US4968640A - Isolation structures for integrated circuits - Google Patents

Isolation structures for integrated circuits Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4968640A
US4968640A US07/283,357 US28335788A US4968640A US 4968640 A US4968640 A US 4968640A US 28335788 A US28335788 A US 28335788A US 4968640 A US4968640 A US 4968640A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
layer
silicon nitride
polysilicon layer
polysilicon
photo
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US07/283,357
Inventor
Fung-Ching Chao
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI filed Critical Industrial Technology Research Institute ITRI
Priority to US07/283,357 priority Critical patent/US4968640A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4968640A publication Critical patent/US4968640A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/70Manufacture or treatment of devices consisting of a plurality of solid state components formed in or on a common substrate or of parts thereof; Manufacture of integrated circuit devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/71Manufacture of specific parts of devices defined in group H01L21/70
    • H01L21/76Making of isolation regions between components
    • H01L21/762Dielectric regions, e.g. EPIC dielectric isolation, LOCOS; Trench refilling techniques, SOI technology, use of channel stoppers
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S148/00Metal treatment
    • Y10S148/117Oxidation, selective
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S148/00Metal treatment
    • Y10S148/122Polycrystalline
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S438/00Semiconductor device manufacturing: process
    • Y10S438/942Masking
    • Y10S438/948Radiation resist

Definitions

  • LOCOS local oxidation of silicon
  • the buried oxide (BOX) technique has been devised which uses an aluminum mask to etch a silicon groove and the subsequent removal of a plasma deposited silicon dioxide layer. See FIG. 1, p. 386, of K. Kurosawa et al., "A New Bird's-Beak Free Field Isolation Technology for VLSI Devices," IEDM 81, Sec. 16.4, pp. 384-387 (1981).
  • Still another technique involves the selective polysilicon oxidation using three layers of silicon dioxide over silicon followed by a polysilicon and cap nitride.
  • a buffer silicon dioxide layer (a pad oxide) is first thermally grown on a silicon wafer.
  • a polysilicon layer is deposited thereover and a photo-resist layer coated and patterned thereon.
  • the structure is etched to remove the polysilicon above the active regions and the residual photo-resist washed away.
  • a silicon nitride layer is then deposited upon the wafer.
  • An etch-back cusp levelling step is then performed. This step includes first covering the silicon nitride layer with a thick photo-resist layer and then etching the photo-resist and silicon nitride at the same rate until the tops of the polysilicon cusps are exposed.
  • an ion-implantation step may be performed either before or after the residual photo-resist is removed.
  • the final step of the process is the removal of the residual silicon oxide and pad oxide.
  • the remaining field oxide layer is a clearly patterned isolation region of precisely controlled dimensions.
  • FIG. 1 shows the initial coating steps wherein the silicon wafer is first coated with a thin, thermally-coated silicon dioxide layer (the pad oxide) and a polysilicon layer.
  • FIG. 2 shows the addition of the photo-resist atop the polysilicon layer in preparation to defining the isolation region.
  • FIG. 3 shows the structure after the polysilicon layer has been stripped from the active regions and the isolation regions have been defined.
  • FIG. 4 shows the structure after the removal of the photo-resist, leaving the polysilicon layer over the isolation region.
  • FIG. 5 shows the structure after coating with a silicon nitride layer.
  • FIG. 6 shows a heavy photo-resist layer having good surface planarity coated on the silicon nitride layer.
  • FIG. 7 shows the structure after the photo-resist and the silicon nitride has been etched back to expose the polysilicon cusps.
  • FIG. 8 shows the ion-implantation of the etched-back structure for channel stopping.
  • FIG. 9 shows the etched-back structure after the removal of the photo-resist.
  • FIG. 10 shows the formation of the field oxide layer by the oxidation of the polysilicon layer.
  • FIG. 11 shows the final isolation structure after the removal of the silicon nitride and pad oxide layers.
  • the improved isolation structures between active regions of an integrated circuit are formed by a novel series of steps.
  • the isolation structure has substantially no bird's beak length and little defect density along the field oxide edge.
  • FIG. 1 represents the initial stages of the process.
  • the silicon wafer 10 has grown thereon a thin film of silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) 20.
  • This layer is typically 550 angstroms and is used for stress release.
  • Atop of the silicon dioxide layer is a layer of polysilicon 30.
  • This layer is generally one-half the desired thickness of the field oxide and typically 3000 angstroms. It will be understood that such a layer will form a field oxide layer of about 6000 angstroms.
  • FIG. 2 shows the application of a photo-resist to the polysilicon layer.
  • the photo-resist masks the isolation region pattern on the surface of the polysilicon layer. It is designated by the numeral 40.
  • FIG. 3 shows the structure after the unmasked portion of polysilicon 30 is removed vertically until the pad oxide layer 20 is reached.
  • a dry etching process such as plasma etching or reactive ion etching is used to remove the unmasked polysilicon.
  • the remainder of the polysilicon layer frequently referred to herein as the "polysilicon island" and designated by the reference character 32, remains under the photo-resist masking pattern 40, as a result of the anisotropic character of the etching.
  • the plasma etching is preferably performed using SF 6 and Feron 115 in a Tegal-701 system (trademark of the Tegal Corporation of Novato, Calif.), while the reactive-ion etching may be performed with NF 3 plus Ar in an AME-8110 system (trademark of the Applied Material Co.).
  • Tegal-701 trademark of the Tegal Corporation of Novato, Calif.
  • AME-8110 trademark of the Applied Material Co.
  • the former system is described in the Tegal Corporation Operation and Maintenance Manual, while the latter is described in Solid State Technology, December 1981, pp. 71-75.
  • the photo-resist mask is removed by a stripping solution such as sulfuric acid.
  • a stripping solution such as sulfuric acid.
  • the remaining structure is shown in FIG. 4. It is the polysilicon island 32 which is eventually oxidized to form the field oxide layer.
  • the next step in the process is the coating of the silicon nitride layer 50 on the surface of the pad oxide 20 and on the sides and top of the polysilicon island 32.
  • This coating is preferably deposited by low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and is used as an oxidation resist during the formation of the field oxide.
  • LPCVD low pressure chemical vapor deposition
  • PECVD plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
  • the thickness of the silicon nitride layer depends on the thickness of the pad oxide layer 20 and is controlled to minimize stress effects on the silicon wafer 10 during the field oxidation step. Typically, the thickness ratio between the silicon nitride and the pad oxide is about 3. For example, where a 550 angstrom pad oxide layer is used, the silicon nitride layer may be 1500 angstroms.
  • FIG. 5 The structure after the silicon nitride coating step is illustrated in FIG. 5.
  • photo-resist HPR 204 (trademark of Philip A. Hunt Chemical Co., West Paterson, N.J.) layer 60 which, after coating, is baked onto the structure to achieve good planarity.
  • the baking is performed at a temperature of 165° C. for 30 minutes. The thermal energy permits the photo-resist to flow sufficiently to achieve good planarity. For the most part, the thicker the photo-resist layer, the better the planarity obtained.
  • the structure shown in FIG. 6 is next subjected to an "etch-back step," which uniformly removes the photo-resist and the silicon nitride layer until the upper surface of the polysilicon island 32 is exposed.
  • the etch-back step performed in an AME-8110 system, uses 60 sccm of CHF 3 and 35 sccm of O 2 , a pressure of 60 mtorr. and a power of 600 watts.
  • the substrate temperature is between 20° and 35° C. and both the silicon nitride's and photo-resist's etch rates are about 367+20 angstroms/min.
  • the resulting cross-section is shown in FIG. 7.
  • the side walls of the polysilicon island 32 are still coated with the silicon nitride layers 52. Also remaining are residual portions of the photo-resist layer 62.
  • the structure is implanted with channel-stopping ions which are driven into the upper region of the polysilicon layer as designated by the numeral 70.
  • the photo-resist residue 62 and the silicon nitride residue 52 serve to mask the remainder of the structure for the implanted ions.
  • a boron dopant is used at a concentration of 4 ⁇ 10 13 ions/cm 2 at a voltage of 25 Kev. This is sufficient to obtain a 12 V field threshold voltage for a p-type wafer with a resistivity of 40 to 60 ohm-cm.
  • the thickness of the photo-resist residue 62 and the silicon nitride residue 52 is designed to insure that none of the ions will penetrate the active regions of the wafer.
  • the residue of the photo-resist is removed, as shown in FIG. 9, and the remaining structure, shown in FIG. 10, is subject to high temperature oxidation in a wet oxygen environment at 1000° C. for a time period sufficient to oxidize completely the polysilicon residue 32.
  • the polysilicon structure 32 is oxidized to form a field oxide layer 34 and the channel-stopping ions implanted in the top of the polysilicon structure diffuse into the silicon wafer 10 to form a channel-stopping region 72 directly under the field oxide region.
  • This region serves to prevent "field inversion" as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,570,325.
  • the silicon dioxide thus formed grows to approximately twice the thickness of the original polysilicon layer.
  • the structure of the active regions are not affected by the oxidation step because of the high oxidation resistance of the silicon nitride residue 52. It will be noted that there is no oxide encroachment, so-called “bird's beak,” under the silicon nitride residue 52 because the oxygen is consumed in the oxidation of the polysilicon island 32 or prevented from reaching the wafer because of the silicon nitride layer. Furthermore, there is no dislocation defect along the edge of the field oxide 34, in contrast to the frequent dislocation defects which occur in the semi-recessed or fully-recessed field oxide edges which are prevalent in other isolation technologies such as the LOCOS technology.
  • the final step in the process is the removal of the silicon nitride residue 52 and the pad oxide layer 20.
  • the former is removed by using boiling phosphoric acid at a temperature of 180° C. and the latter with a hydrofluoric acid stripping solution.
  • a layer, about the same thickness as the pad oxide, is also stripped off the field oxide layer 34 during this final stripping step.
  • FIG. 11 shows the final isolation structure. This structure has a wide range of applications as an isolating device in integrated circuit applications.
  • a semi-recesed field oxide layer is formed.
  • the thickness of the polysilicon island is reduced without modifying the oxidation conditions.
  • the net effect of this procedure is to form a structure having the same overall field oxide thickness as the non-recessed structure, but having a reduced vertical sidewall or step extending above the silicon substrate.
  • the main disadvantage of the subsequent metal sputtering process i.e., the formation of voids on the vertical surfaces, is lessened. It is well known that such voids cause open circuits which may result in the failure of the integrated circuit.
  • the dry etching process used to remove the unmasked polysilicon film may be performed using NF 3 at 20 sccm and Ar at 65 sccm, at a pressure of 40 mtorr, a DC bias of -230 volts, at a maximum power of 1000 watts.
  • Stripping solutions used to remove the photo-resist mask include admixtures of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide at a temperature of about 110° C.
  • the photo-resist layer may be deposited on the silicon nitride layer and baked 30 min. at 165° C., to obtain good planarity.
  • boron is introduced by, for example, ion-implantation at an energy of from 20 to about 50 Kev to achieve a dosage level of from 1 ⁇ 10 13 to 1 ⁇ 10 12 cm 2 .
  • Other well-known techniques may be used for introducing the dopant into the structure.
  • the field oxidation layer may be formed by oxidizing the polysilicon island in the presence of oxygen and hydrogen.
  • the time of the treatment step depends on the thickness of the polysilicon island. For example, if the polysilicon layer is 4500 angstroms thick, the oxidation may be performed for about 190 minutes at 980° C. to form an oxide layer 9000 angstroms thick. It will be understood that both field oxide thickness and p - field implantation doses affect the threshold voltage drastically. A proper combination of the thickness of the field oxide and p - field implantation doses is used to achieve the desired field threshold voltage. Accordingly, the thickness of the final field oxide and of the in-process polysilicon (the latter being about a half of the field oxide thickness) may be varied.

Abstract

The invention relates to an improved isolation structure to separate active regions of integrated circuits and a method of its preparation. These isolation structures eliminate the so-called "bird's beak effect" which reduces the effective device area and thereby permit the manufacture of high packing density VLSIs. In the process, a silicon substrate is initially coated, first with a stress-release layer and then with a layer of polysilicon. After the polysilicon is removed from the active device area and patterned, a silicon nitride layer and then a thick layer of photo-resist are coated on the structure. By means of etching, the tops of the polysilicon cusps are exposed. At this stage, the vertical side walls of the polysilicon cusps remain coated with silicon nitride. The polysilicon layer is then completely oxidized to form the field oxide layer. In the final step of the process, the remaining silicon nitride and the stress-release layers are removed. The resulting field oxide is clearly defined and free of the bird's beak effect.

Description

This is a divisional of co-pending application Ser. No. 205,558 filed on June 7, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,235, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 013,012, filed Feb. 10, 1987, now abandoned.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Virtually all modern MOS and bipolar integrated circuits use the local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) technique to develop regions which will laterally isolate the devices on the integrated circuit. This isolation structure is typically formed by ion-implantation doping of the field region, followed by the local growth of the thick field oxide. The active device regions are protected during these steps by masking layers of silicon nitride which are subsequently removed.
Unfortunately, the LOCOS process results in the lateral oxidation of the silicon underneath the nitride mask, forming the so-called "bird's beak effect". This effect is graphically illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 7 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,551,910. Since the "bird's beak" is insufficiently thick to form effective isolation, but sufficiently thick to prevent the formation of an active device where it is located, it reduces the effective device area and becomes one of the limiting factors in achieving high packing density for very large scale integrated circuits.
It has long been recognized in the prior art that it is desirable to reduce the bird's beak to minimize the transition regions between active areas. Other isolation technologies have been proposed as alternatives for LOCOS. For example, the side wall masked isolation (SWAMI) technique has been proposed which involves the addition of a second nitride layer on the side wall. See FIG. 2, p. 226, of K. Y. Chiu et al., "The SWAMI - A Defect Free and Near-Zero Bird's-Beak Local Oxidation Process and Its Application in VLSI Technology," IEDM 82 (International Electron Device Meeting, 1982), Sec. 9.3, pp. 224-227 (1982). Thus U.S. Pat. No. 4,477,310 shows the use of nitride layers on the side wall of active regions. However, fully recessed field oxide layers are formed from an unmasked silicon substrate.
Still another method described is the so-called sealed interface local oxidation (SILO) technique which uses three layers of nitride over silicon followed by an oxide layer and a cap nitride layer. See FIG. 1, p. 223, of J. Hui et al., "Electrical Properties of MOS Devices Made With SILO Technology," IEDM 82, Sec. 9.2, pp. 220-223 (1982).
Also, the buried oxide (BOX) technique has been devised which uses an aluminum mask to etch a silicon groove and the subsequent removal of a plasma deposited silicon dioxide layer. See FIG. 1, p. 386, of K. Kurosawa et al., "A New Bird's-Beak Free Field Isolation Technology for VLSI Devices," IEDM 81, Sec. 16.4, pp. 384-387 (1981). Still another technique involves the selective polysilicon oxidation using three layers of silicon dioxide over silicon followed by a polysilicon and cap nitride.
Unfortunately, the SILO technique is not fully effective because of contamination and defects at the silicon/nitride interface which cannot be easily controlled. The SWAMI and BOX techniques are far too complicated, the BOX technique requiring several masking steps to achieve good planarity.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a method has been developed for defining isolation structures between active regions which forms a patterned field oxide layer free of the bird's beak effect.
In the process, a buffer silicon dioxide layer (a pad oxide) is first thermally grown on a silicon wafer. A polysilicon layer is deposited thereover and a photo-resist layer coated and patterned thereon. After the isolation regions have been defined, the structure is etched to remove the polysilicon above the active regions and the residual photo-resist washed away. A silicon nitride layer is then deposited upon the wafer. An etch-back cusp levelling step is then performed. This step includes first covering the silicon nitride layer with a thick photo-resist layer and then etching the photo-resist and silicon nitride at the same rate until the tops of the polysilicon cusps are exposed. Thereafter, an ion-implantation step may be performed either before or after the residual photo-resist is removed. The polysilicon cusp, while its vertical surfaces are still coated with the silicon nitride, is completely oxidized to form the field oxide regions. The final step of the process is the removal of the residual silicon oxide and pad oxide.
The remaining field oxide layer is a clearly patterned isolation region of precisely controlled dimensions.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
All of the figures are transverse sectional views of the silicon wafer having layers thereon deposited in accordance with the invention. The abbreviations "POLY", "SiN" and "PR" are used to designate the polysilicon, silicon nitride and photo-resist layers, respectively.
FIG. 1 shows the initial coating steps wherein the silicon wafer is first coated with a thin, thermally-coated silicon dioxide layer (the pad oxide) and a polysilicon layer.
FIG. 2 shows the addition of the photo-resist atop the polysilicon layer in preparation to defining the isolation region.
FIG. 3 shows the structure after the polysilicon layer has been stripped from the active regions and the isolation regions have been defined.
FIG. 4 shows the structure after the removal of the photo-resist, leaving the polysilicon layer over the isolation region.
FIG. 5 shows the structure after coating with a silicon nitride layer.
FIG. 6 shows a heavy photo-resist layer having good surface planarity coated on the silicon nitride layer.
FIG. 7 shows the structure after the photo-resist and the silicon nitride has been etched back to expose the polysilicon cusps.
FIG. 8 shows the ion-implantation of the etched-back structure for channel stopping.
FIG. 9 shows the etched-back structure after the removal of the photo-resist.
FIG. 10 shows the formation of the field oxide layer by the oxidation of the polysilicon layer.
FIG. 11 shows the final isolation structure after the removal of the silicon nitride and pad oxide layers.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the instant invention, the improved isolation structures between active regions of an integrated circuit are formed by a novel series of steps. The isolation structure has substantially no bird's beak length and little defect density along the field oxide edge.
Turning to the drawings, FIG. 1 represents the initial stages of the process. Here the silicon wafer 10 has grown thereon a thin film of silicon dioxide (SiO2) 20. This layer is typically 550 angstroms and is used for stress release. Atop of the silicon dioxide layer is a layer of polysilicon 30. This layer is generally one-half the desired thickness of the field oxide and typically 3000 angstroms. It will be understood that such a layer will form a field oxide layer of about 6000 angstroms.
FIG. 2 shows the application of a photo-resist to the polysilicon layer. The photo-resist masks the isolation region pattern on the surface of the polysilicon layer. It is designated by the numeral 40.
FIG. 3 shows the structure after the unmasked portion of polysilicon 30 is removed vertically until the pad oxide layer 20 is reached. Preferably, a dry etching process such as plasma etching or reactive ion etching is used to remove the unmasked polysilicon. The remainder of the polysilicon layer, frequently referred to herein as the "polysilicon island" and designated by the reference character 32, remains under the photo-resist masking pattern 40, as a result of the anisotropic character of the etching.
The plasma etching is preferably performed using SF6 and Feron 115 in a Tegal-701 system (trademark of the Tegal Corporation of Novato, Calif.), while the reactive-ion etching may be performed with NF3 plus Ar in an AME-8110 system (trademark of the Applied Material Co.). The former system is described in the Tegal Corporation Operation and Maintenance Manual, while the latter is described in Solid State Technology, December 1981, pp. 71-75.
The photo-resist mask is removed by a stripping solution such as sulfuric acid. The remaining structure is shown in FIG. 4. It is the polysilicon island 32 which is eventually oxidized to form the field oxide layer.
The next step in the process is the coating of the silicon nitride layer 50 on the surface of the pad oxide 20 and on the sides and top of the polysilicon island 32. This coating is preferably deposited by low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and is used as an oxidation resist during the formation of the field oxide. The thickness of the silicon nitride layer depends on the thickness of the pad oxide layer 20 and is controlled to minimize stress effects on the silicon wafer 10 during the field oxidation step. Typically, the thickness ratio between the silicon nitride and the pad oxide is about 3. For example, where a 550 angstrom pad oxide layer is used, the silicon nitride layer may be 1500 angstroms. The structure after the silicon nitride coating step is illustrated in FIG. 5.
Atop the silicon nitride layer is coated a 1.2 nm thick photo-resist HPR 204 (trademark of Philip A. Hunt Chemical Co., West Paterson, N.J.) layer 60 which, after coating, is baked onto the structure to achieve good planarity. The baking is performed at a temperature of 165° C. for 30 minutes. The thermal energy permits the photo-resist to flow sufficiently to achieve good planarity. For the most part, the thicker the photo-resist layer, the better the planarity obtained.
The structure shown in FIG. 6 is next subjected to an "etch-back step," which uniformly removes the photo-resist and the silicon nitride layer until the upper surface of the polysilicon island 32 is exposed. The etch-back step, performed in an AME-8110 system, uses 60 sccm of CHF3 and 35 sccm of O2, a pressure of 60 mtorr. and a power of 600 watts. The substrate temperature is between 20° and 35° C. and both the silicon nitride's and photo-resist's etch rates are about 367+20 angstroms/min. The resulting cross-section is shown in FIG. 7.
After the etching step, the side walls of the polysilicon island 32 are still coated with the silicon nitride layers 52. Also remaining are residual portions of the photo-resist layer 62.
In the next step of the process, depicted in FIG. 8, the structure is implanted with channel-stopping ions which are driven into the upper region of the polysilicon layer as designated by the numeral 70. The photo-resist residue 62 and the silicon nitride residue 52 serve to mask the remainder of the structure for the implanted ions. Typically, a boron dopant is used at a concentration of 4×1013 ions/cm2 at a voltage of 25 Kev. This is sufficient to obtain a 12 V field threshold voltage for a p-type wafer with a resistivity of 40 to 60 ohm-cm. The thickness of the photo-resist residue 62 and the silicon nitride residue 52 is designed to insure that none of the ions will penetrate the active regions of the wafer.
After the ion-implantation step, the residue of the photo-resist is removed, as shown in FIG. 9, and the remaining structure, shown in FIG. 10, is subject to high temperature oxidation in a wet oxygen environment at 1000° C. for a time period sufficient to oxidize completely the polysilicon residue 32.
During this step, the polysilicon structure 32 is oxidized to form a field oxide layer 34 and the channel-stopping ions implanted in the top of the polysilicon structure diffuse into the silicon wafer 10 to form a channel-stopping region 72 directly under the field oxide region. This region serves to prevent "field inversion" as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,570,325. The silicon dioxide thus formed, as noted above, grows to approximately twice the thickness of the original polysilicon layer.
The structure of the active regions are not affected by the oxidation step because of the high oxidation resistance of the silicon nitride residue 52. It will be noted that there is no oxide encroachment, so-called "bird's beak," under the silicon nitride residue 52 because the oxygen is consumed in the oxidation of the polysilicon island 32 or prevented from reaching the wafer because of the silicon nitride layer. Furthermore, there is no dislocation defect along the edge of the field oxide 34, in contrast to the frequent dislocation defects which occur in the semi-recessed or fully-recessed field oxide edges which are prevalent in other isolation technologies such as the LOCOS technology.
The final step in the process is the removal of the silicon nitride residue 52 and the pad oxide layer 20. The former is removed by using boiling phosphoric acid at a temperature of 180° C. and the latter with a hydrofluoric acid stripping solution. A layer, about the same thickness as the pad oxide, is also stripped off the field oxide layer 34 during this final stripping step. FIG. 11 shows the final isolation structure. This structure has a wide range of applications as an isolating device in integrated circuit applications.
In another embodiment of the instant invention, a semi-recesed field oxide layer is formed. In this process, the thickness of the polysilicon island is reduced without modifying the oxidation conditions. This results in the field oxide being formed from the completely oxidized polysilicon layer as well as a portion of the silicon substrate below the layer. The net effect of this procedure is to form a structure having the same overall field oxide thickness as the non-recessed structure, but having a reduced vertical sidewall or step extending above the silicon substrate. By minimizing the height of this field oxide step, the main disadvantage of the subsequent metal sputtering process, i.e., the formation of voids on the vertical surfaces, is lessened. It is well known that such voids cause open circuits which may result in the failure of the integrated circuit.
It will be understood that the series of steps used in connection with the process of the invention are individually conventional and well known in the art. It is the combination of these steps which leads to the new and improved results of this invention. Though, for example, the "etch-back" step is commonly used in interlayer planarization technique, it has not heretofore been used to remove the silicon nitride on top of the polysilicon island. Accordingly, it will be understood that many variations of the individual steps are contemplated as being within the scope of the invention, though they have not been specifically described herein.
For example, the dry etching process used to remove the unmasked polysilicon film may be performed using NF3 at 20 sccm and Ar at 65 sccm, at a pressure of 40 mtorr, a DC bias of -230 volts, at a maximum power of 1000 watts. Stripping solutions used to remove the photo-resist mask include admixtures of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide at a temperature of about 110° C. The photo-resist layer may be deposited on the silicon nitride layer and baked 30 min. at 165° C., to obtain good planarity.
In the doping step, boron is introduced by, for example, ion-implantation at an energy of from 20 to about 50 Kev to achieve a dosage level of from 1×1013 to 1×1012 cm2. Other well-known techniques may be used for introducing the dopant into the structure.
The field oxidation layer may be formed by oxidizing the polysilicon island in the presence of oxygen and hydrogen. The time of the treatment step depends on the thickness of the polysilicon island. For example, if the polysilicon layer is 4500 angstroms thick, the oxidation may be performed for about 190 minutes at 980° C. to form an oxide layer 9000 angstroms thick. It will be understood that both field oxide thickness and p- field implantation doses affect the threshold voltage drastically. A proper combination of the thickness of the field oxide and p- field implantation doses is used to achieve the desired field threshold voltage. Accordingly, the thickness of the final field oxide and of the in-process polysilicon (the latter being about a half of the field oxide thickness) may be varied.

Claims (11)

What is claimed is:
1. An isolation region for an integrated circuit prepared by:
(a) forming a polysilicon layer over the isolation region atop a silicon substrate coated with a stress-release layer;
(b) masking the isolation region of the polysilicon layer;
(c) removing the unmasked portion of the polysilicon layer by dry etching so as to leave an upwardly projecting polysilicon layer over the isolation region;
(d) removing the mask from the top of said polysilicon layer;
(e) sequentially depositing on the structure from step (d), including on the top and the vertical surfaces of said upwardly projecting polysilicon layer, a silicon nitride layer;
(f) depositing a photo-resist layer on said silicon nitride layer of a thickness sufficient to form a planar surface above the top of said polysilicon layer;
(g) etching back the photo-resist layer and the silicon nitride layer anisotropically so as to expose the top surface of the polysilicon layer;
(h) removing the residual photo-resist; and
(i) oxidizing the polysilicon layer to form a non-recessed field oxide layer, while the vertical surfaces of the layer remain masked with said silicon nitride layer.
2. An integrated circuit having an isolation region prepared by:
(a) forming a polysilicon layer over the isolation region atop a silicon substrate coated with a stress-release layer;
(b) masking the isolation region of the polysilicon layer;
(c) removing the unmasked portion of the polysilicon layer by dry etching so as to leave an upwardly projecting polysilicon layer over the isolation region;
(d) removing the mask from the top of said polysilicon layer;
(e) sequentially depositing on the structure from step (d), including on the top and the vertical surfaces of said upwardly projecting polysilicon layer, a silicon nitride layer;
(f) depositing a photo-resist layer on said silicon nitride layer of a thickness sufficient to form a planar surface above the top of said polysilicon layer;
(g) etching back the photo-resist layer and the silicon nitride layer anisotropically so as to expose the top surface of the polysilicon layer;
(h) removing the residual photo-resist; and
(i) oxidizing the polysilicon layer to form a non-recessed field oxide layer, while the vertical surfaces of the layer remain masked with said silicon nitride layer.
3. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the stress-release layer is a pad oxide layer.
4. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the silicon substrate is a p-type or an n-type silicon wafer.
5. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein, during said oxidation step, a non-recessed field oxide is formed from the completely oxidized polysilicon layer.
6. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the dry etching is a plasma etching or a reactive ion etching.
7. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the silicon nitride is deposited by LPCVD or PECVD.
8. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the structure is subject to ion-implantation after the etch-back step, either before or after the photo-resist residue is stripped.
9. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein the isolation region forms part of a PMOS, NMOS or CMOS.
10. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein after the etch-back step and the stripping of the photo-resist residue, a p- field mask is defined, the structure is subjected to ion-implantation, and the p- field mask is stripped.
11. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein, after the oxidation step (i), the remaining silicon nitride and stress-release layers are removed.
US07/283,357 1987-02-10 1988-12-12 Isolation structures for integrated circuits Expired - Fee Related US4968640A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/283,357 US4968640A (en) 1987-02-10 1988-12-12 Isolation structures for integrated circuits

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US1301287A 1987-02-10 1987-02-10
US07/283,357 US4968640A (en) 1987-02-10 1988-12-12 Isolation structures for integrated circuits

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/205,558 Division US4818235A (en) 1987-02-10 1988-06-07 Isolation structures for integrated circuits

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4968640A true US4968640A (en) 1990-11-06

Family

ID=26684314

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/283,357 Expired - Fee Related US4968640A (en) 1987-02-10 1988-12-12 Isolation structures for integrated circuits

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US4968640A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR970051889A (en) * 1995-12-26 1997-07-29 김주용 Method for forming self-aligned mask of semiconductor device
US5821145A (en) * 1994-07-28 1998-10-13 Lg Semicon Co., Ltd. Method for isolating elements in a semiconductor device

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5458381A (en) * 1977-10-19 1979-05-11 Seiko Epson Corp Manufacture for semiconductor device
JPS55143047A (en) * 1979-04-25 1980-11-08 Nec Corp Insulating separation method for semiconductor device
US4272308A (en) * 1979-10-10 1981-06-09 Varshney Ramesh C Method of forming recessed isolation oxide layers
US4292156A (en) * 1978-02-28 1981-09-29 Vlsi Technology Research Association Method of manufacturing semiconductor devices
JPS5779644A (en) * 1980-11-06 1982-05-18 Toshiba Corp Manufacture of semiconductor device
JPS58123737A (en) * 1982-01-19 1983-07-23 Seiko Instr & Electronics Ltd Manufacture of semiconductor device
JPS5922342A (en) * 1982-07-29 1984-02-04 Toshiba Corp Manufacture of semiconductor device
US4441941A (en) * 1980-03-06 1984-04-10 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device employing element isolation using insulating materials
US4459325A (en) * 1980-11-06 1984-07-10 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing the same
US4635344A (en) * 1984-08-20 1987-01-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method of low encroachment oxide isolation of a semiconductor device
JPS6281041A (en) * 1985-10-03 1987-04-14 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Formation of element isolation region
US4746625A (en) * 1986-06-09 1988-05-24 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba A method of manufacturing semiconductor elements-isolating silicon oxide layers
US4868136A (en) * 1985-08-28 1989-09-19 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics S.R.L. Process of forming an isolation structure

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5458381A (en) * 1977-10-19 1979-05-11 Seiko Epson Corp Manufacture for semiconductor device
US4292156A (en) * 1978-02-28 1981-09-29 Vlsi Technology Research Association Method of manufacturing semiconductor devices
JPS55143047A (en) * 1979-04-25 1980-11-08 Nec Corp Insulating separation method for semiconductor device
US4272308A (en) * 1979-10-10 1981-06-09 Varshney Ramesh C Method of forming recessed isolation oxide layers
US4441941A (en) * 1980-03-06 1984-04-10 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device employing element isolation using insulating materials
US4459325A (en) * 1980-11-06 1984-07-10 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing the same
JPS5779644A (en) * 1980-11-06 1982-05-18 Toshiba Corp Manufacture of semiconductor device
JPS58123737A (en) * 1982-01-19 1983-07-23 Seiko Instr & Electronics Ltd Manufacture of semiconductor device
JPS5922342A (en) * 1982-07-29 1984-02-04 Toshiba Corp Manufacture of semiconductor device
US4635344A (en) * 1984-08-20 1987-01-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method of low encroachment oxide isolation of a semiconductor device
US4868136A (en) * 1985-08-28 1989-09-19 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics S.R.L. Process of forming an isolation structure
JPS6281041A (en) * 1985-10-03 1987-04-14 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Formation of element isolation region
US4746625A (en) * 1986-06-09 1988-05-24 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba A method of manufacturing semiconductor elements-isolating silicon oxide layers

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5821145A (en) * 1994-07-28 1998-10-13 Lg Semicon Co., Ltd. Method for isolating elements in a semiconductor device
KR970051889A (en) * 1995-12-26 1997-07-29 김주용 Method for forming self-aligned mask of semiconductor device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4755477A (en) Overhang isolation technology
US4561172A (en) Integrated circuit fabrication method utilizing selective etching and oxidation to form isolation regions
US4580330A (en) Integrated circuit isolation
US5196367A (en) Modified field isolation process with no channel-stop implant encroachment
US5151381A (en) Method for local oxidation of silicon employing two oxidation steps
US4929566A (en) Method of making dielectrically isolated integrated circuits using oxygen implantation and expitaxial growth
US4465532A (en) Method for forming an isolation region for electrically isolating elements
US5294562A (en) Trench isolation with global planarization using flood exposure
US4538343A (en) Channel stop isolation technology utilizing two-step etching and selective oxidation with sidewall masking
US5308787A (en) Uniform field oxidation for locos isolation
US4818235A (en) Isolation structures for integrated circuits
US5834359A (en) Method of forming an isolation region in a semiconductor substrate
US4876216A (en) Semiconductor integrated circuit manufacturing process providing oxide-filled trench isolation of circuit devices
JP2004153236A (en) Method of forming isolation film in semiconductor device
US5937310A (en) Reduced bird's beak field oxidation process using nitrogen implanted into active region
US5371036A (en) Locos technology with narrow silicon trench
JPS61145868A (en) Manufacture of semiconductor device
US5192706A (en) Method for semiconductor isolation
US6027985A (en) Method for forming element isolating film of semiconductor device
JPH11145273A (en) Manufacture of semiconductor device
US5563098A (en) Buried contact oxide etch with poly mask procedure
JPS5832466A (en) Manufacture of mosfet
US6071793A (en) Locos mask for suppression of narrow space field oxide thinning and oxide punch through effect
US4968640A (en) Isolation structures for integrated circuits
US6387741B1 (en) Manufacturing a semiconductor device with isolated circuit-element formation layers of different thicknesses

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HLDR NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENT STAT AS INDIV INVENTOR (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LSM1); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS - SMALL BUSINESS (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SM02); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20021106