AU2002337914A1 - LRRCAPS as modifiers of the p53 pathway and methods of use - Google Patents

Description

LRRCAPs AS MODIFIERS OF THE p53 PATHWAY AND METHODS OF USE

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent applications 60/338,733 filed 10/22/2001, 60/357,600 filed 2/15/2002, and 60/361,196 filed 3/1/2002. The contents of the prior applications are hereby incorporated in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The p53 gene is mutated in over 50 different types of human cancers, including familial and spontaneous cancers, and is believed to be the most commonly mutated gene in human cancer (Zambetti and Levine, FASEB (1993) 7:855-865; Hollstein, et al, Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:3551-3555). Greater than 90% of mutations in the p53 gene are missense mutations that alter a single amino acid that inactivates p53 function. Aberrant forms of human p53 are associated with poor prognosis, more aggressive tumors, metastasis, and short survival rates (Mitsudomi et al., Clin Cancer Res 2000 Oct; 6(10):4055-63; Koshland, Science (1993) 262:1953).

The human p53 protein normally functions as a central integrator of signals mcluding DNA damage, hypoxia, nucleotide deprivation, and oncogene activation (Prives, Cell (1998) 95:5-8). In response to these signals, p53 protein levels are greatly increased with the result that the accumulated p53 activates cell cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on the nature and strength of these signals. Indeed, multiple lines of experimental evidence have pointed to a key role for p53 as a tumor suppressor (Levine, Cell (1997) 88:323-331). For example, homozygous p53 "knockout" mice are developmentally normal but exhibit nearly 100% incidence of neoplasia in the first year of life (Donehower et al., Nature (1992) 356:215-221).

The biochemical mechanisms and pathways through which p53 functions in normal and cancerous cells are not fully understood, but one clearly important aspect of p53 function is its activity as a gene-specific transcriptional activator. Among the genes with known p53-response elements are several with well-characterized roles in either regulation of the cell cycle or apoptosis, including GADD45, p21/Waf 1/Cipl, cyclin G, Bax, IGF- BP3, and MDM2 (Levine, Cell (1997) 88:323-331).

Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) are short motifs of 22-28 residues in length and are found in various cytoplasmic, membrane, and extracellular proteins (Rothberg, J. et al. (1990) Genes Dev (12A): 2169-87). These proteins play diverse roles, with protein-protein interactions being the most common property. In vitro studies of a synthetic LRR from Drosophila Toll protein have implied that the peptides form gels by adopting beta-sheet structures that form extended filaments. These results support the idea that LRRs mediate protein-protein interactions and cellular adhesion (Gay, N. (1991) FEBS Lett; 291(1): 87- 91). Other functions of LRR-containing proteins include the binding of enzymes (Tan, F. et al. (1990) J Biol Chem; 265(1): 13-9), vascular repair (Hickey, M. (1989) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 86(17): 6773-7), and neuronal pathfinding and synapse formation (Taniguc^'hi H et al (2000) J Neurobiol 42:104-106). The 3-D structure of ribonuclease inhibitor, a protein containing 15 LRRs, has been determined (Kobe, B. and Deisenhofer, J. (1993) Nature; 366(6457): 751-6) demonstrating LRRs to be a new class of alpha/beta fold. LRRs form elongated non-globular structures and are often flanked by cysteine rich domains.

D2S448 is a melanoma associated gene, a tumor antigen, and possibly a peroxidase, which may be involved in p53 -dependent apoptosis and immune responses. It also shows promise as a potential immunogenic peptide for cancer vaccination (Horikoshi, N. et al. (1999) Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 261(3): 864-9).

Glioma amplified on chromosome 1 protein (GACl) is a member of the leucine rich repeat (LRR) superfamily and may play a role in signal transduction or cell adhesion. Gene amplification of this gene is seen in glioma and retinoblastoma tumors (Almeida, A. et al. (1998) Oncogene 16: 2997-3002). GACl contains 12 full-length LRR motifs, and its LRR block is flanked by cysteine-rich sequences. GACl is expressed in adult brain and at much lower levels in adult heart and kidney (Almeida, A. et al. (1998) supra).

Trophoblast glycoprotein (TPBG) is a protein that is expressed by all types of trophoblasts as early as 9 weeks of development, and was originally identified as a cell surface antigen defined by monoclonal antibody 5T4. TPBG plays a role in cell adhesion and motility and may be involved in metastasis, placentation, and trophoblast invasion. Expression of TPBG in gastric and colon cancers is associated with tumor metastasis and poor prognosis (Boyle, J. et al. (1990) Hum. Genet 84: 455-458). TPBG is expressed in several tumor cell lines (Myers, K. et al. (1994) Biol. Chem. 269: 9319-9324). The ability to manipulate the genomes of model organisms such as Drosophila provides a powerful means to analyze biochemical processes that, due to significant evolutionary conservation, have direct relevance to more complex vertebrate organisms. Due to a high level of gene and pathway conservation, the strong similarity of cellular processes, and the functional conservation of genes between these model organisms and mammals, identification of the involvement of novel genes in particular pathways and their functions in such model organisms can directiy contribute to the understanding of the correlative pathways and methods of modulating them in mammals (see, for example, Mechler BM et al., 1985 EMBO J 4:1551-1557; Gateff E. 1982 Adv. Cancer Res. 37: 33- 74; Watson KL., et al, 1994 J Cell Sci. 18: 19-33; Miklos GL, and Rubin GM. 1996 Cell 86:521-529; Wassarman DA, et al., 1995 Curr Opin Gen Dev 5: 44-50; and Booth DR. 1999 Cancer Metastasis Rev. 18: 261-284). For example, a genetic screen can be carried out in an invertebrate model organism having underexpression (e.g. knockout) or overexpression of a gene (referred to as a "genetic entry point") that yields a visible phenotype. Additional genes are mutated in a random or targeted manner. When a gene mutation changes the original phenotype caused by tl e mutation in the genetic entry point, the gene is identified as a "modifier" involved in the same or overlapping pathway as the genetic entry point. When the genetic entry point is an ortholog of a human gene implicated in a disease pathway, such as p53, modifier genes can be identified that may be attractive candidate targets for novel therapeutics.

All references cited herein, including patents, patent applications, publications, and sequence information in referenced Genbank identifier numbers, are incorporated herein in their entireties.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

We have discovered genes that modify the p53 pathway in Drosophila, and identified their human orthologs, hereinafter referred to as LRRCAPS (Leucine rich repeat, capricious related). The invention provides methods for utilizing these p53 modifier genes and polypeptides to identify LRRCAPS-modulating agents that are candidate therapeutic agents that can be used in the treatment of disorders associated with defective or impaired p53 function and/or LRRCAPS function. Preferred LRRCAPS-modulating agents specifically bind to LRRCAPS polypeptides and restore p53 function. Other preferred LRRCAPS-modulating agents are nucleic acid modulators such as antisense oligomers and RNAi that repress LRRCAPS gene expression or product activity by, for example, binding to and inhibiting the respective nucleic acid (i.e. DNA or mRNA).

LRRCAPS modulating agents may be evaluated by any convenient in vitro or in vivo assay for molecular interaction with an LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid. In one embodiment, candidate LRRCAPS modulating agents are tested with an assay system comprising a LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid. Agents that produce a change in the activity of the assay system relative to controls are identified as candidate p53 modulating agents. The assay system may be cell-based or cell-free. LRRCAPS-modulating agents include LRRCAPS related proteins (e.g. dominant negative mutants, and biotherapeutics); LRRCAPS-specific antibodies; LRRCAPS-specific antisense oligomers and other nucleic acid modulators; and chemical agents that specifically bind to or interact with LRRCAPS or compete with LRRCAPS binding partner (e.g. by binding to an LRRCAPS binding partner). In one specific embodiment, a small molecule modulator is identified using a binding assay. In specific embodiments, the screening assay system is selected from an apoptosis assay, a cell proliferation assay, an angiogenesis assay, and a hypoxic induction assay.

In another embodiment, candidate p53 pathway modulating agents are further tested using a second assay system that detects changes in the p53 pathway, such as angiogenic, apoptotic, or cell proliferation changes produced by the originally identified candidate agent or an agent derived from the original agent. The second assay system may use cultured cells or non-human animals. In specific embodiments, the secondary assay system uses non-human animals, including animals predetermined to have a disease or disorder implicating the p53 pathway, such as an angiogenic, apoptotic, or cell proliferation disorder (e.g. cancer).

The invention further provides methods for modulating the LRRCAPS function and/or the p53 pathway in a mammalian cell by contacting the mammalian cell with an agent that specifically binds a LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid. The agent may be a small molecule modulator, a nucleic acid modulator, or an antibody and may be administered to a mammalian animal predetermined to have a pathology associated the p53 pathway.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Genetic screens were designed to identify modifiers of the p53 pathway in Drosophila, where a genetic modifier screen was carried out in which p53 was overexpressed in the wing (Ollmann M, et al, Cell 2000 101: 91-101). The CAPS gene was identified as a modifier of the p53 pathway. Accordingly, vertebrate orthologs of these modifiers, and preferably the human orthologs, LRRCAPS (Leucine rich repeat, capricious related) genes (i.e., nucleic acids and polypeptides) are attractive drug targets for the treatment of pathologies associated with a defective p53 signaling pathway, such as cancer.

In vitro and in vivo methods of assessing LRRCAPS function are provided herein. Modulation of the LRRCAPS or their respective binding partners is useful for understanding the association of the p53 pathway and its members in normal and disease conditions and for developing diagnostics and therapeutic modalities for p53 related pathologies. LRRCAPS-modulating agents that act by inhibiting or enhancing LRRCAPS expression, directly or indirectly, for example, by affecting an LRRCAPS function such as binding activity, can be identified using methods provided herein. LRRCAPS modulating agents are useful in diagnosis, therapy and pharmaceutical development.

Nucleic acids and polypeptides of the invention

Sequences related to LRRCAPS nucleic acids and polypeptides that can be used in the invention are disclosed in Genbank (referenced by Genbank identifier (GI) number) as GI#s 18073097 (SEQ ID NO:l), 16157510 (SEQ ID NO:3), 14758125 (SEQ ID NO:4), 14149931 (SEQ ID NO:5), 20547335 (SEQ ID NO:7), 5453655 (SEQ ID NO:9), 3253212 (SEQ ID NO:10), 21734210 (SEQ ID NO:12), 21706505 (SEQ ID NO:13), 14764197 (SEQ ID NO:14), 5729717 (SEQ ID NO:15), and 435654 (SEQ ID NO:18) for nucleic acid, and GI#s 11877257 (SEQ ID NO:19), 16157511 (SEQ ID NO:20), 14758126 (SEQ ID NO:21), 5453656 (SEQ ID NO:22), 14764198 (SEQ ID NO:23), and 5729718 (SEQ ID NO:24) for polypeptides. Further, nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 6, 8, 11 , 16, and 17 can also be used in the methods of the invention.

The term "LRRCAPS polypeptide" refers to a full-length LRRCAPS protein or a functionally active fragment or derivative thereof. A "functionally active" LRRCAPS fragment or derivative exhibits one or more functional activities associated with a full- length, wild-type LRRCAPS protein, such as antigenic or immunogenic activity, ability to bind natural cellular substrates, etc. The functional activity of LRRCAPS proteins, derivatives and fragments can be assayed by various methods known to one skilled in the art (Current Protocols in Protein Science (1998) Coligan et ah, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Somerset, New Jersey) and as further discussed below. In one embodiment, a functionally active LRRCAPS polypeptide is a LRRCAPS derivative capable of rescuing defective endogenous LRRCAPS activity, such as in cell based or animal assays; the rescuing derivative may be from the same or a different species. For purposes herein, functionally active fragments also include those fragments that comprise one or more structural domains of an LRRCAPS, such as a binding domain. Protein domains can be identified using the PFAM program (Bateman A., et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27:260- 2). For example, the approximate amino acid locations of LRR (leucine rich repeat) and IG domains of LRRCAPS from GI#s 11877257, 16157511, 14758126, 5453656, 14764198, and 5729718 (SEQ ID NOs:19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, respectively) are listed in Table 1 further below in Example 1. Methods for obtaining LRRCAPS polypeptides are also further described below. In some embodiments, preferred fragments are functionally active, domain-containing fragments comprising at least 25 contiguous amino acids, preferably at least 50, more preferably 75, and most preferably at least 100 contiguous amino acids of any one of SEQ ID NOs:19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24 (an LRRCAPS). In further preferred embodiments, the fragment comprises the entire functionally active domain.

The term "LRRCAPS nucleic acid" refers to a DNA or RNA molecule that encodes a LRRCAPS polypeptide. Preferably, the LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid or fragment thereof is from a human, but can also be an ortholog, or derivative thereof with at least 70% sequence identity, preferably at least 80%, more preferably 85%, still more preferably 90%, and most preferably at least 95% sequence identity with human LRRCAPS. Methods of identifying orthlogs are known in the art. Normally, orthologs in different species retain the same function, due to presence of one or more protem motifs and/or 3-dimensional structures. Orthologs are generally identified by sequence homology analysis, such as BLAST analysis, usually using protein bait sequences. Sequences are assigned as a potential ortholog if the best hit sequence from the forward BLAST result retrieves the original query sequence in the reverse BLAST (Huynen MA and Bork P, Proc Natl Acad Sci (1998) 95:5849-5856; Huynen MA et al, Genome Research (2000) 10:1204-1210). Programs for multiple sequence alignment, such as CLUSTAL (Thompson JD et al, 1994, Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680) may be used to highlight conserved regions and/or residues of orthologous proteins and to generate phylogenetic trees. In a phylogenetic tree representing multiple homologous sequences from diverse species (e.g., retrieved through BLAST analysis), ortliologous sequences from two species generally appear closest on the tree with respect to all other sequences from these two species. Structural threading or other analysis of protein folding (e.g., using software by ProCeryon, Biosciences, Salzburg, Austria) may also identify potential orthologs. In evolution, when a gene duplication event follows speciation, a single gene in one species, such as Drosophila, may correspond to multiple genes (paralogs) in another, such as human. As used herein, the term "orthologs" encompasses paralogs. As used herein, "percent (%) sequence identity" with respect to a subject sequence, or a specified portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of nucleotides or amino acids in the candidate derivative sequence identical with the nucleotides or amino acids in the subject sequence (or specified portion thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, as generated by the program WU-BLAST-2.0al9 (Altschul et al, J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 215:403-410) with all the search parameters set to default values. The HSP S and HSP S2 parameters are dynamic values and are established by the program itself depending upon the composition of the particular sequence and composition of the particular database against which the sequence of interest is being searched. A % identity value is determined by the number of matching identical nucleotides or amino acids divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity is being reported. "Percent (%) amino acid sequence similarity" is determined by doing the same calculation as for determining % amino acid sequence identity, but including conservative amino acid substitutions in addition to identical amino acids in the computation.

A conservative amino acid substitution is one in which an amino acid is substituted for another amino acid having similar properties such that the folding or activity of the protein is not significantly affected. Aromatic amino acids that can be substituted for each other are phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine; interchangeable hydrophobic amino acids are leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and valine; interchangeable polar amino acids are glutamine and asparagine; interchangeable basic amino acids are arginine, lysine and histidine; interchangeable acidic amino acids are aspartic acid and glutamic acid; and interchangeable small amino acids are alanine, serine, threonine, cysteine and glycine. Alternatively, an alignment for nucleic acid sequences is provided by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (Smith and Waterman, 1981, Advances in Applied Mathematics 2:482-489; database: European Bioinformatics Institute; Smith and Watennan, 1981, J. of Molec.Biol., 147:195-197; Nicholas et al, 1998, "A Tutorial on Searching Sequence Databases and Sequence Scoring Methods" (www.psc.edu) and references cited therein.; W.R. Pearson, 1991, Genomics 11:635-650). This algorithm can be applied to amino acid sequences by using the scoring matrix developed by Dayhoff (Dayhoff: Atlas of Protein Sequences and Structure, M. O. Dayhoff ed., 5 suppl. 3:353- 358, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA), and normalized by Gribskov (Gribskov 1986 Nucl. Acids Res. 14(6):6745-6763). The Smith-Waterman algorithm may be employed where default parameters are used for scoring (for example, gap open penalty of 12, gap extension penalty of two). From the data generated, the "Match" value reflects "sequence identity." Derivative nucleic acid molecules of the subject nucleic acid molecules include sequences that hybridize to the nucleic acid sequence of any of SEQ ID NOs:l-18. The stringency of hybridization can be controlled by temperature, ionic strength, pH, and the presence of denaturing agents such as formamide during hybridization and washing. Conditions routinely used are set out in readily available procedure texts (e.g., Current Protocol in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, Chap. 2.10, John Wiley & Sons, Publishers (1994); Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor (1989)). In some embodiments, a nucleic acid molecule of the invention is capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid molecule containing the nucleotide sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs:l-18 under high stringency hybridization conditions that comprise: prehybridization of filters containing nucleic acid for 8 hours to overnight at 65° C in a solution comprising 6X single strength citrate (SSC) (IX SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M Na citrate; pH 7.0), 5X Denhardt' s solution, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate and 100 μg/ml herring sperm DNA; hybridization for 18-20 hours at 65° C in a solution containing 6X SSC, IX Denhardt's solution, 100 ug/ml yeast tRNA and 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate; and washing of filters at 65° C for lh in a solution containing 0.1X SSC and 0.1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate).

In other embodiments, moderately stringent hybridization conditions are used that comprise: pretreatment of filters containing nucleic acid for 6 h at 40° C in a solution containing 35% formamide, 5X SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 5mM EDTA, 0.1% PVP, 0.1% Ficoll, 1% BSA, and 500 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA; hybridization for 18-20h at 40° C in a solution containing 35% formamide, 5X SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 5mM EDTA, 0.02% PVP, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.2% BSA, 100 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 10% (wt/vol) dextran sulfate; followed by washing twice for 1 hour at 55° C in a solution containing 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS. Alternatively, low stringency conditions can be used that comprise: incubation for 8 hours to overnight at 37° C in a solution comprising 20% formamide, 5 x SSC, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), 5X Denhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20 μg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA; hybridization in the same buffer for 18 to 20 hours; and washing of filters in 1 x SSC at about 37° C for 1 hour.

Isolation, Production, Expression, and Mis-expression of LRRCAPS Nucleic Acids and Polypeptides

LRRCAPS nucleic acids and polypeptides, useful for identifying and testing agents that modulate LRRCAPS function and for other applications related to the involvement of LRRCAPS in the p53 pathway. LRRCAPS nucleic acids and derivatives and orthologs thereof may be obtained using any available method. For instance, techniques for isolating cDNA or genomic DNA sequences of interest by screening DNA libraries or by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are well known in the art. In general, the particular use for the protein will dictate the particulars of expression, production, and purification methods. For instance, production of proteins for use in screening for modulating agents may require methods that preserve specific biological activities of these proteins, whereas production of proteins for antibody generation may require structural integrity of particular epitopes. Expression of proteins to be purified for screening or antibody production may require the addition of specific tags (e.g. , generation of fusion proteins). Overexpression of an LRRCAPS protein for assays used to assess LRRCAPS function, such as involvement in cell cycle regulation or hypoxic response, may require expression in eukaryotic cell lines capable of these cellular activities. Techniques for the expression, production, and purification of proteins are well known in the art; any suitable means therefore may be used (e.g., Higgins SJ and Hames BD (eds.) Protein Expression: A Practical Approach, Oxford University Press Inc., New York 1999; Stanbury PF et al., Principles of Fermentation Technology, 2^nd edition, Elsevier Science, New York, 1995; Doonan S (ed.) Protein Purification Protocols, Humana Press, New Jersey, 1996; Coligan JE et al, Current Protocols in Protem Science (eds.), 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York). In particular embodiments, recombinant LRRCAPS is expressed in a cell line known to have defective p53 function (e.g. SAOS-2 osteoblasts, HI 299 lung cancer cells, C33A and HT3 cervical cancer cells, HT-29 and DLD-1 colon cancer cells, among others, available from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA). The recombinant cells are used in cell-based screening assay systems of the invention, as described further below.

The nucleotide sequence encoding an LRRCAPS polypeptide can be inserted into any appropriate expression vector. The necessary transcriptional and translational signals, including promoter/enhancer element, can derive from the native LRRCAPS gene and/or its flanking regions or can be heterologous. A variety of host-vector expression systems may be utilized, such as mammalian cell systems infected with virus (e.g. vaccinia virus, adenovirus, etc.); insect cell systems infected with virus (e.g. baculovirus); microorganisms such as yeast containing yeast vectors, or bacteria transformed with bacteriophage, plasmid, or cosmid DNA. An isolated host cell strain that modulates the expression of, modifies, and/or specifically processes the gene product may be used. To detect expression of the LRRCAPS gene product, the expression vector can comprise a promoter operably linked to an LRRCAPS gene nucleic acid, one or more origins of replication, and, one or more selectable markers (e.g. thymidine kinase activity, resistance to antibiotics, etc.). Alternatively, recombinant expression vectors can be identified by assaying for the expression of the LRRCAPS gene product based on the physical or functional properties of the LRRCAPS protein in in vitro assay systems (e.g. immunoassays).

The LRRCAPS protein, fragment, or derivative may be optionally expressed as a fusion, or chimeric protein product (i.e. it is joined via a peptide bond to a heterologous protein sequence of a different protein), for example to facilitate purification or detection. A chimeric product can be made by ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino acid sequences to each other using standard methods and expressing the chimeric product. A chimeric product may also be made by protein synthetic techniques, e.g. by use of a peptide synthesizer (Hunkapiller et al., Nature (1984) 310:105-111).

Once a recombinant cell that expresses the LRRCAPS gene sequence is identified, the gene product can be isolated and purified using standard methods (e.g. ion exchange, affinity, and gel exclusion chromatography; centrifugation; differential solubility; electrophoresis). Alternatively, native LRRCAPS proteins can be purified from natural sources, by standard methods (e.g. immunoaffinity purification). Once a protein is obtained, it may be quantified and its activity measured by appropriate methods, such as immunoassay, bioassay, or other measurements of physical properties, such as crystallography.

The methods of this invention may also use cells that have been engineered for altered expression (mis-expression) of LRRCAPS or other genes associated with the p53 pathway. As used herein, mis-expression encompasses ectopic expression, over- expression, under-expression, and non-expression (e.g. by gene knock-out or blocking expression that would otherwise normally occur).

Genetically modified animals

Animal models that have been genetically modified to alter LRRCAPS expression may be used in in vivo assays to test for activity of a candidate p53 modulating agent, or to further assess the role of LRRCAPS in a p53 pathway process such as apoptosis or cell proliferation. Preferably, the altered LRRCAPS expression results in a detectable phenotype, such as decreased or increased levels of cell proliferation, angiogenesis, or apoptosis compared to control animals having normal LRRCAPS expression. The genetically modified animal may additionally have altered p53 expression (e.g. p53 knockout). Preferred genetically modified animals are mammals such as primates, rodents (preferably mice or rats), among others. Preferred non-mammalian species include zebrafish, C. elegans, and Drosophila. Preferred genetically modified animals are transgenic animals having a heterologous nucleic acid sequence present as an extrachromosomal element in a portion of its cells, i.e. mosaic animals (see, for example, techniques described by Jakobovits, 1994, Curr. Biol. 4:761-763.) or stably integrated into its germ line DNA (i.e., in the genomic sequence of most or all of its cells). Heterologous nucleic acid is introduced into the germ line of such transgenic animals by genetic manipulation of, for example, embryos or embryonic stem cells of the host animal.

Methods of making transgenic animals are well-known in the art (for transgenic mice see Brinster et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4438-4442 (1985), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,736,866 and 4,870,009, both by Leder et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,873,191 by Wagner et al, and Hogan, B., Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1986); for particle bombardment see U.S. Pat. No., 4,945,050, by Sandford et al.; for transgenic Drosophila see Rubin and Spradling, Science (1982) 218:348-53 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,670,388; for transgenic insects see Berghammer A.J. et al, A Universal Marker for Transgenic Insects (1999) Nature 402:370-371; for transgenic Zebrafish see Lin S., Transgenic Zebrafish, Methods Mol Biol. (2000);136:375-3830); for microinjection procedures for fish, amphibian eggs and birds see Houdebine and Chourrout, Experientia (1991) 47:897-905; for transgenic rats see Hammer et al., Cell (1990) 63:1099-1112; and for culturing of embryonic stem (ES) cells and the subsequent production of transgenic animals by the introduction of DNA into ES cells using methods such as electroporation, calcium phosphate/DNA precipitation and direct injection see, e.g., Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells, A Practical Approach, E. J. Robertson, ed., IRL Press (1987)). Clones of the nonhuman transgenic animals can be produced according to available methods (see Wilmut, I. et al. (1997) Nature 385:810-813; and PCT International Publication Nos. WO 97/07668 and WO 97/07669).

In one embodiment, the transgenic animal is a "knock-out" animal having a heterozygous or homozygous alteration in the sequence of an endogenous LRRCAPS gene that results in a decrease of LRRCAPS function, preferably such that LRRCAPS expression is undetectable or insignificant. Knock-out animals are typically generated by homologous recombination with a vector comprising a transgene having at least a portion of the gene to be knocked out. Typically a deletion, addition or substitution has been introduced into the transgene to functionally disrupt it. The transgene can be a human gene (e.g., from a human genomic clone) but more preferably is an ortholog of the human gene derived from the transgenic host species. For example, a mouse LRRCAPS gene is used to construct a homologous recombination vector suitable for altering an endogenous LRRCAPS gene in the mouse genome. Detailed methodologies for homologous recombination in mice are available (see Capecchi, Science (1989) 244:1288-1292; Joyner et al., Nature (1989) 338:153-156). Procedures for the production of non-rodent transgenic mammals and other animals are also available (Houdebine and Chourrout, supra; Pursel et al, Science (1989) 244:1281-1288; Simms et al, Bio/Technology (1988) 6:179-183). In a preferred embodiment, knock-out animals, such as mice harboring a knockout of a specific gene, may be used to produce antibodies against the human counterpart of the gene that has been knocked out (Claesson MH et al., (1994) Scan J Immunol 40:257-264; Declerck PJ et al., (1995) J Biol Chem. 270:8397-400).

In another embodiment, the transgenic animal is a "knock-in" animal having an alteration in its genome that results in altered expression (e.g., increased (including ectopic) or decreased expression) of the LRRCAPS gene, e.g., by introduction of additional copies of LRRCAPS, or by operatively inserting a regulatory sequence that provides for altered expression of an endogenous copy of the LRRCAPS gene. Such regulatory sequences include inducible, tissue-specific, and constitutive promoters and enhancer elements. The knock-in can be homozygous or heterozygous.

Transgenic nonhuman animals can also be produced that contain selected systems allowing for regulated expression of the transgene. One example of such a system that may be produced is the cre/loxP recombinase system of bacteriophage PI (Lakso et al., PNAS (1992) 89:6232-6236; U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,317). If a cre/loxP recombinase system is used to regulate expression of the transgene, animals containing transgenes encoding both the Cre recombinase and a selected protein are required. Such animals can be provided through the construction of "double" transgenic animals, e.g., by mating two transgenic animals, one containing a transgene encoding a selected protein and the other containing a transgene encoding a recombinase. Another example of a recombinase system is the FLP recombinase system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (O'Gorman et al. (1991) Science 251:1351-1355; U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,182). In a preferred embodiment, both Cre-LoxP and Flp-Frt are used in the same system to regulate expression of the transgene, and for sequential deletion of vector sequences in the same cell (Sun X et al (2000) Nat Genet 25:83-6).

The genetically modified animals can be used in genetic studies to further elucidate the p53 pathway, as animal models of disease and disorders implicating defective p53 function, and for in vivo testing of candidate therapeutic agents, such as those identified in screens described below. The candidate therapeutic agents are administered to a genetically modified animal having altered LRRCAPS function and phenotypic changes are compared with appropriate control animals such as genetically modified animals that receive placebo treatment, and/or animals with unaltered LRRCAPS expression that receive candidate therapeutic agent.

In addition to the above-described genetically modified animals having altered LRRCAPS function, animal models having defective p53 function (and otherwise normal LRRCAPS function), can be used in the methods of the present invention. For example, a p53 knockout mouse can be used to assess, in vivo, the activity of a candidate p53 modulating agent identified in one of the in vitro assays described below. p53 knockout mice are described in the literature (Jacks et al., Nature 2001;410:1111-1116, 1043-1044; Donehower et al., supra). Preferably, the candidate p53 modulating agent when administered to a model system with cells defective in p53 function, produces a detectable phenotypic change in the model system indicating that the p53 function is restored, i.e., the cells exhibit normal cell cycle progression.

Modulating Agents

The invention provides methods to identify agents that interact with and/or modulate the function of LRRCAPS and/or the p53 pathway. Modulating agents identified by the methods are also part of the invention. Such agents are useful in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic applications associated with the p53 pathway, as well as in further analysis of the LRRCAPS protem and its contribution to the p53 pathway. Accordingly, the invention also provides methods for modulating the p53 pathway comprising the step of specifically modulating LRRCAPS activity by administering a LRRCAPS-interacting or - modulating agent.

As used herein, an "LRRCAPS-modulating agent" is any agent that modulates LRRCAPS function, for example, an agent that interacts with LRRCAPS to inhibit or enhance LRRCAPS activity or otherwise affect normal LRRCAPS function. LRRCAPS function can be affected at any level, including transcription, protein expression, protein localization, and cellular or extra-cellular activity. In a preferred embodiment, the LRRCAPS - modulating agent specifically modulates the function of the LRRCAPS. The phrases "specific modulating agent", "specifically modulates", etc., are used herein to refer to modulating agents that directly bind to the LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid, and preferably inhibit, enhance, or otherwise alter, the function of the LRRCAPS. These phrases also encompasses modulating agents that alter the interaction of the LRRCAPS with a binding partner, substrate, or cofactor (e.g. by binding to a binding partner of an LRRCAPS, or to a protein/binding partner complex, and altering LRRCAPS function). In a further preferred embodiment, the LRRCAPS- modulating agent is a modulator of the p53 pathway (e.g. it restores and/or upregulates p53 function) and thus is also a p53- modulating agent.

Preferred LRRCAPS-modulating agents include small molecule compounds; LRRCAPS-interacting proteins, including antibodies and other biotherapeutics; and nucleic acid modulators such as antisense and RNA inhibitors. The modulating agents may be formulated in pharmaceutical compositions, for example, as compositions that may comprise other active ingredients, as in combination therapy, and/or suitable carriers or excipients. Techniques for formulation and administration of the compounds may be found in "Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences" Mack Publishing Co., Easton, PA, 19^th edition.

Small molecule modulators

Small molecules are often preferred to modulate function of proteins with enzymatic function, and/or containing protein interaction domains. Chemical agents, referred to in the art as "small molecule" compounds are typically organic, non-peptide molecules, having a molecular weight less than 10,000, preferably less than 5,000, more preferably less than 1,000, and most preferably less than 500. This class of modulators includes chemically synthesized molecules, for instance, compounds from combinatorial chemical libraries. Synthetic compounds may be rationally designed or identified based on known or inferred properties of the LRRCAPS protein or may be identified by screening compound libraries. Alternative appropriate modulators of this class are natural products, particularly secondary metabolites from organisms such as plants or fungi, which can also be identified by screening compound libraries for LRRCAPS-modulating activity. Methods for generating and obtaining compounds are well known in the art (Schreiber SL, Science (2000) 151: 1964-1969; Radmann J and Gunther J, Science (2000) 151:1947- 1948).

Small molecule modulators identified from screening assays, as described below, can be used as lead compounds from which candidate clinical compounds may be designed, optimized, and synthesized. Such clinical compounds may have utility in treating pathologies associated with the p53 pathway. The activity of candidate small molecule modulating agents may be improved several-fold through iterative secondary functional validation, as further described beiow, structure determination, and candidate modulator modification and testing. Additionally, candidate clinical compounds are generated with specific regard to clinical and pharmacological properties. For example, the reagents may be derivatized and re-screened using in vitro and in vivo assays to optimize activity and minimize toxicity for pharmaceutical development.

Protein Modulators Specific LRRCAPS-interacting proteins are useful in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic applications related to the p53 pathway and related disorders, as well as in validation assays for other LRRCAPS-modulating agents. In a preferred embodiment, LRRCAPS-interacting proteins affect normal LRRCAPS function, including transcription, protein expression, protein localization, and cellular or extra-cellular activity. In another embodiment, LRRCAPS-interacting proteins are useful in detecting and providing information about the function of LRRCAPS proteins, as is relevant to p53 related disorders, such as cancer (e.g., for diagnostic means).

An LRRCAPS-interacting protein may be endogenous, i.e. one that naturally interacts genetically or biochemically with an LRRCAPS, such as a member of the LRRCAPS pathway that modulates LRRCAPS expression, localization, and/or activity. LRRCAPS- modulators include dominant negative forms of LRRCAPS-interacting proteins and of LRRCAPS proteins themselves. Yeast two-hybrid and variant screens offer preferred methods for identifying endogenous LRRCAPS-interacting proteins (Finley, R. L. et al. (1996) in DNA Cloning-Expression Systems: A Practical Approach, eds. Glover D. & Hames B. D (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England), pp. 169-203; Fashema SF et al., Gene (2000) 250:1-14; Drees BL Curr Opin Chem Biol (1999) 3:64-70; Vidal M and Legrain P Nucleic Acids Res (1999) 27:919-29; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,868). Mass spectrometry is an alternative preferred method for the elucidation of protein complexes (reviewed in, e.g., Pandley A and Mann M, Nature (2000) 405:837-846; Yates JR 3^rd, Trends Genet (2000) 16:5-8).

An LRRCAPS-interacting protein may be an exogenous protein, such as an LRRCAPS-specific antibody or a T-cell antigen receptor (see, e.g., Harlow and Lane (1988) Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Harlow and Lane (1999) Using antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). LRRCAPS antibodies are further discussed below.

In preferred embodiments, an LRRCAPS-interacting protein specifically binds an LRRCAPS protein. In alternative preferred embodiments, an LRRCAPS-modulating agent binds an LRRCAPS substrate, binding partner, or cof actor.

Antibodies

In another embodiment, the protein modulator is an LRRCAPS specific antibody agonist or antagonist. The antibodies have therapeutic and diagnostic utilities, and can be used in screening assays to identify LRRCAPS modulators. The antibodies can also be used in dissecting the portions of the LRRCAPS pathway responsible for various cellular responses and in the general processing and maturation of the LRRCAPS.

Antibodies that specifically bind LRRCAPS polypeptides can be generated using known methods. Preferably the antibody is specific to a mammalian ortholog of

LRRCAPS polypeptide, and more preferably, to human LRRCAPS. Antibodies may be polyclonal, monoclonal (mAbs), humanized or chimeric antibodies, single chain antibodies, Fab fragments, F(ab').sub.2 fragments, fragments produced by a FAb expression library, anti-idiotypic (anti-Id) antibodies, and epitope-binding fragments of any of the above. Epitopes of LRRCAPS which are particularly antigenic can be selected, for example, by routine screening of LRRCAPS polypeptides for antigenicity or by applying a theoretical method for selecting antigenic regions of a protein (Hopp and Wood (1981), Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3824-28; Hopp and Wood, (1983) Mol. Immunol. 20:483-89; Sutcliffe et al., (1983) Science 219:660-66) to the amino acid sequence shown in any of SEQ ID NOs: 19-24. Monoclonal antibodies with affinities of 10⁸ M^"1 preferably 10⁹ M^"1 to 10¹⁰ M^"1, or stronger can be made by standard procedures as described (Harlow and Lane, supra; Goding (1986) Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice (2d ed) Academic Press, New York; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,381,292; 4,451,570; and 4,618,577). Antibodies may be generated against crude cell extracts of LRRCAPS or substantially purified fragments thereof. If LRRCAPS fragments are used, they preferably comprise at least 10, and more preferably, at least 20 contiguous amino acids of an LRRCAPS protein. In a particular embodiment, LRRCAPS-specific antigens and/or immunogens are coupled to carrier proteins that stimulate the immune response. For example, the subject polypeptides are covalently coupled to the keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) carrier, and the conjugate is emulsified in Freund's complete adjuvant, which enhances the immune response. An appropriate immune system such as a laboratory rabbit or mouse is immunized according to conventional protocols.

The presence of LRRCAPS-specific antibodies is assayed by an appropriate assay such as a^ solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) using immobilized corresponding LRRCAPS polypeptides. Other assays, such as radioimmunoassays or fluorescent assays might also be used.

Chimeric antibodies specific to LRRCAPS polypeptides can be made that contain different portions from different animal species. For instance, a human immunoglobulin constant region may be linked to a variable region of a murine mAb, such that the antibody derives its biological activity from the human antibody, and its binding specificity from the murine fragment. Chimeric antibodies are produced by splicing together genes that encode the appropriate regions from each species (Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (1984) 81:6851-6855; Neuberger et al., Nature (1984) 312:604-608; Takeda et al., Nature (1985) 31:452-454). Humanized antibodies, which are a form of chimeric antibodies, can be generated by grafting complementary-determining regions (CDRs) (Carlos, T. M., J. M. Harlan. 1994. Blood 84:2068-2101) of mouse antibodies into a background of human framework regions and constant regions by recombinant DNA technology (Riechmann LM, et al., 1988 Nature 323: 323-327). Humanized antibodies contain ~10% murine sequences and ~90% human sequences, and thus further reduce or eliminate immunogenicity, while retaining the antibody specificities (Co MS, and Queen C. 1991 Nature 351: 501-501; Morrison SL. 1992 Ann. Rev. Immun. 10:239-265). Humanized antibodies and methods of their production are well-known in the art (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,101, 5,585,089, 5,693,762, and 6,180,370). LRRCAPS-specific single chain antibodies which are recombinant, single chain polypeptides formed by linking the heavy and light chain fragments of the Fv regions via an amino acid bridge, can be produced by methods known in the art (U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778; Bird, Science (1988) 242:423-426; Huston et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1988) 85:5879-5883; and Ward et al., Nature (1989) 334:544-546). Other suitable techniques for antibody production involve in vitro exposure of lymphocytes to the antigenic polypeptides or alternatively to selection of libraries of antibodies in phage or similar vectors (Huse et al., Science (1989) 246:1275-1281). As used herein, T-cell antigen receptors are included within the scope of antibody modulators (Harlow and Lane, 1988, supra).

The polypeptides and antibodies of the present invention may be used with or without modification. Frequently, antibodies will be labeled by joining, either covalently or non- covalently, a substance that provides for a detectable signal, or that is toxic to cells that express the targeted protein (Menard S, et al., Int J. Biol Markers (1989) 4:131-134). A wide variety of labels and conjugation techniques are known and are reported extensively in both the scientific and patent literature. Suitable labels include radionuclides, enzymes, substrates, cofactors, inhibitors, fluorescent moieties, fluorescent emitting lanthanide metals, chemiluminescent moieties, bioluminescent moieties, magnetic particles, and the like (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,817,837; 3,850,752; 3,939,350; 3,996,345; 4,277,437; 4,275,149; and 4,366,241). Also, recombinant immunoglobulins may be produced (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567). Antibodies to cytoplasmic polypeptides may be delivered and reach their targets by conjugation with membrane-penetrating toxin proteins (U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,900).

When used therapeutically in a patient, the antibodies of the subject invention are typically administered parenterally, when possible at the target site, or intravenously. The therapeutically effective dose and dosage regimen is determined by clinical studies. Typically, the amount of antibody administered is in the range of about 0.1 mg/kg -to about 10 mg/kg of patient weight. For parenteral administration, the antibodies are formulated in a unit dosage injectable form (e.g., solution, suspension, emulsion) in association with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. Such vehicles are inherently nontoxic and non-therapeutic. Examples are water, saline, Ringer's solution, dextrose solution, and 5% human serum albumin. Nonaqueous vehicles such as fixed oils, ethyl oleate, or liposome carriers may also be used. The vehicle may contain minor amounts of additives, such as buffers and preservatives, which enhance isotonicity and chemical stability or otherwise enhance therapeutic potential. The antibodies' concentrations in such vehicles are typically in the range of about 1 mg/ml to aboutlO mg/ml. Immunotherapeutic methods are further described in the literature (US Pat. No. 5,859,206; WO0073469). Specific biotherapeutics

In a preferred embodiment, an LRRCAPS-interacting protem may have biotherapeutic applications. Biotherapeutic agents formulated in pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and dosages may be used to activate or inhibit signal transduction pathways. This modulation may be accomplished by binding a ligand, thus inhibiting the activity of the pathway; or by binding a receptor, either to inhibit activation of, or to activate, the receptor. Alternatively, the biotherapeutic may itself be a ligand capable of activating or inhibiting a receptor. Biotherapeutic agents and methods of producing them are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,628. LRRCAPS, its ligand(s), antibodies to the ligand(s) or the LRRCAPS itself may be used as biotherapeutics to modulate the activity of LRRCAPS in the p53 pathway.

Nucleic Acid Modulators

Other preferred LRRCAPS-modulating agents comprise nucleic acid molecules, such as antisense oligomers or double stranded RNA (dsRNA), which generally inhibit

LRRCAPS activity. Preferred nucleic acid modulators interfere with the function of the LRRCAPS nucleic acid such as DNA replication, transcription, translocation of the LRRCAPS RNA to the site of protein translation, translation of protein from the LRRCAPS RNA, splicing of the LRRCAPS RNA to yield one or more mRNA species, or catalytic activity which may be engaged in or facilitated by the LRRCAPS RNA.

In one embodiment, the antisense oligomer is an oligonucleotide that is sufficiently complementary to an LRRCAPS mRNA to bind to and prevent translation, preferably by binding to the 5' untranslated region. LRRCAPS-specific antisense oligonucleotides, preferably range from at least 6 to about 200 nucleotides. In some embodiments the oligonucleotide is preferably at least 10, 15, or 20 nucleotides in length. In other embodiments, the oligonucleotide is preferably less than 50, 40, or 30 nucleotides in length. The oligonucleotide can be DNA or RNA or a chimeric mixture or derivatives or modified versions thereof, single-stranded or double-stranded. The oligonucleotide can be modified at the base moiety, sugar moiety, or phosphate backbone. The oligonucleotide may include other appending groups such as peptides, agents that facilitate transport across the cell membrane, hybridization-triggered cleavage agents, and intercalating agents.

In another embodiment, the antisense oligomer is a phosphothioate morpholino oligomer (PMO). PMOs are assembled from four different morpholino subunits, each of which contain one of four genetic bases (A, C, G, or T) linked to a six-membered morpholine ring. Polymers of these subunits are joined by non-ionic phosphodiamidate intersubunit linkages. Details of how to make and use PMOs and other antisense oligomers are well known in the art (e.g; see WO99/18193; Probst JC, Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide and Ribozyme Design, Methods. (2000) 22(3): 271-281; Summerton J, and Weller D. 1997 Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. :7:187-95; US Pat. No. 5,235,033; and US Pat No. 5,378,841).

Alternative preferred LRRCAPS nucleic acid modulators are double-stranded RNA species mediating RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi is the process of sequence-specific, post-transcriptional gene silencing in animals and plants, initiated by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is homologous in sequence to the silenced gene. Methods relating to the use of RNAi to silence genes in C. elegans, Drosophila, plants, and humans are known in the art (Fire A, et al., 1998 Nature 391:806-811; Fire, A. Trends Genet. 15, 358-363 (1999); Sharp, P. A. RNA interference 2001. Genes Dev. 15, 485-490 (2001); Hammond, S. M., et al., Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 110-1119 (2001); Tuschl, T. Chem. Biochem. 2, 239- 245 (2001); Hamilton, A. et al.,^' Science 286, 950-952 (1999); Hammond, S. M., et al., Nature 404, 293-296 (2000); Zamore, P. D., et al., Cell 101, 25-33 (2000); Bernstein, E., et al., Nature 409, 363-366 (2001); Elbashir, S. M., et al., Genes Dev. 15, 188-200 (2001); WO0129058; WO9932619; Elbashir SM, et al., 2001 Nature 411:494-498). Nucleic acid modulators are commonly used as research reagents, diagnostics, and therapeutics. For example, antisense oligonucleotides, which are able to inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, are often used to elucidate the function of particular genes (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,790). Nucleic acid modulators are also used, for example, to distinguish between functions of various members of a biological pathway. For example, antisense oligomers have been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatmerit of disease states in animals and man and have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials to be safe and effective (Milligan JF, et al, Current Concepts in Antisense Drug Design, J Med Chem. (1993) 36:1923-1937; Tonkinson JL et al, Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides as Clinical Therapeutic Agents, Cancer Invest. (1996) 14:54-65). Accordingly, in one aspect of the invention, an LRRCAPS-specific nucleic acid modulator is used in an assay to further elucidate the role of the LRRCAPS in the p53 pathway, and/or its relationship to other members of the pathway. In another aspect of the invention, an LRRCAPS-specific antisense oligomer is used as a therapeutic agent for treatment of p53-related disease states. Assay Systems

The invention provides assay systems and screening methods for identifying specific modulators of LRRCAPS activity. As used herein, an "assay system" encompasses all the components required for performing and analyzing results of an assay that detects and/or measures a particular event. In general, primary assays are used to identify or confirm a modulator's specific biochemical or molecular effect with respect to the LRRCAPS nucleic acid or protein. In general, secondary assays further assess the activity of a LRRCAPS modulating agent identified by a primary assay and may confirm that the modulating agent affects LRRCAPS in a manner relevant to the p53 pathway. In some cases, LRRCAPS modulators will be directly tested in a secondary assay.

In a preferred embodiment, the screening method comprises contacting a suitable assay system comprising an LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid with a candidate agent under conditions whereby, but for the presence of the agent, the system provides a reference activity (e.g. binding activity), which is based on the particular molecular event the screening method detects. A statistically significant difference between the agent- biased activity and the reference activity indicates that the candidate agent modulates LRRCAPS activity, and hence the p53 pathway. The LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid used in the assay may comprise any of the nucleic acids or polypeptides described above.

Primary Assays

The type of modulator tested generally determines the type of primary assay.

Primary assays for small molecule modulators For small molecule modulators, screening assays are used to identify candidate modulators. Screening assays may be cell-based or may use a cell-free system that recreates or retains the relevant biochemical reaction of the target protein (reviewed in Sittampalam GS et al., Curr Opin Chem Biol (1997) 1:384-91 and accompanying references). As used herein the term "cell-based" refers to assays using live cells, dead cells, or a particular cellular fraction, such as a membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, or mitochondrial fraction. The term "cell free" encompasses assays using substantially purified protem (either endogenous or recombinantly produced), partially purified or crude cellular extracts. Screening assays may detect a variety of molecular events, including protein-DNA interactions, protein-protein interactions (e.g., receptor-ligand binding), transcriptional activity (e.g., using a reporter gene), enzymatic activity (e.g., via a property of the substrate), activity of second messengers, immunogenicty and changes in cellular morphology or other cellular characteristics. Appropriate screening assays may use a wide range of detection methods including fluorescent, radioactive, colorimetric, spectrophotometric, and amperometric methods, to provide a read-out for the particular molecular event detected.

Cell-based screening assays usually require systems for recombinant expression of LRRCAPS and any auxiliary proteins demanded by the particular assay. Appropriate methods for generating recombinant proteins produce sufficient quantities of proteins that retain their relevant biological activities and are of sufficient purity to optimize activity and assure assay reproducibility. Yeast two-hybrid and variant screens, and mass spectrometry provide preferred methods for determining protein-protein interactions and elucidation of protein complexes. In certain applications, when LRRCAPS-interacting proteins are used in screens to identify small molecule modulators, the binding specificity of the interacting protein to the LRRCAPS protein may be assayed by various known methods such as substrate processing (e.g. ability of the candidate LRRCAPS-specific binding agents to function as negative effectors in LRRCAPS-expressing cells), binding equilibrium constants (usually at least about 10⁷ M^"1, preferably at least about 10⁸ M^"1, more preferably at least about 10⁹ M^"1), and immunogenicity (e.g. ability to elicit LRRCAPS specific antibody in a heterologous host such as a mouse, rat, goat or rabbit). For enzymes and receptors, binding may be assayed by, respectively, substrate and ligand processing.

The screening assay may measure a candidate agent's ability to specifically bind to or modulate activity of a LRRCAPS polypeptide, a fusion protein thereof, or to cells or membranes bearing the polypeptide or fusion protein. The LRRCAPS polypeptide can be full length or a fragment thereof that retains functional LRRCAPS activity. The LRRCAPS polypeptide may be fused to another polypeptide, such as a peptide tag for detection or anchoring, or to another tag. The LRRCAPS polypeptide is preferably human LRRCAPS, or is an ortholog or derivative thereof as described above. In a preferred embodiment, the screening assay detects candidate agent-based modulation of LRRCAPS interaction with a binding target, such as an endogenous or exogenous protein or other substrate that has LRRCAPS -specific binding activity, and can be used to assess normal LRRCAPS gene function. Suitable assay formats that may be adapted to screen for LRRCAPS modulators are known in the art. Preferred screening assays are high throughput or ultra high throughput and thus provide automated, cost-effective means of screening compound libraries for lead compounds (Fernandes PB, Curr Opin Chem Biol (1998) 2:597-603; Sundberg SA, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000, 11:47-53). In one preferred embodiment, screening assays uses fluorescence technologies, including fluorescence polarization, time-resolved fluorescence, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. These systems offer means to monitor protein-protein or DNA-protein interactions in which the intensity of the signal emitted from dye-labeled molecules depends upon their interactions with partner molecules (e.g., Selvin PR, Nat Struct Biol (2000) 7:730-4; Fernandes PB, supra; Hertzberg RP and Pope AJ, Curr Opin Chem Biol (2000) 4:445-451).

A variety of suitable assay systems may be used to identify candidate LRRCAPS and p53 pathway modulators (e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,019 and 6,133,437 (apoptosis assays); U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,135 (p53 modulation), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,976,782, 6,225,118 and 6,444,434 (angiogenesis assays), among others). Specific preferred assays are described in more detail below.

Apoptosis assays. Assays for apoptosis may be performed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated digoxigenin-11-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The TUNEL assay is used to measure nuclear DNA fragmentation characteristic of apoptosis ( Lazebnik et al, 1994, Nature 371, 346), by following the incorporation of fluorescein-dUTP (Yonehara et al, 1989, J. Exp. Med. 169, 1747). Apoptosis may further be assayed by acridine orange staining of tissue culture cells (Lucas, R., et al., 1998, Blood 15:4730-41). An apoptosis assay system may comprise a cell that expresses an LRRCAPS, and that optionally has defective p53 function (e.g. p53 is over-expressed or under-expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the apoptosis assay system and changes in induction of apoptosis relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify candidate p53 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the invention, an apoptosis assay may be used as a secondary assay to test a candidate p53 modulating agents that is initially identified using a cell-free assay system. An apoptosis assay may also be used to test whether LRRCAPS function plays a direct role in apoptosis. For example, an apoptosis assay may be performed on cells that over- or under-express LRRCAPS relative to wild type cells. Differences in apoptotic response compared to wild type cells suggests that the LRRCAPS plays a direct role in the apoptotic response. Apoptosis assays are described further in US Pat. No. 6,133,437.

Cell proliferation and cell cycle assays. Cell proliferation may be assayed via bromodeoxyuridine (BRDU) incorporation. This assay identifies a cell population undergoing DNA synthesis by incorporation of BRDU into newly-synthesized DNA. Newly-synthesized DNA may then be detected using an anti-BRDU antibody (Hoshino et al, 1986, Int. J. Cancer 38, 369; Campana et al, 1988, J. Immunol. Meth. 107, 79), or by other means. Cell Proliferation may also be examined using [³H] -thymidine incorporation (Chen, J.,

1996, Oncogene 13:1395-403; Jeoung, J., 1995, J. Biol. Chem. 270:18367-73). This assay allows for quantitative characterization of S-phase DNA syntheses. In this assay, cells synthesizing DNA will incorporate [³H] -thymidine into newly synthesized DNA. Incorporation can then be measured by standard techniques such as by counting of radioisotope in a scintillation counter (e.g., Beckman LS 3800 Liquid Scintillation Counter). Another proliferation assay uses the dye Alamar Blue (available from Biosource International), which fluoresces when reduced in living cells and provides an indirect measurement of cell number (Voytik-Harbin SL et al., 1998, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:239-46). Cell proliferation may also be assayed by colony formation in soft agar (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor (1989)). For example, cells transformed with LRRCAPS are seeded in soft agar plates, and colonies are measured and counted after two weeks incubation.

Involvement of a gene in the cell cycle may be assayed by flow cytometry (Gray JW et al. (1986) Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 49:237-55). Cells transfected with an LRRCAPS may be stained with propidium iodide and evaluated in a flow cytometer (available from Becton Dickinson), which indicates accumulation of cells in different stages of the cell cycle.

Accordingly, a cell proliferation or cell cycle assay system may comprise a cell that expresses an LRRCAPS, and that optionally has defective p53 function (e.g. p53 is over- expressed or under-expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the assay system and changes in cell proliferation or cell cycle relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify candidate p53 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the invention, the cell proliferation or cell cycle assay may be used as a secondary assay to test a candidate p53 modulating agents that is initially identified using another assay system such as a cell-free assay system. A cell proliferation assay may also be used to test whether LRRCAPS function plays a direct role in cell proliferation or cell cycle. For example, a cell proliferation or cell cycle assay may be performed on cells that over- or under-express LRRCAPS relative to wild type cells. Differences in proliferation or cell cycle compared to wild type cells suggests that the LRRCAPS plays a direct role in cell proliferation or cell cycle.

Angiogenesis. Angiogenesis may be assayed using various human endothelial cell systems, such as umbilical vein, coronary artery, or dermal cells. Suitable assays include Alamar Blue based assays (available from Biosource International) to measure proliferation; migration assays using fluorescent molecules, such as the use of Becton Dickinson Falcon HTS FluoroBlock cell culture inserts to measure migration of cells through membranes in presence or absence of angiogenesis enhancer or suppressors; and tubule formation assays based on the formation of tubular structures by endothelial cells on Matrigel® (Becton Dickinson). Accordingly, an angiogenesis assay system may comprise a cell that expresses an LRRCAPS, and that optionally has defective p53 function (e.g. p53 is over-expressed or under-expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the angiogenesis assay system and changes in angiogenesis relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify candidate p53 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the invention, the angiogenesis assay may be used as a secondary assay to test a candidate p53 modulating agents that is initially identified using another assay system. An angiogenesis assay may also be used to test whether LRRCAPS function plays a direct role in cell proliferation. For example, an angiogenesis assay may be performed on cells that over- or under-express LRRCAPS relative to wild type cells. Differences in angiogenesis compared to wild type cells suggests that the LRRCAPS plays a direct role in angiogenesis. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,976,782, 6,225,118 and 6,444,434, among others.

Hypoxic induction. The alpha subunit of the transcription factor, hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HJF-1), is upregulated in tumor cells following exposure to hypoxia in vitro. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1 stimulates the expression of genes known to be important in tumour cell survival, such as those encoding glyolytic enzymes and VEGF. Induction of such genes by hypoxic conditions may be assayed by growing cells transfected with LRRCAPS in hypoxic conditions (such as with 0.1% 02, 5% CO2, and balance N2, generated in a Napco 7001 incubator (Precision Scientific)) and normoxic conditions, followed by assessment of gene activity or expression by Taqman®. For example, a hypoxic induction assay system may comprise a cell that expresses an LRRCAPS, and that optionally has a mutated p53 (e.g. p53 is over-expressed or under- expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the hypoxic induction assay system and changes in hypoxic response relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify candidate p53 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the invention, the hypoxic induction assay may be used as a secondary assay to test a candidate p53 modulating agents that is initially identified using another assay system. A hypoxic induction assay may also be used to test whether LRRCAPS function plays a direct role in the hypoxic response. For example, a hypoxic induction assay may be performed on cells that over- or under-express LRRCAPS relative to wild type cells. Differences in hypoxic response compared to wild type cells suggests that the LRRCAPS plays a direct role in hypoxic induction.

Cell adhesion. Cell adhesion assays measure adhesion of cells to purified adhesion proteins, or adhesion of cells to each other, in presence or absence of candidate modulating agents. Cell-protein adhesion assays measure the ability of agents to modulate the adhesion of cells to purified proteins. For example, recombinant proteins are produced, diluted to 2.5g/mL in PBS, and used to coat the wells of a microtiter plate. The wells used for negative control are not coated. Coated wells are then washed, blocked with 1% BSA, and washed again. Compounds are diluted to 2x final test concentration and added to the blocked, coated wells. Cells are then added to the wells, and the unbound cells are washed off. Retained cells are labeled directly on the plate by adding a membrane-permeable fluorescent dye, such as calcein-AM, and the signal is quantified in a fluorescent microplate reader.

Cell-cell adhesion assays measure the ability of agents to modulate binding of cell adhesion proteins with their native ligands. These assays use cells that naturally or recombinantly express the adhesion protein of choice. In an exemplary assay, cells expressing the cell adhesion protein are plated in wells of a multiwell plate. Cells expressing the ligand are labeled with a membrane-permeable fluorescent dye, such as BCECF , and allowed to adhere to the monolayers in the presence of candidate agents. Unbound cells are washed off, and bound cells are detected using a fluorescence plate reader.

High-throughput cell adhesion assays have also been described. In one such assay, small molecule ligands and peptides are bound to the surface of microscope slides using a microarray spotter, intact cells are then contacted with the slides, and unbound cells are washed off. In this assay, not only the binding specificity of the peptides and modulators against cell lines are determined, but also the functional cell signaling of attached cells using immunofluorescence techniques in situ on the microchip is measured (Falsey JR et al., Bioconjug Chem. 2001 May-Jun;12(3):346-53).

Cell Migration. An invasion/migration assay (also called a migration assay) tests the ability of cells to overcome a physical barrier and to migrate towards pro-angiogenic signals. Migration assays are known in the art (e.g., Paik JH et al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:11830-11837). In a typical experimental set-up, cultured endothelial cells are seeded onto a matrix-coated porous lamina, with pore sizes generally smaller than typical cell size. The matrix generally simulates the environment of the extracellular matrix, as described above. The lamina is typically a membrane, such as the transwell polycarbonate membrane (Corning Costar Corporation, Cambridge, MA), and is generally part of an upper chamber that is in fluid contact with a lower chamber containing pro-angiogenic stimuli. Migration is generally assayed after an overnight incubation with stimuli, but longer or shorter time frames may also be used. Migration is assessed as the number of cells that crossed the lamina, and may be detected by staining cells with hemotoxylin solution (VWR Scientific, South San Francisco, CA), or by any other method for determining cell number. In another exemplary set up, cells are fluorescently labeled and migration is detected using fluorescent readings, for instance using the Falcon HTS FluoroBlok (Becton Dickinson). While some migration is observed in the absence of stimulus, migration is greatly increased in response to pro-angiogenic factors. As described above, a preferred assay system for migration/invasion assays comprises testing an LRRCAPS's response to a variety of pro-angiogenic factors, including tumor angiogenic and inflammatory angiogenic agents, and culturing the cells in serum free medium.

Sprouting assay. A sprouting assay is a three-dimensional in vitro angiogenesis assay that uses a cell-number defined spheroid aggregation of endothelial cells ("spheroid"), embedded in a collagen gel-based matrix. The spheroid can serve as a starting point for the sprouting of capillary-like structures by invasion into the extracellular matrix (termed "cell sprouting") and the subsequent formation of complex anastomosing networks (Korff and Augustin, 1999, J Cell Sci 112:3249-58). In an exemplary experimental set-up, spheroids are prepared by pipetting 400 human umbilical vein endothelial cells into individual wells of a nonadhesive 96-well plates to allow overnight spheroidal aggregation (Korff and Augustin: J Cell Biol 143: 1341-52, 1998). Spheroids are harvested and seeded in 900μl of methocel-collagen solution and pipetted into individual wells of a 24 well plate to allow collagen gel polymerization. Test agents are added after 30 min by pipetting 100 μl of 10-fold concentrated working dilution of the test substances on top of the gel. Plates are incubated at 37°C for 24h. Dishes are fixed at the end of the experimental incubation period by addition of paraformaldehyde. Sprouting intensity of endothelial cells can be quantitated by an automated image analysis system to determine the cumulative sprout length per spheroid.

Primary assays for antibody modulators

For antibody modulators, appropriate primary assays test is a binding assay that tests the antibody's affinity to and specificity for the LRRCAPS protein. Methods for testing antibody affinity and specificity are well known in the art (Harlow and Lane, 1988, 1999, supra). The enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) is a preferred method for detecting LRRCAPS-specific antibodies; others include FACS assays, radioimmunoassays, and fluorescent assays.

In some cases, screening assays described for small molecule modulators may also be used to test antibody modulators.

Primary assays for nucleic acid modulators

For nucleic acid modulators, primary assays may test the ability of the nucleic acid modulator to inhibit or enhance LRRCAPS gene expression, preferably mRNA expression. In general, expression analysis comprises comparing LRRCAPS expression in like populations of cells (e.g., two pools of cells that endogenously or recombinantly express LRRCAPS) in the presence and absence of the nucleic acid modulator. Methods for analyzing mRNA and protein expression are well known in the art. For instance, Northern blotting, slot blotting, ribonuclease protection, quantitative RT-PCR (e.g., using the TaqMan®, PE Applied Biosystems), or microarray analysis may be used to confirm that LRRCAPS mRNA expression is reduced in cells treated with the nucleic acid modulator (e.g., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1994) Ausubel FM et al., eds.,

John Wiley & Sons, Inc., chapter 4; Freeman WM et al, Biotechniques (1999) 26: 112-

125; Kallioniemi OP, Ann Med 2001, 33:142-147; Blohm DH and Guiseppi-Elie, A Curr Opin Biotechnol 2001, 12:41-47). Protein expression may also be monitored. Proteins are most commonly detected with specific antibodies or antisera directed against either the

LRRCAPS protein or specific peptides. A variety of means including Western blotting,

ELISA, or in situ detection, are available (Harlow E and Lane D, 1988 and 1999, supra).

In some cases, screening assays described for small molecule modulators, particularly in assay systems that involve LRRCAPS mRNA expression, may also be used to test nucleic acid modulators.

Secondary Assays

Secondary assays may be used to further assess the activity of LRRCAPS-modulating agent identified by any of the above methods to confirm that the modulating agent affects LRRCAPS in a manner relevant to the p53 pathway. As used herein, LRRCAPS- modulating agents encompass candidate clinical compounds or other agents derived from previously identified modulating agent. Secondary assays can also be used to test the activity of a modulating agent on a particular genetic or biochemical pathway or to test the specificity of the modulating agent's interaction with LRRCAPS.

Secondary assays generally compare like populations of cells or animals (e.g., two pools of cells or animals that endogenously or recombinantly express LRRCAPS) in the presence and absence of the candidate modulator. In general, such assays test whether treatment of cells or animals with a candidate LRRCAPS-modulating agent results in changes in the p53 pathway in comparison to untreated (or mock- or placebo-treated) cells or animals. Certain assays use "sensitized genetic backgrounds", which, as used herein, describe cells or animals engineered for altered expression of genes in the p53 or interacting pathways.

Cell-based assays

Cell based assays may use a variety of mammalian cell lines known to have defective p53 function (e.g. SAOS-2 osteoblasts, H1299 lung cancer cells, C33A and HT3 cervical cancer cells, HT-29 and DLD-1 colon cancer cells, among others, available from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA). Cell based assays may detect endogenous p53 pathway activity or may rely on recombinant expression of p53 pathway components. Any of the aforementioned assays may be used in this cell-based format. Candidate modulators are typically added to the cell media but may also be injected into cells or delivered by any other efficacious means.

Animal Assays

A variety of non-human animal models of normal or defective p53 pathway may be used to test candidate LRRCAPS modulators. Models for defective p53 pathway typically use genetically modified animals that have been engineered to mis-express (e.g., over- express or lack expression in) genes involved in the p53 pathway. Assays generally require systemic delivery of the candidate modulators, such as by oral administration, injection, etc.

In a preferred embodiment, p53 pathway activity is assessed by monitoring neovascularization and angiogenesis. Animal models with defective and normal p53 are used to test the candidate modulator's affect on LRRCAPS in Matrigel® assays.

Matrigel® is an extract of basement membrane proteins, and is composed primarily of laminin, collagen IV, and heparin sulfate proteoglycan. It is provided as a sterile liquid at 4° C, but rapidly forms a solid gel at 37° C. Liquid Matrigel® is mixed with various angiogenic agents, such as bFGF and VEGF, or with human tumor cells which over- express the LRRCAPS. The mixture is then injected subcutaneously(SC) into female athymic nude mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY) to support an intense vascular response. Mice with Matrigel® pellets may be dosed via oral (PO), intraperitoneal (IP), or intravenous (TV) routes with the candidate modulator. Mice are euthanized 5 - 12 days post-injection, and the Matrigel® pellet is harvested for hemoglobin analysis (Sigma plasma hemoglobin kit). Hemoglobin content of the gel is found to correlate the degree of neovascularization in the gel.

In another preferred embodiment, the effect of the candidate modulator on LRRCAPS is assessed via tumorigenicity assays. In one example, a xenograft comprising human cells from a pre-existing tumor or a tumor cell line is used. Tumor xenograft assays are known in the art (see, e.g., Ogawa K et al., 2000, Oncogene 19:6043-6052). Xenografts are typically implanted SC into female athymic mice, 6-7 week old, as single cell suspensions either from a pre-existing tumor or from in vitro culture. The tumors which express the LRRCAPS endogenously are injected in the flank, 1 x 10 to 1 x 10 cells per mouse in a volume of 100 DL using a 27 gauge needle. Mice are then ear tagged and tumors are measured twice weekly. Candidate modulator treatment is initiated on the day the mean tumor weight reaches 100 mg. Candidate modulator is delivered IV, SC, IP, or PO by bolus administration. Depending upon the pharmacokinetics of each unique candidate modulator, dosing can be performed multiple times per day. The tumor weight is assessed by measuring perpendicular diameters with a caliper and calculated by multiplying the measurements of diameters in two dimensions. At the end of the experiment, the excised tumors maybe utilized for biomarker identification or further analyses. For immunohistochemistry staining, xenograft tumors are fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1M phosphate, pH 7.2, for 6 hours at 4°C, immersed in 30% sucrose in PBS, and rapidly frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen.

In another preferred embodiment, tumorogenicity is monitored using a hollow fiber assay, which is described in U.S. Pat No. US 5,698,413. Briefly, the method comprises implanting into a laboratory animal a biocompatible, semi-permeable encapsulation device containing target cells, treating the laboratory animal with a candidate modulating agent, and evaluating the target cells for reaction to the candidate modulator. Implanted cells are generally human cells from a pre-existing tumor or a tumor cell line. After an appropriate period of time, generally around six days, the implanted samples are harvested for evaluation of the candidate modulator. Tumorogenicity and modulator efficacy may be evaluated by assaying the quantity of viable cells present in the macrocapsule, which can be determined by tests known in the art, for example, MTT dye conversion assay, neutral red dye uptake, trypan blue staining, viable cell counts, the number of colonies formed in soft agar, the capacity of the cells to recover and replicate in vitro, etc.

In another preferred embodiment, a tumorogenicity assay use a transgenic animal, usually a mouse, carrying a dominant oncogene or tumor suppressor gene knockout under the control of tissue specific regulatory sequences; these assays are generally referred to as transgenic tumor assays. In a preferred application, tumor development in the transgenic model is well characterized or is controlled. In an exemplary model, the "RIPl-Tag2" transgene, comprising the SV40 large T-antigen oncogene under control of the insulin gene regulatory regions is expressed in pancreatic beta cells and results in islet cell carcinomas (Hanahan D, 1985, Nature 315:115-122; Parangi S et al, 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2002-2007; Bergers G et al, 1999, Science 284:808-812). An "angiogenic switch," occurs at approximately five weeks, as normally quiescent capillaries in a subset of hyperproliferative islets become angiogenic. The RJJP1-TAG2 mice die by age 14 weeks. Candidate modulators may be administered at a variety of stages, including just prior to the angiogenic switch (e.g., for a model of tumor prevention), during the growth of small tumors (e.g., for a model of intervention), or during the growth of large and/or invasive tumors (e.g., for a model of regression). Tumorogenicity and modulator efficacy can be evaluating life-span extension and/or tumor characteristics, including number of tumors, tumor size, tumor morphology, vessel density, apoptotic index, etc.

Diagnostic and therapeutic uses

Specific LRRCAPS-modulating agents are useful in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic applications where disease or disease prognosis is related to defects in the p53 pathway, such as angiogenic, apoptotic, or cell proliferation disorders. Accordingly, the invention also provides methods for modulating the p53 pathway in a cell, preferably a cell pre-determined to have defective or impaired p53 function (e.g. due to overexpression, underexpression, or misexpression of p53, or due to gene mutations), comprising the step of administering an agent to the cell that specifically modulates LRRCAPS activity. Preferably, the modulating agent produces a detectable phenotypic change in the cell indicating that the p53 function is restored. The phrase "function is restored", and equivalents, as used herein, means that the desired phenotype is achieved, or is brought closer to normal compared to untreated cells. For example, with restored p53 function, cell proliferation and/or progression through cell cycle may normalize, or be brought closer to normal relative to untreated cells. The invention also provides methods for treating disorders or disease associated with impaired p53 function by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an LRRCAPS -modulating agent that modulates the p53 pathway. The invention further provides methods for modulating LRRCAPS function in a cell, preferably a cell pre-determined to have defective or impaired LRRCAPS function, by administering an LRRCAPS -modulating agent. Additionally, the invention provides a method for treating disorders or disease associated with impaired LRRCAPS function by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an LRRCAPS -modulating agent.

The discovery that LRRCAPS is implicated in p53 pathway provides for a variety of methods that can be employed for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of diseases and disorders involving defects in the p53 pathway and for the identification of subjects having a predisposition to such diseases and disorders.

Various expression analysis methods can be used to diagnose whether LRRCAPS expression occurs in a particular sample, including Northern blotting, slot blotting, ribonuclease protection, quantitative RT-PCR, and microarray analysis, (e.g., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1994) Ausubel FM et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., chapter 4; Freeman WM et al, Biotechniques (1999) 26:112-125; Kallioniemi OP, Ann Med 2001, 33:142-147; Blohm and Guiseppi-Elie, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2001, 12:41-47). Tissues having a disease or disorder implicating defective p53 signaling that express an LRRCAPS, are identified as amenable to treatment with an LRRCAPS modulating agent. In a preferred application, the p53 defective tissue overexpresses an LRRCAPS relative to normal tissue. For example, a Northern blot analysis of mRNA from tumor and normal cell lines, or from tumor and matching normal tissue samples from the same patient, using full or partial LRRCAPS cDNA sequences as probes, can determine whether particular tumors express or overexpress LRRCAPS. Alternatively, the TaqMan® is used for quantitative RT-PCR analysis of LRRCAPS expression in cell lines, normal tissues and tumor samples (PE Applied Biosystems).

Various other diagnostic methods may be performed, for example, utilizing reagents such as the LRRCAPS oligonucleotides, and antibodies directed against an LRRCAPS, as described above for: (1) the detection of the presence of LRRCAPS gene mutations, or the detection of either over- or under-expression of LRRCAPS mRNA relative to the non- disorder state; (2) the detection of either an over- or an under-abundance of LRRCAPS gene product relative to the non-disorder state; and (3) the detection of perturbations or abnormalities in the signal transduction pathway mediated by LRRCAPS.

Thus, in a specific embodiment, the invention is drawn to a method for diagnosing a disease or disorder in a patient that is associated with alterations in LRRCAPS expression, the method comprising: a) obtaining a biological sample from the patient; b) contacting the sample with a probe for LRRCAPS expression; c) comparing results from step (b) with a control; and d) determining whether step (c) indicates a likelihood of the disease or disorder. Preferably, the disease is cancer, most preferably a cancer as shown in TABLE 2. The probe may be either DNA or protein, including an antibody.

EXAMPLES The following experimental section and examples are offered by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. I. Drosophila p53 screen

The Drosophila p53 gene was overexpressed specifically in the wing using the vestigial margin quadrant enhancer. Increasing quantities of Drosophila p53 (titrated using different strength transgenic inserts in 1 or 2 copies) caused deterioration of normal wing moφhology from mild to strong, with phenotypes including disruption of pattern and polarity of wing hairs, shortening and thickening of wing veins, progressive crumpling of the wing and appearance of dark "death" inclusions in wing blade. In a screen designed to identify enhancers and suppressors of Drosophila p53, homozygous females carrying two copies of p53 were crossed to 5663 males carrying random insertions of a piggyBac tiansposon (Fraser M et al, Virology (1985) 145:356-361). Progeny containing insertions were compared to non-insertion-bearing sibling progeny for enhancement or suppression of the p53 phenotypes. Sequence information surrounding the piggyBac insertion site was used to identify the modifier genes. Modifiers of the wing phenotype were identified as members of the p53 pathway. CAPS was an enhancer of the wing phenotype. Human orthologs of the modifiers are referred to herein as LRRCAPS.

BLAST analysis (Altschul et al., supra) was employed to identify Targets from Drosophila modifiers. Various domains, signals, and functional subunits in proteins were analyzed using the PSORT (Nakai K, and Horton P., Trends Biochem Sci, 1999, 24:34-6; Kenta Nakai, Protein sorting signals and prediction of subcellular localization, Adv. Protein Chem. 54, 277-344 (2000)), PFAM (Bateman A., et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27:260-2), SMART (Ponting CP, et al., SMART: identification and annotation of domains from signaling and extracellular protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan l;27(l):229-32), TM-HMM (Erik L.L. Sonnhammer, Gunnar von Heijne, and Anders Krogh: A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. In Proc. of Sixth Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, p 175-182 Ed J. Glasgow, T. Littlejohn, F. Major, R. Lathrop, D. Sankoff, and C. Sensen Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1998), and clust (Remm M, and Sonnhammer E. Classification of transmembrane protein families in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome and identification of human orthologs. Genome Res. 2000 Nov;10(ll):1679-89) programs. For example, PFAM was employed to determine approximate amino acid locations for the LRR and IG domains of GI#s 11877257, 16157511, 14758126, 5453656, 14764198, and 5729718 (SEQ ID NOs:19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, respectively), as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Approximate amino acid locations for various domains of LRRCAPS polypeptides

π. High-Throughput In Vitro Fluorescence Polarization Assay

Fluorescently-labeled LRRCAPS peptide/substrate are added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate, along with a test agent in a test buffer (10 mM HEPES, 10 M NaCl, 6 mM magnesium chloride, pH 7.6). Changes in fluorescence polarization, determined by using a Fluorolite FPM-2 Fluorescence Polarization Microtiter System (Dynatech Laboratories, Inc), relative to control values indicates the test compound is a candidate modifier of LRRCAPS activity.

III. High-Throughput In Vitro Binding Assay.

³³P-labeled LRRCAPS peptide is added in an assay buffer (100 mM KCI, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 1 mM MgCl₂, 1% glycerol, 0.5% NP-40, 50 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1 mg/ml BSA, cocktail of protease inhibitors) along with a test agent to the wells of a Neutralite-avidin coated assay plate and incubated at 25°C for 1 hour. Biotinylated substrate is then added to each well and incubated for 1 hour. Reactions are stopped by washing with PBS, and counted in a scintillation counter. Test agents that cause a difference in activity relative to control without test agent are identified as candidate p53 modulating agents.

IV. Immunoprecipitations and Immunoblotting

For coprecipitation of transfected proteins, 3 x 10 appropriate recombinant cells containing the LRRCAPS proteins are plated on 10-cm dishes and transfected on the following day with expression constructs. The total amount of DNA is kept constant in each transfection by adding empty vector. After 24 h, cells are collected, washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed for 20 min on ice in 1 ml of lysis buffer containing 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM -glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, protease inhibitors (complete, Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 1% Nonidet P-40. Cellular debris is removed by centrifugation twice at 15,000 x g for 15 min. The cell lysate is incubated with 25 μl of M2 beads (Sigma) for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle rocking.

After extensive washing with lysis buffer, proteins bound to the beads are solubilized by boiling in SDS sample buffer, fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and blotted with the indicated antibodies. The reactive bands are visualized with horseradish peroxidase coupled to the appropriate secondary antibodies and the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

V. Expression analysis

All cell lines used in the following experiments are NCI (National Cancer Institute) lines, and are available from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA 20110-2209). Normal and tumor tissues were obtained from Impath, UC Davis, Clontech, Stratagene, and Ambion. TaqMan analysis was used to assess expression levels of the disclosed genes in various samples.

RNA was extracted from each tissue sample using Qiagen (Valencia, CA) RNeasy kits, following manufacturer's protocols, to a final concentration of 50ng/μl. Single stranded cDNA was then synthesized by reverse transcribing the RNA samples using random hexamers and 500ng of total RNA per reaction, following protocol 4304965 of Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA).

Primers for expression analysis using TaqMan assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were prepared according to the TaqMan protocols, and the following criteria: a) primer pairs were designed to span introns to eliminate genomic contamination, and b) each primer pair produced only one product.

Taqman reactions were carried out following manufacturer's protocols, in 25 μl total volume for 96-well plates and 10 μl total volume for 384-well plates, using 300nM primer and 250 nM probe, and approximately 25ng of cDNA. The standard curve for result analysis was prepared using a universal pool of human cDNA samples, which is a mixture of cDNAs from a wide variety of tissues so that the chance that a target will be present in appreciable amounts is good. The raw data were normalized using 18S rRNA (universally expressed in all tissues and cells).

For each expression analysis, tumor tissue samples were compared with matched normal tissues from the same patient. A gene was considered overexpressed in a tumor when the level of expression of the gene was 2 fold or higher in the tumor compared with its matched normal sample. In cases where normal tissue was not available, a universal pool of cDNA samples was used instead. In these cases, a gene was considered overexpressed in a tumor sample when the difference of expression levels between a tumor sample and the average of all normal samples from the same tissue type was greater than 2 times the standard deviation of all normal samples (i.e., Tumor - average(all normal samples) > 2 x STDEV(all normal samples) ).

Results are shown in Table 2. Number of pairs of tumor samples and matched normal tissue from the same patient are shown for each tumor type. Percentage of the samples with at least two-fold overexpression for each tumor type is provided. "ND" means not done. A modulator identified by an assay described herein can be further validated for therapeutic effect by administration to a tumor in which the gene is overexpressed. A decrease in tumor growth confirms therapeutic utility of the modulator. Prior to treating a patient with the modulator, the likelihood that the patient will respond to treatment can be diagnosed by obtaining a tumor sample from the patient, and assaying for expression of the gene targeted by the modulator. The expression data for the gene(s) can also be used as a diagnostic marker for disease progression. The assay can be performed by expression analysis as described above, by antibody directed to the gene target, or by any other available detection method. Table 2

Claims (25)

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A method of identifying a candidate p53 pathway modulating agent, said method comprising the steps of: a. providing an assay system comprising a purified LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid or a functionally active fragment or derivative thereof; b. contacting the assay system with a test agent under conditions whereby, but for the presence of tlie test agent, the system provides a reference activity; and c. detecting a test agent-biased activity of the assay system, wherein a difference between the test agent-biased activity and the reference activity identifies the test agent as a candidate p53 pathway modulating agent.

2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the assay system comprises cultured cells that express the LRRCAPS polypeptide.

3. The method of Claim 2 wherein the cultured cells additionally have defective p53 function.

4. The method of Claim 1 wherein the assay system includes a screening assay comprising a LRRCAPS polypeptide, and the candidate test agent is a small molecule modulator.

5. The method of Claim 4 wherein the assay is a binding assay.

6. The method of Claim 1 wherein the assay system is selected from the group consisting of an apoptosis assay system, a cell proliferation assay system, an angiogenesis assay system, and a hypoxic induction assay system.

7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the assay system includes a binding assay comprising a LRRCAPS polypeptide and the candidate test agent is an antibody.

8. The method of Claim 1 wherein the assay system includes an expression assay comprising a LRRCAPS nucleic acid and the candidate test agent is a nucleic acid modulator.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the nucleic acid modulator is an antisense oligomer.

10. The method of Claim 8 wherein the nucleic acid modulator is a PMO.

11. The method of Claim 1 additionally comprising: d. administering the candidate p53 pathway modulating agent identified in (c)

. to a model system comprising cells defective in p53 function and, detecting a phenotypic change in the model system that indicates that the p53 function is restored.

12. The method of Claim 11 wherein the model system is a mouse model with defective p53 function.

13. A method for modulating a p53 pathway of a cell comprising contacting a cell defective in p53 function with a candidate modulator that specifically binds to a

LRRCAPS polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, whereby p53 function is restored.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the candidate modulator is administered to a vertebrate animal predetermined to have a disease or disorder resulting from a defect in p53 function.

15. The method of Claim 13 wherein the candidate modulator is selected from the group consisting of an antibody and a small molecule.

16. The method of Claim 1, comprising the additional steps of: e. providing a secondary assay system comprising cultured cells or a non- human animal expressing LRRCAPS , f. contacting the secondary assay system with the test agent of (b) or an agent derived therefrom under conditions whereby, but for the presence of the test agent or agent derived therefrom, the system provides a reference activity; and g. detecting an agent-biased activity of the second assay system, h. wherein a difference between the agent-biased activity and the reference activity of the second assay system confirms the test agent or agent derived therefrom as a candidate p53 pathway modulating agent, i. and wherein the second assay detects an agent-biased change in the p53 pathway.

17. The method of Claim 16 wherein the secondary assay system comprises cultured cells.

18. The method of Claim 16 wherein the secondary assay system comprises a non- human animal.

19. The method of Claim 18 wherein the non-human animal mis-expresses a p53 pathway gene.

20. A method of modulating p53 pathway in a mammalian cell comprising contacting the cell with an agent that specifically binds a LRRCAPS polypeptide or nucleic acid.

21. The method of Claim 20 wherein the agent is administered to a mammalian animal predetermined to have a pathology associated with the p53 pathway.

22. The method of Claim 20 wherein the agent is a small molecule modulator, a nucleic acid modulator, or an antibody.

23. A method for diagnosing a disease in a patient comprising: a. obtaining a biological sample from the patient; b. contacting the sample with a probe for LRRCAPS expression; c. comparing results from step (b) with a control; d. determining whether step (c) indicates a likelihood of disease.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein said disease is cancer.

25. The method according to claim 24, wherein said cancer is a cancer as shown in Table 2 as having >25% expression level.