US2469146A - Steel helmet - Google Patents

Steel helmet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2469146A
US2469146A US717134A US71713446A US2469146A US 2469146 A US2469146 A US 2469146A US 717134 A US717134 A US 717134A US 71713446 A US71713446 A US 71713446A US 2469146 A US2469146 A US 2469146A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
steel
helmet
brim
crown
alloy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US717134A
Inventor
Miriam M Barnes
Harold J Elmendorf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
American Steel and Wire Company of New Jersey
Original Assignee
American Steel and Wire Company of New Jersey
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by American Steel and Wire Company of New Jersey filed Critical American Steel and Wire Company of New Jersey
Priority to US717134A priority Critical patent/US2469146A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2469146A publication Critical patent/US2469146A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H1/00Personal protection gear
    • F41H1/04Protection helmets
    • F41H1/06Protection helmets of steel; Steel head-shields
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S148/00Metal treatment
    • Y10S148/902Metal treatment having portions of differing metallurgical properties or characteristics

Definitions

  • This invention is concerned with shaped armor and, particularly, with steel helmets.
  • steel helmets are made from high-alloy, manganese steel, containing from 12% to 15% manganese, because it satisfactorily meets the present requirements in regard to resistance to fracturing and bulging in ballistic tests.
  • Such steel is costly and might become unavailable because of its high manganese content.
  • the present invention provides shaped armor and, particularly, steel helmets, that can meet present ballistic tests, by using any effectively quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an effective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, which would be a great advantage if manganese becomes unavailable, a further and immediately useful feature of the invention being that it permits relatively easy shaping of the armor by cold drawing and the steel used is much less expensive than the presently used high-alloy, manganese steel.
  • Figure 1 is a view in perspective of a helmet made in accordance with the invention
  • Figure 2 is a view, partially in vertical section of heat treating apparatus employed in making the helmet.
  • An example of a steel that is made suitable for use as light armor, by the present invention is steel approximately containing ,70% carbon, .70% manganese, .30% maximum silicon, .04% maximum phosphorus and sulphur and from .20 to .30% molybdenum. While this particular steel is preferred, at present, any other low alloy composition steel may also be used providing it has sufficient carbon to be effectively quench hardened. Other examples of steels contemplated by this invention are to be found in chapter 5 ci the fifth edition of The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, published by Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation.
  • the described steel is hot rolled to a iiat having a thickness requiring further reductions of from 30 to giveit the thickness of the finished armor, this iiat then being spheroidized, which in the case of the exemplary steel may be by annealing it for about eight hours at about 1300 F. and then slow cooling it at a rate effecting spheroidizing Other spheroidizing treatments may also be used. Such spheroidizing is unnecessary if the hot rolling is carefully carried out to nish above the critical temperature of the steel, but it is always preferable.
  • the spheroidized flat is next cold rolled to about the thickness required by the contemplated armor, this producing a cold-rolled flat.
  • the next step is to spheroidize this cold-rolled hat, the previously described annealing practice again being applicable, in the case of the particularly speciiied steel, although other spheroidizing treat- .ments might be resorted to.
  • the necessity is to anneal to soften the cold-rolled steel. It is to be understood that the described cold rolling is carried out without any intermediate anneal so that the flat receives from 30 to '70% cold rolling prior to its second spheroidizing treatment, the amount being sumcient to give it the thickness required by the armor. After this second spheroidizing treatment it is considered preferable to give the spheroidized cold-rolled flat about a 1% cold rolling for the purpose of even further improving its now improved drawing properties.
  • the spheroidized, cold-rolled flat is c'old drawn to the desired shape, is then austenitized by a proper heating cycle, and is then quench hardened by being quenched to within the temperature range producing the austenite-to-bainite transformation, and held within this range until substantial amounts of bainite are produced.
  • the quenching temperature is so selected as to produce a Rockwell C hardness of approximately 48 to 50, and a toughness suiiicient to withstand present ballistic tests of the type given the highalloy, manganese steel.
  • the steel is preferably hot rolled to a flat strip 18 inches wide and from .078 to .093 of an inch thick, this strip being then spheroidized as described, processed to clean it from any scale it might have acquired and then cold rolled to about a .044 of an inch thickness with no inter mediate annealing. Thereafter the steel strip is straightened and cut, given its final spheroidizing Each helmet is then austenitized by heating to approximately 1550 F.
  • the helmets being mechanically restrained against any deformation during this period and being held for approximately one hour, whereupon they will have the hardness previously noted and will be able to meet present ballistic tests.
  • edges of the helmet brim areA subjected to an annealing treatment ranging from 700 to 1200 F., for a very short time, so as to soften the edges by giving the steel around the periphery of the brim a soft steel structure.
  • This treatment is best accomplished by subjecting the edge or rim of the helmet brim to the controlled iiame of a torch, or, more preferably, by dipping the edges of the helmet in a molten metal bath having the temperatures noted. It is to be understood that this softening of the brim is carried out so as not to materially affect the hardness of the crown.
  • the quenching bath l is held by a container 2 also containing a support 3 mounting a heavy castingll, tting the inside of the helmet, having perorations 5.
  • the austenitized helmet 6 is thrust into the bath andA fitted over this casting d.
  • a second movable casting 1, fitting the outside-'of the helmet, having perforations 8, is lowered by any convenient means, such asthe generally indicated mechanism 9, onto the outside of the helmet, the latter being then held between the two heavy castings 4 and 7, the perforations 5 and 8 serving to give the quenching bath access to the helmet.
  • the quenching bath may be agitated if desired. In this fashion the helmet may bel mechanically restrained against deformation or distortion during its quenching and holding required for the production ofthe bainitic structure.
  • the result ofthe foregoing is a steel helmet having a crown and brim integrally made of quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an eiective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, the crown having a bainitic structure and the brim having a structure that is softer than the bainitic structure.
  • the helmet is made of the described low-alloy, molybdenum steel.
  • austenite transformation retarding alloy is present in an effective amount when it slows down the austenite-to-bainite transformation rate, within the temperature ranges causing austenite to transform, to a suiiicient degree to provide time for proper quenching of the helmet, so as to produce a properly bainitic structure having the necessary hardness and toughness.
  • An improved manufacture comprising a steel helmet having a crown and brim integrally made of quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an effective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, said crown having a, bainitic structure and' said brim having a structure that is softer than the bainitic structure.
  • An improved manufacture comprising a steel helmet having a crown and a brim and made of steel containing approximately .70% carbon, .70% manganese, .30% maximum silicon, .04% maximum phosphorus and sulphur, and from .20 to .39% molybdenum, and the remainder' iron, with the crown having a substantially bainitic structure and the brim a relatively softer structure.
  • a crown and a brim In a steel helmet, a crown and a brim, said crown being' of greater hardness than said brim.
  • a crown of low alloy7 bainitic steel and an integralsteel brim softer than said crown In a helmet, a crown of low alloy7 bainitic steel and an integralsteel brim softer than said crown.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Description

May 3, 1949- R. H. BARNES Erm.' 2,459,146
S TEEL HELME T `lorigixml Filed nec. `18, 1943 Patented May 3, 1949 STEEL HELMET Raleigh H. Barnes, deceased, late of Cleveland Heights, Ohio,
by Miriam M. Barnes, executrix,
Cleveland Heights, Ohio, and Harold J Elmendorf, Worcester, can Steel and Mass., assignors to The Ameri- Wire Company of New Jersey, a
corporation of New Jersey Original application December 18, 1943, Serial Divided and this cember 19, 1946, Serial No.
application De- 717,134
7 Claims. (Cl. 2 3) This invention is concerned with shaped armor and, particularly, with steel helmets.
At the present time, steel helmets are made from high-alloy, manganese steel, containing from 12% to 15% manganese, because it satisfactorily meets the present requirements in regard to resistance to fracturing and bulging in ballistic tests. Such steel is costly and might become unavailable because of its high manganese content.
considerable diiculty is encountered in shaping the helmet, which, sometimes, involves excessive breakage of the steel.
The present invention provides shaped armor and, particularly, steel helmets, that can meet present ballistic tests, by using any effectively quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an effective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, which would be a great advantage if manganese becomes unavailable, a further and immediately useful feature of the invention being that it permits relatively easy shaping of the armor by cold drawing and the steel used is much less expensive than the presently used high-alloy, manganese steel.
In the accompanying drawing:
Figure 1 is a view in perspective of a helmet made in accordance with the invention, and Figure 2 is a view, partially in vertical section of heat treating apparatus employed in making the helmet.
An example of a steel that is made suitable for use as light armor, by the present invention, is steel approximately containing ,70% carbon, .70% manganese, .30% maximum silicon, .04% maximum phosphorus and sulphur and from .20 to .30% molybdenum. While this particular steel is preferred, at present, any other low alloy composition steel may also be used providing it has sufficient carbon to be effectively quench hardened. Other examples of steels contemplated by this invention are to be found in chapter 5 ci the fifth edition of The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, published by Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation. In this text the steels contemplated are termed medium alloy steels but the present inventors prefer to consider them as low alloy steels, and where the latter term is used, herein, it is to be understood as meaning steels of the type described in chapter 5 of the named text, providing they contain suiiicient carbon to be eiectively quench hardening.
In making the helmet of the invention, of which that shown at 6 in Figure l is illustrative, the described steel is hot rolled to a iiat having a thickness requiring further reductions of from 30 to to giveit the thickness of the finished armor, this iiat then being spheroidized, which in the case of the exemplary steel may be by annealing it for about eight hours at about 1300 F. and then slow cooling it at a rate effecting spheroidizing Other spheroidizing treatments may also be used. Such spheroidizing is unnecessary if the hot rolling is carefully carried out to nish above the critical temperature of the steel, but it is always preferable.
The spheroidized flat is next cold rolled to about the thickness required by the contemplated armor, this producing a cold-rolled flat. The next step is to spheroidize this cold-rolled hat, the previously described annealing practice again being applicable, in the case of the particularly speciiied steel, although other spheroidizing treat- .ments might be resorted to. The necessity is to anneal to soften the cold-rolled steel. It is to be understood that the described cold rolling is carried out without any intermediate anneal so that the flat receives from 30 to '70% cold rolling prior to its second spheroidizing treatment, the amount being sumcient to give it the thickness required by the armor. After this second spheroidizing treatment it is considered preferable to give the spheroidized cold-rolled flat about a 1% cold rolling for the purpose of even further improving its now improved drawing properties.
Next, the spheroidized, cold-rolled flat is c'old drawn to the desired shape, is then austenitized by a proper heating cycle, and is then quench hardened by being quenched to within the temperature range producing the austenite-to-bainite transformation, and held within this range until substantial amounts of bainite are produced. In the case of the specific steel disclosed, the quenching temperature is so selected as to produce a Rockwell C hardness of approximately 48 to 50, and a toughness suiiicient to withstand present ballistic tests of the type given the highalloy, manganese steel.
During the holding of the steel within the temperature range producing the bainite from the austenite, it being understood that the steel is quenched to this temperature range at a rate at least no slower than its critical cooling rate, there may be some tendency for the shaped armor to deform. However, in the case of the present invention this is prevented by mechanically restraining the steel against deformation during the austenite-to-bainite transformation.
Applying the foregoing specifically to steel helmets, the steel is preferably hot rolled to a flat strip 18 inches wide and from .078 to .093 of an inch thick, this strip being then spheroidized as described, processed to clean it from any scale it might have acquired and then cold rolled to about a .044 of an inch thickness with no inter mediate annealing. Thereafter the steel strip is straightened and cut, given its final spheroidizing Each helmet is then austenitized by heating to approximately 1550 F. for a suitable period ofI time, and is then immediately quenched in a quenching medium maintained at the temperavture of approximately 650` F., the helmets being mechanically restrained against any deformation during this period and being held for approximately one hour, whereupon they will have the hardness previously noted and will be able to meet present ballistic tests.
Since the brim will have the same hardness of the crown, there may be some danger of the brim being cracked when struck by a bullet. To avoid this the edges of the helmet brim areA subjected to an annealing treatment ranging from 700 to 1200 F., for a very short time, so as to soften the edges by giving the steel around the periphery of the brim a soft steel structure. This treatment is best accomplished by subjecting the edge or rim of the helmet brim to the controlled iiame of a torch, or, more preferably, by dipping the edges of the helmet in a molten metal bath having the temperatures noted. It is to be understood that this softening of the brim is carried out so as not to materially affect the hardness of the crown.
In Figure 2 of the accompanying drawing there is schematically illustrated equipment suitable for mechanically retaining the helmet 6 during its austenite-to-bainite transformation.
In this figure the quenching bath l is held by a container 2 also containing a support 3 mounting a heavy castingll, tting the inside of the helmet, having perorations 5. The austenitized helmet 6 is thrust into the bath andA fitted over this casting d. Immediately thereafter, a second movable casting 1, fitting the outside-'of the helmet, having perforations 8, is lowered by any convenient means, such asthe generally indicated mechanism 9, onto the outside of the helmet, the latter being then held between the two heavy castings 4 and 7, the perforations 5 and 8 serving to give the quenching bath access to the helmet. The quenching bath may be agitated if desired. In this fashion the helmet may bel mechanically restrained against deformation or distortion during its quenching and holding required for the production ofthe bainitic structure.
The result ofthe foregoing is a steel helmet having a crown and brim integrally made of quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an eiective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, the crown having a bainitic structure and the brim having a structure that is softer than the bainitic structure. Preferably the helmet is made of the described low-alloy, molybdenum steel. It is to be understood that the austenite transformation retarding alloy is present in an effective amount when it slows down the austenite-to-bainite transformation rate, within the temperature ranges causing austenite to transform, to a suiiicient degree to provide time for proper quenching of the helmet, so as to produce a properly bainitic structure having the necessary hardness and toughness.
This application is a division of application Serial No. 514,844, led December 18, 1943, now abandoned.
We claim:
1. An improved manufacture comprising a steel helmet having a crown and brim integrally made of quench hardening steel of the low alloy class containing an effective amount of an austenite transformation retarding alloy, said crown having a, bainitic structure and' said brim having a structure that is softer than the bainitic structure.
2. An improved manufacture comprising a steel helmet having a crown and a brim and made of steel containing approximately .70% carbon, .70% manganese, .30% maximum silicon, .04% maximum phosphorus and sulphur, and from .20 to .39% molybdenum, and the remainder' iron, with the crown having a substantially bainitic structure and the brim a relatively softer structure.
3. In a steel helmet, a crown and a brim, said crown being' of greater hardness than said brim.
4. In a steel helmet, an integral crown and brim, said crown being of' greater hardness than said brim,
5. In a helmet, a crown of bainitic steel and a brim of steel softerthan bainitic steel.
6. In a helmet, a crown of bainitic steel and an integral brim of steel softer than bainitic steel.
-7. In a helmet, a crown of low alloy7 bainitic steel and an integralsteel brim softer than said crown.
MIRIAM M. BARNES, Exccutrz of the Estate of Raleigh H. Barnes,
Deceased.
HAROLDJ ELMENDORF.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the nie of this. patent:
UNITEB STATES PATENTS'
US717134A 1943-12-18 1946-12-19 Steel helmet Expired - Lifetime US2469146A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US717134A US2469146A (en) 1943-12-18 1946-12-19 Steel helmet

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US51484443A 1943-12-18 1943-12-18
US717134A US2469146A (en) 1943-12-18 1946-12-19 Steel helmet

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2469146A true US2469146A (en) 1949-05-03

Family

ID=27058332

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US717134A Expired - Lifetime US2469146A (en) 1943-12-18 1946-12-19 Steel helmet

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2469146A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2974941A (en) * 1957-08-02 1961-03-14 Hobdell Alan Cyril Manufacture of metal articles
US3552730A (en) * 1968-11-12 1971-01-05 Southington Mfg Inc Quenching device

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB156716A (en) * 1916-01-17 1921-11-24 Friedrich Schwerd Improvements in steel helmets
US1924099A (en) * 1931-11-20 1933-08-29 United States Steel Corp Thermally hardening steel

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB156716A (en) * 1916-01-17 1921-11-24 Friedrich Schwerd Improvements in steel helmets
US1924099A (en) * 1931-11-20 1933-08-29 United States Steel Corp Thermally hardening steel

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2974941A (en) * 1957-08-02 1961-03-14 Hobdell Alan Cyril Manufacture of metal articles
US3552730A (en) * 1968-11-12 1971-01-05 Southington Mfg Inc Quenching device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US1924099A (en) Thermally hardening steel
US2731403A (en) Manufacture of nickel-plated steel
CN105886717A (en) Normalizing method for forging waste heat of steel
GB1506029A (en) Method of making a low yield point coldreduced steel sheet by continuous annealing process
US2469146A (en) Steel helmet
US2531731A (en) Razor blade stock
GB1334022A (en) Process for continuously annealing steels
GB979512A (en) Improvements in or relating to the manufacture of steel cutting tools
US2395608A (en) Treating inherently precipitationhardenable chromium-nickel stainless steel
US2987429A (en) High-carbon razor blade stock and the like
US3223562A (en) Heat treating process for martensitic transformation alloys
US3459599A (en) Method of thermomechanically annealing steel
JPS58141333A (en) Heat treatment of forging
GB1179829A (en) Improved Method for the Manufacture of Razor Blades and Like Tools
US2624687A (en) Process of heat-treating alloy steel
US2924543A (en) Cold-finished steels and method for manufacturing same
US2924544A (en) Metallurgical process for cold-finishing steel
US3009843A (en) Steel products and method for producing same
KR830004429A (en) Manufacturing method of spheroidized annealed steel wire
US2365956A (en) Thermally hardening steel
US3235413A (en) Method of producing steel products with improved properties
US2832711A (en) Method of continuously annealing steel strip
US2378300A (en) Method of heat treating alloy steel
US4313772A (en) Continuous heat-treatment process for steel strip
US3210221A (en) Steel products and method for producing same