US7240358B2 - Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources - Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7240358B2 US7240358B2 US09/768,843 US76884301A US7240358B2 US 7240358 B2 US7240358 B2 US 7240358B2 US 76884301 A US76884301 A US 76884301A US 7240358 B2 US7240358 B2 US 7240358B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- segment
- client
- media object
- block
- rate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
- H04N21/234—Processing of video elementary streams, e.g. splicing of video streams, manipulating MPEG-4 scene graphs
- H04N21/23406—Processing of video elementary streams, e.g. splicing of video streams, manipulating MPEG-4 scene graphs involving management of server-side video buffer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/02—Details
- H04L12/16—Arrangements for providing special services to substations
- H04L12/18—Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast
- H04L12/1881—Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast with schedule organisation, e.g. priority, sequence management
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
- H04N21/231—Content storage operation, e.g. caching movies for short term storage, replicating data over plural servers, prioritizing data for deletion
- H04N21/23106—Content storage operation, e.g. caching movies for short term storage, replicating data over plural servers, prioritizing data for deletion involving caching operations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
- H04N21/238—Interfacing the downstream path of the transmission network, e.g. adapting the transmission rate of a video stream to network bandwidth; Processing of multiplex streams
- H04N21/2387—Stream processing in response to a playback request from an end-user, e.g. for trick-play
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
- H04N21/24—Monitoring of processes or resources, e.g. monitoring of server load, available bandwidth, upstream requests
- H04N21/2401—Monitoring of the client buffer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/43—Processing of content or additional data, e.g. demultiplexing additional data from a digital video stream; Elementary client operations, e.g. monitoring of home network or synchronising decoder's clock; Client middleware
- H04N21/433—Content storage operation, e.g. storage operation in response to a pause request, caching operations
- H04N21/4331—Caching operations, e.g. of an advertisement for later insertion during playback
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/60—Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client
- H04N21/63—Control signaling related to video distribution between client, server and network components; Network processes for video distribution between server and clients or between remote clients, e.g. transmitting basic layer and enhancement layers over different transmission paths, setting up a peer-to-peer communication via Internet between remote STB's; Communication protocols; Addressing
- H04N21/64—Addressing
- H04N21/6405—Multicasting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/60—Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client
- H04N21/63—Control signaling related to video distribution between client, server and network components; Network processes for video distribution between server and clients or between remote clients, e.g. transmitting basic layer and enhancement layers over different transmission paths, setting up a peer-to-peer communication via Internet between remote STB's; Communication protocols; Addressing
- H04N21/64—Addressing
- H04N21/6408—Unicasting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/80—Generation or processing of content or additional data by content creator independently of the distribution process; Content per se
- H04N21/83—Generation or processing of protective or descriptive data associated with content; Content structuring
- H04N21/845—Structuring of content, e.g. decomposing content into time segments
- H04N21/8456—Structuring of content, e.g. decomposing content into time segments by decomposing the content in the time domain, e.g. in time segments
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/173—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
- H04N7/17309—Transmission or handling of upstream communications
- H04N7/17318—Direct or substantially direct transmission and handling of requests
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to media-on-demand systems, wherein a large number of clients might make requests of the system for a particular piece of media content that is served in real-time, or near real-time, to the clients.
- the present invention relates to optimized media-on-demand systems including systems using chain reaction codes.
- Media-on-demand (“MOD”) is a term often used to refer to a client-server system, where many clients make requests from a choice of many possible media objects that are to be served by a server (or array of servers) to the clients.
- MOD Media-on-demand
- a design goal of a MOD system is to allow a client to request a media object or stream and have the content play at the client with no interruptions.
- the on-demand implies that there is little to no delay experienced by the client before the media object starts playing out at the client.
- On-demand also implies that the media object starts playing out from the beginning or possibly some specified point in the content, as opposed to joining a transmission in progress.
- One example is a video-on-demand system, where large numbers of clients may each make requests among many different digital videos.
- a digital cable broadcasting system is a digital video server, as it serves up many digital video streams to many clients (end-user televisions, for example). Such a system might support hundreds of independent video streams and millions of clients.
- the system can be easily built, however customers are constrained to receive only the pre-selected set of videos at the times selected by the system operator, so the system is not on-demand.
- a true media-on-demand system is much more difficult to build because the system may have to serve as many different streams as there are active clients, as each client demands different content (media objects) or the same content at different times. Potentially each client will require an independent stream of the media object it requested, where a stream is the flow of data required by that client in order to play out the content from the beginning without interruptions.
- the different multicast or broadcast strategies that have been proposed in the literature can be divided into two distinct classes: (1) user-centered and (2) data-centered. See, e.g., S. Viswanathan and T. Imielinski, “Metropolitan area video-on-demand services using pyramid broadcasting”, Multimedia Systems, 4(4):197–208 (March 1996) (hereinafter “Viswanathan”).
- user-centered strategies the server bandwidth is allocated according to client requests, i.e., the bandwidth assigned at the server to serve a particular media object can vary over time depending on how many clients are requesting that media object.
- data-centered strategies the server bandwidth is allocated among the different media objects, i.e., the bandwidth assigned at the server to serve a particular media object is constant over time.
- a typical user-centered strategy is “batching”, wherein all clients that make a request during an interval for the same media object are all serviced by one stream.
- batching schemes that consider the various possible scheduling policies for assigning the available server bandwidth to a particular media object. See, e.g., C. Aggarwal, J. Wolf, and P. Yu, “On optimal batching policies for video-on-demand storage servers”, Proc. Intl. Conf on Multimedia Computing and Systems , pp. 253–258, Hiroshima, Japan, (June 1996) (hereinafter “Aggarwal”); K. C. Almeroth and M. H.
- the server bandwidth requirement for a particular media object can be expected to grow with the frequency of user requests for that media object. This may be acceptable for a small number of users, but may be infeasible if the number of users grows very large for very popular content.
- Data-centered strategies are scalable to potentially millions of users as, unlike user-centered strategies, the server bandwidth required to serve a single media object is independent of the number of user requests or the frequency of user requests.
- a simple data-centered strategy is to divide the available bandwidth for a media object equally among C channels, and to retransmit the media object over one of the channels at equally spaced time intervals. For example, some pay-per-view digital satellite systems show the same one and half to two hour movie on four different channels, where a new transmission starts every half an hour. In this case, the worst case startup latency is just less than half an hour, where the startup latency, Ts, is defined to be the amount of time that passes between when the client requests the media object and the media object commences playing out on the client's media object player.
- the startup latency, Ts may include delays such as processing the client's request at the server, propagation delay in the network, and decoding and encoding delays at the client and server respectively. Halving the startup latency for a media object requires doubling the number of channels and therefore the server bandwidth requirement also doubles.
- Viswanathan describes “pyramid broadcasting”, which is an early data-centered protocol that greatly reduces startup latency and only requires a server bandwidth that is logarithmic in the length of the content instead of linear.
- a media object is partitioned into segments, where the segment size may vary. Each segment is transmitted repeatedly in a looping fashion at the same rate as the other segments, where a different channel may be used for each segment.
- Many other similar schemes have also been proposed to reduce the client startup latency or the maximum client temporary storage requirement for pyramid broadcasting, where the temporary storage requirement is the storage the client needs to save the data for the media object that has been downloaded at the client and not played out. If the data is saved at the client, then the storage needed is at least the size of the media object. See, e.g., C.
- Kermode U.S. Pat. No. 6,018,359 issued to Kermode (hereinafter “Kermode”) describes a generalized scheme wherein a client can download multiple segments simultaneously. Kermode proposes downloading the segments starting from any point and reordering the data at the client, which allows the clients to download the segments asynchronously.
- a second class of data-centered protocols fixes the size of each segment to be equal, but varies the rate that each segment is transmitted. See, e.g., L. Juhn and L. Tseng, “Harmonic broadcasting for video-on-demand service”, IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, 43:268–271 (September 1997) (hereinafter “Juhn97”); L. Juhn and L. Tseng, “Adaptive fast data broadcasting scheme for video-on-demand service”, IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, 44:182–185 (June 1998); J. -F Paris, S. W. Carter, and D. D. E.
- chain reaction coding is a useful method of recovering from missing data in many communications systems.
- Luby I and Luby II describe the application of chain reaction codes for content download, and not for an on-demand media streaming application.
- the probability of a decoder being able to decode a media object is low until the decoder has collected enough data, where enough data is approximately the size of the entire media object. Thus, it is unlikely that a media object can be decoded in parts when the encoding is applied to the entire media object as a whole.
- a method of scheduling a media object for transmission between a server and a client comprises partitioning the media object into segments of blocks, wherein each block is a unit of media for which a client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block, and wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks.
- the method also comprises determining one or more channels on which to serve each segment, the channels capable of carrying data between the server and the client, and determining a rate at which to serve each segment.
- the method further comprises determining a schedule pair for each channel, the schedule pair including a time at which the client may start receiving on the channel and a time at which the client may stop receiving on the channel.
- a system for scheduling a media object for transmission between a server and a client includes a module for partitioning the media object into segments of blocks, wherein each block is a unit of media for which a client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block, and wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks.
- the system additionally inlcudes a module for determining one or more channels on which to serve each segment, the channels capable of carrying data between the server and the client, and a module for determining a rate at which to serve each segment.
- the system further includes a module for determining a schedule pair for each channel, the schedule pair including a time at which the client may start receiving on the channel and a time at which the client may stop receiving on the channel.
- a method of serving a media object comprises receiving segments of a media object, wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks, wherein each block is a unit of media for which the client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block, and wherein each block includes one or more input symbols.
- the method also comprises, for each segment, receiving an indication of one or more channels on which to serve the segment and, for each segment, receiving a rate at which to serve the segment.
- the method additionally comprises determining an order in which to encode blocks.
- the method further comprises generating output symbols for each block in the order, and transmitting the output symbols on the corresponding one or more channels, wherein each segment is served at the corresponding rate.
- an apparatus for serving a media object includes a block encoder coupled to receive segments of a media object, wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks, wherein each block is a unit of media for which a client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block, and wherein each block includes one or more input symbols.
- the block encoder includes an input to receive an order in which to encode the blocks, and wherein the block encoder is configured to generate, in the order, output symbols for each block.
- the apparatus additionally includes a transmitter coupled to receive the output symbols from the block encoder, and coupled to receive, for each segment, an indication of one or more channels on which to serve the segment and a rate at which to serve the segment. The transmitter is configured to serve the output symbols on the corresponding one or more channels at the corresponding rate.
- a method of receiving a media object that includes segments of blocks, wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks, and wherein each block is a unit of media for which a client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block comprises receiving a media object description of the media object, and joining and leaving each of a plurality of channels according to the media object description to download the segments.
- the method additionally comprises reassembling the blocks in each segment, and playing the blocks out in an order after a startup latency.
- a system for receiving a media object that includes segments of blocks, wherein each segment includes an integer number of blocks, and wherein each block is a unit of media for which a client will wait to receive an entire block before playing out the block.
- the system includes a module for handling input of a media object description of the media object, and a module for handling channel joins and channel leaves for each of a plurality of channels according to the media object description, wherein the channels are capable of use for downloading the segments to the client.
- the system also includes a module for reassembling the blocks in each segment, and a module for playing the blocks out in an order after a startup latency.
- Advantages of the present invention include providing improved scheduling of media objects that are to be served to clients so that the clients may play out the media objects uninterrupted after a startup latency. Advantages also include improved serving of media objects to clients. Advantages further include improved receiving of media objects served by a server.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a MOD system with k servers and m clients according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a MOD server with a single server and a single client according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a block encoder as may be used in the MOD system shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an encoder as may be used in the block encoder shown in FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 5 is an illustration of how an output symbol may be generated from a set of associated input symbols.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a receive module as may be used in the MOD system shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 7 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be used by the client scheduler shown in FIG. 2 , to determine the time to join and leave channels, and when to reassemble all the blocks received on a channel.
- FIG. 8 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be used by the client scheduler shown in FIG. 2 , to determine when to reassemble each block.
- FIG. 9 is a plot of the amount of content that should be downloaded, and the amount of content that has played out, from the time the client request the content until it has completed playing out.
- FIG. 12 shows a plot of the amount of required server bandwidth as the length of the movie varies from 1 minute to 4 hours for optimal server bandwidth scheduling.
- FIG. 13 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be used by the media object schedule generator shown in FIG. 2 , to determine how to schedule a media object using a variable rate fixed segment size scheduler.
- FIG. 14 is an illustration of how a variable rate fixed segment size scheduler may schedule the first five segments in a media object.
- FIG. 15 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be used by the media object schedule generator shown in FIG. 2 , to determine how to schedule a media object using a fixed rate variable segment size scheduler.
- FIG. 16 shows a plot of the amount of required server bandwidth versus a for various numbers of concurrent channels at the client for a fixed rate variable segment size scheduler.
- FIG. 17 shows a plot of the amount of required server bandwidth versus the number of concurrent channels at the client for a fixed rate variable segment size scheduler.
- FIG. 18 is an illustration of how a fixed rate variable segment size scheduler may schedule the first ten segments in a media object when the download bandwidth for a single segment is split among later segments.
- FIG. 19 is an illustration of how a fixed rate variable segment size scheduler may schedule five segments in a media object when the download bandwidth for two segments is combined for use in later segments.
- FIG. 20 is a simplified flow diagram of a process that may be used by the media object schedule generator shown in FIG. 2 , to determine how to schedule a media object using a restricted server channel scheduler.
- a MOD system may be constrained by available resources such as the total network bandwidth available to the MOD system, the client download rate or the total number of channels (or multicast groups, where a multicast network is used) available to the client or the server.
- the only delay that a client will experience after a request is made for a media object is the propagation delay before the first data of the media object arrives.
- a small startup latency at the client is permitted in order to make the system scalable, more reliable and reduce the amount of required system resources.
- the client or the network between the server and the client are more of a constraint on transmission of the stream.
- the maximum rate that the client can download a media object, Rd may be constrained by the client's link to the network. What is crucial is the relationship between the download rate Rd and the media play out rate Rp.
- the amount of bandwidth used by a particular media object at the server is defined to be Rs, i.e., the aggregate rate at which the object is being served.
- a more realistic example is a play out rate Rp of 300 Kbps and a download rate Rd of 400 Kbps.
- an MOD system should be carefully designed to enable a client to download at a slightly greater rate than the play out rate and still experience uninterrupted play out of the media.
- the number of channels available for use may also be an important resource the MOD system should consider in determining how to serve a set of media objects efficiently.
- the number of multicast groups available to the server, g could be limited due to server or network administrative reasons such as the memory required to maintain a list of multicast groups, or the number of joins and leave messages the server and the network routers can handle.
- the number of multicast groups, r that the client is actively joined to at once may be limited due to constraints imposed by the system design, memory limitations, or the processing power of the network interface card (NIC) at the client.
- NIC network interface card
- a media object file may be divided into sequentially numbered blocks, where the block index indicates the temporal position of each block in playing out the media object.
- “media object” refers to data representing some media content where the size of the data is defined and “media stream” refers to data representing some media content where the size of the data is open-ended.
- An example of the former is a 60 minute video encoded at a rate of 4 Mbps and an example of the latter is a live streaming video feed. Unless otherwise indicated, it should be assumed herein that what is described with reference to media objects can also be used with reference to media streams and vice versa.
- a block may be treated as the fundamental unit of play out in the system, in that the client cannot play out any of the content associated with a block until the entire block is received at the client.
- a block could be a single video frame and the sound associated with that frame.
- a block could be a minute of compressed video.
- the size of each block may be varied.
- One or more blocks are grouped together to form a segment.
- each segment includes only one block. If each segment is transmitted on a separate channel, or set of channels, then a client can join and leave channels such that the client downloads the segments in some order. The client can also reassemble and view the media object from the beginning, while other segments are still arriving.
- the client stores the packets for a block as they arrive and waits for the entire block to arrive before playing it out. There need not be a time that is global to all clients associated with each block, at which the client starts downloading or playing out the block.
- Each client can initiate the session at any point in time, and time may then be measured for each client relative to when it initiated the session. In embodiments of the MOD scheme, each client experiences the same startup latency.
- the resources required for each client may be identical and predictable, and may be based on the size and rate that each block is being served.
- the global time at which a particular client starts downloading or playing out a block may be particular to when it initiated the download of the media object or stream, but the experience of each client may be the same relative to when it initiated the session.
- Luby I, Luby II, the High Weight Application, and the Windowing Application describe various chain reaction coding systems in detail. As described therein, a chain reaction encoder generates output symbols from input symbols of the input file as needed. Luby I, Luby II, the High Weight Application, and the Windowing Application define and describe various concepts relating to chain reaction coding, and those teachings are incorporated by reference herein rather than restating them here in their entirety. Generally speaking, Luby I, Luby II, the High Weight Application, and the Windowing Application teach how to make and use a chain reaction coding encoder and decoder to transport data, including a process for generating an output symbol or a group of output symbols from selected input symbols.
- Luby I, Luby II, the High Weight Application, and the Windowing Application generally describe chain reaction coding systems for an entire input file.
- the file, or media object is broken into blocks, where each block may be encoded and decoded independently using a chain reaction encoder and decoder, respectively.
- the size of each block determines the efficiency of the chain reaction encoder and decoder.
- the amount of overhead i.e., the number of extra output symbols that the decoder should collect greater than the block size
- the blocks should therefore be as large as possible.
- increasing the symbol size improves encoding/decoding speed at the cost of overhead performance.
- One approach is to set the block size (which may be variable) to match the smallest unit of media object that can be played out by the client or transmitted by the server.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary MOD system 100 .
- MOD servers 102 serve media objects to MOD clients 104 over a network 106 .
- MOD system 100 includes k MOD servers and m MOD clients, but the actual values for k and m are not particularly relevant to this description.
- network 106 is the Internet, but other networks or subsets of the Internet can be used as well, such as intranets, virtual private networks, LAN's, WAN's, wireless or satellite networks.
- network 106 need not be a network in the strictest sense of the term, but may be a collection of point-to-point connections.
- MOD servers 102 receive requests for media objects from MOD clients 104 .
- an administrative server 125 may determine a schedule of which media objects are available.
- the administrative server 125 may also maintain a list of MOD clients 104 that are eligible to download a particular media object. For instance, in a pay-per-view system, the administrative server 125 may maintain a list of MOD clients 104 that have paid and are currently eligible to download and/or view a particular media object.
- the administrative server 125 also may control the MOD server 102 , and may determine a schedule of which MOD servers will serve a particular media object, or portion of a media object.
- a list of media objects currently available for download and any other parameters required by the MOD client 104 may be published by the administrative server 125 at the request processor 130 .
- the request processor 130 may publish the play out rate, cost, length, and schedule of availability of each media object currently being served by the MOD servers 102 .
- the MOD server 102 , administrative server 125 and request processor 130 may reside on a single machine, separate machines, or some combination thereof.
- each MOD server 102 may be associated with an administrative server 125 and/or request processor 130 .
- a subset of MOD servers 102 may be associated with the same administrative server 125 and/or request processor 130 .
- all the MOD servers 102 in one location may be associated with a single administrative server 125 .
- all the MOD servers 102 serving the same media object or set of media objects may be associated with the same administrative server 125 .
- two or more request processors 130 may be associated with a single administrative server 125 .
- one administrative server 125 may have one request processor 130 for each different type of media object that is available to different classes of MOD clients 104 .
- one request processor may be associated with multiple administrative servers 125 .
- the media objects may be stored in media object storage 108 , but may also be a media object stream 115 fed to MOD servers 102 from other sources as needed. Only one media object storage 108 and media object stream 115 is shown, but it should be understood that other configurations are possible. For instance, in one embodiment each MOD server 102 may be connected to a different media object storage 108 and/or media object stream 115 . In another embodiment, a subset of MOD servers 102 may be fed by the same media object storage 108 and/or media object stream 115 .
- the MOD client 104 may obtain a list of media objects available using a client browser 135 .
- the client browser 135 may obtain the list of media objects from the request processor 130 via the network 106 .
- the channel used by the client browser 135 may be the same physical channel used by the MOD client 104 .
- the client browser 135 may download a media object description from the request processor 130 which contains information necessary for the client to begin downloading the media object.
- the media object description may include the length, play out rate, startup latency and download rate of the media object as well as the location of the MOD server or servers that are currently serving the media object
- the media object description may contain a list of multicast groups and the relative time at which the client should join each multicast group.
- the client browser 135 may send the media object description to the MOD client.
- the client browser 135 may be a web browser, which receives the schedule using an http or a similar request from the request processor 130 , which may include a web server. However, this is not the only way a client may hear an announcement of an MOD session.
- the request processor 130 may continuously advertise, on a dedicated set of channels, which MOD sessions are available and the relevant information required by the client to join to them. The client browser 135 may maintain a permanent list of available MOD sessions or just listen to the channel to see what is available based on a user request.
- connection between a MOD server 102 ( i ) and network 106 may be modeled as a plurality of server channels 110 ( i ) and the connection between a MOD client 104 ( i ) and the network 106 may be modeled as a plurality of client channels 112 ( i ).
- the server channels 110 and client channels 112 may be physical and/or logical channels.
- the MOD client 104 and MOD server 102 may be connected via a multicast network.
- a server may send all packets destined for a particular logical channel to a particular multicast group.
- the client may join and/or leave a particular logical channel by joining and/or leaving the particular multicast group.
- a join or a leave message propagates through the network towards the server up to the first router that can service the request.
- the multicast network may make sure that packets sent to multicast group are received by all the joined clients.
- the MOD client 104 and MOD server 106 may be connected via a unicast network.
- the server may send all the packets destined for a particular logical channel to a particular unicast address and a particular port of a server.
- the client may join a particular logical channel by sending a request to receive any packets received by a particular server on a particular port address.
- the server may make sure that all packets received on a particular port address are copied and sent to all clients that have sent request messages to receive such packets, and thus the server may be an active agent in making the bindings between the logical channel and the physical channels.
- the MOD server 102 may be connected to the MOD client 104 via a broadcast network, such as a satellite network and the MOD client 104 may either adjust its receiver to receive a particular subset of physical channels or receive a single physical channel and filter out the data except for a particular subset of logical channels, or a combination thereof.
- the physical channel may be the satellite uplink from the MOD server 102 to the network, while the client channel may be a terrestrial link to a local switch in the network.
- server channels 110 from the network 106 to the MOD server 102 may be terrestrial links, while the server channels 110 from the MOD server 102 to the network 106 may be satellite based.
- multicasting is referred to herein as a mechanism for scaling the required server and network bandwidths, it should be understood that broadcasting could be used as well.
- the logical channels are each shown as bidirectional. Requests may flow from MOD clients 104 towards MOD servers 102 , media objects may flow from media object storage 108 to MOD servers 102 , served media data may flow from MOD servers 102 to MOD clients 104 and media objects to be played out may flow from MOD clients 104 to their associated MOD play out devices 120 .
- Examples of play out devices may include televisions, music-playing devices, computer processors (where the media is to be operated upon by computers as opposed to being viewed by users), or software running on a general purpose computer (e.g., media player plug-ins or client software).
- a single MOD server 102 may serve one or more media objects to any number of clients.
- a single MOD server 102 may only serve a portion of a media object to any number of clients, where other MOD servers 102 serve the rest of the segments in the media object.
- one MOD server 102 may serve the even numbered segments in a media object, and a second MOD server 102 may serve the odd numbered segments.
- one MOD server 102 may serve the segments in the first half of the media object, while a second MOD server 102 may serve the segments in the second half.
- more than one MOD server 102 may serve the same segment in a media object.
- two or more MOD servers 102 at different geographic locations in the network may be used to serve the entire media object, or overlapping portions of the media object concurrently.
- MOD clients 104 can download from one or more of the MOD servers 102 concurrently.
- Multiple MOD servers 102 at the same or different locations in the network make the MOD system 100 more reliable in the event portions of the network, or some of the MOD servers 102 fail.
- One skilled in the art will recognize many other combinations, variations, and alternatives to the above embodiments and examples.
- a single MOD client 104 may receive the same or disjoint portions of a single media object from one or more MOD servers 102 .
- a MOD client 104 may download a segment of the media object from the nearest available MOD server 102 , or from a MOD server among the MOD servers 102 ( 1 - k ) currently serving the segment with the lowest aggregate load of MOD clients 104 .
- the MOD client 104 may decide from which MOD server 102 to download a segment based on its current reception rate of other segments from that MOD server 102 .
- the MOD client 104 may add or remove MOD servers 102 from which it is downloading in order to receive a segment.
- a MOD client 104 may try to download a segment from a second MOD server 102 concurrently if there is congestion in the network.
- a MOD client 104 may download a segment from a second MOD server 102 due to failure of, lost communication with, etc., a first MOD server 102 from which it was downloading the segment.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a basic MOD system 200 comprising a single MOD server 102 and a single MOD client 104 , connected by a plurality of channels 245 .
- the server channels 110 , network 106 and client channels 112 have been combined into a single set of channels 245 .
- these channels may be physical channels or logical channels.
- a media object residing in media object storage 201 or forming a media object stream 205 , may be provided to a media object symbol generator 210 .
- Media object symbol generator 210 may generate a sequence of one or more input symbols (IS( 0 ), IS( 1 ), IS( 2 ), . . . ) from the media object file or stream, with each input symbol having a value and a position (denoted in FIG. 2 as a parenthesized integer).
- the output of media object symbol generator 210 is provided to a block encoder 215 .
- the media object schedule generator 214 receives as input the administrative server description of the media object and generates a media object description for the request processor 130 .
- the functionality of the media object schedule generator 214 may be performed by the administrative server 125 .
- One function of the media object schedule generator 214 may be to partition the media object into a set of segments, where each segment comprises one or more blocks and has an associated size, rate and set of channels to be served on. If the media object is a stream, then the media object schedule generator 214 may partition the media object as the content arrives.
- the rate and channel to serve each block or segment may vary over time. For instance, in a multicast network, a dynamic layering scheme may be used to serve each segment.
- the Dynamic Layering Application describes various dynamic layering schemes that may be used. It is to be understood, however, that many other types of dynamic layering schemes may also be used. Moreover, other methods in addition to dynamic layering schemes may also be used to serve each segment.
- the size, rate and set of channels to serve each segment and block of the media object may serve as the input to the media object block scheduler 216 .
- Each segment of the media object may be logically divided into a plurality of disjoint blocks by the media object block scheduler 216 . In one embodiment, the blocks may be approximately equal in size.
- the media object block scheduler 216 may determine how many output symbols from each block of each segment are to be generated by the block encoder 215 . Each block may be identified by a unique block index F. When chain reaction codes are used, if output symbols are generated on the fly, the media object block scheduler 216 should ensure that there are enough output symbols generated for each block so that each segment can be served at the rate determined by the media object schedule generator 214 .
- Each output symbol may be generated as a function of input symbols from a single block or subset of blocks.
- the block or set of blocks from which input symbols are chosen to generate an output symbol will be referred to as the blocks associated with that output symbol.
- each output symbol is associated with only one block.
- the block encoder 215 provides output symbols to a transmit module 240 .
- Transmit module 240 may also be provided the key of each such output symbol and the set of blocks associated with each such output symbol. Transmit module 240 transmits the output symbols, and depending on the keying method used, transmit module 240 may also transmit some data about the keys of the transmitted output symbols, or the associated blocks, over a plurality of channels 245 to a receive module 250 .
- Transmit module 240 may include a buffer to store output symbols, thereby allowing transmit module 240 to transmit output symbols in an order that is different from the order in which transmit module 240 receives the output symbols. Transmit module may transmit each segment on a different channel, on multiple channels, or subsets of segments on different channels.
- block encoder 215 is a chain reaction encoder as described below.
- Each block is encoded and decoded separately, as described in the Scheduling Multiple Files Application. Since each block or segment is sent on a separate channel, it is not necessary to collect enough symbols to decode the entire media object before decoding and hence playing out the content. For instance, in one embodiment, the blocks or segments are received and decoded in order. It is to be understood, however, that a chain reaction code need not be used, and that each block need not be encoded and decoded separately as described in the Scheduling Multiple Files Application.
- the system can also be implemented with other encoders or without any encoding at all.
- the output symbols are simply the original input symbols which are broadcast repeatedly by transmit module 240 on each channel in a looping manner.
- the original symbols are encoded by block encoder 215 using an erasure correcting code other than a chain reaction code, such as a Reed-Solomon code or a Tornado code. These codes have a fixed number of encoded symbols so if there is sufficient storage available at the server, the block encoder 215 need only generate each output symbol once and store it, where the encoded symbols may be generated prior to the start of transmission, or as needed by the transmit module 240 .
- the encoded symbols may then be broadcast repeatedly by transmit module 240 on each channel either in a looping manner, or by choosing a random output symbol each time.
- For encoded data it is important to design the system so that a client receives a minimal number of duplicate encoded packets.
- the system works well using a chain reaction encoder because the client may concurrently download encoded data from multiple servers without coordination and not receive redundant data.
- An additional advantage of chain reaction codes is that they offer a greater amount of protection and flexibility in system design against loss compared to a code that has been designed for a fixed loss rate.
- Receive module 250 receives the output symbols from the plurality of channels and determines the key I and block F associated with each output symbol. In one embodiment, the receive module may use information explicitly transmitted with each output symbol to determine the key and the block for each output symbol. In another embodiment, receive module 250 may use timing information, or information about the channel an output symbol was received on, in order to calculate the key I or the block F for that output symbol. Receive module 250 provides the output symbols and their associated block and key to a temporary storage buffer 252 .
- a client scheduler 262 receives the media object description from the client browser 135 .
- the client scheduler 262 determines the time to join and leave channels, and when to have the block decoder 255 reassemble any block in its entirety, where reassemble may be defined to include decode, or just reorder in the case only the original data is sent.
- the client scheduler 262 uses feedback from the block decoder 255 and receive module 250 in order to determine these actions.
- the client scheduler 262 may wait for the receive module 250 to indicate that enough output symbols from a particular channel, or for a particular block, have been received before issuing a command to the receive module 250 to leave the channel, or the block decoder 255 to reassemble the block F.
- the client scheduler 262 uses timing information from the media object description to determine which channels to join and leave and when to reassemble a block.
- the block decoder 255 receives a signal from the client scheduler 262 to reassemble a block.
- the block decoder 255 loads the block F to be reassembled from the temporary storage buffer 252 , and may use the keys together with the corresponding output symbols, to recover the input symbols (again IS( 0 ), IS( 1 ), IS( 2 ), . . . ).
- Block decoder 255 provides the recovered input symbols to a media object reassembler 265 , which generates a copy 270 of the media object file 201 or media object stream 205 , or feeds the reassembled media object directly to a media object player 275 .
- the MOD play out device 120 receives the reassembled media object as a stream as in the media object player 275 .
- the media object is first stored as a media object file 270 , and later accessed by the MOD play out device 120 .
- the MOD play out device 120 may wait for the entire media object to be reconstructed before beginning the play out, or just a portion of it, for instance, the first block or segment.
- FIG. 3 shows a basic block encoder 215 for an MOD system using chain reaction codes.
- the block encoder 215 comprises a random number generator 335 , counter 325 , stream identifier 322 , key generator 320 and encoder 315 .
- Key generator 320 generates a key for each output symbol to be generated by encoder 315 .
- Key generator 320 may use a combination of the output of a counter 325 , a unique stream identifier 322 , and/or the output of a random number generator 335 to produce each key.
- the counter 325 , random number generator 335 and stream identifier may all have a block index F as input.
- each key may be generated independently of the block for which encoder 315 is to generate an output symbol, and the same key may be used on multiple different blocks. However, it is to be understood that the same key need not be used on multiple different blocks.
- the output of key generator 320 is provided to the encoder 315 . Using each key I provided by key generator 320 and block index F, the encoder 315 generates an output symbol, with a value B(I,F). The value of an output symbol is generated based on its key and on some function of one or more input symbols in the block F provided by the media object symbol generator 210 . In one embodiment, a heavy weight basis is associated with each block so that output symbols of large weight may be generated more efficiently.
- the High Weight Application provides further details on generating output symbols using a basis. It is to be understood, however, that many other methods of generating large weight symbols using a basis. Moreover, many other methods may be used to generate large weight symbols.
- the input symbols used in generating an output symbol are referred to herein as the output symbol's “associated input symbols”.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of block encoder 315 shown in FIG. 3 .
- the block diagram of FIG. 4 is explained herein with references to FIG. 5 , which is a diagram showing the logical equivalent of some of the processing performed by the encoder shown in FIG. 4 .
- Block encoder 315 is provided with input symbols from a fast buffer 405 and input symbol buffer 400 and a key I and a block F for each output symbol it is to generate.
- L(F) input symbols in order of position are stored in fast buffer 205 , where L(F) is the number of symbols in block F and the first input symbol in block F occurs at position J.
- the size L(F) of the block is expressed here as a function of the block index F, it should be understood that in some variations, L(F) is fully determinable from the block F while in other variations L(F) is a function of other values as well, or is independent of F. In one embodiment L(F) is the same for all the blocks.
- fast buffer 405 would be a storage medium with a faster access time than input symbol buffer 400 .
- fast buffer 405 may be implemented in RAM while input symbol buffer 400 is stored in disk storage.
- as many as possible of the input symbols should be in fast buffer 405 when the calculator 425 is invoked, balancing the time savings of invoking the calculator 425 when many symbols are in fast buffer 405 with the time it takes to move input symbols from the input symbol buffer 400 to fast buffer 405 .
- Key I (provided by key generator 320 shown in FIG. 3 ) and block F (provided by media object block scheduler 216 shown in FIG. 2 ) are inputs to value function selector 410 , weight selector 415 and associator 420 .
- the number of input symbols L(F) in block F may also be provided to these three components 410 , 415 and 420 .
- a calculator 425 is coupled to receive outputs from value function selector 410 , weight selector 415 , associator 420 , input symbol buffer 400 and the fast buffer 405 , and has an output for output symbol values. It should be understood that other equivalent arrangements to the elements shown in FIG. 4 may be used, and that this is but one example of an encoder according to the present invention.
- weight selector 415 determines the number W(I,F) of input symbols that are to be “associates” of the output symbol having key I. In one variation, W(I,F) is chosen based on I but is not based on F. Once the number W(I,F) is determined, weight selector 415 supplies the number to associator 420 and to calculator 425 if needed.
- associator 420 determines a list AL(I,F) of the W(I,F) positions of input symbols selected among the L(F) symbols in block F to be associated with the current output symbol. It should be understood that W(I,F) need not be separately or explicitly calculated if associator 420 can generate AL(I,F) without knowing W(I,F) ahead of time. Once AL(I,F) is generated, W(I,F) can be easily determined because it is the number of associates in AL(I,F). It should also be understood that not all the input symbols used by the calculator need be in fast buffer 405 , as some or all of the input symbols may be obtained from input symbol buffer 400 . Preferably, as many input symbols as possible can be obtained from the fast buffer 405 .
- calculator 425 accesses the W(I,F) input symbols referenced by AL(I,F) in fast buffer 405 , or in input symbol buffer 400 if the needed input symbols are not present in fast buffer 405 , to calculate the value, B(I,F), for the current output symbol.
- Calculator 425 calculates the value B(I,F) of the output symbol being calculated based on a value function V(I,F), if a variable value function is used.
- a suitable value function One property of a suitable value function is that it would allow the value for an associate in AL(I,F) to be determined from output symbol value B(I,F) and from the values for the other W(I,F) ⁇ 1 associates in AL(I,F).
- One preferred value function used in this step is the XOR value function, since it satisfies this property, is easily computed and easily inverted.
- other suitable value functions may be used instead. Luby II describes, for instance, a system in which a group of output symbols are generated using a Reed-Solomon value function.
- Luby II describes other value functions that may also be used, including methods based on polynomials over finite fields, methods based on linear systems of equations, methods based on Cauchy matrices over finite fields, and other MDS codes (of which Reed-Solomon codes are examples).
- value function selector 410 determines a value function V(I,F) from key I, and possibly F and L(F).
- the value function V(I,F) is the same value function V for all I and F.
- value function selector 410 is not needed and calculator 425 can be configured with the value function V.
- the value function may be XOR for all I, i.e., the output symbol value is an XOR (exclusive OR) of the values of all of its associates.
- Block encoder 315 then outputs B(I,F).
- block encoder 315 performs the action illustrated in FIG. 5 , namely, to generate an output symbol value B(I,F) as some value function of selected input symbols.
- the value function is XOR
- the weight W(I,F) of the output symbol is 3
- the size L(F) of the block is 5
- the associated input symbols are at positions 5, 7, and 8 and have respective values IS( 5 ), IS( 7 ) and IS( 8 ).
- the number L(F) of input symbols in block F is used by the encoder 315 to select the associates.
- the value L(F) may also be used by the encoder 315 to allocate storage for input symbols.
- a windowing encoder such as, for example, the windowing encoder described in the Windowing Application may be used to encode the block. It is to be understood, however, that the many other types of windowing encoders may also be used. Moreover, other methods in addition to windowing may additionally be used to encode the block.
- the media transmitted from a MOD server 102 to a MOD client 104 is preferably encoded using chain reaction coding.
- the coding can be done ahead of time, in which case the encoded output symbols for the media object could be stored in a storage buffer in transmit module 240 .
- the encoding can be done by the MOD servers 102 on the fly, with the block encoder 215 continuously generating new output symbols at the appropriate rate for each block.
- the operation of several variations of a chain reaction coder 214 are described in detail in Luby I, Luby II, the High Weight Application, and the Windowing Application and rather than describe those in great detail here, those references are incorporated herein.
- FIG. 6 shows a basic receive module 250 from FIG. 2 .
- the receive module 250 comprises a receiver 600 , a key regenerator 610 and a block index regenerator 620 .
- Receiver 600 processes the data received on the channels 245 and provides the output symbols to a temporary storage buffer 252 . Data that receiver 600 receives about the keys of these output symbols is provided to a key regenerator 610 , and data that receiver 600 receives about the block index is provided to a block index regenerator 620 .
- Key regenerator 610 regenerates the keys for the received output symbols and provides these keys to temporary storage buffer 252 .
- Block index regenerator 620 regenerates the block index for the received output symbols and provides these block indices to temporary storage buffer 252 .
- temporary storage buffer 252 will store all the output symbols from the same block in a contiguous portion of the buffer. For instance, for a media object comprising n blocks, the temporary storage buffer will contain n disjoint portions of contiguous buffer space, where output symbols from a particular block are stored in buffer space reserved exclusively for that block. In another embodiment, the buffer space for a block may be reused once that block has been processed by the block decoder 255 in order to conserve the amount of temporary storage buffer 252 required.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are simplified flow diagrams of a method according to an embodiment of the invention that may be implemented to control the actions of the client such as, for example, the client scheduler 262 shown in FIG. 2 . These diagrams are merely for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims herein.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are a high-level flow diagram of a method for controlling the actions of the client so that the client can download the media object and play it out uninterrupted.
- FIG. 7 is an embodiment of a process that the client scheduler 262 may use to determine which channels to join and leave and when to perform these actions.
- FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a process that the client scheduler 262 may use to determine when to reassemble each block.
- the media object description may include the order to join each channel, the size of the segment or segments and the rates the segment or segments are served on each channel, and the time at which to join and leave each channel.
- the media object description may be simply a list of channels to join, where the list is organized so that each time a segment completes downloading on a channel, the client scheduler 262 will leave that channel and join a new set of channels specified on the list. For example, if the client only receives data on a single channel at a time, the media object description may just be the list of the channels to join in order.
- the media object description includes the list of channels, the segment and the size of the segment associated with each channel.
- the media object description may also include a security key for each channel and/or the entire media object, which the client needs in order to reassemble the received blocks on each channel. Note that only a subset of these may be sufficient for the client scheduler 262 to determine which channels to join and when to join them.
- the client scheduler 262 determines the rules of joining and leaving the channels according to the media object description. These rules may specify, for example, when a client may join and/or leave a channel, the number of channels to join at any particular time and/or time period, the order in which to join and/or leave channels, etc. In one embodiment, the client may only leave a channel when the segment completes downloading on that channel. In another embodiment, the client may join and leave the same channel more than once before a segment completes downloading on that channel. For example, the client may join one or more channels to increase its reception rate if, for example, it does not experience congestion, and leave one or more channels to decrease its reception rate if, for example, it does experience congestion.
- the order in which to join and/or leave channels may be defined according to the media object description. Therefore, in certain embodiments in which the client joins and/or leaves channels as a function of congestion, the client may, for example, join and leave channels in a stack-like manner according to congestion (e.g., losses) experienced during the download. For instance, if the client is not experiencing congestion, it may join the next channel in the specified order to which it has not yet joined, or re-join a channel that it had last dropped. Similarly, the client may drop channels from which it has completed downloading, and may also drop the most recently joined channel if the client does experience congestion. Thus, the client may join or drop channels in response to a level of congestion, and the reception rate at the client oscillates accordingly. An average reception rate should be maintained in order to guarantee that the client will be able to play out the media object without interruption.
- congestion e.g., losses
- step 720 the client scheduler 262 sends a message to receive module 250 to join the initial set of channels determined in 715 .
- the client scheduler 262 then waits for a message from the receive module 250 to indicate that all the data from one of the channels C has been received.
- the client scheduler 262 sends a message to receive module 250 to leave channel C and schedules the reassembly of the blocks from channel C as shown in FIG. 8 . If there are additional channels to join at this time, the client scheduler 262 sends a message to receive module 250 to join the appropriate channels in steps 750 and 760 .
- step 770 the client scheduler checks if there are any segments that have not completed downloading, or if there are more channels to be joined at a later time. If there are still segments to be downloaded, or channels to be joined in the future, then the client scheduler returns to step 730 , otherwise the media object has completed downloading (step 780 ).
- the client scheduler may use timing information to determine when to join and leave channels and may join and leave channels at times other than when the reception for a channel has completed. For example, a new channel may be joined if some fraction of a segment on another channel has completed downloading, or if some amount of time has passed.
- FIG. 8 is a simplified flow diagram of a method according to an embodiment of the invention that may be implemented to reassemble a segment or set of segments downloaded on a channel C.
- the flow diagram in FIG. 8 is initiated by a call from step 740 in FIG. 7 when the client scheduler 262 is ready to reassemble the blocks received on some channel C.
- the client scheduler 262 determines if there is a set of blocks available that is ready to be reassembled. If there is a set of blocks available, then in step 810 the client scheduler 262 determines and orders the set of blocks to be reassembled.
- the client scheduler 262 selects the first block F to be reassembled, and sends a message to the block decoder 255 to reassemble block F.
- the client scheduler 262 then loops through the set of additional blocks from which to reassemble until all the blocks have completed reassembly in steps 840 and 845 . Once all the blocks in the set have been reassembled, the client scheduler 262 returns to step 805 . If there is no new set of blocks ready to be reassembled, then, in a step 850 , the client scheduler 262 performs the same check as in step 770 of FIG.
- step 860 the media object has completed reassembly
- the block decoder 255 may reassemble a particular block in a segment before the entire segment has been received, and/or try and reassemble some or all of the blocks in a segment for which data is currently being received. In another embodiment, the block decoder 255 may reassemble a number of blocks at once, where the number of blocks may vary from client to client depending upon the system resources available to the block decoder 255 .
- the client scheduler 262 will schedule the reassembly of each block so that if the block decoder 255 and the media object player 275 are using the same set of system resources, the block decoder 255 will reassemble each block using the resources in a manner that will not effect the quality of the play out of the media object, while still ensuring that each block is reassembled before it is required to be played out. For instance, if the media object player 275 uses the processor at specific known intervals, then the client scheduler 262 can ensure that a block is not reassembled during those intervals.
- the media object schedule generator 214 may first partition each media object into a set of disjoint blocks. Then, the blocks may be grouped together to form a set of segments, where each segment comprises one or more blocks. In another embodiment, the media object schedule generator 214 may first partition each media object into a set of disjoint segments, where each segment is then partitioned into one or more disjoint blocks. Each segment is scheduled to be served on one or more channels. The size of the blocks and segments, and the rate on each channel may vary.
- the input to the media object schedule generator 214 is an administrative server description, and the output comprises a media object description which is sent to the client, and a set of instructions for the media object block scheduler 216 on how to serve each block.
- the administrative server description comprises two parts: the media object parameters and a set of system constraints for serving the media object.
- the media object parameters include the size S Mbits (megabits) and the play out rate Rp Mbps of the media object. (Note that megabits is used here instead of megabytes to simplify the equations below. To convert from megabits to megabytes, divide by 8.)
- the media object parameters include a list of positions at which it is possible to partition the media object.
- the media object schedule generator 214 may partition the media object into frames, or sets of frames. The list may include the position in the media object at which each frame starts.
- the media object schedule generator 214 may be required to partition the media object into scenes. For instance, the client may want to insert commercials between the play out of different blocks, and the commercials are desired to occur only at the end of a scene.
- the system constraints for serving the media object may include basic constraints such as:
- Additional system constraints may include the minimum block size Bmin, the maximum block size Bmax, and the maximum segment size Smax.
- the minimum segment size is at least the minimum block size. If the maximum block size Bmax is at least twice as large as the minimum block size Bmin, then any segment can be partitioned into disjoint blocks that are all within the minimum and maximum block sizes. If the maximum block size is smaller than twice the minimum block size, then some adjustment in the sizes of the segments may be necessary in order to partition each segment into an integer number of blocks.
- One constraint that normally applies to scheduling methods is that, unless the client has already downloaded the media object, or has it otherwise available, the client should receive enough data to reassemble a block in its entirety by the time the block is to be played out in the sequence. Otherwise, the client will either interrupt the play out and pause while the data is being received, or move onto the next block or segment to be played out or downloaded.
- One output of the media object schedule generator 214 is a partition of the media object into n blocks, where the size of block i is b(i) Mbits. The size of the entire media object is therefore
- r(i) the download rate for S(i) is referred to here as r(i) without ambiguity.
- Block j in segment S(i) is served on up to g(i) channels.
- the aggregate rate of all the blocks being served for segment S(i) is r(i).
- the aggregate serving rate i.e., the amount of bandwidth required at the server is
- the aggregate rate rb(j) for each block j in segment S(i) is the same for all the blocks in segment S(i). In one embodiment, the aggregate rate rb(j,C) for block j in segment S(i), served on the C-th channel for segment S(i) is equal to r(i,C) rb(j)/r(i) for every block in every segment.
- the data for the different blocks in a segment is transmitted on each channel serving that segment as described in the Scheduling Multiple Files Application. It is to be understood, however, that many other ways for transmitting data may be used in addition to methods described in the Scheduling Multiple Files Application.
- the blocks in each segment are encoded using chain reaction codes, there is no difficulty associated with partitioning the content of a block among many channels, since a specific set, or order, of output symbols is not required, and multiple independent streams of output symbols are information additive.
- the original data is transmitted across the channel, or a fixed rate FEC code is used to encode each block, then the data from the block can be partitioned and served on different channels.
- the fraction of the block that is served on each channel is proportional to the amount of data that the client is expected to download from that channel.
- the same data for a block is served on more than one channel.
- the media object schedule generator 214 For each channel C serving the media object, the media object schedule generator 214 produces a pair of values (I(C), E(C)), where I(C) is the schedule time that the client first joins channel C and E(C) is the schedule time that the client leaves channel C. Both times I(C) and E(C) are given relative to the time that the client first receives data for the media object, and E(C) ⁇ I(C) is the approximate time that the client will spend downloading a segment on channel C.
- a client downloading the media object is not required to start receiving data from channel C at time I(C) relative to the time the client first receives data for the media object.
- a client downloading the media object is not required to stop receiving data from channel C at time E(C) relative to the time the client first receives data for the media object.
- a client is only required to minimally fulfill the schedule pair for each channel, wherein minimally fulfill means that the client receives data from the set of channels associated with a segment for a length of time sufficient to download and reassemble the entire segment before it is to be played out.
- the client downloads the segment on channel C for two separate time intervals, such that the total time spent downloading the segment is E(C) ⁇ I(C) seconds, and the second time interval ends before time t+E(C), then the client also minimally fulfills the schedule pair for segment S(i).
- the media object schedule generator 214 should partition and serve the media object so that all the system constraints are satisfied.
- the list of instructions generated by the media object schedule generator 214 for the media object block scheduler 216 include how the media object is partitioned into blocks and segments, and a list of channels on which to serve each segment.
- the list may also include the rate to serve each block in each segment, or the rate to serve each block in each segment for each channel for that segment.
- the media object description describes how the media object is to be partitioned and downloaded on the different channels to the client.
- the media object description may include a list of block and segment sizes, a list of channels for the media object, and the schedule pairs for each channel.
- the media object description includes a schedule of the order to join the channels and how many channels to join at each time.
- the client leaves a channel once the necessary data for that segment on that channel has been received. The client may also join and leave a channel multiple times in response to congestion in the network.
- a “pseudo-segment” with index ⁇ 1 may be played out during the startup latency period.
- That pseudo-segment can be an empty block, in which case the media object does not start playing out until the end of the startup latency period, or the pseudo-segment may be a pre-downloaded segment S( ⁇ 1) that starts playing out when the client requests the media object. In this way, there is no apparent delay at the client.
- One possible implementation of this would be for every client to pre-download segment S( ⁇ 1) of the ten (or some other number) most popular pieces of media object currently available. When the client requests one of these media objects, then the pre-downloaded segment S( ⁇ 1) starts to play out while the segment S( 0 ) is being downloaded, resulting in an apparent latency of zero.
- rb(i,t) Define rb(i,t) to be the aggregate rate at which a client downloads information about block i at time t, and define T(i) to be time that block i begins playing out, where again time is measured relative to the client, where time zero is when the client initiates the session and the download starts.
- Rd maximum client download rate
- Equ. 3 The constraint in (Equ. 3) is due to the fact that the client should have finished downloading block i by the time it needs to play it out, i.e., by the time blocks 0 , . . . , i ⁇ 1 have completed playing out.
- FIG. 9 shows the amount of content that should be downloaded (solid line), and the amount of content that has played out (dashed line), from the time the client request the content until it has completed playing out.
- the stair-like graph showing the amount of content downloaded is due to the constraint in (Equ. 3) that a block should be downloaded completely before it can be played out. As the size of each block decreases, the height of the stairs decreases and the two curves approach one another.
- the play out rate is constant over time. In other embodiments, the play out rate may vary over time and Rp is the average play out rate for a block. If the play out rate varies substantially from block to block, then the scheduler may compensate by either varying the rate each block is served, and/or the size of each block, so that the block is downloaded in time to have uninterrupted play out at the client.
- the client accounts for variations in the play out rate by including an additional delay called a buffering latency, defined to be the time between when the latest segment has finished downloading and been reassembled and when the first block in the segment actually starts to play out.
- the buffering latency can be introduced at the client by increasing the initial startup latency. In this way, variations in the play out rate result in variations in the amount of buffering latency and do not affect the quality of the play out.
- Equ. 4 The constraint in (Equ. 4) exists because the client cannot download data for a block at a greater rate than what is being transmitted by the server for that block.
- the design of a scheduler where the client experiences loss is considered in more detail below.
- (Equ. 6) and (Equ. 7) are a special case of (Equ. 3) and (Equ. 5), where all the blocks are chosen to be of size Bmin and there is no loss between the server and the client.
- the (Equ. 6) is the more stringent constraint when ⁇ 1
- (Equ. 7) is the more stringent constraint when ⁇ 1.
- Equ. 6 applies, since the first block should be downloaded before play out can commence, and after that each block can be downloaded in time since the download rate is greater than the play out rate.
- Equ. 7 applies, since the last block should be downloaded in time to play it out. If the last block can be downloaded in time to play out, then all the other blocks should already have been downloaded and played out.
- a straightforward scheduling method that satisfies the constraints in (Equ. 6) and (Equ. 7), is to have the server make each segment a single block and send out each segment on a single channel at a rate of Rd Mbps, which will allow a client to achieve the startup time Ts by consecutively downloading each segment in order at a rate Rd.
- the amount of content that should be downloaded from the time the client requests the content until it has completed playing out is shown by the solid line in these figures.
- the dashed line is to the left of the solid line, so uninterrupted play out is possible. Decreasing the startup latency moves the curves closer together.
- Eps(N(i)) ⁇ N(i) Mbits of data is the overhead that the media object schedule generator 214 includes for segment S(i) in the designed schedule to allow for loss between the server and the client and/or any overhead required to reassemble the blocks in the segment.
- Eps(N(i)) is chosen so that each segment can be reassembled at the client with high probability.
- the number of extra symbols required at the decoder to reassemble a segment with high probability is proportional to the square root of the number of input symbols in that segment.
- c is 13 or 14 depending on the value of N(i).
- a client may adjust its reception rate in response to congestion by joining and leaving channels.
- a client experiencing up to certain levels of congestion may be expected to be joined to a particular channel at least 1 ⁇ p of the schedule time for that channel.
- a client with no loss will receive 1/(1 ⁇ p) times the data of a client that loses a fraction p.
- Any client that loses up to a fraction p of the data it is meant to receive for segment S(i) will receive at least N(i) Mbits of information about S(i) and be able to reassemble segment S(i) completely assuming a perfect erasure code is used.
- Eps(N(i)) is independent of N(i).
- Equation . ⁇ 8 i.e., the probability that d′ ⁇ d or less packets are lost.
- Eps(N(i)) can be chosen according to the loss rate and number of packets in segment S(i), so that at least N(i) Mbits is received with some probability.
- the overhead function Eps(N(i)) 0, when no loss is allowed for at the client and the original data is transmitted across the channels.
- the overhead function could be chosen to account for both a packet loss fraction p, as well as the decoder overhead required for chain reaction codes or other codes.
- the overhead function could also be dependent on the schedule pair, or the number of blocks in the segment. For example, for a client that experiences loss in bursts, the schedule time for each segment affects the variance of the loss rate seen by the client for that segment.
- the overhead function Eps(N(i)) may have to account for duplicate packets received at the client. For instance, if the original data is transmitted, or if a fixed rate FEC code is used, then it is important to organize the data so that a client will receive all the data it requires to reassemble the block, with as little duplication as possible. In this case, choosing the overhead function becomes much more difficult.
- chain reaction codes are used, the client only cares about the quantity of reception for each block. The particular data that is received is generally not an issue if the data for each block on the channel is transmitted according to the methods described in Luby I, Luby II, and the Scheduling Multiple Files Application unless the number of blocks in a segment is large.
- Optimal server bandwidth scheduling is one scheduling method that can be used by the media object schedule generator 214 , when there is no restriction on the client download bandwidth Rd.
- the required server bandwidth is therefore
- FIG. 12 shows the amount of required server bandwidth as the length of the movie varies from 1 minute to 4 hours.
- the client may filter out any output symbols from a block that has completed downloading. Once the first block has been received completely, the client starts to play out the media object. Thus, the startup latency is equal to the time it takes to download the first block.
- the number of blocks in each segment may be chosen so that each segment is transmitted at approximately the same rate. Alternatively, the number of blocks in each segment may be chosen so that each segment contains approximately the same number of blocks, or is approximately the same size.
- the schemes that are described below are different scheduling methods that can be used by the media object schedule generator 214 when there is a restriction on the maximum client download rate Rd.
- a maximum client download rate is a realistic concern for most MOD systems since the client's maximum download rate depends on the type of connection it has to the network.
- the MOD system may want to serve an MPEG-1 media stream with a play out rate of 1.4 Mbps to clients connected over a T 1 line with a maximum download rate of 1.5 Mbps.
- VRFS scheduling is a scheduling method that can be used by the media object schedule generator 214 when there is a restriction on the maximum client download rate Rd.
- the VRFS scheduler partitions the media object into blocks and segments in a pre-processing step.
- the VRFS scheduler determines the next segment size and blocks in the segment for the media object when the VRFS scheduler is ready to schedule the next segment, or when enough data for a new segment becomes available.
- the VRFS scheduler first partitions the media object into blocks. For example, each block could be chosen to be the minimum block size Bmin, or the blocks could be chosen according to specific breaks in the play out. One or more blocks are grouped together to form each segment. In another embodiment, the VRFS scheduler first partitions the media object into segments. Each segment is then partitioned into one or more blocks. In a preferred embodiment, the blocks within each segment are all chosen to be the same size. For VRFS scheduling, each segment is served on one channel, so there is a schedule pair (I(i),E(i)) associated with each segment.
- the VRFS scheduler uses a greedy algorithm to determine when to schedule a segment to be downloaded, where the segments are scheduled to be downloaded in order When a segment S(i) completes downloading at time E(i), the bandwidth used to download segment S(i) is made available and the VRFS scheduler schedules as many new segments to be downloaded as possible up to the maximum client download bandwidth. Each segment is scheduled to start downloading at the client as early as possible.
- FIG. 13 is a simplified flow diagram of a method, according to an embodiment of the invention, that may be implemented by a media object schedule generator 214 , using a VRFS scheduler, to determine the rate and schedule pair for each segment in a media object, so that the client can download the media object and play it out uninterrupted.
- a media object schedule generator 214 using a VRFS scheduler, to determine the rate and schedule pair for each segment in a media object, so that the client can download the media object and play it out uninterrupted.
- This diagram is merely for illustrative purposes and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims herein.
- the schedule pair (I( ⁇ 1), E( ⁇ 1)) for the pseudo-segment S( ⁇ 1) is initialized to zero since the client does not download this segment.
- Ns( ⁇ 1) and Ns( 0 ) are initialized to 0 and N( ⁇
- step 1430 j, i and Rc are all initialized, where j represent the segment S(j) in the schedule that is currently playing out, i represents the next segment S(i) to be scheduled to be downloaded while segment S(j) is playing out, and Rc represents the download bandwidth scheduled for use at the client when segment S(j) is playing out.
- i the next segment S(i) to be scheduled to be downloaded while segment S(j) is playing out
- Rc represents the download bandwidth scheduled for use at the client when segment S(j) is playing out.
- the VRFS scheduler checks if there are any more segments to be scheduled for downloading, i.e., if i ⁇ n, and if the next segment to be scheduled to be downloaded is less than the segment that is currently playing out, i.e., if i>j.
- the VRFS scheduler attempts to schedule the next segment S(i) to be downloaded.
- the serving rate r(i) for segment S(i) is chosen so that N′(i) Mbits of data can be downloaded by the client in the schedule time of E(i) ⁇ I(i) seconds.
- step 1460 the VRFS scheduler checks whether the current available bandwidth at the client when segment S(j) is playing out, which is Rd–Rc Mbps, is large enough to start downloading segment S(i) at rate r(i). If r(i) ⁇ Rd–Rc, then the segment S(i) can be downloaded when segment S(j) is playing out. In steps 1470 and 1475 , Rc is updated to include the bandwidth required to download segment S(i), Ns(i+1) is calculated, and the scheduler increments i by 1, so the next segment can be scheduled for downloading.
- the scheduler increments j by 1 to indicate that segment S(i) can not be scheduled to be downloaded until at least the next segment completes downloading and starts playing out.
- the bandwidth r(j) that becomes available when segment S(j) completes downloading is also subtracted from Rc, and the VRFS scheduler tries to reschedule segment S(i) if i>j in steps 1440 and 1450 .
- the x-axis shows time in units of blocks and the y-axis shows the bandwidth in units of the play out bandwidth.
- the height of each segment is equal to the rate that the segment is downloaded by the client.
- the VRFS scheduler initially schedules the first three segments at rates Rp/2 Mbps, Rp/3 Mbps and Rp/4 Mbps respectively. At this point, the client is downloading at an aggregate rate of 1.08Rp Mbps. Segment S( 3 ) requires 0.2Rp Mbps to download so there is not enough bandwidth available to start downloading segment S( 3 ). When segment S( 0 ) completes downloading, the VRFS scheduler can schedule the client to start downloading segment S( 3 ) and segment S( 4 ) at rates Rp/3 Mbps and Rp/4 Mbps respectively. The VRFS scheduler first drops the bandwidth associated with segment S( 0 ), so the aggregate download rate when segment S( 0 ) is playing out is 1.17Rp Mbps. The process continues until all the segments have been scheduled to be downloaded.
- the VRFS scheduler uses about 99.9% of the available download bandwidth, which is very efficient.
- Rd is reduced to 1.5 Rp in the above example, then the client downloads at about 99.8% of the maximum download rate until the last segment has started downloading.
- the required server bandwidth is 27.04 Mbps.
- the VRFS scheduler makes very efficient use of the available client download bandwidth.
- the VRFS scheduler may become less efficient.
- the VRFS scheduler is not guaranteed to download at the maximum download rate Rd, it is possible to satisfy the conditions in (Equ. 6) and (Equ. 7), and not actually be able to achieve uninterrupted play out.
- Rd maximum download rate
- the VRFS scheduler cannot schedule the five segments to be downloaded to achieve uninterrupted play out at the client.
- the VRFS scheduler can schedule the segments to be downloaded in an arbitrary order, as long as each segment completes downloading before it is scheduled to play out. When a segment completes downloading, as many new segments as possible are scheduled to start downloading at the client, until all the segments have been scheduled to be downloaded.
- the segments can be served on more than one channel.
- the VRFS scheduler tries to schedule as many segments as possible for the client to download up to the maximum client download bandwidth. If there is not enough bandwidth available to completely download segment S(i) when segment S(j) is playing out, then segment S(i) may be downloaded on more than one channel.
- the server can avoid serving segment S(i) on multiple channels and instead increase the size of segment S(i ⁇ 1) so that segment S(i ⁇ 1) requires all the remaining download bandwidth at the client when segment S(j) is playing out.
- FRVS Fixed Rate Variable Segment Size
- the FRVS scheduler first partitions the media object into n′ segments, where each segment is further partitioned into one or more blocks.
- the blocks within each segment are all chosen to be the same size.
- Each segment is served on one channel, so there is a schedule pair (I(i),E(i)) associated with each segment.
- the FRVS scheduler schedules the segments to be downloaded in order where the client is downloading from at most r channels at a time.
- the client starts to play out the media object once the segment S( 0 ) has been received completely.
- segment S(i) completes downloading, the client starts downloading segment S(i+r), while i ⁇ n′ ⁇ r.
- the FRVS scheduler chooses the size of segment S(i) based on the constraint that segment S(i) should finish downloading and be reassembled before segment S(i ⁇ 1) finishes playing out.
- FIG. 15 is a simplified flow diagram of a method, according to an embodiment of the invention, that may be implemented by a media object schedule generator 214 , using a FRVS scheduler, to determine the size of each segment in a media object, so that the client can download the media object and play it out uninterrupted.
- This diagram is merely for illustrative purposes and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims herein.
- the N( ⁇ 2), N( ⁇ 3), . . . , N( ⁇ r) are initialized to zero. These are the sizes of the r ⁇ 1 of the r pseudo-segments pre-pended by the FRVS scheduler to the sequence of segments.
- Ns( ⁇ 1), Ns( ⁇ 2), . . . , Ns( ⁇ r) are initialized to zero and Ns( 0 ) is initialized to N( ⁇ 1).
- Ns( ⁇ 1), Ns( ⁇ 2), . . . , Ns( ⁇ r) are initialized to zero and Ns( 0 ) is initialized to N( ⁇ 1).
- the FRVS checks if the segment N(i) is at least as large as the minimum segment size. If it is not, then in step 1696 , the scheduler declares that there is no valid schedule using this scheduler. If it is, then in step 1660 , the schedule pair (I(i), E(i)) is chosen.
- Ns(i+1) is calculated, and the scheduler increments i by 1, so the next segment can be scheduled for downloading.
- step 1694 the scheduler completes.
- the size of the last segment can be increased by decreasing the download rate of the second last segment to decrease it in size, and therefore increase the size of the last segment by the same amount. In another embodiment, if the last segment is small enough, the download rate of the second last segment can be increased so that there is no need for another segment.
- N(6) 550.0
- N(7) 716.3
- N(12) 2529.6
- the server bandwidth is reduced by almost 1 Mbps.
- the server bandwidth generally decreases as r increases although the additional server bandwidth savings also decreases as r decreases.
- FRVS scheme such that the client can download up to r channels simultaneously as follows. Divide the available bandwidth into r channels where each channel is assigned an equal share of the client download bandwidth. As before, the segment sizes that are already chosen determine the size of the next segment. Each new segment is scheduled to be downloaded at an aggregate rate of c ⁇ Rd/r, where c is an integer between 1 and r. Generally, c should be chosen to be as small as possible but large enough to ensure that the segment is at least as large as the minimum segment size.
- the segments increase in size, so the time to download future segments is greater than for previous segments (since the segments also take longer to play out). Therefore, future segments will require less bandwidth to achieve the minimum segment size.
- the y-axis represents the client download bandwidth and the x-axis represents time.
- the length of each segment represents how long it is designed to be downloaded by the client and the height represents the bandwidth at which the client downloads the segment. For instance, segment S( 0 ) is downloaded from time 0 to Ts using 3Rd/5 Mbps of the bandwidth.
- segment S( 0 ) completes downloading, there is enough time to download segment S( 2 ) at only 2Rd/r Mbps and segment S( 3 ) at Rd/r Mbps. If segment S( 3 ) is too small if downloaded at Rd/r Mbps, then the FRVS scheduler could either make segment S( 2 ) larger by downloading it at 3Rd/r Mbps, or assign S( 3 ) a second channel when S( 1 ) completes downloading.
- the segments decrease in size, so the time to download future segments is less than that for previous segments. Therefore, future segments will require more bandwidth to achieve the minimum block size.
- segment S(i+2) would not be large enough if it is only downloaded at a rate of Rd/2 Mbps.
- the bandwidth available after segment S(i+1) completes downloading is therefore also assigned to segment S(i+2) so that S(i+2) achieves the minimum segment size. Segments S(i+3) is downloaded at Rd Mbps.
- a segment that is served at a rate of c ⁇ Rd/r Mbps is served on a single channel. In another embodiment, a segment that is served at a rate of c ⁇ Rd/r Mbps is served on c channels where each channel is served at a rate of Rd/r Mbps.
- the maximum storage requirement at the client is lower bounded by the size of the largest segment.
- the server bandwidth can be further divided so that a segment finishes downloading as late as possible before it is scheduled to play out.
- the segment sizes can be adjusted so that a segment contains an integer number of blocks by decreasing or increasing the segment size. This can be done by changing the rate that each segment is served. The size and rate of segments scheduled later in the play out may be adjusted accordingly.
- Restricted server channel scheduling is a scheduling method that can be used by the media object schedule generator 214 when there is a restriction on the maximum number of concurrent channels at the server g, the maximum client download rate Rd, and the maximum number of concurrent channels at the client r.
- the RSC scheduler partitions the media object into at most g segments, where each segment is served on one or more channels such that the maximum number of channels is g.
- FIG. 20 is a simplified flow diagram of a method, according to an embodiment of the invention, that may be implemented by a media object schedule generator 214 , using a RSC scheduler, to determine the size of each segment in a media object, so that the client can download the media object and play it out uninterrupted.
- the RSC scheduler finds the schedule produced by the FRVS scheduler with as many concurrent channels at the client as possible, and with at most g channels at the server. For the FRVS scheduler, when the number of concurrent channels at the client increases, the number of concurrent channels at the server usually increases as well, and the required server bandwidth usually decreases.
- the RSC scheduler initializes r′ to one and runs the FRVS scheduler on the media object with r′ concurrent channels at the client. Then, in step 2125 , the RSC scheduler checks if the FRVS found a valid schedule in step 2120 , i.e., if the FRVS scheduler in FIG. 15 completed in step 1694 . If no valid schedule was found, then in step 2196 , the scheduler declares that there is no valid schedule using this scheduler.
- the RSC scheduler increases the number of segments in the FRVS schedule to be equal to g′ by splitting some of the segments into two or more segments and adjusting the bandwidth to serve each segment accordingly.
- the RSC scheduler does not decrease r′ in step 2190 , and instead decreases the number of segments in the FRVS schedule by combining segments and the bandwidth used to download the segments.
- the RSC scheduler can also be used without a restriction on the maximum number of concurrent channels at the client r by not comparing r′ to r in steps 2130 and 2160 .
- An additional constraint for the media object schedule generator 214 to consider is the maximum client temporary storage requirement when the media object is not being stored at the client.
- the client starts to play out block i, it has already played out the first i blocks, so the client only needs to store the data that has already been downloaded, but not yet played out.
- the client in the time that block i is played out, whatever information that is downloaded about blocks i+1 to n ⁇ 1 should be stored at the client in temporary storage.
- the temporary storage requirement at the client is increasing when the amount of data downloaded during the play out of block i is greater than the size of block i. If the client reception rate is non-increasing over time, then Mmax occurs at the first index i for which the average client reception rate is less than the play out rate.
- the client maximum temporary storage requirement is at least as large as the size of the largest segment.
- One method of reducing the client temporary storage requirement is to download the content as late as possible. This is in conflict with the goal of reducing the server bandwidth Rs, where generally a block is scheduled to be downloaded as slowly as possible.
- Another method of reducing the client temporary storage requirement is to change the schedule at a point before the index i, for which the storage requirement is a maximum.
- the maximum storage requirement at the client occur for the smallest i such that M(i+1) ⁇ M(i), or when i ⁇ (n+m ⁇ 1)/(e) ⁇ m. Therefore, the maximum client storage requirement is Mmax ⁇ (n ⁇ Tf ⁇ Rp)/e.
- the client Since the size of the media content is n ⁇ Tf ⁇ Rp Mbits, the client should store a maximum of approximately 37% of the entire media content. To reduce the storage requirement, the client can download segments S((n+m ⁇ 1)/e ⁇ m) to S(n ⁇ 1) at a later point in the schedule, and at a higher rate.
- the maximum storage requirement at the client can be upper bounded as follows.
- the maximum amount of data that a client could have downloaded but not yet played out at this point is (Rd ⁇ Rp) ⁇ T(i), so Mmax ⁇ (Rd ⁇ Rp) ⁇ T(i) Mbits.
- the designed client reception rate is less than the play out rate for the first time as block 172 begins to play out.
- the server When the maximum server bandwidth Rsmax is limited, then the server will have a maximum number of media objects that can be served simultaneously.
- the server may have to stop serving one or more of the media objects currently being served. The transition of dropping one or more media objects and starting to serve another should be done so that users can view each media object for as long as possible.
- the server stops serving the segments in order, i.e., the segments from the beginning stop being served first, and for the media object being added, the server starts serving the segments in order i.e., the segments from the beginning are served first.
- the next segment S(j) that will stop being served is the segment S(j) among all the media objects that are no longer to be served with the smallest E(j).
- Te(j) to be the time that segment S(j) stops being served at the server.
- T 0 (j) Te(j) ⁇ E(j) to be the latest startup time at which a client can request the media object and still complete downloading segment S(j).
- the server starts serving the segment S(i) of the second movie I(i) seconds after 7:00pm, and stops serving the segment S(i) of the first movie at this time, then the segments of the first movie stop serving in order.
- the segments from the second movie start serving in order.
- All of the above scheduling methods do not require the scheduler to know the total length of the media object in order to schedule the media object since the scheduler can be run incrementally as the rest of the media object arrives to be served. Because of this, all of these schedulers can be used to perform on demand scheduling for a media stream.
- the stream is partitioned into blocks and segments as the content becomes available to the server.
- the media object description at the client can be updated by information sent on the channels that it has already joined. Alternatively, the client can use the client browser to update the media object description, or can implement the same functionality as the media object schedule generator 214 to determine what to do next.
- the downloading of one segment may occur concurrently with the reassembling and/or playing out of blocks in a second segment.
- the reassembling of blocks in one segment may occur concurrently with the playing out of blocks in a second segment.
- FIGS. 1–4 , 5 – 6 may be implemented by a combination of hardware and/or software, and that in specific implementations some or all of the functionality of some of the blocks may be combined.
- the various methods discussed herein may be implemented by a combination of hardware and/or software.
Abstract
Description
- 1. the maximum total server bandwidth Rsmax Mbps;
- 2. the maximum client download rate Rd Mbps;
- 3. the maximum startup latency at the client Ts seconds;
- 4. the maximum total number of channels concurrently available to the client r;
- 5. the maximum total number of channels concurrently available to the server g; and
- 6. the maximum temporary storage available at the client Mmax Mbits.
rb(i,t)≦rb(i) (Equ.4)
α≧1/m (Equ.6)
α≧n/(n−1+m) (Equ.7)
i.e., the probability that d′−d or less packets are lost. For example, if N(i) Mbits is equivalent to 100 packets and perfect erasure codes are used for the channel, and each packet is lost with probability 0.1, i.e., an expected 10% packet loss rate, then in order for the client to receive at least d=100 packets for segment S(i) with 99.99% probability, d′=126 packets. In general, Eps(N(i)) can be chosen according to the loss rate and number of packets in segment S(i), so that at least N(i) Mbits is received with some probability.
The schedule pairs are I(i)=0 and E(i)=T(i), for i=0, . . . , n−1. The client initially joins all n channels and receives data from each channel concurrently, i.e., g=r=n. After a segment has been received completely, the client drops the channel associated with that segment.
can be approximated as ln(n), so for large m, Rs≈Rp·1n((n+m−1)/(m−1)) Mbps, i.e., the server bandwidth requirement grows logarithmically in n.
i.e., Ns(i) is the aggregate size of the segments S(−1) to S(i−1). In another embodiment, Ns(i) can be precalculated, for i=−1,0,1, . . . , n−1, if the size of all the segments is known beforehand. If the play out rate is Rp Mbps, then segment S(i) begins playing out Ns(i)/Rp seconds after the client requests the content.
i.e., Ns(i) is the size of the first i segments plus the size of the pseudo-segment S(−1) and the pre-pended pseudo-segments of
N(0) = 96 | N(1) = 134.4 | N(2) = 188.2 | ||
N(3) = 263.4 | N(4) = 368.8 | N(5) = 420.3 | ||
N(6) = 550.0 | N(7) = 716.3 | N(8) = 927.5 | ||
N(9) = 1193.2 | N(10) = 1522.9 | N(11) = 1964.0 | ||
N(12) = 2529.6 | N(13) = 3254.9 | N(14) = 4184.9 | ||
N(15) = 5382.9 | N(16) = 5101.6 | |||
The required server bandwidth is Rs=27.2 Mbps, which is 7.68 Mbps greater than OSB. When r is set to 12, there are 36 segments and the server bandwidth is Rs=24 Mbps. The server bandwidth can be further reduced by serving the last segment S(n′−1) at a lower rate. For instance, for the above example where r=5, if the rate of the last segment is reduced so that the last segment only completes downloading when it is due to be played out, then the server bandwidth is reduced by almost 1 Mbps. In another embodiment, the rate b Mbps that each segment is served or the startup latency can be reduced so that when the loop exits in
During the same time interval, block i plays out, so b(i) Mbits of temporary storage is freed for use by other blocks. Define M(i) to be the total client temporary storage requirement as block i begins to play out, i.e., the amount of data that has been downloaded but not yet played out. The storage requirement after block i is played out can be calculated as the sum of the storage requirement after block i−1 played out, and the difference between the amount of data downloaded and the amount of data played out when block i is playing out, i.e., M(i)=M(i−1)+AS(i)−b(i), for 0<i<n−1. The initial conditions is M(−1)=AS(−1), where AS(−1) is defined as the storage requirement when the play out commences, i.e.,
Mbps of bandwidth available at the server to serve segments S(0) thru S(i), for i=0, 1, . . . , n′−1.
Claims (94)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/768,843 US7240358B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
AU2002229029A AU2002229029A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-11-09 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
PCT/US2001/048114 WO2002047391A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-11-09 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
TW090130370A TW560189B (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-12-07 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
US11/757,112 US20080086751A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2007-06-01 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US25451400P | 2000-12-08 | 2000-12-08 | |
US09/768,843 US7240358B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/757,112 Continuation US20080086751A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2007-06-01 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020107968A1 US20020107968A1 (en) | 2002-08-08 |
US7240358B2 true US7240358B2 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
Family
ID=26944093
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/768,843 Expired - Fee Related US7240358B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
US11/757,112 Abandoned US20080086751A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2007-06-01 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/757,112 Abandoned US20080086751A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2007-06-01 | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on-demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7240358B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002229029A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW560189B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002047391A1 (en) |
Cited By (91)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030105604A1 (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2003-06-05 | Ash Leslie E. | Real-time streaming media measurement system and method |
US20030217362A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2003-11-20 | Summers Macy W. | Wideband direct-to-home broadcasting satellite communications system and method |
US20040064836A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-01 | Ludvig Edward A. | Systems and methods for generating a walled garden program for substantially optimized bandwidth delivery |
US20050044250A1 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-24 | Gay Lance Jeffrey | File transfer system |
US20050071508A1 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2005-03-31 | Brown Michael K. | System and method for processing encoded messages |
US20050229228A1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2005-10-13 | Sandeep Relan | Unicast cable content delivery |
US20050268088A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-01 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle control system, and in-vehicle control apparatus and mobile device used therefor |
US20070192663A1 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2007-08-16 | Jijina Aspandyar M | Methods and apparatus to select tornado error correction parameters |
US20070233891A1 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2007-10-04 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi-output packet server with independent streams |
US20070294176A1 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2007-12-20 | Radtke Kenneth A | Methods and Systems for Uninterrupted Media Change |
US20080034273A1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2008-02-07 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Information additive code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US20080120661A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2008-05-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Conversion of Web Content to an Interactive Walled Garden Program |
US20080250312A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method for automatically and graphically associating programmatically-generated media item recommendations related to a user's socially recommended media items |
US20080319833A1 (en) * | 2006-07-11 | 2008-12-25 | Concert Technology Corporation | P2p real time media recommendations |
US20090031345A1 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2009-01-29 | The Directv Group. Inc. | Method and system for preordering content in a user device associated with a content processing system |
US20090089772A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Arrangement for scheduling jobs with rules and events |
US20090094248A1 (en) * | 2007-10-03 | 2009-04-09 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method of prioritizing the downloading of media items in a media item recommendation network |
US20090222886A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2009-09-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Unit using os and image forming apparatus using the same |
US20090307565A1 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2009-12-10 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Method and apparatus for fast encoding of data symbols according to half-weight codes |
US20100023974A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Tatsuya Shiragaki | Method and device for receiving content in a content delivery system |
US20100125885A1 (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method of providing near video on demand |
US20100146081A1 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2010-06-10 | Perry Scherer | Method and system for managing high-bandwidth data sharing |
US20100284275A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Reliable network streaming of a single data stream over multiple physical interfaces |
US20100287296A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Network streaming of a single data stream simultaneously over multiple physical interfaces |
US20100287274A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Efficient network utilization using multiple physical interfaces |
US20110004904A1 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2011-01-06 | The DIRECTV Goup, Inc. | On-demand system interfaces and features |
US20110231569A1 (en) * | 2009-09-22 | 2011-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using block partitioning or request controls for improved client-side handling |
US8060525B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2011-11-15 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on tagging play history information with location information |
US8059646B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2011-11-15 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for identifying music content in a P2P real time recommendation network |
US8090606B2 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2012-01-03 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Embedded media recommendations |
US8117193B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2012-02-14 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US20120110140A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2012-05-03 | Swarmcast Inc. BVI | Parallel data transfer over multiple channels with data order prioritization |
US20120144438A1 (en) * | 2010-12-02 | 2012-06-07 | Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. via the Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS) | Method and apparatus for distributing content via a network to user terminals |
US8200602B2 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2012-06-12 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for creating thematic listening experiences in a networked peer media recommendation environment |
US20120166590A1 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2012-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Reading and Writing During Cluster Growth Phase |
US20120198031A1 (en) * | 2011-01-07 | 2012-08-02 | Nokia Corporation | Method and Apparatus for Signaling Presentation Description Updates in HTTP Streaming |
US8285776B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2012-10-09 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for processing a received media item recommendation message comprising recommender presence information |
USRE43741E1 (en) | 2002-10-05 | 2012-10-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systematic encoding and decoding of chain reaction codes |
US8327266B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2012-12-04 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Graphical user interface system for allowing management of a media item playlist based on a preference scoring system |
US8356109B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2013-01-15 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Network streaming of a video stream over multiple communication channels |
US8396951B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2013-03-12 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for populating a content repository for an internet radio service based on a recommendation network |
US8438244B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-05-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Bandwidth-proportioned datacenters |
US8533299B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-09-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Locator table and client library for datacenters |
US8577874B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-11-05 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US8620699B2 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2013-12-31 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Heavy influencer media recommendations |
US8806050B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 | 2014-08-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Manifest file updates for network streaming of coded multimedia data |
US8843502B2 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2014-09-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Sorting a dataset of incrementally received data |
US8887020B2 (en) | 2003-10-06 | 2014-11-11 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Error-correcting multi-stage code generator and decoder for communication systems having single transmitters or multiple transmitters |
US8909667B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2014-12-09 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Systems, methods, and computer readable media for generating recommendations in a media recommendation system |
US8918533B2 (en) | 2010-07-13 | 2014-12-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Video switching for streaming video data |
US8958375B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2015-02-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Framing for an improved radio link protocol including FEC |
US8983950B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-03-17 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for sorting media items in a playlist on a media device |
US8996611B2 (en) | 2011-01-31 | 2015-03-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Parallel serialization of request processing |
US9003056B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2015-04-07 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Maintaining a minimum level of real time media recommendations in the absence of online friends |
US9037632B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-05-19 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method of generating a media item recommendation message with recommender presence information |
US9060034B2 (en) | 2007-11-09 | 2015-06-16 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method of filtering recommenders in a media item recommendation system |
US9136983B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2015-09-15 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Streaming and buffering using variable FEC overhead and protection periods |
US9136878B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2015-09-15 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | File download and streaming system |
US9164993B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-10-20 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for propagating a media item recommendation message comprising recommender presence information |
US9170892B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2015-10-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Server failure recovery |
US9178535B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-11-03 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Dynamic stream interleaving and sub-stream based delivery |
US9185439B2 (en) | 2010-07-15 | 2015-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signaling data for multiplexing video components |
US9191151B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-11-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using cooperative parallel HTTP and forward error correction |
US9224427B2 (en) | 2007-04-02 | 2015-12-29 | Napo Enterprises LLC | Rating media item recommendations using recommendation paths and/or media item usage |
US9237101B2 (en) | 2007-09-12 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Generating and communicating source identification information to enable reliable communications |
US9236976B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi stage code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US9240810B2 (en) | 2002-06-11 | 2016-01-19 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Systems and processes for decoding chain reaction codes through inactivation |
US9253233B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-02-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Switch signaling methods providing improved switching between representations for adaptive HTTP streaming |
US9264069B2 (en) | 2006-05-10 | 2016-02-16 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Code generator and decoder for communications systems operating using hybrid codes to allow for multiple efficient uses of the communications systems |
US9270299B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2016-02-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Encoding and decoding using elastic codes with flexible source block mapping |
US9270414B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2016-02-23 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multiple-field based code generator and decoder for communications systems |
US9281847B2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2016-03-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Mobile reception of digital video broadcasting—terrestrial services |
US9288010B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2016-03-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Universal file delivery methods for providing unequal error protection and bundled file delivery services |
US9294226B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2016-03-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Universal object delivery and template-based file delivery |
US9380096B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-06-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system for handling low-latency streaming |
US9386064B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-07-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using URL templates and construction rules |
US9419749B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2016-08-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus employing FEC codes with permanent inactivation of symbols for encoding and decoding processes |
US9432433B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-08-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system using signaling or block creation |
US9454441B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2016-09-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Data layout for recovery and durability |
US9485546B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2016-11-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signaling video samples for trick mode video representations |
US9596447B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2017-03-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Providing frame packing type information for video coding |
US9734507B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2017-08-15 | Napo Enterprise, Llc | Method and system for simulating recommendations in a social network for an offline user |
US9778856B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2017-10-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Block-level access to parallel storage |
US9798631B2 (en) | 2014-02-04 | 2017-10-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Block storage by decoupling ordering from durability |
US9813529B2 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2017-11-07 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Effective circuits in packet-switched networks |
US9843844B2 (en) | 2011-10-05 | 2017-12-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Network streaming of media data |
US9948708B2 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2018-04-17 | Google Llc | Data retrieval based on bandwidth cost and delay |
US10133780B2 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2018-11-20 | Scenera Mobile Technologies, Llc | Methods, systems, and computer program products for determining availability of presentable content |
US10667008B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2020-05-26 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for setting and receiving user notifications for content available far in the future |
US20200197793A1 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-25 | Universal City Studios Llc | Scalable interactive video systems and methods |
US11422907B2 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2022-08-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Disconnected operation for systems utilizing cloud storage |
Families Citing this family (73)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8875198B1 (en) | 2001-08-19 | 2014-10-28 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Network video unit |
US9602862B2 (en) | 2000-04-16 | 2017-03-21 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Accessing programs using networked digital video recording devices |
US6801947B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2004-10-05 | Nortel Networks Ltd | Method and apparatus for broadcasting media objects with guaranteed quality of service |
US7139280B2 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2006-11-21 | Yishay Mansour | Buffer management policy for shared memory switches |
WO2003058877A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2003-07-17 | Woodstock Systems, Llc | Personal digital servertm (pdstm) |
US7551888B2 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2009-06-23 | Nokia Corporation | Method and system of displaying content associated with broadcast program |
US7624415B1 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2009-11-24 | Broadlogic Network Technologies Inc. | Techniques for optimizing use of channel bandwidth in on-demand content delivery systems |
US20030204602A1 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2003-10-30 | Hudson Michael D. | Mediated multi-source peer content delivery network architecture |
KR100854531B1 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2008-10-27 | 노키아 코포레이션 | A system and method for delivering representative media objects of a broadcast media stream to a terminal |
JP4120461B2 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2008-07-16 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Transmission data generation method and transmission data generation apparatus |
KR100537499B1 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2005-12-19 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method of generating transmission control parameter and selective retranmission method according to the packet characteristics. |
US8397269B2 (en) | 2002-08-13 | 2013-03-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast digital channel changing |
US7523482B2 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2009-04-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Seamless digital channel changing |
US7870593B2 (en) * | 2002-12-05 | 2011-01-11 | Att Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | DSL video service with storage |
US7797064B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2010-09-14 | Stephen Loomis | Apparatus and method for skipping songs without delay |
US20040177115A1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-09-09 | Hollander Marc S. | System and method for music search and discovery |
US7912920B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2011-03-22 | Stephen Loomis | Stream sourcing content delivery system |
US7412532B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2008-08-12 | Aol Llc, A Deleware Limited Liability Company | Multimedia scheduler |
US7493289B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2009-02-17 | Aol Llc | Digital content store system |
US7328256B2 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2008-02-05 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for distributing computer files across a network to multiple clients |
US7603689B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2009-10-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast start-up for digital video streams |
US7516232B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2009-04-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Media organization for distributed sending of media data |
US7562375B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2009-07-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Fast channel change |
US7444419B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Media stream scheduling for hiccup-free fast-channel-change in the presence of network chokepoints |
US7443791B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Priority mechanism for distributed sending of media data |
US7614071B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2009-11-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for distributed sending of media data |
US7430222B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2008-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Media stream splicer |
EP1589706B1 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2008-03-19 | Alcatel Lucent | Control of multicast traffic |
US20050252958A1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2005-11-17 | Lee Peter S | System and method for wireless transfer of data content to a portable device |
US7631098B2 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2009-12-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program product for optimized concurrent data download within a grid computing environment |
TWI276979B (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2007-03-21 | Asustek Comp Inc | Method and system for downloading data from networks using a network device |
US7277985B2 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2007-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program product for storing downloadable content on a plurality of enterprise storage system (ESS) cells |
US8904458B2 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2014-12-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for pre-caching a first portion of a video file on a set-top box |
US7640352B2 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2009-12-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for presentation of media obtained from a media stream |
US7477653B2 (en) * | 2004-12-10 | 2009-01-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Accelerated channel change in rate-limited environments |
US8270901B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2012-09-18 | Martin E. Hellman | Dropout-resistant media broadcasting system |
US8627354B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2014-01-07 | Martin E. Hellman | Tiered subscription broadcast system |
US7865917B2 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2011-01-04 | Martin E Hellman | Security enhanced tiered subscription broadcast system |
KR100660850B1 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2006-12-26 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A Video On Demand system and a method for reconstructing a Video On Demand system |
US20060184688A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | System and Method for Parallel Indirect Streaming of Stored Media from Multiple Sources |
US20060225115A1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for network communication |
US7840178B2 (en) * | 2005-07-12 | 2010-11-23 | Martin E. Hellman | FM broadcast system competitive with satellite radio |
US8135040B2 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2012-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Accelerated channel change |
US20070178889A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2007-08-02 | Xcellasave, Inc. | Advertising on mobile devices |
KR101319189B1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2013-10-16 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method, Terminal And System For Providing a Multiple Session PoC Multimedia Service Simultaneously |
US7647276B2 (en) | 2006-05-11 | 2010-01-12 | Cfph, Llc | Methods and apparatus for electronic file use and management |
US20100211690A1 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2010-08-19 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Block partitioning for a data stream |
US7783686B2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2010-08-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Application program interface to manage media files |
US7603387B2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2009-10-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Techniques to manage media files |
US7761900B2 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2010-07-20 | Clarendon Foundation, Inc. | Distribution of content and advertisement |
US8442989B2 (en) * | 2006-09-05 | 2013-05-14 | Thomson Licensing | Method for assigning multimedia data to distributed storage devices |
JP2008083918A (en) * | 2006-09-27 | 2008-04-10 | Aisin Aw Co Ltd | Navigation device |
EP2183927A4 (en) * | 2007-05-14 | 2014-12-17 | Sigma Group Inc | Wireless multimedia system |
US8996547B2 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2015-03-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic fragmentation of digital media |
US8527588B2 (en) * | 2009-05-12 | 2013-09-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web conference performance monitoring system |
US20110096828A1 (en) * | 2009-09-22 | 2011-04-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using scalable encoding |
US9225961B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2015-12-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frame packing for asymmetric stereo video |
US9258175B1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2016-02-09 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for sharing playlists for content stored within a network |
US9516357B2 (en) * | 2010-09-10 | 2016-12-06 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Recording variable-quality content stream |
US8583818B2 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2013-11-12 | Cbs Interactive Inc. | System and method for custom segmentation for streaming video |
US9553817B1 (en) * | 2011-07-14 | 2017-01-24 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Diverse transmission of packet content |
CN102611947B (en) * | 2011-11-24 | 2017-11-17 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Create method, system and the media server of multicast channel |
JP6021487B2 (en) * | 2012-07-18 | 2016-11-09 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information processing system, control method, server, information processing apparatus, and computer program |
US20150172340A1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2015-06-18 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Technique for Operating Client and Server Devices in a Broadcast Communication Network |
FR3001353A1 (en) * | 2013-01-24 | 2014-07-25 | Tdf | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT, DIFFUSION SOURCE EQUIPMENT, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM AND MEDIUM STORAGE MEDIUM. |
US9680689B2 (en) | 2013-02-14 | 2017-06-13 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Fragmenting media content |
US9734194B1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2017-08-15 | Google Inc. | Encoding time interval information |
FR3005386B1 (en) * | 2013-05-02 | 2016-10-14 | Tdf | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING A PART ALREADY DIFFUSED FROM A MULTIMEDIA STREAM, USER TERMINAL, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM AND MEDIUM STORAGE MEDIUM |
US10123212B2 (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2018-11-06 | Shared Spectrum Company | DSA radio policy-controlled classifier restriction |
US9559805B2 (en) * | 2014-11-03 | 2017-01-31 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Self-describing error correction of consolidated media content |
US9723434B1 (en) * | 2016-05-24 | 2017-08-01 | Dell Products L.P. | Information handling system proximity sensing |
US10873781B2 (en) | 2017-06-13 | 2020-12-22 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Video fragment file processing |
JP6471252B1 (en) * | 2018-03-20 | 2019-02-13 | 株式会社Jストリーム | Playback apparatus and program |
Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5371532A (en) | 1992-05-15 | 1994-12-06 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Communications architecture and method for distributing information services |
US5379297A (en) | 1992-04-09 | 1995-01-03 | Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. | Concurrent multi-channel segmentation and reassembly processors for asynchronous transfer mode |
US5421031A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1995-05-30 | Delta Beta Pty. Ltd. | Program transmission optimisation |
US5617541A (en) | 1994-12-21 | 1997-04-01 | International Computer Science Institute | System for packetizing data encoded corresponding to priority levels where reconstructed data corresponds to fractionalized priority level and received fractionalized packets |
US5659614A (en) | 1994-11-28 | 1997-08-19 | Bailey, Iii; John E. | Method and system for creating and storing a backup copy of file data stored on a computer |
US5701582A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1997-12-23 | Delta Beta Pty. Ltd. | Method and apparatus for efficient transmissions of programs |
US5751336A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1998-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Permutation based pyramid block transmission scheme for broadcasting in video-on-demand storage systems |
US5757415A (en) | 1994-05-26 | 1998-05-26 | Sony Corporation | On-demand data transmission by dividing input data into blocks and each block into sub-blocks such that the sub-blocks are re-arranged for storage to data storage means |
US5835165A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-11-10 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Reduction of false locking code words in concatenated decoders |
US5903775A (en) | 1996-06-06 | 1999-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for the sequential transmission of compressed video information at varying data rates |
US5926205A (en) * | 1994-10-19 | 1999-07-20 | Imedia Corporation | Method and apparatus for encoding and formatting data representing a video program to provide multiple overlapping presentations of the video program |
US5936949A (en) | 1996-09-05 | 1999-08-10 | Netro Corporation | Wireless ATM metropolitan area network |
US5936659A (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1999-08-10 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Method for video delivery using pyramid broadcasting |
US6011590A (en) | 1997-01-03 | 2000-01-04 | Ncr Corporation | Method of transmitting compressed information to minimize buffer space |
US6018359A (en) | 1998-04-24 | 2000-01-25 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | System and method for multicast video-on-demand delivery system |
US6073250A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-06-06 | Luby; Michael G. | Loss resilient decoding technique |
US6081909A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-06-27 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Irregularly graphed encoding technique |
US6134596A (en) * | 1997-09-18 | 2000-10-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Continuous media file server system and method for scheduling network resources to play multiple files having different data transmission rates |
US6141053A (en) | 1997-01-03 | 2000-10-31 | Saukkonen; Jukka I. | Method of optimizing bandwidth for transmitting compressed video data streams |
US6163870A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-12-19 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Message encoding with irregular graphing |
US6185265B1 (en) | 1998-04-07 | 2001-02-06 | Worldspace Management Corp. | System for time division multiplexing broadcast channels with R-1/2 or R-3/4 convolutional coding for satellite transmission via on-board baseband processing payload or transparent payload |
US6195777B1 (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2001-02-27 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Loss resilient code with double heavy tailed series of redundant layers |
WO2001057667A1 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2001-08-09 | Bandwiz, Inc. | Data streaming |
WO2001058131A2 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2001-08-09 | Bandwiz, Inc. | Broadcast system |
US6307487B1 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2001-10-23 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Information additive code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US6320520B1 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2001-11-20 | Digital Fountain | Information additive group code generator and decoder for communications systems |
US6732325B1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2004-05-04 | Digeo, Inc. | Error-correction with limited working storage |
US6882618B1 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2005-04-19 | Sony Corporation | Transmitting apparatus, receiving apparatus, communication system, transmission method, reception method, and communication method |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5372532A (en) * | 1993-01-26 | 1994-12-13 | Robertson, Jr.; George W. | Swivel head cap connector |
US6486803B1 (en) * | 2000-09-22 | 2002-11-26 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | On demand encoding with a window |
US6411223B1 (en) * | 2000-10-18 | 2002-06-25 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Generating high weight encoding symbols using a basis |
-
2001
- 2001-01-23 US US09/768,843 patent/US7240358B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-11-09 AU AU2002229029A patent/AU2002229029A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-11-09 WO PCT/US2001/048114 patent/WO2002047391A1/en active Search and Examination
- 2001-12-07 TW TW090130370A patent/TW560189B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2007
- 2007-06-01 US US11/757,112 patent/US20080086751A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5421031A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1995-05-30 | Delta Beta Pty. Ltd. | Program transmission optimisation |
US5701582A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1997-12-23 | Delta Beta Pty. Ltd. | Method and apparatus for efficient transmissions of programs |
US5379297A (en) | 1992-04-09 | 1995-01-03 | Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. | Concurrent multi-channel segmentation and reassembly processors for asynchronous transfer mode |
US5371532A (en) | 1992-05-15 | 1994-12-06 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Communications architecture and method for distributing information services |
US5757415A (en) | 1994-05-26 | 1998-05-26 | Sony Corporation | On-demand data transmission by dividing input data into blocks and each block into sub-blocks such that the sub-blocks are re-arranged for storage to data storage means |
US5926205A (en) * | 1994-10-19 | 1999-07-20 | Imedia Corporation | Method and apparatus for encoding and formatting data representing a video program to provide multiple overlapping presentations of the video program |
US5659614A (en) | 1994-11-28 | 1997-08-19 | Bailey, Iii; John E. | Method and system for creating and storing a backup copy of file data stored on a computer |
US5617541A (en) | 1994-12-21 | 1997-04-01 | International Computer Science Institute | System for packetizing data encoded corresponding to priority levels where reconstructed data corresponds to fractionalized priority level and received fractionalized packets |
US5835165A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-11-10 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Reduction of false locking code words in concatenated decoders |
US5751336A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1998-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Permutation based pyramid block transmission scheme for broadcasting in video-on-demand storage systems |
US5936659A (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1999-08-10 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Method for video delivery using pyramid broadcasting |
US5903775A (en) | 1996-06-06 | 1999-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for the sequential transmission of compressed video information at varying data rates |
US5936949A (en) | 1996-09-05 | 1999-08-10 | Netro Corporation | Wireless ATM metropolitan area network |
US6011590A (en) | 1997-01-03 | 2000-01-04 | Ncr Corporation | Method of transmitting compressed information to minimize buffer space |
US6141053A (en) | 1997-01-03 | 2000-10-31 | Saukkonen; Jukka I. | Method of optimizing bandwidth for transmitting compressed video data streams |
US6134596A (en) * | 1997-09-18 | 2000-10-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Continuous media file server system and method for scheduling network resources to play multiple files having different data transmission rates |
US6195777B1 (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2001-02-27 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Loss resilient code with double heavy tailed series of redundant layers |
US6081909A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-06-27 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Irregularly graphed encoding technique |
US6073250A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-06-06 | Luby; Michael G. | Loss resilient decoding technique |
US6163870A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-12-19 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Message encoding with irregular graphing |
US6185265B1 (en) | 1998-04-07 | 2001-02-06 | Worldspace Management Corp. | System for time division multiplexing broadcast channels with R-1/2 or R-3/4 convolutional coding for satellite transmission via on-board baseband processing payload or transparent payload |
US6018359A (en) | 1998-04-24 | 2000-01-25 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | System and method for multicast video-on-demand delivery system |
US6307487B1 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2001-10-23 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Information additive code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US6320520B1 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2001-11-20 | Digital Fountain | Information additive group code generator and decoder for communications systems |
US6882618B1 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2005-04-19 | Sony Corporation | Transmitting apparatus, receiving apparatus, communication system, transmission method, reception method, and communication method |
WO2001057667A1 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2001-08-09 | Bandwiz, Inc. | Data streaming |
WO2001058130A2 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2001-08-09 | Bandwiz, Inc. | Coding method |
WO2001058131A2 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2001-08-09 | Bandwiz, Inc. | Broadcast system |
US6732325B1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2004-05-04 | Digeo, Inc. | Error-correction with limited working storage |
Non-Patent Citations (21)
Title |
---|
Aggarwal, et al., "A permutation-based pyramid broadcasting scheme for video-on-demand systems", Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Multimedia Systems, (Hiroshima, Japan, Jun. 1996). |
Aggarwal, et al., "On optimal batching policies for video-on-demand storage servers", Proc. Intl. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 253-258, Hiroshima, Japan, (1996). |
Almeroth, et al., "The use of multicast delivery to provide a scalable and interactive video-on-demand service", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 14(6):110-1122, (1996). |
Bar-Noy, et al., "Competitive on-line stream merging algorithms for media-on-demand", Draft (Jul. 2000). |
Bar-Noy, et al., "Efficient algorithms for optimal stream merging for media-on-demand", Draft (Aug. 2000). |
Dan, et al., "Scheduling policies for an on-demand video server with batching", Proc. ACM Multimedia, pp. 391-398 (1998). |
Eager, et al., "Minimizing bandwidth requirements for on-demand data delivery", Proc. Intl. Workshop on Advances in Multimedia Information Systems, pp. 80-87, (Indian Wells, CA, Oct. 1999). |
Eager, et al., "Optimal and efficient merging schedules for video-on-demand servers", Proc. ACM Multimedia, vol. 7, pp. 199-203 (1999). |
Gao, et al., "Efficient schemes for broadcasting popular videos", Proc. Inter. Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, (Jul. 1998). |
Hua, et al., "Skyscraper broadcasting: A new broadcasting system for metropolitan video-on demand systems", Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 89-100 (Cannes, France, 1997). |
Juhn, et al., "Adaptive fast data broadcasting scheme for video-on-demand service", IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, 44:182-185 (1998). |
Juhn, et al., "Harmonic broadcasting for video-on-demand service", IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, 43:268-271 (1997). |
Ozden, et al, "A Low-cost Storage Service for Movie on Demand Databases," Proceedings of the 20th Very Large DataBases (VLDB) Conference (Santiago, Chile 1994). |
Paris, et al., "A low bandwidth broadcasting protocol for video on demand", Proc. International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, vol. 7, pp. 690-697 (Oct. 1998). |
Paris, et al., "Efficient broadcasting protocols for video on demand", International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), vol. 6, pp. 127-132 (Jul. 1998). |
Rangan, et al., "Designing an On-Demand Multimedia Service," IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 30, pp. 5-65, (Jul. 1992). |
Sincoskie, W. D., "System Architecture for Large Scale Video on Demand Service," Computer Network and ISDN Systems, pp. 155-162. (1991). |
Viswanathan, et al., "Metropolitan area video-on-demand services using pyramid broadcasting", Multimedia Systems, 4(4):197-208 (1996). |
Viswanathan, et al., "Pyramid Broadcasting for Video-on-Demand Service", Proceedings of the SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking Conference, vol. 2417, pp. 66-77 (San Jose, CA, Feb. 1995). |
Viswanathan, S.R., "Publishing in Wireless and Wireline Environments", Ph.D. Thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (Nov. 1994). |
Wong, J. W., "Broadcast delivery", Proceedings of the IEEE, 76(12):1566-1577, (1988). |
Cited By (149)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9246633B2 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2016-01-26 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Information additive code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US20080034273A1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2008-02-07 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Information additive code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US20070233891A1 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2007-10-04 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi-output packet server with independent streams |
US8185809B2 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2012-05-22 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi-output packet server with independent streams |
US8671163B2 (en) | 2001-03-09 | 2014-03-11 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi-output packet server with independent streams |
US7647418B2 (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2010-01-12 | Savvis Communications Corporation | Real-time streaming media measurement system and method |
US20030105604A1 (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2003-06-05 | Ash Leslie E. | Real-time streaming media measurement system and method |
US9236976B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multi stage code generator and decoder for communication systems |
US20030217362A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2003-11-20 | Summers Macy W. | Wideband direct-to-home broadcasting satellite communications system and method |
US20100023972A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2010-01-28 | Summers Macy W | Wideband direct-to-home broadcasting satellite communications system and method |
US7587736B2 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2009-09-08 | Xanadoo Company | Wideband direct-to-home broadcasting satellite communications system and method |
US9240810B2 (en) | 2002-06-11 | 2016-01-19 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Systems and processes for decoding chain reaction codes through inactivation |
US8473631B2 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2013-06-25 | Paltalk Holdings, Inc. | Method and system for managing high-bandwidth data sharing |
US20100146081A1 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2010-06-10 | Perry Scherer | Method and system for managing high-bandwidth data sharing |
US20080141325A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2008-06-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Conversion of Web Content to an Interactive Walled Garden Program |
US20080120661A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2008-05-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Conversion of Web Content to an Interactive Walled Garden Program |
US7533406B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2009-05-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for generating a walled garden program for substantially optimized bandwidth delivery |
US8225367B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2012-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for dynamic conversion of web content to an interactive walled garden program |
US20040064836A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-01 | Ludvig Edward A. | Systems and methods for generating a walled garden program for substantially optimized bandwidth delivery |
US9236885B2 (en) | 2002-10-05 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Systematic encoding and decoding of chain reaction codes |
USRE43741E1 (en) | 2002-10-05 | 2012-10-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systematic encoding and decoding of chain reaction codes |
US20120110140A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2012-05-03 | Swarmcast Inc. BVI | Parallel data transfer over multiple channels with data order prioritization |
US8239515B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2012-08-07 | Google Inc. | Parallel data transfer over multiple channels with data order prioritization |
US20050044250A1 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-24 | Gay Lance Jeffrey | File transfer system |
US8335823B2 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2012-12-18 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for processing encoded messages |
US8650258B2 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2014-02-11 | Blackberry Limited | System and method for processing encoded messages |
US20050071508A1 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2005-03-31 | Brown Michael K. | System and method for processing encoded messages |
US8887020B2 (en) | 2003-10-06 | 2014-11-11 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Error-correcting multi-stage code generator and decoder for communication systems having single transmitters or multiple transmitters |
US20050229228A1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2005-10-13 | Sandeep Relan | Unicast cable content delivery |
US9236887B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | File download and streaming system |
US9136878B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2015-09-15 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | File download and streaming system |
US20050268088A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-01 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle control system, and in-vehicle control apparatus and mobile device used therefor |
US20090307565A1 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2009-12-10 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Method and apparatus for fast encoding of data symbols according to half-weight codes |
US20090094501A1 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2009-04-09 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Methods and apparatus to select tornado error correction parameter |
US20070192663A1 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2007-08-16 | Jijina Aspandyar M | Methods and apparatus to select tornado error correction parameters |
US7480848B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2009-01-20 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Methods and apparatus to select tornado error correction parameters |
US8301958B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2012-10-30 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Methods and apparatus to select tornado error correction parameter |
US9136983B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2015-09-15 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Streaming and buffering using variable FEC overhead and protection periods |
US9270414B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2016-02-23 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Multiple-field based code generator and decoder for communications systems |
US9264069B2 (en) | 2006-05-10 | 2016-02-16 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Code generator and decoder for communications systems operating using hybrid codes to allow for multiple efficient uses of the communications systems |
US9628536B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2017-04-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using cooperative parallel HTTP and forward error correction |
US9386064B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-07-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using URL templates and construction rules |
US9380096B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-06-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system for handling low-latency streaming |
US9432433B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-08-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system using signaling or block creation |
US9178535B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-11-03 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Dynamic stream interleaving and sub-stream based delivery |
US9191151B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-11-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using cooperative parallel HTTP and forward error correction |
US9209934B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using cooperative parallel HTTP and forward error correction |
US11477253B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2022-10-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system using signaling or block creation |
US8291122B2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2012-10-16 | Nvidia Corporation | Methods and systems for uninterrupted media change |
US20070294176A1 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2007-12-20 | Radtke Kenneth A | Methods and Systems for Uninterrupted Media Change |
US20080319833A1 (en) * | 2006-07-11 | 2008-12-25 | Concert Technology Corporation | P2p real time media recommendations |
US8327266B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2012-12-04 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Graphical user interface system for allowing management of a media item playlist based on a preference scoring system |
US10469549B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2019-11-05 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Device for participating in a network for sharing media consumption activity |
US9003056B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2015-04-07 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Maintaining a minimum level of real time media recommendations in the absence of online friends |
US9292179B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2016-03-22 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for identifying music content in a P2P real time recommendation network |
US8059646B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2011-11-15 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for identifying music content in a P2P real time recommendation network |
US8422490B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2013-04-16 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for identifying music content in a P2P real time recommendation network |
US7970922B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2011-06-28 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | P2P real time media recommendations |
US8762847B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2014-06-24 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Graphical user interface system for allowing management of a media item playlist based on a preference scoring system |
US8620699B2 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2013-12-31 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Heavy influencer media recommendations |
US8090606B2 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2012-01-03 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Embedded media recommendations |
US10133780B2 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2018-11-20 | Scenera Mobile Technologies, Llc | Methods, systems, and computer program products for determining availability of presentable content |
US9224427B2 (en) | 2007-04-02 | 2015-12-29 | Napo Enterprises LLC | Rating media item recommendations using recommendation paths and/or media item usage |
US20080250312A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method for automatically and graphically associating programmatically-generated media item recommendations related to a user's socially recommended media items |
US8112720B2 (en) | 2007-04-05 | 2012-02-07 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for automatically and graphically associating programmatically-generated media item recommendations related to a user's socially recommended media items |
US8434024B2 (en) | 2007-04-05 | 2013-04-30 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for automatically and graphically associating programmatically-generated media item recommendations related to a user's socially recommended media items |
US8983950B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-03-17 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for sorting media items in a playlist on a media device |
US9037632B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-05-19 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method of generating a media item recommendation message with recommender presence information |
US8285776B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2012-10-09 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for processing a received media item recommendation message comprising recommender presence information |
US9164993B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2015-10-20 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for propagating a media item recommendation message comprising recommender presence information |
US20090031345A1 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2009-01-29 | The Directv Group. Inc. | Method and system for preordering content in a user device associated with a content processing system |
US9693106B2 (en) | 2007-07-26 | 2017-06-27 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for preordering content in a user device associated with a content processing system |
US20110004904A1 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2011-01-06 | The DIRECTV Goup, Inc. | On-demand system interfaces and features |
US9237101B2 (en) | 2007-09-12 | 2016-01-12 | Digital Fountain, Inc. | Generating and communicating source identification information to enable reliable communications |
US20090089772A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Arrangement for scheduling jobs with rules and events |
US20090094248A1 (en) * | 2007-10-03 | 2009-04-09 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method of prioritizing the downloading of media items in a media item recommendation network |
US9060034B2 (en) | 2007-11-09 | 2015-06-16 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method of filtering recommenders in a media item recommendation system |
US8396951B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2013-03-12 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for populating a content repository for an internet radio service based on a recommendation network |
US9071662B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2015-06-30 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for populating a content repository for an internet radio service based on a recommendation network |
US9734507B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2017-08-15 | Napo Enterprise, Llc | Method and system for simulating recommendations in a social network for an offline user |
US8886666B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2014-11-11 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Method and system for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on tagging play history information with location information |
US8060525B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2011-11-15 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on tagging play history information with location information |
US8983937B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2015-03-17 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US8117193B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2012-02-14 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US9275138B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2016-03-01 | Lemi Technology, Llc | System for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on seed information |
US9552428B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2017-01-24 | Lemi Technology, Llc | System for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on seed information |
US8577874B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-11-05 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US8874554B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2014-10-28 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Turnersphere |
US20090222886A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2009-09-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Unit using os and image forming apparatus using the same |
US8453260B2 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2013-05-28 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Unit using OS and image forming apparatus using the same |
US20100023974A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-28 | Tatsuya Shiragaki | Method and device for receiving content in a content delivery system |
US20100125885A1 (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method of providing near video on demand |
US9824144B2 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2017-11-21 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for previewing recommendation queues |
US8200602B2 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2012-06-12 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for creating thematic listening experiences in a networked peer media recommendation environment |
US9367808B1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2016-06-14 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for creating thematic listening experiences in a networked peer media recommendation environment |
US9281847B2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2016-03-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Mobile reception of digital video broadcasting—terrestrial services |
US8325601B2 (en) | 2009-05-08 | 2012-12-04 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Reliable network streaming of a single data stream over multiple physical interfaces |
US8396960B2 (en) | 2009-05-08 | 2013-03-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Efficient network utilization using multiple physical interfaces |
US20100287274A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Efficient network utilization using multiple physical interfaces |
US20100287296A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Network streaming of a single data stream simultaneously over multiple physical interfaces |
US20100284275A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Reliable network streaming of a single data stream over multiple physical interfaces |
US9948708B2 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2018-04-17 | Google Llc | Data retrieval based on bandwidth cost and delay |
US9419749B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2016-08-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus employing FEC codes with permanent inactivation of symbols for encoding and decoding processes |
US9876607B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2018-01-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus employing FEC codes with permanent inactivation of symbols for encoding and decoding processes |
US9660763B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2017-05-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus employing FEC codes with permanent inactivation of symbols for encoding and decoding processes |
US9288010B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2016-03-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Universal file delivery methods for providing unequal error protection and bundled file delivery services |
US9917874B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2018-03-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using block partitioning or request controls for improved client-side handling |
US20110231569A1 (en) * | 2009-09-22 | 2011-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using block partitioning or request controls for improved client-side handling |
US10855736B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2020-12-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using block partitioning or request controls for improved client-side handling |
US11770432B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2023-09-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming system for handling low-latency streaming |
US11743317B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2023-08-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block-request streaming using block partitioning or request controls for improved client-side handling |
US9170892B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2015-10-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Server failure recovery |
US20120166590A1 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2012-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Reading and Writing During Cluster Growth Phase |
US8438244B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-05-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Bandwidth-proportioned datacenters |
US9454441B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2016-09-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Data layout for recovery and durability |
US8447833B2 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2013-05-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Reading and writing during cluster growth phase |
US8533299B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-09-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Locator table and client library for datacenters |
US8356109B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2013-01-15 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Network streaming of a video stream over multiple communication channels |
US9992555B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2018-06-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signaling random access points for streaming video data |
US9485546B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2016-11-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signaling video samples for trick mode video representations |
US8918533B2 (en) | 2010-07-13 | 2014-12-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Video switching for streaming video data |
US9185439B2 (en) | 2010-07-15 | 2015-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signaling data for multiplexing video components |
US9602802B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2017-03-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Providing frame packing type information for video coding |
US9596447B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2017-03-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Providing frame packing type information for video coding |
US9456015B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 | 2016-09-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Representation groups for network streaming of coded multimedia data |
US8806050B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 | 2014-08-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Manifest file updates for network streaming of coded multimedia data |
US9319448B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 | 2016-04-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Trick modes for network streaming of coded multimedia data |
US20120144438A1 (en) * | 2010-12-02 | 2012-06-07 | Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. via the Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS) | Method and apparatus for distributing content via a network to user terminals |
US8935424B2 (en) * | 2011-01-07 | 2015-01-13 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for signaling presentation description updates in HTTP streaming |
US20120198031A1 (en) * | 2011-01-07 | 2012-08-02 | Nokia Corporation | Method and Apparatus for Signaling Presentation Description Updates in HTTP Streaming |
US8996611B2 (en) | 2011-01-31 | 2015-03-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Parallel serialization of request processing |
US9270299B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2016-02-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Encoding and decoding using elastic codes with flexible source block mapping |
US8958375B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2015-02-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Framing for an improved radio link protocol including FEC |
US9813529B2 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2017-11-07 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Effective circuits in packet-switched networks |
US8843502B2 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2014-09-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Sorting a dataset of incrementally received data |
US9253233B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-02-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Switch signaling methods providing improved switching between representations for adaptive HTTP streaming |
US9843844B2 (en) | 2011-10-05 | 2017-12-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Network streaming of media data |
US8909667B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2014-12-09 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Systems, methods, and computer readable media for generating recommendations in a media recommendation system |
US9015109B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2015-04-21 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Systems, methods, and computer readable media for maintaining recommendations in a media recommendation system |
US9294226B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2016-03-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Universal object delivery and template-based file delivery |
US9778856B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2017-10-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Block-level access to parallel storage |
US11422907B2 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2022-08-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Disconnected operation for systems utilizing cloud storage |
US9798631B2 (en) | 2014-02-04 | 2017-10-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Block storage by decoupling ordering from durability |
US10114709B2 (en) | 2014-02-04 | 2018-10-30 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Block storage by decoupling ordering from durability |
US10667008B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2020-05-26 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for setting and receiving user notifications for content available far in the future |
US20210339128A1 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2021-11-04 | Universal City Studios Llc | Scalable interactive video systems and methods |
US11083961B2 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2021-08-10 | Universal City Studios Llc | Scalable interactive video systems and methods |
US20200197793A1 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-25 | Universal City Studios Llc | Scalable interactive video systems and methods |
US11623138B2 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2023-04-11 | Universal City Studios Llc | Scalable interactive video systems and methods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20020107968A1 (en) | 2002-08-08 |
WO2002047391A1 (en) | 2002-06-13 |
TW560189B (en) | 2003-11-01 |
US20080086751A1 (en) | 2008-04-10 |
AU2002229029A1 (en) | 2002-06-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7240358B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for scheduling, serving, receiving media-on demand for clients, servers arranged according to constraints on resources | |
US8495233B2 (en) | Scheduling of multiple files for serving on a server | |
US7327761B2 (en) | Data streaming | |
Chou et al. | Error control for receiver-driven layered multicast of audio and video | |
Mahanti et al. | Scalable on-demand media streaming with packet loss recovery | |
US7224702B2 (en) | System and method for error-control for multicast video distribution | |
JP5763019B2 (en) | Dynamic stream interleaving and substream-based delivery | |
US6823394B2 (en) | Method of resource-efficient and scalable streaming media distribution for asynchronous receivers | |
CA2294511C (en) | System for adaptive video/audio transport over a network | |
Mahanti et al. | Scalable on-demand media streaming with packet loss recovery | |
WO2000074367A2 (en) | Method of optimizing near-video-on-demand transmission | |
AU2007236534B2 (en) | Method, system and software product for streaming content | |
Horn et al. | A scalable and reliable paradigm for media on demand | |
Mahanti | On-demand media streaming on the internet: trends and issues | |
Reisslein et al. | Periodic broadcasting with VBR-encoded video | |
Nikolaidis | Towards scalable VoD distribution on the Internet | |
Janakiraman et al. | Achieving scalable and efficient video-on-demand over multicast | |
Yang et al. | A live harmonic broadcasting scheme for VBR-encoded hot videos | |
Mahanti | Scalable reliable on-demand media streaming protocols | |
WO2002011364A9 (en) | Data streaming | |
Nikmanzar et al. | Request-Based Multicasting in Video-on-Demand Systems | |
Li | Video-on-demand: Scalability and QoS control | |
Chouy et al. | Optimal Error Control for Receiver-driven Layered Multicast of Audio and Video | |
Lee et al. | System and method for error-control for multicast video distribution | |
Jung et al. | Retransmission-based distributed video streaming with a channel-adaptive packet scheduler |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DIGITAL FOUNTAIN, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HORN, GAVIN;LUBY, MICHAEL G.;RASMUSSEN, JENS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:011938/0134 Effective date: 20010612 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGITAL FOUNTAIN, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045641/0207 Effective date: 20180315 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190703 |