US20120097401A1 - Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization - Google Patents

Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120097401A1
US20120097401A1 US13/277,578 US201113277578A US2012097401A1 US 20120097401 A1 US20120097401 A1 US 20120097401A1 US 201113277578 A US201113277578 A US 201113277578A US 2012097401 A1 US2012097401 A1 US 2012097401A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
hydrate
hydrates
releasing agent
well
hydrocarbons
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/277,578
Inventor
Keith C. Hester
James J. Howard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ConocoPhillips Co
Original Assignee
ConocoPhillips Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ConocoPhillips Co filed Critical ConocoPhillips Co
Priority to US13/277,578 priority Critical patent/US20120097401A1/en
Assigned to CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY reassignment CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HESTER, KEITH C., HOWARD, JAMES J.
Publication of US20120097401A1 publication Critical patent/US20120097401A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • E21B41/005Waste disposal systems
    • E21B41/0057Disposal of a fluid by injection into a subterranean formation
    • E21B41/0064Carbon dioxide sequestration
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • E21B41/0099Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00 specially adapted for drilling for or production of natural hydrate or clathrate gas reservoirs; Drilling through or monitoring of formations containing gas hydrates or clathrates
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons trapped in hydrate formations.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Ser. No. 61/406,261 filed on Oct. 25, 2010 the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons trapped in hydrate formations.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A number of hydrocarbons, especially lower boiling-point light hydrocarbons, in formation fluids or natural gas, are known to form hydrates in conjunction with the water present under a variety of conditions—particularly at a combination of lower temperature and higher pressure. The hydrates are solid crystalline compounds which co-exist with the surrounding porous media or natural gas fluids. Any solids in formation or natural gas fluids are at the least a nuisance for production, handling, and transport of these fluids. It is not uncommon for solid hydrates to cause plugging and/or blockage of pipelines or transfer lines or other conduits, valves and/or safety devices and/or other equipment, resulting in shutdown, loss of production, and risk of explosion or unintended release of hydrocarbons into the environment either on-land or off-shore. Accordingly, hydrocarbon hydrates have been of substantial interest as well as concern to many industries, particularly the petroleum and natural gas industries.
  • Natural gas hydrates are in a class of compounds known as clathrates, and are also referred to as inclusion compounds. Clathrates consist of cage structures formed between a host molecule and a guest molecule. Gas hydrates are generally composed of crystals formed by water host molecules surrounding the hydrocarbon guest molecules. The smaller or lower-boiling hydrocarbon molecules, particularly C1 (methane) to C4 hydrocarbons and their mixtures, are often the most problematic in the oil and gas industry because they form in hydrate or clathrate crystals under a wide range of production conditions. Even certain non-hydrocarbons such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are known to form hydrates under the proper conditions. Beyond being a problem for production of hydrocarbons, hydrates are being looked at as a possible energy source.
  • Known production strategies of hydrocarbons from hydrates have mainly focused on dissociation of the hydrate to release the trapped hydrocarbons. These known methods of dissociation of hydrates are based on shifting the thermodynamic equilibrium, which can be achieved by: increasing the system temperature above the temperature of hydrate formation at a specified pressure; decreasing the system pressure below the pressure of hydrate formation at a specified temperature; or injecting inhibitors such as methanol to shift the pressure-temperature equilibrium. However, there are two major problems with these known methods. First, these known methods can require a large amount of energy to be added to the system, especially in heating methods, resulting in a high cost of extraction. Second, they destabilize hydrate formations because both depressurization and heating cause the hydrate to dissociate. This can lead to the destabilization and/or collapse of sediments that contain hydrates and other nearby subterranean reservoirs. Because gas hydrates are often located near oil and natural gas deposits, such instability during extraction can result in problems with the extraction of oil and natural gas.
  • Of the known hydrate production methods being explored, hydrate depressurization provides significant economical and process benefits over thermal heating or inhibitor injection. Hydrate bearing layers are subjected to pressure from the hydrostatic pressure of the overburden. Hydrate depressurization decreases the pressure at the hydrate interface, so that the hydrate equilibrium temperature is below that of the surroundings temperature, inducing dissociation. However, the hydrate production from depressurization suffers from several limitations including, but not limited to: significant production of water, endothermic cooling, and loss of geomechanical stability as hydrates dissociate. Furthermore, depressurizing inside the well will not necessarily lead to depressurization of the entire methane hydrate-bearing layer.
  • An alternative process for the extraction of natural gas hydrates has been identified using a releasing agent. The releasing agent is preferably a hydrate-forming fluid which is thermodynamically more stable under system conditions than the natural gas hydrate. This has been most studied with carbon dioxide (often in liquid form) as the releasing agent. Injection of carbon dioxide has been shown to release the natural gas in the hydrate while simultaneously sequestering the carbon dioxide in the hydrate cages. This process only requires the injection of a releasing agent and is therefore less energy intensive then conventional methods. In addition, because the releasing agent enters the hydrate and exchanges with natural gas, bulk hydrate dissociation is not thought to occur, mitigating the destabilization risk posed by hydrate dissociation during production.
  • Therefore, a need exists for a method that mitigates the significant production of water, the endothermic cooling, and the loss of geomechanical stability as hydrates dissociate during the hydrate depressurization process while simultaneously providing environmentally and economically positive consequences of sequestering carbon dioxide in the form of gas hydrate.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In an embodiment, a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method includes: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation; (c) causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and (e) reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
  • In another embodiment, a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates the method comprising: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof; (c)causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and (e) reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not as a limitation of the invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover such modifications and variations that come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
  • Methane hydrate conversion to carbon dioxide hydrate requires an understanding of hydrodynamics of carbon dioxide injection and transport to the methane hydrate accumulation; along with thermodynamics of formation and dissociation of the hydrates of methane
  • In order to recover sequestered methane gas from within a subterranean formation containing a gas hydrates, one or more wells are drilled into the subterranean formation. A casing string is cemented within the subterranean formation and one or more windows or perforations are opened directly into the area of the formation containing the gas hydrates. At this point, the releasing agent (e.g., carbon dioxide) is injected into the formation. The releasing agent contacts the gas hydrate, resulting in the releasing agent spontaneously (i.e., without the need for added energy) replacing the gas within the formation without requiring a significant change in the temperature, pressure, or volume of the hydrate. As used herein, the releasing agent is a compound that forms a thermodynamically more stable than the gas hydrates originally contained within the well. In an embodiment, the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the releasing agent is gaseous carbon dioxide. In another embodiment, the releasing agent is liquid. In yet another embodiment, the releasing agent is liquid carbon dioxide.
  • As the hydrate becomes enriched in the releasing agent, the hydrate releasing agent mixture becomes more stable based on the thermodynamic pressure-temperature relationship (i.e. for a given temperature, the hydrate will remain stable at lower pressures). The stability of the hydrate refers to the pressure at which it dissociates at a given pressure. The more stable the hydrate, the lower this pressure will be.
  • After an initial period of releasing agent exchange, the pressure of the well can be reduced to selectively dissociate only hydrates with a desired methane content. The original in-place hydrate is less stable than the hydrate following exchange with the releasing agent. Further, hydrates will become increasingly stable based on the exposure conditions to the releasing agent (e.g. exposure time, composition of releasing agent in pore space). Therefore, based on the exposure time of the hydrate to the releasing agent, the pressure in which the well is depressurized to will only cause partial hydrate dissociation. With hydrate dissociation selectively limited, the amount of free water created (due to hydrate dissociation) is also simultaneously controlled by the well operating pressure. Thus, part of the hydrate is selectively dissociated with the simultaneous reformation of the releasing agent hydrate. This method minimizes loss of geomechanical stability which can occur in known depressurization production techniques.
  • Turning now to the drawings wherein like numerals indicate like parts, FIG. 1 discloses a pictorial representation of one operating context of the invention. FIG. 1 illustrates an oil or natural gas well 18 that has been modified to employ the present inventive methodology. Well 18 generally comprises a superstructure 20 and a casing string located in the well down to the reservoir interval of interest 22. Well 18 was previously used to produce oil and/or gas from a subterranean reservoir 24 via lower perforations 26 in casing 22. In an embodiment, the well is drilled for hydrate production. After production of the oil and/or gas from subterranean reservoir 24 has been completed, a plug 28 is inserted into casing 22 above perforations 26 and immediately below a gas hydrate formation 30. The casing 22 and the perforations 26 create a subterranean channel, which provides access to the hydrates in question. In an embodiment, the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
  • Upper perforations 32 are created in casing 22 above plug 28 and proximate to hydrate formation 30. The perforations 32 open up the well bore to the reservoir through the casing, which allows on to reduce the pressure in the hydrate formation 30 around the well 18 and induce an initial dissociation of the gas hydrates. As the initial dissociate begins to occur, carbon dioxide is injected into the formation. The carbon dioxide, i.e., the releasing agent, from carbon dioxide supply 34 can be introduced into casing 22 via a carbon dioxide pump 36. As the methane from the dissociated hydrate is produced, the injected carbon dioxide will form hydrate from the free water left as a result of dissociation. The carbon dioxide is injected in a controlled manner so as to selectively dissociate the methane-rich hydrates. As carbon dixoide is injected into the formation, it will both form a pure carbon dioxide hydrate from the free water and also exchange with the methane in the existing hydrate formation creating a more stable hydrate. The reformation of the hydrate from the carbon dioxide serves to sequester it and reduce the produced free water. Because the hydrate formation is exothermic, this also counters the cooling from the hydrate dissociation. In addition, because hydrate is formed, the loss in geomechanical strength of the hydrate-bearing sediments should be minimized.
  • The preferred embodiment of the present invention has been disclosed and illustrated. However, the invention is intended to be as broad as defined in the claims below. Those skilled in the art may be able to study the preferred embodiments and identify other ways to practice the invention that are not exactly as described in the present invention. It is the intent of the inventors that variations and equivalents of the invention are within the scope of the claims below and the description, abstract and drawings not to be used to limit the scope of the invention.
  • REFERENCES
  • All of the references cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference. The discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication data after the priority date of this application. Incorporated references are listed again here for convenience:
    • 1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,222,673, Graue et al., “Production of Free Gas by Gas Hydrate Conversion.”

Claims (6)

1. A method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method comprising:
a. drilling a well into a subterranean formation;
b. introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation;
c. causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate;
d. selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and
e. reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
4. A method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method comprising:
a. drilling a well into a subterranean formation;
b. introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof;
c. causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate;
d. selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and
e. reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
5. The method according to claim 5, wherein the releasing agent is in liquid phase when contacted with the gas hydrates.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
US13/277,578 2010-10-25 2011-10-20 Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization Abandoned US20120097401A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/277,578 US20120097401A1 (en) 2010-10-25 2011-10-20 Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US40626110P 2010-10-25 2010-10-25
US13/277,578 US20120097401A1 (en) 2010-10-25 2011-10-20 Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120097401A1 true US20120097401A1 (en) 2012-04-26

Family

ID=45971989

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/277,578 Abandoned US20120097401A1 (en) 2010-10-25 2011-10-20 Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20120097401A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012061027A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130206414A1 (en) * 2012-02-10 2013-08-15 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for pre-conditioning a hydrate reservoir
US9322250B2 (en) 2013-08-15 2016-04-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated System for gas hydrate production and method thereof
CN106677745A (en) * 2016-12-02 2017-05-17 中国石油大学(华东) Process method combining natural gas hydrate depressurizing development with CO2 storage
US20180045029A1 (en) * 2015-02-16 2018-02-15 Osman Zuhtu Goksel A System and a Method for Exploitation of Gas from Gas Hydrate Formations

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO340973B1 (en) 2015-12-22 2017-07-31 Aker Solutions As Subsea methane hydrate production
NO344641B1 (en) * 2016-07-06 2020-02-17 Aker Solutions As Subsea methane production assembly
US11225858B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2022-01-18 Jgc Corporation Methane gas production facility and methane gas production method
CN113431534B (en) * 2021-08-09 2022-11-08 北京科技大学 Low-permeability compact reservoir CO 2 Huff and puff well selection method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040200618A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2004-10-14 Piekenbrock Eugene J. Method of sequestering carbon dioxide while producing natural gas
US20060060356A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-03-23 Arne Graue Production of free gas by gas hydrate conversion

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050121200A1 (en) * 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 Alwarappa Sivaraman Process to sequester CO2 in natural gas hydrate fields and simultaneously recover methane
US6946017B2 (en) * 2003-12-04 2005-09-20 Gas Technology Institute Process for separating carbon dioxide and methane
CA2709248C (en) * 2009-07-10 2017-06-20 Schlumberger Canada Limited Method and apparatus to monitor reformation and replacement of co2/ch4 gas hydrates

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040200618A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2004-10-14 Piekenbrock Eugene J. Method of sequestering carbon dioxide while producing natural gas
US20060060356A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-03-23 Arne Graue Production of free gas by gas hydrate conversion

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130206414A1 (en) * 2012-02-10 2013-08-15 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for pre-conditioning a hydrate reservoir
US9243451B2 (en) * 2012-02-10 2016-01-26 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. System and method for pre-conditioning a hydrate reservoir
US9322250B2 (en) 2013-08-15 2016-04-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated System for gas hydrate production and method thereof
US20180045029A1 (en) * 2015-02-16 2018-02-15 Osman Zuhtu Goksel A System and a Method for Exploitation of Gas from Gas Hydrate Formations
US10927656B2 (en) * 2015-02-16 2021-02-23 Osman Zuhtu Goksel System and a method for exploitation of gas from gas hydrate formations
CN106677745A (en) * 2016-12-02 2017-05-17 中国石油大学(华东) Process method combining natural gas hydrate depressurizing development with CO2 storage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012061027A1 (en) 2012-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20120097401A1 (en) Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization
RU2370642C2 (en) Gas recovery by conversion of gas hydrate
US20120035405A1 (en) Method for enhanced gas hydrate permeability
Gong et al. Miscible CO2 simultaneous water-and-gas (CO2-SWAG) injection in the Bakken formation
US9777563B2 (en) Natural gas hydrate reservoir heating
Sahin et al. Bati Raman field immiscible CO2 application—Status quo and future plans
Majidaie et al. A simulation study of chemically enhanced water alternating gas CWAG injection
RU2502863C2 (en) Method and system for production of hydrocarbons from hydrate formation using blowdown gas
US9091156B2 (en) Downhole fluid injection systems, CO2 sequestration methods, and hydrocarbon material recovery methods
Wan et al. Factors controlling recovery in liquids rich unconventional systems
Zadeh et al. Characteristics of formation and dissociation of CO2 hydrates at different CO2-Water ratios in a bulk condition
Fakher et al. Reducing excessive water production associated with gas hydrate reservoirs using a thermal in-situ heating-inhibitor method
AU2009260314B2 (en) Producing gaseous hydrocarbons from hydrate capped reservoirs
Bondor et al. Planning EOR projects in offshore oil fields
US10876384B2 (en) Methods of utilizing carbon monoxide to increase oil recovery and protect tubulars
Jenvey et al. The application of oil soluble scale inhibitors into the Texaco galley reservoir. A comparison with traditional squeeze techniques to avoid problems associated with wettability modification in low water-cut wells
Peat et al. Laboratory Testing to Assess Suitability of Geological Storage Prospects and the Associated Risks of CO2 Hydrates During CO2Injection (III)–Assessment of Thermal Hydrate Inhibitors
Gupta et al. Gas hydrates extraction by swapping-depressurisation method
Bogaert et al. Managing formation-damage risk from scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in deepwater, subsea fields in the campos basin
Ghajari et al. Hydrate-related drilling hazards and their remedies
JP6085610B2 (en) System and method for converting a class II hydrate reservoir
Atia et al. State of the art on enhanced oil recovery with CO2 sequestration for low carbon industry
Mackay et al. How is Scale Prevention Affected by the Late Field Depressurisation of Waterflooded Reservoirs?
Mishra et al. Validation of Produced Gas Rate Modelling in an Oil Reservoir with Very High CO2 Through Matching of Live Oil Coreflood
Sun Modeling of hydrate formation and dissociation in porous media

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HESTER, KEITH C.;HOWARD, JAMES J.;REEL/FRAME:027093/0139

Effective date: 20111014

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION