AU2006208416A1 - Taste masking spill-resistant formulation - Google Patents

Description

Our Ref: 12707161 P/00/011 Regulation 3:2 00

OO

O

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990 00

(O

ORIGINAL

COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Applicant(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

P.O. Box 2043 46120 Herzlia Pituach 26110 Haifa Israel DAVIES COLLISON CAVE Patent Trade Mark Attorneys 255 Elizabeth Street Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000 Taste masking spill-resistant formulation The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- 5951

(O

e. TASTE MASKING SPILL-RESISTANT FORMULATION C) This application claims the benefit of provisional application USSN 60/330,447, filed October 22, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to a taste masking spill resistant pharmaceutical 00 composition, comprising an elegant spill resistant formulation with taste masking concentrations of low-molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG). This composition is less \0 bitter, sweeter and has better overall flavor than current pharmaceutical compositions, while S 10 maintaining advantageous spill resistant properties.

Heretofore, pharmaceutical agents for systemic treatment by oral administration have generally been fonnulated in solid form as pills or capsules or in liquid form. Children, the elderly and people with motor problems often have problems swallowing pills and capsules. It is also difficult to administer medicine in liquid form to children, even when the liquid has been thickened to a syrup, and the elderly and those with motor problems also have difficulty with the self administration of liquid, especially when it is necessary to measure a specific unit dose.

Important requirements for any non-solid pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration include palatability to children and adults, stability, i.e. a long shelf life, compatibility of formulation components with active agent, and accuracy of administration of the required dose. Ease of administration is a long-standing need for such formulations.

Pharmaceutical preparations in semisolid form for topical application are well known in the art. Such preparations include gels, pastes, creams and ointments for use on the skin, teeth and mucous membranes. Antacids and anti-ulcer agents in suspension and gel form for coating the mucous lining of the stomach are also well known in the art.

References have been made to incorporating pharmaceutical agents into thickened vehicles for oral administration, as for example those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.

Wiczer, US 4,305,933, Ravel et al., 4,576,645, Munshi US 4,427,681, and Tachon, US 5,300,302, and Gorman et al., US 5,288,479. There is a need for spill resistant pharmaceutical compositions that do not contain gelatin, pectin, or seaweed polysaccharides such as agar, algin, carrageenan or furcelleran, with commercially acceptable taste.

However, these vehicles all suffer from one or more disadvantages, such as the presence of a component which is undesirable for administration to children and/or is 1

IO

Sincompatible with many pharmaceutical agents, the presence of an emulsion which is difficult to manufacture and tends to be unstable and/or inadequate viscosity, or bitter taste.

00 There is a need for an economical formulation of systemic pharmaceutical agents in easily-administered form, as well as a need for easily administered spill resistant IN 5 pharmaceutical formulations which can be measured and administered effortlessly to children and by adults with motor problems. Such a formulation must be palatable, ie. not bitter, with 00 an acceptable overall flavor and texture.

C Spill resistant pharmaceutical formulations for oral administration are Sdescribed in U.S. Patent 6,071,523 issued to Mehta et al., and U.S. Patent 6,102,254 issued to CNl 10 Ross, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. There remains a need for formulations with improved palatability, and a need for balancing the components of the formulation to achieve this goal while maintaining the other requisite characteristics of a spill resistant formulation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [10] The invention relates to a taste masking spill resistant pharmaceutical composition, comprising an elegant spill resistant formulation with taste masking concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) from at least about 1% to about 25%. Specific examples include PEG concentrations of about 5, 10, 15, and below 20%. The composition can be formulated as a placebo (base) or can further comprise an active ingredient. This composition is less bitter, sweeter and has better overall flavor than current pharmaceutical compositions, while maintaining advantageous spill resistant properties. The formulations contain orally active therapeutic agents in semisolid form for oral administration, in a multidose container or a single dose device.

[11] The invention provides pharmaceutical agents useful for systemic treatment by the oral route in a form which is convenient to administer to children, which is convenient for self administration of aging adults, as well as adults with motor problems, with improved taste.

[12] The invention provides pharmaceutical agents useful for systemic treatment by oral administration in a composition which is provided in a device from which it is particularly easy to administer and convenient to measure single dosage units of the composition, and avoids the problems of liquid formulations, such as spillage.

O

O

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [13] Figure 1 shows the solubility of acetaminophen in water, glycerin and 00 propylene glycol.

[14] Figure 2 shows a viscosity carbomer concentration relationship.

S 5 DETAILED DESCRIPTION In describing embodiments of the present invention, specific terminology is 00 Semployed for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the 0 specific terminology so selected. It is to be understood that each specific element includes all Steclmical equivalents, which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. The above-described embodiments of the invention may be modified or varied, and elements added or omitted, without departing from the invention, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. Each reference cited here is incorporated by reference as if each were individually incorporated by reference.

[16] Where the term "pharmaceutical" is used herein, it should be understood to include prescription, over the counter, GRAS (generally recognized as safe), nutraceutical, and other products whether subject to approval by a drug regulatory agency or not. The pharmaceutical agents useful in the inventive formulations are typically bitter.

[17] The term "spill resistant formulation" refers here to a product which, as sold, has viscosity in a certain range 5,000 to 20,000 cps), is a semi-solid, is easy to administer accurately, has spill-resistant consistency, is storage stable, and has mutually compatible ingredients, as described in Mehta et al., US 6,071,523. Viscosity is measured using a Brookfield Viscometer with a spindle with Helipath movement at 20 RPM and 20-25 degrees C, or equivalent. Viscosity decreases slightly with increasing temperature.

[18] Semi-solid character in this context generally indicates a formulation that has a viscometric yield value determined as a relative value, e.g. using a Brookfield Viscometer to measure a shear vs. stress curve. Ease of administration is intended to mean (a) extrudability under light manual pressure from a squeezable container or a proxy a syringe with a 5 mm orifice), and spreadability in a spoon bowl measured by extruding the formulation into a spoon bowl and determining whether the material levels or spreads to the edges of the spoon bowl. Spreadability also contributes to accuracy of measurement.

[19] A spill-resistant formulation according to the invention begins to spill from a spoon bowl during test periods of vibrations, inversion, and tilting, but slowly enough to ID O conform with practical time limits between dispensing and ingesting, and quickly enough to Senable the product to be readily consumed from a spoon bowl by a patient.

00 Mutual compatibility of the components means that they do not separate in preparation and storage for the equivalent of two years at room temperature (as indicated by IND 5 three-months accelerated stability testing at 40 degrees centigrade and 75% relative humidity). Storage stability means that the materials do not lose their desirable properties Sduring storage for the same period. Preferred compositions do not exhibit a drop in viscosity IN of more than 50% or an increase in viscosity of more than 100% during that period.

i[21] The inventive formulations have attractive appearance, suitable texture and mouthfeel. The components are mutually compatible in that they do not interfere with the bioactivity of the pharmaceutical agent or physical properties of the vehicle, and the components do not separate and retain their properties.

[22] The invention relates to a palatable spill resistant pharmaceutical composition, comprising an elegant spill resistant base with taste masking concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) from at least about 1% to about 20%, from about 5% to about 15%, about 5% to about 10%, or about 10% to about 15%. Specific examples include PEG concentrations of about about 10% and about 15%. The PEG may include PEG 400, PEG 600, PEG 1000, or combinations. The PEG component may be selected depending on the other components.

Higher values for PEG are less toxic, as are concentrations of 15% or less. Toxicology studies are required for a formulation with higher than 15% PEG. The composition can further comprise an active ingredient. The taste-masking PEG component is a low-weight PEG. Useful low-weight PEGs include PEG 200, 300 400, 540, 600, 800, 900, 1000, 1450, 1540 and 2000, and combinations. These low-weight PEGs can be used to replace other liquids and solvents for bitter active agent suspensions and solutions.

[23] The formulation may comprise about 5% to about 15% PEG, up to about 30 or water, up to about 50% glycerin, 50% active ingredient, up to about 0.3% to about 0.4% sucralose liquid concentrate, about 0.5 to about 0.6 Carbomer 934P, and a flavor selected from grape, cherry, or bubble gum.

[24] In one embodiment the composition comprises from about 1% to about polyethylene glycol (PEG), up to about 40 water, up to about 50% active ingredient, up to about sucralose liquid concentrate, up to about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, up to about 0.15% grape flavor, and up to about 0.4% of a taste masking agent.

4

IO

Other embodiments include the composition comprising about 30% water, about 50% glycerin, about 15% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.4% sucralose liquid 00 0 concentrate, about 0.29% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% grape flavor, and about 0.4% masking agent.

[26] Another embodiment includes the composition comprising about 38.5% water, Sabout 50.0% glycerin, about 10.0% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.55% Carbomer 934P, 00 Sabout 0.15% grape bubble gum flavor, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate.

[27] Yet another embodiment includes a composition comprising about 33.3% Swater, about 50.0% glycerin, about 15.0% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% grape bubble gum flavor, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate.

[28] A composition comprises about 43.3% water, about 50.0% glycerin, about polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% grape bubble gum flavor, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate.

[29] In contrast to prior formulations e.g. Gorman et al., US 5,288,479, the spill resistant pharmaceutical composition does not contain a seaweed polysaccharide such as agar, algin, carrageenan or furcelleran, and does not include gelatin or pectin, or gums like xanthan gum. Such seaweed polysaccharides gelatin agents and gums are incompatible with the desired characteristics of the inventive spill-resistant formulations, which derive desirable rheological properties from the use of carboxyvinyl polymers and similar components, such as high-weight PEGs and cellulose derivatives.

The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention comprise a pharmaceutical agent in an effective amount for systemic treatment by oral administration in admixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle comprising a thickening agent in an amount which provides a semisolid, such as a gel or a paste suspension. The semisolid has a Brookfield viscosity at of above 2500 cps, preferably 2500 to 70,000 cps more preferably 3500-25,000 cps, about 5000-10,000 cps, about 5000-15,000 cps, about 5000-20,000 cps, about 6000- 17,000, or about 8,000 to about 11,000 cps. In the present application, viscosity refers to Brookfield viscosity, measured at 25 0 C and a spindle speed of 10 rpm, unless otherwise noted, which measures viscosity of plastic materials.

[31] In general, the viscosity of the compositions of the invention can be varied by the choice and amount of thickening agent and other components to a consistency which

ID

O

O

j permits the composition to be readily squeezed and flow through a relatively narrow orifice, i.e. of the order of about 1 to 10 mm in diameter.

00 S[32] By systemic treatment is meant treatment that affects the body as a whole, as compared to topical treatment, which affects only that part of the body to which it is applied, i.e. skin, teeth or particular mucous membrane, such as the lining of the stomach.

00 [33] Orally active pharmaceutical agents which may be present in the semisolid CN compositions of the invention are those useful for systemic treatment by oral administration.

0 The advantageous properties of the formulation are most apparent when the pharmaceutical C( agent tastes bitter in the absence of a taste masking component. Alternatively, a non-active component of the formulation such as propylene glycol is bitter or both the pharmaceutical agent and the base taste bitter in the absence of taste masking. The pharmaceutical agent may be an analgesic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, antihistamine, cough suppressant, expectorant, bronchodilator, anti-infective, CNS active drug, cardiovascular drug, antineoplastic, cholesterol-lowering drug, anti-emetic, vitamin, mineral supplement and fecal softener. The pharmaceutical agent may be selected from the group consisting of acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, diphenhydramine, dextromethorphan, guaifenesin, pseudoephedrine, carbidopa, levodopa, terfenadine, ranitidine, ciprofloxacin, triazolam, fluconazole, propranolol, acyclovir, fluoxetine, enalapril, diltiazem, lovastatin and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof.

[34] Particular examples of therapeutic agents include bitter agents selected from: analgesics, such as acetaminophen, codeine, aspirin and dihydrocodeinone; [36] anti-inflammatory agents, such as ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac; [37] anti-histamines including Hi -blockers, such as chlorpheniramine, terfenadine, loratidine, astemizole and cetirizine and H2 -blockers, such as cimetidine and ranitidine; [38] anti-infectives including: antibacterials such as sulfa drugs, i.e. sulfisoxazole, and cephalosporins, penicillins, and macrolide antibiotics; [39] quinolones, i.e. ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin; tetracyclines, i.e. tetracycline; [41] anti-virals, i.e acyclovir and amantadine and anti-fungals, i.e. fluconozole; [42] bronchodilators, such as albuterol, metaproterenol and theophylline; 6

OD

O

[43] cough suppressants, such as dextromethorphan; V) [44] expectorants, such as guaifenesin; 00 O [45] CNS active agents, including: hypnotics, such as triazolam; sedatives, such as phenobarbital;

ID

[46] tranquilizers, such as chlorpromazine and diazepam; antidepressants, such as 00 fluoxetine and nortriptylline; [47] anti-convulsants, such as carbamazepine and ethosuximide and anti- Parkinson's agents, such as L-DOPA; [48] cardiovascular drugs including: diuretics, such as hydrochlorthiazide; [49] anti-hypertensives including: beta-blockers, such as propranolol; ACE inhibitors, such as captopril and enalapril; calcium channel blockers, such as diltiazem; [51] anti-anginals, same as anti-hypertensive agents; [52] cardiac glycosides, such as digoxin; [53] antineoplastics, such as 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide; [54] cholesterol-lowering agents such as lovastatin; anti-emetics, such as metoclopramide; [56] vitamins; [57] minerals, such as iron, calcium and zinc salts and fecal softeners, such as docusate; [58] plant extracts, such as echinacea, gingko biloba, St. John's wort, etc.

[59] Useful pharmaceutical agents of course include pharmaceutically acceptable salts and esters of the named compositions.

The semisolid compositions of the invention have a liquid base, which is a palatable pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, which may dissolve or suspend the active pharmaceutical agent. Solvents include water, propylene glycol, glycerin and mixtures thereof. In some instances it may be necessary to include a compound which is effective to

IND

O

O

1 solubilize the active pharmaceutical agent in the solvent; for example, lactic acid is used in an Saqueous formulation of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride to solubilize this active ingredient.

00 O [61] According to the invention, a pharmaceutically acceptable compatible semisolid thickening agent is used in the compositions of the invention, providing of course that the thickening agent is compatible with the active agent, the solvent base, and other 00 components. Useful thickening agents include water soluble carboxyvinyl polymers, such as Sthose sold under the names of carbomer and Carbopol T M which is produced by B. F.

D Goodrich Chemical Group.

[62] A sweetener may be added to the composition of the invention in an amount necessary to increase sweetness.

[63] Ingredients such as flavoring, coloring matter, filler, preservative, buffer, sodium chloride and carriers usual in phannaceutical compositions can also be present in the semisolid compositions of the invention.

[64] The following examples further illustrate the invention, but must not be construed as limiting the invention in any manner.

EXAMPLE 1 A semi-solid gel product for oral administration was designed with spill resistant characteristics (vibration resistance and invertability) and an easy spreadability to obtain an accurate measured dosage.

[66] Acetaminophen was supplied as a white powdery material. It is very slightly soluble in water (12.9mg/g), slightly soluble in glycerin (22.2mg/g) and soluble in propylene glycol (101.2mg/g) (Figure Acetaminophen is also soluble in methanol, ethanol dimethylformamide, ethylene dichloride, acetone and ethyl acetate. (Merck Index 12th Ed.) [67] Acetaminophen has a chemical formula of CsH 9

NO

2 and a molecular weight of 151.16 (USP 24 and Merck Index 12th The chemical name is N-(4hydroxyphenyl)acetamide or 4' Hydroxyacetanilide.

[68] A semi-solid base was made having a liquid base comprised of glycerin, propylene glycol and water. Propylene glycol has become widely used as a solvent, extractant, and preservative in a variety of pharmaceutical formulations (Handbook of Pharm.

Excipients). As an antiseptic it is similar to ethanol, and against molds it is similar to glycerin and only slightly less effective than ethanol.

ID

O

O

e( aD [69] The fIG range of propylene glycol is 2.0-50.0% for oral solution and 0.69o 70% for oral suspension. The level of 25% w/w propylene glycol was chosen for its solvent O effect. It was found that the propylene glycol imparts a bitter taste to the gel and so an alternative was required.

\D

[70] Glycerin is also used in a wide variety of pharmaceutical formulations. In oral 00 solution glycerin is used as a solvent, sweetener agent, antimicrobial preservatives, and N viscosity-increasing agent. The IIG range of glycerin 5.0-50.0% for oral syrup.

ID

S[71] The levels of 40% and 50% w/w glycerol with 25% w/w propylene glycol (K were used for acetaminophen solubility study. It was found that the batches remained as a solution with glycerin amount at both 40% and 50% w/w. A six cycles of freeze and thaw study was conducted, and no crystallization was found. Therefore, 40% glycerin was chosen as the final concentration if 25% of propylene glycol was added to the formula.

Polyethylene Glycol [72] Polyethylene glycols are stable, hydrophilic substances that can be used to enhance the aqueous solubility or dissolution characteristics of poor soluble compounds (Handbook ofPharm. Excipients, incorporated herein by reference). Polyethylene glycols do not support microbial growth (Handbook of Pharm. Excipients). Both polyethylene glycol 600 and polyethylene glycol 1000 were evaluated for the formula. Both of them can be used to replace propylene glycol as a solvent for acetaminophen. More than 20 cycles of freeze thaw study was performed to a acetaminophen NSG batch contained 15% of polyethylene glycol 1000 and 40% glycerin, and no crystal was found in the sample indicating a stable solution was formed.

[73] Taste improvement was observed after introducing polyethylene glycol into the formula. There is no bitter taste detectable after replacing the propylene glycol with the polyethylene glycol.

[74] A final formula contains 15% of polyethylene glycol 1000 and 50% glycerin.

Carbomner Several thickening agents can be used in the formulation including sodium carboxymethylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose and carbomer (carboxyvinyl polymer). Certain polyethylene glycols with higher molecular weight (>1540, PEG 2000, 3000, 3350,

O

O

IN

1) 4000, 4600 and 8000) may not perform well as bitter masking agents, but instead may be useful as thickeners. Carbomer was chosen for this formulation due to its clarity and 00 O rheological properties, specifically high yield value and shear thinning quality.

[76] In this batch, a level of 0.265% w/w carbomer (Figure 2) provided a viscosity within the target range of 6,000 to 17,000 cps (as measured using a Brookfield Viscometer).

S[77] Carbomer based gels derive their viscosity by pH adjustment and the viscosity Sof this product is integral to the non-spill properties. Two 3.0-kg batches of Acetaminophen O NonSpilTM Gel (Taro) were subdivided into portions and adjusted to different pH values to Sconduct the viscosity study. The plateau region occurs from about pH 6.4 to 7.0. The gels should have a pH of 6.4 or greater to ensure the viscosity will be higher than 8000 cps and will exhibit non-spill properties. The pH should not exceed approximately 7.0 as the viscosity starts to decrease.

EXAMPLE 2 Acetaminophen Suspension NSG Formulation Development Introduction [78] It was found that the acetaminophen solution NSG had a somewhat bitter after taste. A suspension version of acetaminophen NSG was developed to give a better taste. The suspension may also offer greater chemical stability of acetaminophen since the drug is not in solution form. Three flavor versions of acetaminophen NSG suspension were developed: cherry, grape and bubble gum.

Propylene Glycol [79] Propylene glycol was decreased to 0.5% in order to decrease the solubility of acetaminophen Glycerin [80] Glycerin was eliminated from the formula in order to decrease the solubility of acetaminophen Poloxamer 188 [81] Poloxamer 188 at a level of 0.05% w/w was used to provide the desired effects of retarding crystal growth. The usual concentration of surfactants varies from 0.05% to and depends on the solids content intended for suspension. On the other hand, surfactants at

NO

O

t concentration less than about 0.05% can result in incomplete wetting. Concentration greater Sthan 0.5% surfactant may solubilize ultrafine particles and lead eventually to change the 00 particle size distribution and crystal growth. (Pharm. Dosage forms: disperse system)

O

Acetaminophen NSG Suspension Carbomer Concentration Investigation 0 5 [82] According to the specific gravity, the concentration of acetaminophen in the 4 batch would be changed from 2.8% to 2.89%. Therefore, the carbomer concentration would 0 be adjusted to obtain the optimal viscosity.

l [83] The following two batches were made for carbomer concentration Sinvestigation: Lot No. Size Carbomer Viscosity S175-52435 1.0 kg 0.30% S175-52436 1.0 kg 0.28% TABLE 1 Conclusion: The final concentration ofcarbomer is 0.30%.

Masking Agent Concentration Investigation [84] Studies were performed to investigate the masking agent of the formula (a blend from Bell Flavors). Conclusion: The masking agent is optional and can be left out.

Surprisingly, it was determined that inventive formulations with PEG and the masking agent tasted better than formulations without PEG, with an equal amount of the masking agent.

Preservative Several preservatives were considered: methylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben and sodium benzoate. Sodium benzoate has both bacteriostatic and antifungal properties attributed to undissociated benzoic acid, hence preservative efficacy is best seen in acidic solution (pH In alkaline conditions it is almost without effect. Therefore, sodium benzoate is not suitable for NSG formula (pH around 7).

[86] Guidelines IIG recommend the use of propylparaben at 0.01-0.02% levels in case when preservation required. Formulations with at least 25 glycerin and propylene glycol are relatively anti-microbial and do not require additional preservation. A screen study according to USP Preservative effectiveness test was conducted using a series of formulations with varied levels of glycols.

IO

C. EXAMPLE 3 Vj Objective: Evaluate the effect of PEG-1000 level variation in the NSG Pseudoephedrine 00 formulation.

[87] Three 1.0 kg lab batches were compounded, whereby the level of the Polyethylene glycol 1000 (PEG 1000) was varied at 5 10% and 00 [88] In order to determine the effect of PEG 1000 a sensory evaluation test was CN, conducted using six subjects. The subjects who evaluated two samples, the high level O and the low (5 level, were asked to rate the intensity of sweetness, bitterness and flavor.

C'1 The perceived intensities for sweetness and bitterness were rated on a 7-point scale.

Respondents were trained in previous sessions to use the 7-point intensity scale as it applies to sweetness intensity. They were also asked to describe the texture of the two samples in their own words. Samples were evaluated in alternating sequence.

RESULTS

[89] Sweetness was perceived by four out of six subjects to be one unit higher for the 15% PEG sample, while two subjects rated the 5% PEG sample as one unit sweeter.

Bitterness was rated one to two units lower for the 15% PEG sample by four subjects, while only one subject perceived the 5% PEG sample to be less bitter. This indicates that the higher PEG level tends to mask the unpleasantly bitter taste of the active ingredient and also increases the sweetness perception. The terms used to describe the texture for both samples were: "smooth", "jelly like", "syrupy" "oily", but there was no apparent distinction between the samples.

CONCLUSION

Directionally the higher level of PEG 1000 was perceived as increasing sweetness and suppressing the bitterness perception.

SENSORY TEST RESULTS Subject Evaluation Attribute intensity Sample 1) Sample 2) sequence 5% PEG 1000 15% PEG 1000 Batch S184-52981 Batch S184-52982 A. L. Sample 2) Sweetness Slight to moderate Moderate Sample 1) Bitterness Very slight Very slight (2) Flavor Slight to moderate Moderate Texture Syrupy, very smooth, Syrupy, very smooth description compares to sample 2) S.A. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate to high High (7) Sample 2) Bitterness Threshold to slight Threshold (1) Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture Creamy, slightly oily, jelly Smooth, oily jelly like, description like compares to sample 1) E.P. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate to high High (7) Sample 1) Bitterness Very slight to threshold None (0) (1) Flavor Moderate to high Moderate Texture Smooth, syrupy Smooth, jelly like, description syrupy, smoother than sample 1 E.Z. Sample 1) Sweetness Slight Threshold to slight (2) Sample 2) Bitterness Moderate Slight (3) Flavor Moderate Moderate Terture Smooth, thick, creamy Smooth, slightly description "gummy", compares to sample 1 P.v.H. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate Slight to moderate (4) Sample 1) Bitterness Slight to moderate Moderate to high (6) Flavor Moderate to high Moderate Texture Smooth, jelly like, Smooth, jelly like description compares to sample 1) Z. B. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate to high High (7) Sample 2) Bitterness Threshold to slight Threshold (1) Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture Viscous gel, smooth, Viscous gel, smooth, description velvety mouthfeel slightly oily, waxy mouth.feel TABLE 2

IO

0 0 0 Intensity scale: 00 0 0 TABLE 3 TALLY OF INTENSITY SCORES Sample 1, Sample 2 Net Difference PEG 1000 15 PEG 1000 (Sample 2 minus sample 1) Sweetness 4, 6, 6, 3, 5.5, 6 5, 7, 7, 2, 4, 7 1, 1, 1, 1 Average: 6 Average: 6 Bitterness 2, 2, 1.5, 5, 4, 2 2, 1, 0, 3, 6, 1 -1 Average: 4.4 Average:2.1 2 TABLE 4 NSG PSE FORMULATION Batch S184-52981 Batch S 184-52982 Water 43.3 33.3 Glycerin 50.0 50.0 Polyethylene glycol 1000 5.0 15.0 Carbomer 934P 0.59 0.59 Grape bubble gum flavor 0.15 0.15 Sucralose liquid concentrate 0.30 0.30 Initial viscosity at 23 0 C, cps 9490 10,090 pH was adjusted to within 5.5 to 7.0 with NaOH for this and the following formulations.

TABLE

IO

e, EXAMPLE 4 Vj) Objective: Evaluate the effect of using PEG-1000 at 10% level in NSG Pseudoephedrine 0 formulation as compared to alternate case of not using PEG 1000.

[91] Two 1.0 kg lab batches were compounded, whereby Polyethylene glycol 1000 NO 5 (PEG 1000) was used at 10% level in one and was replaced with the alternate substitute 00 solvent propylene glycol in the second batch.

C [92] In order to determine the effect of PEG 1000 a sensory evaluation test was I conducted using six subjects. The subjects who evaluated the two samples, were asked to rate the intensity of sweetness, bitterness and flavor. The perceived intensities for sweetness and bitterness were rated on a 7-point scale. Respondents were trained in previous sessions to use the 7-point intensity scale as it applies to sweetness intensity. They were also asked to describe the texture of the two samples in their own words. Samples were evaluated in alternating sequence.

RESULTS

[93] Sweetness was perceived higher by five of the six panelists for the sample that was formulated with 10% PEG 1000. Only one panelist perceived the sample with the propylene glycol as sweeter. The average sweetness score for the PEG sample was 5.7 as compared to 4.9. The bitterness of the PEG 1000 sample was found markedly lower by all, two panelists found no bitterness at all in this sample (score Average bitterness score is 1.8 for the PEG sample as compared to 3.6. The comments on texture reflect that all subjects noted a difference and perceived the sample with PEG 1000 smoother. The comments on flavor level indicate that the sample with PEG 1000 may require somewhat higher flavor level.

CONCLUSION

[94] It can be concluded that 10% PEG 1000 effected an increased sweetness and suppressed bitterness perception over a PEG-free control.

IO

0

IN

0 0o SENSORY TEST RESULTS Subject Evaluation Attribute intensity Sample 1) Sample 2) Ssequence No PEG 1000 10% PEG 1000 Batch S184-52925 Batch S184-52926 E. Z. Sample 2) Sweetness Slight Slight to moderate (4) Sample 1) Bitterness Moderate Slight (3) Flavor Slight to moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth, slightly less Syrupy, creamy, thicker creamy than sample 2) than sample 1) F.R. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high Sample 2) Bitterness Threshold to slight None (0) Flavor Moderate, distinct grape Slightly lower than 1) Texture description Smooth creamy, like Smooth, thicker, more honey persistent smoothness S.Ch. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate to high Moderate Sample 1) Bitterness Moderate to high 6) Slight to moderate (4) Flavor Slightly stronger than Slightly too strong sample 2) Texture description Less smooth, thicker than Smooth sample 2) E.P. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high Sample 2) Bitterness Slight Threshold to plus Flavor Strong, definite grape Less, more candy type grape Texture description Smooth, jelly like Smoother texture, spreads easily B.W. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate plus Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Slight plus Threshold to slight (2) Flavor Strong Strong Texture description Less smooth than sample Smooth, syrupy 1) less slippery S.A. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Threshold to slight None (0) Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth, palatable, Smooth, leaves clean somewhat "sticky" palate TABLE 6 00 Intensity scale.- TA3LE 7 TALLY OF INTENSITY SCORES Sample 1, Sample 2 Net Difference No PEG 1000 10 PEG 1000 (Sample 2 minus sample 1) Sweetness 3, 5, 6, 5, 5.5, 5 4, 6.5, 5, 6.5, 6, 6 1, 1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 1 Biteres jAverage: 4.9 Average: 5.7 -1, B,2,6,3,3e5, 3, 0, 4. 1.5, 2, 0 Average: 3.6 Average: 1.8 TAB3LE 8 NSG PSE FORMULATION EXAMPLE Batch S 184-52925 Batch S 184-52926 Water 38.5 38.5 Glycerin 50.0 50.0 Propylene glycol 10.0 Polyethylene glycol 1000 1.

Carbomer 934P 0.55 Grape bubble Sun flavor -0.15 [0.15 Sucralose liquid concentrate_ 0.30 0.30 Ini~tial viscosity at 2300, cps 6400 16730 TABLE 9

IO

O

EXAMPLE 00 Objective: Evaluate the taste effect of Acetaminophen NSG solution with PEG- 1000 as O compared to alternate case of Acetaminophen NSG suspension without PEG 1000.

IN [95] A 1.0 kg batch of acetaminophen NSG suspension was compound for the sensory evaluation. This batch contained no propylene glycol as and no PEG 1000. The other 00 10 kg batch was compounded for marketing study, and this batch contained 15% of PEG Nl 1000 as a solvent of acetaminophen.

[96] In order to determine the effect of PEG 1000, a sensory evaluation test was

C

conducted using six subjects. The subjects, who evaluated the two samples, were asked to rate the intensity of sweetness, bitterness and flavor. The perceived intensities for sweetness and bitterness were rated on a 7-point scale. Respondents were trained in previous sessions to use the 7-point intensity scale as it applies to sweetness intensity. They were also asked to describe the texture of the two samples in their own words. Samples were evaluated in alternating sequence.

RESULTS

[97] Sweetness was perceived by three out of six subjects to be one to three units higher for the PEG 1000 formula. Three subjects failed to find the difference of the sweetness between two samples. Bitterness was rated half to three units lower for the PEG 1000 sample than that of the suspension sample by five out of six subjects, while only one subject perceived the suspension sample to be less bitter. This indicates that the PEG 1000 tends to mask the bitter taste of the acetaminophen and also increases the sweetness perception. It was also found that the PEG 1000 solution sample was smoother than the suspension sample.

CONCLUSION

[98] Acetaminophen NSG solution with 10% PEG 1000 is less bitter and smoother than the PEG-free suspension formula.

IO

0

O

IN

0O t^D SENSORY TEST RESULTS Subject Evaluation Attribute intensity Sample 1) Sample 2) sequence No PEG 1000 15% PEG 1000 APAP suspension APAP solution Batch SI 75-52303 Batch S175-52970 E. P. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate to high Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Slight Threshold to slight Flavor Slightly less than sample Slightly weak grape 2 flavor Texture description Slightly less smooth than Smooth sample 2 (sl. coarse) X.W. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to strong (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Slight Threshold plus Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture description Less smooth than sample Smooth (slightly 2 smoother than sample 1) Z.B. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Slight Threshold plus Flavor Slight to moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth initially than Very smooth, creamy coarse, slightly gritty E.Z. Sample 1) Sweetness Slight Moderate (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Moderate plus Slight to moderate (4) Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth, slightly coarse, Smooth, thick, pudding thick like S Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate to high Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Moderate Threshold (1) Flavor Slightly to strong Moderate Texture description Creamy, thick Smooth, thick S.A. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate to high Moderate to high (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Slightly Slight to moderate (4) Flavor Moderate Moderate plus Texture description Creamy Smooth TABLE 00 Intensity scale:- TABLE 11 TALLY OF INTENSITY SCORES Sample 1, Sample 2 Net Difference No PEG 1000 10 PEG 1000 (Sample 2 minus sample 1) Sweetness 0.8 Average: 5.2 Average: Bitterness -1.6 Average: 3.8 Average: 2.4 TABLE 12 NSG APAP FORMULATION EXAMPLE Batch S 175-53004 Batch S 175-52970 Water 55.73% 30.93% Glycerin 35% Propylene glycol N/A N/A Polyethylene glycol 1000 N/A Sorbital crystalline 5% N/A Sucralose liquid concentrate 0.4% 0.4% Carbomer 934P 0.28% 0.29% Grape flavor 0.15% 10.15% Masking Agent 0.4% 10.4% TABLE 13

IO

SEXAIMPLE 6 C31 Objective: Evaluate the effect of using PEG 1000 in NSG Acetaminophen formulation 00 as compared to alternate case of using propylene glycol.

[99] A 1.0 kg batch was compound for the sensory evaluation. This batch contained ID 5 25% of propylene glycol as a solvent and no PEG 1000. The other 10 kg batch contained of PEG 1000 as a solvent of acetaminophen.

00 C[100] In order to determine the effect of PEG 1000, a sensory evaluation test was Sconducted using six subjects. The subjects who evaluated the two samples, were asked to rate the intensity of sweetness, bitterness and flavor. The perceived intensities for sweetness and bitterness were rated on a 7-point scale. Respondents were trained in previous sessions to use the 7-point intensity scale as it applies to sweetness intensity. They were also asked to describe the texture of the two samples in their own words. Samples were evaluated in alternating sequence.

RESULTS

[101] Sweetness was perceived by five out of six subjects to be at least one unit higher for the PEG 1000 sample than that of the propylene glycol sample, while one subject failed to find the difference of the sweetness between two samples. Bitterness was rated two to four units lower for the PEG 1000 sample than the propylene glycol samples by all of the subjects. This indicates that the higher PEG 1000 level tends to mask the bitter taste of the acetaminophen and also increases the sweetness perception. The terms used to describe the texture for both samples were: "smooth", "honey like", "sticky", but there was no apparent distinction between the samples.

CONCLUSION

[102] PEG 1000 increases the sweetness and masks the bitterness perception of the acetaminophen NSG formula.

00 oo

C

0q c^ oo o SENSORY TEST RESULTS Subject Evaluation Attribute intensity Sample 1) Sample 2) sequence 25% Propylene Glycol 15% PEG 1000 APAP solution APAP solution Batch S1 75-52303 Batch SI 75-52970 X.W. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Slight to Moderate Threshold to slight (2) Flavor Moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth Smooth Z.B. Sample 2) Sweetness Moderate to high Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Slight to moderate Threshold (1) after taste Flavor Slightly less than Moderate Moderate Texture description Thinner, smooth Smooth, thicker (more body) E.P. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Sample 2) Bitterness Moderate to high Slight (3) after taste Flavor Slight to moderate Less intensity than the other sample Texture description Smooth Smooth B.W. Sample 2) Sweetness Slight to Moderate Moderate to high (6) Sample 1) Bitterness Moderate to high Slight to moderate after taste Flavor Less than Moderate Moderate Texture description Smooth, no sticky Sticky, honey like S.A. Sample 1) Sweetness Moderate Moderate to high (6) Sample 2) Bitterness Moderate Threshold to slight (2) Flavor Less than moderate Less than moderate Texture description Smooth Smooth P.H. Sample 2) Sweetness Slightly Slight to Moderate (4) Sample 1) Bitterness High after taste Slight (3) Flavor Slight Moderate to high Texture description Smooth -Smooth TABLE 14

IO

0 0

,N

00 ,q

¢,D

Intensity scale TABLE TALLY OF INTENSITY

SCORES

NSG APAP FORMULATION

EXAMPLE

Water 26.12% Glycerin Propylene glycol Polyethylene glycol 1000 N/A Sorbital crystalline Sucralose liquid concentrate 0.4% Carbomer 934P 0.265% Grape flavor 0.15% Masking Agent 0.2% TABLE 17 [103] The embodiments illustrated and discussed in this specification are intended only to teach those skilled in the art the best way known to the inventors to make and use the invention. Nothing in this specification should be considered as limiting the scope of the present invention. The above-described embodiments of the invention may be modified or varied, and elements added or omitted, without departing from the invention, as appreciated -24- Sby those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood 0 that, within the scope of the claims and their equivalents, the invention may be practiced 0 otherwise than as specifically described.

Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires 00 otherwise, the word "comprise", and variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will ID be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or Ssteps.

The reference in this specification to any prior publication (or information derived from it), or to any matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as an acknowledgment or admission or any form of suggestion that that prior publication (or information derived from it) or known matter forms part of the common general knowledge in the field of endeavour to which this specification relates.

O

O

e REFERENCES The following publications are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Martindale's The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 29th Ed., J.E. Reynolds London, The Pharmaceutical Press, 1989, Pg 908.

IN0 2. Remington's Pharm. Sciences 18th Ed., A.R. Gennaro Mack Publishing Co., Easton Penn., Pg. 865.

00 C 3. United States Pharmacopoeia 24,U.S. Phann. Convention Inc., Rockville, MD., Mack i0 10 Printing Co., Easton, PA.

4. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Volume Marcel Deker, nc., New York and Basel.

4. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Volume 1, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York and Basel.

Claims (9)

1. A spill resistant pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration, Scomprising a pharmaceutical agent and a spill resistant base, the pharmaceutical agent or base 00 being bitter in the absence of taste masking, and a bitterness masking component consisting essentially of low-weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) in a concentration from about 1% to \0 about 15% wt/wt. 00

2. The formulation of claim 1, which tastes less bitter and more sweet m a taste Stest than an equivalent formulation having water or propylene glycol substituted for the PEG. ID S 10

3. The formulation of claim 1, further comprising an active ingredient. c

4. The formulation of claim 3, wherein the active ingredient is pseudoephedrine.

The formulation of claim 3, wherein the active ingredient is acetaminophen.

6. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the formulation is a suspension.

7. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the formulation is a solution.

8. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG concentration is in the range from about 5 to about

9. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG is PEG 600 to PEG

1500. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG is selected from the group consisting of PEG 200, PEG 300, PEG 400, PEG 540, PEG 600, PEG 800, PEG 900, PEG 1000, PEG 1450, PEG 1540 and combinations. 11. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG is PEG 600 or PEG 1000 or combinations. 12. The formulation of claim 1, comprising about 5% to about 15% PEG, up to about 30 or 45 water, up to about 40 to 50% glycerin, up to 10 active ingredient, up to about 0.2% to about 0.6% sucralose liquid concentrate, about 0.2 to about 1.0 Carbomer 934P, and a selected commercially acceptable flavoring agent. 13. The formulation of claim 1, comprising from at least about 1% to about polyethylene glycol (PEG), up to about 45 water, up to about 50% active ingredient, up to 26 IO O about 0.4% sucralose liquid concentrate, up to about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, and up to about 0.15% grape flavoring agent. 00 14. The formulation of claim 1, comprising about 30% water, about 50% glycerin, about 15% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.4% sucralose liquid concentrate, about 0.29% Carbomer 934P, and about 0.15% grape flavoring agent. 00 15. The formulation of claim 1, comprising about 38% water, about 50.0% 1 glycerin, about 10.0% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.55% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% Sgrape bubble gum flavoring agent, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate. 16. The formulation of claim 1, comprising about 33% water, about 50.0% glycerin, about 15.0% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% grape bubble gum flavoring agent, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate. 17. The formulation of claim 1, comprising about 43% water, about 50.0% glycerin, about 5.0% polyethylene glycol 1000, about 0.59% Carbomer 934P, about 0.15% flavoring agent, and about 0.30% sucralose liquid concentrate. 18. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the spill resistant pharmaceutical composition does not contain a seaweed polysaccharide selected from the group consisting of agar, algin, carrageenan and furcelleran or a mixture thereof. 19. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the spill resistant pharmaceutical composition has antibacterial and antifungal properties without an added preservative. 20. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the viscosity is between about 5000 and about 15,000 cps. 21. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG concentration is below 22. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the low-weight PEG concentration is below 23. A method of making a semi-solid formulation, comprising determining a bitterness masking amount of a low-weight polyethylene glycol (PEG), and adding said bitterness masking amount of PEG to a spill resistant base to form a spill resistant pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration, O O wherein the bitterness masking amount of low-weight PEG is from about 1% to about 24. A seri-solid pharmaceutical formulation comprising a pharmaceutical agent, 00 a spill resistant base comprising a carbomer, the pharmaceutical agent and/or base being bitter, and ,D low-weight polyethylene glycol in an amount sufficient to mask the bitterness 00 of the pharmaceutical agent and/or base. (N SDATED THIS 7 th day of September 2006 TARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED By Its Patent Attorneys DAVIES COLLISON CAVE