WO2003058385A2 - Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables - Google Patents

Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003058385A2
WO2003058385A2 PCT/US2002/040369 US0240369W WO03058385A2 WO 2003058385 A2 WO2003058385 A2 WO 2003058385A2 US 0240369 W US0240369 W US 0240369W WO 03058385 A2 WO03058385 A2 WO 03058385A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
emissions
energy
energy savings
reductions
program
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/040369
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2003058385A3 (fr
Inventor
Franklin D. Raines
Robert J. Sahadi
Kenneth Berlin
Michelle Desiderio
Scott Lesmes
Marcia Gowen Trump
Jay Hall
Craig Ebert
Matt Howes
Dean Gamble
Original Assignee
Fannie Mae
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fannie Mae filed Critical Fannie Mae
Priority to EP02794286A priority Critical patent/EP1470508A4/fr
Priority to CA002471942A priority patent/CA2471942A1/fr
Priority to JP2003558634A priority patent/JP2005514694A/ja
Priority to MXPA04006331A priority patent/MXPA04006331A/es
Priority to AU2002359731A priority patent/AU2002359731A1/en
Publication of WO2003058385A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003058385A2/fr
Publication of WO2003058385A3 publication Critical patent/WO2003058385A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to, and is entitled to the benefit of the earlier filing date and priority of United States Provisional Application Serial No. 60/342,843, filed December 28, 2001 , which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application also relates to United States Provisional Application Serial No. 60/342,853, filed December 28, 2001 and entitled "System and Method for Residential Emissions Trading.”
  • the present invention relates to a system and method of quantifying tradable residential emission reductions.
  • a Utah Division of Air Quality program provided for companies to earn emissions credits for SO 2 and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) reductions.
  • Massachusetts implemented a retail choice pilot program for residential and small business customers who purchased "green power" from solar and less- polluting power plants. Depending on the price that customers would pay for green power, the suppliers would retire a certain amount of SO 2 emissions credits.
  • ERCs Emission Reduction Credits
  • GHG greenhouse gases
  • the measurement and verification (M&V) system of the present invention provides a novel system and method for promoting increased energy savings, which may be an actual reduction in electricity use (kWh), electric demand (kW), or thermal units (Btu), and reduced energy use at the level of the individual residential consumer. Increased residential energy efficiency may reduce energy consumption for electricity, natural gas, oil, and other energy sources.
  • Nitrox nitrogen oxides
  • VOCs volatile organic compounds
  • SO x sulfur oxides
  • PM particulate matter
  • CO carbon monoxide
  • GSG greenhouse gases
  • CO 2 carbon dioxide
  • CH methane
  • the SCQAMD's programs provide alternate methods of compliance with local emission reduction regulations.
  • Rule 2506 established a voluntary program that encourages replacement of old, higher- emitting equipment (area sources) with lower-polluting technology.
  • the Rule 2506 program generates low-cost emissions credits termed Area Source Credits (ASCs).
  • Area sources include water heaters, home heaters, clothes dryers, and small boilers.
  • the present invention also contemplates the replacement of such residential area sources, but in contrast to the Rule 2506 program, does not require the homeowner to submit a complicated plan for eligibility.
  • the Rule 2506 plain requires, among other components, a Protocol for Emission Reduction Quantification, Documentation of the Occurrence and Extent of the Emission Reduction, Credit Calculation, and a Compliance Verification Report with annual certification signed under penalty of perjury.
  • the present invention substantially reduces these transaction costs for the homeowner by taking care of such complexities at an administrative level.
  • a utility displacement credit is a type of emission credit that can be granted by the governing regulatory agency to entities that take actions that allow the utility to avoid delivery of power. Precedent is found under Clean Air Act programs. For example, a residence or industrial operation that generates its own power removes its demand from the grid. This reduction allows the utility to incrementally reduce its power generation which, in turn, results in an incremental emission reduction from power generating sources at the utility.
  • a residential emissions trading program that reduces or eliminates these hurdles is disclosed in Assignee's co-pending United States Provisional Patent Application Number 60/342,853, filed December 28, 2001 and entitled "System and Method for Residential Emissions Trading," which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • This system and method may employ a M&V protocol of the present invention. M&V is the process of determining savings using a quantifying methodology. Alternatively, any other suitable quantification, measurement, and/or verification means may be employed.
  • This program may aggregate emissions reductions through a number of mechanisms, such as direct purchase from homeowners, as a side transaction to mortgaging energy efficient homes, or by coordinating with other entities that are already in a role of aggregating customers (i.e., multi- family building owners, energy service companies, and utility companies). Emissions reductions from individual homes are insignificant when measured alone but, when aggregated, can have substantial environmental and financial value. Aggregating can provide individual homeowners with a mechanism to add value to individual actions through collective action. Aggregating the emission reductions can also reduce the per pound transaction cost of an emissions reduction program and improve the potential to secure recognition for utility reduction credits and residential emissions savings.
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide credible monitoring and verification procedures for various potential energy efficiency programs in order to:
  • the residential energy savings may be captured in the emissions reductions realized by utility companies that generate less power.
  • upgrades in residential appliances - for example, changing a fuel oil-powered device to a solar-powered device - may produce direct emissions reductions.
  • the residential reductions in SO x , NO x , CO 2 , VOC, etc., emissions may be captured in tradable credits.
  • emissions reductions may be generated both by the residential upgrade and the utility's generation of less power.
  • an emissions trading initiative may support a GHG emissions trading market for emissions reductions from efficient energy use and fuel switching in residential buildings.
  • the resulting residential emissions reductions may be bundled into an emissions pool and sold into an emissions trading market.
  • an M&V protocol ensures that the energy reductions from an energy efficiency measure are quantified as accurately as practicable. Quantification protocols ensure that the emission reductions are reliably ascertained.
  • a rigorous M&V program provides assurance to potential parties in the emission trading market that reductions - and most important credits - are both actual and quantifiable. M&V protocols, therefore, have become an important part of many emissions trading markets.
  • the energy consumption with the energy efficiency program may be subtracted from the energy consumption without the energy efficiency program, giving the energy savings from the program.
  • Energy consumption is calculated from a number of measurable variables and their associated measurement techniques.
  • the present invention contemplates quantifying the following aspects of a given energy efficiency (or emissions reduction) project:
  • the present invention has many potential benefits. Energy costs are typically the second largest cost for homeowners.
  • the present invention when implemented in an emissions trading program such as that disclosed in Assignee's co-pending application for a "System and Method for Residential Emissions Trading," provides incentives to invest in energy efficiency that will save the homeowner money. It has been estimated, for example, that an efficient house can save 30% on annual energy bills.
  • the present invention improves the stability of the emissions credits - a valuable new commodity - and also helps to decrease the costs associated with energy efficiency.
  • an innovative method for quantifying residential emissions reductions comprising the steps of: measuring an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties; calculating an emissions reduction resulting from the energy savings; and aggregating a plurality of the emissions reductions into a tradable commodity.
  • the step of calculating an emissions reduction may further comprise calculating a reduction in emissions of one or more compounds.
  • the one or more compounds may be selected from the group consisting of: SO 2 , NOx, and GHGs.
  • the method may further comprise the step of monitoring the residential energy savings opportunities.
  • the method may further comprise the step of monitoring the quantification of the emissions reduction.
  • the method may further comprise the step of verifying the quantification of the emissions reduction.
  • the method for quantifying residential emissions reductions comprises the steps of: estimating an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties; calculating an emissions reduction resulting from the energy savings; aggregating a plurality of the emissions reductions into a tradable commodity; monitoring the residential energy savings opportunity; monitoring the quantification of the emissions reduction; and verifying the quantification of the emissions reduction.
  • the step of estimating an energy savings may further comprise the step of estimating energy saved by one or more energy efficiency upgrades selected from the group consisting of: replacement of an appliance; upgrade of a domestic water heating system; upgrade of a heating system; upgrade of an air conditioning system; modification to lighting; fuel switching; and whole home renovation.
  • the step of aggregating a plurality of the emissions reductions may further comprise the step of aggregating the emissions reductions produced by the one or more energy efficiency upgrades into a tradable commodity.
  • the step of aggregating the emissions reductions may further comprise the step of pooling the emissions reductions, or alternatively, converting the emissions reductions into one or more emissions trading credits.
  • the step of calculating an emissions reduction resulting from the energy savings may further comprise the step of calculating a forecasted emissions reduction.
  • the step of calculating a forecasted emissions reduction may further comprise the steps of: estimating a forecasted baseline energy use for the energy savings opportunity; estimating a forecasted baseline emissions factor for the energy savings opportunity; calculating a forecasted baseline emissions by multiplying the forecasted baseline energy use with the forecasted baseline emissions factor; estimating a forecasted program energy use for the energy savings opportunity; estimating a forecasted program emissions factor for the energy savings opportunity; calculating a forecasted program emissions by multiplying the forecasted program energy use with the forecasted program emissions factor; and calculating a forecasted emissions reduction by subtracting the forecasted program emissions from the forecasted baseline emissions.
  • the method may further comprise the step of calculating a tradable portion of the forecasted emissions reduction.
  • the step of calculating a tradable portion of the forecasted emissions reduction may further comprise the step of quantifying a TCF for the energy savings opportunity.
  • the step of quantifying a TCF may further comprise the steps of: identifying a risk factor for energy savings estimates; identifying a risk factor for emissions factor estimates; identifying an adjustment factor; and determining the TCF by its relationship to the sum of the risk factor for energy savings estimates, the risk factor for emissions factor estimates, and the adjustment factor.
  • the method may further comprising the steps of: multiplying the TCF with the emissions reduction to obtain the tradable portion of the emissions reduction, wherein the remaining portion of the emissions reduction is non-tradable; and holding the non-tradable portion in reserve for possible conversion into a tradable commodity.
  • the method may also comprise the step of converting any portion of the non-tradable portion into a tradable commodity.
  • the step of calculating a forecasted emissions reduction may further comprise the steps of: calculating a plurality of annual forecasted emissions reductions for the residential energy savings opportunities; and summing the plurality of annual forecasted emissions reductions to determine a lifetime emissions reduction estimate for the residential savings opportunities.
  • the step of monitoring the residential savings opportunity may further comprise the steps of: compiling data on the energy savings collected at a facility; and managing the energy savings data.
  • the step of verifying the quantification of the emissions reduction may further comprise the steps of: calculating a measured emissions reduction; and comparing the measured emissions reduction to a forecasted emissions reduction.
  • the step of calculating a measured emissions reduction may further comprise the step of collecting data for the energy savings opportunity.
  • the step of calculating a measured emissions reduction may further comprise the steps of: estimating a measured baseline energy use for the energy savings opportunity; estimating a measured baseline emissions factor for the energy savings opportunity; calculating a measured baseline emissions by multiplying the measured baseline energy use with the measured baseline emissions factor; estimating a measured program energy use for the energy savings opportunity; estimating a measured program emissions factor for the energy savings opportunity; calculating a measured program emissions by multiplying the measured program energy use with the measured program emissions factor; and calculating a measured emissions reduction by subtracting the measured program emissions from the measured baseline emissions.
  • the steps of estimating a measured baseline energy use and estimating a measured program energy use may be selected from one or more of the group consisting of conducting: on-site inspection; metering; sub- metering; utility bill analysis; and engineering modeling.
  • the step of conducting engineering modeling may further comprise the step of utilizing one or more of: engineering calculations and computer simulation.
  • the step of conducting engineering modeling may further comprise the step of conducting one or more of: degree day analysis; bin analysis; hourly analysis; and time-step analysis.
  • the method for quantifying a tradable emissions commodity comprises the steps of: offering a plurality of residential energy efficiency programs, wherein the energy efficiency programs comprise a plurality of residential energy savings opportunities; estimating an energy savings resulting from the plurality of residential energy savings opportunities; calculating emissions reductions resulting from the energy savings; aggregating the emissions reductions into a tradable commodity; monitoring the residential energy savings opportunities; monitoring the quantification of the emissions reductions; and verifying the quantification of the tradable emissions reductions to produce a tradable commodity.
  • the plurality of residential energy efficiency programs may be offered by one or more emissions trading partners.
  • the step of verifying the quantification of the tradable emissions reductions may further comprise the step of producing a commodity that is tradable on national and international emissions trading markets.
  • the method may further comprise the step of offering to a market one or more of the tradable commodities.
  • the step of offering to a market one or more of the tradable commodities may further comprise the step of managing one or more transactions of the tradable commodities in the market.
  • Fig. 1 is a flow chart depicting a method of quantifying reductions in residential pollution emissions according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart depicting a method of estimating an energy savings, calculating an emissions reduction, aggregating emissions reductions, monitoring the residential energy savings opportunities, and monitoring and verifying the quantification of the emissions reductions according to an another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a flow chart depicting the steps of measuring an energy savings according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a flow chart depicting the steps of calculating an emissions reduction from an energy savings according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 5 is a graph depicting greenhouse gas add-on sampling versus creditable emissions according to prior art M&V programs.
  • Fig. 6 is a graph depicting baseline and program emissions with emission reductions according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 7 is a flow chart depicting forecasted baseline and program emissions according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 8 is a flow chart depicting measured baseline and program emissions according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 9 is a graph depicting calculated forecast emission reductions and tradable emissions reductions versus year of program for an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 10 is a graph depicting calculated forecast and measured emission reductions and tradable emissions reductions versus year of program for an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 11 is a graph depicting calculated forecast emission reductions, measured emission reductions, and tradable emissions reductions versus year of program for another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 12 is a graph depicting the correlation between heating degree days and heating energy consumption according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the method 10 for quantifying reductions in residential emissions may comprise the steps of measuring an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties 100, calculating an emissions reduction resulting from the energy savings 200, and aggregating a plurality of the emissions reductions into a tradable commodity 300.
  • the tradable commodity may comprise tradable emissions reduction(s), tradable emissions credit(s), or any other suitable commodity for trading in any emissions trading market.
  • the method 20 may comprise the steps of estimating an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties 100, calculating an emissions reduction resulting from the energy savings 200, aggregating a plurality of the emissions reductions into a tradable commodity 300, monitoring the residential energy savings opportunities 400, monitoring the quantification of the emissions reduction 500, and verifying the quantification of the emissions reduction 600.
  • the step of measuring an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties 100 may comprise the steps of quantifying a baseline energy use 101 , quantifying a program energy use 102, calculating an annual energy savings 103, calculating a lifetime energy savings 104, and calculating a total program energy savings 105.
  • the equations are shown below (Equations 1a - 1f).
  • Calculating the emissions reduction may comprise calculating a reduction in emissions of one or more compounds, e.g., pollutants.
  • compounds may include, but are not limited to, SO 2 , NO x , GHGs, and any other suitable compounds that may be converted into a tradable commodity in any emissions trading market.
  • the step of calculating the emissions reduction 200 may further comprise the steps of calculating a baseline emissions factor 201 , calculating a program emissions factor 202, calculating a baseline emissions 203, calculating a program emissions 204, calculating an annual emissions reduction 205, and calculating a lifetime emissions reduction 206.
  • the equations are shown below (Equations 1 g - 11).
  • Embodiments of the present invention may also comprise an M&V protocol for participants in a residential emissions trading program, including but not limited to: program partners; program administration staff; third party auditors; and program investors.
  • the M&V protocol may focus on the specification of measurement protocols that may be implemented by the program partners. It also, however, may include monitoring protocols that may be implemented by program administration staff, and verification protocols that may be implemented by third party auditors. Monitoring may comprise the collection of data at a facility over time, such as, for example, energy and water consumption, temperature, humidity, and hours of operation. A purpose of the monitoring protocol may be to compile and manage the data collected by the program partners. Verification may comprise the process of examining reports of others to comment on their suitability for the intended purpose. The verification protocol may act as a quality assurance mechanism on the data submitted by the utility partners (for the benefit of the program investors).
  • a primary responsibility of program partners may be to carry out the measurement of emissions reductions from qualifying energy efficiency programs or improvements.
  • a primary responsibility of program administration staff may be data collection and management.
  • a primary responsibility of third party auditors may be quality assurance and quality control (on data supplied by program partners) for program investors.
  • a primary responsibility of program investors may be to provide the primary source of funding for the emission trading program.
  • the M&V protocol may be modified for several types of projects aimed at improving energy efficiency in residential buildings.
  • An embodiment of the present invention may comprise a sequence of steps that typically are followed in establishing estimated savings and emissions reductions and verifying the actual savings and emissions reductions from any given energy efficiency program:
  • An embodiment of the present invention may be designed to address the needs of different participants in a residential emissions trading program. It is anticipated that as demand for tradable emissions increases in the marketplace (and the value of tradable emissions increases), that a more rigid (or less flexible) approach to M&V may be warranted. As shown in Fig. 5, the sampling rigor in existing programs has a direct correlation to the amount of creditable emissions that are generated (in this example, for a greenhouse gas program).
  • An emissions trading initiative of embodiments of the present invention is intended to create a marketplace for the trading of emission reductions that result from energy efficiency programs.
  • Energy efficiency programs may reduce household energy consumption through the implementation of more efficient technologies or the maintenance of existing devices within the home.
  • baseline energy use and the resulting emissions may be calculated.
  • Baseline emissions are those emissions that would have occurred if the energy efficiency project had not been undertaken, or if the status quo had not been altered by the energy efficiency project. This baseline may not be constant over time, because changes in occupant behavior, weather, and/or other factors may affect the baseline energy use and emissions.
  • program emissions may be calculated.
  • Program emissions are those emissions that occur after the energy efficiency project has been installed or completed. Program emissions may also change in time, due to the effects of occupant behavior, weather, and/or other factors.
  • the emissions reductions may be calculated as the difference between the baseline and the program emissions.
  • the emissions reduction, shown in Fig. 6, is the amount of emissions that are avoided due to the energy efficiency project.
  • Step 100 measuring an energy savings resulting from one or more energy savings opportunities in one or more residential properties, may comprise any one or more of a variety of improvements.
  • energy efficient upgrades include, but are not limited to: replacing older appliances with more energy efficient appliances; upgrading domestic hot water (DHW) heating systems, electric or gas; upgrading heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning (HVAC) systems; modifying lighting; fuel switching; renovating the entire home; and myriad other home improvements. Purchase of new homes with more energy efficient systems or upgrades from existing systems to more energy efficient ones are both contemplated by the present invention.
  • DHW domestic hot water
  • HVAC heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning
  • measuring an energy savings 100 may comprise measuring and collecting data for the particular type of energy efficiency program or energy savings opportunities. Means for measuring an energy savings are described below in "Measurement Techniques.” For each type of program, a number of different data collection methods may be used. The collected data may be used to calculate the energy savings and the corresponding emissions reductions and, ultimately, the tradable emissions reductions.
  • On-site inspection, metering, sub-metering, utility bill analysis, engineering modeling, or any combination thereof may be used to assess the energy savings.
  • On-site inspections may be random, and may comprise report review, visual inspection, and device rating verification.
  • Metering may comprise collecting energy and water consumption data over time at a facility through the use of measurement devices.
  • Utility bill analysis may comprise analyzing: samples of measured data of the energy savings from the residential properties; samples of control data of residential energy use; raw data; data normalized by weather; stratified data; data that are both stratified and weather-normalized; or a combination thereof.
  • Additional measuring methodologies may include engineering calculations or computer simulation to assess an energy savings.
  • Computer simulation may utilize computer-based building energy software.
  • Engineering modeling may use heating degree day analysis, bin analysis, hourly analysis, time-step analysis, or any combination thereof.
  • energy savings may be calculated in step 100, as shown in Fig. 3, as the difference between baseline energy use and post- implementation or program energy use.
  • Baseline energy use may be calculated as the product of instantaneous demand for energy multiplied by the hours of operation of the relevant energy consuming equipment without the implementation of any energy efficiency improvements (see Equation 1a).
  • Calculations may be for a baseline year, which is a defined period of any length before implementation of an energy conservation measure.
  • Program energy use (after completion of the installation of the energy efficiency improvements) may be calculated in a similar manner (see Equation 1b).
  • the annual energy savings may then be calculated as the difference between the baseline energy use and the program energy use (see Equation 1c).
  • KWj P Instantaneous demand for energy in the hour "i", at completion of the energy efficiency program, expressed in kW (kilowatts)
  • h Annual number of hours of operation of energy consuming equipment at completion of the energy efficiency program (hours per year).
  • Baseline Energy Us ⁇ j Energy use without the implementation of energy efficiency measures, in the year "j.”
  • an initial estimate (for each year of the program life) may be made for the baseline energy use, the program energy use, and the annual energy savings. These initial estimates may be based on engineering calculations, or any other suitable methodology. After the energy efficiency program is implemented, these initial estimates may be updated with monitored data from the field programs.
  • g Subscript denoting a group of households with similar characteristics.
  • HH Number of households in a particular group.
  • AES Average energy savings of a home in group g. Emission Factors
  • Emission factors may be employed in step 200 to correlate reductions in energy consumption with their associated emission reductions.
  • Emission factors may indicate the amount of emissions generated per unit of energy. They are essentially conversion factors, translating energy measurements (kWh or other appropriate units) to quantifiable emissions reductions in tonnes per carbon equivalent (TCE) or other pollution emission.
  • the residential energy efficiency programs or energy savings opportunities discussed below may convert fuels into productive energy and polluting emissions.
  • the amount of emissions and energy generated may be dependent on the characteristics of the device (device type, efficiency, pollution reduction, etc.) and on the type of fuel (or source of electricity).
  • EPA has compiled a substantial body of information on emissions factors in the "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors" (also known as AP42), which is incorporated herein by reference. This compilation can be found on the EPA website at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/index.html. The data is summarized in EPA's E-Grid database, which contains emissions factors at the national, state, and utility level. Examples of some of the EPA factors include:
  • Electricity emission factors are not calculated with site-based information. The emissions from electricity generation occur at the power plants that produce the electricity. Emission factors, therefore, are based on power plants' emission factors. In many cases the electricity comes from the grid and consequently the emission factor is a function of the individual emission factors from multiple power plants. [0085] In steps 201 and 202 of Fig.4, the following equations may be used to calculate emission factors.
  • EFj Marginal Emission Factor for the program, in a given hour of the year "i”.
  • h Subscript denoting the number of hours of equipment operation in the year.
  • current or updated EPA emission factors may be utilized for determining emissions reductions, or program participants may provide their own emission factors.
  • baseline emissions may be calculated as the product of baseline energy consumption and emissions factors for the appropriate fuel source (see Equation 1 i).
  • program emissions may be calculated as the product of the program energy consumption and emissions factors for the appropriate fuel source (see Equation 1j).
  • emissions reductions may be calculated as the difference between baseline pollutant emissions (for a given pollutant) and program (post-implementation) pollutant emissions. Annual emissions reductions may be calculated in step 205 (see Equation 1k).
  • Baseline emissions may also be expressed as a series of annual emissions estimates - one for each year in the anticipated life of the energy efficiency program (as described above for annual energy savings). Each value in the series represents the expected annual emissions (without any energy efficiency improvements) for a given year.
  • program emissions and annual emissions reductions may be expressed as a time series of values - one for each year (or other appropriate time period) in the life of the project. These annual values may be summed, as shown in the following equation, to calculate lifetime emissions reductions in step 206.
  • Lifetime Emissions Reductions ⁇ ⁇ (Baseline Emissions; -Program Emissions )
  • Baseline EmissionS j Baseline emissions in the year "j”.
  • Project EmissionS j Program emissions in the year "j”.
  • y Number of years in program life.
  • Quantifying emissions reductions from measures taken to increase energy efficiency may require data on - and is the product of - energy savings and emission factors specific to each measure, opportunity, or program. These estimates may comprise an equation, two variations of which are shown in Equations 1i and 1j. Both equations, as well as those presented in the following sections, are essentially the same for both future baseline forecasts and program estimates. The significance of the changes in the variables may be dependent upon the specific action taken to increase energy efficiency. [0091] As embodied herein, the methodology for quantifying energy consumption and savings for the energy savings opportunities or energy efficiency programs may be similar to that for calculating baseline data above. Procedures for calculating various areas of potential energy efficiency upgrades are described in the following sections, including, but not limited to, energy efficient appliance, domestic water heating, HVAC, lighting, fuel switching, and whole house programs. Other suitable energy efficiency upgrades are considered well within the scope of the present invention.
  • the quality of the overall energy savings assessment may be dependent on the estimation or (measurement) approach used.
  • a TCF may assign varying degrees of confidence to an energy savings estimate. Quantification of TCFs is described below under "Calculation of Technical Confidence Factors.”
  • Average household energy efficiency may be increased by replacing less efficient appliances with more efficient alternatives. Newer and more energy efficient appliances generally consume less energy, without sacrificing performance. Energy efficient products may also provide energy- saving benefits by working faster, thereby using energy for less time. Appliance upgrades may include: refrigerators; stoves and ovens; clothes washers and dryers; dishwashers; and any other appropriate appliances. Energy Savings Equations for Appliance Programs
  • the energy savings from an appliance upgrade may be calculated as follows:
  • OBI Occupant behavior index
  • Equation 2a determines the area under a graph of kilowatt-hours as the dependent variable against time.
  • Energy consumption may be calculable both pre- and post-implementation, and may be useful in quantifying consumption for a baseline scenario, as well as under an energy efficiency program scenario. Because appliances generally operate at different power demands over time, the product of power demand and the duration of time at that power demand may be summed in order to arrive at the total energy consumption for a particular appliance.
  • the occupant behavior index (OBI) may be useful when additional information is available concerning occupant behavior over time (due to shifting prices or relocation).
  • OBI is an indicator variable for the occupant behavior, which may range from 0 to 1. OBI may be used to normalize energy consumption based on variations in occupants' behavior or presence, and where occupant behavior directly impacts energy consumption.
  • the total net energy savings from an energy efficiency program may comprise the total of energy savings (from Equation 2b) summed across all households participating in the program.
  • g Subscript denoting a group of households with similar characteristics.
  • HH Number of households in a particular group.
  • AES Average energy savings of a home in group g .
  • the data collection methodology may be based on the calculations' input requirements.
  • the key input variables may include:
  • the energy consumption of the device may be measured with energy consumption meter (to spot test or sub-meter), may be collected from utility bills, or may be derived from other appropriate source(s).
  • Wattage the power demand (kW) of the device for a given unit of time and use may be measured with watt meters (to either spot test or sub- meter the appliance), from inspecting the device's nameplate capacity, or other appropriate means.
  • Measurements may be taken according to industry-accepted standards/practices. Records may be maintained, indicating the method of test or measurement standard used. Relevant standards and codes may include older, current, more recent or replacement versions of:
  • DHW domestic hot water
  • electric or gas consumes energy by heating water for showers, baths, and other household uses. Improvements in domestic hot water systems of homes may result in substantial energy savings. For example, an oil-fired boiler could be replaced with a natural gas hot water heater.
  • WC Amount of water consumed (in kg) during the period under consideration.
  • SpH Specific heat capacity of water (4.184 J g "1 °C "1 ).
  • ⁇ T Difference between the inlet and outlet water temperature (in degrees Celsius).
  • Eff Overall operating efficiency of the water heating device.
  • the net energy savings from a whole home DHW upgrade may be calculated as in Equation 1d.
  • household energy consumption for a baseline and for post-implementation may be calculated.
  • Net energy savings may be calculated as the difference between the two.
  • the program- wide energy savings may be determined by summing savings in each household, as represented in Equation 1e or 1f.
  • the key input variables may include:
  • the energy consumption of the installation may be measured with kWh meter (to spot test or sub-meter), utility bill records, subsystem consumption monitoring, or other appropriate means.
  • the household water consumption may be monitored using flow meters, may be based on ASHRAE estimates, or other appropriate means.
  • Temperature water temperature may be measured using thermometers, may be based on assumptions found in the ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook, or other appropriate means.
  • Measurements may be taken according to industry-accepted standards/practices. Records may be maintained comprising the method of test or measurement standard used. Relevant standards and codes may include older, current, more recent, or replacement versions of: • Oil-fired Steam and Hot-Water Boilers for Residential Use (CSA. B140.7.1-1976 (R 1991);
  • HVAC heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning
  • energy savings may be calculated from the following equation:
  • Household Energy Savings EC - EC p ⁇
  • DD Heating degree days (HDD) or cooling degree days (CDD), as appropriate.
  • Eff Overall device efficiency rating.
  • RC Rated capacity of the device.
  • DT Design temperature.
  • EC Household energy consumption (as measured in kWh).
  • b Subscript denoting the baseline (without EE program) scenario.
  • P i Subscript denoting the post-implementation
  • the total net energy savings from the energy efficiency program may be determined by summing savings in each household, calculated as shown in Equations 1e and 1f.
  • the key input variables may include:
  • Energy the energy consumption of the device may be measured with kWh meter (to spot test or sub-meter), or may be collected from utility bills, or other appropriate means.
  • Wattage the power demand (kW) of the device for a given unit of time and use may be measured with watt meters (to either spot test or sub- meter the appliance), or from inspecting the device's nameplate capacity, or other appropriate means.
  • Heating Degree Days and Cooling Degree Days a measure of heating or cooling load on a facility created by an outdoor temperature. When the mean daily outdoor temperature is one degree below a stated reference temperature such as 1°C, for one day, it is defined that there is one heating degree day. If this temperature difference prevailed for ten days there would be ten heating degree days counted for the total period. If the temperature difference were to be 12° for 10 days, 120 heating degree days would be counted. When ambient temperature is below the reference temperature, heating degree days are counted; when ambient temperatures are above the reference, cooling degree days are counted. Any reference temperature may be used for recording degree days, usually chosen to reflect the temperature at which heating or cooling is no longer needed. Many utilities operate weather stations that record this information. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency also gathers this information (http://www.ncdc .noaa.gov/).
  • Design Temperature (Tdesig ⁇ .indoor and Td es i g n,outdoor): design temperatures may be specified in the ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook or by local code organization (state building codes, etc.), or from other appropriate means.
  • Measurements may be taken according to generally-accepted standards and/or practices. Records may be maintained comprising the method of test or measurement standard used. Relevant standards and codes may include older, current, more recent, or replacement versions of:
  • Adequate lighting typically is a necessity in living and working environments. Many spaces, such as hallways, may require twenty-four hour illumination. Lighting upgrades, therefore, may have substantial potential to reduce energy consumption, especially in situations where lights are on for extended periods of time. Improvements in lighting efficiencies also may lead to reduced cooling loads, because inefficient lights cause electrical energy to be converted to heat instead of light.
  • kW reported energy demand (in kilowatts).
  • b Subscript denoting the baseline scenario.
  • P i Subscript denoting the post-implementation scenario.
  • t duration of time over which the lighting system is active.
  • the baseline scenario for lighting upgrade programs may comprise the continued use of a current lighting system or comparable standard replacement systems (assuming no energy efficiency program is in place).
  • Post-implementation energy consumption may be calculated from accurate on-site metering, by multiplying the duration of usage by an accepted standard rate of energy consumption for a particular system, or by other appropriate means. Equation 5a is calculable only when the wattage of the lights is fixed (the lights are not dimmable) and the number of hours is known.
  • Equation 1c When lights are dimmable or when it is possible to monitor the system-specific energy consumption, the energy consumption, (pre- or post- implementation) may be calculated as presented in Equation 1c. Net household energy savings may be calculated as shown in Equation 1d, and program-wide energy savings may be calculated as in Equations 1e and 1f.
  • the key input variables may include:
  • the energy consumption of the installation may be measured with kWh meter (to spot test or sub-meter), or sub-system consumption monitoring, or other appropriate means.
  • the power demand (kW) of the device for a given unit of time and use may be measured with watt meters (to either spot test or sub- meter the installations), or from inspecting the rating on the installed bulb and the ballast's nameplate capacity, or from other appropriate means.
  • Measurements may be taken according to generally-accepted standards and/or practices. Records may be maintained comprising the method of test or measurement standard used. Relevant standards and codes may include older, current, more recent, or replacement versions of:
  • Fuel switching may include changing from a more-polluting to a less-polluting fuel. Most combustible fuels, while producing energy, result in a range of air pollutants. Increasing the efficiency of a device or system may reduce emissions, so too changing to a "cleaner" fuel may reduce emissions. Fuel switching improvements may include use of a specific fuel (e.g., switching from coal with a high sulfur content to coal with a low sulfur content) or switching to a different fuel type (e.g., switching from fuel oil to natural gas). Other cleaner fuel sources may include solar, heat pump, geothermal, methane, and a variety of others. Fuel switching changes the emission factors for the device and may also result in a greater operating efficiency. Maintenance may also be done on the device while doing the fuel conversion.
  • a specific fuel e.g., switching from coal with a high sulfur content to coal with a low sulfur content
  • Other cleaner fuel sources may include solar, heat pump, geothermal, methane, and a variety of others. Fuel switching changes the emission factors
  • Fuel switching emissions reductions may be calculated from the following equation:
  • Emission factors may be calculated for both the baseline case and the upgrade, due to the different operating efficiencies and pollution emission rates.
  • HVAC space heating and cooling systems
  • Whole home upgrades may increase home insulation and decrease both infiltration of outside air (cold air in winter and hot air in summer) and leakage of inside air (warm air in winter and cool air in summer). Such renovations may include, but are not limited to: installing insulation in attics and exterior walls; installing more efficient windows and/or doors; reducing infiltration; and any other appropriate improvements.
  • Whole home energy consumption may be highly dependent on the exterior environment and therefore, it may be advantageous to normalize the result using a weather index for the local environment, when possible.
  • Equation 7a The net energy savings from a whole home upgrade may be calculated as in Equation 7a.
  • the program-wide energy savings may be determined by summing savings in each household, as presented in Equation 7b.
  • OBI Occupant behavior index
  • HH Number of households in a particular group.
  • AES Average energy savings of a home in group g .
  • the key input variables may include:
  • Energy the energy consumption of the installation may be measured with kWh meter (to spot test or sub-meter); utility bill records; subsystem consumption monitoring; or other appropriate means.
  • Building Insulation insulation levels may be gathered from construction records or may be estimated based on the building's age, building type, or other appropriate means.
  • testing for infiltration may be conducted with a Minneapolis blower door or other suitable product. Testing may be undertaken by a trained and experienced technician, according to the relevant standards.
  • Modification of a building's thermal envelope may impact primarily on the home's space heating and space cooling loads.
  • Measurements may be taken according to generally-accepted standards and/or practices. Records may be maintained comprising the method of test or measurement standard used. Relevant standards and codes may include older, current, more recent, or replacement versions of:
  • Emission reductions are a function of their associated emission factors and energy savings. Reductions in emissions of a gas may be calculated from the following equation:
  • p Subscript denoting the implemented project, or specific efficiency-improving measure.
  • n Number of contributing energy efficiency programs.
  • ES Energy saved from project p , expressed in kWh
  • EF Emission factor associated with g, expressed as tons carbon equivalent (TCE) per kWh.
  • TCE tons carbon equivalent
  • the relevant emission factors may vary over time. Embodiments of the present invention also contemplate incorporating a changing emission factor into the above equation.
  • Emissions reductions from an energy efficiency program may be calculated in step 200 based on the predicted energy savings and relevant emission factors. Uncertainties are associated with both the energy savings and the emission factor estimates. Embodiments of the present invention include a set of procedures for assessing the level of uncertainty in these estimates and the assignment of TCFs to each (see below). A purpose of the TCFs is to determine a portion of the calculated emissions reduction that is certain (or tradable) from the portion that is uncertain (or untradable). The uncertain portion of the emissions reductions may be held in reserve and may be released in future years, if verified.
  • TCF Technical Confidence Factor
  • TCF may be a number from 0 to 1 (or other appropriate scale) that captures the uncertainty in both the energy savings and emissions factor estimates.
  • a high TCF (approaching 1) indicates that there is very little uncertainty in the calculated emission reductions and, therefore, the size of the tradable emissions reductions pool is almost the same size as the calculated emissions reductions.
  • a low TCF (approaching 0) indicates that there is substantial uncertainty and the tradable emissions reductions, therefore, are only a small portion of the calculated emissions reductions.
  • the graph in Fig. 9 presents an example of predicted emissions reductions from the calculations (Equations 2-7 above) and tradable emissions reductions.
  • the vertical error bars show the uncertainty.
  • a TCF may be identified and used on the calculated emissions reductions to produce the tradable emissions reductions (the horizontal dashed line in Fig. 9).
  • the emissions reduction potential may be predicted, or estimated. This is shown as the solid horizontal line in Fig. 9.
  • uncertainty of the measured emissions reduction results may be estimated. This uncertainty is shown by the vertical error bars.
  • the uncertainty bars indicate the portion of the estimated emissions reduction that is certain (i.e., the region below the error bars) and uncertain (the region within the error bars). This general approach may be used to determine a TCF for each of several M&V approaches.
  • data may be entered by a program participant (e.g., program partner) into electronic spreadsheets that automatically calculate emissions reductions and tradable emissions reductions for a program.
  • Data entered into the electronic spreadsheet(s) may include, but is not limited to: energy consumption; emissions factors; and M&V options.
  • the spreadsheet(s) may be adapted to provide a number of options to the participant, allowing the participant to select the most relevant options. For example, a participant may select a default emissions factor or may enter its own emissions factor.
  • the spreadsheet may automatically perform the various calculations through linked algorithms.
  • Electronic spreadsheets may be provided by suitable software, such as, for example, Excel spreadsheets. Alternatively, data may be entered into hardcopy versions of spreadsheets without automatic calculations of emissions reductions and tradable emissions reductions.
  • Fig. 11 shows how a new pool of tradable emissions reductions (depicted as Tradable Emissions Reduction 2) may be formed from the un-traded (or untapped) emissions reductions from these energy efficiency programs.
  • the new pool may be formed from actual field measurements of energy savings and resulting emissions reductions.
  • Equation 9a A method for assessing tradable emissions is provided in Equation 9a.
  • the TCF may be determined based on the sum of three other factors, as in the following equation.
  • TCF Technical Confidence Factor
  • a risk factor is, therefore, a function of the type of program (such as HVAC or lighting), and the rigor used to verify the energy savings and emission factors.
  • the rigor of an energy savings program is dependent on the type of measurement approach method used, and the scale at which these methods are undertaken. Possible measurement approaches include: Energy Star; engineering calculations/modeling; billing analysis; metering/sub-metering, and/or other appropriate means.
  • the Energy Star label may be employed to provide credible monitoring and verification procedures for each of the various programs it covers (e.g., appliances, homes). Default values for different programs may be provided. If a participant's program is based on Energy Star, the default values and associated risk factors may be used.
  • Energy savings values may be based on other sources, such as, for example, previously published studies or statistics. These estimates may be regional or local and may be from a number of different sources, whether governmental, academic, private, or other sources. Risk factors associated with several types of outside sources are presented in Table 1. [00140] Energy savings and emissions reductions may also be quantified using engineering estimates, or computer models, or other appropriate means. This may include simple degree day analysis, bin analysis, hourly modeling, and/or time-step analysis with building energy software (such as DOE-2, EnergyPlus, or any other suitable software). Sample risk factors for different engineering calculation methods at different scales of measurement (the number of homes and weather scenarios examined) are shown in Table 2.
  • Billing analysis may be performed by analyzing large samples of measured data from program participants and control groups to quantify the shift in energy consumption due to program participation. This analytical methodology may be performed on raw data or on data that is normalized and stratified by relevant factors (such as weather and group characteristics). Sample risk factors, for different billing analysis methods, at different scales of inspection (the percentage of homes examined), are presented in Table 3.
  • Metering and sub-metering may be used to measure the consumption in those end-uses affected by a given energy efficiency program. Sample risk factors for different metering and sub-metering analysis methods, at different scales of inspection (the percentage of homes examined), are shown in Table 4. Table 1
  • emission factors may be used to convert these savings into emissions reductions.
  • Emission factors typically have some uncertainty, based on the method of measurement and the resolution of the data (national, state, utility, or plant specific). Sample risk factors for emission factors based on different quantification methodologies are presented in Table 5.
  • E-grid EPA's emission factor database
  • Uncertainty may be related to future energy use patterns (e.g., due to unexpected changes in energy costs or weather) and emission factors (e.g., due to unexpected changes in regulations). Such changes may be difficult to anticipate and could affect emissions reductions achieved in a given year.
  • an Adjustment Factor (AF) may be incorporated into a TCF.
  • An AF may be assigned a value corresponding to the total emissions reductions available, such as, for example 15%. An assigned value may be periodically revisited and updated.
  • An AF ensures that the tradable emissions reductions do not exceed the actual emissions reductions achieved by a program. If an overall TCF is shown to be too conservative, the excess emissions reductions may be included in future emission pools. Alternatively, if the actual emissions reductions are shown to align with the tradable emissions reductions, the overall TCF has effectively performed its function of protecting the financial interests of an ETI's participants.
  • step 600 quantification of the emissions reduction may be verified.
  • an initial estimate of energy savings may be calculated based on an assessment of the difference between baseline energy use and post-implementation or measured energy use.
  • Baseline forecasts may be constructed from historical records of energy consumption and use. When historical information is not available, field monitoring or other appropriate means may be employed. Post- implementation energy use may be measured, or may be estimated through engineering calculations, deemed savings estimates, or other appropriate means. Deemed savings estimates may be used for energy efficient technologies that are well-understood and on which there is general agreement on the energy use and savings that can be achieved (e.g., many electric appliances). Deemed savings may be calculated by using a device's power output and length of use. Deemed savings may be used when a device is used for predictable time periods and energy consumption does not vary. For example, deemed savings could be used with lights that are on 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (the energy consumption may be calculated with reasonable certainty due to the consistent demand and length of use).
  • baseline energy use and post- implementation energy use may be verified through field monitoring, deemed savings estimates, or other appropriate means. Net energy savings may be calculated by subtracting post-implementation energy use from baseline energy use. In cases where energy consumption is highly dependent on external variables (such as an HVAC system's dependence on weather), energy consumption may be normalized for such variables.
  • Step 600 may further comprise verifying the emissions reductions for energy savings opportunities or energy efficiency programs.
  • Baseline emissions and emission reductions that result from implementation of a project may be calculated from energy consumption and savings data.
  • the translation from energy use/savings to emissions/reductions may be based on emission factors appropriate to the device and fuel source (e.g., gas, oil, electric) being examined.
  • a methodology is used to determine emission factors based on U.S. EPA's "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors" (AP-42), or any subsequent revision or replacement.
  • an emission factor database may be used to calculate the emissions reductions of the program.
  • step 600 calculations and estimates undertaken in the measurement phase may be used to verify that the emissions reductions predicted in the forecasting phase are achieved. Verification may afford the emissions reduction purchaser confirmation that the reductions are genuine. This process may support the value of the emissions reductions in the marketplace. Self-verification by program participants and/or third party verification may be employed. If measured emissions reductions are significantly different from forecasted emissions reductions, then reconciliation may be needed. For example, a program partner may recalculate and resubmit new estimations of its tradable emissions reductions.
  • Energy savings may be calculated from analysis of historical energy consumption and modeling of future consumption. These calculations will have a degree of uncertainty and may be verified after the program has been in place for a length of time, thereby allowing actual consumption to be measured from utility bills, metering devices, and/or other appropriate means.
  • Statistical methods may be used in calculating energy savings in step 200 to determine the results of a particular residential energy saving program and to help secure confidence and financing for a residential emission trading credit program embodying the present invention.
  • the M&V protocol of the present invention may further comprise statistical means, such as confidence levels and sampling. Methods for applying the following statistical equations are known in the art of error and risk analysis. Uncertainty analysis may also employ methods described in the International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol, Appendix B, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • a certain degree of uncertainty is inherent in many measurements, estimations, and forecasts. Sources of uncertainty include, for example, instrumentation error, modeling error, sampling error, and other systematic and/or random errors. The magnitude of errors typically is given by manufacturer's specifications. Typically, instrumentation errors are small, and are not believed to be a major source of error in estimating savings. Nonetheless, they too may be considered where appropriate.
  • Modeling error refers to errors in the models used to estimate parameters of interest. Biases may arise from model miss-specification, including, but not limited to: omitting important terms from the model; assigning incorrect values for "known" factors; and extrapolation of the model results outside their range of validity. Random effects of factors not accounted for by the model variables are non-systematic errors.
  • regression models are inverse mathematical models that describe the correlation of independent and dependent variables.
  • Linear regressions may be employed of the form:
  • the accuracy of the estimate may be measured by the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the predicted mean. This accuracy measure is provided by most standard regression packages.
  • the MSE of prediction is the expected value of the following equation and the RMSE of prediction is the square root of the MSE. (Eq. 10b) (y lx - y lx,Nne) 2
  • the accuracy of the estimate may be measured by the standard error of the estimated coefficient. This standard error is also provided by standard regression packages.
  • the variance of the estimate b is the expected value of:
  • sampling error refers to errors resulting from the fact that a sample of units was observed, rather than observing the entire set of units under study.
  • the simplest form of sampling error is random error. A fixed number n of units is selected at random from a total population of N units. Each unit has the same probability of being included in the sample.
  • SE(S) (SE(C 1 ) 2 +SE(C 2 ) 2 +SE(C 3 ) 2 +...SE(C P ) 2 ) 05
  • Components may be estimated independently. Independence means that whatever random errors affect one of the components are unrelated to errors affecting the other components. In particular, different components would not be estimated by the same regression fit, or from the same sample of observations.
  • Determining savings may comprise estimating a difference in level rather than measuring the level of consumption directly.
  • calculating a difference with a given relative precision requires greater absolute precision than for measuring a level of consumption. Therefore, a larger sample would be needed than for measuring a level with the same relative precision. For example, suppose an average load is around 500 kW, and the anticipated savings is around 100 kW. A 10% error with 90% confidence (90/10) criterion applied to the load would require absolute precision of 50 kW at 90 percent confidence. The 90/10 criterion applied to the savings would require absolute precision of 10 kW, at the same confidence level.
  • Precision criterion may be applied not only to demand or energy savings but also to parameters that determine savings.
  • a savings amount could comprise the product of number (N) of units, hours (H) of operation, and change (C) in watts:
  • C Change in watts
  • the 90/10 criterion could be applied separately to each of these parameters. Achieving 90/10 precision for each of these parameters separately does not imply that 90/10 is achieved for the savings. On the other hand, if number of units and change in watts are assumed to be known without error, 90/10 precision for hours implies 90/10 precision for savings.
  • the precision standard may be imposed at various levels in an M&V protocol of the present invention.
  • the choice of level of disaggregation may affect the desired sample size and associated monitoring costs. Possible level choices include any one or more of the following:
  • Normalization may be further used in measuring and calculating energy savings to compensate for dependence on environmental variables such as occupant behavior, weather, and other factors. This may be conducted only when dependence on these factors is strong.
  • HVAC heating degree days
  • CDD cooling degree days
  • Weather normalization may comprise modeling energy consumption of a home under a number of different weather scenarios. This modeling may be accomplished using software supplied by the U.S. Department of Energy or other appropriate building energy modeling software. Engineering estimates also may be used to estimate energy consumption but this method typically has lower accuracy.
  • Fig. 12 shows the results of modeling the same home under different total number of HDD assumptions.
  • future weather may be calculated in terms of annual heating degree days. This prediction could be the thirty- year mean temperature, or alternatively, another estimation based on recent historical weather trends. Correlation calculations and assumptions about future weather patterns may be explicitly defined. For example, the graph depicted in Fig. 12 shows heating energy consumption (in MMBtu) equal to 0.0159 (HDD) - 10.6.
  • HDD heating degree days
  • CDD cooling degree days
  • the number and behavior of occupants in a home can substantially affect the energy consumption of a home. Energy conscious people may turn off lights when they leave the room, whereas other inhabitants may not. A two person family may use much less energy than a six person family, all other factors being equal. As a result, energy consumption may shift if the occupants of a home change, regardless of the upgrades undertaken. To compensate for this effect, characteristics of inhabitants may be gathered and used to normalize the model where possible. This additional analysis may be employed when the sample size is small. If there are thousands of homes participating in a given program, the change of inhabitants in one house will likely be balanced by changes elsewhere in the program.
  • Indices for occupant behavior may be developed by modeling a prototypical house under a number of occupant scenarios. For example, a single home's energy consumption may be determined for a couple, a family of three, and a family of seven. This analysis may be used to develop a relationship (such as a formula) between occupants and energy consumption. Consequently, this relationship may be used to compensate for occupant changes by normalizing raw consumption data for a given household or sets of households.
  • the present invention contemplates participation in existing new source review, open market, and area source emissions trading markets where other pollutants such as NO x , VOCs, SO x , PM, and CO and C0 2 emission reductions are traded. Further, a four pollutants - N0 2 , SO x , C0 2 and mercury - approach to emissions regulation is currently under consideration in legislative arenas. It is expressly contemplated that these - and other pollutants yet to be determined - are within the scope of the present invention.
  • a system for quantifying residential emissions reductions may comprise client device(s) for inputting energy savings data and other data relating to residential energy savings opportunities.
  • Client device(s) may comprise, but are not limited to, one or more computers or any other suitable hardware device.
  • Client device(s) may communicate with one or more servers via a network, such as, but not limited to, the Internet.
  • One or more databases may reside on server(s) for storing inputted energy savings data and other relevant data. Data stored on database(s) may be processed in accordance with the various calculations disclosed herein for quantifying and aggregating emissions reductions.
  • Software contained on database(s) may comprise program instructions for carrying out the various calculations.
  • a method of sensing alternating electrical current (AC) for energy efficiency and savings applications may comprise sensing current with a current transformer or current transducer (CT).
  • CTs may be placed on wires connected to specific loads, such as motors, pumps, or lights, and may be connected to an ammeter, power meter, or other suitable meter device.
  • CTs may have split core or solid torroid configuration. Torroids are typically more economical than split-core CTs, but require a load to be disconnected for a short period while they are installed. Split-core CTs allow installation without disconnecting the load. Both types of CTs may have accuracies better than one percent.
  • Voltage may be sensed by a direct connection to the power source.
  • voltmeters and power measuring equipment are directly connected to voltage leads.
  • voltmeters and power measuring equipment may utilize an intermediate device, such as a potential transducer (PT), to lower the voltage to safer levels at the meter.
  • PT potential transducer
  • true RMS power digital sampling meters are used for inductive loads such as motors or magnetic ballasts. Though electrical load is the product of voltage and current, separate voltage and current measurements are not preferred for these loads. Such meters are particularly important if variable frequency drives or other harmonic-producing devices are on the same circuit, resulting in the likelihood of harmonic voltages at the motor terminals.
  • True RMS power and energy metering technology based on digital sampling principles, may be preferred, because of its ability accurately to measure distorted waveforms and properly to record load shapes.
  • Power measurement equipment meeting the IEEE Standard 519-1992 sampling rate of 3 kHz may be used where harmonic issues are present.
  • Most metering equipment of the type known in the art comprises sampling strategies to address this issue. It may be preferable to obtain documentation from meter manufacturers in order to ascertain that the equipment is accurately measuring electricity use under waveform distortion.
  • Power may also be measured directly using watt transducers.
  • Watt- hour energy transducers that integrate power over time eliminate the error inherent in assuming or ignoring variations in load over time.
  • Watt-hour transducer pulses may be recorded by a pulse-counting data logger for storage and subsequent retrieval and analysis.
  • An alternative technology comprises combining metering and data logging functions into a single piece of hardware.
  • hand-held wattmeters are used for spot measurements of watts, volts, amps, power factor, or waveforms.
  • the device should meet the minimum performance requirements for accuracy of the American National Standards Institute standard for solid state electricity meters, ANSI C12.16-1991 , published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). This standard applies to solid-state electricity meters that are primarily used as watt-hour meters, typically requiring accuracies of one to two percent based on variations of load, power factor, and voltage.
  • Some equipment may not be continuously metered with recording watt- hour meters to establish energy consumption, such as, for example, constant load motors and lights.
  • determination of energy savings may comprise measuring the time that a piece of equipment is on, and then multiplying it by a short term power measurement.
  • Self-contained battery- powered monitoring devices may be utilized to record equipment runtime and, in some cases, time-of-use information, providing a reasonably priced, simple to install, approach for energy savings calculations.
  • Computerized temperature measurement devices may comprise resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), thermocouples, thermistors, integrated circuit (IC) temperature sensors, and any other suitable devices for measuring temperature.
  • RTDs resistance temperature detectors
  • IC integrated circuit
  • RTDs Resistance Temperature Detectors
  • An RTD measures the change in electrical resistance in materials.
  • RTDs are generally considered accurate, reproducible, stable, and sensitive.
  • RTDs are economical and readily available in various configurations to measure indoor and outdoor air temperatures, as well as fluid temperatures in chilled water or heating systems.
  • RTDs may comprise 100 and 1 ,000 Ohm platinum devices in various packaging configurations, further comprising ceramic chips, flexible strips, and thermowell installations.
  • two, three, and four-wire RTDs may be employed. Accuracy, distance, and routing between the RTD and the data logging device may determine the specific type of RTD for a project.
  • Four- wire RTDs may offer a high level of precision.
  • Three-wire RTDs may compensate for applications where an RTD requires a long wire lead, exposed to varying ambient conditions.
  • Wires of identical length and material exhibit similar resistance-temperature characteristics and can be used to cancel the effect of the long leads in an appropriately designed bridge circuit.
  • Two-wire RTDs may be field-calibrated to compensate for lead length and may not have lead wires exposed to conditions that vary significantly from those being measured.
  • RTDs For Installation of RTDs, conventional copper lead wire may be used as opposed to the more expensive thermocouple wire.
  • Metering equipment may allow for direct connection of RTDs by providing internal signal conditioning and the ability to establish offsets and calibration coefficients.
  • Thermocouples measure temperature using two dissimilar metals, joined together at one end, which produce a small unique voltage at a given temperature. The voltage may be measured and interpreted by a thermocouple thermometer. Thermocouples may comprise different combinations of metals, for different temperature ranges. In addition to temperature range, chemical abrasion, vibration resistance, and installation requirements may be considered when selecting a thermocouple.
  • thermocouples may be employed when reasonably accurate temperature data are required, such as for thermal energy metering.
  • the main disadvantage of thermocouples is their weak output signal. As a result, thermocouples are sensitive to electrical noise and may require amplifiers. Few energy savings determinations warrant the accuracy and complexity of current thermocouple technology, although improvements in thermocouple technology may make it attractive for a wider variety of applications.
  • Thermistors are semiconductor temperature sensors comprising an oxide of manganese, nickel, cobalt, or one of several other suitable materials.
  • One difference between thermistors and RTDs is that thermistors exhibit a relatively large resistance change with temperature.
  • Thermistors are not interchangeable, and their temperature-resistance relationship is non-linear.
  • Thermistors may include shielded power lines, filters, or DC voltage, as they are relatively fragile. Thermistors are infrequently used in savings determinations.
  • Integrated Circuit Temperature Sensors may comprise semiconductor diodes and transistors that exhibit reproducible temperature sensitivities. IC sensors may further comprise an external power source. These devices are occasionally found in HVAC applications where low cost and a strong linear output are required. IC sensors have a fairly good absolute error, but they are fragile and are subject to errors due to self-heating.
  • Flow may be measured for natural gas, oil, steam, condensate, water, and compressed air, among others.
  • Liquid flow measurement devices are well-known prior to the present invention.
  • Flow sensors may be grouped into two general types: intrusive flow meters (using differential pressure and obstruction sensors), and non-intrusive flow meters (using ultrasonic and magnetic sensors).
  • the appropriate flow meter for a particular application may depend on the type of fluid being measured; how dirty or clean it is; the highest and lowest expected flow velocities; and the budget.
  • Differential Pressure Flow Meters calculate fluid flow rate by measuring pressure loss across a restriction. This technique is commonly used in building and industrial applications. Pressure drops generated by various shaped restrictions have been well-characterized over the years, and would be known by those of ordinary skill in the art. These "head" flow elements come in a wide variety of configurations, each with strengths and weaknesses. Examples of flow meters utilizing the concept of differential pressure flow measurement include Orifice Plate meter, Venturimeter, and Pitot Tube meter. The accuracy of differential pressure flow meters that may be employed in the present invention is typically from about one to about five percent of the maximum flow for which each meter is calibrated.
  • Obstruction Flow Meters may provide a linear output signal over a wide range of flow rates, often without the pressure loss penalty incurred with an orifice plate or venturi meter. These meters may comprise a small target, weight, or spinning wheel placed in the flow stream. Fluid velocity may be determined by the rotational speed of the meter (turbine) or by the force on the meter body (vortex).
  • Turbine meters may measure fluid flow by counting the rotations of a rotor that is placed in a flow stream, providing an output that is linear with flow rate.
  • Turbine meters may comprise an axial-type or insertion-type.
  • Axial turbine meters may have an axial rotor and a housing that is sized for an appropriate installation.
  • Insertion turbine meters may allow the axial turbine to be inserted into the fluid stream and use existing pipe as the meter body.
  • Insertion turbine meters may measure fluid velocity at a single point in the cross-sectional area of the pipe. Total volumetric flow rate for the pipe may be inferred from the measurement.
  • Insertion turbine meters may be installed in straight sections of pipe away from internal flow turbulence.
  • Vortex meters utilize oscillating instabilities in a low pressure field after it splits into two flow streams around a blunt object to measure flow. Vortex meters require minimal maintenance and have high accuracy and long-term repeatability. Vortex meters may provide a linear output signal that is captured by meter/monitoring equipment.
  • Non-Interfering Flow Meters may be employed in applications where the pressure drop of an intrusive flow meter is of critical concern, or where the fluid is dirty, such as in sewage, slurries, crude oils, chemicals, some acids, process water, and other similar fluids.
  • Ultrasonic flow meters may be employed to measure clean fluid velocities by detecting small differences in the transit time of sound waves that are shot at an angle across a fluid stream. Ultrasonic flow meters facilitate rapid measurement of fluid velocities in pipes of varying sizes. Accuracies may range from one percent of actual flow to two percent of full scale. In alternative embodiments, an ultrasound meter that uses the Doppler principle in place of transit time may be employed. In such meters, a certain amount of particles and air are necessary in order for the signal to bounce off and be detected by a receiver. Doppler-effect meters are available with an accuracy between about two percent and about five percent of full scale and cost somewhat less than standard transit time-effect ultrasonic devices. Meter cost is independent of pipe size.
  • Magnetic flow meters may measure the disturbance that a moving liquid causes in a strong magnetic field. Magnetic flow meters are usually more expensive than other types of meters. Such meters have no moving parts, and are accurate to about one to about two percent range of actual flow.
  • U-tube manometers were among the first pressure indicators. Manometers are large, cumbersome, and not well suited for integration into automatic control loops. Manometers are usually found in the laboratory or used as local indicators. Depending on the reference pressure used, they may indicate absolute, gauge, or differential pressure. Pressure measurement devices may be selected based on their accuracy, pressure range, temperature effects, outputs (millivolt, voltage, or current signal), and application environment.
  • Modern pressure transmitters have been developed from the differential pressure transducers used in flow meters. They may be used in building energy management systems, which are computers programmed to control and/or monitor the operations of energy consuming equipment in a facility, and measure pressure with the necessary accuracy for proper building pressurization and air flow control.
  • the measurement of thermal energy flow may comprise flow and temperature difference.
  • cooling provided by a chiller is recorded in Btus and is calculated by measuring chilled water flow and the temperature difference between the chilled water supply and return lines.
  • An energy flow meter may perform an internal Btu calculation in real time based on input from a flow meter and temperature sensors. Electronic energy flow meters typically are accurate to better than one percent. They may also provide other useful data on flow rate and temperature (both supply and return).
  • the two temperature sensors may be matched or calibrated.
  • the sensors may be matched or calibrated with respect to one another, rather than to a standard. Suppliers of RTDs provide sets of matched devices.
  • Typical purchasing specifications may be for a matched set of RTD assemblies (each consisting of an RTD probe, holder, connection head with terminal strip, and a stainless steel thermowell), calibrated to indicate the same temperature, for example within a tolerance of 0.1 ° F over the range of 25 ° F to 75 ° F.
  • a calibration data sheet typically is provided with each set.
  • Design and installation of temperature sensors used for thermal energy measurements may consider the error caused by: sensor placement in the pipe; conduction of the thermowell; and any transmitter, power supply, or analog-to-digital converter. Complete error analysis through the measurement system may be preferred.
  • Thermal energy measurements for steam may require steam flow measurements (e.g., steam flow or condensate flow), steam pressure, temperature, and feedwater temperature where the energy content of the steam is then calculated using steam tables.
  • steam flow measurements e.g., steam flow or condensate flow
  • steam pressure e.g., steam pressure
  • temperature e.g., temperature
  • feedwater temperature e.g., feedwater temperature
  • measurements may be reduced to measurement of steam flow or condensate flow (i.e., assumes a constant steam temperature- pressure and feedwater temperature-pressure) along with either temperature or pressure of steam or condensate flow.
  • Baseline year Energy Data The energy consumption or demand during the base year.
  • Degree Day - A measure of heating or cooling load on a facility created by outdoor temperature. When the mean daily outdoor temperature is one degree below a stated reference temperature such as 1°C, for one day, it is defined that there is one heating degree day. If this temperature difference prevailed for ten days there would be ten heating degree days counted for the total period. If the temperature difference were to be 12° for 10 days, 120 heating degree days would be counted. When ambient temperature is below the reference temperature, heating degree days are counted; when ambient temperatures are above the reference, cooling degree days are counted. Any reference temperature may be used for recording degree days, usually chosen to reflect the temperature at which heating or cooling is no longer needed.
  • Deemed savings The energy consumption calculated by using a device's power output and length of use. Deemed savings are used when a device is used for predictable time periods and energy consumption does not vary. For example, deemed savings could be used with lights that are on 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (the energy consumption can be calculated with reasonable certainty due to the consistent demand and length of use).
  • Energy Conservation/Efficiency Measure (ECM or EEM) - A set of activities designed to increase the energy efficiency of a facility. Several ECMs may be carried out in a facility at one time, each for a different purpose. An ECM may involve one or more of: physical changes to facility equipment; revisions to operating and maintenance procedures; software changes; or new means of training or managing users of the space or operations and maintenance staff.
  • EMS or Energy Management System A computer that can be programmed to control and/or monitor the operations of energy consuming equipment in a facility.
  • Energy Performance Contract A contract between two or more parties where payment is based on achieving specified results, typically, guaranteed reductions in energy consumption and/or operating costs.
  • Occupant Behavior Index (OBI) - Indicator variable for the occupant behavior (should range from 0 to 1). This index is used to normalize the energy consumption based on variations in the occupants' behavior or presence. For example, more occupants will place greater demand on HVAC systems. This is used where occupant behavior directly impacts energy consumption.
  • OCI Occupant Behavior Index
  • Simulation Model - Assembly of algorithms that calculates energy use based on engineering equations and user-defined parameters.
  • Weather Index - Energy consumption can be heavily dependent on the exterior environment. For example, less heating energy is used during mild winters than in severe winters. Due to this dependence, it is often important to take into account the weather when trying to calculate the energy efficiency of a system. This process is called normalization.
  • the first step in normalization is to quantify the weather. Indicator variables such as heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree days (CDD) are frequently used for this purpose. By comparing the relationship between energy consumption and HDD, it is possible to establish what the energy consumption of the upgraded building would be in the same weather that was used to calculate the baseline energy consumption.
  • HDD heating degree days
  • CDD cooling degree days

Abstract

La présente invention se rapporte à un système et à un procédé permettant de quantifier des réductions d'émissions résidentielles. Le procédé associé audit système peut notamment comprendre les étapes consistant à: mesurer une économie d'énergie résultant d'une possibilité d'économiser l'énergie dans une propriété résidentielle, calculer une réduction des émissions générée par cette économie d'énergie, rassembler une pluralité de réductions d'émissions en une marchandise négociable, surveiller les possibilités d'économies d'énergie résidentielle, contrôler la quantification de la réduction des émissions et vérifier la quantification de la réduction des émissions. Ledit système peut comprendre des moyens permettant la mise en oeuvre de chacune de ces étapes.
PCT/US2002/040369 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables WO2003058385A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02794286A EP1470508A4 (fr) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables
CA002471942A CA2471942A1 (fr) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables
JP2003558634A JP2005514694A (ja) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 取引可能な住宅排出物削減のための測定および検証プロトコル
MXPA04006331A MXPA04006331A (es) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Protocolo de medicion y verificacion para reducciones negociables en emisiones residenciales.
AU2002359731A AU2002359731A1 (en) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Measurement and verification for emissions reductions

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US34284301P 2001-12-28 2001-12-28
US60/342,843 2001-12-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003058385A2 true WO2003058385A2 (fr) 2003-07-17
WO2003058385A3 WO2003058385A3 (fr) 2004-06-03

Family

ID=23343512

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/040369 WO2003058385A2 (fr) 2001-12-28 2002-12-19 Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1470508A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP2005514694A (fr)
CN (1) CN1623155A (fr)
AU (1) AU2002359731A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2471942A1 (fr)
MX (1) MXPA04006331A (fr)
WO (1) WO2003058385A2 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7529705B1 (en) 2001-08-21 2009-05-05 Cantorco2E, Llc Electronic trading system for simulating the trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission reductions and methods of use
US11268996B2 (en) * 2018-03-30 2022-03-08 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Building energy management system with virtual audit metrics

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007164754A (ja) * 2005-11-17 2007-06-28 Nec Corp 環境対策支援システム、環境対策支援方法及びプログラム
JP2007164753A (ja) * 2005-11-17 2007-06-28 Nec Corp 温暖化対策支援システム、温暖化対策支援方法及びプログラム
KR101022288B1 (ko) * 2010-04-12 2011-03-17 (주) 에코센스 무정전 설치가 가능한 분리형 자기장 감지센서를 구비하여 온실가스 배출량을 자동 산출하는 온실가스 측정장치
WO2016051477A1 (fr) * 2014-09-29 2016-04-07 株式会社日立製作所 Système et procédé de service pour aider à l'amélioration de climatisation de bâtiment
JP6764371B2 (ja) * 2017-05-15 2020-09-30 東京瓦斯株式会社 クーポン配信管理装置、クーポン配信方法、及びプログラム
JP6312350B1 (ja) * 2017-09-19 2018-04-18 株式会社Ｐｅｒｓｈ クレジット要求方法、装置
JP7308492B2 (ja) * 2021-07-29 2023-07-14 アスエネ株式会社 温室効果ガス排出量管理方法

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4677552A (en) * 1984-10-05 1987-06-30 Sibley Jr H C International commodity trade exchange
US5532928A (en) * 1992-11-25 1996-07-02 Recra Environmental, Inc. Computer system and method for waste accounting, reduction, and evaluation
US5621654A (en) * 1994-04-15 1997-04-15 Long Island Lighting Company System and method for economic dispatching of electrical power
US5664112A (en) * 1992-03-02 1997-09-02 Alternative Systems, Inc. Integrated hazardous substances management unit
US5726884A (en) * 1992-03-02 1998-03-10 Alternative Systems, Inc. Integrated hazardous substance tracking and compliance
US5794212A (en) * 1996-04-10 1998-08-11 Dominion Resources, Inc. System and method for providing more efficient communications between energy suppliers, energy purchasers and transportation providers as necessary for an efficient and non-discriminatory energy market
US6067549A (en) * 1998-12-11 2000-05-23 American Management Systems, Inc. System for managing regulated entities
US6115698A (en) * 1995-08-18 2000-09-05 Continental Power Exchange, Inc. Apparatus and method for trading electric energy
US20010032168A1 (en) * 2000-01-07 2001-10-18 Seabron Adamson Tradable contingent securities bundled with activity permits
US20010049651A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2001-12-06 Selleck Mark N. Global trading system and method
US20030055665A1 (en) * 2001-04-23 2003-03-20 Teletrips Inc. Mobile emissions data collection, aggregation, and trading
US20030085179A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2003-05-08 General Electric Company Methods and systems for reducing waste and emissions from industrial processes

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4677552A (en) * 1984-10-05 1987-06-30 Sibley Jr H C International commodity trade exchange
US5664112A (en) * 1992-03-02 1997-09-02 Alternative Systems, Inc. Integrated hazardous substances management unit
US5726884A (en) * 1992-03-02 1998-03-10 Alternative Systems, Inc. Integrated hazardous substance tracking and compliance
US5532928A (en) * 1992-11-25 1996-07-02 Recra Environmental, Inc. Computer system and method for waste accounting, reduction, and evaluation
US5621654A (en) * 1994-04-15 1997-04-15 Long Island Lighting Company System and method for economic dispatching of electrical power
US6115698A (en) * 1995-08-18 2000-09-05 Continental Power Exchange, Inc. Apparatus and method for trading electric energy
US5794212A (en) * 1996-04-10 1998-08-11 Dominion Resources, Inc. System and method for providing more efficient communications between energy suppliers, energy purchasers and transportation providers as necessary for an efficient and non-discriminatory energy market
US6067549A (en) * 1998-12-11 2000-05-23 American Management Systems, Inc. System for managing regulated entities
US6256640B1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2001-07-03 American Management Systems, Inc. System for managing regulated entities
US20010032168A1 (en) * 2000-01-07 2001-10-18 Seabron Adamson Tradable contingent securities bundled with activity permits
US20010049651A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2001-12-06 Selleck Mark N. Global trading system and method
US20030055665A1 (en) * 2001-04-23 2003-03-20 Teletrips Inc. Mobile emissions data collection, aggregation, and trading
US20030085179A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2003-05-08 General Electric Company Methods and systems for reducing waste and emissions from industrial processes

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1470508A2 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7529705B1 (en) 2001-08-21 2009-05-05 Cantorco2E, Llc Electronic trading system for simulating the trading of carbon dioxide equivalent emission reductions and methods of use
US11268996B2 (en) * 2018-03-30 2022-03-08 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Building energy management system with virtual audit metrics

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1623155A (zh) 2005-06-01
EP1470508A4 (fr) 2007-10-31
JP2005514694A (ja) 2005-05-19
WO2003058385A3 (fr) 2004-06-03
MXPA04006331A (es) 2005-10-26
AU2002359731A1 (en) 2003-07-24
CA2471942A1 (fr) 2003-07-17
EP1470508A2 (fr) 2004-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20030229572A1 (en) Measurement and verification protocol for tradable residential emissions reductions
Guideline Measurement of energy, demand, and water savings
Haberl et al. ASHRAE's Guideline 14-2002 for Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings: How to Determine what was really saved by the retrofit
Carstens et al. Measurement uncertainty in energy monitoring: Present state of the art
Barley et al. Procedure for measuring and reporting commercial building energy performance
Frick et al. End-use load profiles for the US building stock: Market needs, use cases, and data gaps
EP1470508A2 (fr) Protocole de mesure et de verification pour reductions d'emissions residentielles negociables
Jayaweera et al. The uniform methods project: methods for determining energy efficiency savings for specific measures
Pless et al. Procedure for measuring and reporting the performance of photovoltaic systems in buildings
Parker et al. Metering best practices: A guide to achieving utility resource efficiency, release 3.0
Mims Frick et al. End-Use Load Profiles for the US Building Stock: Market Needs, Use Cases, and Data Gaps
Cowan International performance measurement and verification protocol: Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water Savings-Vol. I
Kaiser et al. Preliminary assessment of the Louisiana Home Energy Rebate Offer program using IPMVP guidelines
Yamagami Non-intrusive submetering of residential gas appliances
Kurnik et al. Peak Demand and Time-Differentiated Energy Savings Cross-Cutting Protocol. The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures
Energy International performance measurement & verification protocol
Walker et al. Supplement to M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Performance-Based Contracts Version 4.0
Blanchard et al. Actual and estimated energy savings comparison for deep energy retrofits in the Pacific Northwest
Jacobson Residential Furnaces and Boilers Evaluation Protocol
Haberl et al. What the Retrofit Really Saved
Salvalai et al. Monitoring Approaches for New-Generation Energy Performance Certificates in Residential Buildings. Buildings 2022, 12, 469
Romberger HVAC Controls (DDC/EMS/BAS) Evaluation Protocol
Baylon et al. Ductless Heat Pump Impact & Process Evaluation: Field Metering Report
Sullivan et al. Metering Best Practices, A Guide to Achieving Utility Resource Efficiency, Release 2.0
Mort Metering Cross-Cutting Protocol. The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy-Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002359731

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/2004/006331

Country of ref document: MX

Ref document number: 2003558634

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2471942

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002794286

Country of ref document: EP

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20028284011

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002794286

Country of ref document: EP