AU2007200896B2 - Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions - Google Patents

Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2007200896B2
AU2007200896B2 AU2007200896A AU2007200896A AU2007200896B2 AU 2007200896 B2 AU2007200896 B2 AU 2007200896B2 AU 2007200896 A AU2007200896 A AU 2007200896A AU 2007200896 A AU2007200896 A AU 2007200896A AU 2007200896 B2 AU2007200896 B2 AU 2007200896B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
group
herbicide
alkyl
hydrogen
picolinafen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU2007200896A
Other versions
AU2007200896A1 (en
Inventor
Roy Allan Killins
Ronald Steven Piskalny
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BASF SE
Original Assignee
BASF SE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2005204319A external-priority patent/AU2005204319B2/en
Application filed by BASF SE filed Critical BASF SE
Priority to AU2007200896A priority Critical patent/AU2007200896B2/en
Publication of AU2007200896A1 publication Critical patent/AU2007200896A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2007200896B2 publication Critical patent/AU2007200896B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

pool Section 29 Regulation 3.2(2) AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Application Number: Lodged: Invention Title: Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: 1 SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDAL METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS This application is a divisional application of Australian application no. 2005204319, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by 5 cross reference. Aryloxypicolinamides such as those described in U.S. 5,294,597 demonstrate excellent herbicidal activity, in particular against broadleaf weeds in cereal crops. However, said aryloxypicolinamides, 10 when used as the sole active ingredient, do not always achieve effective control of the full spectrum of weed species encountered in commercial agronomic practice at application rates required for acceptable crop safety. Such gaps in the spectrum of control can often be remedied by co-treatment with another herbicide known to be effective against the 15 relevant weed species. It has been disclosed (U.S. 5,674,807) that selected combinations of aryloxypicolinamides produce not merely the expected additive effect, but may exhibit a significant synergistic effect (i.e., the combination shows a much higher level of activity than that which could be predicted from that of the individual components). 20 This synergistic effect enables a greater margin of safety for the crop species. However, the disclosure is limited to two-way combinations of aryloxypicolinamides and members of selected known chemical classes which do not include herbicidal partners in the imidazolinone, cyclohexanedione, aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid, or pyridinecarboxylic 25 acid classes. Moreover, although the phenoxyacetic acid chemical class is disclosed, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), its esters and salts are not specifically exemplified. Therefore it is an object of this invention to provide synergistic, 30 crop-selective herbicidal combinations with broad-spectrum weed control. It is another object of this invention to provide synergistic herbicidal compositions useful for the control of a broad-spectrum of weeds in the presence of a crop. 35 Although aryloxypicolinamide compounds demonstrate excellent herbicidal activity, when applied alone they do not always achieve the desired spectrum of weed control at rates required for acceptable crop safety. Surprisingly, it has now been found that a two-way combination 40 comprising an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I 2 N, R I 1 3 M 5 0 (CHR) q z 10 wherein Z represents an oxygen or sulfur atom; 15 R, represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or halo alkyl group;
R
2 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl group; 20 g is 0 or 1;
R
3 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl or alkenyl group; the or each group X independently represents a 25 halogen atom or an optionally substituted alkyl or alkoxy group, preferably a haloalkyl group, or an alkenyloxy, cyano, carboxy, alkoxycarbonyl, (alkylthio) carbonyl, alkylcarbonyl, amido, alkylamido, nitro, alkylthio, halo alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkynylthio, alkylsulphinyl, al 30 kylsulphonyl, alkyloxyminoalkyl or alkenyloximinoalkyl group; n is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5; 35 the or each group Y independently represents a halogen atom or an alkyl, nitro, cyano, haloalkyl, alkoxy or haloalkoxy group; and m is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5 40 or one of its environmentally compatible salts; plus a second herbicide selected from 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) or one of its environmentally compatible esters or 45..salts, an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione an aryloxyphenoxy propionic acid, or a pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide demonstra tes a synergistic herbicidal effect. Further, unexpectedly, a se- 3 lected three-way combination comprising an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I and 2,4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters or salts; and a third herbicide selected from the group consisting of an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione, and 5 an aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid herbicide produces a significant synergistic effect. Advantageously, the synergistic two-way and three-way combinations of the invention allow for lower application rates of said aryloxypicolinamide with concomittant increased'spectrum of weed control. Moreover, the synergistic 10 herbicidal methods and compositions of the invention allow for effective resistance management. The present invention provides a method for the synergistic con trol of undesirable plants such as Polygonum, Kochia, Galeopsis, 15 Galium, Stelaria, Sinapis, and Avena which comprises applying to the locus of said plants or to the foliage or stems of said plants a synergistically effective amount of a two-way combina tion comprising an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I plus a second herbicide selected from 2,4-D or one of its environmen 20 tally compatible esters or salts, an imidazolinone,- a cyclohexa nedione, an aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid, or a pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide. The present invention also provides a method for the synergistic control of undesirable plants which comprises ap plying to the locus of said plants a synergistically effective 25 amount of a three-way combination comprising an aryloxypicolina mide compound of formula I, 2,4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters or salts, and a third herbicide selected from the group consisting of an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione, or an aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide. 30 The present invention also provides a synergistic herbicidal com position which comprises an agriculturally acceptable carrier and a synergistically effective amount of a two-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I plus a second herbicide 35 selected from 2-,.4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters or -salts, an imidazolinone, .a cyclohexanedione, an arylo xyphenoxypropionic acid, or a pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide; or a three-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I, 2,4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters 40 or salts, and-a third-herbicide selected from the group consi sting of an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione, and an aryloxyphe noxypropionate herbicide. Aryloxypicolinamides of formula I 45 4 RR Ry 0 '(CHR)q \O/ z 5 wherein Z, R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , X, n, Y and m are defined herein above and methods for their preparation are described in U.S. 5,294,597. Said aryloxypicolinamides demonstrate excellent herbicidal activity, in particular against broadleaf weeds in cereal crops. However, said aryloxypicolinamides when used as the sole active ingredient do not 10 always achieve effective control of the full spectrum of weed species encountered in commercial agronomic practice, in conjunction with reliable selectivity for the crop species. Surprisingly, it has now been found that a two-way combination of an 15 aryloxypicolinamide of formula I and a second herbicide which is a cyclohexanedione herbicide provides synergistic control of troublesome weeds such as Polygonum, Kochia, Galeopsis, Galium, Stelaria, Sinapis, and Avena. Also, surprisingly, a three-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide of formula I, a second herbicide which is a 20 cyclohexanedione herbicide and a third herbicide which is 2,4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters or salts provides synergistic weed control. That is, the application of the two-way or three-way combinations of the invention gives a mutual reinforcing action such that the application rates of the individual herbicidal components can 25 be reduced and still the same herbicidal effect is achieved or, alternatively, the application of the combination of herbicidal components demonstrates a greater herbicidal effect than expected from the effect of the application of the individual herbicidal components when applied singly at the rate at which they are present in the 30 combination (synergistic effect).
4a In a preferred embodiment the invention provides a synergistic herbicidal composition which comprises an agriculturally acceptable carrier and a synergistically effective amount of a two-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide of formula I RR 11 3 0 N <1(CHR 2 ) q z 5 wherein Z represents an oxygen or sulfur atom; 10 R 1 represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or haloalkyl group;
R
2 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl group; 15 q is 0 or 1; R3 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl or alkenyl group; the or each group X independently represents a halogen atom or an 20 optionally substituted alkyl or alkoxy group, preferably a haloalkyl group, or an alkenyloxy, cyano, carboxy, alkoxycarbonyl, (alkylthio)carbonyl, alkylcarbonyl, amido, alkylamido, nitro, alkylthio, haloalkylthio, alkenylthio, alkynylthio, alkylsulphinyl, alkylsulphonyl, alkyloxyminoalkyl or alkenyloximinoalkyl group; 25 n is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5; the or each group Y independently represents a halogen atom or an alkyl, nitro, cyano, haloalkyl, alkoxy or haloalkoxy group; and 30 m is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5 4b or one of its environmentally compatible salts; and a second herbicide selected from the group consisting of 2,4-D or one its environmentally compatible salts or esters. 5 The aryloxypicolinamides of formula I may exist in the form of their environmentally compatible salts. Suitable salts are, in general, the salts of those cations, or the acid addition salts 5 of those acids, whose cations, or anions, respectively, do not adversely affect the herbicidal action of the active ingredients. Suitable cations are, in particular, ions of the alkali metals, 5 preferably lithium, sodium and potassium, of the alkaline earth metals, preferably calcium and magnesium, and of the transition metals, preferably manganese, copper, zinc and iron, and also ammonium, it being possible in this case, if desired, for one to four hydrogen atoms to be replaced by Cl-C 4 -alkyl, 10 hydroxy-C 1
-C
4 -alkyl, Cl-C 4 -alkoxy-Ci-C 4 -alkyl, hydroxy-Cl-C 4 -alkoxy-Ci-C 4 -alkyl, phenyl or benzyl, preferably ammonium, dimethylammonium, diisopropylammonium, tetramethylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, 2- (2-hydroxyeth-l-oxy) eth-1-y1 ammonium, 15 di (2-hydroxyeth-1-yl) ammonium, trimethylbenzylammonium, furthermore phosphonium ions, sulfonium ions, preferably tri(CI-C 4 -alkyl)sulfonium and sulfoxonium ions, preferably, tri (Cl-C 4 -alkyl) sulfoxonium. 20 Anions of suitable acid addition salts are mainly chloride, bromide, fluoride, hydrogen sulfate, sulfate, dihydrogen phosphate, hydrogen phosphate, nitrate, hydrogen carbonate, carbonate, hexafluorosilicate, hexafluorophosphate, benzoate and 25 the anions of Ci-C 4 -alkanoic acids, preferably formate, acetate, propionate and butyrate. In the specification and claims, the term 2,4-D designates 2,4-dichlorophoxyacetic acid. 2,4-D may also exist in the form of 30 its environmentally compatible esters or-salts. Suitable salts are, in general, the salts of those cations, which do not adversely affect the herbicidal action of the active ingr edients. 35 Suitable cations are, in particular, ions of the alkali metals, preferably lithium, sodium and potassium, of the alkaline earth metals, preferably calcium or magnesium, and of the transition metals, preferably manganese, copper, zinc and iron, and also ammonium, it being possible in this case if desired, for one to 40 four hydrogen atoms to be replaced by Ci-C 4 -alkyl, hydroxy Ci-C 4 -alkyl, Ci-C 4 -alkoxy-Ci-C 4 -alkyl, hydroxy-Ci-C 4 -alkoxy-Ci-C4 alkyl, phenyl or benzyl, preferably ammonium, dimethylammonium, diisopropylammonium, (2-hydroxy-eth-1-yl) ammonium, di(2-hydr oxy-eth-1-yl)ammonium or tri(2-hydroxy-eth-1-y)ammonium, 45 6 Expecially suitable cations are sodium, dimethylammonium, di(2-hydroxy-eth-1-yl)ammonium and tri(2-hydroxy eth-1-yl)ammonium. 5 Suitable esters of 2,4-D are the CI-CF-alkyl esters, for example the methyl, ethyl, propyl, 1-methylethyl, butyl, 1-methylpropyl, 2-methylpropyl, 1,1-dimethylethyl, pentyl, 1-methylbutyl, 2-methylbutyl, 3-methylbutyl, 2,2-dimethylpropyl, 1-ethylpropyl, hexyl, 1,1-dimethylpropyl, 1,2-dimethylpropyl, 1-methylpentyl, 10 2-methylpentyl, 3-methylpentyl, 4-methylpentyl, 1,1-dimethyl butyl, 1,2-dimethylbutyl, 1,3-dimethylbutyl, 2,2-dimethylbutyl, 2,3-dimethylbutyl, 3,3-dimethylbutyl, 1-ethylbutyl, 2-ethylbutyl, 1,1,2-trimethylpropyl, 1-ethyl-1-methylpropyl, 1-ethyl-3 -methyl propyl, heptyl, 5-methyl-l-hexyl, octyl, 6-methyl-l-heptyl, 15 2-ethyl-l-hexyl or 4-ethyl-1-hexyl esters, or the Cl-C 4 -alko xy-C 1
-C
4 -alkyl esters for example the methoxymethyl, ethoxymethyl, propoxymethyl, (1-methylethoxy)methyl, butoxymethyl, (1-methyl propoxy)methyl, (2-methylpropoxy)-methyl, (1,1-dimethyl ethoxy)methyl, 2-(methoxy)ethyl, 2-(ethoxy)ethyl, 20 2- (propoxy) ethyl, 2- (1-methylethoxy) ethyl, 2- (butoxy) ethyl, 2-(1-methylpropoxy)ethyl, 2-(2-methylpropoxy) ethyl, 2- (1, 1-dimethylethoxy) ethyl, 2- (methoxy) propyl, 2- (ethoxy)propyl, 2-(propoxy)propyl, 2-(1-methylethoxy)-propyl, 2-(butoxy)propyl, 2-(1-methylpropoxy)propyl, 2-(2-methylpropoxy)propyl, 25 2- (1, 1-dimethylethoxy) propyl, 3- (methoxy)propyl, 3- (ethoxy) -propyl, 3- (propoxy)propyl, 3- (1-methylethoxy) propyl, 3-(butoxy)propyl, 3-(1-methylpropoxy)propyl, 3- (2-methyl propoxy)propyl,. 3-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)propyl, 2-(methoxy)butyl, 2- (ethoxy)butyl, 2-(propoxy)butyl, 2-(1-methylethoxy)butyl, 30 2- (butoxy)butyl, 2- (1-methylpropoxy)butyl, 2-(2-methyl propoxy)butyl, 2-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)butyl, 3-(methoxy)butyl, 3-(ethoxy) -butyl, 3-(propoxy)butyl, 3-(methylethoxy)butyl, 3- (butoxy)butyl)., 3-(1-methylpropoxy)butyl, 3-(2-methyl propoxy)butyl, 3-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)butyl, 4-(methoxy)butyl, 35 4- (ethoxy)butyl, 4-(propoxy)butyl, 4-(1-methylethoxy)butyl, 4-(butoxy)butyl, 4-(1-methylpropoxy)butyl, 4- (2-methyl propoxy)butyl or 4-(1,1,-dimethylethoxy)butyl esters; Especially suitable esters are the 1-methyl-l-ethyl, butyl, 40 6-methyl-l-heptyl, 2-ethyl-l-hexyl or 2-butoxy-l-ethyl esters. Examples of an imidazolinone herbicide suitable for use in the methods and compositions of the invention include imazapyr, ima zethapyr, imazapic, imazaquin, imazamox, imazamethabenz methyl, 45 imazamethapyr or the like or one of its environmetntally compati ble salts, preferably imazamethabenz methyl. Suitable salts are in general, the salts of those anions which do not adversely af- 7 fect the herbicidal action of the active ingredient. They are si milar to those listed for the compounds of formula I. A cyclohexanedione herbicide suitable for use in the methods and 5 compositions of the invention include sethoxydim, clethodim, al loxydim, tralkoxydim, cycloxydim, butroxydin, clefoxydim, clopr oxydim, tepraloxydim or the like, or one of its environmentally compatible salts preferably tralkoxydim. Suitable salts are in general the salts of those cations which do not adversely affect 10 the herbicidal action of the active ingredient. They are similar to those listed tor the compounds of formula I. Exemplary of aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides suitable for use in the inventive methods and compositions are fluazifop-p-butyl, 15 fenoxaprop-ethyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, quizalofop-p-terfuryl, qui zalofop-p, haloxyfop-methyl, clodinafop-propargyl, isoxapurifop, cyhalofop butyl, fenthioprop, propaquizafop, quizalafop-ethyl, quizalafop-P-ethyl or the like, or one of its environmentally compatible salts or esters, preferably fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. Suita 20 ble salts or esters are similar to those listed for 2,4-D. A pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide such as picloran, clopyralid, or the like, preferably clopyralid, is suitable for use in the two-way combination of the invention. Also salts thereof may be 25 used. Suitable salts are similar to those listed for 2,4-D. In the specification and claims, the term alkyl (alone or in com bination) represents a Cl-C6-alkyl group, especially a Ci-C 4 -alkyl group; the term alkoxy (alone or in combination) represents a 30 Ci-C6-alkoxy group, especially a Ci-C 4 -alkoxy group; the term alkenyl (alone or in combiantion) represents a C 3
-C
6 -alkenyl group, especially a C 3
-C
4 -alkenyl group; the term alkynyl repre sents a C 3
-C
6 -alkynyl group, especially a C 3
-C
4 -alkynyl group. 35 Preferred synergistic combinations of the invention are those two-way or three-way combinations containing a formula I aryloxy picolinamide wherein Z is oxygen; 40
R
1 is hydrogen; q is 0; 45 R 3 is hydrogen; 8 X is haloalkyl; and Y is hydrogen or fluorine. 5 Especially those two-way or three-way combinations containing a formula I aryloxypicolinamide wherein n=l and X is linked in meta-position to the phenyl radical (with regard to the oxygen bridge). 10 More preferred synergistic two-way and three-way combinations are those wherein the formula I compound is N-(4-fluorophe nyl)-6-[3-trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-2-pyridine carboxamide ilus trated below , and hereinafter designated, picolinaf en.
CF
3 O N F 0 20 picolinafen Preferred second herbicides for the two-way combinations of the invention are 2,4-D, imazamethabenz methyl, tralkoxydim, fenoxa 25 prop-p-ethyl, and clopyralid. Another prefered embodiment of the invention are those two-way combinations wherein the second herbicide is 2,4-D or one of its environmentally compatible esters or salt, expecially 2,4-D. 30 Another preferred embodiment of the invention are those two-way combinations wherein the second Herbicide is selected from the group consisting of an imidazolinone herbicide, a cyclohexanedi one herbicide and a pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide. Especially 35 the second herbicide is imazamethabenz methyl, tralkoxydim or clopyralid. Another preferred embodnient of the invention are those two-way combinations wherein the second herbicide is an aryoxyphenoxy 40 propionate herbicide. Especially the second herbicide is fenoxa prop-p-ethyl. Preferred third herbicides for the three-way combination of the invention are imazamethabenz methyl, tralkoxydim or fenoxaprop 45 p-ethyl.
9 Another preferred embodiment of the invention are those three-way combinations wheren the third herbicide is selected from the group consisting of an imidazolinone herbicide and a cyclohexanedione herbicide. 5 Especially the third herbicide is imazamethabenz methyl or tralk oxydim. Another preferred embodiment of the invention are those three-way 10 combinatins wherein the third herbicide is an ayloxyphenoxypro pionate herbicide. Especially the second herbicide is fenoxaprop p-ethyl. In actual practice, the combination of the invention may be 15 applied simultaneously (as a tank mix or a premix), separately or sequentially. Thus, in accordance with the method of invention a synergisti cally effective amount of a two-way combination of aryloxypicoli 20 namide and a second herbicide selected from 2,4-D, or one of its environmentally compatible salts or esters, an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione, an aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid, or a pyridine carboxylic acid herbicide; or a synergistically effective amount of a three-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide, 2,4-D, or 25 one of its environmentally compatible salts or esters and a third herbicide selected from an imidazolinone, a cyclohexanedione, or an aryloxyphenoxypropionate is applied to the locus, foliage or stems of undesirable plants, particularly plants selected from the genera Polygonum, Kochia, Galeopsis, Galium, Stelaria, Sina 30 pis, and Avena, optionally in the presence of a crop, preferably a cereal crop such as wheat, barley, rice, corn, rye or the like. The synergistically effective amount of the two- and three-way combinations described above may vary according to prevailing 35 conditions such as the particular second and third component pre sent, weed pressure, application timing, weather conditions, soil conditions, mode of application, topographical character, target crop species and the like. 40 Preferred two-way combinations of the invention are those wherein the weight/weight ratio of the aryloxypicolinamide of formula I to the second compound is about: aryloxypicolinamide:2,4 D (or its salts or ester), 1:1 to 1:25; 45 aryloxypicolinamide:imidazolinone herbicide, 1:1 to 1:35; 10 aryloxypicolinamide:cyclohexenedione herbicide, 1:1 to 1:20; aryloxypicolinamide:aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide, 1:1 to 1:10; 5 aryloxpicalinamide:pyridicarboxylic acid herbicide, 1:1 to 1:15. More preferred two-way combinations of the invention are those wherein the weight/weight ratio of picolinafen to the second com 10 ponent is about: picolinafen:2,4-D, 1:1 to 1:25; picolinafen:imazethabenz methyl, 1:1 to 1:35; 15 picolinafen:tralkoxydim, 1:1 to 1:20; picolinafen:fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, 1:1 to 1:10; or 20 picolinafen:clopyralid, 1:1 to 1:15. Preferred three-way combinations of the: invention are those whe rein the weight/weight ratio of the aryloxypicolinamide of for mula I to 2,4-D (or its salts or esters) to third component is 25 about: aryloxypicolinamide: 2,4 D (or its salts or esters): imidazolinone herbicide, 1:1:1 to 1:35:25; 30 aryloxypicolinamide: 2,4 D (or its salts or esters): cyclohexane dione herbicide; 1:1:1 to 1:20:25; aryloxypicolinamide: 2,4 D (or its salts or esters) : aryloxyphen oxypropionate herbicide, 1:1:1 to 1:10:25. 35 More preferred three-way combinations of the invention are those wherein the weight/weight/weight ratio of picolinafen to 2,4-D to third component is about: 40 picolinafen:2,4-D:imazamethabenz methyl, 1:1:1 to 1:35:25; picoli&ifen:2,4-D:tralkoxydim, 1:1:1 to 1:20:25; or picolinafen:2,4-D:fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, 1:1:1 to 1:10:25. 45 11 The present invention also provides a synergistic herbicidal com position comprising an agriculturally acceptable carrier and a synergistically effective amount of a two-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide of formula I and a second herbicidal compound 5 selected from the group consisting of 2,4-D, or one of its envi ronmentally compatible salts or esters an imidazolinone herbicide, a cyclohexanedione herbicide, an aryloxyphenoxypropio nic acid herbicide and a pyridinecarboxylic acid herbicide. The present invention further provides a synergistic herbicidal com 10 position which comprises an agriculturally acceptable carrier and a synergistically effective amount of a three-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide compound of formula I, 2,4-D, or one of its environmentally compatible salts or esters and a third herbi cidal compound selected from the group consisting of an 15 imidazolinone herbicide, a cyclohexanedione herbicide, and an aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide. . The agriculturally acceptable carrier may be a solid or a liquid, preferably a liquid, more preferably water. While not required, 20 the combination compositions of the invention may also contain other additives such as fertilizers, inert formulation aids, i.e. surfactants, emulsifiers, defoamers, dyes, extenders or any of the conventional inert ingredients typically employed in herbici dal formulated products. 25 Compositions according to the invention may be formulated in any conventional form, for example in the form of a twin pack, or as an aqueous concentrate, soluble granular, dispersible granular or the like. 30 Preferred two-way combination compositions of the invention are those compositions wherein the aryloxypicolinamide compound is picolinafen. Also preferred are those synergistic two-way combi nation compositions having a second herbicide selected from the 35 group consisting of 2,4-D, imazamethabenz methyl, tralkoxydim, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and clopyralid. More preferred two-way combi nation compositions of the invention are those compositions of the invention wherein the weight/weight ratio of picolinafen to second component is about: 40 picolinafen:2,4-D, 1:1 to 1:25; picolinafen:imazethabenz methyl, 1:1 to 1:35; 45 picolinafen:tralkoxydim, 1:1 to 1:20; 12 picolinafen:fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, 1:1 to 1:10; or picolinafen:clopyralid, 1:1 to 1:15. 5 Preferred three-way combination compositions of the invention are those compositions wherein the picolinamide compound is picolina fen. Also preferred are those synergistic three-way combination compositions having a third herbicide selected from the group consisting of imazamethabenz methyl, tralkoxydim and fenoxaprop 10 p-ethyl. More preferred three-way combination compositions of the invention are those compositions wherein the weight/weight/ weight ratio of picolinafen to 2,4-D to third component is about: picolinafen:2,4-D:imazamethabenz methyl, 1:1:1 to 1:35:25; 15 picolinafen:2,4-D:tralkoxydim, 1:1:1 to 1:20:25; or picolinafen:2,4-D:fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, 1:1:1 to 1:10:25. 20 For a more clear understanding of the invention, specific exam ples thereof are set forth below. These examples are merely il lustrative, and are not to be understood as. limiting the scope and underlying principles of- the invention in any way. 25 In the following examples, synergism for two-way combinations is determined by the Colby method (S.R. Colby, Weeds 1967 (15), 20), i.e. the expected (or predicted) response of the combination is calculated by taking the product of the observed response for each individual component of the combination when applied alone 30 divided by 100 and subtracting this value from the sum of the ob served response for each component when applied alone. Synergism of the combination is then determined by comparing the observed response of the combination to the expected (or predicted) re sponse as calculated from the observed responses of each indivi 35 dual component alone. If the observed response of the combina tion is greater than the expected (or predicted) response then the combination is said to be synergistic and falls within the definition of synergistic effect as previously defined. 40 The foregoing is illustrated mathematically below, wherein a two way combination, C 2 , is composed of component X plus component Y and Obs. designates the observed response of the combination C 2 . 45 13 XY (X + Y) - = Expected response (Exp.) 100 5 Synergism= Obs. > Exp. In similar manner for the case of three-way combination, C 3 , is composed of component X plus component Y plus component X and Obs. designates the observed response of the combination C 3 . 10 (XY+XZ+YZ) XYZ (X + y + Z) - + = Exp. 100 1000+0 15 Synergism = Obs. > Exp. In the following examples, crop tolerance ratings are taken pe riodically throughout the growing season. The first rating is 20 taken one to two weeks after treatment and the final rating is taken just prior to harvest. For all treatments described in the following examples crop tolerance was commercially acceptable, i.e. < 20% injury, on each of the three crops tested. None of the treatments demonstrated commercially unacceptable injury to 25 barley, durum wheat or hard red spring wheat. Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 30 nafen and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Grassy and broadleaved weeds are either seeded perpendicular to the direction of the crop or broadcast in early to mid-May. The crop is seeded after the weed seed. Row width is 18 cm. The seed 35 is drilled in with a Roger's 1.8 m width drill to a depth of 5 cm. All trials employ standard accepted weed science procedures. Ap plications are made with a Roger's C0 2 -powered shrouded sprayer. 40 Test design is a modified randomized complete block design with four replications. All applications are made post-emergence to the weeds and crop. The test solutions are prepared by tank-mixing sufficient quanti 45 ties of aqueous solutions and/or dispersions of the test compounds.
14 The treated plots are examined at intervals during the growing season and rated for percent control of weeds and crop injury. The data listed is an average of the replicates for that treat ment. The Colby method of analysis is used to determine the re 5 sultant biological effect of the combination treatment as compa red to the biological effect of each component when applied alone. The data are reported in Table I. As can be seen from the data shown in Table I, application of a 10 combination of picolinafen plus 2,4-D gave significantly greater weed control than that which could be predicted from the weed control resulting from the application of either picolinafen alone or 2.,4-D alone. 15 TABLE I Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picolinafen plus 2,4-D picolinafen 2,4-D picolinafen + 50g/ha 280g/ha 2,4-D 20 50g/ha + 280 g/ha Weed Species Percent Control Ob- Expected served Avena fatua 5 2 15 7 25 Chenopodium album 57 91 97 96 Polygonum convolvu- 54 48 80 76 lus 30 Galeopsis tetrahit 59 2 70 60 Polygonum 26 53 85 65 (smartweed) spp. Vaccaria pyramaidata 63 51 97 82 35 EXAMPLE 2 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli nafen and Imazamethabenz Methyl 40 Following essentially the same procedure described in Example 1 and employing picolinafen and imazamethabenz methyl, the data shown in Table II are obtained. 45 15 As can be. seen from the data in Table II, the application of a combination of picolinafen plus imazamethabenz methyl gives si gnificantly greater weed control than that which could be predic ted from the weed control resulting from the application of ei 5 ther picolinafen alone or imazamethabenz methyl alone. 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 16 1 N (1) CO NXok or 44 Q' ) v c oN0 oc C: '-4 0 r4I 0 ao N 4-4 Q) o coc 0 o 4 C ro 4-4 00 > ri C.) ro 0) Q)4 -q 44) 0'-4 -4 -P-40 (0 C 44 M CNCU Q)4 " r -4 Q) Q)19 ma 00 ac >, V)D 4 0 l i E-4u 17 EXAMPLE 3 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 nafen and Tralkoxydim Following essentially the same procedure as described in Example 1 and employing picolinafen and tralkoxydim, the data shown in Table III are obtained 10 As can be seen from the data shown on Table III, the application of a combination of picolinafen plus tralkoxydim gives signifi cantly greater weed control than that which could be predicted from the weed control resulting from the application of either 15 picolinafen alone or tralkoxydim alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 >15 .~ 0 M4~ 114. . 4 .u r- co 0D in r- %M co 4 '.) Q 9 0) LA LA %0 $4 ON 4-4 o> -44 o0 d 0 =4 4- 4 0) -w ~ 0 0 0 0 4 I) 0 Uo o to > 0 0) U 1-4 V a) U a) 44 al 0 V- E b 44 C ) =~) 4) ) C4 a~ w 0) :t, m, q0 s H- -14 1- 4 4i to U u N 0 I m .4 --I 1"C m a 0 5- 4 Ca to En T3 0) ?3h 0m q ~ U) fa- I 4 r- >, U S -4a) a) m (a C z ma a) '- U U) a a ! ,. L4 ,* -. 4 ( E- ~ _ _ 19 EXAMPLE 4 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 nafen and Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl Following essentially the same procedure as described in Example 1 and employing picolinafen and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, the data shown in Table IV are obtained. 10 As can be seen from the data shown on Table IV, the application of a combination of picolinafen plus fenoxaprop-p-ethyl gives si gnificantly greater weed control than that which could- be predic ted from the weed control resulting from the application of ei 15 ther picolinafen alone or fenoxaprop-p-ethyl alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 20 >1 a) x x 0 o 0 c C to n 0 60 rn 0 + a)) C C O a c 0 >a H4 - .0 O 0 o0 0 o o o co oCo 00 C. o C.C & L A4 0 10 0 L C -l O k0 O A L
-'
00 *0 -m 4O u * cz $ - .2 .0 co vCD r >1 -4 C Do J )0 Mn 2 .0 0 4 '-a 0 E - '4 1 ') $- .0 0 ~ V N ) tO C '0 to 0 2 to 0 00 u. 'U N- 41 0 r- 4 fu 0. C: -% C.u.N .~ ' '0 024 C4 1 E .C O > Q) -- mU r') to ~ 21 EXAMPLE 5 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 nafen and Clopyralid Following essentially the same procedure as in Example 1 and em ploying picolinafen and clopyralid, the data shown in Table V are obtained. 10 As can be seen from the data shown on Table IV the application of a combination of picolinafen plus clopyralid gives significantly greater weed control than that which could be predicted from the weed control resulting from the application of either picolinafen 15 alone or clopyralid alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 22 4 H T >1 cu a) oo c (N 0 tN C4 1. + I + W 44 0 0 -4 0 00 0 o 4 %D 19 o u ~ -4 '0 (NI L) u ruJ 0 4 o 4 4 U cu $4 >~ 0* L 0 'A N -4 1 Q 4 0 a -4 - - U I4i C4 to Or fuW CDL44 m > u ' 23 EXAMPLE 6 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 nafen, Imazamethabenz Methyl and 2,.4-D Following essentially the same procedure as described in Example 1 and employing picolinafen, 2,4-D and imazamethabenz methyl, the data shown in Table VI are obtained. 10 As can be seen from the data on Table VI, the application of 'a combination of picolinafen, .2,4-D and imazamethabenz methyl gives significantly greater weed control than that which could be pre dicted from the weed control resulting from the application of 15 picolinafen.alone, 2,4-D alone or imazamethabenz methyl alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 24 41 > a) . E co CO $4 (7N C- c- N C %W v o c C ) ON m O 0 Ln Q) ro 0 + ) cu C, c ~ - D (Na ~ N r U4, 0 0u 0 -i 0 c .0 o o %D e 41 -( 0 >41 0 ) ) -'.-4 -4t C-)o -1 00 0C ) -0 mC 0z E-4 W.( L .
25 EXAMPLE 7 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 nafen, Tralkoxydim and 2,4-D Following essentially the same procedure as described in Example 1 and employing picolinaf en, 2,4-D, and tralkoxydim, the data shown in Table VII are obtained. 10 As can be seen from the data on Table VII, the application of a combination of picolinafen, 2,4-D and tralkoxydim gives signifi cantly greater weed control than that which could be predicted from the weed control resulting from the application of picolina 15 fen alone, 2,4-D alone or tralkoxydim alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 26 E o 17 00 E 0 +~ W 01 00 + C CC - 44 o co C)co C .0 t . 0 , o* M~- 0 - c .,- '0m aN C .1 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 o o ' 0 1. "-' -H 0 LA 04 -'-1 .H :3 0) 0 CU 4- 0 Q C4 0) U) Ut ru cu E-4 3:1 OC 4 Cu0 27 EXAMPLE 8 Evaluation of the Herbicidal Activity of a Combination of Picoli 5 naf en, 2,4-D and Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl Following essentially the same procedure as described in Example 1 and employing picolinafen, 2,4-D and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, the data- shown in Table VIII are obtained. 10 As can be seen from the data shown in Table VIII, the application of a combination of picolinafen, 2,4-D and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl gi ves significantly greater weed control than that which could be predicted from the weed control resulting from the application of 15 picolinafen alone, or 2,4-D alone or fenoxaprop-p-ethyl alone. 20 25 30 35 40 45 28 0 a a) u w 'co %0 0 ko + x + 0o 0 0 0 0D 0% 00 o I-.. r- c -4 C. LW~ 00 0 0 0 -14 O-404J 0ro % 0. 0 0 0D x ) 0i 1 -4 0i4 LW 0 0 L1 L) 0 0 U4 o co -4 C6 0 '0 x U Aj 0 o L 'q-1 0 -1 0 0 z .0 m m - - 0 tU 4-4 0 L, 0, UQ UN 00 m - -4 0 Q) m) m- o z Q) -i occ > -r. a) 14 14 u C 29 Comprises/comprising and grammatical variations thereof when used in this specification are to be taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components or groups thereof, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, 5 integers, steps, components or groups thereof.

Claims (4)

1. A synergistic herbicidal composition which comprises an agriculturally acceptable carrier and a synergistically effective amount of a two-way combination of an aryloxypicolinamide of formula I R 1 R 3 z (CHR 2 ) q \ 0 "' z wherein Z represents an oxygen or sulfur atom; RI represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or haloalkyl group; R 2 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl group; q isOorl; R 3 represents a hydrogen or an alkyl or alkenyl group; the or each group X independently represents a halogen atom or an optionally substituted alkyl or alkoxy group, preferably a haloalkyl group, or an alkenyloxy, cyano, carboxy, alkoxycarbonyl, (alkylthio)carbonyl, alkylcarbonyl, amido, alkylamido, nitro, alkylthio, haloalkylthio, alkenylthio, alkynylthio, alkylsulphinyl, alkylsulphonyl, alkyloxyminoalkyl or alkenyloximinoalkyl group; n is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5; 31 the or each group Y independently represents a halogen atom or an alkyl, nitro, cyano, haloalkyl, alkoxy or haloalkoxy group; and m is 0 or an integer from 1 to 5 or one of its environmentally compatible salts; and a second herbicide selected from the group consisting of 2,4-D or one its environmentally compatible salts or esters.
2. The composition according to claim 1 having a formula I aryloxypicolinamide wherein Z is oxygen; R, is hydrogen; q is 0; R 3 is hydrogen; X is haloalkyl; and Y is hydrogen or fluorine.
3. The composition according to claim 2 wherein said formula I aryloxypicolinamide is picolinafen.
4. A. method for the control of undesirable plants, which comprises applying to the locus of said plants or to the foliage or stems of said plants an effective amount of a composition as claimed in any one of claims I to 3. P21197AU02
AU2007200896A 1999-10-14 2007-03-01 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions Expired AU2007200896B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2007200896A AU2007200896B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2007-03-01 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US60/159383 1999-10-14
AU2005204319A AU2005204319B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2005-08-29 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods and Compositions
AU2007200896A AU2007200896B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2007-03-01 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2005204319A Division AU2005204319B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2005-08-29 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods and Compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2007200896A1 AU2007200896A1 (en) 2007-03-22
AU2007200896B2 true AU2007200896B2 (en) 2010-02-25

Family

ID=37909137

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007200896A Expired AU2007200896B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2007-03-01 Synergistic Herbicidal Methods & Compositions

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2007200896B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2007200896A1 (en) 2007-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2005204319B2 (en) Synergistic Herbicidal Methods and Compositions
AU2007200896B2 (en) Synergistic Herbicidal Methods &amp; Compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK24 Application lapsed reg. 22.2e(2) - failure to pay response fee
NB Applications allowed - extensions of time section 223(2)

Free format text: THE TIME IN WHICH TO PAY AN EXAM RESPONSE FEE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO 02 MAY 2010.

FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired