US20120290828A1 - Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120290828A1
US20120290828A1 US13/558,277 US201213558277A US2012290828A1 US 20120290828 A1 US20120290828 A1 US 20120290828A1 US 201213558277 A US201213558277 A US 201213558277A US 2012290828 A1 US2012290828 A1 US 2012290828A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
configuration change
configuration
ces
change
status information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/558,277
Inventor
Rishi Bhargava
Chiradeep Vittal
Swaroop Sayeram
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
McAfee LLC
Original Assignee
McAfee LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by McAfee LLC filed Critical McAfee LLC
Priority to US13/558,277 priority Critical patent/US20120290828A1/en
Publication of US20120290828A1 publication Critical patent/US20120290828A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/62Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30Monitoring
    • G06F11/3003Monitoring arrangements specially adapted to the computing system or computing system component being monitored
    • G06F11/3006Monitoring arrangements specially adapted to the computing system or computing system component being monitored where the computing system is distributed, e.g. networked systems, clusters, multiprocessor systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30Monitoring
    • G06F11/3051Monitoring arrangements for monitoring the configuration of the computing system or of the computing system component, e.g. monitoring the presence of processing resources, peripherals, I/O links, software programs

Definitions

  • the invention relates to systems and processes for enforcing and monitoring a configuration management process for configurable elements in configurable computational systems.
  • CCS Change/Configuration Management System
  • Ticketing Systems define a business process or rules for making configuration changes.
  • the configuration changes at issue are changes to configurable computation systems (CCS), which can be coupled together over a network or through other communication means.
  • CCSs can include but are not limited to servers, desktop system, personal computers, directory servers, database servers, work stations, programmable factory equipment, PDAs, cell phones, microchip, software, network devices, and virtual machines.
  • Configuration change includes but not limited to content changes for files, permission changes on files, file creation, file deletion, registry key creation, registry key deletion, registry value changes, environment variable creation, environment variable deletion, environment variable value changes, virtual machine creation, virtual machine deletion, virtual machine restart, virtual machine settings changes, network configuration change, database settings changes and database data changes.
  • a configuration change may effect one or more configurable elements (CEs). These CEs include but are not limited to files within a file system, registry settings, environment variables, databases, virtual machine settings, networked device configuration parameters, computationally controlled mechanical switches, and electronically controlled valve settings.
  • CMS system While using a CMS system defines a business process for making and managing changes to CCSs and the corresponding CEs, the CMS system does not automatically enforce, control, or monitor such changes. Human discipline, monitoring, encouragement, and other incentives have to be used to enforce a configuration management process. Thus, a system enforced by human implementation is subject to human nature and human imperfection. People will work around the system. Alternatively, due to human nature, error, or misunderstanding changes are made outside of the defined process, such as making changes at inappropriate times, or making other improper changes.
  • What is need is method and apparatus for automatically enforcing a defined process for making changes to a CE within a CCS, or monitoring the changes in a CCSs or CEs in relations to a define configuration management processes.
  • the invention allows for the enforcement and monitoring of a configuration management process as applied to configurable elements (CEs) within a configurable computing system (CCSs). Changes to CEs within CCSs are controlled by a selectable lock that only enable changes to the CEs when the rules for the change management process is met. Also, the invention provides a less restrictive configuration management process where changes are monitored and reconciled against configuration change requests and change authorization rules.
  • a method of automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configuration change requests to one or more configurable elements within a single or multiple configurable computational elements involves the steps of accessing the change process rules, analyzing the configuration change requests utilizing the rules, selectively authorizing the configuration changes to the configurable elements for the configurable elements that comply with the change process rules for the respective change request, and selectively enabling a lock to allow configuration changes on a configurable computational system containing the configurable elements.
  • the analysis of the configuration change request can be based on the state of the configuration change request which can include external authorizations.
  • the state of the external authorizations can be evaluated with the accessed change process rules.
  • the selective authorization is based on the state of the configuration change request being evaluated utilizing the accessed change process rules.
  • the analyzing of the configuration change request further utilizes current conditions in the determination of the selective authorization of configuration changes of CEs.
  • These current conditions can include but are not limited to the current time, date, day of the week, and any electronically retrievable value representing a level or quantity such as an inventory value, and the mechanical state of a switch or valve.
  • the configuration of the selective locks involves the authenticating the selective authorization of the configuration change of the configurable elements.
  • the authentication can be performed by an SSL key exchange.
  • the selective locks generate status information related to configuration changes in the CEs for the corresponding CCSs.
  • the status information can include but is not limited to the status of the CE configuration change, whether the changes succeed or failed, and information relating to the failure of the configuration change.
  • the status information is associated with configuration change request.
  • the status change request can further be associated with the corresponding CEs. Further, an association can be made with the CCS, successful configuration changes, failed configuration changes, or the information regarding the failure of the configuration change.
  • the associated information is used to generate reports of at least the status of the configuration change requests, the changes to the CE, the configuration changes to the CCS.
  • a system for automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configurable element (CE) within a configurable computation system (CCS) is disclosed.
  • the system is comprised of means for managing a configuration change process for CEs within CCSs, means for generating a configuration change request, means for applying one or more configuration change rules to a configuration change request to generate a selective configuration change authorization of the one or more CEs, and means for selectively locking configuration changes in a CCS wherein the means for locking can selectively enable configuration changes to the one or more CE based on the selective configuration authorization.
  • the means for managing a configuration change process can include standard configuration management systems (CMSs) which can also be referred to as ticketing systems.
  • CMSs standard configuration management systems
  • CMS systems receive requests for a configuration change which then generate a configuration change ticket. Before a fully authorized ticket is generated, various authorization inputs are required. These inputs define a configuration management process to be followed.
  • the means for applying authorization rules generates selective configuration authorization for one or more CEs based on configuration change authorization.
  • the means for applying the one or more configuration change rules further includes utilizing current conditions in the determination of the selective authorization of configuration changes of CEs.
  • These current conditions can include but are not limited to the current time, date, day of the week, any electronically retrievable value representing a level or quantity such as an inventory value, and mechanical state of a switch or valve.
  • the means for locking and unlocking the configuration includes authenticating the selective authorization of the configuration change of the CE.
  • the authentication can be performed by an SSL key exchange.
  • the means for selectively locking configuration changes in a CCS generates status information related to configuration changes in the configurable elements for the corresponding CCSs.
  • the status information can include but is not limited to a change of configuration status of a CE, whether the change succeed or failed, and information relating to the failure cause of the configuration change.
  • the present invention further comprises means for associating the status information with the configuration change request.
  • the status information and change request can further be associated with the corresponding CEs. Further, associations can be made with elements including the CCSs, successful configuration changes, failed configuration changes, or the information regarding the failure of the configuration change.
  • the means for applying the one or more authorization rules generates reports comprising the associated status information, the configuration change requests, the configuration changes to the CE, the configuration changes to the CCS.
  • a system for automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more CE within a CCS is comprised of a means for selectively monitoring configuration changes to one or more CEs within a CCS, a means for managing a configuration change, and a means for processing the configuration change status information.
  • the means for selectively monitoring configuration changes generates configuration change status information.
  • the means for managing a configuration change process generates one or more configuration change requests.
  • the means for processing utilizes the configuration change status information, the one or more configuration change requests, and the one or more configuration change rules for the CEs.
  • the processing associates the configuration changes with the configuration change requests and determines if the configuration changes complied with the one or more associated configuration change rules.
  • the means for processing can include current conditions as part of the analysis.
  • the invention further comprises a means for generating reports where the configuration change status information is associated with at least one of the CE and the CCS.
  • a method of automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more configuration change requests to one or more CEs within at least one CCS is disclosed.
  • the steps are comprised of generation configuration stat change information from a CCS and corresponding to on or more CEs, accessing one or more configuration change rules where the rules are associated with a configuration change to one or more CEs within a CCS.
  • the means for processing can include one or more current conditions as part of the analysis.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system for enforcing a configuration management process on configurable elements within a configurable computation system.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system for monitoring configuration changes to configurable elements within a configurable computation system and reconciling them against a configuration management process.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the process for enforcing a configuration management process on configurable elements within a configurable computation system.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the process for monitoring configuration changes to configurable elements within a configurable computation system and reconciling them with a configuration management process.
  • the illustrative embodiments of the invention provide the means for enforcing, monitoring and reconciling a business management process for making configuration changes to configurable systems.
  • the benefits of such a system are numerous.
  • configuration changes to configurable system such as servers, factory controllers, office automation systems can be controlled to prevent problems not limited to, loss of productivity because of down time at inappropriate times, and quality and performance issues caused by operations running with an improper configuration.
  • Sarbanes-Oxley the regulatory environment demands stronger control over financial systems.
  • being able to control changes to financial systems such as software packages and databases gives an organization higher confidence that business critical process are being followed and unauthorized changes are not made.
  • FIG. 1 An illustrative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the system 100 automatically enforces a configuration change process for a configuration change of one or more configurable elements (CEs) 135 within a configurable computational system (CCS) 130 .
  • the system comprises a configuration management system (CMS) 110 coupled to an analytics module 120 which is coupled to at least one CCS 130 .
  • the CCS 130 contains a selective configuration lock 132 and of one or more configurable elements CEs 135 .
  • a rule input module 122 is coupled to the analytics module 120 is for configuring change authorization rules within the analytics module 120 .
  • An output reporting module 124 for requesting and displaying reports on status information regarding the result of configuration changes to the CEs 135 within the CCS 130 is also coupled to the analytics module 120 .
  • a change database 125 holding configuration change status information for the generation of reports on the configuration status of the CEs 135 and CCSs 130 .
  • the CMS 110 is used for generating a configuration change(s) authorization for one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130 according to a specific business process.
  • the CMS 110 is configured with the change authorization requirements. For example, to authorize a change can require the authorization by two senior officers of a company.
  • Input to the CCS 110 is a configuration change request 112 preferably corresponding to a configuration change to one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130 .
  • the change request 112 preferably generates a change ticket that requires authorizations before authorized implementation.
  • the change ticket is stored in the change ticket database 116 .
  • the change ticket database 116 stores information related to the authorization and completion of the configuration change request.
  • the ticket can include authorization fields, and implementation status fields.
  • authorizations for the change ticket can be provided by an operator input(s) 114 or other automated means such as electronic inputs from other electronic devices (not shown) coupled to the CMS 110 . If all of the configuration change rules are met, the change ticket is authorized notification is given to the analytics module 120 .
  • the change tickets are stored in a change ticket database 116 contained within or coupled to the CMS 110 .
  • the CMS 110 and change ticket database 116 may contain a number of configuration change requests, in varying stages of authorization and implementation.
  • the CMS 110 can be a separate server, a process running on a server with other applications, or running an application on a personal computer.
  • the change ticket data 116 base can be networked and can be directly or indirectly accessible by the analytics module 120 over the network.
  • An analytics module 120 is coupled to the CMS 110 .
  • the analytics module 120 enforces the configuration change process of the CMS 11 . 0 by configuring the selectable configuration locks 132 on the CCSs 130 to selectively enable or disable configuration changes to the CEs 135 .
  • the analytics module 120 receives configuration change rules. These configuration change rules are associated with the one or more CCSs 130 and the one or more CEs 135 within a CCS 130 .
  • the configuration change rules are configured through the rule input 112 , which is preferably coupled to the analytics module 120 . Also, contemplated are configuration rules received from other sources. Alternatively, the configuration change rules can be read directly from the CMS 110 , derived from information retrieved from the CMS 110 , or through another source (not shown) coupled to the analytics module 120 .
  • the analytics module 120 receives configuration change ticket information from the CMS 110 .
  • the configuration change ticket information can be either requested from the CMS 110 .
  • the information can automatically be sent by the CMS 110 to the analytics module 120 .
  • the analytics module 120 directly accessing the change ticket database 116 .
  • the configuration change ticket is preferably processed according to rules specified during the rule input 122 to determine if all the criteria for the configuration change process for an associated CEs 135 or an associated CCS 130 are being met.
  • one or more subsets of the CEs 135 meeting the configuration change process rules and the configuration change authorization being limited to these CEs 135 .
  • the subset of CEs meeting the configuration change rule criteria will be authorized for making the configuration change. If all the criteria of the rules are met, then the analytics module 120 authorizes configuration changes the CEs 135 .
  • the configuration authorizing rules used by the analytics module 120 can include current conditions 126 in the determination for the authorization for the configuration changes to the CE.
  • a current condition is the current time, date, and the day of the week.
  • the authorization of the configuration change can be delayed until the time, day of the week, or date condition is met.
  • contemplated is the sending of a message to the selective configuration lock 132 containing a time window during which configuration changes are enabled.
  • Another illustrative use of current conditions is the checking an inventory and requiring that a specified inventory level be available before authorizing a configuration change that would increase the production rate of an item.
  • the analytics module 120 When the configuration change authorization for all or some of the CEs 135 is met, the analytics module 120 will send a selective authorization message to a selective configuration lock 132 on the corresponding CCS 130 for the CEs 135 to be changed. The message will cause the selective configuration lock 132 to enable changes to the selective CEs.
  • the message can be sent over a network where the analytics module 120 and the CCS 130 are located on separate systems remote from one another. The disabling of configuration changes to the CEs can be based on time, the completion of the configuration change to the CE, or by a message from the analytics module 120 .
  • the analytics module 120 can be a process or subroutine operating within the same processing system as the CCS 130 where the configuration authorization message is sent through inter-process communication means.
  • the analytics module 120 can receive status information from the selective configuration locks 132 regarding the occurrence of the success or failure of a configuration change, and the reasons for failure. This status information is stored in a change database 125 .
  • the change database 125 can later be used to generate reports regarding the status of the success configuration changes and change tickets.
  • the analytics module 120 can associate status changes into groups based on type of configuration change, failed changes, and failure status information. Further the analytics module 120 can associate the changes with the configuration ticket database 116 to reconcile configuration change requests. As part of the reconciliation, information can be passed from the analytics module 120 to the CMS 110 to automatically update the status information for the associated change ticket indicating the final result of the configuration change.
  • the CCS 130 is coupled with the analytics module 120 preferably through a network.
  • the CCS 130 contains one or more CEs 135 .
  • the CCS 130 also includes a selective lock 132 which is configured to prevent changes to the CEs 135 unless enabled by the analytics module 120 .
  • the selective enabling of the selective configuration lock 132 contains a time window during which the enabled configuration changes can be made. The time window can vary by each configuration change for each CE 135 . It can be desirable that the configuration changes to the CEs 135 are performed in a specific order. Having non-overlapping time windows for each enabled CE 135 configuration change can enforce such a sequence. Further information regarding the operation of the selective configuration locks 132 can be found in the co-owned application Ser. No.
  • the selective configuration lock 132 can be a hook into the file system driver of the CCS 130 to monitor and control changes to files associated with the CEs 135 and further associated with the configuration change ticket resulting from a change request 112 .
  • the selective configuration lock 132 can also include catching and monitoring triggers caused by a database modification.
  • the selective configuration lock 132 can generate information regarding the status of a configuration change to a CE 135 . This information can include whether the configuration change succeeded or failed. Further, the information can include information regarding why the change failed.
  • information generated by the selective lock 132 is sent to the analytics module 120 but alternatively can be sent directly to the change database 125 for later processing, reference, and report generation.
  • Configuration changes 140 to the CEs 135 preferably do not come from the analytics module 120 but are made directly to the CCS 130 or alternatively over a network. Exemplary of this process would be the loading of an updated application where the application files are the CEs 135 to be changed.
  • the communication between the analytics module 120 and the selective configuration locks 132 can be encrypted and authenticated. Any authentication and encryption techniques can be used. Preferably the authentication and encryption technique uses a secure socket layer (SSL) using SSL key exchange to authenticate the selective enabling of the selective configuration lock.
  • SSL secure socket layer
  • the information generated by the selectable configuration lock 132 can be used to generate a variety of reports.
  • the information can be used to reconcile the change ticket database 116 with the changes made to the CEs 135 and thus generating change compliance reports.
  • compliance reports can be organized by but not limited to user, CCS 130 , CE 135 , time, and type of change.
  • FIG. 2 A second illustrative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the monitoring generates a log of changes, that can be stored within a change database 125 , which can be reconciled with authorized configuration changes in the change ticket database 116 as provided by the configuration management system (CMS) 110 .
  • CMS configuration management system
  • the monitoring system comprises substantially the same elements as described in FIG. 1 with two primary differences.
  • the analytics module 220 operates differently than for the system described for FIG. 1 and the selective configuration lock ( 132 - FIG. 1 ) is replaced with the configuration change monitor 232 .
  • the CMS 110 is used for generating an configuration changes(s) authorization for one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130 according to a specific business process.
  • the operation of the CMS 110 , the configuration change request 112 input to the CMS 110 , the operator input 114 , and the storage of the change request in the change ticket database 116 , is the same as previously described for FIG. 1 .
  • An analytics module 220 is coupled to the CMS 110 .
  • the analytics module 220 is a post configuration change analysis tool that analyzes changes in the change ticket database 116 according to configuration change rules input into the analytics module 220 , and determines at least which configuration changes complied with the change process rules, which changes did not comply with the rules, configuration change made without an associated configuration change request, which change tickets were not completed, and reasons that the configuration changes failed.
  • the configuration change rules preferably can be configured into the analytics module 220 from the rule input 122 but can be received from other sources. Alternatively, the configuration change rules can be acquired directly from the CMS 110 , derived from information retrieved from the CMS 110 , or through a source (not shown) coupled to the analytics module 220 .
  • the analytics module 220 can receive configuration change request information from the CMS 110 .
  • the analytics module 220 directly accesses the change ticket database 116 .
  • the CMS 110 can signal the analytics module 220 when a change has occurred to the change ticket database 116 .
  • a report 124 interface for an operator requesting and receiving reports related to, reconciling the change ticket database 116 and the information in the change database 125 to determine what configuration changes were made, determining which changes were made conforming to within the configuration change process, and which changes were made outside the configuration change process.
  • the configuration change ticket information is requested directly from the change ticket database 116 or from the CMS 110 alternatively after the configuration changes are made to the CEs 135 within a CCS 130 .
  • the change ticket information can automatically be sent by the CMS 110 to the analytics module 220 , stored and processed when reconciliation reports are generated.
  • the configuration change ticket is preferably processed according to rules input by the rules input 122 to determine if all the criteria for configuration change process for the associated CEs 135 are met. Also contemplated is analysis and reporting on an individual CE 135 basis or on a CCS basis.
  • the configuration authorizing rules used by the analytics module 120 can include current conditions 126 in analyzing the configuration changes to the CEs.
  • exemplary of a current condition is the current time and the day of the week. If the analytics module 220 are to use the current conditions, then the change information stored in the change database 125 must include current condition information. It is contemplated that the current condition information is provided by the analytics module 220 or that the configuration change monitor 232 provides this information.
  • Information sent between the analytics module 220 and the CMS 110 , the configuration change monitor 232 and the CMS 110 can be sent over a network.
  • the analytics module 220 can be a process or subroutine operating within the same processing system as the CCS 130 where communication is provided through inter-process or processor communication means.
  • the analytics module 220 is configured to receive status information from the CCS 130 sent by the configuration change monitor 232 regarding the occurrence of a configuration change, status regarding a failure of an attempted configuration changes, and status regarding a successful configuration change. This information can be stored in a change database 125 .
  • the change database 125 can later be utilized to generate reports reconciling the change ticket database 116 and the change database 125 .
  • the analytics module 220 can associate changes into groups based on type of configuration change, failed changes, and failure status information. Further the analytics module 220 can associate the changes with the configuration ticket database 116 to reconcile configuration change requests. This reconciliation can be automatic where as part of the reconciliation process, information is passed from the analytics module 220 to the CMS 110 to automatically update the status information for the associated change ticket. This information can include closing a change ticket or noting a failure of a configuration change in the ticket.
  • the CCS 130 is coupled with the analytics module 220 , preferably through a network.
  • the CCS 130 contains one or more CEs 135 .
  • the CCS 130 also includes a configuration change monitor 232 which is configured to monitor changes to the CEs 135 .
  • the change monitor 232 has access to the current conditions, such as date and time so that this information can be tagged to the status information generated.
  • the status information which is generated can be sent as generated to the analytics module 220 or preferably directly to the change database 125 .
  • contemplated is the ability of the change monitor 232 to store change information for later transfer to the analytics module 220 or change database 125 .
  • the change monitor 232 can be a driver that is coupled to the file system of the CCS 130 to monitor and control changes to files associated with the CEs 135 .
  • the change monitor 232 can also include but is not limited to monitoring triggers generated by a database modification.
  • the change monitor 232 can generate information regarding the status of a configuration change to a CE 135 . This information can include whether the configuration change succeeded or failed. Further, when the change fails the information can include information regarding why the change failed. This can include but is not limited to, incompatible operating system, insufficient memory to do the change, and insufficient permission to access a file.
  • information generated by the selective lock 132 is sent to the analytics module 120 but alternatively or additionally can be sent directly to the change database 125 for later processing, reference, and report generation.
  • Configuration changes 140 to the CEs 135 preferably do not come from the analytics module 120 but are made directly to the CCS 130 or over the network. Exemplary of this process is loading of an updated application where the application files are the CEs 135 to be changed.
  • a secure and authenticate channel can be used to communicated between the analytics module 220 and the change monitor 232 . Any authentication and securing method can be implemented.
  • the authentication scheme uses SSL (secure socket layer) using SSL key exchange to authenticate the analytic module 130 .
  • the information generated by the change monitor 232 can be used to generate a variety of reports.
  • the information can be used to reconcile the change ticket database with the changes made to the CEs 135 and thus generating change compliance reports.
  • compliance reports can be organized by user, system, type of configurable element, time, and type of change.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustrative embodiment of the process 300 for automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configurable elements (CE) within a configurable computation system (CCS).
  • the change process rules associated with the configurable elements within and configurable computation system are accessed.
  • the rules can encompass a larger set of rules where only a subset of rules applies to specific CEs or a specific CCS.
  • An exemplary embodiment of these rules is having authorizations by specific people, the availability of inventory, and performing a configuration change in a specified time window and on a specified day or day of the week.
  • a configuration change request can embody that state of a request by containing information about who has authorized the configuration change, available inventory, or other information related to the request. The information within the configuration change request is evaluated against the rules for the associated CEs and CCSs referenced by a configuration change request.
  • a step 320 the information associated with the configuration change request is analyzed using the rules associated with the CEs and CCS effected by the configuration change request.
  • external conditions can be utilized. These include conditions like the current time of day, the date, and the day of the week. The analysis can find that some, none, or all of the associated CE have conformed to the rules for a configuration change.
  • configuration changes are selectively authorized for the CEs within the CCSs corresponding to the configuration change request.
  • the authorization is based on analysis of the configuration change request and the configuration change rules.
  • the authorization is communicated to at least one selective-lock which is used to provide selective enabling of configuration changes to the associated CEs.
  • the communication is preferably over a network but other means are contemplated.
  • contemplated are secure authenticated communications. SSL (secure socket layer) can be used to secure encrypted the communications and authenticated by the use of SSL keys exchange.
  • one or more selective locks corresponding to one or more CCSs are configured to selectively allow configuration changes to the selectively authorized CEs.
  • the selective enabling of CE configuration changes is based upon the selective authorizations generated in the step 330 .
  • the selective locks generate status information regarding configuration changes made to enabled CEs.
  • This status information can include information about but not limited to when the change was made, whether the change succeeded or failed, and reasons for the success or failure.
  • This information can be stored for later transmission to a central collection point, such as a database for later analysis and report generation. Also contemplated by the invention is the transmission of the status information over a network and through other processing elements before storage.
  • reports are generated based on the stored status information and the configuration change requests.
  • the report generation can associate the status information with the associated configuration change request. Further, the report generation can associate the status information with the CE, CCS, or a combination of these.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustrative embodiment of the process 400 for automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more CEs within one or more CCSs.
  • a configuration change monitor generated status information regarding configuration changes made to CEs can include information about but not limited to when the change was made, whether the change succeeded or failed, and reasons for the success or failure of the configuration change.
  • This information can be stored for later transmission to a central collection point, such as a database, for later analysis.
  • a central collection point such as a database
  • contemplated by the invention is the transmission of the status information through other processing elements before storage. Preferably the information is transmitted over a network.
  • the change configuration rules associated with the CEs corresponding to the status information generated in step 410 are identified.
  • the one or more configuration change rules associated with a CE can be a subset of a larger set of rules.
  • An exemplary embodiment of these rules is the requirement for authorization by specific people, the availability of inventory, and performing a configuration change in a specified time window and on a specified day or day of the week.
  • a step 430 the information associated with the state of a configuration change request, the change ticket, is analyzed using the identified rules associated with the CEs and CCS and the associated status information generated in step 410 .
  • the change request state information or change ticket status information can be stored in a change ticket database.
  • external conditions can be used. These include conditions like the current time of day, the date, and the day of the week.
  • the analysis can determine that some, none, or all of the associated CE have conformed to the configuration change rules. Further, the processing determines whether there was a change configuration request. The results of such an analysis is saved in a form and structure such that the data can be used in the generation of reports associating status information with configuration change requests, CEs and CCSs.
  • reports are generated based on the stored status information and the configuration change requests.
  • the report generation can associate status information with the associated configuration change. Further, the report generation can associate the status information with the CE, CCS, or a combination of these.

Abstract

A system for and method of automatically enforcing a configuration change process for change requests of one or more configurable element within one or more configurable computation systems. The system comprises means for managing a configuration change process for one or more configurable elements within a corresponding configurable computation system, means for generation a configuration request, means for applying a set of authorization rules to the configuration change requests to generate selective authorization of the CEs, and means for selectively locking and unlocking changes to configurable elements within the configurable computational systems.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a non-provisional which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of the co-pending, co-owned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/879,826, filed Jan. 10, 2007, and entitled “SOFTWARE THAT MESSAGES CHANGE CONTROL” The Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/879,826 filed Jan. 10, 2007, and entitled “SOFTWARE THAT MESSAGES CHANGE CONTROL” is also hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to systems and processes for enforcing and monitoring a configuration management process for configurable elements in configurable computational systems.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Mechanisms currently exist for the management of configurable systems. These systems, referred to as Change/Configuration Management System (CMS) or Ticketing Systems define a business process or rules for making configuration changes. The configuration changes at issue are changes to configurable computation systems (CCS), which can be coupled together over a network or through other communication means. These CCSs can include but are not limited to servers, desktop system, personal computers, directory servers, database servers, work stations, programmable factory equipment, PDAs, cell phones, microchip, software, network devices, and virtual machines. Configuration change includes but not limited to content changes for files, permission changes on files, file creation, file deletion, registry key creation, registry key deletion, registry value changes, environment variable creation, environment variable deletion, environment variable value changes, virtual machine creation, virtual machine deletion, virtual machine restart, virtual machine settings changes, network configuration change, database settings changes and database data changes. With a CCS, a configuration change may effect one or more configurable elements (CEs). These CEs include but are not limited to files within a file system, registry settings, environment variables, databases, virtual machine settings, networked device configuration parameters, computationally controlled mechanical switches, and electronically controlled valve settings.
  • While using a CMS system defines a business process for making and managing changes to CCSs and the corresponding CEs, the CMS system does not automatically enforce, control, or monitor such changes. Human discipline, monitoring, encouragement, and other incentives have to be used to enforce a configuration management process. Thus, a system enforced by human implementation is subject to human nature and human imperfection. People will work around the system. Alternatively, due to human nature, error, or misunderstanding changes are made outside of the defined process, such as making changes at inappropriate times, or making other improper changes.
  • What is need is method and apparatus for automatically enforcing a defined process for making changes to a CE within a CCS, or monitoring the changes in a CCSs or CEs in relations to a define configuration management processes.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention allows for the enforcement and monitoring of a configuration management process as applied to configurable elements (CEs) within a configurable computing system (CCSs). Changes to CEs within CCSs are controlled by a selectable lock that only enable changes to the CEs when the rules for the change management process is met. Also, the invention provides a less restrictive configuration management process where changes are monitored and reconciled against configuration change requests and change authorization rules.
  • In a first aspect of the invention, a method of automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configuration change requests to one or more configurable elements within a single or multiple configurable computational elements is disclosed. The method involves the steps of accessing the change process rules, analyzing the configuration change requests utilizing the rules, selectively authorizing the configuration changes to the configurable elements for the configurable elements that comply with the change process rules for the respective change request, and selectively enabling a lock to allow configuration changes on a configurable computational system containing the configurable elements. The analysis of the configuration change request can be based on the state of the configuration change request which can include external authorizations. The state of the external authorizations can be evaluated with the accessed change process rules. The selective authorization is based on the state of the configuration change request being evaluated utilizing the accessed change process rules.
  • In one embodiment, the analyzing of the configuration change request further utilizes current conditions in the determination of the selective authorization of configuration changes of CEs. These current conditions can include but are not limited to the current time, date, day of the week, and any electronically retrievable value representing a level or quantity such as an inventory value, and the mechanical state of a switch or valve.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the configuration of the selective locks involves the authenticating the selective authorization of the configuration change of the configurable elements. Preferable, the authentication can be performed by an SSL key exchange.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the selective locks generate status information related to configuration changes in the CEs for the corresponding CCSs. The status information can include but is not limited to the status of the CE configuration change, whether the changes succeed or failed, and information relating to the failure of the configuration change.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention the status information is associated with configuration change request. The status change request can further be associated with the corresponding CEs. Further, an association can be made with the CCS, successful configuration changes, failed configuration changes, or the information regarding the failure of the configuration change.
  • In a further embodiment, the associated information is used to generate reports of at least the status of the configuration change requests, the changes to the CE, the configuration changes to the CCS.
  • In a second aspect of the present invention, a system for automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configurable element (CE) within a configurable computation system (CCS) is disclosed. The system is comprised of means for managing a configuration change process for CEs within CCSs, means for generating a configuration change request, means for applying one or more configuration change rules to a configuration change request to generate a selective configuration change authorization of the one or more CEs, and means for selectively locking configuration changes in a CCS wherein the means for locking can selectively enable configuration changes to the one or more CE based on the selective configuration authorization. The means for managing a configuration change process can include standard configuration management systems (CMSs) which can also be referred to as ticketing systems. These CMS systems receive requests for a configuration change which then generate a configuration change ticket. Before a fully authorized ticket is generated, various authorization inputs are required. These inputs define a configuration management process to be followed. The means for applying authorization rules generates selective configuration authorization for one or more CEs based on configuration change authorization.
  • In one embodiment, wherein the means for applying the one or more configuration change rules further includes utilizing current conditions in the determination of the selective authorization of configuration changes of CEs. These current conditions can include but are not limited to the current time, date, day of the week, any electronically retrievable value representing a level or quantity such as an inventory value, and mechanical state of a switch or valve.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the means for locking and unlocking the configuration includes authenticating the selective authorization of the configuration change of the CE. Preferable, the authentication can be performed by an SSL key exchange.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the means for selectively locking configuration changes in a CCS generates status information related to configuration changes in the configurable elements for the corresponding CCSs. The status information can include but is not limited to a change of configuration status of a CE, whether the change succeed or failed, and information relating to the failure cause of the configuration change.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention further comprises means for associating the status information with the configuration change request. The status information and change request can further be associated with the corresponding CEs. Further, associations can be made with elements including the CCSs, successful configuration changes, failed configuration changes, or the information regarding the failure of the configuration change.
  • In a further embodiment, the means for applying the one or more authorization rules generates reports comprising the associated status information, the configuration change requests, the configuration changes to the CE, the configuration changes to the CCS.
  • In another aspect of the present invention, a system for automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more CE within a CCS. The system is comprised of a means for selectively monitoring configuration changes to one or more CEs within a CCS, a means for managing a configuration change, and a means for processing the configuration change status information. The means for selectively monitoring configuration changes generates configuration change status information. The means for managing a configuration change process generates one or more configuration change requests. Further, the means for processing utilizes the configuration change status information, the one or more configuration change requests, and the one or more configuration change rules for the CEs. The processing associates the configuration changes with the configuration change requests and determines if the configuration changes complied with the one or more associated configuration change rules.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the means for processing can include current conditions as part of the analysis. In another embodiment, the invention further comprises a means for generating reports where the configuration change status information is associated with at least one of the CE and the CCS.
  • In another aspect of the invention, a method of automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more configuration change requests to one or more CEs within at least one CCS is disclosed. The steps are comprised of generation configuration stat change information from a CCS and corresponding to on or more CEs, accessing one or more configuration change rules where the rules are associated with a configuration change to one or more CEs within a CCS. In one embodiment of the invention, the means for processing can include one or more current conditions as part of the analysis.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention is better understood by reading the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system for enforcing a configuration management process on configurable elements within a configurable computation system.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system for monitoring configuration changes to configurable elements within a configurable computation system and reconciling them against a configuration management process.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the process for enforcing a configuration management process on configurable elements within a configurable computation system.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the process for monitoring configuration changes to configurable elements within a configurable computation system and reconciling them with a configuration management process.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The following description of the invention is provided as an enabling teaching of the invention in its best, currently known embodiment. Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that many changes can be made to the embodiment described, while still obtaining the beneficial results of the present invention. It will also be apparent that some of the desired benefits of the present invention can be obtained by selecting some of the features of the present invention without utilizing other features. Accordingly, those who work in the art will recognize that many modifications and adaptations to the present inventions are possible and can even be desirable in certain circumstances, and are a part of the present invention. Thus, the following description is provided as illustrative of the principles of the present invention and not in limitation thereof, since the scope of the present invention is defined by the claims.
  • The illustrative embodiments of the invention provide the means for enforcing, monitoring and reconciling a business management process for making configuration changes to configurable systems. The benefits of such a system are numerous. First, in the enforcement mode, configuration changes to configurable system such as servers, factory controllers, office automation systems can be controlled to prevent problems not limited to, loss of productivity because of down time at inappropriate times, and quality and performance issues caused by operations running with an improper configuration. Further, with Sarbanes-Oxley the regulatory environment demands stronger control over financial systems. Thus, being able to control changes to financial systems such as software packages and databases gives an organization higher confidence that business critical process are being followed and unauthorized changes are not made.
  • An illustrative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The system 100 automatically enforces a configuration change process for a configuration change of one or more configurable elements (CEs) 135 within a configurable computational system (CCS) 130. The system comprises a configuration management system (CMS) 110 coupled to an analytics module 120 which is coupled to at least one CCS 130. The CCS 130 contains a selective configuration lock 132 and of one or more configurable elements CEs 135. A rule input module 122 is coupled to the analytics module 120 is for configuring change authorization rules within the analytics module 120. An output reporting module 124 for requesting and displaying reports on status information regarding the result of configuration changes to the CEs 135 within the CCS 130 is also coupled to the analytics module 120. Also, coupled to the analytics module 120 is a change database 125 holding configuration change status information for the generation of reports on the configuration status of the CEs 135 and CCSs 130.
  • The CMS 110 is used for generating a configuration change(s) authorization for one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130 according to a specific business process. Preferably the CMS 110 is configured with the change authorization requirements. For example, to authorize a change can require the authorization by two senior officers of a company. Input to the CCS 110 is a configuration change request 112 preferably corresponding to a configuration change to one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130. The change request 112 preferably generates a change ticket that requires authorizations before authorized implementation. Preferably, the change ticket is stored in the change ticket database 116. The change ticket database 116 stores information related to the authorization and completion of the configuration change request. The ticket can include authorization fields, and implementation status fields. Preferably, authorizations for the change ticket can be provided by an operator input(s) 114 or other automated means such as electronic inputs from other electronic devices (not shown) coupled to the CMS 110. If all of the configuration change rules are met, the change ticket is authorized notification is given to the analytics module 120. Preferably, the change tickets are stored in a change ticket database 116 contained within or coupled to the CMS 110. Thus, the CMS 110 and change ticket database 116 may contain a number of configuration change requests, in varying stages of authorization and implementation. The CMS 110 can be a separate server, a process running on a server with other applications, or running an application on a personal computer. The change ticket data 116 base can be networked and can be directly or indirectly accessible by the analytics module 120 over the network.
  • An analytics module 120 is coupled to the CMS 110. The analytics module 120 enforces the configuration change process of the CMS 11.0 by configuring the selectable configuration locks 132 on the CCSs 130 to selectively enable or disable configuration changes to the CEs 135. The analytics module 120 receives configuration change rules. These configuration change rules are associated with the one or more CCSs 130 and the one or more CEs 135 within a CCS 130. The configuration change rules are configured through the rule input 112, which is preferably coupled to the analytics module 120. Also, contemplated are configuration rules received from other sources. Alternatively, the configuration change rules can be read directly from the CMS 110, derived from information retrieved from the CMS 110, or through another source (not shown) coupled to the analytics module 120. The analytics module 120, receives configuration change ticket information from the CMS 110. Preferably, the configuration change ticket information can be either requested from the CMS 110. However, the information can automatically be sent by the CMS 110 to the analytics module 120. Also contemplated by the invention is the analytics module 120 directly accessing the change ticket database 116. The configuration change ticket is preferably processed according to rules specified during the rule input 122 to determine if all the criteria for the configuration change process for an associated CEs 135 or an associated CCS 130 are being met. Also contemplated are one or more subsets of the CEs 135 meeting the configuration change process rules and the configuration change authorization being limited to these CEs 135. Preferably, the subset of CEs meeting the configuration change rule criteria will be authorized for making the configuration change. If all the criteria of the rules are met, then the analytics module 120 authorizes configuration changes the CEs 135. Also contemplated is a means to bypass the rules for generation an authorization in emergency situations.
  • Optionally, the configuration authorizing rules used by the analytics module 120 can include current conditions 126 in the determination for the authorization for the configuration changes to the CE. Exemplary of a current condition is the current time, date, and the day of the week. Preferably, if the authorizing rules criteria are met but the current conditions are not met, the authorization of the configuration change can be delayed until the time, day of the week, or date condition is met. Also, contemplated is the sending of a message to the selective configuration lock 132 containing a time window during which configuration changes are enabled. Another illustrative use of current conditions is the checking an inventory and requiring that a specified inventory level be available before authorizing a configuration change that would increase the production rate of an item.
  • When the configuration change authorization for all or some of the CEs 135 is met, the analytics module 120 will send a selective authorization message to a selective configuration lock 132 on the corresponding CCS 130 for the CEs 135 to be changed. The message will cause the selective configuration lock 132 to enable changes to the selective CEs. The message can be sent over a network where the analytics module 120 and the CCS 130 are located on separate systems remote from one another. The disabling of configuration changes to the CEs can be based on time, the completion of the configuration change to the CE, or by a message from the analytics module 120. Alternatively, the analytics module 120 can be a process or subroutine operating within the same processing system as the CCS 130 where the configuration authorization message is sent through inter-process communication means.
  • The analytics module 120 can receive status information from the selective configuration locks 132 regarding the occurrence of the success or failure of a configuration change, and the reasons for failure. This status information is stored in a change database 125. The change database 125 can later be used to generate reports regarding the status of the success configuration changes and change tickets. The analytics module 120 can associate status changes into groups based on type of configuration change, failed changes, and failure status information. Further the analytics module 120 can associate the changes with the configuration ticket database 116 to reconcile configuration change requests. As part of the reconciliation, information can be passed from the analytics module 120 to the CMS 110 to automatically update the status information for the associated change ticket indicating the final result of the configuration change.
  • The CCS 130 is coupled with the analytics module 120 preferably through a network. The CCS 130 contains one or more CEs 135. The CCS 130 also includes a selective lock 132 which is configured to prevent changes to the CEs 135 unless enabled by the analytics module 120. Preferably, the selective enabling of the selective configuration lock 132 contains a time window during which the enabled configuration changes can be made. The time window can vary by each configuration change for each CE 135. It can be desirable that the configuration changes to the CEs 135 are performed in a specific order. Having non-overlapping time windows for each enabled CE 135 configuration change can enforce such a sequence. Further information regarding the operation of the selective configuration locks 132 can be found in the co-owned application Ser. No. 11/346,741 titled “Enforcing Automatic Opening and Closing of an Existing Workflow” which is incorporated by reference. In general, the selective configuration lock 132 can be a hook into the file system driver of the CCS 130 to monitor and control changes to files associated with the CEs 135 and further associated with the configuration change ticket resulting from a change request 112. The selective configuration lock 132 can also include catching and monitoring triggers caused by a database modification. The selective configuration lock 132 can generate information regarding the status of a configuration change to a CE 135. This information can include whether the configuration change succeeded or failed. Further, the information can include information regarding why the change failed. This can include but is not limited to, incompatible operating system, insufficient memory to do the change, and insufficient permission to access a file. Preferably, information generated by the selective lock 132 is sent to the analytics module 120 but alternatively can be sent directly to the change database 125 for later processing, reference, and report generation. Configuration changes 140 to the CEs 135 preferably do not come from the analytics module 120 but are made directly to the CCS 130 or alternatively over a network. Exemplary of this process would be the loading of an updated application where the application files are the CEs 135 to be changed.
  • To prevent monitoring or unauthorized control over the selective configuration locks 132, the communication between the analytics module 120 and the selective configuration locks 132 can be encrypted and authenticated. Any authentication and encryption techniques can be used. Preferably the authentication and encryption technique uses a secure socket layer (SSL) using SSL key exchange to authenticate the selective enabling of the selective configuration lock.
  • The information generated by the selectable configuration lock 132, preferably stored in the change database 125, can be used to generate a variety of reports. First, the information can be used to reconcile the change ticket database 116 with the changes made to the CEs 135 and thus generating change compliance reports. Further, compliance reports can be organized by but not limited to user, CCS 130, CE 135, time, and type of change.
  • A second illustrative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2. The system 200 for monitoring configuration changes to one or more configurable elements (CEs) 135 within a configurable computational system (CCS) 130. The monitoring generates a log of changes, that can be stored within a change database 125, which can be reconciled with authorized configuration changes in the change ticket database 116 as provided by the configuration management system (CMS) 110. The monitoring system comprises substantially the same elements as described in FIG. 1 with two primary differences. The analytics module 220 operates differently than for the system described for FIG. 1 and the selective configuration lock (132-FIG. 1) is replaced with the configuration change monitor 232.
  • The CMS 110 is used for generating an configuration changes(s) authorization for one or more CEs 135 within one or more CCSs 130 according to a specific business process. The operation of the CMS 110, the configuration change request 112 input to the CMS 110, the operator input 114, and the storage of the change request in the change ticket database 116, is the same as previously described for FIG. 1.
  • An analytics module 220 is coupled to the CMS 110. The analytics module 220 is a post configuration change analysis tool that analyzes changes in the change ticket database 116 according to configuration change rules input into the analytics module 220, and determines at least which configuration changes complied with the change process rules, which changes did not comply with the rules, configuration change made without an associated configuration change request, which change tickets were not completed, and reasons that the configuration changes failed. The configuration change rules preferably can be configured into the analytics module 220 from the rule input 122 but can be received from other sources. Alternatively, the configuration change rules can be acquired directly from the CMS 110, derived from information retrieved from the CMS 110, or through a source (not shown) coupled to the analytics module 220. The analytics module 220, can receive configuration change request information from the CMS 110. Preferably, the analytics module 220 directly accesses the change ticket database 116. The CMS 110 can signal the analytics module 220 when a change has occurred to the change ticket database 116.
  • Also contemplated by the invention is a report 124 interface for an operator requesting and receiving reports related to, reconciling the change ticket database 116 and the information in the change database 125 to determine what configuration changes were made, determining which changes were made conforming to within the configuration change process, and which changes were made outside the configuration change process. Preferably, the configuration change ticket information is requested directly from the change ticket database 116 or from the CMS 110 alternatively after the configuration changes are made to the CEs 135 within a CCS 130. However, the change ticket information can automatically be sent by the CMS 110 to the analytics module 220, stored and processed when reconciliation reports are generated. During analysis of the change ticket database 116 and the change database 125, the configuration change ticket is preferably processed according to rules input by the rules input 122 to determine if all the criteria for configuration change process for the associated CEs 135 are met. Also contemplated is analysis and reporting on an individual CE 135 basis or on a CCS basis.
  • Optionally, the configuration authorizing rules used by the analytics module 120 can include current conditions 126 in analyzing the configuration changes to the CEs. Exemplary of a current condition is the current time and the day of the week. If the analytics module 220 are to use the current conditions, then the change information stored in the change database 125 must include current condition information. It is contemplated that the current condition information is provided by the analytics module 220 or that the configuration change monitor 232 provides this information.
  • Information sent between the analytics module 220 and the CMS 110, the configuration change monitor 232 and the CMS 110 can be sent over a network. Alternatively, the analytics module 220 can be a process or subroutine operating within the same processing system as the CCS 130 where communication is provided through inter-process or processor communication means.
  • The analytics module 220 is configured to receive status information from the CCS 130 sent by the configuration change monitor 232 regarding the occurrence of a configuration change, status regarding a failure of an attempted configuration changes, and status regarding a successful configuration change. This information can be stored in a change database 125. The change database 125 can later be utilized to generate reports reconciling the change ticket database 116 and the change database 125. As discussed for FIG. 1, the analytics module 220 can associate changes into groups based on type of configuration change, failed changes, and failure status information. Further the analytics module 220 can associate the changes with the configuration ticket database 116 to reconcile configuration change requests. This reconciliation can be automatic where as part of the reconciliation process, information is passed from the analytics module 220 to the CMS 110 to automatically update the status information for the associated change ticket. This information can include closing a change ticket or noting a failure of a configuration change in the ticket.
  • The CCS 130 is coupled with the analytics module 220, preferably through a network. The CCS 130 contains one or more CEs 135. The CCS 130 also includes a configuration change monitor 232 which is configured to monitor changes to the CEs 135. Preferably, the change monitor 232 has access to the current conditions, such as date and time so that this information can be tagged to the status information generated. The status information which is generated can be sent as generated to the analytics module 220 or preferably directly to the change database 125. Also, contemplated is the ability of the change monitor 232 to store change information for later transfer to the analytics module 220 or change database 125. In general, the change monitor 232 can be a driver that is coupled to the file system of the CCS 130 to monitor and control changes to files associated with the CEs 135. The change monitor 232 can also include but is not limited to monitoring triggers generated by a database modification. The change monitor 232 can generate information regarding the status of a configuration change to a CE 135. This information can include whether the configuration change succeeded or failed. Further, when the change fails the information can include information regarding why the change failed. This can include but is not limited to, incompatible operating system, insufficient memory to do the change, and insufficient permission to access a file. Preferably, information generated by the selective lock 132 is sent to the analytics module 120 but alternatively or additionally can be sent directly to the change database 125 for later processing, reference, and report generation. Configuration changes 140 to the CEs 135 preferably do not come from the analytics module 120 but are made directly to the CCS 130 or over the network. Exemplary of this process is loading of an updated application where the application files are the CEs 135 to be changed.
  • A secure and authenticate channel can be used to communicated between the analytics module 220 and the change monitor 232. Any authentication and securing method can be implemented. Preferably the authentication scheme uses SSL (secure socket layer) using SSL key exchange to authenticate the analytic module 130.
  • The information generated by the change monitor 232, preferably stored in the change database 125, can be used to generate a variety of reports. First, the information can be used to reconcile the change ticket database with the changes made to the CEs 135 and thus generating change compliance reports. Further, compliance reports can be organized by user, system, type of configurable element, time, and type of change.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustrative embodiment of the process 300 for automatically enforcing a configuration change process for one or more configurable elements (CE) within a configurable computation system (CCS). In the step 310, the change process rules associated with the configurable elements within and configurable computation system are accessed. The rules can encompass a larger set of rules where only a subset of rules applies to specific CEs or a specific CCS. An exemplary embodiment of these rules is having authorizations by specific people, the availability of inventory, and performing a configuration change in a specified time window and on a specified day or day of the week. A configuration change request can embody that state of a request by containing information about who has authorized the configuration change, available inventory, or other information related to the request. The information within the configuration change request is evaluated against the rules for the associated CEs and CCSs referenced by a configuration change request.
  • In a step 320, the information associated with the configuration change request is analyzed using the rules associated with the CEs and CCS effected by the configuration change request. As part of the analysis, external conditions can be utilized. These include conditions like the current time of day, the date, and the day of the week. The analysis can find that some, none, or all of the associated CE have conformed to the rules for a configuration change.
  • In a step 330, configuration changes are selectively authorized for the CEs within the CCSs corresponding to the configuration change request. The authorization is based on analysis of the configuration change request and the configuration change rules. The authorization is communicated to at least one selective-lock which is used to provide selective enabling of configuration changes to the associated CEs. The communication is preferably over a network but other means are contemplated. Also, contemplated are secure authenticated communications. SSL (secure socket layer) can be used to secure encrypted the communications and authenticated by the use of SSL keys exchange.
  • In a step 340, one or more selective locks corresponding to one or more CCSs are configured to selectively allow configuration changes to the selectively authorized CEs. The selective enabling of CE configuration changes is based upon the selective authorizations generated in the step 330.
  • In a step 350, the selective locks generate status information regarding configuration changes made to enabled CEs. This status information can include information about but not limited to when the change was made, whether the change succeeded or failed, and reasons for the success or failure. This information can be stored for later transmission to a central collection point, such as a database for later analysis and report generation. Also contemplated by the invention is the transmission of the status information over a network and through other processing elements before storage.
  • In a step 360, reports are generated based on the stored status information and the configuration change requests. The report generation can associate the status information with the associated configuration change request. Further, the report generation can associate the status information with the CE, CCS, or a combination of these.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustrative embodiment of the process 400 for automatically monitoring a configuration change process for one or more CEs within one or more CCSs. In a step 410, a configuration change monitor generated status information regarding configuration changes made to CEs. This status information can include information about but not limited to when the change was made, whether the change succeeded or failed, and reasons for the success or failure of the configuration change. This information can be stored for later transmission to a central collection point, such as a database, for later analysis. Also, contemplated by the invention is the transmission of the status information through other processing elements before storage. Preferably the information is transmitted over a network.
  • In the step 420, the change configuration rules associated with the CEs corresponding to the status information generated in step 410 are identified. The one or more configuration change rules associated with a CE can be a subset of a larger set of rules. An exemplary embodiment of these rules is the requirement for authorization by specific people, the availability of inventory, and performing a configuration change in a specified time window and on a specified day or day of the week.
  • In a step 430, the information associated with the state of a configuration change request, the change ticket, is analyzed using the identified rules associated with the CEs and CCS and the associated status information generated in step 410. The change request state information or change ticket status information can be stored in a change ticket database. Part of the analysis, external conditions can be used. These include conditions like the current time of day, the date, and the day of the week. The analysis can determine that some, none, or all of the associated CE have conformed to the configuration change rules. Further, the processing determines whether there was a change configuration request. The results of such an analysis is saved in a form and structure such that the data can be used in the generation of reports associating status information with configuration change requests, CEs and CCSs.
  • In a step 440, reports are generated based on the stored status information and the configuration change requests. The report generation can associate status information with the associated configuration change. Further, the report generation can associate the status information with the CE, CCS, or a combination of these.

Claims (21)

1-25. (canceled)
26. A method comprising:
generating configuration change status information corresponding to one or more configurable elements (CEs) in a configurable computation system (CCS);
accessing at least one or more sets of configuration change rules, wherein each set of configuration change rules is associated with a configuration change to the one or more CEs; and
processing the configuration change status information and a configuration change request according to the one or more sets of configuration change rules to determine compliance of a configuration change indicated in the configuration change request.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the processing further comprises processing one or more current conditions.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the one or more current conditions include at least one of: a current time, a date, a day of the week, an inventory level, and a state of a mechanical device.
29. The method of claim 26, further comprising selectively authorizing the configuration change request to a subset of the one or more CEs.
30. The method of claim 26, further comprising authenticating configuring of one or more selective locks.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the one or more selective-locks generates the configuration change status information.
32. The method of claim 26, further comprising generating a report, wherein the report contains the configuration change status information, wherein the status information is associated with the configuration change request, the corresponding CEs, and the corresponding CCS.
33. Logic encoded in non-transitory media that includes instructions for execution and when executed by a processor, is operable to perform operations comprising:
generating configuration change status information corresponding to one or more CEs in a CCS;
accessing at least one or more sets of configuration change rules, wherein each set of configuration change rules is associated with a configuration change to the one or more CEs; and
processing the configuration change status information and a configuration change request according to the one or more sets of configuration change rules to determine compliance of a configuration change indicated in the configuration change request.
34. The logic of claim 33, wherein the processing further comprises processing one or more current conditions.
35. The logic of claim 34, wherein the one or more current conditions include at least one of: a current time, a date, a day of the week, an inventory level, and a state of a mechanical device.
36. The logic of claim 33, the operations further comprising selectively authorizing the configuration change request to a subset of the one or more CEs.
37. The logic of claim 33, the operations further comprising authenticating configuring of one or more selective locks.
38. The logic of claim 37, wherein the one or more selective-locks generates the configuration change status information.
39. The logic of claim 33, the operations further comprising generating a report, wherein the report contains the configuration change status information, wherein the status information is associated with the configuration change request, the corresponding CEs, and the corresponding CCS.
40. An apparatus, comprising:
a memory element for storing data; and
a processor that executes instructions associated with the data, wherein the processor and the memory element cooperate, such that the apparatus is configured for:
generating configuration change status information corresponding to one or more CEs in a CCS;
accessing at least one or more sets of configuration change rules, wherein each set of configuration change rules is associated with a configuration change to the one or more CEs; and
processing the configuration change status information and a configuration change request according to the one or more sets of configuration change rules to determine compliance of a configuration change indicated in the configuration change request.
41. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the processing further comprises processing one or more current conditions.
42. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the one or more current conditions include at least one of: a current time, a date, a day of the week, an inventory level, and a state of a mechanical device.
43. The apparatus of claim 40, further configured for selectively authorizing the configuration change request to a subset of the one or more CEs.
44. The apparatus of claim 40, further configured for authenticating configuring of one or more selective locks.
45. The apparatus of claim 40, further configured for generating a report, wherein the report contains the configuration change status information, wherein the status information is associated with the configuration change request, the corresponding CEs, and the corresponding CCS.
US13/558,277 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management Abandoned US20120290828A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/558,277 US20120290828A1 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US87982607P 2007-01-10 2007-01-10
US12/008,274 US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2008-01-09 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,277 US20120290828A1 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/008,274 Division US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2008-01-09 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120290828A1 true US20120290828A1 (en) 2012-11-15

Family

ID=47142693

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/008,274 Active 2030-12-19 US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2008-01-09 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,227 Active US8707422B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,181 Active US8701182B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,277 Abandoned US20120290828A1 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US14/251,009 Active US9864868B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2014-04-11 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/008,274 Active 2030-12-19 US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2008-01-09 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,227 Active US8707422B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US13/558,181 Active US8701182B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-07-25 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/251,009 Active US9864868B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2014-04-11 Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (5) US8332929B1 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8701182B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2014-04-15 Mcafee, Inc. Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US8707446B2 (en) 2006-02-02 2014-04-22 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US8713668B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-04-29 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US8739272B1 (en) 2012-04-02 2014-05-27 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US8762928B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2014-06-24 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of usage of language interfaces
US8763118B2 (en) 2005-07-14 2014-06-24 Mcafee, Inc. Classification of software on networked systems
US8800024B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-08-05 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for host-initiated firewall discovery in a network environment
US8843496B2 (en) 2010-09-12 2014-09-23 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for clustering host inventories
US8869265B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2014-10-21 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US8925101B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2014-12-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8938800B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2015-01-20 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US8973146B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
US9075993B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2015-07-07 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for selectively grouping and managing program files
US9112830B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2015-08-18 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US20160050113A1 (en) * 2014-08-14 2016-02-18 Netapp, Inc. Methods for managing storage virtual machine configuration changes in a distributed storage system and devices thereof
US9424154B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2016-08-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for computer system state checks
US9465700B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2016-10-11 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US9578052B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2017-02-21 Mcafee, Inc. Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US9576142B2 (en) 2006-03-27 2017-02-21 Mcafee, Inc. Execution environment file inventory
US9594881B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2017-03-14 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for passive threat detection using virtual memory inspection
CN107180338A (en) * 2017-05-22 2017-09-19 深圳市小牛在线互联网信息咨询有限公司 Business performs method, device, storage medium and computer equipment
US9946562B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2018-04-17 Mcafee, Llc System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9418040B2 (en) 2005-07-07 2016-08-16 Sciencelogic, Inc. Dynamically deployable self configuring distributed network management system
US8555404B1 (en) 2006-05-18 2013-10-08 Mcafee, Inc. Connectivity-based authorization
US8515075B1 (en) 2008-01-31 2013-08-20 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for malicious software detection using critical address space protection
US8615502B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2013-12-24 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for reverse mapping vnode pointers
JP5623271B2 (en) * 2010-12-27 2014-11-12 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation Information processing apparatus, authority management method, program, and recording medium
US8713088B2 (en) * 2011-03-27 2014-04-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Identifying users of remote sessions
US10423509B2 (en) * 2011-08-05 2019-09-24 Entit Software Llc System and method for managing environment configuration using snapshots
US8694738B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2014-04-08 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for critical address space protection in a hypervisor environment
US8898806B1 (en) 2011-12-15 2014-11-25 Symantec Corporation Systems and methods for protecting services
US9817739B1 (en) * 2012-10-31 2017-11-14 Veritas Technologies Llc Method to restore a virtual environment based on a state of applications/tiers
EP3186790A4 (en) * 2014-08-27 2019-05-01 Ponsse Oyj Method, arrangement and user interface for presenting data describing forest work unit operation
US10091067B2 (en) 2015-12-04 2018-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Discovering and publishing device changes in a cloud environment

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020069367A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-06 Glen Tindal Network operating system data directory
US20040088398A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-05-06 Barlow Douglas B. Systems and methods for providing autoconfiguration and management of nodes

Family Cites Families (368)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4982430A (en) 1985-04-24 1991-01-01 General Instrument Corporation Bootstrap channel security arrangement for communication network
US4688169A (en) 1985-05-30 1987-08-18 Joshi Bhagirath S Computer software security system
US5155847A (en) 1988-08-03 1992-10-13 Minicom Data Corporation Method and apparatus for updating software at remote locations
US5560008A (en) 1989-05-15 1996-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation Remote authentication and authorization in a distributed data processing system
CA2010591C (en) 1989-10-20 1999-01-26 Phillip M. Adams Kernels, description tables and device drivers
US5222134A (en) 1990-11-07 1993-06-22 Tau Systems Corporation Secure system for activating personal computer software at remote locations
US5390314A (en) 1992-10-09 1995-02-14 American Airlines, Inc. Method and apparatus for developing scripts that access mainframe resources that can be executed on various computer systems having different interface languages without modification
US5339261A (en) 1992-10-22 1994-08-16 Base 10 Systems, Inc. System for operating application software in a safety critical environment
US5584009A (en) 1993-10-18 1996-12-10 Cyrix Corporation System and method of retiring store data from a write buffer
JP3777196B2 (en) 1994-05-10 2006-05-24 富士通株式会社 Communication control device for client / server system
JP3042341B2 (en) 1994-11-30 2000-05-15 日本電気株式会社 Local I / O Control Method for Cluster-Coupled Multiprocessor System
US6282712B1 (en) 1995-03-10 2001-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Automatic software installation on heterogeneous networked computer systems
US5699513A (en) 1995-03-31 1997-12-16 Motorola, Inc. Method for secure network access via message intercept
US5787427A (en) 1996-01-03 1998-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation Information handling system, method, and article of manufacture for efficient object security processing by grouping objects sharing common control access policies
US5842017A (en) 1996-01-29 1998-11-24 Digital Equipment Corporation Method and apparatus for forming a translation unit
US5907709A (en) 1996-02-08 1999-05-25 Inprise Corporation Development system with methods for detecting invalid use and management of resources and memory at runtime
US5884298A (en) 1996-03-29 1999-03-16 Cygnet Storage Solutions, Inc. Method for accessing and updating a library of optical discs
US5907708A (en) 1996-06-03 1999-05-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for facilitating avoidance of an exception of a predetermined type in a digital computer system by providing fix-up code for an instruction in response to detection of an exception condition resulting from execution thereof
US5787177A (en) 1996-08-01 1998-07-28 Harris Corporation Integrated network security access control system
US5926832A (en) 1996-09-26 1999-07-20 Transmeta Corporation Method and apparatus for aliasing memory data in an advanced microprocessor
US5991881A (en) 1996-11-08 1999-11-23 Harris Corporation Network surveillance system
US5987611A (en) 1996-12-31 1999-11-16 Zone Labs, Inc. System and methodology for managing internet access on a per application basis for client computers connected to the internet
US6141698A (en) 1997-01-29 2000-10-31 Network Commerce Inc. Method and system for injecting new code into existing application code
US7821926B2 (en) 1997-03-10 2010-10-26 Sonicwall, Inc. Generalized policy server
US5944839A (en) 1997-03-19 1999-08-31 Symantec Corporation System and method for automatically maintaining a computer system
US6587877B1 (en) 1997-03-25 2003-07-01 Lucent Technologies Inc. Management of time and expense when communicating between a host and a communication network
US6192475B1 (en) 1997-03-31 2001-02-20 David R. Wallace System and method for cloaking software
US6167522A (en) 1997-04-01 2000-12-26 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing security for servers executing application programs received via a network
US6356957B2 (en) 1997-04-03 2002-03-12 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for emulating native object oriented foundation classes on a target object oriented programming system using a template library
US5987557A (en) 1997-06-19 1999-11-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for implementing hardware protection domains in a system with no memory management unit (MMU)
US6073142A (en) 1997-06-23 2000-06-06 Park City Group Automated post office based rule analysis of e-mail messages and other data objects for controlled distribution in network environments
US6275938B1 (en) 1997-08-28 2001-08-14 Microsoft Corporation Security enhancement for untrusted executable code
US6192401B1 (en) 1997-10-21 2001-02-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for determining cluster membership in a heterogeneous distributed system
US6393465B2 (en) 1997-11-25 2002-05-21 Nixmail Corporation Junk electronic mail detector and eliminator
US5987610A (en) 1998-02-12 1999-11-16 Ameritech Corporation Computer virus screening methods and systems
EP0994427A4 (en) 1998-05-06 2004-03-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method and system for digital data transmission/reception
US6795966B1 (en) 1998-05-15 2004-09-21 Vmware, Inc. Mechanism for restoring, porting, replicating and checkpointing computer systems using state extraction
US6442686B1 (en) 1998-07-02 2002-08-27 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. System and methodology for messaging server-based management and enforcement of crypto policies
US6182142B1 (en) 1998-07-10 2001-01-30 Encommerce, Inc. Distributed access management of information resources
US6338149B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-01-08 Westinghouse Electric Company Llc Change monitoring system for a computer system
US6546425B1 (en) 1998-10-09 2003-04-08 Netmotion Wireless, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment
JP3753873B2 (en) 1998-11-11 2006-03-08 株式会社島津製作所 Spectrophotometer
JP3522141B2 (en) 1999-01-28 2004-04-26 富士通株式会社 Automatic generation method of program inheriting correction program, automatic program generation device, and recording medium recording program for automatically generating program inheriting correction program
US6969352B2 (en) 1999-06-22 2005-11-29 Teratech Corporation Ultrasound probe with integrated electronics
US6453468B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2002-09-17 B-Hub, Inc. Methods for improving reliability while upgrading software programs in a clustered computer system
US6496477B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2002-12-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Processes, articles, and packets for network path diversity in media over packet applications
US6567857B1 (en) 1999-07-29 2003-05-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic proxy insertion in network traffic flow
US7340684B2 (en) 1999-08-19 2008-03-04 National Instruments Corporation System and method for programmatically generating a second graphical program based on a first graphical program
US6256773B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-07-03 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for configuration management in a development architecture framework
US6990591B1 (en) 1999-11-18 2006-01-24 Secureworks, Inc. Method and system for remotely configuring and monitoring a communication device
US6321267B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2001-11-20 Escom Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering junk email
US6662219B1 (en) 1999-12-15 2003-12-09 Microsoft Corporation System for determining at subgroup of nodes relative weight to represent cluster by obtaining exclusive possession of quorum resource
US6460050B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2002-10-01 Mark Raymond Pace Distributed content identification system
US7836494B2 (en) 1999-12-29 2010-11-16 Intel Corporation System and method for regulating the flow of information to or from an application
US6769008B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2004-07-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically altering configurations of clustered computer systems
WO2001069439A1 (en) 2000-03-17 2001-09-20 Filesx Ltd. Accelerating responses to requests made by users to an internet
US6748534B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2004-06-08 Networks Associates, Inc. System and method for partitioned distributed scanning of a large dataset for viruses and other malware
US6941470B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2005-09-06 Everdream Corporation Protected execution environments within a computer system
CA2305078A1 (en) 2000-04-12 2001-10-12 Cloakware Corporation Tamper resistant software - mass data encoding
US7325127B2 (en) 2000-04-25 2008-01-29 Secure Data In Motion, Inc. Security server system
US6377808B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2002-04-23 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for routing data in a communication system
EP1277326A2 (en) 2000-04-28 2003-01-22 Internet Security Systems, Inc. Method and system for managing computer security information
US6769115B1 (en) 2000-05-01 2004-07-27 Emc Corporation Adaptive interface for a software development environment
US6847993B1 (en) 2000-05-31 2005-01-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program products for managing cluster configurations
US6934755B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2005-08-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for migrating processes on a network
US6611925B1 (en) 2000-06-13 2003-08-26 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Single point of entry/origination item scanning within an enterprise or workgroup
US20030061506A1 (en) 2001-04-05 2003-03-27 Geoffrey Cooper System and method for security policy
US6901519B1 (en) 2000-06-22 2005-05-31 Infobahn, Inc. E-mail virus protection system and method
US8204999B2 (en) 2000-07-10 2012-06-19 Oracle International Corporation Query string processing
US7093239B1 (en) 2000-07-14 2006-08-15 Internet Security Systems, Inc. Computer immune system and method for detecting unwanted code in a computer system
US7350204B2 (en) 2000-07-24 2008-03-25 Microsoft Corporation Policies for secure software execution
US7441265B2 (en) 2000-08-04 2008-10-21 Prismtech Gmbh Method and system for session based authorization and access control for networked application objects
AUPQ968100A0 (en) * 2000-08-25 2000-09-21 Telstra Corporation Limited A management system
EP1386239A4 (en) 2000-09-01 2005-11-02 Tut Systems Inc A method and system to pre-compile configuration information for a data communications device
US20020165947A1 (en) 2000-09-25 2002-11-07 Crossbeam Systems, Inc. Network application apparatus
US7707305B2 (en) 2000-10-17 2010-04-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for protecting against overload conditions on nodes of a distributed network
US7146305B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-12-05 Vcis, Inc. Analytical virtual machine
US7606898B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2009-10-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US7054930B1 (en) 2000-10-26 2006-05-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for propagating filters
US6930985B1 (en) 2000-10-26 2005-08-16 Extreme Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for management of configuration in a network
US6834301B1 (en) 2000-11-08 2004-12-21 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. System and method for configuration, management, and monitoring of a computer network using inheritance
US6766334B1 (en) 2000-11-21 2004-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Project-based configuration management method and apparatus
US6907600B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2005-06-14 Intel Corporation Virtual translation lookaside buffer
JP2002244898A (en) 2001-02-19 2002-08-30 Hitachi Ltd Database managing program and database system
US6993012B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2006-01-31 Innomedia Pte, Ltd Method for communicating audio data in a packet switched network
US7739497B1 (en) 2001-03-21 2010-06-15 Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. Method and apparatus for anonymous IP datagram exchange using dynamic network address translation
WO2002093334A2 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-11-21 Symantec Corporation Temporal access control for computer virus outbreaks
US6918110B2 (en) 2001-04-11 2005-07-12 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Dynamic instrumentation of an executable program by means of causing a breakpoint at the entry point of a function and providing instrumentation code
CN1141821C (en) 2001-04-25 2004-03-10 数位联合电信股份有限公司 Redirectable network access system
US6715050B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2004-03-30 Oracle International Corporation Storage access keys
US6988101B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2006-01-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and computer program product for providing an extensible file system for accessing a foreign file system from a local data processing system
US6988124B2 (en) 2001-06-06 2006-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Locating potentially identical objects across multiple computers based on stochastic partitioning of workload
US7290266B2 (en) 2001-06-14 2007-10-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Access control by a real-time stateful reference monitor with a state collection training mode and a lockdown mode for detecting predetermined patterns of events indicative of requests for operating system resources resulting in a decision to allow or block activity identified in a sequence of events based on a rule set defining a processing policy
US7065767B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2006-06-20 Intel Corporation Managed hosting server auditing and change tracking
US7069330B1 (en) 2001-07-05 2006-06-27 Mcafee, Inc. Control of interaction between client computer applications and network resources
US20030023736A1 (en) 2001-07-12 2003-01-30 Kurt Abkemeier Method and system for filtering messages
US20030014667A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2003-01-16 Andrei Kolichtchak Buffer overflow attack detection and suppression
US6877088B2 (en) 2001-08-08 2005-04-05 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for controlling speculative execution of instructions based on a multiaccess memory condition
US7007302B1 (en) 2001-08-31 2006-02-28 Mcafee, Inc. Efficient management and blocking of malicious code and hacking attempts in a network environment
US7010796B1 (en) 2001-09-28 2006-03-07 Emc Corporation Methods and apparatus providing remote operation of an application programming interface
US7278161B2 (en) 2001-10-01 2007-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Protecting a data processing system from attack by a vandal who uses a vulnerability scanner
US7177267B2 (en) 2001-11-09 2007-02-13 Adc Dsl Systems, Inc. Hardware monitoring and configuration management
US7853643B1 (en) 2001-11-21 2010-12-14 Blue Titan Software, Inc. Web services-based computing resource lifecycle management
EP1315066A1 (en) 2001-11-21 2003-05-28 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Computer security system
US7346781B2 (en) 2001-12-06 2008-03-18 Mcafee, Inc. Initiating execution of a computer program from an encrypted version of a computer program
US7039949B2 (en) 2001-12-10 2006-05-02 Brian Ross Cartmell Method and system for blocking unwanted communications
US7159036B2 (en) 2001-12-10 2007-01-02 Mcafee, Inc. Updating data from a source computer to groups of destination computers
US10033700B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2018-07-24 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Dynamic evaluation of access rights
US7690023B2 (en) 2001-12-13 2010-03-30 Japan Science And Technology Agency Software safety execution system
US7398389B2 (en) 2001-12-20 2008-07-08 Coretrace Corporation Kernel-based network security infrastructure
US7096500B2 (en) 2001-12-21 2006-08-22 Mcafee, Inc. Predictive malware scanning of internet data
JP3906356B2 (en) 2001-12-27 2007-04-18 独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Syntax analysis method and apparatus
US7743415B2 (en) 2002-01-31 2010-06-22 Riverbed Technology, Inc. Denial of service attacks characterization
US6772345B1 (en) 2002-02-08 2004-08-03 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Protocol-level malware scanner
US20030167399A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-09-04 Yves Audebert Method and system for performing post issuance configuration and data changes to a personal security device using a communications pipe
US6941449B2 (en) 2002-03-04 2005-09-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for performing critical tasks using speculative operations
US7600021B2 (en) 2002-04-03 2009-10-06 Microsoft Corporation Delta replication of source files and packages across networked resources
US20070253430A1 (en) 2002-04-23 2007-11-01 Minami John S Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
US7370360B2 (en) 2002-05-13 2008-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation Computer immune system and method for detecting unwanted code in a P-code or partially compiled native-code program executing within a virtual machine
US7823148B2 (en) 2002-05-22 2010-10-26 Oracle America, Inc. System and method for performing patch installation via a graphical user interface
US20030221190A1 (en) 2002-05-22 2003-11-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for performing patch installation on multiple devices
US7024404B1 (en) 2002-05-28 2006-04-04 The State University Rutgers Retrieval and display of data objects using a cross-group ranking metric
US8843903B1 (en) 2003-06-11 2014-09-23 Symantec Corporation Process tracking application layered system
US7512977B2 (en) 2003-06-11 2009-03-31 Symantec Corporation Intrustion protection system utilizing layers
US7823203B2 (en) 2002-06-17 2010-10-26 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Method and device for detecting computer network intrusions
US7139916B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2006-11-21 Ebay, Inc. Method and system for monitoring user interaction with a computer
US8924484B2 (en) 2002-07-16 2014-12-30 Sonicwall, Inc. Active e-mail filter with challenge-response
US7522906B2 (en) 2002-08-09 2009-04-21 Wavelink Corporation Mobile unit configuration management for WLANs
JP2004078507A (en) 2002-08-16 2004-03-11 Sony Corp Access control device, access control method and computer program
US7647410B2 (en) 2002-08-28 2010-01-12 Procera Networks, Inc. Network rights management
US7624347B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2009-11-24 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for forwarding full header information in email messages
US7546333B2 (en) 2002-10-23 2009-06-09 Netapp, Inc. Methods and systems for predictive change management for access paths in networks
US7353501B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2008-04-01 Microsoft Corporation Generic wrapper scheme
US7865931B1 (en) 2002-11-25 2011-01-04 Accenture Global Services Limited Universal authorization and access control security measure for applications
US7346927B2 (en) 2002-12-12 2008-03-18 Access Business Group International Llc System and method for storing and accessing secure data
US20040143749A1 (en) 2003-01-16 2004-07-22 Platformlogic, Inc. Behavior-based host-based intrusion prevention system
US20040167906A1 (en) 2003-02-25 2004-08-26 Smith Randolph C. System consolidation tool and method for patching multiple servers
US7024548B1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2006-04-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for auditing and tracking changes to an existing configuration of a computerized device
US7529754B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2009-05-05 Websense, Inc. System and method of monitoring and controlling application files
WO2004095285A1 (en) 2003-03-28 2004-11-04 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.,Ltd. Recording medium, recording device using the same, and reproduction device
US8209680B1 (en) 2003-04-11 2012-06-26 Vmware, Inc. System and method for disk imaging on diverse computers
US7607010B2 (en) 2003-04-12 2009-10-20 Deep Nines, Inc. System and method for network edge data protection
US20050108516A1 (en) 2003-04-17 2005-05-19 Robert Balzer By-pass and tampering protection for application wrappers
US20040230963A1 (en) 2003-05-12 2004-11-18 Rothman Michael A. Method for updating firmware in an operating system agnostic manner
DE10324189A1 (en) 2003-05-28 2004-12-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for controlling access to a resource of an application in a data processing device
US7657599B2 (en) 2003-05-29 2010-02-02 Mindshare Design, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically updating electronic mail access lists
US20050108562A1 (en) 2003-06-18 2005-05-19 Khazan Roger I. Technique for detecting executable malicious code using a combination of static and dynamic analyses
US7827602B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2010-11-02 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Network firewall host application identification and authentication
US7454489B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2008-11-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for accessing clusters of servers from the internet network
US7283517B2 (en) 2003-07-22 2007-10-16 Innomedia Pte Stand alone multi-media terminal adapter with network address translation and port partitioning
US7463590B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2008-12-09 Reflex Security, Inc. System and method for threat detection and response
US7526541B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2009-04-28 Enterasys Networks, Inc. System and method for dynamic network policy management
US7886093B1 (en) 2003-07-31 2011-02-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Electronic device network supporting compression and decompression in electronic devices
US7925722B1 (en) 2003-08-01 2011-04-12 Avocent Corporation Method and apparatus for discovery and installation of network devices through a network
US7401104B2 (en) 2003-08-21 2008-07-15 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for synchronizing computer systems through an intermediary file system share or device
US7386888B2 (en) 2003-08-29 2008-06-10 Trend Micro, Inc. Network isolation techniques suitable for virus protection
US7464408B1 (en) 2003-08-29 2008-12-09 Solidcore Systems, Inc. Damage containment by translation
US8539063B1 (en) 2003-08-29 2013-09-17 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of networked application client software by explicit human input
US7577995B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2009-08-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Controlling user-access to computer applications
US7360097B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2008-04-15 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. System providing methodology for securing interfaces of executable files
US20050081053A1 (en) 2003-10-10 2005-04-14 International Business Machines Corlporation Systems and methods for efficient computer virus detection
US7930351B2 (en) 2003-10-14 2011-04-19 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Identifying undesired email messages having attachments
US7280956B2 (en) 2003-10-24 2007-10-09 Microsoft Corporation System, method, and computer program product for file encryption, decryption and transfer
US7814554B1 (en) 2003-11-06 2010-10-12 Gary Dean Ragner Dynamic associative storage security for long-term memory storage devices
US20050114672A1 (en) 2003-11-20 2005-05-26 Encryptx Corporation Data rights management of digital information in a portable software permission wrapper
US20040172551A1 (en) 2003-12-09 2004-09-02 Michael Connor First response computer virus blocking.
US7600219B2 (en) 2003-12-10 2009-10-06 Sap Ag Method and system to monitor software interface updates and assess backward compatibility
US7546594B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation System and method for updating installation components using an installation component delta patch in a networked environment
US7840968B1 (en) 2003-12-17 2010-11-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of usage of language interfaces
JP2005202523A (en) 2004-01-13 2005-07-28 Sony Corp Computer device and process control method
US7272654B1 (en) 2004-03-04 2007-09-18 Sandbox Networks, Inc. Virtualizing network-attached-storage (NAS) with a compact table that stores lossy hashes of file names and parent handles rather than full names
JP4480422B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2010-06-16 富士通株式会社 Unauthorized access prevention method, apparatus, system, and program
US7783735B1 (en) 2004-03-22 2010-08-24 Mcafee, Inc. Containment of network communication
JP2005275839A (en) 2004-03-25 2005-10-06 Nec Corp Software use permission method and system
US7966658B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2011-06-21 The Regents Of The University Of California Detecting public network attacks using signatures and fast content analysis
WO2005099342A2 (en) 2004-04-19 2005-10-27 Securewave S.A. A generic framework for runtime interception and execution control of interpreted languages
US20060004875A1 (en) 2004-05-11 2006-01-05 Microsoft Corporation CMDB schema
US7890946B2 (en) 2004-05-11 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Efficient patching
US7818377B2 (en) 2004-05-24 2010-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Extended message rule architecture
DE602005018213D1 (en) * 2004-05-24 2010-01-21 Computer Ass Think Inc SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF A MOBILE DEVICE
US7506170B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-03-17 Microsoft Corporation Method for secure access to multiple secure networks
US20050273858A1 (en) 2004-06-07 2005-12-08 Erez Zadok Stackable file systems and methods thereof
US7624445B2 (en) 2004-06-15 2009-11-24 International Business Machines Corporation System for dynamic network reconfiguration and quarantine in response to threat conditions
JP4341517B2 (en) 2004-06-21 2009-10-07 日本電気株式会社 Security policy management system, security policy management method and program
US7694150B1 (en) 2004-06-22 2010-04-06 Cisco Technology, Inc System and methods for integration of behavioral and signature based security
US20050289538A1 (en) 2004-06-23 2005-12-29 International Business Machines Corporation Deploying an application software on a virtual deployment target
US7203864B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2007-04-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for clustering computers into peer groups and comparing individual computers to their peers
US7908653B2 (en) 2004-06-29 2011-03-15 Intel Corporation Method of improving computer security through sandboxing
CN1985489B (en) 2004-07-09 2012-05-09 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Method and arrangement for providing different services in multimedia communication system
US20060015501A1 (en) 2004-07-19 2006-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product to determine a time interval at which to check conditions to permit access to a file
US7937455B2 (en) 2004-07-28 2011-05-03 Oracle International Corporation Methods and systems for modifying nodes in a cluster environment
JP2006059217A (en) 2004-08-23 2006-03-02 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Software memory image generation apparatus and built-in device software update system and program
US7703090B2 (en) 2004-08-31 2010-04-20 Microsoft Corporation Patch un-installation
US7873955B1 (en) 2004-09-07 2011-01-18 Mcafee, Inc. Solidifying the executable software set of a computer
US7392374B2 (en) 2004-09-21 2008-06-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Moving kernel configurations
US7561515B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2009-07-14 Intel Corporation Role-based network traffic-flow rate control
US8146145B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-03-27 Rockstar Bidco Lp Method and apparatus for enabling enhanced control of traffic propagation through a network firewall
US7685632B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Access authorization having a centralized policy
US7506364B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2009-03-17 Microsoft Corporation Integrated access authorization
US20060080656A1 (en) 2004-10-12 2006-04-13 Microsoft Corporation Methods and instructions for patch management
US9329905B2 (en) 2004-10-15 2016-05-03 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for configuring, monitoring and/or managing resource groups including a virtual machine
US7765538B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2010-07-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for determining which program patches to recommend for installation
US8099060B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2012-01-17 Research In Motion Limited Wireless/wired mobile communication device with option to automatically block wireless communication when connected for wired communication
EP1820099A4 (en) 2004-11-04 2013-06-26 Tti Inv S C Llc Detecting exploit code in network flows
US20060101277A1 (en) 2004-11-10 2006-05-11 Meenan Patrick A Detecting and remedying unauthorized computer programs
WO2006101549A2 (en) 2004-12-03 2006-09-28 Whitecell Software, Inc. Secure system for allowing the execution of authorized computer program code
US7765544B2 (en) 2004-12-17 2010-07-27 Intel Corporation Method, apparatus and system for improving security in a virtual machine host
US8479193B2 (en) 2004-12-17 2013-07-02 Intel Corporation Method, apparatus and system for enhancing the usability of virtual machines
US7607170B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2009-10-20 Radware Ltd. Stateful attack protection
US7752667B2 (en) 2004-12-28 2010-07-06 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Rapid virus scan using file signature created during file write
WO2006081032A2 (en) 2005-01-24 2006-08-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a network
US7302558B2 (en) 2005-01-25 2007-11-27 Goldman Sachs & Co. Systems and methods to facilitate the creation and configuration management of computing systems
US7385938B1 (en) * 2005-02-02 2008-06-10 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for adjusting a network device configuration change distribution schedule
US20130247027A1 (en) 2005-02-16 2013-09-19 Solidcore Systems, Inc. Distribution and installation of solidified software on a computer
US8056138B2 (en) 2005-02-26 2011-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and service for detecting improper manipulation of an application
US7836504B2 (en) 2005-03-01 2010-11-16 Microsoft Corporation On-access scan of memory for malware
US7685635B2 (en) 2005-03-11 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for multi-level intercept processing in a virtual machine environment
TW200707417A (en) 2005-03-18 2007-02-16 Sony Corp Reproducing apparatus, reproducing method, program, program storage medium, data delivery system, data structure, and manufacturing method of recording medium
US7552479B1 (en) 2005-03-22 2009-06-23 Symantec Corporation Detecting shellcode that modifies IAT entries
JP2006270894A (en) 2005-03-25 2006-10-05 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Gateway unit, terminal device, communications system and program
US7770151B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2010-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic generation of solution deployment descriptors
US8590044B2 (en) 2005-04-14 2013-11-19 International Business Machines Corporation Selective virus scanning system and method
US7349931B2 (en) 2005-04-14 2008-03-25 Webroot Software, Inc. System and method for scanning obfuscated files for pestware
US7562385B2 (en) 2005-04-20 2009-07-14 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for dynamic authentication using physical keys
US7603552B1 (en) 2005-05-04 2009-10-13 Mcafee, Inc. Piracy prevention using unique module translation
US7363463B2 (en) 2005-05-13 2008-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for caching address translations from multiple address spaces in virtual machines
US8001245B2 (en) 2005-06-01 2011-08-16 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for autonomically configurable router
WO2006137057A2 (en) 2005-06-21 2006-12-28 Onigma Ltd. A method and a system for providing comprehensive protection against leakage of sensitive information assets using host based agents, content- meta-data and rules-based policies
US8839450B2 (en) 2007-08-02 2014-09-16 Intel Corporation Secure vault service for software components within an execution environment
CN101218568A (en) 2005-07-11 2008-07-09 微软公司 Per-user and system granular audit policy implementation
US7739721B2 (en) 2005-07-11 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation Per-user and system granular audit policy implementation
US7856661B1 (en) 2005-07-14 2010-12-21 Mcafee, Inc. Classification of software on networked systems
US7984493B2 (en) 2005-07-22 2011-07-19 Alcatel-Lucent DNS based enforcement for confinement and detection of network malicious activities
US7895651B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2011-02-22 Bit 9, Inc. Content tracking in a network security system
BRPI0616018A2 (en) 2005-07-29 2011-06-07 Bit9 Inc security systems and methods for computer networks
US7962616B2 (en) 2005-08-11 2011-06-14 Micro Focus (Us), Inc. Real-time activity monitoring and reporting
US8327353B2 (en) 2005-08-30 2012-12-04 Microsoft Corporation Hierarchical virtualization with a multi-level virtualization mechanism
US7340574B2 (en) 2005-08-30 2008-03-04 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing an industrial controller with a redundant controller
US8166474B1 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-04-24 Vmware, Inc. System and methods for implementing network traffic management for virtual and physical machines
US20070074199A1 (en) 2005-09-27 2007-03-29 Sebastian Schoenberg Method and apparatus for delivering microcode updates through virtual machine operations
EP1770915A1 (en) 2005-09-29 2007-04-04 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Policy control in the evolved system architecture
US7712132B1 (en) 2005-10-06 2010-05-04 Ogilvie John W Detecting surreptitious spyware
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US7725737B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2010-05-25 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. System and methodology providing secure workspace environment
US9055093B2 (en) 2005-10-21 2015-06-09 Kevin R. Borders Method, system and computer program product for detecting at least one of security threats and undesirable computer files
US20070169079A1 (en) 2005-11-08 2007-07-19 Microsoft Corporation Software update management
US7836303B2 (en) 2005-12-09 2010-11-16 University Of Washington Web browser operating system
US7856538B2 (en) 2005-12-12 2010-12-21 Systex, Inc. Methods, systems and computer readable medium for detecting memory overflow conditions
US20070143851A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 Fiberlink Method and systems for controlling access to computing resources based on known security vulnerabilities
US8296437B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2012-10-23 Logmein, Inc. Server-mediated setup and maintenance of peer-to-peer client computer communications
US20070168861A1 (en) * 2006-01-17 2007-07-19 Bell Denise A Method for indicating completion status of user initiated and system created tasks
US20070174429A1 (en) 2006-01-24 2007-07-26 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and servers for establishing a connection between a client system and a virtual machine hosting a requested computing environment
US7757269B1 (en) 2006-02-02 2010-07-13 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
JPWO2007100045A1 (en) 2006-03-03 2009-07-23 日本電気株式会社 COMMUNICATION CONTROL DEVICE, COMMUNICATION CONTROL SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL PROGRAM
WO2007099273A1 (en) 2006-03-03 2007-09-07 Arm Limited Monitoring values of signals within an integrated circuit
US8621433B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2013-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Managing version information for software components
US7895573B1 (en) 2006-03-27 2011-02-22 Mcafee, Inc. Execution environment file inventory
US7752233B2 (en) 2006-03-29 2010-07-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Techniques for clustering a set of objects
KR20070099201A (en) 2006-04-03 2007-10-09 삼성전자주식회사 Method of security management for mobile wireless device and apparatus for security management using the same
US7870387B1 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-01-11 Mcafee, Inc. Program-based authorization
US8015563B2 (en) 2006-04-14 2011-09-06 Microsoft Corporation Managing virtual machines with system-wide policies
US7966659B1 (en) 2006-04-18 2011-06-21 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Distributed learn mode for configuring a firewall, security authority, intrusion detection/prevention devices, and the like
US8352930B1 (en) 2006-04-24 2013-01-08 Mcafee, Inc. Software modification by group to minimize breakage
US8458673B2 (en) 2006-04-26 2013-06-04 Flexera Software Llc Computer-implemented method and system for binding digital rights management executable code to a software application
US7849507B1 (en) 2006-04-29 2010-12-07 Ironport Systems, Inc. Apparatus for filtering server responses
US8555404B1 (en) 2006-05-18 2013-10-08 Mcafee, Inc. Connectivity-based authorization
US20080082662A1 (en) 2006-05-19 2008-04-03 Richard Dandliker Method and apparatus for controlling access to network resources based on reputation
US8291409B2 (en) 2006-05-22 2012-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Updating virtual machine with patch on host that does not have network access
US20070276950A1 (en) 2006-05-26 2007-11-29 Rajesh Dadhia Firewall For Dynamically Activated Resources
US7761912B2 (en) 2006-06-06 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Reputation driven firewall
US7809704B2 (en) 2006-06-15 2010-10-05 Microsoft Corporation Combining spectral and probabilistic clustering
US7831997B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-11-09 Intel Corporation Secure and automatic provisioning of computer systems having embedded network devices
US20070300215A1 (en) 2006-06-26 2007-12-27 Bardsley Jeffrey S Methods, systems, and computer program products for obtaining and utilizing a score indicative of an overall performance effect of a software update on a software host
US8009566B2 (en) 2006-06-26 2011-08-30 Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Packet classification in a network security device
US8468526B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2013-06-18 Intel Corporation Concurrent thread execution using user-level asynchronous signaling
US8365294B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2013-01-29 Intel Corporation Hardware platform authentication and multi-platform validation
US7950056B1 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-05-24 Symantec Corporation Behavior based processing of a new version or variant of a previously characterized program
US8495181B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2013-07-23 Citrix Systems, Inc Systems and methods for application based interception SSI/VPN traffic
US8572721B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2013-10-29 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for routing packets in a VPN-client-to-VPN-client connection via an SSL/VPN network appliance
US8015388B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2011-09-06 Vmware, Inc. Bypassing guest page table walk for shadow page table entries not present in guest page table
US20080059123A1 (en) 2006-08-29 2008-03-06 Microsoft Corporation Management of host compliance evaluation
EP1901192A1 (en) 2006-09-14 2008-03-19 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Mobile application registration
US8161475B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Automatic load and balancing for virtual machines to meet resource requirements
US7769731B2 (en) 2006-10-04 2010-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Using file backup software to generate an alert when a file modification policy is violated
US8584199B1 (en) 2006-10-17 2013-11-12 A10 Networks, Inc. System and method to apply a packet routing policy to an application session
US9697019B1 (en) 2006-10-17 2017-07-04 Manageiq, Inc. Adapt a virtual machine to comply with system enforced policies and derive an optimized variant of the adapted virtual machine
US8055904B1 (en) 2006-10-19 2011-11-08 United Services Automobile Assocation (USAA) Systems and methods for software application security management
US7979749B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-07-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and infrastructure for detecting and/or servicing a failing/failed operating system instance
US7689817B2 (en) 2006-11-16 2010-03-30 Intel Corporation Methods and apparatus for defeating malware
US8091127B2 (en) 2006-12-11 2012-01-03 International Business Machines Corporation Heuristic malware detection
US20080155336A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for dynamically identifying components contributing to service degradation
US7996836B1 (en) 2006-12-29 2011-08-09 Symantec Corporation Using a hypervisor to provide computer security
US8336046B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2012-12-18 Intel Corporation Dynamic VM cloning on request from application based on mapping of virtual hardware configuration to the identified physical hardware resources
US8381209B2 (en) 2007-01-03 2013-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Moveable access control list (ACL) mechanisms for hypervisors and virtual machines and virtual port firewalls
US8254568B2 (en) 2007-01-07 2012-08-28 Apple Inc. Secure booting a computing device
US9424154B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2016-08-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for computer system state checks
US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-12-11 Mcafee, Inc. Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US8380987B2 (en) 2007-01-25 2013-02-19 Microsoft Corporation Protection agents and privilege modes
JP4715774B2 (en) 2007-03-02 2011-07-06 日本電気株式会社 Replication method, replication system, storage device, program
US8276201B2 (en) 2007-03-22 2012-09-25 International Business Machines Corporation Integrity protection in data processing systems
US20080282080A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-11-13 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for adapting a communication network according to information provided by a trusted client
US7930327B2 (en) 2007-05-21 2011-04-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for obtaining the absolute path name of an open file system object from its file descriptor
US20080295173A1 (en) 2007-05-21 2008-11-27 Tsvetomir Iliev Tsvetanov Pattern-based network defense mechanism
US20080301770A1 (en) 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 Kinder Nathan G Identity based virtual machine selector
US20090007100A1 (en) 2007-06-28 2009-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Suspending a Running Operating System to Enable Security Scanning
US8763115B2 (en) 2007-08-08 2014-06-24 Vmware, Inc. Impeding progress of malicious guest software
CN101370004A (en) 2007-08-16 2009-02-18 华为技术有限公司 Distribution method and multicast apparatus for multicast conversation security policy
US20090049172A1 (en) 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Robert Miller Concurrent Node Self-Start in a Peer Cluster
US7921686B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2011-04-12 Cisco Technology, Inc. Highly scalable architecture for application network appliances
US20090138480A1 (en) 2007-08-29 2009-05-28 Chatley Scott P Filing system and method for data files stored in a distributed communications network
US8250641B2 (en) 2007-09-17 2012-08-21 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamic switching and real time security control on virtualized systems
US20090113111A1 (en) 2007-10-30 2009-04-30 Vmware, Inc. Secure identification of execution contexts
US8195931B1 (en) 2007-10-31 2012-06-05 Mcafee, Inc. Application change control
JP5238235B2 (en) 2007-12-07 2013-07-17 株式会社日立製作所 Management apparatus and management method
US8515075B1 (en) 2008-01-31 2013-08-20 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for malicious software detection using critical address space protection
US8788805B2 (en) 2008-02-29 2014-07-22 Cisco Technology, Inc. Application-level service access to encrypted data streams
US8146147B2 (en) 2008-03-27 2012-03-27 Juniper Networks, Inc. Combined firewalls
US8321931B2 (en) 2008-03-31 2012-11-27 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for sequential hypervisor invocation
US8615502B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2013-12-24 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for reverse mapping vnode pointers
US9058420B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2015-06-16 Vmware, Inc. Synchronous decoupled program analysis in virtual environments
US8234709B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2012-07-31 Symantec Operating Corporation Streaming malware definition updates
US8132091B2 (en) 2008-08-07 2012-03-06 Serge Nabutovsky Link exchange system and method
US8065714B2 (en) 2008-09-12 2011-11-22 Hytrust, Inc. Methods and systems for securely managing virtualization platform
US8726391B1 (en) 2008-10-10 2014-05-13 Symantec Corporation Scheduling malware signature updates in relation to threat awareness and environmental safety
US9141381B2 (en) 2008-10-27 2015-09-22 Vmware, Inc. Version control environment for virtual machines
JP4770921B2 (en) 2008-12-01 2011-09-14 日本電気株式会社 Gateway server, file management system, file management method and program
US8544003B1 (en) 2008-12-11 2013-09-24 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for managing virtual machine configurations
US8274895B2 (en) 2009-01-26 2012-09-25 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Dynamic management of network flows
US8904520B1 (en) 2009-03-19 2014-12-02 Symantec Corporation Communication-based reputation system
US8387046B1 (en) 2009-03-26 2013-02-26 Symantec Corporation Security driver for hypervisors and operating systems of virtualized datacenters
US8060722B2 (en) 2009-03-27 2011-11-15 Vmware, Inc. Hardware assistance for shadow page table coherence with guest page mappings
US20100299277A1 (en) 2009-05-19 2010-11-25 Randy Emelo System and method for creating and enhancing mentoring relationships
US8359422B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2013-01-22 Vmware, Inc. System and method to reduce trace faults in software MMU virtualization
GB2471716A (en) 2009-07-10 2011-01-12 F Secure Oyj Anti-virus scan management using intermediate results
JP2010016834A (en) 2009-07-16 2010-01-21 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Filtering method
US8341627B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2012-12-25 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for providing user space address protection from writable memory area in a virtual environment
US8381284B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2013-02-19 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US8572695B2 (en) 2009-09-08 2013-10-29 Ricoh Co., Ltd Method for applying a physical seal authorization to documents in electronic workflows
US8234408B2 (en) 2009-09-10 2012-07-31 Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. Differentiating unique systems sharing a common address
US9552497B2 (en) 2009-11-10 2017-01-24 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for preventing data loss using virtual machine wrapped applications
US9390263B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2016-07-12 Sophos Limited Use of an application controller to monitor and control software file and application environments
US8875292B1 (en) 2010-04-05 2014-10-28 Symantec Corporation Systems and methods for managing malware signatures
US8813209B2 (en) 2010-06-03 2014-08-19 International Business Machines Corporation Automating network reconfiguration during migrations
US8925101B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2014-12-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8938800B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2015-01-20 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US8549003B1 (en) 2010-09-12 2013-10-01 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for clustering host inventories
EP2622525A1 (en) 2010-09-30 2013-08-07 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Virtual machines for virus scanning
US9075993B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2015-07-07 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for selectively grouping and managing program files
US9112830B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2015-08-18 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US20130247192A1 (en) 2011-03-01 2013-09-19 Sven Krasser System and method for botnet detection by comprehensive email behavioral analysis
US9015709B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2015-04-21 Rackspace Us, Inc. Hypervisor-agnostic method of configuring a virtual machine
US9122877B2 (en) 2011-03-21 2015-09-01 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for malware and network reputation correlation
US8776234B2 (en) 2011-04-20 2014-07-08 Kaspersky Lab, Zao System and method for dynamic generation of anti-virus databases
US9594881B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2017-03-14 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for passive threat detection using virtual memory inspection
US8694738B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2014-04-08 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for critical address space protection in a hypervisor environment
US8973144B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US9069586B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2015-06-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US8800024B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-08-05 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for host-initiated firewall discovery in a network environment
US8713668B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-04-29 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US8713684B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2014-04-29 Appthority, Inc. Quantifying the risks of applications for mobile devices
US8793489B2 (en) 2012-03-01 2014-07-29 Humanconcepts, Llc Method and system for controlling data access to organizational data maintained in hierarchical
US8739272B1 (en) 2012-04-02 2014-05-27 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US8931043B2 (en) 2012-04-10 2015-01-06 Mcafee Inc. System and method for determining and using local reputations of users and hosts to protect information in a network environment
US9292688B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2016-03-22 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation System and method for automated machine-learning, zero-day malware detection
US8973146B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
WO2014143000A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Mcafee, Inc. Server-assisted anti-malware
US9614865B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-04-04 Mcafee, Inc. Server-assisted anti-malware client
US9578052B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2017-02-21 Mcafee, Inc. Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020069367A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-06 Glen Tindal Network operating system data directory
US20040088398A1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-05-06 Barlow Douglas B. Systems and methods for providing autoconfiguration and management of nodes

Cited By (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8762928B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2014-06-24 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of usage of language interfaces
US8763118B2 (en) 2005-07-14 2014-06-24 Mcafee, Inc. Classification of software on networked systems
US8707446B2 (en) 2006-02-02 2014-04-22 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US9602515B2 (en) 2006-02-02 2017-03-21 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US9134998B2 (en) 2006-02-02 2015-09-15 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US10360382B2 (en) 2006-03-27 2019-07-23 Mcafee, Llc Execution environment file inventory
US9576142B2 (en) 2006-03-27 2017-02-21 Mcafee, Inc. Execution environment file inventory
US9864868B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2018-01-09 Mcafee, Llc Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US8707422B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2014-04-22 Mcafee, Inc. Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US8701182B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2014-04-15 Mcafee, Inc. Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US9424154B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2016-08-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for computer system state checks
US9652607B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2017-05-16 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US8869265B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2014-10-21 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US8925101B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2014-12-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8938800B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2015-01-20 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US9832227B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2017-11-28 Mcafee, Llc System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US9467470B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2016-10-11 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8843496B2 (en) 2010-09-12 2014-09-23 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for clustering host inventories
US9075993B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2015-07-07 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for selectively grouping and managing program files
US9112830B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2015-08-18 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US9866528B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2018-01-09 Mcafee, Llc System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US9594881B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2017-03-14 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for passive threat detection using virtual memory inspection
US9946562B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2018-04-17 Mcafee, Llc System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US9465700B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2016-10-11 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US8713668B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-04-29 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US9356909B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2016-05-31 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US10652210B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2020-05-12 Mcafee, Llc System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US9882876B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2018-01-30 Mcafee, Llc System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US8800024B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-08-05 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for host-initiated firewall discovery in a network environment
US9413785B2 (en) 2012-04-02 2016-08-09 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US8739272B1 (en) 2012-04-02 2014-05-27 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US10171611B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2019-01-01 Mcafee, Llc Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
US8973146B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
US10205743B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2019-02-12 Mcafee, Llc Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US9578052B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2017-02-21 Mcafee, Inc. Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US10645115B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2020-05-05 Mcafee, Llc Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US11171984B2 (en) 2013-10-24 2021-11-09 Mcafee, Llc Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US10397053B2 (en) * 2014-08-14 2019-08-27 Netapp Inc. Methods for managing storage virtual machine configuration changes in a distributed storage system and devices thereof
US20160050113A1 (en) * 2014-08-14 2016-02-18 Netapp, Inc. Methods for managing storage virtual machine configuration changes in a distributed storage system and devices thereof
US11228486B2 (en) 2014-08-14 2022-01-18 Netapp, Inc. Methods for managing storage virtual machine configuration changes in a distributed storage system and devices thereof
CN107180338A (en) * 2017-05-22 2017-09-19 深圳市小牛在线互联网信息咨询有限公司 Business performs method, device, storage medium and computer equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9864868B2 (en) 2018-01-09
US8707422B2 (en) 2014-04-22
US8701182B2 (en) 2014-04-15
US20140351895A1 (en) 2014-11-27
US20120290827A1 (en) 2012-11-15
US8332929B1 (en) 2012-12-11
US20120297176A1 (en) 2012-11-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9864868B2 (en) Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US11611560B2 (en) Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing consensus on read via a consensus on write smart contract trigger for a distributed ledger technology (DLT) platform
US11257073B2 (en) Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing machine learning models for smart contracts using distributed ledger technologies in a cloud based computing environment
EP3729287B1 (en) Systems and methods for generating and maintaining immutable digital meeting records within distributed network nodes
US10158670B1 (en) Automatic privilege determination
US9455975B2 (en) Techniques for managing credentials in a distributed computing environment
US20190347442A1 (en) Method for Personal Data Administration in a Multi-Actor Environment
US11811907B2 (en) Data processing permits system with keys
US20080319909A1 (en) System and method for managing the lifecycle of encryption keys
US8107100B2 (en) Post deployment electronic document management and security solution
US9053343B1 (en) Token-based debugging of access control policies
US11611587B2 (en) Systems and methods for data privacy and security
US11080175B2 (en) Scalable enterprise platform for automated functional and integration regression testing
US20150113614A1 (en) Client based systems and methods for providing users with access to multiple data bases
WO2020145967A1 (en) Access control method
US20220091896A1 (en) Hybrid cloud delivery telemetry engine
US20170270602A1 (en) Object manager
CN115766296A (en) User account authority control method, device, server and storage medium
US8156297B2 (en) Smart device recordation
US20030065795A1 (en) Computer system and method for managing remote access of user resources
US20230412611A1 (en) Systems for Securely Tracking Incident Data and Automatically Generating Data Incident Reports Using Collaboration Rooms with Dynamic Tenancy
US20230421567A1 (en) Systems for Securely Tracking Incident Data and Automatically Generating Data Incident Reports Using Collaboration Rooms with Dynamic Tenancy
US20240070674A1 (en) Behavior-Generated and Client-Event Signed Immutable Transactions
CN115603958A (en) Login data processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN114282272A (en) Distributed data storage management method, device and system based on cloud chain fusion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION