AU2002350412A1 - Abin-mediated hepatitis protection - Google Patents

Description

ABIN-MEDIATED HEPATITIS PROTECTION

Field of the invention The present invention relates to the use of the A20-binding inhibitor of NF-κB activation (ABIN) to protect against TNF-induced liver failure, such as viral hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. More particularly, it relates to the prevention of the toxic effects of said diseases, including lethality, by over expressing ABIN.

Background of the invention Acute liver failure is a clinical syndrome that results from massive necrosis and apoptosis of liver cells leading to hepatic encephalopathy and severe impairement of hepatic function. It is caused by different kinds of diseases, such as viral hepatitis (A, B, C, ...), drugs, intoxication, auto-immune hepatitis, etc. Many studies have shown that TNF plays a central role in liver disease. TNF is produced mainly by activated macrophages but is also produced in smaller amounts by several other cell types. TNF exerts a variety of effects on different cell types and is implicated as an important mediator in various physiological and pathophysiological conditions. In addition, it has become clear that TNF is an important mediator of apoptosis (programmed cell death). TNF was originally identified by its capacity to induce hemorrhagic necrosis of tumors in mice. Attempts to use TNF for systemic anti-cancer therapy have failed due to the appearance of severe side effects before therapeutic doses could be reached. One of the side effects of TNF treatment was an elevation in serum levels of transaminases and bilirubin levels, indicating a direct cytotoxic effect of TNF on human hepatocytes. Subsequent studies have shown that TNF may be involved in viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, and fulminant hepatic failure (Muto et al., 1988; Bird et al., 1990; Gonzalez-Amaro et al., 1994; Diehl et al., 1994; Larrea et al., 1996). TNF serum levels are clearly elevated in patients with fulminant hepatitis (Muto et al., 1988). In addition, it was found that serum TNF levels were significantly higher in patients who died than in patients who survived (Bird et al., 1990). A role for TNF in the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B and C viral infection has been suggested. Both viruses induce TNF expression in human liver and human hepatoma cell lines (Gonzalez-Amaro et al., 1994). Patients with chronic hepatitis B have elevated plasma TNF levels, and their peripheral blood mononuclear cells show enhanced TNF production in vitro. In addition, in chronic hepatitis B-infected patients undergoing interferon treatment, a massive increase in spontaneous TNF production by blood mononuclear cells was observed at the time of successful antigen seroconversion (Diehl et al., 1994), suggesting that the increased TNF levels may be involved in hepatitis B virus clearance. Furthermore, the serum levels of soluble TNF-R1 and TNF- R2 are significantly elevated in chronic hepatitis B infection. The serum levels of soluble TNF-R2 correlate closely with the extent of inflammation and hepatocyte death in the liver. During interferon therapy, the response and the increase in transaminases are associated with an increase in soluble TNF-R2 serum levels. For hepatitis C patients, interferon treatment clears the virus and reduces TNF levels to normal in responsive patients (Larrea et al., 1996). Interestingly, pretreatment levels of TNF were higher in unresponsive compared with responsive patients (Larrea et al., 1996). Hepatitis C proteins interact with the TNF receptor, although whether this interaction promotes or prevents apoptosis is not clear (Ray et al., 1998). Recently, an interaction between hepatitis C virus NS5A protein and the TNF-receptor associated proteins TRADD and TRAF2 has been shown (Majumder et al., 2002; Park et al., 2002). Park and coworkers showed that NS5A impairs TNF-mediated hepatic apoptosis by preventing the association between TRADD and FADD. Moreover, both groups also showed that NS5A prevents TRADD and TRAF2-mediated NF- B activation. TNF serum levels are increased in patients with alcoholic hepatitis, and the levels correlate inversely with patient survival. TNF concentrations were significantly higher in patients who did not survive an episode of acute alcoholic hepatitis (Bird et al., 1990). Monocytes isolated from patients with alcoholic hepatitis spontaneously produced higher amounts of TNF compared with healthy controls. Monocytes derived from patients with alcoholic hepatitis also produced significantly more TNF in response to LPS than normal monocytes. Several hypotheses have been developed to explain increased TNF levels in patients with chronic ethanol exposure. Chronic ethanol feeding increases the permeability of the gut to bacterial products such as LPS, potentially inducing TNF production in macrophages (McClain, 1991). In addition, studies investigating the promoter polymorphism in patients with alcoholic steatohepatitis indicated that patients with alcoholic steatohepatitis had a mutation in the TNF promoter that increases its activity (Grove et al., 1997). Thus genetic factors may be involved in the increased TNF production in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. The role of TNF in liver injury has been studied in several animal models. By using neutralizing anti-TNF antibodies or knockout mice for TNF, TNF-R1, or TNF-R2, it has become evident that TNF triggers apoptosis and/or necrosis of hepatocytes in vivo. In different animal models of liver injury, TNF plays a central or an additive role in the pathogenesis of acute liver injury. Here we used the TNF/Galactosamine (GalN) model. In this model, TNF is administered in combination with D-(+)-galactosamine (GalN), a hepatotoxin, that selectively blocks transcription in hepatocytes by depleting uridine nucleotides (Dekker and Keppler, 1974), inducing lethality, activation of caspases and subsequent hepatocyte apoptosis (Leist et al., 1995; Van Molle et al., 1999; Tiegs et al., 1989). TNF-R1 knockout mice are resistant to TNF/GalN treatment, demonstrating the essential role of TNF-R1 in this apoptosis model (Leist et al., 1995). The sensitising effect of GalN suggests that the transcriptional block induced by GalN directly inhibits synthesis of anti-apoptotic proteins. Recently, the transcription factor NF-κB has been shown to regulate the expression of a number of anti-apoptotic proteins. NF-κB is an essential transcription factor that is ubiquitously expressed in all cell types and whose activity is modulated by a wide range of inducers, including cytokines and bacterial or viral products. Many of the NF-κB responsive genes play a key role in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses. Deregulation of NF-κB activity is often observed in several chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as in acute diseases such as septic shock. Furthermore, NF-κB serves to protect against apoptosis and supports cell cycle progression. The first indication that NF-κB activation may modulate hepatocyte responses relevant to liver injury was the finding that knockout mice deficient in the p65/Rel-A subunit of NF-κB were nonviable because of massive hepatocyte apoptosis during embryogenesis (Beg et al., 1995). Recent reports from several laboratories have now demonstrated that NF-κB activation regulates hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. In rats subjected to partial hepatectomy, inhibition of NF-κB activation impaired subsequent liver regeneration and triggered hepatocyte apoptosis (limuro et al., 1998). These findings suggest a critical role for NF-κB activation in hepatocytes following a mitogenic stimulus, although the mechanism by which inhibition of NF-κB activity blocked proliferation is unclear. Apoptosis may have resulted from a cell cycle block or from sensitization to TNF produced following partial hepatectomy. An essential role for NF-κB activation during hepatocyte proliferation is also supported by the finding that inhibition of NF-κB activity resulted in apoptosis in an exponentially growing murine hepatocyte cell line (Bellas et al., 1997). However, other studies in confluent rat hepatocyte cultures have demonstrated that NF-κB inhibition by itself did not result in cell death (Xu et al., 1998). In these cells, NF-κB inhibition did convert the hepatocellular response to the mitogenic stimulus of TNF from proliferation to one of apoptosis (Xu et al., 1998). The mechanism by which NF-κB inactivation triggered TNF-induced apoptosis in these studies involved activation of the caspase cascade, and cell death could be prevented by caspase inhibition or NO (Xu et al., 1998).

The NF- B-dependent gene product(s) that protects hepatocytes against TNF-induced injury remains to be identified. Possible candidate genes are iNOS and interleukin-6, since they are regulated by NF-κB and their gene products may have hepatoprotective effects. It also remains to be determined whether NF-κB activation inhibits hepatotoxicity from injurious agents other than TNF. In the hepatoma cell line Hep G2, treatment with a nontoxic concentration of the superoxide generator menadione protected against subsequent toxic doses of menadione or H2O₂ by an NF-κB dependent mechanism (Chen and Cederbaum, 1997). However, studies in a rat hepatocyte cell line demonstrated that, although H₂O₂ and copper induced NF-κB activation and caused apoptosis at toxic concentrations, inhibition of NF-κB activity did not sensitize the cells to death from H₂O₂ or copper (Xu et al., 1998). NF-κB activation may therefore stimulate a defense mechanism specific for the TNF death pathway. The possibility that NF-κB activation in hepatocytes is protective following liver injury points to the complexity of events following global activation of NF-κB in all cell types in the liver. After a toxic stimulus, it is known that activation of NF-κB in hepatic macrophages results in the production of injurious products such as cytokines and reactive oxygen intermediates. Inhibition of hepatic NF-κB activation was therefore viewed as a potential therapy for liver injury. It now appears that NF-κB signaling represents a problematic therapeutic target, since blanket inhibition of hepatic NF-κB activation may lead to both beneficial and detrimental effects.

Recently, considerable progress has been made in understanding the details of signalling pathways that regulate and mediate NF-κB activation in response to TNF and IL-1. These cytokines act by binding to specific cell surface receptors, which in turn initiate the recruitment of a number of specific adaptor proteins, and the activation of a kinase complex that phosphorylates the NF-κB inhibitor lκB. The latter retains NF-κB in the cytoplasm in an inactive dimeric form. Once phosphorylated, lκB is marked for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the proteasome, allowing the nuclear translocation of NF-κB. Whereas members of the lκB family have been well studied as direct inhibitors of NF-κB, a number of other proteins have been reported to negatively regulate NF-κB dependent gene expression. We and others have previously shown that the zinc finger protein A20 is a potent inhibitor of NF-κB activation in response to TNF, IL-1 , LPS and CD-40 (reviewed in Beyaert et al., 2000). In addition, A20 also exerts an anti-apoptotic function in a number of cell lines. A20 is only expressed upon NF-κB activation, and is involved in the negative feedback regulation of NF-κB activation. A20 deficient mice were recently shown to be defective in the termination of NF- B activation, leading to strong inflammatory responses and cachexia (Lee et al., 2000). The underlying mechanisms responsible for the inhibition of NF-κB dependent gene expression by A20 is still unclear. A20 interacts with the lκB kinase complex, as well as with TRAF2 and TRAF6, which are part of the lκB kinase activation cascade initiated by TNF and IL-1/LPS, respectively. In addition, three novel A20-binding proteins (ABIN, ABIN-2 and ABIN-3) were recently isolated. Upon overexpression in cell lines, these proteins were shown to inhibit NF-κB dependent gene expression in response to TNF or IL-1 (Beyaert et al., 2000; Heyninck et al., 1999; Van Huffel et al., 2001 , Van Huffel et al., unpublished; AJ320534). The present invention relates to the surprising finding that overexpression of ABIN prevents TNF-induced lethal hepatitis in mice.

Brief description of the figures

Figure 1: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN-stimulated degradation of lκB (upper panel) and DNA-binding of NF-κB (lower panel) in vivo. Mice were injected (i.v.) with 2.5x10⁹ pfu Ad-ABIN, Ad-lκB^s (= lκB superrepressor), or AdRR5 (= empty virus control), and challenged after three days by injection with a lethal dosis of TNF (0.3 μg)/GalN (20mg) diluted in PBS. PBS as such served as a control. Different times after TNF/GalN treatment, mice were killed and liver homogenates were prepared. lκBα expression was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-lκBα antibody (upper panel). NF-κB DNA-binding was analyzed by incubating 10 μg nuclear extract with radiolabeled probe and run on a native gel. Binding of NF-κB to the DNA-probe was revealed by exposure to an X-ray film (lower panel). Figure 2: Effect of AdABIN on TNF-mediated cell death in vitro. AdABIN, AdRRδ or mock infected BWTG3 cells were seeded in 96 well plates and stimulated with a serial dilution of mTNF in the absence (upper) or presence of CHX (lower) for 8 hours. Cell death was analysed upon incubation with MTT. 5 Figure 3: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN induced body temperature drop in mice. Mice were injected (i.v.) with 2.5.10⁹ pfu AdABIN (n = 8) or AdRRδ (=control) (n=9) and challenged 3 days afterwards with 0.3 μg TNF + 20 mg GalN. Temperature (°C) was measured every hour up to 18 hours after the challenge. Figure 4: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN-induced lethality. Mice were injected (i.v.) with 0 2.5.10⁹ pfu AdABIN (n = 8) or AdRRδ (=control) (n=9) and challenged 3 days afterwards with 0.3 μg TNF + 20 mg GalN. Lethality was measured over a period of 72 h (no further deaths occurred).

Figure 5: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN induced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) release in serum. AdABIN or AdRRδ infected mice, challenged with a lethal dose of δ TNF/GalN were bled 8 hours after the injection. Serum-was prepared and serum ALT values were measured (in IL).

Figure 6: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN induced DNA-fragmentation in the liver. Livers of AdABIN or AdRRδ infected mice were isolated 8 hours after a challenge with a lethal dose of TNF/GalN. DNA fragmentation was measured by ELISA, and is 0 expressed as % of control mice (AdRRδ).

Figure 7: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN induced caspase activity in liver homogenates. AdABIN or AdRRδ infected mice (n=δ each) were treated with TNF + GalN for 8 hours. 30 μg of liver homogenate was tested for its proteolytic activity on Ac-DEVD.AMC. Proteolytic activity is expressed as the increase in AMC fluorescence as a function of δ time (ΔF/min).

Figure 8: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN induced cleavage of caspase-3 in liver homogenates. AdABIN or AdRRδ infected mice were left untreated (n=4) or injected (n=δ) with TNF + GalN for 8 hours. Liver homogenates were prepared, proteins were separated by 1δ% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using a polyclonal anti-caspase-3 0 antibody. Inactive pro-caspase-3 as well as the p20 subunit of caspase-3 that is proteolytically released are indicated by an arrow.

Figure 9: Comparison of AdABIN and Adl Bs on TNF/GalN-induced lethality. Mice were injected (i.v.) with 2.6.10⁹ pfu AdABIN (n=δ), AdlκB^s (n=δ) or AdRRδ (=control) (n=9) and challenged 3 days afterwards with 0.3 μg TNF + 20 mg GalN. Lethality was measured over a period of 7 days.

Figure 10: Effect of AdABIN on anti-Fas induced lethality. Mice were injected (i.v.) with

2.δ.10⁹ pfu AdABIN (n = 3) or AdRRδ (=control) (n=3) and challenged 3 days afterwards with 10 μg anti-Fas. Lethality was measured over a period of δ h.

Figure 11: Effect of AdABIN on TNF/ActD-induced lethality. Mice were injected (i.v.) with

2.5.10⁹ pfu AdABIN (n = 5) or AdRRδ (=control) (n=δ) and challenged 3 days afterwards with 0.3 μg TNF + 20 μg ActD (actinomycine D). Lethality was measured over a period of

3δ h. 0

Detailed description of the invention A first aspect of the invention is the use of ABIN, as represented in SEQ ID N°2, or a functional fragment or variant thereof for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of TNF-induced liver failure. The term 'ABIN' relates to ABIN, ABIN-2 and δ ABIN-3 as disclosed in Beyaert et al., 2000; Heyninck et al., 1999; Van Huffel et ah, 2001, Van Huffel et al. (unpublished; AJ320δ34) and WO 99/δ7133. More specifically, the term ABIN relates to any polypeptide that comprises the consensus amino acid sequence(s) as depicted in SEQ ID N° 4 and/or SEQ ID N° δ which are also disclosed in WO 99/δ7133 that is hereby incorporated by reference. A second aspect of the 0 invention is the use of a nucleotide sequence encoding ABIN, as represented in SEQ ID N°1, or for a functional fragment or a variant thereof, for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of TNF-induced liver failure. A functional fragment of ABIN is a polypeptide that is still able to interact with protein A20 and/or capable of modulating NF-κB activation. Preferably, said modulation is an inhibition of NF-κB δ activation. Functional fragments are, as a non limiting example, fragments that comprise at least amino acids 420-647 of SEQ ID N°2, preferably at least amino acids 390-647, more preferably at least 54-647 (SEQ ID N° 3). Preferentially said fragment is essentially consisting of at least amino acids 420-647 of SEQ ID N°2, preferably at least amino acids 390-647, more preferably at least δ4-647 (SEQ ID N° 3). Variants are 0 polypeptides with at least 6δ% identity on amino acid level, preferably 70% identity, as measured by BLAST (Altschul ef al., 1997). Variants have common characteristics, such as biological activity, immunological reactivity, conformation etc. As a non-limiting example, Naf1 alpha protein (AJ01189δ), Naf1 beta protein (AJ011896) and virion- associated nuclear shuttling protein (AY0121δδ) are considered as variants. A further aspect is the use of an ABIN inducing and/or activating compound for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of TNF-induced liver failure. As a non- limiting example, phytohemagglutinin (PHA) is an ABIN inducing compound (Gupta et al., 2000). In the case of ABIN-3, LPS induces expression of this protein in THP1 δ monocytes.

Said TNF-induced liver failure is, as a non-limiting example, viral hepatitis such as hepatitis A, B or C, fulminant hepatitis and/or alcoholic liver disease. In case a nucleic acid is used, said medicament is preferably intended for delivery of said nucleic acid into the cell, in a gene therapy treatment. A large number of delivery methods are well 0 known to those of skill in the art. Preferably, the nucleic acids are administered for in vivo or ex vivo gene therapy uses. Non-viral vector delivery systems include DNA plasmids, naked nucleic acid, and nucleic acid complexed with a delivery vehicle such as a liposome. Viral vector delivery systems include DNA and RNA viruses, which have either episomal or integrated genomes after delivery to the cell. Methods of non-viral 6 delivery of nucleic acids include lipofection, microinjection, biolistics, virosomes, liposomes, immunoliposomes, polycation or lipid: nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, and agent-enhanced uptake of DNA. Lipofection is described in, e.g., US Pat. No. δ.049,386, US Pat No. 4,946,787; and US Pat. No. 4,897,3δδ and lipofection reagents are sold commercially (e.g., Transfectam™ and Lipofectin™). 0 Cationic and neutral lipids that are suitable for efficient receptor-recognition lipofection of polynucleotides include those of Flegner, WO 91/17424, WO 91/16024. Delivery can be to cells (ex vivo administration) or target tissues {in vivo administration). The preparation of lipid: nucleic acid complexes, including targeted liposomes such as immunolipid complexes, is well known to one of skill in the art (see, e.g., Crystal, 199δ; δ Blaese ef al., 199δ; Behr, 1994; Remy et al., 1994; Gao and Huang, 199δ; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,186,183, 4,217,344, 4,236,871 , 4,261 ,976, 4,48δ,0δ4, 4,601,728, 4,774,086, 4,837,028, and 4,946,787). The use of RNA or DNA viral based systems for the delivery of nucleic acids take advantage of highly evolved processes for targeting a virus to specific cells in the body and trafficking the viral payload to the nucleus. Viral 0 vectors can be administered directly to patients {in vivo) or they can be used to treat, cells in vitro and the modified cells are administered to patients (ex vivo). Conventional viral based systems for the delivery of nucleic acids could include retroviral, lentivirus, adenoviral, adeno-associated and herpes simplex virus vectors for gene transfer. Viral vectors are currently the most efficient and versatile method of gene transfer in target cells and tissues. Integration in the host genome is possible with the retrovirus, lentivirus, and adeno-associated virus gene transfer methods, often resulting in long- term expression of the inserted transgene. Additionally, high transduction efficiencies have been observed in many different cell types and target tissues, δ In cases where transient expression of the nucleic acid is preferred, adenoviral based systems, including replication deficient adenoviral vectors are typically used. Adenoviral based vectors are capable of very high transduction efficiency in many cell types and do not require cell division. With such vectors, high titer and levels of expression have been obtained. This vector can be produced in large quantities in a relatively simple 0 system. Adeno-associated virus ("AAV") vectors, including recombinant adeno- associated virus vectors are also used to transduce cells with target nucleic acids, e.g., in the in vitro production of nucleic acids and peptides, and for in vivo and ex vivo gene therapy procedures {see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 4,797,368; WO 93/24641 ; Kotin, 1994; Muzyczka. The construction of recombinant AAV vectors is described in a number of δ publications, including U.S. Pat. No. 6,173,414; Hermonat & Muzyczka, 1984; Samulski et al., 1989).

Gene therapy vectors can be delivered in vivo by administration to an individual patient, typically by systemic administration (e.g., intravenous, intraperitbneal, intramuscular, subdermal, or intracranial infusion) or topical application. Alternatively, vectors can be 0 delivered to cells ex vivo, such as cells explanted from an individual patient (e.g., lymphocytes, bone marrow aspirates, tissue biopsy) or universal donor hematopoietic stem cells, followed by reimplantation of the cells into a patient, usually after selection for cells which have incorporated the vector. Ex vivo cell transfection for diagnostics, research, or for gene therapy (e.g., via re-infusion of the transfected cells into the host 6 organism) is well known to those of skill in the art. In a preferred embodiment, cells are isolated from the subject organism, transfected with a nucleic acid (gene or cDNA), and re-infused back into the subject organism (e.g., patient). Various cell types suitable for ex vivo transfection are well known to those of skill in the art (see, e.g., Freshney et al., 1994) and the references cited therein for a discussion of how to isolate and culture 0 cells from patients).

In a further embodiment the invention provides a method for the production or manufacture of a medicament or a pharmaceutical composition comprising ABIN or a functional fragment or variant thereof and further more mixing said polypeptide with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The administration of said pharmaceutical composition may be by way of oral, inhaled or parenteral administration. The active compound may be administered alone or preferably formulated as a pharmaceutical composition. A unit dose will normally contain 0.01 to 60 mg for example 0.01 to 10 mg, or O.Oδ to 2 mg of compound or a δ pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Unit doses will normally be administered once or more than once a day, for example 2, 3, or 4 times a day, more usually 1 to 3 times a day, such that the total daily dose is normally in the range of 0.0001 to 1 mg/kg; thus a suitable total daily dose for a 70 kg adult is 0.01 to 60 mg, for example 0.01 to 10 mg or more usually O.Oδ to 10 mg. It is greatly preferred that the compound or a 0 pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered in the form of a unit-dose composition, such as a unit dose oral, parenteral, or inhaled composition. Such compositions are prepared by admixture and are suitably adapted for oral, inhaled or parenteral administration, and as such may be in the form of tablets, capsules, oral liquid preparations, powders, granules, lozenges, reconstitutable powders, injectable δ and infusable solutions or suspensions or suppositories or aerosols. Tablets and capsules for oral administration are usually presented in a unit dose, and contain conventional excipients such as binding agents, fillers, diluents, tabletting agents, lubricants, disintegrants, colourants, flavourings, and wetting agents. The tablets may be coated according to well-known methods in the art. Suitable fillers for use include 0 cellulose, mannitol, lactose and other similar agents. Suitable disintegrants include starch, polyvinylpyrrolidone and starch derivatives such as sodium starch glycollate. Suitable lubricants include, for example, magnesium stearate. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable wetting agents include sodium lauryl sulphate. These solid oral compositions may be prepared by conventional methods of blending, filling, δ tabletting or the like. Repeated blending operations may be used to distribute the active agent throughout those compositions employing large quantities of fillers. Such operations are, of course, conventional in the art. Oral liquid preparations may be in the form of, for example, aqueous or oily suspensions, solutions, emulsions, syrups, or elixirs, or may be presented as a dry product for reconstitution with water or other 0 suitable vehicle before use. Such liquid preparations may contain conventional additives such as suspending agents, for example sorbitol, syrup, methyl cellulose, gelatin, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, aluminium stearate gel or hydrogenated edible fats, emulsifying agents, for example lecithin, sorbitan monooleate, or acacia; non-aqueous vehicles (which may include edible oils), for example, almond oil, fractionated coconut oil, oily esters such as esters of glycerine, propylene glycol, or ethyl alcohol; preservatives, for example methyl or propyl p- hydroxybenzoate or sorbic acid, and if desired conventional flavouring or colouring agents. Oral formulations also include conventional sustained release formulations, δ such as tablets or granules having an enteric coating. Preferably, compositions for inhalation are presented for administration to the respiratory tract as a snuff or an aerosol or solution for a nebulizer, or as a microfine powder for insufflation, alone or in combination with an inert carrier such as lactose. In such a case the particles of active compound suitably have diameters of less than δO microns, preferably less than 10 0 microns, for example between 1 and δ microns, such as between 2 and δ microns. A favored inhaled dose will be in the range of O.Oδ to 2 mg, for example O.Oδ to O.δ mg, 0.1 to 1 mg or O.δ to 2 mg. For parenteral administration, fluid unit dose forms are prepared containing a compound of the present invention and a sterile vehicle. The active compound, depending on the vehicle and the concentration, can be either 6 suspended or dissolved. Parenteral solutions are normally prepared by dissolving the compound in a vehicle and filter sterilising before filling into a suitable vial or ampoule and sealing. Advantageously, adjuvants such as a local anaesthetic, preservatives and buffering agents are also dissolved in the vehicle. To enhance the stability, the composition can be frozen after filling into the vial and the water removed under vacuum. Parenteral suspensions are prepared in substantially the same manner except that the compound is suspended in the vehicle instead of being dissolved and sterilised by exposure to ethylene oxide before suspending in the sterile vehicle. Advantageously, a surfactant or wetting agent is included in the composition to facilitate uniform distribution of the active compound. Where appropriate, small amounts of bronchodilators for example sympathomimetic amines such as isoprenaline, isoetharine, salbutamol, phenylephrine and ephedrine; xanthine derivatives such as theophylline and aminophylline and corticosteroids such as prednisolone and adrenal stimulants such as ACTH may be included. As is common practice, the compositions will usually be accompanied by written or printed directions for use in the medical treatment concerned.

With regard to the protein transduction with ABIN or ABIN-fragments into target cells, it has been shown that a series of small protein domains, termed protein transduction domains (PTDs), cross biological membranes efficiently and independently of transporters or specific receptors, and promote the delivery of peptides and proteins into cells. For example, the TAT protein from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) is able to deliver biologically active proteins in vivo. Similarly, the third alpha-helix of Antennapedia homeodomain, and VP22 protein from herpes simplex virus promote the delivery of covalently linked peptides or proteins into cells (reviewed in Ford et al., δ 2001). Protein delivery based on a short amphipathic peptide carrier, Pep-1 , is efficient for delivery of a variety of peptides and proteins into several cell lines in a fully biologically active form, without the need for prior chemical covalent coupling (Morris et al., 2001). The capacity of VP22 chimeric proteins to spread from the primary transduced cell to surrounding cells can improve gene therapy approaches (Zender et 0 al., 2002).

Protein can also be delivered via liposomes. Liposomes have been used as vehicles for drug delivery and gene therapy and they have been shown to have substantial potential in the targeting of specific cell types of the liver. Thus, the use of liposomes may improve targeting efficacy in the treatment of a variety of liver diseases (Wu and Zerm, δ 1999).

Definitions

Nucleotide sequence as used herein refers to a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, either ribonucleotides or deoxyribonucleotides. This term refers only to the 0 primary structure of the molecule. Thus, this term includes double- and single-stranded DNA, and RNA. It also includes known types of modifications, for example, methylation, "caps" substitution of one or more of the naturally occuring nucleotides with an analog. Overexpression as used here means that the transformed cells do produce more of the overexpressed protein that the untransformed control, when kept under the same δ condition. Preferably, overexpression is obtained by placing the coding sequence downstream a constitutive promoter.

Coding sequence is a nucleotide sequence, which is transcribed into mRNA and/or translated into a polypeptide when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences. The boundaries of the coding sequence are determined by a translation 0 start codon at the δ'-terminus and a translation stop codon at the 3'-terminus. A coding sequence can include, but is not limited to mRNA, cDNA, recombinant nucleotide sequences or genomic DNA, while introns may be present as well under certain circumstances. Protein A20 ("A20") means the TNF induced zinc finger protein, described by Dixit et al., 1990; Opipari et al., 1990 and Tewari et al., 1995, or an active fragment thereof, such as the zinc finger containing part (amino acids 387-790 of human A20, amino acids 369-775 of murine A20). δ The terms protein and polypeptide as used in this appliction are interchangeable. Polypeptide refers to a polymer of amino acids and does not refer to a specific lenth of the molecule: This term also includes post-translational modifications of the polypeptide, such as glycosylation, phosphorylation and acetylation.

IKB superrepressor (lκB^s) means a nondegradable mutant form of B-α, with S32A 0 and S36A mutations, that locks NF-κB in a cytosolic protein complex, preventing its nuclear action.

Examples Example 1: Generation of the ABIN adenovirus 6 The murine ABIN cDNA, N-terminally fused to an E-tag, was amplified via PCR with forward (δ'cgggatccgccatgggtgcgccggtgcc3') and reverse

(δ'ccccaagcttaaatgacccactgcagcc3') primers that contained restriction sites for BamHI and Hindlll, respectively. The resulting fragment was cloned into a BamHI and Hindlll opened pLpA.CMV shuttle vector (Gomez-Foix et al., 1992), and cotransfected with 0 pJM17 (McGrory et al., 1988) by DNA/calcium phosphate coprecipitation in 911 retina cells. In vivo recombination of the shuttle vector expressing the ABIN trangene with the pJM17 backbone resulted in the production of a replication-deficient E1-deleted adenovirus type δ (AdABIN). A control virus (AdRRδ), which does not express a transgene, was generated in a similar way: Following recombination, recombinant δ plaques were isolated, extracted DNA was verified via PCR, and expression of the correct transgene was confirmed by means of Western Blotting. High titer virusstocks were prepared in HEK293 cells and purified via single CsCI banding. The infectious unit titer was determined in a plaque assay that was performed on confluent HEK293 cells with different virus dilutions. The plaques of lysed cells were counted and calculated as 0 plaque forming units (pfu) per ml virus stock.

Example 2: Expression of ABIN in vitro upon infection with AdABIN

AdABIN was tested for the expression of the transgene in the BWTG3 hepatoma cell line (Szpirer and Szpirer, 1976). Infection with AdABIN was performed at a multiplicity of infection (moi) 100:1. Cells were incubated with virus in a minimal volume of serum- free medium for 2 hours, after which serum containing medium was added for overnight incubation. For controlling the expression of ABIN, cells were lysed 24 hours after infection and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with HRP-coupled anti E-tag 5 antibodies (Amersham). Infection with AdABIN resulted in clear expression of ABIN (data not shown).

Efficiency of infection and the subcellular expression pattern of ABIN was analysed by immunofluorescence. In this case, cells were splitted and seeded onto cover slips 24 hours after infection. Another 24 hour later, cells were washed, fixed with 100% 0 methanol at -20 °C for 10 minutes and permeabilised with 1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature. After blocking with 0.6% BSA for 30 minutes, cells were incubated with 1/3000 dilution of monoclonal anti-E-tag antibody (Amersham) for 90 minutes and with 1/600 dilution of Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular probes) antibody for 90 minutes. After DAPI nuclear staining, coverslips were mounted δ with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories), and analysed with a Leica DM-IL microscope. This revealed that the efficiency of infection was more than 90 %, and that ABIN was exclusively localized in the cytoplasm (data not shown).

Example 3: Inhibition of TNF-induced NF-κB dependent gene expression in vitro 0 by AdABIN

To analyze the effect of ABIN on NF-κB dependent gene expression, cells were transfected with pNFconluc 24 hours after infection. The latter carries a luciferase reporter gene that is preceded by a minimal promoter and three NF-κB binding sites (Kimura et al., 1986). Transfection was performed using the FuGene transfection δ reagent according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Roche biochemicals). A 6:1 FuGene:DNA ratio was used, and FuGene:DNA mixtures were preincubated for 46 min prior to addition to the cells for 24 hours in fresh complete medium. Cells were seeded on 24-well plates and incubated for 24 hours. Then cells were either left untreated or stimulated with 1000 lU/ml TNF. Six hours later, all cells were lysed in 100 μl lysis 0 buffer (2δ mM Tris-phosphate pH 7.8, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM CDTA, 10 % glycerol and 1% Triton X-100). Luc and Gal activities were analyzed as described previously (De Valck et al., 1996). Luc values were normalized for Gal values in order to correct for differences in transfection efficiency (plotted as luc/gal). AdABIN infection prevented NF-κB dependent luciferase expression in response to TNF, whereas AdRRδ infection had no effect .

The observation that lκB levels were not changed upon ABIN expression suggests that ABIN does not affect the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB dimer. To analyze the δ effect of ABIN on the presence of nuclear NF-κB and the binding to a NF-κB specific DNA-probe, cells were left untreated or treated for 30 min with 1000 lU/ml mTNF 24 h after infection. Cells were washed twice with PBS, scraped from the plate and centrifuged for 30 sec at 12000xg to collect the cells.

0 Example 4: ABIN does not significantly inhibit TNF mediated cell death.

To investigate if ABIN had an effect on TNF mediated cell death, AdABIN, AdRRδ or mock infected BWTG3 cells were incubated with TNF, or combinations of TNF and cycloheximide (CHX). More specifically, 24 hours after infection, cells were seeded in 96 wel plates at a density of 4 x 10⁴ cells per well. Another 24 hours later, cells were δ stimulated with dilutions of mTNF alone, or with a combination of dilutions of TNF and a constant concentration (10 μg/ml) CHX. Cell death was observed microscopically, and quantitated by incubating the cells with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,δ- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Tada ef al., 1986). After dissolution of the formed crystals, absorbance was determined in an immunoreader (Biorad) at wavelength 596 0 nm, with 655 nm as reference wavelength. TNF alone had no cytotoxic effect on BWTG3 cells, while TNF + CHX treatment caused cell death by apoptosis. Infection with AdABIN only provided a limited protection against low doses of TNF, while there was no protection at all at higher doses of TNF (Fig. 2).

Example 5: Expression of ABIN in the liver of AdABIN infected mice 5 AdABIN was tested for the expression of the transgene and its biological activity in vivo by injecting C57BL/6 mice with 2.5x10⁹ pfu AdABIN into the tail vein. 1-6 days after infection, mice were sacrificed and livers were isolated. One third of the liver was cut in small pieces and homogenized by douncing in lysis buffer (1 % NP-40, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-CI pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 10 % glycerol) supplemented with 0.1 mM 0 aprotinine, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 mM gluthation. After 20 minutes incubation on ice, homogenates were centrifuged for 30 min at maximal speed in a tabletop centrifuge at 4°C. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford analysis (Biorad). 50 μg protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with HRP coupled anti E-tag antibody (Amersham). Signals were revealed by ECL (Amersham). ABIN expression was maximal 3 days after infection and remained high for at least 6 days (data not shown).

Example 6: Inhibition of TNF/GalN-induced NF-κB activation in vivo by AdABIN and byAd-lκB^s

To analyze the effect of AdABIN on TNF/GalN-induced NF-κB activation in the liver, we tested the effect of AdABIN infection on TNF/GalN-induced l Bα degradation by Western blotting. In parallel, the same samples were also analyzed in a gelshift assay for the presence of active NF- B in nuclear cell extracts of liver. Mice were injected (i.v.) with 2.6x10⁹ pfu Ad-ABIN, Ad-lκB^s (= lκB superrepressor), or AdRRδ (= empty virus control), and challenged after three days by injection with a lethal dosis of TNF (0.3 μg)/GalN (20mg) diluted in PBS. PBS as such served as a control. Different times after TNF/GalN treatment, mice were killed and liver homogenates were prepared. lκBα expression was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with polyclonal anti- IKBOC antibody (Santa Cruz) (Fig. 1 , upper panel). lκBα was almost complete degraded after 0.5 h TNF/GalN treatment, and reappeared after 1.5 h. This reappearance is most likely due to de novo synthesis of lκBα in response to TNF. Strong lκBα signals were visible in the Ad Bs infected mice, in which the expression of the transgene masked the expression of the endogenous gene. Most importantly, in the case of AdABIN infected animals, lκBα degradation was strongly delayed compared to AdRRδ control mice. These results demonstrate that ABIN inhibits NF-κB activation in the liver of AdABIN infected mice. NF-κB activation was further analyzed in a gelshift assay of nuclear cell extracts of murine liver. Pieces of murine liver were homogenized by Douncing in 1 ml of swelling buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCI2, 5% glycerol, O.δ mM EDTA pH7.5, 0.1 mM EGTA pH 7.5, 2 mM Pefablock, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.15 lU/ml aprotinin). After 15 min incubation on ice, 65 μl of a 10% NP-40 solution was added, followed by centrifugation at maximum speed in an eppendorff centrifuge for 15 min. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of nuclear extraction buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 1% NP-40, 1 mM MgCI2, 400 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCL, 20% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA pH7.δ, 0.1 mM EGTA pH 7.6, 2 mM Pefabloc, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.15 lU/ml aprotinin). After centrifugation for 15 min at maximum speed in an eppendorff centrifuge, supernatants were stored at -70 until use. 10 μl of nuclear lysate was incubated at room temperature for 30 min with a ³²P-labeled NF-κB specific DNA- probe (agctagaggggasctttccgagagg) in the. following buffer: 4 % Ficoll 400, 20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, 100 μg/ml poly d(l-C), 1 mg/ml acetylated BSA. Extracts were then run on a 4% native polyacrylamide gel. Radioactivity was visualized by exposure to x-ray films. This showed that AdABIN as well as AdlκB^s strongly prevented TNF/GalN-induced nuclear translocation and DNA-binding of NF-κB (Fig. 1, lower panel). From this, we can conclude that adenoviral infection with AdABIN or AdkBα inhibits NF-κB TNF/GalN-induced NF- B activation in mouse liver.

Example 7: Inhibition of TNF/GalN-induced lethal hepatitis by ABIN

To analyze the effect of ABIN on TNF/GalN-induced lethality, C57BL/6 mice were intravenously (i.v.) injected with 2.5x10⁹ pfu of AdABIN (n=8) or AdRR5 (n=9). Three days later, all mice received a lethal dose of TNF/GalN. Every hour, body temperature was measured and lethality was assessed. Control mice showed a drastic fall in body temperature as soon as 6 hours after injection (Fig. 3), whereas ABIN expressing mice showed a normal body temperature throughout the whole experiment (analyzed up to 18 days after injection). Most importantly, whereas all control mice died over a period of 36 hours, ABIN expressing mice all survived and did now show any signs of illness (Fig. 4). To analyze the effect of ABIN on liver toxicity, mice were injected with AdABIN (n=5) or AdRRδ (n=δ) as described above, followed after three days by injection with a lethal dosis of TNF/GalN. At the time that AdRRδ mice showed a strong decrease in body temperature, animals were sacrificed for histology and biochemistry studies. Blood was collected from AdRRδ and AdABIN mice, and livers were prepared for further analysis. The concentration of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the blood after TNF/GalN injection was determined using an enzymatic/colorimetric kit (Sigma), and served as a parameter for liver necrosis (Reutter et al., 1968). Blood was taken from the retro- orbital plexus under light ether anesthesia and was allowed to clot for 30 min at 37°C and 1 h at 4°C, followed by centrifugation at 16,000 x g. Serum was stored at -20°C. ALT levels were significantly diminished in AdABIN infected mice when compared to control mice (Fig. δ). DNA fragmentation and caspase activation were analyzed as parameters for apoptosis. DNA fragmentation was measured by immunochemical determination of histon-complexed DNA fragments in a microtiter plate (Salgame et al. 1997). Briefly, plates were coated with an Ab directed against histon H2B. After blocking, liver homogenates were added and a biotinylated detection Ab specific for the nucleosome subparticle of histones H2A, H2B, and DNA was administered. Detection was performed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (Sanvertech, Boechout, Belgium) and substrate (Sigma). Signals obtained with samples from TNF/GalN-treated mice were set as 100%. These experiments show that TNF/GalN- induced DNA fragmentation is significantly reduced in AdABIN infected animals (Fig. 6). Caspase activation was revealed by the hydrolysis of Ac-DEVD-amc upon incubation with liver cell extracts. Briefly, 30 μg of liver homogenate was incubated in 200 ul cell free system buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 220 mM Mannitol, 68 mM Sucrose, 2 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCI₂, 2.5 mM KH₂PO₄, 10 mM DTT) in the presence of 50 μM Ac- DEVD.amc (Peptide Institute; Osaka, Japan), for 60 min at 30 degrees. Release of 7- amino-4-methyl coumarin (AMC) was monitored during 60 min in a fluorometer (CytoFluor; PerSeptive Biosystems; Cambridge MA, USA) at an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength of 409 nm. Data are expressed as increase in fluorescence as a function of time (ΔF/min). Hydrolysis of Ac-DEVD-AMC upon incubation with liver homogenates of TNF/GalN treated mice was significantly reduced in AdABIN infected animals (Fig. 7). Similarly, inhibition of TNF/GalN induced caspase activation upon AdABIN infection was also demonstrated by inhibition of the proteolytic maturation of caspase-3, as revealed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with caspase- 3 specific polyclonal antibodies (Fig. 8).

As shown by histology, TNF/GalN-induced lethal hepatitis is associated with total tissue destruction of the parenchymal tissue, influx of erythrocytes (hemorrhage) at the site of the sinusoids and apoptosis and necrosis of the hepatocytes. In addition, a massive influx of macrophages and neutrophils in the liver can be observed. Livers of AdABIN pretreated mice show better preservation of the tissue integrity and nearly no hemorrhage. In contrast to the complete protection against TNF/GalN-induced lethality, hepatocyte cell death, and hemorrhage, infiltration of white blood cells was only partially reduced by in vivo expression of ABIN. As mentioned earlier, blanket inhibition of hepatic NF-κB activation may lead to both beneficial and detrimental effects. Indeed, adenoviral administration of a dominant IKBA superrepressor does not protect against TNF/GalN induced lethality. In the same experiment, adenoviral administration of ABIN completely protected the mice (Fig. 9). At this moment, a clear explanation for the different effect of ABIN and lκB^s cannot be given. However, it should be mentioned that ABIN, in contrast to lκB , inhibits NF-κB activation upstream of the IKK complex. Because stimulus-specific differences in NF- KB signalling have been shown upstream of the IKK complex, it is not unlikely that ABIN mediated inhibition of NF-κB dependent gene expression is limited to a selection of NF-κB responsive genes. Such a possible slective inhibition of NF-κB dependent genes might shift a balance between sensitizing and protective proteins, which could result in a net protective effect of this inhibitor. Alternatively, we cannot exclude NF-κB independent effects of ABIN in the protection against TNF-induced liver failure.

Fas is an apoptosis-signalling cell surface molecule that triggers cell death upon specific ligand or antibody binding. Treatment of mice with an anti-Fas antibody causes fulminant hepatic failure due to massive apoptosis (Ogasawara et al., 1993). In contrast to TNF/GalN, anti-Fas does not lead to NF-κB activation and an inflammatory response in the liver, but rather induces induces a direct apoptotic response. To examine the susceptibility of AdABIN infected mice to anti-Fas mediated lethality, mice were injected with AdRRδ or AdABIN as described above, and three days later (i.v.) injected with 10 μg anti-Fas (Pharmingen). Both AdRRδ and AdABIN pretreated mice died within 3-5 hours following administration of anti-Fas (Fig. 10). This demonstrates that ABIN does not significantly influence the signalling pathway of Fas-mediated apoptosis. To further investigate whether the difference in protection in the TNF/GalN versus the anti-Fas induced liver failure is due to a difference in receptor involvement (TNF-receptor versus Fas) or reflects a difference in the role of apoptosis and gene-dependent effects, we also analyzed the effect of AdABIN on TNF-induced lethality in actinomycine D sensitized mice. Actinomycine D blocks cellular transcription, and sensitizes cells to the direct apoptotic effect of TNF, without a contribution of an inflammatory component. Therefore, mice were injected with AdRRδ or AdABIN as described above, and three days later (i.v.) injected with 0.3 μg TNF and 20 μg actinomycine D. Both AdRRδ and AdABIN pretreated mice died within 20-36 hours following administration of TNF/ActD (Fig. 11). Taken together, these results suggest that ABIN-mediated protection against TNF/GalN-induced liver failure involves a transcription-dependent event. References Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. And Lipman, D.J. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389-3402.

Arvelo, M.B., Cooper, J.T., Longo, C, Daniel, S., Grey, ST., Mahiou, J., Czismadia, E., Abu-Jawdeh, G., and Ferran, C, (2002) Hepatology 35, 636-543.

Beg, A. A., Sha, W. C, Branson, R. T., Ghosh, S., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Nature 376, 167-170.

- Behr, J. P. (1994) Bioconjugate Chem. 5, 382-389.

Bellas, R. E., FitzGerald, M. J., Fausto, N., and Sonenshein, G. E. (1997) American Journal of Pathology 151 , 891-896.

Beyaert, R., Heyninck, K., and Van Huffel, S. (2000) Biochem Pharmacol 60(8),

1143-1151.

Bird, G., Sheron, N., Goka, A., Alexander, G., and Williams, R. (1990) Ann Intern

Med 112, 917-20. - Blaese, R. M., Culver, K. M., Miller, A. D., Carter, C. S., Fleisher, T., Clerici, M.,

Shearer, G., Chang, L, Tolstoshev, P., et al. (1995) Cancer Gene Ther. 2, 291-197.

Chen, Q., and Cederbaum, A. (1997) Molecular Pharmacology 52, 648-657.

- Crystal, . (1995) Science 270, 404-410.

Decker, K., and Keppler, D. (1974) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 71, 77-106. - De Valck, D., Heyninck, K., Van Criekinge, W., Contreras, R., Beyaert, R., and

Fiers, W. (1996) Fejbs Letters 384(1 ), 61-64.

Diehl, A., Yin, M., Fleckenstein, J., Yang, S., Lin, H., Brenner, D. A., Westwick, J.,

Bagby, G., and S, N. (1994) Am J Physiol 267 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 30),

G562-G561. - Dixit V.M., Green, S., Sarma, V., Holzman, L.B., Wolf, F.W., O'Rourke, K., Ward,

P.A., Prochownik, EN. and Marks, R.M. (1990) J Biol Chem 265, 2973-2978.

Freshney et al., Culture of Animal Cells, A Manual of Basic Technique (3^rd ed.

1994)

Ford, K.G., Souberbielle, B.E., darling, D., and Farzanch, F. (2001) Gene Ther. 8, 1-4.

Gao, X. and Huang, L. (1995) Gene Therapy 2, 710 - 722

Gomez-Foix, A., Coats, W., Baque, S., Alam, T., Gerard, R., and Νewgard, C.

(1992) Journal of Biological Chemistry 267, 26129. Gonzalez-Amaro, R., Garcia-Monzon, C, Garcia-Buey, L., Moreno-Otero, R.,

Alonso, J., Yague, E., Pivel, J., Lopez-Cabrera, M., Fernandez-Ruiz, E., and

Sanchez-Madrid, F. (1994) Journal of Experimental Medicine 179, 841-848.

Grove, J., Daly, A. K., Bassendine, M. F., and Day, C. (1997) Hepatology 26, 143- 146.

Gupta, K., Ott, D., Hope, T.J., Siliciano, R.F. and Boecke, J.D. (2000) J Virol 74,

11811-11824.

Hermonat, and Muzyczka, . (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 6466-6470.

Heyninck, K., De Valck, D., Vanden Berghe, W., Van Criekinge, W., Contreras, R., Fiers, W., Haegeman, G., and Beyaert, R. (1999) J Cell Biol 145(7), 1471-1482. limuro, Y., Nishiura, T, Hellerbrand, C, Behrns, K. E., Schoonoven, R., Grisham, J.

W., and Brenner, D. A. (1998) Journal of Clinical Investigation 101, 802-811.

Kimura, A., Israel, A., Le Bail, O., and Kourilsky, P. (1986) Ce//44, 261.

Kotin, R. M. (1994) Human Gene Therapy 5, 793-801. - Larrea, E., Garcia, N., Qian, C, Civeira, M., and Prieto, J. (1996) Hepatology 23,

210-217.

Lee, E. G., Boone, D. L., Chai, S., Libby, S. L., Chien, M., Lodolce, J. P., and Ma,

A. (2000) Science 289, 2350-2354.

Leist, M., Gantner, F., Jilg, S., and Wendel, A. (1995) Journal of Immunology 154, 1307-1316.

Majumder, M., Ghosh, A.K., Steele, R., Zhou, X.Y., Philips, N.J., Ray, R., and Ray,

R.B. (2002) Virology 294, 94-105.

- McClain, C. (1991 ) Hepatology 14, 394-396.

McGrory, W., Bautista, D., and Graham, F. (1988) Virology 163, 614. - Morris, M.C., Depolier, J., Mery, J., Heitz, F., Divita, G. (2001) Nat. Biotechnol. 19,

1173-1176.

Muto, Y., Nouri-Aria, K., Meager, A., Alexander, G., Eddleston, A., and Williams, R.

(1988) Lancet 2, 72-1 A.

Ogasawara, J., Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., Adachi, M., Matsuzawa, A., Kasugai, T., Kitamura, Y., Itoh, N., Suda, T, and Nagata, S. (1993) Nature 364, 806-809.

- Opipari, A.W., Boguski, M.S. and Dixit, V.M. (1990) J Biol Chem 265, 14705-14708.

- Park, K.-J., Cho, S.-H., Lee, S.Y., Hwang, S.B., and Lai, M.M.C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 13122-13128. Ray, R. B., Meyer, K., Steele, R., Shrivastava, A., Aggarwal, B. B., and Ray, R.

(1998) Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 2266-2269.

Remy, J.S., Seerlin, C, Vierling, P. and Behr, J. P. (1994) Bioconjugate Chem. 5,

647-664. - Reutter, W., Lesch, R., Keppler, D., and Decker, K. (1968) Naturwissenschaften 55,

497.

Salgame, P., Varadhachary, A. S., Primiano, L. L., Fincke, J. E., Muller, S., and

Monestier, M. (1997) Nucleic Acids Research 25, 680.

Samulski, R. J., Chang, L. S. and Shenk, T. (1989) J. Virol. 63, 3822-3828. - Szpirer, C. , and Szpirer, J. (197δ) Differentiation 4(2), 86-91.

Tada, H., Shiho, O., Kuroshima, K., Koyama, M., and Tsukamoto, K. (1986) J

Immunol Methods 6, 167-16δ. - Tewari, M., Wolf, F.W., Seldin, M.F., O'Shea, K.S., Dixit, V.M. and Turka, L.A.

(1996) J Immunol 154, 1699-1706. - Tiegs, G., Wolter, M., and Wendel, A. (1989) Biochem Pharmacol 38, 627-631.

Van Huffel, S., Delaei, F., Heyninck, K., De Valck, D., and Beyaert, R. (2001)

Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 30216-30223.

Van Molle, W., Denecker, G., Rodriguez, I., Brouckaert, P., Vandenabeele, P., and

Libert, C. (1999) Journal of Immunology 163, 6236-5241. - Wu, J, and Zern, M.A. (1999) Front. Biosci. 4, D520-D627.

Xu, Y., Bialik, S., Jones, B. E., limuro, Y., Kitsis, R., Srinivasan, A., Brenner, D. A., and Czaja, M. (1998) /American Journal of Physiology 275, C1068-C1066.

Zender, L., Kuhnel, F., Kock, R., Manns, M., Kubicka, S. (2002) Cancer Gene Ther.

9, 489-496.

Claims (1)

1. Claims

   1. The use of ABIN, or a functional fragment or variant thereof, for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of TNF-induced liver failure, δ 2. The use according to claim 1 wherein said ABIN comprises the consensus amino acid sequence depicted in SEQ ID N° 4 and/or SEQ ID N° δ. 3. The use according to claim 1 wherein said functional fragment is a fragment that comprises the amino acid sequence as depicted in SEQ ID N° 3 and that interacts with protein A20. 0 4. The use according to claim 1 wherein said functional fragment is a fragment that comprises amino acids 420-647 of SEQ ID N° 2 and that interacts with protein A20. δ. The use according to claim 1 wherein said variant is chosen from the group consisting of Nafl alpha protein, Naf1 beta protein and virion-associated nuclear shuttling protein. δ 6. The use of a nucleotide sequence encoding ABIN, or a functional fragment or variant thereof for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of TNF- induced liver failure. 7. The use of an ABIN inducing and/or activating compound for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of TNF-induced liver failure. 0 8. The use according to claim 7, whereby said compound is PHA.

   9. The use according to any of the claims 1 to 8, whereby said TNF-induced liver failure is viral hepatitis, fulminant hepatitis and/or alcoholic liver disease.

   10. The use according to claim 6, whereby said medicament is a gene therapy vector.