AU2002310811A1 - Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves - Google Patents
Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube wavesInfo
- Publication number
- AU2002310811A1 AU2002310811A1 AU2002310811A AU2002310811A AU2002310811A1 AU 2002310811 A1 AU2002310811 A1 AU 2002310811A1 AU 2002310811 A AU2002310811 A AU 2002310811A AU 2002310811 A AU2002310811 A AU 2002310811A AU 2002310811 A1 AU2002310811 A1 AU 2002310811A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- time
- shifted
- data
- tube wave
- seismic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Description
REMOVING IRREGULARITIES FROM SEISMIC DATA CAUSED BY TUBE
WAVES
The present invention relates to removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves. Tube waves are sound waves in a borehole. Such tube waves are encountered when a seismic survey is carried out such that the seismic sources or the seismic receivers or both the seismic sources and the seismic receivers are located in a borehole. A disadvantage of tube waves is that the seismic signals from relevant events are mixed with the signals generated by the tube waves, and therefore the valuable information is substantially invisible.
USA patent specification No. 4 992 995 discloses a method for attenuating noise in seismic data. The method comprises obtaining a set of seismic data sorted into gathers of seismic signals, aligning selected coherent events, sorting the gathers in order to disorder the sequential order of the seismic signals in each gather, filtering the disordered gathers with a spatial filter, resorting the filtered signals in their original order, and combining the filtered signals with a respective gather of seismic singles to obtain a gather of seismic signals that is substantially free of unwanted coherent and random noise.
USA patent specification No. 5 237 538 also discloses a method of removing coherent noise from seismic traces. USA patent specification No. 5 392 213 discloses a method for suppressing coherent noise from seismic or borehole data, which method comprises horizontally aligning the traces, comparing the. amplitude, phase and/or shape of neighbouring traces, and subtracting
traces from neighbouring traces only when the local correlation is high.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method that effectively removes the irregularities caused by tube waves.
To this end the method of removing irregularities caused by tube waves from seismic data obtained in a borehole seismic survey, using a first set of transducers (seismic receivers or sources) and a second set of transducers (seismic sources or receivers) and wherein at least the transducers of the first set are arranged in a borehole, according to the present invention comprises the steps as outlined in claim 1.
The invention will now be explained by way of example in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein
Figure 1 shows schematically and not to scale a first configuration of the transducers for application of the method according to the present invention; Figure 2 shows schematically and not to scale a second configuration of the transducers for application of the method according to the present invention;
Figure 3 shows schematically and not to scale a third configuration of the transducers for application of the method according to the present invention;
Figure 4 shows an untreated common receiver gather;
Figure 5 shows the common receiver gather after subjecting the data to a time shifts- Figure 6 shows the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data;
Figure 7 shows the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data after the correlation check;
Figure 8 shows the predicted tube wave data set in the original domain;
Figure 9 shows the common receiver gather of Figure 4* after subtraction of the predicted tube waves; and
Figure 10 shows the final result of applying the- method of the present invention on the common receiver gather of Figure 4.
In order to apply the method according to the present invention there are needed two sets of transducers: a " first set of transducers (seismic receivers or sources) and a second set of transducers (seismic sources or receivers) . The possible configurations of these two sets are now discussed with reference to Figures 1-3.
Reference is now made to Figure 1. The first set of transducers is a set of seismic receivers 10 arranged in a borehole 12 extending from surface 13 into the earth 14 and the second set of transducers is a set of seismic sources 18 arranged at the surface 13.
Reference' is now made to Figure 2. In this Figure the sets are interchanged. The first set of transducers is now a set of seismic sources 20 arranged in a borehole 22 extending from surface 23 into the earth 24, and the second set of transducers is a set of seismic receivers 28 arranged at the surface 23.
Reference is now made to Figure 3. The first set of transducers is a set of seismic sources 30 arranged in a first borehole 32 extending from surface 33 into the earth 34 and the second set of transducers is a set of seismic receivers 38 arranged in a second borehole 39 extending from the surface 33 into the earth 34.
It will be understood that the boreholes 12, 22, 32 and 39 are filled with a liquid, that they need not be vertical and that the boreholes can be cased. The first step of the method of removing irregularities caused by tube waves from seismic data obtained in a borehole seismic survey is obtaining a set of original seismic data pm(t,k), wherein the integer k
refers to the k'th transducer of the first set of transducers and the integer m refers to the m'th transducer of the second set of transducers. The seismic data for a fixed k and m is also called a trace. The original seismic data set pm(k,t) can be grouped in two ways. A first way is to combine for each seismic source a number of traces equal to the number of seismic receivers. When the data are grouped in this way each set of traces is called a common source (or common shot) gather. It will be understood that there are as many different common source gathers as there are seismic sources. However, the data can also be grouped in a different way: for each seismic receiver a number of traces equal to the number of seismic sources. This is called a common receiver gather, and there are as many different common receiver gathers as there are receivers.
The method according to the invention will now be explained with reference to the Figures 1-3.
In the configuration shown in Figure 1, the seismic receivers 10 (the first set of transducers) are arranged in the borehole 12 and the seismic sources 18 (the second set of transducers)' are arranged at the surface 13. The first step of the method according to the present invention is obtaining a set of original seismic data pm(t,k), wherein the integer k refers to the k'th seismic receiver of the set of seismic receivers 10 (the first set) in the borehole 12 and the integer m refers to the m'th seismic source of the set of seismic sources 18 (the second set) . When the seismic receivers are arranged in the borehole, it is convenient to group the original seismic data in a common source gather, thus for each source 18m there are grouped a number of traces, each trace belonging to a receiver 10k, wherein k is in the range of
from 1 to the number of receivers. The number of common source gathers can equal the number of sources .
The method of the present invention removes the effect of tube waves generated in the* borehole 12 in which the seismic receivers 10 are arranged. Thereto the original seismic data set is subjected to a time-shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pm(t, k) is obtained. Then a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter is applied to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, k) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qm(t, k) . The time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is undone to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qm(t,k). Subsequently the predicted tube wave data set qm(t,k) is subtracted from the original seismic data set pm(t,k) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc m(t,k), and the original seismic data set is replaced by the corrected seismic data set. The now original seismic data set (common source gather) has been corrected for tube wave in the borehole 12 having an estimated velocity in one direction, and next a correction is made for a tube wave having this velocity in opposite direction. This is done by repeating the steps that are described in the preceding paragraph. The result of this two-step operation is a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves in the borehole 12 have been removed. An edge-preserving filter is a filter that removes noise and other unwanted components from data without destroying discontinuities in the data, and a structurally oriented filter is an adaptive filter that acts differently in different directions, wherein the
directions are computed from the data. An advantage of an edge-preserving filter is that it does not suppress the first arrival .
Subjecting the data set pm(t,k) to a time-shift to align the tube waves in time is done in accordance with the following equation pm(t, k) = pm(t ± z^ / v-^u e' k) . Undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is done in accordance with the following equation qm(t, k) = qm(t + z^ / v-^ be' k) . In these equations t is time, z^ is the depth along the borehole 12 of receiver k, ^^e is the magnitude of the tube wave velocity, and the plus sign refers to tube waves in one direction and the minus sign to tube waves in the opposite direction. In the configuration shown in Figure 2, the seismic sources 20 (the first set of transducers) are arranged in the borehole 22 and the seismic receivers 28 (the second set of transducers) are arranged at the surface 23. The first step of the method according to the present invention is obtaining a set of original seismic data pm(t,k), wherein the integer k refers to the k'th seismic source of the set of seismic sources 20 (the first set) in the borehole 22 and the integer m refers to the m'th seismic receiver of the set of seismic receivers 28 (the second set) . When the seismic sources are arranged in the borehole, it is convenient to group the original seismic data in a common receiver gather, thus for each receiver 28m there are a number of traces, each trace belonging to a source 20k, wherein k is in the range of from 1 to the number of sources. The number of common receiver gathers can equal the number of receivers . The method of the present invention removes the effect of tube waves generated in ,the borehole 22 in which now the seismic sources 20 are arranged. Thereto
the original seismic data set is subjected to a time- shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pm(t, k) is obtained. Then a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter is applied to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, k) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qm(t, k) . The time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is undone to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qm(t,k). Subsequently the predicted tube wave data set qm(t,k) is subtracted from the original seismic data set pm(t,k) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc m(t,k), and the original seismic data set is replaced by the corrected seismic data set. The now original seismic data set (common receiver gather) has been corrected for tube wave in the borehole 22 having an estimated velocity in one direction, and next a correction is made for a tube wave having this velocity in opposite direction. This is done by repeating the steps that are described in the preceding paragraph. The result of this two-step operation is a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves in the borehole 12 have been removed. Subjecting the data set pm(t,k) to a time-shift to align the tube waves in time is done in accordance with the following equation pm(t, k) = pm(t ± z^ / v^ube' k) . Undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is done in accordance with the following equation qm(t, k) = qm(t + z^ / -j-^ , k) . In these equations, t is time, z^ is the depth along the borehole 22 of source k, v^ube i-s "t-^ιe magnitude of the tube wave velocity, and the plus sign refers to tube
waves in one direction and the minus sign to tube waves in the opposite direction.
Please note that the depth z^ refers to the depth along the borehole of the transducer that is present in the borehole, which is in Figure 1 the seismic receiver and in Figure 2 the seismic source.
In the configuration shown in Figure 3, the seismic sources 30 (the first set of transducers) are arranged in the borehole 32 and the seismic receivers 38 (the second set of transducers) are arranged in the borehole 39. Thus now there are two boreholes in which tube waves occur. The effect of the tube waves in both boreholes has to be removed. Because there are two boreholes, the seismic data can now be grouped in a common source gather or in a common receiver gather. The method now comprises two correction steps. The first correction step is done on the data grouped in a common source gather and the second correction step is done on the corrected data from the first step grouped in a common receiver gather. Please note that the sequence of the correction step is not relevant.
The first step of the method according to the present invention is obtaining a set of original seismic data pm(t,k), wherein the integer k refers to the k'th seismic source of the set of seismic sources 30 (the first set) and the integer refers to the m'th seismic receiver of the set of seismic receivers 38 (the second set) . The data are at first grouped in a common receiver gather, thus for each receiver 38m there are a number of traces, each trace belonging to a source 30k, wherein k is in the range of from 1 to the number of sources. The number of common receiver gathers can equal the number of receivers .
The method of the present invention removes the effect of tube waves generated in the borehole 32 in
which now the seismic sources 30 are arranged. Thereto the original seismic data set is subjected to a time- shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pm(t, k) is obtained.
Then a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter is applied to the time-shifted seismic data set τn( , k) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qm(t, k) . The time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is undone to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qm(t,k). Subsequently the predicted tube wave data set qm(t,k) is subtracted from the original seismic data set pm(t,k) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc m(t,k), and the original seismic data set is replaced by the corrected seismic data set. The now original seismic data set (common receiver gather) has been corrected for tube wave in the borehole 32 having an estimated velocity in one direction, and next a correction is made for a tube wave having this velocity in opposite direction. This is done by repeating the steps that are described in the preceding paragraph. The result of this two-step operation is a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves in the borehole 32 have been removed.
Subjecting the data set pm(t,k) to a time-shift to align the tube waves in time is done in accordance with the following equation pm(t, k) = pm(t +
k) . Undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) is done in accordance with the following equation qm(t, k) = qm(t + z^ / ^ tuber ^l ' in these equations, t is time, z^ is the depth along the borehole 32 of source k, i-s the magnitude of the tube wave velocity, and the plus sign refers to tube
waves in one direction and the minus sign to tube waves in the opposite direction.
Then the tube waves in the borehole 39 are removed. To this end the data are grouped in a common source gather.
The next step is arranging the data in a common source gather, pn(t,l), wherein the integer 1 refers to the 1'th seismic receiver of the set of seismic receivers 38 (the second set) in the borehole 39 and the integer n refers to the n'th seismic source of the set of seismic sources 30 (the first set) . Thus for each source 30n there are a number of traces, each trace belonging to a receiver 381, wherein 1 is in the range of from 1 to the number of receivers . The number of common source gathers can equal the number of sources.
To remove the effect of tube waves in the second borehole 39, hereto the seismic data set previously obtained is subjected to a time-shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pn(t, 1) is obtained.
Then a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter is applied to the time-shifted seismic data set pn(t, 1) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data <in r 1) • τhe time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qn(t, 1) is undone to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qn(t,l). Subsequently the predicted tube wave data set qn(t,l) is subtracted from the original seismic data set pn(t,l) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc n(t,l), and the original seismic data set is replaced by the corrected seismic data set.
The now original seismic data set (common source gather) has been corrected for tube wave in the borehole 12 having an estimated velocity in one
direction, and next a correction is made for a tube wave having this velocity in opposite direction. This is done by repeating the steps that are described in the preceding paragraph. The result of this two-step operation is a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves in the boreholes 32 and 39 have been removed.
Subjecting the data set pn(t,l) to a time-shift to align the tube waves in time is done in accordance with the following equation pn(t, 1) = pn(t + zj_ / ^ e' 1) •
Undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qn(t, 1) is done in accordance with the following equation qn(t, 1) = qn(t + zj_ / v-j-u e 1) • In these equations, t is time, Z_ is the depth along the borehole 39 of receiver 1, v-^u e is the magnitude of the tube wave velocity, and the plus sign refers to tube waves in one direction and the minus sign to tube waves in the opposite direction.
The other steps of the method according to the present invention will now be described by way of example in more detail with reference to Figures 3 and 4-11.
Figure 4 shows a common receiver gather consisting of obtained by activating a set of 64 seismic sources 30 (see Figure 3) arranged in the first vertical borehole 32, the first of the seismic sources 30 was located at a depth of 800 m, and the interval between adjacent seismic sources was 1.9 m. In the second vertical borehole 39, located at a horizontal distance of 130 m from the first borehole 32, a set of 64 seismic receivers 38 were arranged at the same depths as the seismic sources 30. Figure 4 shows the common receiver gather pιc(t,m) obtained for receiver k=59, wherein m=l,...,64. The original seismic data is referred to with reference numeral 40. Clearly visible are the tube
waves 41 and 42. Reference numeral -43 refers to a reflection of a reflector.
The original seismic data set pjc(t,m) is subjected to a time-shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time- shifted data p]ζ(t, m) is obtained. Subjecting the data set to a time shift is governed by the following equation Pk(t, m) = P]*(t ± zm /
m) r wherein the plus sign refers to tube waves moving in one direction, and the minus sign refers to tube waves moving in the opposite direction, wherein zm is the depth along the borehole 39 of receiver m, and wherein v-^ e is the magnitude of the tube wave velocity. Figure 5 shows the common receiver gather after applying the time shift P (t, ) = p]ζ(t - zm / tube' m) / wherein k=59, vtu e=1480 m/s and m=l,...,64. Figure 5 shows clearly that by applying the time shift, the tube waves 50 are aligned in time. Please note that the data shown in Figures 5-7 have a reference time that differs from the reference time used in Figures 4 and 8-10. This was done for practical reasons and it does not affect the overall result.
Next the tube wave data will be predicted so that in the end they can be removed from the original data set . In order to predict the tube wave data a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter is applied to each element of the time-shifted seismic data set P]^(t, m) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qjζOt, m) . In this case k=59 m=l,...,64.
Suitably, applying the structurally oriented, edge- preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, m) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, m) comprises first determining for each element of the data set pm(t, m) the local
orientation of the time-shifted seismic data, which local orientation is the orientation of a plane tangent to the time-shifted seismic data for that element. Then for each element one determines whether there is an edge in its neighbourhood. Finally an averaging operation is carried out for each element of the data set pm(t, m) , wherein the direction of the averaging operation is the local orientation of the data and wherein the averaging operation does not go over the edge, to obtain the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, ) .
Applying the structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, m) to obtain the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, m) suitably comprises first defining a window of nL+nR+1 traces centred on trace m and 2n-(-+l time samples centred on tn=tQ+nΔt, wherein tg is the time at which sampling starts. Then a semblance measure is calculated in accordance with the following equation
l=-nt k=-nL account for variations in the estimated velocity of the tube wave, two further semblance measures S+ and S~ are calculated, wherein the data used to calculate the two further semblance measures is p(t ± αz^, m 4- k) , wherein α is a slowness parameter, and wherein z^ is the distance along the borehole between transducers m and k. Having calculated the three semblance measures the maximum value αmax °f the slowness parameter is calculated. The maximum value of the slowness parameter is calculated as follows: given S^, S+ and S~ a dummy variable ξ is defined, such
that S(ξ=0)=S°, S(ξ=l)=S+, and S(ξ=-l)=S~, then a parabola is fit through these three values, and its maximum Smax=S (ξmax) is computed on the interval [-1,1] for ξ. The maximum value of the slowness parameter then is ccmax= .ξmax. Then the time-shifted tube wave data by taking the median of p(t + αItιaxzιζ, m + k) , wherein - nL k<πR-
To account for abrupt changes in the velocity of the tube waves, the steps discussed in the above paragraph are repeated for three ranges: a left range (L) , wherein nL=nk anc np=0, a central range (C) , wherein nιJ=n] and nR=nk; an a right range (R) , wherein n** J=0 and ^ j^.
This gives SLmax and q-^ , S iαax and qς , and Sj-max and
CJR , respectively. The integer n^ has a predetermined value. Then the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are selected as follows, if Srjmax>ε.max (SLmax, SR ax) then the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are q^ , else, if Sj*>_max>SτJ max then the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are qR , else the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are CJL .
If the semblance measure corresponding to the chosen prediction is smaller than a threshold value Smιn, the predicted tube wave data are set to zero.
Figure 6 shows the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data 60, for n^δ, nt=9, oc=0. 3/^tύbe' ε=0.5 and smin=0. x .
These tube wave data can be transformed by undoing the time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q]*(t, m) to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data q] (t,m) . And these data can be subtracted from the original data to obtain a set of correct original seismic data. However, suitably, a correction is applied on the
time-shifted, predicted tube wave data in order to remove uncorrelated data, because uncorrelated data are considered not to be part of the tube wave data.
Thereto the step of applying a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set PkOt, m) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qj t, m) further comprises correlating for each element of the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data with the time-shifted seismic data set, and removing the less well correlated elements from the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data.
Suitably, correlating the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data with the time-shifted seismic data set, and removing the less well correlated elements from the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data comprises determining a correlation measure and if the correlation measure is less than a predetermined minimum value Cm n, the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are made equal to zero. The correlation measure is suitably nt ∑ p(tn + lΔt, m) .q(tn + iΔt, m) l=-n C(tn, m) = 2 τ
∑ fe2(tn + lΔt, m) + q2(tn + lΔt, m) l=-nt
Figure 7 shows the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data q]ς(t, m) , referred to -with reference numeral 70 after the correlation check with
.3. Then the time shift is undone for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set
m) to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qj (t,m) . Undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q-jt, j) is done in accordance with the following equation
qi( , j) = qi(t + ZJ / v-tubβ' j) i and for the particular case the equation is q]ζ(t, m) = qj^t + zm / -|-uke, m) •
Figure 8 shows the predicted tube wave data set q] (t,m), referred to with reference numeral 80 in the original domain.
Then the predicted tube wave data set q- (t,m) is subtracted from the original seismic data set p]ζ(t,m) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc] (t,m), and the original seismic data set is replaced by the corrected seismic data set.
Then the above-described steps are repeated for a tube wave velocity that is opposite to the tube wave velocity used to obtain the result shown in Figure 9. Then the data are grouped as common source gathers pn(t,l), and the steps as described with reference to Figure 3 for the common source gathers are repeated to remove the effect of tube waves in the borehole 32. The correction was applied with the parameters given above . Then the corrected data are grouped as common receiver gathers and the receiver gather for receiver 59 is shown in Figure 10. Figure 10 shows clearly the effect of the method according to the present invention on the final result of removing the effects of tube waves for the common receiver gather of Figure 4. The method of the present invention includes using a structurally oriented edge-preserving filter, wherein the structurally oriented approach reduces errors due to small variations in the tube wave velocity, and wherein the edge-preserving approach allows proper handling of the start or abrupt changes in the tube waves. Optionally the method includes removing less well correlated elements from the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data. This optional step reduces the chance of removing a true event during the subtraction.
Claims (10)
1. Method of removing irregularities caused by tube waves from seismic data obtained in a borehole seismic survey, using a first set of transducers (seismic receivers or sources) and a second set of transducers (seismic sources or receivers) and wherein at least the transducers of the first set are arranged in a borehole, which method comprises the steps of
(a) obtaining a set of original seismic data pm(t,k), wherein the integer k refers to the k'th transducer of the first set of transducers and the integer m refers to the m'th transducer of the second set of transducers;
(b) subjecting the original seismic data set to a time- shift based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data Pm(tf k) is obtained;
(c) applying a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, k) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qm(t, k) ; (d) undoing the time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qm(t, k) to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qm(t,k);
(e) subtracting the predicted tube wave data set qm(t,k) from the original seismic data set pm(t,k) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pc m(t,k), and replacing the original seismic data set by the corrected seismic data set;
(f) subjecting the set of corrected, original seismic data to a time-shift based on a tube wave velocity opposite to the velocity used in step (b) to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pm(t, k) is obtained; and
(g) repeating steps (c) , (d) and (e) to obtain a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves have been removed.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (c) comprises applying a structurally oriented, edge- preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pm(t, k) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qm(t, k), correlating the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data with the time-shifted seismic data set, and removing the less well correlated elements from the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein also the transducers of the second set of transducers are located in a borehole, which differs from the borehole in which the transducers of the first set are located, which method further comprises the steps of (h) subjecting the set of seismic data obtained in step (i) to a time-shift to based on an estimated tube wave velocity to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pn(t, 1) is obtained, wherein the integer 1 refers to the l'th transducer of the second set and the integer n refers to the n'th transducer of the first set;
(i) applying a structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pn(t, 1) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qn(t, l); (j) undoing the time shift for the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set qn(t, 1) to obtain a set of predicted tube wave data qn(t,l);
(k) subtracting the predicted tube wave data set qn(t,l) from the original seismic data set pn(t,l) to obtain a set of corrected seismic data pCn(t, 1) , and replacing the original seismic data by the corrected seismic data; • (1) subjecting the set of corrected, original seismic data to a time-shift based on a tube wave velocity opposite to the velocity used in step (h) to align the tube waves in time so that a set of time-shifted data pn(t, 1) is obtained, and repeating steps (i) , (j) and (k);
(m) repeating steps (i) through (1) for each transducer 1 of the first set of transducers and for each transducer n of the second set of transducers to obtain a set of seismic data of which irregularities caused by tube waves have been removed.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein step (i) comprises applying a structurally oriented, edge- preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pn(t, 1) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data qn(t, 1), correlating the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data with the time-shifted seismic data set, and removing the less well correlated elements from the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data.
5. The method according to claim any one of the claims 1-4, wherein applying a structurally oriented, edge- preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set pj_(t, j) to obtain a set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q_(t, j) comprises the steps of:
1) determining for each element of the data set pj_(t, j) the local orientation of the time-shifted seismic data, which local orientation is the orientation of a plane tangent to the time-shifted seismic data for that element;
2) determining for each element whether there is an edge in its neighbourhood; and 3) carrying out an averaging operation for each element of the data set pj_(t, j) , wherein the direction of the averaging operation is the local orientation of the data and wherein the averaging operation does not go over the edge, to obtain the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q-j_(t, j) .
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein applying the structurally oriented, edge-preserving filter to the time-shifted seismic data set Pj_(t, j) to obtain the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q-j_(t, j) comprises the steps of:
(1) defining a window of nL+nR+1 transducers centred on transducer j and 2^+1 time samples centred on tn=tQ+nΔt, wherein tg is the time at which sampling starts; (2) calculating a semblance measure in accordance with the following equation
l=-nt k=-nL calculating two further semblance measures S+ and S~ wherein the data used to calculate the two further semblance measures is p(t ± z^, j + k) , wherein α is a slowness parameter, and wherein ZJ is the distance along the borehole between transducers j and k and determining the slowness parameter max that pertains to the maximum of S+, S® and S~, and calculating time-shifted tube wave data by taking the median of p(t + ocmaxzj, JQ + k) , wherein
-nL<k<np_;
(3) repeating step (1) for a left range (L) , wherein nL=rιk anc*- nR=0, a central range (C) , wherein n*rJ=n]ζ and nR=nk anc °r a right range (R) , wherein n-r^O and nj-^n^ to obtain SLmax and CJL , S max and qς , and SR ιnax and qR , respectively, wherein n^ is a predetermined integer; and (4) selecting the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data as follows, if Sc max>ε.max (SL max, SR max) then the time- shifted, predicted tube wave data are q^ , else, if
SR max>S*rJ ax then the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are qR , else the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are q-^ , wherein ε is a predetermined constant.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein if the semblance measure selected in step (4) is less than a minimum value the time-shifted, predicted tube wave data are made equal to zero.
8. The method according to claims 2 or 4, wherein correlating the set of time-shifted, predicted tube wave data with the time-shifted seismic data set, and removing the less well correlated elements from the set of time- shifted, predicted tube wave data comprises determining a correlation measure and if the correlation measure is less than a predetermined minimum value, the time- shifted, predicted tube wave data are made equal to zero.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the correlation measure is nt ∑ p(tn + lΔt, j) .q(tn + lΔt, j)
10. The method according to any one of the claims 1-9, wherein subjecting a data set pj_(t,j) to a time-shift to align the tube waves in time is done in accordance with the following equation pj_(t, j) = pj_(t ± ZJ / ^tuber J) r wherein
Z is the depth along the borehole of transducer j , and wherein v-*-ube is the magnitude of the tube wave velocity, and wherein undoing the time shift for a time-shifted, predicted tube wave data set q-j_(t, j) is done in accordance with the following equation qj_(t, j) = qj_(t + ZJ / v^u e' j) •
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP01304236 | 2001-05-11 | ||
| EP01304236.1 | 2001-05-11 | ||
| PCT/EP2002/005085 WO2002093196A1 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2002-05-06 | Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2002310811A1 true AU2002310811A1 (en) | 2003-05-01 |
| AU2002310811B2 AU2002310811B2 (en) | 2006-05-18 |
Family
ID=8181964
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2002310811A Ceased AU2002310811B2 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2002-05-06 | Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6856912B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1389309B1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2002310811B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2446270C (en) |
| NO (1) | NO20034982D0 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002093196A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7614302B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2009-11-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Acoustic fluid analysis method |
| US7874362B2 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2011-01-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determination of downhole pressure while pumping |
| US9103203B2 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2015-08-11 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireless logging of fluid filled boreholes |
| DE102007019103A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-30 | Institut für geowissenschaftliche Gemeinschaftsaufgaben | Method for seismic measurement of subsurface, involves setting geophones on earth surface at different distances of acoustic source, where acoustic source in borehole radiate waves |
| US8570834B2 (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2013-10-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of acoustic ranging |
| MX2013011206A (en) * | 2011-04-01 | 2014-03-31 | Halliburton Energy Serv Inc | Improved time-based processing of broadband borehole acoustic data. |
| US20140078864A1 (en) * | 2012-09-17 | 2014-03-20 | David Fraga Freitas | Intra-bed source vertical seismic profiling |
| CN107255836B (en) * | 2017-07-13 | 2019-02-05 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Multi-component earthquake data filtering method based on vector mixing distance-taxis |
| CN113219539B (en) * | 2020-02-05 | 2022-08-30 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Method and device for removing borehole wave interference in optical fiber acoustic sensing seismic data |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4208732A (en) * | 1972-05-11 | 1980-06-17 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Apparatus and method for enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio in seismic data |
| US4992995A (en) * | 1989-10-24 | 1991-02-12 | Amoco Corporation | Methods for attenuating noise in seismic data |
| US5237538A (en) * | 1992-02-20 | 1993-08-17 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for removing coherent noise from an array of seismic traces |
| US5392213A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1995-02-21 | Exxon Production Research Company | Filter for removal of coherent noise from seismic data |
| US5572483A (en) | 1995-07-25 | 1996-11-05 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method of reducing noise in seismic signals by adaptive filtering of a noise reference |
| GB9800142D0 (en) * | 1998-01-07 | 1998-03-04 | Anadrill Int Sa | Seismic detection apparatus and method |
| US6951262B2 (en) * | 2002-03-05 | 2005-10-04 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Method and apparatus for suppressing waves in a borehole |
-
2002
- 2002-05-06 EP EP02735347A patent/EP1389309B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-05-06 US US10/477,296 patent/US6856912B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-05-06 WO PCT/EP2002/005085 patent/WO2002093196A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-05-06 CA CA2446270A patent/CA2446270C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-05-06 AU AU2002310811A patent/AU2002310811B2/en not_active Ceased
-
2003
- 2003-11-10 NO NO20034982A patent/NO20034982D0/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5572483A (en) | Method of reducing noise in seismic signals by adaptive filtering of a noise reference | |
| US8990053B2 (en) | Method of wavelet estimation and multiple prediction in full wavefield inversion | |
| CA2829765C (en) | Simultaneous wavelet extraction and deconvolution in the time domain | |
| US20150168573A1 (en) | Geologic quality factor inversion method | |
| US8315124B2 (en) | System and method for suppression of seismic multiple reflection signals | |
| WO1997020235A1 (en) | Method of monitoring quality of seismic data processing and method of processing vertical seismic profile data | |
| AU2002310811A1 (en) | Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves | |
| EP1389309A1 (en) | Removing irregularities from seismic data caused by tube waves | |
| Xin et al. | Robust Q tomographic inversion through adaptive extraction of spectral features | |
| EA004486B1 (en) | Ground roll attenuation method | |
| Verschuur et al. | Multiple removal results from Delft University | |
| CN105572735B (en) | A kind of method and device for improving pre-stack depth migration imaging precision | |
| Yilmaz et al. | A robust xt domain deghosting method for various source/receiver configurations | |
| Kriegerowski et al. | Event couple spectral ratio Q method for earthquake clusters: application to northwest Bohemia | |
| Herman et al. | Analysis and removal of multiply scattered tube waves | |
| Krohn et al. | Vibroseis productivity: shake and go | |
| Golikov* et al. | Building near-surface models with velocity inversions and evaluating their impact on depth imaging | |
| Abbasi et al. | Attenuating long-period multiples in short-offset 2D streamer data: Gulf of California | |
| CN113064205B (en) | Fresnel zone constrained shallow water multiple attenuation method | |
| Wang et al. | Challenges and strategies of interbed multiple attenuation in the Asia-Pacific region | |
| CN111722286B (en) | Random function median filtering technique | |
| Telling et al. | Evaluation of a broadband marine source | |
| Rebel et al. | Real-time detection of microseismic events using surface array | |
| Alexandrov et al. | Improving land seismic repeatability with virtual source redatuming: synthetic case study | |
| Nadri et al. | Tube Wave removal from vertical seismic profiling (VSP) surveys |