AU2007355782B2 - A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose - Google Patents

A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2007355782B2
AU2007355782B2 AU2007355782A AU2007355782A AU2007355782B2 AU 2007355782 B2 AU2007355782 B2 AU 2007355782B2 AU 2007355782 A AU2007355782 A AU 2007355782A AU 2007355782 A AU2007355782 A AU 2007355782A AU 2007355782 B2 AU2007355782 B2 AU 2007355782B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
water
content
range
calculating
water treatment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2007355782A
Other versions
AU2007355782A1 (en
Inventor
Jason Frederick Colton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Lutra Ltd
Original Assignee
H2OPE HOLDINGS Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by H2OPE HOLDINGS Ltd filed Critical H2OPE HOLDINGS Ltd
Publication of AU2007355782A1 publication Critical patent/AU2007355782A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2007355782B2 publication Critical patent/AU2007355782B2/en
Assigned to LUTRA LIMITED reassignment LUTRA LIMITED Request to Amend Deed and Register Assignors: H2OPE HOLDINGS LIMITED
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/33Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using ultraviolet light
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/52Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
    • C02F1/5209Regulation methods for flocculation or precipitation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/18Water
    • G01N33/1826Water organic contamination in water
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/52Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
    • C02F1/5236Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/005Processes using a programmable logic controller [PLC]
    • C02F2209/006Processes using a programmable logic controller [PLC] comprising a software program or a logic diagram
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/11Turbidity
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/21Dissolved organic carbon [DOC]

Abstract

This invention provides a method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose for enabling determination of chemical dose in the treatment of raw water to potable water. Preferably, the present invention relates to a method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose enabling predictive calculation of chemical dosage applicable in the treatment of any raw water type with or without local WTP pre-calibration. The method including the steps of: quantifying the turbidity of water as a measure of particulate content; quantifying the ultraviolet absorbance of water as a first measure of natural organic matter (NOM) content; quantifying the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of water as a second measure of NOM content; calculating a specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) as the ratio of ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon; using SUVA to adjust the weightings of the particulate content and NOM content and predicting a water treatment chemical dose from the sum of the particulate content and NOM content.

Description

WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 A METHOD OF CALCULATING A WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL DOSE STATEMENT OF CORRESPONDING APPLICATIONS This application is not based on any priority application. 5 TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose for enabling determination of chemical dose in the treatment of raw water to potable water. Preferably, the present invention relates to a method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose enabling predictive calculation of chemical dosage 10 applicable in the treatment of any raw water type with or without local WTP pre calibration. BACKGROUND ART Treatment of raw water to produce drinking (or potable water) requires the removal of contaminants such as natural organic matter (NOM) and/or particulates which can be 15 harmful to humans if injested. NOM in water contains a mixture of hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic compounds in a range of molecular weights. Compounds with high molecular weight and high hydrophobicity, such as aquatic humics and aquatic fulvics resulting from decaying organic matter like leaves, are more amenable to chemical treatment methods such as coagulation and subsequent solids separation. 20 The coagulant dose required for a given plant and given raw water conditions has traditionally been set based on either the plant operator's experience, physical jar 1 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 testing, or by a streaming current meter. Streaming current meters operate under feed back process control, measuring the quality of water after coagulant dosing and adjusting the coagulant dose based on that measurement to achieve a target water quality 5 More recently, feed forward, or predictive, control methods have been used utilising sampling of raw water, prediction of the chemical dose required and dosing accordingly for a given raw water condition. W02005022278 discloses a feed forward/feedback control method using calculation of a purity index based on outgoing water turbidity. A low purity index valve causes a 10 feedback controller to increase the chemical dose and a high purity index value causes the feedback controller to decrease the chemical dose to minimise deviation from the outgoing water turbidity set point. However, the disadvantage with known feedback and feed forward methods is that they can be unreliable with different raw water chemistries with varying particulate and 15 NOM components or with rapidly changing raw water conditions, such as after heavy rain fall, varying WTP flow rate, pH changes resulting from chemical treatment and incomplete mixing of water with the chemical treatment agent. US6408227 discloses a system using predictive dosage based on colour, turbidity and coagulant dosed. Dosage is determined by multiplying the sum of the square colour 20 and turbidity of the untreated water by a conversion factor. The conversion factor is determined by dividing the dosage of coagulant used to achieve the optimum treated water quality by the sum of the square colour and turbidity of the untreated water. 2 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 US6408227 describes a system and method for controlling effluents in treatment systems using neural networks, genetic algorithms and deterministic models to control WTPs and predict parameters such as chemical dosage. The disadvantage with these known methods is the need to train the system with 5 historical data to predict chemical dosage before use. It is an object of the present invention to address the foregoing problems or at least to provide the public with a useful choice. All references, including any patents or patent applications, cited in this specification are hereby incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any reference 10 constitutes prior art. The discussion of the reference states what their authors assert, and the applicants reserve the right to challenge the accuracy and pertinence of the cited documents. It will be clearly understood that, although a number of prior art publications are referred to herein, this reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents forms parts of the common general knowledge in the art, in 15 New Zealand or in any other country. It is acknowledged that the term 'comprise' may, under varying jurisdictions, be attributed with either an exclusive or an inclusive meaning. For the purpose of this specification, and unless otherwise noted, the term 'comprise' shall have an inclusive meaning - i.e. that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed 20 components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements. This rationale will also be used when the term 'comprised' or 'comprising' is used in relation to one or more steps in a method or process. 3 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only. DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of 5 calculating a water treatment chemical dose including the steps of: * quantifying the turbidity of water as a measure of particulate content; " quantifying the ultraviolet absorbance of water as a first measure of natural organic matter (NOM) content; " quantifying the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of water as a second 10 measure of NOM content; * calculating a specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) as the ratio of ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon; characterised in that the calculated SUVA is used to adjust the weightings of the particulate content and NOM content and predicting a water treatment chemical dose 15 from the sum of the particulate content and NOM content. According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose including the steps of: * quantifying the turbidity of water as a measure of particulate content; " quantifying the ultraviolet absorbance of water as a first measure of natural 20 organic matter (NOM) content; 4 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 * quantifying the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of water as a second measure of NOM content; * calculating a specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) as the ratio of ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon 5 characterised in that a water treatment chemical dose is calculated with the following algorithm: chemical dose = (((Turbidity A )x B)x C)+ D1+ E x e(U AbsorbancexF) x where A, B, D, E and F are constants; C +(H+I xSUVAJ)K 10 where H, I, J and K are constants; SUVA = UVAbsorbance[/m] , and DOC[mg IL] G = Lx e(Mx(NSUVA))+P where L, M, N and P are constants. It is envisaged the constants A, B, D, E, F H, I, J, K L, M, N and P are predetermined 15 values which can be applied by the user for any water source or selected by the user for a specific water source and/or WTP to increase the accuracy of the predicted water chemical treatment dose. In preferred embodiments the constant A is in the range 150 to 300, constant B is the range 5 to 50, constant D is in the range -2 to -0.2, constant E is in the range 0.1 to 5 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 1.5, constant F is in the range 3 to 5, constant H is in the range 2 to 4, constant I is in the range 0.001 to 0.005, constant J is in the range 1 to 5, constant K is in the range 0.5 to 4, constant L is in the range 0.1 to 1.5, constant M is in the range -10 to -50, constant N is in the range -1 to -8 and constant P is in the range 1 to 1.8. 5 In preferred embodiments the ultraviolet absorbance is in the range 250 to 750 nanometres (nm). In preferred embodiments the ultraviolet absorbance is 254 nm. In preferred embodiments the water treatment chemical is a metal based coagulant. In preferred embodiments the water treatment chemical is based on aluminium and 10 iron based coagulant. In preferred embodiments the DOC content of the water is in the range 0 to 50 milligrams per litre (mg/L). In preferred embodiments the particulate content of the water is in the range 0 to 200 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). 15 It is envisaged the water treatment control method may be used via a control apparatus including a programmable logic unit with computer executable instructions defining the algorithm of the present invention. The present invention may provide many potential advantages over existing systems for water treatment control including: 20 * 'real-time" prediction of coagulant dose with different pre-settings for use with any, or a specific, water source which provides for a reduction in treatment 6 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 chemical used, which in turn leads to an economic and operationally efficient treatment of water; * more accurate prediction of coagulant dose and more rapid dose response adjustments to changeable source water quality; 5 0 more stable coagulant dose control since the method of the present invention is unaffected by flocculation pH changes, WTP flow rate, response lag time, pH adjustment chemical additive and coagulant mixing efficiencies; and * an additional user selectable coagulation mode enables the user to optimise treatment for either particulate or NOM removal. 10 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows an illustration of the correlation of specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) (the ratio of ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon) with the character of NOM water content. SUVA is a component of the algorithm used to implement the present invention; 15 Figure 2 shows a graph illustrating increasing percentage of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal with increasing coagulant dose as a result of implementation of the present invention; Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of a feed forward coagulant dosage control process used to implement the present invention; 20 FIT refers to Flow Indicating Transmitter; AIT refers to Analyser Instrument Transmitter; 7 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 Fx refers to Function block; PID refers to Proportional Integral Derivative; SP refers to Set point; CV refers to Control Value (output from PID block); 5 PV refers to Process value, and VSD refers to Variable speed drive Figure 4 shows a graph of coagulant dose predictions achieved with the present invention over time compared to coagulant dose predictions derived from a streaming current meter of the prior art; 10 Figure 5 shows a composite graph of coagulant dose and water turbidity versus coagulant dose response time using a user and preset mode dosage of the present invention compared to dose predictions derived from a streaming current meter of the prior art. BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION 15 Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof. A correlation is shown in Figure 1 between specific ultraviolet absorbance of water at 254 nm and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content (Edzwald, J.K. and Tobiason, 20 J.E., "Enhanced versus Optimized Multiple Objective Coagulation", in Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment V, H.H. Hahn, E. Hoffman and H. Odegaard, Editors, 8 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 Springer, New York, pp. 113-124, 1998). Such a relationship is used as the basis of the calculation of coagulant dose in the algorithm of the present invention. Referring to Figure 2 in a relationship of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) percentage removal versus chemical coagulant dose there is seen an exponential phase (A) where 5 increasing coagulant dose results in increasing DOC percentage removal until a plateau is reached where the DOC percentage removal is static at around 78% with increasing coagulant dose (B). At low levels of coagulant dose such that WTP failure is seen (C). The algorithm of the present invention calculates the optimal water treatment coagulant dose for either particulate removal or for maximizing DOC percentage 10 removal but with a minimal coagulant chemical usage. Referring to Figure 3 a preferred feed forward coagulant dosage control process used to implement the present invention in a WTP is generally shown by arrow 1. The WTP must have a coagulant dose pump 2 which can automatically be controlled by a control unit 3 configured with a programmable logic unit (not shown) running the algorithm of 15 the present invention. An analyser instrument transmitter (AIT) 4 measures the turbidity, UV254nm absorbance and DOC of the raw water 5. The algorithm of the present invention determines the coagulant dose set point (mg/litre) 6. The raw water 5 flow rate is measured via a flow instrument transmitter (FIT) 7 and the coagulant flow rate 8 via a flow instrument transmitter (FIT) 9. The raw water 5 flow rate is flow paced 20 with the coagulant flow rate 8 via a variable speed drive 10 and the control unit 3. The coagulant flow rate provides the process variable (PV) 11 and allows the actual coagulant dose to be monitored (in Litres/hour). The control unit 3 is capable of using a proportional integral and derivative control block (PID) 12 and function block 12A.The PID 12 with output via a control valve (CV) 13 is configured with the required coagulant 9 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 dose (referred to as the set point (SP) 14 in Litres/hour), the measured coagulant flow (in Litres/hour)' as the PV 11 and the output as the coagulant dose pump stroke 15. The ability of the method of the present invention to more rapidly track changes in water quality and coagulant dose the water accordingly in comparison to known 5 feedback methods, utilising a streaming current meter, is illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 shows tracked changes over a time period of 5.5 weeks. Figure 5 shows a raw water quality change event starting at 19:25 and which peaks at 04:25 the next day as measured by water turbidity. The predicted dose of the feed forward control method of the present invention peaks at 04:25 correlating with the peak of water 10 turbidity whereas the known feedback method peaks significantly later at 09:45. Such rapid changes in chemical dosage of the present invention provides for more consistent water quality. The method of the present invention can be used in two user selectable modes of operation: a conventional mode which predicts the lowest coagulant dose possible to 15 achieve particulate removal and an enhanced mode which predicts the lowest coagulant dose to achieve maximum NOM removal. The conventional mode can account for an up to 15% reduction in chemical dosage in comparison to prior art methods.. 10

Claims (10)

1. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose including the steps of: * quantifying the turbidity of water as a measure of particulate content; * quantifying the ultraviolet absorbance of water as a first measure of natural 5 organic matter (NOM) content; * quantifying the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of water as a second measure of NOM content; * calculating a specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) as the ratio of ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon; 10 characterised in that the calculated SUVA is used to adjust the weightings of the particulate content and NOM content and predicting a water treatment chemical dose from the sum of the particulate content and NOM content.
2. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose including the steps of: " quantifying the turbidity of water as a measure of particulate content; 15 0 quantifying the ultraviolet absorbance of water as a first measure of natural organic matter (NOM) content; * quantifying the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of water as a second measure of NOM content; * calculating a specific ultraviolet absorbance factor (SUVA) as the ratio of 20 ultraviolet absorbance and dissolved organic carbon 11 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164 characterised in that a water treatment chemical dose is calculated with the following algorithm: chemical dose = (((Turbidity A 1+ Ex(As F DxGJ where A, B, D, E and F are constants; 5 C= ( + K (H + I x SUVAJ) where H, I, J and K are constants; SUVA = UVAbsorbance[/m] and DOC[mgIL] G= Lxe (MX"(NxSUVA)) where L, M, N and P are constants. 10
3. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 2 wherein the constant A is in the range 150 to 300, constant B is the range 5 to 50, constant D is in the range -2 to -0.2, constant E is in the range 0.1 to 1.5, constant F is in the range 3 to 5, constant H is in the range 2 to 4, constant I is in the range 0.001 to 0.005, constant J is in the range 1 to 5, constant K is in the range 0.5 to 4, constant L 15 is in the range 0.1 to 1.5, constant M is in the range -10 to -50, constant N is in the range -1 to -8 and constant P is in the range 1 to 1.8.
4. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the ultraviolet absorbance is in the range 250 to 750 nanometres (nm). 12 WO 2009/002192 PCT/NZ2007/000164
5. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 4 wherein the ultraviolet absorbance is 254 nm.
6. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the water treatment chemical is a metal based coagulant. 5
7. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 6 wherein the water treatment chemical is based on aluminium and iron based coagulant.
8. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the DOC content of the water is in the range 0 to 50 milligrams per 10 litre (mg/L).
9. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the particulate content of the water is in the range 0 to 200 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU).
10. A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose as claimed in claim 1 15 or claim 2 wherein the method is used via a control apparatus including a programmable logic unit with computer executable instructions defining the algorithm of the present invention. 20 13
AU2007355782A 2007-06-22 2007-06-22 A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose Ceased AU2007355782B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/NZ2007/000164 WO2009002192A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2007-06-22 A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2007355782A1 AU2007355782A1 (en) 2008-12-31
AU2007355782B2 true AU2007355782B2 (en) 2013-09-19

Family

ID=40185845

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007355782A Ceased AU2007355782B2 (en) 2007-06-22 2007-06-22 A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2007355782B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2009002192A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013102810A1 (en) * 2012-04-12 2013-10-17 Endress + Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbH + Co. KG Method for detecting and / or monitoring the solids content of raw water production from wells
CA2989452C (en) * 2015-06-23 2020-06-02 Trojan Technologies Process and device for the treatment of a fluid containing a contaminant
CN107922213A (en) * 2015-08-05 2018-04-17 三菱重工业株式会社 The control method of water treatment system, power plant and water treatment system
FR3083868B1 (en) 2018-07-13 2020-07-17 Suez Groupe METHOD FOR DETERMINING A COAGULANT DOSE FOR THE TREATMENT OF RAW WATER
WO2020012022A1 (en) 2018-07-13 2020-01-16 Suez Groupe Method for determining a dose of coagulant for treating raw water
WO2020099723A1 (en) * 2018-11-14 2020-05-22 Kemira Oyj Measuring and controlling organic matter in waste water stream
JP7234013B2 (en) * 2019-04-04 2023-03-07 株式会社東芝 Driving support device, driving support method and computer program
FR3106131B1 (en) 2020-01-10 2022-07-01 Suez Groupe Method for defining and regulating a dose of coagulant for coagulation treatment of raw water
CN111693522B (en) * 2020-05-29 2021-11-02 苏州科技大学 On-line characterization method for urban water pollution degree
CN114624152B (en) * 2022-05-16 2022-08-12 生态环境部长江流域生态环境监督管理局生态环境监测与科学研究中心 Method for testing organic carbon source of water body particles and related equipment
CN116242793A (en) * 2023-01-08 2023-06-09 北京工业大学 Method for comparing inhibition degree of photocatalytic removal of different natural organic matters on antibody

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5400137A (en) * 1993-08-11 1995-03-21 Texaco Inc. Photometric means for monitoring solids and fluorescent material in waste water using a stabilized pool water sampler
US5489977A (en) * 1993-08-11 1996-02-06 Texaco Inc. Photomeric means for monitoring solids and fluorescent material in waste water using a falling stream water sampler
WO2000064821A1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2000-11-02 Clear Value, Inc. Potable water treatment system and method of operation thereof

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5400137A (en) * 1993-08-11 1995-03-21 Texaco Inc. Photometric means for monitoring solids and fluorescent material in waste water using a stabilized pool water sampler
US5489977A (en) * 1993-08-11 1996-02-06 Texaco Inc. Photomeric means for monitoring solids and fluorescent material in waste water using a falling stream water sampler
WO2000064821A1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2000-11-02 Clear Value, Inc. Potable water treatment system and method of operation thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009002192A1 (en) 2008-12-31
AU2007355782A1 (en) 2008-12-31
WO2009002192A9 (en) 2009-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2007355782B2 (en) A method of calculating a water treatment chemical dose
Stoller Effective fouling inhibition by critical flux based optimization methods on a NF membrane module for olive mill wastewater treatment
CN101561661B (en) Fuzzy control method and fuzzy controller
US9682872B2 (en) Wastewater treatment system
CN101825870B (en) Method and system for controlling supply quantity of water-treatment flocculating agent
Griffiths et al. The application of artificial neural networks for the optimization of coagulant dosage
JP2007061800A (en) Flocculant injection controller to be applied to water treatment plant
US20230257283A1 (en) Process, system, and computer readable storage medium for determining optimal coagulant dosage
CN100565181C (en) The water treatment flocculant granularity fractal dimension determination method for deciding optimal charging amount
JP6250431B2 (en) Water treatment process control method and control apparatus
JP2008194559A (en) Apparatus for controlling injection of flocculant
CN1673114A (en) Coagulant throwing control method and system
CN108211798A (en) A kind of reverse osmosis purified water process control method and system
KR101042243B1 (en) chlorine automatic System
CA2970196A1 (en) Real-time dewatering optimization
WO2022009481A1 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling injection of coagulant in water treatment plant
AU2019300360A1 (en) Method for determining a dose of coagulant for treating raw water
Ratnaweera et al. Coagulant dosing control–a review
EP3820825B1 (en) Method for dewatering watery biomass
JP2009061453A (en) pH CONTROL DEVICE IN WATER PURIFICATION PLANT
JP2005329358A (en) System for controlling injection of chlorine into water purification plant
Mussared et al. Implementation of predictive alum dose control systems
JP2023509815A (en) Method for Dosing and Adjusting Coagulants for Coagulation Treatment of Raw Water
Dongsheng et al. A case study on the IMC for ozone dosing process of drinking water treatment
Yavich et al. Chemical feed control using coagulation computer models and a streaming current detector

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK1 Application lapsed section 142(2)(a) - no request for examination in relevant period
NB Applications allowed - extensions of time section 223(2)

Free format text: THE TIME IN WHICH TO REQUEST EXAMINATION HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO 27 MAY 2012.

FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
HB Alteration of name in register

Owner name: LUTRA LIMITED

Free format text: FORMER NAME(S): H2OPE HOLDINGS LIMITED

MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired