US20100146948A1 - Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products - Google Patents

Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100146948A1
US20100146948A1 US12/337,128 US33712808A US2010146948A1 US 20100146948 A1 US20100146948 A1 US 20100146948A1 US 33712808 A US33712808 A US 33712808A US 2010146948 A1 US2010146948 A1 US 2010146948A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
exhaust
recited
coating
treatment system
engine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/337,128
Inventor
Herbert Dacosta
Mark D. Veliz
Cho Y. Liang
Jinhui Sun
Timothy Gimbert
Matthew Leustek
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Caterpillar Inc
Original Assignee
Caterpillar Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Caterpillar Inc filed Critical Caterpillar Inc
Priority to US12/337,128 priority Critical patent/US20100146948A1/en
Assigned to CATERPILLAR INC. reassignment CATERPILLAR INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIANG, CHO Y., DACOSTA, HERBERT, GIMBERT, TIMOTHY, LEUSTEK, MATTHEW, VELIZ, MARK D., SUN, JINHUI
Publication of US20100146948A1 publication Critical patent/US20100146948A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/08Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
    • F01N3/10Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
    • F01N3/18Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
    • F01N3/20Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion ; Methods of operation or control of catalytic converters
    • F01N3/2066Selective catalytic reduction [SCR]
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2610/00Adding substances to exhaust gases
    • F01N2610/02Adding substances to exhaust gases the substance being ammonia or urea
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/12Improving ICE efficiencies

Definitions

  • the present disclosure is directed to an engine exhaust treatment system and, more particularly, to an engine exhaust treatment system providing enhanced decomposition of a reductant into ammonia and/or other gaseous byproducts which are useful to enhance the selective catalytic reduction of NO x into molecular nitrogen.
  • Air pollutants may be composed of both solid material, such as, for example, particulate matter, and gaseous material, which may include, for example, oxides of nitrogen, such as NO 2 and NO (commonly refereed to collectively as “NO x ”).
  • urea CO(NH 2 ) 2 as a precursor to generate the ammonia used during selective catalytic reduction may be desirable in many applications due to the relative ease of storing urea.
  • urea is relatively benign and is, therefore, easy to handle and transport.
  • Urea undergoes a relatively complex thermal decomposition process when injected into an exhaust system. This involves both solid phase and a gas phase decomposition pathways.
  • the solid phase pathway may yield solid byproducts that form within the system. These solid byproducts may eventually interfere with the subsequent selective catalytic reduction.
  • One approach which has been used to improve the conversion efficiency of urea is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,747 to Upadhyay et al., having an issue date of May 24, 2005.
  • This reference advocates using a reductant delivery system wherein a mixture of urea and air is injected into the system and is vaporized by a heating element prior to selective catalytic reduction.
  • a hydrolyzing catalyst may be placed in the path of the vaporized reductant prior to selective catalytic reduction.
  • the present disclosure provides an engine exhaust treatment system.
  • the treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector.
  • a selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia.
  • a contact surface of basic metal oxide and/or amphoteric metal oxide is disposed along the exhaust flow path.
  • the present disclosure provides an engine exhaust treatment system.
  • the treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector.
  • a selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia.
  • a coating layer defining a contact surface is disposed along the exhaust flow path.
  • the coating layer includes a first oxide-forming metal of basic or amphoteric character, which may be combined with at least one alloy element characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the first oxide-forming metal.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of reducing an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by treatment of the exhaust gases in an exhaust treatment system.
  • the treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector.
  • a selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in the exhaust gases by reaction of the NOx with ammonia and/or other byproducts of urea decomposition.
  • the method includes providing a contact surface of basic metal oxide and/or amphoteric metal oxide disposed along the exhaust flow path upstream from the selective catalytic reduction device.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a machine according to an exemplary and disclosed embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a portion of an exhaust conduit housing a reductant injector and a reductant mixer.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a machine 10 .
  • Machine 10 may include a frame 12 , an operator station 14 , one or more traction devices 16 , and a power system 17 .
  • the power system 17 may include an engine 18 and an exhaust treatment system 20 configured to reduce the amount of one or more constituents of the exhaust produced by the engine 18 .
  • the machine 10 is shown as a truck, the machine 10 could be any type of machine having an engine 18 .
  • the traction devices 16 may be any type of traction devices such as, for example, wheels, as shown in FIG. 1 , tracks, belts, or any combinations thereof.
  • the engine 18 may be mounted to the fame 12 and may include any kind of engine that produces a flow of exhaust gases.
  • the engine 18 may be an internal combustion engine, such as a gasoline engine, a diesel engine, a natural gas engine or any other exhaust gas producing engine.
  • the engine 18 may be naturally aspirated or, in other embodiments, may utilize forced induction (e.g., turbocharging or supercharging).
  • the exhaust treatment system 20 may include, among other things, an exhaust conduit 26 , an oxidation device 28 , a selective catalytic reduction device 30 and a reductant injector 32 adapted to inject urea or other reductants as may be desired into the exhaust conduit 26 upstream from the selective catalytic reduction device 30 .
  • the exhaust treatment system 20 may also include a particulate trap 34 .
  • the particulate trap 34 may include any type of filtration device configured to remove one or more types of particulate matter, such as soot and/or ash, from the exhaust flow of engine 18 .
  • the particulate trap 34 may include a filter medium configured to trap particulate matter as the exhaust flows through it.
  • the filter medium may include a mesh-like material, a porous ceramic material (e.g., cordierite), or any other material and/or configuration suitable for trapping particulate matter.
  • the exhaust treatment system 20 may include combinations of various devices.
  • the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may include a catalyst which is packaged with, or otherwise associated with a filter medium.
  • the filter medium may, itself be a catalytic material.
  • various combinations of multiple units may be used if desired.
  • the engine exhaust treatment system 20 is shown with a single selective catalytic reduction device 30 , a single reductant injector 32 , and a single particulate trap 34 , the engine exhaust treatment system 20 may include more than one of any of those units.
  • Such multiple after-treatment devices may be positioned in series (e.g., along exhaust conduit 26 ) or in parallel (e.g., in dual exhaust conduits; not shown).
  • the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may be positioned downstream from the particulate trap 34 . In other embodiments, the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may be positioned upstream from the particulate trap 34 . While the use of a particulate trap 34 may be desirable in many applications, it is likewise contemplated that the particulate trap 34 may be eliminated in applications where particulate generation is relatively low.
  • the reductant injector 32 is in fluid communication with a reductant supply source 40 such as a tank of liquid urea solution or other reductant such as diesel fuel or other hydrocarbon material.
  • a reductant supply source 40 such as a tank of liquid urea solution or other reductant such as diesel fuel or other hydrocarbon material.
  • the reductant injector 32 is also in fluid communication with an air supply 42 such as a compressor or the like which delivers a supply of air to facilitate injection of the urea or other reductant.
  • the reductant injector 32 may provide airless injection of the urea or other reductant into the exhaust conduit 26 if desired.
  • the urea is decomposed into ammonia and, possibly, other chemical species, such as isocyanic acid (HNCO) and solid byproducts.
  • Ammonia may be retained within the selective catalytic reduction device 30 .
  • the ammonia stored in the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may reduce the amount of NO x in the exhaust gases passing through the selective catalytic reduction device 30 .
  • Other agents suitable for reducing NO x may also be injected into the exhaust conduit 26 and/or the selective catalytic reduction device 30 if desired.
  • the use of urea as a reducing agent precursor for formation of ammonia may be desirable due to the relative ease of handling urea.
  • the urea is thermally decomposed into ammonia and HCNO.
  • the HCNO then reacts with water on the appropriate catalyst surface (which could be a hydrolysis catalyst or the SCR catalyst itself) to yield carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and additional ammonia (NH 3 ).
  • the ammonia may act as a reducing agent within the selective catalytic reduction device 30 .
  • the use of urea as a reducing agent precursor to provide ammonia may be defined generally by the following overall chemical equation:
  • hydrolysis catalyst may be desirable to promote the reaction of HNCO with water.
  • the urea undergoes a complex thermal decomposition process.
  • This process involves both a gas phase decomposition pathway (into ammonia and isocyanic acid) and a solid phase decomposition pathway.
  • the solid phase pathway tends to yield residual solid byproducts that may build up within the exhaust system. Over time, these solid byproducts may build up around the injection point for the reductant injector and/or within the selective catalytic reduction device 30 . Such a build-up may interfere with NO x removal.
  • the present disclosure addresses the issue of solid byproduct accumulation by use of one or more metal oxide catalysts defining contact surfaces within the system to promote the gas phase decomposition pathway of urea preferentially over the solid phase decomposition pathway.
  • the metal oxide catalysts consistent with this disclosure convert urea into ammonia and CO 2 , thereby reducing or eliminating the need for a separated hydrolysis catalyst.
  • the use of the metal oxide catalysts may be perceived as performing both reactions (i.e. the urea thermal decomposition into ammonia and HNCO as well as the reaction of HNCO with water to produce CO 2 and additional ammonia) on the same catalyst.
  • Such an approach is significantly different from previous practices wherein the steps of thermal decomposition and hydrolysis are substantially localized at different locations of the exhaust system.
  • the metal oxide catalysts may be used in the form of a coating applied to walls of the exhaust conduit 26 .
  • the coating may reduce the ability of solid byproducts to adhere to the exhaust conduit 26 and also may catalyze the decomposition of urea into ammonia.
  • the coating can be applied following any suitable technique as may be known to those of skill in the art.
  • the coating can be applied as basic metal oxide or as an amphoteric metal oxide, or as metal coating that is subsequently oxidized into the respective basic metal or amphoteric metal oxide. Blends of basic metals and amphoteric metals and their respective oxides may also be used.
  • the reductant injector 32 may be a wall mounted device adapted to inject an atomized stream of air and reductant in generally perpendicular relation to the exhaust flow.
  • the reductant injector 32 is in fluid communication with a mixer 45 .
  • the mixer 45 may include an arrangement of blades, fins, tabs, or other suitable components adapted to create turbulence and to facilitate mixing of the injected reductant with the exhaust gases. This mixing action facilitates the reductant decomposition into ammonia. This decomposition continues as the exhaust gases and injected reductant move along the flow path of the exhaust conduit 26 .
  • the use of a mixer may be beneficial in many environments of use, it may nonetheless be eliminated in some embodiments where sufficient mixing is inherent.
  • the resultant ammonia is eventually received by the selective catalytic reduction device 30 .
  • the exhaust conduit 26 is illustrated as having a single “Z” bend formed by two elbows downstream from the reductant injector 32 , such a configuration is illustrative only, and any number of other configurations may likewise be utilized as may be desired.
  • portions of the mixer 45 and/or the exhaust conduit 26 are provided with a coating 50 of a basic and/or amphoteric oxide catalyst defining contact surfaces adapted to engage the urea or other reductant during mixing and/or during transport through the exhaust conduit.
  • a coating 50 of a basic and/or amphoteric oxide catalyst defining contact surfaces adapted to engage the urea or other reductant during mixing and/or during transport through the exhaust conduit.
  • the thickness of the coating 50 in FIG. 2 has been significantly enhanced to aid in visual reference. In actual practice, the coating will typically have a thickness of about 50 to about 400 microns. However, higher and lower thicknesses levels may be used if desired.
  • the coating 50 may be applied to the walls of the mixer 45 and/or to the walls of the exhaust conduit 26 using plasma deposition or other coating application techniques.
  • one metal oxide catalyst which may be particularly desirable is zinc oxide (ZnO).
  • ZnO zinc oxide
  • other metal oxides including CaO, MgO, SrO, BaO, La 2 O 3 and the like may also be used if desired.
  • ZnO zinc oxide
  • a layer of zinc oxide or other basic or amphoteric metal oxide may be used alone or in alloyed form with other metals to aid in catalyzing urea into ammonia.
  • a layer of zinc oxide may be developed by applying a layer of zinc metal or an alloy containing a substantial percentage of zinc metal, directly to surfaces in contact with the exhaust stream.
  • the application of the zinc layer may be carried out by any suitable deposition process, including thermal spray, physical vapor deposition, electrodeposition (plating), and hot dip galvanizing.
  • a surface oxide layer is formed by exposure to oxygen at elevated temperatures.
  • the applied layer of zinc may be oxidized by heating to a temperature of about 260 degrees Celsius in a circulated air furnace for about 10 hours. Such treatment is believed to develop a surface oxide layer of about 1 micron in thickness.
  • temperatures and/or heating times may be used as desired.
  • temperatures up to about 400 degrees Celsius may be used during the oxidation of zinc thereby approaching the melting point of 419 degrees Celsius.
  • other temperatures can be used to oxidize other metals and/or metal alloys.
  • thermal spray processes may be used.
  • an energy source applies heat to a feedstock material to melt or partially melt the material, and the feed stock material is propelled towards a substrate where it is deposited.
  • thermal spray coatings range from about 50 microns to about 1 millimeter, although higher and lower thickness levels are possible.
  • PTWA plasma transferred wire arc process
  • twin wire arc also known as wire arc spray
  • atmospheric plasma spray processing may also be suitable as each has equipment that is designed for coating internal diameters, which is especially convenient for exhaust components.
  • a coating layer of pure zinc which is subsequently oxidized by high-temperature treatment provides a highly adherent coating which is effective at performing the intended catalyzing function of promoting the gas-phase decomposition of urea under normal engine operating conditions where the temperature does not rise substantially over about 400 degrees Celsius.
  • the particulate trap 34 may be periodically regenerated by heating to burn out entrapped particles. During this regeneration cycle, temperatures downstream from the particulate trap may be substantially increased. Such increased temperature may promote delamination of the oxide coating.
  • alloying elements to the zinc which increase the melting point and which are characterized by suppressed oxidation relative to the zinc may be useful in preventing delamination while nonetheless promoting the desired zinc oxide formation.
  • additions of nickel, iron, cobalt or combinations thereof may be beneficial in increasing the high temperature performance of the applied coating while still allowing the formation of zinc oxide on the surface. That is, the zinc will preferentially oxidize in the presence of these other elements due to thermodynamic considerations.
  • the added elements are characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the zinc.
  • the zinc oxide is formed preferentially relative to oxides of the added elements. Moreover, since alloys of zinc and the added elements have substantially increased melting points relative to pure zinc, the propensity for localized melting is also diminished.
  • alloy constituent levels of about 10 percent or greater by weight with the remainder being zinc may be beneficial in many environments of use.
  • a suitable alloy may be provided from the wire feedstock by techniques such as hot dip coating a nickel, cobalt or iron wire with zinc; plating nickel, cobalt or iron on a zinc wire; co-extruding zinc and nickel, cobalt or iron; either in wire or powder form; swaging zinc and nickel, cobalt or iron to form a cold worked alloy blend; or producing a cored wire using a metal sheath and filling with powder to create a desired composition.
  • a suitable alloy may be provided by using a blend of discrete zinc particles and additive particles; pre-alloyed particles; or a spray dried and sintered particle composition made up of zinc and alloy additions. Of course, combinations of any of these may be used as desired.
  • any number of other metals that form an effective oxide coating of basic or amphoteric character may likewise be used either alone or in combination with suitable alloying elements.
  • Such alloying elements may be characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the oxide coating formed by the base metal.
  • the coating 50 may be applied to provide a generally smooth surface. Such a smooth surface may be beneficial in reducing the accumulation of any solid byproducts generated by the urea decomposition. However, it is also contemplated that the applied coating may have an irregular surface to enhance contact area if desired. The coating may be uniform throughout the exhaust treatment system or may be localized if desired. As illustrated schematically in FIG. 2 , according to one contemplated practice, the coating 50 may be applied to the walls of the exhaust conduit 26 in surrounding and opposing relation to the discharge of the reductant injector 32 . The oxide catalyst may also be applied at elbows or other bends along the length of the exhaust conduit 26 . By placing the coating 50 at locations characterized by substantial turbulence, the contacting relationship between the exhaust and the coating may be enhanced. Of course, the metal oxide catalyst may also be placed at any other locations as may be desired.
  • the metal oxide catalyst may also be present in other forms.
  • the metal oxide catalyst may be present in the form of fins, coated inserts or other structures defining contact surfaces adapted for disposition within the mixer 45 and/or exhaust conduit 26 .
  • a stainless steel laboratory scale exhaust system incorporating a urea mixer upstream from a selective catalytic reduction device was connected to a diesel engine and the level of NOx conversion was monitored. Conversion levels averaged approximately 88%.
  • a thermal spray coating of zinc oxide ZnO was then applied to the urea mixer and at the elbows of the exhaust conduit.
  • the laboratory scale exhaust system was then reconnected to the diesel engine and the level of NOx conversion was monitored. Conversion levels averaged approximately 90%.
  • Systems consistent with the present disclosure may be suitable to enhance exhaust emissions control for engines.
  • the disclosed systems may be used for any application of an engine. Such applications may include supplying power for machines, such as, for example, stationary equipment such as power generation sets, or mobile equipment, such as vehicles.
  • machines such as, for example, stationary equipment such as power generation sets, or mobile equipment, such as vehicles.
  • the disclosed techniques and features may be used for any kind of vehicle, such as, for example, automobiles, locomotives, marine craft, construction machines (including those for on-road, as well as off-road use), and other heavy equipment.
  • An exemplary technique for enhanced exhaust treatment using the disclosed techniques may include delivering urea into an exhaust treatment system including one or more surfaces of a metal oxide catalyst and reacting the urea with water in the presence of the metal oxide catalysts to promote gas phase decomposition of the urea to ammonia and delivering the ammonia to a selective catalytic reduction device to reduce an amount of NO x in exhaust gases produced by the engine.
  • the enhanced gas phase decomposition of the urea promotes enhances NO x conversion.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)

Abstract

An engine exhaust treatment system. The treatment system includes and a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust stream moving along an exhaust flow path. A selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia. A basic and/or amphoteric oxide contact surface is disposed along the exhaust flow path.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present disclosure is directed to an engine exhaust treatment system and, more particularly, to an engine exhaust treatment system providing enhanced decomposition of a reductant into ammonia and/or other gaseous byproducts which are useful to enhance the selective catalytic reduction of NOx into molecular nitrogen.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Engines, including diesel engines, gasoline engines, natural gas engines, and other engines known in the art, may exhaust a complex mixture of chemical species. The air pollutants may be composed of both solid material, such as, for example, particulate matter, and gaseous material, which may include, for example, oxides of nitrogen, such as NO2 and NO (commonly refereed to collectively as “NOx”).
  • Due to increased environmental concerns, engine manufacturers have developed devices for treatment of engine exhaust after it leaves the engine (sometimes referred to as “after-treatment”). For example, engine manufacturers have employed exhaust treatment devices that utilize catalysts to convert one or more components of the exhaust to different, more environmentally friendly compounds. Catalyst-based devices have been developed for reducing or removing NOx from the exhaust stream. In some systems, NOx may be reduced by selective catalytic reduction (commonly referred to as “SCR”). In such systems, urea may be added to a catalyst-based device where it is broken down into ammonia (NH3) that is stored in (or on) the catalyst. The ammonia stored in or on the catalyst reacts with NOx in the exhaust to thereby convert the NOx to Nitrogen (N2) and water (H2O) by the following formulas:

  • 4NH3+4NO+O2→4N2+6H2O

  • 4NH3+3NO2→3.5N2+6H2O

  • NO2+NO+2NH3→2N2+3H2O
  • The use of urea CO(NH2)2 as a precursor to generate the ammonia used during selective catalytic reduction may be desirable in many applications due to the relative ease of storing urea. Specifically, urea is relatively benign and is, therefore, easy to handle and transport. Urea undergoes a relatively complex thermal decomposition process when injected into an exhaust system. This involves both solid phase and a gas phase decomposition pathways. The solid phase pathway may yield solid byproducts that form within the system. These solid byproducts may eventually interfere with the subsequent selective catalytic reduction. One approach which has been used to improve the conversion efficiency of urea is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,747 to Upadhyay et al., having an issue date of May 24, 2005. This reference advocates using a reductant delivery system wherein a mixture of urea and air is injected into the system and is vaporized by a heating element prior to selective catalytic reduction. A hydrolyzing catalyst may be placed in the path of the vaporized reductant prior to selective catalytic reduction.
  • SUMMARY
  • In accordance with one aspect, the present disclosure provides an engine exhaust treatment system. The treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector. A selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia. A contact surface of basic metal oxide and/or amphoteric metal oxide is disposed along the exhaust flow path.
  • In accordance with another aspect, the present disclosure provides an engine exhaust treatment system. The treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector. A selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia. A coating layer defining a contact surface is disposed along the exhaust flow path. The coating layer includes a first oxide-forming metal of basic or amphoteric character, which may be combined with at least one alloy element characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the first oxide-forming metal.
  • In accordance with another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of reducing an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by treatment of the exhaust gases in an exhaust treatment system. The treatment system may include a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust conduit defining an exhaust flow path and optionally may include a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector. A selective catalytic reduction device is disposed downstream from the reductant injector. The selective catalytic reduction device is adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in the exhaust gases by reaction of the NOx with ammonia and/or other byproducts of urea decomposition. The method includes providing a contact surface of basic metal oxide and/or amphoteric metal oxide disposed along the exhaust flow path upstream from the selective catalytic reduction device.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a machine according to an exemplary and disclosed embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a portion of an exhaust conduit housing a reductant injector and a reductant mixer.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a machine 10. Machine 10 may include a frame 12, an operator station 14, one or more traction devices 16, and a power system 17. The power system 17 may include an engine 18 and an exhaust treatment system 20 configured to reduce the amount of one or more constituents of the exhaust produced by the engine 18.
  • Although the machine 10 is shown as a truck, the machine 10 could be any type of machine having an engine 18. Accordingly, the traction devices 16 may be any type of traction devices such as, for example, wheels, as shown in FIG. 1, tracks, belts, or any combinations thereof.
  • The engine 18 may be mounted to the fame 12 and may include any kind of engine that produces a flow of exhaust gases. For example, the engine 18 may be an internal combustion engine, such as a gasoline engine, a diesel engine, a natural gas engine or any other exhaust gas producing engine. The engine 18 may be naturally aspirated or, in other embodiments, may utilize forced induction (e.g., turbocharging or supercharging).
  • The exhaust treatment system 20 may include, among other things, an exhaust conduit 26, an oxidation device 28, a selective catalytic reduction device 30 and a reductant injector 32 adapted to inject urea or other reductants as may be desired into the exhaust conduit 26 upstream from the selective catalytic reduction device 30. The exhaust treatment system 20 may also include a particulate trap 34. The particulate trap 34 may include any type of filtration device configured to remove one or more types of particulate matter, such as soot and/or ash, from the exhaust flow of engine 18. By way of example, the particulate trap 34 may include a filter medium configured to trap particulate matter as the exhaust flows through it. The filter medium may include a mesh-like material, a porous ceramic material (e.g., cordierite), or any other material and/or configuration suitable for trapping particulate matter.
  • In some embodiments, the exhaust treatment system 20 may include combinations of various devices. For example, the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may include a catalyst which is packaged with, or otherwise associated with a filter medium. In some embodiments, the filter medium may, itself be a catalytic material. Likewise, various combinations of multiple units may be used if desired. Thus, while the engine exhaust treatment system 20 is shown with a single selective catalytic reduction device 30, a single reductant injector 32, and a single particulate trap 34, the engine exhaust treatment system 20 may include more than one of any of those units. Such multiple after-treatment devices may be positioned in series (e.g., along exhaust conduit 26) or in parallel (e.g., in dual exhaust conduits; not shown). In some embodiments, the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may be positioned downstream from the particulate trap 34. In other embodiments, the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may be positioned upstream from the particulate trap 34. While the use of a particulate trap 34 may be desirable in many applications, it is likewise contemplated that the particulate trap 34 may be eliminated in applications where particulate generation is relatively low.
  • In the illustrated exemplary embodiment, the reductant injector 32 is in fluid communication with a reductant supply source 40 such as a tank of liquid urea solution or other reductant such as diesel fuel or other hydrocarbon material. In the illustrated embodiment, the reductant injector 32 is also in fluid communication with an air supply 42 such as a compressor or the like which delivers a supply of air to facilitate injection of the urea or other reductant. However, it is likewise contemplated that the reductant injector 32 may provide airless injection of the urea or other reductant into the exhaust conduit 26 if desired.
  • In the practice wherein the injected reductant is urea, the urea is decomposed into ammonia and, possibly, other chemical species, such as isocyanic acid (HNCO) and solid byproducts. Ammonia may be retained within the selective catalytic reduction device 30. The ammonia stored in the selective catalytic reduction device 30 may reduce the amount of NOx in the exhaust gases passing through the selective catalytic reduction device 30. Other agents suitable for reducing NOx may also be injected into the exhaust conduit 26 and/or the selective catalytic reduction device 30 if desired. As noted previously, the use of urea as a reducing agent precursor for formation of ammonia may be desirable due to the relative ease of handling urea. In the exemplary practice, the urea is thermally decomposed into ammonia and HCNO. The HCNO then reacts with water on the appropriate catalyst surface (which could be a hydrolysis catalyst or the SCR catalyst itself) to yield carbon dioxide (CO2) and additional ammonia (NH3). The ammonia, in turn, may act as a reducing agent within the selective catalytic reduction device 30. The use of urea as a reducing agent precursor to provide ammonia may be defined generally by the following overall chemical equation:

  • CO(NH2)2+H2O→CO2+2 NH3
  • The use of a hydrolysis catalyst may be desirable to promote the reaction of HNCO with water.
  • Regardless of whether or not a hydrolysis catalyst is used, the urea undergoes a complex thermal decomposition process. This process involves both a gas phase decomposition pathway (into ammonia and isocyanic acid) and a solid phase decomposition pathway. The solid phase pathway tends to yield residual solid byproducts that may build up within the exhaust system. Over time, these solid byproducts may build up around the injection point for the reductant injector and/or within the selective catalytic reduction device 30. Such a build-up may interfere with NOx removal.
  • The present disclosure addresses the issue of solid byproduct accumulation by use of one or more metal oxide catalysts defining contact surfaces within the system to promote the gas phase decomposition pathway of urea preferentially over the solid phase decomposition pathway. The metal oxide catalysts consistent with this disclosure convert urea into ammonia and CO2, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for a separated hydrolysis catalyst. In other words, the use of the metal oxide catalysts may be perceived as performing both reactions (i.e. the urea thermal decomposition into ammonia and HNCO as well as the reaction of HNCO with water to produce CO2 and additional ammonia) on the same catalyst. Such an approach is significantly different from previous practices wherein the steps of thermal decomposition and hydrolysis are substantially localized at different locations of the exhaust system. Promoting the gas phase decomposition pathway reduces the level of solid byproducts produced during urea decomposition. Moreover, the metal oxide catalysts may be used in the form of a coating applied to walls of the exhaust conduit 26. The coating may reduce the ability of solid byproducts to adhere to the exhaust conduit 26 and also may catalyze the decomposition of urea into ammonia. The coating can be applied following any suitable technique as may be known to those of skill in the art. The coating can be applied as basic metal oxide or as an amphoteric metal oxide, or as metal coating that is subsequently oxidized into the respective basic metal or amphoteric metal oxide. Blends of basic metals and amphoteric metals and their respective oxides may also be used.
  • As shown schematically in FIG. 2, the reductant injector 32 may be a wall mounted device adapted to inject an atomized stream of air and reductant in generally perpendicular relation to the exhaust flow. In the illustrated, exemplary arrangement, the reductant injector 32 is in fluid communication with a mixer 45. By way of example only, and not limitation, the mixer 45 may include an arrangement of blades, fins, tabs, or other suitable components adapted to create turbulence and to facilitate mixing of the injected reductant with the exhaust gases. This mixing action facilitates the reductant decomposition into ammonia. This decomposition continues as the exhaust gases and injected reductant move along the flow path of the exhaust conduit 26. As will be appreciated, while the use of a mixer may be beneficial in many environments of use, it may nonetheless be eliminated in some embodiments where sufficient mixing is inherent. The resultant ammonia is eventually received by the selective catalytic reduction device 30. As will be understood, although the exhaust conduit 26 is illustrated as having a single “Z” bend formed by two elbows downstream from the reductant injector 32, such a configuration is illustrative only, and any number of other configurations may likewise be utilized as may be desired.
  • As shown in FIG. 2, in the exemplary system, portions of the mixer 45 and/or the exhaust conduit 26 are provided with a coating 50 of a basic and/or amphoteric oxide catalyst defining contact surfaces adapted to engage the urea or other reductant during mixing and/or during transport through the exhaust conduit. As will be appreciated, the thickness of the coating 50 in FIG. 2 has been significantly enhanced to aid in visual reference. In actual practice, the coating will typically have a thickness of about 50 to about 400 microns. However, higher and lower thicknesses levels may be used if desired. By way of example only, the coating 50 may be applied to the walls of the mixer 45 and/or to the walls of the exhaust conduit 26 using plasma deposition or other coating application techniques.
  • It is believed that the presence of the oxide catalyst within the mixer 45 and/or along the exhaust conduit 26 may promote the gas phase decomposition of the injected reductant to ammonia, thereby reducing the production of solid byproducts and improving overall efficiency of the NOx conversion. By way of example only, and not limitation, one metal oxide catalyst which may be particularly desirable is zinc oxide (ZnO). However, it is likewise contemplated that other metal oxides including CaO, MgO, SrO, BaO, La2O3 and the like may also be used if desired. In this regard, it is contemplated that virtually any basic or amphoteric oxide may provide some benefit. These include oxides of alkali metals, alkaline earth elements and corresponding transition elements. Such metals and their oxides are generally proton acceptors when reacted with water.
  • According to one exemplary practice, a layer of zinc oxide or other basic or amphoteric metal oxide may be used alone or in alloyed form with other metals to aid in catalyzing urea into ammonia. By way of example only, a layer of zinc oxide may be developed by applying a layer of zinc metal or an alloy containing a substantial percentage of zinc metal, directly to surfaces in contact with the exhaust stream. The application of the zinc layer may be carried out by any suitable deposition process, including thermal spray, physical vapor deposition, electrodeposition (plating), and hot dip galvanizing. Following application of the metal layer, a surface oxide layer is formed by exposure to oxygen at elevated temperatures. According to one exemplary practice, the applied layer of zinc may be oxidized by heating to a temperature of about 260 degrees Celsius in a circulated air furnace for about 10 hours. Such treatment is believed to develop a surface oxide layer of about 1 micron in thickness. Of course, other temperatures and/or heating times may be used as desired. By way of example, temperatures up to about 400 degrees Celsius may be used during the oxidation of zinc thereby approaching the melting point of 419 degrees Celsius. Of course, other temperatures can be used to oxidize other metals and/or metal alloys.
  • Any suitable application technique may be used to apply the metal layer. By way of example only, it is contemplated that various thermal spray processes may be used. In general, during a thermal spray process an energy source applies heat to a feedstock material to melt or partially melt the material, and the feed stock material is propelled towards a substrate where it is deposited. In most applications, thermal spray coatings range from about 50 microns to about 1 millimeter, although higher and lower thickness levels are possible. One suitable thermal spray process which may be used is the plasma transferred wire arc process (PTWA) a single, consumable wire plasma process. It is contemplated that twin wire arc, also known as wire arc spray, and atmospheric plasma spray processing may also be suitable as each has equipment that is designed for coating internal diameters, which is especially convenient for exhaust components.
  • Applying a coating layer of pure zinc which is subsequently oxidized by high-temperature treatment provides a highly adherent coating which is effective at performing the intended catalyzing function of promoting the gas-phase decomposition of urea under normal engine operating conditions where the temperature does not rise substantially over about 400 degrees Celsius. However, in some engines, the particulate trap 34 may be periodically regenerated by heating to burn out entrapped particles. During this regeneration cycle, temperatures downstream from the particulate trap may be substantially increased. Such increased temperature may promote delamination of the oxide coating.
  • It has been found that the addition of alloying elements to the zinc which increase the melting point and which are characterized by suppressed oxidation relative to the zinc may be useful in preventing delamination while nonetheless promoting the desired zinc oxide formation. By way of example only, it has been found that additions of nickel, iron, cobalt or combinations thereof may be beneficial in increasing the high temperature performance of the applied coating while still allowing the formation of zinc oxide on the surface. That is, the zinc will preferentially oxidize in the presence of these other elements due to thermodynamic considerations. Specifically, at typical oxidizing treatment temperatures, the added elements are characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the zinc. Since a more negative free energy represents a greater thermodynamic driving force for formation, the zinc oxide is formed preferentially relative to oxides of the added elements. Moreover, since alloys of zinc and the added elements have substantially increased melting points relative to pure zinc, the propensity for localized melting is also diminished.
  • It is contemplated that alloy constituent levels of about 10 percent or greater by weight with the remainder being zinc may be beneficial in many environments of use. By way of example only, and not limitation, when the coating is applied by a thermal spray process using a wire feedstock, a suitable alloy may be provided from the wire feedstock by techniques such as hot dip coating a nickel, cobalt or iron wire with zinc; plating nickel, cobalt or iron on a zinc wire; co-extruding zinc and nickel, cobalt or iron; either in wire or powder form; swaging zinc and nickel, cobalt or iron to form a cold worked alloy blend; or producing a cored wire using a metal sheath and filling with powder to create a desired composition. In the event that a plasma spray process using a powder feedstock is used, a suitable alloy may be provided by using a blend of discrete zinc particles and additive particles; pre-alloyed particles; or a spray dried and sintered particle composition made up of zinc and alloy additions. Of course, combinations of any of these may be used as desired.
  • It is to be understood that while zinc may be a desirable base metal for the catalyzing coating, any number of other metals that form an effective oxide coating of basic or amphoteric character may likewise be used either alone or in combination with suitable alloying elements. Such alloying elements may be characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the oxide coating formed by the base metal.
  • According to one contemplated practice, the coating 50 may be applied to provide a generally smooth surface. Such a smooth surface may be beneficial in reducing the accumulation of any solid byproducts generated by the urea decomposition. However, it is also contemplated that the applied coating may have an irregular surface to enhance contact area if desired. The coating may be uniform throughout the exhaust treatment system or may be localized if desired. As illustrated schematically in FIG. 2, according to one contemplated practice, the coating 50 may be applied to the walls of the exhaust conduit 26 in surrounding and opposing relation to the discharge of the reductant injector 32. The oxide catalyst may also be applied at elbows or other bends along the length of the exhaust conduit 26. By placing the coating 50 at locations characterized by substantial turbulence, the contacting relationship between the exhaust and the coating may be enhanced. Of course, the metal oxide catalyst may also be placed at any other locations as may be desired.
  • While the use of a coating of metal oxide catalyst may be desirable in many applications, the metal oxide catalyst may also be present in other forms. By way of example only, and not limitation, the metal oxide catalyst may be present in the form of fins, coated inserts or other structures defining contact surfaces adapted for disposition within the mixer 45 and/or exhaust conduit 26.
  • EXAMPLE
  • Features consistent with the present disclosure may be further understood by reference to the following non-limiting example.
  • A stainless steel laboratory scale exhaust system incorporating a urea mixer upstream from a selective catalytic reduction device was connected to a diesel engine and the level of NOx conversion was monitored. Conversion levels averaged approximately 88%. A thermal spray coating of zinc oxide ZnO was then applied to the urea mixer and at the elbows of the exhaust conduit. The laboratory scale exhaust system was then reconnected to the diesel engine and the level of NOx conversion was monitored. Conversion levels averaged approximately 90%.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
  • Systems consistent with the present disclosure may be suitable to enhance exhaust emissions control for engines. The disclosed systems may be used for any application of an engine. Such applications may include supplying power for machines, such as, for example, stationary equipment such as power generation sets, or mobile equipment, such as vehicles. The disclosed techniques and features may be used for any kind of vehicle, such as, for example, automobiles, locomotives, marine craft, construction machines (including those for on-road, as well as off-road use), and other heavy equipment.
  • An exemplary technique for enhanced exhaust treatment using the disclosed techniques may include delivering urea into an exhaust treatment system including one or more surfaces of a metal oxide catalyst and reacting the urea with water in the presence of the metal oxide catalysts to promote gas phase decomposition of the urea to ammonia and delivering the ammonia to a selective catalytic reduction device to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by the engine. The enhanced gas phase decomposition of the urea promotes enhances NOx conversion.
  • It will be appreciated that the foregoing description provides examples of the disclosed system and technique. However, it is contemplated that other implementations of the disclosure may differ in detail from the foregoing examples. All references to the disclosure or examples thereof are intended to reference the particular example being discussed at that point and are not intended to imply any limitation as to the scope of the disclosure more generally. All language of distinction and disparagement with respect to certain features is intended to indicate a lack of preference for those features, but not to exclude such from the scope of the disclosure entirely unless otherwise indicated.
  • Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
  • Accordingly, this disclosure includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the disclosure unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Claims (25)

1. An engine exhaust treatment system, comprising:
a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust stream moving along an exhaust flow path defined by an exhaust conduit;
a selective catalytic reduction device disposed downstream from the reductant injector, the selective catalytic reduction device being adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia; and
a contact surface of a material selected from the group consisting of basic metal oxide, amphoteric metal oxide and blends thereof disposed along the exhaust flow path.
2. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 1, wherein the contact surface includes ZnO.
3. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 1, wherein the contact surface is selected from the group consisting of CaO, MgO, SrO, BaO, and La2O3.
4. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 1, wherein the contact surface includes a ZnO coating.
5. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 4, wherein the ZnO coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in surrounding relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
6. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 4, wherein the ZnO coating is disposed at one or more elbows of the exhaust conduit.
7. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 1, wherein the contact surface is a coating selected from the group consisting of CaO, MgO, SrO, BaO, and La2O3.
8. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 7, wherein the coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in surrounding relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
9. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 7, wherein the coating is disposed at one or more elbows of the exhaust conduit.
10. An engine exhaust treatment system, comprising:
a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust stream moving along an exhaust flow path defined by an exhaust conduit;
a reductant mixer in fluid communication with the reductant injector;
a selective catalytic reduction device disposed downstream from the reductant injector, the selective catalytic reduction device being adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia; and
a basic oxide coating disposed within each of the reductant mixer and the exhaust conduit.
11. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 10, wherein the basic oxide coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in surrounding relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
12. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 11, wherein the basic oxide coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in substantially opposing relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
13. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 12, wherein the basic oxide coating is disposed at one or more elbows of the exhaust conduit.
14. An engine exhaust treatment system, comprising:
a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust stream moving along an exhaust flow path defined by an exhaust conduit;
a selective catalytic reduction device disposed downstream from the reductant injector, the selective catalytic reduction device being adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by reaction of the NOx with ammonia; and
a coating layer defining a contact surface disposed along the exhaust flow path, the coating layer including a first oxide-forming metal of basic or amphoteric character in combination with at least one alloy element characterized by a Gibbs free energy of oxide formation more positive than the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the first oxide-forming metal.
15. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 14, wherein the first oxide-forming metal is zinc.
16. The engine exhaust treatment system as recited in claim 15, wherein the at least one alloy element is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Co, Fe and combinations thereof.
17. A method of reducing an amount of NOx in exhaust gases produced by an engine by treatment of the exhaust gases in an exhaust treatment system, the exhaust treatment system including a reductant injector adapted to deliver a reductant composition into an exhaust stream moving along an exhaust flow path defined by an exhaust conduit, and a selective catalytic reduction device disposed downstream from the reductant injector, the selective catalytic reduction device being adapted to reduce an amount of NOx in the exhaust gases by reaction of the NOx with ammonia, the method comprising:
providing a contact surface of a material selected from the group consisting of basic oxide, amphoteric oxide and blends thereof disposed along the exhaust flow path upstream from the selective catalytic reduction device.
18. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the contact surface is a coating having an oxide surface layer including at least one of the group consisting of ZnO, CaO, MgO, SrO, BaO, and La2O3.
19. The method as recited in claim 18, wherein the coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in surrounding relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
20. The method as recited in claim 19, wherein the coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in substantially opposing relation to an opening for the reductant injector.
21. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the contact surface is a thermal spray coating.
22. The method as recited in claim 21, wherein the thermal spray coating is applied by a plasma transferred wire arc process.
23. The method as recited in claim 18, wherein the coating is disposed at one or more elbows of the exhaust conduit.
24. The method as recited in claim 18, wherein the coating has a thickness of about 50 to about 400 microns.
25. The method as recited in claim 18, wherein the coating is disposed at walls of the exhaust conduit in substantially opposing relation to an opening for the reductant injector and at one or more elbows of the exhaust conduit at a thickness of about 50 to about 400 microns.
US12/337,128 2008-12-17 2008-12-17 Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products Abandoned US20100146948A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/337,128 US20100146948A1 (en) 2008-12-17 2008-12-17 Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/337,128 US20100146948A1 (en) 2008-12-17 2008-12-17 Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100146948A1 true US20100146948A1 (en) 2010-06-17

Family

ID=42238936

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/337,128 Abandoned US20100146948A1 (en) 2008-12-17 2008-12-17 Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20100146948A1 (en)

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090094968A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Mazda Motor Corporation Exhaust-gas purification device disposition structure of vehicle
US20110174264A1 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-21 Crawley Ii Wilbur H Airless fuel delivery system
US20120006011A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2012-01-12 Scion-Sprays Limited Injection system for an internal combustion engine
US20120047882A1 (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-03-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust gas purification apparatus
US20130095003A1 (en) * 2010-06-02 2013-04-18 Emitec Gesellschaft Fuer Emissionstechnologie Mbh High-temperature-resistant component of high-grade steel with a cobalt-containing coating, exhaust-gas treatment unit and method for producing such an exhaust-gas treatment unit
WO2013112146A1 (en) * 2012-01-25 2013-08-01 Cummins Ip, Inc. Apparatus for facilitating reductant decomposition and mixing
US8820059B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2014-09-02 Caterpillar Inc. Mounting assembly for reductant injector with thermal isolation and sealing gasket
US20150107226A1 (en) * 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Cummins Ip, Inc. Gasoline dithering for spark-ignited gaseous fuel internal combustion engine
EP3015158A3 (en) * 2014-09-15 2016-08-10 Paccar Inc Urea hydrolysis reactor for selective catalytic reduction
US9650938B2 (en) * 2010-03-19 2017-05-16 Hino Motors, Ltd. Exhaust emission control device
US20170284258A1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Reducing agent injection device and exhaust gas treatment method
US10675586B2 (en) 2017-06-02 2020-06-09 Paccar Inc Hybrid binary catalysts, methods and uses thereof
US10744458B2 (en) 2015-11-06 2020-08-18 Paccar Inc Thermally integrated compact aftertreatment system
US10835866B2 (en) 2017-06-02 2020-11-17 Paccar Inc 4-way hybrid binary catalysts, methods and uses thereof
US10906031B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2021-02-02 Paccar Inc Intra-crystalline binary catalysts and uses thereof
US10934918B1 (en) 2019-10-14 2021-03-02 Paccar Inc Combined urea hydrolysis and selective catalytic reduction for emissions control
US11007514B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2021-05-18 Paccar Inc Ammonia facilitated cation loading of zeolite catalysts
US11348811B2 (en) * 2017-07-27 2022-05-31 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Thermal chamber exhaust structure and method
US11542847B2 (en) 2017-06-06 2023-01-03 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Systems and methods for mixing exhaust gases and reductant in an aftertreatment system
US11828214B2 (en) 2020-05-08 2023-11-28 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Configurable aftertreatment systems including a housing

Citations (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5281403A (en) * 1991-09-27 1994-01-25 Noell, Inc. Method for converting urea to ammonia
US5431893A (en) * 1992-02-24 1995-07-11 Hug; Hans T. Cleaning exhaust gases from combustion installations
US5851376A (en) * 1995-11-20 1998-12-22 Mazda Motor Corporation Catalyst degradation determination apparatus and method
US5976475A (en) * 1997-04-02 1999-11-02 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Reducing NOx emissions from an engine by temperature-controlled urea injection for selective catalytic reduction
US6074619A (en) * 1997-03-13 2000-06-13 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for selective reduction of NOx in exhaust gas
US6153159A (en) * 1996-03-01 2000-11-28 Volkswagen Ag Method for purifying exhaust gases
US20010002244A1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2001-05-31 Jurgen Gieshoff Process for the selective catalytic reduction of the nitrogen oxides contained in a lean exhaust gas
US20010049936A1 (en) * 1996-04-19 2001-12-13 Kenneth Voss E. System for reduction of harmful exhaust emissions from diesel engines
US6449947B1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2002-09-17 Fleetguard, Inc. Low pressure injection and turbulent mixing in selective catalytic reduction system
US6562461B1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-05-13 Ensci Inc Thin film metal oxide coated substrates
US20030110763A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-06-19 Kenneth Pawson Catalytic converter
US6761025B1 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-07-13 Caterpillar Inc. Enhanced ammonia feed control for selective catalytic reduction
US6895747B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-05-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Diesel aftertreatment systems
US6919051B1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2005-07-19 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Low profile, integrated catalytic converter and flexible coupling assembly
US6928807B2 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-08-16 Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag Method and apparatus for producing ammonia (NH3)
US6928806B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-08-16 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Exhaust gas aftertreatment systems
US7065958B2 (en) * 2002-05-07 2006-06-27 Extengine Transport Systems Emission control system
US20070089403A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2007-04-26 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Exhaust-gas purification system for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the lean exhaust gas of internal combustion engines and method of exhaust-gas purification
US20070160518A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-07-12 Galligan Michael P Exhaust inlet metallic foam trap coupled to a downstream monolithic precious metal catalyst
US20080041040A1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2008-02-21 Doring Andreas Exhaust gas post treatment system
US20080041045A1 (en) * 2006-08-21 2008-02-21 Southwest Research Institute Apparatus and method for assisting selective catalytic reduction
US7380395B2 (en) * 2002-11-22 2008-06-03 Emitec Gesellschaft Fuer Emissionstechnologie Mbh Exhaust gas system
US7406822B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2008-08-05 Caterpillar Inc. Particulate trap regeneration system and control strategy
US20090324453A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2009-12-31 Cummins Filtration Ip, Inc. Catalytic Devices for Converting Urea to Ammonia

Patent Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5281403B1 (en) * 1991-09-27 1996-06-11 Noell Inc Method for converting urea to ammonia
US5281403A (en) * 1991-09-27 1994-01-25 Noell, Inc. Method for converting urea to ammonia
US5431893A (en) * 1992-02-24 1995-07-11 Hug; Hans T. Cleaning exhaust gases from combustion installations
US5851376A (en) * 1995-11-20 1998-12-22 Mazda Motor Corporation Catalyst degradation determination apparatus and method
US6153159A (en) * 1996-03-01 2000-11-28 Volkswagen Ag Method for purifying exhaust gases
US20010049936A1 (en) * 1996-04-19 2001-12-13 Kenneth Voss E. System for reduction of harmful exhaust emissions from diesel engines
US6074619A (en) * 1997-03-13 2000-06-13 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for selective reduction of NOx in exhaust gas
US5976475A (en) * 1997-04-02 1999-11-02 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Reducing NOx emissions from an engine by temperature-controlled urea injection for selective catalytic reduction
US20010002244A1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2001-05-31 Jurgen Gieshoff Process for the selective catalytic reduction of the nitrogen oxides contained in a lean exhaust gas
US6919051B1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2005-07-19 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Low profile, integrated catalytic converter and flexible coupling assembly
US6562461B1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-05-13 Ensci Inc Thin film metal oxide coated substrates
US20030110763A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-06-19 Kenneth Pawson Catalytic converter
US6449947B1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2002-09-17 Fleetguard, Inc. Low pressure injection and turbulent mixing in selective catalytic reduction system
US6928807B2 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-08-16 Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag Method and apparatus for producing ammonia (NH3)
US7065958B2 (en) * 2002-05-07 2006-06-27 Extengine Transport Systems Emission control system
US6895747B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-05-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Diesel aftertreatment systems
US6928806B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-08-16 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Exhaust gas aftertreatment systems
US7380395B2 (en) * 2002-11-22 2008-06-03 Emitec Gesellschaft Fuer Emissionstechnologie Mbh Exhaust gas system
US6761025B1 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-07-13 Caterpillar Inc. Enhanced ammonia feed control for selective catalytic reduction
US20070089403A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2007-04-26 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Exhaust-gas purification system for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in the lean exhaust gas of internal combustion engines and method of exhaust-gas purification
US7406822B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2008-08-05 Caterpillar Inc. Particulate trap regeneration system and control strategy
US20070160518A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-07-12 Galligan Michael P Exhaust inlet metallic foam trap coupled to a downstream monolithic precious metal catalyst
US20080041040A1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2008-02-21 Doring Andreas Exhaust gas post treatment system
US20080041045A1 (en) * 2006-08-21 2008-02-21 Southwest Research Institute Apparatus and method for assisting selective catalytic reduction
US20090324453A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2009-12-31 Cummins Filtration Ip, Inc. Catalytic Devices for Converting Urea to Ammonia

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120006011A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2012-01-12 Scion-Sprays Limited Injection system for an internal combustion engine
US8056671B2 (en) * 2007-10-12 2011-11-15 Mazda Motor Corporation Exhaust-gas purification device disposition structure of vehicle
US20090094968A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Mazda Motor Corporation Exhaust-gas purification device disposition structure of vehicle
US20110174264A1 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-21 Crawley Ii Wilbur H Airless fuel delivery system
US8359842B2 (en) * 2010-01-21 2013-01-29 Emcon Technologies Llc Airless fuel delivery system
US9650938B2 (en) * 2010-03-19 2017-05-16 Hino Motors, Ltd. Exhaust emission control device
US9011785B2 (en) * 2010-06-02 2015-04-21 Emitec Gesellschaft Fuer Emissionstechnologies Mbh Exhaust-gas treatment unit having high-temperature-resistant component of high-grade steel with a cobalt-containing coating and method for producing such an exhaust-gas treatment unit
US20130095003A1 (en) * 2010-06-02 2013-04-18 Emitec Gesellschaft Fuer Emissionstechnologie Mbh High-temperature-resistant component of high-grade steel with a cobalt-containing coating, exhaust-gas treatment unit and method for producing such an exhaust-gas treatment unit
US20120047882A1 (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-03-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust gas purification apparatus
US9745879B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2017-08-29 Cummins Ip, Inc. Apparatus for facilitating reducant decomposition and mixing
US10669912B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2020-06-02 Cummins Ip, Inc. Apparatus for facilitating reductant decomposition and mixing
WO2013112146A1 (en) * 2012-01-25 2013-08-01 Cummins Ip, Inc. Apparatus for facilitating reductant decomposition and mixing
GB2512262A (en) * 2012-01-25 2014-09-24 Cummins Ip Inc Apparatus for facilitating reductant decomposition and mixing
GB2512262B (en) * 2012-01-25 2018-05-16 Cummins Ip Inc Apparatus for facilitating reductant decomposition and mixing
US8820059B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2014-09-02 Caterpillar Inc. Mounting assembly for reductant injector with thermal isolation and sealing gasket
US20150107226A1 (en) * 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Cummins Ip, Inc. Gasoline dithering for spark-ignited gaseous fuel internal combustion engine
EP3015158A3 (en) * 2014-09-15 2016-08-10 Paccar Inc Urea hydrolysis reactor for selective catalytic reduction
US9849444B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2017-12-26 Paccar Inc Urea hydrolysis reactor for selective catalytic reduction
US10744458B2 (en) 2015-11-06 2020-08-18 Paccar Inc Thermally integrated compact aftertreatment system
US20170284258A1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Reducing agent injection device and exhaust gas treatment method
US10519834B2 (en) * 2016-03-30 2019-12-31 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Reducing agent injection device and exhaust gas treatment method
CN107261839A (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-20 日本碍子株式会社 Reducing agent injection apparatus and waste gas processing method
US10675586B2 (en) 2017-06-02 2020-06-09 Paccar Inc Hybrid binary catalysts, methods and uses thereof
US10835866B2 (en) 2017-06-02 2020-11-17 Paccar Inc 4-way hybrid binary catalysts, methods and uses thereof
US11542847B2 (en) 2017-06-06 2023-01-03 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Systems and methods for mixing exhaust gases and reductant in an aftertreatment system
US11982219B2 (en) 2017-06-06 2024-05-14 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Systems and methods for mixing exhaust gases and reductant in an aftertreatment system
US11348811B2 (en) * 2017-07-27 2022-05-31 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Thermal chamber exhaust structure and method
US10906031B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2021-02-02 Paccar Inc Intra-crystalline binary catalysts and uses thereof
US11007514B2 (en) 2019-04-05 2021-05-18 Paccar Inc Ammonia facilitated cation loading of zeolite catalysts
US10934918B1 (en) 2019-10-14 2021-03-02 Paccar Inc Combined urea hydrolysis and selective catalytic reduction for emissions control
US11828214B2 (en) 2020-05-08 2023-11-28 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Configurable aftertreatment systems including a housing

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100146948A1 (en) Exhaust system promoting decomposition of reductants into gaseous products
KR100969378B1 (en) Apparatus for purifying exhaust gas
JP4460458B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification device
US7984609B2 (en) Exhaust gas post treatment system
JP5618542B2 (en) Use of aqueous solutions containing guanidinium formate as ammonia precursors for selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in exhaust gas
US8176731B2 (en) Exhaust gas aftertreatment system
KR101598988B1 (en) Method and device for the purification of diesel exhaust gases
EP2230001A1 (en) Exhaust gas treatment
KR100999616B1 (en) Apparatus for reducing nitrogen oxide cotained in exhaust gas
CN103269773A (en) Architectural diesel oxidation catalyst for enhanced no2 generator
CN103362610A (en) Method for use in conjunction with an exhaust-gas aftertreatment system
US20130047583A1 (en) Aftertreatment system
US8776499B2 (en) Emission treatment systems and methods using passivated surfaces
Luo et al. Effect of regeneration method and ash deposition on diesel particulate filter performance: a review
JP2005273509A (en) NOx REMOVAL EQUIPMENT AND NOx REMOVING METHOD
JP6776338B2 (en) Exhaust treatment systems and methods for the treatment of exhaust gas flows
CN211598795U (en) Post-processing system
US11313264B2 (en) Method and system for the removal of noxious compounds from engine exhaust gas
CN201521330U (en) Quick-repair quick-change urea reductant nozzle structure
US8020378B2 (en) Exhaust manifold comprising aluminide
US9205378B2 (en) NO2 slip catalyst
EP4234494A1 (en) Device and method for suppressing generation of high melting point pipe clogging substance
JP7462730B2 (en) Device and method for exhaust gas aftertreatment and use thereof
US9009967B2 (en) Composite catalyst substrate
JP7389617B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification equipment for diesel engines and their applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CATERPILLAR INC.,ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DACOSTA, HERBERT;VELIZ, MARK D.;LIANG, CHO Y.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20081203 TO 20081216;REEL/FRAME:021997/0001

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION