AU2002227224A1 - Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system - Google Patents
Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion systemInfo
- Publication number
- AU2002227224A1 AU2002227224A1 AU2002227224A AU2002227224A AU2002227224A1 AU 2002227224 A1 AU2002227224 A1 AU 2002227224A1 AU 2002227224 A AU2002227224 A AU 2002227224A AU 2002227224 A AU2002227224 A AU 2002227224A AU 2002227224 A1 AU2002227224 A1 AU 2002227224A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- aqueous environment
- facultative
- waste
- stream
- solids
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Description
LOW OXYGEN ORGANIC WASTE BIOCONVERSION SYSTEM
The present invention relates to a novel nutrient rich humus material produced by a
process for the substantially odorless biological treatment of solid and liquid organic
wastes, particularly animal farm wastes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Municipal wastewater treatment facilities, animal farming facilities, and organic
industrial treatment and food processing facilities treat and generate highly polluting,
odoriferous organic waste streams. With increasing human population density, such
facilities have come under increasing pressure to upgrade^ modify, or supplement their
treatment processes so as to improve the air quality in and around such facilities and further
protect the environment, and human and animal health. A particularly persistent problem
addressed by the present invention is the treatment of animal excrement containing high
concentrations of microbial substrates (nutrients such as phosphorus, sulfur and particularly
nitrogen and other organic biodegradable materials as measured by the total biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) test) which, in typical animal treatment systems, not only pollute
surface and subsurface water supplies, but also negatively impact air and soil quality.
Further, present treatment alternatives for organic waste streams, such as animal excrement,
frequently generate and exacerbate the offensive odors.
Traditionally, animal farming was accomplished on large tracts of land in remote
rural areas, with the farmer accepting the offensive odors associated with animal husbandry
as a necessary evil. Waste excrement generated from the animal farming was gathered and
spread on the farm as fertilizer. The animal waste excrement was allowed to slowly decay
in the field and a portion of the unstable nutrients, including phosphorous and nitrogen
products, were generally taken up by the growing crop plants. The remainder of the
bioavailable or biologically useable nutrients was assimilated by the general environment,
usually with no negative ecological impact. When incorporated by plant growth, the
nutrients were eventually consumed by the animals for an efficient recycling of nutrients.
Modern high-density animal farming practices, particularly modern feedlot and
dairy farming practices, have detrimentally impacted the ecological balance of traditional
animal farming methods. Modern agricultural practices concentrate larger numbers of
animals in ever-smaller areas leaving larger amounts of waste excrement to be managed by
distribution to ever decreasing land areas. In addition, the larger amounts of food required
by the increasing density of animals per, acre and modern intense feeding practices which
use supplemental animal feed containing high concentrations of nutrients, result in larger
volumes of manure which cannot be efficiently distributed by traditional methods without
severe environmental impacts. Fields on which such manures have been spread become
exceedingly rich in unstabilized nutrients and sludge, thereby creating a pollution hazard to
water bodies and promoting emissions of repugnant odors. Rain, snow and the like falling
on the soil, cany large masses of the unstabilized waste (along with accompanying odors)
into the underlying soil that may then infiltrate to the underlying groundwater. The runoff
created carries the substances to surface water bodies and generates airborne odors. With
the flow of water through drainage ditches, groundwater movement and the like,
eventually fresh water aquifers, groundwater, surface waters and other water resources
become polluted.
The problem of air and water pollution caused by excessive organic wastes can be
exacerbated by an accompanying concentration of toxic materials. Concentrations of toxic
materials, which may have been used as animal pharmaceuticals, insecticides, and/or
herbicides, including heavy metals and the like, may be part of the animal food intake.
Though not generally harmful to the animal or the animal product being produced these
materials may end up being further concentrated in the animal's excrement, which is in
turn discharged to the local ecosystem.
Various solutions have been proposed to solve the waste management problems
posed by modern animal farming, but have been judged to be incomplete, too expensive or
so specialized that they only serve to change or postpone the problem.
For example, it has been proposed that complex mechanical systems be installed to
provide manageable manure slurries and that systems be installed by the farmer to enable
spraying the manure slurry on differing land areas in a rotating manner to reduce the
impact of excrement concentration. It has also been proposed to isolate manure in
depositories secure from rainwater run-off until the stabilization (decaying) process has
produced a concentrated, desirable humus material that can then be commercially sold or
otherwise distributed to non impacted localities. Such solutions merely allow for the
natural incomplete decay of the manure as evidenced by exacerbated odor problems,
require constant manpower, do not resolve the problem of migration of unstabilized waste,
and require excessive amounts of time, space and money for treatment.
Conventional biological wastewater treatment technologies for domestic, industrial
and animal organic wastes utilize aerobic or anaerobic bioconversion processes, with
aerobic processes being the most common. Some modern treatment technologies, such as
waste stabilization ponds, utilize both aerobic and anaerobic processes wherein different
zones are created within a single treatment unit for each different type of microbial
bioconversion. Within these systems, the aerobic zone is typically separated from the
anaerobic zone by a facultative zone. Facultative zones contain bacteria that can grow and
function both in the presence and absence of oxygen.
One generally successful treatment process of the prior art developed by Bion
Technologies, Inc., generally known as the BION® NMS process, is a bioconversion
process which transforms animal waste excrement, containing significant concentrations of
total BOD and nutrients, into an ecologically stable, nutrient rich organic humus material
known as BIONSOIL®. As described in U.S. Patent No. 5,755,852, the BION® NMS
process generally includes an anaerobic process in a first zone (an ecoreactor) which
utilizes both anaerobic and facultative bacteria and a combination aerobic/anaerobic
process which utilize aerobic, anaerobic and facultative bacteria in a second zone (a
bioreactor). Alternatively, the BION® NMS process could also include a third zone (a
polishing ecoreactor) wherein plants and microorganisms treat the waste.
Generally, the BION® NMS process utilizes a combination of chemical
precipitation, physical settling, and natural living systems such as microbes and plants to
achieve bioconversion of the waste. Specific treatment systems incorporating the BION®
NMS process such as for dairy farms and hog farms are individually designed according to
actual conditions but generally include one or more of the three zones; a solids ecoreactor,
a bioreactor and a polishing ecoreactor.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,852, an ecoreactor is a multi-cell composting,
solids dewatering and bioconversion means. A solids ecoreactor of the BION® NMS
process requires construction of a plurality of holding cells, surrounded by containment
berms, generally arranged so that individual or sets of cells may be periodically taken off¬
line from the on-going process so that their contents may be harvested (removal of
bioconverted biosolids), dewatered (physical unit process, usually mechanical, for
.1
reducing moisture content) and/or dried (reduction of water content by vaporizing water to
the air) to produce a bioconverted organic humus or BIONSOIL®. Once harvested, the
cell(s) are available and are eventually reactivated or placed back on-line within the
bioconversion process. The principle function of a solids ecoreactor is to convert excess
biomass produced by the bioreactor to an ecologically beneficial humus material.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,755,852, a bioreactor is an organism growth
managing, enhancing and concentrating means. The principle function of a bioreactor,
which receives oxygen from the atmosphere and/or from direct, mechanically assisted,
aeration, is to promote the growth of biological organisms, which utilize both the incoming
soluble materials and waste stream solids converted or hydrolyzed to further the
bioconversion process. A bioreactor generally comprises a suitably sized pond
environment or the like. Although the bioreactor may include some aeration, multiple
subenvironments exist within it which utilize aerobic, facultative and/or anaerobic
bacteria. The solids ecoreactor, on the other hand, principally contains and utilizes
anaerobic and facultative bacterial populations in the flowing liquid phase using the
oxygen input in the bioreactor. As bacterial and other organic solids separate from the
flowing liquid in the solids ecoreactor, the high solids concentration subenvironments
formed contain some active facultative organisms but are predominated by anaerobic
microbial populations.
A polishing ecoreactor generally comprises a flooded vegetative complex made up
of plants and microorganisms. The plants and microorganisms in the polishing ecoreactor
generally capture the nutrients contained in the effluent discharged from a bioreactor.
Generally, the water effluent from a polishing ecoreactor is sufficiently pollutant free to
allow discharge thereof into a natural receiving water or wetland. Alternatively, this clean
discharge may be recycled for beneficial animal husbandry use or used for irrigation.
In the BION® NMS treatment process, wash and flushing water containing slurried
animal excrement, and wasted feed, bedding and drinking water from an animal confining
barn, penning area or the like, is directed to either or both a solids ecoreactor and a
bioreactor. In the solids ecoreactor, non-soluble settleable and floatable solids separate
and the bioconversion of the substrate begins. In the bioreactor, microorganisms are
enhanced, modified and/or concentrated providing additional bioconversion.
The beneficial humus material produced by the BION® NMS process is
substantially free of the objectionable odors normally associated with the animal
excrement such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, skatole, mercaptans and other odor causing
compounds. However, a significant environmental problem which is occasionally
associated with the BION® NMS process, and which is usually associated with other
present and past wastewater treatment processes, is odor emission from the treatment
tanks, cells, or units during the treatment process. Moreover, as is the case for the BION®
NMS process, this odor problem can be exacerbated when treatment processes include
aeration or intense agitation or mixing which creates greater dispersion, and possibly
greater volumes of odorous emissions.
Presently, treatment facilities have two options for coping with these unwanted
odors. Either endure the unpleasant odors or manage them. Under the first option, where
possible, treatment facilities locate open tanks or treatment process units such as aeration
tanks, biological contact tanks, aeration lagoons, and the like in open fields removed from
developed areas. This provides for dispersion and dilution of the odors before odor
nuisance becomes problematic. Such is the case for typical animal farming treatment
processes.
When a treatment facility is located near developed areas another type of passive
method for coping with unwanted odors commonly used for wastewater treatment
facilities in most locations is the use of buffer zones. As an example, New York City
Department of Environmental Conservation suggests minimum buffer distances from
developed areas (actual distances depend upon site-specific circumstances), for many
treatment process units. The suggested buffer distance from an aerated lagoon is 1,000
feet. Metcalf & Eddy Inc., revised by George Tchobanoglous and Frank Burton,
Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, 3rd Edition 513 (1991).
Although these passive techniques could be effective methods for minimizing the effects
of odors on developed areas, it is more often the case that the desired distance between the
treatment facility and the developed area is unavailable.
Even if the land is available to create a buffer zone, the use of buffer zones is often
ineffective. Most importantly, the odors in and around the treatment tanks, vessels or the
like are a nuisance, and at times a safety concern, for workers at the facilities.
The second option for treatment facilities is to manage the odors. Odor
management techniques include of physical, chemical and biological processes or
combinations thereof. Chemical treatment typically includes oxidizing the odor
compounds with chlorine, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, or potassium permanganate or using
a masking agent to disguise the odor. Physical treatment, probably the most common
method, includes containment of the treatment units with covers, collection hoods and air
handling equipment, followed by some form of physical treatment which could include
combustion, scrubbing, and/or adsorption (with activated carbon). Biological processes
include bioconversion of the odor causing compounds by some form of microorganism.
Such processes include treatment of odorous air by passing it through activated-sludge
aeration tanks, treatment such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,159, relating to a bio-
scrubber which is a cylindrical tower with a high surface area media (usually plastic) on
which biological growths are maintained, or as disclosed in U.S. 6,068,774 relating to the
addition of biological organisms such as Pseudomonas species to assimilate odor causing
compounds.
While such odor treatment methodologies can be effective ^treating odors they
carry significant disadvantages. For example, they consume considerable amounts of
energy to power additional equipment, require significant amounts of capital, often require
additional real estate which is usually unavailable and scarce around facilities, and require
excessive, continuous maintenance and manpower to keep them running once installed.
Further, some such systems consume substantial amounts of costly chemicals or activated
carbon which must be regenerated or disposed of.
Applicants have surprisingly discovered a process for the biological conversion of
animal waste. This process operates at low dissolved oxygen concentrations throughout
the process while maintaining high quantities of diverse populations of microorganisms.
The wastewater and sludge are treated simultaneously. Thus, the present invention
addresses many of the problems associated with municipal, domestic, industrial, food
industry, animal husbandry and other organic wastes, by providing an attractive and
efficient means to resolve ecological problems associated with the treatment of organic
wastes. More specifically, the present invention addresses the odor emission problem
through the efficient, substantially odorless, bioconversion of waste excrement materials or
a vast array of other organic wastes into stable, economically and/or ecologically beneficial
materials.
Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide an ecologically suitable means for
managing organic wastes.
It is another object to provide an improved process for the efficient, substantially
odorless, biological transformation of animal wastes, toxins or other organic waste
materials economically into suitable materials for recycling to the environment.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process to create a
biologically active, ecologically beneficial, substantially odorless humus material through
the bioconversion of organic waste, particularly animal excrement
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a process to create a
biologically active, and/or a nutrient-rich, organic soil.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an efficient process that
permits biological treatment of higher waste loads in existing treatment facilities and
allows for reduced size facilities.
These and other objects will be apparent from the following description of the
invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a low oxygen, high microorganism mass, organic
waste bioconversion process and the product of this process. In the process organic waste,
such as animal excrement, containing significant concentrations of potentially polluting or
environmentally harmful substrates, is biologically transformed into an ecologically
beneficial, nutrient rich, valuable organic humus material.
Applicants have discovered that if specific environmental conditions are
maintained in a biological wastewater treatment process, a natural microbial community
will evolve such that it will seek a state of dynamic equilibrium within a plurality of
desired ecological niches. Applicants have surprisingly determined that a high mass of
microorganisms can be maintained in combination with a low dissolved oxygen
concentration resulting in a substantially odorless, efficient bioconversion of organic
waste.
The process provides for simultaneous treatment and stabilization of the organic
waste, is substantially odorless and is more efficient than present biological treatment
systems. The resulting humus material has commercial value, is of pleasant odor and can
be safely maintained in open storage without significant migration of compounds. The
process also manages water, which may have been combined with animal waste to
optionally provide a nutrient rich aqueous fertilizer, which can be used to irrigate crops, or
as a clean, generally low nutrient liquid, suitable for discharge to a water body.
This substantially odorless bioconversion of organic waste results, in part, from the
presence of diverse populations of microorganisms in the treatment process. Although not
limited to these specific populations, the low oxygen bioconversion process of the present
invention is believed to be the result of the presence, in significant quantities, of four
microbial populations including facultative heterotrophic fermentors, autotrophic nitrifiers,
facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers, and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers, as well as
other organisms that coexist in this engineered environment. Each microbial population
contributes to the bioconversion of the organic waste to nitrogen gas (N2), carbon dioxide
(CO2), water vapor (H2O), clean water and beneficial soil products (humus) containing
nutrients such as phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N). Odorous compounds are not a product
of the bioconversion process.
The process comprises introducing organic waste containing sufficient
concentrations of total BOD and organic nitrogen (measured as Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
(T- -N)) into an aqueous environment defined by at least one cell, tank, pond, unit or the
like, wherein resides a diverse microbial community comprising large populations of
facultative heterotrophic fermentors, autotrophic nitrifiers, facultative heterotrophic
denitrifiers, and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers as well as other classes of organisms
that coexist in this engineered environment. The microbial populations within the aqueous
environment are brought into contact with the substrate of the organic waste via some
means, generally including agitation or mixing where the microorganisms exist as
suspended populations within the aqueous environment, or by flowing the aqueous stream
across settled or attached populations of organisms, or by other contact means.
The amount of microorganisms within the bioconversion process is monitored and
generally controlled to remove cellulosic and large particulate solids and to concentrate
microbes through the use of recycle loops, clarifiers or other solids concentrating or
separating techniques. Excess microorganisms are removed from the aqueous
environment via a variety of possible mechanisms to maintain favorable microbial health
and viability. Preferably, all microorganisms removed from the aqueous environment are
eventually harvested, dewatered and/or dried to create a nutrient rich humus product,
and/or they may be combined with other materials to create a variety of differing nutrient
rich humus products.
Dissolved oxygen concentrations are monitored within the aqueous environment
and/or the aqueous stream and when necessary, oxygen is introduced into these
environments at rates and in stoichiometric ratios so that the concentration of dissolved
oxygen does not exceed 2.0 mg/1, and preferably does not exceed about 0.1 mg/1.
The increased rate of this low oxygen bioconversion process of the present
invention allows for reduced size treatment facilities or makes it possible to treat a higher
waste load in an existing system. Further, the production rate of the nutrient rich humus
material is also believed to be enhanced.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 comprises a schematic illustrating the predominant interrelationships of
the organic waste, the major microbial groups responsible for bioconversion, the
intermediate breakdown substances, and the final products of the process of the invention.
Figure 2 comprises a flow diagram of an embodiment of the process of the
invention for a typical installation for a dairy farm.
Figure 3 comprises a flow diagram of another embodiment of the process of the
invention for "a higher rate dairy farm system.
DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
In the low oxygen bioconversion process of the present invention, evolution of a
natural microbial community is encouraged under low dissolved oxygen conditions
leading to a plurality of desirable ecological niches. Further, when the flowable organic
waste stream to the bioconversion process of the present invention contains relatively high
concentrations of total BOD and TKN, and the TKN to total BOD by weight ratio is
relatively high, e.g. when the mass ratio of TKN:total BOD is more than about 1 :20 by
weight, and preferably more than about 3:20, the resulting low oxygen bioconversion
process can be an effective processing approach for rapid, substantially odorless,
bioconversion of the waste stream substrates.
When the influent oxygen loading and the dissolved oxygen concentration in a
biological treatment process are suitably regulated to maintain a dissolved oxygen
concentration of less than about 2.0 mg/1, preferably less than about 0.1 mg/1 in the
aqueous portion of the process, a series of compatible, and overlapping and simultaneously
occurring, ecological niches are formed. These niches so formed promote the growth and
coexistence of desirable major populations of facultative heterotrophic fermentors,
autotrophic nitrifiers, facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers, and autotrophic ammonium
denitrifiers to the growth inhibition of other microbial populations such as heterotrophic
aerobes, which usually dominate the bacteria present in conventional wastewater treatment
processes. Figure 1, comprises a schematic illustration of the interrelationships believed to
exist between these microorganisms and the major substrates being affected during the
bioconversion process.
With reference to Figure 1, populations of facultative heterotrophic fermentors 10
will thrive on the organic wastes 5 available, while the growth of obligate aerobes and
obligate anaerobes, that might otherwise be expected to compete for the carbon and energy
sources, are suppressed by the very low dissolved oxygen concentrations maintained.
There will generally be enough oxygen available to inhibit obligate anaerobes but not
enough to allow the obligate aerobes to be competitive.
In typical biological treatment processes enough oxygen is supplied to the
facultative heterofrophs for complete bioconversion of the carbon containing compounds.
In the low oxygen bioconversion process of the present invention it is believed that the
limitation of the oxygen concentration induces the facultative heterofrophs to shift from an
oxidative metabolism to a fermentative metabolism. Thus, the facultative heterotrophic
fermentors ferment the organics present to organic acids and/or alcohols instead of
oxidizing them through oxidative phosphorylation to carbon dioxide and water.
The oxygen introduced into the process of the present invention is taken up by the
autotrophic nitrifiers 12 to nitrify, generally by oxidizing to nitrite (NO2 ") and/or nitrate
(NO3 "), the nitrogen containing compounds in the system. In a typical biological treatment
process, the organisms with an oxidative metabolism take up the oxygen. Since the
oxygen introduced into the process of the present invention appears to be readily taken up
by autotrophic nitrifier 12 populations, simplified control systems can be used to control
oxygen loading to promote nitrification in a low dissolved oxygen process, without
promoting the competing growth of obligate aerobes and facultative heterotrophic
microorganisms using oxidative phosphorylation. The desired dissolved oxygen
concentration for the process of the present invention is below the point where the
organisms using facultative fermentative pathways predominate over organisms using
oxidative pathways. Applicants have found this dissolved oxygen concentration is less
than 2.0 mg/1 and preferably, is less than about 0.1 mg/1. Generally oxygen present in the
process in excess of the requirements for nitrification by the autotrophic nitrifiers 12 will
be used preferentially to support heterotrophic aerobic activity. Within limits, the
scavenging action of these heterotrophic aerobes removes the excess oxygen and maintains
the present invention's oxygen concentration at very low levels.
Surprisingly, the low oxygen process of the present invention is believed to also
use very low oxygen concentrations to establish a population of facultative heterotrophic
denitrifiers 14 that use the NO2 ' and/or NO3 " produced by the autotrophic nitrifiers 12 as
their electron acceptor instead of dissolved oxygen. These facultative heterotrophic
denitrifiers 14 then convert the organic acids and alcohols produced by the facultative
heterotrophic fermentors 10 and other waste stream organics present into CO2 and H2O
while reducing the NO2 "and/or NO3 " nitrogen to N2. Sustaining low oxygen concentrations
that are high enough to concurrently allow the autotrophic nitrifiers 12 to thrive and nitrify
ammonium (NHt*) to NO2 "and/or NO3 " and low enough to establish populations of
facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14 able to reduce NO2 "and or NO3 " to N2 is of benefit
to the current invention. This low oxygen environment also allows the establishment of
autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16 capable of using NO2 " to oxidize NH + to N2 and a
small portion of NO3 " in reducing CO2 to cell material (biomass). Application of this
concurrent or simultaneous nitrification and denitrifϊcation process results in a nutrient
rich humus material made by a process for the substantially odorless biological treatment
of solid and liquid organic wastes, particularly animal farm wastes.
Thus, referring to Figure 1, applicants have found that controlling the amount of
oxygen introduced into a biological treatment process comprising a waste stream 5 having
a relatively high concentration of TKN and total BOD in a ratio of more than about 1 :20
provides a strong niche for facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14. The organic acids
and/or alcohols produced by the facultative heterotrophic fermentors 10, together with
other organics present in the waste stream and dead microbial cells or cell fragments, will
efficiently combine with the nitrite and/or nitrate produced by the autotrophic nitrifiers 12
to provide this strong niche for facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14 and autotrophic
ammonium denitrifiers 16. The facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14, in turn denitrify
the nitrite and/or nitrate to nitrogen gas while the autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16
oxidize NH to N2 as well and return NO3 " to the facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14.
Ultimately, the organic waste is bioconverted to N2, CO2, H2O, clean water and beneficial
soil products. The low oxygen bioconversion process of the present invention, therefore,
provides for substantially odorless, efficient, treatment of organic waste.
Table 1 below provides example stoichiometric relationships that illustrate the
types of biochemical reactions that drive this process.
Table I
EXAMPLE STOICHIOMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS
1) Fermentation of glucose into acetic acid by facultative heterotrophic fermentors: C6H12O6 → 3 C2H4O2
2) Cell synthesis by fermenting glucose into acetic acid by facultative heterotrophic fermentors: 2 C6H12O6 + 2 NH + 2 OH " → 2 C5H7O2N + C2H4O2 + 8 H2O
3) Observed cell yields when fermenting glucose into acetic acid by facultative heterotrophic fermentors:
1.00 C6H12O6 + 0.05 NH4 + + 0.05 OH " → 0.05 C5H7O2N + 3.025 C2H4O2 + 0.20 H2O
4) Endogenously nitrifying ammonia to nitrite by autotrophic nitrifiers: 2 NH4 + + 2 OH - + 3 O2 → 2 NOE + 2 H+ + 4 H2O
5) Cell synthesis by nitrifying ammonia to nitrite by autotrophic nitrifiers:
48 NBU+ + 40 HCO3 " + 8 Off + 20 O2 → 8 C5H7O2N + 40 NO2 " + 40 if + 72 H2O
6) Observed cell yields when nitrifying ammonia to nitrite with Nitrosomonas by autotrophic nitrifiers. USEPA, Manual: Nitrogen Control (1993), Office of Research and Development, EPA/625/R-93/010, Washington, DC:
1.0 NH4 + + 1.44 O2 + 0.0496 CO2 → 0.01 C5H7O2N + 0.990 NO2 " + 0.970 H2O + 1.99 H+
7) Observed cell yields when oxidizing nitrite to nitrate with Nitrobacter by autotrophic nitrifiers (from USEPA 1993):
1.00 NO2 " + 0.00619 NH4 + + 0.031 CO2 + 0.0124 H2O + 0.50 O2→ → 0.00619 C5H7O2N+ 1.00 NO3 ' + 0.00619 H+
8) Observed cell yields for the overall nitrification reaction of ammonia to nitrate by autotrophic nitrifiers (from USEPA 1993): __
1.00 NH4 + + 1.89 O2 + 0.0805 CO2 → 0.0161 C5H7O2N + 0.952 H2O + 0.984 NO3 " + 1.98 H+
9) Endogenously denitrifying nitrite to nitrogen gas using acetate by facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers:
3 C2H4θ2 + 8 NO2 " + 8 H+ → 4 N2 + 6 CO2 + 10 H2O
10) Cell synthesis by denitrifying nitrite to nitrogen gas using acetate by facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers:
95 CzHjOz + 32 NH + 40 NO2 ~ + 8 H+ → 32 C5H7O2N + 20 N2 + 30 CO2 + 146 H2O
11) Observed cell yields when denitrifying nitrite to nitrogen gas using methanol by facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers (from USEPA 1993): l.OO NCh" + 0.67 CH3OH + 0.53 H2CO3 ^
0.04 C5H7O2N + 0.48 N2 + 1.23 H2O + 1.00 HCO3 "
12) Endogenously and autotrophically denitrifying ammonium to nitrogen gas using nitrite: 8 NfL+ + 23 NO2 * + 6 ¥? → 11 N2 + 9 NO3 " + 19 H2O
13) Cell synthesis when autotrophically denitrifying ammonium to nitrogen gas using nitrite: 2 NH-/ + 27 NO2- + 10 HCO3- + 10 H+ → N2 + 25 NO3 _ + 2 C5H7O2N + 5 H2O
14) Observed cell yields for the autotrophic denifrification of ammonium to nitrogen gas using nitrite s an electron acceptor:
NH4 + + 1.32 NO2 " + 0.066 HCO3 " + 0.126 H+ →
→ 1.02 N2 + 0.26 NO3 " + 0.066CH2O0.5No.i5+ 2.03 H2O
Reaction numbers 1, 2 and 3 are examples of fermentation processes performed by
the facultative heterotrophic fermentors 10 using glucose (C6Hi2O6) as the model carbon
source and acetic acid (C2H4O2) as the model product. Reaction 1 shows the general
fundamental relationship for the endogenous energy producing reaction of the
fermentation. Reaction 2 shows the general fundamental relationship for the coupling of
energy production with the synthesis of a microbial biomass (represented as C5H7O2N).
Reaction 3 shows how these two reactions are combined in actual operating conditions
with experimentally observed cell yields. Although the reactions shown use glucose and
acetic acid, as known by those of ordinary skill in the art, many other compounds may be
substituted. For example carbohydrates, proteins celluloses, and/or other organic
compounds containing oxygen may be substituted for the glucose and ethanol, lactic acid,
propionic acid, butyric acid, or other organic acids, alcohols, aldehydes, and the like may
be substituted for the acetic acid. These types of compounds along with amino acids,
peptides, nucleotides, and other compounds contained in the influent waste stream and/or
resulting from microbial cell death and lysis are known to serve as substrates similar to the
acetic acid shown in the denifrification pathways represented by reaction numbers 9 and 10
and the methanol shown in the pathway represented by reaction 11.
Reaction numbers 4, 5, and 6 depict the reactions for the nitrification of ammonia
by the autotrophic nitrifiers 12. Reaction 4 shows the general fundamental relationship for
the endogenous energy producing reaction in which ammonia is nitrified to nitrite.
Reaction 5 shows the general fundamental relationship for the coupling of reaction 4 with
microbial cell synthesis. Reaction 6 illustrates how the combination of reactions 4 and 5
describes the observed yields of microbial cells that are synthesized during the nitrification
of ammonia to nitrite by Nitrosomonas type bacterial species. Conventional nitrification
processes employ a second step for the nifrification of nitrite to nitrate by Nitrobacter type
bacterial species and this pathway may be present in the process of the current invention to
varying degrees depending on the specific dynamic operating conditions imposed. In
contrast, the process of the present invention utilizes facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers
14 and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16 to denitrify the nitrite to N2. However, if
nitrate were present or produced in the process of the present invention, the facultative
heterotrophic denitrifiers 14 would denitrify it to N2 as well. Reaction 7 shows this
process relative to observed yields of microbial cells and reaction 8 shows the combined
nitrification of ammonia to nitrate (reaction numbers 6 and 7), again relative to observed
yields of microbial cells.
Similarly, the reactions of the facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14, reaction
numbers 9, 10, and 11, show the bioconversion of nitrite (similar reactions could be used
to show the bioconversion of nitrate) to N2 gas. This is illustrated using general
fundamental relationships, endogenously (9), and during cell synthesis (10), when using
acetate as an electron acceptor. In reaction 11 the denitrification is shown relative to
observed yields of microbial cells and uses methanol (CH3OH) as an electron acceptor.
Reactions 12, 13, and 14 portray the autotrophic conversion of ammonium and
CO2 to nitrate and N2 by the autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16. As before, reaction
12 shows the endogenous process, reaction 13 shows the process relative to cell synthesis,
and reaction 14 shows the combined process relative to observed cell yields. In reaction
14, the microbial cell mass was represented as CH2Oo.5N0.ιs instead of C5H7O2N to reflect
its publication reference. Astrid A. Van de Graaf , Peter de Bruijn and Lesley A.
Robertson, Autotrophic Growth of Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing Micro-organisms in a
Fluidized Bed Reactor, Microbiology, 142:2187-96 (1996).
The nitrate produced in the autotrophic ammonium denitrification reactions is
consumed by denitrification reactions very similar to those shown in reactions 9, 10, and
11.
In order to attain and maintain dynamic equilibrium of ecological niches, it is
important that enough growing microorganisms be present in the total treatment system so
that the population as a whole can evolve to optimally populate the four ecological niches
in a reasonable time period. Many waste streams are very complex, containing many
different chemical constituents, many of which contribute to both BOD and TKN,
consequently there are many possible fermentative pathways that the facultative
heterotrophs can use. The waste stream also provides even more possible substrates for
the denitrification process including dead cells and cell fragments as well as the fermented
products of facultative heterotrophic fermentors 10. A large dynamic microbial population
can evolve to optimally fit the available distributions of materials in a waste stream and
then can evolve to maintain this optimal fit as the waste stream and other environmental
conditions, such as temperature, continually change. Thus, maintenance of a sufficient
population of microorganisms provides the system with efficient adaptability to system
changes normally associated with wastewater treatment systems. The larger the total
population of microbes growing at a given average growth rate, the larger the number of
mutations that will occur. Thus, the process of the present invention benefits from a
sufficient quantity of microorganisms to maintain a sufficient quantity of mutations
thereby providing for an efficient, dynamic bioconversion process.
When optimizing the evolutionary criteria of a population of microbes, there is a
preferred minimum population size and growth rate. This is expressed as both a minimum
mass of microbes and as a function of total BOD and TKN loading. Generally the process
of the present invention requires a minimum population of about 1015 microbes or more,
with an average doubling time of about 30 days or less. A less efficient process of the
invention can be achieved with a greater quantity of microbes regenerating at a slower rate
(i.e. a larger doubling time). Preferably, the sustained minimum operating population is
comprised of from about 10 to about 1018 microbes with a doubling time often days or
less to insure the presence of an adequate biomass to treat the waste stream. In addition to
these minimum population size or mass criteria, it is also preferred to have at least 1013
microbes with a doubling period of 30 days or less, per pound of influent total BOD or
TKN. These two biomass parameters can alternatively be expressed as more than about
1015 base pair replications per second for the minimum population and about 1017 base pair
replications per pound of total BOD or TKN loaded into the treatment process. Most
preferred values run about 100 times these figures.
Thus, the beneficial results of the low oxygen bioconversion process of the present
invention are believed to be a result of three general considerations. First, the process
benefits from the presence of a dynamically responsive, diverse, microbial community in
sufficient numbers or mass of microorganisms, growing at sufficient rates in the process to
allow the microbial community to adapt in a workable time frame to achieve a dynamic
equilibrium. Second, organic and nitrogen loading allows an energy, carbon and nitrogen
balance to occur between the microbial populations of facultative heterotrophic
fermentors, 10, autotrophic nitrifiers 12, facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14 and
autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16. Third, control of dissolved oxygen levels and/or
oxygen additions creates and maintains the populations of facultative heterotrophic
fermentors 10, autotrophic nitrifiers 12, facultative heterotrophic denitrifiers 14 and
autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16.
The low oxygen bioconversion process of the present invention is one in which the
organic constituents contained in a waterborne waste stream, such as total BOD and TKN
are bioconverted to a mixture of microbial cells, very stable refractory organic humus
solids and inert material, inert nitrogen gas, carbon dioxide, and water.
In a process of the present invention, a BOD and TKN containing waste stream,
having a TKN:total BOD ratio of about 1 :20 or more is introduced into an aqueous
environment containing a microbial community comprising large populations of
facultative heterotrophic fermentors 10, autotrophic nitrifiers 12 facultative heterotrophic
denitrifiers 14 and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers 16. The waste stream of BOD and
TKN is brought into close contact with the microorganism populations by any suitable
means, preferably by mechanically mixing and/or by flowing the aqueous stream across
settled or attached populations of organisms. The aqueous environment of the process of
the invention is generally contemplated as an open, bermed cell arrangement and is
conveniently adaptable to automated operation. However, closed tanks, cells or units
could be utilized for the aqueous environment. Oxygen is introduced into this
environment at controlled rates and in specific stoichiometric ratios so that the
concentration of dissolved oxygen is maintained less than about 2.0 mg/1 and most
preferably does not exceed about 0.1 mg/1. The aeration means could be accomplished via
diffused aeration, mechanical mixers, surface mixers, surface atmospheric transfer, algal
generation or other equivalent means.
Solids in the aqueous environment may be clarified by floating or sitting,
thickened, centrifuged, separated or treated by other equivalent concentrating means and
recycled to maintain the biomass requirements. Excess microorganisms may be harvested,
dewatered, and/or dried and sometimes further combined with other materials to create a
nutrient rich humus material that can be beneficially used.
Figure 2 illustrates a first embodiment of the invention in a dairy farm treatment
system. Wash water, liquid wastewaters 10 and or recycled treated flushing water 45 is
used to transport and slurry the animal excrement and wastes 27 from an animal confining
barn, penning area or the like 25 to a solids concentrating treatment unit 30 which acts a
multi-zone composting, solids dewatering and bioconversion means. The solids
concentrating treatment unit 30, could be a plurality of holding cells or zones, surrounded
by containment berms which are generally arranged so that individual or sets of cells may
be periodically interrupted from the process so that their contents may be harvested,
dewatered and/or dried for recovery of bioconverted organic humus. The principle
function of the solids concentrating treatment unit 30 is to convert excess biomass to an
ecologically beneficial humus material suitable for recovery. The process of the present
invention, however, is not limited to the bermed holding cell. Other solid concentrating
treatment units 30, both open and closed to the surrounding environment, such as
clarifiers, flotation units, screens, filter presses, heat dryers, and the like could be used in
addition to or in place of the bermed holding cell.
The solids concentrating treatment unit liquid effluent stream 32 is treated by a
microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 35 wherein microbes are grown,
enhanced, modified and/or concentrated. The principle function of a microorganism
growth managing and enhancing unit 35, is to promote the growth of biological
microorganisms which entrain the soluble material of the waste stream and continue the
bioconversion process. A microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 35
generally comprises a suitably sized pond environment, tank, cell or the like.
The dissolved oxygen concentration and the amount of microorganisms in the
aqueous portion of the process stream are monitored; specifically low dissolved oxygen
and high microorganism quantity are sought to be maintained. Dissolved oxygen
concentrations are controlled by a means of aeration 36 that could include a dissolved
oxygen aeration system, some type of mechanical mixers, enhanced natural surface
aeration or the like. The biomass quantity is maintained by a biomass concentrating means
40 that concentrates the liquid effluent stream 37 from the microorganism growth
managing and enhancing unit 35 and/or recycles it.
The treated microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit liquid effluent
stream 37 is directed to a biomass concentrating means 40 such as a clarifier wherein the
biomass is settled and/or floated, thickened, separated and/or concentrated so that higher
concentrations of microbes can be recycled back to the microorganism growth managing
and enhancing unit 35. Other treatment units besides clarifiers could be used to
accomplish the biomass concentrating means 40. For example, settling tanks, cyclones,
centrifuges, filter presses, filters, screens, and/or membranes could be used. Concentrated
biomass sludge containing large quantities of living microbes is recycled via stream 42
back to the influent end of the microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 35 to
maintain biomass quantity therein. Alternatively, the concentrated biomass sludge could
be directed to and combined with the solids concentrating treatment unit liquid effluent
stream 32, via stream 42a, before entering the microorganism growth managing and
enhancing unit 35, it could be directed, via sfream 43a, to the influent end of the solids
concentrating treatment unit 30, it could be directed to and combined with via stream 43b,
the slurried animal excrement and wastes 27 before entering the solids concentrating
treatment unit 30, and/or it could be removed from the system via stream 44 for conversion
into a beneficial humus material or other uses. The liquid effluent from the biomass
concentrating means 40 (for example the overflow if a clarifier) could be used either as
flush or wash water directed back via stream 45 to the barn, penning area or the like 25,
and/or it could be discharged from the system via stream 47 as a nutrient rich aqueous
fertilizer for crops and/or it could be directed via stream 49 for further treatment prior to
irrigation or discharge.
Ultimately, the process parameters, specifically the biomass and dissolved oxygen
concentration parameters, are maintained in the aqueous portion of the treatment system.
In Figure 2, the aqueous portion includes the flowable portion of the solids concentrating
treatment unit 30, the microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 35 and the
biomass concentrating means 40.
In an alternative embodiment, the liquid effluent from the biomass concentrating
means 40 undergoes further treatment. Clarified, settled, or separated effluent in stream 49
undergoes -further bioconversion in an additional microorganism growth managing and
enhancing unit 52. The additional microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit
effluent is directed, via stream 53, for further solids, total BOD and nutrient removal such
as by means of a polishing unit 55.
A polishing unit 55 generally constitutes a flooded vegetative complex and
preferably comprises a wetlands environment or overland flow system made up of plants
and microorganisms suitable for capturing the relatively small quantity of nutrients
contained in the effluent discharged from a microorganism growth managing and
enhancing unit 52. In a prefened embodiment, the polishing unit 55 generally comprises
multiple, distinct cells arranged such that liquid discharged from a microorganism growth
managing and enhancing unit can be directed thereto in a variable and controlled manner.
An especially prefened polishing unit generally comprises a suitable low lying field with a
bermed perimeter and cross berms which create two or more liquid holding cells, wherein
effluent from a microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit can be variably
directed to one or more cells of the polishing unit. The liquid effluent from a polishing
unit is sufficiently treated for reuse, wetland creation or maintenance, or discharge to a
water body via stream 60. As for the solids concentrating treatment unit (stream 62), a
polishing unit 55 could be removed from service and the solids within could be harvested
64 and dried for humus material.
Alternately, conventional wastewater treatment processes could be used to further
treat the stream discharged from the biomass concentrating means 40 via stream 49, or
from an additional microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 52 via stream 53,
to the quality desired before recycle, reuse or discharge 60. In yet another embodiment,
the process of the invention could be modified to speed up the bioconversion process by
removing solids that are digested at a slower rate by the microorganisms (i.e. cellulosic
and course organic and inorganic solids) at the beginning of the process. This can be
accomplished by replacing solids concentrating freatment unit 30 with a solids separating
means and adding another means of concentrating the microorganism growth managing
and enhancing unit liquid effluent stream 37 to achieve the processes biomass
requirements.
As shown in Figure 3, wash water, liquid wastewaters 70 and/or recycled flushing
water 110 are passed through an animal confining barn, penning area or the like 75. The
slurried animal excrement waste is directed to a solids separating means 200, to' separate
cellulosic solids and other course organic and inorganic solids from soluble and finely
suspended solids. The separated sfream is then directed to a microorganism growth
managing and enhancing unit 79 via stream 78 wherein microbes are grown, enhanced,
modified and/or concentrated. The course, mostly cellulosic solids, removed by the solids
separating means 200 are delivered by stream 205 to a mixer 95 for further processing or
- may be removed from the system for other uses.
The dissolved oxygen concentration and the amount microorganisms in the
aqueous portion of the process stream are monitored for compliance with process
parameters, specifically low dissolved oxygen and high microorganism quantity.
Dissolved oxygen concentrations are controlled by a means of aeration 82 that could
include a dissolved oxygen aeration system, some type of mechanical mixers or the like.
The biomass quantity in the system is maintained by concentrating and recycling the
effluent from the bioreactor.
The treated microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit liquid effluent
stream 85 is directed to a biomass concentrating means 89 wherein the biomass is settled,
thickened, separated and/or concentrated. Further solids treatment for the concentrated
biomass from the biomass concentrating means 89 is achieved by directing the solids via
stream 92 to a solids mixer 95. Alternatively, these solids may be harvested via stream 93
for use as soil for plant growth product additives, or for feed and food stocks or raw
materials for such processed stocks. The solids mixer 95 mixes the concentrated biomass
from the biomass concentrating means 89 delivered to it via stream 92, with the cellulosic
and other course solids separated from stream 77 by the solids separator 200 that is
delivered to the mixer via stream 205. Excess liquid is directed back to the microorganism
growth managing and enhancing unit 79 via stream 97 and the mixed solids are removed
via sfream 99 and harvested, dewatered and/or dried to create a nutrient rich humus
product.
The liquid effluent from the biomass concentrating means 89 is directed via stream
101 to a solids clarifier 104 for further concentration of the solids. Concentrated biomass
sludge from the solids clarifier is directed via stream 108 back to the influent end of the
microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 79 to maintain biomass quantity
therein. The liquid effluent from the solids clarifier could either be used as flushing or
wash water directed back via stream 110 to the bam, penning area or the like 75, and/or it
could be used discharged from the system via sfream 114 as a nutrient rich aqueous
fertilizer for crops and/or it could be directed via stream 118 for further treatment prior to
reuse or ultimate surface discharge into a wetland or water body, or by subsurface
discharge to an underground aquifer, via stream 130.
The system parameters, specifically the biomass and dissolved oxygen
concentration are maintained in the microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit
79, the biomass concentrating means 89 and the clarifier 104 in this embodiment.
Another embodiment includes further freatment for clarified, settled, or separated
effluent in an additional microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 120. The
microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit effluent is directed, via sfream 122,
for such as by means of a polishing unit 124. The liquid effluent from a polishing unit is
sufficiently treated for recycle, reuse or discharge to a created, restored, enhanced, or
constructed wetland or surface or subsurface water body via sfream 130.
The nutrient rich humus of the invention is a microorganism active, by-product of
the biomass concentrating means 89, solids mixer 95 and/or polishing unit 124 via sfream
126.
Alternately, conventional wastewater treatment processes could be used to further
treat the stream discharged from the solids clarifier 104 via sfream 118, or from the
additional microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit 120 via sfream 122, to the
quality desired before recycle, reuse or discharge 130.
The process of the invention could be further modified for other applications. For
example, a standard hog farm system according to the present invention might
advantageously incorporate an additional microorganism growth managing and enhancing
unit in between the bam and the solids concentrating unit.
A process of the present invention may include a chemical addition/mixing
subzone within a microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit or positioned in
one or more cells of a solids concentrating treatment unit. Such a subzone could be
positioned for mixing in chemicals that could be added to the process of the invention to
essentially chemically conduct the role of the facultative heterotrophic fermentors and/or
for mixing in metallic salts or organic polymers for the removal of precipitable phosphorus
and other materials. Preferably, such a subzone is positioned at the influent end of a
microorganism growth managing and enhancing unit or solids concentrating treatment
unit. In such an embodiment, although the facultative heterotrophic fermentors would still
be present in the process of the invention, albeit in smaller quantities, chemicals can be
added to the process of the invention to supply an electron acceptor for the autotrophic
nitrifiers for nitrification of NH4 +. For example, acetic acid, methanol, or other organic
acids or alcohols could be used. Preferred metallic salts for this purpose include ferrous
sulfate, ferric chloride, alum and the like which can combine with suspended and/or
solubilized phosphorus compounds to form a precipitate and/or associated chemical
complexes.
In an another embodiment, a system using the process of the invention may have
one or a series of closed vessels, the vessels being initially loaded with a microbial
population of about 101 microbes or more, and being in fluid communication with an
influent aqueous waste sfream having a concentration of total BOD and a ratio of
TKN:total BOD of more than about 1 :20. The vessel includes means for delivery of
oxygen thereto, preferably comprising a combined mechanical mixing and aeration means,
arranged to be automatically enabled as desired.
The process of the present invention could further comprise a plurality of sensing
means, arranged to sense dissolved oxygen and/or oxygen loading, biomass and/or influent
stream temperature and rates of influent flow, each being interconnected to a central
processing unit. Sensing means for example, may include oxidation/reduction potential
(redox), pH, conductivity, temperature and/or combinations thereof alone or together with
other sensors, which enable data indicative of dissolve oxygen concentration and/or
availability. Other sensing means which relate to the functionality, stability, and/or
performance of the systems as a whole or the microbial biomass, may also be used in the
process of the invention. These might include liquid sensors, such as specific ion
electrodes for a variety of ions including ammonium ions, and gas sensors which could
detect ammonia and other nitrogen containing gaseous compounds, hydrogen sulfide,
mercaptans, and a variety of volatile organic compounds such as the acetic, butyric, and
propionic acids commonly associated with ruminant manures.
A central processing unit such as a computer, typically comprising micro-controller
means, data distribution means, data storage means and comparator/computing means may
be used. Data from at least one or a plurality of sensing means is typically routed to the
micro-controller means wherein it is digitized for use by the central processing unit and
provided to the distribution means for distribution to the comparator/computing means
and or data storage means. The comparator/computing means generally compares data
received from the distribution means with previously stored data and analyzes, computes
and/or confirms system parameters within the biomass, enabling, disabling or varying
oxygen loading and/or mixing and/or recycle flows and/or influent waste stream flow in
accord with preset and/or continually calculated system parameters. A monitor and/or
printer provides visual and/or hard copy confirmation of status and the cenfral processing
unit may be interconnected to a remote station to enable remote monitoring and remote
system modification as desired.
In a further preferred embodiment, a vessel will automatically discharge suitably
bioconverted product for subsequent processing and/or aqueous stream for recycle and the
like, and retain an appropriate quantity of biomass containing the appropriate mass of
microbes for managed treatment of the aqueous influent stream.
The efficiency of the process of the present invention is best described by example.
In a typical wastewater application of the present invention, 100 pounds of TKN and 260
pounds of total BOD, can be treated with 260 pounds of oxygen, to produce 105 pounds of
cells while discharging essentially no TKN in the effluent and predominately discharging
N2 and CO2 to the atmosphere. In comparison, an advanced wastewater treatment plant
using costly energy intensive nitrogen removal technology would require more than 600
pounds of oxygen to achieve the same discharge criteria. In further comparison, a
conventional secondary freatment wastewater plant, would use about the same 260 lbs. of
oxygen as the process of the invention, just to freat the BOD, while a significant part of the
influent TKN nitrogen would be discharged to the atmosphere as ammonia gas, with most
of the remainder of TKN being discharged in the effluent stream as ammonium ions and
TKN.
The process of the present invention is applicable to multiple diverse wastewater
streams. For example, the process is applicable to municipal wastewater streams
containing a total BOD of about 100 to about 400 mg/1 and a TKN of about 10 to about 50
mg/1; to flushed wastewater from hog, dairy and/or other animal holding area having a
total BOD of about 500 to about 10,000 mg 1 and a TKN of about 100 to about 2,000
mg/1; and industrial, food processing and the like wastewater having a total BOD of about
400 to about 80,000 mg/1 and a TKN of about 20 to about 10,000 mg/1. Additional
application areas include the production of a microbial cell mass for single cell protein
production from a variety of biodegradable materials, e.g. solid and/or waterborne, and
appropriate nitrogen sources.
The nutrient rich humus of the invention is a settled and in some cases precipitated,
microorganism active-product of the process. The humus comprises bioconverted organic
waste containing stable nitrogen, phosphoms and potassium rich material, bound in an
active microorganism matrix intermixed with fibrous cellulosic and/or other organic
materials. The appearance of dried humus varies significantly from dried manure in that it
is a deep brown, peat like or granular material, which readily mixes with soil, including
clay, sand and the like. The material is substantially generally absent an offensive odor
and has limited odor that is closely similar to that of rich topsoil. The material may be
comminuted (ground, granulated, screened, milled) and generally contains few clumps.
The material is generally hydrophobic in that it resists wetting, but once wetted it becomes
hydrophilic in that it tends to hold water. The material appears to resist clumping even
when wetted.
A preferred humus of the invention comprises from about 0.2 to about 6.0%
nitrogen, about 0.1 to about 2.0% phosphoms and from about 0.1 to about 2.0% potassium
on a dry weight basis, in stable form. The use of chemical precipitation and high rate
processing can raise the nitrogen, phosphoms and potassium upper limits to 10% on a dry
weight basis. Nitrogen, in the form of ammonia, is generally at 10% or less, and
preferably at 3% or less of total nitrogen and quantities of calcium, manganese,
magnesium, iron and sulfur are generally present. Though unstable nitrogen and
phosphoms values are generally present in the humus of the invention, they appear to be in
quantities so low as to constitute little or no environmental threat through aqueous
dissolution and mn-off but are available for uptake by plants. Thus, the humus of the
invention is unique in that the nifrogen and phosphoms nutrient rich character thereof is in
a form beneficial for enhancing the growth of vegetation within its environment, yet
resistant to migration by rainfall, ground water flow and the like to pollution of aquifer,
surface and groundwater accumulations.
The humus of the invention created from animal excrement could comprise other
components which are defined by the animal feed supply, the animal from which the
humus is generated, any bedding, parlor washwaters, cleaners, run-off and the like, or
other materials which may be collected or added to the system for humus generation. Such
other added components are synergistic and are intended to improve the efficacy of a
particular humus of the invention for a particular use.
The organic matrix of the humus of the invention is rich in stabilized nutrient
content and comprises dynamic macro and/or micro organisms and other components
which appear especially predisposed to proactively adapt and interact with additive
materials in an efficacious phenomena which can be managed to provide a host of further
beneficial products.
Due to the maintenance of the process parameters in the desired ranges, a
consistent quality of humus can be obtained. Waste may be collected from any convenient
organic waste source such as dairy cows, sheep, goats and the like, feed lot cattle, swine,
horses, zoo animals, poultry including chicken, turkeys, ducks and the like and even
aquatic animals such as fish, frogs and alligators.
The process of the invention is managed to maximize the active, facultative
heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass by continually generating genetic variations in its
organisms to optimize microbial adaptability of the biomass to survive and thrive in
varying environments. The humus harvested has an active microbial potential that appears
to adapt to environmental changes with a host of interesting beneficial effects.
Thus, the humus of the invention which comprises captured and stabilized nutrients
along with trace metals appears to adapt and capture toxic substrates or trace metals when
produced from or mixed with a waste stream containing same. Microbial variations which
appear to degrade cellulose and lignin are enhanced by microbial variations which appear
to degrade other polymerized materials. Microbial variations which appear to capture and
stabilize nutrients are enhanced by microbial variations which appear to promote seed
germination and release of nutrients which increase crop yield and size of fruits, grains and
vegetables.
The humus of the invention is generally processed after harvesting for both
convenience of handling and enhancement of microbial activity. Generally, the humus of
the invention is at least partially dried to reduce its handling weight by air drying, vacuum
water removal, mild heat drying or the like and thereafter shredded, screened, pulverized
or the like as may be desired. It is also possible to use other drying processes or
techniques such as intense heat drying, forced air, or cyclonic drying. It should be
understood however, that the humus of the invention need not be dried or further
comminuted to be effective as a beneficial product in accord with the invention.
Partially dried and processed humus is easily mixed with other materials and has
been found to be especially effective in providing an enhanced growth media when mixed
with normal soils and. top soils. When mixing the humus with normal- soils it is prefened
to use not more than about 1 :2 parts by volume humus :soil and generally adequate
nutrition content will be imparted to a soil at levels of about 1 :3-7 parts by volume
humus:soil. Generally when mixing with top soils the amount of humus can be reduced to
about 1 :4-12 parts by volume humus:topsoil.
The humus of the invention can also be effective in producing remediated growth
soil media when mixed with clay, sand, silt, mud, soil, gravel, dust, mine tailings, dredge
materials, depleted or spent soils and the like. New growth media can be created through
mixtures of the humus with sawdust, paper, cardboard, polymers, plastics, waste organics
or agricultural materials such as bagasse, hulls, stalks, stems, waste hay, leaves, shells,
cotton or rayon dust and the like.
It is contemplated that the humus of the invention can also be used in aquatic .
It is contemplated that the humus of the invention can also be used in aquatic
growth environments wherein the humus alone or mixed as above indicated with other
media is added to a flooded environment for plant growth. This could be used for the
creation, restoration, or enhancement of wetlands.
Though the humus of the invention provides enhanced nutrient content to promote
germination and growth of plants, it has also been found to be effective in suppressing
plant disease and providing plant pest resistance. Humus which is harvested direct from
the process of the invention is generally too nutrient rich to be a suitable plant growth
media standing alone, and is generally mixed with an appropriate material as above
described to provide a desirable medium. Interestingly however, such directly harvested
humus appears to provide a good top cover for plants which have been seeded or
germinated in under soils, appearing to provide resistance from the spread of disease
bacteria and the like while providing a rich nutrient source which can be utilized by the
root structure of the existing plant.
The humus of the invention can also be an effective feed component. Depending
upon the animal source of the waste used to generate the humus of the invention, the
humus can be of beneficial utility as a feed stock and/or additive. For example, the humus
produced from the waste from typical swine feed lot operations generally comprises
protein content which appears to define and characterize a delivery vehicle for nutrients,
trace elements and the like for feed stock utility.
Thus, humus generated from bam and manure waste from a trough fed dairy cow
or feed lot operation comprises an active organic matrix which may be characterized
differently from that of a grazing fed dairy cow operation, which is different from a hog
feed lot operation and/or chicken or turkey lot operation. Though each such operation
produces a nutrient rich humus which has general applicability for plant growth, each
operation also results in a humus containing other components which generally contribute
to an individual humus being particularly suitable for specific utilities such as enhanced
germination and growth of specific plants and/or remediation of specific soils and/or
characterization as foodstuffs or feed additives. The humus of the invention can be
modified to achieve specific objectives by introducing various materials into the influent
flush waters to the process or into various other of the bioreactor or ecoreactor or other
components of the process. The nature of the added material and the manner and location
of its addition will influence the adaptive and biodynamic character of the process and the
resulting humus or other byproduct material. This can be managed to achieve a variety of
desirable end product uses and functions.
Claims (17)
1. A method for converting organic waste into a beneficial humus material comprising:
collecting organic waste;
combining said organic waste with an aqueous or water containing flowable stream
thereby creating a combined waste stream;
treating said combined waste sfream in an aqueous environment containing 1015 or
more biological microorganisms with an average doubling time of less than 30 days to
promote the-growth of microbial populations thereby subjecting the organic waste to
biological conversion and treatment;
monitoring the amount of dissolved oxygen in said aqueous environment;
maintaining less than 2.0 mg/1 of dissolved oxygen in said aqueous environment
via an aeration means to promote the growth of microorganisms using facultative
pathways; and
separating solids from the aqueous environment for the recovery of an organic
humus material.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said microbial populations include major populations
of facultative heterotrophic fermentors, autotrophic nitrifiers, heterotrophic facultative
denitrifiers, and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said microbial populations include major populations
of autotrophic nitrifiers and facultative heterotrophic denifrifiers generally combined with
facultative heterotrophic fermentors and autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers, the process
further comprising the addition of chemicals to provide an electron acceptor for the
denitrification of nitrite or nitrate by facultative heterotrophic denifrifiers.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the aqueous sfream is a recycle of said combined waste
stream from said aqueous environment.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the combined waste sfream comprises a concenfration
of BOD and TKN of at least about 100 mg/1, and a TKN to total BOD ratio of more than
about 1 :20.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the dissolved oxygen concentration is maintained at a
concentration of less than 0.1 mg/1 substantially throughout said aqueous environment.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said aqueous environment contains at least 1017
biological microorganisms with a doubling time of 10 days or less.
8. The method of claim 5 wherein said aqueous environment contains at least 1013
biological microorganisms with an average doubling time of less than 30 days per pound
of total BOD or TKN in said combined waste stream
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the combined waste sfream comprises total BOD and
TKN at concentrations of at least about 100 mg/1, and a TKN to total BOD ratio of more
than about 3:20. "
10. The method of claim 1 wherein said aqueous environment includes a concentrating
means to maintain microorganism quantity within said aqueous environment.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising the recovery of liquid effluent from said
aqueous environment.
12. The method of claim 10 further comprising recovery of the liquid effluent from said
aqueous environment for further biological treatment in a second aqueous environment:
13. The method of claim 12 further comprising recovery of the liquid effluent from said second aqueous environment for further biological treatment in a wetlands environment
comprising plants and microorganisms to yield a substantially pollutant free liquid effluent
and recoverable solids.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said wetlands environment is dewatered and the
solids therein are harvested to recover a beneficial humus material.
15. The method of claim 13 wherein the biologically treated effluent is discharged to a
receiving water body.
16. A substantially odorless beneficial organic humus material, said humus material being
harvested from a substantially odorless, biological treatment process comprising;
combining organic waste with an aqueous stream thereby creating a combined waste
stream; treating said combined waste stream in an aqueous environment reactor system
containing 1015 or more biological microorganisms with an average doubling time of less
than 30 days to promote the growth of major microbial populations of facultative
heterotrophic fermentors, autotrophic nitrifiers, heterotrophic facultative denitrifiers and
autotrophic ammonium denitrifiers thereby subjecting the organic waste to biological
treatment; monitoring the amount of dissolved oxygen in said aqueous environment; maintaining less than 2.0 mg/1 of dissolved oxygen in said aqueous environment via an
aeration means to promote the growth of microorganisms using facultative pathways; and
separating solids from the aqueous environment for the recovery of an organic humus
material.
17. The humus material of Claim 16, mixed with at least one of clay, sand, silt, mud, soil,
gravel, dust, mine tailings and dredgings, polymers, plastics or other inert or inorganic
materials.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/709,171 US6689274B1 (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2000-11-10 | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
US09/709,171 | 2000-11-10 | ||
PCT/US2001/046496 WO2002038508A2 (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2001-11-08 | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2002227224A1 true AU2002227224A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 |
AU2002227224B2 AU2002227224B2 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
Family
ID=24848765
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2002227224A Expired AU2002227224B2 (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2001-11-08 | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
AU2722402A Pending AU2722402A (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2001-11-08 | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2722402A Pending AU2722402A (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2001-11-08 | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6689274B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1343728A2 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2002227224B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2428417C (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA03004143A (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ526342A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002038508A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7431839B2 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2008-10-07 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Low oxygen biologically mediated nutrient removal |
US7575685B2 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2009-08-18 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Low oxygen biologically mediated nutrient removal |
US6689274B1 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2004-02-10 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
DE10350391A1 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2005-06-02 | Greenfield Holding Gmbh | Flooring |
US7445707B2 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2008-11-04 | Envirolytic Technologies, Llc | Waste effluent treatment system |
FR2890960B1 (en) * | 2005-09-22 | 2007-12-21 | Jean Francois Bonvallot | METHOD FOR TREATING ANIMAL DEJECTIONS COMPRISING A MICRO-AEROBIC TREATMENT STEP IN THE PRESENCE OF AMMONIA |
US7651615B2 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2010-01-26 | Clemson University Research Foundation | Process for reducing waste volume |
US7544292B2 (en) * | 2006-05-03 | 2009-06-09 | Hoot Aerobic Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for denitrifying wastewater |
WO2007131197A2 (en) * | 2006-05-05 | 2007-11-15 | Hoot Aerobic Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of denitrifying a solution |
US20070266751A1 (en) * | 2006-05-16 | 2007-11-22 | Blackstone Business Group, Inc. | Biosolid waste transformation process |
US20080035036A1 (en) * | 2006-06-05 | 2008-02-14 | Bassani Dominic T | Environmentally compatible integrated food and energy production system |
US7552827B2 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2009-06-30 | Envirolytic Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods of separating manure from a manure and bedding mixture |
US7666300B2 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2010-02-23 | Hoot Aerobic Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for denitrifying wastewater |
US8066880B2 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2011-11-29 | Hoot Aerobic Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for denitrifying wastewater |
US8101081B2 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2012-01-24 | Hoot Aerobic Systems, Inc. | Method of denitrifying wastewater |
US20100163484A1 (en) * | 2007-06-18 | 2010-07-01 | Cormier Murphy J | Compound for denitrifying wastewater |
GB0722486D0 (en) * | 2007-11-16 | 2007-12-27 | Javel Ltd | Treatment of wastewater |
US8241363B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2012-08-14 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Expandable corpectomy spinal fusion cage |
US8241294B2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2012-08-14 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Instruments for expandable corpectomy spinal fusion cage |
US8287734B2 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2012-10-16 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Method for treating nitrogen in waste streams |
US8876905B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2014-11-04 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Minimally invasive corpectomy cage and instrument |
EP2341034A1 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-07-06 | Basf Se | Reduction of the heavy metal content of wastewater in a biological treatment and plant therefor |
US8617280B2 (en) * | 2010-08-13 | 2013-12-31 | Woods End Laboratories, Inc. | Compositions and methods for buffered growing media |
US20140047880A1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-02-20 | Lloyd Myles Phipps | Methods of Processing Food Waste |
US9651304B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-05-16 | Green Recovery Technologies, LLC | Pretreatment of biomass prior to separation of saturated biomass |
US10214786B2 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2019-02-26 | Procell Investments Limited | Wastewater treatment for the production of microbial biomass |
GB201310798D0 (en) * | 2013-06-18 | 2013-07-31 | Aerobact Ltd | Animal waste treatment |
JP5996819B1 (en) * | 2016-04-23 | 2016-09-21 | 株式会社 小川環境研究所 | Aeration control method for activated sludge |
CN107651757B (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-22 | 中冶华天工程技术有限公司 | Method for removing ammonia nitrogen in surface water environment |
CN110803947A (en) * | 2019-11-13 | 2020-02-18 | 苏州腾康环保科技有限公司 | Manufacturing method for producing efficient water flush fertilizer by utilizing biogas slurry |
Family Cites Families (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3462275A (en) | 1968-01-31 | 1969-08-19 | Gen Electric | Waste conversion process and product |
US3964998A (en) * | 1972-08-04 | 1976-06-22 | The South African Inventions Development Corporation | Improvements in and relating to waste water treatment |
US4179374A (en) | 1976-05-12 | 1979-12-18 | Dravo Corporation | Apparatus for the treatment of wastewater |
US4292328A (en) | 1978-08-21 | 1981-09-29 | Coulthard T Lionel | Thermophilic aerobic digestion process for producing animal nutrients and other digested products |
DE2908134C2 (en) | 1979-03-02 | 1983-10-20 | Böhnke, Botho, Prof. Dr.-Ing., 5100 Aachen | Plant for the purification of wastewater |
US4540666A (en) * | 1981-08-13 | 1985-09-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Limited | Methane fermentation |
US4780208A (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1988-10-25 | Botho Bohnke | Process for purification of effluent |
US4721569A (en) | 1987-04-17 | 1988-01-26 | Zabion, Ltd. | Phosphorus treatment process |
DK96989D0 (en) | 1989-02-28 | 1989-02-28 | Faxe Kalkbrud Aktieselskabet | PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES |
US5078882A (en) | 1990-03-21 | 1992-01-07 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Bioconversion reactor and system |
US5342524A (en) * | 1991-05-24 | 1994-08-30 | Gaddy James L | Performance of anaerobic digesters |
US5447633A (en) | 1991-08-06 | 1995-09-05 | Austrian Energy & Environment Sgp/Waagner Biro Gmbh | Activated sludge process for sewage purification |
DE4133984A1 (en) | 1991-10-14 | 1993-04-15 | Rudolf Prof Dr Kuerner | METHOD FOR BIOLOGICAL DIGESTION OF MINERALS |
US5248422A (en) | 1992-05-28 | 1993-09-28 | Neu Kenneth E | Process for treating wastewater to remove BOD and nutrients |
US5338452A (en) * | 1993-01-14 | 1994-08-16 | The Lemna Corporation | High rate anaerobic reactor for primary treatment of high strength wastewater |
US5538529A (en) | 1993-09-10 | 1996-07-23 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Bioconverted nutrient rich humus |
US5755852A (en) | 1993-09-10 | 1998-05-26 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Bioconverted nutrient rich humus |
US5472472A (en) | 1993-09-10 | 1995-12-05 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Animal waste bioconversion system |
BR9608119A (en) | 1995-05-11 | 1999-09-21 | Biobalance As | New method for the control of biodegradation. |
CA2239300C (en) | 1996-02-15 | 2006-05-16 | Bedminster Bioconversion Corporation | Odor control system |
US5733454A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1998-03-31 | Ehh Holding Co., Inc. | Process and apparatus for the treatment of flowable waste |
US6013512A (en) | 1996-11-06 | 2000-01-11 | Turschmid; Krzysztof H. | Method for scrubbing gaseous emissions using bacteria |
US6068774A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-05-30 | Osprey Biotechnics, Inc. | Biological control of agricultural waste odor |
IL120583A (en) | 1997-04-01 | 2000-07-16 | Berkman Eliezer | System for purification of domestic household effluent |
US6350350B1 (en) * | 1997-04-01 | 2002-02-26 | Science Applications International Corp. | Integrated system and method for purifying water, producing pulp and paper and improving soil quality |
US6190566B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-02-20 | Steven N. Kolber | Treatment of waste produced by farm animals raised under confined conditions |
BR9912387A (en) * | 1998-07-24 | 2001-04-24 | Paques Bio Syst Bv | Process for biological water treatment |
US6312599B1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2001-11-06 | John H. Reid | Method of using wastewater flow equalization basins for multiple biological treatments |
US6689274B1 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2004-02-10 | Bion Technologies, Inc. | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system |
-
2000
- 2000-11-10 US US09/709,171 patent/US6689274B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-11-08 MX MXPA03004143A patent/MXPA03004143A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-11-08 EP EP01993586A patent/EP1343728A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-11-08 AU AU2002227224A patent/AU2002227224B2/en not_active Expired
- 2001-11-08 NZ NZ526342A patent/NZ526342A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-11-08 WO PCT/US2001/046496 patent/WO2002038508A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2001-11-08 CA CA 2428417 patent/CA2428417C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-11-08 AU AU2722402A patent/AU2722402A/en active Pending
-
2003
- 2003-06-20 US US10/600,936 patent/US6908495B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6689274B1 (en) | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system | |
US7575685B2 (en) | Low oxygen biologically mediated nutrient removal | |
AU2002227224A1 (en) | Low oxygen organic waste bioconversion system | |
CA2503166C (en) | Low oxygen biologically mediated nutrient removal | |
US5755852A (en) | Bioconverted nutrient rich humus | |
Chen et al. | Sludge production and management for recirculating aquacultural systems | |
US6398959B1 (en) | Aerobic treatment of liquids to remove nutrients and control odors | |
US10464835B2 (en) | Process for the treatment of biological materials and wastewater | |
EP1494971A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for treating animal manure | |
Day et al. | Processing manure: physical, chemical and biological treatment | |
KR0170039B1 (en) | Method of waste treatment for stock farms | |
US6630072B2 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for treating waste water | |
US20040011734A1 (en) | Lagoon for hog waste and the method of treatment thereof | |
KR100502180B1 (en) | Treatment method of sewage for converting sewage into an organic compost | |
Woestyne et al. | Biotechnology in the treatment of animal manure | |
CA2481867A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for treating animal manure | |
Chen et al. | Livestock waste treatment | |
Gan | A prototype swine waste treatment system in Hawaii | |
Humenik | Lesson 25 | |
Golz et al. | Reducing the environmental impact of high density fish production: An integrated approach to solids treatment for Recirculating Aquaculture Systems using expandable granular biofilters | |
Oleszkiewicz et al. | Agricultural wastes | |
Pattanaik et al. | Waste Processing in Engineered Ecosystems- Building Brand Equity for Environment | |
Jewell et al. | Agricultural Wastes | |
JP2000015289A (en) | Simple excretion treatment method by control of putrefying bacteria and apparatus therefor |