AU2009298710B2 - Mercury removal process - Google Patents
Mercury removal process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2009298710B2 AU2009298710B2 AU2009298710A AU2009298710A AU2009298710B2 AU 2009298710 B2 AU2009298710 B2 AU 2009298710B2 AU 2009298710 A AU2009298710 A AU 2009298710A AU 2009298710 A AU2009298710 A AU 2009298710A AU 2009298710 B2 AU2009298710 B2 AU 2009298710B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- liquid hydrocarbon
- stream
- hydrocarbon stream
- water
- accordance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D11/00—Solvent extraction
- B01D11/04—Solvent extraction of solutions which are liquid
- B01D11/0492—Applications, solvents used
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G17/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge
- C10G17/02—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge with acids or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge
- C10G17/04—Liquid-liquid treatment forming two immiscible phases
- C10G17/07—Liquid-liquid treatment forming two immiscible phases using halogen acids or oxyacids of halogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G27/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, by oxidation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/10—Feedstock materials
- C10G2300/1033—Oil well production fluids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/201—Impurities
- C10G2300/205—Metal content
Abstract
A process is disclosed for decreasing the level of elemental mercury contained in a liquid hydrocarbon stream by a) contacting the liquid hydrocarbon stream with a water stream containing an oxidizing agent for conversion of at least a portion of the Hg(0) to Hg(II); b) extracting at least a portion of the Hg(II) from the liquid hydrocarbon stream into the water stream, thereby forming a treated liquid hydrocarbon stream and a waste water stream containing water and Hg(II); and c) separating the treated liquid hydrocarbon stream from the waste water stream.
Description
MERCURY REMOVAL PROCESS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a process for the removal of mercury from crude oil. In 5 another aspect, this invention relates to a process for the removal of mercury from crude oil using water and an oxidizing agent. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Since the presence of mercury in crude oil can cause problems with downstream processing units, as well as health and environmental concerns, there is an incentive to remove 10 mercury from crude oil. Therefore, development of an improved process for effectively removing mercury from crude oil before downstream processing into products would be a significant contribution to the art. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 15 In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a process is provided including the following: a) contacting a liquid hydrocarbon stream comprising liquid hydrocarbons and Hg(0) with a water stream consisting essentially of water and an oxidizing agent for conversion of at least a portion of the Hg(0) to Hg(II); 20 b) extracting at least a portion of the Hg(II) from the liquid hydrocarbon stream into the water stream, thereby forming a treated liquid hydrocarbon stream containing less total Hg than the liquid hydrocarbon stream and a waste water stream comprising water and Hg(II); and c) separating the treated liquid hydrocarbon stream from the waste water stream. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a process is provided 25 comprising: a) contacting a liquid hydrocarbon stream comprising liquid hydrocarbons and Hg(0) with a water stream consisting of water and sodium hypochlorite for conversion of at least a portion of said Hg(0) to Hg(II); b) extracting at least a portion of said Hg(II) from said liquid hydrocarbon stream into 30 said water stream, thereby forming a treated liquid hydrocarbon stream containing less Hg than said liquid hydrocarbon stream and a waste water stream comprising water and Hg(II); and 1 c) separating said treated liquid hydrocarbon stream from said waste water stream; wherein said sodium hypochlorite is present in said water stream in an amount such that the molar ratio of said sodium hypochlorite to said Hg(O) present in said liquid hydrocarbon 5 stream is at least about 143:1. la WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES FIGURE 1 is a bar graph showing the mass balance of Hg between the hydrocarbon and aqueous phases for variously treated samples of a crude oil. FIGURE 2 is a bar graph showing the mass balance of Hg between the hydrocarbon and 5 aqueous phases for variously treated samples of a crude oil. FIGURE 3 is a bar graph showing the mass balance of Hg between the hydrocarbon and aqueous phases for variously treated samples of a crude oil. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 10 The liquid hydrocarbon stream of this invention can be any liquid hydrocarbon stream which comprises liquid hydrocarbons and mercury in the 0 valence state (Hg (0)). Most typically, the liquid hydrocarbon stream will be a crude oil stream or a condensate stream from a natural gas well. Most typically the liquid hydrocarbon stream comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of a crude oil containing Hg(O). 15 The liquid hydrocarbon stream typically comprises at least about 10 ppb (parts per billion) Hg(O), and more particularly comprises at least about 200 ppb Hg (0). The liquid hydrocarbon stream is contacted with a water stream consisting essentially of water and an oxidizing agent for conversion of at least a portion of the Hg(O) to mercury in a +2 valence state (Hg(II)). The oxidizing agent can be any chemical or chemical compound capable 20 of oxidizing Hg(O) to Hg(II). The oxidizing agent can be sodium hypochlorite. The water stream preferably does not contain any component(s) in sufficient quantities such that such 2 WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 component(s) materially affect the ability of the oxidizing agent to oxidize the Hg(O) to Hg(II) or materially affect the ability of the water to extract the Hg(II) from the liquid hydrocarbon stream. The oxidizing agent is present in the water stream preferably in an amount such that the molar ratio of the oxidizing agent to the Hg(O) present in liquid hydrocarbon stream is at least about 5 1:1, more preferably at least about 7:1, and most preferably at least about 143:1. The contacting of the liquid hydrocarbon stream with the water stream is preferably at a temperature at least above the freezing points of the liquid hydrocarbon stream and the water stream, more preferably at a temperature at least above the freezing points of the liquid hydrocarbon stream and the water stream and below about 1 00 0 C, and most preferably at a 10 temperature at least above about 20 0 C and below about 70 0 C. At least a portion of the Hg(II) is then extracted from the liquid hydrocarbon stream into the water stream, thereby forming a treated liquid hydrocarbon stream containing less Hg than the liquid hydrocarbon stream and a waste water stream comprising water and Hg(II). The treated liquid hydrocarbon stream is then separated from the waste water stream by any suitable 15 means. The treated liquid hydrocarbon stream preferably contains less than about 50 wt. %, more preferably less than about 20 wt. %, and most preferably less than about 1 wt. %, of the Hg contained in the liquid hydrocarbon stream. The following examples are provided to further illustrate this invention and are not to 20 be considered as unduly limiting the scope of this invention. 3 WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 EXAMPLES Example 1 To approximately 80 mL of decane, approximately 1 gram of Hg(O) was added. 5 The mixture stirred for several days and the mercury spiked decane was decanted. Approximately 10 g of the spiked decane mixture was added to each of five 30 mL Nalgene@ bottles. To the first bottle, nothing was added; to the second bottle, approximately 10 g of deionized water was added; to the third bottle, approximately 10 g of 5.6-6.0% bleach solution was added; to the fourth bottle, approximately 10 g of 5.6-6.0% bleach solution and 0.5 g of 4% hydrochloric acid 10 solution was added; and to the fifth bottle, approximately 10 g of 4.6% sodium chloride solution was added. All 5 bottles were shaken on a mechanical shaker for 30 minutes. A sample of the aqueous layer was removed via transfer pipette from bottles 2-5 for mercury analysis using the OhioLumex Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (CVAA) coupled with the RP-91 15 attachment which utilizes chemical reduction of mercury via chemical reaction with stannous chloride. The organic layer (decane) was analyzed with the OhioLumex CVAA Spectrometer coupled with pyrolysis. 4 WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 TABLE 1 Partitioning of total mercury between decane and aqueous phases Percent Hg Percent Hg Aqueous Additive in Decane in Aqueous None 100% N/A DI Water 92% 8% Bleach 0% 100% Bleach + HCl 2% 98% Sodium Chloride Soln. 90% 10% 5 Table 1 shows that compared to the first bottle with no aqueous wash, there was substantially more mercury removed from the hydrocarbon phase upon the addition of an oxidizing agent (bleach) to the aqueous wash. Example 2 10 Reagent grade decane, in the amounts shown in Table 2, was spiked with approximately 1.1 ppm of Hg(O) to which was added various quantities of 6 wt. % sodium hypochlorite solution and deionized water in the amounts shown in Table 2. The experiments were performed using the procedure outlined above in Example 1. 5 WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 TABLE 2 Assessing the minimum bleach needed to affect mercury removal DI % Total Hg Decane Bleach* Water Avg Hg(0) Wt. % Mole Removal Wt. Wt. Wt. In Decane NaOCl in Ratio (Compared (grams) (grams) (grams) (ppb) Mixture Hg: NaOCl to Control 10.15 0.00 0.00 1117 0 1:0 0% 10.50 10.00 0.00 5 2.93 1:143 99.6% 10.04 5.01 5.18 6 1.49 1:72 99.50 10.15 1.03 9.02 33 0.31 1:15 97.0o 10.08 0.50 9.53 38 0.15 1:7 96.6% 10.08 0.11 10.13 231 0.03 1:2 79.30 * ~6 wt. % stock NaOCl Soln. 5 As can be seen from Table 2, the optimal mole ratio of mercury to NaOCl in the decane/Bleach solution mix is at least about 1:7. Example 3 Samples of three different crude oils (designated as A, B and C) were heated beyond the 10 wax point to obtain representative samples. For each crude oil, four samples of approximately 30 g each were prepared. To three of the four samples, the following bottles were prepared: 1) crude oil only, 2) crude oil and 3 g deionized water, and 3) crude oil and 3 g of 5.6% to 6.0% sodium hypochlorite solution. 15 The fourth sample was capped and retained while the first three samples were shaken for 2 minutes. The three shaken samples were centrifuged at 70 degrees C and 3500 RPM for 20 minutes to effect the separation. All hydrocarbon samples were analyzed for mercury using the 6 WO 2010/039716 PCT/US2009/058799 OhioLumex CVAA coupled with pyrolysis. All aqueous samples were analyzed for mercury using the OhioLumex CVAA Spectrometer coupled with the RP-91 chemical reduction attachment. Figures 1 - 3 are plots of the mass balance of mercury for samples 1-4 for crude oils A, B 5 and C. The black bars in the graph represent the total mercury in ng of the analyzed hydrocarbon phase (or crude oil sample) and the grey bars (to the right of the black bars, if visible) represent the total mercury in ng of the analyzed aqueous phase. Errors due to loss of mass to a rag layer or dilution during centrifuge balancing were small and did not influence the conclusions drawn from the data. 10 It is clear that substantially more mercury was removed by the centrifuge separation for the bleach washed crude samples (the number 3 samples) as compared to the other samples, and the transfer of the mercury to the aqueous phase is evidenced by the increase in mercury concentration in the aqueous layer, as is depicted in the Figures. Example 4 15 A sample of a crude oil was heated beyond the wax point to obtain a representative sample. To four glass bottles, the following was added: 1) 40 g crude oil only, 2) 40 g crude oil and 4 g deionized water, 3) 40 g crude oil and 4 g 5.6-6.0% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) solution, and 4) 40 g crude oil and 4 g 50% ethylene glycol in water solution. The four samples were shaken for 2 minutes. The four shaken samples were centrifuged at 90 degrees C and 3500 20 RPM for 20 minutes to effect the separation. All hydrocarbon samples and the sample of ethylene glycol/water were analyzed for mercury using the OhioLumex CVAA coupled with 7 pyrolysis. All aqueous samples were analyzed for mercury using the OhioLumex CVAA Spectrometer coupled with the RP-91 chemical reduction attachment. Results are shown in Table 3 below, and show that the addition of bleach had a significant effect on Hg removal from the crude as compared to the use of ethylene glycol or DI water to wash the crude. 5 TABLE 3 Avg. Hg in Avg. Hg in Crude Aqueous % Hg in % Hg in (ng) (ng) Crude Aqueous Control 22663 0 100% 0% Ethylene Glycol 21384 64 100% 0% DI Water 22490 20 100% 0% Bleach 5868 13683 30% 70% While this invention has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration, it should not be construed as limited thereby but intended to cover all changes and modifications 10 within the spirit and scope thereof. A reference herein to a patent document or other matter which is given as prior art is not to be taken as an admission that that document or matter was known or that the information it contains was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of any of the claims. 15 Throughout the description and claims of the specification, the word "comprise" and variations of the word, such as "comprising" and "comprises", is not intended to exclude other additives, components, integers or steps. 8
Claims (10)
1. A process comprising: a) contacting a liquid hydrocarbon stream comprising liquid hydrocarbons and Hg(O) with a water stream consisting of water and sodium hypochlorite for conversion of at least a portion of said Hg(O) to Hg(II); b) extracting at least a portion of said Hg(II) from said liquid hydrocarbon stream into said water stream, thereby forming a treated liquid hydrocarbon stream containing less Hg than said liquid hydrocarbon stream and a waste water stream comprising water and Hg(II); and c) separating said treated liquid hydrocarbon stream from said waste water stream; wherein said sodium hypochlorite is present in said water stream in an amount such that the molar ratio of said sodium hypochlorite to said Hg(O) present in said liquid hydrocarbon stream is at least about 143:1.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said liquid hydrocarbon stream comprises crude oil and Hg (0).
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said contacting of said liquid hydrocarbon stream with said water stream is at a temperature at least above the freezing points of said liquid hydrocarbon stream and said water stream.
4. A process in accordance with claim 3 wherein said contacting of said liquid hydrocarbon stream with said water stream is at a temperature at least above the freezing points of said liquid hydrocarbon stream and said water stream and below about 100'C.
5. A process in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said contacting of said liquid hydrocarbon stream with said water stream is at a temperature at least above about 20'C and below about 70'C.
6. A process in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said treated liquid hydrocarbon stream contains less than about 50 wt. % of the total Hg contained in said liquid hydrocarbon stream. 9
7. A process in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said treated liquid hydrocarbon stream contains less than about 20 wt. % of the total Hg contained in said liquid hydrocarbon stream.
8. A process in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein said treated liquid hydrocarbon stream contains less than about 1 wt. % of the total Hg contained in said liquid hydrocarbon stream.
9. The process in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 8, substantially as herein described with reference to the Examples and/or accompanying Figures.
10. A treated liquid hydrocarbon stream treated by the process of any one of claims 1 to 9. 10
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/241,126 | 2008-09-30 | ||
US12/241,126 US20100078358A1 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2008-09-30 | Mercury removal process |
PCT/US2009/058799 WO2010039716A1 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2009-09-29 | Mercury removal process |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2009298710A1 AU2009298710A1 (en) | 2010-04-08 |
AU2009298710B2 true AU2009298710B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 |
Family
ID=41259675
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2009298710A Expired - Fee Related AU2009298710B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2009-09-29 | Mercury removal process |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100078358A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2352567A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2009298710B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010039716A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8489231B2 (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2013-07-16 | Raf Technology, Inc. | Loop mail processing |
US8728304B2 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2014-05-20 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
SG188484A1 (en) * | 2010-09-16 | 2013-04-30 | Chevron Usa Inc | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US8702975B2 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2014-04-22 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US8673133B2 (en) * | 2010-09-16 | 2014-03-18 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US8663460B2 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2014-03-04 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US9296956B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2016-03-29 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Method for reducing mercaptans in hydrocarbons |
US8721874B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-05-13 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US8728303B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-05-20 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
AU2011328930A1 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2013-05-30 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US8721873B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-05-13 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
EP2659265A4 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2016-10-05 | Chevron Usa Inc | Processes and systems for characterizing and blending refinery feedstocks |
US9103813B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2015-08-11 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Processes and systems for characterizing and blending refinery feedstocks |
US9464242B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2016-10-11 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Processes and systems for characterizing and blending refinery feedstocks |
US9140679B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2015-09-22 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process for characterizing corrosivity of refinery feedstocks |
AU2013262694A1 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2014-11-06 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
US9447674B2 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2016-09-20 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | In-situ method and system for removing heavy metals from produced fluids |
AR094523A1 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2015-08-12 | Chevron Usa Inc | PROCESS, METHOD AND SYSTEM TO SEPARATE FLUID MERCURY |
AR094994A1 (en) * | 2012-05-16 | 2015-09-16 | Chevron Usa Inc | PIPE REACTION TO SEPARATE HEAVY METALS FROM PRODUCED FLUIDS |
CN104736678A (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2015-06-24 | 雪佛龙美国公司 | Process, method, and system for removing mercury from fluids |
US9169445B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-10-27 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from oily solids |
US9234141B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-01-12 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from oily solids |
US9023196B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-05-05 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4601816A (en) * | 1984-08-09 | 1986-07-22 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Upgrading heavy hydrocarbon oils using sodium hypochlorite |
EP0352420A1 (en) * | 1988-07-25 | 1990-01-31 | JGC Corporation | A process for removal of mercury from a liquid hydrocarbon |
US4915818A (en) * | 1988-02-25 | 1990-04-10 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Use of dilute aqueous solutions of alkali polysulfides to remove trace amounts of mercury from liquid hydrocarbons |
US5510565A (en) * | 1993-12-22 | 1996-04-23 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. | Mercury removal from liquid hydrocarbon fraction |
Family Cites Families (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3476552A (en) * | 1966-09-07 | 1969-11-04 | Mountain Copper Co Of Californ | Mercury process |
US3899570A (en) * | 1973-02-09 | 1975-08-12 | Wisconsin Alumni Res Found | Extraction of mercuric chloride from dilute solution and recovery |
SE396772B (en) * | 1975-09-16 | 1977-10-03 | Boliden Ab | PROCEDURE FOR EXTRACTION AND EXTRACTION OF MERCURES FROM GASES |
ES447417A1 (en) * | 1976-04-28 | 1977-07-01 | Diaz Nogueira Eduardo | Process for elimination of mercury from industrial waste waters by means of extraction with solvents |
US4101631A (en) * | 1976-11-03 | 1978-07-18 | Union Carbide Corporation | Selective adsorption of mercury from gas streams |
US5017280A (en) * | 1990-05-08 | 1991-05-21 | Laboratorios Paris, C.A. | Process for recovering metals and for removing sulfur from materials containing them by means of an oxidative extraction |
US5223145A (en) * | 1992-10-09 | 1993-06-29 | Uop | Removal of mercury from process streams |
US5226545A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1993-07-13 | General Electric Company | Extraction of mercury and mercury compounds from contaminated material and solutions |
US5900042A (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 1999-05-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method for the removal of elemental mercury from a gas stream |
US6268543B1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2001-07-31 | Idemitsu Petrochemical Co., Ltd. | Method of removing mercury in liquid hydrocarbon |
US6855859B2 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2005-02-15 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Method for controlling elemental mercury emissions |
US6350372B1 (en) * | 1999-05-17 | 2002-02-26 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Mercury removal in petroleum crude using H2S/C |
JP3546160B2 (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2004-07-21 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Mercury removal method |
US6537443B1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2003-03-25 | Union Oil Company Of California | Process for removing mercury from liquid hydrocarbons |
AU777082B2 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2004-09-30 | Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd | Process for removing mercury from liquid hydrocarbon |
JP3872677B2 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2007-01-24 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Mercury removal method and system |
US7914669B2 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2011-03-29 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Reactive extraction of sulfur compounds from hydrocarbon streams |
US8034741B2 (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2011-10-11 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Capture of mercury from a gaseous mixture containing mercury |
US8034246B2 (en) * | 2007-05-16 | 2011-10-11 | Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Company | Wastewater mercury removal process |
-
2008
- 2008-09-30 US US12/241,126 patent/US20100078358A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-09-29 EP EP09793119A patent/EP2352567A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2009-09-29 WO PCT/US2009/058799 patent/WO2010039716A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-09-29 AU AU2009298710A patent/AU2009298710B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4601816A (en) * | 1984-08-09 | 1986-07-22 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Upgrading heavy hydrocarbon oils using sodium hypochlorite |
US4915818A (en) * | 1988-02-25 | 1990-04-10 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Use of dilute aqueous solutions of alkali polysulfides to remove trace amounts of mercury from liquid hydrocarbons |
EP0352420A1 (en) * | 1988-07-25 | 1990-01-31 | JGC Corporation | A process for removal of mercury from a liquid hydrocarbon |
US5510565A (en) * | 1993-12-22 | 1996-04-23 | Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. | Mercury removal from liquid hydrocarbon fraction |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
SIZENEVA et al.,Russian Journal Of Applied Chemistry, Vol 78, No 4, 2005, pages 546-548 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2009298710A1 (en) | 2010-04-08 |
EP2352567A1 (en) | 2011-08-10 |
WO2010039716A1 (en) | 2010-04-08 |
US20100078358A1 (en) | 2010-04-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2009298710B2 (en) | Mercury removal process | |
US8992769B2 (en) | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids | |
US4915818A (en) | Use of dilute aqueous solutions of alkali polysulfides to remove trace amounts of mercury from liquid hydrocarbons | |
US8906228B2 (en) | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids | |
WO2012068277A2 (en) | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids | |
WO2015057300A2 (en) | Removing mercury from crude oil using a stabilization column | |
BR112014002636B1 (en) | METHOD OF REMOVING SPECIES WITH MERCURY FROM A FLUID CONTAINING HYDROCARBON | |
JPH08295654A (en) | Purification of aniline | |
AU758916B2 (en) | Process for neutralization of petroleum acids | |
AU2010216134B2 (en) | Mercury removal from hydrocarbons | |
US20120125820A1 (en) | Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids | |
US2317054A (en) | Method of treating petroleum oils | |
CN103571521B (en) | A kind of method removing chlorine-containing organic compounds in oil product | |
US1771350A (en) | Process of refining hydrocarbon oils | |
EP0509964B1 (en) | Process for the treatment of spent aqueous solutions of caustic soda used for purification and washing of petroleum products | |
RU2734388C1 (en) | Method of determining content of organic chlorine in oil after hydrochloric acid treatments | |
US2253638A (en) | Treating motor fuels | |
US20110073526A1 (en) | Method for Desulfurization of Hydrocarbon Oils | |
NO316075B1 (en) | Process for the treatment of crude oil | |
RU2677462C1 (en) | Method of oil-protection of raw oil by hydrogen peroxide with identification of oxidation products | |
RU2243552C2 (en) | Method of determining compounds in petroleum | |
Obini et al. | EVALUATION OF DESULPHURIZATION POTENTIALS OF BARIUM CHLORIDE, CALCIUM HYDROXIDE, SODIUM HYDROXIDE AND HYDROCHLORIC ACID ON DIESEL, KEROSENE AND GASOLINE | |
CN1053213C (en) | Process for petroleum solvent refining of fine chemical products | |
US2292636A (en) | Method of removing weakly acidic organic compounds from petroleum oils | |
US3481866A (en) | Extraction of lead from petroleum products employing aqueous iodine monochloride |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PC1 | Assignment before grant (sect. 113) |
Owner name: PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY Free format text: FORMER APPLICANT(S): CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY |
|
MK25 | Application lapsed reg. 22.2i(2) - failure to pay acceptance fee |