AU2003213496A1 - Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet - Google Patents

Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2003213496A1
AU2003213496A1 AU2003213496A AU2003213496A AU2003213496A1 AU 2003213496 A1 AU2003213496 A1 AU 2003213496A1 AU 2003213496 A AU2003213496 A AU 2003213496A AU 2003213496 A AU2003213496 A AU 2003213496A AU 2003213496 A1 AU2003213496 A1 AU 2003213496A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
credit data
lending institutions
lending
computer
credit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2003213496A
Other versions
AU2003213496B2 (en
Inventor
Douglas Lebda
Richard Stiegler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
LendingTree Inc
Original Assignee
LendingTree Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU38925/99A external-priority patent/AU759423B2/en
Application filed by LendingTree Inc filed Critical LendingTree Inc
Priority to AU2003213496A priority Critical patent/AU2003213496B2/en
Priority claimed from AU2003213496A external-priority patent/AU2003213496B2/en
Publication of AU2003213496A1 publication Critical patent/AU2003213496A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2003213496B2 publication Critical patent/AU2003213496B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)

Description

AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 LENDINGTREE,
INC.
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT
DIVISIONAL
Invention Title: Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet The following statement is a full description of this invention including the best method of performing it known to us:- METHOD AND COMPUTER NETWOK FOR COORDINATING A LOAN OVER THE INTERNET BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. The Field of the Invention The invention relates to a process for coordinating loans on a loan processing computer. over a computer network or the Internet. The Internet, a vast collection of computers world wide, is a relatively new medium for both personal and commercial entities to transact business. To conduct business over the Internet, companies must find ways to communicate with potential customers. The two most common forms of communication across the Internet are web pages, and e-mail.
2. The Prior Art Various methods are known for presenting web pages over the Internet. For example, information about the Internet and web browsers can be found in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,701,451 to Rogers et al., which is incorporated herein by reference. Rogers et al., details how requests of a web browser are processed. The Rogers invention speeds up the process for receiving requests from web browser users and retrieving the required information. United States Pat. No. 5,535,407 to Yanagawa et al., details a customer data processing system which is used to assist credit card purchases made in stores. The Yanagawa invention simplifies the way in which credit card purchases are verified at the time of checkout. United States Pat. No. 4,346,442 to Musmanno details a securities brokerage-cash management system. The Musmanno invention maintains customer brokerage accounts, charge cards and checking accounts and calculates available credit for purchases of securities.
Until now, there has been no way to apply for credit from a multitude of lending institutions without physically going to or calling each lender and filling out an application. This process was tedious and time consuming. All applications required substantially the same information: name, address, occupation, debt, amount of loan, etc.. This invention combines the vast resources and speed of a computer network with additional knowledge of various lending institution's selection criteria to create a simple mechanism whereby a credit applicant can apply for credit from a multitude of lending institutions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION To overcome these limitations, it is therefore an advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention that a fast, convenient process is provided in which to apply for credit from a large number of lending institutions. In accordance with our invention, needless repetitive applications are eliminated.
It is a further advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide a universal credit application over a computer network and to allow the credit applicant to submit a single credit application to a plurality of lending institutions who then make offers to the customer via a computer network.
In a first aspect, the invention is a method for coordinating an electronic qualification form between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions; and transmitting the credit data to each of the selected lending institutions; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user.
In a second aspect, the invention is a method for coordinating business between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of storing selection criteria for a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user corresponding to an electronic qualification form; matching the credit data with lending institutions and the selection criteria; determining an appropriate transfer method to transmit said electronic qualification form to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data; transmitting the electronic qualification form to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data according to the determined transfer method; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user by electing to make offers to the computer user.
In a third aspect, the invention is a method for promoting commerce between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; matching the credit data with lending institutions and the selection criteria; transmitting the credit data to one or more lending institutions associated with a match of the credit data; and displaying a plurality of positive credit decisions from one or more of the lending institutions to the computer user via the computer network.
In a fourth aspect, the invention is a computer readable medium having computer-executable instructions for coordinating an electronic financial services application between at Internet user and a plurality of financial institutions via the Internet, the instructions comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from one or more financial institutions; receiving credit data from the Internet user; applying the credit data to a filter comprising a plurality of selection criteria to select each one of the financial institutions associated with a match of the credit data to the selection criteria; transmitting the credit data to the selected ones of the financial institutions to assist a determination of offering financial services to the Internet user; and coordinating communication between the selected financial institutions and the Internet user so that the Internet user can accept financial services from one of the selected financial institutions.
In a fifth aspect, the invention is a system for coordinating business between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions comprising: a processing unit; a memory storage device; and a program module, stored in said memory storage device for providing instructions to said processing unit; said processing unit responsive to said instructions of said program module, operable for receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions; and forwarding the credit data to the selected one or more lending institutions; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user.
The filter may be made up of a plurality of selection criteria in which a specific lending institution has given to the inventor. The filter may be customizable by the specific lending institution in real time and unique to each lending institution. Once the application has been filtered, it is sent to a list of lending institutions that match with the credit application. These lending institutions may then reply as to whether the application has been accepted or rejected. The criteria for acceptance or rejection of an application may be determined by each lending institution based upon an administration services form. For example, this program can administer a mortgage filter for lending institutions to filter out mortgage applications from borrowers. In that way, once an application is completed and screened through the filter process the lending institution may simply accept or deny only a select few number of applications that pass through the filter. This type filter process may also be applied to home equity loans, auto loans, personal loans, and credit card applications.
The information may be sent in many different ways. For example, the information can be sent in an Active File Transfer system (AFTS), via e-mail, through a secured webpage or through a Common Gateway Interface (CGI). In addition, since much of the information relayed between the network of computers is private information, it may be encrypted before it is sent from one computer to another.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings which disclose several embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the drawings are designed for the purpose of illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views: FIG. 1 shows an overview of the method of the invention; FIG. 2 shows a schematic depiction of network designed to achieve the method of the invention; FIG. 3a shows the steps involving the second stage of the lending process; FIG. 3b shows the steps involving the third stage of the lending process; FIG. 4 shows the steps of the fourth stage of the lending process; FIG. 5 shows the steps of the fifth stage of the lending process; FIG. 6 shows a schematic of the filter process, matching an individual lender to an individual borrower; FIG. 7 shows the lending process where an individual lender selects from a plurality of borrowers; FIG. 8 shows the steps of the sixth stage of the lending process; FIGS. 9a, 9b, and 9c show an interactive webpage for allowing lending institution to select and filter out mortgage applications; FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c show an interactive webpage for allowing a lending institution to select and filter out home equity applications; FIGS. 1a and llb show an interactive webpage for allowing a lending institution to select and filter out car loan applications; FIGS. 12a and 12b show an interactive webpage for allowing a lending institution to select and filter out personal loan applications; FIGS. 13a and 13b show an interactive webpage for allowing a lending institution to select and filter out credit card applications; FIG. 14a shows a schematic of the seventh stage of the lending process; FIG. 14b shows the various transfer methods in the eighth stage of the lending process; and FIG. 15 shows the steps of the Active File Transfer System in the eighth stage in the of the lending process; FIG. 16 shows the steps of the Active File Transfer System in the ninth stage of the lending process; and FIG. 17 shows the tenth stage of the lending process.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Essentially, the invention is a process and a computer.
for coordinating loans between lending institutions and borrowers via a computer network. FIG. 1 illustrates the ten general stages in the process required to coordinate an electronic credit application between a prospective borrower and a plurality of lending institutions. For example, in stage 1 the process presents background information and a credit application to a prospective borrower-credit applicant on a web site. In stage 2, the prospective borrower inputs information onto the web site. In stage 3, validation checks are performed on this information to make sure that the application is complete and correct. Next, stage 4 involves storing and manipulating the credit application in a database.
In stage 5, a Fair Isaac Credit Score is obtained based upon the credit application and that score is matched to the application and stored in the database. Next, in stage 6, the application is filtered where it is compared to a list of criteria presented by a series of lending institutions. If the application passes this list of criteria then in stage 7 the application is sent to each one of those institutions whose criteria match with the application. In stage 8 the lender processes the application and can either accept or deny it. If the lender accepts the application then in stage 9, the borrower can reply stating whether he accepts or denies the lender's application. Finally, in stage 10, information about this transaction is sent to a database to allow lending institutions to have access to their lending history.
For this process to occur, there must be a series of computers connected to each other via telecommunication lines as shown in FIG. 2. Here, computer program 10, controls the process and is housed on loan processing computer 100. Loan processing computer 100 coordinates a loan application between a series of lending institution computers 200, and a plurality of borrower computers 300. Computer program 10 is stored on -9loan processing computer 100 in storage device 110 and is run by processor 112. Program 10 is designed to transmit and receive information through a computer network via a web browser such as Netscape or Internet Explorer, installed on the computers.
Loan processing computer 100 must have sufficient memory and processor power to project program 10 over a computer network. Therefore, the recommended minimum requirements for processor 12 on computer 100 is an Intel Pentium 200 Mhz processor. The remaining standard components are 64 megabytes of ram, 2 gigabytes of disk space, an Internet connection, additional Ethernet connection, and Windows NT workstation operating system. Computer 100 is installed with one Ethernet interface directly on a computer network, and the other Ethernet interface connected to a firewall storage device 110, to allow disposition of files on a designated server inside the corporate network. In addition computer 100 could be a Unix style server that interfaces with other Unix and non-Unix based computers on a computer network.
When program 10 runs on computer 100 it instructs computer 100 to interact with other computers through a computer network to co-ordinate a loan application. For example, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, in stage 1, computer 100 allows lender computers 200 to access information on web-page 114 housed in loan processing computer 100 at a predetermined URL address via telecommunication lines 400. In stage 2, computer 100 allows prospective borrowers using satellite computers 300 to view a plurality of documents provided by computer 100. Stage 2 consists of a series of steps that are shown in FIG. 3a. For example, in step 12, computer 100 sends the prospective borrower background information documents to web-site 114 concerning the loan application. These background information documents include a document welcoming the credit applicant to the web-site, a document explaining the application process, and a document explaining the services provided. In step 14, computer 100 sends an open application to a prospective borrower through a computer network to computer 300. In step 15, the prospective borrower inputs information onto the application. When the prospective borrower wants to send this information back to computer 100 he clicks a "SEND" button which initiates the third stage of the program.
FIG 3b outlines stage 3 wherein computer 100 sends a series of instructions to computer 300 to initiate edit and validation checks. In step 16, computer 100 checks the Social Security number entered. In step 17 computer 100 checks the addresses, in step 18 it checks phone numbers, and in step 19 it checks the email addresses entered. The edit and validation checks in stage 3 insure that the data to be received by the database 140 in computer 100 is in the proper format for further processing. If computer 100 determines that the data is in the proper format, then the borrower can then transmit a completed application 115 to a database on computer 100.
FIG. 4 shows stage 4, wherein in step 20 the data from the completed application 115 is encrypted by SSL technology.
Next in step 21, at the borrowers instruction, this information is sent to computer 100, unlocked and stored in storage device 110 for further manipulation. In this stage, the data from completed application 115 is sorted and stored in tables 150 in database 140 based on the type of loan requested(i.e. mortgage, home equity, credit card, etc.).
Next, in step 22, program 10 queries the data from tables 150 to produce reports providing loan information based on data given any field in the application form state of residence, borrower income, etc.).
In FIG. 5, computer 100 moves into stage 5, wherein in step 23, computer 100 dials to a credit bureau housed on Credit Computer 500 via telecommunication lines 400. In step computer 100 obtains a Fair Isaac Credit Score from computer 500 based upon the data sent to computer 500. Next, in step 26, computer 100 inputs the Fair Isaac Credit Score to the database tables 150. The lenders can use this Fair Isaac Credit Score as one determinant to the borrower's credit risk.
FIGS. 6, 7, and 8 show stage 6 of the process, wherein computer 100 runs a filter to match completed application 115 in table 150 against preset criteria established by each lender. As shown in FIG. 6, lender criteria are stored in tables 175 in lender database 170 on computer 100. Wherein in FIG. 7 lender database 170 includes a listing of tables 175 for several lending institutions. The process for matching borrower's application in tables 150 to lender criteria in tables 175 is shown in FIG. 8. For example, in step program 10 starts the filter process. Next, in step 36,. the filter process initiates and moves to the appropriate type application 115 in tables 150. Next, in step 37 the filter moves to a first lending institution in table 175. In step 38, program 10 instructs computer 100 to read all of the lending institution's criteria for extending credit. In step 39, program 10 reads whether there are any criteria present in tables 175. If the requested data is not present, next, in step 45 the filter checks to see if there is any database connection that is broken and whether the database information in the message. If the criteria are present, step 40 instructs computer 100 to see whether any remaining criteria to match to application 115. stored on tables 150.
If there are more criteria to match to application 115, then in step 47, program 10 checks to see whether that remaining criteria matches with application 115. If the criteria matches with application 115 then in step 58, program advances to the next available criteria in tables 175. As shown in FIG. 6, step 58 creates a loop back to step 40. If the criteria does not match with application 115, then in step 48, program 10 checks to see whether there is another lending institution in database 170. If there are no remaining -13lending institutions in database 170 then in step 59, computer 100 generates a message that no acceptable match has been found.. After this message, in step 51, the filter process ends.
If there is another lending institution found, then the filter process advances to another lending institution in step 49. Step 49 creates a loop back to step 38 wherein the filter process reads all of the criteria for the new lending institution. This loop continues until in step 40, the filter finds there are no criteria available to match to completed application 115.
In figures 9a, 9b, and 9c are a series of selection criteria for filtering out mortgage applications sent to a lending institution. For example, a series of interactive display screens are presented where there are first a series of consumer preferences such as selecting first mortgage, refinance an existing.mortgage; or either. In addition, one can select a fixed rate mortgage variable rate mortgage or either.
The different property types could be selected such as a single family detached, a town house, a condominium, a cooperative, a multiple family dwelling, or a mobile home.
The occupancy type can be selected as well from a primary residence to a secondary residence to an investment property.
-14- The types of loans requested is also important. First there could be a no documentation mortgage, one could select the maximum number of units, the maximum loan term (in years), the current loan to value as a percentage, the proposed loan to value as a percentage, the current combined loan, and the proposed combined loan to value. All of these calculations could be done on a greater than, or less than scale so that the lending institution can set a series of ranges for acceptance or denial of a loan applicant.
Next, the lending institution can select the appropriate credit score range having a high and a low value entered from an applicant. Next, the lending institution can select the geographic location of the property based upon a series of states or zip codes. In addition, bankruptcy details such as whether they ever declared bankruptcy, the time that applicant's bankruptcy is last discharged etc., the consumer details such as military relationship, the length of residence at that current address, the monthly salary, monthly income, the length of employment, and the debt to income ratio.
Similarly, the criteria for selecting a home equity loan is presented in FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c. These selection criteria for the filter are the same as outlined for mortgage selections.
For an automobile.loan filter, as shown in FIGS. 11a and 11b are a series of selection criteria are presented so that the consumer can select a new car, a used car, or either, they can also select a finance preference such as a loan, a lease, compare or select all. There could also be a cut off selection where the loan amount is between a certain amount, and a range for the credit score as well. Similar to the above mortgage selection, there are also a geographical selection a bankruptcy selection, consumer detail selection, length of residence, monthly salary, total monthly income, length of the employment, and a debt to income ratio.
Next, in FIGS. 12a, and 12b is a personal loan filter which would consist of selection criteria such as amount or type of collateral as a percentage of the loan, the finance preference such as a loan, or line of credit, these qualifications could be where the loan amount is within a particular range, and where the credit score is within a particular range. In addition, as stated above, the filter can also be based upon geographic location, bankruptcy details, consumer details, length of residence, monthly salary, total monthly income, length of employment, and a debt to income ratio.
Finally in FIGS. 13a, and 13b, are a series of selection criteria for credit card filters. These selection criteria are based upon the following consumer preferences, the lowest possible annual fee, the lowest possible interest rate, gold card or credit limit, and air milage or other bonuses. Next, it will refer qualifications where a range of credit line -16requested is within a particular range. In addition, the credit score can also be selected within a particular range.
Finally the geographical location of the consumer, the bankruptcy details, the consumer details, the length of residence, the monthly salary, the total monthly income, the length of employment, and the debt to income ratio can be selected to be within a particular range so that a lending institution can filter out applicants for a credit card application.
If there are no more criteria to match to application 115, then in step 50, the filter determines whether there has been an acceptable match between a borrower and a lender. If there is an acceptable match, then in step 55 the filter selects that lender as a suitable lender for application 115.
In step 56 program 10 checks to see if there is another lending institution available, if yes, then program advances to the next lending institution in step 49. If there are no more lending institutions available, then program advances to step 57 wherein the filter process ends. Finally in step 59a computer 100 selects a limited number of matched lending institutions in which to send application 115. For example, if the filter process matches application 115 with lending institutions, computer 100 may send application 115 to only a fraction of those matched lending institutions. This selection process in step 58 is based upon either random -17selection or a predetermined set of criteria stored in computer 100.
Next, as shown in FIG. 14a in stage 7, program determines the interface method between computer 100 and the selected lending institution computers 200. The interface method can be Common Gateway Interface (CGI), Active File Transfer (AFTS), as a secured file on a secured webpage or via e-mail. Stage 7 allows loan computer 100 to access many different lender sites which thereby allows for greater communication flexibility within the system.
In stage 8, as shown in FIGS. 15a, 15b and 16, computer 100 sends data from table 150 via the interface method selected in stage 7 to the lending institutions selected in the filter process of stage 6. FIG. 16 shows the Active File Transfer System (AFTS) of FIG. 15b in greater detail. For example, in step 60, program 10 instructs computer 100 to start the AFTS. Next, in step 61 a text referral notice is sent to The Institution Internet Host (IIH) computer 220. In step 62, IIH computer 220 requests a full message from computer 100. In step 63 computer 100 sends an encrypted full message to IIH computer 220. Next, in step 64 computer 200 moves the message to the Institution's Corporate Network (ICH) 600. In step 65, ICH 600 converts the message from HTML format to a customized fixed record format defined and controlled by the destination institution. Next, in step outside program 10, this information can be processed and -18stored in the lender's system. In step 71 the lender approves or denies application 115. If the lending institution approves application 115 it attaches an approval to the record file in step 73. Alternatively if the lending institution denies application 115, then in step 72 it attaches a denial to the record file. In step 74, the lender computers 700 generate a text decision message file. This message file is converted from the existing format into HTML format and sent to computer 100 web-site via encrypted transmission in step 75. The text decision message file contains a loan id number and a request for more information from the borrower.
Computer 100 next stores the decision file in database 180 in step 80. Next, in step 81, computer 100 notifies an applicant that a decision has been made.
In addition, the data from credit application 115 can also be sent via e-mail with Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) encryption as shown in FIG. 15b. PGP is an encryption program that can be used to encrypt, a binary file to someone, with very high security, without having to exchange a set of private encryption keys beforehand. In this style transfer system, the text of table 150 comprising credit application 115, is transformed into an e-mail text message. Next, the email message is encrypted in PGP format. Finally, computer 100 sends the e-mail message to computer 230 which is a remote networked computer on a lending institution's site.
The third transfer process, that of the secured dynamic -19website serves as a place for lenders to log in to a website to change their lending criteria filters and to view loan applications. In this process, information is stored on computer 100 in a website that can be accessed by a lender.
To access this site, a lender is given a login access account to log into the website that is encrypted by SSL technology.
Once the lender logs into the website he can download information relating to a borrower's request for information.
In the fourth transfer method, the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) format is shown in FIG. 15b. There, computer 100 sends data from table 150 to institution server 250 via a Common Gateway Interface (CGI) program. CGI programs allow for a server to server interface over which encrypted information can be transferred. For example, the data located on table 150 is first encrypted. Next the data can be sent from computer 100 to institution server 250. Server 250 next stores and unlocks the encrypted data. This unlocked data can then be read by all other networked computers 230 in a lender's home network.
In stage 9, as shown in FIG. 17, computer program moves into the second phase of (AFTS) in step 82. In this stage, the borrower informs the lender of his decision concerning the loan. For example, in step 83 a borrower sends his decision notification from computer 300 to computer 100.
Next, in step 84, computer 100 generates and sends a notification to computer 220 (IIH). In step, 85 computer 100 sends a full acceptance message to IIH computer 220 and next moves the acceptance message to ICH computer 600 in step After that, in step 91 ICH computer 600 converts the acceptance message from HTML format and moves it to a final directory 190 on computer 230 (step 91).
At this point the lending institution program takes over so that in step 93, institution computer 230 processes the acceptance message. In step 94, institution computer 230 attaches a receipt file to the acceptance message. In step institution computer 230 generates a notification of receipt message, and in step 96, it converts the notification from its standard database format into HTML format. Finally, in step 97 ICH computer 600 sends a notification of the receipt message to computer 100 and in step 98 the Active File Transfer System ends.
In the tenth and final stage, as shown in FIG. 18, in step 142 the lender contacts the borrower to coordinate the closing of the loan. Here, the lending institution has the borrower's name, social security number, application id number, phone number at both work and home, and the best time to contact the borrower from the acceptance email sent when the offer was accepted. The loan closing can take place in any way that the lender typically closes loans. Once all documents are signed and delivered from the borrower, the loan is closed. Once the lender closes a loan, in step 144 it contacts computer 100 and sends a notification of the loan closure. In step 146 computer 100 stores this information in result database 195 which can be accessed by the lenders in step 148. Finally in step 152, the process according to the invention ends for that individual transaction.
While several embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is to be understood that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as 0 defined in the appended claims.

Claims (24)

1. A method for coordinating an electronic qualification form between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions; and transmitting the credit data to each of the selected lending institutions; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of determining an appropriate transfer method to forward the credit data to the selected lending institutions.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of displaying a plurality of positive credit decisions from the selected lending institutions to the computer user.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of assigning each lending institution a corresponding filter.
The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of customizing selection criteria of each filter in response to receiving communications from a corresponding lending institution.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of receiving credit data further comprises receiving credit data from the credit user comprising information relating to one of a first mortgage, a second mortgage, a car loan, a student loan, a personal loan, and a credit card.
7. A method for coordinating business between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of: storing selection criteria for a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user corresponding to an electronic qualification form; matching the credit data with lending institutions and the selection criteria; determining an appropriate transfer method to transmit said electronic qualification form to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data; transmitting the electronic qualification form to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data according to the determined transfer method; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user by electing to make offers to the computer user.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of matching the credit data comprises employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of displaying one or more positive credit decisions from the selected lending institutions to the computer user.
The method of claim 7, further comprising transmitting said electronic qualification form to said lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data via a Common Gateway Interface (CGI).
11. The method of claim 7, further comprising transmitting said electronic qualification form to said lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data via a secured website.
12. The method of claim 7, further comprising transmitting said qualification form to said lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data via a secured E- Mail.
13. A method for promoting commerce between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions via a computer network, comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; matching the credit data with lending institutions and the selection criteria; transmitting the credit data to one or more lending institutions associated with a match of the credit data; and displaying a plurality of positive credit decisions from one or more of the lending institutions to the computer user via the computer network.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the step of matching the credit data comprises employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions.
The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of determining an appropriate transfer method to transmit the credit data to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data.
16. The method of 15, further comprising the step of transmitting the credit data to the lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data according to the determined transfer method.
17. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of receiving via the computer network at least one decision from the computer user regarding at least one of the positive credit decisions, the Internet user's decision comprising an acceptance, denial or request for more information regarding a positive decision for one of said lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data.
18. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of transmitting a computer user's decision regarding a positive credit decision to at least one lending institution corresponding with the positive credit decision so that said Internet user can obtain credit or a loan from one of said lending institutions associated with a match of said credit data.
19. A computer readable medium having computer-executable instructions for coordinating an electronic financial services application between at Internet user and a plurality of financial institutions via the Internet, the instructions comprising the steps of: receiving selection criteria from one or more financial institutions; receiving credit data from the Internet user; applying the credit data to a filter comprising a plurality of selection criteria to select each one of the financial institutions associated with a match of the credit data to the selection criteria; transmitting the credit data to the selected ones of the financial institutions to assist a determination of offering financial services to the Internet user; and coordinating communication between the selected financial institutions and the Internet user so that the Internet user can accept financial services from one of the selected financial institutions.
The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the step of coordinating communication further comprises the step of receiving a decision from the Internet user regarding one or more offers made from the selected ones of the financial institutions.
21. The computer readable medium of claim 19, further comprises the step of displaying one or more positive credit decisions from the selected lending institutions to the computer user.
22. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the financial services comprise services relating to one of first mortgages, second mortgages, car loans, student loans, personal loans, and credit cards.
23. A system for coordinating business between a computer user and a plurality of lending institutions comprising: a processing unit; a memory storage device; and a program module, stored in said memory storage device for providing instructions to said processing unit; said processing unit responsive to said instructions of said program module, operable for receiving selection criteria from a plurality of lending institutions; receiving credit data sent from the computer user; employing the selection criteria to filter the credit data and to automatically select one or more lending institutions from the plurality of lending institutions; and forwarding the credit data to the selected one or more lending institutions; whereby the selected lending institutions compete with each other for business with the computer user.
24. The system of claim 23, wherein said processing unit is further operable for determining an appropriate transfer method to forward the credit data to the selected lending institutions. The system of claim 23, wherein said processing unit is further operable for displaying a plurality of positive credit decisions from the selected lending institutions to the computer user. Dated this sixteenth day of July 2003 LendingTree, Inc. Patent Attorneys for the Applicant: F B RICE CO
AU2003213496A 1998-05-08 2003-07-16 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet Ceased AU2003213496B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003213496A AU2003213496B2 (en) 1998-05-08 2003-07-16 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/075136 1998-05-08
AU38925/99A AU759423B2 (en) 1998-05-08 1999-05-07 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the internet
AU2003213496A AU2003213496B2 (en) 1998-05-08 2003-07-16 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU38925/99A Division AU759423B2 (en) 1998-05-08 1999-05-07 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the internet

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007202483A Division AU2007202483A1 (en) 1998-05-08 2007-05-30 Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2003213496A1 true AU2003213496A1 (en) 2003-08-14
AU2003213496B2 AU2003213496B2 (en) 2007-03-01

Family

ID=

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20220253878A1 (en) * 2018-04-04 2022-08-11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Financial incentives for student loans

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20220253878A1 (en) * 2018-04-04 2022-08-11 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Financial incentives for student loans

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU759423B2 (en) Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the internet
US20050273406A1 (en) Method and computer network for co-ordinating a loan over the internet
US20120054091A1 (en) Method and system for selecting qualification forms for financial services and financial products
US20120054092A1 (en) Method and computer network for co-ordinating financial service/products
US6920434B1 (en) Computerized system and method for establishing a loan participation network
US7478064B1 (en) System and process for applying for and obtaining universal multiple mortgage underwriting approvals
US20070185793A1 (en) Method and computer network for coordinating a financial, insurance, investment, business service over the Internet
US7962517B2 (en) Simultaneous real-time access to financial information
US7720750B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing consumers anonymous pre-approved offers from a consumer-selected group of merchants
US8538857B2 (en) Online trading system having real-time account opening
US20020107765A1 (en) Electronic financing system
US20040199458A1 (en) System and method for on-line mortgage services
WO2002041115A2 (en) Method and system for aggregating real estate information content in an on-line computing environment
WO2001061589A2 (en) Browser interface and network based financial service system
EP1316044A4 (en) Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network
US20040034567A1 (en) On-line transactions and system therefore
US8538847B2 (en) Method for investing working capital
US20040088253A1 (en) Delinquent account payment system
US20040030639A1 (en) Method and computer network for co-ordinating a loan over the internet
US20080071675A1 (en) Method and computer network for co-ordinating a loan over the Internet
US8160955B2 (en) Method and apparatus for capturing commercial loan application data and assigning a commercial loan request
EP1259914A2 (en) Method and system for processing a mortgage application
AU2003213496A1 (en) Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet
AU2007202483A1 (en) Method and computer network for coordinating a loan over the Internet
KR20010106581A (en) A real estate transaction intermediation method and system based on network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired