US20130150241A1 - Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants - Google Patents

Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130150241A1
US20130150241A1 US13/696,826 US201213696826A US2013150241A1 US 20130150241 A1 US20130150241 A1 US 20130150241A1 US 201213696826 A US201213696826 A US 201213696826A US 2013150241 A1 US2013150241 A1 US 2013150241A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
surfactant
spray
surfactants
lipophilic balance
composition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/696,826
Inventor
Curtis M. Elsik
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC
Original Assignee
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huntsman Petrochemical LLC filed Critical Huntsman Petrochemical LLC
Priority to US13/696,826 priority Critical patent/US20130150241A1/en
Assigned to HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC reassignment HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ELSIK, CURTIS M.
Publication of US20130150241A1 publication Critical patent/US20130150241A1/en
Priority to US14/987,126 priority patent/US10123532B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N25/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
    • A01N25/24Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing ingredients to enhance the sticking of the active ingredients
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N25/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
    • A01N25/30Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests characterised by the surfactants
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N57/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds
    • A01N57/10Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds having phosphorus-to-oxygen bonds or phosphorus-to-sulfur bonds
    • A01N57/12Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds having phosphorus-to-oxygen bonds or phosphorus-to-sulfur bonds containing acyclic or cycloaliphatic radicals

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to drift reduction agents for use in agricultural applications, but may also be applied in other applications where it is beneficial to reduce off-target deposition.
  • Spray drift may be defined as the physical movement of airborne spray particles through the air at the time of application or soon thereafter to any off-target site.
  • formulations with greater spray drift characteristics are typically unfavorable because less of the formulation interacts with the target site.
  • drift reduction agents are typically added to the spray mixtures to reduce the amount of spray drift that occurs.
  • DTT drift reduction technology
  • TMA tank mix adjuvants
  • oils that can be mineral or natural based, such as esterified seed oil. These oils produce either emulsions or invert emulsions that are thought to function by preventing small drops from forming during spray generation due to the emulsion phase present.
  • Surfactants are typically added to many pesticidal spray solutions to increase bioefficacy. When a surfactant is added to a spray solution the surface tension and dynamic surface tensions may be reduced. It is thought that this reduction in surface tension makes it easier to generate smaller droplets. Adding a surfactant typically reduces the average particle size and more importantly generally increases the amount of fines generated during spraying. It is the finer particles that typically drift the most. Therefore, despite their other benefits, surfactants are not typically thought of as agents to reduce spray drift.
  • HLB hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
  • Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that concentrate at the interface between two phases and modify the properties of that interface.
  • a list of surfactants can be found in McCutcheon's Emulsifiers & Detergents or the Industrial Surfactants Handbook.
  • the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) of a surfactant is measured on an empirical scale developed by Griffin (W. C. Griffin, J. Cosmet. Chem., 1, 311, 1949). This scale ranges from 0 to 20, with 0 for a completely lipophilic molecule and 20 for a completely hydrophilic molecule.
  • the function of surfactants can be generally described by their HLB number. Defoaming surfactants have an HLB range of 1-3.
  • Water-in-oil emulsifiers have an HLB range of 3-6. Wetting agents have an HLB range of 7-9. Oil-in-water emulsifiers have an HLB range of 8-18. Detergents have an HLB range of 13-15. Solubilizers have an HLB range of 15-18.
  • Surfactants with low HLB are not considered soluble in water. They are considered dispersible in water. They may form this dispersed phase spontaneously, without agitation. In other words, low HLB surfactants form a surfactant-rich dispersed phase when added to water. The presence of the dispersed surfactant-rich phase is thought to reduce the amount of fines formed during the spray atomization process. This novel DRT TMA chemistry is not believed to deleteriously broaden the particle size distribution as the polymeric DRT agents do.
  • low HLB is defined as any surfactant HLB that will result in the surfactant's cloud point as measured in the targeted spray system being below the temperature at which the system is sprayed. In some embodiments this HLB is from about 7 to about 9. However, the actual HLB required will therefore be a function of the spray system components and their concentrations. When spraying at temperatures above the surfactant cloud point, a dispersed surfactant-rich phase will form, and this dispersed phase will function to reduce the fines generated even though the surface tension is reduced due to the presence of the dispersed surfactant phase. Higher HLB surfactants should also reduce fines if used above their cloud point. This would normally required elevated temperatures in the absence of formulation additives designed to reduce the cloud point.
  • Examples of the low HLB surfactants of the current invention may include, but are not limited to, alcohol alkoxylates, alkylamine alkoxylates, polyetheramine alkoxylates, ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block polymers, phosphate esters, alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkyl and alkylbenzene sulfonates, fatty acid esters, fatty oil alkoxylates, saccharide derivatives, sorbitan derivatives, alkyl phenol alkoxylates, arylphenol alkoxylates, sulphosuccinates and sulphosuccinamates and combinations thereof.
  • the surfactants can be nonionic, anionic, cationic or zwitterionic.
  • SURFONIC® surfactants that are commercially available from the Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also disclose a pesticidal composition to reduce spray drift that comprises one or more active ingredients and one or more low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants.
  • the one or more active ingredients may be herbicides, insecticides, fungicides or combinations thereof. Such herbicides may be water soluble herbicides or other herbicides such as 2,4-D esters.
  • the one or more active ingredients may be glyphosate or one or more salts or esters thereof.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a method of reducing spray drift by providing a composition for spraying that comprises a pesticide and a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactant and spraying the composition.
  • Further embodiments include a method of controlling weeds by contacting such a pesticidal composition to the weed or soil; a method of controlling insects by applying such a pesticidal composition to insects, soils or crops; and a method of controlling fungi by applying such a pesticidal composition to the fungi, crops or soils.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a method of reducing spray drift comprising providing a composition for spraying that comprises a surfactant and spraying the spray mixture above the surfactant's cloud point as measured in the spray mixture.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a spray composition comprising a blend of two or more surfactants wherein the blend has a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance.
  • a method is disclosed of producing a spray drift reduction composition by blending a low HLB surfactant with a second surfactant (such as higher HLB surfactants) to produce a blend with a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance.
  • a second surfactant such as higher HLB surfactants
  • a user may add low HLB surfactants to a spray tank mixture.
  • the pesticidal composition would have a blend of two or more surfactants where the effective surfactant blend has a combined low HLB level.
  • the primary application of this technology will be to reduce drift during the spraying of pesticide formulations.
  • the technology may also be applicable in other areas such as polyurethane or polyurea spraying, paint spraying, or other spraying systems where it is beneficial to reduce off-target deposition.
  • Table 1 shows particle size data.
  • the spray particle size distribution and percent fines can be measured using ASTM Standard Test Method E2798: “Characterization of Performance of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application.” Sample solutions where sprayed through a nozzle (XR8004VS) at 40 psig.
  • Example 1 the pesticide composition, contains 1.7 v/v % POWERMAX® herbicide (commercially available from The Monsanto Company of St. Louis, Mo. POWERMAX is a registered mark of The Monsanto Company) diluted into 342 ppm hardness water.
  • EO average 3 moles ethylene oxide
  • Example 3 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% SURFONIC® L12-3 surfactant which is commercially available from the Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex.
  • Example 4 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% SURFONIC® TDA-3B surfactant which is commercially available from Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex.
  • Example 5 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% TERMIX® 5910 tank mix adjuvant which is commercially available from Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex.
  • Table 1 shows several low HLB surfactants that reduce the amount of fines while also reducing both dynamic (10 mSec) and static (1 s) surface tension.
  • Table 1 also shows that the low HLB surfactant SURFONIC TDA-3B reduced % fines ⁇ 105 microns from 16.0 v/v % with no DRT adjuvant to a value of only 8.7%. This is almost a 50% reduction in fines, while dynamic surface tension dropped from 51.3 to 48.8 mN/m and static surface tension dropped from 42.9 to 26.9 mN/m. Normally a reduction in tension would result in an increase in the volume of fines generated during spraying.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)

Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention disclose using low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants as spray drift reduction agents and methods of using such agents.

Description

    FIELD OF INVENTION
  • This invention relates generally to drift reduction agents for use in agricultural applications, but may also be applied in other applications where it is beneficial to reduce off-target deposition.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Spray drift may be defined as the physical movement of airborne spray particles through the air at the time of application or soon thereafter to any off-target site. In the agricultural context, formulations with greater spray drift characteristics are typically unfavorable because less of the formulation interacts with the target site. To counteract spray drift, drift reduction agents are typically added to the spray mixtures to reduce the amount of spray drift that occurs.
  • There are many drift reduction technology (DRT) tank mix adjuvants (TMA) currently on the market today. They can be lumped into broad categories based on their individual chemistries. There are natural polymers such as guar gum and other polysaccharides. There are synthetic polymers such as the polyacrylamides. These both function to increase extensional or kinematic viscosity, and this increased viscosity usually results in increased particle size and reduced fines. Reducing fines generally reduces spray drift. However, the polymer systems tend to increase the average particle size and broaden the particle size distribution (PSD). Bioefficacy can be adversely affected when mean particle size becomes too wide.
  • There are also oil products available that can be mineral or natural based, such as esterified seed oil. These oils produce either emulsions or invert emulsions that are thought to function by preventing small drops from forming during spray generation due to the emulsion phase present.
  • Surfactants are typically added to many pesticidal spray solutions to increase bioefficacy. When a surfactant is added to a spray solution the surface tension and dynamic surface tensions may be reduced. It is thought that this reduction in surface tension makes it easier to generate smaller droplets. Adding a surfactant typically reduces the average particle size and more importantly generally increases the amount of fines generated during spraying. It is the finer particles that typically drift the most. Therefore, despite their other benefits, surfactants are not typically thought of as agents to reduce spray drift.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
  • Surprisingly, it has been discovered that relatively low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) surfactants may be used as spray drift reduction agents. Such surfactants generally reduce the amount of fines generated during spraying. Rather, other surfactants usually increase the amount of fines when added to the spray tank since the reduced tension makes it easier for the spray drops to break up.
  • Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that concentrate at the interface between two phases and modify the properties of that interface. A list of surfactants can be found in McCutcheon's Emulsifiers & Detergents or the Industrial Surfactants Handbook. The hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) of a surfactant is measured on an empirical scale developed by Griffin (W. C. Griffin, J. Cosmet. Chem., 1, 311, 1949). This scale ranges from 0 to 20, with 0 for a completely lipophilic molecule and 20 for a completely hydrophilic molecule. The function of surfactants can be generally described by their HLB number. Defoaming surfactants have an HLB range of 1-3. Water-in-oil emulsifiers have an HLB range of 3-6. Wetting agents have an HLB range of 7-9. Oil-in-water emulsifiers have an HLB range of 8-18. Detergents have an HLB range of 13-15. Solubilizers have an HLB range of 15-18.
  • Surfactants with low HLB are not considered soluble in water. They are considered dispersible in water. They may form this dispersed phase spontaneously, without agitation. In other words, low HLB surfactants form a surfactant-rich dispersed phase when added to water. The presence of the dispersed surfactant-rich phase is thought to reduce the amount of fines formed during the spray atomization process. This novel DRT TMA chemistry is not believed to deleteriously broaden the particle size distribution as the polymeric DRT agents do.
  • For this application, “low HLB” is defined as any surfactant HLB that will result in the surfactant's cloud point as measured in the targeted spray system being below the temperature at which the system is sprayed. In some embodiments this HLB is from about 7 to about 9. However, the actual HLB required will therefore be a function of the spray system components and their concentrations. When spraying at temperatures above the surfactant cloud point, a dispersed surfactant-rich phase will form, and this dispersed phase will function to reduce the fines generated even though the surface tension is reduced due to the presence of the dispersed surfactant phase. Higher HLB surfactants should also reduce fines if used above their cloud point. This would normally required elevated temperatures in the absence of formulation additives designed to reduce the cloud point.
  • Examples of the low HLB surfactants of the current invention may include, but are not limited to, alcohol alkoxylates, alkylamine alkoxylates, polyetheramine alkoxylates, ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block polymers, phosphate esters, alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkyl and alkylbenzene sulfonates, fatty acid esters, fatty oil alkoxylates, saccharide derivatives, sorbitan derivatives, alkyl phenol alkoxylates, arylphenol alkoxylates, sulphosuccinates and sulphosuccinamates and combinations thereof. The surfactants can be nonionic, anionic, cationic or zwitterionic.
  • Commercial examples of such low HLB surfactants include the SURFONIC® surfactants that are commercially available from the Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex. SURFONIC® L12-3 surfactant is a linear C10-12 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=9.0. SURFONIC® L24-3 surfactant is a linear C12-16 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=8.0. SURFONIC® TDA-3B surfactant is a branched C13 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=8.0. SURFONIC® DA-4 surfactant is a branched C10 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 4 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=10.5. SURFONIC® CO-15 surfactant is a castor oil ethoxylate with an average 15 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=8.2. SURFONIC® N-60 surfactant is a nonylphenol ethoxylate with an average of 6 moles EO and an HLB=10.9. SURFONIC® T-5 surfactant is a tallowamine ethoxylate with an average of 5 moles EO and an HLB=9.0.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also disclose a pesticidal composition to reduce spray drift that comprises one or more active ingredients and one or more low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants. In embodiments, the one or more active ingredients may be herbicides, insecticides, fungicides or combinations thereof. Such herbicides may be water soluble herbicides or other herbicides such as 2,4-D esters. In another embodiment, the one or more active ingredients may be glyphosate or one or more salts or esters thereof.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a method of reducing spray drift by providing a composition for spraying that comprises a pesticide and a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactant and spraying the composition.
  • Further embodiments include a method of controlling weeds by contacting such a pesticidal composition to the weed or soil; a method of controlling insects by applying such a pesticidal composition to insects, soils or crops; and a method of controlling fungi by applying such a pesticidal composition to the fungi, crops or soils.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a method of reducing spray drift comprising providing a composition for spraying that comprises a surfactant and spraying the spray mixture above the surfactant's cloud point as measured in the spray mixture.
  • Embodiments of the present invention disclose a spray composition comprising a blend of two or more surfactants wherein the blend has a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance.
  • In other embodiments of the present invention, a method is disclosed of producing a spray drift reduction composition by blending a low HLB surfactant with a second surfactant (such as higher HLB surfactants) to produce a blend with a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance. In order to counteract the usual deleterious spray drift effects of higher HLB surfactants, a user may add low HLB surfactants to a spray tank mixture. Here the pesticidal composition would have a blend of two or more surfactants where the effective surfactant blend has a combined low HLB level.
  • The primary application of this technology will be to reduce drift during the spraying of pesticide formulations. However, the technology may also be applicable in other areas such as polyurethane or polyurea spraying, paint spraying, or other spraying systems where it is beneficial to reduce off-target deposition.
  • To further illustrate various illustrative embodiments of the present invention, the following examples are provided.
  • EXAMPLES
  • Table 1 shows particle size data. The spray particle size distribution and percent fines can be measured using ASTM Standard Test Method E2798: “Characterization of Performance of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application.” Sample solutions where sprayed through a nozzle (XR8004VS) at 40 psig.
  • Example 1, the pesticide composition, contains 1.7 v/v % POWERMAX® herbicide (commercially available from The Monsanto Company of St. Louis, Mo. POWERMAX is a registered mark of The Monsanto Company) diluted into 342 ppm hardness water. Example 2 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5 v/v % SURFONIC® L24-3 surfactant which is commercially available from Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex. SURFONIC® L24-3 surfactant is a linear C12-16 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=8.0. Example 3 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% SURFONIC® L12-3 surfactant which is commercially available from the Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex. SURFONIC L12-3 surfactant is a linear C10-12 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=9.0. Example 4 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% SURFONIC® TDA-3B surfactant which is commercially available from Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex. SURFONIC TDA-3B surfactant is a branched C13 alcohol ethoxylate with an average 3 moles ethylene oxide (EO) and an HLB=8.0. Example 5 is the same base composition as Example 1 except it also contains 0.5% TERMIX® 5910 tank mix adjuvant which is commercially available from Huntsman Corporation of The Woodlands, Tex.
  • TABLE 1
    Particle Size Data
    VMD KINE DST @ DST @
    % FINES < D10 [D50] D90 REL VISC 10 mS 1 s EXT
    Example 105 μm (μm) (μm) (μm) SPAN (cSt) (mN/m) (mN/m) VISC
    1 16.0 85.7 198.6 387.9 1.52 0.734 51.3 42.9 1.00
    2 10.8 100.0 265.4 420.9 1.21 0.844 52.5 32.1 6.94
    3 9.4 107.5 238.2 404.6 1.25 0.870 36.6 27.5 6.93
    4 8.7 112.5 273.4 426.7 1.15 0.827 48.8 26.9 6.84
    5 9.8 105.8 251.8 412.5 1.22 0.743 43.4 29.7 6.80
  • Table 1 shows several low HLB surfactants that reduce the amount of fines while also reducing both dynamic (10 mSec) and static (1 s) surface tension. Table 1 also shows that the low HLB surfactant SURFONIC TDA-3B reduced % fines<105 microns from 16.0 v/v % with no DRT adjuvant to a value of only 8.7%. This is almost a 50% reduction in fines, while dynamic surface tension dropped from 51.3 to 48.8 mN/m and static surface tension dropped from 42.9 to 26.9 mN/m. Normally a reduction in tension would result in an increase in the volume of fines generated during spraying.
  • Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations may be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (9)

1) A spray drift reduction agent comprising a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactant.
2) A pesticidal composition to reduce spray drift that comprises one or more active ingredients and one or more low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants.
3) A composition of claim 2 wherein the one or more active ingredients comprise a herbicide.
4) A composition of claim 2 wherein the one or more active ingredients comprise an insecticide.
5) A composition of claim 2 wherein the one or more active ingredients comprise a fungicide.
6) A method of reducing spray drift comprising providing a composition for spraying that comprises a pesticide and a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactant and spraying the composition.
7) A method of reducing spray drift comprising:
adding a surfactant to a spray mixture; and,
spraying the spray mixture at a temperature above the surfactant's cloud point as measured in the spray mixture.
8) A spray composition comprising a blend of two or more surfactants wherein the blend has a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance.
9) A method of producing a spray drift reduction composition comprising blending a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactant with a second surfactant to produce a blend with a low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance.
US13/696,826 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants Abandoned US20130150241A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/696,826 US20130150241A1 (en) 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants
US14/987,126 US10123532B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2016-01-04 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161477251P 2011-04-20 2011-04-20
PCT/US2012/032265 WO2012145177A1 (en) 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants
US13/696,826 US20130150241A1 (en) 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/032265 A-371-Of-International WO2012145177A1 (en) 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/987,126 Division US10123532B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2016-01-04 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130150241A1 true US20130150241A1 (en) 2013-06-13

Family

ID=47041879

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/696,826 Abandoned US20130150241A1 (en) 2011-04-20 2012-04-05 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants
US14/987,126 Active 2032-04-15 US10123532B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2016-01-04 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/987,126 Active 2032-04-15 US10123532B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2016-01-04 Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US20130150241A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2699089B1 (en)
JP (2) JP6227524B2 (en)
CN (1) CN103442559B (en)
AR (1) AR086105A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2012245869B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112013024083A8 (en)
CA (1) CA2830518C (en)
ES (1) ES2756799T3 (en)
MX (1) MX352462B (en)
WO (1) WO2012145177A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9596846B2 (en) 2011-09-12 2017-03-21 Rhodia Operations Agricultural pesticide compositions
US10390530B2 (en) 2014-10-08 2019-08-27 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Use of hydrophobic, self-emulsifying polyglycerol esters as adjuvants and anti-spray-drift agents
US10888091B2 (en) 2013-08-14 2021-01-12 Croda, Inc. Adjuvancy combination

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MX352462B (en) * 2011-04-20 2017-11-27 Huntsman Petrochemical Llc Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophili c balance surfactants.
CN104684387A (en) * 2012-09-11 2015-06-03 维泰尔澳大利亚有限公司 Spray drift adjuvant formulation and method of use
MX2015004552A (en) * 2012-10-12 2015-07-14 Dow Agrosciences Llc Alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactants for controlling herbicide spray drift.
US20160374334A1 (en) 2015-06-29 2016-12-29 Lamberti Spa Method for reducing spray drift
CN112741102A (en) * 2020-12-30 2021-05-04 浙江新安化工集团股份有限公司 Fine glufosinate-ammonium herbicide

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5352672A (en) * 1993-10-20 1994-10-04 Fmc Corporation Acaricidal combinations of neem seed extract and bifenthrin
US6165939A (en) * 1998-03-09 2000-12-26 Monsanto Company Concentrate herbicidal composition
US6251415B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2001-06-26 Fmc Corporation Solvent system for pesticide products
US20030125211A1 (en) * 2001-11-14 2003-07-03 North Dakota State University Adjuvant blend for enhancing efficacy of pesticides
US20030153461A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-08-14 Parrish Scott K. Herbicide composition comprising herbicide compound in acid form and acidifying agent
US20050043182A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2005-02-24 Andrew Douglass Agrochemical compositions
US20060057173A1 (en) * 2004-09-13 2006-03-16 Whitmire Micro-Gen Research Laboratories, Inc. Insecticide compositions and process
US20060063678A1 (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-03-23 Monsanto Technology Llc Fast symptom glyphosate formulations
US20070137042A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Focht Heather L Shaving kit, article of commerce and a method of shaving comprising a personal care composition
US20090306003A1 (en) * 2006-01-10 2009-12-10 Innovation Technologies, Llc Pesticide Delivery System

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1195284B (en) * 1981-10-27 1988-10-12 Montedison Spa ADDITIVE FOR AQUEOUS SUSPENSIONS OF PESTICIDE FORMULAS TO BE DISTRIBUTED BY AIRPLANE TO PREVENT THE DERIVING EFFECT
GB8804988D0 (en) * 1988-03-02 1988-03-30 Wellcome Found Sprayable formulations
GB9018227D0 (en) * 1990-08-20 1990-10-03 Wellcome Found Pesticidal formulations
US5529975A (en) * 1990-03-26 1996-06-25 Allied Colloids Limited Sprayable agricultural compositions
GB9006676D0 (en) * 1990-03-26 1990-05-23 Allied Colloids Ltd Sprayable agricultural compositions
MY111437A (en) * 1992-07-31 2000-05-31 Monsanto Co Improved glyphosate herbicide formulation.
US6610654B2 (en) 1993-03-31 2003-08-26 Wellstat Therapeutics Corporation Inhibitor of stem cell proliferation and uses thereof
GB2306965B (en) 1995-11-06 1999-09-01 American Cyanamid Co Aqueous spray compositions
US20030096726A1 (en) * 1999-01-11 2003-05-22 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation Concentrated surfactant blends
US6689719B2 (en) * 1999-08-11 2004-02-10 Monsanto Technology Llc Coformulation of carfentrazone-ethyl and glyphasate
PT1333721E (en) * 2000-10-17 2006-08-31 Victorian Chemical Internat Pt HERBICIDE COMPOSITION
CA2448403C (en) * 2001-06-01 2009-11-24 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation Adjuvant compositions and pesticides
BR0309492B1 (en) 2002-04-24 2014-09-02 Basf Ag USING A 2-PROPIL ALCOXYLATE HEPTANOL
US6797673B1 (en) * 2002-05-01 2004-09-28 Platte Chemical Company Lecithin-containing drift reduction composition for use in spraying agricultural acreage
WO2003096807A1 (en) * 2002-05-14 2003-11-27 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation Agricultural formulations containing enhanced surfactants
ITMI20030411A1 (en) * 2003-03-06 2004-09-07 Sipcam Spa PHYTOPHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS.
US7396803B2 (en) * 2003-04-24 2008-07-08 Croda Uniqema, Inc. Low foaming, lubricating, water based emulsions
US8765637B2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2014-07-01 Huntsman Petrochemical Llc Crop oil concentrate adjuvants containing amine surfactants
CA2583124C (en) 2004-10-04 2015-06-02 Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation High-load glyphosate formulations
US20060180677A1 (en) * 2005-02-02 2006-08-17 Mcmanic Greg M Agricultural compositions which enhance performance of pesticides applied through drift reducing nozzles
US8236731B2 (en) * 2005-05-24 2012-08-07 Monsanto Technology Llc Herbicide compatibility improvement
GB0518859D0 (en) 2005-09-16 2005-10-26 Ciba Sc Holding Ag Pesticide and/or herbicide compositions and methods of their use
US8288317B2 (en) * 2006-10-09 2012-10-16 Huntsman Petrochemical Llc Liquid crystal agrochemical formulations
GB0703394D0 (en) * 2007-02-22 2007-03-28 Ciba Sc Holding Ag Process for Preparing and Applying Pesticide or Herbicide Formulation
GB2460590B (en) 2007-03-09 2011-04-13 Nippon Kayaku Kk Adjuvant composition, agrochemical spray aqueous solution containing the same and control method using the same
BRPI0913535A2 (en) * 2008-09-04 2016-07-26 Akzo Nobel Nv pesticide formulation spray mixture, method of reducing spray dispersion of a pesticide formulation and use of a formulation
AR075294A1 (en) 2008-10-31 2011-03-23 Dow Agrosciences Llc CONTROL OF THE DISPERSION OF PESTICIDE SPRAYING WITH SELF-EMULSIFICABLE ESTERS
MX342473B (en) 2009-04-24 2016-09-30 Huntsman Petrochemical Llc Nitrogen containing isethionic acid salts in field ready spray and tank mixes.
CN101731223A (en) * 2010-02-25 2010-06-16 北京颖泰嘉和科技股份有限公司 Fungicide composition containing azoxystrobin and ethirimol, and application thereof
MX352462B (en) * 2011-04-20 2017-11-27 Huntsman Petrochemical Llc Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophili c balance surfactants.

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5352672A (en) * 1993-10-20 1994-10-04 Fmc Corporation Acaricidal combinations of neem seed extract and bifenthrin
US6251415B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2001-06-26 Fmc Corporation Solvent system for pesticide products
US6165939A (en) * 1998-03-09 2000-12-26 Monsanto Company Concentrate herbicidal composition
US20050043182A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2005-02-24 Andrew Douglass Agrochemical compositions
US20030153461A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-08-14 Parrish Scott K. Herbicide composition comprising herbicide compound in acid form and acidifying agent
US20030125211A1 (en) * 2001-11-14 2003-07-03 North Dakota State University Adjuvant blend for enhancing efficacy of pesticides
US20060057173A1 (en) * 2004-09-13 2006-03-16 Whitmire Micro-Gen Research Laboratories, Inc. Insecticide compositions and process
US20060063678A1 (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-03-23 Monsanto Technology Llc Fast symptom glyphosate formulations
US20070137042A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Focht Heather L Shaving kit, article of commerce and a method of shaving comprising a personal care composition
US20090306003A1 (en) * 2006-01-10 2009-12-10 Innovation Technologies, Llc Pesticide Delivery System

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Morjan et al., "Fungicidal Effects of Glyphosate and Glyphosate Formulations on Four Species of Entomopathogenic Fungi", 2002, Enviromental Entomology, vol. 31 iss. 6, pp. 1206-1212. *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9596846B2 (en) 2011-09-12 2017-03-21 Rhodia Operations Agricultural pesticide compositions
US10888091B2 (en) 2013-08-14 2021-01-12 Croda, Inc. Adjuvancy combination
US10390530B2 (en) 2014-10-08 2019-08-27 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Use of hydrophobic, self-emulsifying polyglycerol esters as adjuvants and anti-spray-drift agents

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2012245869B2 (en) 2015-12-03
EP2699089A1 (en) 2014-02-26
JP6230671B2 (en) 2017-11-15
MX2013011447A (en) 2013-10-17
US20160219873A1 (en) 2016-08-04
US10123532B2 (en) 2018-11-13
JP6227524B2 (en) 2017-11-08
EP2699089B1 (en) 2019-09-04
JP2014512383A (en) 2014-05-22
AU2012245869A1 (en) 2013-09-19
EP2699089A4 (en) 2014-09-03
BR112013024083A2 (en) 2016-08-09
CN103442559B (en) 2017-03-22
CN103442559A (en) 2013-12-11
CA2830518A1 (en) 2012-10-26
BR112013024083A8 (en) 2018-01-16
MX352462B (en) 2017-11-27
ES2756799T3 (en) 2020-04-27
CA2830518C (en) 2019-07-16
WO2012145177A1 (en) 2012-10-26
JP2017036286A (en) 2017-02-16
AR086105A1 (en) 2013-11-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10123532B2 (en) Spray drift reduction agents comprising low hydrophilic-lipophilic balance surfactants
AU2016201938B2 (en) Microemulsions and uses thereof as delivery systems
CA2810437C (en) Amine and amine oxide surfactants for controlling herbicide spray drift
US20230148592A1 (en) Compositions comprising ethoxylated lecithin and methods of making and using the same
US20170258078A1 (en) Use of a blend, adjuvant composition for drift reduction, use thereof, agrochemical formulation and spray mix
WO2001076365A1 (en) Wetting agent composition for agricultural chemicals
CN100527956C (en) Composition for use as an adjuvant, and method of preparing the composition
EP1113864B1 (en) Pesticide formulations containing ethoxylated amine neutralized aromatic sulfonic acid surfactants
WO2012057610A2 (en) A potentiator for soluble liquid herbicide
CN107249323A (en) Sub-micron imidacloprid and Ah bar&#39;s rhzomorph composition
CN110621156B (en) Use of N-alkylglucamides for reducing drift when applying plant treatment agents containing glufosinate
AU2017201554A1 (en) Amine and amine oxide surfactants for controlling herbicide spray drift
SK109096A3 (en) Emulsifier compositions
AU2004284834A1 (en) Composition for use as an adjuvant, and method of preparing the composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HUNTSMAN PETROCHEMICAL LLC, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ELSIK, CURTIS M.;REEL/FRAME:029261/0691

Effective date: 20120828

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION