg/kg 0,44 0,38 0,37 Day Day Day 3 7 14 No enzyme 0,45 0,41 0,37 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,50 0,47 0,45 25 mg/kg 0,51 0,49 0,48 D 3 mg/kg 0,48 0,46 0,43 4 mg/kg 0,50 0,48 0,45 5 mg/kg 0,50 0,47 0,45 B 3 mg/kg 0,50 0,48 0,45 4 mg/kg 0,51 0,49 0,47 5 mg/kg 0,52 0,49 0,47 M 3 mg/kg 0,50 0,48 0,45 16 4 mg/kg 0,50 0,47 0,45 5 mg/kg 0,51 0,49 0,46 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 0,42 0,34 0,31 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,44 0,40 0,38 25 mg/kg 0,44 0,43 0,40 F 3 mg/kg 0,43 0,39 0,34 6 mg/kg 0,43 0,40 0,35 9 mg/kg 0,43 0,40 0,35 12 mg/kg 0,43 0,43 0,36 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 0,40 0,32 0,28 Ref 10 mg/kg 0,42 0,38 0,35 25 mg/kg 0,44 0,40 0,40 17 C 5 mg/kg 0,43 0,36 0,33 10 mg/kg 0,42 0,36 0,34 The hardness of the cakes increased with storage time. The addition of variants of Novamyl* delayed this increase in hardness as can be seen in Table 4. 5 Table 4 Change in Hardness [g] of cakes with time measured with the TPA method Dosage Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 586 875 1093 Ref 10 mg/kg 597 768 955 25 mg/kg 603 732 957 A 10 mg/kg 612 801 953 25 mg/kg 602 731 827 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 515 811 1046 Ref 10 438 651 762 18 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 530 687 869 H 2 mg/kg 521 809 892 4 mg/kg 573 773 908 6 mg/kg 523 702 797 N 2 mg/kg 516 751 898 4 mg/kg 484 668 872 6 mg/kg 565 753 821 D 2 mg/kg 556 794 1015 4 mg/kg 524 715 953 6 mg/kg 521 716 876 Day Day Day 1 7 15 No enzyme 484 738 956 Ref 10 mg/kg 518 753 976 25 mg/kg 559 714 868 J 2 mg/kg 576 823 1058 4 mg/kg 549 761 908 6 mg/kg 601 798 1092 19 K 2 mg/kg 584 889 1081 4 mg/kg 551 811 993 6 mg/kg 564 782 935 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 760 1064 1397 Ref 10 mg/kg 748 943 1175 25 mg/kg 747 937 1101 2 mg/kg 821 1085 1394 4 mg/kg 829 1089 1315 6 mg/kg 756 947 1071 L 2 mg/kg 795 1033 1363 4 mg/kg 808 1062 1164 6 mg/kg 770 1020 1160 Day Day Day 1 6 14 No enzyme 602 984 1172 Ref 10 mg/kg 636 897 1035 20 25 mg/kg 627 851 1018 E 5 mg/kg 660 987 1176 10 mg/kg 644 894 1023 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 480 966 1284 Ref 10 mg/kg 593 961 1106 25 mg/kg 535 843 1079 G 4 mg/kg 692 985 1336 6 mg/kg 637 1095 1287 8 mg/kg 616 1074 1214 Day Day Day 3 7 14 No enzyme 595 827 981 Ref 10 mg/kg 641 829 1020 25 mg/kg 589 657 809 21 D 3 mg/kg 599 766 987 4 mg/kg 678 801 1009 5 mg/kg 652 847 1018 B 3 mg/kg 627 767 973 4 mg/kg 639 780 923 5 mg/kg 578 768 960 M 3 mg/kg 679 772 1014 4 mg/kg 601 814 1005 5 mg/kg 646 789 957 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 616 1038 1255 Ref 10 mg/kg 682 912 1155 25 mg/kg 640 844 1077 F 3 mg/kg 683 843 1131 6 mg/kg 626 831 1131 9 mg/kg 644 785 947 12 mg/kg 571 903 992 22 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 469 724 952 Ret 10 mg/kg 474 672 956 25 mg/kg 515 661 873 C 5 mg/kg 546 800 1050 10 mg/kg 546 753 993 The free water mobility is correlated with the moist perception of the cake crumb, it decreases with time. The addition of the Novamyl" variants increased the mobility compared to the control, indicating that the amylases were able to keep the cakes more moist. Results are 5 listed in Table 5. Table 5 Change in Free water mobility [ps] of cakes with time measured with low field NMR Dosage Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 7703 5339 4138 Ref 10 mg/kg 7755 5670 4434 25 mg/kg 7502 5751 4366 A 10 7809 6124 4839 23 mg/kg 25 mg/kg 7753 6175 4811 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 6464 5577 4618 Ref 10 mg/kg 7009 5507 4831 25 mg/kg 7109 5897 5004 H 2 mg/kg 6819 5521 4743 4 mg/kg 7171 5906 5157 6 mg/kg 7340 6196 5131 N 2 mg/kg 7034 5697 4955 4 mg/kg 6897 6024 5067 6 mg/kg 7196 6184 5368 D 2 mg/kg 6936 5753 4910 4 mg/kg 7169 5787 5031 6 mg/kg 6876 5983 5228 Day Day Day 1 7 15 24 No enzyme 7358 5537 4385 Ref 10 mg/kg 7606 5735 4830 25 mg/kg 7456 5648 4977 J 2 mg/kg 7502 5638 4818 4 mg/kg 7575 5663 5081 6 mg/kg 7853 6093 5193 K 2 mg/kg 7714 5649 4845 4 mg/kg 7999 5766 5022 6 mg/kg 8029 6291 5312 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 7004 4887 4266 Ref 10 mg/kg 7354 5331 4567 25 mg/kg 7489 5486 4856 I 2 mg/kg 7569 5374 4766 4 mg/kg 7596 5241 4925 6 mg/kg 7710 5673 5110 L 2 mg/kg 7495 5101 4647 25 4 mg/kg 7433 5228 4821 6 mg/kg 7577 5342 4988 Day Day Day 1 6 14 No enzyme 7137 5308 4130 Ref 10 mg/kg 7523 6554 4751 25 mg/kg 7449 5808 4778 E 5 mg/kg 7387 6227 4725 10 mg/kg 7288 5670 4786 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 6954 5037 4152 Ref 10 mg/kg 7307 5384 4278 25 mg/kg 7461 5323 4440 G 4 mg/kg 7240 5254 4435 6 mg/kg 7077 5371 4659 26 8 mg/kg 7207 5634 4893 Day Day Day 3 7 14 No enzyme 6322 5101 4458 Ref 10 mg/kg 6037 5452 4769 25 mg/kg 6882 5515 5304 D 3 mg/kg 6604 5446 4952 4 mg/kg 6373 5466 4550 5 mg/kg 6460 5507 4891 S3 mg/kg 7126 5896 5334 4 mg/kg 7134 5774 5341 5 mg/kg 7117 6014 5203 M 3 mg/kg 7054 5917 5189 4 mg/kg 6449 5362 4833 5 mg/kg 7057 5501 5173 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 7285 4791 3766 27 Ref 10 mg/kg 7410 5437 4542 25 mg/kg 7367 4959 4511 F 3 mg/kg 7114 5462 4593 6 mg/kg 7457 5698 4648 9 mg/kg 7298 5309 4293 12 mg/kg 7528 5938 4599 Day Day Day 1 7 14 No enzyme 6722 4344 3477 Ref 10 mg/kg 6816 4761 3769 25 mg/kg 7008 5109 3923 C 5 mg/kg 6606 5623 4265 10 mg/kg 6746 4782 3690 28