WO2016169609A1 - Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile - Google Patents

Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016169609A1
WO2016169609A1 PCT/EP2015/058885 EP2015058885W WO2016169609A1 WO 2016169609 A1 WO2016169609 A1 WO 2016169609A1 EP 2015058885 W EP2015058885 W EP 2015058885W WO 2016169609 A1 WO2016169609 A1 WO 2016169609A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pipe
out profile
gradient
pipeline
sections
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2015/058885
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Peter Sassan JOHANSSON
Zhilin YANG
Bjørnar Hauknes PETTERSEN
Original Assignee
Statoil Petroleum As
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Statoil Petroleum As filed Critical Statoil Petroleum As
Priority to PCT/EP2015/058885 priority Critical patent/WO2016169609A1/en
Publication of WO2016169609A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016169609A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L—PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L1/00—Laying or reclaiming pipes; Repairing or joining pipes on or under water
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/18—Network design, e.g. design based on topological or interconnect aspects of utility systems, piping, heating ventilation air conditioning [HVAC] or cabling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
    • G06F2113/14—Pipes

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile.
  • a pipe carrying a fluid will have a certain liquid holdup.
  • the liquid holdup in a pipe will depend on a number of factors such as the properties of the fluids being transported, flow pattern, flow rate, pipe diameter and pipe inclination etc.
  • the downstream holdup of a pipe section can determine if the high holdup or low holdup solution will be the prevailing solution in that length of pipe for a given flow rate.
  • the present invention provides a method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile, the method comprising: assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile that is to be modified, the pipeline lay-out profile being made up of a number of sections of pipe, in order to: 1 a) identify sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient; and 1 b) identify regions of the initial pipeline lay-out profile made up of consecutive sections of pipe identified in step 1 a) wherein the gradient of the pipe changes over the length of the region and wherein consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section; and modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction.
  • a modified pipeline lay-out profile can be provided which will be less likely to transition to a high holdup solution in certain sections of the pipe. Specifically, it is possible for the minimum flow rate of fluid, before the transition to high holdup solutions occurs in the pipe, to be lower. This is because the modified pipe lay-out profile may be designed such that lengths of pipe which have multiple hold-up solutions are not forced into a high holdup regime by the downstream pipe profile.
  • the operational window/envelope i.e. the difference between the maximum flow rate and the minimum flow rate before high holdup solutions are experienced
  • the operational window/envelope can be increased.
  • This method may also enable multiphase transport over longer distances.
  • the method may provide a pipeline profile which has reduced risk of hydrate plugs and/or liquid surging.
  • the flow rate at which liquid accumulation occurs may be decreased.
  • a lower minimum flow rate (rate at minimum pressure drop) of the flow line also results in increased recovery for the field.
  • the pipeline lay-out profile may be modified so as to reduce liquid accumulation, pressure drop and liquid surge potential in the pipeline.
  • This method is particularly useful in larger pipe diameters since the regions over which multiple holdup solutions occur increases with diameter.
  • the pipeline lay-out profile arising from modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections may be referred to as a modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the modified pipeline lay-out profile may have no lengths of positively inclined pipes greater than a threshold gradient which are followed in the downstream direction by a positively inclined pipe of greater gradient without there being a length of pipe therebetween which has a gradient less than the threshold gradient (i.e. a pipe with a negative incline, a horizontal section of pipe or a pipe with a positive gradient less than the threshold).
  • a length of positively inclined pipe with a gradient greater than a threshold gradient may always be immediately followed (i.e. adjacent) in the downstream direction by a length of pipe of a lesser gradient (i.e. either less positive, horizontal or negative).
  • Positively inclined or having a positive gradient may mean that the vertical height of the pipe is increasing in a downstream direction and negatively inclined or having a negative gradient may mean that the vertical height of the pipe is decreasing in a downstream direction.
  • Horizontal or not inclined may mean that the vertical height of the pipe does not change over distance.
  • the downstream direction may be defined as the net fluid flow direction or the direction from the inlet of the pipe to the outlet of the pipe.
  • the upstream direction is the opposite direction to the downstream direction.
  • a region may be a length of pipe which is made up of a plurality of sections of pipe.
  • the identified regions may be replaced with the same number of sections as the number of sections which make up the identified region.
  • the replaced sections and the replacement sections may be equal in length.
  • the replacement sections may be of different length, such as longer, than the pipe sections they are replacing.
  • the sections in the identified region may be replaced by a single pipe section.
  • This single replacement pipe section may be a straight pipe section. In this case the gradient in the region would be constant.
  • the identified regions may be considered to be 'concave' regions, i.e.
  • downstream pipe section with a high gradient may force an upstream pipe section with a lower gradient into high holdup even though, with all other things being equal, it would not normally have transitioned to high holdup at that flow rate.
  • These 'concave' regions may be replaced by straight or 'convex' regions, i.e. regions in which the gradient of the pipe is constant over horizontal distance or in which the gradient decreases over horizontal distance.
  • the 'convex' regions may be made up of a number of pipe sections which all have a positive gradient, but the gradients of which are decreasing in a downstream direction.
  • Replacing a 'concave' region with a 'convex' region may result in a pipe profile which can be operated at lower flow rates before high holdup is experienced than if the concave regions are replaced with straight regions.
  • replacing the 'concave' regions with 'convex' regions may require more extensive
  • the method may involve replacing some of the identified regions ('concave' regions) with regions which have a constant gradient (straight regions) and some of the identified regions with regions which have a gradient which decreases in a downstream direction ('convex' regions).
  • the start and the end points of the identified regions may remain the same
  • the sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may all be equal (i.e. approximately equal or exactly equal) in length.
  • each section may be less than 100m, less than 50m, less than 10m, 3 to 7m or about 5m.
  • the length of the pipe section will depend on factors such as the length of the pipeline lay-out profile being modified and the possible resolution of a simulator if a model is being used.
  • the sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may each be straight pipe sections, i.e. each section may have a constant gradient.
  • the initial pipeline lay-out profile may be made up of sections which start and end when the gradient of the pipe lay-out profile changes. In this case the length of the sections may vary between sections. This is because the length of the section may be dependent on the length of pipe until the gradient changes.
  • the sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may be equal in length and each have a constant gradient (i.e. be straight pipe sections).
  • adjacent pipe sections may have the same gradient and thus together form a straight length of pipe, i.e. there is not necessarily a change of gradient between adjacent pipe sections.
  • the method involves identifying sections of pipe that have a positive gradient greater than a threshold.
  • the threshold may be greater than 0°. It is beneficial to have a threshold gradient below which the pipe sections are not taken into account in the modifying process. This is because it can significantly reduce the extent to which the pipe lay-out profile is modified.
  • a negative gradient may be considered to be a gradient less than 0°.
  • the chosen threshold gradient will depend on a number of factors such as the desired operating window and the gradients of other sections of pipe which will vary between each field development. Therefore, the threshold will need to be determined based on physical and commercial constraints for each field
  • the method may involve a step of determining a threshold positive gradient.
  • the threshold gradient may be 1 ° or less (i.e. between 1 and 0°), 0.5° or less, between 0.1 ° and 0.7° or about 0.5°.
  • the method may involve choosing a threshold gradient, e.g. 0.5°, and modifying the pipeline lay-out profile in accordance with the method based on this threshold gradient to provide a first modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the method may further include changing the threshold gradient and again modifying the pipeline lay-out profile in accordance with the method based on this changed threshold gradient to provide a second modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the method may comprise comparing the first modified pipeline lay-out profile with the second modified pipeline lay-out profile to determine a desired threshold gradient.
  • the comparing of the two pipeline lay-out profiles may involve comparing the extent of modification required to achieve each of the modified pipeline lay-out profile and/or the operational window of each of the modified profiles (this may be among other factors which are compared). This process may be repeated multiple times with different threshold gradients. The process may therefore be an iterative process to determine a desired or optimum threshold gradient based on commercial factors such as cost to modify the pipeline lay-out profile compared with the change in operational window.
  • the initial pipeline lay-out profile may be a model (such as a computer model) of a pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the profile may be modelled by a simulator such as OLGA Dynamic Multiphase Flow Simulator.
  • pipeline lay-out profile may be an actual, i.e. in situ, pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the initial pipeline lay-out profile may be based on the profile of the surface of the installation site for the pipe (e.g. the sea bed).
  • the method may involve obtaining the profile of the installation site and providing the initial pipeline lay-out profile based on the profile of the installation site.
  • the method may comprise surveying (i.e. taking measurements of) a surface, such as a sea bed, to determine the profile of the installation site and providing an initial pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the step of modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile may result in a modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • This modified pipeline lay-out profile may be a model (such as a computer model) of a pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the pipeline lay-out profile may be an actual, i.e. in situ, pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the replacing of the pipe sections may be replacing pipe sections of the model with one or more replacement pipe sections.
  • the method may further comprise a step of laying a pipeline according to the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the method may comprise modifying the profile of the installation site based on the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the method may comprise changing the profile of the installation site, such as by rock dumping or trenching, to more closely match the profile of the modified pipe sections and then laying the pipeline.
  • the method may comprise determining the modified pipeline lay-out profile, determining the required modifications to the installation site profile so that it matches the modified pipeline lay-out profile, modifying the installation site profile (e.g. by means of rock duping and/or trenching) and laying a pipeline according to the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • the pipeline may be a pipeline for transporting dry gas-condensate, i.e. the pipeline may be a dry gas-condensate pipeline.
  • Dry gas condensate is a multiphase flow (e.g. two or three phase flow) comprising gas and liquid and possibly water.
  • the dry gas-condensate may comprise greater than 90%, greater than 95%, or about 96% methane.
  • These pipelines typically have a low liquid loading, e.g. a loading which is such that the gas volume flow rate is at least 1000 times the liquid volume flow rate.
  • the liquid content of the pipeline may vary along its length. This is due to condensation which may occur as the fluid is transported.
  • the pipe inlet may have a liquid content of between 0.001 and 0.01 %, such as about 0.005%
  • the pipe outlet may have a liquid content of about 0.005 to 0.1 %, such as about 0.01 %.
  • the method may be performed by software.
  • the present invention also relates to a software product comprising instructions which when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform the above described method of the first aspect of the invention (including one or more of the optional features).
  • the software product is a physical data carrier.
  • a physical data carrier for example, a CD or flash memory card.
  • the software product could be provided in the form of instructions transmitted over a network, such as downloaded over the Internet, for example.
  • the present invention also relates to a method of manufacturing a software product which is in the form of a physical carrier, comprising storing on the data carrier instructions which when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform the method of the first aspect of the invention (including one or more of the optional features).
  • Figure 1 is a plot of liquid holdup versus the superficial gas velocity (Usg) for a pipe with multiple hold up solutions;
  • Figure 2 is a plot which shows exemplary initial and modified pipeline lay-out profiles
  • Figure 3 is a turndown curve for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 2;
  • Figure 4 shows other exemplary initial and modified pipeline lay-out profiles
  • Figure 5 shows a pipeline lay-out profile (solid line) from a field development and a modified pipeline lay-out profile (dashed line);
  • Figure 6 shows the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 5.
  • Figure 7 shows the liquid accumulation as a function of mass flow rate for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 5.
  • Figures 1 illustrates the liquid holdup versus the superficial gas velocity (Usg) for a pipe modelled by standard OLGA.
  • This graph is the output for a pipe with an inclination of 2.5°, a pipeline diameter of 0.1937m, a superficial liquid velocity of 0.0001 m/s, a gas density of 68.3 kg/m 3 and liquid density of 757 kg/m 3 and a surface tension of 0.016859 Pa/m.
  • Figure 1 shows that in a multiphase pipeline with low liquid loading level there exists multiple hold up solutions.
  • the method of modifying an initial pipeline lay-out profile to provide a modified pipeline lay-out profile involves assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile that is to be modified.
  • This initial pipeline lay-out profile is made up of a number of sections of pipe.
  • the sections of pipe may all be straight, i.e. have a constant gradient over their length.
  • the assessment of the initial pipeline lay-out profile involves identifying the sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient, for example a gradient greater than 0.5°.
  • the method can then involve identifying regions (wherein a region is a length of pipe made up of two or more sections of pipe) of the initial pipeline lay-out profile which are made up of consecutive sections of pipe with a gradient greater than the threshold.
  • the regions should have a gradient which changes over the length of the region (i.e. the regions should not be straight lengths of pipe) and consecutive pipe sections of the region should each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section.
  • the method then involves modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction so as to make a modified pipeline lay-out profile.
  • FIG. 2 A simplified illustration of the effect of this method is illustrated in figure 2.
  • the figures shows a plot of vertical distance (y) versus horizontal distance (x) to illustrate a pipeline geometry.
  • the plot shows an initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 and a modified pipeline lay-out profile 4.
  • the length of pipe of the initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 between about 10m and 1 10m would be an identified region in which the gradient of the pipe changes, all the sections have a gradient above a threshold gradient and consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section. Therefore, the sections of this region are replaced with sections such that the gradient in the region decreases in a downstream direction.
  • Each of the regions (of the initial and modified geometries) consists of one section with a 1 ° inclination, a section with a 2° inclination and a section with a 3° inclination.
  • the inclination between adjacent pipe sections is increasing whereas in the modified geometry in a downstream direction the inclination between adjacent the pipe sections is decreasing.
  • the identified region has a concave shape and by following the method it is replaced with a length of pipe which has a convex shape.
  • the modified pipeline lay-out profile 4 may not obtain high hold up in the 1 ° section before the flow rate becomes so low that the pipe is no longer in the multiple holdup region.
  • the 1 ° section may be forced into the high holdup region at a certain flow rate at which it may normally be in the low holdup region due to the downstream 3° section being in the high holdup region.
  • Figure 3 is a turndown curve which shows the effect the geometry has on accumulation.
  • the oil content verses superficial gas velocity is shown by line 6
  • the oil content verses superficial gas velocity is shown by line 8. It can be seen that for the initial geometry severe accumulation begins when the superficial gas velocity reaches about 1.8 m/s whereas for the modified geometry 4 the superficial gas velocity can drop to about 1.3 m/s before severe accumulation starts.
  • the modified pipeline lay-out profile 4 can have an increased operational window, i.e. it has a greater turn down flexibility.
  • FIG. 4 shows an initial pipeline lay-out profile 10 and a replacement length of pipe 12.
  • the concave portion 10a of the pipeline lay-out profile 10 which is the identified region in this initial pipeline layout profile, is replaced with a length of straight pipe 12.
  • the modified pipeline lay-out profile will have a transition to high holdup at a lower flow rate than the last section (the section determining hold up 10b) of the concave part of the initial pipeline lay-out profile 10. If the last part of the concave portion 10b of the initial geometry 10 has high holdup this will enforce high holdup in the sections upstream that are operated in the multiple holdup region. This can be avoided by replacing the concave region with pipe sections that provide a straight region or a convex region of pipe.
  • Figure 5 shows a pipeline lay-out profile 16 from a field development (survey profile) that was deemed not economical at present market conditions.
  • This profile is based on a survey of the sea bed and is modelled using standard OLGA.
  • This is a pipeline for dry gas condensates which is very dry and contains about 96% methane.
  • the liquid content varies from about 0.005% at the inlet and 0.01 % at the outlet.
  • the liquid flow rate increases along the flow line due to condensation.
  • the initial profile contains 1000 pipe sections evenly distributed alone 200km. Each section is about 5m long.
  • the initial profile 16 is modified according to the above described method to result in a modified profile 18.
  • the identified regions i.e. concave regions with all pipe sections having a gradient greater than a threshold, which in this case is 0.5%) are replaced by straight sections.
  • Figure 6 shows the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for the initial geometry 20 and for the modified geometry 22.
  • Figure 7 shows the liquid accumulation as a function of flow rate for the initial geometry 24 and for the modified geometry 26.
  • a lower minimum flow (rate at minimum pressure drop) of the flow line also results in increased recovery for the field.
  • the turndown capacity of the pipeline can be increased further if low points and high points are reduced by either trenching of rock dumping of the installation profile. Such modification will generally reduce high inclination angles.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Pipeline Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile, the method comprising: assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile (2) that is to be modified, the pipeline lay-out profile being made up of a number of sections of pipe, in order to: 1 a) identify sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient; and 1 b) identify regions of the initial pipeline lay-out profile made up of consecutive sections of pipe identified in step 1 a) wherein the gradient of the pipe changes over the length of the region and wherein consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section; and modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile (2) to form a modified pipeline lay-out profile (4) by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction.

Description

METHOD OF MODIFYING A PIPELINE LAY-OUT PROFILE
The invention relates to a method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile.
A pipe carrying a fluid will have a certain liquid holdup. The liquid holdup (HL) is defined as the fraction of an element of pipe which is occupied by liquid (i.e. HL = volume of liquid in a pipe element / volume of the pipe element). The liquid holdup in a pipe will depend on a number of factors such as the properties of the fluids being transported, flow pattern, flow rate, pipe diameter and pipe inclination etc.
It has been found that under certain conditions two and three-phase flows in upwardly inclined sections of pipe can have multiple holdup solutions (low, intermediate and high holdup). This means that the pipe can have either a low liquid holdup or high levels of liquid holdup depending on the conditions.
It has also been found that in the lengths of pipes that have multiple holdup solutions, the downstream holdup of a pipe section can determine if the high holdup or low holdup solution will be the prevailing solution in that length of pipe for a given flow rate.
It is desirable to avoid high holdup in a pipeline. This is because, in the case of high holdup, the pressure drop and the potential for liquid surges are considerably higher. Thus, it is desirable to be able to provide a pipeline lay-out profile that permits a lower flow rate before there is a transition to high holdup in the lengths of pipe which have multiple holdup solutions.
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile, the method comprising: assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile that is to be modified, the pipeline lay-out profile being made up of a number of sections of pipe, in order to: 1 a) identify sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient; and 1 b) identify regions of the initial pipeline lay-out profile made up of consecutive sections of pipe identified in step 1 a) wherein the gradient of the pipe changes over the length of the region and wherein consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section; and modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction. It has been realised that by modifying the pipeline lay-out profile, as outlined above, a modified pipeline lay-out profile can be provided which will be less likely to transition to a high holdup solution in certain sections of the pipe. Specifically, it is possible for the minimum flow rate of fluid, before the transition to high holdup solutions occurs in the pipe, to be lower. This is because the modified pipe lay-out profile may be designed such that lengths of pipe which have multiple hold-up solutions are not forced into a high holdup regime by the downstream pipe profile.
This means that the operational window/envelope (i.e. the difference between the maximum flow rate and the minimum flow rate before high holdup solutions are experienced) can be increased. By increasing the operational window (by designing a pipe that can transport a lower flow rate before high holdup solutions are experienced) it may be possible to extract more fluid (e.g. natural gas) from a field or to develop a field which was not previously considered to be economical to exploit.
This method may also enable multiphase transport over longer distances.
This is because the method may provide a pipeline profile which has reduced risk of hydrate plugs and/or liquid surging. The flow rate at which liquid accumulation occurs may be decreased.
Typically, for extremely long flow lines the operational window will be small, i.e. the flow rate cannot be reduced much from the design flow rate before liquid significantly accumulates. Generally an operator will not risk entering far in to the region of accumulation. As a result the increased turn down flexibility, i.e.
increased operational window, which can be achieved by the present invention is desirable. A lower minimum flow rate (rate at minimum pressure drop) of the flow line also results in increased recovery for the field.
The pipeline lay-out profile may be modified so as to reduce liquid accumulation, pressure drop and liquid surge potential in the pipeline.
This method is particularly useful in larger pipe diameters since the regions over which multiple holdup solutions occur increases with diameter.
The pipeline lay-out profile arising from modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections may be referred to as a modified pipeline lay-out profile.
The modified pipeline lay-out profile may have no lengths of positively inclined pipes greater than a threshold gradient which are followed in the downstream direction by a positively inclined pipe of greater gradient without there being a length of pipe therebetween which has a gradient less than the threshold gradient (i.e. a pipe with a negative incline, a horizontal section of pipe or a pipe with a positive gradient less than the threshold). In other words in the modified pipe lay-out profile a length of positively inclined pipe with a gradient greater than a threshold gradient may always be immediately followed (i.e. adjacent) in the downstream direction by a length of pipe of a lesser gradient (i.e. either less positive, horizontal or negative).
Positively inclined or having a positive gradient may mean that the vertical height of the pipe is increasing in a downstream direction and negatively inclined or having a negative gradient may mean that the vertical height of the pipe is decreasing in a downstream direction. Horizontal or not inclined may mean that the vertical height of the pipe does not change over distance.
The downstream direction may be defined as the net fluid flow direction or the direction from the inlet of the pipe to the outlet of the pipe. The upstream direction is the opposite direction to the downstream direction.
A region may be a length of pipe which is made up of a plurality of sections of pipe.
The identified regions may be replaced with the same number of sections as the number of sections which make up the identified region. In this case the replaced sections and the replacement sections may be equal in length.
Alternatively, the replacement sections may be of different length, such as longer, than the pipe sections they are replacing. The sections in the identified region may be replaced by a single pipe section. This single replacement pipe section may be a straight pipe section. In this case the gradient in the region would be constant.
The identified regions may be considered to be 'concave' regions, i.e.
regions in which the gradient of the pipe increases over distance in a downstream direction. These 'concave' regions may result in a high holdup solution for a pipe section which is operated in a multiple holdup region. This is because a
downstream pipe section with a high gradient (and thus which may transition to high holdup at a relatively high flow rate) may force an upstream pipe section with a lower gradient into high holdup even though, with all other things being equal, it would not normally have transitioned to high holdup at that flow rate. 'These 'concave' regions may be replaced by straight or 'convex' regions, i.e. regions in which the gradient of the pipe is constant over horizontal distance or in which the gradient decreases over horizontal distance.
The 'convex' regions may be made up of a number of pipe sections which all have a positive gradient, but the gradients of which are decreasing in a downstream direction.
Replacing a 'concave' region with a 'convex' region may result in a pipe profile which can be operated at lower flow rates before high holdup is experienced than if the concave regions are replaced with straight regions. However, replacing the 'concave' regions with 'convex' regions may require more extensive
modifications, e.g. more rock dumping to modify the installation site to support the modified pipe profile. Thus financially it may be preferable to replace the 'concave' regions with straight regions. Which option is preferable will depend on a number of factors such as the financial advantage associated with maximising the operational window and environmental considerations. The method may involve replacing some of the identified regions ('concave' regions) with regions which have a constant gradient (straight regions) and some of the identified regions with regions which have a gradient which decreases in a downstream direction ('convex' regions).
The start and the end points of the identified regions may remain the same
(i.e. may have the same (i.e. unchanged) vertical and horizontal location) but the pipe profile between these points may be modified to result in the pipe overall having sections which transition to high holdup at a lower flow rate than in if the profile were not modified.
The sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may all be equal (i.e. approximately equal or exactly equal) in length. For example, each section may be less than 100m, less than 50m, less than 10m, 3 to 7m or about 5m. The length of the pipe section will depend on factors such as the length of the pipeline lay-out profile being modified and the possible resolution of a simulator if a model is being used.
The sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may each be straight pipe sections, i.e. each section may have a constant gradient. The initial pipeline lay-out profile may be made up of sections which start and end when the gradient of the pipe lay-out profile changes. In this case the length of the sections may vary between sections. This is because the length of the section may be dependent on the length of pipe until the gradient changes.
The sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile may be equal in length and each have a constant gradient (i.e. be straight pipe sections). In this case, adjacent pipe sections may have the same gradient and thus together form a straight length of pipe, i.e. there is not necessarily a change of gradient between adjacent pipe sections.
The method involves identifying sections of pipe that have a positive gradient greater than a threshold. The threshold may be greater than 0°. It is beneficial to have a threshold gradient below which the pipe sections are not taken into account in the modifying process. This is because it can significantly reduce the extent to which the pipe lay-out profile is modified.
A negative gradient may be considered to be a gradient less than 0°.
When the threshold gradient is greater than 0°, pipe sections with a small positive gradient are not included in the modifying process. Whilst these positively inclined sections with small gradient can have multiple holdup solutions at certain flow rates it has been found that there may be a threshold gradient below which the flow rate at which the multiple hold up solutions exists is so low that it would be unlikely to be realistic to operate a system at these low flow rates during typical operation. This is because it is likely that liquid accumulation would occur in other sections of the pipe before the pipe sections with a positive incline (i.e. gradient) less than the threshold would reach the multiple hold up solution regime.
The chosen threshold gradient will depend on a number of factors such as the desired operating window and the gradients of other sections of pipe which will vary between each field development. Therefore, the threshold will need to be determined based on physical and commercial constraints for each field
development. The method may involve a step of determining a threshold positive gradient.
The threshold gradient may be 1 ° or less (i.e. between 1 and 0°), 0.5° or less, between 0.1 ° and 0.7° or about 0.5°. The method may involve choosing a threshold gradient, e.g. 0.5°, and modifying the pipeline lay-out profile in accordance with the method based on this threshold gradient to provide a first modified pipeline lay-out profile. The method may further include changing the threshold gradient and again modifying the pipeline lay-out profile in accordance with the method based on this changed threshold gradient to provide a second modified pipeline lay-out profile. The method may comprise comparing the first modified pipeline lay-out profile with the second modified pipeline lay-out profile to determine a desired threshold gradient. The comparing of the two pipeline lay-out profiles may involve comparing the extent of modification required to achieve each of the modified pipeline lay-out profile and/or the operational window of each of the modified profiles (this may be among other factors which are compared). This process may be repeated multiple times with different threshold gradients. The process may therefore be an iterative process to determine a desired or optimum threshold gradient based on commercial factors such as cost to modify the pipeline lay-out profile compared with the change in operational window.
The initial pipeline lay-out profile may be a model (such as a computer model) of a pipeline lay-out profile. The profile may be modelled by a simulator such as OLGA Dynamic Multiphase Flow Simulator.
Alternatively the pipeline lay-out profile may be an actual, i.e. in situ, pipeline lay-out profile.
The initial pipeline lay-out profile may be based on the profile of the surface of the installation site for the pipe (e.g. the sea bed). The method may involve obtaining the profile of the installation site and providing the initial pipeline lay-out profile based on the profile of the installation site. For example, the method may comprise surveying (i.e. taking measurements of) a surface, such as a sea bed, to determine the profile of the installation site and providing an initial pipeline lay-out profile.
The step of modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile may result in a modified pipeline lay-out profile. This modified pipeline lay-out profile may be a model (such as a computer model) of a pipeline lay-out profile. Alternatively the pipeline lay-out profile may be an actual, i.e. in situ, pipeline lay-out profile.
When the initial pipeline lay-out is a model the replacing of the pipe sections may be replacing pipe sections of the model with one or more replacement pipe sections. In this case, the method may further comprise a step of laying a pipeline according to the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
The method may comprise modifying the profile of the installation site based on the modified pipeline lay-out profile. For example, the method may comprise changing the profile of the installation site, such as by rock dumping or trenching, to more closely match the profile of the modified pipe sections and then laying the pipeline. The method may comprise determining the modified pipeline lay-out profile, determining the required modifications to the installation site profile so that it matches the modified pipeline lay-out profile, modifying the installation site profile (e.g. by means of rock duping and/or trenching) and laying a pipeline according to the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
The pipeline may be a pipeline for transporting dry gas-condensate, i.e. the pipeline may be a dry gas-condensate pipeline. Dry gas condensate is a multiphase flow (e.g. two or three phase flow) comprising gas and liquid and possibly water. For example the dry gas-condensate may comprise greater than 90%, greater than 95%, or about 96% methane. These pipelines typically have a low liquid loading, e.g. a loading which is such that the gas volume flow rate is at least 1000 times the liquid volume flow rate.
The liquid content of the pipeline may vary along its length. This is due to condensation which may occur as the fluid is transported. For example, the pipe inlet may have a liquid content of between 0.001 and 0.01 %, such as about 0.005%, and the pipe outlet may have a liquid content of about 0.005 to 0.1 %, such as about 0.01 %.
As will be apparent to a person skilled in the art, the method may be performed by software.
Thus the present invention also relates to a software product comprising instructions which when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform the above described method of the first aspect of the invention (including one or more of the optional features).
Preferably the software product is a physical data carrier. For example, a CD or flash memory card.
Alternatively or in addition, the software product could be provided in the form of instructions transmitted over a network, such as downloaded over the Internet, for example.
The present invention also relates to a method of manufacturing a software product which is in the form of a physical carrier, comprising storing on the data carrier instructions which when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform the method of the first aspect of the invention (including one or more of the optional features).
Certain preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a plot of liquid holdup versus the superficial gas velocity (Usg) for a pipe with multiple hold up solutions;
Figure 2 is a plot which shows exemplary initial and modified pipeline lay-out profiles;
Figure 3 is a turndown curve for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 2;
Figure 4 shows other exemplary initial and modified pipeline lay-out profiles; Figure 5 shows a pipeline lay-out profile (solid line) from a field development and a modified pipeline lay-out profile (dashed line);
Figure 6 shows the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 5; and
Figure 7 shows the liquid accumulation as a function of mass flow rate for the pipeline lay-out profiles of Figure 5.
Figures 1 illustrates the liquid holdup versus the superficial gas velocity (Usg) for a pipe modelled by standard OLGA. This graph is the output for a pipe with an inclination of 2.5°, a pipeline diameter of 0.1937m, a superficial liquid velocity of 0.0001 m/s, a gas density of 68.3 kg/m3 and liquid density of 757 kg/m3 and a surface tension of 0.016859 Pa/m. Figure 1 shows that in a multiphase pipeline with low liquid loading level there exists multiple hold up solutions.
Specifically it can be seen that in this case at a superficial gas velocity of between about 1.6 and 2.5 m/s there is all of low, intermediate and high holdup solutions.
This means that this section of pipe can operate in either high or low liquid hold up regime depending on the conditions.
It has been realised that, in a steady state, a downstream liquid hold up solution will determine whether a low or high holdup will be experienced by a section of pipe which is operated in the multiple holdup regime. It has been realised that this knowledge can be used to modify pipeline lay-out profiles to provide a pipeline lay-out profile which can have a higher turn down flexibility.
The method of modifying an initial pipeline lay-out profile to provide a modified pipeline lay-out profile involves assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile that is to be modified. This initial pipeline lay-out profile is made up of a number of sections of pipe. The sections of pipe may all be straight, i.e. have a constant gradient over their length.
The assessment of the initial pipeline lay-out profile involves identifying the sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient, for example a gradient greater than 0.5°. The method can then involve identifying regions (wherein a region is a length of pipe made up of two or more sections of pipe) of the initial pipeline lay-out profile which are made up of consecutive sections of pipe with a gradient greater than the threshold. The regions should have a gradient which changes over the length of the region (i.e. the regions should not be straight lengths of pipe) and consecutive pipe sections of the region should each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section. The method then involves modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction so as to make a modified pipeline lay-out profile.
A simplified illustration of the effect of this method is illustrated in figure 2. The figures shows a plot of vertical distance (y) versus horizontal distance (x) to illustrate a pipeline geometry. The plot shows an initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 and a modified pipeline lay-out profile 4.
The length of pipe of the initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 between about 10m and 1 10m would be an identified region in which the gradient of the pipe changes, all the sections have a gradient above a threshold gradient and consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section. Therefore, the sections of this region are replaced with sections such that the gradient in the region decreases in a downstream direction.
Each of the regions (of the initial and modified geometries) consists of one section with a 1 ° inclination, a section with a 2° inclination and a section with a 3° inclination. In the initial geometry in a downstream direction the inclination between adjacent pipe sections is increasing whereas in the modified geometry in a downstream direction the inclination between adjacent the pipe sections is decreasing. In the initial geometry the identified region has a concave shape and by following the method it is replaced with a length of pipe which has a convex shape.
The modified pipeline lay-out profile 4 may not obtain high hold up in the 1 ° section before the flow rate becomes so low that the pipe is no longer in the multiple holdup region. In contrast, in the initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 the 1 ° section may be forced into the high holdup region at a certain flow rate at which it may normally be in the low holdup region due to the downstream 3° section being in the high holdup region.
Figure 3 is a turndown curve which shows the effect the geometry has on accumulation. For the initial pipeline lay-out profile 2 the oil content verses superficial gas velocity is shown by line 6 and for the modified pipeline lay-out profile 4 the oil content verses superficial gas velocity is shown by line 8. It can be seen that for the initial geometry severe accumulation begins when the superficial gas velocity reaches about 1.8 m/s whereas for the modified geometry 4 the superficial gas velocity can drop to about 1.3 m/s before severe accumulation starts. As a result the modified pipeline lay-out profile 4 can have an increased operational window, i.e. it has a greater turn down flexibility.
Another simplified example is shown in Figure 4 which shows an initial pipeline lay-out profile 10 and a replacement length of pipe 12. The concave portion 10a of the pipeline lay-out profile 10, which is the identified region in this initial pipeline layout profile, is replaced with a length of straight pipe 12. In this case the modified pipeline lay-out profile will have a transition to high holdup at a lower flow rate than the last section (the section determining hold up 10b) of the concave part of the initial pipeline lay-out profile 10. If the last part of the concave portion 10b of the initial geometry 10 has high holdup this will enforce high holdup in the sections upstream that are operated in the multiple holdup region. This can be avoided by replacing the concave region with pipe sections that provide a straight region or a convex region of pipe.
Figure 5 shows a pipeline lay-out profile 16 from a field development (survey profile) that was deemed not economical at present market conditions. This profile is based on a survey of the sea bed and is modelled using standard OLGA. This is a pipeline for dry gas condensates which is very dry and contains about 96% methane. The liquid content varies from about 0.005% at the inlet and 0.01 % at the outlet. The liquid flow rate increases along the flow line due to condensation.
The initial profile contains 1000 pipe sections evenly distributed alone 200km. Each section is about 5m long.
The parameters defining this case are shown below in Table 1. I P mt r .; u'n it
230 km
! C'ia meter 0 864 m
j Liqj d !oaa U-iV & 0.005-0.01 I
103
Table 1
The initial profile 16 is modified according to the above described method to result in a modified profile 18. As a result of following the method the identified regions (i.e. concave regions with all pipe sections having a gradient greater than a threshold, which in this case is 0.5%) are replaced by straight sections.
It can be seen that the modifications between the initial (i.e. survey) profile 16 and the modified pipeline lay-out profile 18 are fairly modest in most cases. This can be achieved because only pipeline sections with a greater than a threshold, which in this case is 0.5%, are taken into account when modifying the pipeline lay- out profile. This means that the profile can be modified to improve the operational window at a relatively modest cost.
Figure 6 shows the pressure drop as a function of flow rate for the initial geometry 20 and for the modified geometry 22. Figure 7 shows the liquid accumulation as a function of flow rate for the initial geometry 24 and for the modified geometry 26.
From these plots it can be seen that the operational window will be increased for the modified pipeline lay-out profile 18.
A lower minimum flow (rate at minimum pressure drop) of the flow line also results in increased recovery for the field. The turndown capacity of the pipeline can be increased further if low points and high points are reduced by either trenching of rock dumping of the installation profile. Such modification will generally reduce high inclination angles.

Claims

CLAIMS:
A method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile, the method comprising: assessing an initial pipeline lay-out profile that is to be modified, the pipeline lay-out profile being made up of a number of sections of pipe, in order to:
1 a) identify sections of pipe that have a positive gradient in a downstream direction that is greater than a threshold gradient; and
1 b) identify regions of the initial pipeline lay-out profile made up of consecutive sections of pipe identified in step 1 a) wherein the gradient of the pipe changes over the length of the region and wherein consecutive pipe sections of the region each have a gradient which is equal to or greater than the gradient of the adjacent upstream pipe section; and
modifying the initial pipeline lay-out profile to form a modified pipeline lay-out profile by replacing the pipe sections in each of the identified regions with one or more replacement pipe sections such that the gradient of the pipe in the region does not increase in a downstream direction.
The method according claim 1 , wherein the threshold gradient is between 0° and 1 °.
The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the method comprises determining the threshold gradient.
The method according to claim 1 , 2 or 3, wherein the identified regions are each replaced by regions in which the gradient of the pipe is constant.
The method according to any preceding claim, wherein the modified pipeline lay-out profile has no lengths of positively inclined pipe greater than a threshold gradient which are followed in the downstream direction by a positively inclined pipe of greater gradient without there being a length of pipe therebetween which has a gradient less than the threshold gradient.
6. The method according to any preceding claim, wherein the start and end points of the identified regions are unchanged in the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
7. The method according to any preceding claim, wherein the sections of pipe which make up the initial pipeline lay-out profile are each straight sections.
8. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the initial pipeline lay-out profile is a model of a pipeline lay-out profile and/or wherein the modified pipeline lay-out profile is a model of a pipeline lay-out profile.
9. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the initial pipeline lay-out profile is based on the profile of a surface of an installation site for the pipeline.
10. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the method
comprises laying a pipeline according to the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
1 1. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the method
comprises modifying the profile of an installation site based on the modified pipeline lay-out profile.
12. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein modified pipeline lay-out profile is for a pipeline which is a pipeline for transporting dry gas- condensate.
13. A software product comprising instructions which when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform the method of any preceding claim.
PCT/EP2015/058885 2015-04-24 2015-04-24 Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile WO2016169609A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2015/058885 WO2016169609A1 (en) 2015-04-24 2015-04-24 Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2015/058885 WO2016169609A1 (en) 2015-04-24 2015-04-24 Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016169609A1 true WO2016169609A1 (en) 2016-10-27

Family

ID=53039883

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2015/058885 WO2016169609A1 (en) 2015-04-24 2015-04-24 Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2016169609A1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0382168A2 (en) * 1989-02-09 1990-08-16 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Computerized analyzing system for piping network
WO2014082916A1 (en) * 2012-11-27 2014-06-05 Sinvent As Method for simulation of multiphase fluid flow in pipelines
US20140172382A1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-06-19 Fluor Technologies Corporation Pipeline Network Optimization Using Risk Based Well Production
EP2829993A1 (en) * 2013-07-25 2015-01-28 Dassault Systèmes Design of a path connecting a first point to a second point in a three-dimensional scene

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0382168A2 (en) * 1989-02-09 1990-08-16 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Computerized analyzing system for piping network
WO2014082916A1 (en) * 2012-11-27 2014-06-05 Sinvent As Method for simulation of multiphase fluid flow in pipelines
US20140172382A1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-06-19 Fluor Technologies Corporation Pipeline Network Optimization Using Risk Based Well Production
EP2829993A1 (en) * 2013-07-25 2015-01-28 Dassault Systèmes Design of a path connecting a first point to a second point in a three-dimensional scene

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Xing et al. A new flow conditioner for mitigating severe slugging in pipeline/riser system
US7395864B2 (en) Method and apparatus for preventing slug flow in pipelines
AU2008227251B2 (en) Subsea installation and method for separation of liquid and gas
Farghaly Study of severe slugging in real offshore pipeline riser-pipe system
Henriot et al. Simulation of process to control severe slugging: Application to the dunbar pipeline
Kovalev et al. The slug suppression system in operation
WO2016169609A1 (en) Method of modifying a pipeline lay-out profile
Sarshar The recent applications of jet pump technology to enhance production from tight oil and gas fields
Jain et al. Mature Field Revitalization: Analysis of wellhead compression to enhance productivity from a mature retrograde reservoir
WO2005040670A1 (en) Method and system for reducing liquid accumulation in a multiphase flow pipeline
Pettersen et al. Liquid inventory and three phase surge wave data from the Midgard gas condensate fields in the North Sea
Enilari et al. Slug Flow and it's Mitigation Techniques in the Oil and Gas Industry
CN113204836A (en) Method for estimating data of deepwater jumper pipe segment plug flow fatigue analysis
Hagesaether et al. Flow-assurance modeling: reality check and aspects of transient operations of gas/condensate pipelines
Lacy et al. Increasing Production by Applying Field-proven Active Slug Suppression Technology
Peeran et al. Novel examples of the use of surface jet pumps (SJPs) to enhance production & processing. Case studies & lessons learnt
Akhmadeev et al. Implementation of adaptive gathering systems as the method to optimize oil transportation at offshore field (Russian)
Soliman et al. Unconventional Waste & Flare Gas Recovery System UFGRS in New Circular Economy
Takei et al. Flow instability in deepwater flowlines and risers-a case study of subsea oil production from chinguetti field, mauritania
Fong et al. Increasing Production by Applying Simple, Field Proven Slug Control Technology
Davis et al. Novel Liquid Mitigation Solutions in Brown Field Gas Compression Projects
Sarshar et al. A cost effective way to boost production from tight oil and gas fields using surface jet pump systems
Wolf et al. Project Case Study: Online Sand Removal System for Water Tanks
Kumar et al. Securing the Future: Gas Well Deliquification Strategy for Mature Gas Wells in Tripura
Nair et al. End of tubing and packer placement effects on gas lift operations in toe down gas wells

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15720038

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15720038

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1