WO2004019616A1 - Safety method and apparatus - Google Patents

Safety method and apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004019616A1
WO2004019616A1 PCT/GB2003/003635 GB0303635W WO2004019616A1 WO 2004019616 A1 WO2004019616 A1 WO 2004019616A1 GB 0303635 W GB0303635 W GB 0303635W WO 2004019616 A1 WO2004019616 A1 WO 2004019616A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
image
zone
image data
current image
difference
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2003/003635
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Nicholas John Flowers
Richard Louis Mansfield
Original Assignee
Scyron Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scyron Limited filed Critical Scyron Limited
Priority to AU2003255821A priority Critical patent/AU2003255821A1/en
Publication of WO2004019616A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004019616A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
    • G08B13/194Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
    • G08B13/196Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
    • G08B13/19602Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
    • G08B13/194Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
    • G08B13/196Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
    • G08B13/19602Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction
    • G08B13/19604Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction involving reference image or background adaptation with time to compensate for changing conditions, e.g. reference image update on detection of light level change
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
    • G08B13/194Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
    • G08B13/196Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
    • G08B13/19697Arrangements wherein non-video detectors generate an alarm themselves
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/18Closed-circuit television [CCTV] systems, i.e. systems in which the video signal is not broadcast
    • H04N7/188Capturing isolated or intermittent images triggered by the occurrence of a predetermined event, e.g. an object reaching a predetermined position
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00Details of television systems
    • H04N5/14Picture signal circuitry for video frequency region
    • H04N5/144Movement detection

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a safety method and apparatus. Specifically, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for monitoring a particular zone, for example a hazardous or restricted access zone, and providing a signal when a presence is detected in such hazardous or restricted access zone.
  • a particular zone for example a hazardous or restricted access zone
  • Equipment/zone guarding to prevent the risk of worker injury or to prevent entry by an intruder is regulated according to strict legislative standards in most countries.
  • Application areas are many and various, and include, but are not restricted to, perimeter guarding for industrial robots, machinery, hazardous fluid areas, hot areas, electrical hazard areas, radiation hazard areas and point-of-access guarding for automated machine assemblies.
  • perimeter guarding for industrial robots, machinery, hazardous fluid areas, hot areas, electrical hazard areas, radiation hazard areas and point-of-access guarding for automated machine assemblies As safety standards in the workplace become ever more stringent, the demand for more technically advanced and more secure products increases.
  • Typical guards include an assortment of components and systems designed to protect industrial machinery and/or its operators from hazards such as the examples given above. It is a requirement that such guards be relatively simple in terms of activation as deployment time is a critical factor in assuring operator and/or equipment safety.
  • Light guards typically use a photoelectric transmitter which projects a suitably configured array of synchronised, parallel light beams (a "light curtain") in the vicinity of the equipment or area to be guarded.
  • the beams which are typically in the infrared region, are normally detected by suitably placed detectors.
  • the light-curtain controller activates an emergency condition, for example sending an emergency stop signal to the guarded equipment.
  • pressure-sensitive devices may be similarly employed.
  • the devices are typically placed in one or more locations around the zone/machine to be monitored, an emergency condition being activated once a device is tripped.
  • the monitoring region of a light-curtain device is typically planar ("flat-face monitoring") .
  • Such devices are consequently inflexible, and are difficult to configure for different spatial arrangements.
  • a number of separate light curtains must be deployed.
  • alignment of the devices is complex and difficult.
  • pressure-sensitive devices a large number of devices must be provided in order to provide satisfactory equipment/zone monitoring.
  • the sensor arrangements must also be robust enough for local deployment in an often-inhospitable industrial environment .
  • the apparatus/method should also be amenable to automation, networking and centralised monitoring, and should be resistant to removal/avoidance .
  • a method for monitoring at least one zone comprising the steps of a) capturing a current image of the at least one zone; b) analysing the at least one current image in order to derive current image data representative of the current image; c) comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image; and d) generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
  • an apparatus for monitoring at least one zone comprising: a) means for capturing a current image of the at least one zone; b) means for analysing the at least one current image in order to derive current image data representative of the current image; c) means for comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image; and d) means for generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
  • the image may be captured using a digital or analogue camera.
  • the image may be a visible image, an infra-red image or any other suitable image.
  • Step c) may include the additional step of analysing any difference that exists between the current image data and historical image data, the alarm condition of step d) being generated according to whether the difference fulfils certain predetermined criteria.
  • difference criteria may be adaptable in real time and will depend on the particular application.
  • the difference criteria may be selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, object temperature, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone to be monitored and previous history of the intruder (such as where he has come from and how long he has been there) .
  • the at least one zone to be monitored may contain a hazard such as for example hazardous equipment, material or fluid, temperature levels, gas, radiation or similar.
  • a hazard such as for example hazardous equipment, material or fluid, temperature levels, gas, radiation or similar.
  • the at least one zone may be an environmentally controlled zone, disturbance of which may jeopardise a sensitive operation, for example a manufacturing operation.
  • the alarm condition may include the generating of an audible and/or visible alarm signal.
  • the alarm condition may include one or more of the steps of disabling or restricting access to equipment or one or more zones, cutting off power to equipment, putting on standby of equipment or the initiation of any other safety or security procedure.
  • Step c) may include the sub-steps of deriving a present weighted reference image using a plurality of previous historical images of the at least one zone; forming a difference image which represents the difference between the current image and the present weighted reference image; dividing the difference image into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel; calculating at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell; and determining whether the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a view from above of a piece of hazardous equipment to be monitored, with no obtruding presence;
  • Figure 3 shows a difference image between Figure 2 and a reference image;
  • Figure 4 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 3 and a reference image
  • Figure 5 is a view from above of the equipment of Figures 2 to 4, this time with an obtruding presence;
  • Figure 6 shows a difference image between Figure 5 and a reference image
  • Figure 7 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 6 and a reference image.
  • a camera 1 is placed above the area to be monitored.
  • the zone 2 to be monitored is defined with reference to the image captured by the camera.
  • the area to be monitored may contain, for example, a piece of hazardous equipment 3.
  • the camera 1 captures a current image 4 of the zone.
  • Image processing and analysis means 5 are provided, in which data representative of the current image 4 are compared with historical image data representative of at least one previous image 6.
  • An alarm response 7 is generated depending on the result of the comparison.
  • the camera 1 may be optical (i.e., responsive to visible radiation) , infrared and/or responsive to one or more further wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum and, depending on environmental requirements, may be for example weatherproof or waterproof.
  • the use of a camera allows large zones to be simultaneously monitored, and also allows multiple monitoring zones so that, for example, equipment with rotating, moving or otherwise hazardous parts (such as lathes, presses, conveyor belts, etc.) may be selectively monitored.
  • the camera image is initially analysed and the zones to be monitored are designated by defining a virtual boundary around the zones.
  • the image signal from the camera passes to processing means (such as a suitably programmed computer) , which analyses the image.
  • Data derived from the image are compared with data derived from at least one historical image. From this comparison, the size, shape, direction of movement and/or nature of any obtruding object can be determined. Any difference in image is compared against pre-defined criteria and an alarm response generated as determined.
  • this approach allows, for example, discrimination between an insignificant object (such as an insect) and a significant object (such as a hand) obtruding into the monitored zone.
  • the alarm response may typically be the sounding of an alarm signal, the lighting of an alarm indicator panel, and/or the shutting down of hazardous equipment, or any other required response.
  • the difference criteria may be adaptable in real time and will depend on the particular application.
  • the difference criteria may be selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone to be monitored and previous history of the intruder (such as where he has come from and how long he has been there) .
  • an object 8 such as a hand is shown obtruding into the monitored zone 2.
  • An image 9 of the obtruding portion appears in the current captured image 4.
  • data representing this current image are compared with data representing one or more historical images (e.g. 6) and, if the result of this comparison fulfils particular criteria, an alarm response 7 is generated.
  • a "present weighted reference image” is derived using a plurality of previous historical images of a scene.
  • a difference image is formed which represents the difference between the current image and the present weighted reference image.
  • the difference image is divided into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel, and at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell are calculated.
  • a significant change of scene is detected when the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
  • Figure 2 is a view from above of a piece of hazardous equipment to be monitored, with no obtruding presence.
  • Figure 3 is a corresponding difference image showing the monitoring zone 2.
  • Figure 4 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 3 and a reference image.
  • the reference image may be substantially identical to that of Figures 2 and 3.
  • the reference image may be derived from a plurality of previous historical images - this approach is particularly useful when monitoring a sudden obtrusion into a zone which is gradually changing, and is described more fully in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB02/00762 "Method of Detecting A Significant Change of Scene", previously discussed.
  • Figure 5 is a view from above of the equipment of Figures 2 to 4, this time with an obtruding presence 4 in the monitored zone 2, and Figure 6 is a corresponding difference image.
  • Figure 7 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 6 and a reference image. The obtruding presence 4 in the monitored zone 2 can clearly be seen in Figure 7, and this will trigger the required alarm response.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)

Abstract

At least one zone (2) is monitored by capturing a current image (4) of the at least one zone (2), analysing the at least one current image (4) in order to derive current image data representative of the current image (4), comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6), and generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.

Description

SAFETY METHOD AND APPARATUS
The invention relates to a safety method and apparatus. Specifically, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for monitoring a particular zone, for example a hazardous or restricted access zone, and providing a signal when a presence is detected in such hazardous or restricted access zone.
Equipment/zone guarding to prevent the risk of worker injury or to prevent entry by an intruder is regulated according to strict legislative standards in most countries. Application areas are many and various, and include, but are not restricted to, perimeter guarding for industrial robots, machinery, hazardous fluid areas, hot areas, electrical hazard areas, radiation hazard areas and point-of-access guarding for automated machine assemblies. As safety standards in the workplace become ever more stringent, the demand for more technically advanced and more secure products increases.
Typical guards include an assortment of components and systems designed to protect industrial machinery and/or its operators from hazards such as the examples given above. It is a requirement that such guards be relatively simple in terms of activation as deployment time is a critical factor in assuring operator and/or equipment safety.
Typical technologies used are, for example, photoelectric sensors ("light guards") and pressure-sensitive devices. Light guards typically use a photoelectric transmitter which projects a suitably configured array of synchronised, parallel light beams (a "light curtain") in the vicinity of the equipment or area to be guarded. The beams, which are typically in the infrared region, are normally detected by suitably placed detectors. When one or more of the beams is interrupted, the light-curtain controller activates an emergency condition, for example sending an emergency stop signal to the guarded equipment. Alternatively, pressure-sensitive devices may be similarly employed.
The devices are typically placed in one or more locations around the zone/machine to be monitored, an emergency condition being activated once a device is tripped.
The abovementioned devices have various drawbacks. For example, the monitoring region of a light-curtain device is typically planar ("flat-face monitoring") . Such devices are consequently inflexible, and are difficult to configure for different spatial arrangements. Furthermore, should it be desired to monitor plural approaches to a region or piece of equipment, a number of separate light curtains must be deployed. In addition, alignment of the devices is complex and difficult. When using pressure-sensitive devices, a large number of devices must be provided in order to provide satisfactory equipment/zone monitoring. Furthermore, it might be possible, for example, to jump or fall into the danger zone without having triggered the sensor. The sensor arrangements must also be robust enough for local deployment in an often-inhospitable industrial environment .
There is therefore a requirement for an improved safety method and apparatus avoiding the above disadvantages. In particular, there is a requirement for such a method and apparatus that is simple, reliable, rapid in its operation, fail-safe, rugged (for example, weatherproof, waterproof and/or environment-proof) , portable and easy to install, deploy and use. There is an additional requirement for such a method and apparatus that is versatile, so that it can be used in guarding equipment, zones or hazards of various shapes and sizes, and in addition has the ability simultaneously to monitor different regions. In addition, there is a requirement for the regions to be capable of rapid redesignation, for example by programming. There is a further requirement for the equipment to be capable of deployment in a number of different positions and/or orientations with respect to the zone/item to be guarded. Further requirements are the ability to discriminate between objects, for example between persons and products (muting) , and also the ability to recognise different items such as fingers, hands, limbs and bodies. The apparatus/method should also be amenable to automation, networking and centralised monitoring, and should be resistant to removal/avoidance .
It is an object of the present invention to fulfil one or more of the above requirements.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for monitoring at least one zone, the method comprising the steps of a) capturing a current image of the at least one zone; b) analysing the at least one current image in order to derive current image data representative of the current image; c) comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image; and d) generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus for monitoring at least one zone, the apparatus comprising: a) means for capturing a current image of the at least one zone; b) means for analysing the at least one current image in order to derive current image data representative of the current image; c) means for comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image; and d) means for generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
The image may be captured using a digital or analogue camera. The image may be a visible image, an infra-red image or any other suitable image.
Step c) may include the additional step of analysing any difference that exists between the current image data and historical image data, the alarm condition of step d) being generated according to whether the difference fulfils certain predetermined criteria. Such difference criteria may be adaptable in real time and will depend on the particular application. The difference criteria may be selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, object temperature, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone to be monitored and previous history of the intruder (such as where he has come from and how long he has been there) .
The at least one zone to be monitored may contain a hazard such as for example hazardous equipment, material or fluid, temperature levels, gas, radiation or similar. Alternatively, the at least one zone may be an environmentally controlled zone, disturbance of which may jeopardise a sensitive operation, for example a manufacturing operation.
The alarm condition may include the generating of an audible and/or visible alarm signal. Alternatively, or in addition, the alarm condition may include one or more of the steps of disabling or restricting access to equipment or one or more zones, cutting off power to equipment, putting on standby of equipment or the initiation of any other safety or security procedure. Step c) may include the sub-steps of deriving a present weighted reference image using a plurality of previous historical images of the at least one zone; forming a difference image which represents the difference between the current image and the present weighted reference image; dividing the difference image into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel; calculating at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell; and determining whether the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
For a better understanding of the present invention and to show more clearly how it may be carried into effect reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings which show schematically various embodiments of the present invention. The figures are not to scale.
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a view from above of a piece of hazardous equipment to be monitored, with no obtruding presence; Figure 3 shows a difference image between Figure 2 and a reference image;
Figure 4 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 3 and a reference image;
Figure 5 is a view from above of the equipment of Figures 2 to 4, this time with an obtruding presence;
Figure 6 shows a difference image between Figure 5 and a reference image; and
Figure 7 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 6 and a reference image.
In Figure 1, a camera 1 is placed above the area to be monitored. The zone 2 to be monitored is defined with reference to the image captured by the camera. The area to be monitored may contain, for example, a piece of hazardous equipment 3. The camera 1 captures a current image 4 of the zone. Image processing and analysis means 5 are provided, in which data representative of the current image 4 are compared with historical image data representative of at least one previous image 6. An alarm response 7 is generated depending on the result of the comparison. The camera 1 may be optical (i.e., responsive to visible radiation) , infrared and/or responsive to one or more further wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum and, depending on environmental requirements, may be for example weatherproof or waterproof. The use of a camera allows large zones to be simultaneously monitored, and also allows multiple monitoring zones so that, for example, equipment with rotating, moving or otherwise hazardous parts (such as lathes, presses, conveyor belts, etc.) may be selectively monitored. The camera image is initially analysed and the zones to be monitored are designated by defining a virtual boundary around the zones. The image signal from the camera passes to processing means (such as a suitably programmed computer) , which analyses the image. Data derived from the image are compared with data derived from at least one historical image. From this comparison, the size, shape, direction of movement and/or nature of any obtruding object can be determined. Any difference in image is compared against pre-defined criteria and an alarm response generated as determined. Subject to the defining of relevant criteria, this approach allows, for example, discrimination between an insignificant object (such as an insect) and a significant object (such as a hand) obtruding into the monitored zone. The alarm response may typically be the sounding of an alarm signal, the lighting of an alarm indicator panel, and/or the shutting down of hazardous equipment, or any other required response.
The difference criteria may be adaptable in real time and will depend on the particular application. The difference criteria may be selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone to be monitored and previous history of the intruder (such as where he has come from and how long he has been there) .
In Figure 1, an object 8 such as a hand is shown obtruding into the monitored zone 2. An image 9 of the obtruding portion appears in the current captured image 4. In a comparison and analysis step 5, data representing this current image are compared with data representing one or more historical images (e.g. 6) and, if the result of this comparison fulfils particular criteria, an alarm response 7 is generated.
A particularly advantageous, but not exclusive, method of comparing current and historical images and determining whether an alarm response is required is described in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB02/00762 "Method of Detecting A Significant Change of Scene", the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference. In the method according to this application, a "present weighted reference image" is derived using a plurality of previous historical images of a scene. A difference image is formed which represents the difference between the current image and the present weighted reference image. The difference image is divided into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel, and at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell are calculated. A significant change of scene is detected when the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
Figure 2 is a view from above of a piece of hazardous equipment to be monitored, with no obtruding presence.
Figure 3 is a corresponding difference image showing the monitoring zone 2. Figure 4 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 3 and a reference image. In this case, the reference image may be substantially identical to that of Figures 2 and 3. In other applications, however, the reference image may be derived from a plurality of previous historical images - this approach is particularly useful when monitoring a sudden obtrusion into a zone which is gradually changing, and is described more fully in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB02/00762 "Method of Detecting A Significant Change of Scene", previously discussed.
Figure 5 is a view from above of the equipment of Figures 2 to 4, this time with an obtruding presence 4 in the monitored zone 2, and Figure 6 is a corresponding difference image. Figure 7 is a processed image showing the calculated difference between Figure 6 and a reference image. The obtruding presence 4 in the monitored zone 2 can clearly be seen in Figure 7, and this will trigger the required alarm response.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring at least one zone (2), the method characterised by comprising the steps of a) capturing a current image (4) of the at least one zone (2) ; b) analysing the at least one current image (4) in order to derive current image data representative of the current image (4); c) comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6); and d) generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
2. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the image (4) is captured using a camera (1) .
3. A method according to claim 2, characterised in that the camera (1) is a digital camera.
4. A method according to claim 2, characterised in that the camera (1) is an analogue camera.
5. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the image (4) is a visible image.
6. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the image (4) is an infra-red image.
7. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the step of comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6) includes the additional step of analysing any difference that exists between the current image data and historical image data.
8. A method according to claim 7, characterised in that the alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison is generated according to whether the difference fulfils certain predetermined criteria.
9. A method according to claim 8, characterised in that the criteria are adaptable in real time.
10. A method according to claim 8 or 9, characterised in that the criteria depend on the particular application.
11. A method according to claim 8, 9 or 10, characterised in that the criteria are selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, object temperature, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone (2) to be monitored and previous history of the movements of an intruder.
12. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the at least one zone (2) to be monitored contains a hazard (3) .
13. A method according to claim 12, characterised in that the hazard (3) is selected from hazardous equipment, material or fluid, temperature levels, gas, or radiation.
14. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterised in that the at least one zone (2) to be monitored is an environmentally controlled zone.
15. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the alarm condition includes the generating of an audible alarm signal.
16. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the alarm condition includes the generating of a visible alarm signal.
17. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the alarm condition includes one or more of the steps of disabling or restricting access to equipment or one or more zones, cutting off power to equipment, putting on standby of equipment, and the initiation of any other safety or security procedure.
18. A method according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the step of comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6) includes the sub-steps of: deriving a present weighted reference image using a plurality of previous historical images of the at least one zone (2) ; forming a difference image which represents the difference between the current image (4) and the present weighted reference image; dividing the difference image into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel; calculating at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell; and determining whether the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
19. An apparatus for monitoring at least one zone (2), the apparatus comprising: a) means (1) for capturing a current image (4) of the at least one zone (2); b) means (5) for analysing the at least one current image (4) in order to derive current image data representative of the current image (4) ; c) means for comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6); and d) means (7) for generating an alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison.
20. An apparatus as claimed in claim 19, characterised in that a camera (1) is used to capture the image.
21. An apparatus as claimed in claim 20, characterised in that the camera (1) is a digital camera.
22. An apparatus as claimed in claim 20, characterised in that the camera (1) is an analogue camera.
23. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 22, characterised in that the image (4) is a visible image .
24. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 23, characterised in that the image (4) is an infra-red image.
25. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 24, characterised in that the means (5) for comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6) includes the additional means for analysing any difference that exists between the current image data and historical image data.
26. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25, characterised in that the alarm condition dependent on the result of the comparison is generated according to whether the difference fulfils certain predetermined criteria.
27. An apparatus as claimed in claim 26, characterised in that the criteria are adaptable in real time.
28. An apparatus as claimed in claim 26 or 27, characterised in that the criteria depend on the particular application.
29. An apparatus as claimed in claim 26, 27 or 28, characterised in that the criteria are selected from one or more of object size, object shape, object movement, object temperature, direction of movement, speed, colour information, approach zones around the zone (2) to be monitored and previous history of the movements of an intruder.
30. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 29, characterised in that the at least one zone (2) to be monitored contains a hazard (3) .
31. An apparatus as claimed in claim 30, characterised in that the hazard (3) is selected from hazardous equipment, material or fluid, temperature levels, gas, or radiation.
32. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 29, characterised in that the at least one zone (2) to be monitored is an environmentally controlled zone.
33. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to
32, characterised in that the alarm condition includes means (7) for generating an audible alarm signal.
34. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to
33, characterised in that the alarm condition includes means (7) for generating a visible alarm signal.
35. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 34, characterised in that the alarm condition includes one or more means (7) for disabling or restricting access to equipment or one or more zones, cutting off power to equipment, putting on standby of equipment, and the initiation of any other safety or security procedure.
36. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 19 to 35, characterised in that the means for comparing the current image data with historical image data representative of at least one corresponding previous image (6) includes: means for deriving a present weighted reference image using a plurality of previous historical images of the at least one zone (2) ; means for forming a difference image which represents the difference between the current image (4) and the present weighted reference image; means for dividing the difference image into a defined number of cells dimensioned such that each cell is more than one pixel; means for calculating at least one of mean and variance values of the pixel intensity of each cell; and means for determining whether the calculated values exceed preset corresponding trigger threshold values.
PCT/GB2003/003635 2002-08-20 2003-08-20 Safety method and apparatus WO2004019616A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003255821A AU2003255821A1 (en) 2002-08-20 2003-08-20 Safety method and apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0219370.4 2002-08-20
GB0219370A GB0219370D0 (en) 2002-08-20 2002-08-20 Safety method and apparatus

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004019616A1 true WO2004019616A1 (en) 2004-03-04

Family

ID=9942651

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2003/003635 WO2004019616A1 (en) 2002-08-20 2003-08-20 Safety method and apparatus

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2003255821A1 (en)
GB (1) GB0219370D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004019616A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014152923A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for producing anomaly images

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997007486A1 (en) * 1995-08-21 1997-02-27 Prism Video, Inc. Event monitoring
US5956424A (en) * 1996-12-23 1999-09-21 Esco Electronics Corporation Low false alarm rate detection for a video image processing based security alarm system
EP0944260A2 (en) * 1998-03-18 1999-09-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Remote image monitoring method & system & recording medium used for executing image monitoring
EP1184810A2 (en) * 1996-02-05 2002-03-06 Texas Instruments Incorporated Improvements in or relating to motion event detection
WO2002045434A1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2002-06-06 Vigilos, Inc. System and method for processing video data utilizing motion detection and subdivided video fields

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997007486A1 (en) * 1995-08-21 1997-02-27 Prism Video, Inc. Event monitoring
EP1184810A2 (en) * 1996-02-05 2002-03-06 Texas Instruments Incorporated Improvements in or relating to motion event detection
US5956424A (en) * 1996-12-23 1999-09-21 Esco Electronics Corporation Low false alarm rate detection for a video image processing based security alarm system
EP0944260A2 (en) * 1998-03-18 1999-09-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Remote image monitoring method & system & recording medium used for executing image monitoring
WO2002045434A1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2002-06-06 Vigilos, Inc. System and method for processing video data utilizing motion detection and subdivided video fields

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014152923A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for producing anomaly images

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2003255821A1 (en) 2004-03-11
GB0219370D0 (en) 2002-09-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20200164516A1 (en) Robot control method
KR102136070B1 (en) Disaster and Accident Prevention Device in Construction site using AI image analysis
US7768549B2 (en) Machine safety system with mutual exclusion zone
US9489730B2 (en) Method and device for safeguarding a hazardous working area of an automated machine
EP1598792B1 (en) Infrared safety systems and methods
US7167575B1 (en) Video safety detector with projected pattern
CN111226178B (en) Monitoring device, industrial system, method for monitoring and computer program
US7924164B1 (en) Method for sensing the presence of a human body part within a region of a machine tool
US6469734B1 (en) Video safety detector with shadow elimination
US7065241B2 (en) Method for monitoring a detection region of a working element
US7746236B2 (en) Fire detection system and method
EP3112900B1 (en) Safety system and method to detect a risk condition in a region to be monitored placed close to an operating machine, such as a drilling machine or the like
CN101018973A (en) Device and method for safeguarding a machine-controlled handling device
JP2003222295A (en) Method and device for controlling safety-related function of machine
CN108068140A (en) For being applied to the device and method on object
KR101619307B1 (en) Protection system of guard post for military
JPH05261692A (en) Working environment monitoring device for robot
CA2943863A1 (en) Method for automated control of a machine component
EP2685150B2 (en) Monitoring system and method
WO2004019616A1 (en) Safety method and apparatus
US11187378B2 (en) Power tool safety system
CN109314859A (en) Methods, devices and systems for security control
DE202004019536U1 (en) Safety system for machine tools or robots comprises IR beam system which produces alarm if object enters outer area, light grid system shutting machine down if object is detected in inner area
Burton Industrial Robotics: Hazards, Accidents, Safety Application
CN109716010A (en) Security component and warehousing system for warehousing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP