AU2011101689B4 - Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation - Google Patents

Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2011101689B4
AU2011101689B4 AU2011101689A AU2011101689A AU2011101689B4 AU 2011101689 B4 AU2011101689 B4 AU 2011101689B4 AU 2011101689 A AU2011101689 A AU 2011101689A AU 2011101689 A AU2011101689 A AU 2011101689A AU 2011101689 B4 AU2011101689 B4 AU 2011101689B4
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
signal
period
relatively
soil
frequency component
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU2011101689A
Other versions
AU2011101689A4 (en
Inventor
Bruce Halcro Candy
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Minelab Electronics Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Minelab Electronics Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2007304831A external-priority patent/AU2007304831A1/en
Application filed by Minelab Electronics Pty Ltd filed Critical Minelab Electronics Pty Ltd
Priority to AU2011101689A priority Critical patent/AU2011101689B4/en
Publication of AU2011101689A4 publication Critical patent/AU2011101689A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2011101689B4 publication Critical patent/AU2011101689B4/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

A method for detecting a target in a soil including the steps of generating a transmit signal, the transmit signal includes at least one pulse; generating a transmitted magnetic field, based on the 5 transmit signal, for transmission into the soil; receiving a received magnetic field; producing a receive signal induced by the received magnetic field; synchronous demodulating the receive signals during a plurality of different periods, each producing one of a plurality of processed signals; and linearly combining the plurality of processed signals to produce an indicator output signal, the indicator output signal including a signal indicative of a presence of the target in the soil; wherein 10 coefficients for the step of linearly combining are selected such that the indicator output signal is approximately independent of log-linear frequency-dependent resistive signal components and log uniform resistive signal components from the soil.

Description

Regulation 3.2 AUSTRALIA PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR AN INNOVATION PATENT ORIGINAL Name of Applicant: Minelab Electronics Pty Limited Actual Inventor: Bruce Halcro Candy Address for Service: C/- MADDERNS, GPO Box 2752, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Invention title: METAL DETECTOR WITH IMPROVED MAGNETIC SOIL RESPONSE CANCELLATION The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us.
2 TECHNICAL FIELD This disclosure relates to metal detectors which are relatively insensitive to the interrogation of magnetic soils whose magnetic permeable resistive component is mostly frequency independent, but also includes at least a higher order effect of relatively small frequency dependence, in particular, 5 small variations in a ratio of received relatively high frequency resistive components compared to lower frequency resistive components. BACKGROUND ART In this specification unless the contrary is expressly stated, where a document, act or item of 10 knowledge is referred to or discussed, this reference or discussion is not to be construed as an admission that the document, act or item of knowledge or any combination thereof was at the priority date, publicly available, known to the public, part of common general knowledge; or known to be relevant to an attempt to solve any problem with which this specification is concerned. The general forms of most metal detectors that interrogate soils are one of handheld battery-operated 15 units, conveyor-mounted units, or vehicle-mounted units. Examples of hand-held products include detectors used to locate gold, explosive land mines or ordnance, coins and treasure. Examples of conveyor-mounted units include fine gold detectors in ore mining operations, and an example of a vehicle-mounted unit includes a unit to search for land mines. 20 These metal detectors usually consists of a at least one or more inductors which may transmit and receive an alternating magnetic field, such inductors often referred to as "coils," transmit electronics which may generate a transmit signal applied to at least one inductor to produce a transmitted magnetic field, at least one inductor, a first inductor, receives a magnetic field to produce a receive emf signal, the said first inductor is connected to receive electronics which may amplify and filter 25 the receive emf signal to produce a receive signal, the receive electronics contains signal processing which may process the receive signal to produce and output indicator signal. Magnetic soils produce relatively large interfering signals compared to typical targets sought, for example gold or landmines buried relatively deeply. To detect such targets in magnetic soils, it is 30 necessary for the transmitted magnetic field to contain multi-frequencies and the receive signal to be processed in such a way that linear combinations of the multi-frequencies cancel out the signals from the magnetic soils whilst not canceling target signals. Most metal detectors transmit a repeating sequence. Examples of multi-frequency metal detectors 35 with the ability to substantially reduce magnetic soil signals are disclosed in: 1) US5,576,624, US6,636,044, US6,653,838; a pulse induction transmit waveform "time domain" detector. Receive signal relatively high frequency resistive components are most strongly manifest following immediately after the very short high back emf. This period following the back emf is a 3 receive period, a first period, during which the transmitted magnetic field is zero. Mostly only relatively low frequency resistive components are manifest in the receive signal near the end of the first period before the transmitted magnetic field turns "on" again, and mostly relatively medium frequency resistive components (and low-frequency resistive components) are manifest during 5 periods between the above periods within the first period. 2) US4,942,360 describes a multi-frequency system for which the transmit signal may be any form, but as an example, sine-waves are suggested. 3) US5,537,041, WO 2005/047932 describes a multi-period rectangular-wave transmitting metal detector. 10 4) Australian application 2006903737 describes a pulse-induction-like transmission but with a finite constant transmitted magnetic field during the receiving period. In terms of receive frequency resistive components, this is similar in response to the pulse induction system described above. Whilst all of the above describe means to cancel soils with resistive components independent of 15 frequency, they do not describe means to cancel higher order effects for soils with very small but significant variations in resistive components not being quite independent of frequency, including the resistive frequency spectrum being slightly dependent on the magnitude of the transmitted magnetic field. This said soil resistive component frequency dependence limits the detection depth in some high magnetic permeable soils in the art described above. 20 The inventor has contrived a means to address this problem and thus increase detection depth in such soils. Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following 25 description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of the present invention is disclosed. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for detecting a target 30 in a soil including the steps of: generating a transmit signal, the transmit signal includes at least one pulse; generating a transmitted magnetic field, based on the transmit signal, for transmission into the soil; receiving a received magnetic field; producing a receive signal induced by the received magnetic field; synchronous demodulating the receive signals during a plurality of different periods, each producing one of a plurality of processed signals; and linearly combining the plurality of 35 processed signals to produce an indicator output signal, the indicator output signal including a signal indicative of a presence of the target in the soil; wherein coefficients for the step of linearly combining are selected such that the indicator output signal is approximately independent of log linear frequency-dependent resistive signal components and log-uniform resistive signal components 4 from the soil. In one form, the plurality of different periods include at least a period of relatively short duration, a period of relatively medium duration and a period of relatively long duration. 5 In one form, the receive signal includes at least three different frequency components due to the at least one pulse, a relatively high frequency component, a relatively medium frequency component and a relatively low frequency component; and that the plurality of different periods include at least a first period for sampling the relatively high frequency component, the relatively medium frequency 10 component and the relatively high frequency component, a second period for sampling the relatively medium frequency component and the relatively low frequency component, and a third period for sampling the relatively low frequency component. In one form, an average of the indicator output signal is zero when the soil is a magnetised magnetic 15 soil and when the target is absent. According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided metal detector configurable to perform the first aspect, and/or its various forms. 20 In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawing. The invention is capable of embodiments in addition to those described and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology 25 employed herein, as well as the abstract, are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate certain embodiments of the invention, and together with the description, serve to explain 30 the principles of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilised as a basis for designing other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, to recognize that the claims 35 should be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS For a better understanding of this disclosure it will now be described with respect to an exemplary embodiment which shall be described herein with the assistance of drawings wherein: Figure I shows an example of an exemplary electronic system capable of producing an appropriate 5 transmit waveform and signal processing; Figure 2 shows an exaggerated frequency dependent resistive component of the complex magnetic permeability of magnetic soil or rock; Figure 3 shows an example of a multi-period multi-voltage pulse induction transmitting system as described in US 6,653,838 with suitable synchronous demodulator timings suitable for this 10 invention; and Figure 4 shows an example of a transmit waveform described in Australian application 2006903737 (a bi-polar finite current constant zero reactive transmit voltage), with suitable synchronous demodulator timings suitable for this invention. 15 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION A transmitted magnetic field must contain at least three different frequency components, a relatively high frequency component, a relatively low frequency component and a relatively medium frequency component, including a transmitted magnetic field spectrum which may be continuous or discrete, the receive electronics contains signal processing which may process the receive signal to 20 produce and output indicator signal, such that at least part of the signal processing includes at least one linear combination of, in effect, adding receive signal components containing at feast relatively high frequency resistive components to receive signal components containing at least relatively low frequency resistive components and the resultant sum is subtracted from receive signal components containing at least relatively medium frequency resistive components to give a linear combination 25 output, coefficients of the linear combination being selected so that the linear combination output is approximately independent of signals from magnetic soils including higher order effects of different soils under the influence of the transmitted magnetic field which may include small variations in a ratio of received relatively high frequency resistive components compared to lower frequency resistive components the said linear combination output may be further processed to produce at a 30 signal resulting in the said output indicator signal. Owing to the smaller electronic linearity difficulties of receiving whilst the transmit signal is not varying, the best results at the time of writing are obtained when the transmitted magnetic field is controlled by the transmit electronics during at least a first period to transmit an approximately 35 constant magnetic field which may be zero or finite in magnitude. The receive electronics contains signal processing which may process the receive signal to produce and output indicator signal, wherein receive electronics signal processing includes synchronous 6 demodulators, post synchronous demodulation filters and further processing to produce an indicator output signal. The said synchronous demodulators and post synchronous demodulation filters may be in analogue or in dsp form including analogue to digital converters or samplings averaged over sampling periods. The said synchronous demodulators are controlled by the said signal processing to 5 demodulate and pass a product of a synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal to the said post synchronous demodulation filters during the first period. The integral or low-pass filtered, or average of the product of the synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal approximately results in zero for a component of the receive signal resulting from the presence of magnetic soils only within the 10 influence of the said transmitted magnetic field and first inductor. The said receive signal resulting from the said magnetic soils only may include small variations in the ratio of the receive voltage signal during early periods within the first period compared to later periods within the first period, such that at least part of the 5 synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal includes at least one linear combination of in effect adding receive signal components 15 containing at least relatively high frequency resistive components to receive signal components containing at least relatively low frequency resistive components and the resultant sum is subtracted from receive signal components containing at least relatively medium frequency resistive components to give a linear combination output. Coefficients of the linear combination are selected so that the linear combination output is approximately independent of signals from the said magnetic 20 soils, including the said small variations in the ratio of the receive voltage signal during early periods within the first period compared to later periods within the first period. The said integrated or average of the product of the said linear combination is selected to approximately equal zero from relatively slow varying magnetic fields such as those received when the coil is moved within the influence of static fields both from terrestrial and from magnetised 25 magnetic soils to avoid signal contamination from these sources. The said linear combination output may be further processed, such as further filtering for example, to produce a signal resulting in the said output indicator signal at an indicator output. An example of the above could be the said transmit signal being a repetitive sequence of pulse 30 induction waveforms, or pulse induction-like waveforms as described in Australian Application No 2006903737. The magnetically permeable resistive component (R) of magnetic soils, or so called mineralised soils, increases with frequency and peaks, approximately, at a frequency corresponding to when an 35 attenuation of the magnetically permeable real or reactive component X starts to decrease at a substantial rate (>=6dB/octave). Near-pure magnetite rocks or pebbles have high X/R ratios where the decrease in X per frequency decade at typical metal detector frequencies is low, that is around 1% or lower. Typically near-pure magnetite rocks or pebbles have low ratios of the frequency 7 dependent R component to the non-frequency dependent R component. Most goldfield soils and rocks contain a mixture of magnetic materials with lower X/R ratios than near pure-magnetite, and for these the decrease in X per frequency decade at typical metal detector frequencies is higher at typically several percent. Note that the ratio of R to a difference in X at two different frequencies, onh 5 and oi, is R/(Xh-XI) = pi/(21n(oh/coj)); see US4,942,360. This assumes that R is very much less frequency dependent than X, at least at typical metal detector frequencies. Most of the more nugget rich gold fields have a relatively random mixture of magnetite and other magnetic materials, where this mixture varies significantly within gold fields; so thus too does X/R. The ratio of the frequency dependent R component to the non-frequency dependent R component is correlated with R/X 10 positively in gold field soils, but this correlation is poor mainly because of the random mixture of magnetite and other magnetic materials. The frequency dependent component of R is approximately proportional to log(F) where F is frequency, so the resistive component R of complex permeability is (k] + k2log(F))i where i is the usual square root of -I and F is frequency, and kI and k2 are material constants, k2<kl as the frequency dependent resistive component is relatively very small. This 15 applies to typical metal detector frequencies, for example, at least over a range of frequencies from I kHz to 100kHz. Referring now to Figure 1, where an exemplary embodiment is illustrated. Specifically, Figure 1 illustrates an inductor, a first inductor 1, acts as a transmit inductor to and a receive inductor to 20 transmit and receive an alternating magnetic field. Transmit electronics 2 which may generate a transmit signal applied to the first inductor 1 to produce a transmitted magnetic field. The first inductor 1, receives a received magnetic field to produce a receive emf signal, the said first inductor is connected to receive electronics 3 which may include a transmit/receive switch (TiR) and may amplify and filter the receive emf signal in an amplifier (plus T/R switch) 4 to produce a receive 25 signal at the output 12 of amplifier 4. The output 12 of amplifier 4 is fed to inputs of synchronous demodulators 6 which may be in conventional analogue switch or mixer form, or DSP form including A-Ds, or sampling electronics. The transmit electronics 2 and synchronous demodulators 6 are controlled by timing and control electronics 5. An output 13 of the synchronous demodulators 6 is fed to inputs of filters, or integrators or averagers 7. An output 14 of filters, or integrators or 30 averagers 7 is fed to an input of further processing electronics 8, such as further filtering for example, to produce the indicator output signal at the output 15 of the further processing electronics 8. This may be in software or hardware. The output 15 is fed to an indicator output 9. Figure 2 shows a graph of a frequency-dependent resistive component of the complex oermeability of mineralised soils or rocks, exaggerated for the sake of clarity. Axis 20 is the resistive component 35 R, and axis 21 that of log(F) where F is frequency. Frequencies between 26 and 27 mark the effective operational frequency range of typical metal detectors, say 1kHz to 100kHz. Within this range, the resistive component of the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks is 8 approximately equal to R=kl+k2log(F), where kI and k2 are dependent upon the material. At low frequencies, the resistive component of the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks is constant 22. The resistive component peaks at 25, then decreases at higher frequencies 24, typically at >6dB per octave over some frequency range. 5 In figure 3, there is illustrated a repeating transmit signal consisting of 33, a transmit inductor current charging period with a third voltage applied to the transmit coil of relatively short duration, 31, a very short duration high back emf of a first voltage applied to the transmit coil, 30, zero transmitted magnetic field with a second voltage of zero reactive voltage applied to the transmit coil, 10 a "first period", 34, a transmit inductor current charging period with a fourth voltage applied to the transmit coil of relatively long duration, where the third voltage is at least double in magnitude the value of the fourth voltage, then another period 30 of zero transmitted magnetic field, another "first period", and then the sequence is repeated. 15 After the first voltage period 31, at time 42, a "first period" commences with zero transmit field. After a delay suitable for most soil conductive eddy currents and electronic transients to become insignificant, a short period 35 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample all three frequency components, in particular the relatively high frequency resistive components. Thereafter a medium period 37 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low and in particular the relatively 20 medium frequency resistive components. Thereafter a period 39 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low frequency resistive components. Similarly, after the first voltage period 32, at time 43, another (first) period commences with zero transmit field. After a delay suitable for most soil conductive eddy currents and electronic transients to become insignificant, a short period 36 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample all three frequency resistive components, in particular 25 the relatively high frequency resistive components. Thereafter a medium period 38 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low and in particular the relatively medium frequency resistive components. Thereafter a relatively long period 40 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low frequency resistive components. A static magnetic field or slowly varying magnetic field components balancing period 41 is required to null such fields, which may result from relative 30 movement of the first inductor within the earth's static magnetic field or relative movement of the first inductor compared to statically magnetised soils. This period 41 contains low levels of low frequency resistive components. Contributions from periods 35, 36, 39 and 40 are added and contributions from periods 37, 38 and 41 are subtracted, and hence the synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal includes at least one linear combination of in 35 effect adding receive signal components containing at least relatively high frequency resistive components to receive signal components containing at least relatively low frequency resistive components and the resultant sum is subtracted from receive signal components containing at least relatively medium frequency resistive components to give a linear combination output which is 9 passed to low pass filters. To a first order effect, the output of the contributions from periods 35 added to 36, and subtracted from half the contributions of periods 37, 38 and 41 approximately null signals from the constant frequency independent resistive component of the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks (kl), and similarly so too is the output of the contributions from periods 5 39 added to 40, and subtracted from half the contributions of periods 37, 38 and 41 approximately null signals from the constant frequency independent resistive component of the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks (kl), and in total, the linear combination output is nulled to variations in frequency dependence of R. 10 In figure 4, there is illustrated a reactive voltage transmit signal consisting of 51, zero reactive transmit volts but finite (positive) transmitted magnetic field (a "first period"), 52, a very short high back emf period, 53, another zero reactive transmit volts but finite (negative) transmitted magnetic field (another "first period"), 50, a very short high voltage back emf period. 15 Receive synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal passed to the said post synchronous demodulation filters during the "first periods" is similar to figure 3: A "first period" commences at time 54. After a delay suitable for most soil conductive eddy curcents and electronic transients to become insignificant, a short period 56 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample all three frequency components, in particular the relatively high frequency resistive 20 components. Thereafter a medium period 58 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low and in particular the relatively medium frequency resistive components. Thereafter a relatively long period 60 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low frequency resistive components. Similarly, another "first period" commences at time 55. After a delay suitable for most soil conductive eddy currents and electronic transients to become insignificant, a short period 57 of 25 synchronous demodulation occurs to sample all three frequency components, in particular the relatively high frequency resistive components. Thereafter a medium period 59 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low and in particular the relatively medium frequency resistive components. Thereafter a relatively long period 61 of synchronous demodulation occurs to sample the low frequency resistive components. Given the alternating sign of the transmit field, 30 contributions from periods 56, 57, 60 and 61 are in effect added and contributions from periods 58 and 59 are subtracted, and hence the synchronous demodulation multiplication function multiplied by the receive signal includes at least one linear combination of in effect adding receive signal components containing at least relatively high frequency resistive components to receive signal components containing at least relatively low frequency resistive components and the resultant sum 35 is subtracted from receive signal components containing at least relatively medium frequency resistive components to give a linear combination output which is passed to low pass filters. To a first order effect, again taking the alternating transmit field sign into account, the output of the contributions from periods 56 added to 57, and subtracted from half the contributions of periods 58 10 and 59 approximately null signals from the constant frequency-independent resistive component of the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks (kl) and, similarly, so too is the output of the contributions from periods 60 added to 61, and subtracted from half the contributions of periods 58 and 59 approximately null signals from the constant frequency independent resistive component of 5 the complex permeability of mineralised soils or rocks (kl) and, in total, the linear combination is nulled to variations in the frequency dependence of R. A detailed description of one or more preferred embodiments of the invention is provided above along with accompanying figures that illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention. 10 While the invention is described in connection with such embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any embodiment. On the contrary, the scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications, and equivalents. For the purpose of example, numerous specific details are set forth in the description above in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present 15 invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the present invention is not unnecessarily obscured. Throughout this specification and the claims that follow unless the context requires otherwise, the 20 words 'comprise' and 'include' and variations such as 'comprising' and 'including' will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers. The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an 25 acknowledgment or any form of suggestion that such prior art forms part of the common general knowledge of the technical field.

Claims (5)

1. A method for detecting a target in a soil including the steps of: generating a transmit signal, the transmit signal includes at least one pulse; 5 generating a transmitted magnetic field, based on the transmit signal, for transmission into the soil; receiving a received magnetic field; producing a receive signal induced by the received magnetic field; synchronous demodulating the receive signals during a plurality of different periods, each producing one of a plurality of processed signals; and 10 linearly combining the plurality of processed signals to produce an indicator output signal, the indicator output signal including a signal indicative of a presence of the target in the soil; wherein coefficients for the step of linearly combining are selected such that the indicator output signal is approximately independent of log-linear frequency-dependent resistive signal components and log-uniform resistive signal components from the soil. 15
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of different periods include at least a period of relatively short duration, a period of relatively medium duration and a period of relatively long duration. 20
3. The method of claim I or 2, wherein the receive signal includes at least three different frequency components due to the at least one pulse, a relatively high frequency component, a relatively medium frequency component and a relatively low frequency component; and that the plurality of different periods include at least a first period for sampling the relatively high frequency component, the relatively medium frequency component and the relatively high frequency component, a second 25 period for sampling the relatively medium frequency component and the relatively low frequency component, and a third period for sampling the relatively low frequency component.
4. The method of any one of claims I to 3, wherein an average of the indicator output signal is zero when the soil is a magnetised magnetic soil and when the target is absent. 30
5. A metal detector configurable to perform the method defined in any one of claims I to 4.
AU2011101689A 2006-10-05 2011-12-21 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation Expired AU2011101689B4 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2011101689A AU2011101689B4 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-12-21 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2006905485 2006-10-05
AU2007304831A AU2007304831A1 (en) 2006-10-05 2007-10-05 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation
AU2011101689A AU2011101689B4 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-12-21 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007304831A Division AU2007304831A1 (en) 2006-10-05 2007-10-05 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2011101689A4 AU2011101689A4 (en) 2012-02-02
AU2011101689B4 true AU2011101689B4 (en) 2012-03-01

Family

ID=45812597

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2011101689A Expired AU2011101689B4 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-12-21 Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2011101689B4 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9366779B2 (en) 2013-04-26 2016-06-14 Minelab Electronics Pty Limited Signal processing technique for a metal detector

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6653838B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2003-11-25 Bhc Consulting Pty Ltd. Ground mineralization rejecting metal detector (transmit signal)

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6653838B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2003-11-25 Bhc Consulting Pty Ltd. Ground mineralization rejecting metal detector (transmit signal)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2011101689A4 (en) 2012-02-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2011200515B2 (en) Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation
US8237560B2 (en) Real-time rectangular-wave transmitting metal detector platform with user selectable transmission and reception properties
AU2011200516B2 (en) Metal detector for salt soils
US7791345B2 (en) Rectangular-wave transmitting metal detector
US7474102B2 (en) Rectangular-wave transmitting metal detector
US5654637A (en) Method for detecting buried high conductivity objects including scaling of voltages for eliminating noise of a particular depth
CN111751890A (en) Land mine detection system and method capable of inhibiting background
AU2005301093B2 (en) Metal detector
US10969512B2 (en) Metal detector
AU2011101689B4 (en) Metal detector with improved magnetic soil response cancellation
WO2009062230A1 (en) Metal detector with improved magnetic response application
US6690169B2 (en) Interference cancelling metal detector including electronic selection of effective sensing coil arrangement
AU2019200964B2 (en) A signal processing technique for a metal detector
AU2011101687B4 (en) Metal detector for salt soils
US20220268961A1 (en) Metal detector
AU2011101742A4 (en) A metal detector
AU781988B2 (en) Interference cancelling metal detector
CA2149828C (en) Method of detecting buried high conductivity objects
GB2605254A (en) An improved metal detector

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGI Letters patent sealed or granted (innovation patent)
FF Certified innovation patent
MK22 Patent ceased section 143a(d), or expired - non payment of renewal fee or expiry