WO1995005615A1 - Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system - Google Patents

Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995005615A1
WO1995005615A1 PCT/CA1994/000440 CA9400440W WO9505615A1 WO 1995005615 A1 WO1995005615 A1 WO 1995005615A1 CA 9400440 W CA9400440 W CA 9400440W WO 9505615 A1 WO9505615 A1 WO 9505615A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
gravity
aircraft
acceleration
vertical
horizontal
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA1994/000440
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jerry R. Panenka
Original Assignee
Noranda Inc.
Canagrav Research Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to CA002104354A priority Critical patent/CA2104354A1/en
Application filed by Noranda Inc., Canagrav Research Ltd. filed Critical Noranda Inc.
Priority to AU74550/94A priority patent/AU699238B2/en
Publication of WO1995005615A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995005615A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V7/00Measuring gravitational fields or waves; Gravimetric prospecting or detecting
    • G01V7/16Measuring gravitational fields or waves; Gravimetric prospecting or detecting specially adapted for use on moving platforms, e.g. ship, aircraft

Definitions

  • This invention relates to (1) improvements of conventional air-borne gravity survey systems, and (2) development of a novel type of air-borne gravity survey system, namely a "differential gravity" system, for the survey of earth formations along the flight path of an air-borne vehicle.
  • ⁇ GPS Differential Global Positioning System
  • ⁇ GPS Differential Global Positioning System
  • ⁇ GPS Differential Global Positioning System
  • An example of such installations is that developed by Carson Helicopters of Perkasie, Penn. as disclosed in U.S. patent No. 4 , 435 , 981 .
  • Any linear accelero eter including a gravity meter, when installed on a moving platform, such as an aircraft, helicopter, airship, etc. will record the sum of platform motion acceleration, which is the noise, and gravity acceleration, which is the signal.
  • Motion acceleration noise is typically four-to-five orders of magnitude stronger than the gravity signal. Both spectra strongly overlap.
  • platform motion accelerations must be determined by non-inertial means, with the help of an independent vertical reference level.
  • this vertical reference level is sea level; for off-shore air-borne gravity, it is derived from a radar or laser altitude above sea level. Above land mass this reference can be provided by an extremely accurate electronic navigation system, like a Differential Global Positioning System ( ⁇ GPS) , often employed in combination with a high-resolution barometric altimeter.
  • ⁇ GPS Differential Global Positioning System
  • Double differentiation of the vertical position of the aircraft with time will yield vertical (Z) motion acceleration, which, after subtraction from the total inertial (Z) acceleration, will yield gravity acceleration.
  • the main problem of conventional systems is to obtain a resolution of at least one milligal with at most one minute time constant, such parameters being desirable for petroleum exploration.
  • One milligal is equivalent to the very small acceleration of 10 "3 cm/sec 2 .
  • a common way around this problem is to increase the time constant to, for example 60 seconds
  • Aircraft or helicopters are relatively noisy platforms for on-board gravity installations.
  • in-flight vertical accelerations in survey regime typically reach .2G, which is IO 4 - 10 s higher than gravity acceleration changes.
  • a one milligal gravity anomaly can be caused by a 10 m topographic high ridge (or valley) .
  • topographic contours for a one milligal survey should be known to better than ⁇ 5m.
  • the standard procedure subtracts radar altitude from ⁇ GPS or Baro- altimeter elevation to yield the terrain profile. In forested areas, this value is degraded by unknown tree heights, which may introduce errors in excess of one milligal.
  • the air-borne gravity surveying system in accordance with the present invention comprises an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) which includes at least one inertial measurement unit (IMU) (such as manufactured by Honeywell Inc., Clearwater, Florida) containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of providing all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations, and a differential global positioning system ( ⁇ GPS) to provide location of the aircraft for derivation of all three components of linear motion acceleration which, after substraction from the total linear inertial acceleration, will yield gravity acceleration.
  • AGSA acceleration/gravity sensor assembly
  • IMU inertial measurement unit
  • ⁇ GPS differential global positioning system
  • the IMU unit replaces the gravity meter on a stabilized platform as used in conventional systems.
  • the IMU consists of one or more vertical (Z) accelerometers and at least one pair of orthogonal (XY) horizontal accelerometers combined with at least two gyroscopes for attitude control.
  • the IMU provides, in addition to the Z component of linear acceleration, the X and Y components and tilts relative to the inertial frame of reference.
  • the availability of X and Y components of acceleration is useful to correct for the coupling of horizontal accelerations into the vertical accelerometer channel when this channel is not perfectly aligned with the vertical direction.
  • the IMU can also supply magnitude of the total linear acceleration vector from which the magnitude of the total linear motion acceleration vector (as measured by ⁇ GPS) can be subtracted to yield the gravity vector magnitude (if gravity and motion acceleration vectors are nearly parallel, which is mostly the case) .
  • the IMU may be installed on-board of an aircraft, or in a towed body ("bird") suspended from an aircraft where it is subjected to lower in-flight accelerations.
  • the IMU can be either strapped down or, if lower noise is required, installed on an active isolation table, controlled by feedback from such IMU, capable of operation in the Shuler-tuned mode.
  • the "bird” may be stabilized with active control surfaces, such as wings and a drag tail.
  • the aircraft may also be stabilized by towing a dummy "bird” .
  • terrain contour data for gravity terrain corrections may be acquired with sufficient precision ( ⁇ 5m) even in forested area, using, for example a laser ranger or scanner.
  • two or more of the above-ground contour data for gravity terrain corrections may be acquired with sufficient precision ( ⁇ 5m) even in forested area, using, for example a laser ranger or scanner.
  • two or more of the following events may be suppress chaotic noise.
  • IMU's either strapped-down, or installed on one or more platforms, can be used in an aircraft installation.
  • the "differential gravity” system uses two acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies (AGSA) , each preferably containing at least one IMU as disclosed above, each sensor assembly containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of acquiring at least the vertical but preferably all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations.
  • AGSA acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies
  • Both AGSA's can be installed in separate towed bodies suspended on a cable from an aircraft at a predetermined distance from each other, or one AGSA can be mounted on- board an aircraft and the other suspended on a cable from the aircraft, or mounted on-board or towed behind and below separate aircraft flying either one above the other or in tandem at a predetermined vertical or horizontal distance, respectively.
  • the differential gravity surveying system further comprises means for constantly monitoring vertical and horizontal distances between the two sensor assemblies (preferably using laser ranging device and/or differential GPS) and means for subtracting the respective vertical and, optionally, horizontal components of motion acceleration and gravity of the two sensor assemblies and dividing the difference by the respective distance between the sensor assemblies to provide normalized gravity difference along the respective directions.
  • the advantage of the "Differential Gravity” over present “Gravity” systems is that the difference in gravity sensor positions can be measured to at least one order better resolution than the absolute position of a single gravity sensor using differential GPS alone. Since positioning error is the dominant source of error in air-borne gravity, improvement in positioning accuracy directly translates directly into improved resolution of gravity information. Furthermore, the system can operate with a ranging device only, and thus independently of GPS, should GPS become unusable for this purpose.
  • the vertical and/or horizontal distance between the two AGSA's may be measured by a laser or microwave range measuring device, which consists of a transmitter at one sensor assembly and a reflective surface located at the other sensor assembly.
  • the vertical and horizontal distance between the two sensor assemblies may also be measured by a differential Global Positioning System ( ⁇ GPS) having an antenna at each sensor location, as well as, optionally, a barometric altimeter.
  • ⁇ GPS Global Positioning System
  • the system can be operated, at lower resolution, with ⁇ GPS only.
  • the x, y, z position difference between the two sensor assemblies is monitored.
  • a second ⁇ GPS antennae serves as a mobile "base station” for the first one.
  • the distance between the two moving sensor assemblies, (length of the "baseline”) is thus reduced, from several hundred kilometres for a typical regional air-borne gravity survey, to a maximum of several kilometres. Since a large portion of ⁇ GPS positioning error is expressed as a percentage of the baseline length, the result is a substantial improvement in the relative position resolution and thus differential gravity signal.
  • Figure 1 shows an embodiment of an air-borne gravity survey system
  • Figures 2a and 2b show first and second embodiments of a "Differential Gravity” System using acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies (AGSA) , in towed bodies ("birds") suspended several hundred meters from a helicopter or an aircraft, or mounted one in the aircraft and the other suspended from the aircraft, respectively;
  • AGSA acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies
  • Figures 3a, and 3b show third and fourth embodiments using sensor assemblies mounted on-board of separate aircraft flying one or more kilometres above or behind each other;
  • Figure 4 shows sensor assemblies installed in towed bodies, flown suspended behind and below the aircraft.
  • an IMU unlike a conventional gravity meter, can provide all three components of linear as well as angular acceleration.
  • can provide valuable redundancy to T z , since ⁇ ⁇ L ⁇ anomalies have similar amplitudes and shapes to T 2 . Subtracting geometrically T z and T x (where
  • T x J T x ,dz
  • z r is a reference flight
  • an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) 1 mounted on a stabilized platform 2 on board an aircraft.
  • the sensor assembly includes at least one IMU containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of providing all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations, and a differential global positioning system ( ⁇ GPS) including antennas 3 capable of providing the location of the aircraft.
  • ⁇ GPS differential global positioning system
  • Also mounted on board of the aircraft is a laser ranger/profiler to provide distance or terrain contour data as illustrated by dashed lines A or B.
  • FIGS 2 to 4 of the drawings there are shown systems comprising two sensor assemblies AGSA X and AGSA 2 , which constitute variations of "Differential Gravity" systems.
  • sensor assemblies AGSA : and AGSA 2 are installed in towed bodies ("bird") 6 and 7 suspended on a cable from a helicopter, and spaced several hundred or more meters apart. Towed bodies 6 and 7 are stabilized with drag tails 8.
  • the vertical spacing between the two sensor assemblies AGSA 1# and AGSA 2 is being constantly monitored by, for example, one or more laser ranger measuring devices, such as the G510 Laser Ranger (produced by Optech Systems Corp., Downsview, Ont.) located at one AGSA with a small reflective device located at the other AGSA as illustrated by dashed line "A" on Figures 2 - 4 and/or by a differential satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) with separate antennas at each AGSA (such as produced by the Ashtech Corp. of Sunnyvale, CA) , as well as at least one base station antenna 5 located on the ground.
  • one or more laser ranger measuring devices such as the G510 Laser Ranger (produced by Optech Systems Corp., Downsview, Ont.) located at one AGSA with a small reflective device located at the other AGSA as illustrated by dashed line "A" on Figures 2 - 4 and/or by a differential satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) with separate antennas at each AGSA (such as produced by the Ashtech Corp.
  • Terrain profile is being acquired with, for example, a laser profiler, as illustrated with dashed line "B" in Figures 2-4.
  • the configuration illustrated in Figure 2a measures the following parameters: ( ⁇ zl - T z2 ) i ilx -
  • FIG. 2b Another embodiment, illustrated in Figure 2b, is with one sensor assembly AGSA : mounted on-board of an aircraft and the second AGSA 2 suspended on a cable in a "bird" where the cable length may exceed one kilometre.
  • the measurements taken are the same as in Figure 2a.
  • the other embodiments, illustrated in Figures 3a and 3b, may consist of two planes each equipped with a sensor assembly (AGSAi, AGSA 2 ) flying up to ten or even more kilometres above ( Figure 3a) or behind ( Figure 3b) each other, respectively.
  • the aircraft may be stabilized with dummy payload 9 and drag tails 8.
  • the vertical or horizontal spacing between the two planes would be monitored with the aid of one or more laser or microwave ranger measuring devices, mounted at one sensor assembly and a reflective device at the other sensor assembly, and/or by differential GPS with antennas at each sensor assembly.
  • the measurements taken in the embodiment of Figure 3a are the same as in Figures 2a or 2b.
  • the measurements taken in Figure 3b are T zl , T z2 , T zx ,
  • the sensor assemblies are installed in towed bodies ("birds") towed behind and below their respective aircrafts.
  • the measurements taken are the same as in Figures 2a, 2b or 3a.
  • two or more IMU's either strapped-down, or installed on one or more platforms, can be used in an aircraft installation.
  • In-flight motion accelerations of the aircraft or "birds” must be kept minimal. This can be accomplished by one or more of the following: a) an autopilot controlled by the IMU for a minimum acceleration flight regime, b) towing heavy stabilizing "bird” below the aircraft, c) a drag tail attached to the tail of the aircraft.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
  • Telescopes (AREA)
  • Golf Clubs (AREA)

Abstract

A system for conducting an air-borne gravity survey of earth formations along the flight path of a helicopter or any other aircraft comprises an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) which includes at least one inertial measurement unit (IMU) containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of acquiring all three components of total linear as well as angular accelerations and a differential global positioning system (ΔGPS) to provide location of the aircraft for derivation of all three linear motion acceleration components which after subtraction from the total linear inertial acceleration components will yield gravity acceleration components.

Description

AIR-BORNE GRAVITY AND DIFFERENTIAL GRAVITY SURVEYING SYSTEM
This invention relates to (1) improvements of conventional air-borne gravity survey systems, and (2) development of a novel type of air-borne gravity survey system, namely a "differential gravity" system, for the survey of earth formations along the flight path of an air-borne vehicle. Background of the Invention
Conventional air-borne gravity survey systems use a modified ship-borne gravity meter (which includes a gravity meter installed on a gimballed stabilized platform) as well as an independent non-inertial positioning reference, like a satellite-based
Differential Global Positioning System (ΔGPS) often in combination with a barometric altimeter, installed on¬ board an aircraft or a helicopter. An example of such installations is that developed by Carson Helicopters of Perkasie, Penn. as disclosed in U.S. patent No. 4 , 435 , 981 .
Any linear accelero eter, including a gravity meter, when installed on a moving platform, such as an aircraft, helicopter, airship, etc. will record the sum of platform motion acceleration, which is the noise, and gravity acceleration, which is the signal. Motion acceleration noise is typically four-to-five orders of magnitude stronger than the gravity signal. Both spectra strongly overlap. Hence platform motion accelerations must be determined by non-inertial means, with the help of an independent vertical reference level.
For ship-borne gravity, this vertical reference level is sea level; for off-shore air-borne gravity, it is derived from a radar or laser altitude above sea level. Above land mass this reference can be provided by an extremely accurate electronic navigation system, like a Differential Global Positioning System (ΔGPS) , often employed in combination with a high-resolution barometric altimeter.
Double differentiation of the vertical position of the aircraft with time will yield vertical (Z) motion acceleration, which, after subtraction from the total inertial (Z) acceleration, will yield gravity acceleration.
The main problem of conventional systems, however, is to obtain a resolution of at least one milligal with at most one minute time constant, such parameters being desirable for petroleum exploration. One milligal is equivalent to the very small acceleration of 10"3 cm/sec2. A common way around this problem is to increase the time constant to, for example 60 seconds
(at the expense of spatial resolution) . This relaxes the vertical reference resolution requirement to 602 = 3600 x IO"3 cm = 3.6 cm per milligal per minute. The latest differential GPS data are beginning to approach this figure. A one minute time constant, however, represents an approximately 3.3 km spatial resolution at slow aircraft surveying speed; or half of that if a more expensive, slower flying helicopter is used. This is already acceptable for petroleum surveys but too coarse for mining and groundwater surveys.
Aircraft or helicopters are relatively noisy platforms for on-board gravity installations. In addition to vibration and other noise, in-flight vertical accelerations in survey regime typically reach .2G, which is IO4 - 10s higher than gravity acceleration changes.
Moreover, a one milligal gravity anomaly can be caused by a 10 m topographic high ridge (or valley) . Hence topographic contours for a one milligal survey should be known to better than ± 5m. The standard procedure subtracts radar altitude from ΔGPS or Baro- altimeter elevation to yield the terrain profile. In forested areas, this value is degraded by unknown tree heights, which may introduce errors in excess of one milligal. Statement of the Invention
It is one object of the present invention to provide an air-borne gravity surveying system which overcomes the above drawbacks.
The air-borne gravity surveying system in accordance with the present invention comprises an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) which includes at least one inertial measurement unit (IMU) (such as manufactured by Honeywell Inc., Clearwater, Florida) containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of providing all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations, and a differential global positioning system (ΔGPS) to provide location of the aircraft for derivation of all three components of linear motion acceleration which, after substraction from the total linear inertial acceleration, will yield gravity acceleration.
The IMU unit replaces the gravity meter on a stabilized platform as used in conventional systems. The IMU consists of one or more vertical (Z) accelerometers and at least one pair of orthogonal (XY) horizontal accelerometers combined with at least two gyroscopes for attitude control.
The IMU provides, in addition to the Z component of linear acceleration, the X and Y components and tilts relative to the inertial frame of reference. The availability of X and Y components of acceleration is useful to correct for the coupling of horizontal accelerations into the vertical accelerometer channel when this channel is not perfectly aligned with the vertical direction. The IMU can also supply magnitude of the total linear acceleration vector from which the magnitude of the total linear motion acceleration vector (as measured by ΔGPS) can be subtracted to yield the gravity vector magnitude (if gravity and motion acceleration vectors are nearly parallel, which is mostly the case) .
The IMU may be installed on-board of an aircraft, or in a towed body ("bird") suspended from an aircraft where it is subjected to lower in-flight accelerations. The IMU can be either strapped down or, if lower noise is required, installed on an active isolation table, controlled by feedback from such IMU, capable of operation in the Shuler-tuned mode.
The "bird" may be stabilized with active control surfaces, such as wings and a drag tail. The aircraft may also be stabilized by towing a dummy "bird" . If necessary, terrain contour data for gravity terrain corrections may be acquired with sufficient precision (<<5m) even in forested area, using, for example a laser ranger or scanner. In order to suppress chaotic noise, two or more
IMU's either strapped-down, or installed on one or more platforms, can be used in an aircraft installation.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel "differential gravity" system. The "differential gravity" system uses two acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies (AGSA) , each preferably containing at least one IMU as disclosed above, each sensor assembly containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of acquiring at least the vertical but preferably all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations. Both AGSA's can be installed in separate towed bodies suspended on a cable from an aircraft at a predetermined distance from each other, or one AGSA can be mounted on- board an aircraft and the other suspended on a cable from the aircraft, or mounted on-board or towed behind and below separate aircraft flying either one above the other or in tandem at a predetermined vertical or horizontal distance, respectively. The differential gravity surveying system further comprises means for constantly monitoring vertical and horizontal distances between the two sensor assemblies (preferably using laser ranging device and/or differential GPS) and means for subtracting the respective vertical and, optionally, horizontal components of motion acceleration and gravity of the two sensor assemblies and dividing the difference by the respective distance between the sensor assemblies to provide normalized gravity difference along the respective directions.
The advantage of the "Differential Gravity" over present "Gravity" systems is that the difference in gravity sensor positions can be measured to at least one order better resolution than the absolute position of a single gravity sensor using differential GPS alone. Since positioning error is the dominant source of error in air-borne gravity, improvement in positioning accuracy directly translates directly into improved resolution of gravity information. Furthermore, the system can operate with a ranging device only, and thus independently of GPS, should GPS become unusable for this purpose.
The vertical and/or horizontal distance between the two AGSA's may be measured by a laser or microwave range measuring device, which consists of a transmitter at one sensor assembly and a reflective surface located at the other sensor assembly. The vertical and horizontal distance between the two sensor assemblies may also be measured by a differential Global Positioning System (ΔGPS) having an antenna at each sensor location, as well as, optionally, a barometric altimeter.
The system can be operated, at lower resolution, with ΔGPS only. In this case, the x, y, z position difference between the two sensor assemblies is monitored. A second ΔGPS antennae serves as a mobile "base station" for the first one. The distance between the two moving sensor assemblies, (length of the "baseline") is thus reduced, from several hundred kilometres for a typical regional air-borne gravity survey, to a maximum of several kilometres. Since a large portion of ΔGPS positioning error is expressed as a percentage of the baseline length, the result is a substantial improvement in the relative position resolution and thus differential gravity signal. Short Description of the Drawings
The invention will now be disclosed, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows an embodiment of an air-borne gravity survey system;
Figures 2a and 2b show first and second embodiments of a "Differential Gravity" System using acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies (AGSA) , in towed bodies ("birds") suspended several hundred meters from a helicopter or an aircraft, or mounted one in the aircraft and the other suspended from the aircraft, respectively;
Figures 3a, and 3b show third and fourth embodiments using sensor assemblies mounted on-board of separate aircraft flying one or more kilometres above or behind each other; and
Figure 4 shows sensor assemblies installed in towed bodies, flown suspended behind and below the aircraft.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
Before proceeding with the detailed description of a few embodiments of the invention let us provide the following well known definitions: Gravity Potential T
Gravity Vector Ti = T(x, y, z)
Gravity Vector magnitude |τ = (Tx 2 + Ty 2 + Tz 2)*
Txxx Txx T•■■xz
Gravity Gradient Tensor Ti # j = Tyz Tyy Tyz Tzx Tzy T2Z
T- • = T- ■
As mentioned previously, an IMU, unlike a conventional gravity meter, can provide all three components of linear as well as angular acceleration. In addition, the IMU can measure the magnitude of a total acceleration vector from which the magnitude of total gravity vectorIT = (Tx 2 + Ty 2 + T-2)* can be derived. |τ can provide valuable redundancy to Tz, since \ τL \ anomalies have similar amplitudes and shapes to T2. Subtracting geometrically Tz and Tx (where
Tx = J Tx,dz where zr is a reference flight
altitutde) from |Ti| yields an estimate of absolute value of |τy| . A simplified procedure can be used at the peaks and troughs of anomalies of |Ti| and Tz, where Txz and Tx = 0. At these locations |Ty| = |τ - Tz. The sign of Ty can be estimated from values of Tz and iT on adjacent lines. Knowledge of |Ty| values allows better contouring and improves detectability of targets not directly overflown.
Referring to Figure 1, there is shown an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) 1 mounted on a stabilized platform 2 on board an aircraft. The sensor assembly includes at least one IMU containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of providing all three components of total inertial linear as well as angular accelerations, and a differential global positioning system (ΔGPS) including antennas 3 capable of providing the location of the aircraft. Also mounted on board of the aircraft is a laser ranger/profiler to provide distance or terrain contour data as illustrated by dashed lines A or B.
Referring now to Figures 2 to 4 of the drawings there are shown systems comprising two sensor assemblies AGSAX and AGSA2, which constitute variations of "Differential Gravity" systems. In Figure 2a, sensor assemblies AGSA: and AGSA2 are installed in towed bodies ("bird") 6 and 7 suspended on a cable from a helicopter, and spaced several hundred or more meters apart. Towed bodies 6 and 7 are stabilized with drag tails 8. The vertical spacing between the two sensor assemblies AGSA1# and AGSA2 is being constantly monitored by, for example, one or more laser ranger measuring devices, such as the G510 Laser Ranger (produced by Optech Systems Corp., Downsview, Ont.) located at one AGSA with a small reflective device located at the other AGSA as illustrated by dashed line "A" on Figures 2 - 4 and/or by a differential satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) with separate antennas at each AGSA (such as produced by the Ashtech Corp. of Sunnyvale, CA) , as well as at least one base station antenna 5 located on the ground.
Terrain profile is being acquired with, for example, a laser profiler, as illustrated with dashed line "B" in Figures 2-4. The configuration illustrated in Figure 2a measures the following parameters: (τzl - Tz2) i ilx - |τ 2
Tzι, Tz2
Figure imgf000014_0001
Terrain Profile or Scan
Prefixes 1 and 2 refer to the above mentioned towed bodies
Another embodiment, illustrated in Figure 2b, is with one sensor assembly AGSA: mounted on-board of an aircraft and the second AGSA2 suspended on a cable in a "bird" where the cable length may exceed one kilometre. The measurements taken are the same as in Figure 2a.
The other embodiments, illustrated in Figures 3a and 3b, may consist of two planes each equipped with a sensor assembly (AGSAi, AGSA2) flying up to ten or even more kilometres above (Figure 3a) or behind (Figure 3b) each other, respectively. Optionally, the aircraft may be stabilized with dummy payload 9 and drag tails 8. The vertical or horizontal spacing between the two planes would be monitored with the aid of one or more laser or microwave ranger measuring devices, mounted at one sensor assembly and a reflective device at the other sensor assembly, and/or by differential GPS with antennas at each sensor assembly. The measurements taken in the embodiment of Figure 3a are the same as in Figures 2a or 2b. The measurements taken in Figure 3b are Tzl, Tz2, Tzx, |T χ |Ti|2, |Tt| ,. - |τ 2. In Figure 4, the sensor assemblies are installed in towed bodies ("birds") towed behind and below their respective aircrafts. The measurements taken are the same as in Figures 2a, 2b or 3a. In order to suppress chaotic noise, two or more IMU's either strapped-down, or installed on one or more platforms, can be used in an aircraft installation.
In-flight motion accelerations of the aircraft or "birds" must be kept minimal. This can be accomplished by one or more of the following: a) an autopilot controlled by the IMU for a minimum acceleration flight regime, b) towing heavy stabilizing "bird" below the aircraft, c) a drag tail attached to the tail of the aircraft. Although the invention has been disclosed, by way of example, with reference to preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, it is to be understood that it is not limited to such embodiments and that other alternatives are also envisaged within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A system for conducting an air-borne gravity survey of earth formations along the flight path of a helicopter or any other aircraft comprising an acceleration/gravity sensor assembly (AGSA) which includes at lest one inertial measurement unit (IMU) containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of acquiring all three components of total linear as well as angular accelerations and a differential global positioning system (ΔGPS) to provide location of the aircraft for derivation of all three linear motion acceleration components which after substraction from the total linear inertial acceleration components will yield gravity acceleration components.
2. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the IMU is installed on-board the aircraft or in a towed body called "bird" suspended from the aircraft.
3. A system as defined in claim 2, wherein the IMU is either strapped-down or mounted on a stabilized platform.
4. A system as defined in claim 2, wherein the "bird" is stabilized with active control surfaces and/or a drag tail.
5. A system as defined in claim 2, wherein the aircraft is stabilized by towing a dummy "bird", for lower motion noise and vibration.
6. A system as defined in claim 1, further comprising means to acquire high-resolution terrain profile data underneath the aircraft by means of laser ranger or scanner.
7. A system which measures vertical and/or horizontal gravity difference over a distance of several hundred meters to several kilometres along the flight path of a helicopter or any other aircraft comprising: (a) two acceleration/gravity sensor assemblies each containing accelerometers and gyroscopes capable of acquiring at least the vertical component of motion acceleration and gravity, each sensor assembly being installed in a towed body called "bird" suspended on a cable at a predetermined distance from each other, or mounted one on-board an aircraft and the other suspended from the aircraft at a predetermined distance, or mounted on-board or towed behind and below separate aircraft flying either one above the other or in tandem at a predetermined vertical or horizontal distance respectively; b) means for continuously measuring the vertical and horizontal distance between the two sensor assemblies; and c) means for subtracting the respective vertical and horizontal components of motion acceleration and gravity of the two sensor assemblies and dividing the difference by the respective distance between the sensor assemblies to provide normalized gravity difference along the respective directions.
8. A system as defined in claim 1 or 7, wherein each acceleration/gravity sensor is a IMU consisting of one or more vertical (Z) accelerometer and at least one pair of orthogonal (X, Y) horizontal accelerometers combined with at least two gyroscopes for attitude control.
9. A system as defined in claim 7, wherein the means for measuring the vertical and horizontal distance between the two sensors is a laser or microwave ranger located at one sensor assembly and a reflective device located at the other sensor assembly and/or a differential Global Positioning System (ΔGPS) , having separate antennas at each sensor assembly.
10. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the horizontal component Tx is derived from the equation Tx = ( Txzdz where zr is a reference flight altitude.
11. A system as defined in claim 10, wherein the magnitude of horizontal component of gravity |Ty| is derived from geometrical substraction of Tz and Tx from the absolute value of total gravity vector |τ .
12. A system as defined in claim 11, wherein the magnitude of horizontal component of gravity |τy| at peaks and troughs of anomalies is derived by subtraction of Tz from |T.I at those locations.
PCT/CA1994/000440 1993-08-18 1994-08-16 Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system WO1995005615A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002104354A CA2104354A1 (en) 1993-08-18 1993-08-18 Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system
AU74550/94A AU699238B2 (en) 1993-08-18 1994-08-16 Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002104354A CA2104354A1 (en) 1993-08-18 1993-08-18 Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system
CA2,104,354 1993-08-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995005615A1 true WO1995005615A1 (en) 1995-02-23

Family

ID=4152170

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA1994/000440 WO1995005615A1 (en) 1993-08-18 1994-08-16 Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (2) AU699238B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2104354A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1995005615A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996007113A1 (en) * 1994-08-30 1996-03-07 Gerd Boedecker Device and process for gravitation measurement
US6125698A (en) * 1998-05-12 2000-10-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and process for optimizing gravity gradiometer measurements
WO2002103398A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-27 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd Gravity surveys
WO2003032015A1 (en) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-17 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd Airborne geophysical measurements
GB2478408A (en) * 2010-03-01 2011-09-07 Christopher Ian Moir Gravity Gradiometer
CN102778232A (en) * 2012-07-10 2012-11-14 清华大学 Micro inertial measuring unit
RU2494405C1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2013-09-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Тихоокеанский океанологический институт им. В.И. Ильичева Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук (ТОИ ДВО РАН) Method and device for measurement of gravity acceleration
CN103901496A (en) * 2014-03-26 2014-07-02 哈尔滨工程大学 Gravity measuring method based on fiber-optic gyroscope SINS and Big Dipper
WO2018064716A1 (en) 2016-10-04 2018-04-12 HZW Holdings Pty Ltd A gravimeter assembly
EP3364217A1 (en) * 2017-02-21 2018-08-22 Action Communication Airborne antenna structure including a planarity error measurement system
CN115079287A (en) * 2022-06-15 2022-09-20 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Strapdown vehicle-mounted dynamic gravity vector measurement method for observing attitude of gyro component

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5728935A (en) * 1996-08-14 1998-03-17 Czompo; Jozsef Method and apparatus for measuring gravity with lever arm correction

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3976937A (en) * 1973-04-16 1976-08-24 Atlantic Richfield Company Method and apparatus for recording position of sensor in airborne magnetic surveying
GB2092975A (en) * 1981-02-18 1982-08-25 Barringer Research Ltd Improved geophysical bird
US4550601A (en) * 1984-02-27 1985-11-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for determining the magnitude of earth's gravity
GB2174210A (en) * 1985-04-15 1986-10-29 Carson Helicopters Inc Airborne gravity surveying method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3976937A (en) * 1973-04-16 1976-08-24 Atlantic Richfield Company Method and apparatus for recording position of sensor in airborne magnetic surveying
GB2092975A (en) * 1981-02-18 1982-08-25 Barringer Research Ltd Improved geophysical bird
US4550601A (en) * 1984-02-27 1985-11-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for determining the magnitude of earth's gravity
GB2174210A (en) * 1985-04-15 1986-10-29 Carson Helicopters Inc Airborne gravity surveying method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A. KLEUSBERG ET AL.: "Airborne Gravimetry and the Global Positioning System", IEEE POSITION LOCATION AND NAVIGATION SYMPOSIUM, March 1990 (1990-03-01), LAS VEGAS, pages 273 - 278 *
C. JEKELI: "A review of gravity gradiometer survey system data analyses", GEOPHYSICS, vol. 58, no. 4, 1993, TULSA US, pages 508 - 514 *

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996007113A1 (en) * 1994-08-30 1996-03-07 Gerd Boedecker Device and process for gravitation measurement
AU700890B2 (en) * 1994-08-30 1999-01-14 Gerd Boedecker Device and method for measuring gravitation
US6125698A (en) * 1998-05-12 2000-10-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and process for optimizing gravity gradiometer measurements
US6152226A (en) * 1998-05-12 2000-11-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and process for secondary hydrocarbon recovery
US6467543B1 (en) 1998-05-12 2002-10-22 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and process for secondary hydrocarbon recovery
WO2002103398A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-27 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd Gravity surveys
AU2002304979B2 (en) * 2001-06-18 2004-09-02 Cgg Data Services Ag Gravity surveys
US6804608B2 (en) 2001-06-18 2004-10-12 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty. Ltd. Method and system for conducting airborne gravity surveys
WO2003032015A1 (en) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-17 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd Airborne geophysical measurements
AP1773A (en) * 2001-10-11 2007-08-27 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd Airborne geophysical measurements.
AU2002328690B2 (en) * 2001-10-11 2007-10-25 Cgg Data Services Ag Airborne geophysical measurements
US7365544B2 (en) 2001-10-11 2008-04-29 Bhp Billiton Innovation Pty Ltd. Methods of adjusting airborne geophysical measurements based on mapping instrument measurements
WO2011107792A3 (en) * 2010-03-01 2012-07-26 Moir Christopher I A gradiometer
GB2478408B (en) * 2010-03-01 2015-02-25 Christopher Ian Moir A gradiometer
GB2478408A (en) * 2010-03-01 2011-09-07 Christopher Ian Moir Gravity Gradiometer
RU2571164C2 (en) * 2010-03-01 2015-12-20 Кристофер И. МУАР Gradient meter
CN102906601A (en) * 2010-03-01 2013-01-30 克里斯多夫·I·莫伊尔 A gradiometer
WO2011107792A2 (en) 2010-03-01 2011-09-09 Moir Christopher I A gradiometer
AU2011222724B2 (en) * 2010-03-01 2014-03-20 Christopher I. Moir A gradiometer
US9140819B2 (en) 2010-03-01 2015-09-22 Christopher I. Moir Gradiometer
RU2494405C1 (en) * 2012-06-21 2013-09-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Тихоокеанский океанологический институт им. В.И. Ильичева Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук (ТОИ ДВО РАН) Method and device for measurement of gravity acceleration
CN102778232A (en) * 2012-07-10 2012-11-14 清华大学 Micro inertial measuring unit
CN103901496A (en) * 2014-03-26 2014-07-02 哈尔滨工程大学 Gravity measuring method based on fiber-optic gyroscope SINS and Big Dipper
WO2018064716A1 (en) 2016-10-04 2018-04-12 HZW Holdings Pty Ltd A gravimeter assembly
EP3523683A4 (en) * 2016-10-04 2020-05-27 HZW Holdings Pty Ltd A gravimeter assembly
EP3364217A1 (en) * 2017-02-21 2018-08-22 Action Communication Airborne antenna structure including a planarity error measurement system
WO2018153758A1 (en) * 2017-02-21 2018-08-30 Action Communication Airborne antenna structure including a planarity error measurement system
CN115079287A (en) * 2022-06-15 2022-09-20 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Strapdown vehicle-mounted dynamic gravity vector measurement method for observing attitude of gyro component
CN115079287B (en) * 2022-06-15 2024-05-17 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Strapdown vehicle-mounted dynamic gravity vector measurement method for gyroscope assembly attitude observation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1429099A (en) 1999-04-22
AU699238B2 (en) 1998-11-26
CA2104354A1 (en) 1995-02-19
AU7455094A (en) 1995-03-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1237769A (en) System and method for real time data collection surveying and processing
US7236885B2 (en) Method and system for geophysical data acquisition on an airship
Gebre-Egziabher Design and performance analysis of a low-cost aided dead reckoning navigator
US4814711A (en) Survey system and method for real time collection and processing of geophysicals data using signals from a global positioning satellite network
US20050017721A1 (en) Airborne geophysical measurements
US20080125920A1 (en) Unmanned Airborne Vehicle For Geophysical Surveying
Brozena et al. An airborne gravity study of eastern North Carolina
WO1995005615A1 (en) Air-borne gravity and differential gravity surveying system
US5661649A (en) Airborne gravity and magnetic field surveying method
US4435981A (en) Airborne gravity surveying
EP3523683B1 (en) Gravimeter assembly
CA1256537A (en) Airborne gravity surveying method
Forsberg et al. Development of an airborne geoid mapping system for coastal oceanography (AGMASCO)
Holladay et al. Bird orientation effects in quantitative airborne electromagnetic interpretation of pack ice thickness sounding
EP3640592B1 (en) A navigation system
Omerbashich Integrated INS/GPS navigation from a popular perspective
Brozena Airborne gravimetry
Brozena GPS and airborne gravimetry: Recent progress and future plans
Tomé et al. Integrating multiple gps receivers with a low cost imu for aircraft attitude determination
Tomé et al. Position+ Attitude from GPS+ INS for RTK Airborne Sensoring
GB2148016A (en) Airborne gravity surveying
CA1204158A (en) Airborne gravity surveying
Panova THE INS PROSPECTS FOR IN FLIGHT GRAVITATION MEASUREMENTS
Anthony AFCRL's experimental aerial gravimetry program
Brozena An Airborne Gravity Measurement System for Use in the Arctic

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CH CN CZ DE DK ES FI GB GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LU LV MD MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SI SK TJ TT UA US UZ VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE MW SD AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: US

Ref document number: 1996 596200

Date of ref document: 19960216

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase