WO2011090921A1 - Systèmes et procédés de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz - Google Patents
Systèmes et procédés de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2011090921A1 WO2011090921A1 PCT/US2011/021493 US2011021493W WO2011090921A1 WO 2011090921 A1 WO2011090921 A1 WO 2011090921A1 US 2011021493 W US2011021493 W US 2011021493W WO 2011090921 A1 WO2011090921 A1 WO 2011090921A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- well
- formation
- mixture
- optimum
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V11/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas.
- EOR Enhanced Oil Recovery
- thermal thermal
- chemical/polymer chemical/polymer
- gas injection gas injection
- Thermal enhanced recovery works by adding heat to the reservoir.
- the most widely practised form is a steamdrive, which reduces oil viscosity so that can flow to the producing wells.
- Chemical flooding increases recovery by reducing the capillary forces that trap residual oil and/or by reducing the interfacial tension between oil and water.
- Polymer flooding improves the sweep efficiency of injected water. Miscible injection works by creating a mixture of the injectant and the oil that flows more easily towards the production well than the oil by itself.
- System 100 includes underground formation 102, underground formation 104, underground formation 106, and underground formation 1 08.
- Production facility 1 10 is provided at the surface.
- Well 1 12 traverses formations 102 and 104, and terminates in formation 106.
- the portion of formation 106 is shown at 1 14.
- Oil and gas are produced from formation portion 1 14 through well 1 12, to production facility 1 1 0.
- Gas and liquid are separated from each other, gas is stored in gas storage 1 16 and liquid is stored in liquid storage 1 1 8.
- U.S. Patent Number 6,022,834 discloses a concentrated surfactant formulation and process for the recovery of residual oil from subterranean petroleum reservoirs, and more particularly an alkali surfactant flooding process which results in ultra-low interfacial tensions between the injected material and the residual oil, wherein the concentrated surfactant formulation is supplied at a concentration above, at, or, below its CMC, also providing in situ formation of surface active material formed from the reaction of naturally occurring organic acidic components with the injected alkali material which serves to increase the efficiency of oil recovery.
- U.S. Patent Number 6,022,834 is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- U.S. Patent Number 5,068,043 discloses an aqueous alkaline flood for recovering oil from a reservoir containing acidic oil which includes adding to the injected aqueous alkaline solution both a stoichiometric excess of the alkaline material and a kind and amount of preformed cosurfactant material that increases the salinity of that solution so that, in contact with the oil in the reservoir, it will form a surfactant system having a salinity requirement which minimizes the interfacial tension between it and the oil.
- U.S. Patent Number 5,068,043 is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- Optimum salinity type and optimum salinity in surfactant/polymer flooding is determined by core-flood experiments so that a variety of multiphase flow parameters such as relative permeability and phase trapping that affects oil recovery factor, influences the determination of the optimum salinity type and optimum salinity.
- the optimum salinity determined preferably corresponds to the highest oil recovery factor.
- U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2009/0194276 is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2009/0194281 published August 6, 2009, discloses an optimum salinity profile in surfactant/polymer flooding from formation water to post-flush drive that leads to the highest oil recovery factor.
- the optimum salinity determined from core-flooding experiments may be used in the surfactant slug.
- the surfactant slug is protected from deterioration by the injection of cushion slugs immediately before and after the injection of the surfactant slug in a reservoir wherein the cushion slugs have the same salinity or about the same salinity as the surfactant slug.
- a salinity lower may be used in the post-flush drive, while formation water could be of any salinity.
- U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2009/0194281 is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- the invention provides a method for producing oil and/or gas from an underground formation comprising locating a suitable reservoir in a
- subsurface formation creating a model of the reservoir; populating the model with laboratory data; modeling the reservoir to determine fluid displacements based on fluids injected and fluids produced; determining an optimum fluid mixture for the fluids to be injected based on a series of sensitivity analyses performed with the model; drilling a first well in the formation; injecting the optimum fluid mixture into the first well ; drilling a second well in the formation; and producing oil and/or gas from the second well.
- Figure 1 illustrates an oil and/or gas production system.
- Figure 2a illustrates a well pattern
- Figures 2b and 2c illustrate the well pattern of Figure 2a during enhanced oil recovery processes.
- FIG. 3 illustrates oil and/or gas production systems.
- Figure 4 illustrates a well pattern
- Figure 5 illustrates mixtures of crude oil and brine.
- Figure 6 illustrates mixtures of crude oil and brine.
- Figure 7 illustrates results of a core flood experiment.
- Figure 8 illustrates results of a core flood experiment.
- Figure 9 illustrates results of a core flood experiment.
- Figure 10 illustrates a simulation of a pilot ASP flood.
- Figure 1 1 illustrates a relationship between the optimal salinity of a surfactant and the optimal salinity of a soap.
- Figure 12 illustrates the partitioning of soap and surfactant based on salinity.
- Figure 13 illustrates the results of a well log.
- Figure 14 illustrates field data from a Single-Well Chemical tracer test.
- Figure 15 illustrates field data from a Single-Well Chemical tracer test.
- Figure 16 illustrates a simulation of a pilot ASP flood.
- Array 200 includes well group 202 (denoted by horizontal lines) and well group 204 (denoted by diagonal lines).
- Array 200 defines a production area, enclosed by the rectangle.
- Array 200 defines an interior of the system. Exterior to array 200 may be located a plurality of containment wells 250.
- Each well in well group 202 has horizontal distance 230 from the adjacent well in well group 202.
- Each well in well group 202 has vertical distance 232 from the adjacent well in well group 202.
- Each well in well group 204 has horizontal distance 236 from the adjacent well in well group 204.
- Each well in well group 204 has vertical distance 238 from the adjacent well in well group 204.
- array may be composed of vertical wells that are perpendicular to the earth's surface, horizontal wells that are parallel to the earth's surface, or wells that are inclined at some other angle, for example 30 to 60 degrees with respect to the earth's surface.
- Each well in well group 202 is distance 234 from the adjacent wells in well group 204.
- Each well in well group 204 is distance 234 from the adjacent wells in well group 202.
- each well in well group 202 is surrounded by four wells in well group 204. In some embodiments, each well in well group 204 is surrounded by four wells in well group 202.
- horizontal distance 230 is from about 25 to about 1 000 meters, or from about 30 to about 500 meters, or from about 35 to about 250 meters, or from about 40 to about 100 meters, or from about 45 to about 75 meters, or from about 50 to about 60 meters.
- vertical distance 232 is from about 25 to about 1000 meters, or from about 30 to about 500 meters, or from about 35 to about 250 meters, or from about 40 to about 100 meters, or from about 45 to about 75 meters, or from about 50 to about 60 meters.
- horizontal distance 236 is from about 25 to about 1 000 meters, or from about 30 to about 500 meters, or from about 35 to about 250 meters, or from about 40 to about 100 meters, or from about 45 to about 75 meters, or from about 50 to about 60 meters.
- vertical distance 238 is from about 25 to about 1000 meters, or from about 30 to about 500 meters, or from about 35 to about 250 meters, or from about 40 to about 100 meters, or from about 45 to about 75 meters, or from about 50 to about 60 meters.
- distance 234 is from about 1 5 to about 750 meters, or from about 20 to about 500 meters, or from about 25 to about 250 meters, or from about 30 to about 100 meters, or from about 35 to about 75 meters, or from about 40 to about 50 meters.
- array of wells 200 may have from about 10 to about 1000 wells, for example from about 5 to about 500 wells in well group 202, and from about 5 to about 500 wells in well group 204.
- array of wells 200 is seen as a top view with well group 202 and well group 204 being vertical wells spaced on a piece of land. In some embodiments, array of wells 200 is seen as a cross-sectional side view with well group 202 and well group 204 being horizontal wells spaced within a formation.
- the recovery of oil and/or gas with array of wells 200 from an underground formation may be accomplished by any known method. Suitable methods include subsea production, surface production, primary, secondary, or tertiary production. The selection of the method used to recover the oil and/or gas from the underground formation is not critical.
- the containment of oil and/or gas and/or an enhanced oil recovery agent with containment wells 250 may be accomplished by any known method. Suitable methods include pumping water, steam, produced connate water, sea water, carbon dioxide, natural gas or other gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons, nitrogen, air, brine, or other liquids or gases into containment wells 250.
- containment wells 250 may be used to create a freeze wall barrier.
- One suitable freeze wall barrier is disclosed in U.S. Patent Number 7,225,866 is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. The selection of the method used to contain oil and/or gas and/or an enhanced oil recovery agent with containment wells 250 is not critical.
- oil and/or gas may be recovered from a formation into a well, and flow through the well and flowline to a facility.
- enhanced oil recovery with the use of an ASP mixture for example a mixture of water, an alkali, a surfactant, and a polymer, may be used to increase the flow of oil and/or gas from the formation.
- array of wells 200 is illustrated.
- Array 200 includes well group 202 (denoted by horizontal lines) and well group 204 (denoted by diagonal lines).
- Optional containment wells 250 are provided about array of wells 200.
- an ASP mixture is injected into well group 204, and oil is recovered from well group 202. As illustrated, the ASP mixture has injection profile 208, and oil recovery profile 206 is being produced to well group 202.
- a containment agent is injected into containment wells 250. As illustrated, the containment agent has an injection profile about each of the
- Containment agent may be used to force ASP mixture and/or oil and/or gas towards producing well group 202.
- ASP mixture is injected into well group 202, and oil is recovered from well group 204. As illustrated, the ASP mixture has injection profile 206, and oil recovery profile 208 is being produced to well group 204.
- a containment agent is injected into containment wells 250. As illustrated, the containment agent has an injection profile about each of the
- Containment agent may be used to force ASP mixture and/or oil and/or gas towards producing well group 204.
- well group 202 may be used for injecting an ASP mixture, and well group 204 may be used for producing oil and/or gas from the formation for a first time period; then well group 204 may be used for injecting an ASP mixture, and well group 202 may be used for producing oil and/or gas from the formation for a second time period, where the first and second time periods comprise a cycle.
- an ASP mixture or a mixture including an ASP mixture may be injected at the beginning of a cycle, and water optionally with added polymer may be injected at the end of the cycle to push the ASP mixture towards the producing wells.
- the beginning of a cycle may be the first 10% to about 80% of a cycle, or the first 20% to about 60% of a cycle, the first 25% to about 40% of a cycle, and the end may be the remainder of the cycle.
- water optionally with added polymer may be used as a containment agent and injected into containment wells 250.
- ASP mixtures injected into the formation may be recovered from the produced oil and/or gas and re-injected into the formation.
- oil as present in the formation prior to the injection of any enhanced oil recovery agents has a viscosity of at least about 5 centipoise, or at least about 10 centipoise, or at least about 25 centipoise, or at least about 50 centipoise, or at least about 75 centipoise, or at least about 90 centipoise. In some embodiments, oil as present in the formation prior to the injection of any enhanced oil recovery agents has a viscosity of up to about 125 centipoise, or up to about 200 centipoise, or up to about 500 centipoise, or up to about 1000 centipoise.
- array of wells 200 is illustrated.
- Array 200 includes well group 202 (denoted by horizontal lines) and well group 204 (denoted by diagonal lines). Containment wells 250 are located exterior to array 200 to form a perimeter about array 200.
- an ASP mixture is injected into well group 204, and oil is recovered from well group 202.
- the ASP mixture has injection profile 208 with overlap 210 with oil recovery profile 206, which is being produced to well group 202.
- a containment agent is injected into containment wells 250.
- the containment agent has an injection profile about each of the containment wells 250. Containment agent may be used to force ASP mixture and/or oil and/or gas towards producing well group 202.
- containment agent injection profile may overlap with one or more of injection profile 208 and oil recovery profile 206 so that enhanced oil recovery agent is contained within array 200; and/or so that oil and/or gas is contained within array 200; and/or so that containment agent is produced to well group 202.
- an ASP mixture is injected into well group 202, and oil is recovered from well group 204.
- the ASP mixture has injection profile 206 with overlap 210 with oil recovery profile 208, which is being produced to well group 204.
- a containment agent is injected into containment wells 250.
- the containment agent has an injection profile about each of the containment wells 250. Containment agent may be used to force ASP mixture and/or oil and/or gas towards producing well group 204.
- containment agent injection profile may overlap with one or more of injection profile 208 and oil recovery profile 206 so that enhanced oil recovery agent is contained within array 200; and/or so that oil and/or gas is contained within array 200; and/or so that containment agent is produced to well group 204.
- Releasing at least a portion of the ASP mixture and/or other liquids and/or gases may be accomplished by any known method.
- One suitable method is injecting the ASP mixture into a first well, and pumping out at least a portion of the ASP mixture with gas and/or liquids through a second well.
- the selection of the method used to inject at least a portion of the ASP mixture and/or other liquids and/or gases is not critical.
- the ASP mixture and/or other liquids and/or gases may be pumped into a formation at a pressure up to the fracture pressure of the formation.
- the ASP mixture may be mixed in with oil and/or gas in a formation to form a mixture which may be recovered from a well.
- a quantity of the ASP mixture may be injected into a well, followed by another component to force the ASP mixture across the formation.
- another component for example water in liquid or vapor form, water with a dissolved polymer to increase its viscosity, carbon dioxide, other gases, other liquids, and/or mixtures thereof may be used to force the ASP mixture across the formation.
- from about 0.1 to about 5 pore volumes of the ASP mixture may be injected, for example from about 0.2 to about 2 pore volumes, or from about 0.3 to about 1 pore volumes of the ASP mixture may be injected.
- the injection of the ASP mixture may be followed by from about 2 to about 10 pore volumes of a polymer water mixture, for example from about 3 to about 8 pore volumes of the polymer-water mixture.
- the inject of a polymer water mixture may be followed with water from about 1 to about 10 pore volumes.
- System 400 includes underground formation 402, formation 404, formation 406, and formation 408.
- Production facility 410 is provided at the surface.
- Well 412 traverses formation 402 and 404 has openings at formation 406. Portions of formation 414 may be optionally fractured and/or perforated.
- Gas and liquid may be separated, and gas may be sent to gas storage 416, and liquid may be sent to liquid storage 418.
- Production facility 410 is able to mix, produce and/or store ASP mixture, which may be produced and stored in production / storage 430.
- ASP mixture is pumped down well 432, to portions 434 of formation 406.
- ASP mixture traverses formation 406 to aid in the production of oil and gas, and then the ASP mixture, oil and/or gas may all be produced to well 412, to production facility 410.
- ASP mixture may then be recycled, for example by utilizing a oil-water gravity separator, centrifuge, demulsifiers, boiling, condensing, filtering, and other separation methods as are known in the art, then re-injecting the ASP mixture into well 432.
- Containment well 450 with injection mechanism 452 and containment well 460 with injection mechanism 462 may be provided to contain ASP mixture between containment well 450 and containment well 460.
- Injection mechanisms 452 and 462 may be used to inject a containment agent, for example a refrigerant to create a freeze wall, or a liquid or gas such as water, water mixed with a viscosifier, water mixed with an alkali, water mixed with a surfactant, carbon dioxide, natural gas, other suitable containment agent, for example a refrigerant to create a freeze wall, or a liquid or gas such as water, water mixed with a viscosifier, water mixed with an alkali, water mixed with a surfactant, carbon dioxide, natural gas, other
- Ci - C-15 hydrocarbons nitrogen, or air, or mixtures thereof.
- a quantity of ASP mixture or ASP mixture mixed with other components may be injected into well 432, followed by another component to force ASP mixture or ASP mixture mixed with other components across formation
- 406 for example water in gas or liquid form; water mixed with one or more salts, polymers, alkalis, and/or surfactants; carbon dioxide; other gases; other liquids;
- from about 0.1 to about 2 for example from about 0.25 to about 1 pore volumes of ASP mixture may be injected into well 432. Then from about
- 0.5 to about 10 for example from about 1 to about 5 pore volumes of a polymer - water mixture having a viscosity within about 25%, for example within about 1 0% of the viscosity of the ASP mixture may be injected into well 432. Then from about 1 to about 10 pore volumes of water may be injected into well 432.
- well 412 which is producing oil and/or gas is
- ASP mixture is representative of a well in well group 204.
- well 412 which is producing oil and/or gas is
- well 432 which is being used to inject ASP mixture is representative of a well in well group 202.
- Process 500 includes determining the optimum salinity for the surfactant 502, determining the optimum salinity for the soap 504, determining the viscosity of the mixture due to the added polymer 506, creating a model for the ASP flood including formation, chemical, and oil properties 508, correlating the model with known data 510, and designing the ASP flood using the model 512. Further details of each of the steps will be set forth below.
- the ASP process is a combination of two earlier chemical flooding techniques: the surfactant-polymer flood and the alkaline flood.
- the task of the chemicals injected in these processes is two-fold: firstly, to reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water in order to liberate oil trapped by capillary forces; and secondly, to stabilise the displacement, when necessary, by increasing the water viscosity through the addition of a polymer.
- the reduction of the interfacial tension is achieved by the injected surfactant.
- the alkali e.g. NaOH or Na2C03
- raises the pH of the brine which, in turn, leads to a saponification of crude-borne oleic acids to generate a natural surfactant in-situ, commonly referred to as "soap.”
- the injected surfactant in the following referred to in short as “the surfactant”
- the soap in-situ generated surfactant
- the surfactant and the soap are chemically rather different, they share the general property that their interfacial activity depends on the environment, for example on salinity. At otherwise constant external conditions, there exists an optimum brine salinity at which the surfactant or the soap reduce the oil-water interfacial tension most strongly.
- the reduction of interfacial tension is less.
- the surfactant and the soap partition favourably into the brine phase; in the over-optimum regime they partition favourably into the oil phase; only near their respective optimum salinities are they able to generate a third, separate "micro- emulsion" phase that exhibits very low interfacial tensions with both the water and the oil phases.
- the optimum salinity is surfactant-specific; the optimum salinity of soap is generally significantly lower than that of typical injected surfactants
- the ASP mixture may be designed such that the optimum salinity of the chemical slug is at or close to the actual brine salinity of the injected water in order to achieve a low oil-water interfacial tension.
- a high or a low salinity will cause the surfactant or the soap to be pushed ineffectively to the producing wells (under- optimum case) or to be partitioned into immobile oil, i. e. to be retained, and thus lost (over-optimum case).
- the ASP mixture may include alkali, surfactant and polymer which are injected together as one slug.
- the alkali and the surfactant will generally travel at (slightly) different velocities: the surfactant is subject to partitioning into any remaining oil and to matrix adsorption while the alkali is consumed by the saponification, by precipitation of carbonates and possibly by exchange reactions with the matrix.
- the phase behaviour of the ASP slug is under-optimum or near optimum.
- the saponification process leads to a reduction of the optimum salinity in the region where soap is generated such that the phase behaviour locally changes to over-optimum.
- a gradient in optimum salinity from over-optimum at the front of the chemical slug to (under-)optimum at the rear of the chemical slug establishes which serves to confine the chemical slug and limit dispersive dilution.
- This inherent gradient can be progressed through the reservoir, moving, in principle, an optimally interfacially active zone though the reservoir which leaves no oil behind.
- test tubes In order to determine the chemical phase behavior of a surfactant, an array of samples with different concentrations of alkali and sodium chloride, for example test tubes may be used.
- the test tubes which generate a separate emulsion phase may be inferred to be at or near the optimum salinity such that the interfacial tension reduction is at a maximum.
- the soap is a reactive product of alkali or, more specifically, hydroxide with oleic acid. As such, the amount of soap generated is dependent on the amount of alkali added to the brine.
- HA 0 represents the oil-borne acids and A " represents the soap. Since HA 0 + OH " reside in oil and water, respectively, the latter reaction is understood to occur at the interface between oil and water.
- TAN total acid number
- samples with varying salinities may have a given volume of polymer added to them, and then the viscosity of the samples determined.
- increasing salinity leads to a lower viscosity, while an increased volume of polymer leads to a higher viscosity.
- the mobility ratio of the ASP mixture is matched to the oil in the formation.
- the mobility ratio of the ASP mixture and of the oil is a function of the viscosity. Therefore, polymer is added to the ASP mixture until the viscosity of the mixture is similar to that of the oil.
- the ASP mixture has a viscosity value within 50% of the viscosity value of the oil, for example within 20%, or within 10%.
- Model Setup In short, the model is a two-phase (water and oil) multi-component (surfactant, acid, soap, polymer, aqueous chemistry) description of the ASP process including brine chemistry, compositionally dependent partitioning of the chemicals, adsorption and viscosity modification.
- surfactant acid, soap, polymer, aqueous chemistry
- the model contains two liquid phases (water and oil) over which it partitions the surfactant and the soap depending on the ratio of salinity versus optimum salinity, and one stationary solid phase.
- Both the surfactant and the soap are allowed to partition over water and oil as a function of the local chemical concentrations (phase composition). This partitioning determines the flow of the surfactant and the soap. Underlying the partitioning model is the qualitative observation that the surfactant and the soap partition strongly into either water or oil as the local composition is under-optimum or over-optimum, respectively. At optimum salinity, however, surfactant and soap partition into both water and oil in equal parts. Since an ASP flood may be over-optimum ahead of the surfactant bank and under-optimum inside the bank, the exact nature of the partitioning coefficient may be less relevant.
- An interfacial tension correlation is provided in the model. This correlation assumes that a user-defined minimum interfacial tension is obtained at optimum salinity. Moreover, at a high ratio of soap to surfactant concentration, a minimum interfacial tension due to the soap is established. Finally, minimum interfacial tension can only be achieved if the total surfactant concentration (i.e. the sum of the surfactant and soap concentrations) is at or above the critical micelle concentration. As the total concentration of soap and surfactant is reduced, the interfacial tension gradually approaches the unmodified oil-water value.
- the model has a viscosity model taking into account viscosity dependence on polymer mass fraction in water and on effective salinity.
- the extent of saponification depends on the local concentration of alkali.
- the number of reactants may be kept as small as possible in order not to inflate simulation time, involving the saponification equations set forth above.
- the complexity of an ASP flood and of the ASP model alongside with the necessary simplifications of the model require a validation of the forecasts generated by the model.
- detailed one-dimensional simulations may be carried out and the resulting chemical and production profiles compared to other models or other known data.
- experimental ASP core flood data may be history matched in order to correlate the model with the data generated by the core-floods.
- the model may then be further improved by using field trial and commercial scale data obtained from a reservoir.
- the model may be used to determine the components for an ASP mixture. Given the complexity of the number of parameters and the complex chemistry, one suitable starting point would be a previously used ASP mixture chemistry, or to use the optimum mixture chemistry determined from the laboratory experiments discussed above. From there, the salinity of the mixture can be varied, as well as the concentration of surfactant, the concentration of polymer, and the concentration of alkali can be varied. The model may require further calibration with the use of additional lab tests and experiments in order to properly model varied salinity, surfactant concentration, polymer concentration, and/or alkali concentration.
- a sensitivity analysis for the surfactant concentration may be completed first to achieve the optimum surfactant concentration, followed by the same analysis for the alkali, then the polymer.
- the order is not critical. In general, the incremental oil recovery is compared to the cost of the chemicals to come up with the optimum mixture.
- oil and/or gas produced may be transported to a refinery and/or a treatment facility.
- the oil and/or gas may be processed to produce commercial products such as transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel, heating fuel, lubricants, chemicals, and/or polymers.
- Processing may include distilling and/or fractionally distilling the oil and/or gas to produce one or more distillate fractions.
- the oil and/or gas, and/or the one or more distillate fractions may be subjected to a process of one or more of the following: catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, hydrotreating, coking, thermal cracking, distilling, reforming, polymerization, isomerization, alkylation, blending, and dewaxing. Examples:
- a suite of laboratory experiments is required to quantify the behaviour of an ASP formulation. Initially, the phase behaviour of the surfactant mixture and the polymer viscosity behaviour are analysed independently. Thereafter, the two are combined in a core-flood experiment to study oil recovery for a given combination, and to calibrate a flow simulation for subsequent forecasting.
- the surfactant mixture may be considered as consisting of two independent species: the manufactured injected surfactant and the in-situ generated petroleum soaps. Although these two are, in principle, of rather different molecular structure, they share the ability to reduce the interfacial tension between crude oil and brine, albeit at different brine salinities, all other thermodynamic properties assuming to be determined by the reservoir.
- the salinity at which a given surfactant achieves the lowest interfacial tension is referred to as its optimum salinity.
- a low interfacial tension promotes the generation of an oil-brine emulsion phase, which, in turn, may be used as evidence for the achievement of optimum salinity.
- the partitioning of a surfactant between the oil, brine and emulsion phases depends on salinity: at optimum salinity the surfactant partitions into the emulsion phase; at a salinity lower than the optimum salinity (under-optimum case) the surfactant partitions predominantly into brine; at a salinity higher than the optimum salinity (over-optimum case) the surfactant partitions predominantly into oil.
- Petroleum soaps originate from naturally occurring petroleum acids, which are saponified by raising the alkalinity of the brine (pH) through the addition of an alkali, such as sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate. As such, however, the intentional saponification comes jointly with an unintentional rise in salinity (sodium concentration) with a possibility of rendering the environment for the generated petroleum soaps over-optimum, i.e. less effective in reducing oil-water interfacial tension. This interdependence means that plain alkali floods can be difficult to control.
- Manufactured surfactants can be tailored to a desired optimum salinity. Originating from industrial chemical synthesis, these molecules are, however, significantly more costly than petroleum soaps which come at the cost of the injected alkali only. Moreover, a dominant loss mechanism for manufactured surfactants is adsorption to the reservoir rock.
- the optimum salinity behaviour of the petroleum soaps alone can be determined by test tube experiments where oil and brine are combined in different ratios, and where alkali is subsequently added in varying concentrations.
- One such set of test tubes is displayed in Figure 5 from which the optimum salinity of the petroleum soaps of the particular crude can be inferred to be about 0.22 mol/1 Na + .
- An independent but similar analysis for a manufactured surfactant mixture selected for this particular crude resulted in a value of 0.76 mol/1 Na + .
- Reference source not found shows an alkali scan using oil and brine at a volume ratio of 50/50.
- the brine contains 0.3 wt.% of the manufactured surfactant mixture.
- the optimum salinity for the combination of surfactants and petroleum soaps can be inferred to be 0.31 mol/1 Na + , i.e. in-between the individual values of the petroleum soaps and the manufactured surfactant mixture.
- an ASP formulation is tested in core flood experiments to prove its ability to liberate and mobilise remaining oil.
- These experiments provide information about the adsorption characteristics of the chemical components as well as the displacement stability of the (internal) polymer drive.
- Error! Reference source not found, through Error! Reference source not found. show experimental data of a core flood carried out on a 30 cm long outcrop sandstone core with a diameter of 5 cm.
- the flooding sequence in this experiment was as follows: a 2.2 PV waterflood; a 0.3 PV ASP flood; a 2.6 PV polymer drive.
- the ASP formulation consisted of 0.3 wt.% manufactured surfactant, 1 wt.% Na 2 C0 3 , and a 27 mPa.s polymer solution.
- the polymer drive also had a viscosity of 27 mPa.s.
- the effluent surfactant concentration (Error! Reference source not found.9) allows determining the adsorption characteristics of the surfactant by way of its breakthrough time. For the present case, a maximum adsorption as low as 2 ⁇ g/g (amount of surfactant per amount of porous medium) was found, representative for the very clean outcrop core.
- the simulation model does not reproduce the magnitude of the experimentally determined effluent surfactant concentration. This is likely owing to the fact that only water-borne surfactant was measured whereas the larger fraction of the surfactant was expected to be produced in the emulsion or oil phase. Our simulation, however, does not model the emulsion phase but uses a simplified phase behaviour:
- the optimum salinity (cf. Error! Reference source not found.l l) is calculated from a thermodynamic mixing rule as
- SWCT Single-Well Chemical Tracer tests
- each concentration profile exhibits a single maximum.
- the separation between the maxima of the two profiles relates to the remaining oil saturation through an explicit analytical formula. Deviations from this ideal situation can be caused, for example, by poor well integrity, or by any subsurface rearrangement, during the shut- in period, of the chemical slug, such as well-bore cross-flow or fluid drift.
- the selection criteria for a well undergoing an SWCT include, therefore, good well integrity as well as a short, single-zone perforation interval and a safe distance from active wells to avoid any interference.
- Error! Reference source not found.13 shows the reservoir description log of a well in a PDO sandstone reservoir that was tested by an SWCT. Like most other candidate wells taken into consideration in this field, the selected well features a 30 m wire-wrapped screen completion interval that accesses more than one reservoir. Pressure and rate data as well as the effluent tracer concentration profiles recorded during the SWCT are displayed in Error! Reference source not found, and Error! Reference source not found., respectively. Error!
- Reference source not found.13 shows the individual flow periods during the SWCT: a 3000 m 3 water-flood followed by a short perforation clean-out production; a 30 m 3 chemical tracer slug containing 1 wt.% ethyl formate (EtF) as the injected tracer chemical as well as 0.5 wt.% normal propyl alcohol (NPA) to earmark this slug; a 120 m 3 water slug driving the chemical out to 3 m from the well -bore; a two day shut-in period during which EtF partially hydrolyses to from ethanol (EtOH); a 1.2 day back-production period.
- EtF ethyl formate
- NPA normal propyl alcohol
- the second well received a smaller ASP slug (44 m 3 ) followed by a polymer drive (131 m 3 ), a short tapered polymer drive (20 m 3 ) and, finally, a long water drive (830 m 3 ).
- a polymer drive 131 m 3
- a short tapered polymer drive 20 m 3
- a long water drive 830 m 3
- the base-line SWCT for this second well resulted in a similar remaining oil saturation (25%) as the first well
- the final SWCT was interpreted to yield an oil saturation of 23%.
- this apparent lack of desaturation was unexpected from the experimental core flood results.
- the Single-Well Chemical Tracer test series provided evidence for the subsurface desaturation efficiency of the selected ASP formulations it cannot, by design, verify the robustness of the ASP process in a typical flooding application: the stability of the chemicals in the subsurface throughout the duration of a pattern flood; the formation of an oil bank and the stable displacement thereof; the susceptibility to reservoir heterogeneity; the maximum sustainable injection rate of an ASP slug and a polymer drive without uncontrolled fracturing of the reservoir; the commercially optimal volume of these slugs.
- the main criteria for this work are: the maximisation of data acquisition, such as injectivity, desaturation and recovery factor; the robustness against well or equipment failure; the quantification and mitigation of emulsion and scale formation; a representative geological setting; a feasible pilot duration.
- Identified risks include the contamination of near-by production wells with ASP chemicals as well as uncontrolled fracturing.
- an inverted five-spot pattern (one central injector surrounded by four corner producers) with an edge length of the order of 75 m x 75 m is considered the best compromise. Moreover, if desired, this pattern allows an extension of the pilot toward a larger pattern size by converting the corner producers into injectors and drilling four new corner producers at a larger distance surrounding the original pilot pattern.
- ASP forecast simulations have been carried out starting from a current "history-matched" fine-gridded field model. The injection and production rate results are displayed in Error! Reference source not found.16 while the expected effluent concentration profiles are shown in Error! Reference source not found..
- a method producing oil and/or gas from an underground formation comprising locating a suitable reservoir in a subsurface formation; creating a model of the reservoir; populating the model with laboratory data; modeling the reservoir to determine fluid displacements based on fluids injected and fluids produced; determining an optimum fluid mixture for the fluids to be injected based on a series of sensitivity analyses performed with the model; drilling a first well in the formation; injecting the optimum fluid mixture into the first well ; drilling a second well in the formation; and producing oil and/or gas from the second well.
- the first well is at a distance of 25 meters to 1 kilometer from the second well.
- the optimum fluid mixture comprises water, a surfactant, a polymer, and an alkali.
- the method also includes a mechanism for injecting a water based mixture into the formation, after the optimum fluid mixture has been released into the formation.
- populating the model with laboratory data further comprises determining an optimum salinity of a surfactant in the optimum fluid mixture.
- populating the model with laboratory data further comprises
- drilling a first well further comprises drilling a first array of wells comprising from 5 to 500 wells
- drilling a second well further comprises drilling a second array of wells comprising from 5 to 500 wells.
- populating the model with laboratory data further comprises determining a viscosity of the optimum fluid mixture based on a volume of polymer added to the mixture.
- the method also includes mixing the optimum fluid mixture prior to injecting the mixture.
- the underground formation comprises an oil having a viscosity from 0.5 to 250 centipoise, prior to the injection of the optimum fluid mixture.
- the first well comprises a ASP mixture profile in the formation
- the second well comprises an oil recovery profile in the formation, the method further comprising an overlap between the ASP mixture profile and the oil recovery profile.
- populating the model with laboratory data further comprises performing a core flood experiment with a core sample from the formation comprising oil from the formation.
- performing the series of sensitivity analyses with the model comprises modifying each ingredient in the mixture and determining an optimum value for each said ingredients.
- the oil in the formation comprises a first viscosity
- the optimum fluid mixture comprises a second viscosity
- the first viscosity is within 75 centipoise of the second viscosity.
- the oil in the formation comprises a first viscosity
- the optimum fluid mixture comprises a second viscosity
- the second viscosity is from about 25% to about 200% of the first viscosity.
- the second well produces the optimum fluid mixture, and oil and/or gas.
- the method also includes recovering the optimum fluid mixture from the oil and/or gas, if present, and then optionally re-injecting at least a portion of the recovered optimum fluid mixture into the formation.
- the optimum fluid mixture is injected at a pressure from 0 to 37,000 kilopascals above the initial reservoir pressure, measured prior to when injection begins.
- the underground formation comprises a permeability from 0.0001 to 1 5 Darcies, for example a permeability from 0.001 to 1 Darcy.
- the method also includes converting at least a portion of the recovered oil and/or gas into a material selected from the group consisting of transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel, heating fuel, lubricants, chemicals, and/or polymers.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
- Lubricants (AREA)
Abstract
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/522,595 US20120292025A1 (en) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-01-18 | Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas |
CA 2784910 CA2784910A1 (fr) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-01-18 | Systemes et procedes de production de petrole et/ou de gaz |
RU2012135549/08A RU2012135549A (ru) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-01-18 | Системы и способ для добычи нефти и/или газа |
CN201180010305.5A CN102763118B (zh) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-01-18 | 生产油和/或气的系统和方法 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US29667710P | 2010-01-20 | 2010-01-20 | |
US61/296,677 | 2010-01-20 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2011090921A1 true WO2011090921A1 (fr) | 2011-07-28 |
Family
ID=44307153
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/021493 WO2011090921A1 (fr) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-01-18 | Systèmes et procédés de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120292025A1 (fr) |
CN (1) | CN102763118B (fr) |
CA (1) | CA2784910A1 (fr) |
RU (1) | RU2012135549A (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2011090921A1 (fr) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016100103A1 (fr) | 2014-12-15 | 2016-06-23 | Shell Oil Company | Processus et composition pour inondation de polymère par un tensioactif |
US9670396B2 (en) | 2013-01-16 | 2017-06-06 | Shell Oil Company | Method, system, and composition for producing oil |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2973828B1 (fr) * | 2011-04-11 | 2014-04-18 | Snf Sas | Ensemble de materiel de mesure et regulation de viscosite en ligne a haute pression |
MX365745B (es) * | 2011-11-22 | 2019-06-12 | Baker Hughes Inc | Método para utilizar marcadores de liberación controlada. |
WO2014151289A1 (fr) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | Meadwestvaco Corporation | Procédé et composition pour améliorer la récupération du pétrole en utilisant des tensioactifs marqués au phosphore |
WO2014151284A1 (fr) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | Meadwestvaco Corporation | Procédé et composition de fracturation hydraulique |
CN103939078A (zh) * | 2014-03-27 | 2014-07-23 | 上海井拓石油开发技术有限公司 | 等流度驱油与压裂一体化技术 |
US10641083B2 (en) | 2016-06-02 | 2020-05-05 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Method of monitoring fluid flow from a reservoir using well treatment agents |
CN108266182B (zh) * | 2016-12-30 | 2021-08-31 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | 水平井分段压裂的裂缝布缝模式的选择方法和装置 |
US11254861B2 (en) | 2017-07-13 | 2022-02-22 | Baker Hughes Holdings Llc | Delivery system for oil-soluble well treatment agents and methods of using the same |
EP3460178A1 (fr) * | 2017-09-22 | 2019-03-27 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Procédé de réduction de solutions non physiques dans des simulations de récupération de pétrole assistées par voie chimique |
EP3704206A1 (fr) | 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-09 | Baker Hughes Holdings Llc | Procédés de traitement mettant en oeuvre des fluides aqueux contenant des agents de traitement solubles dans l'huile |
US10815416B2 (en) * | 2018-04-09 | 2020-10-27 | Alchemy Sciences, Inc. | Multi-functional surfactant solution for improving hydrocarbon recovery |
US10961444B1 (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2021-03-30 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc | Method of using coated composites containing delayed release agent in a well treatment operation |
US11434758B2 (en) * | 2020-05-17 | 2022-09-06 | North Oil Company | Method of assessing an oil recovery process |
US20220254455A1 (en) * | 2021-02-11 | 2022-08-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Utilizing hydraulic simulation to evaluate quality of water in salt water disposal systems |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4613631A (en) * | 1985-05-24 | 1986-09-23 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Crosslinked polymers for enhanced oil recovery |
US20060289157A1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2006-12-28 | Rao Dandina N | Gas-assisted gravity drainage (GAGD) process for improved oil recovery |
US20070267191A1 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2007-11-22 | Jochen Pfeiffer | Method of Modifying Permeability between Injection and Production Wells |
US20080288226A1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2008-11-20 | Gurpinar Omer M | Integrated Resevoir optimization |
US20090188669A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-07-30 | Steffen Berg | Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas |
US20090198478A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Oilfield emulator |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5068043A (en) * | 1985-11-12 | 1991-11-26 | Shell Oil Company | Preformed surfactant-optimized aqueous alkaline flood |
US6022834A (en) * | 1996-05-24 | 2000-02-08 | Oil Chem Technologies, Inc. | Alkaline surfactant polymer flooding composition and process |
FR2850187B1 (fr) * | 2003-01-16 | 2005-03-11 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | Methode pour determiner des zones d'un milieu stratifie ou l'interface entre un fluide en place dans le milieu et un fluide de balayage, se deplace de facon stationnaire |
US20090194276A1 (en) * | 2008-01-31 | 2009-08-06 | Total E&P Usa, Inc. | Determination of an actual optimum salinity and an actual optimum type of microemulsion for surfactant/polymer flooding |
-
2011
- 2011-01-18 US US13/522,595 patent/US20120292025A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-01-18 CN CN201180010305.5A patent/CN102763118B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2011-01-18 RU RU2012135549/08A patent/RU2012135549A/ru not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2011-01-18 CA CA 2784910 patent/CA2784910A1/fr not_active Abandoned
- 2011-01-18 WO PCT/US2011/021493 patent/WO2011090921A1/fr active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4613631A (en) * | 1985-05-24 | 1986-09-23 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Crosslinked polymers for enhanced oil recovery |
US20080288226A1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2008-11-20 | Gurpinar Omer M | Integrated Resevoir optimization |
US20060289157A1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2006-12-28 | Rao Dandina N | Gas-assisted gravity drainage (GAGD) process for improved oil recovery |
US20070267191A1 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2007-11-22 | Jochen Pfeiffer | Method of Modifying Permeability between Injection and Production Wells |
US20090188669A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-07-30 | Steffen Berg | Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas |
US20090198478A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Oilfield emulator |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9670396B2 (en) | 2013-01-16 | 2017-06-06 | Shell Oil Company | Method, system, and composition for producing oil |
US9840657B2 (en) | 2013-01-16 | 2017-12-12 | Shell Oil Company | Method, system, and composition for producing oil |
WO2016100103A1 (fr) | 2014-12-15 | 2016-06-23 | Shell Oil Company | Processus et composition pour inondation de polymère par un tensioactif |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2784910A1 (fr) | 2011-07-28 |
US20120292025A1 (en) | 2012-11-22 |
CN102763118B (zh) | 2015-02-11 |
CN102763118A (zh) | 2012-10-31 |
RU2012135549A (ru) | 2014-02-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20120292025A1 (en) | Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas | |
Wang et al. | Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs | |
Thomas | Essentials of polymer flooding technique | |
Rogers et al. | A literature analysis of the WAG injectivity abnormalities in the CO2 process | |
US8215392B2 (en) | Gas-assisted gravity drainage (GAGD) process for improved oil recovery | |
Dang et al. | Modeling and optimization of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding and hybrid enhanced oil recovery processes | |
CA2672487C (fr) | Preconditionnement d'un reservoir de champ petrolifere | |
Stoll et al. | Alkaline/surfactant/polymer flood: From the laboratory to the field | |
Riazi et al. | Experimental study of pore-scale mechanisms of carbonated water injection | |
EP2812409B1 (fr) | Procédé de récupération de pétrole amélioré à l'aide d'eau à faible salinité | |
Seyyedsar et al. | Experimental investigation of tertiary CO2 injection for enhanced heavy oil recovery | |
Shakiba et al. | Investigation of oil recovery and CO2 storage during secondary and tertiary injection of carbonated water in an Iranian carbonate oil reservoir | |
Karpan et al. | West Salym ASP pilot: Project front-end engineering | |
Sheng | Surfactant–polymer flooding | |
Jamaloei | Chemical flooding in naturally fractured reservoirs: fundamental aspects and field-scale practices | |
Guo et al. | Microscopic transport and phase behaviors of CO2 injection in heterogeneous formations using microfluidics | |
Matthews | Carbon dioxide flooding | |
Kulkarni | Multiphase mechanisms and fluid dynamics in gas injection enhanced oil recovery processes | |
Zhang et al. | Determining the most profitable ASP flood strategy for enhanced oil recovery | |
Mwangi | An experimental study of surfactant enhanced waterflooding | |
Al-Murayri et al. | Encouraging chemical EOR field results: first multi-well ASP flooding pilot project in a carbonate reservoir worldwide | |
Han | Optimum Water-Alternating-Gas (CO 2-WAG) Injection in the Bakken Formation | |
Khanifar et al. | Maximizing oil recovery using a chemical application in offshore environment-case study | |
Alcorn et al. | Upscaling CO2 Foam for EOR as CCUS from On-To Offshore | |
Davoodi et al. | Carbon dioxide sequestration through enhanced oil recovery: A review of storage mechanisms and technological applications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201180010305.5 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11735032 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2784910 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13522595 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2012135549 Country of ref document: RU |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 11735032 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |