US20130298665A1 - System and method for monitoring strain & pressure - Google Patents

System and method for monitoring strain & pressure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130298665A1
US20130298665A1 US13/996,439 US201113996439A US2013298665A1 US 20130298665 A1 US20130298665 A1 US 20130298665A1 US 201113996439 A US201113996439 A US 201113996439A US 2013298665 A1 US2013298665 A1 US 2013298665A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
well
strain
treatment
monitoring
change
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/996,439
Inventor
Michael Charles Minchau
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell USA Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/996,439 priority Critical patent/US20130298665A1/en
Assigned to SHELL OIL COMPANY reassignment SHELL OIL COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MINCHAU, MICHAEL CHARLES
Publication of US20130298665A1 publication Critical patent/US20130298665A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/06Measuring temperature or pressure
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/06Measuring temperature or pressure
    • E21B47/07Temperature
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/10Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements
    • E21B47/107Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements using acoustic means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B11/16Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring the deformation in a solid, e.g. optical strain gauge
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B11/16Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring the deformation in a solid, e.g. optical strain gauge
    • G01B11/18Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring the deformation in a solid, e.g. optical strain gauge using photoelastic elements

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to a system and a method for measuring strain and/or pressure in an underground formation.
  • the present disclosure provides a system and an in-situ permanent method for measuring formation strain in a volume around the treatment well and at an acceptable cost and accuracy.
  • the invention includes installation of DAS fibers in both a treatment well and in neighboring wells.
  • Laser light enters the fiber above the wellhead and a backscattered signal is measured by optical components at the surface.
  • Known optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) methods and preferably used to infer formation strain based on the backscattered signal from a segment of the fiber adjacent to the formation. All depths can be interrogated in the time scale of fractions of a millisecond, providing a virtually instantaneous strain measurement at all depths of interest.
  • Strain/pressure assessments can be performed on many wells at once, providing a sampling of the volume strain or pressure over potentially a large area. The measurements can be used to diagnose and correct a geomechanical model or can be used to directly intervene in the treatment with or without integration with other measurements.
  • the invention includes a method for detecting the effect of a well treatment such as a fracturing treatment or fluid injection performed in a first well, comprising the steps of: a) installing at least one distributed acoustic strain sensor in at least one monitoring well that is located a known distance from the first well, b) initiating a well treatment on the first well, c) monitoring the formation surrounding the monitoring well using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, d) using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, detecting a change in strain at a first location in the monitoring well, and e) using the change in strain or pressure detected in step d) to make determinations about the well treatment in step b).
  • the invention can also be used to determine the lateral, horizontal or vertical (formation) extent of the fracture network or induced hydraulic fracture.
  • the distributed acoustic strain sensors may be installed in one or more monitoring wells, with each monitoring well between 50 m and 5000 m from the first or treatment well.
  • Each distributed acoustic sensor preferably comprises a fiber optic cable and associated laser interrogator unit for sending and receiving optical signals through the fiber.
  • the change in strain detected in step d) can be used as an indication that the effect of the well treatment has extended to or beyond the limit of a predetermined preferred treatment zone and the well treatment may be controlled or ceased based on the determinations made in step e).
  • the present method can also be used to determine information about the formation between the first well and the monitoring well.
  • strain measurements can be measured over long periods of time—seconds/minutes/days/weeks/months/years—giving them greater scope than normal seismic data.
  • well treatment refers to any fluid injection or removal process that may be carried out on a well, including fraccing, solvent injection, production, and the like.
  • the present disclosure relates generally to a system and a method for monitoring strain or pressure in one or more monitoring wells and using the collected information to control processes in a treatment well or to understand the effectiveness of those treatments.
  • distributed acoustic sensors comprising fiber optic cables such as are known in the art are deployed in one or more monitoring wells that are located at a distance from the treatment well.
  • the distance between the treatment well and any given monitoring well may be in the range of from 50 m to 5000 m. If more than one monitoring well is used, the wells can be arranged on opposite sides of or evenly spaced about the treatment well, or the monitoring wells can be located in locations determined by the geology and/or topography surrounding the well. If more than one monitoring well is used, it is possible to collect more data about the subsurface and therefore to provide more useful information.
  • a treatment well 10 and a monitoring well 20 are preferably located according to a predetermined plan.
  • the treatment well will be one in which a fraccing or other injection operation will be performed.
  • Treatment well 10 may contain one or more tubulars and may be cased, as shown.
  • the well treatment will comprise pumping fluid into the well at sufficiently high pressure to fracture the adjacent formation, as illustrated by arrows 11 , resulting in fractures 13 .
  • One or more fiber optic cables 12 designed to collect distributed strain measurements are deployed in monitoring well(s) 20 and coupled to the formation by any suitable means.
  • monitoring well 20 has been cemented with a fiber optic sensor embedded in the cement.
  • the optic fiber can also be clamped or bonded to a downhole tubular, or acoustically coupled by any other means.
  • One or more light boxes 14 containing laser light sources and signal-receiving means are optically coupled to the fiber at the surface.
  • the cable may be double-ended, i.e. may be folded back in the middle so that both ends of the cable are at the source, or it may be single-ended, with one end at the source and the other end at a point that is remote from the source.
  • the length of the cable can range from a few meters to several kilometers, or even hundreds of kilometers. In either case, measurements can be based solely on backscattered light, if there is a light-receiving means only at the source end of the cable, or a light receiving means can be provided at the second end of the cable, so that the intensity of light at the second end of the fiber optic cable can also be measured.
  • the light source may be a long coherence length phase-stable laser and is used to transmit direct sequence spread spectrum encoded light down the fiber. Localized strain or other disruptions cause small changes to the fiber, which in turn produce changes in the backscattered light signal.
  • the returning light signal thus contains both information about strain changes and location information indicating where along the fiber they occurred.
  • the location along the fiber can be determined using spread spectrum encoding, which uniquely encodes the time of flight along the length of the fiber.
  • the light source transmits at least one light pulse into the end of the fiber optic cable and a backscattered signal is received at the signal-receiving means.
  • OTDR optical time-domain reflectometry
  • formation strain or pressure can be measured in the monitoring well(s) or treatment well(s) over the duration of the treatment process and, if desired, for a period of time thereafter, providing information about changes in the formation strain or pressure over time.
  • strain measurements indicating that the effect of the injection in the treatment well has extended to or beyond the limit of a predetermined preferred treatment zone.
  • strain in the formation resulting from the injection of fluid is preferably detected by fiber optic cable 12 for at least the duration of the injection.
  • acoustic events attributable strain-induced fractures may also be detectable by fiber optic cable 12 .
  • measurements in a pressurize zone can be used to sense movement of a pressure front.
  • Pressure in the formation will cause a dilation in the matrix, i.e. an isotropic strain in all directions.
  • a fiber oriented in any direction will pick this up as long as is passes through a region of changing pressure—the “pressure front.”
  • All depths can be interrogated in the time scale of fractions of a millisecond, providing a virtually instantaneous strain measurement at all depths of interest.
  • Strain and pressure assessments can be performed on many wells at once, providing a sampling of the volume strain over potentially a large area.
  • the measurements can be used to diagnose and correct a geomechanical model or can be used to directly intervene in the treatment with or without integration with other measurements.
  • the present invention allows control of pressures to reduce out-of-zone effects and also allows better understanding of production given the measured connectivity.
  • strain anomalies typically travel from the treatment well to neighboring wells and that, shortly after the strain anomaly reaches a neighboring well, it travels up and down that wellbore, creating pressure connectivity over a significant vertical column (as measured using pressure gauges in the field data). This is undesirable for optimal production of the zones.
  • the present invention makes it possible to monitor the treatment using DAS signals in the monitoring wells and to stop pumping when initial inter-well connectivity is established.
  • the present methods have no inherent lower limit to the frequency of investigation and are therefore limited only by the stability of the hardware over long time scales.
  • distributed OTDR sensing can be used to detect hydraulic fracturing according to the following workflow:
  • the foregoing workflow can be generalized beyond hydraulic fracture detection to include any earth motion that can be measured with DAS, including but not limited to pressure or radial strain.
  • the inventive methods are used to measure time-dependent strain in a depleting field. More specifically, the inventive methods provide a way to measure moderate resolution differential depletion in a reservoir.
  • the cost and availability of fiber optic sensors, allows construction of an areal picture of depletion induced strain.
  • distributed OTDR sensing can be used to detect and monitor field depletion according to the following workflow:

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
  • Optical Transform (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Preliminary Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
  • Measuring Fluid Pressure (AREA)

Abstract

A method for monitoring a well treatment, comprising the steps of installing at least one distributed acoustic strain sensor in at least one monitoring well, said monitoring well being a known distance from the treatment well, initiating a well treatment on the first well, monitoring the formation surrounding the monitoring well using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, and using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, detecting a change in strain at a first location in the monitoring well, using the change in strain to make determinations about the well treatment. The sensor may comprise a fiber optic cable. The change in strain may be used as an indicator that the effect of the well treatment has extended beyond a predetermined preferred treatment zone, the treatment may be a fracture treatment, and the well treatment may be controlled or ceased based on the determinations made in step e).

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present case claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/425,603, filed on 21 Dec. 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present disclosure relates generally to a system and a method for measuring strain and/or pressure in an underground formation.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • In oilfield operations there is a often need to measure changes in formation strain or pressure that occur as a result of well interventions such as hydraulic fracturing and fluid injection. These operations generally create high pressures in the formation, often leading to breakdown (fracturing) of the rock matrix, and will strain the formation in a volume surrounding the intervention. Measurement of this formation strain can be diagnostic of the effectiveness of the intervention and can lead to modification of the intervention parameters that can give significant economic benefit if the measurement technique is inexpensive enough. Changes in strain can occur over time scales ranging from fractions of a second to years and can occur at locations that are far away from the well where the intervention takes place (“treatment well”), often affecting rock volumes intersected by neighboring wells. Similarly, detection of abnormal pressure may indicate fluid paths or potential breakdown or formation/concrete.
  • Various methods for applying transducers and/or sensors to a cylindrical structure such as casing and using the sensors or transducers to monitor deformation of the structure as the structure is subjected to various forces are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,791 discloses that temperature variations may impart additional strain to an optical fiber and to a supporting structure, such as a well tubular and/or casing, about which the optical fiber is wrapped, and that these temperature variations affect the index of refraction in the optical fiber, so that temperature variations may be considered independently for calibrating the strain measurements.
  • Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is currently no in-situ method for measuring, in a volume around the treatment well and at an acceptable cost and accuracy, formation strain during well interventions. Surface and vertical seismic profile (VSP) measurements can be used, but these are not accurate and require calibration, as they yield formation velocity as the raw measurement, which in turn needs to be converted into strain. In principle, formation strainmeters could be deployed in a permanent installation outside of casing but this can be prohibitively expensive, especially if multiple wells and depth stations are targeted. Furthermore, it is sometimes desirable to detect formation strain and/or pressure in a treatment well, which is difficult if not impossible using traditional pressure or strain gauges.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present disclosure provides a system and an in-situ permanent method for measuring formation strain in a volume around the treatment well and at an acceptable cost and accuracy.
  • In preferred embodiments, the invention includes installation of DAS fibers in both a treatment well and in neighboring wells. Laser light enters the fiber above the wellhead and a backscattered signal is measured by optical components at the surface. Known optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) methods and preferably used to infer formation strain based on the backscattered signal from a segment of the fiber adjacent to the formation. All depths can be interrogated in the time scale of fractions of a millisecond, providing a virtually instantaneous strain measurement at all depths of interest. Strain/pressure assessments can be performed on many wells at once, providing a sampling of the volume strain or pressure over potentially a large area. The measurements can be used to diagnose and correct a geomechanical model or can be used to directly intervene in the treatment with or without integration with other measurements.
  • In some embodiments, the invention includes a method for detecting the effect of a well treatment such as a fracturing treatment or fluid injection performed in a first well, comprising the steps of: a) installing at least one distributed acoustic strain sensor in at least one monitoring well that is located a known distance from the first well, b) initiating a well treatment on the first well, c) monitoring the formation surrounding the monitoring well using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, d) using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, detecting a change in strain at a first location in the monitoring well, and e) using the change in strain or pressure detected in step d) to make determinations about the well treatment in step b). The invention can also be used to determine the lateral, horizontal or vertical (formation) extent of the fracture network or induced hydraulic fracture.
  • The distributed acoustic strain sensors may be installed in one or more monitoring wells, with each monitoring well between 50 m and 5000 m from the first or treatment well. Each distributed acoustic sensor preferably comprises a fiber optic cable and associated laser interrogator unit for sending and receiving optical signals through the fiber.
  • The change in strain detected in step d) can be used as an indication that the effect of the well treatment has extended to or beyond the limit of a predetermined preferred treatment zone and the well treatment may be controlled or ceased based on the determinations made in step e). The present method can also be used to determine information about the formation between the first well and the monitoring well.
  • Other embodiments of the invention relate to time-lapse measurement of either proximal and/or distal strain or pressure, in a formation before, during, and after production operations. According to the invention, strain measurements can be measured over long periods of time—seconds/minutes/days/weeks/months/years—giving them greater scope than normal seismic data.
  • As used herein, “well treatment” refers to any fluid injection or removal process that may be carried out on a well, including fraccing, solvent injection, production, and the like.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawing, which is a schematic illustration of a system in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
  • The present disclosure relates generally to a system and a method for monitoring strain or pressure in one or more monitoring wells and using the collected information to control processes in a treatment well or to understand the effectiveness of those treatments.
  • In one embodiment, distributed acoustic sensors comprising fiber optic cables such as are known in the art are deployed in one or more monitoring wells that are located at a distance from the treatment well. The distance between the treatment well and any given monitoring well may be in the range of from 50 m to 5000 m. If more than one monitoring well is used, the wells can be arranged on opposite sides of or evenly spaced about the treatment well, or the monitoring wells can be located in locations determined by the geology and/or topography surrounding the well. If more than one monitoring well is used, it is possible to collect more data about the subsurface and therefore to provide more useful information.
  • By way of example only, referring initially to FIG. 1, a treatment well 10 and a monitoring well 20 are preferably located according to a predetermined plan. In some embodiments, the treatment well will be one in which a fraccing or other injection operation will be performed.
  • Treatment well 10 may contain one or more tubulars and may be cased, as shown. In some cases, the well treatment will comprise pumping fluid into the well at sufficiently high pressure to fracture the adjacent formation, as illustrated by arrows 11, resulting in fractures 13.
  • One or more fiber optic cables 12 designed to collect distributed strain measurements are deployed in monitoring well(s) 20 and coupled to the formation by any suitable means. In the embodiment shown, monitoring well 20 has been cemented with a fiber optic sensor embedded in the cement. It will be understood that the optic fiber can also be clamped or bonded to a downhole tubular, or acoustically coupled by any other means. One or more light boxes 14 containing laser light sources and signal-receiving means are optically coupled to the fiber at the surface. The cable may be double-ended, i.e. may be folded back in the middle so that both ends of the cable are at the source, or it may be single-ended, with one end at the source and the other end at a point that is remote from the source. The length of the cable can range from a few meters to several kilometers, or even hundreds of kilometers. In either case, measurements can be based solely on backscattered light, if there is a light-receiving means only at the source end of the cable, or a light receiving means can be provided at the second end of the cable, so that the intensity of light at the second end of the fiber optic cable can also be measured.
  • In some embodiments, the light source may be a long coherence length phase-stable laser and is used to transmit direct sequence spread spectrum encoded light down the fiber. Localized strain or other disruptions cause small changes to the fiber, which in turn produce changes in the backscattered light signal. The returning light signal thus contains both information about strain changes and location information indicating where along the fiber they occurred. In some embodiments, the location along the fiber can be determined using spread spectrum encoding, which uniquely encodes the time of flight along the length of the fiber.
  • When it is desired to make measurements, the light source transmits at least one light pulse into the end of the fiber optic cable and a backscattered signal is received at the signal-receiving means. Known optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) methods are preferably used to infer formation strain based on the backscattered signal from one or more segments of the fiber adjacent to the formation of interest.
  • Using the present invention, formation strain or pressure can be measured in the monitoring well(s) or treatment well(s) over the duration of the treatment process and, if desired, for a period of time thereafter, providing information about changes in the formation strain or pressure over time. Of particular interest are strain measurements indicating that the effect of the injection in the treatment well has extended to or beyond the limit of a predetermined preferred treatment zone. Thus, for example, strain in the formation resulting from the injection of fluid is preferably detected by fiber optic cable 12 for at least the duration of the injection. In addition, acoustic events attributable strain-induced fractures may also be detectable by fiber optic cable 12.
  • Similarly, measurements in a pressurize zone can be used to sense movement of a pressure front. Pressure in the formation will cause a dilation in the matrix, i.e. an isotropic strain in all directions. A fiber oriented in any direction will pick this up as long as is passes through a region of changing pressure—the “pressure front.”
  • All depths can be interrogated in the time scale of fractions of a millisecond, providing a virtually instantaneous strain measurement at all depths of interest. Strain and pressure assessments can be performed on many wells at once, providing a sampling of the volume strain over potentially a large area. The measurements can be used to diagnose and correct a geomechanical model or can be used to directly intervene in the treatment with or without integration with other measurements. Thus, the present invention allows control of pressures to reduce out-of-zone effects and also allows better understanding of production given the measured connectivity.
  • In addition to the foregoing, it has been observed that strain anomalies typically travel from the treatment well to neighboring wells and that, shortly after the strain anomaly reaches a neighboring well, it travels up and down that wellbore, creating pressure connectivity over a significant vertical column (as measured using pressure gauges in the field data). This is undesirable for optimal production of the zones. The present invention makes it possible to monitor the treatment using DAS signals in the monitoring wells and to stop pumping when initial inter-well connectivity is established.
  • The present methods have no inherent lower limit to the frequency of investigation and are therefore limited only by the stability of the hardware over long time scales. There are various methods of backscatter measurement, including the use of Rayleigh and Brillouin backscattering, and one method may be preferred over others for this implementation of the present invention, especially at low frequency.
  • The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present claimed subject matter may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present claimed subject matter. By way of example only, one of skill in the art will recognize that the number and location of the monitoring well(s) with respect to the first well, the number and configuration of cables and sensors, the sampling rate and frequencies of light used, and the nature of the cable, coupling devices, light sources, light signals, and photodetectors can all be modified within the scope of the invention. By way of further example, embodiments have been described in which a fiber is placed in one or more wells that are spaced apart from the treatment well. It will be understood that fibers could also be placed in the treatment well itself. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the present disclosure.
  • The subject matter of the present disclosure is described with specificity. However, the description itself is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. The claimed subject matter, thus, might also be embodied in other ways to include different steps or combinations of steps similar to the ones described herein, in conjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover, although the term “step” may be used herein to connote different methods employed, the term should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed except when the order of individual steps is explicitly described.
  • For illustrative purposes only, two examples of implementation of the inventive concepts are set forth below.
  • Example 1 Hydraulic Fracturing
  • According to a first exemplary embodiment, distributed OTDR sensing can be used to detect hydraulic fracturing according to the following workflow:
      • deploy one or more DAS fibers in one or more wells in the vicinity of an intended hydraulic fracturing operation;
      • prior to hydraulic fracturing in the area, record noise levels along the fiber as a control measurement;
      • upon initiation of pumping of fracture fluids, for any or all fracture stages and fluid types, including mini-frac (or test frac), record the strain field as measured by the DAS system, for all locations in the well where the formation can be affected by the fracture operation;
      • simulate the strain field as a function of time and space using a geomechanical simulation;
      • from the results of the simulation, make a prediction of the axial strain measurements at the places where the DAS fibers have made the measurements;
      • compare the predictions and measurements and adjust the geomechanical model parameters to minimize the difference;
      • use the new geomechanical model to make further predictions that can be compared with DAS (or other) measurements;
      • use the new geomechanical model to optimize perforation locations and pumping schedule (and any other relevant parameters) such that the predictions of the updated model, with the new perforation locations and pumping schedule, predict optimal production over the life of the field; and
      • keep the geomechanical model evergreen by including data from either infill hydraulic fracturing, recompletion fractures, long-term depletion or other changes in formation strain due to production operations.
  • The foregoing workflow can be generalized beyond hydraulic fracture detection to include any earth motion that can be measured with DAS, including but not limited to pressure or radial strain.
  • Example 2 Depletion
  • According to a second exemplary embodiment, the inventive methods are used to measure time-dependent strain in a depleting field. More specifically, the inventive methods provide a way to measure moderate resolution differential depletion in a reservoir. The cost and availability of fiber optic sensors, allows construction of an areal picture of depletion induced strain.
  • Thus, according to this embodiment, distributed OTDR sensing can be used to detect and monitor field depletion according to the following workflow:
      • deploy one or more DAS fibers in one or more wells in the vicinity of an intended hydraulic fracturing operation;
      • prior to field startup, record noise levels along the fibers as a control measurement;
      • upon initiation of field depletion, the strain field as measured by the DAS system, for all instrumented wells;
      • simulate the strain field as a function of time and space using a geomechanical simulation;
      • from the results of the simulation, make a prediction of the axial strain measurements at the places where the DAS fibers have made the measurements;
      • compare the predictions and measurements and adjust the geomechanical model parameters to minimize the difference therebetween;
      • make changes in the model as required to match the data highlight differences in subsidence/depletion for different parts of a formation, leading to localized interventions;
      • alternatively, depleted/depleting areas may be obvious even without the benefit of a geomechanical model as areas with greater or lesser strain changes;
      • if the fiber is also configured to measure formation pressure, a measure of rock compressibility might be possible from strain and pressure.
  • While the invention has the particular advantaged described above, it can be used advantageously to detect inter-well effects caused by other sources and can be used to determine information about properties of the formation between wells. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.

Claims (10)

1. A method for detecting the effect of a well treatment performed in a first well, comprising the steps of:
a) installing at least one distributed acoustic strain sensor in at least one monitoring well, said monitoring well being a known distance from the first well;
b) initiating a well treatment on the first well;
c) monitoring the formation surrounding the monitoring well using the distributed acoustic strain sensor;
d) using the distributed acoustic strain sensor, detecting a change in strain or pressure at a first location in the monitoring well; and
e) using the change in strain detected in step d) to make determinations about the well treatment in step b).
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein distributed acoustic strain sensors are installed in at least two monitoring wells.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein each monitoring well is between 50 m and 5000 m from the first well.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the distributed acoustic sensor comprises a fiber optic cable.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the change in strain detected in step d) indicates that the effect of the well treatment has extended to or beyond the limit of a predetermined preferred treatment zone.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the well treatment is a fracture treatment.
7. The method according to claim 1 further including the step of controlling the well treatment based on the determinations made in step e).
8. The method according to claim 1, further including the step of ceasing the well treatment based on the determinations made in step e).
9. The method according to claim 1 further including the step of detecting, at one or more locations that are vertically spaced from the first locations, further changes in strain that are related to the change in strain detected in step d).
10. The method according to claim 8 further including the step of using the change in strain detected in step d) to determine information about the formation between the first well and the monitoring well.
US13/996,439 2010-12-21 2011-12-09 System and method for monitoring strain & pressure Abandoned US20130298665A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/996,439 US20130298665A1 (en) 2010-12-21 2011-12-09 System and method for monitoring strain & pressure

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201061425603P 2010-12-21 2010-12-21
US13/996,439 US20130298665A1 (en) 2010-12-21 2011-12-09 System and method for monitoring strain & pressure
PCT/US2011/064105 WO2012087604A2 (en) 2010-12-21 2011-12-09 System and method for moniitoring strain & pressure

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130298665A1 true US20130298665A1 (en) 2013-11-14

Family

ID=46314736

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/996,439 Abandoned US20130298665A1 (en) 2010-12-21 2011-12-09 System and method for monitoring strain & pressure

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20130298665A1 (en)
CN (1) CN103270244B (en)
AU (1) AU2011349851B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2822033C (en)
WO (1) WO2012087604A2 (en)

Cited By (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140126325A1 (en) * 2012-11-02 2014-05-08 Silixa Ltd. Enhanced seismic surveying
WO2015108563A1 (en) * 2014-01-20 2015-07-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydraulic fracture geometry monitoring with downhole distributed strain measurements
FR3017155A1 (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-07 Total Sa METHOD FOR MONITORING AN INTERVENTION IN A FLUID OPERATING WELL IN THE BASEMENT, AND ASSOCIATED INTERVENTION DEVICE
WO2015187153A1 (en) * 2014-06-04 2015-12-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture treatment analysis based on seismic reflection data
CN105257261A (en) * 2015-11-24 2016-01-20 中国海洋石油总公司 Sea area non-digenetic and digenetic natural gas hydrate fluidization trial production method
WO2016091972A1 (en) * 2014-12-12 2016-06-16 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Method for ascertaining characteristics of an underground formation
US20170139071A1 (en) * 2014-05-27 2017-05-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic deblurring for downwell sensors
WO2017156337A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Hydraulic fracture monitoring by low-frequency das
WO2017156331A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Production logs from distributed acoustic sensors
US20170268944A1 (en) * 2015-09-14 2017-09-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Detection Of Strain In Fiber Optics Cables Induced By Narrow-Band Signals
US20170284187A1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Monitoring Wireline Coupling and Distribution
EP3137735A4 (en) * 2014-04-30 2018-01-10 Baker Hughes Incorporated Distributed acoustic sensing using low pulse repetition rates
US9988895B2 (en) 2013-12-18 2018-06-05 Conocophillips Company Method for determining hydraulic fracture orientation and dimension
US9988900B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-06-05 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of geometric evaluation of hydraulic fractures by using pressure changes
US10030497B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2018-07-24 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of acquiring information of hydraulic fracture geometry for evaluating and optimizing well spacing for multi-well pad
WO2020142074A1 (en) * 2018-12-31 2020-07-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensing: locating of microseismic events using travel time information with heterogeneous anisotropic velocity model
US10808521B2 (en) 2013-05-31 2020-10-20 Conocophillips Company Hydraulic fracture analysis
US10890058B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2021-01-12 Conocophillips Company Low-frequency DAS SNR improvement
WO2021025669A1 (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensor with trackable plug
US10975687B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2021-04-13 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors
US11021934B2 (en) 2018-05-02 2021-06-01 Conocophillips Company Production logging inversion based on DAS/DTS
US11028679B1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2021-06-08 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for controlling fracturing operations using monitor well pressure
US11053791B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2021-07-06 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11098576B2 (en) 2019-10-17 2021-08-24 Lytt Limited Inflow detection using DTS features
WO2021183145A1 (en) * 2020-03-13 2021-09-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydraulic fracture proximity detection using strain measurements
US11162353B2 (en) 2019-11-15 2021-11-02 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores
CN113661373A (en) * 2019-04-05 2021-11-16 日本电气株式会社 Surveying system and surveying method
US11193367B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2021-12-07 Conocophillips Company Low frequency DAS well interference evaluation
US11199084B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2021-12-14 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features
US11199085B2 (en) 2017-08-23 2021-12-14 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11255997B2 (en) 2017-06-14 2022-02-22 Conocophillips Company Stimulated rock volume analysis
US20220112796A1 (en) * 2020-10-09 2022-04-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Expert system for well treatment
US11333636B2 (en) 2017-10-11 2022-05-17 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features
US11352878B2 (en) 2017-10-17 2022-06-07 Conocophillips Company Low frequency distributed acoustic sensing hydraulic fracture geometry
US11365617B1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2022-06-21 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for controlling fracturing operations using monitor well pressure
US20220290559A1 (en) * 2020-03-18 2022-09-15 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for preventing wellbore interactions
US11466563B2 (en) 2020-06-11 2022-10-11 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for subterranean fluid flow characterization
US11473424B2 (en) 2019-10-17 2022-10-18 Lytt Limited Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid DAS/DTS measurements
US11500114B2 (en) 2018-05-09 2022-11-15 Conocophillips Company Ubiquitous real-time fracture monitoring
US11593683B2 (en) * 2020-06-18 2023-02-28 Lytt Limited Event model training using in situ data
US20230108047A1 (en) * 2021-10-01 2023-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed Acoustic Sensing Systems and Methods with Dynamic Gauge Lengths
US11643927B2 (en) 2020-12-16 2023-05-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) cumulative strain to relate near wellbore completions performance and far-field cross well communication
US11643923B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2023-05-09 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration
US11675336B2 (en) 2020-10-09 2023-06-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for equipment control
US11686871B2 (en) 2017-05-05 2023-06-27 Conocophillips Company Stimulated rock volume analysis
CN116403370A (en) * 2023-04-20 2023-07-07 华南理工大学 Slope disaster monitoring and early warning system based on distributed optical fiber sensing technology
US11802783B2 (en) 2021-07-16 2023-10-31 Conocophillips Company Passive production logging instrument using heat and distributed acoustic sensing
US11859490B2 (en) 2021-08-19 2024-01-02 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for monitoring fracturing operations using monitor well flow
US11859488B2 (en) 2018-11-29 2024-01-02 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited DAS data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type
CN117591837A (en) * 2024-01-19 2024-02-23 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 Method for diagnosing feasibility of mounting scheme of strain gauge of rotor blade of gas compressor

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB201312549D0 (en) * 2013-07-12 2013-08-28 Fotech Solutions Ltd Monitoring of hydraulic fracturing operations
US9416652B2 (en) 2013-08-08 2016-08-16 Vetco Gray Inc. Sensing magnetized portions of a wellhead system to monitor fatigue loading
US20160076932A1 (en) * 2014-09-11 2016-03-17 Trican Well Service, Ltd. Distributed acoustic sensing to optimize coil tubing milling performance

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060272809A1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2006-12-07 Baker Hughes Incorporated Wellbores utilizing fiber optic-based sensors and operating devices
US20090114386A1 (en) * 2007-11-02 2009-05-07 Hartog Arthur H Systems and methods for distributed interferometric acoustic monitoring
WO2010136764A2 (en) * 2009-05-27 2010-12-02 Qinetiq Limited Fracture monitoring
US20130197810A1 (en) * 2012-01-27 2013-08-01 Allan Kayser Haas Monitoring of drinking water aquifers during possible contamination operations
US20130233537A1 (en) * 2010-12-01 2013-09-12 Optasense Holdings Limited Fracture Characterisation

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6281489B1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2001-08-28 Baker Hughes Incorporated Monitoring of downhole parameters and tools utilizing fiber optics
US7561771B2 (en) * 2003-08-11 2009-07-14 Shell Oil Company Method for installing a double ended distributed sensing fiber optical assembly within a guide conduit
EP2374029A2 (en) * 2009-01-05 2011-10-12 Services Pétroliers Schlumberger Processing time series data embedded in high noise
US20100207019A1 (en) * 2009-02-17 2010-08-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Optical monitoring of fluid flow

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060272809A1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2006-12-07 Baker Hughes Incorporated Wellbores utilizing fiber optic-based sensors and operating devices
US20090114386A1 (en) * 2007-11-02 2009-05-07 Hartog Arthur H Systems and methods for distributed interferometric acoustic monitoring
WO2010136764A2 (en) * 2009-05-27 2010-12-02 Qinetiq Limited Fracture monitoring
US8950482B2 (en) * 2009-05-27 2015-02-10 Optasense Holdings Ltd. Fracture monitoring
US20130233537A1 (en) * 2010-12-01 2013-09-12 Optasense Holdings Limited Fracture Characterisation
US20130197810A1 (en) * 2012-01-27 2013-08-01 Allan Kayser Haas Monitoring of drinking water aquifers during possible contamination operations

Cited By (82)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140126325A1 (en) * 2012-11-02 2014-05-08 Silixa Ltd. Enhanced seismic surveying
US10808521B2 (en) 2013-05-31 2020-10-20 Conocophillips Company Hydraulic fracture analysis
US10954774B2 (en) * 2013-12-18 2021-03-23 Conocophillips Company Method for determining hydraulic fracture orientation and dimension
US11371339B2 (en) * 2013-12-18 2022-06-28 Conocophillips Company Method for determining hydraulic fracture orientation and dimension
US9988895B2 (en) 2013-12-18 2018-06-05 Conocophillips Company Method for determining hydraulic fracture orientation and dimension
US11725500B2 (en) 2013-12-18 2023-08-15 Conocophillips Company Method for determining hydraulic fracture orientation and dimension
WO2015108563A1 (en) * 2014-01-20 2015-07-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydraulic fracture geometry monitoring with downhole distributed strain measurements
US10125605B2 (en) * 2014-01-20 2018-11-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Using downhole strain measurements to determine hydraulic fracture system geometry
US20160282507A1 (en) * 2014-01-20 2016-09-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydraulic fracture geometry monitoring with downhole distributed strain measurements
US20160319661A1 (en) * 2014-01-20 2016-11-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Using Downhole Strain Measurements to Determine Hydraulic Fracture System Geometry
WO2015118066A1 (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-13 Total Sa Method of monitoring an intervention in a fluid exploitation well made in the subsoil, and associated intervention device
GB2538470A (en) * 2014-02-05 2016-11-16 Total Sa Method of monitoring an intervention in a fluid exploitation well made in the subsoil, and associated interventions device
FR3017155A1 (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-07 Total Sa METHOD FOR MONITORING AN INTERVENTION IN A FLUID OPERATING WELL IN THE BASEMENT, AND ASSOCIATED INTERVENTION DEVICE
EP3137735A4 (en) * 2014-04-30 2018-01-10 Baker Hughes Incorporated Distributed acoustic sensing using low pulse repetition rates
US20170139071A1 (en) * 2014-05-27 2017-05-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic deblurring for downwell sensors
WO2015187153A1 (en) * 2014-06-04 2015-12-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture treatment analysis based on seismic reflection data
WO2016091972A1 (en) * 2014-12-12 2016-06-16 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Method for ascertaining characteristics of an underground formation
US10669832B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2020-06-02 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Well system of acquiring information of hydraulic fracture geometry for evaluating and optimizing well spacing for multi-well pad
US10030497B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2018-07-24 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of acquiring information of hydraulic fracture geometry for evaluating and optimizing well spacing for multi-well pad
US9988900B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-06-05 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of geometric evaluation of hydraulic fractures by using pressure changes
US10436027B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2019-10-08 Statoil Gulf Services LLC Method of geometric evaluation of hydraulic fractures
US20170268944A1 (en) * 2015-09-14 2017-09-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Detection Of Strain In Fiber Optics Cables Induced By Narrow-Band Signals
US9976920B2 (en) * 2015-09-14 2018-05-22 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Detection of strain in fiber optics cables induced by narrow-band signals
CN105257261A (en) * 2015-11-24 2016-01-20 中国海洋石油总公司 Sea area non-digenetic and digenetic natural gas hydrate fluidization trial production method
US10890058B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2021-01-12 Conocophillips Company Low-frequency DAS SNR improvement
WO2017156337A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Hydraulic fracture monitoring by low-frequency das
WO2017156323A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Das method of estimating fluid distribution
US10095828B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2018-10-09 Conocophillips Company Production logs from distributed acoustic sensors
US10458228B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2019-10-29 Conocophillips Company Low frequency distributed acoustic sensing
US10465501B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2019-11-05 Conocophillips Company DAS method of estimating fluid distribution
US10287874B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2019-05-14 Conocophillips Company Hydraulic fracture monitoring by low-frequency das
US20170260849A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Das method of estimating fluid distribution
WO2017156338A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Low frequency distributed acoustic sensing
EP3704477A4 (en) * 2016-03-09 2021-10-06 ConocoPhillips Company Hydraulic fracture monitoring by low-frequency das
WO2017156331A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 Conocophillips Company Production logs from distributed acoustic sensors
US20170284187A1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Monitoring Wireline Coupling and Distribution
US10316641B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2019-06-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Monitoring wireline coupling and distribution
US11530606B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2022-12-20 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11215049B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2022-01-04 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features
US11199084B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2021-12-14 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features
US11053791B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2021-07-06 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11365617B1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2022-06-21 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for controlling fracturing operations using monitor well pressure
US11028679B1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2021-06-08 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for controlling fracturing operations using monitor well pressure
US11131176B1 (en) * 2017-01-24 2021-09-28 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for controlling fracturing operations using monitor well pressure
US10975687B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2021-04-13 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors
US11686871B2 (en) 2017-05-05 2023-06-27 Conocophillips Company Stimulated rock volume analysis
US11255997B2 (en) 2017-06-14 2022-02-22 Conocophillips Company Stimulated rock volume analysis
US11199085B2 (en) 2017-08-23 2021-12-14 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting downhole sand ingress locations
US11333636B2 (en) 2017-10-11 2022-05-17 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features
US11352878B2 (en) 2017-10-17 2022-06-07 Conocophillips Company Low frequency distributed acoustic sensing hydraulic fracture geometry
US11193367B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2021-12-07 Conocophillips Company Low frequency DAS well interference evaluation
US11021934B2 (en) 2018-05-02 2021-06-01 Conocophillips Company Production logging inversion based on DAS/DTS
US11649700B2 (en) 2018-05-02 2023-05-16 Conocophillips Company Production logging inversion based on DAS/DTS
US11500114B2 (en) 2018-05-09 2022-11-15 Conocophillips Company Ubiquitous real-time fracture monitoring
US11859488B2 (en) 2018-11-29 2024-01-02 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited DAS data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type
US11643923B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2023-05-09 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration
US11747501B2 (en) 2018-12-31 2023-09-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensing: locating of microseismic events using travel time information with heterogeneous anisotropic velocity model
WO2020142074A1 (en) * 2018-12-31 2020-07-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensing: locating of microseismic events using travel time information with heterogeneous anisotropic velocity model
EP3951311A4 (en) * 2019-04-05 2022-08-24 NEC Corporation Measurement system and measurement method
CN113661373A (en) * 2019-04-05 2021-11-16 日本电气株式会社 Surveying system and surveying method
US11920962B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2024-03-05 Nec Corporation Surveying system and surveying method
GB2597234B (en) * 2019-08-02 2023-05-03 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Distributed acoustic sensor with trackable plug
WO2021025669A1 (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensor with trackable plug
GB2597234A (en) * 2019-08-02 2022-01-19 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Distributed acoustic sensor with trackable plug
US11572759B2 (en) 2019-08-02 2023-02-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensor with trackable plug
US11098576B2 (en) 2019-10-17 2021-08-24 Lytt Limited Inflow detection using DTS features
US11473424B2 (en) 2019-10-17 2022-10-18 Lytt Limited Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid DAS/DTS measurements
US11162353B2 (en) 2019-11-15 2021-11-02 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores
WO2021183145A1 (en) * 2020-03-13 2021-09-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydraulic fracture proximity detection using strain measurements
US20220290559A1 (en) * 2020-03-18 2022-09-15 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for preventing wellbore interactions
US11828171B2 (en) * 2020-03-18 2023-11-28 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for preventing wellbore interactions
US11466563B2 (en) 2020-06-11 2022-10-11 Lytt Limited Systems and methods for subterranean fluid flow characterization
US11593683B2 (en) * 2020-06-18 2023-02-28 Lytt Limited Event model training using in situ data
US11675336B2 (en) 2020-10-09 2023-06-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for equipment control
US20220112796A1 (en) * 2020-10-09 2022-04-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Expert system for well treatment
US11643927B2 (en) 2020-12-16 2023-05-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) cumulative strain to relate near wellbore completions performance and far-field cross well communication
US11802783B2 (en) 2021-07-16 2023-10-31 Conocophillips Company Passive production logging instrument using heat and distributed acoustic sensing
US11859490B2 (en) 2021-08-19 2024-01-02 Devon Energy Corporation Systems and methods for monitoring fracturing operations using monitor well flow
US20230108047A1 (en) * 2021-10-01 2023-04-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed Acoustic Sensing Systems and Methods with Dynamic Gauge Lengths
US11939863B2 (en) * 2021-10-01 2024-03-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Distributed acoustic sensing systems and methods with dynamic gauge lengths
CN116403370A (en) * 2023-04-20 2023-07-07 华南理工大学 Slope disaster monitoring and early warning system based on distributed optical fiber sensing technology
CN117591837A (en) * 2024-01-19 2024-02-23 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 Method for diagnosing feasibility of mounting scheme of strain gauge of rotor blade of gas compressor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2011349851B2 (en) 2014-11-13
CN103270244B (en) 2017-12-01
CN103270244A (en) 2013-08-28
WO2012087604A2 (en) 2012-06-28
CA2822033A1 (en) 2012-06-28
CA2822033C (en) 2019-02-26
WO2012087604A3 (en) 2012-10-26
AU2011349851A1 (en) 2013-06-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2822033C (en) System and method for monitoring strain & pressure
US11421527B2 (en) Simultaneous distributed measurements on optical fiber
AU2017230721B2 (en) Measuring downhole temperature by combining DAS/DTS data
US8245780B2 (en) Method of detecting fluid in-flows downhole
US11092007B2 (en) Determining wellbore properties with an optic fibre while lowering a casing
CA2753420C (en) System and method for wellbore monitoring
US10591639B2 (en) Methods and systems employing a flow prediction model based on acoustic activity and proppant compensation
US20110090496A1 (en) Downhole monitoring with distributed optical density, temperature and/or strain sensing
US20160282507A1 (en) Hydraulic fracture geometry monitoring with downhole distributed strain measurements
WO2016091972A1 (en) Method for ascertaining characteristics of an underground formation
US9234999B2 (en) System and method for making distributed measurements using fiber optic cable
WO2014058335A1 (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating the cementing quality of a borehole
Reinsch et al. H2020 GeoWell: Deliverable D5. 2 Combined measurement of temperature, strain and noise in a cemented annulus of a geothermal well and its application to monitor the well integrity
이다솜 Post-calibration of DTS data and analysis of well completion process monitoring in CO2 geological storage demonstration site

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SHELL OIL COMPANY, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MINCHAU, MICHAEL CHARLES;REEL/FRAME:030655/0484

Effective date: 20120830

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION