WO2004084090A1 - Systeme et procede electronique d'attribution de prix - Google Patents

Systeme et procede electronique d'attribution de prix Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004084090A1
WO2004084090A1 PCT/US2003/017752 US0317752W WO2004084090A1 WO 2004084090 A1 WO2004084090 A1 WO 2004084090A1 US 0317752 W US0317752 W US 0317752W WO 2004084090 A1 WO2004084090 A1 WO 2004084090A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
award
information
approver
awards
employee
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2003/017752
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Emmett D. Williams
Original Assignee
United States Postal Services
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by United States Postal Services filed Critical United States Postal Services
Priority to AU2003247491A priority Critical patent/AU2003247491A1/en
Publication of WO2004084090A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004084090A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10—Text processing
    • G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting

Definitions

  • the invention was made by an agency of the United States government or under a contract with an agency of the United States government, the United States Postal Service ("USPS" or "Postal Service”), an independent establishment of the executive branch of the U.S. government.
  • USPS United States Postal Service
  • Postal Service an independent establishment of the executive branch of the U.S. government.
  • the present invention relates to systems and methods for employee performance awards. More particularly, the present invention relates to an electronic interactive program for processing and tracking grants of employee performance awards.
  • Description of the Related Art [0003] To motivate employees, business institutions have customarily given awards to their employees. The process and the nature of granting an award varies from workplace to workplace. Traditionally a supervisor nominates an employee for an award-on the basis of work, achievements, and supporting documents regarding the employee's achievements. The award is then reviewed and approved by the departmental head or other approval committee. The award is then communicated to the Personnel Department which further approves it. An authorization may be forwarded to a financial department for a monetary portion of the award. Typically, the employee's supervisor then announces the award in a departmental ceremony.
  • management structures are increasingly matrix patterned where an individual employee may have more than one report or supervisor. Thus the review and award of an employee may call for input from several individuals, supervisors who may themselves be at different locations.
  • a new management tool that allows for recognition and award to employees where all appropriate individuals can participate in the process.
  • Employees and managers in different offices oftentimes suffer from communication disadvantages that "central office" workers may not experience. Further, in larger organizations, it may not be clear to employees the criteria that went into an award decision. Why was employee in city A given an award, while an employee in city B was not awarded? Thus, there also is also a need for a management tool that allows transparency regarding the award process to the award transaction participants.
  • the present invention provides a business tool to be used in facilitating employee performance awards.
  • the method provides computer-based tools for automating and processing employee award programs.
  • the system and method is well suited to those award programs in a large organization where, for example, employees and supervisors are working at multiple locations.
  • the method uses computer-based tools that permit users at different to locations to create an award file, access the file, and act on the file.
  • the system allows flexibility so that the electronic awards system may be adjusted to awards and award criteria and approval that are appropriate for each organization.
  • a user can take several actions such as create an award file, view an award, approve an award, and reject an award, request additional information, designate others to review the award, and save an award.
  • the award system is computer based and may be made accessible to employees on, for example, an organization's intranet.
  • the electronic awards system provides a method for electronically preparing and processing employee award information on an organization's computer system. The method includes the following steps: creating a computer-based award profile by selecting an award type from a scroll down menu, entering the recipients social security number; entering the award amount, completing address information for the recipient, designating a finance number, certifying the award information, and selecting an approver. The method then includes providing the award profile to approvers through electronic means; approving the award; and awarding the employee.
  • the present invention provides a system for electronically processing employee awards.
  • the system includes a network of linked computers; at least one server linked to said network; and awards software residing on a server wherein the awards software processes employee award information.
  • the system network preferably comprises an intranet within an organization.
  • the awards software provides means to create an award; means to approve an award; means to view an award, and means to provide maintenance for award information.
  • the awares software to create an award further comprises functionality to select an award type from a scroll down menu; to enter the recipients social security number; to enter the award amount; to complete address information for the recipient; to designate a finance number; to certify the award information, to selecting an approver; and to provide the award profile to an approver through electronic means.
  • the system also preferably includes a database residing on a server wherein the database comprises employee address information, award types, and approver identities.
  • the system and method is generally described as an electronic awards system. Thus embodiments of the invention may be described herein as the eAwards system.
  • Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
  • the present invention comprises a combination of features, steps, and advantages which enable it to overcome various deficiencies of the prior art.
  • the various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of the Welcome Page displayed by one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is an illustration of the Create Award screen displayed by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating the features that certain types of employees are authorized to view in one embodiment.
  • Figure 4 is an illustration of the Award Information page displayed by an embodiment of the present inventions.
  • an online program has been devised which automates the awards process.
  • An electronic award is based on a participant workflow model.
  • Participants are 1) designees, 2) submitters, and 3) approvers. Designees may be assigned by submitters to draft awards in their behalf. Submitters are employees eligible by policy to nominate other employees for awards. Approvers are employees eligible by policy to approve an award for eligible employees.
  • [0024] Participants are notified, preferably by email, concerning award events.
  • Eligible employees, Supervisors and Managers use the eA wards program to enter an award request.
  • the program further allows the award request to be submitted, and for the progress of the request during the approval process to be monitored.
  • the application uses computer-based software.
  • Oracle Workflow software is the software engine that controls the approval process and email notifications.
  • a software such as Oracle Workflow manages workflow processes, and has the capability to send and receive email messages, and is integrated with an Oracle database.
  • the program prompts the persons involved to enter the required input at each stage.
  • the recommender opens the program.
  • the program offers a choice of award types including as for example within the United States Postal Service, Special Achievement Award, Meritorious Service Award, Distinguished Service Award, Spot Cash, Spot Cash Equivalent, Spot Non-Cash Tangible, and Team awards.
  • the recommender makes the desired award type selection.
  • the automated award system calls upon the submitter or recommender to enter certain information related to the award.
  • the recommender then enters the Social Security Number (SSN) of the recipient. Where the award type includes a cash amount, the recommender is also prompted to enter the award amount. The program also asks the recommender to submit a Basis of Award. The accounting code or appropriate billing information with which to charge or account for the award is also included. Finally the address information for the recipient is submitted so that a check may be mailed to the person receiving the award.
  • SSN Social Security Number
  • FIG. 1 represents the Welcome screen displayed by a preferred embodiment of the eAwards system. Screens within the Employee awards application are preferably divided into four main regions: header, navigation bar, content area, and footer.
  • the header and footer preferably contain links to frequently accessed areas of the application. These are Welcome,- FAQ, Help, and Sign Out. Welcome returns you to the Welcome page/Home page. FAQ displays a list of commonly asked questions and their answers. Help provides assistance for the awards application. And Sign Out logs out of eAwards.
  • the Welcome page or starting point of the eAwards system provides the following options: Create an Award (10), Approve an Award (20), View an Award (30), and Maintenance (40). This is shown in Figure 1. While this is the preferred starting point of the system, it will be understood by those practiced in the art, that a new user may be directed to this point after first entering and saving user profile information. Likewise, if desired, access to the program may be protected by password requirements. [0032] Referring now to Figure 2, in the logical organization of the eAwards system, a node with several options or decisions is the Create Awards section. This section is where the process of creating any award begins and is visible to Designees, Subitters, Approvers, and System Administrators.
  • the Create Award list option contains a list, preferably a drop down list (50), from which to select the Award Type. After selecting the Award Type, the user clicks Create (60) to access the Award Information Page. At that point the remainder of the information necessary to begin the awards process is entered. [0033]
  • the Create Award page will also display a notice whether the user has any draft awards.
  • a message such as "You have X draft awards.” (12) will appear.
  • the message is also a hyperlink so that clicking the link will open a Draft awards page. At that location the user can select a draft award to view.
  • the eAwards program If awards have been returned, the eAwards program generates a message, such as "You have X returned awards.” (14) to notify the user.
  • the message is also a hyperlink so that a list of returned awards are displayed on the Draft awards page. Selecting an individual award now displays the Award Information page with the comments from the approver why the award is returned.
  • a user has an option to delete a draft award by, for example, selecting a delete link.
  • a second node with options for further action is the Approve Awards (20) section.
  • One option is Awards Submitted for Approval.
  • This page returns a list of awards that are currently in submitted status and are awaiting approval by the user. Only those award for which the user is designated as having approval authority appear on that users list of awards Submitted for Approval.
  • the user may select the Award Information page for a particular submitted award. Preferably this selection is done in windows based applications by clicking the desired name from the list.
  • the View Award feature is available to a Submitter, Designee,
  • the Maintenance (40) option located at the Welcome page provides further structural links in the eAwards system. Selecting the Maintenance option displays the suboptions.
  • a first suboption is a User Profile page in which users may enter/update contact information.
  • the User Profile also allows a user to select Designees and Approvers if applicable.
  • the Maintenance page also allows selection of an Approver/ Alternate Approver Lookup. That page allows a user to look up employees with an eAwards user account who may be selected as a primary or alternative approver for a given award.
  • there is a Designee Lookup on the Maintenance page The Designee lookup allows a user to look up employees with an eAwards user account to select as a Designee.
  • the Welcome page displays a list of options dependent on each user's profile.
  • Figure 3 indicates which options are displayed for each user type.
  • different user types can have differing privileges for the same option.
  • An important function of the eAwards system is the process of creating the portion for an award on an Award Information page. Criteria for the awards, depending on the organization, can be built into the eAwards system. These criteria include features such as eligibility requirements, fiscal limits, and a recipient's award history. Additionally, some awards may require approval of employees at a certain organizational level. Preferably the eAwards system alerts a user during the creation process if there is a problem with a proposed award as drafted. [0043] In a preferred embodiment, the Create Award section of the Welcome page includes the following steps in creating an award. Under the Create Award section of the Welcome page, a user selects the type of aware from a drop down list.
  • the user activates a Create function by clicking the Create button.
  • the team name is entered.
  • the user Under the Recipient/Recipients section (80), the user enters the social security number of the recipient and the award amount.
  • the information can be displayed by clicking the OK button (82) which activates that function.
  • a reason for the basis of the award is entered in the Basis of Award field (90).
  • the information can be text pasted from another document, such as a Word document. If the award is a contest award, the Contest Type is selected from a list, such as a drop down list.
  • a Finance Number to account for the charge of the award is entered in the Finance Number field (100).
  • Address information related to the recipient is, preferably, automatically loaded into the address fields (110) once the recipient's social security number is entered. If necessary, the address information that is automatically displayed may be updated and corrected in the address fields.
  • a certification statement (120) may be affirmed by checking an OK box.
  • the Award Information page may also include information for the individual who recommended the award.
  • an approver may be selected from the list in the approver box (130).
  • a scroll down menu or search function can assist in viewing and selecting an approver.
  • the US Postal Service is an example of one organization that recognizes a number of awards that can be given to its employees. Among the awards recognized in the USPS Employee Relations Manual are Special Achievement Award, Meritorious Service Award, Distinguished Service Award, Spot Cash ($50 - $2,000), Spot Cash Equivalent, Spot Non-Cash Tangible ($50 - $2,000), VP Own Group, Team Cash Award, Team Cash Equivalent Award, Team Non-Cash Tangible, Exceptional Performance Award (up to $7,000), Contest Award, and Safety Award. It is noted that the eAwards system is suitable for use with teams so that each employee of the team shares in the award. These award types are among those that are built into an eAwards system to be used by the US Postal Service.
  • Print features may be included to the eAwards software.
  • an Award Summary or Award Information Page may be printed.
  • the database may be an Oracle Database (version 8.1.7).
  • Oracle Workflow may be used to manage workflow processes, provide capability to send and receive email messages, and integrate with an Oracle database.
  • an Oracle 91 Application Server (9iAS) may be used to manage login and SSL encryption.
  • the eAwards system may be integrated into that company's or organization's intranet.
  • the eAwards system may be hosted, in part, on an Application Server such as a Sun 4500 which acts as the Oracle 9i Application Server providing JSPs and Java Classes to generate dynamic HTML pages.
  • a database server, such as the Sun 4500 may host the Oracle database and include handling of workflow processes and email processes.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un système et un procédé permettant d'automatiser des programmes d'attribution de prix à des membre du personnel au sein de grandes entreprises. Ce procédé fait intervenir des outils informatiques qui permettent à des utilisateurs situés en divers points de créer un fichier de prix et d'y donner suite. Flexible, le système d'attribution de prix peut être adapté selon les prix ainsi qu'en fonction de critères d'attribution et d'approbation répondant aux besoins de chaque organisation. Un utilisateur habilité à accéder à ce système électronique peut prendre diverses mesures tells que créer un fichier prix (10), visionnner un prix (30), approuver un prix (20), et rejeter un prix, demander un complément d'informations, désigner des tiers chargés d'examiner le prix, et ne pas attribuer de prix. Ce système informatique de prix peut être rendu accessible à des membres du personnel, par exemple via Intranet.
PCT/US2003/017752 2003-03-18 2003-06-05 Systeme et procede electronique d'attribution de prix WO2004084090A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003247491A AU2003247491A1 (en) 2003-03-18 2003-06-05 Electronic awards system and method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US45539003P 2003-03-18 2003-03-18
US60/455,390 2003-03-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004084090A1 true WO2004084090A1 (fr) 2004-09-30

Family

ID=33029992

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2003/017752 WO2004084090A1 (fr) 2003-03-18 2003-06-05 Systeme et procede electronique d'attribution de prix

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2003247491A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004084090A1 (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6061660A (en) * 1997-10-20 2000-05-09 York Eggleston System and method for incentive programs and award fulfillment
US20020120511A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-29 Maritz Inc. System and method for print-on-demand electronic awards for motivation programs
US20020123921A1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2002-09-05 Frazier Charles P. System and method for fulfilling staffing requests
US6609111B1 (en) * 1998-10-22 2003-08-19 Lawrence L. Bell Method and apparatus for modeling and executing deferred award instrument plan

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6061660A (en) * 1997-10-20 2000-05-09 York Eggleston System and method for incentive programs and award fulfillment
US6609111B1 (en) * 1998-10-22 2003-08-19 Lawrence L. Bell Method and apparatus for modeling and executing deferred award instrument plan
US20020120511A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2002-08-29 Maritz Inc. System and method for print-on-demand electronic awards for motivation programs
US20020123921A1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2002-09-05 Frazier Charles P. System and method for fulfilling staffing requests

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2003247491A1 (en) 2004-10-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11763227B2 (en) Reminder system
US7523053B2 (en) Internal audit operations for Sarbanes Oxley compliance
US8005709B2 (en) Continuous audit process control objectives
US7941353B2 (en) Impacted financial statements
US7899693B2 (en) Audit management workbench
US7640165B2 (en) Web based methods and systems for managing compliance assurance information
US8365080B2 (en) Document reminder system
US7337950B2 (en) Transaction workflow and data collection system
US7302436B2 (en) Business workflow database and user system
US7822628B2 (en) System and method for a planner
US8005741B2 (en) Pension administration system and method
US20040260591A1 (en) Business process change administration
US20050138031A1 (en) Systems and methods for assigning task-oriented roles to users
US20060059026A1 (en) Compliance workbench
US20020137015A1 (en) Computer-aided methods and apparatus for assessing an organizational process or system
US20030078798A1 (en) Computerized maintenance management system
US20050209899A1 (en) Segregation of duties reporting
US20060106686A1 (en) Audit procedures and audit steps
US20060089861A1 (en) Survey based risk assessment for processes, entities and enterprise
WO2001097073A1 (fr) Dispositif et procede servant a organiser et a presenter des taches dans un environnement de portail base sur un reseau
US20060074739A1 (en) Identifying risks in conflicting duties
WO2004038556A2 (fr) Procede et dispositif de gestion d'un flux de travail
US20060160059A1 (en) User education and management system and method
JP2011048843A (ja) 企業全体にわたるポリシー管理のシステムおよび方法
US20020124184A1 (en) Method and system for automated request authorization and authority management

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP