WO2019146117A1 - Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program - Google Patents

Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019146117A1
WO2019146117A1 PCT/JP2018/002779 JP2018002779W WO2019146117A1 WO 2019146117 A1 WO2019146117 A1 WO 2019146117A1 JP 2018002779 W JP2018002779 W JP 2018002779W WO 2019146117 A1 WO2019146117 A1 WO 2019146117A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
journalizing
journal
text
output
unit
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2018/002779
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
森啓太郎
小嶋勇志
Original Assignee
ファーストアカウンティング株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ファーストアカウンティング株式会社 filed Critical ファーストアカウンティング株式会社
Priority to JP2018504954A priority Critical patent/JP6535860B1/en
Priority to PCT/JP2018/002779 priority patent/WO2019146117A1/en
Publication of WO2019146117A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019146117A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a journalizing element analyzing apparatus, an accounting processing apparatus, a journalizing element analyzing method, and a journalizing element analyzing program for extracting journalizing elements such as date, customer, amount of money, etc. from image data of vouchers such as passbooks and receipts of financial institutions. .
  • journal element information is extracted as text format data.
  • journals of transactions described in vouchers and similar transactions are extracted with reference to the past history of the registered users, and recommended journals are presented according to the frequency of use.
  • a journal with the largest number of users of all users is presented to the user as a recommended journal.
  • the learning means updates the database used for the journal so that each user consumes more journal results. Optimized.
  • transaction information is digitized by manual input or an OCR device, reasoning from general commerce (general reasoning), from those similar to a journal entry entered in the past
  • general reasoning general commerce
  • reasoning historical reasoning
  • reasoning from accounting events such as accounts receivable and borrowings
  • the journalizing element is extracted from the voucher using the OCR device.
  • the display format of the voucher is various, and it is not easy to enhance the extraction accuracy of the journalizing element.
  • the passbook of a financial institution differs in the description form depending on the financial institution
  • the receipt differs in the description form of each company
  • some receipts are handwritten
  • the display form of the voucher is not stable.
  • the present invention has been made to solve such problems, and the object of the present invention is to improve the efficiency of the input operation of the journal element described in the voucher and to ensure the accuracy of the journal element extraction.
  • a journal element analysis device, an accounting processor, a journal element analysis method, and a journal element analysis program that can realize more accurate automatic journaling.
  • the journal element analysis apparatus specifies an image analysis unit that specifies a portion corresponding to a journal element including at least a date and an amount from image data of a voucher, and the image analyzer
  • the journalizing element output AI for outputting as a text the journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the extracted part, the journalizing element outputting as a text a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis unit
  • An output unit and a journalizing element determining unit that determines the validity of the text output from the journalizing element output unit as a journalizing element, and outputs the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity.
  • the journal element output unit may determine the validity of the text as a journal element based on the reliability of the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI.
  • journal element judging unit is previously based on the reliability output from the image analysis AI for specifying a region including a portion corresponding to the journal element from the image data by learning. The validity may be determined.
  • the accounting processing device outputs journal items based on the journalizing element determined by the journalizing element analyzing device, the journalizing element determining unit that determines the text of the journalizing element, and the journalizing element determining unit. And a unit.
  • the journal element output AI for outputting as a text the journal element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the document output the journal element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis process as a text
  • an element determination step is provided.
  • journal element analysis program causes a computer to execute the journal element analysis method described above.
  • FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing an accounting processing system including a journalizing element analysis unit according to an embodiment of the present invention, and the configuration of the embodiment will be described based on the figure.
  • the accounting system 1 is configured to process each device on the user side and accounting process provider side via the communication network 2 such as the Internet, VPN (Virtual Private Network), etc.
  • the apparatus 10 is connected and configured. Although only one user is shown in FIG. 1 for simplification of the description, the accounting apparatus 10 can be connected to a plurality of users via the communication network 2.
  • the user is, for example, an expert such as a tax accountant and an accountant, or a corporation or an individual who directly performs accounting processing, and has at least the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4.
  • the reading device 3 is an optical device such as a scanner or a camera, for example, and is a device capable of capturing a voucher as image data.
  • the term "evidence" in the present embodiment and the scope of claims refers to a passbook of a financial institution (hereinafter simply referred to as a passbook), a receipt or receipt, other receipts, a bill, a statement of delivery, financial transfer for accounting.
  • This document shall also include documents that are proofs of the above, transaction information with an IC card such as electronic money, etc.
  • the information terminal 4 is a mobile terminal such as a personal computer (hereinafter referred to as a PC), a smartphone, a tablet PC, and a mobile phone, for example, and is a terminal capable of displaying at least web information.
  • a PC personal computer
  • smartphone a smartphone
  • tablet PC a mobile phone
  • the user can acquire the image data of the voucher by the reading device 3 and can transmit it to the accounting processor 10 by the information terminal 4 and can receive the information from the accounting processor 10.
  • the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4 are shown as separate bodies in FIG. 1, the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4 may be integrated as in a portable terminal with a camera. Further, the user does not have to possess the reading device 3.
  • image data of a voucher read by an external reading device may be acquired via mail or web.
  • an accounting service provider (hereinafter, also simply referred to as a service provider) is a business that provides accounting services by so-called cloud computing, and is a person who manages the accounting processing apparatus 10.
  • the accounting apparatus 10 has one or more servers (computers) that execute journal processing based on a program, and functionally analyzes the journal element by extracting journal elements from the image data of the voucher and analyzing them mainly A section 11 (journalization element analysis device), a journalization element determination section 12 for determining the analyzed journalization element, a journalization section 13 for performing automatic journaling based on the determined journalization element, generation of a journalization element output AI and a journal AI And a learning system 14.
  • servers computers
  • journal element analysis unit 11 includes an image analyzer 20, a journal element output unit 21, a display unit 22, and a journal element determination unit 23.
  • the image analysis unit 20 receives an image data of a voucher from a user, and has an image analysis function of specifying a portion corresponding to a journal element from the image data.
  • the journalizing elements include, for example, dates, amounts, customers, abstracts (including proviso and product names), and vendors (including addresses), and corresponding numbers, letters and figures (eg logo marks, imprints, and other companies) There is a design that can be identified, and the appearance of the voucher (for example, the size and color of the passbook and receipt).
  • the image analysis unit 20 specifies, for a date, characters such as "date”, “year”, “month”, “day”, and symbols such as "/" before and after or upper and lower numeric parts.
  • characters such as “date”, “year”, “month”, “day”, and symbols such as "/" before and after or upper and lower numeric parts.
  • amount of money a symbol such as “ ⁇ ” or the like, “amount of money”, “payment”, “deposit”, “balance”, “balance”, “yen”, and the like are used to specify numerical portions before and after or upper and lower.
  • the character part before and after the characters such as “Inc.”, “Co., Ltd.” and “(f)”, the logo mark, the telephone number, and the appearance of the voucher, and based on these information Identify the part corresponding to the company name or personal name.
  • identify the character part following the characters such as "Tani”.
  • For the source identify the portion of the character that precedes the character such as "like”.
  • the journal element is not limited to this, and the numbers, characters, and figures used for extracting the journal element are not limited to these. For example, if the number of items purchased is described in the voucher, the amount may be included as a journalizing element, or if the information such as the names and the number of persons present is described, the persons present and the number of persons present May be included as a journal entry element. In addition, numbers (corporate numbers, establishment numbers) set to identify each company may be extracted.
  • the image analysis unit 20 designates an area including a portion corresponding to a date, transaction details, payment, deposit, balance, etc. Identify the part corresponding to the journal element. If the image data is a scanned receipt or receipt, specify the area corresponding to the journalizing element by specifying the date part, logo or company name part, monetary part, and area including proviso part. Do.
  • the image analysis unit 20 performs such designation of the area by the image analysis AI.
  • the image analysis AI is an AI that is learned in the learning system 14 to specify an area including a portion corresponding to a journal element from image data by machine learning.
  • the image analysis part 20 can also output the reliability in the image analysis of image analysis AI.
  • the reliability of image analysis is the accuracy of the judgment of the image analysis AI, and can be expressed, for example, as a percentage. For example, since the image analysis AI widens the area which designates that the portion corresponding to the journal element can not be identified accurately, the reliability of the image analysis becomes low in such a case.
  • the part corresponding to the journal element can be identified accurately, the part corresponding to the journal element and the designated area substantially match, and the reliability of the image analysis is high. That is, the higher the reliability of the image analysis, the higher the validity of the specified journal element portion, and the lower the reliability, the lower the validity of the journal element portion.
  • the journal element output unit 21 has a character recognition function of outputting a journal element corresponding to the content of the portion specified by the image analysis unit 20 as a text by the journal element output AI.
  • the journal element output AI is an AI learned in the learning system 14 to output as a text a journal element corresponding to the content of the part specified by the image analysis unit 20 by machine learning in advance.
  • the journal element output AI recognizes numbers in the date part and the money part and outputs texts of the date and money, and recognizes characters in the part corresponding to the customer and the part corresponding to the abstract. Output the texts of customers and payrolls.
  • the journalizing element output unit 21 not only recognizes letters and numbers and outputs texts, but, for example, when only logo marks, seal imprints or telephone numbers are specified, a company (not shown) stores company information in advance. You may output as a text of a supplier name by searching from information DB or searching for information published on the Internet. Also, if there is no description of the address, such as receipt, the user name who has sent the image data may be output as the text of the transaction source, or the company that is the user of the user may be set in advance. The image data transmitted from the user may output the set company name as the text of the trading source.
  • the journal element output unit 21 can also output the reliability of the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI, that is, the reliability of character recognition.
  • the reliability of character recognition is the accuracy of the judgment of the journal element output AI and can be expressed, for example, as a percentage. That is, as the reliability of character recognition is higher, the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI is more appropriate as a journal element, and as the reliability is lower, the text is lower.
  • the display unit 22 is, for example, a display of the accounting apparatus 10, and has a function of displaying the text of the journalizing element output from the journalizing element output unit 21.
  • the journal element determining unit 23 determines the validity of the text output from the journal element output unit 21 as a journal element, and outputs the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity. Have. Specifically, the journal element determining unit 23 causes the display unit 22 to display a warning display different from the normal display for the invalid text.
  • the validity of the text of the journalizing element is determined using the reliability of character recognition output by the journalizing element output unit 21 and the reliability of image recognition by the image analysis unit 20.
  • the first threshold Rc1 and the second threshold Rc2 (Rc1> Rc2) in the reliability Rc of character recognition and the third threshold Ri3 in the reliability Ri of the image analysis in advance. And are determined, and the degree of validity is determined based on these reliability threshold values.
  • a normal display, a first warning display, and a second warning display are set according to the degree of each reliability.
  • a first threshold Rc1 for example, 80%
  • the journal element judging unit 23 determines that the journal element is highly relevant as a journal element.
  • the text is usually displayed. If the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the first threshold Rc1 and not less than the second threshold Rc2 (for example 50%) and the reliability Ri of the image analysis is more than the third threshold Ri3 (for example 50%) , The relevance as a journal entry element is judged to be medium, and the text is regarded as the first warning display. If the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the second threshold R2 or the reliability Ri of the image analysis is less than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the journal element is low in relevance and the text is the second Warning display.
  • the warning display may be a display different from the normal display, and the display format is not particularly limited.
  • the text of the corresponding journal element is underlined, the text color is different, or a flag is displayed near the text And express.
  • the number of types of warning display may be set according to the appropriateness, or only one type may be set.
  • the journalizing element determining unit 12 performs a determining process of determining the text of the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22 by the service provider or the program for determining the journalizing element. For example, the person in charge at the service provider side confirms the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22 and performs the confirmation operation as it is for the journalizing element having no problem, and performs the correcting operation for the journalizing element having the problem. Perform the confirmation operation.
  • the journalizing unit 13 has a function of outputting an account item according to the journalizing element determined by the journalizing element determining unit 12.
  • the output of the account item according to this journal entry element is performed by, for example, journal entry AI.
  • the journal AI is an automatic journal AI that is learned in the learning system 14 to output account items for journal elements in advance by machine learning.
  • the account item output in the journalizing unit 13 is transmitted to the user's information terminal 4 as a journalizing result together with the journalizing element.
  • the learning system 14 has a function of learning the journal element output AI and the journal AI described above and supplying a learned AI. Specifically, the learning system 14 generates an image analysis AI and a journal entry element output AI by machine learning (so-called deep learning) based on learning data including the voucher image data and the journal entry included in the image data. . Further, the learning system 14 generates a journal AI by performing machine learning based on learning data including a journal element and an account item corresponding to the journal element.
  • the accounting processing apparatus 10 configured in this manner causes the journalizing element analysis unit 11 to identify the portion of the journalizing element from the image data of the voucher by the image analyzing unit 20, and the journalizing element output unit 21 converts the journalizing element into text and displays It is displayed on the part 22, and the invalidating of the text of the journalizing element is judged by the journalizing element judging unit 23 to display a warning. Then, the service provider side confirms the text of the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22, and the automatic journaling is performed by the journalizing unit 13 based on the journalizing element decided by the journalizing element deciding unit 12.
  • journal element analysis unit 11 a flow chart showing the flow of the journal element analysis performed by the journal element analysis unit 11 is shown, and the journal element analysis method will be described in detail below along the same flowchart.
  • said journaling element analysis will start an analysis, if the image data of the voucher from a user is received.
  • step S1 the journalizing element analysis unit 11 specifies the journalizing element portion in the image data of the voucher by the image analyzing unit 20 (image analysis process). At this time, the reliability Ri of the image recognition is output to the journal element determining unit 23.
  • step S2 the journalizing element output unit 21 converts the journalizing elements in the journalizing element specifying portion into text by means of the journalizing element output AI (journalizing element output process). While the journalized element in text form is displayed on the display unit 22, it is output to the journalized element determination unit 23 together with the reliability Rc of character recognition by the journalized element output AI.
  • step S3 the journalizing element determining unit 23 determines whether the reliability Rc of character recognition of the textified journaling element is less than the first threshold Rc1 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the degree of reliability Rc of character recognition is equal to or higher than the first threshold Rc1, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is high, and the process proceeds to step S4. move on.
  • step S4 the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 in a normal display, and returns the routine.
  • step S3 determines whether the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the first threshold Rc1. If the determination result in step S3 is true (Yes), that is, if the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the first threshold Rc1, the process proceeds to step S5.
  • step S5 the journalizing element determining unit 23 determines whether the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the second threshold Rc2 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the character recognition reliability Rc is equal to or greater than the second threshold Rc2, the process proceeds to step S6.
  • step S6 the journalizing element determination unit 23 determines whether the reliability Ri of the image analysis is less than the third threshold Ri3 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the reliability Ri is equal to or more than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is medium, and the process proceeds to step S7. .
  • step S7 the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 with a first warning display, and returns the routine.
  • step S5 determines whether the character recognition reliability Rc is less than the second threshold Rc2 or the image analysis reliability Ri is less than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is low, and the process proceeds to step S8.
  • step S8 the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 with a second warning display, and returns the routine.
  • the routine is continued until the determination on all the journal elements specified in the voucher image data is completed.
  • FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 display examples displayed on the display unit 33 are respectively shown, and the display of a specific journalizing element will be described based on these figures.
  • the first display example shown in FIG. 3 is a display example when a journal entry element is extracted from the passbook image data, and the original image of the passbook scanned is displayed on the left side of the screen, and the journal entry element output unit 21 is displayed on the right side.
  • the textified journal element output from the journal element judging unit 23 is displayed.
  • the passbook describes transactions on a row-by-row basis, and a plurality of transactions are collectively displayed on one image.
  • the image analysis unit 20 recognizes the characters of date, contents of transaction, payment, deposit, balance, and the range in the downward direction is designated as a portion corresponding to the journal element. There is. Note that this dotted line may not actually be displayed on the display unit 22.
  • items of date, contents of transaction, payment, deposit, balance are formed in the same arrangement as the original image.
  • the arrangement of each item may not necessarily match the original image.
  • journalizing element textified by the journalizing element output AI is displayed.
  • “29-1-10” is displayed as the date
  • “transfer” as the transaction content
  • “K) ABC as the payment
  • “ 30,000 ”as the deposit
  • “ 130,000 ”as the balance There is.
  • the journal element output AI is erroneously recognized as “80,000” in the reading result.
  • the journal element judging unit 23 judges that the validity is moderate, and performs the first warning display underlined “80,000”. There is.
  • the rubbish 31 overlaps the transaction contents "Transfer”, “Payment” "Ca” DEF, and "120,000” of the deposit.
  • the output AI erroneously recognizes the payment as “f) BEF”.
  • the transaction contents “Transfer” and “120,000” of deposit are correctly written in text, but the reliability as the journal element output AI is low, and the journal element judgment unit 23 includes “f) BEF” Also, it is judged that the relevance is low, and the second warning display with double underlining is performed.
  • a second display example of FIG. 4 is a display example when a journal entry element is extracted from image data of a receipt, and the original image of the scanned receipt is displayed on the left side of the screen, and the journal entry element output unit is on the right side of the screen. 21 and the journalized element outputted from the journal element judging unit 23 are displayed.
  • the receipt is displayed with one transaction described for one image.
  • the image analysis unit 20 specifies the portion 40a corresponding to the date, the portion 41a corresponding to the amount, and the portion 42a corresponding to the company name, as indicated by the dotted line in the original image, These enlarged views 40b, 41b and 42b are displayed in the reading result. Note that this dotted line may not actually be displayed on the display unit 22.
  • journalizing element determination unit 23 determines that the text of the date has low reliability and is of moderate validity, and performs the first warning display as the white out flag 43.
  • the portions 41a and 41b corresponding to the amount of money originally specify the portion of "tea ⁇ 500", while the image analysis unit 20 should specify the portion of "total 1,080".
  • the journal element determining unit 23 does not include the total amount portion in the area indicating the total amount specified by the image analysis unit 20, and the designated area is wide. Since the degree of reliability of is low, it is judged that the relevance is low, and a second warning display of a black flag 44 is performed in the amount field of the reading result.
  • journalizing element determination unit 23 determines that the validity is high, and is normally displayed without a flag or the like.
  • journalizing element output unit 21 extracts the text of the journalizing element from the image of the voucher by using the journalizing element output AI. This eliminates the need for human-to-human reading of each case, and improves the efficiency of entering journal elements.
  • the journalizing element judging unit 23 judges the validity of the text of the journalizing element extracted by the journalizing element output AI, and as in the case of a normal display or a warning display, in two or more modes according to the validity. By outputting the display information related to the text, it is possible to easily confirm the journal element having a problem. This makes it possible to secure the extraction accuracy of the journalizing element.
  • journal element output AI outputs the reliability (text recognition reliability) together with the textification of the journal element
  • the journal element determination unit 23 determines the validity as the journal element based on the reliability. The determination of the journal element can be made easily and appropriately.
  • journalizing element determining unit 23 can more accurately determine the validity of the journalizing element by determining the validity based on the reliability of the image analysis by the image analysis AI of the image analyzing unit 20.
  • journalizing element determination unit 23 can display the validity of the journalizing element in more detail by displaying different warnings according to the degree of relevance to the invalid text, and the journaling can be performed more precisely. The validity of the element can be confirmed.
  • the accounting processing apparatus 10 including the journalizing element analyzing unit 11 improves the efficiency of the input operation of the journalizing element described in the voucher and secures the accuracy of the extraction of the journalizing element. Can realize more accurate automatic journaling
  • the extraction of the journal elements of the passbook and receipt is described as a voucher based on the display examples of FIGS. 3 and 4, but the type of voucher is not limited to this.
  • the image analysis AI of the image analysis unit 20 identifies the portion corresponding to the journalizing element in the image data.
  • the journalizing element output AI may have this function.
  • the validity of the text of the journalizing element is determined based on the two reliabilities of the character recognition reliability Rc and the image analysis reliability Ri, but both reliability are summarized into one.
  • one relevance may be used to determine the validity.
  • the method of combining the two reliabilities into one may be performed by calculation, or the journal element output AI learned for the image analysis may output the reliability in which the two reliabilities are combined into one.
  • journalizing is performed using the journalizing AI in the journalizing unit 13, but journalizing may be performed using an automatic journalizing program that does not use the AI.
  • the first threshold Rc1 and the second threshold Rc2 in the reliability Rc of character recognition and the third threshold Ri3 in the reliability Ri of image analysis are set, but the number of threshold settings Is not limited to this.
  • the journal element determination unit may have a function of correcting the text of the invalid journal element to more appropriate text based on another journal element.
  • journaling element used for this correction use the journalizing element for which the judgment made appropriate by the journalizing element judging part is made.
  • a warning may or may not be displayed on the corrected text.
  • journal element analysis unit (journal element analyzer) 12 journal element determination section 13 journal section 14 learning system 20 image analysis section 21 journal element output section 22 display section 23 journal element determination section

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)

Abstract

This journal element output unit 11 is provided with: an image analysis unit 20 which, from image data of documentation, identifies the parts corresponding to the journal elements including at least date and amount; a journal element output unit 21 which, by means of a journal element output AI for outputting as text a journal element corresponding to the content of the parts identified by the image analysis unit 20 in advance by learning, outputs as text a journal element corresponding to the content of the parts identified by the image analysis unit 20; and a journal element determination unit 23 which determines the suitability as a journal element of the text outputted from the journal element output unit 21 and outputs display information relating to said text in at least two forms corresponding to said suitability.

Description

仕訳要素解析装置、会計処理装置、仕訳要素解析方法、仕訳要素解析プログラムJournal element analysis device, accounting processor, journal element analysis method, journal element analysis program
 本発明は金融機関の通帳やレシート等の証憑の画像データから日付、取引先、金額、摘要等の仕訳要素を抽出する仕訳要素解析装置、会計処理装置、仕訳要素解析方法、仕訳要素解析プログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a journalizing element analyzing apparatus, an accounting processing apparatus, a journalizing element analyzing method, and a journalizing element analyzing program for extracting journalizing elements such as date, customer, amount of money, etc. from image data of vouchers such as passbooks and receipts of financial institutions. .
 従来、証憑の会計処理として、税理士や会計士、簿記担当者が証憑に記載の情報を一件一件読み取り、例えば日付、取引先、金額等の仕訳要素を帳簿に入力し、当該仕訳要素に対応した勘定科目を経験的に判断して仕訳の入力を行っていた。 Conventionally, as accounting treatment of vouchers, tax accountants, accountants, and bookkeeping personnel read the information described in the vouchers one by one, for example, enter journalizing elements such as date, customer, amount, etc. in the book and respond to the journalizing elements The account items were judged empirically and journal entries were made.
 このように、証憑を人間が一件一件読み取って仕訳を行うのでは作業効率が悪い上、仕訳の精度は担当者の経験に依存するところが大きく、仕訳の精度にばらつきが生じるという問題があった。 As described above, it is not efficient to read documents by having one person read a voucher one by one, and the accuracy of the journal depends largely on the experience of the person in charge, and there is a problem that the accuracy of the journal varies. The
 そこで、OCR(Optical Character Reader)装置を用いて、証憑の内容を電子データとして読み取り、インターネットを介して仕訳解析センターシステムに送信するだけで、その証憑に示される簿記上の取引についての仕訳の結果をユーザが参照することが可能となるいわゆるクラウド型の会計処理システムが開発されている(特許文献1、2参照)。 Therefore, only by reading the contents of the voucher as electronic data using an optical character reader (OCR) device and transmitting it to the Journal Analysis Center System via the Internet, the result of the journal entry on the bookkeeping transaction indicated in the voucher A so-called cloud-type accounting processing system has been developed which allows the user to refer to (see Patent Documents 1 and 2).
 詳しくは、特許文献1に記載された技術では、携帯端末等で撮影した証憑データを仕訳要素抽出手段によって解析して仕訳要素情報をテキスト形式のデータとして抽出している。そして、会計ソフトを所有する登録ユーザについては、当該登録ユーザの過去履歴を参照して証憑記載の取引と類似取引の仕訳を抽出し、その使用頻度に応じて推奨仕訳を提示する。一方、非登録ユーザについては全ユーザ(全国多数の個人や企業)の使用人数が一番多い仕訳を推奨仕訳としてユーザに提示する。また、当該特許文献1では、新たな仕訳が生じたり、ユーザ側で仕訳を修正したりした場合には、学習手段により仕訳に用いるデータベースを更新することで、各ユーザが使い込むほど仕訳の結果が最適化される。 Specifically, in the technology described in Patent Document 1, voucher data taken by a portable terminal or the like is analyzed by the journal element extraction unit, and journal element information is extracted as text format data. Then, for registered users who possess accounting software, journals of transactions described in vouchers and similar transactions are extracted with reference to the past history of the registered users, and recommended journals are presented according to the frequency of use. On the other hand, for non-registered users, a journal with the largest number of users of all users (a large number of individuals and companies across the country) is presented to the user as a recommended journal. Further, in Patent Document 1, when a new journal entry occurs or the journal side is corrected on the user side, the learning means updates the database used for the journal so that each user consumes more journal results. Optimized.
 また、特許文献2に記載された技術では、手入力またはOCR装置により取引の情報を電子化し、一般的な商取引からの推論(一般推論)、過去に入力した仕訳に類似しているものからの推論(履歴推論)、売掛金や借入金などの事前に発生した会計事象からの推論(消込推論)の3つの推論によって仕訳を行っている。 In the technique described in Patent Document 2, transaction information is digitized by manual input or an OCR device, reasoning from general commerce (general reasoning), from those similar to a journal entry entered in the past There are three kinds of reasoning: reasoning (historical reasoning) and reasoning from accounting events such as accounts receivable and borrowings (clearing reasoning).
特開2014-235484号公報JP 2014-235484 特開2007-304643号公報JP 2007-304643 A
 上記特許文献1、2では、OCR装置を用いて証憑から仕訳要素を抽出しているが、証憑の表示形式は様々であり、仕訳要素の抽出精度を高くすることは容易ではない。例えば、金融機関の通帳は金融機関によって記載形式が異なっており、レシートは各社記載形式が異なっており、領収書に関しては手書きのものもあり、証憑の表示形式は安定していない。 In the Patent Documents 1 and 2 described above, the journalizing element is extracted from the voucher using the OCR device. However, the display format of the voucher is various, and it is not easy to enhance the extraction accuracy of the journalizing element. For example, the passbook of a financial institution differs in the description form depending on the financial institution, the receipt differs in the description form of each company, some receipts are handwritten, and the display form of the voucher is not stable.
 このように証憑の種類が様々ある上、証憑をスキャンする際に、例えば証憑に汚れが付着していたり、印字がかすれていたりすると、さらに仕訳要素を正確に抽出することは困難となる。そして、抽出した仕訳要素が誤っていると、特許文献1、2のような技術を用いた場合、正確な仕訳を行うことは不可能となる。 As described above, there are various types of vouchers, and when the vouchers are scanned, for example, if the vouchers are soiled or the printing is faint, it is difficult to accurately extract the journal elements. Then, if the extracted journaling element is incorrect, it becomes impossible to perform accurate journaling when using techniques such as Patent Documents 1 and 2.
 本発明はこのような問題点を解決するためになされたもので、その目的とするところは、証憑に記載された仕訳要素の入力作業の効率を向上させるとともに、仕訳要素の抽出の精度を確保することができ、より正確な自動仕訳を実現することのできる仕訳要素解析装置、会計処理装置、仕訳要素解析方法、及び仕訳要素解析プログラムを提供することにある。 The present invention has been made to solve such problems, and the object of the present invention is to improve the efficiency of the input operation of the journal element described in the voucher and to ensure the accuracy of the journal element extraction. A journal element analysis device, an accounting processor, a journal element analysis method, and a journal element analysis program that can realize more accurate automatic journaling.
 上記した目的を達成するために、本発明に係る仕訳要素解析装置は、証憑の画像データから少なくとも日付、金額を含む仕訳要素に対応する部分を特定する画像解析部と、前記画像解析部により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力するための仕訳要素出力AIによって、前記画像解析部により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力する仕訳要素出力部と、前記仕訳要素出力部から出力されたテキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定し、当該妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力する仕訳要素判定部と、を備える。 In order to achieve the above-described object, the journal element analysis apparatus according to the present invention specifies an image analysis unit that specifies a portion corresponding to a journal element including at least a date and an amount from image data of a voucher, and the image analyzer The journalizing element output AI for outputting as a text the journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the extracted part, the journalizing element outputting as a text a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis unit An output unit and a journalizing element determining unit that determines the validity of the text output from the journalizing element output unit as a journalizing element, and outputs the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity. And.
 上述の仕訳要素解析装置において、前記仕訳要素出力部は、前記仕訳要素出力AIが出力した仕訳要素のテキストの信頼度に基づいて前記テキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定してもよい。 In the above-mentioned journal element analysis apparatus, the journal element output unit may determine the validity of the text as a journal element based on the reliability of the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI.
 また、上述の仕訳要素解析装置において、前記仕訳要素判定部は、予め学習により前記画像データ内から仕訳要素に対応する部分を含む領域を指定するための画像解析AIが出力した信頼度に基づいて前記妥当性を判定してもよい。 Further, in the above-mentioned journal element analysis apparatus, the journal element judging unit is previously based on the reliability output from the image analysis AI for specifying a region including a portion corresponding to the journal element from the image data by learning. The validity may be determined.
 本発明に係る会計処理装置は、上述の仕訳要素解析装置と、前記仕訳要素のテキストを確定する仕訳要素確定部と、前記仕訳要素確定部により確定された仕訳要素に基づく勘定科目を出力する仕訳部と、を備える。 The accounting processing device according to the present invention outputs journal items based on the journalizing element determined by the journalizing element analyzing device, the journalizing element determining unit that determines the text of the journalizing element, and the journalizing element determining unit. And a unit.
 また、上記した目的を達成するために、本発明に係る仕訳要素解析方法は、証憑の画像データから少なくとも日付、金額を含む仕訳要素 に対応する部分を特定する画像解析工程と、前記画像解析工程により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力するための仕訳要素出力AIによって、前記画像解析工程により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力する仕訳要素出力工程と、前記仕訳要素出力工程にて出力されたテキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定し、該妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力する仕訳要素判定工程と、を備える。 Further, in order to achieve the above-mentioned object, according to the journalizing element analysis method of the present invention, there is provided an image analyzing step of specifying a portion corresponding to a journalizing element including at least a date and an amount from image data of vouchers; The journal element output AI for outputting as a text the journal element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the document output the journal element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis process as a text A journaling element output process and a journaling element determining a validity of the text outputted in the journalizing element output process as a journalizing element, and outputting the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity. And an element determination step.
 また、上記した目的を達成するために、仕訳要素解析プログラムでは、コンピュータに、上述の仕訳要素解析方法を実行させる。 Also, in order to achieve the above-described purpose, the journal element analysis program causes a computer to execute the journal element analysis method described above.
 上記手段を用いる本発明によれば、証憑に記載された仕訳要素の入力作業の効率を向上させるとともに、仕訳要素の抽出の精度を確保することができ、より正確な自動仕訳を実現することができる。 According to the present invention using the above-described means, it is possible to improve the efficiency of the input operation of the journalizing element described in the voucher and to ensure the extraction accuracy of the journalizing element, and to realize more accurate automatic journaling. it can.
本発明の一実施形態に係る仕訳要素解析部を含む会計処理システムを示したシステム構成図である。It is a system configuration figure showing an accounting processing system including a journal element analysis part concerning one embodiment of the present invention. 仕訳要素解析部により実行される仕訳要素解析の流れを示したフローチャートである。It is the flowchart which showed the flow of the journal element analysis which is executed by the journal element analysis section. 表示部に表示される第1の表示例である。It is a 1st example of a display displayed on a display part. 表示部に表示される第2の表示例である。It is a 2nd display example displayed on a display part.
 以下、本発明の一実施形態を図面に基づき説明する。 Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described based on the drawings.
 図1は本発明の一実施形態に係る仕訳要素解析部を含む会計処理システムを示したシステム構成図であり、同図に基づき本実施形態の構成について説明する。 FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing an accounting processing system including a journalizing element analysis unit according to an embodiment of the present invention, and the configuration of the embodiment will be described based on the figure.
 図1に示すように、本実施形態に係る会計処理システム1は、インターネット、VPN(Virtual Private Network)等の通信網2を介して、ユーザ側の各装置と会計処理サービス提供者側の会計処理装置10とが接続されて構成されている。なお、説明の簡略化のため図1では一人のユーザのみを示しているが、会計処理装置10は通信網2を介して複数のユーザと接続可能である。 As shown in FIG. 1, the accounting system 1 according to the present embodiment is configured to process each device on the user side and accounting process provider side via the communication network 2 such as the Internet, VPN (Virtual Private Network), etc. The apparatus 10 is connected and configured. Although only one user is shown in FIG. 1 for simplification of the description, the accounting apparatus 10 can be connected to a plurality of users via the communication network 2.
 ユーザは、例えば税理士及び会計士等の専門家であったり、直接会計処理を行う法人や個人等であり、少なくとも読取装置3と情報端末4を有している。 The user is, for example, an expert such as a tax accountant and an accountant, or a corporation or an individual who directly performs accounting processing, and has at least the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4.
 読取装置3は、例えばスキャナ又はカメラ等の光学機器であり、証憑を画像データとして取り込める装置である。なお、本実施形態及び特許請求の範囲における「証憑」という文言は、金融機関の通帳(以下、単に通帳という)、領収書やレシート、その他の受領書、請求書、納品書、会計上金銭授受の証明となる書類、電子マネー等のICカードによる取引情報も含むものとする。 The reading device 3 is an optical device such as a scanner or a camera, for example, and is a device capable of capturing a voucher as image data. In addition, the term "evidence" in the present embodiment and the scope of claims refers to a passbook of a financial institution (hereinafter simply referred to as a passbook), a receipt or receipt, other receipts, a bill, a statement of delivery, financial transfer for accounting. This document shall also include documents that are proofs of the above, transaction information with an IC card such as electronic money, etc.
 情報端末4は、例えばパーソナルコンピュータ(以下、PCという)や、スマートフォン、タブレットPC、及び携帯電話のような携帯端末であり、少なくともweb情報を表示可能な端末である。 The information terminal 4 is a mobile terminal such as a personal computer (hereinafter referred to as a PC), a smartphone, a tablet PC, and a mobile phone, for example, and is a terminal capable of displaying at least web information.
 ユーザは、読取装置3により証憑の画像データを取得して、情報端末4により会計処理装置10に送信可能であるとともに、会計処理装置10からの情報を受信可能である。なお、図1では読取装置3と情報端末4とが別体のように示しているが、カメラ付きの携帯端末のように読取装置3と情報端末4とが一体であってもよい。また、ユーザ自身が読取装置3を所有している必要はなく、例えば外部の読取装置により読み取った証憑の画像データをメールやwebを介して取得してもよい。 The user can acquire the image data of the voucher by the reading device 3 and can transmit it to the accounting processor 10 by the information terminal 4 and can receive the information from the accounting processor 10. Although the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4 are shown as separate bodies in FIG. 1, the reading device 3 and the information terminal 4 may be integrated as in a portable terminal with a camera. Further, the user does not have to possess the reading device 3. For example, image data of a voucher read by an external reading device may be acquired via mail or web.
 一方、会計処理サービス提供者(以下、単にサービス提供者ともいう)は、いわゆるクラウドコンピューティングにより会計処理サービスを提供する事業者であり、会計処理装置10を管理する者である。 On the other hand, an accounting service provider (hereinafter, also simply referred to as a service provider) is a business that provides accounting services by so-called cloud computing, and is a person who manages the accounting processing apparatus 10.
 会計処理装置10は、プログラムに基づき仕訳処理を実行する1又は複数のサーバ(コンピュータ)を有し、機能的には主に、証憑の画像データから仕訳要素を抽出して解析を行う仕訳要素解析部11(仕訳要素解析装置)と、解析した仕訳要素を確定する仕訳要素確定部12と、確定された仕訳要素に基づいて自動仕訳を行う仕訳部13と、仕訳要素出力AI及び仕訳AIを生成する学習システム14と、を有している。 The accounting apparatus 10 has one or more servers (computers) that execute journal processing based on a program, and functionally analyzes the journal element by extracting journal elements from the image data of the voucher and analyzing them mainly A section 11 (journalization element analysis device), a journalization element determination section 12 for determining the analyzed journalization element, a journalization section 13 for performing automatic journaling based on the determined journalization element, generation of a journalization element output AI and a journal AI And a learning system 14.
 さらに、仕訳要素解析部11は、画像解析部20、仕訳要素出力部21、表示部22、及び仕訳要素判定部23とを有している。 Further, the journal element analysis unit 11 includes an image analyzer 20, a journal element output unit 21, a display unit 22, and a journal element determination unit 23.
 画像解析部20は、ユーザから証憑の画像データを受信し、当該画像データから仕訳要素に対応する部分を特定する画像解析機能を有している。 The image analysis unit 20 receives an image data of a voucher from a user, and has an image analysis function of specifying a portion corresponding to a journal element from the image data.
 仕訳要素としては、例えば日付、金額、取引先、摘要(但し書き、商品名含む)、取引元(宛名含む)があり、これらに対応する数字、文字、図形(例えばロゴマーク、印影、その他企業を特定可能な図柄)、及び証憑の外観(例えば通帳や領収書の大きさ、色)がある。 The journalizing elements include, for example, dates, amounts, customers, abstracts (including proviso and product names), and vendors (including addresses), and corresponding numbers, letters and figures (eg logo marks, imprints, and other companies) There is a design that can be identified, and the appearance of the voucher (for example, the size and color of the passbook and receipt).
 画像解析部20は、例えば日付については、「日付」「年」「月」「日」等の文字や「/」等の記号の前後や上下の数字部分を特定する。金額については「¥」等の記号や「金額」「支払い」「預り」「残高」「円」等の文字の前後や上下の数字部分を特定する。また、取引先については、「株式会社」「(株)」「(カ)」等の文字の前後の文字部分や、ロゴマーク、電話番号、証憑の外観を特定して、これらの情報に基づく会社名や個人名に対応する部分を特定する。摘要については、「但」等の文字に続く文字部分を特定する。取引元については、「様」等の文字の前にある文字の部分を特定する。 For example, the image analysis unit 20 specifies, for a date, characters such as "date", "year", "month", "day", and symbols such as "/" before and after or upper and lower numeric parts. As for the amount of money, a symbol such as “¥” or the like, “amount of money”, “payment”, “deposit”, “balance”, “balance”, “yen”, and the like are used to specify numerical portions before and after or upper and lower. In addition, for business partners, specify the character part before and after the characters such as “Inc.”, “Co., Ltd.” and “(f)”, the logo mark, the telephone number, and the appearance of the voucher, and based on these information Identify the part corresponding to the company name or personal name. For the abstract, identify the character part following the characters such as "Tani". For the source, identify the portion of the character that precedes the character such as "like".
 なお、仕訳要素はこれに限られるものではなく、また仕訳要素の抽出に用いる数字、文字、図形もこれに限られるものではない。例えば、証憑に、購入品の数量が記載されている場合には数量を仕訳要素として含めてもよいし、同席者の名前や人数等の情報が記載されている場合には、同席者及び人数を仕訳要素として含めてもよい。また、各企業を特定するために設定された番号(法人番号、事業所番号)を抽出してもよい。 The journal element is not limited to this, and the numbers, characters, and figures used for extracting the journal element are not limited to these. For example, if the number of items purchased is described in the voucher, the amount may be included as a journalizing element, or if the information such as the names and the number of persons present is described, the persons present and the number of persons present May be included as a journal entry element. In addition, numbers (corporate numbers, establishment numbers) set to identify each company may be extracted.
 具体的には、画像解析部20は、入力された画像データが通帳をスキャンしたものである場合は、日付、取引内容、支払い、預り、残高等に対応した部分を含む領域を指定することで仕訳要素に対応する部分の特定を行う。また、画像データがレシートや領収書をスキャンしたものである場合は、日付部分、ロゴや会社名の部分、金額部分、但し書き部分を含む領域を指定することで仕訳要素に対応する部分の特定を行う。 Specifically, when the input image data is obtained by scanning a passbook, the image analysis unit 20 designates an area including a portion corresponding to a date, transaction details, payment, deposit, balance, etc. Identify the part corresponding to the journal element. If the image data is a scanned receipt or receipt, specify the area corresponding to the journalizing element by specifying the date part, logo or company name part, monetary part, and area including proviso part. Do.
 画像解析部20は、このような領域の指定を画像解析AIにより行う。画像解析AIは、学習システム14において、機械学習により画像データ内から仕訳要素に対応する部分を含む領域を指定することを学習したAIである。そして、画像解析部20は、画像解析AIの画像解析における信頼度を出力することも可能である。画像解析の信頼度は、画像解析AIの判断の確度であり、例えばパーセントで表すことが可能である。例えば、画像解析AIは仕訳要素に対応する部分を正確に特定できないと指定する領域を広くするため、このような場合は画像解析の信頼度は低くなる。一方、仕訳要素に対応する部分を正確に特定できる場合は、仕訳要素に対応する部分と指定領域がほぼ一致し、画像解析の信頼度は高くなる。つまり、画像解析の信頼度が高いほど特定された仕訳要素の部分の妥当性が高く、当該信頼度が低いほど仕訳要素の部分の妥当性が低くなる。 The image analysis unit 20 performs such designation of the area by the image analysis AI. The image analysis AI is an AI that is learned in the learning system 14 to specify an area including a portion corresponding to a journal element from image data by machine learning. And the image analysis part 20 can also output the reliability in the image analysis of image analysis AI. The reliability of image analysis is the accuracy of the judgment of the image analysis AI, and can be expressed, for example, as a percentage. For example, since the image analysis AI widens the area which designates that the portion corresponding to the journal element can not be identified accurately, the reliability of the image analysis becomes low in such a case. On the other hand, if the part corresponding to the journal element can be identified accurately, the part corresponding to the journal element and the designated area substantially match, and the reliability of the image analysis is high. That is, the higher the reliability of the image analysis, the higher the validity of the specified journal element portion, and the lower the reliability, the lower the validity of the journal element portion.
 仕訳要素出力部21は、仕訳要素出力AIによって、画像解析部20により特定された部分の内容に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力する文字認識機能を有している。仕訳要素出力AIは、学習システム14において、予め機械学習により画像解析部20により特定された部分の内容に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力することを学習したAIである。例えば、仕訳要素出力AIは、日付部分や金額部分においては数字を認識して年月日や金額のテキストを出力し、取引先に対応する部分や摘要に対応する部分においては文字を認識して取引先や摘要のテキストを出力する。 The journal element output unit 21 has a character recognition function of outputting a journal element corresponding to the content of the portion specified by the image analysis unit 20 as a text by the journal element output AI. The journal element output AI is an AI learned in the learning system 14 to output as a text a journal element corresponding to the content of the part specified by the image analysis unit 20 by machine learning in advance. For example, the journal element output AI recognizes numbers in the date part and the money part and outputs texts of the date and money, and recognizes characters in the part corresponding to the customer and the part corresponding to the abstract. Output the texts of customers and payrolls.
 仕訳要素出力部21は、文字や数字を認識してテキストを出力するだけでなく、例えば、ロゴマークや印影又は電話番号のみが特定された場合には、図示しないが予め企業情報を記憶した企業情報DBより検索して、又はインターネットに公開されている情報を検索することで、取引先名のテキストとして出力してもよい。また、レシート等のように宛名の記載がない場合には、画像データを送信してきたユーザ名を取引元のテキストとして出力してもよいし、ユーザの顧客である企業を予め設定しておき当該ユーザから送信された画像データはその設定された企業名を取引元のテキストとして出力してもよい。 The journalizing element output unit 21 not only recognizes letters and numbers and outputs texts, but, for example, when only logo marks, seal imprints or telephone numbers are specified, a company (not shown) stores company information in advance. You may output as a text of a supplier name by searching from information DB or searching for information published on the Internet. Also, if there is no description of the address, such as receipt, the user name who has sent the image data may be output as the text of the transaction source, or the company that is the user of the user may be set in advance. The image data transmitted from the user may output the set company name as the text of the trading source.
 また仕訳要素出力部21は、仕訳要素出力AIにより出力した仕訳要素のテキストの信頼度、即ち文字認識の信頼度も出力可能である。文字認識の信頼度は仕訳要素出力AIの判断の確度であり、例えばパーセントで表すことが可能である。つまり、文字認識の信頼度が高いほど仕訳要素出力AIにより出力された仕訳要素のテキストは仕訳要素として妥当性が高く、信頼度が低いほど妥当性が低くなる。 The journal element output unit 21 can also output the reliability of the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI, that is, the reliability of character recognition. The reliability of character recognition is the accuracy of the judgment of the journal element output AI and can be expressed, for example, as a percentage. That is, as the reliability of character recognition is higher, the text of the journal element output by the journal element output AI is more appropriate as a journal element, and as the reliability is lower, the text is lower.
 表示部22は、例えば会計処理装置10のディスプレイであり、仕訳要素出力部21より出力された仕訳要素のテキストを表示する機能を有している。 The display unit 22 is, for example, a display of the accounting apparatus 10, and has a function of displaying the text of the journalizing element output from the journalizing element output unit 21.
 仕訳要素判定部23は、仕訳要素出力部21より出力されたテキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定し、妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力する機能を有している。具体的には、仕訳要素判定部23は妥当でないテキストについては通常表示と異なる警告表示を表示部22に表示させる。仕訳要素のテキストの妥当性は、仕訳要素出力部21が出力する文字認識の信頼度や、画像解析部20による画像認識の信頼度を用いて判定する。 The journal element determining unit 23 determines the validity of the text output from the journal element output unit 21 as a journal element, and outputs the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity. Have. Specifically, the journal element determining unit 23 causes the display unit 22 to display a warning display different from the normal display for the invalid text. The validity of the text of the journalizing element is determined using the reliability of character recognition output by the journalizing element output unit 21 and the reliability of image recognition by the image analysis unit 20.
 本実施形態では、仕訳要素判定部23において、予め文字認識の信頼度Rcにおける第1の閾値Rc1及び第2の閾値Rc2(Rc1>Rc2)と、画像解析の信頼度Riにおける第3の閾値Ri3とが設定されており、これらの信頼度の閾値に基づいて妥当性の度合いを判定する。 In this embodiment, in the journal element determining unit 23, the first threshold Rc1 and the second threshold Rc2 (Rc1> Rc2) in the reliability Rc of character recognition and the third threshold Ri3 in the reliability Ri of the image analysis in advance. And are determined, and the degree of validity is determined based on these reliability threshold values.
 そして、仕訳要素判定部23には、各信頼度の度合い応じて通常表示、第1の警告表示、第2の警告表示が設定されている。例えば、仕訳要素判定部23は、テキスト化した仕訳要素の文字認識の信頼度Rcが、第1の閾値Rc1(例えば80%)以上である場合は、仕訳要素としての妥当性が高いと判断し、当該テキストは通常表示とする。文字認識の信頼度Rcが第1の閾値Rc1未満、第2の閾値Rc2(例えば50%)以上であり、且つ画像解析の信頼度Riが第3の閾値Ri3(例えば50%)以上であれば、仕訳要素としての妥当性が中程度と判断し、当該テキストは第1の警告表示とする。文字認識の信頼度Rcが第2の閾値R2未満、又は画像解析の信頼度Riが第3の閾値Ri3未満である場合は、仕訳要素の妥当性が低いと判断し、当該テキストは第2の警告表示とする。 Then, in the journalizing element determination unit 23, a normal display, a first warning display, and a second warning display are set according to the degree of each reliability. For example, when the reliability Rc of character recognition of a text-converted journal element is equal to or more than a first threshold Rc1 (for example, 80%), the journal element judging unit 23 determines that the journal element is highly relevant as a journal element. , The text is usually displayed. If the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the first threshold Rc1 and not less than the second threshold Rc2 (for example 50%) and the reliability Ri of the image analysis is more than the third threshold Ri3 (for example 50%) , The relevance as a journal entry element is judged to be medium, and the text is regarded as the first warning display. If the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the second threshold R2 or the reliability Ri of the image analysis is less than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the journal element is low in relevance and the text is the second Warning display.
 警告表示は、通常表示と異なる表示であればよく、表示形式は特に限定されず、例えば該当する仕訳要素のテキストに下線を記載したり、文字色を異ならせたり、テキストの近くにフラグを表示する等して表現する。また警告表示の種類も妥当性に応じて複数設定してもよいし、1種類のみでもよい。 The warning display may be a display different from the normal display, and the display format is not particularly limited. For example, the text of the corresponding journal element is underlined, the text color is different, or a flag is displayed near the text And express. Also, the number of types of warning display may be set according to the appropriateness, or only one type may be set.
 次に、仕訳要素確定部12は、サービス提供者又は仕訳要素確定用のプログラムにより、表示部22に表示された仕訳要素のテキストを確定させる確定処理を行う。これは、例えばサービス提供者側の担当者が表示部22に表示された仕訳要素を確認して、問題のない仕訳要素についてはそのまま確定操作を行い、問題のある仕訳要素については修正作業を行った上で確定操作を行う。 Next, the journalizing element determining unit 12 performs a determining process of determining the text of the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22 by the service provider or the program for determining the journalizing element. For example, the person in charge at the service provider side confirms the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22 and performs the confirmation operation as it is for the journalizing element having no problem, and performs the correcting operation for the journalizing element having the problem. Perform the confirmation operation.
 仕訳部13は、仕訳要素確定部12により確定された仕訳要素に応じた勘定科目を出力する機能を有している。この仕訳要素に応じた勘定科目の出力は、例えば仕訳AIにより行う。仕訳AIは、学習システム14において、予め機械学習により仕訳要素に対する勘定科目を出力することを学習した自動仕訳のAIである。当該仕訳部13において出力された勘定科目は、仕訳要素と共に、仕訳結果としてユーザの情報端末4に送信される。 The journalizing unit 13 has a function of outputting an account item according to the journalizing element determined by the journalizing element determining unit 12. The output of the account item according to this journal entry element is performed by, for example, journal entry AI. The journal AI is an automatic journal AI that is learned in the learning system 14 to output account items for journal elements in advance by machine learning. The account item output in the journalizing unit 13 is transmitted to the user's information terminal 4 as a journalizing result together with the journalizing element.
 学習システム14は、上述した仕訳要素出力AI及び仕訳AIを学習させ、学習済みのAIを供給する機能を有している。詳しくは、学習システム14は、証憑の画像データと当該画像データに含まれる仕訳要素からなる学習用データに基づき機械学習(いわゆるディープラーニング)させることで、画像解析AIや仕訳要素出力AIを生成する。また、学習システム14は、仕訳要素と当該仕訳要素に対応する勘定科目からなる学習用データに基づき機械学習させることで、仕訳AIを生成する。 The learning system 14 has a function of learning the journal element output AI and the journal AI described above and supplying a learned AI. Specifically, the learning system 14 generates an image analysis AI and a journal entry element output AI by machine learning (so-called deep learning) based on learning data including the voucher image data and the journal entry included in the image data. . Further, the learning system 14 generates a journal AI by performing machine learning based on learning data including a journal element and an account item corresponding to the journal element.
 このように構成された会計処理装置10は、仕訳要素解析部11において、画像解析部20により証憑の画像データから仕訳要素の部分を特定し、仕訳要素出力部21により仕訳要素をテキスト化して表示部22に表示し、仕訳要素判定部23により仕訳要素のテキストの妥当でないものを判定して警告表示を行う。そして、表示部22に表示された仕訳要素のテキストをサービス提供者側が確認して、仕訳要素確定部12により確定した仕訳要素に基づいて、仕訳部13により自動仕訳が行われる。 The accounting processing apparatus 10 configured in this manner causes the journalizing element analysis unit 11 to identify the portion of the journalizing element from the image data of the voucher by the image analyzing unit 20, and the journalizing element output unit 21 converts the journalizing element into text and displays It is displayed on the part 22, and the invalidating of the text of the journalizing element is judged by the journalizing element judging unit 23 to display a warning. Then, the service provider side confirms the text of the journalizing element displayed on the display unit 22, and the automatic journaling is performed by the journalizing unit 13 based on the journalizing element decided by the journalizing element deciding unit 12.
 ここで図2を参照すると、仕訳要素解析部11により実行される仕訳要素解析の流れを示したフローチャートが示されており、以下同フローチャートに沿って、仕訳要素解析方法について詳しく説明する。なお、当該仕訳要素解析は、ユーザからの証憑の画像データを受信すると、解析をスタートする。 Referring now to FIG. 2, a flow chart showing the flow of the journal element analysis performed by the journal element analysis unit 11 is shown, and the journal element analysis method will be described in detail below along the same flowchart. In addition, the said journaling element analysis will start an analysis, if the image data of the voucher from a user is received.
 まず、ステップS1として、仕訳要素解析部11は画像解析部20により、証憑の画像データ内の仕訳要素部分を特定する(画像解析工程)。このとき、画像認識の信頼度Ri仕訳要素判定部23に出力される。 First, as step S1, the journalizing element analysis unit 11 specifies the journalizing element portion in the image data of the voucher by the image analyzing unit 20 (image analysis process). At this time, the reliability Ri of the image recognition is output to the journal element determining unit 23.
 そして、ステップS2では、仕訳要素出力部21において、仕訳要素出力AIにより仕訳要素特定部分内の仕訳要素をテキスト化する(仕訳要素出力工程)。テキスト化された仕訳要素は表示部22に表示される一方、仕訳要素出力AIによる文字認識の信頼度Rcとともに仕訳要素判定部23に出力される。 Then, in step S2, the journalizing element output unit 21 converts the journalizing elements in the journalizing element specifying portion into text by means of the journalizing element output AI (journalizing element output process). While the journalized element in text form is displayed on the display unit 22, it is output to the journalized element determination unit 23 together with the reliability Rc of character recognition by the journalized element output AI.
 ステップS3では、仕訳要素判定部23において、テキスト化された仕訳要素の文字認識の信頼度Rcが第1の閾値Rc1未満であるか否かを判定する(仕訳要素判定工程)。当該判定結果が偽(No)である場合、即ち文字認識の信頼度Rcが第1の閾値Rc1以上である場合は、このテキスト化された仕訳要素の妥当性は高いと判断し、ステップS4に進む。 In step S3, the journalizing element determining unit 23 determines whether the reliability Rc of character recognition of the textified journaling element is less than the first threshold Rc1 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the degree of reliability Rc of character recognition is equal to or higher than the first threshold Rc1, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is high, and the process proceeds to step S4. move on.
 ステップS4では、仕訳要素判定部23は、表示部22にテキスト化された仕訳要素を通常表示で表示し、当該ルーチンをリターンする。 In step S4, the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 in a normal display, and returns the routine.
 一方、ステップS3の判定結果が真(Yes)であった場合、即ち文字認識の信頼度Rcが第1の閾値Rc1未満であった場合はステップS5に進む。 On the other hand, if the determination result in step S3 is true (Yes), that is, if the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the first threshold Rc1, the process proceeds to step S5.
 ステップS5において、仕訳要素判定部23は、文字認識の信頼度Rcが第2の閾値Rc2未満であるか否かを判定する(仕訳要素判定工程)。当該判定結果が偽(No)である場合、即ち文字認識の信頼度Rcが第2の閾値Rc2以上である場合はステップS6に進む。 In step S5, the journalizing element determining unit 23 determines whether the reliability Rc of character recognition is less than the second threshold Rc2 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the character recognition reliability Rc is equal to or greater than the second threshold Rc2, the process proceeds to step S6.
 ステップS6において、仕訳要素判定部23は、画像解析の信頼度Riが第3の閾値Ri3未満であるか否かを判定する(仕訳要素判定工程)。当該判定結果が偽(No)である場合、即ち信頼度Riが第3の閾値Ri3以上である場合は、このテキスト化された仕訳要素の妥当性は中程度であると判断しステップS7に進む。 In step S6, the journalizing element determination unit 23 determines whether the reliability Ri of the image analysis is less than the third threshold Ri3 (journalizing element determining step). If the determination result is false (No), that is, if the reliability Ri is equal to or more than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is medium, and the process proceeds to step S7. .
 ステップS7において、仕訳要素判定部23は、表示部22にテキスト化された仕訳要素を第1の警告表示で表示し、当該ルーチンをリターンする。 In step S7, the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 with a first warning display, and returns the routine.
 一方、ステップS5の判定結果及びステップS6の判定結果のいずれかが真(Yes)であった場合、即ち文字認識の信頼度Rcが第2の閾値Rc2未満であるか、画像解析の信頼度Riが第3の閾値Ri3未満である場合は、このテキスト化された仕訳要素の妥当性は低いと判断し、ステップS8に進む。 On the other hand, if one of the determination result in step S5 and the determination result in step S6 is true (Yes), that is, the character recognition reliability Rc is less than the second threshold Rc2, the image analysis reliability Ri If is less than the third threshold Ri3, it is determined that the validity of the textified journal element is low, and the process proceeds to step S8.
 ステップS8において、仕訳要素判定部23は、表示部22にテキスト化された仕訳要素を第2の警告表示で表示し、当該ルーチンをリターンする。 In step S8, the journalizing element determination unit 23 displays the textified journalizing element on the display unit 22 with a second warning display, and returns the routine.
 当該ルーチンは、証憑の画像データ内にて特定された仕訳要素の全てにおいての判定が終了するまで継続される。 The routine is continued until the determination on all the journal elements specified in the voucher image data is completed.
 ここで図3、図4を参照すると、表示部33に表示される表示例がそれぞれ示されており、これらの図に基づき、具体的な仕訳要素の表示について説明する。 Here, referring to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, display examples displayed on the display unit 33 are respectively shown, and the display of a specific journalizing element will be described based on these figures.
 図3に示す第1の表示例は、通帳の画像データから仕訳要素を抽出した場合の表示例であり、画面左側にスキャンされた通帳の元画像が表示され、画面右側に仕訳要素出力部21及び仕訳要素判定部23より出力されたテキスト化された仕訳要素が表示されている。 The first display example shown in FIG. 3 is a display example when a journal entry element is extracted from the passbook image data, and the original image of the passbook scanned is displayed on the left side of the screen, and the journal entry element output unit 21 is displayed on the right side. The textified journal element output from the journal element judging unit 23 is displayed.
 詳しくは、通帳は一行ごとに取引が記載され、複数の取引がまとめて一つの画像上に表示される。元画像において点線で示されているように、画像解析部20により日付、取引内容、支払い、預り、残高の文字が認識され、その下方向の範囲を仕訳要素に対応する部分として領域指定されている。なお、この点線は実際には表示部22に表示されていなくてもよい。 Specifically, the passbook describes transactions on a row-by-row basis, and a plurality of transactions are collectively displayed on one image. As shown by the dotted lines in the original image, the image analysis unit 20 recognizes the characters of date, contents of transaction, payment, deposit, balance, and the range in the downward direction is designated as a portion corresponding to the journal element. There is. Note that this dotted line may not actually be displayed on the display unit 22.
 読取結果には、元画像と同様の配列で、日付、取引内容、支払い、預り、残高の項目が形成されている。なお、各項目の配列は必ずしも元画像と一致していなくてもよい。 In the reading result, items of date, contents of transaction, payment, deposit, balance are formed in the same arrangement as the original image. The arrangement of each item may not necessarily match the original image.
 そして、読取結果には、仕訳要素出力AIによりテキスト化された仕訳要素が表示されている。例えば一行目の取引では、日付として「29-1-10」、取引内容として「振込」、支払いとして「カ)ABC」、預りとして「30,000」、残高として「130,000」が通常表示で表示されている。 Then, in the reading result, the journalizing element textified by the journalizing element output AI is displayed. For example, in the first transaction, “29-1-10” is displayed as the date, “transfer” as the transaction content, “K) ABC as the payment,“ 30,000 ”as the deposit, and“ 130,000 ”as the balance. There is.
 一方、元画像には、通帳に付いた汚れ30やゴミ31も表示されている。このような汚れ30やゴミ31が仕訳要素部分と重なっていると、仕訳要素出力AIは仕訳要素を正確にテキスト化することができず、信頼度が低くなる。その結果、仕訳要素判定部23において妥当でないと判定された仕訳要素については警告表示がなされる。 On the other hand, in the original image, dirt 30 and dust 31 attached to the passbook are also displayed. If such dirt 30 and trash 31 overlap the journalizing element portion, the journalizing element output AI can not accurately convert the journalizing element into text, and the reliability is low. As a result, a warning is displayed for the journal elements determined to be invalid in the journal element determination unit 23.
 具体的には図3においては、2行目の取引の残高は元画像では「30,000」であるが汚れ30のため、読取結果において仕訳要素出力AIは「80,000」と誤って認識している。ここで仕訳要素判定部23はこの「80,000」の信頼度及び位置関係を判定した結果、中程度の妥当性と判定し、「80,000」の下に下線を引いた第1の警告表示を行っている。 More specifically, in FIG. 3, the balance of the transaction in the second line is “30,000” in the original image, but because the dirt 30 is present, the journal element output AI is erroneously recognized as “80,000” in the reading result. Here, as a result of judging the reliability and positional relationship of “80,000”, the journal element judging unit 23 judges that the validity is moderate, and performs the first warning display underlined “80,000”. There is.
 また、4行目の取引においては元画像において、取引内容の「振込」、支払いの「カ)DEF」、預りの「120,000」に跨ってゴミ31が重なっているために、読取結果において仕訳要素出力AIは支払いについて「カ)BEF」と誤って認識している。取引内容の「振込」と、預りの「120,000」については正しくテキスト化されているが、仕訳要素出力AIとしての信頼度は低くなり、仕訳要素判定部23は「カ)BEF」も含めていずれも妥当性が低いと判断し、二重下線が引かれた第2の警告表示が行っている。 In the fourth line of the transaction, in the original image, the rubbish 31 overlaps the transaction contents "Transfer", "Payment" "Ca" DEF, and "120,000" of the deposit. The output AI erroneously recognizes the payment as “f) BEF”. The transaction contents “Transfer” and “120,000” of deposit are correctly written in text, but the reliability as the journal element output AI is low, and the journal element judgment unit 23 includes “f) BEF” Also, it is judged that the relevance is low, and the second warning display with double underlining is performed.
 次に図4の第2の表示例は、レシートの画像データから仕訳要素を抽出した場合の表示例であり、画面左側にスキャンされたレシートの元画像が表示され、画面右側に仕訳要素出力部21及び仕訳要素判定部23より出力されたテキスト化された仕訳要素が表示されている。 Next, a second display example of FIG. 4 is a display example when a journal entry element is extracted from image data of a receipt, and the original image of the scanned receipt is displayed on the left side of the screen, and the journal entry element output unit is on the right side of the screen. 21 and the journalized element outputted from the journal element judging unit 23 are displayed.
 詳しくは、レシートは一画像について一取引が記載されて表示される。このような場合、元画像において点線で示されているように、画像解析部20は日付に対応する部分40aと、金額に対応する部分41aと、社名に対応する部分42aを特定しており、これらの拡大図40b、41b、42bが読取結果に表示されている。なお、この点線は実際には表示部22に表示されていなくてもよい。 Specifically, the receipt is displayed with one transaction described for one image. In such a case, the image analysis unit 20 specifies the portion 40a corresponding to the date, the portion 41a corresponding to the amount, and the portion 42a corresponding to the company name, as indicated by the dotted line in the original image, These enlarged views 40b, 41b and 42b are displayed in the reading result. Note that this dotted line may not actually be displayed on the display unit 22.
 読取結果には、対応する拡大図の上に、仕訳要素出力AIによりテキスト化された日付、金額、社名が記載されている。 In the reading result, the date, the amount, and the company name, which are made into text by the journal element output AI, are described on the corresponding enlarged view.
 具体的には、日付に対応する部分40a、40bは正しくは「2019/10/10」と記載されているが、最後の「0」の印字がかすれているために、仕訳要素出力AIは「2019年10月1日」と誤ってテキスト化している。これに対して仕訳要素判定部23は、当該日付のテキストは信頼度が低く妥当性が中程度と判断して、白抜きのフラグ43である第1の警告表示を行っている。 Specifically, although the parts 40a and 40b corresponding to the date are correctly described as "2019/10/10", since the printing of the last "0" is blurred, the journal element output AI is " The text has been incorrectly made "October 1, 2019". On the other hand, the journalizing element determination unit 23 determines that the text of the date has low reliability and is of moderate validity, and performs the first warning display as the white out flag 43.
 また、金額に対応する部分41a、41bは、本来は画像解析部20が「合計 \1,080」の部分を特定すべきところ、「紅茶 \500」の部分を特定している。このような場合、仕訳要素判定部23は、画像解析部20により指定された合計金額を示す領域に合計金額部分が含まれていない上、指定領域が広いため、文字認識の信頼度及び画像解析の信頼度は低くなることから、妥当性が低いと判断して、読取結果の金額欄に黒いフラグ44である第2の警告表示を行っている。 Further, the portions 41a and 41b corresponding to the amount of money originally specify the portion of "tea \ 500", while the image analysis unit 20 should specify the portion of "total 1,080". In such a case, the journal element determining unit 23 does not include the total amount portion in the area indicating the total amount specified by the image analysis unit 20, and the designated area is wide. Since the degree of reliability of is low, it is judged that the relevance is low, and a second warning display of a black flag 44 is performed in the amount field of the reading result.
 一方、社名に対応する部分42a、42bについては、仕訳要素判定部23は妥当性が高いと判断しフラグ等を付していない通常表示としている。 On the other hand, with respect to the portions 42a and 42b corresponding to the company name, the journalizing element determination unit 23 determines that the validity is high, and is normally displayed without a flag or the like.
 以上のように、本実施形態における会計処理システム1では、仕訳要素解析部11において、仕訳要素出力部21が仕訳要素出力AIを用いて証憑の画像から仕訳要素のテキストを抽出することで、証憑を人間が一件一件読み取るような作業を省くことができ、仕訳要素の入力作業の効率を向上させることができる。 As described above, in the accounting processing system 1 according to the present embodiment, in the journalizing element analyzing unit 11, the journalizing element output unit 21 extracts the text of the journalizing element from the image of the voucher by using the journalizing element output AI. This eliminates the need for human-to-human reading of each case, and improves the efficiency of entering journal elements.
 その一方で、仕訳要素判定部23が仕訳要素出力AIにより抽出された仕訳要素のテキストの妥当性を判定し、通常表示や警告表示等のように、当該妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力することで、問題がある仕訳要素について容易に確認を行うことができる。これにより、仕訳要素の抽出の精度を確保することができる。 On the other hand, the journalizing element judging unit 23 judges the validity of the text of the journalizing element extracted by the journalizing element output AI, and as in the case of a normal display or a warning display, in two or more modes according to the validity. By outputting the display information related to the text, it is possible to easily confirm the journal element having a problem. This makes it possible to secure the extraction accuracy of the journalizing element.
 特に、仕訳要素出力AIは仕訳要素のテキスト化とともにその信頼度(文字認識の信頼度)を出力し、仕訳要素判定部23が当該信頼度に基づいて仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定することで、容易に且つ適切に仕訳要素の判定を行うことができる。 In particular, the journal element output AI outputs the reliability (text recognition reliability) together with the textification of the journal element, and the journal element determination unit 23 determines the validity as the journal element based on the reliability. The determination of the journal element can be made easily and appropriately.
 また、仕訳要素判定部23は、画像解析部20の画像解析AIによる画像解析の信頼度に基づいても妥当性を判定することで、より正確に仕訳要素の妥当性を判定することができる。 Further, the journalizing element determining unit 23 can more accurately determine the validity of the journalizing element by determining the validity based on the reliability of the image analysis by the image analysis AI of the image analyzing unit 20.
 さらに、仕訳要素判定部23は、妥当でないテキストに対して、妥当性の度合いに応じて異なる警告表示を行うことで、より詳細に仕訳要素の妥当性を表現することができ、より精密に仕訳要素の妥当性を確認することができる。 Furthermore, the journalizing element determination unit 23 can display the validity of the journalizing element in more detail by displaying different warnings according to the degree of relevance to the invalid text, and the journaling can be performed more precisely. The validity of the element can be confirmed.
 そして、仕訳要素判定部23により判定された結果に基づいて仕訳要素を確定し、仕訳部13による自動仕訳を行うことで、より正確な自動仕訳を実現することができる。 Then, by determining the journalizing element based on the result determined by the journalizing element determining unit 23 and performing the automatic journaling by the journalizing unit 13, a more accurate automatic journaling can be realized.
 以上のことから、本実施形態に係る仕訳要素解析部11を含む会計処理装置10は、証憑に記載された仕訳要素の入力作業の効率を向上させるとともに、仕訳要素の抽出の精度を確保することができ、より正確な自動仕訳を実現することができる From the above, the accounting processing apparatus 10 including the journalizing element analyzing unit 11 according to the present embodiment improves the efficiency of the input operation of the journalizing element described in the voucher and secures the accuracy of the extraction of the journalizing element. Can realize more accurate automatic journaling
 以上で本発明の実施形態の説明を終えるが、本発明の態様はこの実施形態に限定されるものではない。 This completes the description of the embodiments of the present invention, but the aspects of the present invention are not limited to this embodiment.
 例えば、上記実施形態では、図3、4の表示例に基づき、証憑として通帳とレシートの仕訳要素の抽出について説明したが、証憑の種類はこれに限られるものではない。 For example, in the above embodiment, the extraction of the journal elements of the passbook and receipt is described as a voucher based on the display examples of FIGS. 3 and 4, but the type of voucher is not limited to this.
 また、上記実施形態では、画像解析部20の画像解析AIにより画像データ内の仕訳要素に対応する部分を特定しているが、この機能を仕訳要素出力AIが備えていてもよい。 In the above embodiment, the image analysis AI of the image analysis unit 20 identifies the portion corresponding to the journalizing element in the image data. However, the journalizing element output AI may have this function.
 また、上記実施形態では、文字認識の信頼度Rcと画像解析の信頼度Riの2つの信頼度に基づいて仕訳要素のテキストの妥当性を判定しているが、両信頼度を一つにまとめて、1つの信頼度を用いて当該妥当性を判定してもよい。この両信頼度を一つにまとめる手法が、計算により行ってもよいし、画像解析についても学習した仕訳要素出力AIが両信頼度を一つにまとめた信頼度を出力してもよい。 Further, in the above embodiment, the validity of the text of the journalizing element is determined based on the two reliabilities of the character recognition reliability Rc and the image analysis reliability Ri, but both reliability are summarized into one. Thus, one relevance may be used to determine the validity. The method of combining the two reliabilities into one may be performed by calculation, or the journal element output AI learned for the image analysis may output the reliability in which the two reliabilities are combined into one.
 また、上記実施形態では、仕訳部13において仕訳AIを用いて自動仕訳を行っているが、AIを用いない自動仕訳用プログラムにより仕訳を行ってもよい。 Further, in the above embodiment, automatic journalizing is performed using the journalizing AI in the journalizing unit 13, but journalizing may be performed using an automatic journalizing program that does not use the AI.
 また、上記実施形態では、文字認識の信頼度Rcにおける第1の閾値Rc1、第2の閾値Rc2、及び画像解析の信頼度Riにおける第3の閾値Ri3を設定しているが、閾値の設定数はこれに限られるものでない。 In the above embodiment, the first threshold Rc1 and the second threshold Rc2 in the reliability Rc of character recognition and the third threshold Ri3 in the reliability Ri of image analysis are set, but the number of threshold settings Is not limited to this.
 また、仕訳要素判定部は、妥当でない仕訳要素のテキストに対して、他の仕訳要素に基づいて、より妥当なテキストに補正する機能を有していてもよい。例えば、図3の表示例において、2行目の取引の残高が汚れ30によって「30,000」を「80,000」と誤って出力しているが、1行目の残高「130,000」と2行目の支払いの額「100,000」との関係(130,000-100,000=30,000)から、又は3行目の残高「20,000」と支払い「10,000」との関係(20,000+10,000=30,000)から、2行目の残高が「30,000」となることは明らかである。したがって、このような他の仕訳要素から、より妥当な仕訳要素に補正できる場合、仕訳要素判定部は2行目の残高を「30,000」と補正したテキストとして表示してもよい。 In addition, the journal element determination unit may have a function of correcting the text of the invalid journal element to more appropriate text based on another journal element. For example, in the display example of FIG. 3, the balance of the transaction on the second line erroneously outputs “30,000” as “80,000” due to the stain 30, but the balance on the first line is “130,000” and the second line is paid From the relationship with the amount "100,000" (130,000-100,000 = 30,000) or the relationship between the balance "20,000" in the third row and the payment It is clear that it will be 30,000 ". Therefore, if it is possible to correct such a journal element to a more appropriate journal element, the journal element judging unit may display the balance of the second line as "30,000" as a corrected text.
 このように、妥当性の低い仕訳要素のテキストについて補正することで、修正作業を削減でき、さらなる作業効率の向上を図ることができる。また、この補正に用いる他の仕訳要素は、仕訳要素判定部により妥当である判定がなされた仕訳要素を用いるのが好ましい。なお、補正したテキストに対しては警告表示を行ってよいし、行わなくてもよい。 In this way, by correcting the text of the less appropriate journal element, it is possible to reduce the correction work and to further improve the work efficiency. Moreover, it is preferable that the other journaling element used for this correction use the journalizing element for which the judgment made appropriate by the journalizing element judging part is made. A warning may or may not be displayed on the corrected text.
 1 会計処理システム
 2 通信網
 3 読取装置
 4 情報端末
 10 会計処理装置
 11 仕訳要素解析部(仕訳要素解析装置)
 12 仕訳要素確定部
 13 仕訳部
 14 学習システム
 20 画像解析部
 21 仕訳要素出力部
 22 表示部
 23 仕訳要素判定部
1 accounting system 2 communication network 3 reader 4 information terminal 10 accounting processor 11 journal element analysis unit (journal element analyzer)
12 journal element determination section 13 journal section 14 learning system 20 image analysis section 21 journal element output section 22 display section 23 journal element determination section

Claims (6)

  1.  証憑の画像データから少なくとも日付、金額を含む仕訳要素に対応する部分を特定する画像解析部と、
     前記画像解析部により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力するための仕訳要素出力AIによって、前記画像解析部により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力する仕訳要素出力部と、
     前記仕訳要素出力部から出力されたテキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定し、当該妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力する仕訳要素判定部と、
    を備える仕訳要素解析装置。
    An image analysis unit for specifying a portion corresponding to a journal entry including at least a date and an amount from the image data of the voucher;
    A journalizing element output AI for outputting as a text a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis part, a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis part Journal element output section to output as text,
    A journalizing element determining unit that determines the validity of the text output from the journalizing element output unit as a journalizing element, and outputs the display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity;
    Journal element analysis device comprising.
  2.  前記仕訳要素判定部は、前記仕訳要素出力AIが出力した仕訳要素のテキストの信頼度に基づいて前記テキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定する請求項1記載の仕訳要素解析装置。 The journalizing element analyzing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the journalizing element determining unit determines the validity of the text as a journalizing element based on the reliability of the text of the journalizing element output by the journalizing element output AI.
  3.  前記仕訳要素判定部は、予め学習により前記画像データ内から仕訳要素に対応する部分を含む領域を指定するための画像解析AIが出力した信頼度に基づいて前記妥当性を判定する請求項1又は2記載の仕訳要素解析装置。 The journal element determining unit determines in advance the validity on the basis of the reliability output from the image analysis AI for designating an area including a portion corresponding to the journal element from the image data by learning in advance. The journal element analysis device described in 2.
  4.  請求項1から請求項3のいずれか一項に記載の仕訳要素解析装置と、
     前記仕訳要素のテキストを確定する仕訳要素確定部と、
     前記仕訳要素確定部により確定された仕訳要素に基づく勘定科目を出力する仕訳部と、を備える会計処理装置。
    The journal element analysis device according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
    A journalizing element deciding unit for deciding the text of the journalizing element;
    An accounting processing apparatus comprising: a journalizing unit for outputting an account item based on the journalizing element decided by the journalizing element deciding unit.
  5.  証憑の画像データから少なくとも日付、金額を含む仕訳要素 に対応する部分を特定する画像解析工程と、
     前記画像解析工程により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力するための仕訳要素出力AIによって、前記画像解析工程により特定された部分の少なくとも一部に対応する仕訳要素をテキストとして出力する仕訳要素出力工程と、
     前記仕訳要素出力工程にて出力されたテキストの仕訳要素としての妥当性を判定し、該妥当性に応じた2以上の態様で当該テキストに関連する表示情報を出力する仕訳要素判定工程と、
    を備える仕訳要素解析方法。
    An image analysis step of identifying a portion corresponding to a journal entry including at least a date and an amount from the image data of the voucher;
    A journalizing element output AI for outputting as a text a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of a part specified by the image analysis step, a journalizing element corresponding to at least a part of the part specified by the image analysis step Journal element output process output as text,
    A journalizing element determining process of judging the validity of the text output in the journalizing element output process as a journalizing element and outputting display information related to the text in two or more modes according to the validity;
    Journal element analysis method comprising.
  6.  コンピュータに、請求項5に記載の仕訳要素解析方法を実行させるための仕訳要素解析プログラム。

     
    A journal element analysis program for causing a computer to execute the journal element analysis method according to claim 5.

PCT/JP2018/002779 2018-01-29 2018-01-29 Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program WO2019146117A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018504954A JP6535860B1 (en) 2018-01-29 2018-01-29 Journal element analysis device, accounting processor, journal element analysis method, journal element analysis program
PCT/JP2018/002779 WO2019146117A1 (en) 2018-01-29 2018-01-29 Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2018/002779 WO2019146117A1 (en) 2018-01-29 2018-01-29 Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019146117A1 true WO2019146117A1 (en) 2019-08-01

Family

ID=67144541

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2018/002779 WO2019146117A1 (en) 2018-01-29 2018-01-29 Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method and journal element analysis program

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6535860B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2019146117A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2020086974A (en) * 2018-11-27 2020-06-04 辻・本郷税理士法人 Passbook conversion device, passbook conversion system, and program
JP2021072110A (en) * 2020-04-30 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Voucher determination device, accounting processing device, voucher determination program, voucher determination system, and voucher determination method
JP2021072088A (en) * 2020-04-30 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Voucher determination device, accounting processing device, voucher determination program, voucher determination system, and voucher determination method
JP2021071988A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and program
JP2021093222A (en) * 2021-03-17 2021-06-17 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, method for accounting processing, and program
JP2021165967A (en) * 2020-04-07 2021-10-14 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, accounting processing method and program

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06215293A (en) * 1993-01-19 1994-08-05 Hitachi Ltd Device for recognizing vehicle number
JP2014049069A (en) * 2012-09-04 2014-03-17 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Information processor, trail collection system and program
JP6165957B1 (en) * 2016-12-16 2017-07-19 ファーストアカウンティング株式会社 Accounting processing apparatus, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and accounting processing program

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6528147B2 (en) * 2014-01-31 2019-06-12 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting data entry support system, method and program

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06215293A (en) * 1993-01-19 1994-08-05 Hitachi Ltd Device for recognizing vehicle number
JP2014049069A (en) * 2012-09-04 2014-03-17 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Information processor, trail collection system and program
JP6165957B1 (en) * 2016-12-16 2017-07-19 ファーストアカウンティング株式会社 Accounting processing apparatus, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and accounting processing program

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2020086974A (en) * 2018-11-27 2020-06-04 辻・本郷税理士法人 Passbook conversion device, passbook conversion system, and program
JP2021071988A (en) * 2019-10-31 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and program
JP2021165967A (en) * 2020-04-07 2021-10-14 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, accounting processing method and program
JP2021072110A (en) * 2020-04-30 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Voucher determination device, accounting processing device, voucher determination program, voucher determination system, and voucher determination method
JP2021072088A (en) * 2020-04-30 2021-05-06 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Voucher determination device, accounting processing device, voucher determination program, voucher determination system, and voucher determination method
JP2021093222A (en) * 2021-03-17 2021-06-17 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting processor, accounting processing system, method for accounting processing, and program
JP6993032B2 (en) 2021-03-17 2022-01-13 株式会社日本デジタル研究所 Accounting equipment, accounting systems, accounting methods and programs

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6535860B1 (en) 2019-07-03
JPWO2019146117A1 (en) 2020-02-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6535860B1 (en) Journal element analysis device, accounting processor, journal element analysis method, journal element analysis program
USRE47309E1 (en) System and method for capture, storage and processing of receipts and related data
JP6179853B2 (en) Accounting system, accounting program, and book
US20200097933A1 (en) Method and system for resolution of deposit transaction exceptions
JP6165957B1 (en) Accounting processing apparatus, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and accounting processing program
US9195977B2 (en) System and method for remote deposit system
JP6307745B2 (en) Accounting system
US8073751B2 (en) Automated review and hold placement
US20050038722A1 (en) Methods, systems, and computer program products for processing and/or preparing a tax return and initiating certain financial transactions
US20070214078A1 (en) Bill payment apparatus and method
WO2016009636A1 (en) Account processing device, account processing method, and account processing program
JP6646308B1 (en) Voucher analysis device, accounting processing system, voucher analysis method, voucher analysis program
WO2020012539A1 (en) Journalization element analysis device, accounting system, journalization element analysis method, and journalization element analysis program
KR20130084645A (en) Teller supporting counter reception system and counter processing method
JP2018173935A (en) Accounting processing system
JP6799981B2 (en) Accounting equipment, accounting methods and accounting programs
JP6404524B1 (en) Accounting processing apparatus, accounting processing system, accounting processing method, accounting processing program
JP6732325B1 (en) Accounting system, accounting method, accounting program
US10956728B1 (en) Systems and methods of check processing with background removal
JP6981671B2 (en) Journal element analysis device, accounting processing device, journal element analysis method, journal element analysis program
JP2016173838A (en) Accounting processor, accounting processing method and accounting processing program
JP6612962B1 (en) Electronic data determination system, electronic data determination device, electronic data determination method, electronic data determination program
WO2020255361A1 (en) Accounting processing system, accounting processing method, and accounting processing program
CN115345725A (en) Remote cashing method and device for paper bank acceptance draft
WO2008141342A1 (en) Banking system and process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018504954

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18902486

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18902486

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1