US20090229714A1 - Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels - Google Patents

Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090229714A1
US20090229714A1 US12/047,471 US4747108A US2009229714A1 US 20090229714 A1 US20090229714 A1 US 20090229714A1 US 4747108 A US4747108 A US 4747108A US 2009229714 A1 US2009229714 A1 US 2009229714A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
chromium
alloy material
stress corrosion
corrosion cracking
carbide precipitates
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/047,471
Inventor
Martin Mathew Morra
Aaron John Avagliano
Wei Chen
Jonathan Sebastian Janssen
James Michael Storey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to US12/047,471 priority Critical patent/US20090229714A1/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JANSSEN, JONATHAN SEBASTIAN, STOREY, JAMES MICHAEL, AVAGLIANO, AARON JOHN, CHEN, WEI, MORA, MARTIN MATHEW
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SCRIVENOR'S ERROR ON ASSIGNOR'S LAST NAME MARTIN MATHEW "MORA" TO THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "MORRA" PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 020647 FRAME 0599. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SCRIVENOR'S ERROR ON ASSIGNOR'S LAST NAME MARTIN MATHEW "MORA" TO THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "MORRA". Assignors: JANSSEN, JONATHAN SEBASTIAN, STOREY, JAMES MICHAEL, AVAGLIANO, AARON JOHN, CHEN, WEI, MORRA, MARTIN MATHEW
Priority to EP09154817A priority patent/EP2100977A1/en
Priority to CN200910127528A priority patent/CN101532075A/en
Publication of US20090229714A1 publication Critical patent/US20090229714A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D6/00Heat treatment of ferrous alloys
    • C21D6/004Heat treatment of ferrous alloys containing Cr and Ni
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/26Methods of annealing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D6/00Heat treatment of ferrous alloys
    • C21D6/02Hardening by precipitation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/058Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium without Mo and W
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/50Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/001Austenite
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/004Dispersions; Precipitations
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/50Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for welded joints

Definitions

  • the present disclosure is generally directed to methods for mitigation stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels.
  • high-temperatures in high purity water or water/steam systems can become aggressive environments that can adversely affect structural materials either by general corrosion or by stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
  • high temperature water may cause stress corrosion SCC in materials such as stainless steels, nickel-iron base alloys, and nickel base alloys.
  • SCC develops when the material is subjected to an applied or residual tensile stress in the presence of some corrosive environment, especially chloride or sulfate-containing environments at higher temperatures.
  • SCC can result from residual stresses caused by welding, cold working, and other thermomechanical metal treatments.
  • Stress corrosion cracking also includes cracks propagated by static or dynamic tensile stresses acting in combination with corrosion. Water chemistry, welding, heat treatment, and radiation may all increase the susceptibility of a metal or alloy component to stress corrosion cracking.
  • Intergranular stress corrosion cracking is localized cracking that occurs at the grain boundaries of a susceptible material in an aggressive environment under load. Intergranular slip step oxidation reactions weaken the grain boundaries, which then open under an applied load and physical cracks are formed. The cracks propagate with little or no evidence of plastic deformation, and failure of the component is likely. Three simultaneous conditions are generally present for IGSCC to occur: localized changes to the material's chemical composition or grain boundary microstructure, residual or applied stresses, and exposure to a corrosive environment. All of these critical factors can contribute to the formation and propagation of a stress corrosion crack.
  • one common form of sensitization is caused by the thermal cycle of welding, where the post-weld cooling rate is sufficiently slow to allow precipitation of chromium-rich carbides at grain boundaries.
  • the precipitation of carbides depletes the adjacent grain boundaries of chromium to an extent that they are no longer corrosion resistant.
  • SCC can occur at these boundaries in otherwise corrosion-resistant materials when in the presence of a chemically aggressive water environment and a tensile stress.
  • HWC hydrogen water chemistry
  • Stainless steels, higher chromium super stainless steels, Fe—Ni-base and Ni-based alloys are alloyed with chromium to achieve general corrosion resistance but this approach can fail to mitigate SCC if the amount of Cr added is insufficient to maintain a stable oxide film in a corrosive environment or if microstructural changes create regions of lower chromium concentration.
  • One problem is that these materials may not be microstructurally stable at their intended operating temperatures or may have been heat treated or welded to produce SCC susceptible microstructures.
  • One approach employed to mitigate SCC is continual addition of oxide strengthening or stabilizing elements to a corrosive environment.
  • Another approach utilizes the addition of catalytic elements (such as platinum) to generate hydrogen in a corrosive environment, the hydrogen reducing free oxygen in the water, thereby minimizing its corrosive inducing effects.
  • catalytic elements such as platinum
  • One problem with this approach is that it requires a commitment by the end user to actively maintain the SCC mitigation strategy. Additionally, it will incur additional operating costs over a component or plant lifetime.
  • the disclosure provides for a method for providing resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in an Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material, the method comprising sensitizing the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to form carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and chromium-depleted zones about the carbide precipitates, and heating the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to a temperature and a time effective to diffuse chromium into a chromium-depleted zone.
  • the disclosure provides for a method for treating a sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material having carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and a chromium-depleted zone about the carbide precipitates, the method comprising heating the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to a temperature and a time effective to diffuse chromium from a grain matrix of the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material into the chromium-depleted zone, wherein resistance to the intergranular stress corrosion cracking increases relative to the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr in an absence of the heating.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a process for improving an alloy material's resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the absence of chromium-rich carbides at grain boundaries in an 800H alloy after a solution anneal heat treatment.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates chromium-rich carbide precipitated at the grain boundaries in an 8001-1 alloy after a sensitization heat treatment.
  • She present disclosure generally relates to a method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels, specifically Fe-base, Fe—Ni base or Ni-base alloys, such as those used in high temperature and pressure aqueous environments. More particularly, it relates to preventing intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) in austenitic solid solution strengthened 800 and 300 series of alloys.
  • the disclosed method includes sensitizing the alloy component to form chromium carbide precipitates at the grain boundaries then extending the heat treatment time to allow diffusion of the chromium into the chromium depleted zones that resulted from sensitization.
  • the material may be left in a sensitized condition while in austenitic stainless steels the extended heat treatment will be required to recover the chromium composition at the grain boundaries.
  • the chromium carbide precipitates which are globular or lamellar in nature, in combination with the diffusion of chromium into the chromium-depleted zones provide enhanced resistance to IGSCC.
  • an alloy component that has been sensitized can be exposed to a heat treatment process that causes diffusion of chromium into the chromium-depleted zones that resulted from sensitization.
  • the sensitized alloy component includes chromium-rich carbide precipitates at about the grain boundaries. In this manner, the alloy component undergoes a self-healing process.
  • solution strengthened stainless steel is given its ordinary meaning and generally refers to a heat treatment process in which an alloy is heated to a suitable temperature, held at that temperature long enough to cause secondary phases to undergo solid state dissolve and result in one or more of the constituent elements of those phases to enter into the matrix phase solid solution, and then cooled rapidly enough to hold these constituents in solution or to ensure that secondary phases do not re-precipitate.
  • microstructures are formed that are generally comprised of primary carbides dispersed in a single-phase matrix with essentially clean grain boundaries.
  • the process comprises sensitizing an alloy component followed by continued heating of the component after sensitization of an alloy material.
  • sensitization can cause precipitation of chromium carbides at the grain boundaries. The precipitation of these carbides depletes the adjacent grain boundary regions of chromium to an extent that they are no longer corrosion resistant.
  • Sensitization is caused by the formation of chromium carbides about the grain boundaries. The Cr-rich precipitate draws chromium from the adjacent matrix, which results in the formation of a chromium-depleted zone. If the chromium content is below 11-12 atomic percent in the chromium-depleted zone, the stainless steel is said to be sensitized.
  • the components would normally be susceptible to intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC).
  • IGSCC intergranular stress corrosion cracking
  • continued heating of the component having chromium-depleted zones at the grain boundaries is effective to diffuse chromium within the matrix into the chromium depleted zones.
  • the component having chromium-depleted zones is heated at about 450 to about 700° C. for a period of time effective to cause chromium from the matrix to diffuse down the chromium composition gradient caused by sensitization and replenish the depleted zone along the boundary, restoring the metal's corrosion properties.
  • the presence of intergranular chromium-rich carbides at the grain boundaries has been found, by the present disclosure, to provide enhanced resistance to IGSCC.
  • the present disclosure is generally directed to a heat treatment process designed to impart IGSCC resistance by first sensitizing the metal and then letting it self-heal.
  • the resulting alloy material is IGSCC resistant to intergranular SCC promoting environments and under static or dynamic mechanical loading.
  • the alloy material is an austenitic solid solution strengthened super stainless steel similar to the composition range of the 800 series of alloys.
  • Austenitic stainless steels are generally characterized by high ductility, relativity low yield stress and ultimate tensile strengths, when in the annealed or solution annealed conditions, cold work will dramatically increase the tensile properties.
  • a typical low carbon steel on cooling transforms from austenite to either a mixture of ferrite and iron carbide (Fe 3 C). With austenitic stainless steel, the high chromium and nickel content suppress this transformation keeping the material essentially austenite on cooling.
  • Austenitic steels are classified in three groups, the AISA 200 series (alloys of iron-chromium-nickel-manganese), the AISA 300 series (alloys of iron-chromium-nickel), and nitrogen-strengthened alloys.
  • the carbon content varies dependent on the series (generally 0.15% or less carbon) and in the 300 series is dependent on whether the alloy is an L-grade, low carbon concentration (0.03% or less), or of a nominal composition (0.08% or less).
  • These alloy have a range of compositions but generally contain a minimum of 16% chromium with sufficient nickel and manganese to provide a stable austenitic structure at temperatures below the martensite start (Ms) temperature.
  • Nitrogen-strengthened austenitic stainless steels are alloys of chromium-manganese-nitrogen; some grades also contain nickel. Austenitic stainless steels are generally used for corrosive or cryogenic environments where corrosion resistance and toughness are the primary requirements. Typical applications include shafts, pumps, fasteners, and piping in seawater and equipment for processing chemicals, food, and dairy products. Another classification, more relevant to this disclosure, is that of austenitic ‘super stainless’ steels that are mid-way between austenitic stainless steels and Fe—Ni base superalloys. These materials, represented by the alloy 800 series, are characterized by; much higher nickel and chromium contents, higher carbon levels, and intentional additions of small amounts of titanium and aluminum.
  • the alloy material has a composition of 18-30% chromium, 8-80% nickel, and lesser alloying additions of carbon, nitrogen, molybdenum, niobium, titanium, and manganese.
  • Suitable austenitic alloys include, but are not meant to be limited to, the super stainless steels represented by the 800 series (19.0-23 wt % Cr, 30-35 wt % Ni, 0.15-0.6 wt % Al, 0.15-0.6 wt % Ti, and 10 wt % C max) and those of the 300 series such as stainless steel grade 304 (18-20% Cr and 8-12% Ni), 316 (16-18% Cr, 10-14% Ni, and 2-3% Mo), 316 Ti (316 with Titanium added), 320 (Same as 316 Ti), 321 (17-19% Cr, 9-12% Ni, and Titanium), 347 (17-19% Cr, 9-13% Ni, and Niobium), 308 (19-22% Cr, 9-11% Ni), 309 (22-24% Cr, 12-15% Ni), 310 (24-26% Cr, 19-22% Ni), 904L (20% Cr, 25% Ni, 4.5% Mo) and the like.
  • the super stainless steels represented by the 800 series (19.0-23 wt % Cr, 30-
  • alloying elements may include vanadium (V), aluminum (Al), tungsten (W), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), nitrogen (N), and carbon (C).
  • V vanadium
  • Al aluminum
  • W tungsten
  • Co cobalt
  • Cu copper
  • N nitrogen
  • C carbon
  • the number of grades is therefore seemingly infinite, with a large number of standard compositions to which manufacturers add variants depending on the particular application.
  • stainless steel grades with chromium concentrations below 16 wt % are not applicable, due to the fact that lower chromium concentrations will not provide adequate overall corrosion resistance for the intended applications due to the nature of a protective Cr oxide layer formed and the reduction of Cr in the alloy matrix due to the precipitation of Cr-rich intergranular carbides.
  • the alloys can be produced via various process paths such as for example casting, powder metallurgy or cast/wrought metallurgy. Alloy constituents can be melted using any conventional melt process such as air melting, Argon Oxygen Deoxidation (AOD), Ladle Refining, Vacuum Induction Melting (VIM), Vacuum Arc Re-Melting (VAR), Electro Slag Re-Melting (ESR), etc.
  • AOD Argon Oxygen Deoxidation
  • VIM Vacuum Induction Melting
  • VAR Vacuum Arc Re-Melting
  • ESR Electro Slag Re-Melting
  • the alloy may then be homogenized prior to hot working or it may be heated and directly hot worked. If homogenization is used, it may be carried out by heating the alloy to a metal temperature in the range of about 1100° C. to about 1400° C. for a period of time of at least eight hours to dissolve soluble elements and carbides and to also homogenize the structure. A suitable time is eight hours or more in the homogenization metal temperature range. Normally, the soak time at the homogenization temperature does not have to extend for more than seventy-two hours. After homogenization, the alloy is typically hot worked. The alloy can be hot worked by, but not limited to: hot rolling, hot forging, or hot extrusion or any combinations thereof to yield the desired size and shape.
  • This process is followed by delivery of the alloy product to a customer for final manufacture of a component part and appropriate heat treating and finishing.
  • a customer will form the alloy into a desired shape.
  • Heat treatment, warm work, or cold work separately or in various combinations may be employed to obtain the tensile properties and fracture toughness desired.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the grain boundaries in an austenitic super stainless steel in the solution annealed condition.
  • step 10 prior to the sensitization and heat treatment process of the disclosure, the interfaces 12 of several grains of a polycrystalline alloy material are shown that exhibit essentially clean grain boundaries, wherein chromium carbide precipitation has not yet occurred.
  • step 20 the steel alloy material is first exposed to a sensitization process, wherein the steel alloy material has been heated and cooled at rates and conditions such that chromium carbide precipitates 22 are formed at the grain boundary interfaces. The formation of the chromium carbide precipitates results in a chromium-depleted zone 24 about the chromium carbide precipitates.
  • the chromium carbide precipitate 22 is Cr 23 C 6 and may further include, Mo, V, W, Nb, Ta, B, and combinations thereof.
  • the steel alloy may next be subjected to a heat treatment process that permits chromium diffusion into the chromium-depleted zone 24 .
  • the heat treatment process may be independently performed or may be integrated with a process that results in sensitization, i.e., formation of chromium carbides at the grain boundary interfaces.
  • Subsequent thermal exposure; heat treatment, operation, or processing of the component drives the diffusion of chromium down the Cr composition gradient generated by the precipitation and growth of chromium carbides and restores the material's corrosion resistance properties.
  • the presence of intergranular carbides 22 with the diffused chromium at the interfaces provides resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
  • the heating source can be any method capable of replenishing the chromium-depleted zone as described above.
  • the heating source can be a gas or electric furnace, inductive, infrared, molten salt or metal baths, or laser.
  • the heat source can be localized to specific areas of a component using the methods described above or may occur as a consequence of manufacturing, welding or heat treatment or during component operation in an elevated temperature environment.
  • Heat treatment is a relatively inexpensive process compared with specifying a specialty-grade alloy or with a post-assembly heat treatment. This disclosure will provide a significant material and labor cost savings while providing superior lifetimes on gasification products. In addition, the disclosed heat treatment process will be of benefit, for example, to any business that requires IGSCC resistance of austenitic alloys used in structural components for gasification, nuclear, water, and oil and gas industries, among others.
  • sensitization properties of alloy 800H were studied. IGSCC tests on sensitized samples confirmed IGSCC resistance. Duplicate testing was performed on alloy 800H comprising sensitization, carbide precipitation, and subsequent heat treatment according to the process of this disclosure. Sensitization was detected using ASTM A262 Practice C boiling nitric acid (or ‘Huey’) test and confirmed by measuring the chromium concentration of the regions adjacent to the grain boundaries using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). In more conclusive proof of the efficacy of this disclosure the IGSCC growth rate was measured in a high temperature (288° C.) and pressure (1500 psig) aqueous environment in alloy 800H heat treated to precipitate intergranular M 23 C 6 carbides.
  • TEM Transmission Electron Microscope
  • the mechanical test conditions used for the test were designed to induce IGSCC in austenitic metals over a wide range in chemical compositions.
  • Test results from the sensitization heat treated material showed extremely low IGSCC growth rates (1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 9 mm/s) that indicate a very low probability for sustained SCC growth. This is in comparison with IGSCC growth rate of above 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 7 mm/s for typical sensitized materials tested under similar conditions.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Abstract

A method of providing resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in an alloy material, the method comprising sensitizing the alloy to form carbides, allowing the carbides to precipitate, and applying a heat treatment to replenish a chromium-depleted zone.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • The present disclosure is generally directed to methods for mitigation stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels.
  • In applications such as nuclear reactors, steam driven turbines, or water deaerators, high-temperatures in high purity water or water/steam systems can become aggressive environments that can adversely affect structural materials either by general corrosion or by stress corrosion cracking (SCC). For example, high temperature water may cause stress corrosion SCC in materials such as stainless steels, nickel-iron base alloys, and nickel base alloys. SCC develops when the material is subjected to an applied or residual tensile stress in the presence of some corrosive environment, especially chloride or sulfate-containing environments at higher temperatures. These stresses can result or originate from differences in thermal expansion or contraction between components, relatively high or varying operating pressures, or they can be residual stresses created by the various processes performed during the manufacture or assembly of the components or system. In addition to stresses, residual plastic strains produced during the manufacture or assembly of the components or system can make a material more susceptible to SCC. For example, SCC can result from residual stresses caused by welding, cold working, and other thermomechanical metal treatments. Stress corrosion cracking also includes cracks propagated by static or dynamic tensile stresses acting in combination with corrosion. Water chemistry, welding, heat treatment, and radiation may all increase the susceptibility of a metal or alloy component to stress corrosion cracking.
  • Intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) is localized cracking that occurs at the grain boundaries of a susceptible material in an aggressive environment under load. Intergranular slip step oxidation reactions weaken the grain boundaries, which then open under an applied load and physical cracks are formed. The cracks propagate with little or no evidence of plastic deformation, and failure of the component is likely. Three simultaneous conditions are generally present for IGSCC to occur: localized changes to the material's chemical composition or grain boundary microstructure, residual or applied stresses, and exposure to a corrosive environment. All of these critical factors can contribute to the formation and propagation of a stress corrosion crack. For example, one common form of sensitization is caused by the thermal cycle of welding, where the post-weld cooling rate is sufficiently slow to allow precipitation of chromium-rich carbides at grain boundaries. The precipitation of carbides depletes the adjacent grain boundaries of chromium to an extent that they are no longer corrosion resistant. Hence, SCC can occur at these boundaries in otherwise corrosion-resistant materials when in the presence of a chemically aggressive water environment and a tensile stress.
  • IGSCC-related research has produced various mitigation methods that deal with each of these contributors. One method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking of susceptible material in, for example, a boiling water reactor is through the application of hydrogen water chemistry (HWC), which involves the addition of hydrogen gas to the reactor feedwater. Addition of hydrogen reduces the level of oxidizing species, such as dissolved oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, thereby reducing the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility. Unfortunately, the hydrogen water chemistry technique can require large quantities of hydrogen to effectively reduce the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility to acceptable levels in the various components.
  • Stainless steels, higher chromium super stainless steels, Fe—Ni-base and Ni-based alloys are alloyed with chromium to achieve general corrosion resistance but this approach can fail to mitigate SCC if the amount of Cr added is insufficient to maintain a stable oxide film in a corrosive environment or if microstructural changes create regions of lower chromium concentration. One problem is that these materials may not be microstructurally stable at their intended operating temperatures or may have been heat treated or welded to produce SCC susceptible microstructures. One approach employed to mitigate SCC is continual addition of oxide strengthening or stabilizing elements to a corrosive environment. Another approach utilizes the addition of catalytic elements (such as platinum) to generate hydrogen in a corrosive environment, the hydrogen reducing free oxygen in the water, thereby minimizing its corrosive inducing effects. One problem with this approach is that it requires a commitment by the end user to actively maintain the SCC mitigation strategy. Additionally, it will incur additional operating costs over a component or plant lifetime.
  • Therefore, there remains a need for new approaches to mitigate stress corrosion cracking.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY
  • Disclosed herein are methods for providing resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in a Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material.
  • In one embodiment, the disclosure provides for a method for providing resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in an Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material, the method comprising sensitizing the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to form carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and chromium-depleted zones about the carbide precipitates, and heating the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to a temperature and a time effective to diffuse chromium into a chromium-depleted zone.
  • In another embodiment, the disclosure provides for a method for treating a sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material having carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and a chromium-depleted zone about the carbide precipitates, the method comprising heating the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to a temperature and a time effective to diffuse chromium from a grain matrix of the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material into the chromium-depleted zone, wherein resistance to the intergranular stress corrosion cracking increases relative to the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr in an absence of the heating.
  • The features and advantages of the components and processes disclosed herein can be more readily understood by reference to the following drawings and detailed description, and the examples included therein.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The figures below, wherein like elements are numbered alike, are for illustrative purposes.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a process for improving an alloy material's resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the absence of chromium-rich carbides at grain boundaries in an 800H alloy after a solution anneal heat treatment.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates chromium-rich carbide precipitated at the grain boundaries in an 8001-1 alloy after a sensitization heat treatment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • She present disclosure generally relates to a method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels, specifically Fe-base, Fe—Ni base or Ni-base alloys, such as those used in high temperature and pressure aqueous environments. More particularly, it relates to preventing intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) in austenitic solid solution strengthened 800 and 300 series of alloys. In contrast to the prior art, the disclosed method includes sensitizing the alloy component to form chromium carbide precipitates at the grain boundaries then extending the heat treatment time to allow diffusion of the chromium into the chromium depleted zones that resulted from sensitization. In the specific case of the 800 series of alloys the material may be left in a sensitized condition while in austenitic stainless steels the extended heat treatment will be required to recover the chromium composition at the grain boundaries. The chromium carbide precipitates, which are globular or lamellar in nature, in combination with the diffusion of chromium into the chromium-depleted zones provide enhanced resistance to IGSCC.
  • In another embodiment, an alloy component that has been sensitized can be exposed to a heat treatment process that causes diffusion of chromium into the chromium-depleted zones that resulted from sensitization. As noted above, the sensitized alloy component includes chromium-rich carbide precipitates at about the grain boundaries. In this manner, the alloy component undergoes a self-healing process.
  • As used herein, solution strengthened stainless steel is given its ordinary meaning and generally refers to a heat treatment process in which an alloy is heated to a suitable temperature, held at that temperature long enough to cause secondary phases to undergo solid state dissolve and result in one or more of the constituent elements of those phases to enter into the matrix phase solid solution, and then cooled rapidly enough to hold these constituents in solution or to ensure that secondary phases do not re-precipitate. In this condition, microstructures are formed that are generally comprised of primary carbides dispersed in a single-phase matrix with essentially clean grain boundaries. In addition, the terms “first”, “second”, and the like do not denote any order or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another, and the terms “the”, “a”, and “an” do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). Furthermore, all ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints and independently combinable.
  • In one embodiment, the process comprises sensitizing an alloy component followed by continued heating of the component after sensitization of an alloy material. As discussed above, sensitization can cause precipitation of chromium carbides at the grain boundaries. The precipitation of these carbides depletes the adjacent grain boundary regions of chromium to an extent that they are no longer corrosion resistant. Sensitization is caused by the formation of chromium carbides about the grain boundaries. The Cr-rich precipitate draws chromium from the adjacent matrix, which results in the formation of a chromium-depleted zone. If the chromium content is below 11-12 atomic percent in the chromium-depleted zone, the stainless steel is said to be sensitized.
  • As a result, the components would normally be susceptible to intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). However, continued heating of the component having chromium-depleted zones at the grain boundaries is effective to diffuse chromium within the matrix into the chromium depleted zones. In one embodiment, the component having chromium-depleted zones is heated at about 450 to about 700° C. for a period of time effective to cause chromium from the matrix to diffuse down the chromium composition gradient caused by sensitization and replenish the depleted zone along the boundary, restoring the metal's corrosion properties. The presence of intergranular chromium-rich carbides at the grain boundaries has been found, by the present disclosure, to provide enhanced resistance to IGSCC. More importantly, for some higher chromium Fe—Ni base alloys, such as the 800 series family of super stainless steels, the presence of chromium-rich carbides alone imparts an enhanced resistance to IGSCC growth. Thus, the present disclosure is generally directed to a heat treatment process designed to impart IGSCC resistance by first sensitizing the metal and then letting it self-heal. The resulting alloy material is IGSCC resistant to intergranular SCC promoting environments and under static or dynamic mechanical loading.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, the alloy material is an austenitic solid solution strengthened super stainless steel similar to the composition range of the 800 series of alloys. Austenitic stainless steels are generally characterized by high ductility, relativity low yield stress and ultimate tensile strengths, when in the annealed or solution annealed conditions, cold work will dramatically increase the tensile properties. A typical low carbon steel on cooling transforms from austenite to either a mixture of ferrite and iron carbide (Fe3C). With austenitic stainless steel, the high chromium and nickel content suppress this transformation keeping the material essentially austenite on cooling.
  • Austenitic steels are classified in three groups, the AISA 200 series (alloys of iron-chromium-nickel-manganese), the AISA 300 series (alloys of iron-chromium-nickel), and nitrogen-strengthened alloys. The carbon content varies dependent on the series (generally 0.15% or less carbon) and in the 300 series is dependent on whether the alloy is an L-grade, low carbon concentration (0.03% or less), or of a nominal composition (0.08% or less). These alloy have a range of compositions but generally contain a minimum of 16% chromium with sufficient nickel and manganese to provide a stable austenitic structure at temperatures below the martensite start (Ms) temperature. Nitrogen-strengthened austenitic stainless steels are alloys of chromium-manganese-nitrogen; some grades also contain nickel. Austenitic stainless steels are generally used for corrosive or cryogenic environments where corrosion resistance and toughness are the primary requirements. Typical applications include shafts, pumps, fasteners, and piping in seawater and equipment for processing chemicals, food, and dairy products. Another classification, more relevant to this disclosure, is that of austenitic ‘super stainless’ steels that are mid-way between austenitic stainless steels and Fe—Ni base superalloys. These materials, represented by the alloy 800 series, are characterized by; much higher nickel and chromium contents, higher carbon levels, and intentional additions of small amounts of titanium and aluminum.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, the alloy material has a composition of 18-30% chromium, 8-80% nickel, and lesser alloying additions of carbon, nitrogen, molybdenum, niobium, titanium, and manganese.
  • Suitable austenitic alloys include, but are not meant to be limited to, the super stainless steels represented by the 800 series (19.0-23 wt % Cr, 30-35 wt % Ni, 0.15-0.6 wt % Al, 0.15-0.6 wt % Ti, and 10 wt % C max) and those of the 300 series such as stainless steel grade 304 (18-20% Cr and 8-12% Ni), 316 (16-18% Cr, 10-14% Ni, and 2-3% Mo), 316 Ti (316 with Titanium added), 320 (Same as 316 Ti), 321 (17-19% Cr, 9-12% Ni, and Titanium), 347 (17-19% Cr, 9-13% Ni, and Niobium), 308 (19-22% Cr, 9-11% Ni), 309 (22-24% Cr, 12-15% Ni), 310 (24-26% Cr, 19-22% Ni), 904L (20% Cr, 25% Ni, 4.5% Mo) and the like. Other alloying elements may include vanadium (V), aluminum (Al), tungsten (W), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), nitrogen (N), and carbon (C). The number of grades is therefore seemingly infinite, with a large number of standard compositions to which manufacturers add variants depending on the particular application. For the purposes or this disclosure, stainless steel grades with chromium concentrations below 16 wt % are not applicable, due to the fact that lower chromium concentrations will not provide adequate overall corrosion resistance for the intended applications due to the nature of a protective Cr oxide layer formed and the reduction of Cr in the alloy matrix due to the precipitation of Cr-rich intergranular carbides.
  • The alloys can be produced via various process paths such as for example casting, powder metallurgy or cast/wrought metallurgy. Alloy constituents can be melted using any conventional melt process such as air melting, Argon Oxygen Deoxidation (AOD), Ladle Refining, Vacuum Induction Melting (VIM), Vacuum Arc Re-Melting (VAR), Electro Slag Re-Melting (ESR), etc.
  • The alloy may then be homogenized prior to hot working or it may be heated and directly hot worked. If homogenization is used, it may be carried out by heating the alloy to a metal temperature in the range of about 1100° C. to about 1400° C. for a period of time of at least eight hours to dissolve soluble elements and carbides and to also homogenize the structure. A suitable time is eight hours or more in the homogenization metal temperature range. Normally, the soak time at the homogenization temperature does not have to extend for more than seventy-two hours. After homogenization, the alloy is typically hot worked. The alloy can be hot worked by, but not limited to: hot rolling, hot forging, or hot extrusion or any combinations thereof to yield the desired size and shape. This process is followed by delivery of the alloy product to a customer for final manufacture of a component part and appropriate heat treating and finishing. Typically the customer will form the alloy into a desired shape. Heat treatment, warm work, or cold work separately or in various combinations may be employed to obtain the tensile properties and fracture toughness desired.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the grain boundaries in an austenitic super stainless steel in the solution annealed condition. In step 10, prior to the sensitization and heat treatment process of the disclosure, the interfaces 12 of several grains of a polycrystalline alloy material are shown that exhibit essentially clean grain boundaries, wherein chromium carbide precipitation has not yet occurred. In step 20, the steel alloy material is first exposed to a sensitization process, wherein the steel alloy material has been heated and cooled at rates and conditions such that chromium carbide precipitates 22 are formed at the grain boundary interfaces. The formation of the chromium carbide precipitates results in a chromium-depleted zone 24 about the chromium carbide precipitates. In an exemplary embodiment, the chromium carbide precipitate 22 is Cr23C6 and may further include, Mo, V, W, Nb, Ta, B, and combinations thereof. Dependent on the alloy in question in step 30, the steel alloy may next be subjected to a heat treatment process that permits chromium diffusion into the chromium-depleted zone 24. The heat treatment process may be independently performed or may be integrated with a process that results in sensitization, i.e., formation of chromium carbides at the grain boundary interfaces. Subsequent thermal exposure; heat treatment, operation, or processing of the component drives the diffusion of chromium down the Cr composition gradient generated by the precipitation and growth of chromium carbides and restores the material's corrosion resistance properties. The presence of intergranular carbides 22 with the diffused chromium at the interfaces provides resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
  • The heating source can be any method capable of replenishing the chromium-depleted zone as described above. In one embodiment, the heating source can be a gas or electric furnace, inductive, infrared, molten salt or metal baths, or laser. In another embodiment the heat source can be localized to specific areas of a component using the methods described above or may occur as a consequence of manufacturing, welding or heat treatment or during component operation in an elevated temperature environment.
  • The use of extended time heat treatments to achieve IGSCC resistant grain boundary chemistries that are corrosion resistant provides an economical path to preventing IGSCC. Heat treatment is a relatively inexpensive process compared with specifying a specialty-grade alloy or with a post-assembly heat treatment. This disclosure will provide a significant material and labor cost savings while providing superior lifetimes on gasification products. In addition, the disclosed heat treatment process will be of benefit, for example, to any business that requires IGSCC resistance of austenitic alloys used in structural components for gasification, nuclear, water, and oil and gas industries, among others.
  • The following examples fall within the scope of, and serve to exemplify, the more generally described methods set forth above. The examples are presented for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • In one example, sensitization properties of alloy 800H were studied. IGSCC tests on sensitized samples confirmed IGSCC resistance. Duplicate testing was performed on alloy 800H comprising sensitization, carbide precipitation, and subsequent heat treatment according to the process of this disclosure. Sensitization was detected using ASTM A262 Practice C boiling nitric acid (or ‘Huey’) test and confirmed by measuring the chromium concentration of the regions adjacent to the grain boundaries using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). In more conclusive proof of the efficacy of this disclosure the IGSCC growth rate was measured in a high temperature (288° C.) and pressure (1500 psig) aqueous environment in alloy 800H heat treated to precipitate intergranular M23C6 carbides. The mechanical test conditions used for the test were designed to induce IGSCC in austenitic metals over a wide range in chemical compositions. Test results from the sensitization heat treated material showed extremely low IGSCC growth rates (1×10−9 mm/s) that indicate a very low probability for sustained SCC growth. This is in comparison with IGSCC growth rate of above 1×10−7 mm/s for typical sensitized materials tested under similar conditions.
  • This written description uses examples to disclose the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.

Claims (18)

1. A method for providing resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in an Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material, the method comprising:
sensitizing the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material with a heat treatment to form carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and chromium-depleted zones about the carbide precipitates; and
extending the heat treatment of the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material for a time effective to allow diffusion of chromium into a chromium-depleted zone;
wherein the carbide precipitates, in combination with the diffusion of chromium into the chromium depleted zones provide resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material comprises at least 16% chromium.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein sensitizing and the heat treatment of the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material is at a temperature from about 450° C. to 700° C.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein sensitizing the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material comprises a welding process.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the carbide precipitates comprise chromium.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the carbide precipitates are of the formula Cr23C6, Cr7C3 and combinations thereof.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the carbide precipitates further comprise Mo, V, W, Ti, Nb, Ta, Hf, and combinations thereof.
8-10. (canceled)
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the heat treatment is extended for a period of time in a range of about 10 to about 3000 hours.
12-14. (canceled)
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the alloy material comprises a 800 series or 300 series stainless steel.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the alloy material further comprises one or more additional alloying elements.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the one or more additional alloying elements comprise vanadium, aluminum, tungsten, cobalt, copper, nitrogen, carbon and combinations of these.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the method provides the alloy material with resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
19. A method for providing resistance to stress corrosion cracking in a sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material having carbide precipitates at grain boundary interfaces and a chromium depleted zone about the carbide precipitates, the method comprising:
Heating the sensitized Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material to a temperature and a time effective to diffuse chromium from a grain matrix of the Fe—Ni—Cr alloy material into the chromium depleted zone, wherein the carbide precipitates, in combination with the diffusion of chromium into the chromium depleted zones provide resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the alloy material is an 800 series alloy.
21. (canceled)
22. (canceled)
US12/047,471 2008-03-13 2008-03-13 Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels Abandoned US20090229714A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/047,471 US20090229714A1 (en) 2008-03-13 2008-03-13 Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels
EP09154817A EP2100977A1 (en) 2008-03-13 2009-03-11 Method of increasing resistance to stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels
CN200910127528A CN101532075A (en) 2008-03-13 2009-03-12 Method of increasing resistance to stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/047,471 US20090229714A1 (en) 2008-03-13 2008-03-13 Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090229714A1 true US20090229714A1 (en) 2009-09-17

Family

ID=40793305

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/047,471 Abandoned US20090229714A1 (en) 2008-03-13 2008-03-13 Method of mitigating stress corrosion cracking in austenitic solid solution strengthened stainless steels

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20090229714A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2100977A1 (en)
CN (1) CN101532075A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110566293A (en) * 2018-06-06 2019-12-13 曼恩能源方案有限公司 Fracture protection device for turbomachinery

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101603455B1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-03-14 유오피 엘엘씨 Process and apparatus for treating hydrocarbon streams
EP3253898A4 (en) * 2015-02-06 2018-07-11 Atomic Energy of Canada Limited/ Énergie Atomique du Canada Limitée Nickel-chromium-iron alloys with improved resistance to stress corrosion cracking in nuclear environments
CN110195152A (en) * 2019-06-11 2019-09-03 河南神州精工制造股份有限公司 A method of improving austenitic stainless steel anti intercrystalline corrosion ability

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4168994A (en) * 1978-11-13 1979-09-25 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Thermal homogenization of steam generating tubing
US4239556A (en) * 1978-12-22 1980-12-16 General Electric Company Sensitized stainless steel having integral normalized surface region
US4877461A (en) * 1988-09-09 1989-10-31 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-base alloy
US5017249A (en) * 1988-09-09 1991-05-21 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-base alloy
US5022936A (en) * 1988-12-07 1991-06-11 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for improving property of weld of austenitic stainless steel
US5583900A (en) * 1993-03-18 1996-12-10 Hitachi, Ltd. Structural member having superior resistance to neutron irradiation embrittlement, austenitic steel for use in same, and use thereof
US5717193A (en) * 1994-03-24 1998-02-10 Marcelo; Ruben V. Method and apparatus for determining the exponential powers of "i"
US6391173B1 (en) * 1999-10-25 2002-05-21 General Electric Company Electrochemical corrosion potential sensor
US6548178B2 (en) * 2001-01-29 2003-04-15 General Electric Company Method of reducing corrosion potential and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility in nickel-base alloys
US6697449B2 (en) * 1997-11-28 2004-02-24 General Electric Company Temperature-based method for controlling the amount of metal applied to metal oxide surfaces to reduce corrosion and stress corrosion cracking
US6724854B1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-04-20 General Electric Company Process to mitigate stress corrosion cracking of structural materials in high temperature water

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5469516A (en) * 1977-11-14 1979-06-04 Hitachi Ltd Heat treating method for austenitic stainless steel to prevent stress corrosion cracking
JPS60197816A (en) * 1984-03-19 1985-10-07 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Heat treatment of stainless cast steel

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4168994A (en) * 1978-11-13 1979-09-25 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Thermal homogenization of steam generating tubing
US4239556A (en) * 1978-12-22 1980-12-16 General Electric Company Sensitized stainless steel having integral normalized surface region
US4877461A (en) * 1988-09-09 1989-10-31 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-base alloy
US5017249A (en) * 1988-09-09 1991-05-21 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-base alloy
US5022936A (en) * 1988-12-07 1991-06-11 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for improving property of weld of austenitic stainless steel
US5583900A (en) * 1993-03-18 1996-12-10 Hitachi, Ltd. Structural member having superior resistance to neutron irradiation embrittlement, austenitic steel for use in same, and use thereof
US5717193A (en) * 1994-03-24 1998-02-10 Marcelo; Ruben V. Method and apparatus for determining the exponential powers of "i"
US6697449B2 (en) * 1997-11-28 2004-02-24 General Electric Company Temperature-based method for controlling the amount of metal applied to metal oxide surfaces to reduce corrosion and stress corrosion cracking
US6391173B1 (en) * 1999-10-25 2002-05-21 General Electric Company Electrochemical corrosion potential sensor
US6548178B2 (en) * 2001-01-29 2003-04-15 General Electric Company Method of reducing corrosion potential and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility in nickel-base alloys
US6724854B1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-04-20 General Electric Company Process to mitigate stress corrosion cracking of structural materials in high temperature water

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110566293A (en) * 2018-06-06 2019-12-13 曼恩能源方案有限公司 Fracture protection device for turbomachinery

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2100977A1 (en) 2009-09-16
CN101532075A (en) 2009-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10570469B2 (en) Methods for processing alloys
Kwok et al. Effect of laser surface melting on intergranular corrosion behaviour of aged austenitic and duplex stainless steels
Mortezaie et al. An assessment of microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of dissimilar welds between Inconel 718 and 310S austenitic stainless steel
EP3760753B1 (en) Austenitic stainless steel weld joint
Hao et al. The aging precipitation behavior of 20Cr-24Ni-6Mo super-austenitic stainless steel processed by conventional casting and twin-roll strip casting
EP3026138A1 (en) High-strength steel material for oil well use, and oil well pipe
WO2012074026A1 (en) Precipitation-strengthened ni-based heat-resistant alloy and method for producing the same
JP2009161802A (en) Highly corrosion-resistant austenitic stainless steel, nuclear power generation plant constructed by using the stainless steel, weld joint and structural member
JP4995131B2 (en) Ferritic heat-resistant steel and heat-resistant structure with excellent creep characteristics in weld heat-affected zone
EP2100977A1 (en) Method of increasing resistance to stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels
JP4062190B2 (en) Austenitic stainless steel pipe for nuclear power
Bhanu et al. Electron beam welding of P91 steel and incoloy 800HT and their microstructural studies for advanced ultra super critical (AUSC) power plants
Steigerwald The effects of metallic second phases in stainless steels
Elsabbagh et al. On microstructure and microhardness of isothermally aged UNS S32760 and the effect on toughness and corrosion behavior
Kim et al. Effect of serrated grain boundary on stress corrosion cracking of alloy 600
Fritz Heat treating of austenitic and duplex stainless steels
Roychowdhury et al. σ-Phase induced embrittlement in titanium containing austenitic stainless steel tie-bars in a condenser
JP6347408B2 (en) High strength Ni-base alloy
Gupta et al. Dissimilar welding of austenitic and ferritic steels using nickel and stainless-steel filler: Associated issues
Panneer Selvi et al. Microstructure and tensile properties of dissimilar weld joint between alloy 800 and buttered grade 91
Fritz Effects of metallurgical variables on the corrosion of stainless steels
Saldanha et al. Effect of silicon on the corrosion resistance of iron in sulfuric acid
Chan et al. Laser surface melting (LSM) of stainless steels for mitigating intergranular corrosion (IGC)
Pearce et al. Factors influencing the microstructure and corrosion resistance of austenitic and duplex stainless steel castings
Shoemaker et al. Processing and fabricating alloy 825 for optimized properties and corrosion resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MORA, MARTIN MATHEW;AVAGLIANO, AARON JOHN;CHEN, WEI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020647/0599;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080116 TO 20080215

AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SCRIVENOR'S ERROR ON ASSIGNOR'S LAST NAME MARTIN MATHEW "MORA" TO THE CORRECT SPELLING OF "MORRA" PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 020647 FRAME 0599;ASSIGNORS:MORRA, MARTIN MATHEW;AVAGLIANO, AARON JOHN;CHEN, WEI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022002/0495;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080116 TO 20080215

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION