AU2003204430B2 - Preparation and use of biocidal solutions - Google Patents

Description

P/00/011 Regulation 3.2

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990

ORIGINAL

COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Invention Title: "PREPARATION AND USE OF BIOCIDAL SOLUTIONS" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us: -la-

DESCRIPTION

Preparation and use of biocida] solutions.

The present invention relates to a method for the preparation of chlorine dioxide, to a solution capable of releasing chlorine dioxide and to a method of introducing chlorine dioxide to a system requiring bleaching and/or disinfection and/or other benefits derived from the oxidising effect of chlorine dioxide such as, for example, odour control.

The use of chlorine dioxide as a bleaching agent and disinfectant is well known. In particular, the use of chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant in both industrial and potable water systems has become increasingly important in recent years because in contrast to chlorine, the most widely used oxidising biocide, its use does not give rise to the significant production of trihalomethanes. However the adoption of chlorine dioxide has been restricted because of the hazardous nature of the chemical.

Chlorine dioxide is an unstable gas which is explosive at pressures greater than 40 kPa (3000mmHg) It has been found impossible to compress and store chlorine dioxide gas either alone or in combination with other gases. Chlorine dioxide is therefore manufactured at its point of use. The equipment used to produce chlorine dioxide is costly and has to take -2account of the hazardous nature of the chemical.

Large consumers of the chemical, e.g. those involved in the bleaching of wood pulp, have used somewhat complicated processes based on the reduction of sodium chlorate. For use in smaller applications oxidation of chlorite is favoured. However all these processes recuire considerable capital expenditure, an understanding of the chemistry involved and skilled personnel to operate the units efficiently and safely.

There is therefore a need to be able to produce chlorine dioxide safely and cost effectively in relatively small quantities that will allow a greater number of industrial and potable water systems to take advantage of the superior disinfection and stability properties of the chemical without the need for large capital investments and specially trained personnel.

To an extent this need has been satisfied by the introduction in recent years of "stabilised" solutions of chlorine dioxide sold under a variety of trade names. These products claim to be solutions of chlorine dioxide stabilized in solution through the formation of a variety of complexes.

Thus for example, the producers of Purogene claim to have produced a stable aqueous solution whose active ingredient is chlorine dioxide. They state that duritg water treatment 50-70% of the chlorine 3dioxide reacted will immediately appear- as chlorite and the remainder as chloride. The chlorite, it is stated, will continue to react with remaining oxidisable material reducing entirely to chloride.

The reactions occurring being as follows:- Ci0 2 Cia 2 (chlorite) C10 2 4U+44e- Cl? +2H 2 0 (chloride) Viscona limited claim to have a (S0,OOOPwm) aqueous stabilised chlorine dioxide solution chemically buffered at a pH of 9 which releases chlorine dioxide in around 20 minutes when activated.

Release of chlorine dioxide is achieved by lowering the PH of the solution to approximately 2 using a suitable acid (with a chlorine donor for rapid results).

Activation with citric acid converts only approximately 101i of the available chlorine dioxide to free chlorine dioxide, in aqueous solution, after about 15 minutes. It is stated subsequent activation would continue at a very slow rate. Such a method is not sufficiently rapid for use in disinfection where a need-for an activation rate of 50- or more is reauired.

The rate of activation can be increased using a stronger acid. For example adding 30 to hydrochloric acid to bring the pH down to activates 151- of the potential chlorine dioxide in I.

-4hour, 25% in 2 hours and 50% in 24 hours.

By adding a chlorine donor, e.g. hypochlorite, around a 70 to 800 release in about 15 minutes can be achieved.

Another product, OCS Dioxide produced by Odour Control Systems Limited, is stated to be a combination of oxygen and chlorine joined as chlorine dioxide in aqueous solution.

Chlorine dioxide is generated from these solutions by reacting them with acids, particularly strong acids if a 'significant release of chlorine dioxide is required in a reasonable period of time.

A

common approach with these products is to dilute the product in a mixing tank with water to give a solution which contains a theoretical concentration of about 2- 3000ppm chlorine dioxide and then add sufficient strong acid, hydrochloric acid or phosphoric acid most commonly, to reduce the pH to within the specified pH range. The chlorine dioxide is then released from the complex into solution over a period of time which can vary from a few minutes to many hours depending primarily on the pH and the strength of the solutions.

The solution is then proportionately dosed to the system to provide the required reserve of chlorine dioxide. The "stabilised" chlorine dioxide is never fully released from the complex and conversion rates to "free"r chlorine dioxide are quoted as va-rying from 15-1 to 759.' depending upon pH, concentrations and time.

It is clear that while the introduction of these "stabilised, solutions has provided a means of Utilising chlorine dioxide without the need for complex and costly capital equipment they have not fully addressed many problems associated with utilising chlorine dioxide sately and effectively. In particular strong acids have to be used to produce disinfecting amounts of chlorine dioxide, the concentrations and reaction times of the various ingredients have to be carefully controlled to mnaximise the production of chlorine dioxide and finally the solution has to be dosed proportionately to the system to achieve the biocidal concentration of c-hlorine dioxide.

In addition the preparation of these solutions is expensive as the chlorine dioxide has to be firs: generated, dissolved into water and then finally stabilised.

it is an object of the present invention to provide a source of chlorine dioxide which is sirnnle to use, produces effective amounts of chloride dioxide quickly and safely and is cost effective to produce and use.

According to a first aspect of the present -6invention there is provided a stable solution for the production of chlorine dioxide comprising: a chlorite, a chlorine donor, an alkali, and water, the chlorite and chlorine donor being present in a molar ratio of from 1.0:0.1 to 1.0 15.0 chlorite to chlorine donor, the alkali being present in an amount sufficient to ensure a pH of above 10 and the water being present in an amount to give a theoretical minimum concentration of 0.5 ppm chlorine dioxide.

Preferably the water is present in an amount to give a theoretical minimum concentration of 0.05O (500ppm) chlorine dioxide before dilution.

Preferably the chlorite and chlorine donor are respectively an alkali metal chlorite and an alkali metal hypochlorite such as, for example, those derived from sodium or potassium or an alkaline earth metal chlotite or an alkaline earth metal hypochlorite, such as, for example, those derived from magnesium or calcium. Alternative chlorine donors, such as, for example, chioroisocyanurate could however be used.

More preferably the chlorite is sodium chlorite and the chlorine donor is the hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite. -7- The more preferred molar ratio of chlorite to the chlorine donor, preferably a hypochlorite, is from 0.3 to 1.0 5.0 and more preferably still about The more preferred pH is a pH above 11, more preferably still a pH above 12.

The preferred theoretical concentration of chlorine dioxide derivable from the composition before dilution is from 20,000 to 50,000 ppm and after dilution is from 0.5 to 50 ppm.

The composition of the invention may also be advantageously combined with other chemicals known to be useful in providing biocidal properties in water systems such as: quaternary ammonium and phosphonium compounds amines, iso-thiazolone mixtures and thiocyanates; and chemicals which are known to provide cleaning and penetration when combined with biocides such as surfactants particularly non-ionic surfactants.

In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing the composition of the first aspect of the invention, the method comprising sequentially adding the alkali, chlorine donor and chlorite to water in that order whilst maintaining the pH at 10 or above and the -8temperature at or below Preferably the chlorine donor is a hypochlorite.

More preferably the pH is maintained at 12 or above.

More preferably the temperature is maintained at or below 20 0

C.

According to a.third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of introducing chlorine dioxide to a system requiring bleaching and/or disinfection and/or other beneficial effects e.g. odour control, the method comprising reacting the composition of the first aspect of the invention with an acid to generate chlorine dioxide.

Preferably the acid is a weak acid i.e. one which does not readily ionise such as, for example, citric acid or acetic acid.

Alternatively a strong acid, such as, for example, hydrochloric acid can be used.

Whilst any acid which reduces the pH to within the range pH 2 to 4 can be used particular benefits accrue from the use of weak acids such as, for -example, citric acid since they are much less hazardous to handle than strong acids, for example, hydrochloric acid.

The solution of the present invention, comprising a mixture of chlorite ions (CI02-) and a chlorine -9donor, for example, hypochlorite ions (OCi-), overcomes many of the problems of the prior art solutions and when mixed with a weak acid such as citric acid produces almost instant quantitative conversion to chlorine dioxide. The mixed solution can then be dosed proportionately to the system, for example an industrial or potable water system to be treated, without the need for any holding or reaction vessels or sophisticated mixing apparatus to provide the required biocidal level of chlorine dioxide.

The invention thus provides a composition which when mixed with an acid which reduces the pH below 6, preferably below 5 and most preferably below 4 produces chlorine dioxide which can be dosed directly into the system to be treated. It also provides a process by which the solutions can be mixed and added to the system.

Alternatively the chlorine dioxide may be produced in situ.

According to a forth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of introducing chlorine dioxide to a system requiring bleaching and/or disinfection and/or other beneficial effects e.g. odour control, the method comprising reacting a chlorite, a hypochlorite and an acid to generate chlorine dioxide in situ.

The invention will be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the following examples and methodology.

Example 1 (Example composition) Proportion by weight Sodium chlorite solution 96 Sodium hypochlorite solution 134 Sodium hydroxide solution 14 Water 756 C 1 02- OC1- ratio 1.0 0.7 Example 2 (Example composition) Proportion by weight Sodium chlorite solution 96 sodium hypochlorite solution 93 Sodium hydroxide solution 14 Water 797 C102- OC1- ratio 1.0 Example 3 (Method of preparation) To 3.78Kg of deionised water was added 0.07Kg of sodium hydroxide solution. The solution was continuously stirred with a magnetic stirrer. 0.67Kg of a 12% (available chlorine) solution of sodium hypochlorite was added. Finally 0.48Kg of a 28% solution of sodium chlorite was added. The final pH of the solution was 13.0.

-11- Based on the concentration of Sodium Chlorite the product contains the potential to produce 2 0,000ppm of Chlorine Dioxide.

Examnle (Use of composition prepared according to example 3) of solution prepared in Example 3 was added to of deionised water. To this solution was added of a 16% citric acid solution. The solution immediately turned a yellow colour. The solution was analysed using the standard DPD test procedure developed by Palintest, to determine concentration of chlorine dioxide, free chlorine, combined chlorine, and chlorite.

Concentrations determined were: 798pp Chlorine dioxide free chlorine Oppm combined chlorine Oppm chlorite Indicating that all the chlorite had been converted to Chlorine Dioxide.

Example 5 (Apparatus for dosing) Referring to Fig. 1, a method of dosing a composition according to the invention into a system is illustrated. A dosing apparatus 8 is used it comprises two metering pumps (Prominent gamma G/4a -12- 0215) 10,12 delivering respectively a composition according to the invention and an acid. The metering pumps 10,12 were connected via a mixing block 14 into a water line 16 through which water to be treated was continuously flowing. A water meter 18 in the line delivered a signal for each 0.25 litre of water passing. The signal was fed to each of the pumps 10,12 which then delivered a nominal 0.is ml. for each signal received. Pump 12 delivered a 16* solution of citric acid and pump 10 a solution of Example 1.

After a period of operation during which the flow of water and treatment chemicals were allowed to stabilise samples of treated water were collected from the water line and analysed, by the DPD method, for chlorine dioxide, free chlorine, combined chlorine and chlorite. The results obtained were: Chlorine dioxide 12.5 ppm as Cl02 Free chlorine 0.3 ppm as C12 Combined Chlorine 0.0 ppm Chlorite 0.0 ppm In a second experiment the delivery of the pumps was halved by reducing the stroke to 50% of the previous setting. Samples were again collected and analysed with the following results: -13 Chlorine dioxide 5.9 ppm as C1O Free chlorine 0.36 ppm as C1 2 Combined chlorine 0.08 ppm as C12 Chlorite 0.0 ppm

Claims (21)

1. A stable solution for the production of chlorine dioxide comprising: a chlorite, a chlorine donor, an alkali, and water, the chlorite and chlorine donor being present in a molar ratio from 1.0:0.1 to 1.0:15.0 chlorite to chlorine donor, the alkali being present in an amount sufficient to ensure a pH of at or above 10 and the water being present in an amount to give a theoretical minimum concentration of 0.5 ppm chlorine dioxide.

2. A solution as claimed in claim i, in which the water is present in an amount to give a theoretical minimum concentration of 500 ppm chlorine dioxide.

3. A solution as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the chlorite is an alkali metal chlorite.

4. A solution as claimed in claim 3, wherein the alkali metal chlorite is sodium or potassium chlorite. A solution as claimed in any of the previous claims wherein the chlorine donor is an alkali metal hypochlorite.

6. A solution as claimed in claim 5 wherein the alkali metal hypochlorjte is magnesium or calcium hypochlorite.

7. A solution as claimed in any of claims I to 4 wherein the chlorine donor is a chloroisocyanurate.

8. A solution as claimed in any of claims 1 to 7 wherein the chlorite is sodium chlorite and the chlorine donor is sodium hypochlorite.

9. A solution as claimed in any of the preceding claims in which the molar ratio of chlorite to chlorine donor is from 1.0:0.3 to 1.0:5.0. A solution as claimed in claim 9 in which the molar ratio of chlorite to chlorine donor is from 1.0:C.3 to 1.0:2.0.

11. A solution as claimed in any of the previous claims wherein the pH is above ii.

12. A solution as claimed in any of the previous claims wherein the pH is above 12. A solution as claimed in any of the precedAing claims wherein the theoretical concentration of chorine dioxide is from 20,000 to 50,000oo ppm.

14. A solution as claimed in any of the preceiina claims which further comprises a biocide. A solution as claimed in claim 14 wherein the blocide is selected from the group consisting of quace-.ary ammonium and phosphonium compounds, amines, iso-thiazolone mixtures and thiocyanates -16-

16. A solution as claimed in any of the Preceding claims which further comprises a penetrating agent.

17. A solution as claimed in claim 16 wherein the penetrating agent is a surfactant.

18. A method of manufacturing the solution of any of claims i to 17, the method comprising sequentially adding the alkali, chlorine donor and chlorite to water, in that order, whilst maintaining the pH at or above 10 and the temperature at or below 0 C.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18 wherein the pH is maintained at or above 12. A method as claimed in claims 18is or 19 wherein the temperature is maintained at or below 0 C.

21. A method of introducing chlorine dioxide to a system for bleaching or disinfection, the method comprising reacting a solution as claimed in any of claims i to 17 with an acid to generate chlorine dioxide.

22. A method as claimed in claim 21 wherein the acid is a weak acid.

23. A method as claimed in claim 22 wherein the weak acid is citric acid or acetic acid.

24. A method as claimed in any of claims 21 to 23 wherein the '-17- 3 wherein the H of the solution is reduced to below 6. A method as claimed in claim 24 wherein the pH of the solution is reduced to between 2 and 4.

26. A method as claimed in any of claims 21 to wherein the reaction is conducted in situ in the system.

27. A method as claimed in any of claims 21 to wherein the reaction is carried out and then the resulting solution is dosed into the system.