AU2007224393A1 - Code allocation based on cross code correlation - Google Patents

Code allocation based on cross code correlation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2007224393A1
AU2007224393A1 AU2007224393A AU2007224393A AU2007224393A1 AU 2007224393 A1 AU2007224393 A1 AU 2007224393A1 AU 2007224393 A AU2007224393 A AU 2007224393A AU 2007224393 A AU2007224393 A AU 2007224393A AU 2007224393 A1 AU2007224393 A1 AU 2007224393A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
code
codes
multiple access
division multiple
correlation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
AU2007224393A
Inventor
Ariela Zeira
Eldad Zeira
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
InterDigital Technology Corp
Original Assignee
InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2006202912A external-priority patent/AU2006202912B2/en
Application filed by InterDigital Technology Corp filed Critical InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority to AU2007224393A priority Critical patent/AU2007224393A1/en
Publication of AU2007224393A1 publication Critical patent/AU2007224393A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Description

P001 Section 29 Regulation 3.2(2)
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Application Number: Lodged: Invention Title: Code allocation based on cross code correlation The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: CODE ALLO CATION BASED ON CROSS CODE CORRELATION
BACKGROUND
0[0003] This application generally relates to wireless code division multiple access communication systems. In particular, this application relates to code allocation in such systems using cross code correlation chaacteristics.
[0004] To send multiple communications simultaneously over a shared spectrum, ODMA communication systems distinguish the commYnunications using codes. Figure 1 illustrates a simplified wireless code division multiple access (ODMA) communication system. The following discussion refers to components that may be located in either the base station, a N?de-B or a radio network controller (RNC) 20, based on the implementation, as being located at the base station [0005] For downlnk communications, codes are assigned by a code assignment device 26 of the base station 20 to support the downlink communications.
Downlink data is processed by a modulation and spreading device 28 with the assigned codes to produce one or multiple downlink communications. The downlink communications are passed through an isolator or switch 32 and radiated by an antenna or antena array 34 of the base station 20 through a wireless radio interface 46.
[0006] The user equipment 22 receives the downlink communications using an antenna or antenna array 36. The received communications pass through an isolator or switch 38 to a data detection device 42. The data detection device 42 recovers data from the received communications using the assigned downlink O codes. These assigned codes may be determined by a form of blind code detection, 0 be known a priori, the code assignment may be signaled or by other means. A
O
Ni code assignment determination device 40 determines the assigned codes.
[0007] For uplink communications, uplink data is processed by a modulation Cc and spreading device 44 with uplink assigned codes to produce one or multiple uplink communications. The code assignment determination device determines the codes to use for the uplink. The uplink communications are Spassed through the isolator or switch 38 and radiated by an antenna or antenna array 36 of the UE 22 through the wireless radio interface 46.
[0008] The base station 20 receives the uplink communications using its antenna or antenna array 34. The received communications pass through an isolator or switch 32 to a data detection device 30. The data detection device recovers data from the received communications using the assigned uplink codes as determined by the code assignment device 26.
[0009] When a user in such a system requires additional codes to support a new or existing service, the code assignment decision is based on the available codes and power budgets. To illustrate, the user requires one additional uplink code to support a new service. A code out of the available codes is selected to support the service: The required transmission power level for a communication using this new code is determined, such as by using a path loss estimate, known interference levels and other factors. If the use of this code requires transmission power levels beyond the systems resources. The new service is not permitted.
0 [00010] As the number of codes increases, the effectiveness of this assignment approach degrades. The likelihood of using or finding codes with good cross
O
correlation properties decreases, as the number of used codes increases.
Although codes are designed to have minimal or low cross interference, in C practice, some codes may exhibit high cross correlation with other codes. These C0 codes will typically be eliminated from use in the system. Additionally, a group
N
C of codes, a code group, may exhibit a high cross correlation with each other, but acceptable cross correlation with other codes. Although eliminating these codes reduces cross interference, it also reduces the number of available codes to assign.
[00011] Accordingly, it is desirable to have other code assignment approaches to allow more efficient code assignments.
[00012] SUMMARY [00018] The invention includes various approaches to assigning codes in wireless code division multiple access communication systems. The invention estimates the cross code correlation between codes to base the code assignment.
One approach assigns codes having a high cross correlation to users having a low transmission power level. Another approach assigns code groups having a high cross correlation to a same coded composite transport channel. Another approach assigns codes using a cross correlation factor of each code to minimize a system noise rise. Another approach uses transmission or reception diversity to assign bad code groups to users having a different diversity relationship. Another
-T
O approach uses a diversity factor and a cross code correlation factor to assign codes.
O According to one aspect, the present invention provides a method for c assigning codes in a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) communication network, the method Including: Sproviding codes for potential assignment; ~Cevaluating the provided codes to determine codes having a high cross c- code correlation; determining users having a low transmission power level; and assigning the provided codes so that the provided codes having the high N cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users having the low transmission power level and the provided codes having a low cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users having a high transmission power level.
According to a further aspect, the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) radio network controller (RNC) including: a code assignment device for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine codes having a high cross code correlation and to determine users having a low transmission power level; and wherein the code assignment device assigns the provided codes so that the provided codes having the high cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users having the low transmission power level and the provided codes having a low cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users having a high transmission power level.
According to a further aspect, the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine codes having a high cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes so that the provided codes having the high cross code correlation are preferably assigned to users having a low transmission power level and the provided codes having a low cross code correlation are Spreferably assigned to users having a high transmission power level.
O According to one aspect the present invention provides a method for Sassigning codes to communications in a wireless code division multiple access communication system using spatial diversity, the method including: Cc providing codes for potential assignment; Cdetermining users having a different diversity relationship; evaluating the provided codes to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have the different diversity relationship.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining users having a different diversity relationship; means for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and means for assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have a different diversity relationship.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: a code assignment device for determining users having a different diversity relationship; for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and for assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have a different diversity relationship.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by O determining users having a different diversity relationship; evaluating provided c codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high O cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes to users, such that if c codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have a different Sdiversity relationship.
C According to a further aspect the present invention provides a method for Sassigning codes to communication in a wireless code division multiple access Ncommunication system using spatial diversity, the method including: providing codes for potential assignment and codes currently used by users; determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of signals received at a base station of that user; determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user; means for determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for potential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; means for determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and means for assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user; means for determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for Spotential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code O correlation between that provided code and other codes; c means for determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and means for assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
According to a further aspect the present Invention provides a wireless code division multiple access user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user;, determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for potential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING (S) Figure 1 is an illustration of a simplified base station and UE.
Figure 2 is an illustration of a simplified base station and UE using cross code correlation for code assignments.
Figure 3 is a flow chart for assigning codes having a high cross code correlation to communications having a substantially same transmission power level.
Figure 4 is a flow chart for assigning code groups having a high cross code correlation to a same coded composite transport channel.
Figure 5 is a flow chart for assigning codes having a high cross code correlation to communications having a low transmission power level.
Figure 6 is a flow chart for assigning codes based on an estimated noise rise.
Figure 7 is an illustration of a simplified base station and UE using cross code correlation and diversity relationships between users for code assignments.
4d Figure 8 is a flow chart for assigning code groups having a high cross code N correlation to UEs having a different diversity relationship.
o Figure 9 is a flow chart for assigning codes using both cross code c-I correlation and diversity correlation.
~O [00024] Figure 10 is a flow chart for assigning codes using a weighted average Snnoise rise/change over all the slots for a time division duplex/CDMA or time
O
0division multiple access/CDMA communication system.
C [00025] DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S) [00026] The embodiments of the invention can generally be used with any type of CDMA system, such as a time division duplex communication system using 0 CDMA (TDD/CDMA), frequency division duplex communication system using CDMA (FDD/CDMA) or a hybrid time division multiple access/CDMA communication system (TDMA/CDMA).
[00027] Figure 2 illustrates an embodiment of a code allocation system using cross code correlation. A cross code correlation determination device 48 evaluates the cross correlation between codes. The cross code correlation may be determined off-line and stored. Alternately, the cross code correlation may be determined on-line, as needed.
[00028] One approach to evaluating codes for cross correlation ranks the codes from a best code, exhibiting no or minimal cross code correlation, to a worst code, exhibiting the most cross code correlation. Another approach categorizes codes, such as by using a threshold test. One categorization approach uses two categories: good codes, exhibiting no or minimal cross code correlation, and bad codes, exhibiting high cross code correlation. Other categorizations may be used, such as good, medium and bad.
[00029) Additionally, code groups, sUCh as groups Of two Codes, three codes -or more, may be evaluated. The codes of the group are evaluated with respect to the cross code correlation to each other. The code groups may be ranked from groups having no or a low cross correlation to groups having a high cross correlation to each other. Alternately, the groups may be categorized, such as into good groups, having no or little cross correlation, and bad groups, having high cross correlation to each other.
[000301 Based on the code evaluation, the code assignment device 26 assigns codes to uplink and downlink commuunications. The LIE 22 determines the code assignment using an assigned code determination device 40. For downlnk communications, downinuk data is processed by a modulation and spreading device 28 with the assigned codes to produce one or multiple downlink communications. The downlnk communications are passed through an isolator or switch 32 and radiated by an antenna or antenna array 34 of the base station through a wireless radio interface 46.
[00031) The TIE 22 receives the downlink cornnmaunications using an. antenna or antenna array 86. The received communications pass through an isolator or switch 38 to a data detection device 42. The data detection device 42 recovers data from the received communications using the assigned downlink codes.
[00032] For uplink communications, uplink data is processed by a modulation and spreading device 44 with the uplink assigned codes to produce one or multiple uplink com-munications. The uplink communications are passed through an isolator or switch 38 and radiated by an antenna or antenna array 36 of the tiE 22 through the wireless radio interface 46.
0 [00033) The base station 20 receives the uplink comnimunicatioas using its antenna or antenna array 84. The received communications pass through an isolator or switch 32 to a data detection device 30. The data detection device recovers data from the received co-mn~to~ using the assigned uplink codes.
[00034] One approach to assign codes in the downlink assigns code groups *having a high cross code correlation to each other to a user or users transmitting at a substantially same power level. Codes transmitted at different power levels are more difficult to distinguish than codes tra-nsmittd at the sub stantially the same power level As a result, by transmitting codes having a high cross correlation at the same power level, the impact of high cross code correlation is minimized.
[00035] To assign the codes as shownin Figure 3, the transmission power levels for each downlink communication is determined, step 60. The code groups having a high cross code correlation are assigned to the communications having substantially the same power level, step .62.
[00036) Since the transmission power levels for commlunicatin to different users and even to the samne user in a different coded composite transport channel (CCTrOH) vary over time with respect to each other, it is preferred to only assign code groups having a high cross correlation to the same COTrCH. Accordingly, as shown in Figure 4, if a code group having aL high cross correlation is to be used, that code group is assigned to the same CCTrCH, step 64. This code assignment O approach can also be applied to the uplink, preferably when all communications O use the same spreading factor.
O
c' [00037] Another approach as shown in Figure 5 assigns codes having a high cross correlation to communications having a low transmission power level, step Cc 66. This approach minimizes the cross interference that a bad code (code having Sa high cross correlation) induces on the other communications and vice versa.
Conversely, codes having a low cross correlation are assigned to communications O having a high transmission power level.
[00038] In another approach, the cross code correlation can be used to estimate a change in noise level resulting from changing codes or adding new codes. A code assignment can be determined to minimize the noisd level.
[00039] Figure 6 is a preferred approach using estimated noise levels to assigning a new code to a new user of a CDMA system. A user N desires to communicate in a cell having N-l current users, step 68. Out of the unused available codes, a code Co is selected for evaluation, step 70. The cross code correlation X; of Co is determined for each currently used code C, step 72. Using the determined cross code correlation factors Xj, the noise rise from adding the new user using Co is determined. This procedure is repeated to estimate the noise rise for each of the unused codes, step 74. The code that results in the minimum noise rise is selected to support the new user, step 76.
[00040] To further optimize the code assignment, code swapping may be used.
After the minimum noise rise code is determined, the noise change by switching this code for each of the other used codes is determined, step 78. The overall code assignment resulting in the mninimum estimated noise level is selected, step Toilsrtcd C steriiu niers oefr)srN h os C)oilsrtcd ~i Iemnmm os iecd o srN h os Ni change for swapping cods 0. with each of the other users' codes, C1 to is determined. A code Qi is found where if C. is swapped for Ci. the noise is mnizd. User N is subsequently assigned code Ci and the user of Ci will now use code C..
[00041] Figure 7 illustrates an embodiment of a code allocation system where spatial processing is used. An antenna array 64, 56 may be used at either the base station 20, UE 22 or both, as shown in Figure 7, for spatial diversity.
Beams may be formed at a transmitting antenna array 54, 56 to focus a communication onto a p articular reception site or a receiving antenna array 54, 56 is used to steer the receiver towards a transmission source. The antenna array 64, 56 of the base station 20 or UE 22 as shown in Figure 7 may be used for such beam forming and steering.
[00042] In the downlink, multiple beams separate codes of users of that base station's cell. Downlink reception beams at the EJE 22 separate codes of that TJE's cell from other cells. In the uplink, multiple beams used for UE transmissions separate codes of that UE 22 from codes of UEs 22 in other cells.
Uplink reception beams at the base station 20, separate codes for each of that base station's cell tJEa 22.
[00043] If downlink transmission diversity or uplink reception diversity schemes are used, users having a different diversity relationship have no or little cross interference. The term diversity relationship refers to users in separate downlink transmission beams or in separate uplink transmission beams. These users communications are effectively orthogonal to each other. As a result, code groups having a high cross code correlation to each other may be assigned to users with a different diversity relationship with no or little cross correlation.
[00044] One approach to assign codes in such systems is slow code allocation as shown in Figure 8. Slow code allocation is preferably used in systems where codes are changed slowly, such as over seconds or even longer. In slow allocation, code groups having a high cross code correlation are not assigned to users having a similar or same diversity relationship. A UB diversity determination device 52 determines the diversity relationships between the U(Es 22, step 82. One approach to estimate the diversity relationship determines the direction of arrival (DOA) of signals transmitted from users as received at the base station Also, geolocation techniques may be used. If a code group having a high cross code correlation is to be used, the codes of the group are assigned by a cross code and diversity correlation determination device 50 to UEs 22 having different diversity relationships, step 84. As a result, these codes will not interfere with each other.
[00045] Another approach to assign codes is fast code allocation as shown in Figure 9. Fast code allocation~ is preferably used in systems where codes can be changed on the fly, such as the high-speed channel (HSDPA) proposed for the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). It can be used in systems where classical beamn forming is not employed& The UE diversity determination device 52 determines the diversity correlation between the O received UE signals, step 86. The codes are assigned to the users by the code cross and diversity correlation determination device 50 based on the diversity
O
relationship between the users and the cross code correlation, step 88.
Preferably, a diversity factor Si is assigned to each user and a cross code C correlation factor Yj is assigned to each code. Using the factors, a code v assignment is determined which minimizes the resulting cross code noise from N the assignment. The resulting cross code noise is preferably modeled using a 0 function, such as the product of Si and Yj..
[00046] Another embodiment is used with TDD/CDMA or TDMA/CDMA systems as shown in Figure 10. These systems use time slots as well as codes to distinguish communications. In such systems, the overall reception quality is based on a weighted average of the reception quality in each slot. As a result, poor reception quality in one slot canbe compensated for in other slots. The cross code correlation determination device 48 or the cross code and diversity correlation device 50 in such systems, preferably, determines the overall noise rise/change from code assignments using a weighted average over the slots, step Each assignment is also checked to see if each user meets minimum reception quality criteria, step 92. Either the code assignment minimiing the noise over the slots and meeting the minimum quality criteria is selected or the code assignment having a most optimal joint solution minimizing the noise over the slots and maximizing each user's reception quality is selected, step 92, 94.
-11-

Claims (19)

  1. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by ranking the codes from a highest cross code correlation to a least cross code correlation.
  2. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by categorizing the codes using a threshold test.
  3. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the categorizing categorizes the provided codes into a high cross code correlation category and a low cross code correlation category. A wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) radio network controller (RNC) including: a code assignment device for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine codes having a high cross code correlation and to determine users having a low transmission power level; and wherein the code assignment device assigns the provided codes so that the provided codes having the high cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users having the low transmission power level and the provided 13 codes having a low cross code correlation are preferably assigned to the users c having a high transmission power level. C 6. The RNC of claim 5 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by ranking the codes from a highest cross code correlation to a least cross code correlation.
  4. 7. The RNC of claim 5 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by C-I categorizing the codes using a threshold test. S8. The RNC of claim 7 wherein the categorizing categorizes the provided codes into a high cross code correlation category and a low cross code correlation category.
  5. 9. A wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine codes having a high cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes so that the provided codes having the high cross code correlation are preferably assigned to users having a low transmission power level and the provided codes having a low cross code correlation are preferably assigned to users having a high transmission power level. The UE of claim 9 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by ranking the codes from a highest cross code correlation to a least cross code correlation.
  6. 11. The UE of claim 9 wherein the evaluating the provided codes is by categorizing the codes using a threshold test.
  7. 12. The UE of claim 11 wherein the categorizing categorizes the provided codes into a high cross code correlation category and a low cross code correlation category. 14 0 13. A method for assigning codes in a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) communication network according to claim 1 and substantially as O hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings.
  8. 14. A wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) radio network controller (RNC) according to claim 5 and substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings. C 15. A wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) user equipment (UE) Saccording to claim 9 and substantially as hereinbefore described with refemce to Ci the drawings. S1. A method for assigning codes to communications in a wireless code o division multiple access communication system using spatial diversity, the method including: providing codes for potential assignment; determining users having a different diversity relationship; Cevaluating the provided codes to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad 0 code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably C' 10 assigned to the users determined to have the different diversity relationship. 2. A wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining users having a different diversity relationship; means for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and means for assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have the different diversity relationship. 3. A wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: a code assignment device for determining users having a different diversity relationship; for evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high cross code correlation; and for assigning the provided codes to users, such that if codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have the different diversity relationship. 4. A wireless code division multiple access user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by determining users having a different diversity relationship; evaluating provided codes for potential assignment to determine bad groups of codes having a high O cross code correlation; and assigning the provided codes to users, such that if C codes of one of the bad code groups are to be assigned, those bad code group codes are preferably assigned to the users determined to have the different Sdiversity relationship. c- 5. A method for assigning codes to communication in a wireless code division cmultiple access communication system using spatial diversity, the method 0 including: c 10 providing codes for potential assignment and codes currently used by users; determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of signals received at a base station of that user; determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment. The method of claim 5 wherein the determining an optimal code assignment is based on a product of the diversity and the cross code correlation factors. 7. The method of claim 5 wherein the code division multiple access communication system is a time division duplex communication system using code division multiple access and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots. 8. The method of claim 5 wherein the code division multiple access communication system is a time division multiple access communication system using code division multiple access and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots. 9. The method of claim 5 wherein the code division multiple access communication system is a time division duplex communication system using C.) O code division multiple access and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution C to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots and maximize each user reception quality. The method of claim 5 wherein the code division multiple access communication system is a time division multiple access communication system using code division multiple access and the optimal code assignment is a joint 0solution to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots and maximize each user reception quality. 11. A wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user; means for determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for potential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; means for determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and means for assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment. 12. The RNC of claim 11 wherein the determining an optimal code assignment is based on a product of the diversity and the cross code correlation factors. 13. The RNC of claim 11 wherein the RNC is a time division duplex using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots. 14. The RNC of claim 11 wherein the RNC is a time division multiple access using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots. I U The RNC of claim 11 wherein the RNC is a time division duplex using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution O to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time C slots and maximize each user reception quality.
  9. 16. The RNC of claim 11 wherein the RNC is a time division multiple access using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots and maximize each user reception quality. c 17. A wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) including: means for determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user; means for determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for potential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; means for determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and means for assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
  10. 18. The RNC of claim 17 wherein the determining an optimal code assignment is based on a product of the diversity and the cross code correlation factors.
  11. 19. The RNC of claim 17 wherein the RNC is a time division duplex using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots.
  12. 20. The RNC of claim 17 wherein the RNC is a time division multiple access using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots. O 21. The RNC of claim 17 wherein the RNC is a time division duplex using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution o to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time c slots and maximize each user reception quality.
  13. 22. The RNC of claim 17 wherein the RNC is a time division multiple access C using code division multiple access RNC and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots and maximize each user reception quality. C 23. A wireless code division multiple access user equipment (UE) including: an assigned codes determination device for determining codes assigned to support communications of the UE, the code assignment determined by determining a diversity factor for each user using a direction of arrival of received signals of that user; determining a cross correlation factor for each provided code for potential assignment, the cross correlation factor indicating a cross code correlation between that provided code and other codes; determining an optimal code assignment based on the diversity and cross code correlation factors; and assigning the provided codes to users based on the optimal code assignment.
  14. 24. The UE of claim 23 wherein the determining an optimal code assignment is based on a product of the diversity and the cross code correlation factors.
  15. 25. The UE of claim 23 wherein the UE is a time division duplex using code division multiple access UE and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots.
  16. 26. The UE of claim 23 wherein the UE is a time division multiple access using code division multiple access UE and the optimal code assignment minimizes a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots.
  17. 27. The UE of claim 23 wherein the UE is a time division duplex using code division multiple access UE and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution to O minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots Sand maximize each user reception quality. O C 28. The UE of claim 23 wherein the UE is a time division multiple access using code division multiple access UE and the optimal code assignment is a joint solution to minimize a weighted average of an estimated reception quality over all time slots and maximize each user reception quality. CN 29. A method for assigning codes to communications in a wireless code Sdivision multiple access communication system using spatial diversity cIN substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings.
  18. 30. A wireless code division multiple access radio network controller (RNC) substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings.
  19. 31. A wireless code division multiple access user equipment (UE) substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings. INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION P24333AU02
AU2007224393A 2002-02-20 2007-10-12 Code allocation based on cross code correlation Abandoned AU2007224393A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2007224393A AU2007224393A1 (en) 2002-02-20 2007-10-12 Code allocation based on cross code correlation

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US60/358,208 2002-02-20
US10/212,986 2002-08-05
AU2006202912A AU2006202912B2 (en) 2002-02-20 2006-07-06 Code allocation based on cross code correlation
AU2007224393A AU2007224393A1 (en) 2002-02-20 2007-10-12 Code allocation based on cross code correlation

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2006202912A Division AU2006202912B2 (en) 2002-02-20 2006-07-06 Code allocation based on cross code correlation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2007224393A1 true AU2007224393A1 (en) 2007-11-01

Family

ID=38658094

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007224393A Abandoned AU2007224393A1 (en) 2002-02-20 2007-10-12 Code allocation based on cross code correlation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2007224393A1 (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6330460B1 (en) Simultaneous forward link beam forming and learning method for mobile high rate data traffic
EP1744583B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing power control in a wireless communication system
CA2328469C (en) Coded allocation for sectorised radiocommunication systems
US9380588B2 (en) Resource allocation to users in slotted code division multiple access system using beams
EP1033050B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing beam searching in a radio communication system
US6957070B2 (en) Method of allocating transmission resources
AU2003217625B2 (en) Code allocation based on cross code correlation
AU2006202912B2 (en) Code allocation based on cross code correlation
AU2007224393A1 (en) Code allocation based on cross code correlation
JP3885728B2 (en) Directed maximum ratio combining method and system for high data rate traffic
JP3059058B2 (en) Frequency diversity communication system
EP1773087A2 (en) Code allocation based on cross code correlation
Anpalagan et al. A Distributed Packet Scheduling Scheme with Interference Avoidance for Non Real-Time Applications in CDMA Networks
van ROOYEN et al. Space division multiple access considerations in CDMA cellular systems
Hastings Smart antenna effects on soft handoff and capacity in a code division multiple access wireless communication system
HK1074924A (en) Code allocation based on cross code correlation
Mihailescu et al. Resource Allocation for Integrated Voice/WWW Traffic in UMTS/TDD Systems
HK1015216B (en) Method and apparatus for performing handoff between sectors of a common base station

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK1 Application lapsed section 142(2)(a) - no request for examination in relevant period