AU2005202712B2 - Synergistic formulations - Google Patents

Synergistic formulations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2005202712B2
AU2005202712B2 AU2005202712A AU2005202712A AU2005202712B2 AU 2005202712 B2 AU2005202712 B2 AU 2005202712B2 AU 2005202712 A AU2005202712 A AU 2005202712A AU 2005202712 A AU2005202712 A AU 2005202712A AU 2005202712 B2 AU2005202712 B2 AU 2005202712B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
formulation
active composition
domestic animals
milbemycin
compound
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU2005202712A
Other versions
AU2005202712A1 (en
Inventor
Lionel Barry Lowe
James Terence Rothwell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Elanco US Inc
Original Assignee
Elanco US Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2001239017A external-priority patent/AU2001239017B2/en
Application filed by Elanco US Inc filed Critical Elanco US Inc
Priority to AU2005202712A priority Critical patent/AU2005202712B2/en
Publication of AU2005202712A1 publication Critical patent/AU2005202712A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2005202712B2 publication Critical patent/AU2005202712B2/en
Assigned to ELANCO US INC. reassignment ELANCO US INC. Request for Assignment Assignors: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)

Description

S&F Ref: 497376AUD1
AUSTRALIA
PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT Name and Address of Applicant Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Eli Lilly and Company, of Lilly Corporate Center, City of Indianapolis, United States of America Lionel Barry Lowe James Terence Rothwell Spruson Ferguson St Martins Tower Level 31 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 (CCN 3710000177) Synergistic formulations The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845c SYNERGISTIC PESTICIDAL FORMULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF DIPTERAN PESTS Technical Field The present invention relates to combinations of pesticidally active compounds suitable for use as active agents in pesticidal formulations, the formulations themselves and to the various applications of those formulations as pesticides, specifically in controlling all species of Dipteran pests. Such applications include the control of such external Dipteran pests in domestic animals including but not limited to sheep, cattle, poultry, pigs, goats, camelids, horses, dogs and cats, as well as the household and rural applications of such formulations in control of such pests.
Background of the Invention Historically, the greatest damage to domestic animals and crops has been caused and continues to be caused by pests such as insects, fungi, nematodes and microbes.
Insects particularly represent a cause for concern as they are the most numerous of Is all living organisms and constitute approximately 72% of all animal species.
Approximately 1% of insects are considered pests in that they attack humans and/or domestic animals, transmit human, animal and plant diseases, destroy crops, objects and structures and compete for food and other necessities. It is estimated that enormous agricultural losses result worldwide from insect presence.
Domestic animals which include animals of agricultural worth such as sheep, cattle, horses, goats, pigs and other ruminants and monogastrics are almost invariably subject to the activity of pests including insects, mites, acarides, acarina, siphonaptera, anoplura and maltophaga. External parasites such as flies, ticks, lice and fleas irritate the animals and can cause economic loss in the form of poor quality hide, wool or sheep skin, poor quality meat/tissue, reduced weight gain and even death as a result of the animal carrying harmful parasites.
The losses resulting from insect caused human and animal diseases are also enormous. In fact, insects are considered to be the carriers of more than 250 viruses which are pathogens of humans and higher animals. The numbers of human deaths caused by mosquito transmitted diseases such as malaria and lymphatic filariasis are huge. Flies also transmit human and animal related diseases such as trachoma, trypanosomiasis and river blindness.
However, out of the nearly one million species of arthropods which includes lice, ticks, flies and mites, only a small percentage require the application of control A497376AUDIspcci measures. To date, the primary method for controlling insects and other pests, particularly in respect of domestic animals (such as sheep, cattle, goats, horses and hogs) has been by the application of synthetic chemical pesticide compositions. It is estimated that there are at least 35,000 formulated pesticide products worldwide with chemicals as the active ingredients. Such pesticide products include antimicrobials, larvicides, insecticides, animal dips, avicides and disinfectants.
The extensive use of chemical insecticides since the 1940s has resulted in a large number of problems including widespread insect resistance, emergence of secondary pests, hazards to human and animal health as well as detrimental effects on fish and birds, environmental pollution and the increasing economic costs of new insecticides.
Many insect species have developed resistance to the action of specific insecticides so as to necessitate changes in control practices. There is an ever-widening pool of insect pests which are developing multiple resistance. The resistance genes having lengthy persistence in insect genomes which preclude successful reuse of an insecticide to control an insect population with resistant genes.
Pesticide/insecticide residues and their consequential many potential human, animal and environmental risks are also seen as one of the major problems resulting from chemical usage, particularly those formulations containing active agents which include organophosphates or synthetic pyrethroids. With the exception of microbial insecticides, nearly all pesticides result in residues of various chemicals and their degradation products or metabolites which may be present in detectable amounts (ppb to ppm) in food despite food processing. Tissue/meat residues are also a major concern when considering use of insecticides on farm animals.
Potential human risks from the use of such insecticides include acute toxic reactions to the insecticide such as poisoning, skin and eye irritations, as well as possible long term effects such as cancer, birth defects, and reproductive disorders. Acute inhalation toxicity as well as dermal penetration are also potential risks. Health hazards in humans may also arise from repeated exposure to a chemical over a limited period of time.
In particular, the currently used actives of synthetic pyrethroids and organophosphates which are commonly used in insecticidal formulations to control lice and flies, particularly on sheep, are not only toxic to animals but also to the human operator who applies them. Exposure in farmers or operators who handle both pesticide concentrates and the larger volumes of pesticide diluted for use, is a cause for concern.
Further, it is possible for the operator to ingest pesticides not only by mouth, but also by A497376AUDIspeci breathing (eg spray drift) and by absorption through the skin (accidental spillage). Of particular concern has been the use of organophosphates where accidental exposure causes acute and chronic poisoning affecting the nervous system.
Accordingly, insect and other pest control has been sought to be directed away from exclusive reliance on insecticides and towards the optimisation of environmental and economic insect and pest control (integrated pest management). The application of microbial control in which insects are attacked by pathogens such as viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa are favoured as such microbial insecticides are highly selective for insect pests and do not leave toxic residues. However, such microbial insecticides are to not without their problems such as the difficulty in applying as well as confining the natural enemy/parasite/disease to a large area. Further, they also have the disadvantage of short residual action and extreme specificity which limits general applicability.
Biological control has been recently applied in the area of insecticides/pesticides through the release of sterilised male insects. Genetic engineering has also recently been is applied by way of mass introduction of deleterious mutations such as chromosomal translocations. However, such procedures are very expensive and stringent criteria are required before release of sterile males is contemplated. Chemosterilants which sterilise large segments of insect pest populations are also known but are strong carcinogens which precludes their use.
The use of chemical insecticides and pesticides and their environmental and economic viability, the dangerous nature and magnitude of the persisting residues as well as increasing insect and pest resistance, together with high toxicity levels of many chemical insecticides, has resulted in the search for new substances or approaches to insect and other pest control.
There is therefore a need for compounds and combinations thereof which can be used as active agents in pesticides, particularly against insects which afflict domestic animals or their environs, and which are effective at low application rates, selective in biologic action and have low toxicity and a high margin of safety to humans, crops, economic animals, aquatic organisms and birds. Such compounds and combinations must be both environmentally friendly in that there must be demonstrably low impacts on the environment, as well as economically viable to use on a large scale. Further, there must be none or little insect resistance to such compounds or combinations.
Fermentation product A83543, also known as spinosyn, includes a family of related compounds (spinosyns) produced by Saccharopolyspora spinosa. These are naturally derived fermentation products with a positive safety profile in contrast to A497376AUDIspeci currently used synthetic organically derived compounds (such as synthetic pyrethroids, organophosphates, organochlorines and carbamates), and have previously been shown to exhibit excellent insecticidal activity. Accordingly by the term "A83543 compounds" which has the same scope as the phrase "spinosyn and derivatives and analogues thereof' is meant components consisting of a 5,6,5-tricyclic ring system, fused to a 12membered macrocyclic lactone, a neutral sugar (2N,3N,4N-tri-O-methylrhamnose) and an amino sugar (forosamine). The family of natural components of A83543 include a genus taught in EPO patent application No. 0375316 and having the following general formula: R' OR 5 CH3 O I- OCH3 wherein R 1 is H or a group selected from
CH
3 (CH3)2N O
H
2
N
or) (CH 3 2
N-
CH
3 (d) and R 2
R
4
R
3
R
5 and R 6 are hydrogen or methyl; or an acid addition salt thereof when R 1 is other than hydrogen.
A497376AUDIspeci N The family of compounds from A83543 fermentation product has been shown to Scomprise individual compounds A83543A, A83453B, A83543C, A83453D, A83543E, SA83453F, A83543G, A83453H, A83543J, A83453L, A83543M, A83453N, A83543Q, A83453R, A83543S, A83453T, A83453U, A83543V, A83453W, A83453X. Boeck et S 5 al. described spinosyns A-H and J and salts thereof in US patent Nos 5,362,634, 5,496,932 and 5,571,901 which are incorporated herein by reference. Mynderse et al.
CN described spinosyns L-N, their N-demethyl derivatives and salts thereof in US patent r No, 5,202,242 incorporated herein by reference. Turner et al. described spinosyns Q-T, Stheir N-demethyl derivatives and salts thereof in US patent Nos 5,591,606, 5,631,155 n) 0o and 5,767,253 which are also incorporated herein by reference. Spinosyns SK,O,P,U,V,W, and Y are described in the article by DeAmicis, C.V. et al. in American Chemical Society's Symposium Series: Phytochemicals for Pest Control (1997), Chapter 11 "Physical and Biological Properties of Spinosyns: Novel Macrolide Pest-Control Agents from Fermentation ppl46-154.
Spinosyn A (A83543A) was the first spinosyn isolated and identified from the fermentation broth of Saccharapolyspora spinosa. Subsequent examination of the fermentation broth revealed that the parent strain of S. spinosa produced a number of spinosyns (A83543A to Compared to spinosyn A, spinosyns B to J are characterised by differences in the substitution patterns on the amino group of the forosamine, at selected sites on the ring system and on the neutral sugar. The strains of S. spinosa produce a mixture of spinosyns which primary components are spinosyn A and spinosyn D These are the two spinosyns that are currently known as the most active as insecticides.
Similar to the spinosyns, macrocyclic lactones have also previously been shown to exhibit excellent insecticidal activity. Macrocyclic lactones have a complex ring structure and include such well known anthelmintic compounds as avermectins and milbemycins. The avermectins are isolated from fermentation products of Streptomyces avermitilis and ivermectin is a compound which is a semisynthetic chemical formed by modification of avermectin. The basic structure of the avermectins is a 16-membered lactone ring to which are appended three main substituent groups: a hexahydrobenzofuran group, a disaccharide group (at C-13) and a spiroketal ring (C-17 to C-28). Doramectin is a novel avermectin. Milbemycins are other compounds which are not avermectins but which can be considered to come within the class of compounds which are macrocyclic lactones. The milbemycins differ structurally from the avermectin group, mainly in the absence of a disaccharide group on C-13. Moxidectin is A497376AUDIspeci derived from the fermentation product nemadectin and possesses a methoxime substituent on C-23. Another milbemycin of interest is milbemycin oxime, and is a fermentation product of the fungus Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. aureolacrimosus and which comprises a mixture of two compounds: about 70-80% (IOE,14E,16E)- (1 R,4S,5'S,6R,6'R,8R, I 3R,20R,24S)-6 '-ethyl-24-hydroxy-5 11, 1 3,22-tetramethyl- (3,7,1 9-trioxatetracyclo[ 15.6. 1.1 1.0 2 1 24 pentacosa- 10, 14,1 6,22-tetraene)-6-spiro-2 C1 (tetrahydropyran)-2,21I-dione 21 -(EZ)-oxime:
HOH
HH
0CH 3 .0 CH A497376AUD ispeci Milbemycin oxime has known veterinary applications as a wormer, heartworm treatment or acaricide (mites, such as mange), especially in cats and dogs, but is not well known for its pesticidal activity against members of the Diptera.
The present invention resides in the discovery of a synergistic combination of pesticidal compounds, the formulation and application of specific pesticidally active agents based on the synergistic combination and their use in pesticidal formulations against Dipteran pests, particularly in domestic animals.
Objects of the Invention Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a pesticidal composition o0 active against Dipteran pests in domestic animals including cattle, camellids, pigs, dogs, horses, cats, sheep, goats, poultry or their environs, containing a synergistic combination of at least one A83543 compound and at least one milbemycin. The at least one milbemycin may be milbemycin oxime.
Accordingly, it is another object of this invention to provide one or more pesticidal formulations active against Dipteran pests in domestic animals including cattle, camellids, pigs, horses, dogs, cats, sheep, goats, poultry or their environs, containing a synergistic combination of at least one A83543 compound and at least one milbemycin as the active principles together with at least one acceptable carrier or diluent. The at least one milbemycin may be milbemycin oxime.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method of eliminating and/or controlling Dipteran pests in domestic animals including cattle, camellids, pigs, horses, dogs, cats, sheep, goats, poultry or their environs by applying or administering to said animals or their environs a pesticidally active combination of compounds alone or together with an acceptable carrier or diluent.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method of eliminating and/or controlling Dipteran pests in environs of domestic animals including household and rural structures such as farm houses, poultry sheds and dairy sheds by applying an insecticidally/pesticidally active combination of compounds alone or together with an acceptable carrier or diluent.
The term 'Diptera' or 'Dipteran pests' as used herein defines members of the insect order Diptera, which are parasitic during one or more stages of their life cycle, including the larval stage, the adult stage or both stages and further includes Dipteran insect eggs.
It is further noted that for the purposes of the present application, the term 'spinosyn or analogue or derivative thereof is defined to include an individual spinosyn A497376AUDIspcci factor (A83543A-H, J-W or Y) an N-demethyl or other derivative of an individual spinosyn factor, or salt thereof, or a combination thereof, consistent with the disclosure of the abovementioned references which have been incorporated herein. As stated above, the term "A83543 compound" is used herein to mean an individual spinosyn factor, or an analogue, a derivative or salt thereof, or a combination thereof.
The term 'controlling or eradicating' is used to refer to a decrease in the number of living insects (adult or larval forms) or to a decrease in the number of viable insect eggs.
The extent of reduction somewhat depends on the application rate and the active used.
The term 'effective amount' also used herein means the amount which is sufficient to cause a measurable reduction in the treated insect population.
The word 'carrier' is used throughout the present specification to include carrier blends, that is mixtures of more than one substance.
The term 'synergistic' as used herein is defined to mean a combination of components wherein the activity of the combination is greater than the additive of the is individual activities of each component of the combination.
The term 'macrocyclic lactone' as used herein is defined to be compounds of the classes of milbemycins and avermectins.
The term 'domestic animal' as used herein is defined to include animals of agricultural worth and companion animals, including but not limited to cattle, camellids, pigs, dogs, cats, sheep, poultry, horses and goats a well as other ruminants and monogastrics.
The term 'environs of domestic animals is defined to include any environment or structure where domestic animals may be located in or in reasonable proximity to, such as farmyard structures, dairy sheds, poultry sheds, stables, farmhouses, dog and cat kennels, houses where dogs and cats are kept, pig sties and shearing sheds.
Summary of the Invention A first aspect of the present invention provides an active composition for controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs, said composition being a synergistic combination of at least one A83543 compound and at least one milbemycin. The at least one milbemycin may be milbemycin oxime.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a formulation for controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs, said formulation including an effective amount of an active composition of the first aspect of the invention and an acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
A497376AUDIspcci A third aspect of the present invention provides an externally applied formulation for control or eradication of Dipteran pests in domestic animals, said formulation including an effective amount of an active composition of the first aspect of the invention and an acceptable carrier.
A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a formulation for prevention, control or eradication of Dipteran pests in the environs of domestic animals, said formulation including an effective amount of an active composition of the first aspect of the invention and an acceptable carrier.
A fifth aspect of the present invention provides a method of preventing, controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs, said method including the external application of an effective amount of an active composition according to the first aspect of the invention, or of a formulation according to the second or third aspects of the invention to a localised area of the external surface of said animal or to the environs of said animal.
is A sixth aspect of the present invention provides a method of preventing, controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests in the environs of domestic animals, said method including the application of an effective amount of an active composition according to the first aspect of the present invention, or of a formulation according to the second or fourth aspects of the invention to a surface area of the environs.
Another aspect of the present invention provides the use of an active composition of the first aspect of the present invention in the manufacture of a medicament for preventing, controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs.
Another aspect of the present invention provides an active composition of the first aspect of the present invention or a formulation of the second, third or fourth aspects of the present invention when used for preventing, controlling or eliminating Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs.
This invention is predicated upon the surprising discovery of a synergistic interaction between spinosyns and macrocyclic lactones (avermectins/milbemycins).
Whilst not wishing to be bound by theory, it is noted that macrocyclic lactones have a primary effect on the insect nervous system by activating inhibitory glutamate receptors, while spinosyns primarily activate the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in insect neurones causing hyperactivity of neurones. However, both spinosyns and macrocyclic lactones have a secondary effect on gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) gated chloride channels in insect neurones, GABA being an inhibitory neuro-transmitter. It is therefore A497376AUDlspcci possible that when combined together the spinosyns and macrocyclic lactones have a synergistic effect on the GABA receptor leading to effects in an insect's nervous system, this being unrelated to the primary effect of either spinosyns or macrocyclic lactones.
Typically, the first aspect of the present invention provides an active composition for prevention, control or eradication of Dipteran pests in domestic animals or their environs, being a synergistic combination of a spinosyn compound and a milbemycin, wherein the spinosyn milbemycin ratio is in the range of 20:1 to 1:20 w/w.
Typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound: milbemycin ratio is in the range of 19:1 to 1:19 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 15:1 to 1:15 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 12:1 to 1:12 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 10:1 to 1:10 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 9:1 to 1:9 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 8:1 to 1:8 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 7:1 to 1:7 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 6:1 to 1:6 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 5:1 to 1:5 w/w.
Also typically, in the active composition of the invention, the spinosyn compound milbemycin ratio is in the range of 4:1 to 1:4 w/w.
One embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention provides an active composition being a synergistic combination of spinosad and milbemycin oxime.
The composition may also comprise a macrocyclic lactone selected from the group consisting of ivermectin, abamectin, avermectin Ala, avermectin Alb, avermectin A2a, avermectin A2b, avermectin Bia, avermectin Bib, avermectin B2a, avermectin B2b, moxidectin, doramectin, selamectin, and eprinomectin.
Typically in the formulations of the present invention, the carrier is non-aqueous or aqueous and the active composition is suspended, dissolved or dispersed in the A497376AUDIspcci IDcarrier. Preferably, the carriers or excipients used in the formulations of the invention Sinclude dust carriers, solvents, emulsifiers, wetting and dispersing agents and water.
Selection of the carrier is of course made on the basis of compatibility with the active composition, including such considerations as pH, moisture content and stability.
Selection of the carrier is also made depending on the mode of application of the formulation-such as whether it is to be applied topically to a domestic animal or instead "I externally applied to a particular environs of such a domestic animal.
One embodiment of the second or third aspects of the invention provides a formulation for controlling or eradicating Dipteran pests, said formulation including: 0 from 0.1 to 40% by weight of an active composition of the first aspect of the present invention, and from 60-99.9% by weight of a suitable carrier.
Typically each dose of a formulation of the invention would contain lmg-lg of each of the spinosyn compound and the milbemycin.
Formulations can also be made up as concentrates and then diluted prior to use.
It has long been common practice to control external parasites on sheep, cattle and other domestic animals including but not limited to goats, pigs and horses by the localised topical application of a formulation containing an active insecticide/parasiticide and a carrier/vehicle. Typically therefore, a formulation of the third aspect of the invention is a pour-on formulation including an effective amount of an active composition of the first aspect of the invention and a topically acceptable carrier.
It is also typical that a topically applied formulation can be a spray or dip or a solution such as ajetting fluid.
A pour-on formulation of the third aspect of the present invention is typically liquid and is usually applied to the exterior of a domestic animal as a line or a spot, which then acts to protect the external surface of the animal against both larval and adult forms of Dipteran pests such as flies and mosquitoes and can also act to decrease the number of viable Dipteran insect eggs.
While the formulation is applied topically, to a localised area, the active agent migrates over the surface of the animal to protect its whole external surface area.
The carrier (also referred to herein as 'vehicle') present in such pour-on formulations of the third aspect of the present invention is formulated to achieve good spread around the skin and/or penetration of the epidermis of the animal. To date, commercial pour-on formulations are suspensions, emulsifiable concentrates or solutions and are often comprised of at least one organic solvent. Solvents commonly used as A497376AUDIspci carriers in such pour-on formulations include propylene glycol, paraffins, isoparaffins, aromatics, isopropylmyristate (IPM), glycol ethers, alcohols and n-propyl alcohol.
Another embodiment of the third aspect of the invention provides a pour-on formulation for control of Dipteran pests in domestic animals, said formulation including: from 0.1 to 40% by weight of at least one active agent of the first aspect of the present invention, and from 60-99.9% by weight of a suitable carrier selected from the group consisting of TPM/alcohol, OP/IPM/OSU and GTCC/IMP/CAP where TPM is Tripropylene glycol methyl ether; OP is octyl palmitate or 2-ethylhexyl palmitate which is an excellent lubricant, and can also be used as an emollient and a solvent; OP can be replaced by OS (octyl stearate or 2-ethylhexyl stearate); IPM is isopropyl myristate which has excellent spreading and emollient properties this can be used interchangeably with IPP or IPL; 1PP is isopropyl palmitate; IPL is isopropyl laurate; PMP is PPG 2 myristyl ether propionate which spreads rapidly and promotes wetting of other materials; OSU is di-2-ethylhexyl succinate and promotes wetting and spreading of lipophilic substances onto the skin; ICS is isocetyl stearate which can be used as an emollient, lubricant and spreading agent; GTCC is glyceryl tri caprylate/caprate which is an excellent carrier or vehicle for actives; CAP is a selected blend of branched chain esters which again acts as an emollient and spreading agent; Alcohol could be benzyl alcohol, propyl alcohol, diacetone alcohol or other suitable alcohol.
Typically, the formulations of the present invention, can be in the form of a powder, emulsion, foam paste, aerosol, ointment, salve or gel. More typically, the formulation is a solution, and typically water soluble.
Typically, formulations of the present invention can be effectively applied to domestic animals such as sheep, cattle, goats, camelids, pigs, dogs, cats, poultry and horses, other ruminants and monogastrics; and to the environs of these domestic animals.
A497376AUDispeci Typically a pour-on formulation is applied by pouring in one or several lines or in a spot on the dorsal midline (back) or shoulder of a domestic animal. More typically, the pour-on formulation is applied by pouring along the back of the animal, following the spine. A pour-on formulation can also be applied to the animal by other conventional methods including wiping an impregnated material over at least a small area of the animal, by using commercially available applicators, by means of a syringe, by spraying or by using a spray race.
Typically, approximately about 0.1-2000mg active composition/kg of animal bodyweight is an effective amount for topical application to domestic animals.
0to Typically, about 2-100mg of active composition of the first aspect of the present invention will be applied to a cow or sheep (per kg bodyweight).
Typically, a formulation of the present invention, such as a pour-on formulation, is formulated such that the active composition is present in a concentration of about 0.1weight volume, more typically 0.1-20% weight volume, preferably about 0.5 to Is 5% depending on the potency of the active.
Typically, an active composition or a formulation of the present invention is formulated such that each of the A83543 compound and the milbemycin oxime are present in a concentration range of about 1-500ppm. This concentration is most typical in respect of ready to use formulations such as diluted dips and sprays.
Typically only a small volume of a pour-on formulation is required in order to be effective against the Dipteran pests, such as in the order of 0.5-80ml per application, with 10-60 ml per application being preferred for larger animals such as cattle and 1per application for smaller animals such as sheep, dogs and cats.
In the formulations of the present invention having pesticidal activity against Dipteran pests, the active agent is a combination of at least one compound selected from the class of spinosyn compounds (including spinosad) and at least one milbemycin.
The formulations of the present invention suitably can include one or more additional ingredients such as preservatives, spreading agents, adhesion promoters, active solubilisers such as oleic acid, viscosity modifiers, UV blockers or absorbers, colourants and stabilisers such as antioxidants. Suitably, surface active agents including anionic, cationic, non-ionic and ampholytic surface active agents can also be included in the pour-on formulations of the present invention.
If necessary, some oleic acid to dissolve the active may be required, such as if spinosad is used.
A497376AUDIspcci Isopropyl myristate (IPM), isopropyl palmitate (IPP), caprylic/capric acid esters of saturated CI 2
-C
1 8 fatty alcohols, oleic acid, oleyl ester, ethyl oleate, triglycerides, silicone oils and dipropylene glycol mono methyl ether (DPM) are common spreading agents used in pour-on formulations.
Typically, the method of the fifth and sixth aspects of the present invention prevents biting flies, carnivorous flies and other Dipteran pest infestations of domestic animals, including but not limited to cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, camelids, dogs, cats and poultry and other ruminants and monogastrics, and their environs.
Typically, the active compositions, formulations and methods of the present invention are effective against larval and adult forms of Dipteran pests in domestic animals as well as their environs. Typically, the active compositions, formulations and methods of the present invention are also effective in decreasing the number of viable Dipteran insect eggs which may be present in domestic animals or their environs.
More typically, a pour-on formulation of the present invention acts to control bot flies (Oestrus ovis) and blowflies (Lucilia, Calliphora, Chrysomyia spp.) in sheep, acts to control similar flies in goats and camelids, acts to control flies (eg Musca domestica, Haematobia irritrans, Stomoxys calcitrans), and mosquitoes, on cattle and acts to control Dipterida (Culicoides spp, Simulium spp and other flies) in horses and Dipteran pests in pigs.
The formulations of the present invention are prepared according to known techniques. Where the formulation is a solution the parasiticide/insecticide is mixed with the carrier or vehicle, using heat and stirring where required. Auxiliary or additional ingredients can be added to the mixture of active and carrier or can be mixed with the active prior to the addition of the carrier.
The formulations of the present invention can contain as little as Ippm of each macrocyclic lactone compound and spinosyn compound per application and a synergistic effect is still observed.
The active compositions and formulations of the invention are non toxic to humans and animals as well as crops and plants, and residues in the wool, hides and tissue of animals treated with the formulations are at environmentally acceptable levels. Further no skin irritation or other toxicity to end users results from the method and formulations of this invention. Environmental contamination is also minimised.
Also advantageously, as such spinosyn factors and milbemycins are very efficacious at low levels due to their synergistic effect when combined together, the present invention is of utility against Dipteran pest populations in domestic animals and A497376AUDIspeci IDtheir environs that have existing levels of resistance to both spinosyn compounds and Smacrocyclic lactones when these compounds are used separately.
Generally the administration of the formulations, and active compositions of the Cpresent invention is by way of surface/external application to structures or areas where domestic animals may be housed or proximally located and by way of externally/topically to the domestic animals. Such topical application can take the form r of dipping, showering, jetting, spraying, manually applying such as dusting, or otherwise rplacing or laying the formulation containing the active substance/s. Accordingly, typically the active compositions of the invention are formulated into a number of n io topically applied insecticidal formulations.
Preferably such topical insecticidal formulations include spot-ons, pour ons, sprays, dips, dusts, lotions, gels, ointments, salves, dressings, towels, cremes, sticks, soaps, shampoos, collars, medallions, eartags and tail bands. Pour-on formulations including both aqueous and organic solvent based ones as well as emulsions and suspensions are preferred. As stated above, the formulations can be in a concentrated form which are diluted just prior to application.
More preferred are dip formulations, jetting fluid formulations and jetting/spray race formulations.
Wettable powders are another formulation of the invention which are prepared by blending the active with a dust carrier which wets and suspends in water. A surface active agent can be added. Sprays of wettable powders can be applied to the environs of domestic animals including poultry houses, stables, dairy sheds and pig pens because of their relative safety.
Emulsions are another formulation of the invention which are solutions of the active in water-immiscible organic solvents, commonly at 1-40%, with an optional surface active agent to promote emulsification, wetting and spreading. The choice of solvent is based on safety to plants, humans and animals, volatility, flammability and cost. Water emulsion sprays from such emulsion concentrates can be used in household Dipteran pest control.
The spinosyn component of the active composition of the first aspect of the present invention may be present as a single compound, a mixture of two or more compounds, a mixture including at least one of A83543A and A83543D, or a mixture of at least one A83543 compound together with the dried portion of the fermentation medium in which it is produced.
A497376AUDIspcci Macrocyclic lactone compounds which may be used in methods and formulations of the present invention as well as milbemycins and derivatives and analogues thereof include such well known anthelmintic compounds as avermectins and derivatives and analogues thereof. As stated above, the avermectins are isolated from fermentation products of Streptomyces avermitilis and ivermectin is a compound which is a semisynthetic chemical formed by modification of avermectin. Commercially available ivermectin can include for example, the 25-isopropyl analogue of ivermectin.
Avermectins being lipophilic can be prepared for the purposes of the formulations and methods of the present invention by dissolving an avermectin in an organic solvent such 0o as chloroform, methylene chloride, acetone and alcohols.
The spinosyn compound may also be present as a salt in the active agent, formulations and methods of this invention. The salts would be prepared using standard procedures for salt preparation. For example, spinosyn A can be neutralised with an appropriate acid to form an acid additional salt. The acid addition salts of spinosyns which can be used in the present invention are useful and include salts formed by reaction with either an organic or inorganic acid such as, for example, sulfuric, hydrochloric, phosphoric, acetic, succinic, citric, lactic, maleic, fumaric, cholic, pamoic, mucic, glutamic, camphoric, glutaric, glycolic, phthalic, tartaric, formic, lauric, stearic, salicyclic, methanesulfonic, benzenesulfonic, sorbic, picric, benzoic, cinnamic and other like acids.
Generally, emulsifiable concentrates of the A83543 compounds comprise a convenient concentration of an A83543 compound dissolved in an inert carrier which is either a water-miscible solvent or a mixture of a water immiscible organic solvent and emulsifiers. A preferred concentration range is 1-500g/L of said spinosyn compound, more preferably the concentration range is selected from the group consisting of 1- 400g/L, 1-350g/L, 1-300g/L, 1-250g/L, 1-200g/L, 1-150g/L, 1-100g/L, 1-90g/L, 1- 1-70g/L, 1-60g/L, 1-50g/L, 1-40g/L, 1-30g/L, 1-20g/L, even more preferably Useful organic solvents include aromatics including xylenes and petroleum fractions. Other organic solvents may also be used, such as the terpenic solvents, including rosin derivatives, aliphatic ketones such as cyclohexanone and complex alcohols such as 2-ethoxyethanol.
Suitable emulsifiers for emulsifiable concentrates can be chosen from conventional nonionic surfactants, including ethylene oxide adducts of alkylphenols and anionic surfactants, including sulphonate alkyl/aryl salts.
Aqueous suspensions (AS) comprise suspensions of an active water-insoluble spinosyn compound dispersed in an aqueous vehicle at a concentration in the range of A497376AUDIspcci N from about 1-500g/L, preferably the concentration range is selected from the group consisting of about 1-400g/L, about 1-300g/L, about 1-250g/L, about 1-200g/L about 1- C 150g/L, about 1-100g/L, about 1-50g/L, about 1-45g/L, about 1-40g/L, about 1-30g/L, more preferably about 25g/L. Generally the suspensions are prepared by finely grinding S 5 the spinosyn compound and mixing it into a vehicle comprised of water and surfactants chosen from such types as nonionic, sulfonated lignins and alkylsulfates. Inert CN ingredients may also be added.
SThe aqueous suspensions and emulsions are preferably diluted with water to obtain 0 the desired spinosyn concentration in the final formulations of the invention.
t) 10 In another preferred formulation, the one or more active substances take/s the form 0 of a solution of the active/s in water. Sprays are the most common means of pesticide application on surfaces of structures such as stables, dairy sheds and pig pens. Sprays or dips are the most common means of pesticide application on small ruminant animal species with water generally as the principal carrier.
In the active composition and in the formulations of the present invention it is preferred that the spinosyn compound and the milbemycin are each present in a concentration of about 500ppm or less. More typically, each are present in a concentration of about 400ppm or less. Also typically, each are present in a concentration of about 300ppm or less, more typically 200ppm or less, even more typically 100ppm or less, most typically 50ppm or less.
Best Mode and Other Modes of Performing the Invention Preparation of the preferred formulations of the present invention can be made by conventional processes, several examples of which are found below. The preferred process for preparing a spinosad and ivermectin combination of the present invention is to either co-formulate the combination or formulate each of the compounds separately then combine them together. The compounds could even exist in the combination as separate phases.
A497376AUDIspeci
EXAMPLES
Introduction The macrocyclic lactones have a primary effect on the insect nervous system by activating inhibitory glutamate receptors, while spinosyns primarily activate the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in insect neurones causing hyperactivity of neurones.
However, both spinosyns and macrocyclic lactones have a secondary effect on gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) gated chloride channels in insect neurones, GABA being an inhibitory neuro-transmitter. It is therefore possible that when combined spinosyns and macrocyclic lactones have a synergistic effect on the GABA receptor leading to effects in an insect's nervous system which would be unrelated to the primary effect of either spinosyns or macrocyclic lactones. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis in Dipteran pests of veterinary importance.
Example 1 IN-VITRO INVESTIGATION FOR POSSIBLE POTENTIATION BETWEEN SPINOSAD AND IVERMECTIN IN SHEEP BLOWFLY LARVAE.
Materials and Methods Forty to 50 newly hatched 1 st instar larvae of Lucilia cuprina were washed with sheep serum onto chromatography papers treated with serial dilutions of ivermectin or spinosad as set out below. After 48 hours numbers of live and dead larvae were counted.
The LC90 was calculated for spinosad and ivermectin. Larvae were exposed to that concentration of spinosad or ivermectin and 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 of the LC90. In addition larvae were exposed to 1:1, 1:4, 4:1, 9:1 and 1:9 combinations of each chemical with each concentration of chemical being a fraction of the There were 19 treatment groups in the study (plus an untreated control group): A 1-4: Ivermectin alone at rates of Ix, 0.5x, 0.25x and 0.125x B 5-8: Spinosad alone at rates of Ix, 0.5x, 0.25x and 0.125x C 9-11: Equal rates of Ivermectin and Spinosad (0.5x, 0.5x), (0.25x, 0.25x) and (0.125x, 0.125x) A497376AUDIspeci D 12-14: Four:one rates of Ivermectin:Spinosad (0.8x, 0.2x), (0.4x, 0.1x) and (0.2x, 0.05x) E 15-17: Four:one rates of Spinosad:Ivermectin (0.8x, 0.2x), (0.4x, 0.1x) and (0.2x, 0.05x) s F 18,19: Ivermectin:Spinosad rates of(0.45x, 0.05x) and (0.05x, 0.45x) Each group was tested on 4 replicates of 50 flies and the number of dead flies per replicate was recorded.
The method of generalized linear models for overdispersed binomial data using the logistic link function was used for an analysis of the 19 treatment groups. The analysis estimated dose-response lines (on the logarithmic dose scale) for each chemical or combination. The lines for each separate chemical were used to predict the efficacy (on the logistic scale) of the combinations assuming independent action, i.e. with no synergism. These were compared with the efficacy observed or predicted from the doseresponse lines for the combinations.
RESULTS
The efficacy estimates are given below, as sample means and as predictions from doseresponse lines, on both the logistic and percentage scales. For the combinations predicted means assuming independent action are also provided. There was significant potentiation in most of the combinations tested. Potentiation was most pronounced using 4:1 and 9:1 ratios of spinosad: ivermectin.
Treatment Mean efficacy Mean efficacy (x LC90) (Sample estimate) (Dose-response) Logit Logit 1 Iv 1.Ox 2.75±0.46 94.0 2.64±0.34 93.3 2 Iv 0.5x 0.38±0.22 59.5 0.38±0.18 59.4 3 Iv 0.25x -2.09±0.35 11.0 -1.88±0.26 13.2 4 Iv 0.125x -3.48±0.64 3.0 -4.14±0.48 1.6 Sp l.0x 2.38±0.39 91.5 1.98±0.27 87.9 6 Sp 0.5x 0.53±0.23 63.0 0.58±0.16 64.1 7 Sp 0.25x -1.27±0.27 22.0 -0.81±0.17 30.7 8 Sp 0.125x -1.66±0.30 16.0 -2.21+0.28 9.8 A497376AUDIspeci Treatment (x LC90) Mean efficacy (Sample estimate) Logit Mean efficacy (Dose-response) Logit Predicted efficacy (Independence) Logit Difference T-test Logit 9 Iv:Sp 0.5:0.5 Iv:Sp 0.25:0.25 11 Iv:Sp 0.125:0.1 12 Iv:Sp 0.8:0.2 13 Iv:Sp 0.4:0.1 14 Iv:Sp 0.2:0.05 Sp:Iv 0.8:0.2 16 Sp:Iv 0.4:0.1 17 Sp:Iv 0.2:0.05 18 Iv:Sp 0.45:0.05 19 Sp:lv 0.45:0.05 2.51±0.42 0.43±0.22 25 -2.09±0.35 2.75±0.46 0.66±0.23 -1.15±0.26 3.32±0.60 1.42±0.28 -0.49±0.23 0.85±0.24 92.
60.5 11.0 94.0 66.0 24.0 96.5 80.5 38.0 70.0 52.67±0.37 93.5 1.77±0.28 0.34±0.18 58.4 -0.41±0.17 -1.99±0.31 12.0 -2.06±0.32 2.64±0.36 93.3 2.19±0.32 0.72±0.18 67.3 -0.19±0.18 -1.19±0.25 23.3 -2.39±0.35 3.32±0.44 96.5 1.61±0.26 1.42±0.22 80.5 0.15±0.15 -0.49±0.23 38.0 -1.26±0.25 0.07±0.17 85.4 39.8 11.3 90.0 45.2 8.4 83.4 53.6 22.1 51.7 0.90±0.46 0.75±0.25 0.08±0.45 0.45±0.48 0.92±0.26 1.20±0.43 1.71±0.52 1.27±0.27 0.77±0.34 0.78±0.29 1.96 3.01 0.17 NS 0.92 NS 3.59 2.78 3.30 4.73 2.29 2.65 1.77±0.31 85.5 0.37±0.19 59.2 1.40±0.36 3.87 Note: Significance levels: P<0.001; P<0.01; P<0.05; P<0.10; NS P>0.10
DISCUSSION
The results supported the hypothesis that spinosad and ivermectin potentiate the efficacy of each other, particularly when ivermectin is the minor ingredient.
Example 2 IN-VITRO INVESTIGATION FOR POSSIBLE POTENTIATION BETWEEN SPINOSAD AND IVERMECTIN IN SHEEP BLOWFLY LARVAE -PART II.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Solutions of spinosad, ivermectin, spinosad:ivermectin 4:1 and 9:1) were prepared, serially diluted to concentrations expected to give from 0 to 100% mortality of blowfly larvae and used to treat chromatography papers. Forty or 50 newly hatched 1 st instar larvae of Lucilia cuprina were washed on to treated chromatography papers with fortified sheep serum. After 48 hours numbers of live and dead larvae were counted.
The data was assessed in 2 ways 1. Mortality was corrected for control mortality and analysed by Probit regression.
were calculated and used to generate co-toxicity coefficients (Sun and Johnson, 1960 Analysis of joint action of insecticides against House flies. J Econ Entomol 53:887-892.).
2. Estimates of effective sample sizes were calculated using the method for the Wadley problem in Genstat. Estimates of dose response curves were calculated using the method of linear models for overdispersed binomial data using the logistic link A497376AUDIspcci function. LD50s were calculated and co-toxicity coefficients calculated. Curvature effects were not included in the first analysis to allow comparison with method 1.
RESULTS
The analysis using method 2 showed significant curvature for the 1;1 and 4:1 mixtures, which lead to lower LD50s and higher co-toxicity than when curvature was ignored.
Method 1 Method 2 curvature ignored Curvature effect included Chemicals LC50 CT LD50 CT LD50 CT coefficient coefficient coefficient Ivermectin 0.012 0.0115 0.0115 Spinosad 0.102 0.0843 0.0799 1:1 0.02 110 0.0191 106 0.0123 164 4:1 0.030 136 0.0291 128 0.0202 181 9:1 0.039 158 0.0399 130 0.0399 126
DISCUSSION
Co-toxicity coefficients of 100 indicate additive action only. Values of 130 or higher indicate modest potentiation. Taking the curvature of the dose response lines into account a ratio of 4:1 spinosad:ivermectin gave maximum potentiation and the mixture to was 4 x more toxic than spinosad alone. The study confirmed the findings of synergy found in Example 1 using different methodology and analysis Examples of the spinosad ivermectin synergistic formulations to control Dipteran pests Example 3. Pour-on formulation Ingredients g/L Spinosad Ivermectin antioxidant such as BHT Crodamol IPM Crodamol OSU Crodamol OP to 100% The formulation is applied to the dorsal midline of animals from the poll to the base of the tail using an applicator, usually a self filling dosing gun with a nozzle to dispense a narrow or wide band or lines of formulation along the back. The formulation is applied at 0.2 mL per kilogram body weight. Alternatively a set volume is applied to each bodyweight class eg for sheep 10 mL for animals less than 30 kg, 15 for animals 31 A497376AUDIspeci kg and 20 ml for animals 51+ kg. Sheep and other fibre producing animals should be treated within 24 hours of shearing or fibre collection.
Example 4 Suspension concentrate, 20 g/L spinosad, 5 g/L ivermectin The active chemicals are ground into fine particles using a bead mill.
%w/w Spinosad 2 Ivermectin Propylene glycol Surfactant eg Pluronic P123 2 Mineral thickener eg Veegum 2 Xanthan gum eg Rhodopol 23 0.2 Antimicrobial eg Agent Dowicil 75 0.2 Antifoam Agent eg Antifoam C 0.1 Water deionised to 100% The suspension concentrate (SC) is diluted 1:1000 in water and used to fill a bath or dip. The chemical is applied to animals by immersing them. Alternatively a shower dip or jetting race can be used to wet animals to the skin. Sheep can be treated by using a hand jetting wand to pump the diluted chemicals into the wool. For wound dressings the diluted chemicals can be poured into a wound. A number of animal species can be treated by being sprayed with diluted product to control Dipteran pests such as biting flies, mosquitoes and sandflies that plague domestic animals.
Example Emulsifiable concentrate 20 g/L spinosad, 5 g/L ivermectin.
The active chemicals are ground into fine particles using a bead mill.
%w/w Spinosad 2 Ivermectin Antioxidant eg BHT 10% of a blend of ionic and non ionic surfactants For example Toximul 3453F 6.8 Toximul 3454FA 3.2 Aromatic hydrocarbon solvent For example Solvesso 150 to give 100% The emulsifiable concentrate (EC) is diluted 1:1000 in water and used to fill a bath or dip. The chemical is applied to animals by immersing them. Alternatively a shower A497376AUDIspcci dip or jetting race can be used to wet animals to the skin. Sheep can be treated by using a hand jetting wand to pump the diluted chemicals into the wool. For wound dressings the diluted chemicals can be poured into a wound. A number of animal species can be treated by being sprayed with diluted product to control Dipteran pests that plague domestic animals.
Example 6 Suspension concentrate 100 g/L spinosad, 25 g/L ivermectin The active chemicals are ground into fine particles using a bead mill.
%w/w o0 Spinosad Ivermectin Propylene glycol Surfactant eg Pluronic P123 2 Mineral thickener eg Veegum 2 Xanthan gum eg Rhodopol 23 0.2 Antimicrobial eg Agent Dowicil 75 0.2 Antifoam Agent eg Antifoam C 0.1 Water deionised to 100% The concentrate is diluted 1:1000 with water and sprayed onto the floor, walls and if necessary roofs of animal houses and premises to control flies and other Dipteran insect pests. For example; spraying the walls and roof of a dairy will control populations of biting flies that plague cattle during milking, Spraying the walls of pig sheds will control mosquitoes and sandflies that bite pigs in summer and autumn in many areas of the world.
Example 7 In-vitro investigation for possible potentiation between spinosad and milbemycin oxime in adult stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans).
Materials and Methods Test articles were formulated as 10 mM stock concentrated solutions in molecular biology grade, 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Molecular masses of 550 and 741 were assumed for milbemycin oxime and spinosad, respectively. Test material specifications were as follows: o Milbemycin oxime Source: Purified from commercially available tablets of Interceptor, lot ESO-AH00264-065-F2 A497376AUDIspeci 24 O Isomeric Mixture: 80.6% milbemycin A4 5-oxime, 18.5% Smilbemycin A3 Purity: >99% So Spinosad Source: Technical active, lot OI 19160W08 Isomeric Mixture: 65-95% spinosyn A, 5-35% spinosyn D Purity: 89.5% SDoubling dilutions, using DMSO, were performed to yield a series of working stock solutions with concentrations that were 50x the desired exposure level.
Approximately 0.06 mL of each working stock solution was dispensed into one of three glass or plastic disposable test tubes. Approximately 2.946 mL of unrefined bovine serum (Irvin Scientific, #30001) was added to each tube; the resulting 3.0 mL of solution
C
contained the desired concentration of compound with a constant solvent concentration of 2% DMSO.
A 1 inch dental wick was placed into each tube to absorb the liquid. The dental wicks were placed into small weigh boats inside of filter paper-lined 100 mm plastic Petri dishes. Mixed sex, adult stable flies (5-10 d of age) were anesthetized with carbon dioxide, and dispensed into each dish at a rate of approximately 10-20 flies per dish.
Following recovery, flies fed on compound-bovine serum soaked dental wicks. Plates were incubated in a controlled environment, approximately 75°F (approximately 26°C) and 65-80% relative humidity.
Fly mortality was assessed after 24 h of exposure/feeding. Moribund flies were classified as those unable to exhibit normal forward motion or response to stimuli, and were counted as dead flies. Nonlinear regression was performed on normalized mortality data, and the resultant statistical parameters were used to calculate EC 90 effective concentration) values for spinosad and milbemycin oxime.
From this value, stock solutions (50x concentrates in DMSO) of spinosad and milbemycin oxime were prepared representing the 2xEC90 dose. Doubling dilutions in DMSO were made to obtain IxEC 9 0, 1/2xEC90, 1/4xEC 9 o, and 1/8xEC90 solutions.
From the 2xEC9o stocks, volume-to-volume mixtures of were made to generate 1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, 4:1, 9:1 and 19:1 ratio combinations. On a percentage scale, this would correspond to mixtures of 50:50, 20:80, 10:90, 5:95, 80:20, 90:10 and 95:5, respectively. The same scheme was performed for IxEC 9 0, 1/2xEC 9 o, 1/4xEC 9 o, and 1/8xEC 9 0 stocks.
Ratio mixtures were diluted in bovine serum as above. Flies were allowed to feed for 24 h as above. Dose titration of single agents alone was conducted contemporaneously.
A497376AUDIspeci O RESULTS O A series of in vitro dose response bioassays were conducted to assess the activity and potential synergy of various combinations (ratios) of spinosad and milbemycin oxime against a drug susceptible strain of the adult stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans. In the adult stable fly (ASF) bioassay method, mixed-sex adult flies are exposed to test
C
articles via topical (footpad) and systemic (ingestion) routes, and fly mortality is evaluated after 24 h of exposure. Most of the exposure is presumed to be systemic since Sthe compounds are mixed with bovine serum and the flies ingest this with their mouth parts as their food source. Since they land on the drug spiked food source with their footpads and since their mouth parts (stylus) contacts the spiked serum, there may be a n small topical contact exposure.
Spinosad and milbemycin oxime were first evaluated independently for activity
C
against 5-10 d old stable flies. Nonlinear regression analysis was performed on fly mortality data (variable slope, Hill equation) to generate dose response curves and calculate EC 50 (50% effective concentration, micromolar) values, from which respective
EC
90 (90% effective concentration) values were determined. The ratio-testing scheme was based upon fractional EC 90 exposure levels. Ratios of 1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, 4:1, 9:1 and 19:1, spinosad to milbemycin oxime, were tested at exposure levels of 1xEC 9 0, 1/2x ECoo, 1/4xECo9, 1/8xEC 9 0 and 1/16xEC 9 o. Minimums of three replicates were tested for each ratio at all exposure levels, using 10-20 flies per replicate. Mortality data was normalized for background (solvent only) mortality.
Nonlinear regression (four parameter logistic equation) of mortality data yielded full or partial dose-response curves for all ratios tested (Fig Regression analysis results are summarized in Table 1. Spinosad alone was more potent than milbemycin oxime alone, with EC5o (95% confidence interval) values of 1.742 (1.379 2.201) M, and 27.03 (23.35 31.30) uM, respectively. The EC50 values for all combinations where the ratio of spinosad was less than milbemycin oxime 1:9, 1:19) were very close, at approximately 10-12 M. The potency of 4:1 ratio of spinosad to milbemycin oxime was approximately the same as spinosad alone, with 9:1 and 19:1 spinosad to milbemycin oxime ratios being more potent than spinosad alone and having EC5o values of 0.87 [pM and 0.27 jiM, respectively.
The dose (jiM) of the individual components spinosad or milbemycin oxime, as a fraction of the total dose yielding 50% fly mortality at each combination ratio, was determined and compared to the predicted fly mortality of each component if a purely additive interaction were to exist. Data is summarized in Table 2. An interaction factor of 1.0 reflects a scenario where the predicted fly mortality would be equivalent to the observed fly mortality, in this case 50%, if the interaction between the two compounds was purely additive. An interaction factor >1.0 reflects a scenario where the sum of the predicted mortalities would be less than the observed mortality of A497376AUDIspci thereby denoting synergy. An interaction factor <1.0 reflects a scenario where the sum of the predicted mortalities would be greater than the observed mortality of denoting antagonism. Interaction factors of 1.04, 2.71, 2.70, 3.26, 3.35, 4.89 and 16.58 were obtained for spinosad to milbemycin oxime ratios of 1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, 4:1, 9:1 s and 19:1, respectively.
Table 1. Summary of data from nonlinear regression analysis of dose-response data.
Hill Slope 2 Treatment ECso (pM) 95% CI (pM) Sl R2
(SE)
Spinosad only 1.742 1.379 to 2.201 1.530 (0.2674) 0.7587 Milbemycin only 27.03 23.35 to 31.30 1.983 (0.2733) 0.8840 1 (S M) 11.87 10.34 to 13.63 2.083 (0.2609) 0.9274 1 4 (S M) 10.60 7.924 to 14.19 1.081 (0.1923) 0.7732 1 M) 12.03 9.481 to 15.26 1.375 (0.2372) 0.8256 1 19(S:M) 11.20 7.817 to 16.04 1.068(0.2314) 0.7171 4 1 (S M) 1.867 1.606 to 2.171 1.973 (0.2535) 0.8985 9 1 (S M) 0.8742 0.7287 to 1.049 1.767(0.2519) 0.8690 0.8632 19: 1 (S M) 0.2650 0.08191 to 0.8570 0.4923 (0.2776) Both spinosad and milbemycin oxime exhibited insecticidal activity against adult stable flies in the ASF bioassay, with spinosad being approximately 10-fold more potent than milbemycin. The 1:1 ratio of spinosad to milbemycin appears to reflect a purely additive interaction. The 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, 4:1 and 9:1 ratios of spinosad to milbemycin reflect progressively increasing degrees of synergy, with the 19:1 ratio of spinosad to milbemycin exhibiting the highest degree of synergy.
A497376AUDIspeci 2005202712 29 Sep 2006 Table 2. Interaction factor determination for various ratio combinations of spinosad to milbemycin oxime against adult stable flies in vitro.
Fractional Fractional Ratio of ECso Total Spinosad Milbemrycin Predicted Kill Predicted Kill Predicted Kill of Actual K1l11 Interaction Spinosad: Mlbernbcn Slope Dose (AM Lee (AM Lve (AM Spinosad Milbeirlycn Corbrtiol Factor Interaction 1: 0 1 1.3 1.74 f1.74 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 1.00 r'a 0: 1 1.981 27.03 0.00 27.03 0.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 1.00 a 1 :1 208j 11.87 1.13 10.74 34.06 13.85 47.92 50.00 1.04 Adtive 1 :4 1.08 10.60 0.27 10.33 5.46 12.96 18.42 50.00 2.71 Synergistic 1: 9 1.38 1203 0.14 11.89 2.07 16.44 18.51 50.00 2.70 Syrgistic 1 :19 1.07 11.20 0.06 11.14 0.58 14.74 15.32 50.00 3.26 Synergistic 4:1 1.97 1.87 0.55 1.32 14.65 0.25 14.91 50.00 3.35 Syrgistic 9: 1 1.77 0.87 0.42 0.45 10.20 0.03 10.23 50.00 4.89 Synerisic 19: 1 1 0.86 1 0.27 10.18 1 0.09 1 3.01 0.00 1 3.02 150.00 1 16.58 1Hghly Syrgistic A EC 50 Spinosad Alone B EC 50 Milbemycin Alone a Fractional Spinosad Dose (per ratio) yielding 50% Mortality b Fractional Milbemycin Dose (per ratio) yielding 50% Mortality
EC
9 D Spinosad 7.32 giM
EC
9 Milbemycin 81.86 p.M Predicted Kill Equation Spinosad F 100 [(a"-slope A) (aASlope A) (EC 50 AAslope A)] Predicted Kill Equation Milbemnycin F 100 (bAslope B) (bAslope B) (EC 50 BAslope B)] A497376AUDispcCi

Claims (21)

1. An active composition for preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of domestic animals or their environs, comprising a synergistic combination of at least one A83543 compound and at least one milbemycin or derivative thereof.
2. The active composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ratio of A83543 compound:milbemycin or derivative thereof is in the range of 19:1 to 1:19 w/w.
3. The active composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ratio of A83543 compound:milbemycin or derivative thereof is in the range of 9:1 to 1:9 w/w.
4. The active composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the ratio of A83543 compound:milbemycin or derivative thereof is in the range of 4:1 to 1:4 w/w.
The active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the A83543 compound and the milbemycin or derivative thereof are each present in a concentration of between about 1 ppm-500ppm.
6. The active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said A83543 compound is selected from the group consisting of any spinosyn compound and salts thereof, and a mixture of any two or more spinosyn compounds including spinosad.
7. The active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said A83543 compound is spinosad.
8. The active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein said milbemycin or derivative thereof is milbemycin oxime.
9. A formulation for preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of domestic animals or their environs, said formulation including an effective amount of an active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 and an acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
The formulation as claimed in claim 9 wherein the active composition is present in the formulation in a concentration of about 0.1-40% weight/volume.
11. The formulation as claimed in claim 9 or claim 10 for controlling a Dipteran infestation of domestic animals.
12. The formulation as claimed in claim 11 wherein said formulation is externally applied to one or more domestic animals or their environs.
13. The formulation as claimed in claim 12 wherein said formulation is a topical formulation for applying to domestic animals, said topical formulation being selected from the group consisting of spot-ons, pour ons, sprays, dips, dusts, lotions, gels, ointments, salves, dressings, towels, cremes, sticks, soaps, shampoos, collars, medallions, eartags, dip formulations, jetting fluid formulations, jetting/spray race formulations and tail bands. A497376AUDIspcciamendcd
14. The formulation as claimed in claim 12 wherein said formulation is a pour- on formulation applied to a localised area of the external surface of a domestic animal.
The formulation as claimed in any one of claims 12 to 14 wherein about 0.1-2000mg active composition/kg animal bodyweight is effective for topical s application to domestic animals.
16. The formulation as claimed in any one of claims 12 to 15 wherein about 2- 100mg active composition/kg animal bodyweight is effective for topical application to domestic animals.
17. The formulation as claimed in any one of claims 12 to 16 wherein said formulation is for applying to at least a localised area of an environ of a domestic animal, said formulation being selected from the group consisting of aerosol sprays, sprays of wettable powders, emulsions, water emulsion sprays and aqueous based solutions and suspensions.
18. A method of preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of Is domestic animals, said method including the external application of an effective amount of an active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 or of a formulation as claimed in any one of claims 9 to 17 to at least a localised area of the external surface of said animal.
19. A method of preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of the environs of domestic animals, said method including the application of an effective amount of an active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 or of a formulation as claimed in any one of claims 9 to 17 to a surface area of the environs.
Use of an active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 for the manufacture of a formulation for preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of domestic animals or their environs.
21. An active composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 or a formulation as claimed in any one of claims 9 to 17 when used for preventing, controlling or eradicating a Dipteran infestation of domestic animals or their environs. Dated 28 September, 2006 Eli Lilly and Company Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON A497376AUDI spccinamended
AU2005202712A 2000-03-20 2005-06-22 Synergistic formulations Expired AU2005202712B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2005202712A AU2005202712B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2005-06-22 Synergistic formulations

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPQ6343 2000-03-20
AU2001239017A AU2001239017B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2001-03-20 Synergistic formulations
AU2005202712A AU2005202712B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2005-06-22 Synergistic formulations

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2001239017A Division AU2001239017B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2001-03-20 Synergistic formulations

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2005202712A1 AU2005202712A1 (en) 2005-07-14
AU2005202712B2 true AU2005202712B2 (en) 2007-08-23

Family

ID=34744139

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2005202712A Expired AU2005202712B2 (en) 2000-03-20 2005-06-22 Synergistic formulations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2005202712B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2852607C (en) 2011-10-18 2021-05-04 Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique Use of avermectin derivative for increasing bioavailability and efficacy of macrocylic lactones

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5202242A (en) * 1991-11-08 1993-04-13 Dowelanco A83543 compounds and processes for production thereof
US6001981A (en) * 1996-06-13 1999-12-14 Dow Agrosciences Llc Synthetic modification of Spinosyn compounds
WO2000002453A1 (en) * 1998-07-07 2000-01-20 Novartis Ag Pesticidal composition comprising emamectin

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5202242A (en) * 1991-11-08 1993-04-13 Dowelanco A83543 compounds and processes for production thereof
US6001981A (en) * 1996-06-13 1999-12-14 Dow Agrosciences Llc Synthetic modification of Spinosyn compounds
WO2000002453A1 (en) * 1998-07-07 2000-01-20 Novartis Ag Pesticidal composition comprising emamectin

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2005202712A1 (en) 2005-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8048861B2 (en) Pesticidal formulations
AU2001291478A1 (en) Pesticidal formulations
NZ541519A (en) Synergistic pesticidal formulations for the control of dipteran pests
AU2005202712B2 (en) Synergistic formulations
AU2010260102B2 (en) Ectoparasiticidal methods and formulations
AU2001239017B2 (en) Synergistic formulations
NZ550023A (en) Synergistic pesticidal formulations for the control of dipteran pests
AU2001239017A1 (en) Synergistic formulations
AU2013224751B2 (en) Ectoparasiticidal methods and formulations
ZA200402103B (en) Pesticidal formulations.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
PC Assignment registered

Owner name: ELANCO US INC.

Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired