WO2010121209A1 - Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome - Google Patents

Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010121209A1
WO2010121209A1 PCT/US2010/031502 US2010031502W WO2010121209A1 WO 2010121209 A1 WO2010121209 A1 WO 2010121209A1 US 2010031502 W US2010031502 W US 2010031502W WO 2010121209 A1 WO2010121209 A1 WO 2010121209A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
patient
ibs
event log
symptom diary
instructed
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2010/031502
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Leticia Delgado-Herrera
Abhijit Barve
Kathryn Lasch
Allam Fakhoury
Smita Kothari
Akito Nishida
Patrick Marquis
Glen Spears
Original Assignee
Astellas Us Llc
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Astellas Pharma Us, Inc.
Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Mapi Values Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Astellas Us Llc, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Astellas Pharma Us, Inc., Astellas Pharma, Inc., Mapi Values Llc filed Critical Astellas Us Llc
Priority to CA2758969A priority Critical patent/CA2758969A1/en
Publication of WO2010121209A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010121209A1/en
Priority to US13/274,040 priority patent/US20120208899A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/42Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the gastrointestinal, the endocrine or the exocrine systems
    • A61B5/4222Evaluating particular parts, e.g. particular organs
    • A61B5/4255Intestines, colon or appendix

Definitions

  • IBS irritable bowel syndrome
  • IBS is diagnosed with recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort at least three days per month in the last three months associated with two or more of the following: (1) improvement with defecation, (2) onset associated with a change in frequency of stool, and/or (3) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool. It is also noted that these symptoms typically have had symptom onset at least six months prior to diagnosis.
  • diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome IBS-D
  • IBS-D diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  • the invention provides a tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in a human patient.
  • the tool comprises a diary and/or event log, suitable for psychometric testing of symptoms of IBS.
  • the symptom diary and event log can be used singly or in combination.
  • the symptom diary and/or event log can be used to assess the progress of treatment of IBS in a patient.
  • the invention provides a method for diagnosing IBS comprising (a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
  • the invention provides a method for treating IBS comprising (a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency; (b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (c) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
  • the invention provides calculating an index value based on the patient's score in each category of the symptom diary and/or event log, wherein the index value indicates the relative severity of a patient's IBS symptoms as compared to a healthy individual.
  • the IBS can be any type of IBS, such as IBS-D.
  • the tool can be used in conjunction with therapy for IBS (e.g., dietary changes, medication, or both), i.e., in which the patent is undergoing treatment for IBS.
  • the event log, symptom diary, or both can provide meaningful cognitive feedback concerning the severity of the IBS symptoms in response to therapy.
  • the patient is undergoing treatment with a prescription medication approved for treating IBS or under investigation for such indication.
  • Figure IA depicts page 1 of an exemplary 10-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure IB depicts page 2 of an exemplary 10-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 2 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 3 A depicts page 1 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 3B depicts page 2 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 3C depicts page 3 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 4 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 5 A depicts page 1 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 5B depicts page 2 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 5C depicts page 3 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
  • Figure 6 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
  • the invention provides methods of using the symptom diary and/or event log, such as provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively, in treating or diagnosing IBS, or in assessing a patient's symptoms or response to IBS treatment.
  • the invention provides a method for diagnosing IBS comprising (a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
  • the patient is provided with both an event log and a symptom diary.
  • the patient can be provided with an event log and not a symptom diary, or a symptom diary and not an event log.
  • the invention provides a method for treating IBS comprising (a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency; (b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (c) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
  • the patient is provided with both an event log and a symptom diary.
  • the patient can be provided with an event log and not a symptom diary, or a symptom diary and not an event log.
  • the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over a specified time period. For example, the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over one, two, three, or four weeks. Alternatively, the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over one or multiple months. In some embodiments, such as when the patient is undergoing investigational drug therapy, it may be preferred that the patient records bowel movements for the full duration of the investigational drug therapy.
  • the event log can have any form useful to the clinician. However, in preferred embodiments, the event log includes one or more of the questions provided in Table 4 of Example 1 , along with pre-determined characterizations from which the patient can select. In a more preferred embodiment, the event log includes each question provided in Table 4.
  • the event log comprises the form of Figure 2.
  • the patient can be instructed to select a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS.
  • the patient can be instructed to complete the symptom diary using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a single day.
  • the patient can be instructed to complete multiple symptom diaries over a specified time period, wherein each symptom diary is completed using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a different day.
  • the patient can be instructed to complete symptom diaries each day for one, two, three, or four weeks.
  • the patient can be instructed to complete daily symptom diaries over one or multiple months.
  • the symptom diary can have any form useful to the clinician.
  • the symptom diary includes one or more of the questions provided in Table 3 of Example 1, along with pre-determined characterizations from which the patient can select.
  • the symptom diary comprises each question provided in Table 3.
  • the symptom diary comprises the form provided in Figure 1 (IA and IB).
  • the event log and symptom diary are intended to record a patient's experience. Therefore, any suitable format providing any number of predetermined characterizations can be provided for the patient's answers. In some embodiments, it will be useful to provide pre-determined characterizations for the symptom diary and event log as shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. However, in general, the predetermined characterizations can be based on a 5-point scale (Likert scale), an 11 -point scale (0-10), or a positive/negative scale (yes/no).
  • the event log desirably provides visual and/or text characterizations based on the Adapted Bristol Stool Form Scale, which, for IBS-D, can be modified to include forms relevant to IBS-D (e.g., excluding very hard stool forms).
  • the patient is undergoing a treatment for IBS.
  • the treatment can be any IBS treatment, such as a pharmaceutical or biologic treatment, or a dietary therapy, or other therapy.
  • the therapy is a prescription medication approved or under investigational use for treatment of IBS.
  • the invention provides calculating an index value based on the patient's score in each category of the symptom diary and event log, wherein the index value indicates the relative severity of a patient's IBS symptoms as compared to a healthy individual or to a previous baseline.
  • the index value can also be used to determine whether a patient has achieved clinically sastisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
  • the index value can be calculated by any method known to one of skill in the art and/or deemed to be useful in applying the methods of the present invention. However, it is not necessary to calculate a single index value in order to determine whether a patient has achieved improvement in IBS symptoms. If the patient shows improvement based on the total score of six or more items of the symptom diary, in general, such improvement will be considered clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
  • the symptom diary and event log can be used to assess primary and secondary endpoints for diagnosing patients as having IBS or for evaluating the progress of treatment of IBS patients.
  • diarrhea tools frequency and stool consistency
  • pain are the most frequent and most bothersome symptoms of IBS-D, and these can serve as co-primary endpoints.
  • a patient reporting a weekly average abdominal pain severity over a 24 hour period of a threshold value (e.g., 3 or higher, 4 or higher, 5 or higher, etc. on a 0-10 point scale) and a weekly average stool consistency of a threshold value (for example, 4 or above according to the scale presented in Figure 2) could on that basis be diagnosed as having IBS-D.
  • a threshold value e.g., 3 or higher, 4 or higher, 5 or higher, etc. on a 0-10 point scale
  • a weekly average stool consistency of a threshold value for example, 4 or above according to the scale presented in Figure 2
  • a patient can be considered responding if, for example, the patient experiences a threshold decrease (such as, for example, 25% or greater, 30% or greater, 35% or greater) in the weekly average of abdominal pain severity over a 24 hour period.
  • a threshold decrease such as, for example, 25% or greater, 30% or greater, 35% or greater
  • Successful response to IBS-D treatment also can be indicated by a patient who experiences a decreased weekly average stool consistency relative to a baseline measurement, or a weekly average stool consistency below a threshold value (for example, 3 or below according to the scale presented in Figure 2).
  • a threshold value for example, 3 or below according to the scale presented in Figure 2.
  • improvement in both abdominal pain severity and stool consistency are considered.
  • IBS-D immediate need to have a bowel movement, bloating, pressure, gas, incomplete evacuation, and rectal symptoms can serve as secondary endpoints, and improvement in these categories can also be employed to assess an IBS-D patient's response to treatment.
  • This example demonstrates a method for developing a tool for assessment of symptoms of Irritable Bowel Disease.
  • GED General Educational Development
  • IBS-D diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  • N/A not applicable
  • NE not evaluated
  • Grounded theory data collection and analysis methods were used, including constant comparison of quotations by participants, to determine whether concepts were simple or complex; to determine the grouping of sub-concepts; to determine concepts and domains; to determine the recall period; to determine the response options (e.g., a severity or frequency item); to determine whether the items emphasizing patients' exact words were appropriate; and to develop the conceptual framework.
  • the draft symptom diary was developed to capture IBS-D symptoms over a given day while the draft event log was developed to report information regarding individual bowel movements.
  • the draft event log ( Figure 4) was also modified after additional analysis, although it continued to require patients to note the date and time of each episode, along with the consistency thereof. For example, a question explicitly asking patients to rate the severity of their diarrhea was deleted on the basis that such conclusion is best drawn from the number and type of diarrhea events. Additionally, a new question was added having a positive/negative response: "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" [0044] The resulting event log is shown in Figure 2. The questions provided therein are provided in Table 4. Table 4 - Event Log
  • the final event log and symptom diary ( Figures 1 and 2) reflect a highly descriptive yet compact tool for assessing a patient's symptoms of IBS-D.
  • This example demonstrates the use of the event diary and symptom log to diagnose IBS-D in a patient.
  • a patient suspected of having IBS-D is provided by a clinician with an event log as shown in Figure 2.
  • the patient is instructed to record all bowel movements over a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks, as well as to answer the questions provided regarding urgency, emptying of the bowel, and type of bowel movement according to the Adapted
  • the clinician also provides the patient with a symptom diary as shown in Figure 1.
  • the patient is instructed to complete a copy of the symptom diary each day for a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks.
  • the patient can be diagnosed with IBS-D.
  • the event diary and symptom log can be used to diagnose IBS-D in a patient.
  • This example demonstrates the use of the event diary and symptom log in treating IBS-D in a patient.
  • a patient undergoing a treatment for IBS-D is provided by a clinician with an event log as shown in Figure 2.
  • the patient is instructed to record all bowel movements over a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks, as well as to answer the questions provided regarding urgency, emptying of the bowel, and type of bowel movement according to the
  • the clinician also provides the patient with a symptom diary as shown in Figure 1.
  • the patient is instructed to complete a copy of the symptom diary each day for a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks.
  • the clinician reviews them. If the patient shows improvement based on category score or the total score of six or more items of the symptom diary, then the clinician deems the patient to have improved in IBS symptoms. Alternatively, improvement in the patient's response to two primary endpoints (abdominal pain severity and stool consistency) is considered a favorable response to the IBS-D therapy.
  • the clinician revises the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administers a different
  • the event diary and symptom log can be used to evaluate a IBS-D patient's condition and modify treatment accordingly.

Abstract

Methods of treating and/or diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are provided, wherein treatment or diagnosis is undertaken on the basis of the patient's recordation of events associated with IBS in an event log and/or symptom diary.

Description

TOOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMS OF IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/170,059, filed April 16, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/319,656, filed March 31, 2010, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] About 10% to about 20% of adults and adolescents worldwide suffer from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS exacts a disproportionate share of the US health care dollar. In US managed-care populations, for example, total direct costs incurred by subjects suffering from IBS have been measured to amount to about 50% higher than those not suffering from IBS. The negative impact of IBS on patients, their families, and their friends can be great, especially in moderate to severe IBS-D, which accounts for extremely high utilization of health care resources and impairment of quality-of-life. [0003] According to the Rome III criteria, IBS is diagnosed with recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort at least three days per month in the last three months associated with two or more of the following: (1) improvement with defecation, (2) onset associated with a change in frequency of stool, and/or (3) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool. It is also noted that these symptoms typically have had symptom onset at least six months prior to diagnosis. In addition, according to the Rome III criteria, diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is defined as loose mushy stool at least 25% of bowel movements and hard or lumpy stool in less than 25% of bowel movements. However, there currently is no well-validated symptom severity scales for IBS-D. [0004] Multidisciplinary approaches (including diet changes, over-the-counter (OTC) products, and prescription medications) for treating IBS patients are frequent, and such drugs and remedies are often prescribed by family practitioners. Current treatment is mostly based on pharmacological therapy and is palliative in nature. Only one prescription medication - Alosetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist - has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for IBS-D, and it is only available under a restricted access program due to risks of severe side effects if taken by patients who suffer from any other form of IBS (e.g., constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) and mixed IBS). [0005] An instrument (tool) developed and validated for the IBS patient population, ideally to assess symptom severity, would represent an advancement in the treatment of IBS.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The invention provides a tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in a human patient. The tool comprises a diary and/or event log, suitable for psychometric testing of symptoms of IBS. The symptom diary and event log can be used singly or in combination. The symptom diary and/or event log can be used to assess the progress of treatment of IBS in a patient.
[0007] In one aspect, the invention provides a method for diagnosing IBS comprising (a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(c) reviewing the event log and/or symptom diary completed by the patient; and (d) determining whether a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is appropriate.
[0008] In another aspect, the invention provides a method for treating IBS comprising (a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency; (b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (c) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(d) reviewing the event log and/or symptom diary completed by the patient to assess changes in symptoms; (e) revising the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administering a different IBS treatment; and (f) repeating steps (a)-(e) until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
[0009] In another aspect, the invention provides calculating an index value based on the patient's score in each category of the symptom diary and/or event log, wherein the index value indicates the relative severity of a patient's IBS symptoms as compared to a healthy individual. [0010] The IBS can be any type of IBS, such as IBS-D. Also, the tool can be used in conjunction with therapy for IBS (e.g., dietary changes, medication, or both), i.e., in which the patent is undergoing treatment for IBS. In this sense, the event log, symptom diary, or both, can provide meaningful cognitive feedback concerning the severity of the IBS symptoms in response to therapy. In a preferred embodiment, the patient is undergoing treatment with a prescription medication approved for treating IBS or under investigation for such indication.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)
[0011] Figure IA depicts page 1 of an exemplary 10-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0012] Figure IB depicts page 2 of an exemplary 10-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0013] Figure 2 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
[0014] Figure 3 A depicts page 1 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0015] Figure 3B depicts page 2 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0016] Figure 3C depicts page 3 of an exemplary 15-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0017] Figure 4 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
[0018] Figure 5 A depicts page 1 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0019] Figure 5B depicts page 2 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0020] Figure 5C depicts page 3 of an exemplary 17-question symptom diary to be provided to a patient.
[0021] Figure 6 depicts an exemplary event log to be provided to a patient.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0022] The invention provides methods of using the symptom diary and/or event log, such as provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively, in treating or diagnosing IBS, or in assessing a patient's symptoms or response to IBS treatment. [0023] In one aspect, the invention provides a method for diagnosing IBS comprising (a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(c) reviewing the event log and/or symptom diary completed by the patient; and (d) determining whether a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is appropriate. In preferred embodiments, the patient is provided with both an event log and a symptom diary. However, in some embodiments, the patient can be provided with an event log and not a symptom diary, or a symptom diary and not an event log.
[0024] In another aspect, the invention provides a method for treating IBS comprising (a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency; (b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof; and/or (c) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(d) reviewing the event log and/or symptom diary completed by the patient; (e) revising the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administering a different IBS treatment; and (f) repeating steps (a)-(e) until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms. In preferred embodiments, the patient is provided with both an event log and a symptom diary. However, in some embodiments, the patient can be provided with an event log and not a symptom diary, or a symptom diary and not an event log.
[0025] In embodiments in which the patient is provided with an event log, the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over a specified time period. For example, the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over one, two, three, or four weeks. Alternatively, the patient can be instructed to record bowel movements over one or multiple months. In some embodiments, such as when the patient is undergoing investigational drug therapy, it may be preferred that the patient records bowel movements for the full duration of the investigational drug therapy. [0026] The event log can have any form useful to the clinician. However, in preferred embodiments, the event log includes one or more of the questions provided in Table 4 of Example 1 , along with pre-determined characterizations from which the patient can select. In a more preferred embodiment, the event log includes each question provided in Table 4. In a most preferred embodiment, the event log comprises the form of Figure 2. [0027] In embodiments in which the patient is provided with a symptom diary, the patient can be instructed to select a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS. The patient can be instructed to complete the symptom diary using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a single day. Alternatively, the patient can be instructed to complete multiple symptom diaries over a specified time period, wherein each symptom diary is completed using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a different day. For example, the patient can be instructed to complete symptom diaries each day for one, two, three, or four weeks. Alternatively, the patient can be instructed to complete daily symptom diaries over one or multiple months. In some embodiments, such as when the patient is undergoing investigational drag therapy, it may be preferred that the patient completes daily symptom diaries for the full duration of the investigational drug therapy.
[0028] The symptom diary can have any form useful to the clinician. However, in preferred embodiments, the symptom diary includes one or more of the questions provided in Table 3 of Example 1, along with pre-determined characterizations from which the patient can select. In preferred embodiments, the symptom diary comprises each question provided in Table 3. In a most preferred embodiment, the symptom diary comprises the form provided in Figure 1 (IA and IB).
[0029] It will be understood that the event log and symptom diary are intended to record a patient's experience. Therefore, any suitable format providing any number of predetermined characterizations can be provided for the patient's answers. In some embodiments, it will be useful to provide pre-determined characterizations for the symptom diary and event log as shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. However, in general, the predetermined characterizations can be based on a 5-point scale (Likert scale), an 11 -point scale (0-10), or a positive/negative scale (yes/no). In responding to questions regarding the appearance of the bowel movement, the event log desirably provides visual and/or text characterizations based on the Adapted Bristol Stool Form Scale, which, for IBS-D, can be modified to include forms relevant to IBS-D (e.g., excluding very hard stool forms). [0030] In some embodiments, the patient is undergoing a treatment for IBS. The treatment can be any IBS treatment, such as a pharmaceutical or biologic treatment, or a dietary therapy, or other therapy. In some embodiments, the therapy is a prescription medication approved or under investigational use for treatment of IBS. [0031] In another aspect, the invention provides calculating an index value based on the patient's score in each category of the symptom diary and event log, wherein the index value indicates the relative severity of a patient's IBS symptoms as compared to a healthy individual or to a previous baseline. The index value can also be used to determine whether a patient has achieved clinically sastisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms. The index value can be calculated by any method known to one of skill in the art and/or deemed to be useful in applying the methods of the present invention. However, it is not necessary to calculate a single index value in order to determine whether a patient has achieved improvement in IBS symptoms. If the patient shows improvement based on the total score of six or more items of the symptom diary, in general, such improvement will be considered clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
[0032] Additionally, the symptom diary and event log can be used to assess primary and secondary endpoints for diagnosing patients as having IBS or for evaluating the progress of treatment of IBS patients. For IBS-D, diarrhea (stool frequency and stool consistency) and pain are the most frequent and most bothersome symptoms of IBS-D, and these can serve as co-primary endpoints. For example, a patient reporting a weekly average abdominal pain severity over a 24 hour period of a threshold value (e.g., 3 or higher, 4 or higher, 5 or higher, etc. on a 0-10 point scale) and a weekly average stool consistency of a threshold value (for example, 4 or above according to the scale presented in Figure 2) could on that basis be diagnosed as having IBS-D. To assess a patient's response to therapy for IBS-D, a patient can be considered responding if, for example, the patient experiences a threshold decrease (such as, for example, 25% or greater, 30% or greater, 35% or greater) in the weekly average of abdominal pain severity over a 24 hour period. Successful response to IBS-D treatment also can be indicated by a patient who experiences a decreased weekly average stool consistency relative to a baseline measurement, or a weekly average stool consistency below a threshold value (for example, 3 or below according to the scale presented in Figure 2). Preferably, improvement in both abdominal pain severity and stool consistency are considered. Further, for IBS-D, immediate need to have a bowel movement, bloating, pressure, gas, incomplete evacuation, and rectal symptoms can serve as secondary endpoints, and improvement in these categories can also be employed to assess an IBS-D patient's response to treatment.
[0033] The following examples further illustrate the invention but, of course, should not be construed as in any way limiting its scope.
EXAMPLE 1
[0034] This example demonstrates a method for developing a tool for assessment of symptoms of Irritable Bowel Disease.
[0035] Two sets of concept elicitation focus groups were conducted, with patients in each set meeting the ROME III inclusion and exclusion criteria for IBS-D. In the first (Set 1), 34 patients were interviewed in 8 concept elicitation focus groups having 2-9 subjects per group. In the second (Set 2), 32 patients under 70 years of age were interviewed in four gender- specific concept elicitation focus groups (n=3 female, n=l male). Demographic and health information for each patient was recorded and is presented in Table 1. Table 1- Summary of Socio-Demographic and Health Information
Figure imgf000009_0001
Figure imgf000010_0001
GED: General Educational Development; IBS-D: diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome ; N/A: not applicable; NE: not evaluated
[0036] Grounded theory data collection and analysis methods were used, including constant comparison of quotations by participants, to determine whether concepts were simple or complex; to determine the grouping of sub-concepts; to determine concepts and domains; to determine the recall period; to determine the response options (e.g., a severity or frequency item); to determine whether the items emphasizing patients' exact words were appropriate; and to develop the conceptual framework.
[0037] In Set 1 , thirty-six different concepts were elicited, with 29 concepts saturated. Responses from Set 2 were compared with those of Set 1, and determined to be similar. Ethnicity and other demographic data did not impact the reporting of the symptoms by the patients. In particular, educational level did not impact how the symptoms were reported by patients. For example, all patients tend to describe the occurrence of diarrhea (in relation to eating), and description of diarrhea ("the runs") similarly, as illustrated in Table 2. Table 2
Figure imgf000010_0002
[0038] Concepts elicited that were mentioned spontaneously and that were saturated were included in a draft symptom diary (Figure 5) and a draft event log (Figure 6). However, some concepts that met these criteria were excluded due to reasons such as a lack of clinical relevance or specificity to IBS-D, such as vomiting, nausea, heartburn, and sweating. More specifically, concepts included in the draft symptom diary and draft event log were limited to lower GI symptoms in accordance with the ROME III Criteria and clinical diagnosis of IBS- D.
[0039] The concepts that were retained for use in the draft symptom diary and event log were: Diarrhea, immediate need (urgency), bloating/pressure, frequency of bowel movement, cramps, abdominal/stomach pain, gas, complete emptying of bowels/incomplete evacuation, accident, bubbling in intestines/bowel sounds, rectal burning, stool consistency, rectal spasm, and pain while wiping.
[0040] The draft symptom diary was developed to capture IBS-D symptoms over a given day while the draft event log was developed to report information regarding individual bowel movements.
[0041] Eleven cognitive interviews were conducted to determine the comprehensiveness, understanding, appropriateness, and readability of the draft symptom diary and draft event log. Patients were asked to complete the 17-item draft symptom diary (Figure 5) and draft event log (Figure 6), and to provide their feedback using the "think aloud" method. Patients were asked to identify words, terms, or concepts that they did not understand or interpreted differently than had been intended. They were also asked if revisions should be made to the 17-item draft symptom diary or event log to make them more appropriate, comprehensive, or interpretable. After the cognitive interviews, two questions based on concepts listed above were deleted from the 17-item draft symptom diary: "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate your immediate need to use the bathroom to have a bowel movement?" and "In the past 24 hours, how often did you feel full before finishing a normal size meal?" [0042] Five additional questions were deleted from the resulting 15 -item symptom diary (Figure 3) in order to avoid redundancy and optimize clarity. The remaining 10 questions of the symptom diary are presented in Table 3. A complete version of the symptom diary is presented in Figure 1. Table 3 - Symptom Diary
Figure imgf000012_0001
[0043] The draft event log (Figure 4) was also modified after additional analysis, although it continued to require patients to note the date and time of each episode, along with the consistency thereof. For example, a question explicitly asking patients to rate the severity of their diarrhea was deleted on the basis that such conclusion is best drawn from the number and type of diarrhea events. Additionally, a new question was added having a positive/negative response: "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?" [0044] The resulting event log is shown in Figure 2. The questions provided therein are provided in Table 4. Table 4 - Event Log
Figure imgf000013_0001
[0045] The final event log and symptom diary (Figures 1 and 2) reflect a highly descriptive yet compact tool for assessing a patient's symptoms of IBS-D.
EXAMPLE 2
[0046] This example demonstrates the use of the event diary and symptom log to diagnose IBS-D in a patient.
[0047] A patient suspected of having IBS-D is provided by a clinician with an event log as shown in Figure 2. The patient is instructed to record all bowel movements over a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks, as well as to answer the questions provided regarding urgency, emptying of the bowel, and type of bowel movement according to the Adapted
Bristol Stool Form Scale.
[0048] The clinician also provides the patient with a symptom diary as shown in Figure 1.
The patient is instructed to complete a copy of the symptom diary each day for a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks.
[0049] Once the patient completes the event log and symptom diaries for the prescribed period, the clinician reviews them. If the patient shows a pattern of response consistent with
IBS-D, the patient can be diagnosed with IBS-D.
[0050] Accordingly, the event diary and symptom log can be used to diagnose IBS-D in a patient.
EXAMPLE 3
[0051] This example demonstrates the use of the event diary and symptom log in treating IBS-D in a patient. [0052] A patient undergoing a treatment for IBS-D is provided by a clinician with an event log as shown in Figure 2. The patient is instructed to record all bowel movements over a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks, as well as to answer the questions provided regarding urgency, emptying of the bowel, and type of bowel movement according to the
Adapted Bristol Stool Form Scale.
[0053] The clinician also provides the patient with a symptom diary as shown in Figure 1.
The patient is instructed to complete a copy of the symptom diary each day for a set period, e.g., one week or two weeks.
[0054] Once the patient completes the event log and symptom diaries for the prescribed period, the clinician reviews them. If the patient shows improvement based on category score or the total score of six or more items of the symptom diary, then the clinician deems the patient to have improved in IBS symptoms. Alternatively, improvement in the patient's response to two primary endpoints (abdominal pain severity and stool consistency) is considered a favorable response to the IBS-D therapy.
[0055] If the patient does not show adequate improvement in IBS symptoms, the clinician revises the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administers a different
IBS treatment.
[0056] The process of recording IBS events and symptoms in the symptom diary and event log, and evaluating such responses may be repeated until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
[0057] Accordingly, the event diary and symptom log can be used to evaluate a IBS-D patient's condition and modify treatment accordingly.
[0058] All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
[0059] The use of the terms "a" and "an" and "the" and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms "comprising," "having," "including," and
"containing" are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning "including, but not limited to,") unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., "such as") provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
[0060] Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Claims

CLAIM(S):
1. A method of diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof;
(b) reviewing the event log completed by the patient; and
(c) determining whether a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is appropriate.
2. A method of diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(b) reviewing the symptom diary completed by the patient; and
(c) determining whether a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is appropriate.
3. A method of diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) providing a patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof;
(b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(c) reviewing the event log and symptom diary completed by the patient; and
(d) determining whether a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome is appropriate.
4. A method of treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency; (b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof;
(c) reviewing the event log completed by the patient;
(d) revising the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administering a different IBS treatment; and
(e) repeating steps (a)-(d) until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
5. A method of treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency;
(b) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(c) reviewing the symptom diary completed by the patient;
(d) revising the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administering a different IBS treatment; and
(e) repeating steps (a)-(d) until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
6. A method of treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) comprising:
(a) administering to a patient having IBS an IBS treatment at a dosage and frequency;
(b) providing the patient with an event log, wherein the patient is instructed to record in the event log the date and time of each bowel movement together with a description thereof;
(c) providing the patient with a symptom diary, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary by selecting a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
(d) reviewing the event log and symptom diary completed by the patient; (e) revising the dosage and frequency of the IBS treatment, or, optionally, administering a different IBS treatment; and
(f) repeating steps (a)-(e) until the patient achieves a clinically satisfactory improvement in IBS symptoms.
7. The method of any of claims 1 -6, wherein the pre-determined characterizations are selected from the group consisting of a 5-point scale (Likert scale), an 11 -point scale (0-10), and a positive/negative scale (yes/no).
8. The method of claim 1, 3, 4, or 6, wherein the patient is instructed to record bowel movements of one or more weeks in the event log.
9. The method of claim 1 , 3, 4, or 6, wherein the patient is instructed to record bowel movements of one or more months in the event log.
10. The method of 1, 3, 4, or 6, wherein the event log further comprises one or more of the following questions:
(a) "How immediate was your need?";
(b) "Did you feel like you completely emptied your bowels?";
(c) "Which best describes what your bowel movement looked like?";
wherein the event log further comprises pre-determined characterizations from which the patient can choose in answering each question.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein 5 different pre-determined characterizations are provided for question (a).
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the pre-determined characterizations for question (b) are positive and negative, or yes and no.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein the pre-determined characterizations for question (c) are based on the Adapted Bristol Stool Form Scale.
14. The method of claim 10, wherein the event log comprises each of questions (a)-(c).
15. The method of claim 2, 3, 5, or 6, wherein the patient is instructed to complete the symptom diary using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a single day.
16. The method of claim 2, 3, 5, or 6, wherein the patient is instructed to complete multiple symptom diaries, wherein each symptom diary is completed using characterizations of the patient's experience of events associated with IBS on a different day.
17. The method of claim 2, 3, 5, or 6, wherein the symptom diary comprises one or more of the following questions:
(a) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of your stomach pain?";
(b) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of the pressure you felt in your abdomen?";
(c) "In the past 24 hours, how bloated did you feel?"
(d) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of your abdominal cramps?";
(e) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of your rectal spasms?";
(f) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of the burning sensation you experienced after a bowel movement?";
(g) "In the past 24 hours, how would you rate the severity of your abdominal pain?"
(h) "In the past 24 hours, how often did you have gas?";
(i) "In the past 24 hours, how often were you able to hear sounds coming from your abdomen that signaled that you might have diarrhea?"; and
Q) "In the past 24 hours, did you have any accidents (lose control of your bowels)?".
18. The method of claim 17, wherein at least 5 different pre-determined characterizations are provided for each of questions (a)-(i).
19. The method of claim 17, wherein 11 different pre-determined characterizations are provided for each of questions (a)-(g).
20. The method of claim 17, wherein the event log comprises each of questions (a)-G).
21. The method of claim 20, wherein 11 different pre-determined characterizations are provided for each of questions (a)-(g); 5 different pre-determined characterizations are provided for each of questions (h)-(i); and a positive/negative selection is provided for question (j).
22. The method of any of claims 4-6, wherein the treatment comprises a prescription medication approved or under investigational use for treatment of IBS.
23. The method of any of claims 1 -6, further comprising calculating an index value based on the patient's score in each category of the symptom diary and event log.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the index value indicates the relative severity of a patient's IBS symptoms as compared to a healthy individual.
25. A method of assessing the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a patient comprising providing a human patient suffering from IBS with an event log to record the date and time of events associated with IBS together with a description of the event.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the event log comprises substantially the form identified in Figure 2.
27. A method of assessing the symptoms of IBS in a patient comprising providing a human patient suffering from IBS with symptom diary to select a characterization from a series of pre-determined characterizations regarding the patient's subjective experience of events associated with IBS;
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the symptom diary comprises substantially the form identified in Figure 1.
29. The method of any of claims 25-28, wherein the patient is undergoing therapy for treatment of IBS.
30. The method of any preceding claim, wherein the IBS is IBS-D.
PCT/US2010/031502 2009-04-16 2010-04-16 Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome WO2010121209A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2758969A CA2758969A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2010-04-16 Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome
US13/274,040 US20120208899A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2011-10-14 Tool for Assessment of Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17005909P 2009-04-16 2009-04-16
US61/170,059 2009-04-16
US31965610P 2010-03-31 2010-03-31
US61/319,656 2010-03-31

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/274,040 Continuation-In-Part US20120208899A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2011-10-14 Tool for Assessment of Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010121209A1 true WO2010121209A1 (en) 2010-10-21

Family

ID=42982857

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/031257 WO2010121038A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2010-04-15 Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome
PCT/US2010/031502 WO2010121209A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2010-04-16 Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/031257 WO2010121038A1 (en) 2009-04-16 2010-04-15 Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2758969A1 (en)
WO (2) WO2010121038A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9474482B2 (en) * 2010-11-01 2016-10-25 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Method for diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, and apparatus for use therewith
US10499829B2 (en) 2010-11-01 2019-12-10 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Wearable wireless patches containing electrode pair arrays for gastrointestinal electrodiagnostics
US9943264B2 (en) 2012-10-10 2018-04-17 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Wearable wireless patches containing electrode pair arrays for gastrointestinal electrodiagnostics
US11826170B2 (en) 2012-10-10 2023-11-28 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Artificial intelligence models for wireless patch data acquisition for gastrointestinal electrodiagnostics
EP3900618A1 (en) 2014-10-17 2021-10-27 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Systems and methods for processing electromyographic signals of the gastrointestinal tract
US10512414B2 (en) 2015-08-29 2019-12-24 G-Tech Medical, Inc. Apparatus and method for detecting gastrointestinal motor activity during post-operative recovery

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000075748A2 (en) * 1999-06-08 2000-12-14 Salus Media, Inc. Behaviour modification system with personal portal
WO2006091903A1 (en) * 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method of treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a subject
WO2008028976A1 (en) * 2006-09-08 2008-03-13 Ull Meter A/S Method of utilising measurements of threshold of pain

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050148630A1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2005-07-07 Carpenter Randall L. Methods of preventing and treating non-opioid induced gastrointestinal dysfunction

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000075748A2 (en) * 1999-06-08 2000-12-14 Salus Media, Inc. Behaviour modification system with personal portal
WO2006091903A1 (en) * 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method of treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a subject
WO2008028976A1 (en) * 2006-09-08 2008-03-13 Ull Meter A/S Method of utilising measurements of threshold of pain

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
MANNING ET AL.: "Towards Positive Diagnosis of the Irritable Bowel.", BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 2, 1976, pages 653 - 654 *
MAXTON ET AL.: "More Accurate Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome By the Use Of 'Non- Colonic'", SYMPTOMATOLOGY. GUT., vol. 32, 1991, pages 784 - 786 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2010121038A1 (en) 2010-10-21
CA2758969A1 (en) 2010-10-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tanaka et al. Oral Frailty Index-8 in the risk assessment of new-onset oral frailty and functional disability among community-dwelling older adults
Murphy Symptom scales and diagnostic schedules in adult psychiatry
Katz et al. Effectiveness of occupational goal intervention for clients with schizophrenia
Striegel‐Moore et al. Screening for binge eating disorders using the Patient Health Questionnaire in a community sample
WO2010121209A1 (en) Tool for assessment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome
Abbott et al. Effect of perineal self-acupressure on constipation: a randomized controlled trial
Sewitch et al. Clustering patients according to health perceptions: relationships to psychosocial characteristics and medication nonadherence
Lee et al. Effectiveness of an oral health education programme for older adults using a workbook
US20150223747A1 (en) Patient reported outcome instrument
Crane et al. Illness schema and level of reported gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome
Oberi et al. Prevalence of hemorrhoids and their risk factors among the adult population in Jazan, Saudi Arabia
US20120208899A1 (en) Tool for Assessment of Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Cooley et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life questionnaires in ambulatory oncology
Fox et al. Childhood-onset eating problems: Findings from research
Park et al. Development of an adverse-event coping scale (AECS) using item response theory
Benten Relationship between Oral Behaviors and Functional Limitation in Individuals with and without Painful Temporomandibular Disorders
Chen Delaware 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey
Abudayah African Americans with HFpEF An Insight to HRQOL and Family Based on Renal Function
Malepe Factors associated with hypertension among workers in the Greater-Tzaneen Municipality of the Limpopo Province, South Africa
Krautbauer Screening for energy restriction in middle and late life
Ridolfi The relationship between body image disturbance and health maintenance behaviors: An assessment of breast self-examination among women
Gonzalez The Relationship between Dietary Intake of Magnesium, Fiber, and Fluid Intake and Constipation Using NHANES Data
McDonald et al. Quality of life and health outcomes in asthma, COPD, and asthma-COPD overlap
Waugh et al. Educating School Nurses to Improve Bowel Continence in Children with Spina Bifida
Rembert Improving Dietary Habits in African American Patients with Essential Hypertension

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10765306

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2758969

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10765306

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1