AU2001282743A1 - Electro-powder - Google Patents

Electro-powder

Info

Publication number
AU2001282743A1
AU2001282743A1 AU2001282743A AU2001282743A AU2001282743A1 AU 2001282743 A1 AU2001282743 A1 AU 2001282743A1 AU 2001282743 A AU2001282743 A AU 2001282743A AU 2001282743 A AU2001282743 A AU 2001282743A AU 2001282743 A1 AU2001282743 A1 AU 2001282743A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
powder
excipient
electro
acid
particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2001282743A
Other versions
AU2001282743B2 (en
Inventor
Lars-Gunnar Nilsson
Thomas Nilsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microdrug AG
Original Assignee
Microdrug AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from SE0002822A external-priority patent/SE0002822L/en
Application filed by Microdrug AG filed Critical Microdrug AG
Publication of AU2001282743A1 publication Critical patent/AU2001282743A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2001282743B2 publication Critical patent/AU2001282743B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

Electro-powder
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to powders with electrostatic properties as well as a process and a method for preparation of such an electro-powder as a medicament powder and more particularly to preparations of chemical and biological substances forming an electro-powder suitable for electrostatic charging and dosing for operation in an inhaler device.
GENERAL BACKGROUND Today high quality dosing is one of the most difficult factors slowing down the growth of the inhaler market. This is specially the case for systemic delivery by inhalation through a dry powder inhaler (DPI) which represents a market segment making it possible to compete with the injection needle for many types of drugs, i.e. insulin, pain management etc. Systemic delivery refers to the delivery of an active substance to be carried to a deep area of the lung. U.S. Patent No. 5,997,848 discloses a systemic delivery of insulin to a mammalian host being accomplished by inhalation of a dry powder of insulin. An insulin dose 0.5 to 15 mg is dispersed into a high velocity air or gas stream to form a dry insulin aerosol in a holding chamber from which the created aerosol is inhaled. The volume of the chamber has to be sufficiently large to capture a desired dose and may optionally have baffles and/ or one-way valves for promoting containment. Such a device is often referred to as a spacer. The device for instance has a drawback in that there are difficulties to control the amount of medicine emitted to the lung as an uncontrolled amount of powder will stick to the walls of the spacer.
A dry powder inhaler, DPI is intended for administration of powder into the deep or upper lung airways by oral inhalation. With deep lung should be understood the peripheral lung and alveoliy where direct transport of active substance to the blood can take place. Particle sizes, to reach into the deep lung, should be in the range 0.5 - 3 μm and for a local lung delivery in the range 3 - 5 μm, as measured with a laser diffraction instrument, e.g. a Malvern Mastersizer for physical size classification or an Andersen Impactor for an aerodynamic size classification according to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) current guidelines.
Powders for inhalers have a tendency of agglomerating, in other word to clod or to form small or larger lumps, which then have to be de-agglomerated. De-agglomeration is defined as breaking up agglomerated powder by introducing electrical, mechanical, or aerodynamic energy. Usually de- agglomeration is performed as a step one during dosing and as a final step two during the patient's inspiration through the DPI.
Technologies to de-agglomerate today include advanced mechanical and aerodynamic systems and combinations between electrical and mechanical filling systems that can be seen for instance in U.S. Patent No. 5,826,633. Further there are systems disclosed for dispersing aerosolized doses of medicaments, e.g. U.S. Patent No. 5,775,320, U.S. Patent No. 5,785,049, and U.S. Patent No. 5,740,794. Furthermore, in our International Publications WO 00/06236 and WO 00/06235 principles for de- agglomeration and classification are disclosed.
As already noted for an optimal amount of substance to reach the alveoli, an administered powder dose should preferably have a grain size between 0.5 and 3 μm. Besides, the inspiration must take place in a calm way to decrease air speed and thereby reduce deposition in the upper respiratory tracts.
Mainly particles larger than 5 μm will be deposited in the upper airways by impaction and particles less than 0.5 μm will not sediment before exhaling and they are therefore not efficient for delivery to upper or deep lung.
It is also common to utilize carriers i.e. lactose having a larger grain size onto which the fine power is distributed. Upon inspiration the large size grains will then stick in the oral cavity while the fine particle fraction, this is powder smaller than 5 μm, will be let free and proceed to the lung. For instance U.S. Patent No. 5,642,727 discloses a tribo-inhaler having a container portion for electrostatically retaining a predefined dose of medicament powder. The container portion contains a plurality of polymeric beads that have diameters of approximately 50 to 200 microns. Each of the polymeric beads has a specific quantity of dry powder medicament electrostatically adhered to its surface.
To achieve a high quality dose, a so-called spacer is often used to achieve the small grains evenly distributed in a container from which the inhalation can take place. In principle a dosing device or an inhaler is connected to a spacer forming a container having a relatively large volume and into this container a powder or an aerosol is injected, which partly is distributed in the air space and partly sticks to the walls. Upon inhalation from the spacer the fine powder floating free in the air will effectively reach the alveoli of the lung. This method in principle has two drawbacks, firstly difficulties to control the amount of medicine emitted to the lung as an uncontrolled amount of powder sticks to the walls of the spacer and secondly difficulties in handling the relatively space demanding apparatus. The uncontrolled sticking to the walls is highly dependent on the electrostatic charge of the medicament powder.
Today dosing into cavities for inhalation through a dry powder inhaler (DPI) is performed by using mechanical, fluidization and electrical technologies in combinations to fill cavities with powder intended for inhalation by patients. One example of this technique is the already mentioned U.S. Patent No. 5,826,633 in which a combination of fluidization and mechanical forces is used to fill a cavity with a metered dose.
This type of technique -will give a dose tha -will need a -lot of energy to de- agglomerate before inhalation into the deep lung. This is performed using a mechanical pump that is actuated before inhalation and a high-pressurized air stream is shot down into the powder for de-agglomeration into a cylindrical spacer. Inhalation efficiency for this type of system is normally not more than 20 % of metered dose.
One major problem with the technique described above is to also obtain a low relative standard deviation (RSD) between doses due to lack of in-line control possibilities in production making it hard to be in compliance with regulatory demands
Different commercial manufacturing equipment are today present on the market, i.e. equipment used to produce micronized powders working with specialized nozzles for creating liquid or semisolid aerosols, which are dried to powders. The equipment can also be used for coating- techniques and Cryo-techniques to produce low-density powders. Fluid Jet Mill equipment is used to produce micronized powders by working with high-pressurized gases, normally air or nitrogen. Also solvents defined as liquids are used to dissolve or disperse active substances and excipients, e.g. alcohols, before sprayed into the manufacturing equipment or other gases such as carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons or equivalent, perfluorocarbons, air or other suitable inert gas for the manufacturing equipment can be used. Such equipment can also be used for purposes of coating, drying and Cryo- techniques, one at a time or in combinations, where Cryo-techniques is a method in which super cold media, i.e. liquid nitrogen or carbon dioxide, is used for cooling down the manufacturing equipment and the preparation below 0 °C. The above techniques include media at non-cryo temperatures but instaead higher pressures in the process. Blending is defined as a homogeneous mixture of at least one active substance and one or many excipients regardless of amounts and particle sizes, and can be used alone or in combinations with spray drying and Fluid Jet Milling to prepare an eϊectrό-powder. By the Term excipient is meant a chemical or biological substance introduced together with a pharmaceutical active substance to, for instance, improve the performance of the preparation or an compound intended to act as an inactive surface and/or volume suitable for the active substance normally being a mix preferably chosen among the available excipients not to deteriorate the powder properties of the preparation.
Micronized medicament powders are being electrostatically charged in many occasions in the pharmaceutical industry whereby this creates a big problem by causing stops and producing dust on surfaces that should be kept clean.
When electrostatic properties of a micronized medicament powder is controlled this can be used to present an efficient and high quality dosing from electrostatically operating equipment such as disclosed in our U.S. Patent No. 6,089,227 as well as our Swedish Patents No. 9802648-7 and 9802649-5, which present excellent inhalation dosing performance.
An International Publication WO 00/35424 discloses a substrate coating for electrostatic deposition of dry powder medicaments for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical dosage forms. The dry powder comprises micronized polyethylene glycol (PEG), with a molecular weight of 1,000 to 20,000. However, the particles are stated to have a size of 1 - 100 μm and a preferred size is claimed for 5 - 20 μm but there is nothing told about the fine particle fraction or the specific charge of a fine particle fraction.
However, there is still a need for a much more developed control of the electrostatic charging quality of applicable medicament powders before they are going to be used in electrostatic dosing equipment.
SUMMARY The present invention makes it possible for a majority of dry medicament substances to be prepared by using the method and process of the present invention to obtain a medicament dry powder, "eϊectro-powder", suitable for electrostatic charging and dosing. The electro-powder thus obtained will be possible to dose with high efficiency and quality by electrostatic dosing equipment. A method and a process for preparation of medicament powders for electrostatic charging are disclosed. An electro-powder results from preparations of chemical and biological substances with or without excipients to form powders suitable for electrostatic charging and dosing for operation in a dry powder inhaler device. The electro-powder resulting from the method and process forms an active dry powder substance or dry powder medicament formulation with a fine particle fraction (FPF) representing of the order 50 % or more of the content ranging between 0.5-5 μm and provides electrostatic properties with an absolute specific charge per mass after charging of the order 0.1 to 25 μC/g and presents a charge decay rate constant Qso of more than 0.1 s, and having a tap density of less than 0.8 g/ml and a water activity a of less than 0.5. In the processing the active substance is generally a pharmacologically active chemical or biological substance, for instance a polypeptide or any other corresponding substance selected alone or mixed or blended together with one or more excipients being a compound to improve electrostatic properties of the medicament powder substance or dry powder medicament formulation. Further the electro-powder may even be formed as a micro-encapsulation by coating micronized powder with the excipient in such a way that the active substance is capsulated, whereby the powder electrostatic properties mainly comes from the excipient.
A method for producing electro-powder according to the present invention is set forth by the independent claim 1 and further embodiments are set forth by the dependent claims 2 to 6 and a method for preparing electrostatically chargeable power is set forth by the independent claim 16 and further embodiments are set forth by the dependent claims 17 to 26. The electro- powder obtained according to the present invention is set forth by the independent claim 7 and further embodiments of the electrό-pόwdef are set forth by the dependent claims 8 to 16 and powder for further use with a dry powder inhaler is set forth by the independent claim 27 and the dependent claims 28 to 39 and finally a process for preparing electo-powder is set forth by the independent claim 39 and further embodiments of the process is set forth by the dependent claims 40 to 45.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by making reference to the following description taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. l illustrates an alternative for a general structure of the method according to the present invention for obtaining high quality electro- powder;
FIG.2 illustrates an alternative for a powder analysis method;
FIG.3 illustrates an alternative for a method of determining preparation of electro-powder;
FIG.4 illustrates a first example of manufacturing equipment;
FIG.5 illustrates a second example of manufacturing equipment
FIG.6 illustrates in a cross section a first example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface;
FIG.7 illustrates in a cross section a second example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface;
FIG.8 illustrates in a cross section a third example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface of a section;
FIG.9 illustrates in a cross section a fourth example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface; FIG.10 illustrates in a cross section a fifth example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface;
FIG.11 illustrates in a cross section a sixth example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface;
FIG.12 illustrates in a cross section a seventh example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface; and
FIG.13 illustrates in a cross section an eighth example of an electro-powder presenting an electrostatic charged surface.
DESCRIPTION
Electrostatic charging of medicament powders is a new technology making it possible to dose by the use of controlled electrical field techniques. A field is created by suitably applied electrical potentials to transport in a controlled way electrostatically charged powder for dosing or measuring purposes. The electrostatic charging may be performed by means of corona, induction or tribo-electrical charging.
An electro-powder is defined as a fine powder prepared to meet a set of electrical specifications and other specifications. Such an electro-powder is, after a proper processing, expected to present an electrical specification measured at room temperature with an absolute specific charge of the order of 0.1 to 25 μC/g (O. lx lO-'6 - 25χ l0-6 Coulomb /gram of negative or positive charge) and desired to present a charge decay constant Qso of > 0.1 sec, where Q50 is defined as the time until 50% of the electrostatic charge is discharged, (for instance after a corona charging in an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) model 3935 from DEKATI LTD).
The electrostatic charged micronized powder, defined as electro-powder, should in the desirable process be prepared such that at least more than 50 % of the present powder particles have a particle size below 10 μm. According to the present invention such electro-powder is produced in an equipment simultaneously making a preparation and measuring the quality of produced dry powder for electrostatic charging. For instance Fluid Jet Mill and/ or Spray Drying and/ or Cryo-techniques or microwave drying will be used as well as blending, or any other suitable process. However, in the industry today according to the state of the art the processes are not fully controlled and the powder may at some occasions show a positive charge and at other occasions a negative charge. These differences in the behavior are due to the lack of understanding of electrostatic theory in the pharmaceutical industry, which generally does not know how to keep the electrostatic and powder properties under a strict specification and control.
In order to be able to use inhalation to provide administration of a medicament and in this manner replace needle injection of medicine the electro-powder must possess the right properties. Measured at room temperature the electro-powder is expected to contain more than 50 % of fine particle fraction (FPF) and to have a water content of less than 4 % together with a water activity a less than 0.5 and a tap density of less than 0.8 g/ml. The water content is the total amount of water in the powder sample in percent of weight using for instance a Karl-Fischer titration or any equal method. Water activity aw is a dimensionless quantity, which may, for instance, be measured with an AquaLab model series 3 TE. Tap density is, for instance, measured by using a Dual Autotap from Quantachrome® Corporation according to British Pharmacopoeia for Apparent Volume method. Both water activity and tap density are quantities well know to a person skilled in the field of chemistry analysis. The electrostatic properties, defined as the amount of electrostatic charge that the powder holds after a corona, induction or tribo-electrical charging, are critical and should meet the electrical specification, which is measured with an electrometer in μC/g at room temperature 18°C to 25°C in an air or nitrogen atmosphere with a relative humidity of less than 5 %. As electrometer may for instance be utilized a Keithley Electrometer 6512. The fine particle fraction represents the aerodynamic particle size measured for instance with an Andersen Impactor. The physical size can vary due to density and aerodynamic properties of the medicament powder, e.g. super porous particles with a tap density of < 0.1 g/ml.
The preparation of an electro-powder for an inhaler device includes the manufacturing of the medicament powder by particular equipment using one or more active substances.
Consequently, to be able to dose and administer powder using a dry powder inhaler (DPI), some quite important technical basic conditions must be met by the used powder:
a) A powder having a very fine particle fraction (FPF) must be prepared as it is generally only particles between 0.5 and 3 μm that will be pharmacologically active by being transported to the deep lung. For local lung treatments by inhalation the particle size should be between 3 -5 μm.
b) A correct dose and a low dose-to-dose relative standard deviation (RSD) must be released from the inhaler. For electrostatically dosed dry powders with electrostatic properties inside set specification the relative standard deviation between doses (RSD) will not be more than 2-4 %.
c) Electrostatic properties of the powder must be specified and controlled before and during dosing to ensure the right medicament quality of electrostatically dosed powder.
d) Water content, measured as. Karl-Fischer moisture .content, should be below 4 %. e) Powder water activity a must be very low and less than 0.5 and controlled to enable a high quality and amount of electrostatic charge measured as Q/m (μC/g) (charge/ mass of powder).
f) Thus, water activity aw is a key factor and must be below 0.5 and controlled by having an environment, which is kept at a very low relative humidity, most preferably below 5 % at 18-20 C.
The administration of electro-powder into the respiratory tract is then a very attractive way for administration of many substances both for local lung treatments and for systemic treatments.
The amount of electrostatic charge per mass of the medicament electro- powder should be within a certain range to achieve a good control of the dosing process for the electrostatic dosing process. This range for the absolute charge per mass with a medicament dry powder with a fine powder fraction between 0.5 and 5 μm would desirably range from 0.1 to 25 μC/g dependent on the type of constituents.
Micro-encapsulation is defined as a coating of a micronized powder with an excipient in such a way that the active substance is capsulated and the powder properties manly comes from the excipient. This is also a very- efficient preparation method for difficult active substances, for which the electrical specifications of electro-powder otherwise are difficult to meet.
Therefore preparation may be chosen in combination with micro- encapsulation and/ or chosen together with one or more excipients.
In Figure 1 is schematically illustrated the basic "principle of the method" according to the present invention to achieve a high quality dry powder to be electrostatically charged, mainly referred to as just electro-powder, for utilization in a dry powder inhaler (DPI). Many active substances will be of interest to use for local lung delivery or systemic delivery. The active substance is generally a pharmaceutical active chemical or biological substance intended for administration into the deep or upper lung airways by oral inhalation from the DPI. In Figure 1 step 100 a substance would for instance be macromolecules from the following therapeutic areas: insulin rapid intermediate and slow acting and diabetes peptides, interferons, interleukins and antagonists, antibodies, peptides for immune suppression, nerve growth factors, vaccines, gene therapies, genetically modified virons and/ or bacterias, parathyroid hormone, osteoporosis peptides, antiobesity peptides, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and LHRH analogs, somatostatin analogs, human calcitonin, colony stimulating factor, erythropoletins, growth hormones, erectile dysfunction, anti pregnancy hormones.
An active substance is preferably selected from the following pharmaceutical active chemical and biological substances: vasopressin, a vasopressin analogue, desmopressin, glucagon, corticotropin, gonadotropin, calcitonin, C-peptide of insulin, parathyroid hormone, human growth hormone, growth hormone, growth hormone releasing hormone, oxytocin, corticotropin releasing hormone, a somatostatin analogue, a gonadotropin agonist analogue, atrial natriuretic peptide, thyroxine releasing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, an interleukin, a growth factor, a polypeptide vaccine, an enzyme, an endorphin, a glycoprotein, a lipoprotein kinase, intra-cellular receptors, transcription factors, gene transcription activators /repressors, neurotransmitters (natural or synthetic), proteo- glycans.
Further could be selected a polypeptide involved in the blood coagulation cascade, and" which exerts its pharmacological effect systemically or any other polypeptide that has a molecular weight (Daltons) of up to 50 kDa, or a substance from the group consisting of proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, steroids, oligasaccharides, nucleic acids and combinations thereof or a substance from a group consisting of leuprolide and albuterol or is among opiates or nicotine derivatives or scopolamin, morphine, apomorphine analoges or equivalent active substances or pharmaceutical active chemicals for asthma treatment, i.e. budesonid, salbutamol, terbutalinsulphate, salmeterol, flutikason, formoterol or salts thereof.
Thus, the present method starts at a step 100 with an active substance to further go through an electro-powder preparation step 130, to at a step 160 result in a high quality electro-powder to be used in an inhaler. Before the active substance in step 100 will be subjected to a determining of the preparation in a step 120 a powder analysis step 110 is performed. The power analysis step 110 is further described by steps 210 - 290 as illustrated in Figure 2. The powder analysis will first via any of the steps 210 to 230 analyze either the substance itself or an excipient or the substance and excipient together for determining electrostatic charge in a step 240, powder mass in a step 250, particle size in a step 260, water content in a step 270, water activity in a step 280 and finally produce an analytical report in a step 290 as basis for the determination of the preparation. The result from step 290 then is transferred to step 120 of Figure 1.
As already noted the term excipient refers to a chemical or biological substance introduced together with the pharmaceutically active substance to improve its electrostatic performance. The excipient or excipients for instance are selected from a group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, methalose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxy ethyl cellulose, carboxy methyl cellulose, polyoxyethylene cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene octyl ether, polyoxyethylene octylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene oleyl ether, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, polyoxyethylene stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether, and dialkyl- phendxy"pόly(ethyleheoxy)ethanol, or an ahiόhic surfactant selected ffόm" a group consisting of sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfate and sodium dodecylnaphthalene sulfate, glucolipids, phosphoglucolipids. The excipient may also be a cationic surfactant like a quaternary ammonium salt or selected from the group consisting of dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin, dioctanoylphosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidylcholine, and a salt of caprate, laurate, oleate, or myristate or a salt of ursodeoxycholate, taurocholate, glycocholate, or taurodihydrofusidate, or from a group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, a phospholipid, an alkyl glycoside, a cyclodextrin, a salt of capric acid, and a sodium, potassium or organic amine salt of a fatty acid or is a bile salt or selected from homo- and copolymers based on hydroxycarboxylic acids, such as polymers of glycolide, lactide, methylglycolide, dimethylglycolide, polymethylglycolide, diethylglycolide, dibutylglycolide, caprolactone, valerolactone, decalactone, propiolactone, butyrolactone, pivalolactone, as well as polymers based on trioxanone, dioxanone (1,3 and 1,4), substituted dioxanone, trimethylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate or lactic acid, glycolic acid, pentaeiythritol, sorbitol, adonitol, xylitol, fructose, epichlorohydrin, isopropylmorpholine, isopropylmethylmorpholinedione, β- propionic acid, tetramethylglycolide, β -butyrolactone, butyrolactone, pivalolactone, α-hydroxybutyric acid, α-hydroxyisobutyric acid, α- hydroxyvaleric acid, α-hydroxyisovaleric acid, α-hydroxycaproic acid, α- hydroxyisocaproic acid, α-hydroxy-α-ethylbutyric acid, α-hydroxy-α- methylvaleric acid, α-hydroxyheptanoic acid, α-hydroxyoctanoic acid, α- hydroxydecanoic acid, α-hydroxytetradecanoic acid and α-hydroxystearic acid or is a bio-degradable synthetic polymer i.e. PEG, amino acid derived β- poly(2-hydroxyethyl aspartamide) , poly(5N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-L-glutamine) , poly(glutamic acid), poly(aspartic acid), polylysine, PEG-lysine, or polyesters poly(α- or β- malic acid), or block copolymers poly(ethylene glycol-aspartate) also called polymeric micelles or is a liposome forming substance or a natural or synthetic wax or from sugar alcohols i.e. glycerol, sorbitol, or from monosaccarides i.e. fructose, glucose, or from disaccarides i.e. sucrose, maltose, trehalose, lactose, or from trisaccarides i.e. raffinose, or from polysaccarides i.e. dextran, or from oligosaccarides i.e. maltohexose, or from buffering salts i.e. sodium citrate. In Figure 3 a further part of the present method is outlined in a step 330 for determining the preparation and manufacturing process together with a selected excipient. Figure 3 indicates, that the active substance received in step 300 may as a first step have to be micronized in a step 310 and as a second step be subject to powder analysis in a step 320 before being transferred to step 330 for determining preparation and manufacturing equipment together with selection of possible excipient. The result of the step
330 then goes to a powder analysis step 340 to determine whether or not the powder meets both the electrical specification and physical specification of an electro-powder. The powder-analysis step 340 also corresponds to the analyzing process performed in steps 240 to 290 of step 200 of Figure 2.
In case the powder in the powder analysis step 340 is found not to be an approved electro-powder, the process according to the method loops back to steps 320 or 330 for a new determination of preparation and manufacturing equipment together with another possible selected excipient to improve the result of the preparation of the active substance to obtain an electro-powder, which fulfils the basic factors lined up above.
The powder analysis step 200 of Figure 2 is used for analyzing active substance in a step 210 and excipients in a step 220 and combinations of active substances and excipients in a step 230 to then determine the electrostatic charge in step 240, powder mass in step 250, particle size in step 260, water content in step 270, water activity in step 280, discharge in step 245 and contamination in step 285 to make it possible to calculate the specific charge and estimating the discharge rate constant to determine if the tested excipient is suitable or another should be selected. However as mentioned same steps 240 to 290 may be used within steps 320 and 340 of Figure 3.
According to the present process an active substance is tested to obtain a basis for determining preparation and manufacturing equipment together with the excipient to become as efficient as possible. After that the mapping of the active substance and the interesting excipients is done Figure 1 indicates that the process proceeds to step 120 of determining preparation and the results from the powder analysis from step 110 will in step 120 be interpreted for determining preparation. From step 120 determining preparation the process then proceeds into the electro-powder preparation step 130, which is illustrated by examples of embodiments presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5, where Figure 4 illustrates an Fluid Jet Milling at 400 and Fig 5 illustrates a Spray Dryer at 500.
If the step of determining preparation and manufacturing equipment together with an actual excipient has chosen a Fluid Jet Milling preparation step the process will in an illustrative embodiment proceed as below:
In a sketch of the process, illustrated in Figure 4, the powder material will be continuously fed into the mill at 410 together with the chosen media and the micronized powder will be fed out at 420 into a cyclone 430 and the resulting air is filtered at 440 before going back into circulation via a feedback arrangement 470 into the mill. It is possible to add an arrangement 450 for material warming up to dry out moisture trapped in the preparation and also bleed out moist media at 480 to continuously have a correct climate for the electro-powder preparation. The electro-powder is then collected for a new analysis after shaking off the filters at 440 into the dry powder container indicated at 460.
Figure 5 illustrates schematically a Spray Drier 500 where the preparation is feed at 560 into the Spray Drier. Before entering the Spray Drier 500 the preparation will be atomized by a pressurized media 520 and dried to an electro-powder via a classification process and collected in the dry powder container 510. The injected media is going back into circulation via a filter 550 and clean air is let out of the system at 530. New media 600 is possible to be warmed up at 590 to have a even better drying effect on the electro- powder collected in the dry powder container 510. If a closed loop system is used with a media that is not air, the media going through the filter must be cleaned in 540 and circulated back into the system after cleaning step 530.
If a closed loop system is used, the system moisture is controlled by means of a device 570 discarding the moist and new processing media is introduced at 600.
The result of the above methods will be an electro-powder that can have different appearance depending of how the electro-powder is prepared if looking at a cross section of an electro-powder particle and the distribution of electrostatic charge over the electro-powder particle surface. Figure 6 shows a first example of a prepared particle where the active substance 10 itself constitutes the electro-powder and the surface of a cross section presents a homogeneous structure, where electrostatic charges are well distributed over the surface.
The example of Figure 7 shows a prepared electro-powder particle that consists of two components, active substance 22 coated with an excipient 20 presenting electrostatic charges distributed over the surface.
Figure 8 shows yet another prepared electro-powder particle that is not homogeneous and consists of two components, an active substance 32 and an excipient 30, whereby the electrostatic charges are more distributed onto the excipient 30.
Figure 9 illustrates a prepared electro-powder presenting particles having a homogeneous mix of excipient and active substance 40 allowing the electrostatic charges to be distributed over the surface.
Figure 10 shows a prepared electro-powder particle where the active substance 52 and the excipient 50 are loosely attached and the electrostatic charges are mainly distributed on the excipient 50. Figure 11 shows a prepared electro-powder in the form of a micelle or a liposome of an active substance 62 and an excipient 60 where the electrostatic charges are distributed over the surface of the excipient.
Figure 12 shows a prepared electro-powder particle in the form of multiple layered electro-powder consisting of a first mix of excipient 74 and active substance 72 and a second excipient 70 presenting distributed electrostatic charges over the surface.
Finally Figure 13 shows a resulting electro-powder particle prepared as a multiple layer electro-powder consisting of a first homogenous mix of excipient and active substance 82 and a second excipient 80 showing distributed electrostatic charges over the surface. The excipient for achieving the desired electrostatic properties may be mixed in by the order of 2 - 50 %, but to make a core (carrier) with substance the share of excipient mixed with the active substance 82 constituting the medicament as according to Figure 13 may be much more, even of the order of 105: 1 in cases of administering medicaments with a very low dosage.
Below will be exemplified calculated results of preparations of electro-powder according to the process and method of the present invention.
Example 1
The active substance 100 in example 1 was chosen as terbutalinesulphate (TBS) used for asthma treatment. The TBS in step 300, initially being in a powder form with a particle size distribution between 250-500 μm, was first micronized in step 310 in a manufacturing equipment like a device 400 of Figure 4 or a device 500 of Figure 5 to meet the powder specification for an electro-powder.
The TBS was then analyzed in the step 320 first measuring particle size in an Andersen impactor according to U.S. FDA (USP 24, NF 19 Supplement guidelines) at 28.3 liters /minute. The mass of powder was determined for instance by a chemical analysis using a HPLC according to the USP-24. A result of the Andersen impactor was then:
Stage μg
0 10
1 15
2 13
3 20
4 25
5 30
6 49
7 20
Filter 15
Total 197 μg
Result of particle size analysis in step 260 from stage 3 to 7 was a 73 % fine particle fraction and that is better than the basic electro-powder specification demand stipulating > 50 % fine particle fraction.
The micronized TBS powder was then brought to the powder analysis 320 for first analyzing the electrostatic charge in step 240 using for instance an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) model 3935 from DEKATI LTD. The TBS substance was de-agglomerated and sucked into the instrument at 30 liters /minute and the total electrostatic charge in μC was measured together with an analysis of the powder mass sucked into the ELPI. Dividing the total electrostatic charge with the powder mass gives the specific charge in μC/g.
Total electrostatic charge: -6.2 nC
Total powder mass 3.4 mg Resulting measured specific charge= -1.82 μC/g. Specific charge is also within electrical specification of an electro-powder as the measure -1.82 μC/g is within the absolute specific charge range 0.1- 10"6 to 25-10-6 C/g set forth.
The TBS powder was then tested for its discharge rate (i.e. step 245 in Figure 2) using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). An analysis was set up with five consecutive tests at 5 different times to determine the discharge constant Q50, the time until 50 % of the electrostatic charge has been discharged having the TBS electrically isolated.
Discharge rate Q50 for TBS in this preparation was 5 sec. Q50 discharge rate of 5 sec is within the electro-powder specification stipulating the Q50 > 0.1 sec.
discharge at step 245.
TBS powder was now transferred to the chemical analysis. The first chemical analysis was water content at step 270 measured by a standard Karl-Fischer titration Mettler Toledo DL38 Titrator. Result of the five subsequent Karl- Fischer water content measurements gave
1 3.5 %
2 3.7%
3 3.9%
4 4.1% 5 4.5
Average 3.94 % The second chemical analysis was water activity at step 280 measured with a standard AquaLab model serie 3 TE at 24.3 C. Result of the five consecutive water activity measurements was:
1 0.35
2 0.37
3 0.38
4 0.36
5 0.37
giving then an average of 0.37.
The third chemical analysis for contamination at step 285 was performed with a standard HPLC SpectraSYSTEM with a UN 6000 detector. By the term contamination is understood any foreign substance or material not being an excipent or active substance in the powder. This measurement gives a guarantee that the manufacturing process of TBS has not introduced any contamination into the TBS powder. At step 290 a report of the result of the step of TBS powder analysis was reported and printed:
Analysis Specification Result Decision
Electrostatic charge | 0.1 - 25 μC/g | -1.82 μC/g Approved
Discharge rate Qso > 0.1 sec 5 sec Approved
Powder mass ΝA 3.4 mg Approved
Particle size > 50 % < 5μm 73 % Approved
Water content < 4 % 3.94 % Approved
Water activity aw< 0,5 0.37 Approved
Contamination ace. to FDA not found Approved
This result approves that this TBS preparation will serve as an electro- powder for pre-prepared doses for a dry powder inhaler device, particularly an inhaler utilizing electrostatic principles for its operation. Example 2
The active substance nicotintartrate (NT) was tested for use in a DPI for smokers not allowed to smoke cigarettes due to medical reasons. The NT in step 300, initially being in powder form with a particle size distribution between 150-400 μm was first micronized in step 310 in a manufacturing equipment like device 400 of Figure 4 or device 500 of Figure 5 to meet the powder specification for an electro-powder.
The NT then was analyzed in step 320 in the Andersen Impactor at 28.3 liters/minute 260. The mass of powder was determined by chemical analysis using the HPLC SpectraSYSTEM.
Powder analysis of particle size resulted in the measures
Stage μg
0 15
1 25
2 17
3 22
4 30
5 32
6 45
7 21
Filter 11
Total 218 μg
Result of the particle size analysis in step 260 was for stages 3 to 7 a 69 % fine particle fraction and that is more than our electro-powder specification demand stipulating > 50 % fine particle fraction.
The micronized NT powder then was brought to the powder analysis for analyzing first the electrostatic charge in step 240 using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). The NT was de-agglomerated and sucked into the instrument at 30 liters /minute and the total electrostatic charge in μC was measured together with an analysis of the powder mass sucked into the ELPI using standard HPLC metods for NT. Dividing the total electrostatic charge with the powder mass gave the specific charge in μC/g.
Total electrostatic charge: -0.17 nC
Total powder mass 4.3 mg
Resulting measured specific charge= -39.5 nC/g.
The specific charge of NT being -0.039 μC/g is then found to be too low a value to conform with our electro-powder electrical specification defining the absolute specific charge to be within the range of 100 nC/g to 25 μC/g. The conclusion is that NT has a poor value of specific charge and therefore not suitable to directly be used as an electro-powder.
There is no need for analyzing the discharge rate at step 245 for NT when the specific charge is not approved. The NT powder is transferred to chemical analysis of water content in step 270, water activity in step 280, and contamination in step 285.
First chemical analyzis of water content in step 270 was as before measured by the standard Karl-Fischer titration.
Result of the five consecutive water content measurements gave 1 3.8 % 2 3.5%
3 3.7%
4 3.5%
5 3,5 % and an average of 3,6 %. The second chemical analysis was the water activity in step 280 measured with the AquaLab model series 3 TE at 24.3°C yielding 1 0.43
2 0.41
3 0.42
4 0.44
5 0.42 alculated average 0.42
The third chemical analysis was the contamination measurement in step 285 with a the HPLC SpectraSYSTEM.
At step 290 a report of the result of the NT powder analysis was reported and printed:
Analysis of Specification Result Decision
Electrostatic charge at 240 | 0.1 - 25 μC/g | -0.039 μC/g Not App. Powder mass at 250 NA 4.3 mg Approved Particle size at 260 > 50 % < 5μm 69 % Approved Water content at 270 < 4 % 3.6 % Approved Water activity at 270 aw< 0.5 0.42 Approved Contamination at 285 ace. to FDA not found Approved
As a result of the powder analyses the NT is transferred to the step 330 of determining preparation and manufacturing equipment together with an excipient and a new preparation has to be determined.
The following three preparations were suggested for further tests for the active substance NT.
Preparation # 1 #2 #3
Active substance NT 90 75 50
Excipient lactose α-monohydrate 10 25 50
Spray drying one nozzle head Solvent Water/ Methanol 50/50
Particles configuration Figure 8
Preparation 1
The preparation #1 having 90 % active substance and 10 % excipient is analyzed first in the Andersen at 28.3 liters /minute. The mass of powder determined by chemical analysis using the HPLC gives:
Stage μg
0 11
1 17
2 12
3 24
4 25
5 32
6 45
7 22
Filter 18 Total 206 μg
Result of particle size analysis is for stage 3 to 7 a 72 % fine particle fraction, which is better than the electro-powder specification demand stipulating > 50 % fine particle fraction.
The preparation # 1 is then brought to the powder analysis for analyzing first the electrostatic charge in step 240 using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). The preparation 1 is de-agglomerated and sucked into the instrument at 30 liters/ minute and the total electrostatic charge in μC is measured together with an analysis of the powder mass sucked into the ELPI. Dividing the total electrostatic charge with the powder mass will give the specific charge in μC/g. Total electrostatic charge: -0.34 nC
Total powder mass 3.8 mg
Resulting measured specific charge= -0.09 μC/g.
The preparation #1 is then tested for discharge rate in step 245 using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). The analysis is set up with five consecutive tests:
The value of the discharge rate constant is found to be 2 sec for preparation #, and the preparation #1 is now transferred to chemical analysis being first the analysis of water content in step 270 measured by the Karl- Fischer titration.
Result of water content 270 analysis in step 270 then is
1 3.2 %
2 3.5%
3 3.1%
4 3.4% 5 3.4 %
Average 3.32 %
The second chemical analysis is the water activity at step 280 measured with . the AquaLab model series 3 TE at 24.3 C resulting in: 1 0,35
2 0,37
3 0,38
4 0,36
5 0,37
Average 0,37
The third chemical analysis is the contamination test in step 285 with the HPLC SpectraSYSTEM.
At step 290 a report of the result of the preparation #1 powder analysis is reported and printed:
Analysis Specification Result Decision
Electroststic charge | θ. l - 25 μC/g | -0.09 μC/g Not App.
Discharge rate Qso > 0.1 sec 2 sec Approved
Powder mass NA 3.8 mg Approved
Particle size > 50 % < 5μm 73 % Approved
Water content < 4 % 3.32 % Approved
Water activity a < 0.5 0.37 Approved
Contamination ace. to FDA not found Approved
The result tells that the preparation #1 does not constitute an electro- powder.
Preparation #2
The preparation No 2 having a 75 % active substance and 25 % excipient is analyzed first in the Andersen 28.3 liters /minute. The mass of powder is determined by chemical analysis using the HPLC.
Stage μg
0 15
1 17
2 12
3 20
4 23 5 30
6 45
7 22
Filter 25
209 μg
Result of particle size analysis in step 260 is for stages 3 to 7 a 67 % fine particle fraction which is higher than the minimum electro-powder specification demand stipulating > 50 % fine particle fraction.
The preparation #2 is then brought to the powder analysis step 320 for analyzing first the electrostatic charge in step 240 using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). The preparation #2 was de-agglomerated and sucked into the instrument at 30 liters /minute and the total electrostatic charge in μC is measured together with an analysis of the powder mass sucked into the ELPI. Dividing the total electrostatic charge with the powder mass gives the specific charge in μC/g.
Total electrostatic charge: -0.57 nC Total powder mass 4.3 mg
Resulting measured specific charge= -0.133 μC/g.
Then the preparation #2 is in consecutive measurement tested for discharge rate at step 245 using the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI).
The value of the discharge rate constant is >1 sec for preparation #2 and approved according to electrical specification of an electro-powder. The preparation #2 thereafter was transferred to the chemical analysis with the first analysis of water content in step 270 measured by the Karl-Fischer titration method.
Result of water content analysis in step 270 indicated
1 2.8 %
2 3.0%
3 3.1%
4 2.7%
5 2.9 %
Average 2.9 %
The second chemical analysis is water activity in step 280 measured with the AquaLab instrument at 24.3°C resulting in:
1 0.30
2 0.32
3 0.33
4 0.31
5 0.33
Average 0.32
The third chemical analysis is the contamination test in step 285 with the HPLC SpectraSYSTEM.
The result of he preparation #2 powder analysis is reported and printed at step 290:
Analysis Specification Result Decision
Electrostatic charge 10.1 - 25 μC/g I -0.13 μC/g Approved.
Discharge Q50 > 0.1 sec > 1 sec Approved Powder mass NA 4.3 mg Approved Particle size > 50 % < 5μm 67 % Approved Water content < 4 % 2.9 % Approved Water activity a < 0,5 0.32 Approved Contamination ace. to FDA not found Approved
The result is that the preparation #2 is approved as an electro-powder.
Preparation #3 The preparation #3 is a preparation of 50 % active substance and 50 % excipient, which is analyzed first in the Andersen at 28.3 liters /minute. The mass of powder determined by chemical analysis using the HPLC.
Stage μg
0 20
1 17
2 23
3 28
4 31
5 32
6 35
7 26
Filter 20
Total 232 μg
Result of particle size analysis in step 320 is for stages 3 to 7 a 66 % fine particle fraction which is higher than the electro-powder specification demand stipulating > 50 % fine particle fraction.
The preparation #3 then was brought to the powder analysis step 320 for analyzing first in step 240 the electrostatic charge using The Electrical Low Pressure Impactor. The preparation #3 was de-agglomerated and sucked into the instrument at 30 liters/ minute and the total electrostatic charge in μC is measured together with an analysis of the powder mass sucked into the ELPI. Dividing the total electrostatic charge with the powder mass gives the specific charge in μC/g.
Total electrostatic charge: -3.27 nC
Total powder mass 4.3 mg
Result: Measured specific charge =- 0.76 μC/g
The preparation #3 was then tested for discharge rate in step 245 using the ELPI. As before the analysis was set up with five consecutive tests
The value of the discharge rate constant was found to be >5 sec for preparation #3 and the preparation #3 was now transferred to the chemical analysis steps 270 - 285 and the result of the water content analysis in step 270 was:
1 2.8 %
2 2.7%
3 3.0%
4 3.2%
5 3.0 %
Ave rage 2.9 %
The second chemical analysis of water activity 280 measured with the AquaLab instrument at 24.3°C then yielded: 1 0,33
2 0,35
3 0,37
4 0,39
5 0,34
Average 0,36
and finally the third chemical analysis for contamination in step 285 was performed with the HPLC SpectraSYSTEM.
The result of the preparation #3 powder analysis was reported and printed at step 290:
Analysis Specification Result Decision
Electrostatic charge | 0.1 - 25 μC/g | -0.76 μC Approved
Discharge rate Qso > 0.1 sec >5 sec Approved
Powder mass NA 4.3 mg Approved
Particle size > 50 % < 5μm 66 % Approved
Water content < 4 % 2.9 % Approved
Water activity aw< 0.5 0.36 Approved
Contamination ace. to FDA not found Approved
The result was that the preparation #3 also constitutes an electro-powder.
Three different preparations were made and tested where preparation #1 did not meet the electrical specification for an electro-powder. Both preparations #2 and #3 met the specifications for an electro-powder and further test must determine which preparation is best suited for a nicotintartrate dry powder inhaler, DPI. However regarding the specific charge preparation #2 was found to be just within the lower limit but, rather close to preparation #1 which was not approved, while preparation #3 was found well within the given limits for electrostatic charge. Being able to produce an electro-powder which will comply to the set of necessary desired parameters for the electrical field dosing technology will be a major breakthrough for inhalation of active substances to the upper and deep lung for both local lung treatments and for systemic delivery in complement to injection with needle.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications and changes may be made to the present invention without departure from the scope thereof, which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims (45)

1. A method for preparing electro-powder constituting a finely-divided powder suitable for manufacture of doses using either corona, induction or tribo-electric charging in conjunction with electric field dosing techniques of the powder intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device, characterized by the steps of: providing a first electrostatically chargeable powder having a particle size suitable for inhalation therapy and consisting of a pharmacologically active agent or a mixture of such agents and optionally including one or more pharmaceutical excipients, analyzing the pharmaceutical formulation for determining its electrostatic qualities for selecting a composition and manufacturing process giving suitable electrostatic properties; preparing a formulation in accordance with the analysis results by means of a selected formulation and manufacturing equipment; analyzing the thereafter prepared formulation to verify that it fulfils the basic requirements of a finely-divided electrostatically chargeable electro- powder suitable for manufacture of doses intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device; whereby, if the formulation is found not to comply with the basic requirements, the above process is repeated for finding another composition and/ or manufacturing process for a suitable new formulation
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized by the further step of basing the formulation on particles with an aerodynamic mass-median diameter of 10 μm or less, or preferably 5 μm or less, the particles further providing electrostatic properties regarding absolute specific charge per mass after charging of 0.1 - 50 μC/g, or preferably 0.1 - 25 μC/g, and presenting a charge decay rate constant Q50 of more than 0.1 sec.
3. The method according to claim 1, characterized by the further step of finely dividing the formulation by using alternatively milling, preferably fluid jet milling, spray drying or spray chilling.
4. The method according to claim 1, characterized by the further step of selecting the pharmacologically active ingredient or ingredients among vasopressin, a vasopressin analogue, desmopressin, glucagon, corticotropin, gonadotropin, calcitonin, C-peptide of insulin, parathyroid hormone, human growth hormone, growth hormone, growth hormone releasing hormone, oxytocin, corticotropin releasing hormone, a somatostatin analogue, a gonadotropin agonist analogue, atrial natriuretic peptide, thyroxine releasing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, an interleukin, a growth factor, a polypeptide vaccine, an enzyme, an endorphin, a lycoprotein, a lipoprotein, a kinase, intra-cellular receptors, transcription factors, gene transcription activators/ repressors, neuro transmitters, proteoglycans or a polypeptide involved in the blood coagulation cascade, that exerts its pharmacological effect systemically, or as any other polypeptide having a molecular weight (Daltons) of up to 50 kDa or from the group consisting of proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, nucleic acids and combinations thereof or from the group consisting of leuprolide and albuterol, or among opiates or nicotine and nicotine derivates or scopolamin, morphine, apomorphine analoges or equivalent active substances, or as pharmacologically active chemicals for asthma treatment for example budesonide, salbutamol, terbutalinsulphate, salmeterol, flutikason, formoterol or salts thereof.
5. The method according to claim 1, characterized by the further step of selecting the excipient or excipients among polyvinyl alcohol, methalose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxy ethyl cellulose, carboxy methyl cellulose, polyoxyethylene cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene octyl ether, polyoxyethylene octylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene όleyl ether, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, polyoxyethylene stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether, and dialkylphenoxy poly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol; or as an anionic surfactant selected from a group consisting of sodium dodecyl sulphate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulphate and sodium dodecyl- naphthalene sulphate glucolipids, phosphoglucolipids, or a cationic surfactant such as a quaternary ammonium salt; or from a group consisting of dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin, dioctanoylphosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidylcholine, or a salt of caprate, laurate, oleate, or myristate; or from a group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, a phospholipid, a galactolipid, an alkyl glycoside, a cyclodextrin, a salt of capric acid, and a sodium, potassium or organic amine salt of a fatty acid or is a bile salt for example ursodeoxycholate, taurocholate, glycocholate or taurodihydrofusidate or from homo- and copolymers based on hydroxycarboxylic acids, such as polymers of glycolide, lactide, methylglycolide, dimethyl-glycolide, polymethylglycolide, dimethyl-glycolide, dibutylglycolide, capro-lactone, valerolactone, decalactone, propiolactone, butyrolactone, pivalolactone, as well as polymers based on trioxanone, dioxanone (1,3 and 1,4), substituted dioxanone, trimethylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate or lactic acid, glycolic acid, pentaeiythritol, sorbitol, adonitol, xylitol, fructose, epichlorohydrin, isopropylmorpholine, isopropylmethyl- morpholinedione, β-propionic acid, tetramethylglycolide, α-butyrolactone, butyrolactone, pivalolactone, α-hydroxybutyric acid, α-hydroxyisobutyric acid, α- hydroxyvaleric acid, α-hydroxyisovaleric acid, α-hydroxycaproic acid, α-hydroxyisocaproic acid, α-hydroxy-α-ethylbutyric acid, α-hydroxy-α- methylvaleric acid, α-hydroxyheptanoic acid, -hydroxy-octanoic acid, α- hydroxydecanoic acid, α-hydroxytetradecanoic acid and α-hydroxystearic acid or as a bio-degradable synthetic polymer, for example PEG, chitosan, amino acid derived β-ply(2-hydroxyethyl aspartamide), poly(sN-(2- hydroxyethyl)-L-glutamine), poly(glutamic acid), poly(aspartic acid), polylysine, PEG-lysine, or polyesters poly(α or β - malic acid), or block copolymers poly(ethylene glycol-aspartate), also named polymeric micelles; or as a liposome forming substance, or a natural or synthetic wax or from sugar alcohols like glycerol, sorbitol, or from monosaccarides like fructose, glucose, or from disaccarides for example sucrose, maltose, trehalose, lactose, or from trisaccarides, like raffinose, or from polysaccarides like dextran, or from oligosaccarides like maltohexose, or from buffering salts like sodium citrate.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized by the further step of selecting the excipient as being lactose monohydrate, trehalose, mannitol or glucose.
7. A finely-divided electrostatically chargeable electro-powder suitable for manufacture of doses using either corona, induction or tribo-electric charging in conjunction with electric field dosing techniques and intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device, characterized in that it consists of particles with an aerodynamic mass-median diameter of 10 μm or less and providing electrostatic properties regarding absolute specific charge per mass after charging of 0.1 - 50 μC/g and presenting a charge decay rate constant Q50 of more than 0.1 sec.
8. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that the powder consists of particles with an aerodynamic mass median diameter of 5 μm or less.
9. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that the powder provides electrostatic properties regarding absolute specific charge per mass after charging of 0.1 - 25 μC/g.
10. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that the powder is finely divided by using at least one milling alternative, preferably fluid jet milling, spray drying or spray chilling.
11. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that the pharmacologically active ingredient or ingredients are selected among substances listed in claim 4 of the claimed method.
12. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that it contains one or more excipients selected among excipients listed in claim 5 of the claimed method.
13. The electro-powder according to claim 12, characterized in that the excipient is lactose monohydrate, trehalose, mannitol or glucose.
14. The electro-powder according to claim 7, characterized in that the powder has a content of non-hydrate bound water below 4%.
15. The electro-powder according to claim 14, characterized in that the powder is prepared using raised temperature and/ or pressure in the supplied media for drying the powder.
16. A method for preparing a finely-divided electrostatically chargeable powder suitable for manufacture of doses using either corona, induction or tribo-electric charging in conjunction with electric field dosing techniques and intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device, characterized by the step of adding at least one excipient to at least one pharmacologically active ingredient forming the powder to improve the efficiency of the powder.
17. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of mixing at least one pharmacologically active ingredient with at least one excipient for forming resulting particles.
18. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of making the resulting particles consist of a core of at least one pharmacologically active ingredient or at least one excipient and a coating with at least one excipient or pharmacologically active ingredient.
19. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of making the resulting particles consist of agglomerates of particles containing at least one pharmacologically active ingredient and particles further containing at least one excipient.
20. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of making the powder consist both of particles containing at least one pharmacologically active ingredient and particles containing at least one excipient.
21. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of making the resulting particles combinations of at least one of the alternatives described in claims 17 to 20.
22. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of combining resulting particles with coarse particles of a pharmacologically acceptable carrier to form an ordered mixture, the coarse particles having a mass-median diameter between 20 and 800 μm.
23. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of selecting the pharmacologically active ingredient or ingredients among the substances listed in method claim 4.
24. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of selecting the at least one excipient among the excipients listed in method claim 5.
25. The method according to claim 24, characterized by the step of selecting an excipient as lactose monohydrate, trehalose, mannitol ' of ~ glucose.
26. The method according to claim 16, characterized by the further step of finely dividing the formulation by using at least one milling alternative, including fluid jet milling, spray drying or spray chilling.
27. A finely-divided electrostatically chargeable powder suitable for manufacture of doses using either corona, induction or tribo-electric charging in conjunction with electric field dosing techniques and intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device, characterized in that at least one excipient is added to at least one pharmacologically active ingredient to improve the efficiency of the powder.
28. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that each of the particles consists of a mixture of at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient of several possible pharmaceutical ingredients with at least one excipient of several possible excipients.
29. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the particles consists of a core of at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient of several possible pharmaceutical ingredients or at least one excipients and at least one coating with at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient of several possible pharmaceutical ingredients or at least one excipient of several possible excipients.
30. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the particles consist of agglomerates of particles containing at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient of several possible pharmaceutical ingredients and particles containing at least one excipient of several possible excipients.
31. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that it consists both of particles containing at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient of several possible pharmaceutical ingredients and particles containing at least one excipient of several possible excipients.
32. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the particles are combinations of one or more of the alternatives defined by any of claims 28 to 31.
33. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the particles are combined with coarse particles of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier to form an ordered mixture, the coarse particles having a mass-median diameter between 20 and 800 μm.
34. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the active pharmaceutical ingredient or ingredients are selected among the substances listed in claim 4 of the claimed method.
35. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the at least one excipient is selected among excipients listed in claim 5 of the claimed method.
36. The powder according to claim 35, characterized in that the excipient is lactose monohydrate, trehalose, mannitol or glucose.
37. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the formulation is finely divided by using alternatively milling, preferably fluid jet milling, spray drying or spray chilling.
38. The powder according to claim 27, characterized in that the powder has a content of non-hydrate bound water below 4 %.
39. A process for preparing a electrostatically chargeable electrό-pόwder to achieve specified electrostatic properties suitable for manufacture of doses intended for administration into the airways by oral inhalation from a dry powder inhaler device, characterized by the steps of: giving the electro-powder an aerodynamic mass-median diameter of
10 μm or less; charging the electro-powder by either corona, induction or tribo- electric charging to an absolute specific charge per mass after charging of 0.1 - 50 μC/g and presenting a charge decay rate constant Q50 of more than 0.1 sec; dosing the powder onto a technical means using electric field dosing techniques; subsequently loading into an dry powder inhaler device the technical means containing one or more doses of powder for administration of the powder.
40. The process according to claim 39, characterized by the step of giving the powder an aerodynamic mass-median diameter of 5 μm or less.
41. The process according to claim 39, characterized by the step of charging the powder by either corona, induction or tribo-electric charging to an absolute specific charge per mass after charging of 0.1 - 50 μC/g.
42. The process according to claim 39, characterized by the step of finely dividing the powder by using alternatively milling, preferably fluid jet milling, spray drying or spray chilling.
43. The process according to claim 39, characterized by the step of making the powder consist of one or more pharamcologically ingredient or ingredients selected among substances listed in claim 4 of the claimed method.
44. The process according to claim 39, characterized by the step of making the powder contain at least one excipient selected among excipients listed in claim 5 of the claimed method.
45. The process according to claim 44, characterized by the step of selecting the excipient as lactose monohydrate, trehalose, mannitol or glucose.
AU2001282743A 2000-08-04 2001-07-27 Electro-powder Expired - Fee Related AU2001282743B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0002822A SE0002822L (en) 2000-08-04 2000-08-04 electrostatic Powder
SE0002822 2000-08-04
PCT/SE2001/001682 WO2002011803A1 (en) 2000-08-04 2001-07-27 Electro-powder

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2001282743A1 true AU2001282743A1 (en) 2002-05-16
AU2001282743B2 AU2001282743B2 (en) 2005-04-07

Family

ID=20280628

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU8274301A Pending AU8274301A (en) 2000-08-04 2001-07-27 Electro-powder
AU2001282743A Expired - Fee Related AU2001282743B2 (en) 2000-08-04 2001-07-27 Electro-powder

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU8274301A Pending AU8274301A (en) 2000-08-04 2001-07-27 Electro-powder

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US6696090B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1309369A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2004505685A (en)
KR (1) KR20030038685A (en)
CN (1) CN100435879C (en)
AU (2) AU8274301A (en)
BR (1) BR0112903A (en)
CA (1) CA2417225A1 (en)
PL (1) PL360126A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2003101912A (en)
SE (1) SE0002822L (en)
WO (1) WO2002011803A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030055026A1 (en) 2001-04-17 2003-03-20 Dey L.P. Formoterol/steroid bronchodilating compositions and methods of use thereof
ES2425392T3 (en) 2002-03-20 2013-10-15 Mannkind Corporation Cartridge for an inhalation device
SE524990C2 (en) 2002-04-12 2004-11-09 Microdrug Ag Preparation of therapeutic dry powder and method for splitting and spreading in the air of medical powder
JP3691459B2 (en) * 2002-06-14 2005-09-07 久光メディカル株式会社 Powder inhalant composition
TWI359675B (en) 2003-07-10 2012-03-11 Dey L P Bronchodilating β-agonist compositions
CN1838968A (en) 2003-08-08 2006-09-27 艾伯吉尼斯公司 Antibodies aimed to parathyroid hormone (PTH) and uses thereof
US7318925B2 (en) * 2003-08-08 2008-01-15 Amgen Fremont, Inc. Methods of use for antibodies against parathyroid hormone
AU2004285553B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2009-12-10 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. Nanoparticles for drug delivery
CN101010305B (en) 2004-08-20 2010-08-11 曼金德公司 Catalysis of diketopiperazine synthesis
KR101644250B1 (en) 2004-08-23 2016-07-29 맨카인드 코포레이션 Diketopiperazine salts, diketomorpholine salts or diketodioxane salts for drug delivery
AU2006290227B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-08-02 Mannkind Corporation Method of drug formulation based on increasing the affinity of crystalline microparticle surfaces for active agents
DK1986679T3 (en) 2006-02-22 2017-11-20 Mannkind Corp PROCEDURE FOR IMPROVING THE PHARMACEUTICAL PROPERTIES OF MICROPARTICLES INCLUDING DICETOPIPERAZINE AND AN ACTIVE INGREDIENT
US8297959B2 (en) * 2006-05-03 2012-10-30 Terapia Celular, Ln, Inc. Systems for producing multilayered particles, fibers and sprays and methods for administering the same
US8309129B2 (en) * 2007-05-03 2012-11-13 Bend Research, Inc. Nanoparticles comprising a drug, ethylcellulose, and a bile salt
UY31235A1 (en) * 2007-07-21 2009-03-02 NEW PULVERULENT DRUGS CONTAINING TIOTROPY AND SALMETEROL, AS WELL AS LACTOSE AS EXCIPIENT
US8986253B2 (en) 2008-01-25 2015-03-24 Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Two chamber pumps and related methods
CA2728230C (en) 2008-06-13 2017-10-17 Mannkind Corporation A dry powder inhaler and system for drug delivery
US8485180B2 (en) 2008-06-13 2013-07-16 Mannkind Corporation Dry powder drug delivery system
AU2009259883B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2015-02-05 Mannkind Corporation An interactive apparatus and method for real-time profiling of inhalation efforts
US8408421B2 (en) 2008-09-16 2013-04-02 Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Flow regulating stopcocks and related methods
EP2334234A4 (en) 2008-09-19 2013-03-20 Tandem Diabetes Care Inc Solute concentration measurement device and related methods
US8314106B2 (en) 2008-12-29 2012-11-20 Mannkind Corporation Substituted diketopiperazine analogs for use as drug delivery agents
WO2010082543A1 (en) 2009-01-19 2010-07-22 三菱瓦斯化学株式会社 Method for injecting drug into living body by electrospraying and device therefor
JP5341532B2 (en) 2009-01-19 2013-11-13 第一電子工業株式会社 A pair of erroneous mating prevention keys and an electrical connector using the keys
CA2769030C (en) 2009-07-30 2016-05-10 Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Infusion pump system with disposable cartridge having pressure venting and pressure feedback
EP2582421A1 (en) 2010-06-21 2013-04-24 MannKind Corporation Dry powder drug delivery system and methods
ES2625858T3 (en) 2011-04-01 2017-07-20 Mannkind Corporation Blister pack for pharmaceutical cartridges
WO2012174472A1 (en) 2011-06-17 2012-12-20 Mannkind Corporation High capacity diketopiperazine microparticles
CA2852536A1 (en) 2011-10-24 2013-05-02 Mannkind Corporation Methods and compositions for treating pain
US9180242B2 (en) 2012-05-17 2015-11-10 Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Methods and devices for multiple fluid transfer
WO2014012069A2 (en) 2012-07-12 2014-01-16 Mannkind Corporation Dry powder drug delivery systems and methods
US9173998B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-11-03 Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. System and method for detecting occlusions in an infusion pump
BR112016000937A8 (en) * 2013-07-18 2021-06-22 Mannkind Corp dry powder pharmaceutical formulations, method for making a dry powder formulation and use of a dry powder pharmaceutical formulation
US10307464B2 (en) 2014-03-28 2019-06-04 Mannkind Corporation Use of ultrarapid acting insulin
CN107106641B (en) 2014-10-31 2021-12-21 葛兰素史密斯克莱知识产权发展有限公司 Powder formulation

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3268533D1 (en) * 1981-07-24 1986-02-27 Fisons Plc Inhalation drugs, methods for their production and pharmaceutical formulations containing them
IS1796B (en) * 1993-06-24 2001-12-31 Ab Astra Inhaled polypeptide formulation composition which also contains an enhancer compound
US5830853A (en) * 1994-06-23 1998-11-03 Astra Aktiebolag Systemic administration of a therapeutic preparation
DE69519435T2 (en) * 1994-10-04 2001-06-13 Procter & Gamble ELECTROSTATIC SPRAYING OF POWDERED SUBSTANCES
US6214300B1 (en) * 1994-12-02 2001-04-10 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Microencapsulation and electrostatic processing device
US5714007A (en) * 1995-06-06 1998-02-03 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Apparatus for electrostatically depositing a medicament powder upon predefined regions of a substrate
US5858099A (en) * 1996-04-09 1999-01-12 Sarnoff Corporation Electrostatic chucks and a particle deposition apparatus therefor
GB9616047D0 (en) * 1996-07-31 1996-09-11 Glaxo Group Ltd Medicament carrier with agglomerated large medicament particles and related method of manufacture thereof
SE512386C2 (en) * 1998-07-30 2000-03-06 Microdrug Ag Method and apparatus for classifying electrostatically charged powdery material
SE512433C2 (en) * 1998-07-30 2000-03-13 Microdrug Ag Method for atomizing and electrostatic charging of a powder intended for administration primarily by inhalation and apparatus for feeding, atomizing and electrostatic charging of a powder intended for administration primarily by inhalation
US6372246B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-04-16 Ortho-Mcneil Pharmaceutical, Inc. Polyethylene glycol coating for electrostatic dry deposition of pharmaceuticals
US6328033B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2001-12-11 Zohar Avrahami Powder inhaler
US6406745B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-06-18 Nanosphere, Inc. Methods for coating particles and particles produced thereby

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2001282743B2 (en) Electro-powder
AU2001282743A1 (en) Electro-powder
AU701530B2 (en) Methods and system for processing dispersible fine powders
JP4378057B2 (en) Flow resistance controlled aerosolized active drug delivery
US6103270A (en) Methods and system for processing dispersible fine powders
KR100620338B1 (en) Aerosolized active agent delivery
US20020017295A1 (en) Phospholipid-based powders for inhalation
JP2010524948A (en) Pulmonary delivery of spherical insulin microparticles
MXPA06014502A (en) Minimizing powder retention on surfaces.
EP1569626A1 (en) Pharmaceutical porous particles
Batycky et al. The development of large porous particles for inhalation drug delivery
JP2002284703A (en) Powder pharmaceutical preparation
MXPA01003614A (en) Flow resistance modulated aerosolized active agent delivery
MXPA01002649A (en) Dry powder active agent pulmonary delivery