US20130284435A1 - Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons - Google Patents

Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130284435A1
US20130284435A1 US13/888,874 US201313888874A US2013284435A1 US 20130284435 A1 US20130284435 A1 US 20130284435A1 US 201313888874 A US201313888874 A US 201313888874A US 2013284435 A1 US2013284435 A1 US 2013284435A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
satellite
sagdox
site
oxygen
water
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/888,874
Inventor
Richard Kelso Kerr
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CNOOC Petroleum North America ULC
Original Assignee
Nexen Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US13/543,012 external-priority patent/US9828841B2/en
Priority claimed from US13/628,164 external-priority patent/US9163491B2/en
Priority to US13/888,874 priority Critical patent/US20130284435A1/en
Application filed by Nexen Inc filed Critical Nexen Inc
Assigned to NEXEN INC. reassignment NEXEN INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KERR, RICHARD KELSO
Priority to US14/058,488 priority patent/US20140096960A1/en
Publication of US20130284435A1 publication Critical patent/US20130284435A1/en
Priority to US14/078,983 priority patent/US20140166278A1/en
Assigned to NEXEN ENERGY ULC reassignment NEXEN ENERGY ULC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEXEN ENERGY INC.
Assigned to NEXEN ENERGY INC. reassignment NEXEN ENERGY INC. CERTIFICATE OF CONTINUATION Assignors: NEXEN INC.
Priority to US15/147,853 priority patent/US20170002638A1/en
Assigned to CNOOC PETROLEUM NORTH AMERICA ULC reassignment CNOOC PETROLEUM NORTH AMERICA ULC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEXEN ENERGY ULC
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/24Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
    • E21B43/2406Steam assisted gravity drainage [SAGD]
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/24Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
    • E21B43/2406Steam assisted gravity drainage [SAGD]
    • E21B43/2408SAGD in combination with other methods

Abstract

A SAGDOX satellite system for recovering hydrocarbons includes a central SAGDOX site, at least one SAGDOX satellite site, and a pipeline corridor for communication between the central SAGDOX site and the SAGDOX satellite site. The satellite system is designed to recover hydrocarbons using a SAGDOX process at the satellite site and transfer recovered hydrocarbons to the central site.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The Athabasca Oil Sands is one of the largest oil deposits in the world. It contains 2.75 trillion barrels of bitumen resources, including carbonate deposits (Butler, R. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen, Prentice-Hall, 1991). The recoverable resource (excluding carbonate deposits) is currently estimated at about 170 billion barrels. (CAPP, The Facts on Oil Sands, November 2010). 20% of these resources is recoverable by mining and the other 80% is recoverable by in-situ Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) (CAPP, 2010).
  • The leading in-situ EOR process to recover bitumen is steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), a steam-only process. Table 1 provides typical production of leading producers in the industry based on SAGD. However, SAGD does have some limitations. Studies indicate that the economical limit for steam transportation, using an insulated pipeline, is about 10 to 15 km (Finn, A., Integration of Nuclear Power with Oil Sands Extraction Projects in Canada, MIT Thesis, June 2007), (Energy Alberta Corporation, Nuclear Energy: Hedging Option for the Oil Sands, CHUA, presentation Nov. 2, 2006), (PAC, Clean Bitumen Technology Action Plan, April 2011).
  • More specifically, bitumen production is limited because of the following SAGD central plant characteristics: 1) plant life is limited to 40 years at 90% average availability; 2) the available land for SAGD is 30% of the total (either due to reservoir quality, surface access or lease ownership issues); and 3) the average SAGD pattern size is 1000 m×100mth with an average pattern bitumen recovery of 1.5 million barrels (bbls) (411 bbls/day for 10 years). This means that the maximum size for a self-contained bitumen supply, without any satellite plants, based on the above assumptions, is 108,000 bbls/day. Over the assumed 40 year life of a SAGD central plant, the maximum-sized SAGD central plant will recover 1.4 billion barrels of bitumen. In order to fully recover the recoverable resources, there would be a need for about 100 central SAGD maximum sized plants and about 100,000 average SAGD patterns.
  • One option available to increase bitumen production would be for a large central bitumen producer using SAGD to construct a remote, smaller plant. The SAGD central plant supplies services and some feeds to the remote, preferably smaller SAGD plant as opposed to constructing a new stand-alone (greenfield) SAGD central production plant. This SAGD smaller, remote plant is referred to as a bitumen satellite plant. A bitumen satellite plant is defined as a satellite plant for bitumen production that is “tied” to a central plant by a pipeline corridor. The pipeline corridor supplies a significant amount of input feeds from a central SAGD plant to the satellite SAGD plant, and it returns bitumen (or bitumen and diluent, or bitumen and water) to the central plant.
  • There are several choices for conveying bitumen and water (produced fluid mix) from a satellite plant to a central plant. The following are examples:
      • 1. Push Water Systems—bitumen and water may be conveyed together without chemical additions in a gathering line system (Integra Engineering, Pushwater Systems Extend Heavy Oil Collection, 2011). The mixture may be thought of as a bulk oil/water (O/W) emulsion or blob flow. Commercial systems operate at distances up to 12 km (Integra (2011)).
      • 2. Oil-in-Water Emulsions (O/W)—these emulsions may be created and stabilized by adding shear and chemicals to produced fluids. O/W emulsions may be stable and pumped with as low as 30% (v/v) continuous-phase water (Wikipedia, Orimulsion, 2011), (Xinhua Economic News, China's First Orimulsion Pipeline Comes on Steam, Nov. 7, 2006), (Brennan, J. R, Screw Pumps Provide High Efficiency in Transport of Orinocco Bitumen, P and G Journal, March 1995), (Stockwell, A., et al., Transoil Technology for Heavy Oil Transportation: Results of Field Trials at Wolf Lake, SPE 18362-MS, October 1988).
      • 3. Diluent and Bitumen mixture “Dil.bit”—Today, dil.bit is the commercial choice for long distance pipelining of bitumen. But, for a satellite plant this would require oil-water separation (oil treating plant) and produced water reuse or disposal. For a satellite plant with a strategy to minimize capital and operating costs, this is an option but not preferred.
      • 4. Diluent and Bitumen and Water mixture—diluent may be added to the produced fluid mix. One advantage of this is that the oil phase has reduced viscosity, so that if the conveyance pipeline is shut down in cold weather, the oil phase will not block a restart. The disadvantage is that the water concentration is reduced in the mix, so that push water flow and emulsion flow may be more difficult.
  • The SAGD satellite plant described above is desirable for the following reasons:
      • 1. Steam cannot economically be supplied to fully integrate the SAGD satellite plant with the SAGD central plant.
      • 2. Lands around the central SAGD plant have already been exploited.
      • 3. The SAGD remote, satellite plant has more productive reservoirs.
      • 4. The operator owns the land rights at the SAGD satellite plant.
      • 5. The operator wishes to start another SAGD satellite plant that may eventually turn into a SAGD central self-sufficient plant.
      • 6. Expansion of the SAGD central plant (brownfield expansion) and delivery of products (and acceptance of bitumen) is more cost effective than construction of a new (greenfield) project at the SAGD satellite plant.
      • 7. Stand-alone SAGD satellite plant can be operated using some (most) of the SAGD central plant staff, thus saving operating expenses.
      • 8. Construction of new SAGD central plants needed (e.g. Oil/Water separation) can better take advantage of economies of scale for engineering, design, construction, and operation.
      • 9. Process reliability may be improved.
      • 10. It is harder to control construction costs at a new greenfield plant compared to an existing brownfield plant site. Therefore, in a satellite plant, there is motivation to maximize the proportion of capital expenditures at a central SAGD plant and minimize the proportion at a SAGD satellite plant.
  • While existing SAGD satellite production plants do have the advantages described above, there is a need for satellite production plants that operate using a more efficient process. By creating SAGDOX satellite production plants, production and efficiency is increased costs are reduced.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The following terms and acronyms are used herein:
  • CAPP—Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
  • SAGD—Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
  • SAGDOX—SAGD with Oxygen
  • PAC—Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada
  • NEB—National Energy Board (Canada)
  • OTSG—Once Through Steam Generator
  • EOR—Enhanced Oil Recovery
  • SAGDOX (xx)—SAGDOX with xx % oxygen in the steam/oxygen mix (v/v)
  • SAGDOX (35)—SAGDOX with 35% oxygen in the steam/oxygen mix (v/v)
  • ASU—Air Separation Unit
  • ETOR—Energy to oil ratio (MMBTU/bbl)
  • SOR—Steam to Oil Ratio (bbl/bbl)
  • CSS—Cyclic Steam Stimulation
  • DOE—Department of Energy (USA)
  • CHUA—Canada Heavy Oil Association
  • MIT—Mass. Institute of Technology
  • O/W—Oil in Water (emulsion)
  • W/O—Water in Oil (emulsion)
  • HTO—High Temperature Oxidation)(150-300°
  • bbl-barrel
  • bbls-barrels
  • For the purpose of the invention, bitumen is defined as an in situ hydrocarbon with <10 API gravity and >100,000 cp. in-situ viscosity. Preferably for SAGDOX, steam and oxygen are injected separately and continuously. The steam and oxygen rates are controlled to meet oxygen/steam (v/v) ratio targets and to meet energy injection targets. The produced gas removal rate is adjusted to control pattern pressures and to control and/or improve oxygen conformance. The produced fluid (bitumen and water) production rate uses steam trap control, assuming the region around the production well is steam-saturated.
  • Also for convenience SAGDOX is labeled as SAGDOX (A), where A is the (v/v) percent of oxygen in the oxygen and steam injectant gas). We have assessed our cases in our US patent application US 2013/0098603, herein incorporated by reference, for a range of oxygen concentrations from 5% (v/v) to 50% (v/v).
  • Further, in the present invention, satellite plant, satellite facility, and satellite site are used interchangeably. Also, central plant, central facility, and central site are used interchangeably.
  • The present invention relates to a satellite production process for bitumen recovery that either uses SAGDOX or converts an existing SAGD satellite plant to a SAGDOX satellite plant.
  • SAGDOX is a bitumen enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process. The process may be considered as a hybrid of SAGD and in-situ combustion (ISC). SAGDOX is described, in detail, in US2013/0098603. While similar to SAGD, SAGDOX incorporates extra vertical wells (or segregated injection/production) to inject oxygen into the system and to remove non-condensable combustion gases from the system. SAGDOX adds energy to the bitumen reservoir by direct steam injection and oxygen combustion of residual bitumen. Many of the advantages of the present invention stem from the properties of oxygen versus steam for adding heat to the reservoir.
  • According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a SAGDOX satellite system for recovering hydrocarbons, the system comprises a central SAGDOX site, at least one SAGDOX satellite site remote said central SAGDOX site, and a pipeline corridor for communication between the central SAGDOX site and the SAGDOX satellite site, preferably the distance between the central site and satellite site ranges from 9 km to 160 km, more preferably 10 km to 100 km, wherein the satellite system is designed to recover hydrocarbons using a SAGDOX process at the SAGDOX satellite site and transfer recovered hydrocarbons to the central SAGDOX site.
  • Preferably, the central SAGDOX site comprises:
      • (a) an oil/water separation unit,
      • (b) an oil collection unit,
      • (c) a water treatment unit, and
      • (d) an oxygen generation unit.
  • Preferably, the SAGDOX satellite site comprises:
      • (a) a boiler for steam generation,
      • (b) at least one steam injection well,
      • (c) at least one oxygen injection well, and
      • (d) a bitumen recovery well.
  • Preferably, the pipeline corridor comprises:
      • (a) an oxygen supply pipe to supply the SAGDOX satellite site
      • (b) a treated water supply pipe to supply the SAGDOX satellite site
      • (c) a natural gas supply pipe to supply the SAGDOX satellite site, and
      • (d) a bitumen and water recovery pipe.
  • In a preferred embodiment, while the oxygen, water and natural gas are supplied to the SAGDOX satellite site; oxygen with generated steam is injected into an underground formation; and recovered from the underground formation bitumen emulsion, preferably O/W emulsions, are pumped back to the central site, then the bitumen is separated from the water, and treated water is sent back to the satellite site for steam generation.
  • Preferably the recovered bitumen emulsion is further combined with a chemical stabilizer or diluent at the SAGDOX satellite site, and the pipeline corridor further comprises a pipe for delivering said chemical stabilizer or diluent to the SAGDOX satellite site.
  • Preferably the SAGDOX satellite site further comprises a vent gas treating unit for sequestering CO2 and/or other produced gases.
  • Preferably each central SAGDOX plant has more than one SAGDOX satellite plants attached to it with one or more pipeline corridors.
  • Preferably at the SAGDOX satellite plant, the oxygen and generated steam are injected into said underground formation in one of the following ways: 1) the oxygen with generated steam are simultaneously injected into the same well; 2) the oxygen with generated steam are simultaneously injected into several wells; 3) or the oxygen and generated steam are separately injected into separated wells for steam and oxygen and the mixture takes place in the underground formation.
  • Preferably oxygen in the oxygen and generated steam mixture has a concentration in range of 5% to 50% (v/v), preferably 10% to 40% (v/v), more preferably the concentration is about 35% (v/v).
  • According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a process of upgrading an existing SAGD facility by transforming it into an SAGDOX satellite system, the process comprising: installation of an oxygen generation unit at the central SAGD facility, providing at least one remotely located SAGDOX satellite site, preferably a plurality of SAGDOX satellite sites, and providing at least one pipeline corridor, preferably a plurality of pipeline corridors, between the central SAGD facility and the SAGDOX satellite site. Preferably said pipeline corridor further comprising additional pipelines for oxygen supply, produced water and natural gas supply; thus increasing the operational area of the original facility for bitumen recovery by minimizing capital cost.
  • According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for recovering bitumen from a satellite bitumen production site and delivering bitumen to a central facility, whereby:
      • (a) the satellite bitumen production site is remote said central facility, preferably said satellite bitumen production site is located more than 10 km from the central facility,
      • (b) a pipeline corridor is provided for linking the satellite bitumen production site and the central facility, preferably said corridor further comprises at least one pipeline to provide treated water, suitable for boiler use, from the central site; at least one pipeline to provide oxygen gas from the central facility to the satellite bitumen production site, for SAGDOX; and at least one pipeline to provide produced fluids (bitumen and water) to the central facility recovered from the satellite bitumen production site. Preferably, the process used for recovering bitumen from a satellite bitumen production site is SAGDOX as described herein.
  • Preferably, the produced fluids (bitumen and water) are conveyed from the satellite bitumen production site to the central facility in a push-water system.
  • Preferably, the produced fluids (bitumen and water) are conveyed to the central plant as a stabilized emulsion. Preferably said stabilized emulsion comprises a chemical stabilizer, such as ethoxylated nonylphenol, preferably added to the produced fluids (bitumen and water) at the satellite bitumen production site.
  • Preferably a diluent is blended with the produced fluids (water and bitumen) for transport to the central facility.
  • Preferably, natural gas or fuel gas is also provided to the satellite bitumen production site, from the central facility by the pipeline corridor, for use as a boiler fuel.
  • Preferably, electricity is also transported from the central facility to/from the satellite bitumen recovery site.
  • Preferably, a produced gas (CO2) pipeline is added to convey SAGDOX vent gas from the satellite bitumen recovery site to the central facility.
  • According to another aspect of the invention an existing SAGD satellite bitumen recovery site with existing steam capacity, is converted to a SAGDOX satellite site, as defined herein, utilizing existing steam capacity at the SAGD satellite bitumen recovery site.
  • According to another aspect of the invention, produced water is separated at the satellite bitumen recovery site, preferably this water is either treated for boiler use or disposed of on-site, wherein the diluted bitumen, is conveyed back to the central facility generally free from excess water.
  • More specifically, the present invention, a SAGDOX production satellite plant has the following advantages:
  • 1. The SAGDOX satellite plant is greater than 9 km, more preferably 15 km, distance from SAGDOX central plant because oxygen can be economically pipelined for approximately 100 miles. This is more than 10 times steam's limit of approx. 10 km.
  • 2. SAGDOX satellite site reduces capital expenditures at the satellite site (greenfield) for the pipeline corridor and for the overall project. Most of the expenditures for major process elements are at the central facility. Specifically, pipeline corridor costs for SAGDOX are 22% less; boiler costs can be reduced by 85%.
  • 3. If vent gas (mostly CO2) is captured or sequestered on site, either at satellite plant, central plant, or both), emissions per unit bitumen produced are significantly reduced.
  • 4. As shown in US 2013/0098603, the process efficiency when incorporating SAGDOX satellite site is improved compared to SAGD satellite site. If efficiency is measured as the energy produced (in bitumen) compared to the energy used, on the surface, to produce the energy, then SAGDOX is a much more efficient process than SAGD.
  • 5. Water use is minimized. As shown in US 2013/0098603, if SAGDOX produces connate water, make-up water can be reduced and/or eliminated to the central plant. Specifically, SAGDOX can also produce water directly from combustion and by vaporizing connate water, so that no new make-up water is needed.
  • 6. The steam and oxygen mixture has a preferred oxygen concentration range (5 to 50% (v/v)) This preferred range for SAGDOX has minimum and maximum oxygen/steam ratios, with the following rationale:
      • a. The minimum oxygen/steam ratio is 0.05 (v/v) (oxygen concentration of about 5%) Below this concentration, the following occurs:
        • i. HTO combustion starts to become unstable. It becomes more difficult to attain minimum oxygen flux rates to sustain HTO, particularly for a mature SAGDOX process where the combustion front is far away from the injector.
        • ii. It also becomes difficult to vaporize and mobilize all connate water.
      • b. The maximum oxygen/steam ratio is 1.00 (v/v) (oxygen concentration of 50.0%). Above this concentration, the following occurs:
        • i. The reflux rates in the reservoir to sustain steam inventories exceed 70% of the total steam. This may be difficult to attain in practice.
        • ii. The net bitumen (“coke”) fuel that is consumed by oxidation starts to exceed the residual fuel left behind in the SAGD steam-swept zone. So compared to SAGD, SAGDOX (50+) may have lower recoveries and reserves.
        • v. Above this limit it becomes difficult to produce steam and oxygen from an integrated ASU: Cogen plant.
  • So the preferred range for oxygen/steam ratios is 0.05 to 1.00 (v/v) corresponding to a concentration range of 5 to 50% (v/v) of oxygen in the mix.
  • 7. Total capex costs are also less. Per unit energy delivered to the reservoir, oxygen capex is much less than steam and water treating capex.
  • 8. Economies of scale for air separation unit (ASU) oxygen plants at reasonable sizes for SAGDOX satellites have been achieved. For a 25 KBD SAGDOX (35) satellite 2000 tonnes/day of oxygen is needed. This is a nice fit both for the capacity of the satellite and the capacity of the ASU plant.
  • 9. The SAGDOX process of the present invention produces an off-gas in one embodiment that is almost substantially pure CO2. In one embodiment, if this off-gas is captured for sequestration, CO2 emissions in SAGDOX can be much less than SAGD.
  • 10. At first blush, it may appear SAGDOX needs more wells than SAGD—to inject oxygen gas and to remove produced non-condensable gases. However, SAGDOX allows longer horizontal wells to be drilled, by reducing hydraulic limits on horizontal well lengths. So, on a per-unit-volume-of-reservoir basis, SAGDOX well costs can be comparable to or less than SAGD well costs.
  • 11. SAGDOX opex costs are less than SAGD. The wells can be operated longer and reservoirs increased.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts a typical SAGDOX process
  • FIG. 2 depicts a 10 KBD (thousand barrels per day) Satellite SAGD
  • FIG. 3 depicts a 10 KBD Satellite SAGDOX (10)
  • FIG. 4 depicts a 10 KBD Satellite SAGDOX (9)
  • FIG. 5 depicts a 10 KBD Satellite SAGDOX (20)
  • FIG. 6 depicts a 10 KBD Satellite SAGDOX (35)
  • FIG. 7 depicts a 10 KBD Satellite SAGDOX (50)
  • FIG. 8 depicts an Expansion to an Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite SAGDOX (5) Increment
  • FIG. 9 depicts an Expansion to an Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite SAGDOX 9 Increment
  • FIG. 10 depicts an Expansion to an Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite SAGDOX (20) Increment
  • FIG. 11 depicts an Expansion to an Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite SAGDOX (35) Increment
  • FIG. 12 depicts an Expansion to an Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite SAGDOX (50) Increment
  • FIG. 13 depicts Viscosity versus % disperse phase of O/W Emulsions
  • FIG. 14 depicts a central SAGDOX plant connected to more than one satellite SAGDOX plant
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, a typical geometry of the SAGDOX system of the present invention is depicted. As can be seen, oxygen 5 is added during the SAGD process through the steam pipeline 1 and the effluents include produced gas 4 as well as bitumen and water 2.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, there is depicted a SAGD system in which a SAGD central plant is connected to a SAGD satellite site. In this instance, a set-up consists of pipelines running from the base plant 10 to the satellite site 20. A series of pipelines connect the base plant 10 with the satellite site 20. In particular, treated water is provided to satellite site 20 via pipeline 30. Diluent is provided to satellite site 20 via pipeline 40. Natural gas fuel to fuel the boiler in the satellite site is provided to the satellite site via pipeline 50. Finally, pipeline 60 is provided to transport the mixture of diluent+produced water+bitumen from the satellite site 20 to the central plant 10. In this set-up, 33.7 KBD of treated water 30 is needed for the SAGD operation at the satellite site (namely for steam production); Boiler CO2 is 14.8 MMSCFD; 14.8 MMSCFD of natural gas fuel 50 is needed to fuel the boiler; 3.37 KBD of make-up water 75 is needed at the base plant; and diluent+produced water+bitumen 120 product pipeline volume of 53.7 KBD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) SOR is 3.37; 3) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 4) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10 KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; and 8) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; and 9) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, there is depicted a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite site 20. One major difference between the system of FIG. 1 and the system of FIG. 2 is the additional Oxygen pipeline 45 from the base plant 10 to feed oxygen to the SAGDOX satellite site 20. In this system, the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 5 whereas in the system of FIG. 1 there is no oxygen. As can readily be seen, 8.56 MMSCFD or 327 tonnes/d of oxygen 45 is delivered to the SAGDOX satellite plant 20; vent pure CO 2 105 is 8.56 MMSCFD; natural gas fuel 51 from the base plant 10 to the satellite is 9.6 MMSCFD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 121 is 42.0 KBD; treated water 31 is 22.0 KBD; Make up water 76 is 2.2 KBD; disposal water 86 is 2.2 KBD; ASU electricity 60 is 4.0 MW versus zero in FIG. 2; and boiler CO 2 111 is 9.6 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb.; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10 KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; 8) no extra water; 9) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 10) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 11) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; and 12) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, there is depicted a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20. In this system, the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 9. In this instance 12.3 MMSCFD or 421 tonnes/d of oxygen 46 is delivered to the satellite; vent pure CO 2 106 is 12.3 MMSCFD; natural gas fuel 52 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant is 7.38 MMSCFD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 122 is 36.9 KBD; treated water 32 is 16.9 KBD; Make up water 77 is 1.7 KBD; disposal water 87 is 1.7 KBD; ASU electricity 61 is 5.1 MW; and boiler CO 2 112 is 7.38 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) Oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10 KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; 8) no extra water; 9) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 10) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 11) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; and 12) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5, there is depicted a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 20. In this instance 17.6 MMSCFD or 672 tonnes/d of oxygen 47 is delivered to the satellite; vent pure CO2 107i s 17.6 MMSCFD; natural gas fuel 53 from the base plant 10 to the satellite is 4.17 MMSCFD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 123 is 29.54 KBD; treated water 33 is 9.54 KBD; Make up water 78 is 0.95 KBD; disposal water 88 is 0.95 KBD; ASU electricity 62 is 8.1 MW; and boiler CO 2 113 is 4.17 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristic include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10 KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; 8) No extra water; 9) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 10) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 11) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; and 12) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6, there is depicted a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20. In this system, the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 35. In this instance, 20.8 MMSCFD or 794 tonnes/d of oxygen 48 is delivered to the satellite; vent pure CO 2 108 is 20.8 MMSCFD; natural gas fuel 54 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant 20 is 2.28 MMSCFD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 124 is 25.2 KBD; treated water 34 is 5.2 KBD; Make up water 79 is 0.5 KBD; disposal water 89 is 0.5 KBD; ASU electricity 63 is 9.7 MW; and boiler CO 2 114 is 2.28 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb 4) oxygen is at480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; 8) no extra water; 9) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 10) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 11) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; and 12) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 7, there is depicted a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 50. In this instance 22.4 MMSCFD or 855 tonnes/d of oxygen 49 is delivered to the satellite 20; vent pure CO 2 109 is 22.4 MMSCFD; natural gas fuel 55 from the central plant 10 to the satellite 20 is 1.32 MMSCFD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 125 is 23.0 KBD; treated water 35 is 3.0 KBD; Make up water 80 is 0.3 KBD; disposal water 90 is 0.3 KBD; ASU electricity 64 is 10.4 MW; and boiler CO 2 115 is 1.32 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) 10 KBD bitumen 95 increment; 7) all steam injected equals produced water; 8) no extra water; 9) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 10) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 11) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; and 12) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used.
  • As seen in FIGS. 2 through 7, the amount of diluent 40 introduced to the satellite 20 remained constant at 10 KBD.
  • Referring now to FIG. 8, there is depicted an expansion of an existing 10 KBD SAGD system to a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20 and all the steam capacity at the existing satellite is used, which means no natural gas fuel is required to be pipelined to the satellite. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 5. In this instance 13.13 MMSCFD of oxygen 140 is delivered to the satellite; vent pure CO 2 160 is 13.13 MMSCFD; diluent 41 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant 20 is 5.34 KBD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 126 is 16.02 KBD; incremental bitumen 96 is 5.34 KBD; treated water is 0.0 KBD; Make up water 35 is 0.0 KBD; disposal water 91 is 0.0 KBD; ASU electricity 65 is 6.11 MW; and boiler CO 2 116 is 0.0 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) all steam injected equals produced water; 7) No extra water; 8) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 9) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 10) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; 10) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used; and 11) all steam capacity at existing satellite is used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 9, there is depicted an expansion of an existing 10 KBD SAGD system to a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20 and all the steam capacity at the existing satellite is used, which means no natural gas fuel is required to be pipelined to the satellite plant 20. In this system, the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 9. In this instance, 24.6 MMSCFD of oxygen 141 is delivered to the satellite 20; vent pure CO 2 161 is 24.6 MMSCFD; diluent 40 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant 20 is 10.0 KBD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 127 is 30.0 KBD; incremental bitumen 95 is 10.0 KBD; treated water 35 is 0.0 KBD; Make up water is 81 0.0 KBD; disposal water 91 is 0.0 KBD; ASU electricity 66 is 11.5 MW; and boiler CO 2 116 is 0.0 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) all steam injected equals produced water; 7) No extra water; 8) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 9) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 10) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; 10) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used; and 11) all steam capacity at existing satellite is used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 10, there is depicted an expansion of an existing 10 KBD SAGD system to a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite site 20 and all the steam capacity at the existing satellite is used, which means no natural gas fuel is required to be pipelined to the satellite. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 20. As can readily be seen, in this instance 62.0 MMSCFD of oxygen 142 is delivered to the satellite; vent pure CO 2 162 is 62.2 MMSCFD; diluent 42 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant 20 is 25.34 KBD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 128 is 76.02 KBD; incremental bitumen 97 is 25.34 KBD; treated water 35 is 0.0 KBD; Make up water 81 is 0.0 KBD; disposal water 91 is 0.0 KBD; ASU electricity 67 is 29.0 MW; and boiler CO2 116i s 0.0 MMSCFD Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) all steam injected equals produced water; 7) No extra water; 8) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 9) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 10) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; 10) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used; and 11) all steam capacity at existing satellite is used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 11, there is depicted an expansion of an existing 10 KBD SAGD system to a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20 and all the steam capacity at the existing satellite is used, which means no natural gas fuel is required to be pipelined to the satellite. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 35. As can readily be seen, in this instance 134.2 MMSCFD of oxygen 143 is delivered to the satellite plant 20; vent pure CO 2 163 is 134.2 MMSCFD; diluent 43 from the central plant 10 to the satellite plant 20 is 54.52 KBD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 129 is 163.56 KBD; incremental bitumen 98 is 54.52 KBD; treated water 35 is 0.0 KBD; Make up water 81 is 0.0 KBD; disposal water 91 is 0.0 KBD; ASU electricity 68 is 62.5 MW; and boiler CO 2 116 is 0.0 MMSCFD Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) all steam injected equals produced water; 7) No extra water; 8) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 9) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 10) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; 10) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used; and 11) all steam capacity at existing satellite is used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 12, there is depicted an expansion of an existing 10 KBD SAGD system to a SAGDOX satellite system of the present invention wherein central plant 10 is connected to a SAGDOX satellite plant 20 and all the steam capacity at the existing satellite is used, which means no natural gas fuel is required to be pipelined to the satellite. In this system the percentage of oxygen in the steam/oxygen mixture is 50. In this instance 248.9 MMSCFD of oxygen 144 is delivered to the satellite plant 20; vent pure CO 2 164 is 248.9 MMSCFD; diluent 44 from the central plant 10 to the satellite 20 is 101.11 KBD; Diluent+produce water+bitumen 130 is 303.3 KBD; incremental bitumen 98 is 101.11 KBD; treated water 35 is 0.0 KBD; Make up water 81 is 0.0 KBD; disposal water 91 is 0.0 KBD; ASU electricity 68 is 115.9 MW; and boiler CO 2 116 is 0.0 MMSCFD. Further in this instance, characteristics include: 1) the ETOR is 1.8; 2) the OTSG is 80% efficient; 3) steam is at 1000 BTU/lb; 4) oxygen is at 480 BTU/SCF; 5) 90% of produced water that goes to central plant is recycled as steam; 6) all steam injected equals produced water; 7) No extra water; 8) 292.5 kWh/tonne Oxygen (95-97% purity); 9) natural gas fuel at 1000 BTU/SCF; 10) diluent/bitumen ratio equal 1.0; 10) pure carbon dioxide vent gas equals the oxygen used; and 11) all steam capacity at existing satellite is used.
  • Referring now to FIG. 14, there is depicted a SAGDOX central plant 10 connected to more than one SAGDOX satellite plant 20. A pipeline corridor connects the SAGDOX central plant 10 to each SAGDOX satellite plant 20, allowing for communication between the central SAGDOX plant 10 and the SAGDOX satellite plant 20.
  • Table 2 provides the typical injection gas properties of SAGDOX for the different oxygen concentrations in steam and oxygen mixtures discussed above, according the present invention.
  • SAGDOX (35) is the preferred embodiment of the process. SAGDOX (35) is depicted in FIG. 6 with the following properties:
      • 1. An oxygen/steam flow ratio of 0.538 (v/v).
      • 2. 84.5% of the heat stems from oxygen (combustion).
      • 3. Per SCF of mix, the heat delivery is 199 BTU.
      • 4. To deliver 1 MMBTU of energy, we need 5 MSCF of gases (steam and O2).
  • Comparing FIG. 2 (SAGD) to FIG. 6 (SAGDOX (35)), the following advantages are seen:
      • 1. Reduction in steam boiler capacity at the satellite site from 33.7 to 5.2 KBD steam—85% reduction.
      • 2. Reduction in fuel gas demand from 14.8 MMSCFD to 2.3 MMSCFD—85% reduction.
      • 3. Reduction of product pipeline volume from 53.7 to 25.2 KBD—53% reduction. A similar reduction in incremental oil/water separation capacity is expected.
      • 4. Reduction in treated water supply similar to steam—85% reduction. Equivalent reduction in incremental water treatment capacity is expected.
      • 5. Reduction in disposal water and make-up water from 3.4 KBD to 0.5 KBD—85% reduction.
      • 6. Diluent supply is unaffected.
      • 7. If pure CO2 is captured and sequestered, CO2 emissions will be reduced from 14.8 to 2.3 MMSCFD—an 85% decrease (some of the capture benefit can be realized if CO2 is sequestered/retained in the bitumen reservoir).
  • Preferably, the satellite plant is more than 10 km from the central plant, otherwise it would be economic to integrate the satellite and supply steam from a central site. Also, the pipeline corridor, between the satellite site and the central plant site, should contain the following fluids pipelines:
      • 1. Treated water, from the central site.
      • 2. Oxygen gas for SAGDOX, from the central site.
      • 3. Produced water and bitumen, from the satellite site.
  • Also preferably, it may be feasible to pipeline produced fluids, without diluent using push water systems as discussed above. Fuel gas may be available from an alternate source, such as local supplies from pipelines or gas wells. For some cases, as listed below, the pipeline corridor may also contain the following fluid pipelines:
      • 1. Natural gas boiler fuel, from the central site.
      • 2. Diluent, from the central site.
      • 3. A produced fluid pipeline including diluent, from the satellite site.
      • 4. A CO2 vent gas pipeline, from the satellite site.
  • Further explaining the advantages of SAGDOX, the cost of the pipeline corridor for SAGDOX satellites is less than SAGD satellites in all embodiments. Assuming installed cost of pipelines is proportional to pipeline diameter, Table 7 summarizes diameters and cumulative diameters for each case assuming a 5 ft/sec velocity (3.4 mph) for liquids and 50 ft/sec for gases at 500 psia (this is within the safe operating region for oxygen in carbon steel pipelines (Sarathi, P. S., In-Situ Combustion Handbook, DOE, 1996). For our preferred case, SAGDOX (35), the capital cost of the pipeline corridor is 22% less than the cost for the SAGD case.
  • Table 11 highlights a SAGDOX advantage as well. If we pipeline an O/W emulsion from the satellite plant to the central plant, rather than an oil and diluent and water mix, the advantage of the SAGDOX satellite c/w SAGD is even more pronounced.
  • Even further, assuming a 2000 tonne/day ASU oxygen train, at the central plant, to capture the economy-of-scale for oxygen production, Table 4 shows the minimum satellite project size to capture these savings. The size varies from 61 KBD for SAGDOX (5) to 23 KBD for SAGDOX (50). For our preferred case, SAGDOX (35), the minimum satellite size is 25 KBD.
  • Referring to Table 3, considerable boiler cost savings when using SAGDOX are highlighted. For example, for a 10 KBD satellite our satellite site boiler capacities and savings are as follows:
  • MMBTU/hr % SAGD % Savings
    SAGD 492 100 0
    SAGDOX(5) 320 65 35
    SAGDOX(9) 246 50 50
    SAGDOX(20 139 28 72
    SAGDOX(35) 76 15 85
    SAGDOX(50) 44 9 91
  • If we don't add diluent at the satellite site we may have to add shear to produce an oil in water (O/W) emulsion that will be stable until it reaches the central facility. Alternately, we can add an emulsion stabilizer (surfactant) so that we can pipeline the product safely. The viscosity of O/W emulsions is relatively independent of the oil viscosity and low enough to pipeline directly (FIG. 13).
  • Also, the option with the minimum capex at the satellite site and for the satellite pipeline corridor includes the following elements:
      • 1. SAGDOX (50) EOR process at the satellite site.
      • 2. Pipeline for bitumen and produced water as an O/W emulsion, using mechanical stirring at the satellite and addition of a stabilizer/surfactant if necessary.
      • 3. Procurement of fuel gas for boilers from another source, rather than provision of a separate line from the central facility. The same for electrical supply.
      • 4. Expanded water treatment, oil/water separation, oxygen production, and tankage at the central facility.
      • 5. Size the expansion large enough to capture economies of scale.
  • Based on the above, the following can be concluded:
      • 1. The capacity increment, to the 10 KBD satellite plant, varies from 15 KBD for SAGDOX (5) to 111 KBD for SAGDOX (50). Our preferred case (SAGDOX (35)) results in a production increment of 64.5 KBD (Table 8).
      • 2. For the expansion increments, oxygen demands vary from 501 tonnes/d for SAGDOX (5) up to 9510 tonnes/d for SAGDOX (50). Our preferred case (SAGDOX (35)) has an oxygen demand of 5128 tonnes/d—large enough to capture economy of scale for ASU oxygen production.
      • 3. On a per-bbl-of-bitumen basis (Table 9), our SAGDOX increments produce only one third the volume of produced fluids (including diluent) compared to our SAGD satellite or a SAGD increment. No extra water is used at all. The increment is pure combustion based.
      • 4. Also on a per-bbl-of-bitumen basis, without capture of a near-pure vent gas CO2, CO2 emissions are 66% per bbl more incremental bitumen. If the vent gas is captured or retained in the reservoir, the incremental bitumen production has no associated CO2 emissions.
  • Also discussed above, the SAGDOX option for a new satellite plant has at least one additional pipeline compared to SAGD—the oxygen line to deliver oxygen to the satellite site. But, other lines can have significant reduced capacity (FIGS. 2 to 7). Table 6 summarizes the individual volumes for each SAGD and SAGDOX case for a 10 KBD satellite plant. SAGDOX, for all cases, has a reduced liquids capacity but an increased gas capacity.
  • If we are expanding an existing SAGD satellite, it is particularly advantageous to switch to SAGDOX, because:
      • 1. We need not expand/construct any additional boilers, treated water pipelines, water treatment capacity or fuel gas supply pipelines.
      • 2. The SAGDOX increments can be quite large—up to 111 KBD increment based on an existing 10 KBD SAGD satellite.
  • FIGS. 8, 9, 10, 11, & 12 and Tables 8 & 9 show an analysis of a SAGDOX expansion to a 10 KBD SAGD satellite, assuming the existing steam capacity at the satellite is used to supply the steam for SAGDOX, and the size of the expansion is adjusted to consume all the steam for a range of steam and oxygen mixes from 5 to 50% (v/v) oxygen. On an incremental basis, no additional capacity for steam generation and water treatment or new pipeline capacity for treated water supple and fuel gas is needed. This simplifies capital expenditures and the pipeline corridor expansion.
  • Table 10 summarizes the capex item differences at the satellite site and central site when comparing SAGD with SAGDOX, as well as some of the advantages of the present invention.
  • Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art and may be employed by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • TABLE 1
    Canadian Steam EOR Production
    March 2011 (KBD)
    SAGD
    Cenovus (Foster Creek) 118.7
    Suncor (Finebag) 53.9
    Devon (Jackfish) 31.8
    Suncor (Mackay) 31.2
    Meg (Christina LK) 37.2
    Nexen (Long LK) 26.2
    Conoco Phillips (Surmont) 22.3
    Others 47.8
    SAGD Total 359.0
    CSS
    Imperial Oil (Cold Lake) 162.0
    Can. Nat. (Primrose/Wolf Lk) 77.2
    Others 5.1
    CSS Total 244.3
    Canada Total 603.3
    Source:
    1. First Energy Capital. Jun. 9, 2011
  • TABLE 2
    SAGDOX Injection Gas Properties
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    % heat from O2 0.0 34.8 50.0 71.7 84.5 91.0
    % heat from steam 100.0 65.2 50.0 28.3 15.5 9.0
    BTU/SCF mix 47.4 69.0 86.3 133.9 198.8 263.7
    MSCF/MMMBTU mix 21.1 14.5 11.6 7.5 5.0 3.8
    MSCF O2/MMBTU mix 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.8 1.9
    MSCF stm/MMBTU mix 21.1 13.8 10.6 6.0 3.3 1.9
    Where:
    1. Steam = 1000 BTU/lb
    2. Oxygen = 480 BTU/SCF (Butler (1991))
    3. 0% oxygen = 100% steam (SAGD)
  • TABLE 3
    SAGDOX Performance Factors
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    Steam
    % of heat 100.0 65.2 50.0 28.3 15.5 9.0
    MSCF/bbl bit 24.89 16.22 12.45 7.05 3.86 2.24
    SOR (bbl/bbl) 3.37 2.20 1.69 0.954 0.52 0.30
    MMBTU/bbl bit 1.18 0.769 0.590 0.334 0.183 0.106
    Oxygen
    % of heat 0.0 34.8 50.0 71.7 84.5 91.0
    MSCF/bbl bit 0.0 0.856 1.23 1.76 2.08 2.237
    Tonnes/bbl bit 0.0 0.0327 0.0421 0.0672 0.0794 0.0855
    MMBTU/bbl bit 0.0 0.411 0.590 0.846 0.997 1.074
    Totals
    ETOR (MMBTU/bbl) 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18
    Gas (MSCF/bbl) 24.89 17.08 13.68 8.81 5.94 4.48
    Where:
    1. Gas = oxygen and steam
    2. ETOR = energy to oil ratio
    3. 1000 BTU/lb steam; 489 BTU/SCF oxygen
    4. 0% oxygen = 100% steam (SAGD)
    5. All cases have ETOR = 1.18
  • TABLE 4
    Economy of Scale for SAGDOX Satellites
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    5 9 20 35 50
    O2 for 10 KBD Bit
    (MMSCFD) 8.56 12.3 17.6 20.8 22.4
    (tonnes/d) 327 421 672 794 855
    Bit for 2000 t/d O2
    (KBD) 61.2 47.5 29.8 25.2 23.4
    Where:
    1. ETOR = 1.18 for all cases
    2. 2000 t/d oxygen = world scale
    3. 1000 BTU/lb steam; 480 BTU/SCF O2
  • TABLE 5
    10,000 B/D Satellite Performance Factors
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    Steam
    (MMSCFD) 248.9 162.2 124.5 70.5 38.6 22.4
    (MMBTU/hr) 492 320 246 139 76 44
    (K bbls/d) 33.7 22.0 16.9 9.54 5.20 3.00
    (SOR) 3.37 2.20 1.69 0.954 0.520 0.300
    Oxygen
    MMSCFD 0.0 8.56 12.3 17.6 20.8 22.4
    MMBTU/hr 0.0 171 246 353 415 448
    tonnes/d 0.0 327 421 672 794 855
    SCF/bbl 0.0 856 1230 1760 2080 2237
    Totals
    Gas(MMSCFD) 248.9 171 137 88 59 45
    (SCF/bbl) 24890 17100 13700 8800 5900 4500
    Where:
    1. 0% oxygen = 100% steam (SAGD)
    2. All at ETOR = 1.18
    3. gas = O2 and steam (MMSCFD)
  • TABLE 6
    New 10 KBD Satellite Comparisons
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    Liquids (KBD)
    Treated Water 33.7 22.0 16.9 9.5 5.2 3.0
    Diluent Delivery 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
    Dil + bit + water 53.7 42.0 36.9 29.5 25.2 23.0
    Totals 97.4 74.0 63.8 49.0 40.4 36.0
    % bit cut (D + B + W) 18.6 23.8 27.1 33.9 39.7 43.5
    % dil + bit cut 37.2 47.6 54.2 67.8 79.4 87.0
    Gases (MMSCFD)
    Nat gas fuel 14.8 9.6 7.4 4.2 2.3 1.3
    Oxygen 0 8.6 12.3 17.6 20.8 22.4
    Totals 14.8 18.2 19.7 21.8 23.1 23.7
    (KBD) Make-up Water 3.4 2.2 1.7 1.0 0.5 0.3
    Where:
    1. Assumptions as per FIGS. 1 to 5
    2. 0% oxygen = 100% steam (SAGD)
    3. ETOR = 1.18
  • TABLE 7
    New 10KB Satellites: Pipeline Size Comparisons (D inches)
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    Liquids
    Treated Water 8.96 7.24 6.34 4.76 3.52 2.67
    Diluent 4.88 4.88 4..88 4.88 4.88 4.88
    Dil + bit + water 11.31 10.00 9.37 8.38 7.75 7.40
    Total D (liq) 25.15 22.12 20.59 18.02 16.15 14.88
    Gases
    N. Gas fuel 4.30 3.46 3.04 2.29 1.69 1.27
    Oxygen 0 3.28 3.92 4.69 5.10 5.29
    Total D (Gas) 4.30 6.74 6.96 6.98 6.79 6.56
    Total D 29.45 28.86 27.55 25.00 22.94 21.38
    % of SAGD 100 98. 93.5 84.9 77.9 72.6
    Where:
    1. Assumes liquid pipelines at 5 ft./sec design
    2. Gas pipelines at 500 psia pressure (34 atm) and at 50 ft./sec linear velocity
    3. Dia (inches) for liquid lines = (Q/420)1/2, where Q = bbls/d
    4. Dia (inches) for gas lines = (Z/0.801)1/2, where Z = gas capacity in MMSCFD
    5. Volumes based on Table 5
    6. D = pipeline diameter, inches
  • TABLE 8
    SAGDOX Increments to Existing 10 KBD SAGD Satellite
    Existing SAGD SAGDOX Increments (% O2)
    Base 5 9 20 35 50
    Capacity
    SAGDOX Inc. (KBD) 0.0 5.34 10.00 25.34 54.52 101.11
    Total (KBD) 10.0 15.34 20.00 35.34 64.52 111.11
    Liquids (KBD)
    Treated Water 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Diluent 10.0 5.34 10.00 25.34 54.52 101.11
    Dil + bit + wat 53.7 10.68 20.00 50.68 109.04 202.22
    Total 97.4 16.02 30.00 76.02 163.56 303.33
    (bbl/bbl bit) 9.74 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
    Gases (MMSCFD)
    Nat. Gas Fuel 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Oxygen 0.0 13.13 24.6 62.20 134.20 248.89
    Total 14.8 13.13 24.6 62.20 134.20 248.89
    (KSCF/bbl bit) 1.48 2.46 2.46 2.45 2.46 2.46
    CO2 Emissions (MMSCFD)
    Boiler CO2 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Vent Gas CO2 0.0 13.13 24.6 62.20 134.20 248.89
    Total 14.8 13.13 24.6 62.20 134.20 248.89
    (KSCF/bbl bit) 1.48 2.46 2.46 2.45 2.46 2.46
    Electricity
    ASU MW (e) 0.0 6.11 11.45 28.96 62.48 115.87
    (kWh/bbl bit) 0.0 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5
    Where:
    1. All SAGDOX increments use all steam from base SAGD plant, with no new steam capacity at satellite
    2. No extra water from SAGDOX
    3. All ETOR = 1.18
    4. ASU else at 292.5 kWh/tonne O 2
    5. 1 tonne O2 = 26.173 MSCF (1 MMSCF = 38.2 tonnes)
  • TABLE 9
    Comparison SAGDOX vs. SAGD Increments
    (Increments to existing SAGD Satellite)
    SAGD SAGDOX
    Pipelines
    Total Liquids (bbl/bbl bit) 9.0 3.0
    Total Gases (MSCF/bbl bit) 1.48 2.46
    CO2 Emissions
    W/O Capture (MSCF/bbl) 1.48 2.46
    W Capture (MSCF/bbl) 1.48 0
    Water Used
    (bbl/bbl bit) 0.34 0
    Electricity Used (ASU)
    (kWh/bbl bit) 0 27.5
    Where:
    1. See Table 7 for details
    2. Zero electricity assumed for SAGD
  • TABLE 10
    Capex Items
    At Satellite Site At Central Site
    SAGD SAGDOX SAGD SAGDOX
    Steam Boilers (OTSG) Yes Yes (−) No No
    ASU Oxygen No No No Yes
    Vent Gas Treating No Yes (?) No No
    Water Treatment No No Yes Yes (−)
    Oil/Water Separation No No Yes Yes (−)
    Water Disposal No No Yes Yes (−)
    Pipeline Corridor Yes Yes (−)
    New Wells Yes Yes (+?)
    Where:
    1. SAGDOX pipelines - one extra line (oxygen), less liquids and more gas
    2. SAGDOX boilers - much less than SAGD
    3. SAGDOX gas treating - may not need, may not be substantial
    4. Water treating, separation and disposal - less for SAGDOX
    5. New wells - more for SAGDOX with separate O2 injectors and produced gas removal
    6. Yes means there is expenditure; no means there is no expenditure; Yes (−) means, while there is expenditure, it is less than SAGD; Yes (+) means more expenditure than SAGD; and Yes (?) means there is more expenditure, but the exact amount is uncertain.
  • TABLE 11
    New 10KBD Satellite: Pipeline Size Comparisons (D inches) (No Diluent)
    % Oxygen in Steam and O2 Mixes (v/v)
    0 5 9 20 35 50
    Liquids
    Treated Water 8.96 7.24 6.34 4.76 3.52 2.67
    Bit + Water 10.2 8.73 8.00 6.81 6.02 5.56
    Subtotal D 19.16 15.97 14.34 11.57 9.54 8.23
    Gases
    Nat Gas Fuel 4.30 3.46 3.04 2.29 1.69 1.27
    Oxygen 0 3.28 3.92 4.69 5.10 5.29
    Subtotal D 4.30 6.74 6.96 6.98 6.9 6.56
    Total D 23.46 22.71 21.30 18.55 16.33 14.79
    % of SAGD 100 96.8 90.8 79.1 69.6 63.0
    Where:
    1. D = pipeline dia (inches)
    2. Assumes liquid pipelines at 5 ft./sec
    3. Gas pipelines at 500 psia and at 50 ft./sec
    4. For liquids D = (Q/420)1/2; Q = bbls/day
    5. For gases D = (Z/0.801)1/2; Z = MMSCFD gas
    6. Volumes based on Table 5

Claims (21)

1. A SAGDOX satellite system for recovering hydrocarbons, the system comprising a central SAGDOX site, at least one SAGDOX satellite site, and a pipeline corridor for communication between the central SAGDOX site and the SAGDOX satellite site, wherein the satellite system is designed to recover hydrocarbons using a SAGDOX process at the satellite site and transfer recovered hydrocarbons to the central site.
2. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 1 wherein said at least one SAGDOX satellite site is distant said central SAGDOX site from 9 km to 160 km.
3. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 2 wherein said distance is from 10 km to 100 km.
4. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 1 wherein the central site comprises:
(a) an oil/water separation unit,
(b) an oil collection unit,
(c) a water treatment unit, and
(d) an oxygen generation unit,
the satellite site comprises:
(a) a boiler for steam generation,
(b) at least one steam injection well,
(c) at least one oxygen injection well, and
(d) a bitumen recovery well,
and the pipeline corridor comprises:
(a) an oxygen supply pipe,
(b) a treated water supply pipe,
(c) a natural gas supply pipe, and
(d) a bitumen and water recovery pipe.
5. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 4 wherein the recovered oil/water emulsion is further combined with a diluent at the satellite site, and the pipeline corridor further comprises a pipe for delivering said diluent to the satellite site.
6. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 4 wherein the satellite site further comprises a vent gas treating unit for sequestering CO2 and/or other produced gases.
7. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 1 wherein each central unit has more than one satellite unit attached to it with one or more pipeline corridors.
8. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 7 wherein at the satellite site the steam and oxygen mixture is injected into an underground chamber in one of the following ways: the mixture is a) simultaneously injected into the same well, b) simultaneously injected into several wells or c) steam and oxygen are separately injected into separated wells for steam and oxygen and the mixture take place in the underground chamber.
9. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 8 wherein the concentration of oxygen in the steam and oxygen mixture of the SAGDOX is from 5% to 50% (v/v).
10. The SAGDOX satellite system of claim 8 wherein the concentration of oxygen in the steam and oxygen mixture of the SAGDOX is from 10% to 40% (v/v).
11. The SAGDOX satellite of claim 8 wherein the concentration of oxygen in the steam and oxygen mixture is about 35% (v/v).
12. A process of upgrading an existing SAGD facility by transforming it into an SAGDOX satellite system, the process comprises:
installing an oxygen generation unit at the central SAGD facility,
providing at least one remotely located SAGDOX satellite site, and
providing at least one pipeline corridor between the central facility to the at least one satellite site, said corridor having additional pipes for oxygen supply and pipes for produced water and natural gas supply, such that while the oxygen, water and natural gas are supplied to the satellite site; oxygen with generated steam is injected into an underground formation; and recovered from the underground formation, bitumen with water emulsion is pumped back to the central site, then the bitumen is separated from the water, and treated water is sent back to the satellite site for steam generation.
13. A process for recovering bitumen from a satellite bitumen production site and delivering bitumen to a central facility, whereby:
(a) locating the satellite site more than 10 km from the central facility,
(b) linking the satellite site and the central facility via a pipeline corridor, this corridor containing pipes to provide treated water, suitable for boiler use, from the central site; providing oxygen gas from the central facility to the satellite, for SAGDOX; providing produced fluids (bitumen and water) to the central facility from the satellite site, and
(c) recovering bitumen at the satellite site via the SAGDOX process.
14. The process according to claim 13, wherein the produced fluids (bitumen and water) are conveyed from the satellite site to the central facility in a push-water system.
15. The process according to claim 13, wherein the produced fluids (bitumen and water) are conveyed as a stabilized emulsion, with a chemical stabilizer added at the satellite site.
16. The process according to claim 13 whereby a diluent is also delivered to the satellite site and blended with produced fluids (water and bitumen) for transport back to the central facility.
17. The process according to claim 13 wherein natural gas or fuel gas is also provided to the satellite site, from the central facility by the pipeline corridor, as a boiler fuel.
18. The process according to claim 17 wherein electricity is also transported from the central facility to/from the satellite site.
19. The process according to claim 18 wherein a produced gas (CO2) pipeline is added to convey SAGDOX vent gas from the satellite site to the central facility.
20. A process according to claim 13 wherein an existing SAGD satellite is converted to SAGDOX, utilizing the existing steam capacity at the site.
21. A process according to claim 13 wherein produced water is separated at the satellite site, wherein the diluted bitumen, is conveyed back to the central facility generally free from excess water.
US13/888,874 2011-07-13 2013-05-07 Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons Abandoned US20130284435A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/888,874 US20130284435A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-05-07 Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons
US14/058,488 US20140096960A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-10-21 Use of steam assisted gravity drainage with oxygen ("sagdox") in the recovery of bitumen in thin pay zones
US14/078,983 US20140166278A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-11-13 Use of steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen ("sagdox") in the recovery of bitumen in lean zones ("lz-sagdox")
US15/147,853 US20170002638A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2016-05-05 Use of steam assisted gravity drainage with oxygen ("sagdox") in the recovery of bitumen in thin pay zones

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161507196P 2011-07-13 2011-07-13
US201161549770P 2011-10-21 2011-10-21
US201261643538P 2012-05-07 2012-05-07
US13/543,012 US9828841B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2012-07-06 Sagdox geometry
US13/628,164 US9163491B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2012-09-27 Steam assisted gravity drainage processes with the addition of oxygen
US13/888,874 US20130284435A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-05-07 Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons

Related Parent Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/543,012 Continuation-In-Part US9828841B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2012-07-06 Sagdox geometry
US13/628,164 Continuation-In-Part US9163491B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2012-09-27 Steam assisted gravity drainage processes with the addition of oxygen
US13/928,839 Continuation-In-Part US20140000887A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-06-27 Sagdox operation in leaky bitumen reservoirs

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/628,178 Continuation-In-Part US20130098607A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2012-09-27 Steam Flooding with Oxygen Injection, and Cyclic Steam Stimulation with Oxygen Injection
US13/893,902 Continuation-In-Part US9803456B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-05-14 SAGDOX geometry for impaired bitumen reservoirs

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130284435A1 true US20130284435A1 (en) 2013-10-31

Family

ID=49476326

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/888,874 Abandoned US20130284435A1 (en) 2011-07-13 2013-05-07 Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20130284435A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9163491B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2015-10-20 Nexen Energy Ulc Steam assisted gravity drainage processes with the addition of oxygen
US9328592B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2016-05-03 Nexen Energy Ulc Steam anti-coning/cresting technology ( SACT) remediation process
US9803456B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2017-10-31 Nexen Energy Ulc SAGDOX geometry for impaired bitumen reservoirs
US9828841B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2017-11-28 Nexen Energy Ulc Sagdox geometry
US9869169B2 (en) 2013-12-12 2018-01-16 Husky Oil Operations Limited Method to maintain reservoir pressure during hydrocarbon recovery operations using electrical heating means with or without injection of non-condensable gases

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4265310A (en) * 1978-10-03 1981-05-05 Continental Oil Company Fracture preheat oil recovery process
US20060213658A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2006-09-28 Maguire James Q In-situ method of coal gasification

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4265310A (en) * 1978-10-03 1981-05-05 Continental Oil Company Fracture preheat oil recovery process
US20060213658A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2006-09-28 Maguire James Q In-situ method of coal gasification

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9328592B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2016-05-03 Nexen Energy Ulc Steam anti-coning/cresting technology ( SACT) remediation process
US9803456B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2017-10-31 Nexen Energy Ulc SAGDOX geometry for impaired bitumen reservoirs
US9828841B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2017-11-28 Nexen Energy Ulc Sagdox geometry
US9163491B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2015-10-20 Nexen Energy Ulc Steam assisted gravity drainage processes with the addition of oxygen
US9644468B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2017-05-09 Nexen Energy Ulc Steam assisted gravity drainage processes with the addition of oxygen
US9869169B2 (en) 2013-12-12 2018-01-16 Husky Oil Operations Limited Method to maintain reservoir pressure during hydrocarbon recovery operations using electrical heating means with or without injection of non-condensable gases

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2013166586A1 (en) Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons
CA2760967C (en) In situ method and system for extraction of oil from shale
CA2797655C (en) Conduction convection reflux retorting process
US9540916B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for recovery of hydrocarbons
US9097110B2 (en) Viscous oil recovery using a fluctuating electric power source and a fired heater
US20130284435A1 (en) Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons
US8312928B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for the recovery of hydrocarbonaceous and additional products from oil shale and oil sands
US20100224370A1 (en) Method of heating hydrocarbons
US8607884B2 (en) Processes of recovering reserves with steam and carbon dioxide injection
US8973658B2 (en) Heat recovery method for wellpad SAGD steam generation
US8893793B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for the recovery of hydrocarbonaceous and additional products from oil shale and oil sands
US20160084060A1 (en) Apparatus for the recovery of hydrocarbonaceous and additional products from oil shale and sands via multi-stage condensation
US10041340B2 (en) Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir by conducting an exothermic reaction to produce a solvent and injecting the solvent into a hydrocarbon reservoir
CN103917744A (en) Steam flooding with oxygen injection, and cyclic steam stimulation with oxygen injection
CN104011331A (en) Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Processes With The Addition Of Oxygen Addition
US20120261122A1 (en) Method and apparatus for removing low viscosity oil from an oil field
US8312927B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for adjusting operational parameters to recover hydrocarbonaceous and additional products from oil shale and sands
CA2815144A1 (en) Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons
RU2593614C1 (en) Method for mining-well extraction scavenger oil and process equipment system therefor
US20150285032A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for storage and recovery of hydrocarbon fluids
CN104271876A (en) Satellite steam-assisted gravity drainage with oxygen (sagdox) system for remote recovery of hydrocarbons
Rehman A techno-economical evaluation of miscible flooding.
CA2642078A1 (en) Method of heating hydrocarbons

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NEXEN INC., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KERR, RICHARD KELSO;REEL/FRAME:030366/0579

Effective date: 20130430

AS Assignment

Owner name: NEXEN ENERGY ULC, CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NEXEN ENERGY INC.;REEL/FRAME:031611/0627

Effective date: 20130618

Owner name: NEXEN ENERGY INC., CANADA

Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF CONTINUATION;ASSIGNOR:NEXEN INC.;REEL/FRAME:031644/0988

Effective date: 20130618

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: CNOOC PETROLEUM NORTH AMERICA ULC, CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NEXEN ENERGY ULC;REEL/FRAME:048366/0576

Effective date: 20181231