WO1987002496A1 - Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation - Google Patents

Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1987002496A1
WO1987002496A1 PCT/GB1986/000635 GB8600635W WO8702496A1 WO 1987002496 A1 WO1987002496 A1 WO 1987002496A1 GB 8600635 W GB8600635 W GB 8600635W WO 8702496 A1 WO8702496 A1 WO 8702496A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
field
transfer function
vibration
cancelling
residual
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1986/000635
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Brian Alan Taylor
Original Assignee
Contranoise Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Contranoise Limited filed Critical Contranoise Limited
Priority to GB08712273A priority Critical patent/GB2191363B/en
Publication of WO1987002496A1 publication Critical patent/WO1987002496A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1781Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1785Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices
    • G10K11/17853Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices of the filter
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17875General system configurations using an error signal without a reference signal, e.g. pure feedback
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17879General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal
    • G10K11/17883General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal the reference signal being derived from a machine operating condition, e.g. engine RPM or vehicle speed
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/10Applications
    • G10K2210/121Rotating machines, e.g. engines, turbines, motors; Periodic or quasi-periodic signals in general
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/10Applications
    • G10K2210/128Vehicles
    • G10K2210/1282Automobiles
    • G10K2210/12822Exhaust pipes or mufflers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/10Applications
    • G10K2210/129Vibration, e.g. instead of, or in addition to, acoustic noise
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3011Single acoustic input
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3012Algorithms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3023Estimation of noise, e.g. on error signals
    • G10K2210/30232Transfer functions, e.g. impulse response
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3025Determination of spectrum characteristics, e.g. FFT
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K2210/00Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • G10K2210/30Means
    • G10K2210/301Computational
    • G10K2210/3045Multiple acoustic inputs, single acoustic output

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an improved method of generating a transfer function and thus to a method of, and apparatus for, active cancellation of vibration in a system subject to vibration.
  • the invention is applic- able to the cancellation of vibrations propagating in gas(es), liquid(s) or solid(s) or in any combination of these media. Reduction (and at best substantial removal) of noise to create a quiet zone is one particu ⁇ larly important aspect of the invention.
  • the can ⁇ celling algorithm and transfer function may be in the time domain(as described in GB-A-1555760 ) , the frequency domain (as described in GB-A-2107960) , or any suitably methematically formed transformation.
  • the transfer function can be measured in advance and written into the algorithm, it can be measured immed ⁇ iately prior to cancellation or it can be measured during cancellation.
  • the last mentioned approach lends itself to a system which can better adapt to changing conditivns affecting the transfer function.
  • the prior art approach has been to generate the transfer function by inputting some vibration into the system.
  • This vibration can be discrete tones, a swept sine wave, random vibrations (which may be white noise), or an impulse and measuring the system response in the relevant time- or transformed- domain.
  • the problem with these prior art approaches is that, although they do generate an explicit transfer function, they actually increase the vibration in the system media during the period when the transfer function is being generated or adapted.
  • the present invention relates to a truly adaptive means of generating an initial transfer function for a system which is able to update the transfer function during cancellation without introducing appreciable addi ⁇ tional vibration into the system.
  • the invention thus also updates the content of the cancelling signal. Both of these updates are achieved by monitoring the residual vibration in the system.
  • a method for the active cancellation of an incident vibration field which com ⁇ prises superposing on the incident field a cancelling vibration field to create a residual vibration field and operating on the residual field with a transfer func ⁇ tion to obtain an updated cancelling field, is character ⁇ ised in that the transfer function is divided by a refer ⁇ ence point into an upstream part and a downstream part and that the downstream part of the transfer function is periodically updated by multiplying the last obtained value by a factor which is the ratio of a computational value of the last cancelling field and a computational value for the sum of previous residual fields.
  • a method of updating the transfer function used in a transformed domain to determine a cancelling vibration field which when super- posed on an incident vibration field will produce a resid ⁇ ual vibration field, the updating being effected so as to decrease the residual vibration field is characterised in that said method comprises multiplying the existing value of the transfer function in the transformed domain by an updating factor which is the ratio of the existing value of the cancelling field in the transformed domain to the sum of all significant values of the residual field in the transformed domain.
  • the invention in its main apparatus aspect, relates to apparatus for cancelling vibrations entering a given location from a source of repetitive vibrations comprising means to monitor the repetition rate at which the source is emitting said vibrations, a first electro-mechanical transducer to generate a secondary vibration and to feed the same_ to said location, a second electro-mechanical transducer to monitor the resultant vibrations existing at said location due to interaction there between said primary and secondary vibrations, and an electronic digi ⁇ tal processing circuit linking said first and second transducers, which circuit includes synchronising means receiving an electrical signal train from said rate moni ⁇ toring means, said digital processing circuit linking said second and first transducers including a first trans ⁇ form module receiving time waveform samples from the second transducer and generating independent pairs of components at each of a plurality of different frequency locations of the time waveform samples, a processor for separately modifying the independent pairs at each said frequency location outputting from the first transform module and feeding the modified pairs of components to a second transform module, said second transform module generating further time waveform samples which are .
  • said digital processing circuit includes a first region in which the current transform domain representation of the secondary vibration is stored, a second region in which a transformed domain representa ⁇ tion of the sum of earlier differences between primary and secondary vibrations is stored, and a third region in which a ratio between the data in the first and second regions is obtained.
  • the transform modules are commercially available Fourier transformers and the data stored in- eludes information defining the amplitude and phase at a plurality of discrete frequencies.
  • Figure 1 is an overall view of a system for cancell ⁇ ing a vibration
  • Figure 2 is a schematic view of an acoustic system for cancelling noise.
  • FIG. 3 is a more detailed schematic of the system of Figure 2
  • Figure 4 is a schematic view of a practical system for cancelling noise from an engine
  • Figure 5 is a series of graphs showing noise reduc ⁇ tion in the exhaust from the engine of Figure 4. Description of Preferred Embodiments
  • Figure - 1 represents the relevant parameters of any vibrating system.
  • N(ioJ) is the plurality of pairs of real and imaginary components in the frequency domain which components represent the amplitude and phase of each frequency in the frequency band representing the vibration to be cancelled.
  • C ( ⁇ ) is the plurality of pa ⁇ rs of similar frequency components representing the frequency band of the cancelling vibration field.
  • R(i _>) is the plurality of pairs of similar frequency components representing the residual field remaining after super ⁇ position of N(i ⁇ ) and C(iCJ).
  • Fi(ic ) is the combined transfer function of all of the system elements prior to an arbitrary reference point 10 in the system
  • Fo(i ⁇ J) is the combined transfer function of all the system elements after the reference point.
  • the system reference point can in principle- be chosen anywhere but since it is a position in the system to which all the equations are referred, for practical purposes it is best defined within the controller performing the transfer function generation and cancelling computations and ideally is ' selected at a point which leaves Fi(ioj) as sensibly, of unit value.
  • FIG. 2 represents an acoustic cancelling system.
  • the transfer function generator is phase locked by line 11 to a source of repetitive acoustic noise.
  • the elements of , he system shown in Figure 2 are an audio/electric transducer (a microphone) 20 to monitor the residual sound field and an audio amplifier 21 to produce an amplified output of the analogue signal gener ⁇ ated by the microphone.
  • 22 is a low pass filter and 23 an analogue to digital converter (ADC) which associates a numerical value to each of the different time slices into which the analogue output of the microphone 20 is divided.
  • 24 is a microprocessor which is programmed to perform transformation operations on the output of the ADC 23 and will be described in greater detail with reference to Figure 3.
  • the combined transfer function (the input transfer function) of the parts 20 to 24 is collectively represented as Fi(i ⁇ ) in Figure 2.
  • the output transfer function Fo(i(J) relates to inte ⁇ gers 25 to 29 which sequentially represent a digital to analogue converter (DAC) 25, a low pass filter 26, a second audio power amplifier 27, an electro/acoustic transducer (a loudspeaker) 28 and the acoustic path 29 between the transducers 20 and 28.
  • DAC digital to analogue converter
  • a low pass filter 26
  • a second audio power amplifier an electro/acoustic transducer (a loudspeaker) 28 and the acoustic path 29 between the transducers 20 and 28.
  • the microprocessor 24 will undertake frequency domain manipulations based on amplitude and phase values, but it is not essential that this domain, or these parameters representative of that domain,be used.
  • the loop shown in Figure 2 is repetitively followed and periodically (typically each successive loop - but this need not be the case particularly in a system which is not varying signi icantly and is effecting good can ⁇ cellation) at least the output transfer function is adjusted to maintain R(i ⁇ ) at a minimum value.
  • the microprocessor 24 comprises input and output memory regions (30 and 40, respectively), Fourier and inverse ' Fourier transformers (31 and 38 respectively), a low pass .digital filter 32, a first calculator region 33 for determining a digital array representative of the current transformed cancelling vibration field C ( i ⁇ ) a second calculator region 34 for determining a digital array representative of the output transfer function Fo(iU), a third calculator region 35 for updat ⁇ ing a digital array representative of the sum of all previous residual transformed vibration fields by adding thereto the current residual field (Rn(ioJ)), a memory region (36) in which the sum of previous residuals can be stored, and a fourth calculator region 37 for determin ⁇ ing a digital array representative of the new transformed output vibration field (On(ioJ)) from the ratio of the sum stored in region 36 and the current output transfer function determined in calculator region 34.
  • the circuit shown in Figure 3 is for processing repetitive signals and the line 11 receives signals from a sync, generator 41 and feeds them to a memory scanner 42 which sequences the input and output memories
  • a start-up unit 43a is used to set the total in the memory region 36 to unity for the first cycle and 43b to set the output memory 40 to zero for the first cycle.
  • the sync, generator 41 can take many forms, but one convenient practical embodiment for use with rotating machinery serving as a source of the incident vibration, comprises a timing disc (e.g. a toothed wheel) generating (say) 64 pulses each 360° rotation and rotating in syn ⁇ chronism with the vibration source.
  • a timing disc e.g. a toothed wheel
  • Such a timing disc can be made to generate a square wave pulse train with a 50:50 mark space ratio, each leading edge being used as a trigger pulse to advance the memory scanner 42 one stage.
  • 64 timing pulses per revolution of the timing disc it is computationally convenient to let one repeat cycle of the microprocessor 24 represent two rotations of the disc so that the input and output memories 30, 40 each constitute 128 addresses.
  • each address in memory 30 desirably comprises four bytes, '.one 16-bit word of each address representing the real component of a complex number and the other 16-bit word of each address representing the imaginary component of the complex number.
  • each address of the memory 30 is set to zero and on the arrival of the first 128 timing pulses, the two bytes making up the real component of each address in memory 30 is in turn filled with the binary number generated by the ADC 25 on the basis of the amplitude of the then instantaneous output of the vibration sensor 20 (i.e. the amplitude of the incident vibration N(T) is stored in successive time slots).
  • the addresses in the memory 30 are incremented by four bytes for each timing pulse on line 11.
  • each memory address in the memory 30 will have been updated to store the residual field Rn(T) and thus has taken account of the effect of the superposition of the cancelling vibration field C(T) on the incident vibration field N(T).
  • a commercially available fast Fourier transformer is used for integers 31 and 38 and its mode of sequen- tially operating on the data in the addresses of the memory region 30 is so well documented as not to require elaboration here. It is convenient to digitally process information relating to the amplitude and phase of each Fourier transformed component and this involves storing the complex number a + ib in the first 64 addresses and a-ib in the. last 64 addresses, the amplitude then being
  • the first calculator region 33 is designed to work on only one
  • Calculator region 33 determines a digital array representative of the transformed cancelling field after the nth loop C (ic) . During start-up when there is no cancelling field, the region 33 will determine N(i ⁇ ), a digital array representing the transformed incident vibra ⁇ tion field.
  • the digital array in region 33 is next operated on computationally in the four stages represented in Figure 3 by the boxes 34 to 37.
  • Central to this calcu ⁇ lation is a determination of a digital array representing (in the transformed domain) the sum of all previous resid ⁇ ual vibration fields.
  • the updating of the sum of resid- uals is effected in the third calculator region 35 and memory region 36 stores this for use in the second (34) and fourth (37) calculator regions.
  • the transfer function Fo(i ⁇ J) of the integers 24-29 is calcu- lated from the ratio of Cn( i6J) and the sum of residuals.
  • the digital array representing, in the trans ⁇ formed domain, the output electrical waveform needed to drive the amplifier 27 is generated by taking the ratio of the sum of residuals and the output transfer function Fo(i( ). Inverse Fourier transformation is per ⁇ formed, the result is doubled to compensate for the power lost by not processing the conjugate part of the FFT, in unit 38 and fed into the output memory 40 comprising 128 addresses of two bytes each (since only real data is stored in the output memory 40). The addresses in the memory 40 are incremented 2 bytes for each time pulse on line 11.
  • the cancelling vibration is generated in the transducer 28 to create, after passage through the path 29 (which could be " in air, liquid and/or solid), the cancelling field C(T).
  • the residual vibration field R (T) will be at least 15 dB n down on the incident vibration field N(T).
  • N(T) the incident vibration field
  • the key to improving cancellation is the determining of an accurate value for the transfer function Fo(i&>) which, as can be seen from the second calculator region
  • Figure 4 shows an IC engine 50 with an exhaust system 51, a toothed timing wheel 53, a sensor 54 for wheel teeth, a microphone 20, a speaker 28 and a unit 55 repre- senting the units 21 to 27 of Figure 3 between the micro ⁇ phone 20 and speaker 28.
  • the timing cycle must match the repetition cycle of the engine 50 so that a 64 toothed wheel 53 will be required if its drive shaft turns twice per full cycle of engine performance.
  • Figure 5 shows five typical traces of the analogue output of the microphone 20 over the first,* (at A), second (at B), third (at C), fifth (at D) and fifteenth (at E) repetition cycles of the engine 50.
  • the five traces shown in Figure 5 are all drawn to the same scale and relate to the engine operating at constant speed, but because of the very rapid adaptive performance achieved by means of the invention, similar rapid attenuation is achieved when the rotational speed of the engine varies.
  • Equations 2 and 3 give the factor required to update the all-important output transfer function, and from equation 3 can be seen to be the current cancelling field divided by the product of the input transfer function and the sum of the previous residuals. It has been found that: by appropriate choice of components 20 and 21, a working approximation of the updating factor can be ob- tained by assuming that Fi(iOJ) is unity and it will be seen that this assumption has been made in the ratio computed in region 34 of Figure 3.
  • the pair of equations 1 and 2 above can be up ⁇ graded each loop, but in practice since the transfer function rapidly converges to a relatively steady value, it is acceptable practice to cease updating the transfer function each loop after such a steady value has been obtained and only to revise it when it does need recalcu ⁇ lation. This recalculation can be at pre-determined intervals or switched in when the output from the system begins to lose cancellation efficiency.
  • the history of residuals can be successively weighted so that the importance of past events is reduced in the calculation of the sum.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
  • Fittings On The Vehicle Exterior For Carrying Loads, And Devices For Holding Or Mounting Articles (AREA)
  • Exhaust Silencers (AREA)

Abstract

A method for the active cancellation of an incident vibration field (N(iomega)) which comprises superposing on the incident field, a cancelling vibration field (C(iomega)) to create a residual vibration field (R(iomega)) and operating on the residual field with a transfer function to obtain an updated cancelling field, the transfer function being divided by a reference point (10) into an upstream part (Fi(iomega)) and a downstream part (Fo(iomega)) and the downstream part (Fo(iomega)) of the transfer function being periodically updated by multiplying the last obtained value (Fon(iomega)) by a factor which is the ratio of a computational value of the last cancelling field (Cn(iomega)) and a computational value for the sum of previous residual fields (R(iomega)).

Description

Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation Background of the Invention
This invention relates to an improved method of generating a transfer function and thus to a method of, and apparatus for, active cancellation of vibration in a system subject to vibration. The invention is applic- able to the cancellation of vibrations propagating in gas(es), liquid(s) or solid(s) or in any combination of these media. Reduction (and at best substantial removal) of noise to create a quiet zone is one particu¬ larly important aspect of the invention.
Discussion of Prior art Except in certain circumstances (virtual earth or tight-coupled monopole) most active vibration control systems which generate the required cancelling' vibration from a sensing of the signature of the incident vibration it is desired to cancel, require a knowledge of the trans- fer function of the system media and elements of the cancelling system. Depending on the approach, the can¬ celling algorithm and transfer function may be in the time domain(as described in GB-A-1555760 ) , the frequency domain (as described in GB-A-2107960) , or any suitably methematically formed transformation.
The transfer function can be measured in advance and written into the algorithm, it can be measured immed¬ iately prior to cancellation or it can be measured during cancellation. The last mentioned approach lends itself to a system which can better adapt to changing conditivns affecting the transfer function.
The prior art approach has been to generate the transfer function by inputting some vibration into the system. This vibration can be discrete tones, a swept sine wave, random vibrations (which may be white noise), or an impulse and measuring the system response in the relevant time- or transformed- domain. The problem with these prior art approaches is that, although they do generate an explicit transfer function, they actually increase the vibration in the system media during the period when the transfer function is being generated or adapted.
An apternative approach is that described in US- A-4435751 (Hitachi) which finds the transfer function implicitly by a trial and error method. GB-A-2107960 mentions a method of updating the transfer function during cancellation, but this is not a general method.
The present invention relates to a truly adaptive means of generating an initial transfer function for a system which is able to update the transfer function during cancellation without introducing appreciable addi¬ tional vibration into the system. The invention thus also updates the content of the cancelling signal. Both of these updates are achieved by monitoring the residual vibration in the system.
Summary of the Invention
Expressed in one aspect a method for the active cancellation of an incident vibration field which com¬ prises superposing on the incident field a cancelling vibration field to create a residual vibration field and operating on the residual field with a transfer func¬ tion to obtain an updated cancelling field, is character¬ ised in that the transfer function is divided by a refer¬ ence point into an upstream part and a downstream part and that the downstream part of the transfer function is periodically updated by multiplying the last obtained value by a factor which is the ratio of a computational value of the last cancelling field and a computational value for the sum of previous residual fields.
Expressed in a further aspect a method of updating the transfer function used in a transformed domain to determine a cancelling vibration field which when super- posed on an incident vibration field will produce a resid¬ ual vibration field, the updating being effected so as to decrease the residual vibration field, is characterised in that said method comprises multiplying the existing value of the transfer function in the transformed domain by an updating factor which is the ratio of the existing value of the cancelling field in the transformed domain to the sum of all significant values of the residual field in the transformed domain.
In its main apparatus aspect, the invention relates to apparatus for cancelling vibrations entering a given location from a source of repetitive vibrations comprising means to monitor the repetition rate at which the source is emitting said vibrations, a first electro-mechanical transducer to generate a secondary vibration and to feed the same_ to said location, a second electro-mechanical transducer to monitor the resultant vibrations existing at said location due to interaction there between said primary and secondary vibrations, and an electronic digi¬ tal processing circuit linking said first and second transducers, which circuit includes synchronising means receiving an electrical signal train from said rate moni¬ toring means, said digital processing circuit linking said second and first transducers including a first trans¬ form module receiving time waveform samples from the second transducer and generating independent pairs of components at each of a plurality of different frequency locations of the time waveform samples, a processor for separately modifying the independent pairs at each said frequency location outputting from the first transform module and feeding the modified pairs of components to a second transform module, said second transform module generating further time waveform samples which are .fed as input to the first transducer, which apparatus is characterised in that between said first and second trans- form modules said digital processing circuit includes a first region in which the current transform domain representation of the secondary vibration is stored, a second region in which a transformed domain representa¬ tion of the sum of earlier differences between primary and secondary vibrations is stored, and a third region in which a ratio between the data in the first and second regions is obtained.
Desirably the transform modules are commercially available Fourier transformers and the data stored in- eludes information defining the amplitude and phase at a plurality of discrete frequencies..
Brief Description of Drawings
The invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which ~
Figure 1 is an overall view of a system for cancell¬ ing a vibration,
Figure 2 is a schematic view of an acoustic system for cancelling noise.
Figure 3 is a more detailed schematic of the system of Figure 2,
Figure 4 is a schematic view of a practical system for cancelling noise from an engine, and
Figure 5 is a series of graphs showing noise reduc¬ tion in the exhaust from the engine of Figure 4. Description of Preferred Embodiments
Figure - 1 represents the relevant parameters of any vibrating system. N(ioJ) is the plurality of pairs of real and imaginary components in the frequency domain which components represent the amplitude and phase of each frequency in the frequency band representing the vibration to be cancelled. C ( ± ) is the plurality of paάrs of similar frequency components representing the frequency band of the cancelling vibration field. R(i _>) is the plurality of pairs of similar frequency components representing the residual field remaining after super¬ position of N(iω) and C(iCJ). Fi(ic ) is the combined transfer function of all of the system elements prior to an arbitrary reference point 10 in the system, and Fo(iώJ) is the combined transfer function of all the system elements after the reference point. The system reference point can in principle- be chosen anywhere but since it is a position in the system to which all the equations are referred, for practical purposes it is best defined within the controller performing the transfer function generation and cancelling computations and ideally is ' selected at a point which leaves Fi(ioj) as sensibly, of unit value.
The invention will be described by way of the example shown in Figure 2, which represents an acoustic cancelling system. In this example the transfer function generator is phase locked by line 11 to a source of repetitive acoustic noise.
The elements of , he system shown in Figure 2 are an audio/electric transducer (a microphone) 20 to monitor the residual sound field and an audio amplifier 21 to produce an amplified output of the analogue signal gener¬ ated by the microphone. 22 is a low pass filter and 23 an analogue to digital converter (ADC) which associates a numerical value to each of the different time slices into which the analogue output of the microphone 20 is divided. 24 is a microprocessor which is programmed to perform transformation operations on the output of the ADC 23 and will be described in greater detail with reference to Figure 3. The combined transfer function (the input transfer function) of the parts 20 to 24 is collectively represented as Fi(iω) in Figure 2.
The output transfer function Fo(i(J) relates to inte¬ gers 25 to 29 which sequentially represent a digital to analogue converter (DAC) 25, a low pass filter 26, a second audio power amplifier 27, an electro/acoustic transducer (a loudspeaker) 28 and the acoustic path 29 between the transducers 20 and 28.
In the described arrangement, the microprocessor 24 will undertake frequency domain manipulations based on amplitude and phase values, but it is not essential that this domain, or these parameters representative of that domain,be used.
The loop shown in Figure 2 is repetitively followed and periodically (typically each successive loop - but this need not be the case particularly in a system which is not varying signi icantly and is effecting good can¬ cellation) at least the output transfer function is adjusted to maintain R(iω) at a minimum value.
How this is done, represents the substance of the present invention and will now be further described, verbally with reference to Figures 3, 4 and 5, and mathe¬ matically.
From Figure 3, in which the same reference numerals have been used as were used in Figure 2, it can be seen that the microprocessor 24 comprises input and output memory regions (30 and 40, respectively), Fourier and inverse' Fourier transformers (31 and 38 respectively), a low pass .digital filter 32, a first calculator region 33 for determining a digital array representative of the current transformed cancelling vibration field C ( i<ϋ) a second calculator region 34 for determining a digital array representative of the output transfer function Fo(iU), a third calculator region 35 for updat¬ ing a digital array representative of the sum of all previous residual transformed vibration fields by adding thereto the current residual field (Rn(ioJ)), a memory region (36) in which the sum of previous residuals can be stored, and a fourth calculator region 37 for determin¬ ing a digital array representative of the new transformed output vibration field (On(ioJ)) from the ratio of the sum stored in region 36 and the current output transfer function determined in calculator region 34.
The circuit shown in Figure 3 is for processing repetitive signals and the line 11 receives signals from a sync, generator 41 and feeds them to a memory scanner 42 which sequences the input and output memories
(30, 40)..
A start-up unit 43a is used to set the total in the memory region 36 to unity for the first cycle and 43b to set the output memory 40 to zero for the first cycle.
The sync, generator 41 can take many forms, but one convenient practical embodiment for use with rotating machinery serving as a source of the incident vibration, comprises a timing disc (e.g. a toothed wheel) generating (say) 64 pulses each 360° rotation and rotating in syn¬ chronism with the vibration source. Such a timing disc can be made to generate a square wave pulse train with a 50:50 mark space ratio, each leading edge being used as a trigger pulse to advance the memory scanner 42 one stage. With 64 timing pulses per revolution of the timing disc, it is computationally convenient to let one repeat cycle of the microprocessor 24 represent two rotations of the disc so that the input and output memories 30, 40 each constitute 128 addresses. Working with 8-bit technology each address in memory 30 desirably comprises four bytes, '.one 16-bit word of each address representing the real component of a complex number and the other 16-bit word of each address representing the imaginary component of the complex number.
Considering start up conditions, all four bytes in each address of the memory 30 is set to zero and on the arrival of the first 128 timing pulses, the two bytes making up the real component of each address in memory 30 is in turn filled with the binary number generated by the ADC 25 on the basis of the amplitude of the then instantaneous output of the vibration sensor 20 (i.e. the amplitude of the incident vibration N(T) is stored in successive time slots). The addresses in the memory 30 are incremented by four bytes for each timing pulse on line 11.
Following each succeeding two rotations of the timing disc, each memory address in the memory 30 will have been updated to store the residual field Rn(T) and thus has taken account of the effect of the superposition of the cancelling vibration field C(T) on the incident vibration field N(T).
A commercially available fast Fourier transformer is used for integers 31 and 38 and its mode of sequen- tially operating on the data in the addresses of the memory region 30 is so well documented as not to require elaboration here. It is convenient to digitally process information relating to the amplitude and phase of each Fourier transformed component and this involves storing the complex number a + ib in the first 64 addresses and a-ib in the. last 64 addresses, the amplitude then being
/ —1 _ derivable from va +b and the phase from tan /a. It is however not necessary to separate out the complex number into this physical form. Following Fourier trans¬ formation by chip 31, all 128 x 4 bytes are full of digi¬ tal data, the first 64 addresses containing the complex number and the last 64 addresses containing the complex conjugate. The dc level is located in the centre of the memory array (i.e. address 64) with the fundamental in address 1 and the negative fundamental in address 128.
To keep the computation to acceptable levels without loss of any significant degree of performance, the first calculator region 33 is designed to work on only one
•half of the available data (i.e. addresses 1 to 63) and furthermore only the lower frequency terms in the band of interest for active noise control achieve this.
Calculator region 33 determines a digital array representative of the transformed cancelling field after the nth loop C (ic) . During start-up when there is no cancelling field, the region 33 will determine N(iω), a digital array representing the transformed incident vibra¬ tion field.
The digital array in region 33 is next operated on computationally in the four stages represented in Figure 3 by the boxes 34 to 37. Central to this calcu¬ lation is a determination of a digital array representing (in the transformed domain) the sum of all previous resid¬ ual vibration fields. The updating of the sum of resid- uals is effected in the third calculator region 35 and memory region 36 stores this for use in the second (34) and fourth (37) calculator regions. In region 34 the transfer function Fo(iώJ) of the integers 24-29 is calcu- lated from the ratio of Cn( i6J) and the sum of residuals.
In region 37 the digital array representing, in the trans¬ formed domain, the output electrical waveform needed to drive the amplifier 27 is generated by taking the ratio of the sum of residuals and the output transfer function Fo(i( ). Inverse Fourier transformation is per¬ formed, the result is doubled to compensate for the power lost by not processing the conjugate part of the FFT, in unit 38 and fed into the output memory 40 comprising 128 addresses of two bytes each (since only real data is stored in the output memory 40). The addresses in the memory 40 are incremented 2 bytes for each time pulse on line 11.
Following reversion to an analogue signal in the DAC 25, filtering at 26 and amplification in 27, the cancelling vibration is generated in the transducer 28 to create, after passage through the path 29 (which could be "in air, liquid and/or solid), the cancelling field C(T).
In the exemplified case, after ten or twelve rota¬ tions of the timing wheel (i.e. five or six cycles) the residual vibration field R (T) will be at least 15 dB n down on the incident vibration field N(T). As the can¬ cellation improves the input memory comes closer to a full array of zeros.
The key to improving cancellation is the determining of an accurate value for the transfer function Fo(i&>) which, as can be seen from the second calculator region
34, is the ratio of the current cancelling field and the sum of the previous residuals.
Figure 4 shows an IC engine 50 with an exhaust system 51, a toothed timing wheel 53, a sensor 54 for wheel teeth, a microphone 20, a speaker 28 and a unit 55 repre- senting the units 21 to 27 of Figure 3 between the micro¬ phone 20 and speaker 28. The timing cycle must match the repetition cycle of the engine 50 so that a 64 toothed wheel 53 will be required if its drive shaft turns twice per full cycle of engine performance.
Figure 5 shows five typical traces of the analogue output of the microphone 20 over the first,* (at A), second (at B), third (at C), fifth (at D) and fifteenth (at E) repetition cycles of the engine 50. The five traces shown in Figure 5 are all drawn to the same scale and relate to the engine operating at constant speed, but because of the very rapid adaptive performance achieved by means of the invention, similar rapid attenuation is achieved when the rotational speed of the engine varies.
Expressed in mathematical terms, by considering the action of the system shown in Figure .2, the following expressions can be derived for the nth loop
Figure imgf000013_0001
where Fec(i.o) is the cth estimate of Fo ( i(Δ) . Note if Fo(iω) is updated every loop then c=n,
Also
Figure imgf000013_0002
For the special case, when n=l, N(it )-R (iω) is replaced by N(i-O) so equation 2 reduces to
Fe(c+l)(iω) = Cn(iω) Fec(iω) 3
K=n-1 Fi(iω) V RJiu) K=l K since R (iω) = N(iω) - C ( i&>) and for the start-up loop C.(iC ) = 0 so that the first residual is equal to N { ± ) .
Equations 2 and 3 give the factor required to update the all-important output transfer function, and from equation 3 can be seen to be the current cancelling field divided by the product of the input transfer function and the sum of the previous residuals. It has been found that: by appropriate choice of components 20 and 21, a working approximation of the updating factor can be ob- tained by assuming that Fi(iOJ) is unity and it will be seen that this assumption has been made in the ratio computed in region 34 of Figure 3.
The pair of equations 1 and 2 above can be up¬ graded each loop, but in practice since the transfer function rapidly converges to a relatively steady value, it is acceptable practice to cease updating the transfer function each loop after such a steady value has been obtained and only to revise it when it does need recalcu¬ lation. This recalculation can be at pre-determined intervals or switched in when the output from the system begins to lose cancellation efficiency.
The history of residuals can be successively weighted so that the importance of past events is reduced in the calculation of the sum.
The procedure explained with reference to Figures 2 and 3 will only find a transfer function value for frequencies present in N(iω). In a non-repetitive situ¬ ation, it may be necessary to find the transfer function values at other frequencies. This can be achieved by deliberately imparting additional components into the incident vibration field by the controller and eliminating these in the described manner. This is equally applicable to deterministic and random systems, where it is also possible to recompute Fec(iώJ) when new frequency terms appear.
The foregoing description has specified the use of Fourier components of the time domain signals and 5 has concentrated on a repetitive system. Those skilled in the art will realise that the expressions generated for the transfer function and cancellation can be applied to any deterministic system and that the transfer function generator can be applied to random systems. Also, that 10. Z any other suitable mathematical transform can be employed in place of a Fourier transform.

Claims

1. A -method for the active cancellation of an inci¬ dent vibration field (N(iω)) which comprises superposing on the incident field, a cancelling vibration field (C(iω)) to create a residual vibration field (R(iω)) and operating on the residual field with a transfer func¬ tion to obtain an updated cancelling field, characterised in that the transfer function is divided by a reference point (10) into an upstream part (Fi(iω)) and a downstream part (Fo(_Lω,),). and that the downstream part (Fo(icJ)) of the transfer- fun-ction is periodically updated by multiply¬ ing the last obtained value (Fo (icυ) ) by a factor which is the ratio of a computational value of the last cancell¬ ing field (Cn(iJ)) and a computational value for the sum of previous residual fields (R(i )).
2. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the reference point (10) is chosen at a position in which the upstream transfer function approximates to unity.
3. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the reference point (10) is chosen at a position in which the upstream transfer function has known charac¬ teristics which can be included in the computation.
4. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the updating factor is deduced using the expres- sion
Figure imgf000016_0001
where R (itJ) is the computational value of the residual n field on the nth update, and where for the special case where n=l, N(iω)-R (ioj) is replaced by N(i&J).
5. A method according to claim 4, characterised in that the.updating factor is taken to be
cn(it»
K=n-1
K=l where C ( iω) is the computational value of the cancelling field on the nth update.
6. A method of updating the transfer function used in a transformed domain to determine a cancelling vibra¬ tion field (C(T)) which when superposed on an incident vibration field (N(T)) will produce a residual vibration field (R(T)), the updating being effected so as to de- crease the residual vibration field, characterised in that said method comprises multiplying the existing value of the transfer function in 'the transformed 'domain (Fo ( ± ) ) by an updating factor which is the ratio ' of the existing value of the cancelling field in the trans- formed domain (C ( iω) ) to the sum of all significant values of the residual field in the transformed domain.
' 7_ A method according to claim 6, characterised in that the transformed domain is a Fourier transformation and in that the history of values of the incident vibra- tion fields and of the residual fields are successively weighted so that the importance of past events is reduced in the calculation.
8. Apparatus for cancelling vibrations entering a given location from a source (50) of repetitive vibra- tions comprising means (53, 54) to monitor the repetition rate at which the source is emitting said vibrations, a first electro-mechanical transducer (28) to generate a secondary vibration and to feed the same to said loca¬ tion, a second electro-mechanical transducer (20) to monitor the resultant vibrations existing at said location due to interaction there between said primary and second¬ ary vibrations, and an electronic digital processing circuit (55) linking said first and second transducers, which circuit includes synchronising means (42) receiving an electrical signal train from said rate monitoring means (53, 54), said digital processing circuit (55) linking said second and first transducers including a first transform module (31) receiving time waveform samples from the second transducer (20) and generating independent: pairs of components at each of a plurality of different frequency locations of the time waveform samples, a processor (33-38) for separately modifying the independent pairs at each said frequency location outputting from the first transform module (31) and feed- ing the modified pairs of components to a second transform module (39), said second transform module (39) generating further time waveform samples which are fed as input to the first transducer (28), characterised in that between said first and second transform modules said, digital processing circuit includes a first region (33) in which the current transform domain representation of the second¬ ary vibration is stored, a second region (36) in which a transformed domain representation of the sum of earlier differences between primary and secondary vibrations is stored, and a third region (34) in which a ratio between the data in the first and second regions is obtained.
9. Apparatus according to claim 8, characterised in that the transform modules are Fourier transformers.
10. Apparatus according to claim 9, characterised in that the data stored in. the digital processing circuit includes information defining the amplitude and phase at a plurality of discrete frequencies.
PCT/GB1986/000635 1985-10-18 1986-10-17 Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation WO1987002496A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08712273A GB2191363B (en) 1985-10-18 1986-10-17 Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB858525800A GB8525800D0 (en) 1985-10-18 1985-10-18 Transfer function generation
GB8525800 1985-10-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1987002496A1 true WO1987002496A1 (en) 1987-04-23

Family

ID=10586918

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1986/000635 WO1987002496A1 (en) 1985-10-18 1986-10-17 Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0243433A1 (en)
AU (1) AU6523186A (en)
GB (2) GB8525800D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1987002496A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4953217A (en) * 1987-07-20 1990-08-28 Plessey Overseas Limited Noise reduction system
WO1990013108A1 (en) * 1989-04-25 1990-11-01 Active Noise And Vibration Technologies Inc. Active sound and/or vibration control
EP0586261A1 (en) * 1992-09-03 1994-03-09 Paloma Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Pulse combustor

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5263019A (en) * 1991-01-04 1993-11-16 Picturetel Corporation Method and apparatus for estimating the level of acoustic feedback between a loudspeaker and microphone
FR2774606B1 (en) 1998-02-11 2000-03-17 Rhodia Chimie Sa PROCESS FOR REMOVING HALOGENATED COMPOUNDS FROM GASES OR LIQUIDS

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2069280A (en) * 1981-01-05 1981-08-19 Ross C F Process of testing for a sound control system
GB2122052A (en) * 1982-06-09 1984-01-04 Plessey Co Plc Reducing noise or vibration
GB2154830A (en) * 1984-02-21 1985-09-11 Nat Res Dev Attenuation of sound waves

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2069280A (en) * 1981-01-05 1981-08-19 Ross C F Process of testing for a sound control system
GB2122052A (en) * 1982-06-09 1984-01-04 Plessey Co Plc Reducing noise or vibration
GB2154830A (en) * 1984-02-21 1985-09-11 Nat Res Dev Attenuation of sound waves

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems Proceedings, 1978, New York (US) J.E. PAUL: "Adaptive Digital Techniques for Audionoise Cancellation", pages 232-236 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4953217A (en) * 1987-07-20 1990-08-28 Plessey Overseas Limited Noise reduction system
WO1990013108A1 (en) * 1989-04-25 1990-11-01 Active Noise And Vibration Technologies Inc. Active sound and/or vibration control
AU635266B2 (en) * 1989-04-25 1993-03-18 Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. Active sound and/or vibration control
EP0586261A1 (en) * 1992-09-03 1994-03-09 Paloma Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Pulse combustor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU6523186A (en) 1987-05-05
GB8525800D0 (en) 1985-11-20
GB2191363B (en) 1988-11-16
EP0243433A1 (en) 1987-11-04
GB8712273D0 (en) 1987-07-01
GB2191363A (en) 1987-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4947435A (en) Method of transfer function generation and active noise cancellation in a vibrating system
EP0091926B1 (en) Improved method and apparatus for cancelling vibrations
US5359662A (en) Active noise control system
US5321759A (en) Active noise control system for attenuating engine generated noise
JP2627807B2 (en) Selective active cancellation system for repetitive phenomena
EP0568129B1 (en) Noise attenuation system
EP0285632B1 (en) Active vibration control
EP0479367B1 (en) Method and apparatus for attenuating engine generated noise
EP0555585B1 (en) Correlated active attenuation system with error and correction signal input
EP0448121B1 (en) Electronic noise attenuation method and apparatus for use in effecting such method
GB2201858A (en) Active noise control
WO1987002496A1 (en) Transfer function generation for active noise cancellation
GB2107960A (en) Method and apparatus for cancelling vibrations
JPH07133842A (en) Active vibration control device
EP0805432A2 (en) Feedback method of noise control having multiple inputs and ouputs
Tadokoro et al. Pitch detection of musical sounds using adaptive comb filters controlled by time delay
JP6795613B2 (en) Systems and methods for actively influencing sound
CA2138552C (en) Control system using harmonic filters
JP3411611B2 (en) Noise cancellation method
JP2935592B2 (en) Noise control device
Tapia et al. New adaptive online modeling technique for active noise control systems
JPH08339191A (en) Vibration noise control device
JPH0719157B2 (en) Noise control device
JP2524046B2 (en) Electronic silencing method and device
Elliott DSP in the Active Control of Sound and Vibration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU GB US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LU NL SE