US3828336A - Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation - Google Patents
Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3828336A US3828336A US00378562A US37856273A US3828336A US 3828336 A US3828336 A US 3828336A US 00378562 A US00378562 A US 00378562A US 37856273 A US37856273 A US 37856273A US 3828336 A US3828336 A US 3828336A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- frequency
- output
- pass filter
- peak detector
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 15
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/16—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid
- G08B13/1609—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems
- G08B13/1618—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems using ultrasonic detection means
- G08B13/1627—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems using ultrasonic detection means using Doppler shift detection circuits
Definitions
- ABSTRACT [52] US. Cl. 340/258 A, 340/1 R, 340/ 3 D, This ultrasonic intrusion alarm system responds to the 340/16 R Doppler shift caused by moving intruders, Instanta- [51] Int. Cl. G08b 13/16 neous changes in amplitude are detected. by peak de- [58] Field of Search 340/1 R, 3 D, 16 R, 258 R, tectors. The detected signals are filtered to reduce the 340/258 A, 258 B sensitivity to low frequency air turbulence.
- FIG 3A F'IGCJB TIME INTRUSION ALARM SYSTEM WITH IMPROVED AIR TURBULENCE COMPENSATION
- This invention relates to intrusion detection systems and more particularly to improvements in the reliability of ultrasonic detection systems in which the presence of a moving target within secured area is detected by means of a Doppler shift in the transmitted ultrasonic frequency caused by the motion of the target.
- the use of ultrasonics for intrusion detection is well known.
- An early description of a Doppler intrusion alarm is given by Bagno in U.S. Pat. 2,655,645 issued Oct.
- amplitude of the signals appearing in the microphone output in the presence of air turbulence is relatively high at the low end of the frequency spectrum and falls off approximately linearly with increasing frequency over the frequency range 2 Hz to 100 Hz.
- the Doppler frequencies produced by a walking human target are shown to be of approximately constant amplitude over the same frequency range.
- the data indicates that the long time r.m.s. average amplitudes of signals introduced by air turbulence and by a walking human being are approximately equal in the low frequency region below 5 Hz whereas the signals introduced by a walking person are very much greater in average amplitude in comparison to the corresponding air turbulence signals in the high frequency region from about 20 Hz to Hz.
- Bagno et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 2,794,974 utilize the differences in the amplitude vs. frequency spectrum of the signals appearing in the microphone output to discriminate against false alarms caused by air turbulence.
- This patent separates the demodulated signal into two channels, one for processing the low frequencies between 2 and 5 Hz and another for processing the high frequencies between 25 and 50 Hz. Then the alarm is not set off if the averaged signal amplitude appearing in the high frequency channel is considerably less than the averaged signal amplitude appearing in the low frequency channel. The alarm is set off when the averaged amplitude of the signal in the high frequency channel increases over a preset limit with reference to the low I frequency averaged signal level.
- Hankinset al in U.S. Pat. No. 3,638,210 issued Jan. 25, 1972 are also attempting to solve the long standing problem of false alarms which occur in ultrasonic intrusion detection systems due to air turbulence.
- Hankins et al use a somewhat different embodiment of the dual channel, dual time constant signal processing method employed by Bagno.
- Bagno divides the demodulated signal into two separate channels and introduces a long time constant in the low frequency channel and a shorter time constant in the high frequency channel whereas Hankins et a1 extract from the demodulated signal a single frequency band in the 40 Hz region and then split the filtered signal into two separate channels.
- One channel is connected to a positively phased voltage doubler and the other channel is connected to a negatively phased voltage doubler.
- Each channel has an integrating circuit with a different time constant for averaging the random varying amplitude of the 40 Hz signal.
- the time constant in one channel is made higher than in the other channel.
- This modification of the Bagno system still has the drawbacks of employing dual channels for processing which adds to complexity and cost and because this system only looks at the average amplitude of the 40 Hz signal it still retains the disadvantages of the earlier systems which will false alarm in high turbulence air and will be subject to not detecting true targets which move slowly and thereby generate weak Doppler signals in the 40 Hz band.
- Galvin makes use of the same basic spectral amplitude information originally shown by Bagno et al and he also makes use of the additional fact that the air turbulence spectrum which shows an increase in amplitude with decreasing frequency on a long time averaged amplitude basis is symmetrically distributed in both the upper and lower side bands about the ultrasonic carrier frequency.
- the moving target signal will contain Doppler frequencies which appear only in the upper or lower side band depending on whether the target is moving toward or away from the receiving transducer, thereby causing either a positive or negative Doppler shift.
- Galvin splits the received ultrasonic signal into an upper side band channel and a lower side band channel and then sends the signals from the two separate channels to separate detectors; one positive and one negative.
- both detectors In the presence of balanced signals in each side band, both detectors generate equal voltages of opposite polarities and their sum will be zero and the alarm will not be triggered.
- the unbalanced detector output In the presence of unbalanced side band signals such as is caused by a moving target, the unbalanced detector output will trigger the alarm circuit.
- This method of reducing false alarms due to air turbulence presupposes balanced upper and lower side band signals due to air turbulence which is not necessarily true in random air turbulence situations unless long time averaging of the signal amplitudes are employed.
- Galvin Since Galvin is required to use relatively long time constants for obtaining a stable symmetrical averaging of the random amplitude levels that are generated by the air turbulence, his system remains subject to the same limitations of the previous systems; namely, the longer the time constant the easier it is to defeat the alarm by a sophisticated intruder who can move slowly in short spurts and remain undetected. If the time constant is made shorter, a lack of symmetry will occur in the air turbulence spectral distribution which will cause false alarms.
- Another major disadvantage of the Galvin system is the complex, costly multi-channel processing and the expensive ultrasonic side band splitting circuitry required.
- the present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art ultrasonic intrusion alarm systems discussed above by making use of a novel principle of operation.
- Applicants alarm responds to the instantaneous cycle to cycle rate of change of the amplitude of the demodulated signal and thereby eliminates the undesirable need for long time averaging which is necessary with the prior art systems which operate on the averaged amplitude vs. frequency spectrum of the turbulence and moving target generated signals.
- the application of this novel principle as described in this invention eliminates false alarms due to air turbulence and achieves this long sought after objective with a very simple single channel low cost circuit.
- An object of this invention is to provide a new and improved ultrasonic intrusion alarm system which eliminates false alarms in the presence of high air turbulence without decreasing the threshold sensitivity of the detection system.
- Another object of the invention is to improve the efficiency of detection of an ultrasonic intrusion detection system in the presence of adverse ambient conditions such as air turbulence, thermal gradients or noisy backgrounds.
- a further object of this invention is to simplify the signal processing in the system thereby reducing the complexity of the system with corresponding increased reliability and decreased manufacturing cost.
- a still further object of this invention is to reduce the susceptibility of the alarm system to transient disturbances. 7
- Another object of this invention is to provide an improved system which will permit the use of multiple transmitting and receiving transducers for covering a large area to be protected without sacrificing the basic improvements in performance which are realized by the novel system.
- FIG. 1 is a system block diagram illustrating one embodiment of this invention.
- FIG. 2 is a chart representing the amplitude vs. frequency spectrum of the signals appearing in the demodulated signal in an ultrasonic intrusion detection system caused by air turbulence and by a moving target.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B show the signals appearing respectively at the two points 100 and 200 in the circuit of FIG. 1 in the presence of air turbulence.
- FIGS. 4A and 4B show the signals appearing at the same points in the circuit of FIG. 1 when a moving target is present.
- FIG. 1 shows a system block diagram illustrating an embodiment of this invention.
- An oscillator drives the transmitting transducer 11 with a frequency f which results in the generation of an acoustic signal 12 of the same frequency which is radiated from the transducer to insonify the area to be protected against intrusion. If the area is too largeto be covered by a single transducer the transducer 11 may be supplemented by connecting additional transducers such as 11A and 11B to the same oscillator signal which supplies power to transducer 11 such as is illustrated by the dotted lines in FIG. 1.
- the radiated acoustic signal 12 is reflected from any objects or surfaces that may be within the range of coverage by the transmitter 11 and the reflected signal 13 will be picked up by the receiving transducer 14 as illustrated.
- additional receivers such as 14A and 14B may be connected together with receiver 14 as shown by the dotted lines in FIG. 1.
- the reflected signal 13 that reaches receiver 14 will only contain the single frequency f If a moving target is present within the area the reflected signal reaching receiver 14 will contain both'the frequency f which is reflected from any stationary object and also a frequency which is greater or less than f by an amount which corresponds to the Doppler frequency shift which is generated by the movement of the target.
- the Doppler frequency shift f which is proportional to the velocity of the moving target, increases f if the target is moving toward the receiver picking up the reflected signal and decreases f if the target is moving away from the receiving transducer.
- the output of the receiving transducer 14 is applied to the input of an amplifier 15 and the amplified signal is demodulated by the demodulator 16.
- the demodulator also receives an input signal from the oscillator 10 which is of the same frequency f being supplied to the transmitter 11. Alternately it is also possible to use the received ultrasonic signal directly and accomplish the demodulation without need for the oscillator reference signal. During the demodulation process the carrier frequency f is removed from the received signal and only the low frequency signals introduced by air turbulence or by the Doppler shift caused by the moving target will remain at the output of the demodulator 16.
- the demodulator may be any one of the many types well known in the art such as a peak detector demodulator, for example.
- the demodulated signal will not contain any low frequency signals other than DC if there is no moving target or air turbulence in the insonified zone.
- the demodulator output will contain the well known spectrum of low frequency signals as shown in FIG. 2.
- the curve 102 is the long time average r.m.s. amplitude vs. frequency spectrum which results from air turbulence and the curve 101 is a similar long time amplitude vs.'frequency spectrum which results from the Doppler shift caused by a moving target within the insonified zone.
- the two curves indicate that the relative amplitudes of the two signals are approximately equal in the frequency regionfrom 2 to 5 Hz and that the amplitude of the Doppler signal created by a moving target is about an order of magnitude greater than the air turbulence signal'amplitude in the frequency region from 20 Hz.
- the ultrasonic carrier frequency is preferably chosen between 18 kHz 50 kHz. If the carrier frequency is chosen in the higher portion of this range the Doppler shift curve 101 will be shifted proportionately higher in frequency, but the general relationship which is illustrated in FIG. 2 between the relatively uniform amplitude vs. frequency characteristic (curve 101) for the moving target signals and the falling off of the amplitude with increasing frequency for the air turbulence signals (curve 102) will remain unchanged.
- the present invention makes a radical departure in the basic method of operation from all the prior art ultrasonic alarm systems by making use of the differences in the instantaneous rates of change of amplitude of the demodulated signal which applicant discovered while experimentally investigating the instantaneous time variations in the amplitude of the signal appearing at the output of the demodulator 16 under various conditions of operation.
- the signal as observed on an oscilloscope connected at the point in the circuit of FIG. 1, ap-' peared as shown in FIG. 3A when intense air turbulence was generated within the insonified area.
- 3A indicates a relatively slow rate of change of peak amplitude from cycle to cycle as a function of time.
- This general characteristic showing a slow rate of change of amplitude variation in the air turbulence signal remained essentially unchanged and was not found to be critically dependent on the response characteristic of the filter 17 provided its low frequency cut-off was set above 5 Hz.
- the amplitude vs. frequency spectrum of the moving target Doppler signal is shown by curve 101 with an operating frequency of 20 kHz. If an ultrasonic frequency higher than 20 kHz is used in the system the curve 101 will be shifted higher in frequency. Satisfactory results were obtained in operating the newly described system with different band pass filters 17 whose center band frequency response varied over the approximate range 20 Hz 80 Hz.
- the band width of the filter 17 was also found to be not critical. Satisfactory operation of the new system was achieved with band width variations from approximately Mi to 2 octaves. To secure optimum system performance the pass band frequency response of filter 17 should be set within the upper broad peak response range of the moving target Doppler spectrum.
- FIG. 4A When a person walks into the insonified zone the oscilloscope signal at the point 100 in the circuit instantly appears as indicated in FIG. 4A. There was no change in the sensitivity settings of the system between the observations of FIG. 3A and FIG. 4A.
- the observed signal in FIG. 4A shows a very great increase in the rate of change of amplitude from cycle to cycle due to the presence of a moving target as compared to the small rate of change of amplitudecaused by air turbulnce as indicated in FIG. 3A.
- This large difference in the cycle to cycle rate of change of amplitude of the signal as caused by air turbulence in comparison to the signal caused by a moving target was observed with different center frequency settings of the band pass filter 17 ranging from 20 Hz to 80 Hz.
- the actual oscillographic data illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 4A were measured with a band pass filter 17 tuned at a center frequency of approximately 40 Hz and having a band width of l octave.
- the large difference that was found to exist between the low rate of change of amplitude of the demodulated signal caused by turbulence and the high rate of change of amplitude caused by a real moving intruder is the basis of this invention and its novel application very greatly reduces false alarms even in the presence of excessive air turbulence with a simple, low cost, circuit configuration.
- the signal from the output of the filter 17 is connected to a peak detector 18 which may be of any conventional design as is well known in the art. This converts the air tubulence signal of FIG. 3A to the signal shown in FIG. 3B and the moving target signal of FIG. 4A to the signal shown in FIG. 4B. the detected signals shown in FIGS.
- this new invention operates on the instantaneous cycle to cycle differences in the rates of change of the amplitudes of the moving target and air turbulence generated signals it eliminates the undesirable requirement of long time constants which are necessary in prior art systems which depend for their operation on the long time averaged amplitudes of the target and air turbulence generated signals.
- the improved ultrasonic alarm described in this invention is inherently very fast in operation. A single step of an intruder into the insonified zone will set off the alarm and at the same time the presence of severe air turbulence will not cause false alarms.
- an intrusion alarm system means for radiating a signal at a predetermined frequency into a space, means for receiving the signal as it is reflected from objects within the space, the received signal having a frequency differing from that of the radiated signal by amounts corresponding to the rates of movement of said objects, demodulation means for producing a difference signal having a frequency spectrum corresponding to the differences in the frequencies of the radiated and received signal, filter means connected for filtering the difference signal and passing only a selected band of frequencies lying within the upper portion of the frequency spectrum of the difference signal, signal processing means connected to the output of said filter, said signal processing means characterized in that its output contains an AC signal corresponding approximately to the envelope of the variation in the peak amplitudes of the AC signal which appears at the output of said filter, a high pass filter connected to the output of said signal processing means, and signal detection means for recognizing the presence of a signal when it appears at the output of said high pass filter.
- said radiated signal is ultrasonic and said predetermined frequency lies within the approximate range 18 50 kHz
- said filter means is a band pass filter whose pass band is centered at a frequency which lies within the upper broad peak response range of the moving target Doppler spectrum
- said signal processing means includes a peak detector
- said high pass filter has a cut-off frequency greater than 5 Hz.
- demodulation means includes means for combining a signal corresponding to the frequency of the radiated signal with the received signal.
- An ultrasonic intruder alarm comprising an ultrasonic signal oscillator, ultrasonic transmitting transducer means capable of radiating acoustic energy throughout a space to be insonified connected to said oscillator, ultrasonic receiving transducer means capable of receiving said radiated energy as it reflects from objects within the insonified space, an amplifier connected to said receiving transducer means, demodulation means, the amplifier output signal connected to said demodulator, the output from said demodulation means connected to a band pass filter, a first peak detector connected to the output of said band pass filter,
- a high pass filter connected to the output of said first peak detector, a second peak detector connected to the output of said high pass filter and an alarm circuit which is activated by the output signal from said second peak detector whenever an output signal appears.
- demodulation means includes means for combining a signal corresponding to the frequency of the radiated signal with the received signal.
- the invention in claim 12 characterized in that an integrator is included in the output circuit of said second peak detector for preventing transient signals from passing from said second peak detector to said alarm circuit.
Abstract
Description
Claims (13)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US00378562A US3828336A (en) | 1973-07-12 | 1973-07-12 | Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation |
IT25059/74A IT1017081B (en) | 1973-07-12 | 1974-07-11 | ALARM SYSTEM AGAINST INTRUSION WITH PERFECT COMPENSATION OF THE AIR TURBULENCE |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US00378562A US3828336A (en) | 1973-07-12 | 1973-07-12 | Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3828336A true US3828336A (en) | 1974-08-06 |
Family
ID=23493622
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US00378562A Expired - Lifetime US3828336A (en) | 1973-07-12 | 1973-07-12 | Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3828336A (en) |
IT (1) | IT1017081B (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3943503A (en) * | 1973-11-13 | 1976-03-09 | Unwin Electronics Ltd. | Electronic intruder alarm apparatus |
US4529972A (en) * | 1982-04-21 | 1985-07-16 | Racal Security Limited | Signal transmitting and receiving arrangements |
US5539705A (en) * | 1994-10-27 | 1996-07-23 | Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. | Ultrasonic speech translator and communications system |
US5696489A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-12-09 | Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. | Wireless boundary monitor system and method |
US5856778A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-05 | Denso Corporation | Intrusion detecting apparatus for a vehicle |
US6509835B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2003-01-21 | Electronics Line (E.L.) Ltd. | Filtering method and circuit particularly useful in doppler motion sensor devices and intrusion detector systems |
US7535351B2 (en) | 2006-07-24 | 2009-05-19 | Welles Reymond | Acoustic intrusion detection system |
CN105191507A (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2015-12-23 | 皇家飞利浦有限公司 | Mitigating disturbance in sensing |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2623931A (en) * | 1947-09-26 | 1952-12-30 | Alertronic Protective Corp Of | Circuit for detection of frequency differences and apparatus employing same |
US2767393A (en) * | 1953-08-03 | 1956-10-16 | Kidde & Co Walter | Approach alarm system with unwanted signal elimination |
US2769972A (en) * | 1954-03-15 | 1956-11-06 | American District Telegraph Co | Method and apparatus for detecting motion |
US2782405A (en) * | 1954-05-27 | 1957-02-19 | Motorola Inc | Apparatus for detecting motion in a bconfined space |
US3383678A (en) * | 1966-12-23 | 1968-05-14 | Advanced Devices Lab Inc | Moving object detection system |
US3638210A (en) * | 1970-06-26 | 1972-01-25 | Systron Donner Corp | Intrusion alarm system with turbulence compensation |
US3662371A (en) * | 1969-11-17 | 1972-05-09 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Ultrasonic intrusion detection system signal processing circuit |
US3665443A (en) * | 1970-09-03 | 1972-05-23 | Aerospace Res | Ultrasonic intrusion alarm |
-
1973
- 1973-07-12 US US00378562A patent/US3828336A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1974
- 1974-07-11 IT IT25059/74A patent/IT1017081B/en active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2623931A (en) * | 1947-09-26 | 1952-12-30 | Alertronic Protective Corp Of | Circuit for detection of frequency differences and apparatus employing same |
US2767393A (en) * | 1953-08-03 | 1956-10-16 | Kidde & Co Walter | Approach alarm system with unwanted signal elimination |
US2769972A (en) * | 1954-03-15 | 1956-11-06 | American District Telegraph Co | Method and apparatus for detecting motion |
US2782405A (en) * | 1954-05-27 | 1957-02-19 | Motorola Inc | Apparatus for detecting motion in a bconfined space |
US3383678A (en) * | 1966-12-23 | 1968-05-14 | Advanced Devices Lab Inc | Moving object detection system |
US3662371A (en) * | 1969-11-17 | 1972-05-09 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Ultrasonic intrusion detection system signal processing circuit |
US3638210A (en) * | 1970-06-26 | 1972-01-25 | Systron Donner Corp | Intrusion alarm system with turbulence compensation |
US3665443A (en) * | 1970-09-03 | 1972-05-23 | Aerospace Res | Ultrasonic intrusion alarm |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3943503A (en) * | 1973-11-13 | 1976-03-09 | Unwin Electronics Ltd. | Electronic intruder alarm apparatus |
US4529972A (en) * | 1982-04-21 | 1985-07-16 | Racal Security Limited | Signal transmitting and receiving arrangements |
US5539705A (en) * | 1994-10-27 | 1996-07-23 | Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. | Ultrasonic speech translator and communications system |
US5696489A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-12-09 | Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. | Wireless boundary monitor system and method |
US5856778A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-05 | Denso Corporation | Intrusion detecting apparatus for a vehicle |
US6509835B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2003-01-21 | Electronics Line (E.L.) Ltd. | Filtering method and circuit particularly useful in doppler motion sensor devices and intrusion detector systems |
US7535351B2 (en) | 2006-07-24 | 2009-05-19 | Welles Reymond | Acoustic intrusion detection system |
CN105191507A (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2015-12-23 | 皇家飞利浦有限公司 | Mitigating disturbance in sensing |
US9869758B2 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2018-01-16 | Philips Lighting Holding B.V. | Mitigating disturbance in sensing |
CN105191507B (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2018-06-19 | 飞利浦灯具控股公司 | Alleviate the disturbance in sensing |
EP2992740B1 (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2019-04-03 | Signify Holding B.V. | Mitigating disturbance in sensing. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
IT1017081B (en) | 1977-07-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1084618A (en) | Phase difference sensitive movement detectors | |
US4319349A (en) | Ultrasonic intrusion detection system | |
US3665443A (en) | Ultrasonic intrusion alarm | |
US6380882B1 (en) | Motion detector based on the doppler principle | |
US3760400A (en) | Intrusion detection system employing quadrature sampling | |
US5973996A (en) | Ultrasound intrusion detector | |
US4054867A (en) | Detecting damage to bulk material | |
US3801977A (en) | Ultrasonic alarm circuit | |
US4003045A (en) | Intrusion detection systems with turbulence discrimination | |
US4193055A (en) | Automatic sensitivity level adjustment | |
US7123145B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for analysing a signal from a movement detector for determining if movement has been detected in an area under surveillance and an anti-theft system | |
US3828336A (en) | Intrusion alarm system with improved air turbulence compensation | |
US3997866A (en) | Acoustic bus passenger counter | |
US4023156A (en) | Alarm system for detecting disturbance of a solid medium | |
ES422198A1 (en) | Metal impact monitor | |
US3111657A (en) | Compensation for turbulence and other effects in intruder detection systems | |
US3704461A (en) | Intrusion detection system responsive to interruption of a transmitted beam | |
US4570247A (en) | Dual-band ultrasonic motion detector | |
US3922660A (en) | Volumetric intrusion alarm using both Doppler and net-change signal processing | |
US4541080A (en) | Ultrasonic alarm device | |
US3803539A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting motion | |
JPS5937910Y2 (en) | Interference cancellation circuit for electronic defense systems | |
US4975891A (en) | Vehicle sensing device and method | |
US3706961A (en) | Automatic alarm system | |
GB1308702A (en) | Intrusion detection apparatus having supervisory control means |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MASSA PRODUCTS CORPORATION, 280 LINCOLN STREET, HI Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DONALD P. MASSA TRUST;CONSTANCE ANN MASSA TRUST;ROBERT MASSA TRUST;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:005395/0971 Effective date: 19860612 Owner name: MASSA, DONALD P., COHASSET, MA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:STONELEIGH TRUST, THE;REEL/FRAME:005397/0016 Effective date: 19841223 Owner name: DELLORFANO, FRED M. JR. Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:STONELEIGH TRUST, THE;REEL/FRAME:005397/0016 Effective date: 19841223 Owner name: MASSA PRODUCTS CORPORATION, 80 LINCOLN STREET, HIN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DONALD P. MASSA TRUST;CONSTANCE ANN MASSA TRUST *;GEORGIANA M. MASSA TRUST;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:005395/0954 Effective date: 19841223 Owner name: TRUSTEES FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE D.P. MASSA TRUST Free format text: ASSIGN TO TRUSTEES AS EQUAL TENANTS IN COMMON, THE ENTIRE INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:MASSA, DONALD P.;MASSA, CONSTANCE A.;MASSA, GEORGIANA M.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:005395/0942 Effective date: 19841223 |