US5717799A - Optical waveguide filters - Google Patents

Optical waveguide filters Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5717799A
US5717799A US08/731,168 US73116896A US5717799A US 5717799 A US5717799 A US 5717799A US 73116896 A US73116896 A US 73116896A US 5717799 A US5717799 A US 5717799A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
grating
optical
band
gaussian
coupling coefficient
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/731,168
Inventor
Alan Robinson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hanger Solutions LLC
Original Assignee
Northern Telecom Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northern Telecom Ltd filed Critical Northern Telecom Ltd
Priority to US08/731,168 priority Critical patent/US5717799A/en
Assigned to NORTHERN TELECOM INCORPORATED reassignment NORTHERN TELECOM INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROBINSON, ALAN
Priority to PCT/GB1997/002769 priority patent/WO1998015859A1/en
Priority to EP97944968A priority patent/EP0931274B1/en
Priority to CA002262681A priority patent/CA2262681C/en
Priority to DE69709381T priority patent/DE69709381T2/en
Priority to JP10517315A priority patent/JP2001501747A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5717799A publication Critical patent/US5717799A/en
Assigned to NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION reassignment NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED
Assigned to NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED reassignment NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Assigned to NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED reassignment NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME APPEARING ON THE ASSIGNMENT RECORDAL DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 008220 FRAME 0396. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS FROM ALAN ROBINSON TO NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED. Assignors: ROBINSON, ALAN
Assigned to INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, LLC reassignment INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
Assigned to POPKIN FAMILY ASSETS, L.L.C. reassignment POPKIN FAMILY ASSETS, L.L.C. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCIENCES LLC
Assigned to BENHOV GMBH, LLC reassignment BENHOV GMBH, LLC MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: POPKIN FAMILY ASSETS L.L.C.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC reassignment HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC
Assigned to INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC reassignment INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BENHOV GMBH, LLC
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/28Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals
    • G02B6/293Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means
    • G02B6/29304Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means operating by diffraction, e.g. grating
    • G02B6/29316Light guides comprising a diffractive element, e.g. grating in or on the light guide such that diffracted light is confined in the light guide
    • G02B6/29317Light guides of the optical fibre type
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/02Optical fibres with cladding with or without a coating
    • G02B6/02057Optical fibres with cladding with or without a coating comprising gratings
    • G02B6/02076Refractive index modulation gratings, e.g. Bragg gratings
    • G02B6/0208Refractive index modulation gratings, e.g. Bragg gratings characterised by their structure, wavelength response
    • G02B6/02085Refractive index modulation gratings, e.g. Bragg gratings characterised by their structure, wavelength response characterised by the grating profile, e.g. chirped, apodised, tilted, helical
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/28Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals
    • G02B6/293Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means
    • G02B6/29379Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means characterised by the function or use of the complete device
    • G02B6/29389Bandpass filtering, e.g. 1x1 device rejecting or passing certain wavelengths

Definitions

  • This invention relates to optical waveguides filters, and in particular to such filters of the distributed Bragg grating reflector type.
  • An optical waveguide typically an optical fibre, provided with a distributed Bragg reflection grating of uniform amplitude and pitch and of low peak reflectance has a spectral reflectance characteristic of the general shape depicted in FIG. 1 and has a spectral width inversely proportional to grating length.
  • FIG. 1 shows that the pass-band reflectance is non-uniform, and that there are side-bands of significant amplitude on both sides of the pass-band.
  • a more uniform (flatter) pass-band can be obtained by changing from a low peak reflectance grating to a saturated grating in which peak reflectance approaches unity, as depicted in the spectral reflectance characteristic of FIG. 2, but this flatter pass-band is achieved at the expense of an increase in the amplitude of the side-bands.
  • the side-band level of the filter of FIG. 2 can be reduced by apodisation (shading) of the grating amplitude in such a way that the strongest coupling occurs at the centre of the grating, with the coupling coefficient decaying smoothly away to a low value at each end of the grating.
  • the strength of shading of such a grating will be referred to in terms of a dimensionless quantity, its normalised half-width, which for the purposes of this specification is defined as half the distance along the length of the grating over which the coupling coefficient ( ⁇ ) is at least e -1 times its maximum value ⁇ 0 , expressed as a fraction of the total length of the grating.
  • FIG. 3 depicts a Gaussian shading over a 5 mm long grating for which the normalised shading half width is 0.2
  • This spectral characterisation of FIG. 4 shows that the apodisation has greatly reduce the side-band amplitude of ⁇ 80 dB, but left a relatively highly non-uniform amplitude pass-band.
  • the spectral pass-band can be somewhat widened, and its lack of uniformity reduced, by increasing the coupling coefficient. This is shows by the comparing of the spectral reflectance characteristic of FIG. 4, with that of FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 5 is the characteristic of a filter with the same parameters as that of the filter of FIG. 4, except for a twenty-fold increase of the peak coupling coefficient ⁇ 0 from 0.2 to 4 mm -1 , and for a doubling of the length of the grating to 10 mm, while halving the normalised half-width, so that the decay rate is identical to that of FIG. 4 in the central region, but does not suffer the same truncation at ⁇ 2.5 mm.
  • the higher coupling coefficient increased the spectral width to approximately 2 nm, while the longer overall length and less severe truncation of the Gaussian apodisation reduces the level of the out of band reflectance.
  • An alternative way of providing an enlarged pass-band is to employ a chirped grating, i.e. a grating the value of whose Bragg wavelength is not constant, but is a function of position along the length of the grating.
  • the Bragg wavelength at a particular position in a chirped grating is determined by its optical pitch ⁇ at that position, the optical pitch being defined as the product of the physical pitch of the grating elements at that position with the effective refractive index presented to light guided by the waveguide at that position.
  • a linearly chirped grating suffers from side-bands, similar to those of an unchirped grating. These can be suppressed by apodisation, but heavily apodised uniformly chirped gratings typically exhibit significantly non-uniform spectral pass-band transmission and reflective characteristics.
  • the present invention is directed to the obtaining of filters that exhibit more uniform pass bands, good suppression of side-bands, and relatively sharp roll-off between pass-bands and side-bands.
  • an optical waveguide provided with a distributed Bragg grating reflector having grating elements apodised to provide a coupling coefficient, ⁇ , that is a function of axial distance z along the waveguide, and chirped to provide an optical pitch, ⁇ , that is also a function of axial distance z, wherein the rate of change with axial distance of optical pitch is non-linear and substantially proportional to the square of the coupling coefficient.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 are plots of the spectral reflectance characteristics of two distributed Bragg grating reflection filters of uniform amplitude and pitch, and of respectively lower and higher peak reflectance,
  • FIG. 3 is a plot of the Gaussian apodisation of a distributed Bragg grating reflection filter of uniform pitch
  • FIG. 4 is a plot of the spectral reflectance characteristic of the grating of FIG. 3,
  • FIG. 5 is a plot of the spectral reflectance characteristic of a grating primarily distinguished from that of FIG. 3 by having twenty times the magnitude of peak coupling coefficient ⁇ 0 ,
  • FIG. 6 depicts plots of a Gaussian and two split-Gaussian apodisation profiles
  • FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 depict plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three linearly chirped filters respectively having the apodisation profiles of the three plots of FIG. 6,
  • FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 depict plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three filters corresponding to those of FIGS. 7, 8 and 9, but with non-linear instead of linear chirps,
  • FIG. 13 depicts plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a lengthened version of the filter of FIG. 10,
  • FIG. 14 depicts on a larger scale a portion of the plots of FIG. 13,
  • FIG. 15 depicts plots, on the same scale as in FIG. 14, a portion of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of an optimised linearly chirped filter
  • FIG. 16 depicts plots corresponding to those of FIG. 14, but in respect of a longer filter with a reduced amplitude peak coupling coefficient
  • FIGS. 17A and 17B respectively depict a diagram of an optical fibre provided with an apodised non-linearly chirped Bragg filter, and plots of its apodisation and chirp profiles.
  • apodisation can be employed to reduce the amplitude of unwanted side-bands of a uniform pitch distributed Bragg grating reflection filter, and it has also been explained that an unapodised linearly chirped distributed Bragg grating reflection filter has side-bands at least somewhat similar to those of an unapodised uniform pitch grating reflection filter.
  • FIGS. 6 to 9. In traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6 there are depicted three different illustrative examples of different apodisation profile. Trace 60 is a simple Gaussian profile, while traces 61 and 62 are split-Gaussian profiles.
  • split-Gaussian profile a profile resulting from the insertion of a plateau at the peak of a Gaussian profile dividing that profile into two separated halves joined by the plateau.
  • transition half-width a second dimensionless quantity, normalised transition half-width, which for the purposes of this specification is defined as half the difference between the length of the plateau and the length over which the coupling coefficient ⁇ is at least e -1 times its maximum (plateau) value ⁇ 0 , this difference being expressed as a fraction of the total length of the grating.
  • normalised transition half-width means that the conversion of a Gaussian profile to a split-Gaussian profile by the insertion of a plateau produces a value of normalised half-transition width for the split-Gaussian profile equal to the normalised half-width of the Gaussian profile that existed prior to the insertion of the plateau).
  • the normalised (Gaussian) half-width for each of the Gaussian traces 60, 61 and 62 is 0.25, and their normalised transition half-widths are respectively 0.25, 0.06 and 0.02.
  • FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 are computed spectral reflectance and transmittance plots for linearly chirped gratings respectively having the shading profiles of traces 60, 61 and 62, the chirp being at the rate of 350 ppm/mm.
  • the reflectance plot is represented by a solid line and the transmittance plot by a broken line.
  • a comparison between FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 reveals that changing from the Gaussian shading profile of the FIG. 7 grating to the split Gaussian profile of the FIG. 8 grating has the effect of steepening the roll-off and flattening the pass-band; whereas continuing the process to reduce still further the normalised transition half-width from its FIG.
  • FIGS. 7 to 9 demonstrate that the side-bands of a uniformly linearly chirped grating can be at least somewhat suppressed by apodisation, but that heavily apodised uniformly chirped gratings exhibit non-uniform pass-band transmission and reflection characteristics.
  • the suppression of side-bands by a smooth decrease in grating amplitude must be balanced against the resultant broadening of the spectral transition induced by the grating chirp.
  • the required index or grating spatial frequency chirp has a spatial distribution defined by the error function, with the coupling coefficient apodisation ##EQU1## the grating spatial frequency ##EQU2##
  • FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 show the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three linearly chirped filters with apodisations respectively as indicated by the traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6.
  • FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 show the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three filters which similarly have apodisations respectively as indicated by the traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6, but in this instance filters that are non-linearly chirped so that the rate of chirp varies, in each instance, in direct proportion to ⁇ 2 .
  • FIG. 12 A comparison of FIG. 12 with FIG. 9 reveals that, in respect of the split-Gaussian filters with the smaller value of normalised transition half-width, the changeover from linear to non-linear chirp makes relatively little difference to either the rate of roll-off outside the reflection pass-band, or to the amplitude of the ripple within it. Comparing FIG. 11 with FIG. 8 reveals that, in making the changeover from linear to non-linear chirp, the rate of roll-off improvement is more pronounced in the case of the filters with the larger value of normalised transition half-width. Finally, a comparison of FIG. 10 with FIG.
  • FIG. 13 shows that, by increasing the length of the grating, these side-bands can be reduced in amplitude.
  • FIG. 13 shows the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter that differs from that of FIG.
  • FIG. 14 shows, on a larger scale, a portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of the filter of FIG. 13, illustrating its relatively rapid roll-off.
  • FIG. 15 shows an equivalent portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter of the same length (25 mm), the same peak coupling coefficient (3/mm), and the same normalised half-width (0.2), but with a linear chirp, and with a near-optimised normalised transition half-width (0.05).
  • FIG. 16 shows a portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter providing characteristics improved somewhat over those of the filter of FIG. 14 achieved by the use of a non-linearly chirped (chirp rate directly proportional to ⁇ 2 ) Gaussian apodised filter twice as long (50 mm) as the filter of FIG. 14, having the same normalised half-width (0.2), but a peak coupling coefficient reduced from 3.0/mm to 2.3/mm.
  • This use of longer gratings with a lower peak coupling coefficient eases some fabrication issues and, in suitable circumstances, may allow high performance filters to be manufactured without recourse to hydrogen loading.
  • an optical waveguide filter embodying the invention in a preferred form is constructed in a length 170 of single mode optical fibre waveguide provided with an optical core 171.
  • a distributed Bragg grating the individual elements of which are schematically represented by lines 172, may be photo-induced in the fibre 170 holographically, or with the aid of a photomask.
  • the grating elements may be written directly, using for instance an E-beam, UV, X-ray, or other ionising radiation.
  • photo-lithography is yet another method available for grating writing.
  • An apodised grating is produced by varying the strength of writing of the grating elements (and hence varying their coupling coefficients ⁇ ) as a function of distance along the fibre 170.
  • An illustrative substantially Gaussian form of this variation is represented in Fibre 17B by the trace 173.
  • Such variation of writing strength will typically have the ancillary effect of varying, as a function of distance along the fibre, the mean effective refractive index presented by the optical fibre to propagating light. Accordingly if the grating elements were created with a uniform pitch, the very act of producing the required apodisation will typically introduce a certain measure of chirp. This chirp will not be of the requisite form to produce the required relationship between chirp rate and apodisation, and so this chirp will need to be supplemented.
  • the required relationship is that represented in FIG. 17B by trace 174, this satisfying the relationship
  • This supplementary chirp can be provided in a number of ways. If the grating elements are individually directly written, then their physical spacing can be arranged to take the required form. Alternatively, if the grating writing employs a method that automatically produces a uniform physical pitch, then the fibre can for example be differentially strained while the elements are written, or after they have been written. Alternatively the elements can be written into fibre that has been tapered in order to provide it with a non-uniform effective refractive index. Tapering to produce the required axial profile may be achieved by taking the basic method of progressive stretching of a pair of optical fibres that is described in GB 2 150 703A for the manufacture of a tapered fused fibre coupler, and adapting it to the progressive stretching of a single fibre.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Optical Integrated Circuits (AREA)
  • Optical Fibers, Optical Fiber Cores, And Optical Fiber Bundles (AREA)
  • Light Guides In General And Applications Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

A distributed Bragg reflection pass-band filter in an optical fiber waveguide is provided by grating elements arranged to provide improved flatness of reflection pass-band, a high rate of roll-off, and reduced amplitude side-bands by the use of chirp and apodisation profiles that are related such that the square of the coupling coefficient is substantially proportional to the rate of change of chirp.

Description

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
This invention relates to optical waveguides filters, and in particular to such filters of the distributed Bragg grating reflector type.
An optical waveguide, typically an optical fibre, provided with a distributed Bragg reflection grating of uniform amplitude and pitch and of low peak reflectance has a spectral reflectance characteristic of the general shape depicted in FIG. 1 and has a spectral width inversely proportional to grating length. The specific characteristic of FIG. 1 is in respect of a 1 mm long grating and with a centre wavelength λc =1550 nm and a coupling coefficient κ=1 mm-1, created in a waveguide with an effective refractive index neff =1.45. FIG. 1 shows that the pass-band reflectance is non-uniform, and that there are side-bands of significant amplitude on both sides of the pass-band. A more uniform (flatter) pass-band can be obtained by changing from a low peak reflectance grating to a saturated grating in which peak reflectance approaches unity, as depicted in the spectral reflectance characteristic of FIG. 2, but this flatter pass-band is achieved at the expense of an increase in the amplitude of the side-bands. The specific characteristic of FIG. 2 is in respect of a filter having the same parameters as that of the filter of FIG. 1 except for the magnitude of the coupling coefficient, which is changed from κ=1 mm-1 to κ=3 mm-1.
The side-band level of the filter of FIG. 2 can be reduced by apodisation (shading) of the grating amplitude in such a way that the strongest coupling occurs at the centre of the grating, with the coupling coefficient decaying smoothly away to a low value at each end of the grating. The strength of shading of such a grating will be referred to in terms of a dimensionless quantity, its normalised half-width, which for the purposes of this specification is defined as half the distance along the length of the grating over which the coupling coefficient (κ) is at least e-1 times its maximum value κ0, expressed as a fraction of the total length of the grating.
FIG. 3 depicts a Gaussian shading over a 5 mm long grating for which the normalised shading half width is 0.2, and FIG. 4 depicts the spectral reflectance characteristic of a filter with the shading of FIG. 3 in which the effective refractive index and centre wavelength are, as before, respectively neff =1.45 and λc =1550 nm, and in which the peak coupling coefficient κ0 =0.2 mm-1. This spectral characterisation of FIG. 4 shows that the apodisation has greatly reduce the side-band amplitude of <80 dB, but left a relatively highly non-uniform amplitude pass-band.
The spectral pass-band can be somewhat widened, and its lack of uniformity reduced, by increasing the coupling coefficient. This is shows by the comparing of the spectral reflectance characteristic of FIG. 4, with that of FIG. 5. FIG. 5 is the characteristic of a filter with the same parameters as that of the filter of FIG. 4, except for a twenty-fold increase of the peak coupling coefficient κ0 from 0.2 to 4 mm-1, and for a doubling of the length of the grating to 10 mm, while halving the normalised half-width, so that the decay rate is identical to that of FIG. 4 in the central region, but does not suffer the same truncation at ±2.5 mm. The higher coupling coefficient increased the spectral width to approximately 2 nm, while the longer overall length and less severe truncation of the Gaussian apodisation reduces the level of the out of band reflectance.
By this apodisation means, and with currently available technology for grating fabrication using the photorefractive effect, it is possible to make filters with spectral widths of 2 to 3 nm, but it becomes increasingly difficult to expand the spectral width much further. The reason for this is that an expanded spectral width implies a higher peak reflectance, which in turn implies a larger peak coupling coefficient or a longer grating. There is a practical limit to the magnitude of photorefractive effect refractive index change achievable, and lengthening the grating increases the deleterious impact of phase noise and other imperfections in the grating upon the out-of-band response of the filter.
An alternative way of providing an enlarged pass-band is to employ a chirped grating, i.e. a grating the value of whose Bragg wavelength is not constant, but is a function of position along the length of the grating. The Bragg wavelength at a particular position in a chirped grating is determined by its optical pitch Λ at that position, the optical pitch being defined as the product of the physical pitch of the grating elements at that position with the effective refractive index presented to light guided by the waveguide at that position. A linearly chirped grating suffers from side-bands, similar to those of an unchirped grating. These can be suppressed by apodisation, but heavily apodised uniformly chirped gratings typically exhibit significantly non-uniform spectral pass-band transmission and reflective characteristics.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to the obtaining of filters that exhibit more uniform pass bands, good suppression of side-bands, and relatively sharp roll-off between pass-bands and side-bands.
According to the present invention there is provided an optical waveguide provided with a distributed Bragg grating reflector having grating elements apodised to provide a coupling coefficient, κ, that is a function of axial distance z along the waveguide, and chirped to provide an optical pitch, Λ, that is also a function of axial distance z, wherein the rate of change with axial distance of optical pitch is non-linear and substantially proportional to the square of the coupling coefficient.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
There follows a description of optical waveguide distributed Bragg reflection filters embodying the invention in preferred forms. The description refers to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIGS. 1 and 2 are plots of the spectral reflectance characteristics of two distributed Bragg grating reflection filters of uniform amplitude and pitch, and of respectively lower and higher peak reflectance,
FIG. 3 is a plot of the Gaussian apodisation of a distributed Bragg grating reflection filter of uniform pitch,
FIG. 4 is a plot of the spectral reflectance characteristic of the grating of FIG. 3,
FIG. 5 is a plot of the spectral reflectance characteristic of a grating primarily distinguished from that of FIG. 3 by having twenty times the magnitude of peak coupling coefficient κ0,
FIG. 6 depicts plots of a Gaussian and two split-Gaussian apodisation profiles,
FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 depict plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three linearly chirped filters respectively having the apodisation profiles of the three plots of FIG. 6,
FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 depict plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three filters corresponding to those of FIGS. 7, 8 and 9, but with non-linear instead of linear chirps,
FIG. 13 depicts plots of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a lengthened version of the filter of FIG. 10,
FIG. 14 depicts on a larger scale a portion of the plots of FIG. 13,
FIG. 15 depicts plots, on the same scale as in FIG. 14, a portion of the spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of an optimised linearly chirped filter,
FIG. 16 depicts plots corresponding to those of FIG. 14, but in respect of a longer filter with a reduced amplitude peak coupling coefficient, and
FIGS. 17A and 17B respectively depict a diagram of an optical fibre provided with an apodised non-linearly chirped Bragg filter, and plots of its apodisation and chirp profiles.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
It has been explained above how apodisation can be employed to reduce the amplitude of unwanted side-bands of a uniform pitch distributed Bragg grating reflection filter, and it has also been explained that an unapodised linearly chirped distributed Bragg grating reflection filter has side-bands at least somewhat similar to those of an unapodised uniform pitch grating reflection filter. The effects of illustrative examples of different apodisations upon a linearly chirped grating reflection filter can be seen from FIGS. 6 to 9. In traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6 there are depicted three different illustrative examples of different apodisation profile. Trace 60 is a simple Gaussian profile, while traces 61 and 62 are split-Gaussian profiles. For the purposes of this specification by the term split-Gaussian profile is meant a profile resulting from the insertion of a plateau at the peak of a Gaussian profile dividing that profile into two separated halves joined by the plateau. In describing a split-Gaussian profile, reference will additionally be made to a second dimensionless quantity, normalised transition half-width, which for the purposes of this specification is defined as half the difference between the length of the plateau and the length over which the coupling coefficient κis at least e-1 times its maximum (plateau) value κ0, this difference being expressed as a fraction of the total length of the grating. (This definition of normalised transition half-width means that the conversion of a Gaussian profile to a split-Gaussian profile by the insertion of a plateau produces a value of normalised half-transition width for the split-Gaussian profile equal to the normalised half-width of the Gaussian profile that existed prior to the insertion of the plateau). The normalised (Gaussian) half-width for each of the Gaussian traces 60, 61 and 62 is 0.25, and their normalised transition half-widths are respectively 0.25, 0.06 and 0.02.
FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 are computed spectral reflectance and transmittance plots for linearly chirped gratings respectively having the shading profiles of traces 60, 61 and 62, the chirp being at the rate of 350 ppm/mm. In each of FIGS. 7, 8 and 9, and also in each of FIGS. 10 to 16, the reflectance plot is represented by a solid line and the transmittance plot by a broken line. A comparison between FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 reveals that changing from the Gaussian shading profile of the FIG. 7 grating to the split Gaussian profile of the FIG. 8 grating has the effect of steepening the roll-off and flattening the pass-band; whereas continuing the process to reduce still further the normalised transition half-width from its FIG. 8 value of 0.06 to its FIG. 9 value of 0.02 has the effect of cancelling some of the improvement in roll-off rate, and of introducing a more pronounced ripple into the reflectance pass-band (transmittance stop-band), a ripple whose amplitude is greatest near the extremities of that band.
The traces of FIGS. 7 to 9 demonstrate that the side-bands of a uniformly linearly chirped grating can be at least somewhat suppressed by apodisation, but that heavily apodised uniformly chirped gratings exhibit non-uniform pass-band transmission and reflection characteristics. To achieve a relatively flat pass-band together with a reasonably rapid roll-off outside the pass-band, requires careful selection of apodisation profile. The suppression of side-bands by a smooth decrease in grating amplitude must be balanced against the resultant broadening of the spectral transition induced by the grating chirp.
Attention is now turned specifically to embodiments of the present invention, embodiments in which the coupling coefficient κis apodised (varied as a function of distance along the grating) in a manner to provide reduced amplitude side-bands, and in which the chirp rate varies non-linearly in direct proportion to the square of the coupling co-efficient
κ.sup.2, (dΛ/dz∝κ.sup.2)
such a relationship being found, at least in the case of Gaussian and split-Gaussian apodisation profiles, to provide a pass-band reflectance with a high degree of flatness.
For a Gaussian apodisation profile, the required index or grating spatial frequency chirp has a spatial distribution defined by the error function, with the coupling coefficient apodisation ##EQU1## the grating spatial frequency ##EQU2##
FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 show the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three linearly chirped filters with apodisations respectively as indicated by the traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6. Correspondingly, FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 show the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of three filters which similarly have apodisations respectively as indicated by the traces 60, 61 and 62 of FIG. 6, but in this instance filters that are non-linearly chirped so that the rate of chirp varies, in each instance, in direct proportion to κ2.
A comparison of FIG. 12 with FIG. 9 reveals that, in respect of the split-Gaussian filters with the smaller value of normalised transition half-width, the changeover from linear to non-linear chirp makes relatively little difference to either the rate of roll-off outside the reflection pass-band, or to the amplitude of the ripple within it. Comparing FIG. 11 with FIG. 8 reveals that, in making the changeover from linear to non-linear chirp, the rate of roll-off improvement is more pronounced in the case of the filters with the larger value of normalised transition half-width. Finally, a comparison of FIG. 10 with FIG. 7 reveals that the changeover from linear to non-linear chirp in respect of the Gaussian shading profile filters produces an even stronger improvement in the rate of roll-off, this being accompanied by a much flatter characteristic within the reflection pass-band. Against this must be set the fact that the side-bands are rather more pronounced. These side-bands arise from truncation effects which are greater in respect of the Gaussian shading profile filter of FIG. 10 than in respect of the split-Gaussian filters of FIGS. 11 and 12. FIG. 13 shows that, by increasing the length of the grating, these side-bands can be reduced in amplitude. FIG. 13 shows the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter that differs from that of FIG. 10 in two respects, namely that the grating length has been increased from 20 to 25 mm, and the normalised half-width has been correspondingly reduced from 0.25 to 0.2. (The reduction in normalised half-width is provided so that the two filters are identical over the central 20 mm; the extra 2.5 mm at each end of the longer filter being used to accommodate a further reduction in amplitude of the coupling coefficient, and hence reduce the magnitude of truncation effects).
FIG. 14 shows, on a larger scale, a portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of the filter of FIG. 13, illustrating its relatively rapid roll-off. For purposes of comparison, FIG. 15 shows an equivalent portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter of the same length (25 mm), the same peak coupling coefficient (3/mm), and the same normalised half-width (0.2), but with a linear chirp, and with a near-optimised normalised transition half-width (0.05).
FIG. 16 shows a portion of the computed spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics of a filter providing characteristics improved somewhat over those of the filter of FIG. 14 achieved by the use of a non-linearly chirped (chirp rate directly proportional to κ2) Gaussian apodised filter twice as long (50 mm) as the filter of FIG. 14, having the same normalised half-width (0.2), but a peak coupling coefficient reduced from 3.0/mm to 2.3/mm. This use of longer gratings with a lower peak coupling coefficient eases some fabrication issues and, in suitable circumstances, may allow high performance filters to be manufactured without recourse to hydrogen loading.
Referring now to FIGS. 17A and 17B, an optical waveguide filter embodying the invention in a preferred form is constructed in a length 170 of single mode optical fibre waveguide provided with an optical core 171. A distributed Bragg grating, the individual elements of which are schematically represented by lines 172, may be photo-induced in the fibre 170 holographically, or with the aid of a photomask. Alternatively the grating elements may be written directly, using for instance an E-beam, UV, X-ray, or other ionising radiation. In the case of writing a grating in a planar optical waveguide, photo-lithography is yet another method available for grating writing. An apodised grating is produced by varying the strength of writing of the grating elements (and hence varying their coupling coefficients κ) as a function of distance along the fibre 170. An illustrative substantially Gaussian form of this variation is represented in Fibre 17B by the trace 173. Such variation of writing strength will typically have the ancillary effect of varying, as a function of distance along the fibre, the mean effective refractive index presented by the optical fibre to propagating light. Accordingly if the grating elements were created with a uniform pitch, the very act of producing the required apodisation will typically introduce a certain measure of chirp. This chirp will not be of the requisite form to produce the required relationship between chirp rate and apodisation, and so this chirp will need to be supplemented. The required relationship is that represented in FIG. 17B by trace 174, this satisfying the relationship
dΛ/dz∝κ.sup.2
where z is the distance along the grating from
z=-l/2 to z=+l/2
This supplementary chirp can be provided in a number of ways. If the grating elements are individually directly written, then their physical spacing can be arranged to take the required form. Alternatively, if the grating writing employs a method that automatically produces a uniform physical pitch, then the fibre can for example be differentially strained while the elements are written, or after they have been written. Alternatively the elements can be written into fibre that has been tapered in order to provide it with a non-uniform effective refractive index. Tapering to produce the required axial profile may be achieved by taking the basic method of progressive stretching of a pair of optical fibres that is described in GB 2 150 703A for the manufacture of a tapered fused fibre coupler, and adapting it to the progressive stretching of a single fibre.

Claims (4)

What is claimed is:
1. An optical waveguide provided with a distributed Bragg grating reflector having grating elements apodised to provide a coupling coefficient, κ, that is a function of axial distance, z, along the waveguide, and chirped to provide an optical pitch, Λ, that is also a function of axial distance z, wherein the rate of change with axial distance of optical pitch is non-linear and substantially proportional to the square of the coupling coefficient.
2. An optical waveguide as claimed in claim 1, which optical waveguide is an optical fibre waveguide.
3. An optical waveguide as claimed in claim 1, wherein the apodisation of the grating elements is substantially Gaussian.
4. An optical waveguide as claimed in claim 3, which optical waveguide is an optical fibre waveguide.
US08/731,168 1996-10-10 1996-10-10 Optical waveguide filters Expired - Lifetime US5717799A (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/731,168 US5717799A (en) 1996-10-10 1996-10-10 Optical waveguide filters
PCT/GB1997/002769 WO1998015859A1 (en) 1996-10-10 1997-10-08 Optical waveguide filters
EP97944968A EP0931274B1 (en) 1996-10-10 1997-10-08 Optical waveguide filters
CA002262681A CA2262681C (en) 1996-10-10 1997-10-08 Optical waveguide filters
DE69709381T DE69709381T2 (en) 1996-10-10 1997-10-08 OPTICAL WAVE GUIDE FILTER
JP10517315A JP2001501747A (en) 1996-10-10 1997-10-08 Optical waveguide filter

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/731,168 US5717799A (en) 1996-10-10 1996-10-10 Optical waveguide filters

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5717799A true US5717799A (en) 1998-02-10

Family

ID=24938348

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/731,168 Expired - Lifetime US5717799A (en) 1996-10-10 1996-10-10 Optical waveguide filters

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5717799A (en)
EP (1) EP0931274B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2001501747A (en)
CA (1) CA2262681C (en)
DE (1) DE69709381T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1998015859A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5818987A (en) * 1996-03-01 1998-10-06 Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite Filter obtained by writing a Bragg grating into an optical fiber
US5930437A (en) * 1996-05-24 1999-07-27 Fujikura Ltd. Optical filter with planar optical waveguide having periodically varied distribution of refractive index and production process thereof
US6108474A (en) * 1997-12-11 2000-08-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Optical pulse compressor for optical communications systems
US6115403A (en) * 1997-07-22 2000-09-05 Ciena Corporation Directly modulated semiconductor laser having reduced chirp
US6362916B2 (en) 1998-09-25 2002-03-26 Fiver Laboratories All fiber gain flattening optical filter
WO2002037141A2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-05-10 Tsinghua University Optical interleaver filter
US6441962B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2002-08-27 Alcatel Optical filter with little variation in chromatic dispersion
US6643429B2 (en) 2001-06-07 2003-11-04 Nortel Networks Limited Dispersion compensation apparatus and method utilising sampled Bragg gratings
US6694075B1 (en) 1998-07-01 2004-02-17 Corning Incorporated Apodization of optical filters with multiple exposures of photosensitive media
US6707956B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2004-03-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus for fabricating apodized fiber grating
US6757462B2 (en) * 2001-04-09 2004-06-29 Avanex Corporation Bragg grating filter optical waveguide device
US6842544B2 (en) 2001-09-14 2005-01-11 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method for apodizing a planar waveguide grating
US20050259102A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2005-11-24 Lee Kyu T Method and apparatus for displaying characters on a screen
US6978057B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2005-12-20 The Provost Fellows And Scholars Of The College Of The Holy And Undivided Trinity Of Queen Elizabeth Near Dublin Optical waveguide and a method for providing an optical waveguide
US20060257071A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Fitel Usa Corp. Optical fiber filter for suppression of amplified spontaneous emission
CN100422838C (en) * 2005-09-08 2008-10-01 中国计量学院 Flat gain Chirp Bragg optical fibre grating wave filter used for optical amplifier

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1172630A (en) * 1997-06-18 1999-03-16 Pirelli Cavi & Syst Spa Process for producing chirp type optical fiber grating
KR20050114117A (en) * 2004-05-31 2005-12-05 엘지전자 주식회사 Integrated optic true-time delay apparatus and manufacturing method thereof

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5058977A (en) * 1987-01-20 1991-10-22 Hewlett-Packard Company Broadband tunable in-line filter for fiber optics
US5367588A (en) * 1992-10-29 1994-11-22 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Communications Method of fabricating Bragg gratings using a silica glass phase grating mask and mask used by same

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5058977A (en) * 1987-01-20 1991-10-22 Hewlett-Packard Company Broadband tunable in-line filter for fiber optics
US5367588A (en) * 1992-10-29 1994-11-22 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Communications Method of fabricating Bragg gratings using a silica glass phase grating mask and mask used by same

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5818987A (en) * 1996-03-01 1998-10-06 Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite Filter obtained by writing a Bragg grating into an optical fiber
US5930437A (en) * 1996-05-24 1999-07-27 Fujikura Ltd. Optical filter with planar optical waveguide having periodically varied distribution of refractive index and production process thereof
US6115403A (en) * 1997-07-22 2000-09-05 Ciena Corporation Directly modulated semiconductor laser having reduced chirp
US6108474A (en) * 1997-12-11 2000-08-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Optical pulse compressor for optical communications systems
US6694075B1 (en) 1998-07-01 2004-02-17 Corning Incorporated Apodization of optical filters with multiple exposures of photosensitive media
US6362916B2 (en) 1998-09-25 2002-03-26 Fiver Laboratories All fiber gain flattening optical filter
US20020041434A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2002-04-11 Weiti Wu All fiber gain flattening optical filter
US6822786B2 (en) 1998-09-25 2004-11-23 Sdo Communications Corp. All fiber gain flattening optical filter
US6707956B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2004-03-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus for fabricating apodized fiber grating
US6978057B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2005-12-20 The Provost Fellows And Scholars Of The College Of The Holy And Undivided Trinity Of Queen Elizabeth Near Dublin Optical waveguide and a method for providing an optical waveguide
US6441962B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2002-08-27 Alcatel Optical filter with little variation in chromatic dispersion
WO2002037141A3 (en) * 2000-11-06 2004-02-19 Univ Tsinghua Optical interleaver filter
WO2002037141A2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-05-10 Tsinghua University Optical interleaver filter
US6757462B2 (en) * 2001-04-09 2004-06-29 Avanex Corporation Bragg grating filter optical waveguide device
US6643429B2 (en) 2001-06-07 2003-11-04 Nortel Networks Limited Dispersion compensation apparatus and method utilising sampled Bragg gratings
US6842544B2 (en) 2001-09-14 2005-01-11 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method for apodizing a planar waveguide grating
US20050259102A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2005-11-24 Lee Kyu T Method and apparatus for displaying characters on a screen
US7742049B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2010-06-22 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for displaying characters on a screen
US20060257071A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Fitel Usa Corp. Optical fiber filter for suppression of amplified spontaneous emission
US7272287B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2007-09-18 Fitel Usa Corp Optical fiber filter for suppression of amplified spontaneous emission
CN100422838C (en) * 2005-09-08 2008-10-01 中国计量学院 Flat gain Chirp Bragg optical fibre grating wave filter used for optical amplifier

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69709381D1 (en) 2002-01-31
EP0931274A1 (en) 1999-07-28
CA2262681A1 (en) 1998-04-16
CA2262681C (en) 2007-07-17
EP0931274B1 (en) 2001-12-19
WO1998015859A1 (en) 1998-04-16
JP2001501747A (en) 2001-02-06
DE69709381T2 (en) 2002-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5717799A (en) Optical waveguide filters
US5475780A (en) Optical waveguiding component comprising a band-pass filter
EP1722256B1 (en) Optical fiber filter for suppression of amplified spontaneous emission
EP0783117B1 (en) Optical fibers for optical attenuation
US6005999A (en) Waveguide narrowband rejection filter
US4953939A (en) Optical fibre transmission systems
TW316953B (en)
US6009222A (en) Optical fibre and optical fibre grating
US5883990A (en) Low transmission loss optical fiber having a grating
CA2241018C (en) Chirped optical fibre grating
DE60212003T2 (en) Grating with large grating period having optical bandpass filter
JP2002506534A (en) Suppressed cladding fiber design to reduce coupling to cladding modes in fiber gratings
JP2001521202A (en) Fiber optic grating
US5818987A (en) Filter obtained by writing a Bragg grating into an optical fiber
EP1178337A2 (en) Device for fabricating polarization insensitive long period fiber grating
US20030133653A1 (en) Optical filter and a filter method
CN1387627A (en) Asymmetric low dispersion Bragg grating filter
JP3341979B2 (en) Dispersion slope compensator
WO2001022126A1 (en) A grating design
WO2009081904A1 (en) Optical waveguide type wavelength dispersion compensation device and method for manufacturing the same
US6947641B2 (en) Apparatus for filtering optical radiation at an operating wavelength
CA2277665C (en) Optical waveguiding component comprising a band-pass filter
Chao et al. Design of high-performance all-fiber spectral filter with weighted coupling
JP3568391B2 (en) Chromatic dispersion compensator
JP2001051134A (en) Optical waveguide type filter and optical fiber amplifier

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTHERN TELECOM INCORPORATED, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROBINSON, ALAN;REEL/FRAME:008220/0396

Effective date: 19960919

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:010567/0001

Effective date: 19990429

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706

Effective date: 20000830

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED,CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706

Effective date: 20000830

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 7

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED, CANADA

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME APPEARING ON THE ASSIGNMENT RECORDAL DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 008220 FRAME 0396;ASSIGNOR:ROBINSON, ALAN;REEL/FRAME:017746/0157

Effective date: 19960919

AS Assignment

Owner name: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:019215/0788

Effective date: 20070424

AS Assignment

Owner name: POPKIN FAMILY ASSETS, L.L.C., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SCIENCES LLC;REEL/FRAME:019605/0022

Effective date: 20070427

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: BENHOV GMBH, LLC, DELAWARE

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:POPKIN FAMILY ASSETS L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:037241/0651

Effective date: 20150811

AS Assignment

Owner name: HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC;REEL/FRAME:052159/0509

Effective date: 20191206

AS Assignment

Owner name: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 161 LLC, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BENHOV GMBH, LLC;REEL/FRAME:051856/0776

Effective date: 20191126