US20140034322A1 - Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas - Google Patents

Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140034322A1
US20140034322A1 US14/047,592 US201314047592A US2014034322A1 US 20140034322 A1 US20140034322 A1 US 20140034322A1 US 201314047592 A US201314047592 A US 201314047592A US 2014034322 A1 US2014034322 A1 US 2014034322A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
well
fluid
servicing fluid
well servicing
chosen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/047,592
Inventor
D.V. Satyanarayana Gupta
Harpreet Singh Dinsa
Ronald Casey Plasier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US12/855,894 external-priority patent/US8550165B2/en
Application filed by Baker Hughes Inc filed Critical Baker Hughes Inc
Priority to US14/047,592 priority Critical patent/US20140034322A1/en
Assigned to BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED reassignment BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DINSA, HARPREET SINGH, PLASIER, RONALD CASEY, GUPTA, D.V. SATYANARAYANA
Publication of US20140034322A1 publication Critical patent/US20140034322A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2014/056817 priority patent/WO2015053928A1/en
Priority to MX2016004038A priority patent/MX2016004038A/en
Priority to CN201480055477.8A priority patent/CN105722943A/en
Priority to ARP140103742A priority patent/AR097958A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/52Compositions for preventing, limiting or eliminating depositions, e.g. for cleaning
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/66Compositions based on water or polar solvents
    • C09K8/68Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/64Oil-based compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/70Compositions for forming crevices or fractures characterised by their form or by the form of their components, e.g. foams
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/82Oil-based compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/92Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation characterised by their form or by the form of their components, e.g. encapsulated material
    • C09K8/94Foams
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K2208/00Aspects relating to compositions of drilling or well treatment fluids
    • C09K2208/28Friction or drag reducing additives

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to a method for servicing a well with a fluid comprising a friction reducer and a nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • Natural resources such as gas and oil can be recovered from subterranean formations using well-known techniques.
  • the processes for preparing a well bore for the recovery of such resources often employ various well bore servicing fluids.
  • One example of such fluids is hydraulic fracturing fluid, or “frac fluid”.
  • Frac fluids are employed in hydraulic fracturing, which is a common stimulation technique used to enhance production of fluids from subterranean formations in, for example, oil, gas, coal bed methane and geothermal wells.
  • a viscosified fracturing fluid is pumped at high pressures and high rates into a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation to initiate and propagate a hydraulic fracture in the formation.
  • proppant e.g., graded sand, ceramic particles, bauxite, or resin coated sand
  • the proppant becomes deposited into the fractures, forming a permeable proppant pack.
  • the fracture closes onto the proppant pack, which maintains the fracture and provides a fluid pathway for hydrocarbons and/or other formation fluids to flow into the wellbore.
  • slick water fracturing fluids which employ a friction reducer, but which often do not employ a viscosifying agent, is well known in the industry.
  • Most friction reducers used in slickwater fracture stimulation are high molecular weight polyacrylamides in water based mineral oil emulsions.
  • concentrations of friction reducer typically employed in slickwater fracturing fluids which concentrations typically range from about 0.5 gpt to 2 gpt, it is believed that the mineral oil and polyacrylamide in the emulsions can cause a buildup of polymer cake residue that can damage the well formations. For this reason, breakers are sometimes introduced into the slick water fracturing fluids to reduce the size of the polymer chains, and thereby potentially reduce fracture and formation damage.
  • Well servicing fluids that contain water can also damage some well formations due to adverse water saturation effects, which can include what is known as sub-irreducible water saturation.
  • these formations When exposed to aqueous based fluids, these formations will trap water for long periods of time (e.g., permanently). The saturation of the formation with water can result in reduced permeability to hydrocarbons, which in turn can cause reduced productivity of the well.
  • An embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a method of servicing a well.
  • the method comprises providing a well servicing fluid.
  • the well servicing fluid is formulated with the following components comprising, at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides polyalphaolefins; and a nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • the well servicing fluid is introduced into the well.
  • nonaqueous and/or hydrocarbon based well servicing fluids with reduced friction pressures can be formed; in some instances the friction reducing agents may provide relative ease of mixing with hydrocarbons; or the methods of the present application may provide reduced damage to well formations due to relatively low friction reducer treat rates and/or the ability to use nonaqueous well servicing fluids.
  • FIG. 1 shows a graph of friction loop pressure and flow rate versus RPM for 0.5 L/m 3 of FLO® MXC and FLO MXA Friction Reducers compared with 0.5 L/m 3 F-100 and 5 L/m 3 F-100, all mixed with FRACSOLTMat 30° C.
  • FIG. 2 show a graph of friction reduction verse Reynolds Number for 0.5 L/m 3 of FLO® MXC and FLO MXA Friction Reducers compared with 5 L/m 3 F-100, all mixed with FRACSOLTM at 30° C.
  • the present disclosure is directed to a method of servicing a well, such as, for example, natural gas, geothermal, coal bed methane or oil field wells.
  • the method comprises providing a well servicing fluid formulated with components comprising: at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides and polyalphaolefins.
  • the well servicing fluid can be introduced into the well to perform various tasks, such as fracturing, frac packing or coiled tubing cleaning, as will be discussed in greater detail below.
  • the friction reducers are polymers capable of reducing friction pressure in a nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • suitable friction reducers include polyalphaolefins.
  • the monomers used to form the polymer can be alpha olefins having from about 4 to about 16 carbon atoms.
  • the polymer is a polyalphaolefin homopolymer.
  • the polymer is a polyalphaolefin heteropolymer comprising at least two different alpha olefin repeating units.
  • Other suitable friction reducers include polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, and polyalkylene oxides. Mixtures of any of the polymer friction reducers described herein can also be employed.
  • the friction reducer can be polymerized using any suitable techniques. Examples of suitable techniques are well known in the art.
  • the resulting polymers can have molecular weights of, for example, above 10 million per analysis by gel permeation chromatography (GPC).
  • suitable polyalphaolefins include the FLOC family of drag reducing agents available from Baker Pipeline Products, a division of Baker Performance Chemicals, Inc. These FLO family polyalphaolefins include FLO 1004, FLO 1005, FLO 1008, FLO 1010, FLO 1012, FLO 1020 and FLO 1022, among others.
  • the friction reducer can be in any suitable form that is capable of dissolution and/or mixing with the nonaqueous carrier fluid, such as a dispersion or liquid.
  • the friction reducer is a dispersion comprising polyalphaolefin particles.
  • the dispersion can further comprise at least one nonsolvent. Any suitable nonsolvent can be employed, including one or more compounds chosen from alcohols, including glycols and alkyl alcohols, such as isopropyl alcohol; glycol ethers, such as propylene glycol ether; ketones and esters.
  • a nonsolvent of the friction reducer is a material that does not dissolve the dispersed phase, e.g., the particles, in the friction reducer dispersion.
  • the nonsolvents can have, for example, from 2 to 6 carbon atoms.
  • the at least one nonsolvent comprises a glycol ether and an alkyl alcohol.
  • the dispersions employed in the present disclosure can contain other ingredients, such as solvents and anti-agglomeration agents.
  • suitable dispersions can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,733,953 and 7,256,224, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
  • suitable commercial dispersions include FLO MX®, FLO MXC and FLO MXA drag reducing agent dispersions, all of which are available from Baker Petrolite Corp., which is a subsidiary of Baker Hughes of Houston Texas.
  • the concentration of friction reducer can vary depending on, among other things, the type of friction reducer, the carrier fluid in which it is used and the application for which the well servicing fluid is being employed.
  • Friction reducer concentrations can range, for example, from about 0.1 gptg (gallons per thousand gallons) to about 10 gptg, based on the total well servicing fluid, such as about 0.5 gptg to about 1 gptg. Ratios and concentrations outside of these ranges can also be employed.
  • nonaqueous carrier fluid that is usable for servicing a well
  • nonaqueous fracturing fluids or coiled tubing cleaning fluids can be employed. Examples of such fluids are well known in the art.
  • nonaqueous carrier fluid as used herein is defined to mean a carrier fluid that contains 5% water by weight or less, based on the total weight of the carrier fluid. In embodiments, the nonaqueous carrier fluid can contain 1% by weight water or less, or substantially no water.
  • the nonaqueous carrier fluid comprises a hydrocarbon.
  • a hydrocarbon Any hydrocarbon that is suitable as a well servicing fluid, such as for fracturing, can be employed.
  • Suitable hydrocarbons include compressed hydrocarbon gas, such as liquefied hydrocarbon gas. That is, hydrocarbon gas may be compressed into a denser phase than occurs at atmospheric pressure or further compressed to the point that the gas is liquefied. Examples include compressed methane, propane, butane, or natural gas. Since compressed hydrocarbon gas might be available already at a well site, it may be beneficially used instead of other hydrocarbons that would be transported to the well site.
  • liquefied petroleum gas such as liquefied natural gas, or liquid carbon dioxide
  • a nonaqueous carrier fluid such as a nonaqueous fracturing fluid
  • suitable hydrocarbons include aliphatic C 6 to C 18 hydrocarbons, such as heptanes, octanes, nonanes, decanes, undecanes, dodecanes, tridecanes, tetradecanes, pentadecanes, and hexadecanes; and aromatic hydrocarbons, such as toluene and benzenes, including benzene, ethylbenzene, 1,2-dimethylbenzene, 1,3-dimethylbenzene, 1,4-dimethylbenzene, and trimethylbenzene; and mixtures of any of the above hydrocarbons.
  • the nonaqueous carrier can comprise aromatic hydrocarbons and aliphatic hydrocarbons.
  • the energy used to return liquids to the surface after a fracturing treatment is supplied to the formation.
  • removal of the treating composition is difficult and it sometimes remains for a time in the formation to interfere with production.
  • developments in recent years use a gas or a gas-forming material admixed with treating fluids as they are injected down a well and into the formation. Treating pressures are substantially higher than the pressure existing in the formation; therefore, the gas present in the treating fluid is compressed to some extent.
  • Gas or gas-forming material in the treating fluid provides an energy source to assist in removal of the treating fluid after the treatment has been completed by serving as a driving force to push the treating fluid back out of the formation.
  • N 2 and CO 2 Materials heretofore suggested for this purpose have been N 2 and CO 2 .
  • CO 2 can be successfully injected as a liquid.
  • N 2 due to the physical characteristics of N 2 , i.e., its extremely low critical temperature, it is customarily injected as a gas. Therefore, N 2 is limited in its usefulness and acceptability.
  • CO 2 has a critical temperature of 88° F. and a critical pressure of 1072 pounds/inch 2 . These properties permit it to be injected as a liquid and thereafter to vaporize in the formation as the temperature of the injected fluid rises due to the heat of the formation.
  • a fluid that includes a liquefied gas, at least in part, and remains a liquid during the injection and treatment. Thereafter, the liquefied gas may revert to a gas, upon release of pressure at the wellhead and appreciable contact of the fluid with the warmer lower strata.
  • a compressed hydrocarbon fluid is employed of which the critical temperature and critical pressure can be adjusted to provide these conditions.
  • the compressed hydrocarbon fluid does not damage the formation and the flow back fluid might directly be put on a production pipeline without need for any treatment.
  • hydrocarbons examples include FRACSOLTM, which is available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and which contains a mixture of C 7 to C 16 alkanes, toluene, benzene and xylene, as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,499,679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety; and XYSOL, a hydrocarbon suitable as a nonaqueous carrier fluid available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • FRACSOLTM which is available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and which contains a mixture of C 7 to C 16 alkanes, toluene, benzene and xylene, as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,499,679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety
  • XYSOL a hydrocarbon suitable as a nonaqueous carrier fluid available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta
  • the concentration of carrier fluid can vary depending on the type of carrier fluid and the application for which the well servicing fluid is being employed.
  • nonaqueous carrier concentrations can range, for example, from about 90% by weight or more, such as about 98% by weight to about 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the well servicing fluid.
  • a viscosifying agent is a viscosifying agent.
  • Any viscosifying agent suitable for adjusting the viscosity of nonaqueous fluids can potentially be used.
  • the viscosifying agent can be an oil gelling agent, such as a phosphate ester or an aluminum soap or aluminum fatty acid salt.
  • Employing phosphate esters, aluminums soaps or aluminum fatty acid salts as gelling agents is generally well known in the art.
  • the well servicing fluids do not include viscosifying agents, such as phosphate esters or aluminum soaps or aluminum fatty acid salts. Reducing or eliminating phosphate esters can have advantages, as phosphate esters are known to poison refinery catalysts and may have detrimental effects on the environment.
  • Proppants can be mixed with the well servicing fluids of the present application. Any suitable proppant can be employed. Proppants are generally well known for use in fracturing fluids. Examples of suitable proppant include graded sand, glass or ceramic beads or particles, sized calcium carbonate and other sized salts, bauxite grains, resin coated sand, walnut shell fragments, aluminum pellets, nylon pellets, and combinations of the above.
  • Proppants are well known to be used in concentrations ranging from about 0.05 to about 14 pounds per gallon (about 6 to about 1700 kg/m 3 ) of fracturing fluid composition, but higher or lower concentrations can be used as desired for the particular fracture design.
  • Known techniques for using proppant in liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, or liquid carbon dioxide nonaqueous carrier fluids may be used with compressed hydrocarbon gas as the nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • the well servicing fluid can further comprise either one or both of nitrogen gas (N 2 ) or carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), unless the nonaqueous carrier fluid is compressed hydrocarbon gas.
  • the nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide can be used to form a foam or emulsion with the well servicing fluid; the carbon dioxide is soluble in hydrocarbons and can alternatively be present as dissolved carbon dioxide.
  • Employing nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide in well servicing fluids is well known. It can provide various benefits, including reduced damage to the formation, improved cleanup, favorable energy transfer in the wellbore and good proppant carrying capability.
  • the well servicing fluid can comprise at least one additional compound chosen from breakers, non-emulsifiers, clay stabilization additives, scale dissolvers, biopolymer degradation additives, fluid loss control additives, high temperature stabilizers, and other common and/or optional components.
  • breakers are the only other ingredient used in compressed hydrocarbon gas as the nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • the well servicing fluid can comprise relatively low concentrations of hydrocarbons that are not compressed gas, such as about 5% by weight or less, including, for example, about 2% by weight or less. In an embodiment, the well servicing fluid comprises substantially no hydrocarbons other than those that are compressed gas.
  • the ingredients of the well servicing fluid can be combined in any suitable order using any suitable technique.
  • the friction reducer can be mixed with the nonaqueous carrier fluid, such as compressed hydrocarbon gas, prior to, or simultaneous with, introduction of the well servicing fluid into the well.
  • the nonaqueous carrier fluid such as compressed hydrocarbon gas
  • the well servicing fluids of the present application can be employed as fracturing or frac pack fluids. Any suitable fracturing or frac packing technique can be employed. Various techniques for fracturing and frac packing wells are generally well known in the art.
  • the well servicing fluid which comprises a nonaqueous carrier fluid and a friction reducer of the present disclosure, is pumped into the well at a rate and a pressure sufficient to form fractures that extend into the subterranean formation, thereby providing additional pathways through which fluids being produced can flow into the well bores.
  • the well servicing fluid can include a proppant, including, for example, any of the proppants discussed herein. The proppant becomes deposited into the fractures and thus holds the fractures open after the pressure exerted on the fracturing fluid has been released.
  • any of the methods described herein can comprise removing the well servicing fluid from the well after the fluid contacts the formation. This removing step can be aided by gas pressure caused by carbon dioxide or nitrogen gas. Contacting the formation with the well service fluid and then removing the fluid can remove water from the formation. For effective removal of water from the formation, it is preferred that the well servicing fluid have reduced levels of water, such as any of the relatively low water concentrations discussed herein above.
  • the removed well servicing fluid can be recovered, recycled or disposed of according to industry standard practices.
  • Removing the well servicing fluid can be performed at any time after the fluid contacts the formation.
  • the contacting step can be performed for a sufficient time for removing water, followed by the removing step.
  • the well can be “shut in”, where the contacting step is performed for a prolonged period of time.
  • the length of time can be as short as immediate flow back or for up to several days (e.g. 2 or 3 days) shut in.
  • the above compositions were tested using a friction loop test apparatus.
  • the test apparatus included a 10 foot long, 1 ⁇ 4 inch outer diameter and 0.173 inch inner tubing equipped with a pressure gauge to measure friction pressure.
  • a triplex pump attached to an intake was used to pump the fluid from a 4 L container via an intake and into the 1 ⁇ 4 inch tubing.
  • the 1 ⁇ 4 inch tubing was positioned so that the fluid flowed from the tubing into an inverted carboy having a 1 inch inner diameter coiled tubing to reduce velocity of the fluid.
  • the discharge from the carboy was returned to the 4 L container to complete the loop.
  • a site glass was positioned to allow viewing of the fluid flow through the test apparatus.
  • the above general procedure was used to test the following example compositions.
  • the F-100 used in Examples C and E is a high molecular weight polyacrylate based oil soluble friction reducer, available from BJ Services Company LLC of Houston, Tex.
  • FIG. 1 shows the friction loop pressure and flow rate versus RPM for compositions A-E above.
  • each of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions provided significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the FRACSOL alone.
  • the FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions at 1/10 the concentration (0.5 L/m 3 ), provided comparable or slightly better results than the F-100 at about ten times the concentration (5 L/m 3 ); and significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the F-100 at 0.5 L/m 3 .
  • FIG. 1 shows the friction loop pressure and flow rate versus RPM for compositions A-E above.
  • each of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions provided significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the FRACSOL alone.
  • the FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions at 1/10 the concentration (0.5 L/m 3 ) provided comparable or slightly better results than the F-100 at about ten times the concentration (5 L/m 3 ); and significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the F-
  • both the 0.5 L/m 3 FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions showed a comparable percent reduction in friction to F-100 at 5 L/m 3 when plotted verses Reynolds number. Additional testing showed that the 0.5 L/m 3 of each of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC friction reducers gave the same results as when the concentrations of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC were increased to 1 L/m 3 to 5 L/m 3 in FRACSOL.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to a method of servicing a well. The method comprises providing a well servicing fluid. The well servicing fluid is formulated with the following components comprising, at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides, and polyalphaolefins; and a nonaqueous carrier fluid. The well servicing fluid is introduced into the well.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION DATA
  • The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. app. Ser. No. 12/855,894, filed Aug. 13, 2010 and entitled WELL SERVICING FLUID, which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • The present disclosure relates generally to a method for servicing a well with a fluid comprising a friction reducer and a nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Natural resources such as gas and oil can be recovered from subterranean formations using well-known techniques. The processes for preparing a well bore for the recovery of such resources often employ various well bore servicing fluids. One example of such fluids is hydraulic fracturing fluid, or “frac fluid”.
  • Frac fluids are employed in hydraulic fracturing, which is a common stimulation technique used to enhance production of fluids from subterranean formations in, for example, oil, gas, coal bed methane and geothermal wells. In a typical hydraulic fracturing treatment operation, a viscosified fracturing fluid is pumped at high pressures and high rates into a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation to initiate and propagate a hydraulic fracture in the formation. Subsequent stages of viscosified fracturing fluid containing particulate matter known as proppant, e.g., graded sand, ceramic particles, bauxite, or resin coated sand, are then typically pumped into the created fracture. The proppant becomes deposited into the fractures, forming a permeable proppant pack. Once the treatment is completed, the fracture closes onto the proppant pack, which maintains the fracture and provides a fluid pathway for hydrocarbons and/or other formation fluids to flow into the wellbore.
  • The use of slick water fracturing fluids, which employ a friction reducer, but which often do not employ a viscosifying agent, is well known in the industry. Most friction reducers used in slickwater fracture stimulation are high molecular weight polyacrylamides in water based mineral oil emulsions. However, at the concentrations of friction reducer typically employed in slickwater fracturing fluids, which concentrations typically range from about 0.5 gpt to 2 gpt, it is believed that the mineral oil and polyacrylamide in the emulsions can cause a buildup of polymer cake residue that can damage the well formations. For this reason, breakers are sometimes introduced into the slick water fracturing fluids to reduce the size of the polymer chains, and thereby potentially reduce fracture and formation damage.
  • Well servicing fluids that contain water, such as frac fluids, can also damage some well formations due to adverse water saturation effects, which can include what is known as sub-irreducible water saturation. When exposed to aqueous based fluids, these formations will trap water for long periods of time (e.g., permanently). The saturation of the formation with water can result in reduced permeability to hydrocarbons, which in turn can cause reduced productivity of the well.
  • These water retention issues are not limited to fracturing fluids, but can result from any well servicing fluids that are aqueous based, including those used during drilling, completion and work over operations. For formations that are not compatible with water, the use of these aqueous based fluids can be a major cause of productivity impairment in hydrocarbon wells.
  • Thus, there exists a need for improved well servicing fluids that can reduce or eliminate one or more of the problems discussed above.
  • SUMMARY
  • An embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a method of servicing a well. The method comprises providing a well servicing fluid. The well servicing fluid is formulated with the following components comprising, at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides polyalphaolefins; and a nonaqueous carrier fluid. The well servicing fluid is introduced into the well.
  • It has been found that by employing the well servicing fluids of the present disclosure, one or more of the following advantages can be realized: nonaqueous and/or hydrocarbon based well servicing fluids with reduced friction pressures can be formed; in some instances the friction reducing agents may provide relative ease of mixing with hydrocarbons; or the methods of the present application may provide reduced damage to well formations due to relatively low friction reducer treat rates and/or the ability to use nonaqueous well servicing fluids.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a graph of friction loop pressure and flow rate versus RPM for 0.5 L/m3 of FLO® MXC and FLO MXA Friction Reducers compared with 0.5 L/m3 F-100 and 5 L/m3 F-100, all mixed with FRACSOL™at 30° C.
  • FIG. 2 show a graph of friction reduction verse Reynolds Number for 0.5 L/m3 of FLO® MXC and FLO MXA Friction Reducers compared with 5 L/m3 F-100, all mixed with FRACSOL™ at 30° C.
  • While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the invention as defined by the appended claims.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present disclosure is directed to a method of servicing a well, such as, for example, natural gas, geothermal, coal bed methane or oil field wells. The method comprises providing a well servicing fluid formulated with components comprising: at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides and polyalphaolefins. The well servicing fluid can be introduced into the well to perform various tasks, such as fracturing, frac packing or coiled tubing cleaning, as will be discussed in greater detail below.
  • Friction Reducer
  • The friction reducers are polymers capable of reducing friction pressure in a nonaqueous carrier fluid. Examples of suitable friction reducers include polyalphaolefins. In an embodiment, the monomers used to form the polymer can be alpha olefins having from about 4 to about 16 carbon atoms. In an embodiment, the polymer is a polyalphaolefin homopolymer. In another embodiment, the polymer is a polyalphaolefin heteropolymer comprising at least two different alpha olefin repeating units. Other suitable friction reducers include polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, and polyalkylene oxides. Mixtures of any of the polymer friction reducers described herein can also be employed.
  • The friction reducer can be polymerized using any suitable techniques. Examples of suitable techniques are well known in the art. In an embodiment, the resulting polymers can have molecular weights of, for example, above 10 million per analysis by gel permeation chromatography (GPC).
  • Examples of suitable polyalphaolefins include the FLOC family of drag reducing agents available from Baker Pipeline Products, a division of Baker Performance Chemicals, Inc. These FLO family polyalphaolefins include FLO 1004, FLO 1005, FLO 1008, FLO 1010, FLO 1012, FLO 1020 and FLO 1022, among others.
  • The friction reducer can be in any suitable form that is capable of dissolution and/or mixing with the nonaqueous carrier fluid, such as a dispersion or liquid. In an embodiment, the friction reducer is a dispersion comprising polyalphaolefin particles. The dispersion can further comprise at least one nonsolvent. Any suitable nonsolvent can be employed, including one or more compounds chosen from alcohols, including glycols and alkyl alcohols, such as isopropyl alcohol; glycol ethers, such as propylene glycol ether; ketones and esters. A nonsolvent of the friction reducer is a material that does not dissolve the dispersed phase, e.g., the particles, in the friction reducer dispersion. The nonsolvents can have, for example, from 2 to 6 carbon atoms. In an embodiment, the at least one nonsolvent comprises a glycol ether and an alkyl alcohol.
  • The dispersions employed in the present disclosure can contain other ingredients, such as solvents and anti-agglomeration agents. Examples of suitable dispersions can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,733,953 and 7,256,224, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Examples of suitable commercial dispersions include FLO MX®, FLO MXC and FLO MXA drag reducing agent dispersions, all of which are available from Baker Petrolite Corp., which is a subsidiary of Baker Hughes of Houston Texas.
  • The concentration of friction reducer can vary depending on, among other things, the type of friction reducer, the carrier fluid in which it is used and the application for which the well servicing fluid is being employed. Friction reducer concentrations can range, for example, from about 0.1 gptg (gallons per thousand gallons) to about 10 gptg, based on the total well servicing fluid, such as about 0.5 gptg to about 1 gptg. Ratios and concentrations outside of these ranges can also be employed.
  • Nonaqueous Carrier Fluid
  • Any suitable nonaqueous carrier fluid that is usable for servicing a well can be employed. For example, nonaqueous fracturing fluids or coiled tubing cleaning fluids can be employed. Examples of such fluids are well known in the art. The term “nonaqueous carrier fluid” as used herein is defined to mean a carrier fluid that contains 5% water by weight or less, based on the total weight of the carrier fluid. In embodiments, the nonaqueous carrier fluid can contain 1% by weight water or less, or substantially no water.
  • In an embodiment, the nonaqueous carrier fluid comprises a hydrocarbon. Any hydrocarbon that is suitable as a well servicing fluid, such as for fracturing, can be employed. Suitable hydrocarbons include compressed hydrocarbon gas, such as liquefied hydrocarbon gas. That is, hydrocarbon gas may be compressed into a denser phase than occurs at atmospheric pressure or further compressed to the point that the gas is liquefied. Examples include compressed methane, propane, butane, or natural gas. Since compressed hydrocarbon gas might be available already at a well site, it may be beneficially used instead of other hydrocarbons that would be transported to the well site. Known techniques for using liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, or liquid carbon dioxide as a nonaqueous carrier fluid, such as a nonaqueous fracturing fluid, may be used to implement compressed hydrocarbon gas as a nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • Other examples of suitable hydrocarbons include aliphatic C6 to C18 hydrocarbons, such as heptanes, octanes, nonanes, decanes, undecanes, dodecanes, tridecanes, tetradecanes, pentadecanes, and hexadecanes; and aromatic hydrocarbons, such as toluene and benzenes, including benzene, ethylbenzene, 1,2-dimethylbenzene, 1,3-dimethylbenzene, 1,4-dimethylbenzene, and trimethylbenzene; and mixtures of any of the above hydrocarbons. In an embodiment, the nonaqueous carrier can comprise aromatic hydrocarbons and aliphatic hydrocarbons.
  • The energy used to return liquids to the surface after a fracturing treatment is supplied to the formation. In instances where low bottom hole pressure exists and where natural permeability is low, removal of the treating composition is difficult and it sometimes remains for a time in the formation to interfere with production. To alleviate this problem, developments in recent years use a gas or a gas-forming material admixed with treating fluids as they are injected down a well and into the formation. Treating pressures are substantially higher than the pressure existing in the formation; therefore, the gas present in the treating fluid is compressed to some extent. Gas or gas-forming material in the treating fluid provides an energy source to assist in removal of the treating fluid after the treatment has been completed by serving as a driving force to push the treating fluid back out of the formation.
  • Materials heretofore suggested for this purpose have been N2 and CO2. CO2 can be successfully injected as a liquid. However, due to the physical characteristics of N2, i.e., its extremely low critical temperature, it is customarily injected as a gas. Therefore, N2 is limited in its usefulness and acceptability. CO2 has a critical temperature of 88° F. and a critical pressure of 1072 pounds/inch2. These properties permit it to be injected as a liquid and thereafter to vaporize in the formation as the temperature of the injected fluid rises due to the heat of the formation.
  • From the above reference to known practice, those of ordinary skill will appreciate the benefit of a fluid that includes a liquefied gas, at least in part, and remains a liquid during the injection and treatment. Thereafter, the liquefied gas may revert to a gas, upon release of pressure at the wellhead and appreciable contact of the fluid with the warmer lower strata. This can be attained if a compressed hydrocarbon fluid is employed of which the critical temperature and critical pressure can be adjusted to provide these conditions. In addition, the compressed hydrocarbon fluid does not damage the formation and the flow back fluid might directly be put on a production pipeline without need for any treatment.
  • Examples of commercially available hydrocarbons include FRACSOL™, which is available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and which contains a mixture of C7 to C16 alkanes, toluene, benzene and xylene, as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,499,679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety; and XYSOL, a hydrocarbon suitable as a nonaqueous carrier fluid available from Enerchem, located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • The concentration of carrier fluid can vary depending on the type of carrier fluid and the application for which the well servicing fluid is being employed. For other than compressed hydrocarbon gas, nonaqueous carrier concentrations can range, for example, from about 90% by weight or more, such as about 98% by weight to about 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the well servicing fluid.
  • Viscosifying Agents
  • Another optional ingredient that may be employed in the well servicing fluids is a viscosifying agent. Any viscosifying agent suitable for adjusting the viscosity of nonaqueous fluids can potentially be used. For example, the viscosifying agent can be an oil gelling agent, such as a phosphate ester or an aluminum soap or aluminum fatty acid salt. Employing phosphate esters, aluminums soaps or aluminum fatty acid salts as gelling agents is generally well known in the art.
  • In an embodiment, the well servicing fluids do not include viscosifying agents, such as phosphate esters or aluminum soaps or aluminum fatty acid salts. Reducing or eliminating phosphate esters can have advantages, as phosphate esters are known to poison refinery catalysts and may have detrimental effects on the environment.
  • Proppants
  • Proppants can be mixed with the well servicing fluids of the present application. Any suitable proppant can be employed. Proppants are generally well known for use in fracturing fluids. Examples of suitable proppant include graded sand, glass or ceramic beads or particles, sized calcium carbonate and other sized salts, bauxite grains, resin coated sand, walnut shell fragments, aluminum pellets, nylon pellets, and combinations of the above.
  • Proppants are well known to be used in concentrations ranging from about 0.05 to about 14 pounds per gallon (about 6 to about 1700 kg/m3) of fracturing fluid composition, but higher or lower concentrations can be used as desired for the particular fracture design. Known techniques for using proppant in liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, or liquid carbon dioxide nonaqueous carrier fluids may be used with compressed hydrocarbon gas as the nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • Nitrogen Gas and Carbon Dioxide
  • The well servicing fluid can further comprise either one or both of nitrogen gas (N2) or carbon dioxide (CO2), unless the nonaqueous carrier fluid is compressed hydrocarbon gas. The nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide can be used to form a foam or emulsion with the well servicing fluid; the carbon dioxide is soluble in hydrocarbons and can alternatively be present as dissolved carbon dioxide. Employing nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide in well servicing fluids is well known. It can provide various benefits, including reduced damage to the formation, improved cleanup, favorable energy transfer in the wellbore and good proppant carrying capability.
  • Other Ingredients
  • The well servicing fluid can comprise at least one additional compound chosen from breakers, non-emulsifiers, clay stabilization additives, scale dissolvers, biopolymer degradation additives, fluid loss control additives, high temperature stabilizers, and other common and/or optional components. Often, breakers are the only other ingredient used in compressed hydrocarbon gas as the nonaqueous carrier fluid.
  • In an embodiment, the well servicing fluid can comprise relatively low concentrations of hydrocarbons that are not compressed gas, such as about 5% by weight or less, including, for example, about 2% by weight or less. In an embodiment, the well servicing fluid comprises substantially no hydrocarbons other than those that are compressed gas.
  • The ingredients of the well servicing fluid can be combined in any suitable order using any suitable technique. For example, the friction reducer can be mixed with the nonaqueous carrier fluid, such as compressed hydrocarbon gas, prior to, or simultaneous with, introduction of the well servicing fluid into the well. One of ordinary skill in the art would be able to formulate the well servicing fluids without undue experimentation given the guidance provided by the present disclosure.
  • As discussed above, the well servicing fluids of the present application can be employed as fracturing or frac pack fluids. Any suitable fracturing or frac packing technique can be employed. Various techniques for fracturing and frac packing wells are generally well known in the art. In an embodiment, the well servicing fluid, which comprises a nonaqueous carrier fluid and a friction reducer of the present disclosure, is pumped into the well at a rate and a pressure sufficient to form fractures that extend into the subterranean formation, thereby providing additional pathways through which fluids being produced can flow into the well bores. In an embodiment, the well servicing fluid can include a proppant, including, for example, any of the proppants discussed herein. The proppant becomes deposited into the fractures and thus holds the fractures open after the pressure exerted on the fracturing fluid has been released.
  • Any of the methods described herein can comprise removing the well servicing fluid from the well after the fluid contacts the formation. This removing step can be aided by gas pressure caused by carbon dioxide or nitrogen gas. Contacting the formation with the well service fluid and then removing the fluid can remove water from the formation. For effective removal of water from the formation, it is preferred that the well servicing fluid have reduced levels of water, such as any of the relatively low water concentrations discussed herein above. The removed well servicing fluid can be recovered, recycled or disposed of according to industry standard practices.
  • Removing the well servicing fluid can be performed at any time after the fluid contacts the formation. For example, the contacting step can be performed for a sufficient time for removing water, followed by the removing step. Alternatively, the well can be “shut in”, where the contacting step is performed for a prolonged period of time. The length of time can be as short as immediate flow back or for up to several days (e.g. 2 or 3 days) shut in.
  • While the well servicing fluids have been described herein as fracturing fluids, it is expected that the fluids of the present application will find utility in completion fluids, gravel pack fluids, stimulation fluids and the like.
  • The present application will be further described with respect to the following Examples, which are not meant to limit the invention, but rather to further illustrate the various embodiments.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The above compositions were tested using a friction loop test apparatus. The test apparatus included a 10 foot long, ¼ inch outer diameter and 0.173 inch inner tubing equipped with a pressure gauge to measure friction pressure. A triplex pump attached to an intake was used to pump the fluid from a 4 L container via an intake and into the ¼ inch tubing. The ¼ inch tubing was positioned so that the fluid flowed from the tubing into an inverted carboy having a 1 inch inner diameter coiled tubing to reduce velocity of the fluid. The discharge from the carboy was returned to the 4 L container to complete the loop. A site glass was positioned to allow viewing of the fluid flow through the test apparatus.
  • Using the above described friction loop test apparatus, the following general procedure was followed: 4 L of FRACSOL was poured into the 4 L container. The pump was turned on and the fluid was circulated through the friction loop until air bubbles were no longer observed in the site glass. The base line friction pressure readings for FRACSOL at 300-1500 rpm were taken. The friction reducer was then added to the FRACSOL and allowed to mix at approximately 30° Celsius for 4 minutes at 1200 rpm. The friction pressure and temperature of the friction reduced fluid was recorded at 300 rpm, 600 rpm, 900 rpm and 1200 rpm.
  • The above general procedure was used to test the following example compositions. The F-100 used in Examples C and E is a high molecular weight polyacrylate based oil soluble friction reducer, available from BJ Services Company LLC of Houston, Tex.
  • A. 4 L FRACSOL
  • B. 4 L FRACSOL
      • 0.5 L/m3 Baker Petrolite FLO® MXA
  • C. 4 L FRACSOL
      • 5 L/m3 F-100
  • D. 4 L FRACSOL
      • 0.5 L/m3 Baker Petrolite FLO MXC
  • E. 4 L FRACSOL
      • 0.5 L/m3 F-100
  • The results of the friction tests are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 1 shows the friction loop pressure and flow rate versus RPM for compositions A-E above. As shown, each of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions provided significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the FRACSOL alone. The FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions at 1/10 the concentration (0.5 L/m3), provided comparable or slightly better results than the F-100 at about ten times the concentration (5 L/m3); and significantly reduced friction loop pressures than the F-100 at 0.5 L/m3. As shown in FIG. 2, both the 0.5 L/m3 FLO MXA and FLO MXC compositions showed a comparable percent reduction in friction to F-100 at 5 L/m3 when plotted verses Reynolds number. Additional testing showed that the 0.5 L/m3 of each of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC friction reducers gave the same results as when the concentrations of the FLO MXA and FLO MXC were increased to 1 L/m3 to 5 L/m3 in FRACSOL.
  • Although various embodiments have been shown and described, the present disclosure is not so limited and will be understood to include all such modifications and variations as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.

Claims (21)

What is claimed is:
1. A method of servicing a well, the method comprising:
providing a well servicing fluid formulated with the following components comprising:
at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes and vinyl acetate polymers; and
a nonaqueous carrier fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas; and
introducing the well servicing fluid into the well.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises fracturing a well formation by contacting the well formation with the well servicing fluid.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the well servicing fluid comprises about 5% by weight or less hydrocarbons that are not compressed gas.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the well servicing fluid further comprises at least one nonsolvent of the friction reducer.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one nonsolvent is chosen from alcohols, glycol ethers, ketones and esters.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one nonsolvent comprises a glycol ether and an alkyl alcohol.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the glycol ether is propylene glycol ether.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonaqueous carrier comprises compressed, liquefied hydrocarbon gas.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonaqueous carrier comprises compressed methane, propane, butane, or natural gas.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonaqueous carrier is in a concentration of 50% by weight or more based on the total weight of the well servicing fluid.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of friction reducer ranges from about 0.1 gptg to about 10 gptg, based on the total well servicing fluid.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the well servicing fluid is formulated to include a hydrocarbon gelling agent.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the oil gelling agent is chosen from phosphate esters, aluminum soaps and aluminum fatty acid salts.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the well servicing fluid further comprises a proppant.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the well servicing fluid is formulated with at least one additional ingredient chosen from viscosifying agents, fluid loss control additives, breakers and high temperature stabilizers.
16. A method of servicing a well, the method comprising:
providing a well servicing fluid formulated with the following components comprising:
at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides, and polyalphaolefins;
a nonaqueous carrier fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas; and
at least one nonsolvent of the friction reducer; and
introducing the well servicing fluid into the well.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one friction reducer comprises a dispersion of particles in the at least one nonsolvent, the particles being chosen from polychloroprenes, vinyl acetate polymers, polyalkylene oxides, and polyalphaolefins.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one nonsolvent is chosen from alcohols, glycol ethers, ketones, and esters.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one nonsolvent comprises a glycol ether and an alkyl alcohol.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the glycol ether is propylene glycol ether.
21. A method of servicing a well, the method comprising:
providing a well servicing fluid formulated with the following components comprising:
at least one friction reducer chosen from polychloroprenes and vinyl acetate polymers;
a nonaqueous carrier fluid containing compressed methane, propane, butane, or natural gas; and
at least one nonsolvent of the friction reducer containing a dispersion of particles chosen from the polychloroprenes and vinyl acetate polymers; and
introducing the well servicing fluid into the well.
US14/047,592 2010-08-13 2013-10-07 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas Abandoned US20140034322A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/047,592 US20140034322A1 (en) 2010-08-13 2013-10-07 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas
PCT/US2014/056817 WO2015053928A1 (en) 2013-10-07 2014-09-22 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas
MX2016004038A MX2016004038A (en) 2013-10-07 2014-09-22 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas.
CN201480055477.8A CN105722943A (en) 2013-10-07 2014-09-22 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas
ARP140103742A AR097958A1 (en) 2013-10-07 2014-10-07 WELL MAINTENANCE FLUID CONTAINING COMPRESSED HYDROCARBON GAS

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/855,894 US8550165B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2010-08-13 Well servicing fluid
US14/047,592 US20140034322A1 (en) 2010-08-13 2013-10-07 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/855,894 Continuation-In-Part US8550165B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2010-08-13 Well servicing fluid

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140034322A1 true US20140034322A1 (en) 2014-02-06

Family

ID=50024347

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/047,592 Abandoned US20140034322A1 (en) 2010-08-13 2013-10-07 Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20140034322A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017058487A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a soluble servicing gas during a well intervention operation
WO2017058484A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of gaseous phase natural gas as a carrier fluid during a well intervention operation
WO2017058485A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation
US10012062B2 (en) * 2013-03-04 2018-07-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of fracturing with liquefied natural gas
US10822935B2 (en) 2013-03-04 2020-11-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of treating a subterranean formation with natural gas

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3736288A (en) * 1971-07-09 1973-05-29 Union Carbide Corp Drag reducing formulations
US6894088B2 (en) * 2003-03-24 2005-05-17 Baker Hughes Incorporated Process for homogenizing polyolefin drag reducing agents
US20060065400A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Smith David R Method and apparatus for stimulating a subterranean formation using liquefied natural gas
US20110240296A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Dusterhoft Ronald G Methods Relating to Improved Stimulation Treatments and Strengthening Fractures in Subterranean Formations
US20120037371A1 (en) * 2010-08-13 2012-02-16 Gupta D V Satyanarayana Well Servicing Fluid

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3736288A (en) * 1971-07-09 1973-05-29 Union Carbide Corp Drag reducing formulations
US6894088B2 (en) * 2003-03-24 2005-05-17 Baker Hughes Incorporated Process for homogenizing polyolefin drag reducing agents
US20060065400A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Smith David R Method and apparatus for stimulating a subterranean formation using liquefied natural gas
US20110240296A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Dusterhoft Ronald G Methods Relating to Improved Stimulation Treatments and Strengthening Fractures in Subterranean Formations
US20120037371A1 (en) * 2010-08-13 2012-02-16 Gupta D V Satyanarayana Well Servicing Fluid
US8550165B2 (en) * 2010-08-13 2013-10-08 Baker Hughes Incorporated Well servicing fluid

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10012062B2 (en) * 2013-03-04 2018-07-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of fracturing with liquefied natural gas
US10822935B2 (en) 2013-03-04 2020-11-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of treating a subterranean formation with natural gas
WO2017058487A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a soluble servicing gas during a well intervention operation
WO2017058484A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of gaseous phase natural gas as a carrier fluid during a well intervention operation
WO2017058485A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation
US10760390B2 (en) 2015-09-30 2020-09-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of gaseous phase natural gas as a carrier fluid during a well intervention operation
US10907088B2 (en) 2015-09-30 2021-02-02 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation
US11155750B2 (en) 2015-09-30 2021-10-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of natural gas as a soluble servicing gas during a well intervention operation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8550165B2 (en) Well servicing fluid
US8853137B2 (en) Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US20150152318A1 (en) Fracturing process using liquid ammonia
US8697612B2 (en) Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
AU2012213241B2 (en) Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US9422420B2 (en) Low-temperature breaker for well fluid viscosified with a polyacrylamide
RU2747957C1 (en) Hydraulic fracturing method using fluid medium with low viscocity and with low speed of proppant settlement
US20140262265A1 (en) Well stimulation with gas hydrates
CA2735428C (en) Hydrocarbon-based fluid compositions and methods of using same
US20140034322A1 (en) Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas
US20160264849A1 (en) Hydrofluoric Based Invert Emulsions for Shale Stimulation
US20170247997A1 (en) A method of treating a subterranean formation
US20190112521A1 (en) Friction Reduction and Suspension in High TDS Brines
US10093850B2 (en) Activator for breaking system in high-temperature fracturing fluids
CA2557381C (en) Co2 miscible optimized hydrocarbon blends and methods of using co2 miscible optimized hydrocarbon blends
RU2664987C2 (en) Utilization of boron as crosslinking agent in emulsion system
US20190048252A1 (en) Borate Crosslinked Fracturing Fluids
WO2015053928A1 (en) Well servicing fluid containing compressed hydrocarbon gas
US11808112B2 (en) Exothermic and/or gas-generating treatment for subterranean and pipeline operations
Casero et al. Several Decades of Fluid Diversion Evolution, Is There a Good Solution?
US20230148311A1 (en) Uses For Supramolecular Host Guest Product Concentrators In The Oil Field
CA2357973C (en) Fracturing fluid
CA2849848A1 (en) Compositions and methods for making aqueous slurry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GUPTA, D.V. SATYANARAYANA;DINSA, HARPREET SINGH;PLASIER, RONALD CASEY;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130919 TO 20130920;REEL/FRAME:031363/0297

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION