AU2009251002B2 - Food allergens, method of detecting food allergens and method of detecting food allergy-inducing foods - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides a method for detecting food allergens, antibodies and antigens to prepare the antibodies. The antigens of this invention are a mixture comprising multiple native and/or heated food 5 allergens that IgE antibodies of food-allergy patients recognize. The antibodies of this invention are prepared by immunizing animals with the above-mentioned antigens. The food allergen-detecting method of this invention relates to the above-mentioned antibodies. As the method can detect food allergens and food allergy-inducing foods, it can provide safety to 10 food allergy patients.

Description

P/000oIlI Regulation 3.2 AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Invention Title: Food allergens, method of detecting food allergens and method of detecting food allergy-inducing foods The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: -1A SPECIFICATION Food allergens, method of detecting food allergens and method of detecting food allergy-inducing foods 5 Background of the Invention The present invention relates to a mixture comprising multiple native and/or denatured food allergens recognized by IgE antibodies offood-allergy patients, antibodies prepared by immunizing an animal with the mixture 10 and a method for detecting the food allergens and allergy-inducing foods that involves using said antibodies. The invention provides safety to food allergy patients, since it is useful for understanding mechanisms of food-allergy onset, developing and verifying hypoallergenic foods, and detecting food allergens in foods, their raw materials and such food-manufacturing 15 environments as food-manufacturing machines and processes. Food allergy is a detrimental immunoreaction in susceptible individuals that is caused by ingestion of an allergy-inducing substance in a food (referred to as a food allergen in the following). The food allergy can cause dermatitis, asthma, digestive-tract obstacle, anaphylaxis shock, etc. 20 Allergies are classified into types I to IV, depending on the mechanism of disease onset. Food allergy is primarily type-I allergy, in which IgE antibodies react with food allergens taken inside the body. The number of food-allergy patients has been increasing in recent years. Such a phenomenon causes serious problems in the fields of medical science and in 25 the food industry.

-2 To prevent such a hazard, it is necessary to provide information to the consumers through labeling. An FAO/WHO joint food standard committee (Codex Alimentarius Commision) has recognized the necessity of labeling of foods containing any of eight raw materials known as food allergens, and 5 advised each of the member nations to implement the labeling system (June, 1999). In Japan, the labeling of 24 items was promulgated in consideration of the severity and frequency of food allergies (enforced since April, 2002). It should be noted that these regulations require the labeling of neither allergenic substance nor food allergen itself but that of food containing the 10 allergenic substance and food allergen, namely allergy-inducing foods. Allergy-inducing foods include eggs, milk, meat, fishes, the crustaceans and mollusks, cereals, legumes and nuts, fruits, vegetables, beer yeast, or gelatin. Similarly, ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, lysozyme, casein, beta lactoglobulin, alpha-lactoalbumin, gluten, alpha-amylase inhibitor, etc. are is known as allergy-inducing foods. Furthermore, (1) regardless of present knowledge, it is conceivable that there are other many foods and ingredients (food allergens) that cause food allergy; (2) the allergy-inducing foods and ingredients (food allergens) are diverse and reactions to these allergens differ among food allergy patients; 20 and (3) as the after-mentioned examples show, many known and unknown allergens exist even in a single allergy-inducing food. No conventional method, however, can easily detect so many allergy-inducing foods or food allergens. Foods are prepared by such processes as heating, freezing, drying, 25 salting, fermentation, enzymatic treatment, etc. (referred to as food- -3 manufacturing processes in the following) to improve and stabilize their digestibility, shelf lives, taste, physical properties, etc. Although the food manufacturing processes affect proteins and modify their molecular structures (e.g., denaturation of protein), it has seldom been discussed 5 whether or not such food-manufacturing processes cause the formation of food allergens. The present invention elucidated the following facts: (1) some heated food ingredients express allergenicity; (2) allergy-inducing components or epitopes of an individual allergy-inducing food may be altered, depending on 1o whether the concerned food is heated or not. Namely, a) non-heated egg antigen, b) heated egg antigen prepared by heating the antigen in a), c) serum prepared by mixing the pooled serum from multiple food allergy patients (referred to as pooled patient serum) and a) (non-heated egg antigen-depleted serum), and d) serum prepared by mixing the pooled is patient serum and b) (heated egg antigen-depleted serum) were prepared. From the results of reactions between a) and c) or a) and d) and between b) and c) or b) and d), it was shown that the non-heated egg antigen-depleted serum could not immunologically react with the non-heated egg antigen but could react with the heated egg antigen: similarly, it was shown that the 20 heated egg antigen-depleted serum could not immunologically react with the heated egg antigen but could react with the non-heated egg antigen. In summary, the food allergy patients carry IgE antibodies specific to both processed and non-processed foods, resulting in food allergy. So far, however, no simple method has been available to detect allergens in processed foods or 25 their ingredients.

-4 Methods screening for food allergens in chicken egg, peanut, casein, beta-lactoglobulin and gluten have been commercially available (Food and Development, Vol.35, p10-11). However, all or some of them possess one or more the following drawbacks: (1) The methods cannot always detect 5 allergens that food allergy patients are sensitive to. In other words, they cannot always detect substances that are recognized by IgE antibodies of the patients; (2) The methods can detect known allergens, and a single allergen (single antigen) per method; (3) The methods using single antigen-detecting antibodies are not applicable to foods with inhibitory substances; (4) The 1o methods using single antigen-detecting antibodies cannot exactly quantify the allergy-inducing foods as shown in the after-mentioned examples; (5) The methods using single antigen-detecting antibodies are not applicable to inspection of allergy-inducing foods containing no antigen (e.g., a method using a single antibody prepared by exposure to ovalbumin localized in egg is white is not applicable to inspection of egg yolk, egg yolk mayonnaise, etc. and it is known that food allergy is caused by egg yolk); (6) The methods using single antigen-detecting antibodies are not applicable to inspection of the processed foods, because they cannot detect denatured or molecule modified allergens; and (7) Monoclonal antibodies against native and 20 denatured beta-lactoglobulin, ovoalubmin and alpha-casein have been reported (Allergy, vol. 50, p309). Their usefulness may decrease, if the epitopes are removed or modified by the food-manufacturing processes, because the monoclonal antibodies only detect individual epitopes in a food allergen molecule. 25 Although methods screening for food allergens using sera from patients 5 who are allergic to rice (Japanese Patent Disclosure 2000-65820), egg and milk (Japanese Meat Science, vol. 39, p1660-169) have been reported, they are useful in hospitals but not in inspection organizations nor in food manufacturing factories, because the methods need a lot of sera from the patients. Although a food-allergen 5 detection method depending on anaphylaxis reactions has been reported (FFI J., No. 180, p77-82), it is not useful in most of the food-manufacturing factories because of complicated methodology and laboratory-animal husbandry. Although methods using flow system and enzyme-labeled antibodies and allergen sensors using microelectrodes have been developed (Japanese Food Industry, Vol. 42, p53-56), many 0 problems need to be solved before these methods can be put into practical use. Disclosure of the Invention The present invention relates to an allergen mixture consisting of multiple native and denatured food allergens that are recognized by IgE antibodies of food allergy patients and that cause food allergy by ingestion. 5 The present invention relates to the supply (1) a mixture comprising multiple known and/or unknown as well as native and/or denatured food allergens that can be recognized by IgE antibodies of food-allergy patients (referred to as the first invention of this invention for convenience), (2) antibodies prepared by immunizing an animal with the mixture (referred to as the second invention of this invention), and (3) a 20 method for detecting food allergens and allergy-inducing foods that use said antibodies (referred to as the third invention of this invention). Brief Explanation of the Drawings -6 Figure 1 shows reactions between a standard antigen and patients' IgE antibodies and those between the standard antigen and an antibody against standard-antigen antibody of this invention. Figure 2 shows that patient serum carries IgE antibodies specific to 5 both native and denatured egg proteins. The Best Mode for Applying the Invention The first invention of this invention is accomplished by (1-i) isolating IgE antibodies from pooled serum of the food-allergy patients, io and (1-ii) separating multiple substances recognized by the above-mentioned IgE antibodies (in other words, multiple food allergens that IgE antibodies of the food allergy patients recognize) from foods or their ingredients (collectively referred to as foods in the following) treated with or without food is manufacturing processes by using such immunological methods as affinity chromatography and immunoprecipitation. The first invention of this invention is also accomplished by (2-i) conventionally carrying out SDS-PAGE of the food ingredients and transferring to a membrane, 20 (2-ii) carrying out western blotting using the membrane, pooled patients' serum, a conjugated antibody against human IgE and a chromogenic re agent (in other words, preparing a profile of multiple food allergens that IgE antibodies of the food allergy patients recognize), (2-iii) similarly, carrying out western blotting using the membrane, animal 25 serum prepared by conventionally immunizing the food ingredients, a -7 conjugated anti-animal IgG and the chromogenic reagent, and then (2-iv) comparing both western-blotting profiles, and measuring molecular sizes of bands shown not in the former but in the latter (in other words, 5 multiple substances that IgE of the food-allergy patients cannot recognize), and (2-v) depending on the above-mentioned results, separating multiple food allergens that IgE antibodies of the food-allergy patients can recognize from food ingredients by such a conventional method as gel-filtration 10 chromatography. The second invention of this invention is animal antibodies against food allergens prepared by immunizing an animal with the multiple food allergens (including those processed and/or not processed) that are prepared by the above-mentioned first invention and that can be recognized by IgE is antibodies of the food-allergy patients (referred to as antibodies recognizing the multiple antigens). The third invention of this invention is a method for detecting the food allergens and allergy-inducing foods characterized by using the antibodies recognizing the multiple antigens. 20 Temperature ranges of heat treatment in the above-mentioned food manufacturing processes are equivalent to those of food-manufacturing processes, preferably between 40 and 250 degree Celsius and more preferably between 60 and 120 degree Celsius. The antigens are prepared by mixing a raw antigen and antigens heated at two to six different 25 temperatures. The food-allergen fractions that can be recognized by the -8 food-allergy patients' IgE antibodies are prepared from the mixture with the first invention of this invention and subjected to immunization of animals. If a target of the detection is restricted to a heated food, the food allergen fractions that the food-allergy patients' IgE antibodies recognize are 5 prepared from the heated food with the first invention of this invention and subjected to immunization of animals. Examples of animals to be immunized are rabbits, goats, sheep, rats, mice, guinea pigs, horses, pigs, chicken, etc. During an immunization period, it is desirable to partially collect blood and check titers of the anti-food 10 allergen antibody. The antibodies of this invention may be either monoclonal or polyclonal. As the after-mentioned examples show, multiple known and unknown food allergens that IgE antibodies of the food-allergy patients recognize exist even in a single food-allergy inducing food. The polyvalent antibodies recognizing multiple food allergens, i.e., the antibodies 15 recognizing multiple antigens, can easily be prepared by immunizing the animals with these multiple food allergens. As animal antibodies against the food allergens that the food allergy patients' IgE antibodies recognize, anti-sera of the animals can be used as they are. The anti-sera can be used after absorption treatment with the 20 fractions that cannot be recognized by the food allergy patients' IgE antibodies and after conventional IgG purification. The method for detecting the food allergens and food allergy-inducing foods of this invention is applicable to foods containing the allergens without any restriction. Examples of the allergy-inducing foods are eggs, milk, meat, 25 fishes, crustacea and mollusks, cereals, legumes and nuts, fruits, vegetables, -9 beer yeast, and gelatin. More particularly, egg white and egg yolk of the eggs, milk and cheese of the milk, pork, beef, chicken and mutton of the meat, mackerel, horse mackerel, sardine, tuna, salmon, codfish, flatfish and salmon caviar of the fishes, crab, shrimp, blue mussel, squid, octopus, lobster 5 and abalone of the crustacea and mollusks, wheat, rice, buckwheat, rye, barley, oat, corn, millet, foxtail millet and barnyardgrass of the cereals, soybean, peanut, cacao, pea, kidney bean, hazelnut, Brazil nut, almond, coconut and walnut of the legumes and nuts, apple, banana, orange, peach, kiwi, strawberry, melon, avocado, grapefruit, mango, pear, sesame and 10 mustard of the fruits, tomato, carrot, potato, spinach, onion, garlic, bamboo shoot, pumpkin, sweet potato, celery, parsley, yam and Matsutake mushroom of the vegetables, the foods containing them, and the ingredients thereof (e.g., ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, lysozyme, casein, beta-lactoglobulin, alpha lactoalbumin, gluten, and alpha-amylase inhibitor). These foods may be is processed by heating, freezing, drying, salting, fermentation, enzymatic processing, etc. Generally, allergens that food allergy patients' IgE antibodies can recognize with 50% or more of probability are called major allergens, otherwise minor ones. Food allergy is caused not only by major allergens but 20 also minor ones. Some patients are not sensitized by the major allergens but the minor ones. Therefore, the method screening for food allergens should detect both major and minor allergens. The screening method of this invention can detect both native and denatured multiple allergens that the food allergy patients recognize. 25 To prepare the antibodies satisfying such requirements, the present -10 inventors studied and found out the following. Namely, the food ingredients were conventionally subjected to SDS PAGE analysis and the gel was transferred on a membrane: (i) Western blotting was carried out with the membrane, the pooled patient s serum, a conjugated anti-human IgE antibody and a chromogenic reagent; (ii) Similarly, western blotting was done with the membrane, serum prepared by conventionally immunizing the food ingredients to animal, a conjugated anti-animal IgG antibody and the chromogenic reagent; (iii) From comparison of both western-blotting profiles, the following were 10 observed; (1) there were bands commonly stained in both membranes, (2) there were the bands stained not in the former but in the latter (in other words, multiple non-allergenic substances recognized by the food-allergy patients' IgE), and (3) the bands stained only in the latter distributed at higher and/or lower molecular-weight positions than the bands stained in the is former; and (iv) From the above-mentioned results, multiple food-allergen fractions that the food-allergy patients' IgE antibodies could recognize were isolated from the food ingredients by gel-filtration chromatography and immunized to animals to prepare the antibodies against the multiple food allergens. Such 20 homoiothermal animals as rabbits, goats, sheep, rats, mice, guinea pigs, horses, pigs, and chicken might be immunized. Any of the immunization methods known among those skilled in the art might be adopted. The antibodies prepared as mentioned above can be used for the food allergen-detection method of this invention. The antibodies may be 25 immobilized on a microtiter plate, a PVDF membrane, a nitrocellulose -11 membrane, a chromatostrip, a test tube, a bead, a nylon membrane, etc., and applied to such immunological methods as enzyme immunoassay, immunoblotting, dot blotting, immunochromatography and antibody chip. As mentioned above, the food allergen-detection method of this 5 invention aims at detecting the multiple food allergens in foods and such environments as food-manufacturing machines and processes. Liquid extracts from the foods are preferably used for assay. Although extractants are preferably water, phosphate-buffered saline, Tris-HC1 buffer, alcohol, etc., they are not limited to these as far as the allergens can be extracted. To 10 improve the efficiency of extraction of the allergens from foods, a protein denaturation agent (e.g., SDS or urea), an SH-containing antioxidant (e.g., 2-mercaptoehanol), etc. can be added to the extractants, if necessary. The multiple allergens existing in such food-manufacture environment as machines and processes can be determined with the liquid taken by wiping 15 (swabbing) the environment and that taken by trapping air of the environment in a washing bottle. As far as the principle of the food allergen-detection method of this invention is such immunological methods as enzyme immunoassay, immunoblotting and fluorescent multiple-immunobead method, they are not 20 limited to a specific method. For example, sandwich ELISA, the competitive method, direct method, etc. are examples of enzyme immunoassay. If the antibodies are labeled, enzymes (e.g., peroxidase, alkali phosphatase and beta-galactosidase), fluorescent substances (e.g., fluorescent isothiocyanate), biologically-luminescent substances (e.g., luciferin-luciferase), chemically 25 luminescent substances (e.g., luminol, an acridine derivative and an -12 adamantane derivative), biotin, avidin, a gold colloid, radioactive materials (e.g., 32 P), etc. can be used. Outlines of the procedures of sandwich ELISA, competitive method and direct method are explained in the following as examples of the detection 5 method of this invention. To carry out the sandwich ELISA, labeled antibodies recognizing the multiple allergens (those recognizing multiple antigens) of this invention are prepared. Non-labeled antibodies recognizing the multiple antibodies of this invention are immobilized on an ELISA plate by adsorption or chemical 10 binding. Next, the area of the plate where the antibodies are not immobilized is blocked with protein that does not interfere the reaction system; e.g., gelatin and rabbit serum albumin. The extracts from the foods, the food ingredients or the food-manufacturing environments (henceforth called samples) or the standard antigen are added to the plate to carry out the first is antigen-antibody reaction. After the reaction, the plate is washed. To carry out the second antigen-antibody reaction, above-mentioned labeled antibodies are added to the plate, where the immobilized antibodies capture the allergens. After washing and removing the excess labeled antibodies, the detection reagent (e.g., 1,2-phenyldiamine and H 2 0 2 in a case of peroxidase 20 and p-nitrophenylphosphate in the case of alkali phosphatase) is added. The allergens are detected or quantified by determining amounts of reactants between the label and the detection reagent. A calibration curve can be obtained by changing added am ounts of the standard antigen or food allergy-inducing food (e.g., egg and milk) on the 25 ELISA plate. The amounts of the food allergens or food allergy-inducing -13 foods can be quantified with the calibration curve. If the quantified value is 1 ppm or more, the sample may be a food allergy-inducing food. Because a method with single-antigen detecting antibody must convert a value obtained by the single-antigen detecting antibody to a content of an s allergy-inducing food, quantification errors may occur. Taking ovomucoid and avoalbumin for instances as single antigens, concentrations of ovomucoid and avoalbumin in whole egg are approximately 4% and 2%, respectively. Those in egg white are approximately 8% and 4%, respectively. However, egg yolk contains neither ovomucoid nor avoalbumin. 10 Accordingly, (1) a method only detecting either ovomucoid or avoalbumin is not applicable for the determination of an egg-yolk protein; (2) if a calibration curve prepared by whole egg is applied to the determination of egg white, twice or more values than actual ones are quantified; and (3) if the actual values excess a quantification range, extremely high quantitative 15 values are determined. Similarly, it is a problem that single antigen-recognizing antibody cannot precisely quantify processed milk fortified with sodium caseinate, whey protein, etc., since concentrations of casein and beta-lactogloblin in whole milk protein are approximately 80% and 10%, respectively. 20 The multiple antigen-recognizing antibodies of this invention, however, possess no or less such a problem. With the competitive method, a given quantity of a standard antigen is directly immobilized on a solid phase, which is blocked with a non-reactive protein. Then, an enzyme-conjugated antibody recognizing allergen and a 25 sample are simultaneously added to the plate. The plate is allowed to stand -14 for a given time and washed to remove non-bound substances. A color developing substrate is added to the plate and then the reaction is stopped. The reaction between the immobilized allergen and the enzyme-conjugated antibody treated with the sample in advance can be detected. 5 With the direct method, a sample is directly adsorbed on the solid phase, which is blocked with a non-reactive protein and reacted with an enzyme conjugated antibody recognizing the allergen. Then, the same procedures as mentioned above are applied to detect the allergen in the sample. With any of above-mentioned sandwich ELISA, competitive and direct io methods, fluorescent, biologically- and chemically-luminescent substrates can be used for color development. According to the purpose, nature of the sample, principle, etc. of the determination, those skilled in the art can modify other conditions of the methods of this invention. The method for detecting the food allergen of this invention can is sensitively detect 0.1 or 1.0 ng/ml or more allergens in extracts from foods and their raw materials. Industrial Applicability The mixture comprising multiple native and/or denatured food 20 allergens recognized by IgE antibodies of food-allergy patients and the antibodies of this invention are useful for understanding the mechanism of onset of food allergy and developing technology to reduce allergenicity of a food allergen. The method for detecting food allergen of this invention is useful for verifying utility of hypoallergenic technology and detecting the 25 food allergens in foods, food allergy-inducing foods and such food- -15 manufacturing environment as food-manufacturing machines and processes. Accordingly, the present invention is useful for providing safety to the food allergy patients and solving medical and industrial problems caused by recent increment of the number of the food-allergy patients. 5 Examples This invention is explained more concretely based on the following Examples but they should not be construed as limiting the scope of this invention. Abbreviations in this specification are those commonly used in the 10 technical field. Example 1 (Preparation of standard antigens of various foods) (1) Chicken. quail and duck eggs One-kg chicken eggs were shelled, homogenized, freeze-dried and finely 15 ground to prepare a standard chicken-egg antigen. After 10-g antigen was suspended in 10-fold volume of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.0 (abbreviated to PBS in the following), and then dispensed into 5 test tubes, which were not heated or heated for 30 min at 60, 80, 100 and 120 degree Celsius, respectively. Then, they were mixed together and homogenized to 20 prepare the sample. Similarly, the samples were prepared with quail and duck eggs. (2) Cow milk One-litter milk was agitated with cooling to solidify and precipitate milk fat, which was filtered through absorbent cotton. After repeating such a 25 procedure 3 times, the filtrate was freeze-dried and then finely ground to -16 prepare a standard cow-milk antigen. Similarly, the sample was prepared as described in (1). (3) Wheat and rice One-kg wheat flour was extracted with 5-fold amount of 4 M urea-added 5 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.6) with agitation for 2 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged. Supernatant was dialyzed, freeze-dried and then finely ground to prepare a standard wheat antigen. Similarly, the sample was prepared as described in (1). Similarly, the sample was prepared from rice flour. 10 (4) Buckwheat One-kg buckwheat flour was extracted with 5-fold amount of 1 % NaCl added 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.4) with agitation for 2 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged. Supernatant was dialyzed, freeze-dried and then finely ground to prepare a standard buckwheat antigen. Similarly, is the sample was prepared as described in (1). (5) Peanut One-kg peanut was ground and defatted with 5-fold amount of n-hexan with agitation for 2 h at room temperature. After repeating such a procedure 3 times and then removing n-hexane, the preparation was extracted with 5 20 fold amount of 1 % NaCl-added 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.4) with agitation for 2 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged. Supernatant was dialyzed, freeze-dried and then finely ground to prepare a standard peanut antigen. Similarly, the sample was prepared as described in (1). (6)Soybean 25 A standard soybean antigen was prepared as described in (5). Similarly, -17 the sample was prepared as described in (1). Example 2 (Various purified food allergens) (1) Purified chicken-egg allergen 5 Ovoalbumin, a major allergen of chicken egg, was suspended in 10-fold volume of PBS, pH 7.0, and dispensed into 5 test tubes, which were not heated or heated for 30 min at 60, 80, 100 and 120 degree Celsius, respectively. Then, they were mixed together and homogenized to prepare the sample. Similarly, a sample of ovomucoid was prepared. It is known that 10 ovoalbumin and ovomucoid are proteins localized in egg white. (2) Purified cow-milk allergen Similarly as described in Example 2 (1), the samples of casein, beta lactoglobulin and alpha-lactoalbumin were prepared. It is known that beta lactoglobulin and alpha-lactoalbumin are proteins localized in milk whey. 15 Example 3 (Preparation of antibody) (1) Preparation of rabbit antibodies against various standard food antigens Each sample prepared in Example 1 was emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant (used for the first immunization) and incomplete one 20 (used for the second and thereafter immunization) and subjected to immunization of Japanese white rabbits 4 to 6 times. In the meantime, blood was partially collected to confirm production of antibody against the antigen, and then all the blood was collected. Thus, the antibodies were prepared. (2) Preparation of antibodies against various purified food antigens 25 Similarly, antibodies against various purified food allergens were -18 prepared as described above. Example 4 (Detection of various food allergens by the immunoblotting method) s (1) Pooled serum of patients and rabbit antibodies Pooled serum was prepared by mixing equal amount of serum from 20 patients with RAST (radioallergosorbent test) scores of two or more (specific IgE antibody >0.7 UA/ml) against egg, milk or wheat. The rabbit antibodies against egg, milk and wheat were those prepared in Example 3 (1). 1o (2) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylaminde gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) The above-described standard egg, milk and wheat antigens were heated with 2-mercaptoethanol for 3 min and electrophoresed in a mini slab gel of 10 % concentration. The gel was electrically transferred on a PVDF (polyvinilidene difluoride) membrane. Apart of the membrane was subjected is to detection of protein with a gold colloid staining kit (BioRad). (3) Immunostaining The above-mentioned PVDF membrane was blocked with 1 % human serum albumin (HSA). Next, the membrane was washed with PBS containing 0.05 % Tween 20 (PBST), reacted with the pooled patients' serum 20 (100-fold dilution) or the rabbit antibody (1000-fold dilution) for 2 h at room temperature, washed, and then reacted with a secondary antibody of alkali phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgE- e chain goat antibody (2500-fold dilution) or alkali phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (4000 fold dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed with 25 PBST, reacted with a chemiluminescent substrate of 4-methyl-4(3- -19 phosphatephenyl)spiro[1,2-dioxetane-3,2-adamantane] disodium salt (Lumi Phos 530, Wako Pure Chemical) for 30 min at room temperature and exposed on a photosensitive fihm to detect photons produced by dephospholization reaction of the alkali phosphatase. These results are shown in Figure 1. 5 As Figure 1 shows, the pooled patients' serum produced multiple bands (Lanes 1, 4, and 7 of Figure 1) and the multiple allergens which the patients' IgE could recognize existed in each food. Meanwhile, the rabbit antibodies detected the food allergens that the patients' IgE could recognize (Lanes 2, 5, and 8 of Figure 1). 10 The substances that both sera recognized were as follows: ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, lysozome and ovotransferrin of the egg; casein, beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactoalbumin of the milk; glyadine and alpha-amylase inhibitor of the wheat; 132-, 84-, 27- and 11-kDa substances of the buckwheat; and 107-, 72-, 35- and 28-kDa substances of the peanut. is In addition, the rabbit antibodies did not detect non-food allergens that the patients' IgE could not recognize. (4) Concentration and fractionation of allergens The antibodies which cannot recognize any substance except for allergens were prepared as follows: 20 Comparing the molecular-weight distribution of the bands stained by the pooled patients' serum with that by the animal antibodies, it was noticed that some of the bands of the latter distributed at higher and/or lower molecular-weight positions than those of the former (Figure 1). Fractions equivalent to the molecular weights of the food allergens that the food 25 allergy patients' IgE recognized were collected from the standard antigen -20 with gel filtration chromatography (named allergen fraction in the following). The sample was prepared as described in Example 1 and subjected to immunization of an animal to prepare the anti-allergen fraction antibodies. From western blotting carried out as mentioned above using the antibodies, 5 it was found that the antibodies generally recognized the food allergens that the pooled patients' serum could recognize (Lanes 3, 6, and 9 of Figure 1). Such concentration and fractionation of the allergens can be accomplished by immunoprecipitation as well as affinity chromatography using the patients' IgE antibodies and ion-exchange chromatography. 10 Example 5 (Dot-blot detection of major allergens and their heated preparations) After a PBS-soaked PVDF membrane was set in a dot-blotting apparatus, the purified major allergens (ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, 15 ovotransferrin, lysozyme, casein, b eta-lacto globulin, alpha-lactoalbumin, alpha-amylase inhibitor and glyadine) and their heated preparations were absorbed to the membrane, which was blocked with 3 % RSA-added TBS and washed with TBST. The antibodies against egg-allergen fraction, milk allergen fraction and wheat-allergen fraction (diluted 2000-fold) were added 20 to the membrane and allowed to stand for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, biotin-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG sheep antibody and HRP conjugated avidin (4000-fold) were added to the membrane, which was washed and subjected to determination of photons generated by the reaction with a chemiluminescent reagent and trapped on a photosensitive film. 25 The above-mentioned antibodies detected the major allergens of -21 ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, ovotransferrin, lysozyme, casein, beta-lactoglobuin, alpha-lactoalbumin, alpha-amylase inhibitor and glyadine. The antibodies detected the heated preparations of the above-mentioned purified allergens, too. 5 Example 6 (Detection of egg, milk and wheat allergens by sandwich ELISA) (1) Antibodies Antibodies against the allergen fractions of egg, milk and wheat prepared in Example 4 (4), and those conjugated with biotin prepared 10 according to the conventional manner were used in the following. (2) Coating and blocking of the antibodies on a microtiter plate A 100- p1 portion of the above-mentioned antibodies (10 p g/ml) was dispensed in wells of an ELISA plate (Nunc), allowed to stand at 4 degree Celsius overnight, washed (150 mM-NaCI and 0.05 % Tween 20-added 20 is mM Tris-HC1 buffer, pH 7.4), and blocked with 0.1% RSA (Sigma) for 1 h at 25 degree Celsius. (3) Detection of egg. milk and wheat allergens After the blocking solution in the wells was removed, 95- p 1 portion of diluent (0.1%-RSA, 150 mM-NaCl and 0.05 %Tween 20-added 20 mM Tris 20 HCl buffer, pH 7.4) and 5- p1 portion of PBS extract from various foods were added to the wells and allowed to stand for 2 h at 25 degree Celsius. Similarly, 5- pA 1 portion of suspension of the egg, milk and wheat standard antigens mentioned in Example 1 was added to the wells and allowed to stand for 2 h at 25 degree Celsius. After 5-time washing with 300 p1 washing 25 liquid, a 100- p1 portion of biotin-conjugated antibody (10000-fold dilution) -22 was added to the wells and allowed to stand for 1 h at 25 degree Celsius, and then a 100- p 1 portion of peroxidase-conjugated avidin (2500-fold dilution) was added to the wells and allowed to stand for 30 min at 25 degree Celsius. After washing, a 100- 111 portion of 3, 3', 5, 5'-tetrabenzidine solution was 5 added to the wells and allowed to react for 30 min at 25 degree Celsius under light shielding. Then, a 100- p 1 portion of 1 N sulfuric acid was added to stop the reaction. Optical densities of the wells were read by a microtiterplate reader (at 450 nm of a main wavelength and at 630 nm of a sub wavelength). The results are shown in Table 1. As Table 1 shows, the egg, milk and io wheat allergens in various food extracts could be detected. Table 1. Detection of egg, milk and wheat in various foods Food Antibody against Antibody against Antibody against egg-allergen milk-allergen wheat-allergen fraction fraction fraction Boiled egg 0 X x Milk X 0 x Bread (prepared X X 0 in the laboratory) Pudding 0 0 x (prepared in the laboratory with egg and milk) French toast 0 0 0 (prepared in the laboratory with egg, milk and wheat) 0; Detected. X; Not detected. (Similar in the following tables) -23 Example 7 (Evaluation of fundamental property of the food allergen detection kit by the sandwich ELISA method) (1) Dilution test of the standard antigen According to Example 6, the egg, milk and wheat standard antigens 5 prepared in Example 1 were quantified. Plotting these results on sheets of plotting paper, calibration curves approximately running through origins could be obtained. (2) Evaluation of reproducibility among simultaneous assays According to the above-mentioned method, samples A to E of the egg 1o standard antigen of five different concentrations within a detectable range were prepared and subjected to five simultaneous assays. As shown in Table 2, a CV value of lower than 5 % was obtained. Thus, an excellent simultaneous reproducibility was confirmed. 15 Table 2. Evaluation of reproducibility among simultaneous assays of egg standard-antigen detection by the sandwich ELISA method 1 2 3 4 5 Mean SD CV(%) A 1.165 1.079 1.068 1.075 1.064 1.090 0.042 3.87 B 0.756 0.711 0.699 0.689 0.693 0.710 0.027 3.84 C 0.544 0.505 0.500 0.497 0.507 0.511 0.019 3.74 D 0.233 0.222 0.236 0.222 0.227 0.228 0.006 2.79 E 0.175 0.165 0.179 0.173 0.170 0.172 0.005 3.06 (3) Evaluation of reproducibility among day-to-day assays According to the above-mentioned method, samples A to E of the milk 20 standard antigen of five different concentrations within a detectable range -24 were prepared and subjected to 5 successive-day assays. As shown in Table 3, a CV value of lower than 5 % was obtained. Thus, an excellent reproducibility among day-to-day assays was confirmed. 5 Table 3. Evaluation of reproducibility among day-to-day assays of milk standard-antigen detection by the sandwich ELISA method 1 2 3 4 5 Mean SD CV(%) A 2.356 2.387 2.346 2.321 2.241 2.330 0.055 2.37 B 1.353 1.306 1.274 1.246 1.254 1.287 0.044 3.40 C 0.956 0.949 0.928 0.921 0.899 0.931 0.023 2.45 D 0.295 0.292 0.275 0.281 0.278 0.284 0.009 3.10 E 0.195 0.183 0.186 0.184 0.182 0.186 0.005 2.82 These results show that the present method can rapidly and stably detect multiple native and denatured food allergens distributed in foods and 1o their ingredients. It was confirmed that the method could detect 0.5 ng/ml or more of the food allergen or the food allergen-containing food. Example 8 (Food-allergy patients are carrying IgE antibodies against both native and heated food allergens.) 15 Taking egg allergy for instance, it was confirmed that the food-allergy patients were carrying IgE antibodies against not only native but also heated food allergen. Namely, whole egg (non-heated egg antigen) was dissolved in PBS (1.0 %, w/v). Half volume of the solution was heated for 30 min at 120 degree Celsius (heated egg antigen). A 100- u1 portion of each 10-fold diluted 20 solution was dispensed on an ELISA plate, which was coated, washed, -25 blocked with 1% HAS-added PBS and washed. Thus, the native egg antigen coated plate and the heated egg antigen-coated plate were prepared. Next, either the native egg antigen or the heated egg antigen (1, 5, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 ng/ml) was added to the pooled patients' serum described 5 in Example 4 (1) (1000-fold dilution), reacted for 2 h at 37 degree Celsius, and centrifuged. Thus, two kinds of the serum were prepared. The former and the latter were named the native egg antigen-depleted serum and the heated egg antigen-depleted serum, respectively. Then, each 100- p 1 portion of either the native egg antigen-depleted io serum and the heated egg antigen-depleted serum was dispensed on each of the native egg antigen-coated plate and the heated egg antigen-coated plate, which were allowed to stand for 2 h at 37 degree Celsius and washed with PBST. A 100- pl portion of biotin-conjugated anti-human IgE- c goat antibody (2500-fold dilution) was added to the plates, which were allowed to is stand for 1 h at 37 degree Celsius and washed with PBST. After addition of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated avidin (standing for 30 min at 37 degree Celsius) and a luminescent substrate, degrees of luminescence were read (Luminometer CT-9000D, Diatron). The results are shown in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, it was confirmed that the heated egg antigen 20 depleted serum (shown as 0 in Figure 2) could specifically react with the native egg antigen (the left figure of Figure 2), but that the serum could do with the heated antigen (the right figure of Figure 2). Meanwhile, it was confirmed that the native egg antigen-depleted serum (shown as 0 in Figure 2) could specifically react with the heated egg antigen (the right 25 figure of Figure 2), but that the serum could do with the native antigen (the -26 left figure of Figure 2). From these results, it was proved that the food-allergy patients were carrying IgE antibodies specifically recognizing both the native and the heated egg. 5 Therefore, a method for detecting a food allergen should be able to detect both the heated and the native allergen. Example 9 (Enhancement of ELISA intensity with antibody prepared by immunization of a heated antibody) 10 Even if the anti-allergen fraction antibody as described in Example 4 is subjected to the determination, ELISAintensity (optical density, OD value) obtained by a reaction between the antibody and a heated sample may be lower than that obtained by the reaction between the antibody and a native one. This may depend upon (1) that protein concentration of the extract from is the heated sample is lower than that from the native one; and (2) that reactivity between the heated sample and the antibody is lower than that between the native one and the antibody, even if a protein concentration of the samples is evenly adjusted. Consequently, preparation of the antibody with enhanced reactivity was studied. 20 The egg allergen fraction as described in Example 4 (1) was autoclaved for 30 min at 120 degree Celsius, cooled, homogenized with 4 M urea-added PBS, and centrifuged. The supernatant was freeze-dried and finely ground to prepare the antigen, which was subjected to preparation of the rabbit antibody (hereinafter, anti-autoclaved egg antigen antibody) as described in 25 Example 3 (1). According to the method as described in Example 6, the -27 antibody was subjected to reaction with the native egg antigen-coated plate and the heated egg antigen-coated plate as described in Example 8. These results are shown in Table 4. Table 4 shows that the native and heated egg antigens were detected with the almost same ELISA intensities 5 by using the antibody prepared by immunization of the extract from the autoclaved food allergen. Thus, above-mentioned problems were solved. Table 4. Enhancement of ELISA intensity with antibody prepared by immunization of a heated antibody Antibody ELISA intensity Native egg antigen- Heated egg antigen coated plate coated plate Anti-egg allergen fraction 100 36 antibody Anti-autoclaved egg antigen 100 118 antibody io ELISA intensity (OD value) obtained by a reaction between the anti-egg allergen fraction antibody and the standard egg-antigen plate is shown as 100. Example 10 (Determination of the food allergens and the food allergy 15 inducing foods - 1) Whether the multiple antigen-recognizing antibodies of this invention (those as described in Example 3) and the method as described in Example 7 could detect food allergen-containing foods or not was examined. Using a calibration curve prepared as described in Example 7, quantification was 20 carried out and quantification indexes (measured value/actual value x 100) were calculated. Results from egg yolk, egg white, egg-yolk mayonnaise and -28 whole-egg mayonnaise are shown in Table 5. When the antibody prepared from a single antigen localizing in the egg white was subjected to the determination, Table 5 shows that (1) no egg yolk but egg white could be detected, and that (2) the standard egg antigen's 5 measured value from the calibration curve was twice to 60-times more than the actual value. When the multiple antigen-recognizing anti-standard egg antigen antibodies of this invention were subjected to the determination, Table 5 shows that (3) both egg yolk and egg white could be detected, and that (4) io measured value of the standard egg antigen was almost the same as the actual value. From these results, it was noticed that the anti-standard egg antigen antibody recognizing the multiple antigens of this invention could detect and quantify an allergy-inducing food of egg or its ingredient in egg processed food.

-29 Table 5. Possibility of detection and/or quantification of egg and egg products with various antibodies Sample Determina- Multiple Single Single tion antigen- antigen- antigen recognizing recognizing recognizing antibody antibody antibody (Anti- (Anti- (Anti standard egg ovomucoid ovoalbumin antigen antibody) antibody) antibody) Egg yolk Possibility of 0 x x detection Quantifica- 74-106 tion index Egg white Possibility of 0 0 0 detection Quantifica- 105-170 240-310 6,330-13,150 tion index Egg-yolk Possibility of 0 x x mayonnaise detection Whole-egg Possibility of 0 0 0 mayonnaise detection Example 11 (Determination of the food allergens and the food allergy 5 inducing foods - 2) Milk whey, casein, lactoferrin, and casein hydrolysate were examined as mention in Example 10. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 shows that (1) anti-standard milk antigen antibody recognizing the multiple antigen of this invention could detect and quantify the food 1o allergy-inducing milk and its ingredients; but that (2) a single antigen recognizing antibody prepared by immunization of a substance localizing in the milk whey could not quantify them. Symbol of A in Table 6 shows that 30 quantification could be accomplished but that the quantification index was below 5. Table 6. Possibility of detection and/or quantification of the standard milk antigen with various antibodies Multiple Single antigen antigen- Single antigen- Singnig recognizing recognizing recogdzg Sample Determination antibody antibody antibody (Anti-standard (Anti-casein Actieblin milk antigen antibody) antibody) antibody) Possibility of O 5 O detection Milk whey Quantification 160-230 320-1,080 index Possibility of o 0 5 detection Casein Quantification 38-47 170-180 index Lactoferrin Possibility of o A 5 detection Casein Possibility of 5 s hydrolysate detection 5 As used herein, except where the context requires otherwise, the term "comprise" and variations of the term, such as "comprising", "comprises" and "comprised", are not intended to exclude other additives, components, integers or steps. Reference to any prior art in the specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment, or any form of suggestion, that this prior art forms part of the 10 common general knowledge in Australia or any other jurisdiction or that this prior art could reasonably be expected to be ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant by a person skilled in the art.

Claims (10)

1. An antibody mixture comprising polyclonal animal serum, which comprises antibodies recognizing the following native and denatured food allergens that are recognized by IgE antibodies of food-allergy patients and that cause food allergy by ingestion, wherein a food-allergy patient has a 5 RAST score of 2 or more, and said animal is selected from the group consisting of rabbits, goats, sheep, rats, mice, guinea pigs, horses, pigs and chicken: (1) ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, lysozyme and ovotransferrin of egg; (2) casein, beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactoalbumin of milk; (3) gliadin and alpha-amylase inhibitor of wheat; 10 (4) 132-, 84-, 27- and 11 -kDa substances of buckwheat; or (5) 107-, 72-, 35-, and 28-kDa substances of peanut.

2. A method for detecting the food allergens that uses the antibody mixture of claim 1.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the food allergens are ovoalbumin, ovomucoid, lysozvme and ovotransferrin of egg. 15

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the food allergens are casein, beta-lactoglobulin and alpha lactoalbumin of milk.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the food allergens are gliadin and alpha-amylase inhibitor of wheat.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the food allergens are 132., 84-, 27. and 1-kDa substances 20 of buckwheat.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein the food allergens are 107-, 72-, 35- and 28-kDa substances of peanut.

S. A method for detecting food allergy-inducing food that uses the antibody mixture of claim 1.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the food allergy-inducing food is eggs, milk, wheat, 25 buckwheat or peanut, or food containing one or more of these items.

10. The antibody mixture of claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described.