AU2002228478A1 - A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream - Google Patents

A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream

Info

Publication number
AU2002228478A1
AU2002228478A1 AU2002228478A AU2002228478A AU2002228478A1 AU 2002228478 A1 AU2002228478 A1 AU 2002228478A1 AU 2002228478 A AU2002228478 A AU 2002228478A AU 2002228478 A AU2002228478 A AU 2002228478A AU 2002228478 A1 AU2002228478 A1 AU 2002228478A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
sorbent
mercury
cfl
gas stream
oxidator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2002228478A
Other versions
AU2002228478B2 (en
Inventor
Joseph Jan Peter Biermann
Nicolaas Voogt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CDEM Holland BV
Original Assignee
CDEM Holland BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from NL1017206A external-priority patent/NL1017206C2/en
Application filed by CDEM Holland BV filed Critical CDEM Holland BV
Publication of AU2002228478A1 publication Critical patent/AU2002228478A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2002228478B2 publication Critical patent/AU2002228478B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream
The present invention relates to a method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream. The invention re¬ lates also to a sorbent comprising sorbed mercury. The invention also relates to a moulded object obtained with such a sorbent.
As already known, mercury is very harmful to the environment, even in low concentrationsConsequently, there is a need for a suitable method for removing mercury from a gas stream. Such methods are known in the art. In this respect it is important to discriminate between metallic mercury and ionogenic mercury. Both components are present in the gas stream from incineration processes involving mercury-containing materials.
In practice, the removal of metallic mercury from such a gas stream has been shown to be especially difficult. In particular for the removal of metallic mercury, the general practice is to use activated carbon, whereby the mercury is effectively adsorbed on the solid phase of the activated carbon. This known method, however, has a considerable drawback. In order to achieve acceptable removal percentages, it is necessary for the sorption on activated carbon to be carried out at a relatively low temperature. Especially if the gases to be cleaned have a high temperature, for example, if they originate from an incineration process, the gas must first be cooled before it is contacted with the activated carbon, allowing sorption to take place and finally, their temperature has to be raised again for a subsequent treatment or before discharge into the air. Naturally this requires much energy. For cooling purposes, water is sometimes injected into the gas stream, which may, moreover, give rise to corrosion problems. Another drawback is that the mercury-comprising carbon has to be disposed off to, in general, a controlled landfill site. Reuse of the material is hardly possible. A further additional drawback of the use of activated carbon is that the fly-ash from the incineration process are polluted with undesirable amounts of carbon, negatively influencing the quality of the fly-ash and se- riously impeding the recycling of these polluted fly ashes in, for example, the cement industry.
A need therefore exists for an improved method for the removal of mercury, and preferably of metallic mercury, from gas streams. The characteristics particular to mercury are a complicating factor to this problem. At low temperatures it is liquid, it is very volatile and has a very low dew point.
It is a particular object of the invention to provide an improved method, by which mercury of both the ionogenic and the metallic type can be sorbed at high temperatures, for example, at a temperature above 170°C.
The temperature values mentioned below are temperature values that have been corrected with respect to the values mentioned in the priority document. The origi- nally mentioned values were incorrect due to measurement deviations and where relevant, are placed in parenthesis below.
Preferably the temperature is higher than 230°C [300] , especially higher than 300°C [500] , more preferably higher than 450°C [700] , more preferably still higher than 550°C [800] . The object of the invention is in particular to provide a method by which mercury can be sorbed in such a manner that the mercury-comprising sorbent is re-usable. The sorbent according to the invention is understood to be a solid substance.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a method by which mercury of both the ionogenic as well as the metallic type can be removed substantially completely from a gas stream. In order to achieve at least one of the above- mentioned objectives, the invention provides a method as mentioned in the preamble, which is characterized in that at a temperature above 170°C, the gas stream is contacted with a sorbent that as the active component is comprised of a mixture of mainly silica-alumina compounds and/or calcium compounds .
According to a first preferred embodiment, the sorbent comprises kaolin, that may or may not be in the dehydrated form of meta-kaolin. According to a further preferred embodiment, the sorbent comprises calcium carbonate and/or calcium oxide. The calcium fraction of the sorbent typically consists of 60 - 70% of calcium carbon- ate and 40 - 30% of calcium oxide. The sorbent may also contain calcium hydroxide. The presence of calcium hydroxide does not improve the sorbent' s efficienccy further. Typically, the amount of Ca(OH)2 is less than 10% by weight . According to another preferred embodiment, the sorbent is obtained by the thermal conversion of a material chosen from 1. paper waste and 2. residue from the paper production.
By means of such a sorbent the mercury is sorbed chemically, so that in order to remove the mercury, the hot gas streams may be contacted with the sorbent without prior cooling. This results in a considerable saving of energy and has advantages with regard to the installation. According to the invention, the temperature of the gas stream is at least 170°C, preferably at least
230°C [300], especially at least 300°C [500], more preferably at least 450°C [700], still more preferably at least 550°C [800] . Raising the temperature results in an improved sorption of the mercury. By appropriately choosing the amount of sorbent, it becomes possible to reduce the mercury content in the gas stream to below the legal requirements.
In order to further improve the removal of mercury from a gas stream, the sorbent and/or the mercury- containing gas stream is contacted with an oxidator chosen from, for example, sulphate compounds, peroxide, and chlorine compounds. The oxidator is preferably a hypochlorite, for example, calcium hypochlorite (Ca(C10)2). The oxidator may be added to the sorbent prior to adding the sorbent to the gas stream to be scrubbed. Surprisingly, when the sorbent is heated together with the oxidator, the sorbent is shown to have an enhanced effect. This enhanced effect is maintained even after the remaining oxidator has been removed. In this manner, it is thus possible to produce a further improved sorbent.
The oxidator may be added to the sorbent prior to the introduction of the sorbent into the gas stream. The oxidator may also be added to the mercury-containing gas stream preceding the sorbent or at the position of the sorbent. Suitable oxidators already present in the flue gases from mercury-emitting incineration processes may have a similar improved effect, so that none or fewer of these compounds need to be added to the waste gas stream. Reference is made to the German patent publication DE-A 4 339 777. This publication also discloses the use of an oxidator for the removal of mercury from a gas stream. The sorbent described in this publication consists of activated carbon or of a molecular sieve, which is treated with a mercury compound. According to the present invention, such a mercury-loaded pre-treatment is not required, which results in considerable savings and, of course, an improved mercury sorption capacity. According to a working hypothesis used by the inventors, the functionality of the oxidator as added in accordance with the invention is not based exclusively on the oxidation of the mercury in the gas stream, but also on the preceding or in situ activation of the sorbent. The mercury-comprising sorbent obtained after the sorption of mercury may be re-used, for example, for immobilisation or cementation involved in the production of e.g. form-retaining products. Applications may be found, among others, in road construction and the construction of public utilities. Of course, other applications are equally well possible. These applications are possible in particular due to the stable bond of the sorbed mercury in the loaded sorbent, which prevents the possibility of er-
Ω rt H- 3 rt rt 3 rt TJ Ω Φ CD O fu <! Ω Cfl rt rt TJ H- Cfl TJ rt <! Cfl rt DJ φ φ Λ rt tr Ω d d 3 H- 0 t O tr hi O X d σ 0) o rt 3" U hi 3 rt 0) 0) Φ o H- Ω 3 3 d " O d hi hf 3 rt u d hi H- 3 Ω Ω rt o hi 3 H Φ Φ O ιQ hi TJ μ- 3 hi O Ω rt rt H- Φ 3 hi
Φ rt Φ SD rt Cfl o O Ω o ιQ <! H- Cfl Φ Q, Φ Φ f-1 rt tr 3 O hi d •
^ h-1 Ω d hi Φ d ^ O φ O H- fu fu Φ d 0) CU hi H- Φ hj Φ d s: H- Φ 3 3' ιQ 3 O 3 H- d Cfl 3 σ X Ω 3 s: O 3 PJ 0- Ω Q. 3 tr I—1
0) 3 o Cu H Ϊ-T rt rt H- φ 3 3 fl rt o 0J rt ? TJ H- 3 rt P- o Φ Φ φ
CO p. ιQ Hi *< O O H <i hi sQ φ O H- <! 3 3 Ω hj rt • Cfl 3 tr X rt CD
F- 0) hi ft) Cu Φ Ω 3 φ Cfl Φ •ϋ H- 0 0 O l-T rt O ιQ TJ Φ TJ s; Ω n Ω ω ι-3 tr tr H- 3 rt h-1 H- 3 rt X 0 M Cfl s: 3 > f-3 i-T* hi Hi φ Φ tr
Φ Cu SD o Φ tr Φ H- •<: 0J Φ H- • h <i 3 Φ 3 Ό d hi tr DJ hi rt H- tr o Ω Φ H-
3 rt co tr rt φ SD O l-1 hi o Φ 0J φ hi Ω Cfl Φ Φ rt Φ O Cfl Φ hi rt 3 3
O Φ rt 3' TS tr Cfl 3 ω H Ω 3 hi 3 hi 3 hh Φ rt H- rt O Hi h-1 H- hi Φ Φ ιP
<! p. hi Φ hj H- tr d d ^ d Φ H- H- H- rt O Cfl Φ Cfl H- hj Φ μ- H- fU rt 3 φ P. 3
Φ Φ rt Φ Cfl (- hi O H- hj Ω- 3 rt Φ H- hj Ω 3 H- O tr hj 3 C0 rt 3J sQ hh rt f— Φ Hi p. F- £D 1—1 3' Cfl Φ H- f-h rt 0J ^ Φ h! O H T3 3 3 Φ Φ <! Φ Φ O * < H hi
3 3 Φ Φ ? H 3 SU <J Cfl 3 O 3 rt h1- Φ υ3 3 3 φ o O cn H Φ Ω O s: CO 3 3 ιQ H- σ 0J Ω O rt sQ hh Φ 3* σ H hj rt Ω 3 tr H- O Φ 3" d 3
H- H3 H- & 3 rt O Ω ** O (- H- O hi Cfl Φ hi Φ Φ 0) OJ Φ ^ Φ rt rt rt 3 hj ^ 3 H- hj rt P> 3 o φ ≤ O 3 Φ h-1 3 σ 3 O rt CD H- fu O < tr Φ ιQ * rt tr tT s; rt H- 3 3 H" O P> Ω Φ 0) 3 Cfl O d ? H- O rt O H- Φ Φ rt hi 3" t h-1 rt Cfl SD 3 rt Φ ιQ f-h tr Φ 3 Ω o O H- hi 3 fi σ O 3 3 &) 3 3" Ω CU φ rt- Φ tr h-1 rt rt £D £U Φ O 3 rt Hi O cπ H hi 3 Φ O d rt Φ rt Φ d rt 3
Φ rt O O H- 3 hi φ rt H- 3 O cr Ό s: φ > 0) s: 3 H- 3 hi Φ P. hi
Φ 3J H- 3 H- H- H s: ? rt o Φ rt rt 3 H- 3 H- O O Φ H- ^ Φ
<| Φ Ω 3 Ω H- 3 Ω α * 0) DJ Φ CU O 3 H- 3J ι-3 F- 3 h-1 tr d 3 H 3 TJ rt d
£U H- SD Φ O 3 ιQ Φ ω rt Cfl H- rt O Φ 3' fD Cfl Φ Φ H ^ f-1 Ω <i H- Φ 3" CO
H- fl hi 3 PJ rt 3 ιQ 3 rt d H- 3 rt 3 Φ 3 & X £li d Φ fl hj Φ φ p. H- Φ 3 fu <! rt φ φ Ω O d Cfl H- O rt α o H- (B 3 01 Φ Cfl hj 3 CU P. rt O hj p. -1 Φ Cfl 3J i hi ? 3 Cfl o 3 3J O d 3 d 3 σ d o (-• hi rt Φ Ω 3 o φ hi ιQ Cπ Φ hh rt φ 3 rt • M O α •< rt hi rt n o tr TJ s; 3 3 ^« P- Φ d O hh φ 03 H- H- rt £D d H- 0) & •b O Ω rt rt hi H Φ o φ O 3 hi hj TJ d hj o Ω 3 3 hi 3 3 rt 3 O rt 3 3- r O rt Φ tr rt tr 3 il) 3 o φ tr TJ rt rt φ ^ 3 ϋ> 3 Φ ^ H- CU Φ H- φ 0 Φ Φ o O & tr • Φ 3J J. rt 3 <i Φ h- ' t-T Φ o 3 3 O hi 3 H hi dd O rt O 3 hj T3 hh d Φ o Φ H- Q, Cu φ rt 3 H-
Φ 3 TS o ιQ Φ >< d Ω $, sQ ^ Φ O 3 fu b Ω (H Ω hi Ω O M 0- tr rt Ω J φ o Φ hi Cfl d j N rt h-1 , — , φ d rt o 3 Φ 3 Φ rt 3 o O Cu
CA Φ hj H- Ω H ω Φ 3 !-r σ H1 00 H hi Φ hh φ 0- OJ O 0) Φ tr O h rt H- rt
3 3 Ω
O 1-5 H- o H- d O 1 * Φ hi φ Φ H- o DJ 3 hi Ω Ω TJ rt H Cfl H-
H 0) 3 Ω hj 3 I-1 1 rt 0) rt Ω o rt rt o Ω P- hi Ω H 0) hi o H- O
Φ tr rt 3 φ 3 O O Ω Φ DJ . Cfl 3J d s: r d 3 Ω H- O O &) H- Φ 3 cn Ω φ l
£ 3 rt 3 ιQ hi O rt !- d Φ Ω 3 H P- 25 rt hi rt O tr H tr 3 h-1 tr Cf
3 f-j rt hi φ Φ H- 3 Φ h-1 ι-3 hi o φ Φ rt tr1 0J ^ O 3 Φ d o Φ J rt Hi PJ * rt Φ Cfl SD hi H 3 p. •θ hi H- 3' φ H- 3 H ι-3 3- H- <! H- Ω < &. rt tr O hi
. r+ Ω 3 H- Φ hj 3 Ω H- 3 Ό Ω 3J H- f-1 3 9> CD Φ 3 Φ Φ Φ Φ d øj ι-3
SD f ιQ hi d φ 3 rt o H- 3 hj H- LQ • tr CO 3 Ω J
H- d Ω • H- H- Cl ι-3 rt ι-3 o hi rt Cfl 3 3 σ O H- hi tr o 3 ≤ Cfl 3 • h- ' P. rt Φ
3J P •< 3" 3 ω H- Φ Φ ^ H- O <: sQ rt φ 1 1 ιQ CU H- rt H3 rt o Φ
Φ s: Φ H- Φ rt 3 hi Φ 3 H- fu 3J 00 0J Cfl O 3 O H- 3" rt O &> rt hi O
3' SD H- Cfl hi SD ιQ Ω <! 3 ιQ 3 Cfl Φ PJ Cfl (- rt 3 o rt Φ t 0- O H- rt
H- rt ω Ω 3 σ d H- φ iQ M H- o d ω Φ hi rt 3" Φ OJ Φ N Cu
TS TJ
Φ Ω Φ Φ 3J H- α tr Φ tr
TJ s: 1 ιQ ^ hi Ω JD 0) 3 Cfl ιQ α • Ω O Hi hi 3J 3 i— ' SD hj ft) ^* Φ 3 3 rt rt 0J " sQ hj Φ Cϋ 3 3 O φ P- I—
Ω •ϋ • CO Q- 3J rt hi Cfl O H 31 0) O p. <1 φ o O φ
H- Φ <; *< fl
Φ 3 Φ Φ rt P- Φ 3" φ Hi 3 DJ ø) CO 3 Φ Φ rt hj o H tr
3 Φ hi . Φ rt ι-3 ω o rt Φ 0) <i 1 3 3 3" tr hi Φ
P • rt hj £D hi 3' Hi 3" 3 1 1 1 O 1 tr 1 1 1 1 1 φ φ Φ 1
age of captured mercury shown in Table 1 was calculated by dividing the difference between the ingoing mercury concentration and the outgoing mercury concentration by the ingoing mercury concentration. The mercury was fed to the gas stream at 100°C by means of a Dynacal permeation tube, as known in the art. The nitrogen was preheated. Subsequently the mixed gas stream was heated to the temperature indicated in Table 1, after which it was lead through the sorption bed and subsequently to the analyser described above in order to measure whether any, and if so how much, mercury was still present in the gas stream.
The amounts of mercury used in the experiments are compatible with the sensitivity of the analyzer.
Figure 1 shows a graphical illustration of the results obtained from the experiments. The decline in sorption at temperatures in the range from 50 to 230 °C [500] probably indicates an influence of physical sorption. The contribution of physical sorption decreases with rising temperatures, with the consequence that the total sorption also decreases. At higher temperatures the chemical sorption clearly dominates and the total sorption increases. It is observed that with the sorbent for mercury used in the art, activated carbon, there is also a negative trend in the total sorption at rising temperatures. At temperatures above approximately 200°C, sorption with activated carbon has decreased to a negligible value
Table 1:
From Table 1 it can be seen that with an increase in temperature, the sorption of mercury by means of the sorbent according to the invention is enhanced.
The original uncorrected values were as follows:
Figure 2 shows a graph of the activity of the sorbent according to the invention as a function of the temperature, and compared to some of the sorbents known in the prior art. The difference between the sorbent according to the invention and the group of other sorbents can clearly be seen, especially the difference in behaviour at elevated temperatures: at temperatures above 200°C the sorbent according to the invention has a much improved sorption, while the known agents exhibit an increasingly reduced adsorption.
The foregoing Table 1 and the Figures 1 and 2 show that the sorption of mercury on the sorbent according to the invention is of the chemical type. This means in effect that the mercury is substantially irreversibly sorbed on the sorbent. Therefore, the chance of the mercury being removed from the sorbent after use of the sorbent, is negligible. This is confirmed by means of temperature-programmed dissociation measurements carried out on the mercury-loaded sorbents according to the present invention with the aid of thermogravimetrical and differential thermal analysis (TGA/DTA) under a flow of nitrogen gas coupled to a detection of mercury possibly removed from the sorbent in the gaseous form with the aid of the above mentioned "Buck" analyzer. From now on the TGA/DTA
Cfl Φ 3" h-1 tr £U Ω "_ Ω ω hj £D H- TS Ω Hi rt CD rt SD rt Cfl rt Ω Φ rt fl 3 rt rt hi rt ft C Hi rt φ JxJ Cu o >< Ω H- H- Φ o Φ Ω 3 CD O O tr Ω O tr O d tr d 3 tr o Φ tr μ- SD tr φ hi o Φ
3 TJ ft 3 TJ rt SD lQ a o 3 Ω Cfl 3 hj φ tr t-1 Ω Φ hj rt Φ hj SD Φ o tr SD 3 o hi Ω
Ω Φ vQ o H- rt d rt o o O rt fl TJ H- Ω Φ rt tr << σ 3 3 rt μ- s3 3 31
Φ hj 3 Ω <! Φ H SD O <i hi 3" Φ H Φ ua Φ O tr 3 1 SD hh Φ fl ι-3 ^ Ω 3 CD 3
H- O O tr H- Φ iQ CD ft H- Cfl H- X SD ! 3 SD φ SD SD Ω Ω SD 3 Q d •^ rt μ-
O 3 rt H- h-1 rt Ω Φ H H- co Cfl CD CO Φ rt 3 Cfl 3 O Ω Ω rt O S tr TS ^α μ- tQ
Hi φ 3 o ^ O > CO (J1 3 hh H- 3 ft Cu 0 μ- d 3 o rt Hi ^ Φ o d S o d
3 hi Ω hj 3 • o s3 ιQ 3 H 3 TS CO •«» Ω d 3 μ- Hi rt j Ω α hj d rt tr 3 Φ rt rt Φ Φ H- O TJ > o o SD SD O U2 rt rt 3 <! ι-3 3 Cu CD ft rt SD HI ι-3 Ω 3 O ts tr SD Cu rt Hi h-1 rt Hi Cfl rt 3 3 Φ hi Hi H- rt φ 3' Ω μ- μ- tr 3 Q d ft μ- • o s3
Φ (-' Ω tr Φ Φ • O 3 tr •» Φ 0 3 3 Φ Ω rt 3 3 SD > hi rt co » 3 μ- rt Φ rt rt fl h-1 H- Φ rt φ CD hi iQ O rt φ d μ- ιQ rt tr \ CU ^ rt Φ tr H-1 tr Cfl Φ Φ s: 3" Φ d o O 3 rt hi tr ft σ 3 Hi μ- Cfl 3 hj 3 φ O 3 O φ H rt M
>< φ ft 3 (D Φ H Ω O rt Ω - Φ ^ ^ Φ rt o 0 φ Φ ιQ rt rt 3 CD μ- TJ hi 3 tr
TS rt Cfl • tr o\o tr H Φ CO SD X 3J O 3 hi 3 O tr Cfl > h-1 co rt Φ CO r+ μ- tr o 1 ss Ω CO • •* φ Φ tr rt s: TJ rt SD Φ QJ TS rt O Cfl Φ φ !< tr hi "• i-i cn Φ
Ω d H- o TJ O rt H SD H- O O 3- 3 (- 3 rt SD hh O rt φ SD N CO φ SD O tr T5 rt ϋ hi hi H Φ SD CO 3 s: TJ Φ SD CD Ts 3 Ω SD μ- rt hj tr 3 3 3 Φ φ rt H ft rt SD tr TJ O tr rt 3 CO rt Φ <! φ 3 Ω -1 φ H- ^ o μ- 3 tr φ Φ SD H φ CO d CΛ C Φ CD o tr h-1 h-1 φ 5 Φ ft Φ ft rt H- TJ φ hi d 3 o o Φ hj rt h-1 3 o hi W O Ω CO hi •< rt φ O 3 s: Φ Ω 3 3 tr rt 3 O "«« Ω 3 tr 3 d 3 TS Ω O >< O H Φ S rt tr d
H- 3J rt 3 rt SD hj SD TJ Hi rt ft hi - ιQ CO d Φ o -1 rt hj d CO 3 rt tr Cfl μ- 3 3 rr 3 Φ Φ lQ CO SD 3 Φ hj H- tr O Φ H- σ H - h ft φ hj ft μ- O Φ o O μ- Φ
Φ Φ h-1 Φ rt rt hj O O CD d rt rt • < ^ Hi Φ 3 CO *< μ- Cfl 3 O J-. 3 ft
C CO ^ ft tr Cfl d tr SD 3 3 rt sQ 3 tr H- S d 3 ft SD φ co ^ tr rt Hi h-1 d
(D 3 O CD tr hj Φ rt ^« tr Φ φ O H- SI o hj Φ < 3 tr μ- CD Φ rt Φ rt h O hj ft Φ rt o Φ d CD SD hj 3 3 H- Ω rt hj S rt μ- 3 rt rt SD CD ω O O rt tr H- <! s3 O CO H TJ rt rt rt Ω tr rt rt tr tr Ω H tr 3 rt tr TS Ω tr o Ω
Φ O Φ O Φ ≤; 3 φ Φ TS O tr d ^ d hj 3J Φ d o Φ μ- ft Φ Φ rt hj Ω o IV) •-a SD tr hi Hi 3 Cfl 3 CD "> rt φ CO hj SD φ hj TJ TS O o hj hj ft 3 Cfl ιQ Φ Φ o 0 ω tr 3 Φ rt O Cfl tr 3 o ≤ 3 < o ω ft rt hj d H <i hj 3 3 Cfl hi Φ o Φ rt rt Ω SD tr Φ SD H- tr 1 Ω rt d tr μ- μ- Ω Φ Φ rt SD μ- TJ Φ ft σ> tr tr tr w tr H- Hi TJ O Hi H H- rt Φ Φ Ω tr hj Ω Φ rt 3 o rt 1 3 tr rt 3 Φ 3 μ- O • S Φ 3
Φ Φ Φ SD rt -1 s: r hi O 3 Λ ft O h-1 Φ H- Φ TS 3 CO d rt μ- Φ Φ hi rt 3 O SD O
H- rt Φ SD Φ * o o SD σs d 3 o SD 3 Cfl hi Cfl μ- CO H C sQ σ 3 1— Hi s
Ω ιQ 3 Φ hi Ω <! TJ 3 rt o CU TJ hj 3 iQ O rt o rt O Φ o SD rt μ- o t o 3
0 SD sQ ft Φ Φ o TJ Φ h-1 H hi H- hj o <! tr hj ft 3 CO ι-3 H d 3 rt o Φ ^ d
M Cfl ^ rt ft hi Ω rt hi H ιQ X H- rt Hi 3J tr Φ φ rt tr hi 0 ** fl 3 3
TJ hi - 3" tr O ^ hi SD TS CO Φ hj • : Φ rt ft 3 μ- H Φ Cfl Φ rt φ SD ft S
V-1 Cfl Φ tr Φ ft h-1 φ ft SD 3 Φ H- O TJ 3 tr Cfl μ- Hi Cfl o rt CO ^ rt 3 h-α ^ O φ rt 3 • O rt o d h-1 3 O H 3 O 3 o rt Φ tr o 3 O 3 Ω H Φ tr φ 3 ^ hi rt hi o TJ tr ≤: tr hj hj Ω H* CO d H- ιQ 3 Ω . H φ hj rt sQ O d SD Φ hi Φ CO Hi Φ
H- Φ <l o •< 3 (D H- φ φ o\° 3 3 rt tr Cfl tr hj -r h-" 3 Ω rt O Ω SD μ- o
O SD Φ Ω TJ CO rt rt CO ft rt Φ ιQ rt tr ι-3 O SD Φ C Φ Cu ^ O rt Hi TJ d Cfl O hj ft
3 3 ft ^ O rt Φ d rt rt 3 SD 3J Φ o tr hj ft 3 h-1 X rt φ d sC hh hj hj d * Φ
" Ω H SD h-< hj O tr O rt Cfl Φ hi H- tr ft rt SD rt Λ hi 3" 1 Φ <: hi Φ rt
O h o tr Φ 3 s: rt φ Φ Hi Cfl co H- fl Φ μ- tr 3 rt O d Φ μ- ιQ Cfl φ W X SD
Hi H3 hi hj SD H- fl 3 I-1 O O o rt 3 3 SD μ-
TS rt o hj Φ 6 tr φ Ω SD Φ μ- 3 CD μ- tr o H- O 3 H- h- ' o o 3 Cfl 3 rt ιQ o 3 φ rt 3 O tr CO 3 Cfl Φ d 3 h-1 rt Φ 3 rt ι-5 3 -1 Cfl <! o φ O Φ hi hj σ SD o ft Φ tr Ω hh • φ rt 3 sS TS φ " Φ H- o TJ tr SD o\° hj hi hi Φ tr Φ H- •< TS SD o Φ * 3 φ Φ O μ- rt Φ h-1 ft
Φ SD rt rt Hi hi ft o * Ω tr hh SD Φ 3 3 H hj H φ rh tr μ- 3 Cfl hi φ tr tr rt Φ o H- d Φ O 3 3 rt rt tr μ- Cfl ft Cfl Hi hj Cfl O - ^ o 3 fl ^ μ-
Φ f Φ tr rt <i Cfl 3 TJ SD hj 3 hj rt ^ O Φ o d μ- o 1 o hh Φ Hi < φ CO 3
SD 3" tr Φ φ rt * rt 3 1 hi μ- 3 H hj Φ TJ tr Ω μ- 1
1 rt Cu φ ft 0 H- hi Φ rt tr 3 CD o SD 3 ft 1 3 1 ft 1 1 1 1 S2 1
periment is confirmed by measuring with the aid of the TGA/DTA analysis and a coupled mass spectrometer whether any chlorine or chloride compounds of the sorbent used were present in the gases leaving the TGA/DTA characteri- zation. The result of this measurement was that the amounts of of any chlorine or chloride compounds were below the detection limit of the mass spectrometer. These measurements were verified by releasing chlorine with the aid of the so-called Gordinne basic fusion technique, af- ter which the escaping chlorine was detected with the aid of photometric analysis. A more detailed description of this method can be found in ASTM C114. The result of this analysis which was carried out on two sorbents treated with hypochlorite was, that the chlorine content was below the detection limit of 100 ppm-weight, while the chlorine content of the initial calcium hypochlorite/sorbent mixture was more than 4% by weight, or 40,000 ppm-weight. It is concluded therefore, that the sorbent used no longer contains chlorine or chloride compounds. Since the activ- ity enhanced by calcium hypochlorite (from 11% to 100% mercury adsorption at 300°C) was maintained during the entire duration of the experiment, thus also after the chlorine was removed with the mercury-comprising gas stream, it is further concluded that the sorbent treated with the oxidator at elevated temperature possesses a permanently improved mercury-removing activity.
In the present cases an amount of 10 grams of calcium hypochlorite appeared to be sufficient.
The mercury-polluted gas stream may be contacted with the sorbent by placing the sorbent as fixed bed into the stream. The sorbent may optionally be dispersed in the gas stream. According to a first embodiment, the oxidator is added to the sorbent directly. According to a second embodiment, the oxidator may be added to the gas stream upstream from the sorbent, for example, by dispersing the same in the gas stream, and according to a third embodiment, an oxidator may be added to the gas stream simultaneously with the sorbent. The contacting time must in any case be such as to allow a desirable activation and sorption to take place. If the gas stream originates from, for example, an incineration plant, the above-mentioned substances may be added to the gas stream preceding a dust collector, so that the dust collector can remove the solid components from the gas stream all at the same time. The method according to the invention is also applicable to gases or vapors from the petrochemical and chemical industry, for example, for the removal of mercury from natural gases and natural gas condensate, from naphtha and other base materials used in the said industries.
According to a preferred embodiment, the sorbent may be added to a waste gas stream at various positions having different prevailing temperatures. This means that due to the choice of the location for adding a sorbent, different types of metal, irrespective of their condition (metallic or ionogenic) , can be sorbed in a desirable condition. This condition depends on the temperature. Components such as S02, HC1 and Cl2 may also be removed with the aid of the method according to the invention.
The method according to the invention may be applied in an existing system where a cleaning apparatus for gas streams, for example a scrubber, is already present. Optionally only a small amount of sorbent may be added, just sufficient to convert the mercury in the gases into the ionic form (Hg2+) . This improves the mercury capturing performance in the scrubber.
The invention is not restricted to the above- described embodiment. Amounts of sorbent other than those mentioned above may be used in practice. Likewise, it is possible to use other kaolin-comprising sorbents.
The results of the measurements on prior art sorbents as indicated in Figure 2, are retrieved from the following publications: W.A. Rosenhoover et al . , US ICCI project 98-
1/1.2B-2
R.A. Hargis et al., US DOE; Mercury control by- injection of activated carbon, 17th Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf . , 2000
J.R. Butz, C.Turchi, T .E.Broderick, J.Albiston, ADA techn, Littleton, Options for mercury removal from coal fired flue gas streams, pilot scale research on acti- vated carbon and alternative and regenerable sorbents, 17th Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf., 2000
Sid Nelson Jr., High temperature sorbents to lower mercury control costs, 17th Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf., 2000 J. Montgomery, D. Battleson, S. Bryson, Mercury removal from incineration off gas by carbon injection, MSE technology applications Inc., Butte.

Claims (18)

1. A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream, characterized in that at a temperature above 170 °C the gas stream is contacted with a sorbent that as the active component is comprised of a mixture of substan- tially silica-alumina compounds and/or calcium compounds.
2. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the sorbent comprises kaolin, that may or may not be in the dehydrated form of meta-kaolin.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, charac- terized in that the calcium compounds comprise calcium carbonate and/or calcium oxide, preferably 60 - 70% of calcium carbonate and 40 - 30% of calcium oxide.
4. A method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sorbent is obtained by thermal conversion of a material chosen from 1. paper waste and 2. residue from the paper production.
5. A method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that during sorption the temperature is higher than 230°C, preferably higher than 300°C, more preferably higher than 450°C, still more preferably higher than 550°C.
6. A method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the same comprises the step of activating the sorbent by means of an oxidator chosen from, for example, sulphate compounds, peroxides or chloride compounds.
7. A method according to claim 6, characterized in that the activation of the sorbent and the oxidator is carried out prior to contacting the sorbent with the gas stream to be cleaned.
8. A method according to claim 7 , characterized in that after activation of the sorbent, the oxidator is removed.
9. A method according to one of the claims 6 to 8, characterized in that the oxidator and the sorbent are mixed together and as mixture added to the gas stream to be cleaned.
10. A method according to one of the claims 6 to 8, characterized in that the oxidator is added earlier to the gas stream, upstream from the sorbent.
11. A method according to one of the claims 6 to 10, characterized in that as oxidator a chlorine compound, preferably calcium hypochlorite is used.
12. A method according to one of the claims 6 to 10, characterized in that during sorption the temperature is higher than 50°C, preferably higher than 100°C, more preferably higher than 200°C, still more preferably higher than 300°C, and most preferably higher than 400°C.
13. A method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the mercury is present in the metallic form.
14. A sorbent, characterized in that it comprises mercury adsorbed thereto, obtained by a method according to one of the preceding claims.
15. A sorbent according to claim 14, characterized in that up to temperatures of more than 900°C the mercury is irreversibly bound to the sorbent.
16. Use of the mercury-comprising sorbent according to claim 14 or 15 in a binding agent as hydraulic or pozzolanic compound.
17. A moulded product obtained by using a sorbent according to claim 14 or 15.
18. A method of improving a sorbent for the removal of mercury from a gas stream, characterized in that the same comprises steps of activating a compound comprised of a mixture of substantially silica-alumina compounds and/or calcium compounds, with an oxidator chosen from, for example, sulphate compounds, peroxides or chlorine compounds .
AU2002228478A 2001-01-26 2002-01-23 A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream Ceased AU2002228478B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1017206 2001-01-26
NL1017206A NL1017206C2 (en) 2001-01-26 2001-01-26 Method for removing mercury from a gas stream.
PCT/NL2002/000052 WO2002058823A1 (en) 2001-01-26 2002-01-23 A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2002228478A1 true AU2002228478A1 (en) 2003-02-06
AU2002228478B2 AU2002228478B2 (en) 2007-03-15

Family

ID=19772802

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002228478A Ceased AU2002228478B2 (en) 2001-01-26 2002-01-23 A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (2) US6974564B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1357999B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2004524955A (en)
AT (1) ATE389447T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002228478B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2438867C (en)
DE (1) DE60225668T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1357999T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2304134T3 (en)
NL (1) NL1017206C2 (en)
NZ (1) NZ527151A (en)
PT (1) PT1357999E (en)
WO (1) WO2002058823A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8124036B1 (en) 2005-10-27 2012-02-28 ADA-ES, Inc. Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants
NL1017206C2 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-07-29 Cdem Holland Bv Method for removing mercury from a gas stream.
US6878358B2 (en) 2002-07-22 2005-04-12 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Process for removing mercury from flue gases
US6863825B2 (en) 2003-01-29 2005-03-08 Union Oil Company Of California Process for removing arsenic from aqueous streams
US8069797B2 (en) * 2003-06-03 2011-12-06 Alstom Technology Ltd. Control of mercury emissions from solid fuel combustion
US9321002B2 (en) 2003-06-03 2016-04-26 Alstom Technology Ltd Removal of mercury emissions
WO2005042130A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-12 Metal Alloy Reclaimers, Inc Ii Process for reduction of inorganic contaminants from waste streams
US7479263B2 (en) * 2004-04-09 2009-01-20 The Regents Of The University Of California Method for scavenging mercury
CA2848601C (en) * 2004-06-28 2018-10-30 Nox Ii, Ltd. Reducing sulfur gas emissions resulting from the burning of carbonaceous fuels
RU2398617C2 (en) 2004-10-01 2010-09-10 Уильям ДИГДОН Method of oxidising elementary mercury in fuel combustion processes
AU2016250355B2 (en) * 2005-03-17 2018-05-24 Douglas C. Comrie Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
CA3148289C (en) * 2005-03-17 2024-01-23 Nox Ii, Ltd. Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
CA2601239C (en) 2005-03-17 2013-07-16 Nox Ii, Ltd. Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
AU2012202115B2 (en) * 2005-03-17 2014-01-23 Douglas C. Comrie Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
AU2016228203B2 (en) * 2005-03-17 2018-03-22 Comrie, Douglas C Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US7575629B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2009-08-18 Basf Catalysts Llc Pollutant emission control sorbents and methods of manufacture
US7704920B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2010-04-27 Basf Catalysts Llc Pollutant emission control sorbents and methods of manufacture
US7578869B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2009-08-25 Basf Catalysts Llc Methods of manufacturing bentonite pollution control sorbents
US8150776B2 (en) * 2006-01-18 2012-04-03 Nox Ii, Ltd. Methods of operating a coal burning facility
US20070184394A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2007-08-09 Comrie Douglas C Production of cementitious ash products with reduced carbon emissions
US7753992B2 (en) * 2006-06-19 2010-07-13 Basf Corporation Methods of manufacturing mercury sorbents and removing mercury from a gas stream
US7572421B2 (en) * 2006-06-19 2009-08-11 Basf Catalysts Llc Mercury sorbents and methods of manufacture and use
US8066874B2 (en) 2006-12-28 2011-11-29 Molycorp Minerals, Llc Apparatus for treating a flow of an aqueous solution containing arsenic
US8080088B1 (en) 2007-03-05 2011-12-20 Srivats Srinivasachar Flue gas mercury control
US8685351B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2014-04-01 Basf Corporation Pollutant emission control sorbents and methods of manufacture and use
US20090081092A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Xiaolin David Yang Pollutant Emission Control Sorbents and Methods of Manufacture and Use
US8906823B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2014-12-09 Basf Corporation Pollutant emission control sorbents and methods of manufacture and use
US8349764B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2013-01-08 Molycorp Minerals, Llc Composition for treating a fluid
US8252087B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2012-08-28 Molycorp Minerals, Llc Process and apparatus for treating a gas containing a contaminant
US7758829B2 (en) * 2007-12-05 2010-07-20 Alstom Technology Ltd Process for promoting mercury retention in wet flue gas desulfurization systems
US7766997B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2010-08-03 Alstom Technology Ltd Method of reducing an amount of mercury in a flue gas
CA2673686A1 (en) * 2008-07-23 2010-01-23 Srivats Srinivasachar Method for capturing mercury from flue gas
US8196533B2 (en) * 2008-10-27 2012-06-12 Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Co. Methods for operating a fluidized-bed reactor
US20100203461A1 (en) * 2009-02-06 2010-08-12 General Electric Company Combustion systems and processes for burning fossil fuel with reduced emissions
CN102648045A (en) 2009-07-06 2012-08-22 马尔系统公司 Media for removal of contaminants from fluid streams and method of making and using same
EP2454006B1 (en) 2009-07-13 2015-09-02 S.A. Lhoist Recherche Et Developpement Solid mineral composition, method for preparing same and use thereof for reducing heavy metals in flue gas
US20110053100A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Sinha Rabindra K Composition and Method for Reducing Mercury Emitted into the Atmosphere
NL2003717C2 (en) 2009-10-27 2011-04-28 Minplus Holland B V A method for the removal of mercury from a stream of flue gas obtained from the combustion of coal, a sorbent-mixture and a composition comprising spent sorbent.
NL2003712C2 (en) * 2009-10-27 2011-04-28 Minplus Holland B V A method for the removal of mercury from a stream of flue gas obtained from the combustion of coal, and a composition comprising spent sorbent.
US8496894B2 (en) 2010-02-04 2013-07-30 ADA-ES, Inc. Method and system for controlling mercury emissions from coal-fired thermal processes
US8951487B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2015-02-10 ADA-ES, Inc. Hot-side method and system
US8524179B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2013-09-03 ADA-ES, Inc. Hot-side method and system
US11298657B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2022-04-12 ADA-ES, Inc. Hot-side method and system
CA2788820C (en) 2010-02-04 2021-09-21 Michael Durham Method and system for controlling mercury emissions from coal-fired thermal processes
US8784757B2 (en) 2010-03-10 2014-07-22 ADA-ES, Inc. Air treatment process for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials
CA2792732C (en) 2010-03-10 2018-07-31 Martin A. Dillon Process for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials
US9555420B2 (en) * 2010-04-08 2017-01-31 Nalco Company Gas stream treatment process
US9682383B2 (en) 2010-04-08 2017-06-20 Nalco Company Gas stream treatment process
US9233863B2 (en) 2011-04-13 2016-01-12 Molycorp Minerals, Llc Rare earth removal of hydrated and hydroxyl species
US8845986B2 (en) 2011-05-13 2014-09-30 ADA-ES, Inc. Process to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and mercury from coal-fired boilers
US9017452B2 (en) 2011-11-14 2015-04-28 ADA-ES, Inc. System and method for dense phase sorbent injection
DE102011087780A1 (en) * 2011-12-06 2013-06-06 Voith Patent Gmbh Process for the preparation of a mineral solid
US8992868B2 (en) 2012-05-01 2015-03-31 Fuel Tech, Inc. Dry processes, apparatus compositions and systems for reducing mercury, sulfur oxides and HCl
US9802154B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2017-10-31 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process for sulfur dioxide, hydrochloric acid and mercury mediation
US8883099B2 (en) 2012-04-11 2014-11-11 ADA-ES, Inc. Control of wet scrubber oxidation inhibitor and byproduct recovery
US8974756B2 (en) 2012-07-25 2015-03-10 ADA-ES, Inc. Process to enhance mixing of dry sorbents and flue gas for air pollution control
US9957454B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2018-05-01 ADA-ES, Inc. Method and additive for controlling nitrogen oxide emissions
EP2890666B1 (en) 2012-08-30 2018-12-12 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Process for removing heavy metals from fluids
WO2014039758A2 (en) 2012-09-07 2014-03-13 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process, method, and system for removing heavy metals from fluids
CA2902909C (en) 2013-02-27 2017-11-28 Fuel Tech, Inc. Processes, apparatus, compositions and systems for reducing emissions of hci and/or sulfur oxides
US9289721B2 (en) 2013-02-27 2016-03-22 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process and apparatus for improving the operation of wet scrubbers
JP6486840B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2019-03-20 レドックス テクノロジー グループ リミティド ライアビリティ カンパニー Use of ferrous sulfide suspension to remove mercury from flue gas
US9034285B1 (en) 2014-02-28 2015-05-19 Redox Technology Group Llc Use of ferrous sulfide suspension for the removal of mercury from flue gases
US9399597B2 (en) 2013-04-01 2016-07-26 Fuel Tech, Inc. Ash compositions recovered from coal combustion gases having reduced emissions of HCI and/or mercury
US9718025B2 (en) 2013-04-01 2017-08-01 Fuel Tech, Inc. Reducing hydrochloric acid in cement kilns
US8828341B1 (en) 2013-07-18 2014-09-09 Alstom Technology Ltd Sulfite control to reduce mercury re-emission
US9889451B2 (en) 2013-08-16 2018-02-13 ADA-ES, Inc. Method to reduce mercury, acid gas, and particulate emissions
GB201317219D0 (en) * 2013-09-27 2013-11-13 T & L Process Technology Ltd Treated waste products, methods of preparing them and using the same
US9120055B2 (en) 2014-01-27 2015-09-01 Alstom Technology Ltd Mercury re-emission control
US9440190B2 (en) * 2014-02-07 2016-09-13 Novinda Corp. High temperature sorbents for pollution control
US9975787B2 (en) 2014-03-07 2018-05-22 Secure Natural Resources Llc Removal of arsenic from aqueous streams with cerium (IV) oxide compositions
AT516407B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2016-05-15 Andritz Ag Maschf Process for the use of hydrated sorbents in thermal process plants
US10350545B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2019-07-16 ADA-ES, Inc. Low pressure drop static mixing system
TWI640355B (en) 2015-09-01 2018-11-11 雷多斯集團有限責任公司 Use of ferrous sulfide for the removal of selenium from gases
US11306269B2 (en) 2017-12-04 2022-04-19 Gmt Ip, Llc Processing post-industrial and post-consumer waste streams and preparation of post-industrial and post-consumer products therefrom
CA3083262C (en) 2017-12-04 2022-05-03 Gmt Ip, Llc Processing post-industrial and post-consumer waste streams and preparation of post-industrial and post-consumer products therefrom
JP2021535993A (en) * 2018-09-14 2021-12-23 ミンプラス ベスローテン フェンノトシャップ How to operate an incinerator equipped with a device that captures ash mixed in flue gas

Family Cites Families (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4101631A (en) * 1976-11-03 1978-07-18 Union Carbide Corporation Selective adsorption of mercury from gas streams
US4474896A (en) * 1983-03-31 1984-10-02 Union Carbide Corporation Adsorbent compositions
DE3855248D1 (en) * 1987-05-18 1996-06-05 Ftu Gmbh USE OF REACTIVE CALCIUM HYDROXIDE FOR GAS AND EXHAUST GAS PURIFICATION AND
US5306475A (en) 1987-05-18 1994-04-26 Ftu Gmbh Technische Entwicklung Und Forschung Im Umweltschutz Reactive calcium hydroxides
EP0337047A1 (en) * 1988-04-13 1989-10-18 Rijksuniversiteit Gent Fakulteit Landbouwwetenschappen Leerstoel Voor Bodemfysika Process for increasing the specific area and the activity of a sorbent material comprising aluminosilicates, and material obtained
EP0454885A1 (en) * 1990-05-02 1991-11-06 Ftu Gmbh Process for purification of gases and exhaust gases from pollutants
DE4034498A1 (en) * 1990-09-06 1992-03-12 Metallgesellschaft Ag METHOD FOR SEPARATING HEAVY METALS AND DIOXINES FROM COMBUSTION EXHAUST GASES
FR2668388B1 (en) * 1990-10-30 1994-09-09 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A SOLID MERCURY CAPTURE MASS.
DE4202671A1 (en) * 1991-05-27 1992-12-03 Degussa FORMKOERPER CONTAINING DEALUMINATED ZEOLITE Y AND THE METHOD FOR THEIR PRODUCTION
US5322628A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-06-21 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for simultaneously drying and removing metallic and organic mercury from fluids
US5387738A (en) * 1992-11-03 1995-02-07 Beckham; Doyle H. Reagent for treating a contaminated waste material and method for same
JP2809366B2 (en) * 1992-12-10 1998-10-08 三菱重工業株式会社 Method for collecting harmful metals in exhaust gas and method for treating collected ash
NL9202277A (en) * 1992-12-29 1994-07-18 Pelt & Hooykaas Process for the preparation of a layered, clay-like material and a process for rendering waste material immobilizable.
US5387736A (en) * 1993-08-30 1995-02-07 Salomone Bros., Inc. Portable decontamination system and method for environmental well drilling rigs
DE4339777A1 (en) * 1993-11-23 1995-05-24 Krc Umwelttechnik Gmbh Process and apparatus for reducing metallic mercury content of flue gases
DE4403244A1 (en) * 1994-02-03 1995-08-10 Metallgesellschaft Ag Processes for cleaning combustion exhaust gases
DE19512785A1 (en) * 1995-04-05 1996-10-17 Siemens Ag Process for the thermal treatment of waste materials
JPH11262662A (en) * 1998-03-18 1999-09-28 Nittetsu Mining Co Ltd Harmful substance removing agent and production thereof
JP2000042360A (en) * 1998-05-22 2000-02-15 Icc:Kk Blowing agent for flue and its use method
DE19824237B4 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-12-30 Walhalla-Kalk Entwicklungs- Und Vertriebsgesellschaft Mbh Exhaust gas cleaning reagents, their manufacture and their use
NL1009870C2 (en) * 1998-08-14 2000-02-15 Cdem Holland Bv Process for the production of a sorbent, the sorbent obtained by the process, and a process for cleaning a hot gas stream.
US6372187B1 (en) * 1998-12-07 2002-04-16 Mcdermott Technology, Inc. Alkaline sorbent injection for mercury control
US6533842B1 (en) * 2000-02-24 2003-03-18 Merck & Co., Inc. Adsorption powder for removing mercury from high temperature, high moisture gas streams
JP3417398B2 (en) * 2000-12-13 2003-06-16 栗田工業株式会社 Exhaust gas treating agent and exhaust gas treating method
NL1017206C2 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-07-29 Cdem Holland Bv Method for removing mercury from a gas stream.

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2002228478A1 (en) A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream
WO2002058823A1 (en) A method for the removal of mercury from a gas stream
Ghorishi et al. Sorption of mercury species by activated carbons and calcium-based sorbents: effect of temperature, mercury concentration and acid gases
US7341667B2 (en) Process for reduction of inorganic contaminants from waste streams
CA2594540A1 (en) Mercury oxidation of flue gas using catalytic barrier filters
Habeeb et al. Kinetic, isotherm and equilibrium study of adsorption capacity of hydrogen sulfide-wastewater system using modified eggshells
Karatza et al. Removal of mercuric chloride from flue gas by sulfur impregnated activated carbon
US9597654B2 (en) Modified trass and process for its preparation
EP3197589B1 (en) Process for purifying fluids
JP5689878B2 (en) Solid inorganic composition, process for its preparation and its use for reducing heavy metals in flue gas
KR102051502B1 (en) Inorganic adsorbent for removal of hydrogen sulfide
AU2017247530B2 (en) Process for the removal of heavy metals from fluids
Zheng Mercury removal from cement plants by sorbent injection upstream of a pulse jet fabric filter
JP2003305336A (en) Adsorbent packed-bed device
Ahmad et al. Valorization of Raw and Calcined Eggshell for Sulfur Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Removal at Low Temperature. 2021, 11, 295
Wang Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide on Fine Rubber Particle Media (FRPM)
Mohsen et al. A Study on the Effect of Operating Parameters on the Efficiency of a Mercury Removal Unit From Natural Gas
Fowler et al. Thermal conversion of gasworks contaminated soil into carbonaceous adsorbents
Vidic Adsorption of elemental mercury by virgin and impregnated activated carbon
Enneking Fixed Bed Adsorption for Mercury Control
Fisher et al. Reactive carbon from life support wastes for incinerator flue gas cleanup-System Testing
Ghorishi et al. Sorption of mercury species by activated carbons and calcium-based sorbents: effect of temperature, mercury
MEDIO SPANISH TECHNOLOGY FOR THE STABILIZATION AND MICRO-ENCAPSULATION OF METALLIC MERCURY AND CERTAIN MERCURY CONTAINING WASTES