WO1988007720A1 - Dynamically assignable shared register sets - Google Patents

Dynamically assignable shared register sets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1988007720A1
WO1988007720A1 PCT/US1988/001032 US8801032W WO8807720A1 WO 1988007720 A1 WO1988007720 A1 WO 1988007720A1 US 8801032 W US8801032 W US 8801032W WO 8807720 A1 WO8807720 A1 WO 8807720A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
processor
processors
register
assigned
region
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1988/001032
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Milton A Morton
Peter A. Darnell
Original Assignee
Stellar Computer Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stellar Computer Inc. filed Critical Stellar Computer Inc.
Publication of WO1988007720A1 publication Critical patent/WO1988007720A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/52Program synchronisation; Mutual exclusion, e.g. by means of semaphores
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/461Saving or restoring of program or task context
    • G06F9/462Saving or restoring of program or task context with multiple register sets

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Multi Processors (AREA)

Abstract

Dynamic assignment of shared register sets (22) to multiple processors (12) executing a machine instruction sequence (14), is made possible by storing status information (40) that indicates which register sets (22) are assigned to which processors (12), and by including (in the machine instruction sequence (14)) assignment instructions that cause the processors (12) to assign the register sets (22) to the processors (12) based on the status information (40), without interrupting the execution of instructions in the sequence.

Description

Dynamically Assignable Shared Register Sets Background of the Invention This invention relates to assigning sets of shared registers to multiple processors executing 'a machine instruction sequence.
In order to permit multiple processors to communicate quickly, high speed registers are sometimes provided for storing information to be shared in common by the processors. Some mechanism must be provided to assign the registers to processors and to reassign them from time to time.
In one such mechanism, one or more of the processors must be temporarily interrupted in their execution of the machine instruction sequence while the reassignment is done by the operating system, at a substantial cost in processing time, particularly if reassignment is needed often.
In another mechanism, a large number of register sets is provided, and fixed assignments are made once at the beginning of processing.
Summary of the Invention A general feature of the invention enables dynamic assignment of shared register sets to multiple processors executing a machine instruction sequence, by storing status information indicating which register sets are assigned, and by including, in the machine instruction sequence, assignment instructions that cause the processors to assign the register sets to the processors based on the stored status information, without interrupting the execution of the instructions in the sequence. Preferred embodiments include the following . features. Each processor has associated storage (a register) that holds a value identifying the register set assigned to that processor, and the assignment instructions include an instruction that causes the - processor executing it to investigate the values held in the other processors' associated storages in order to assign to itself an available register set. The assignment instructions include an instruction that enables a processor to assign to itself the same register set assigned to another processor, so that the processors may share the register set. There are at least as many shared register sets as the number of processors and the shared register sets (which include more than one register) all have the same capacity.
The invention enables a relatively small number of shared register sets to be assigned and reassigned dynamically at a reduced overhead cost.
Other advantages and features will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment, and from the claims.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment We first briefly describe the drawings. Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a multiple processor computer.
Fig. 2 is a diagram of parallel regions and blocks in a machine instruction sequence.
Fig. 3 is a diagram of shared register sets. Fig. 4 is a diagram of a portion of a program status word.
Fig. 5 is a diagram of a parallel region descriptor.
Figs. 6, 7 are flow diagrams of register set assignment instructions. , Fig. 8 is a diagram of a parallel region. Structure and Operation
Referring to Fig. 1, in one example of a multiple processor computer system 10, four processors 12 (labeled.respectively A, B, C D) are available to execute a machine instruction sequence 14 held in a shared memory 16.
Referring to Fig. 2, machine instruction sequence 14 may include one or more parallel regions 18 of machine instructions (representative parallel regions are labeled W, X, Y, Z) . A given parallel region X has two or more blocks 20 of machine instructions (representative blocks are labeled Q, R, S, T) which are independent in the sense that the same result is obtained whether one processor executes all blocks in the parallel region, or different processors execute different blocks '(e.g. , processor A executes block Q, C executes R, and D executes S and T) .
The system 10 is capable of executing from one up to four processes simultaneously. (A process, as commonly defined, is a sequence of machine instructions and information about the state of its execution) . Each process may be capable of being split up for execution among more than one of the processors. The portion of a process executing on a given processor at a given time may be called a thread. Thus a process is a collection of threads. Threads enter and leave parallel regions from time to time.
Referring again to Fig. 1, in order to regulate the work of the four processors within the machine instruction sequence 14, computer system 10 includes (as a shared resource) a pool 22 of high-speed register sets shared in common by the four processors. Referring to Fig. 3, pool 22 includes as many register sets 24 as there are processors (in this case four, labeled respectively 0, 1, 2, 3). All of the register sets 24 have the same number (two) of 32-bit registers 26. The two registers in a set are called concurrency registers 0 and 1, i.e., CRO and CR1. Any of the four register sets can be dynamically assigned to a processor as it enters a parallel region 18, as explained below. For example, sets 0, 1, 2, 3 may be assigned at a given time to processors A, B, C, D, respectively.
As a processor enters a parallel region it is assigned either a currently unused register set (if no processor is actively working in the region) or the register set already assigned to processors working in the region being entered. As a processor leaves a region the assignment of the register set to it is terminated. As long as at least one processor is actively working in a parallel region, the register set assigned to that processor is, of course, unavailable for reassignment. However, when no processor is currently active within a region, the register set previously associated with that region is free to be dynamically reassigned for use by other processors. The assignment and reassignment of register sets to processors is accomplished dynamically by the processors themselves in the course of (and without interrupting) the normal execution of the machine instruction sequence. To accomplish this, the compiler inserts assignment instructions at appropriate locations in the machine instruction sequence.
There are several types of assignment instructions. One type of assig menr instruction enables a processor to find an available currently unused register set and assign that set to itself, or to assign itself to the same register set currently in use by another processor so that those two processors can share the information in the register set. Another .allocation instruction causes a processor to terminate the assignment of a register set to that processor. When all processors to which a register set had been assigned terminate the assignment, the register set becomes freed for reassignment. Because all of the register sets have the same configuration it is irrelevant which particular register set becomes assigned to the processors working in a region at a given time. The dynamic assignment and reassignment reduces overhead cost and permits a relatively small number of register sets to be used.
Referring again to Fig. 1, each processor has an associated non-shared PSW register 40 which holds a program status word (PSW) . The PSW includes information pertinent to the thread currently executing on the associated processor, including the identity of the register set assigned to the processor.
Referring to Fig. 4, the PSW 42 has both a protected (unaccessible to the user) portion 44 and an unprotected portion 46. The protected portion 44 includes: a one-bit parallel region valid (PRV) field 48; (which is set when the CRI and PID fields, described below, are valid); a two-bit concurrency register indicator (CRI) field 50 which identifies the register set (0, l, 2, or 3) assigned to this processor (CRI is valid only if PRV is set); and a two-bit process identifier (PID) field 52.
Each of the four (or fewer) processes which may be executing concurrently on computer system 10 is assigned a unique identifying value called a process identifier (PID), which is stored in PID field 52. The PSWs of all threads presently executing on behalf of the prdcess are assigned the PID of that process.
A wide variety of possible combinations of processes and threads executing in parallel regions may occur.
In a simple example, there are four processes, each with a single thread executing on one of the processors in one corresponding parallel region. Then there are four different PIDs (0, 1, 2, 3) (identifying the four different processes) and four different CRIs (3, 2, 1, 0) in the four PSWs (identifying the four different register sets).
In a second example, a single process has four threads that are executing (respectively on the four processors) in four different parallel regions. Then there are four different CRI values (0, 1, 2, 3) in the four different PSWs, and the same PID value (e.g. , 2) appears in all four PSWs. In a. third example, a single process has four threads executing (on the four processors) within a single parallel region. All four threads then share the same CRI value (e.g., 3) and a single PID value (e.g., 2). Now suppose there are four executing processes each with a single thread and one process (e.g., the process identified by PID 3) reaches a stopping point, freeing up the processor on which its thread was executing in a parallel region. If the newly available processor takes up a second thread of one of the other processes (e.g., the process identified by PID 2) and begins executing in a parallel region that is already being worked in by another processor, that second thread is assigned the same CRI value (0) as the processor already operating in the region. This is accomplished in a manner described below. • The actual information stored in a register set a d shared by the processors to which the set is assigned may be of any kind. In the particular 'case of processors operating in parallel regions, however, the information may concern the status of the execution of independent blocks by processors operating within the region. Then the information may take the form of bits that keep track of which blocks have been partly or fully executed. The" information"needs to be updated as processors enter and leave parallel regions and must be retained and recovered at times when all processors have temporarily left an unfinished parallel region (thus freeing up the register set for reassignment). The same instructions by which the register sets are assigned and reassigned to processors may be used to retain and recover the status information contained in the register set.
In order to keep track of the status of execution of each parallel region, the compiler establishes for each parallel region an associated parallel region descriptor (PRD) which is stored at a specific location in shared memory 16.
Referring to Fig. 5, each PRD 30 includes three 32-bit words 34, 36, 38.
The first word 34, called a control word, includes five fields as follows. A one-bit flag VI (valid) (68) is set to indicate when the PRD contains valid information. VI is set during initialization and is cleared when the last to leave of all threads that entered the parallel region has permanently left the region (meaning that .the entire region has been executed) .
A one-bit flag Op (open) is set to indicate ' that there is a block (e.g., a section of code or an iteration of a loop) within the region that has not been started.. This saves, time by preventing a thread from entering a region when all of the work in the region has been started (although not necessarily finished). Op is set at initialization and is cleared by the first processor to exit the region upon reaching the end of the region.
A two-bit field (concurrency register index) CRI 87 identifies which one of the four shared register sets 24 is currently assigned to processors working in the region. CRI is zeroed at initialization.
An eleven-bit field Entered 74 keeps a count of the number of threads that have successfully entered the parallel region and have not left permanently (although they may have left temporarily) . Thus Entered begins at zero, is incremented each time a thread (not previously active in the region) enters, is decremented each time a thread permanently leaves the region, and reaches zero again when execution of the parallel region is complete. A three-bit field Active 76 counts the number of threads that have entered and are currently actively working in a parallel region. Active cannot be larger than the number of processors (e.g., four) and Entered is typically slightly larger than Active. Active is initialized at zero and becomes zero again whenever no threads are actively working in a region; this event is a signal that the register set currently associated with the parallel region can be released and reassigned. The second and third words 36, 38 of the PRD are 32-bit words that correspond to the two registers in each register set. The 64 bits of the two words can be used in various ways. One way is to set, e.g., one of the bits when a block of instructions within the parallel is entered. The bit acts as a flag to indicate to later entering processors that the block is being executed by another processor. In the case of loops, one' or more of the bits can be used as a counter to indicate how many iterations of the loop remain. The compiler inserts into the machine language instruction sequence instructions which can set and test the various bits in CRO and CRI to accomplish the desired result, as explained more fully below. The bits of CRO and CRI are initialized to zero and the loop counters are initialized to their starting values.
The second and third words of the PRD serve first as a place to store the 64 bits when they are initialized. Whenever a register set becomes associated with a parallel region, the 64 bits are loaded from the corresponding PRD to the register set. While the register set remains assigned, the 64 bits are updated in the register set by the set and test instructions included in the machine instruction sequence. When a register set is released for reassignment, the 64 bits are stored temporarily in the PRD for reloading to the register set which next becomes associated with that parallel region (the next time a thread enters it) .
There are four different instructions that the compiler either includes in the machine instruction sequence itself (or otherwise causes to be executed at appropriate times, e.g., when a processor is interrupted) in order to control- (1) the dynamic assignment and reassignment of the shared register sets, (2) the updating of the PRDs to regulate the execution of the parallel regions, and (3) the updating of the relevant fields of the PSW registers. All four instructions are atomic, i.e., they are executed by a process'or on a memory location or register, and the results are stored back in that location or register, in such a way that no other processor can access the location or register during the execution.
The four instructions are": (1) enter parallel region (EPR) which is executed by a processor when its thread first enters the parallel region; (2) suspend parallel region (SPR) which is executed under command of the operating system when a processor temporarily exits a parallel region leaving no processor then actively working in the region; (3) resume parallel region (RPR) which is executed under command of the operating system when a processor reenters a previously suspended parallel region; and (4) exit parallel region (XPR) which is executed by a processor that exits a parallel region that has been completely executed.
Referring to Fig. 6, the EPR instruction 60 includes two operands: ea, which is the address of a shared memory location containing the PRD assigned to the parallel region, and Ra, which identifies three registers (Ra, Ra+1, and Ra+2) that are used to store the three words of the PRD temporarily while they are being manipulated. When EPR is executed, the PRD first is loaded (62) into Ra, Ra+1, and Ra+2. The PRV field in the PSW of the processor whose thread is entering the parallel region is tested (64). If invalid, the execution terminates with an "illegal instruction" trap. Asynchronous interrupts are suspended (66). Next the VI and Op fields 68, 70 (Fig. 4) are tesred (72). Unless both fields are set (indicating that the PRD is valid, i.e., contains useful information, and includes a block that has not yet been started) , a condition code Z for this processor is set' (condition code Z is cleared to indipate .when a' processor has successfully entered a ' parallel region and is set to indicate that' a processor has not successfully entered a parallel region or has left a parallel region) and execution.of the remainder of the instruction is suppressed. If both fields are set, the condition code Z is cleared, the Entered and Active fields 74, 76 (Fig. 4) are incremented (78) to indicate that an additional processor will enter (for the first time) and be "active in the parallel region.
If the Active field is zero (80) (indicating that this processor will be the only one active in this region), a currently unused CRI value is found (84) by looking at the CRIs in the PSWs of the other processors (note that because there are as many shared register sets as processors, an unused CRI is guaranteed to be found). The unused CRI value is then loaded (86) into the CRI field of the processor's PSW and into the CRI field 87 (Fig. 4) of the PRD (which alerts all future processors entering the parallel region of the shared register set to be used) . The PRV bit in the PSW is set (88). If Active was not just zero (at least one other processor was active in the region) , the condition code Z is cleared (94); the CRI value in the PRD is fetched (96); and the other PSWs are searched (98) to see if the ones in which PRV is set have the same PID and CRI values. If so, that CRI value is loaded (100) in the PRD and PRV is set (102); otherwise CRI and PRV are left unchanged. This prevents a thread from adopting a CRI unless other threads using the same CRI value also have the same PID. By assigning a unique PID to the PSWs of all processors executing in a parallel region, and by preventing PSWs having different PIDs from sharing the same register set it is assured that processes will not interfere with each other. When a processor begins executing a process, the operating system (which itself is being executed by one of the processors) assigns it a unique PID. The PID associated with each thread of that process is set with the unique PID for 'that process. When a thread is completed (or interrupted) the PID is cleared from the PSW.
Finally, the now modified control word of the PRD in Ra is copied back (106) into the PRD, and Ra+l and Ra+2 are loaded (107) into CRO and CRI.
The execution of the RPR instruction is identical to the execution of the EPR instruction except that Entered is not incremented (because this is not the first time the thread has entered the parallel region) , and Op and VI are not tested because VI is presumed set and even if Op is set, the thread should enter the region to complete work previously begun.
The XPR instruction likewise has the two operands ea and Ra. Referring to Fig. 7, PRV is tested (114) and if not set, an "illegal instruction" trap is triggered. If PRV is set, asynchronous interrupts are suppressed (115), and the control word of the PRD (found at address ea} is loaded (116) into Ra. Entered and Active are each decremented (118) to indicate that one fewer processor is actively working in the region and one fewer thread has unfinished work in the region. Op is cleared (120) to indicate that no unstarted work exists in the parallel region (if there were unstarted work this thread would enter it rather than leaving the parallel region). If Entered is now zero (122) (indicating all threads have permanently left the parallel region), VI is cleared (124) (to iridicate that the PRD no longer contains useful information) . In either case, the PRV is cleared (130) indicating that the thread's PSW fields are no longer valid, the modified control word of the PRD is ' loaded (132) into Ra, and Ra+1 and Ra+2 are copied back to shared memory (134) at address ea.
The execution of the SPR instruction is identical to the execution of the XPR instruction except that it does not decrement Entered (because this thread is not finished in the parallel region) and does not 'clear Op (because the parallel region has' not been' completed) .
The purpose for suppressing asynchronous interrupts is to assure the atomicity of the instructions, so that no other processor can modify the most recent values of the shared register set while the execution of the parallel region instruction proceeds. Referring to Fig. 8, each parallel region 140 begins with an EPR instruction, which points to a PRD address, in this case the address of PRD1. When a processor enters the parallel region, it executes the EPR instruction in the manner previously described. Parallel region 140 has two independent blocks. Each block begins with a so-called test and set instruction. The first processor to enter the parallel region executes the test and set instruction by testing the 0 bit of the first register (CRO) of the register set that was assigned to the processor when it executed the EPR instruction. It will find that bit to have a zero value (the bit was initialized to zero) . The result of finding the bit value to be zero is that the processor simply proceeds directly to the subsequent code in block 1. Now, -suppose that while the first processor is working in the first block a second processor enters the parallel region for the first time. It too executes the EPR instruction which causes it to be assigned the same -'register set as the first processor. It next executes the test and set instruction at line LI. Now the bit 0 • in CRO is set to 1 and this will cause the 'processor to branch to instruction L2 at the beginning of the second block. The effect of that instruction is to set bit 1 in CRO to 1 and cause the processor to proceed into the second block.
Now if a third processor enters the parallel region, it will find, when it executes the EPR instruction that the Op field of PRD1 is cleared, indicating that there is no work in this parallel region that has not already been started. Accordingly, it will not enter this region. Once the second processor reaches the end of the second block it executes the XPR instruction in the manner previously described. Thus it can be seen that the compiler can allocate the register set to the various blocks in a region in advance, without knowing which particular register set will be used during execution. It does so by inserting the appropriate test and set type instructions in the blocks of the region.
When a processor is interrupted in its work within a block, or returns to a block after an interruption, the operating system causes the SPR or RPR instruction to be executed based on the status of the processor's PSW PRV bit.
When a processor reaches the end of its work in a parallel region and executes the XPR instruction, it may be precluded from proceeding until other processors in the parallel region have completed their work. A dependency bit may have been stored in the PRD when it was initialized to indicate, for example, whether the blocks within a parallel region are dependent such that- they all should be completed before subsequent instructions following that parallel region are begun. In that situation, the compiler includes a TEST DEPENDENCY BIT instruction in the sequence following the XPR instruction. If an exiting processor finds the dependency bit set, it may then set an IDLE bit in its own PSW as a flag to the operating system that it is available to work on a different thread. The last processor to exit the parallel region clears the dependency bit before executing the TEST instruction and then simply proceeds to the instructions that follow the parallel region.
The dynamic allocation of register sets 24 has thus been achieved by atomic operations (i.e., those performed by a processor on memory in such a way that no other processor can access the memory during the operations). The register sets are assigned dynamically by the processors themselves without stopping the execution of the processors. The assignments are accomplished quickly by a small number of instructions so that assignments and reassignments can be made frequently with an acceptable overhead cost. Conflicts between processors are avoided.
In addition, the operation of. multiple processors within a parallel region of any given machine instruction sequence is managed by the processor themselves by executing atomic instructions inserted in the instruction sequence itself.
Other embodiments are within the following claims . For example, some processors could' be operating concurrently in one process in oie shared memory, while other processors could be operating concurrently in another process in another shared memory,, and the concurrencies could be vcontrolled in the same manner.

Claims

Claims
1. Apparatus for enabling dynamic assignment of shared register sets to multiple processors executing a machine instruction sequence, comprising storage that holds status information indicating which register sets are assigned, and a shared memory that holds said machine instruction sequence, including assignment instructions that cause said processors to assign said register sets to said processors based on said status information, without interrupting the execution by said processors of successive instructions in said sequence.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein each said processor has associated storage that holds a value identifying the register set assigned to said processor, and said assignment instructions include an instruction that causes a processor to investigate the values held in the other processors' associated storages in order to assign to itself a not-currently-assigned said register set.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said assignment instructions include an instruction that causes a processor to assign to itself the same register set currently assigned to another processor, whereby said processors share said register set.
4. ' The apparatus of claim 1 wherein each said processor has associated storage that holds a' value identifying the register set assigned to said processor, and said assignment instructions include an instruction that enables each processor to update said associated storage to indicate that said processor does not have a register set assigned to it.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said register sets all have the same capacity and configuratio .
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein there are at least as many said shared register sets as the number of said processors, whereby at least one register set is always available for assignment to a processor to which a register set is not currently assigned.
7. The apparatus of claim 2 or 4 wherein said associated storage comprises a register.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein each said set includes more than one register.
9. A method for enabling dynamic assignment of shared register sets to multiple processors executing a machine instruction sequence, comprising storing status information indicating which register sets are assigned to which processors, and including in said machine instruction sequence, assignment instructions that cause said processors to assign said register sets to said processors based on said status information, without interrupting the execution by said processors of successive instructions in said sequence.
PCT/US1988/001032 1987-04-02 1988-03-25 Dynamically assignable shared register sets WO1988007720A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US3416687A 1987-04-02 1987-04-02
US034,166 1987-04-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1988007720A1 true WO1988007720A1 (en) 1988-10-06

Family

ID=21874716

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1988/001032 WO1988007720A1 (en) 1987-04-02 1988-03-25 Dynamically assignable shared register sets

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU1682188A (en)
WO (1) WO1988007720A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0369407A2 (en) * 1988-11-14 1990-05-23 Nec Corporation Central processing unit for data processor having emulation function
FR2674654A1 (en) * 1991-03-27 1992-10-02 Nec Corp System for controlling shared registers

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3317898A (en) * 1963-07-19 1967-05-02 Ibm Memory system
US3916383A (en) * 1973-02-20 1975-10-28 Memorex Corp Multi-processor data processing system
US3934232A (en) * 1974-04-25 1976-01-20 Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. Interprocessor communication apparatus for a data processing system
US3972029A (en) * 1974-12-24 1976-07-27 Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. Concurrent microprocessing control method and apparatus
US3980922A (en) * 1974-01-30 1976-09-14 Kokusan Denki Co., Ltd. Capacitance discharge type breakerless ignition system for an internal combustion engine
US4121286A (en) * 1975-10-08 1978-10-17 Plessey Handel Und Investments Ag Data processing memory space allocation and deallocation arrangements
US4136386A (en) * 1977-10-06 1979-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Backing store access coordination in a multi-processor system
US4197579A (en) * 1978-06-06 1980-04-08 Xebec Systems Incorporated Multi-processor for simultaneously executing a plurality of programs in a time-interlaced manner
US4280176A (en) * 1978-12-26 1981-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Memory configuration, address interleaving, relocation and access control system
US4282572A (en) * 1979-01-15 1981-08-04 Ncr Corporation Multiprocessor memory access system
US4354227A (en) * 1979-11-19 1982-10-12 International Business Machines Corp. Fixed resource allocation method and apparatus for multiprocessor systems having complementarily phased cycles
US4467436A (en) * 1981-10-26 1984-08-21 United States Robots, Inc. Robot arm controller with common bus memory
EP0174446A2 (en) * 1984-08-03 1986-03-19 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed multiprocessing system
US4713757A (en) * 1985-06-11 1987-12-15 Honeywell Inc. Data management equipment for automatic flight control systems having plural digital processors

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3317898A (en) * 1963-07-19 1967-05-02 Ibm Memory system
US3916383A (en) * 1973-02-20 1975-10-28 Memorex Corp Multi-processor data processing system
US3980922A (en) * 1974-01-30 1976-09-14 Kokusan Denki Co., Ltd. Capacitance discharge type breakerless ignition system for an internal combustion engine
US3934232A (en) * 1974-04-25 1976-01-20 Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. Interprocessor communication apparatus for a data processing system
US3972029A (en) * 1974-12-24 1976-07-27 Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. Concurrent microprocessing control method and apparatus
US4121286A (en) * 1975-10-08 1978-10-17 Plessey Handel Und Investments Ag Data processing memory space allocation and deallocation arrangements
US4136386A (en) * 1977-10-06 1979-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Backing store access coordination in a multi-processor system
US4197579A (en) * 1978-06-06 1980-04-08 Xebec Systems Incorporated Multi-processor for simultaneously executing a plurality of programs in a time-interlaced manner
US4280176A (en) * 1978-12-26 1981-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Memory configuration, address interleaving, relocation and access control system
US4282572A (en) * 1979-01-15 1981-08-04 Ncr Corporation Multiprocessor memory access system
US4354227A (en) * 1979-11-19 1982-10-12 International Business Machines Corp. Fixed resource allocation method and apparatus for multiprocessor systems having complementarily phased cycles
US4467436A (en) * 1981-10-26 1984-08-21 United States Robots, Inc. Robot arm controller with common bus memory
EP0174446A2 (en) * 1984-08-03 1986-03-19 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed multiprocessing system
US4713757A (en) * 1985-06-11 1987-12-15 Honeywell Inc. Data management equipment for automatic flight control systems having plural digital processors

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Laughlin, "The Galaxy/5: A large Computer Composed of Multiple Microcomputers", 13th. IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Washington, D.C., (September 1976), pp. 90-94, See entire document. *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0369407A2 (en) * 1988-11-14 1990-05-23 Nec Corporation Central processing unit for data processor having emulation function
EP0369407A3 (en) * 1988-11-14 1991-10-16 Nec Corporation Central processing unit for data processor having emulation function
FR2674654A1 (en) * 1991-03-27 1992-10-02 Nec Corp System for controlling shared registers
US5408671A (en) * 1991-03-27 1995-04-18 Nec Corporation System for controlling shared registers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1682188A (en) 1988-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4829422A (en) Control of multiple processors executing in parallel regions
EP1031927B1 (en) Protocol for coordinating the distribution of shared memory.
US4604694A (en) Shared and exclusive access control
KR100463235B1 (en) Method for reserving resources
US6848033B2 (en) Method of memory management in a multi-threaded environment and program storage device
US7451146B2 (en) Almost non-blocking linked stack implementation
US6411983B1 (en) Mechanism for managing the locking and unlocking of objects in Java
JP2866241B2 (en) Computer system and scheduling method
US4779194A (en) Event allocation mechanism for a large data processing system
US9727338B2 (en) System and method for translating program functions for correct handling of local-scope variables and computing system incorporating the same
JP2002342163A (en) Method for controlling cache for multithread processor
JPH1115793A (en) Protection method for resource maintainability
US6349322B1 (en) Fast synchronization for programs written in the JAVA programming language
US6662364B1 (en) System and method for reducing synchronization overhead in multithreaded code
WO2020005597A1 (en) Managing global and local execution phases
CA1306308C (en) Task scheduling mechanism for large data processing systems
WO1988007720A1 (en) Dynamically assignable shared register sets
EP3794450A1 (en) Managing global and local execution phases
US8689230B2 (en) Determination of running status of logical processor
JPH02238556A (en) Process scheduling system and multiprocessor system
WO1989000734A1 (en) Detecting multiple processor deadlock
US20210342190A1 (en) Versioned progressive chunked queue for a scalable multi-producer and multi-consumer queue
JPH0423137A (en) Thread generation system and parallel processing system
JP2973480B2 (en) Communication register multiplexing method
US20100325098A1 (en) Eliding synchronization in a concurrent data structure

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BB BG BR DK FI HU JP KP KR LK MC MG MW NO RO SD SU

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BJ CF CG CH CM DE FR GA GB IT LU ML MR NL SE SN TD TG