US20090070664A1 - Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents - Google Patents

Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090070664A1
US20090070664A1 US12/198,203 US19820308A US2009070664A1 US 20090070664 A1 US20090070664 A1 US 20090070664A1 US 19820308 A US19820308 A US 19820308A US 2009070664 A1 US2009070664 A1 US 2009070664A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
document
content
redacted
information
objects
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/198,203
Inventor
Mark Gavin
Roger Dunn
Virginia M. Gavin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
APPLIGENT Inc
Original Assignee
APPLIGENT Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by APPLIGENT Inc filed Critical APPLIGENT Inc
Priority to US12/198,203 priority Critical patent/US20090070664A1/en
Publication of US20090070664A1 publication Critical patent/US20090070664A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/166Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
    • G06F40/169Annotation, e.g. comment data or footnotes

Definitions

  • This invention relates to computer programs for redaction of material from documents stored as electronic files.
  • TIFF tag image file format
  • TIFF files are associated with a variety of disadvantages, particularly when compared with the portable document format (PDF) files in the format developed by Adobe Systems, Inc.
  • PDF portable document format
  • designers have great flexibility in creating tags, which results in certain applications not being able to read all TIFF files.
  • More recent versions of TIFF are not interchangeable with older versions.
  • TIFF files for the same document are much larger than comparable PDF files.
  • the overlays of opaque blocks of color ordinarily saved separately from the document pages, causes a delay when a document is opened while the overlays are placed by software on the page.
  • custom programming and system integration is required for the TIFF programs to be operational, because not all applications are compatible with TIFF files.
  • the overlays of blocks of color are not properly embedded in the document, it is possible for the overlays to be removed.
  • the software packages that are commercially available for redaction of TIFF files are only available for certain operating systems, and do not operate on a variety of platform. For example, such systems are not compatible with both systems that operate on Windows PC's and Macintosh PC's.
  • the opaque blocks of color tend to be very large. This can render printing of the documents to be problematic.
  • a method includes the steps of selecting a geometric area on the document for redaction and representing the geometric area as one or more objects.
  • the information in the document representing material to be reviewed, such as text and images, is then represented as a series of geometric locations and codes and stored as one or more objects.
  • the objects representing the geometric area and the objects representing the document information are then compared.
  • An output is created in which the document information is replaced where the geometric location of the geometric areas corresponds to the geometric location of the document information. The resulting output does not contain any of the removed information.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a computer system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a sample screen illustrating a step in a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating steps and a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is also a sample screen illustrating a step in a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a sample screen illustrating a document redacted according to the invention.
  • Computer system 10 has a central processing unit 15 , a display 20 , inputs 25 , and a storage device 30 .
  • Central processing unit 15 may be any one of numerous conventional microprocessors, such as the Intel Pentium processor or various Motorola processors employed in Macintosh personal computers.
  • Display 20 may be a CRT, LCD, or other display device.
  • Inputs 25 are conventionally a keyboard and a mouse, although other input devices may be employed.
  • Storage device 30 may include any storage medium on which a computer program may be stored, including without limitation hard drive, floppy drives, tapes, and the like. Of course, storage device 30 may be accessed over a communications link or network.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a display 20 during a step while a program according to the invention stored on a storage device is running on CPU 15 .
  • a program for the display and manipulation of portable document format (PDF) files is loaded from memory and begins running on the CPU.
  • the PDF display program may be Adobe Acrobat, for example.
  • the user opens the PDF file containing the document to be redacted.
  • a redaction program according to the invention is then loaded and begins running.
  • the user has an option of drawing a geometric shape to start the selection process.
  • document 40 is displayed on display 20 .
  • the redaction program displays a rectangle 45 superimposed over a portion of document 40 .
  • the user may manipulate the size and location of rectangle 45 by suitable features in the software, such as movement of a cursor 50 using a mouse or other input device.
  • the rectangle may also be referred to as a box or a frame. In principle, other geometric shapes may be employed.
  • the user may select a particular size and location for rectangle 45 at any time.
  • the redaction program stores an object in memory having geographic information representing the location of the borders of rectangle 45 on document 40 .
  • This step is indicated by block 300 .
  • the format of the geographic information is a series of coordinate points relative to the PDF page drawing coordinate system.
  • the objects may also contain information selected by a user employing a menu or other options embodied in the redaction program. Such information may include codes identifying the nature of the redaction, or comments associated with the redaction.
  • FIG. 4 An example of the display of such codes is shown in FIG. 4 .
  • document 40 is shown with several boxes 45 representing geographic areas to be redacted.
  • codes 50 such as (j)( 2 ), (k)( 1 ), and the like, are shown associated with boxes 45 .
  • the content, both text and images, within the boxes, is also visible.
  • the objects are stored in association with the document file.
  • the annotations may be viewed in combination with the file. In this manner, a first line reviewer may create annotations for review and ready change by a manager.
  • a preliminary step is the translation from the geometric space occupied by the rectangles, as reflected in the stored annotations, to the layout of the textual content of the PDF format document.
  • the first step in the translation is the creation of a model of the content, as shown by the box labeled 305 .
  • the model is created by parsing the PDF stream.
  • the instructions, or information that relate to the text and images and the geographic location of the text and images are identified and stored. For text, these instructions include those that relate to font selection, font size, the transformation matrix through which individual characters are drawn, character and word spacing, escaped characters, and the tokens that cause text to be emitted.
  • the resulting model represents the text as a list of objects describing each occurrence of text using font characteristics and geometric parameters.
  • the model is stored in a convenient memory location.
  • the objects will be referred to as text occurrence objects.
  • image information is modeled as a list of objects describing each image.
  • the objects with image information may be referred to as image occurrence objects.
  • Text occurrence objects and image occurrence objects may also be referred to more generally as content objects.
  • Information regarding text and images in a particular geographic location on the displayed document may be dispersed in a PDF stream.
  • the creation of the model places the information in proximity in a document.
  • the content objects are then compared to the annotation objects. For text occurrence objects, in the comparison process, geometric intersections identified, as indicated by the box labeled 310 . It will be understood that text associated with geometric intersections is to be redacted.
  • the program can create an output file. For text that is not identified as corresponding to an annotation object, the text object is reproduced in the output file. As text to be redacted is identified, the text is replaced in an output file with appropriate material, as indicated by the block labeled 315 . The replacing material may be exemption codes, hyphens, or other material selected by the user.
  • the output file is also in the form of objects.
  • the output file comprises a geometric representation as a series of objects of the textual content, with those portions to be redacted removed. The redacted text is never contained in the output file that constitutes the newly-created document.
  • the program carries out the redaction on a pixel-by-pixel basis. All pixels that have been identified as to be redacted are replaced. For example, all pixels to be redacted may be changed to solid black. The redacted image information is therefore never contained in the output file where the newly-created document is found.
  • the program will insert additional characters in the output file for text to assure that the original width is maintained.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a displayed redacted document 20 . Selected portions of an image have been replaced by all black pixels at 55 . Selected portions of the text have been replaced by hyphens, as shown at 60 .
  • the resulting document no longer contains any of the redacted information, as the redacted information was removed in the creation of the document.
  • Batch annotation and redaction of documents is useful for certain users.
  • Federal government agencies may have lists of keywords that are ordinarily redacted.
  • the method of the invention may include batch annotation and redaction.
  • the user is provided with the option of identifying words that are to be redacted.
  • the method then reviews a selected document in portable document format and creates annotations corresponding to each identified occurrence of the identified word.
  • the PDF file is parsed and converted into text occurrence objects as described above.
  • the program checks the text occurrence objects against the list of identified words.
  • An annotation object is created coinciding with the geometric position of the word as shown in the text occurrence object.
  • the annotation object can be stored in association with the PDF file. Each occurrence of each of the selected words is thereby designated for redaction.
  • the annotation object can then be considered a candidate annotation for review by a human reviewer.
  • each annotation can be associated with each annotation.
  • the name of the reviewer may be included.
  • Displays may include different colors for different reviewers.
  • the computer programs in accordance with the invention may be stored and distributed in any suitable storage medium, such as fixed disk, portable diskettes, and CD-ROM or other read-only memories. Also, methods described as being carried out in software running on general-purpose computer hardware may be implemented in hardware.

Abstract

A method of redacting content from a document in electronic form includes the steps of selecting a geometric area on the document for redaction, representing the selected geometric area as one or more annotation objects, identifying information in the document representing content and location and nature of content, representing the identified information as one or more content objects, identifying content having the same geometric location as the annotation objects and creating a file with the identified content removed to produce a redacted document.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/215,804 filed Dec. 18, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. ______ the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to computer programs for redaction of material from documents stored as electronic files.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • For a variety of reasons, documents must be presented in their original format, with certain material, such as text or illustrations, redacted. For example, in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, U.S. Government agencies must release certain documents. Often, these documents contain information which is exempt from disclosure under FOIA. The documents themselves are released in their original format, but the material that is exempt from disclosure must be removed. In other situations, such as in litigation, counsel may wish to provide a document in response to a discovery request, but remove privileged portions of the document.
  • Traditionally, the primary method of redacting information from documents was to take a physical copy of the document, and cover over the text and images to be redacted. Covering would be done manually with tools such as a black marker, a grease pencil, or strips of opaque tape. This process is slow and labor intensive. Also, on review of the redacted document, if the reviewer determines that information which is required to be disclosed has been redacted, it is difficult to correct such errors. Once the process is completed, the document can be photocopied and a photocopy furnished to the requester. Many U.S. Government agencies have been placing such documents on World Wide Web servers to make the documents available over the Internet. The documents must be scanned before being placed on the Web server.
  • Methods have been developed to perform redaction of electronic documents. Typically, these methods operate on tag image file format (TIFF) files. Conventionally, these products employ overlays of opaque blocks of color to cover information in the TIFF document.
  • A variety of disadvantages are associated with TIFF files, particularly when compared with the portable document format (PDF) files in the format developed by Adobe Systems, Inc. For example, in the TIFF format, designers have great flexibility in creating tags, which results in certain applications not being able to read all TIFF files. More recent versions of TIFF are not interchangeable with older versions. Also TIFF files for the same document are much larger than comparable PDF files. The overlays of opaque blocks of color, ordinarily saved separately from the document pages, causes a delay when a document is opened while the overlays are placed by software on the page. Generally, custom programming and system integration is required for the TIFF programs to be operational, because not all applications are compatible with TIFF files. If the overlays of blocks of color are not properly embedded in the document, it is possible for the overlays to be removed. The software packages that are commercially available for redaction of TIFF files are only available for certain operating systems, and do not operate on a variety of platform. For example, such systems are not compatible with both systems that operate on Windows PC's and Macintosh PC's. Finally, if large portions of the text are removed, the opaque blocks of color tend to be very large. This can render printing of the documents to be problematic.
  • OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the invention to provide a method, a system, and a computer program for convenient identification of portions of a document to be redacted, and for rapid redaction of electronic documents.
  • It is a further object of the invention to provide a method, system, and computer program for redaction of electronic documents that eliminates the risk of unauthorized recovery from the redacted document of the material that was excised.
  • Among the advantages of the invention are that the foregoing objects are achieved.
  • Additional objects and advantages of the invention will become evident from the detailed description of a preferred embodiment, which follows.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A method according to the invention includes the steps of selecting a geometric area on the document for redaction and representing the geometric area as one or more objects. The information in the document representing material to be reviewed, such as text and images, is then represented as a series of geometric locations and codes and stored as one or more objects. The objects representing the geometric area and the objects representing the document information are then compared. An output is created in which the document information is replaced where the geometric location of the geometric areas corresponds to the geometric location of the document information. The resulting output does not contain any of the removed information.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 depicts a computer system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a sample screen illustrating a step in a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating steps and a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is also a sample screen illustrating a step in a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a sample screen illustrating a document redacted according to the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
  • Referring to FIG. 1, there is depicted schematically the principal hardware components of a computer system 10 of a type which may be used in a method and system according to the invention. Computer system 10 has a central processing unit 15, a display 20, inputs 25, and a storage device 30. Central processing unit 15 may be any one of numerous conventional microprocessors, such as the Intel Pentium processor or various Motorola processors employed in Macintosh personal computers. Display 20 may be a CRT, LCD, or other display device. Inputs 25 are conventionally a keyboard and a mouse, although other input devices may be employed. Storage device 30 may include any storage medium on which a computer program may be stored, including without limitation hard drive, floppy drives, tapes, and the like. Of course, storage device 30 may be accessed over a communications link or network.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a display 20 during a step while a program according to the invention stored on a storage device is running on CPU 15. A program for the display and manipulation of portable document format (PDF) files is loaded from memory and begins running on the CPU. The PDF display program may be Adobe Acrobat, for example. The user opens the PDF file containing the document to be redacted. A redaction program according to the invention is then loaded and begins running. The user has an option of drawing a geometric shape to start the selection process. As may be seen in FIG. 2, document 40 is displayed on display 20. The redaction program displays a rectangle 45 superimposed over a portion of document 40. The user may manipulate the size and location of rectangle 45 by suitable features in the software, such as movement of a cursor 50 using a mouse or other input device. The rectangle may also be referred to as a box or a frame. In principle, other geometric shapes may be employed.
  • The user may select a particular size and location for rectangle 45 at any time. When the user does this, the redaction program stores an object in memory having geographic information representing the location of the borders of rectangle 45 on document 40. Referring to FIG. 3, this step is indicated by block 300. The format of the geographic information is a series of coordinate points relative to the PDF page drawing coordinate system. The objects may also contain information selected by a user employing a menu or other options embodied in the redaction program. Such information may include codes identifying the nature of the redaction, or comments associated with the redaction. An example of the display of such codes is shown in FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, document 40 is shown with several boxes 45 representing geographic areas to be redacted. As can be seen, codes 50, such as (j)(2), (k)(1), and the like, are shown associated with boxes 45. For the convenience of the user, the content, both text and images, within the boxes, is also visible. The objects are stored in association with the document file. When another user next opens the document file, the annotations may be viewed in combination with the file. In this manner, a first line reviewer may create annotations for review and ready change by a manager.
  • After any further changes have been made, the next step is the performance of the redaction. A preliminary step is the translation from the geometric space occupied by the rectangles, as reflected in the stored annotations, to the layout of the textual content of the PDF format document. The first step in the translation is the creation of a model of the content, as shown by the box labeled 305. The model is created by parsing the PDF stream. In the parsing process, the instructions, or information that relate to the text and images and the geographic location of the text and images are identified and stored. For text, these instructions include those that relate to font selection, font size, the transformation matrix through which individual characters are drawn, character and word spacing, escaped characters, and the tokens that cause text to be emitted. The resulting model represents the text as a list of objects describing each occurrence of text using font characteristics and geometric parameters. The model is stored in a convenient memory location. The objects will be referred to as text occurrence objects. Similarly, image information is modeled as a list of objects describing each image. The objects with image information may be referred to as image occurrence objects. Text occurrence objects and image occurrence objects may also be referred to more generally as content objects. Information regarding text and images in a particular geographic location on the displayed document may be dispersed in a PDF stream. The creation of the model places the information in proximity in a document.
  • The content objects are then compared to the annotation objects. For text occurrence objects, in the comparison process, geometric intersections identified, as indicated by the box labeled 310. It will be understood that text associated with geometric intersections is to be redacted. The program can create an output file. For text that is not identified as corresponding to an annotation object, the text object is reproduced in the output file. As text to be redacted is identified, the text is replaced in an output file with appropriate material, as indicated by the block labeled 315. The replacing material may be exemption codes, hyphens, or other material selected by the user. The output file is also in the form of objects. The output file comprises a geometric representation as a series of objects of the textual content, with those portions to be redacted removed. The redacted text is never contained in the output file that constitutes the newly-created document.
  • If an image is to be redacted, the program carries out the redaction on a pixel-by-pixel basis. All pixels that have been identified as to be redacted are replaced. For example, all pixels to be redacted may be changed to solid black. The redacted image information is therefore never contained in the output file where the newly-created document is found.
  • As an option, the program will insert additional characters in the output file for text to assure that the original width is maintained.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a displayed redacted document 20. Selected portions of an image have been replaced by all black pixels at 55. Selected portions of the text have been replaced by hyphens, as shown at 60.
  • The resulting document no longer contains any of the redacted information, as the redacted information was removed in the creation of the document.
  • Batch annotation and redaction of documents is useful for certain users. For example, Federal government agencies may have lists of keywords that are ordinarily redacted. The method of the invention may include batch annotation and redaction. The user is provided with the option of identifying words that are to be redacted. The method then reviews a selected document in portable document format and creates annotations corresponding to each identified occurrence of the identified word. In a preferred embodiment, the PDF file is parsed and converted into text occurrence objects as described above. The program checks the text occurrence objects against the list of identified words. An annotation object is created coinciding with the geometric position of the word as shown in the text occurrence object. The annotation object can be stored in association with the PDF file. Each occurrence of each of the selected words is thereby designated for redaction. The annotation object can then be considered a candidate annotation for review by a human reviewer.
  • Through substantially standard techniques, a variety of information can be associated with each annotation. For example, the name of the reviewer, the time and date of creation, codes representing a reason for the exemption, and comments may be included. Displays may include different colors for different reviewers.
  • The program, method and system of the invention have been described above with respect to the redaction of text from a document. However, the program, method and system may be applied to content of other types, such as image information.
  • The computer programs in accordance with the invention may be stored and distributed in any suitable storage medium, such as fixed disk, portable diskettes, and CD-ROM or other read-only memories. Also, methods described as being carried out in software running on general-purpose computer hardware may be implemented in hardware.
  • It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials and arrangements of the programs, methods and systems which have been described and illustrated above in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principle and scope of the invention as recited in the following claims.

Claims (13)

1. A method of redacting content from a document in electronic form, comprising the steps of:
selecting a geometric area on the document for redaction;
representing said geometric area as one or more annotation objects;
identifying information in the document representing content and location and nature of content;
representing said identified information as one or more content objects;
identifying content having the same geometric location as said annotation objects and creating a file with said identified content removed to produce a redacted document.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more items of information are associated with said annotation object.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the content is text.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the redacted text is not found in the redacted document.
5-16. (canceled)
17. A system for redacting content from a document in electronic form, comprising:
means for permitting a user to select a geometric area on the document for redaction;
means for representing said geometric area as one or more annotation objects;
means for identifying information in the document representing content and location and nature of content;
means for representing said identified information as one or more content objects; and
means for identifying content having the same geometric location as said annotation objects and creating a file with said identified content removed to produce a redacted document.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein one or more items of information are associated with said annotation object.
19. The system of claim 17, wherein the content is text.
20. The system of claim 17, wherein the information to be redacted is not found in the redacted document.
21. A system for designating portions of a document for redaction, comprising the steps of:
means for displaying all or a portion of the document;
means for permitting a user to designate a geographic region of the document for redaction; and
means for saving the designations with the document.
22. The system of claim 21, further comprising means for associating one or more codes with each of said designations.
23. The system of claim 21, wherein said means for permitting a user to designate further comprises means for permitting a user to manipulate a frame displayed on the document.
24. The system of claim 21, wherein said means for permitting a user to designate comprises permitting a user to select content for batch designation and means for designating all geographic regions containing said selected content.
US12/198,203 1998-12-18 2008-08-26 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents Abandoned US20090070664A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/198,203 US20090070664A1 (en) 1998-12-18 2008-08-26 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/215,804 US7428701B1 (en) 1998-12-18 1998-12-18 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents
US12/198,203 US20090070664A1 (en) 1998-12-18 2008-08-26 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/215,804 Continuation US7428701B1 (en) 1998-12-18 1998-12-18 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090070664A1 true US20090070664A1 (en) 2009-03-12

Family

ID=39764237

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/215,804 Expired - Fee Related US7428701B1 (en) 1998-12-18 1998-12-18 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents
US12/198,203 Abandoned US20090070664A1 (en) 1998-12-18 2008-08-26 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/215,804 Expired - Fee Related US7428701B1 (en) 1998-12-18 1998-12-18 Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7428701B1 (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030188024A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for a cloaking service for use with a distributed virtual enterprise
US20070030528A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-08 Cataphora, Inc. Method and apparatus to provide a unified redaction system
US20090019379A1 (en) * 2007-07-12 2009-01-15 Pendergast Brian S Document Redaction in a Web-Based Data Analysis and Document Review System
US20110209053A1 (en) * 2005-11-23 2011-08-25 Beyondcore, Inc. Shuffling Documents Containing Restricted Information
US20110283186A1 (en) * 1999-07-23 2011-11-17 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements
DE102013207040A1 (en) * 2013-04-18 2014-10-23 Universität Rostock Transmission and processing of computer-readable data on a computer network
WO2016112377A1 (en) * 2015-01-09 2016-07-14 Intelemage, Llc Systems, methods, and computer program products for processing medical images to address privacy concerns
US20180089459A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2018-03-29 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely displaying digital images
US10127130B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2018-11-13 Salesforce.Com Identifying contributors that explain differences between a data set and a subset of the data set
US10176338B2 (en) 2005-11-23 2019-01-08 Salesforce.Com Secure distributed storage of documents containing restricted information, via the use of keysets
US10453066B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2019-10-22 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Keystroke analysis
US10535093B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2020-01-14 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of session tampering and fraud prevention
US10616201B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2020-04-07 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of sharing information through a tag-based consortium
US10728350B1 (en) 2014-10-14 2020-07-28 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Data structures for intelligently resolving deterministic and probabilistic device identifiers to device profiles and/or groups
US10796232B2 (en) 2011-12-04 2020-10-06 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Explaining differences between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes of a process
US10802687B2 (en) 2011-12-04 2020-10-13 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Displaying differences between different data sets of a process
US10853813B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2020-12-01 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of global identification
US10862889B2 (en) 2012-03-22 2020-12-08 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for persistent cross application mobile device identification
US10902327B1 (en) 2013-08-30 2021-01-26 The 41St Parameter, Inc. System and method for device identification and uniqueness
US10999298B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2021-05-04 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Method and system for identifying users and detecting fraud by use of the internet
US11010468B1 (en) 2012-03-01 2021-05-18 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for fraud containment
US11301860B2 (en) 2012-08-02 2022-04-12 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for accessing records via derivative locators
US11301585B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2022-04-12 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely displaying digital images
US11314838B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2022-04-26 Tapad, Inc. System and method for analyzing user device information
US11803661B1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2023-10-31 Imagesource, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for facilitating data security of documents

Families Citing this family (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7899843B2 (en) * 2003-09-19 2011-03-01 International Business Machines Corporation Expanding the scope of an annotation to an entity level
US20070143700A1 (en) * 2003-10-29 2007-06-21 Tetsuji Fukada Electronic document viewing system
US20050182755A1 (en) * 2004-02-14 2005-08-18 Bao Tran Systems and methods for analyzing documents over a network
US8099660B1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2012-01-17 Google Inc. Tool for managing online content
WO2006041318A1 (en) * 2004-10-14 2006-04-20 Onstream Systems Limited A process for electronic document redaction
JP4761758B2 (en) * 2004-11-19 2011-08-31 東芝メディカルシステムズ株式会社 Medical image diagnostic apparatus, security management system, and security management method
US7650641B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2010-01-19 Microsoft Corporation Lightweight privacy cover for displayed sensitive information
US10853570B2 (en) * 2005-10-06 2020-12-01 TeraDact Solutions, Inc. Redaction engine for electronic documents with multiple types, formats and/or categories
US11769010B2 (en) * 2005-10-06 2023-09-26 Celcorp, Inc. Document management workflow for redacted documents
US10089287B2 (en) 2005-10-06 2018-10-02 TeraDact Solutions, Inc. Redaction with classification and archiving for format independence
US20070174766A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2007-07-26 Microsoft Corporation Hidden document data removal
US7876335B1 (en) 2006-06-02 2011-01-25 Adobe Systems Incorporated Methods and apparatus for redacting content in a document
US8584005B1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2013-11-12 Adobe Systems Incorporated Previewing redaction content in a document
US9805010B2 (en) 2006-06-28 2017-10-31 Adobe Systems Incorporated Methods and apparatus for redacting related content in a document
JP4270240B2 (en) * 2006-08-14 2009-05-27 コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社 Image display device, image display method, and image display program
JP2008310525A (en) * 2007-06-13 2008-12-25 Canon Inc Information processor, information processing method, and information processing program
CN101802840A (en) * 2007-07-30 2010-08-11 微差通信公司 Scan-to-redact searchable documents
US8533078B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2013-09-10 Celcorp, Inc. Virtual redaction service
US10977614B2 (en) * 2008-05-16 2021-04-13 TeraDact Solutions, Inc. Point of scan/copy redaction
US20090323087A1 (en) * 2008-06-30 2009-12-31 Konica Minolta Systems Laboratory, Inc. Systems and Methods for Document Redaction
KR100985074B1 (en) * 2009-02-05 2010-10-04 주식회사 안철수연구소 Malicious code prevention apparatus and method using selective virtualization, and computer-readable medium storing program for method thereof
US10902202B2 (en) * 2009-11-16 2021-01-26 Refinitiv Us Organization Llc Method for system for redacting and presenting documents
US8732569B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2014-05-20 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events
US8788711B2 (en) * 2011-06-14 2014-07-22 Google Inc. Redacting content and inserting hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) error codes in place thereof
US9769285B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2017-09-19 Google Inc. Access to network content
US8745212B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2014-06-03 Google Inc. Access to network content
US8650139B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2014-02-11 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events
US8566696B1 (en) 2011-07-14 2013-10-22 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events
US8744988B1 (en) 2011-07-15 2014-06-03 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events in an internet browser
US8600921B2 (en) 2011-09-15 2013-12-03 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events in a browser using directed graphs
US8655819B1 (en) 2011-09-15 2014-02-18 Google Inc. Predicting user navigation events based on chronological history data
US9104664B1 (en) 2011-10-07 2015-08-11 Google Inc. Access to search results
US9584579B2 (en) 2011-12-01 2017-02-28 Google Inc. Method and system for providing page visibility information
US8793235B2 (en) 2012-01-19 2014-07-29 Google Inc. System and method for improving access to search results
US9946792B2 (en) 2012-05-15 2018-04-17 Google Llc Access to network content
US8875302B2 (en) 2012-05-15 2014-10-28 International Business Machines Corporation Classification of an electronic document
US8887239B1 (en) 2012-08-08 2014-11-11 Google Inc. Access to network content
US9141722B2 (en) 2012-10-02 2015-09-22 Google Inc. Access to network content
US9330166B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2016-05-03 International Business Machines Corporation User-specific search over protected contextual data
RU2656581C2 (en) * 2014-06-24 2018-06-05 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Аби Девелопмент" Editing the content of an electronic document
DK3188036T3 (en) * 2015-12-30 2019-08-12 Legalxtract Aps PROCEDURE AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN EXTRACT DOCUMENT
US10642940B2 (en) 2016-02-05 2020-05-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Configurable access to a document's revision history
JP6797610B2 (en) * 2016-08-31 2020-12-09 キヤノン株式会社 Equipment, methods, and programs
JP6851853B2 (en) * 2017-02-21 2021-03-31 キヤノン株式会社 Expansion of redacting function
US10878186B1 (en) 2017-09-18 2020-12-29 University Of South Florida Content masking attacks against information-based services and defenses thereto
US20200174990A1 (en) * 2018-11-29 2020-06-04 Anthony Turner Pratkanis Accountably Redactable Data Structures
US11562134B2 (en) 2019-04-02 2023-01-24 Genpact Luxembourg S.à r.l. II Method and system for advanced document redaction

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5581682A (en) * 1991-06-28 1996-12-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method for storing and retrieving annotations and redactions in final form documents
US5903646A (en) * 1994-09-02 1999-05-11 Rackman; Michael I. Access control system for litigation document production
US6209095B1 (en) * 1996-12-20 2001-03-27 Financial Services Technology Consortium Method and system for processing electronic documents
US6279013B1 (en) * 1998-07-20 2001-08-21 Xerox Corporation Interactive newspaper
US6457026B1 (en) * 1997-12-22 2002-09-24 Ricoh Company, Ltd. System to facilitate reading a document

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5581682A (en) * 1991-06-28 1996-12-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method for storing and retrieving annotations and redactions in final form documents
US5903646A (en) * 1994-09-02 1999-05-11 Rackman; Michael I. Access control system for litigation document production
US6209095B1 (en) * 1996-12-20 2001-03-27 Financial Services Technology Consortium Method and system for processing electronic documents
US6457026B1 (en) * 1997-12-22 2002-09-24 Ricoh Company, Ltd. System to facilitate reading a document
US6279013B1 (en) * 1998-07-20 2001-08-21 Xerox Corporation Interactive newspaper

Cited By (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8990683B2 (en) * 1999-07-23 2015-03-24 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements
US20110283186A1 (en) * 1999-07-23 2011-11-17 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements
US20030188024A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for a cloaking service for use with a distributed virtual enterprise
US11238456B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2022-02-01 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Keystroke analysis
US10453066B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2019-10-22 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Keystroke analysis
US11683326B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2023-06-20 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Method and system for identifying users and detecting fraud by use of the internet
US10999298B2 (en) 2004-03-02 2021-05-04 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Method and system for identifying users and detecting fraud by use of the internet
US10127130B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2018-11-13 Salesforce.Com Identifying contributors that explain differences between a data set and a subset of the data set
US20070030528A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-08 Cataphora, Inc. Method and apparatus to provide a unified redaction system
US7805673B2 (en) * 2005-07-29 2010-09-28 Der Quaeler Loki Method and apparatus to provide a unified redaction system
US10176338B2 (en) 2005-11-23 2019-01-08 Salesforce.Com Secure distributed storage of documents containing restricted information, via the use of keysets
US20110209053A1 (en) * 2005-11-23 2011-08-25 Beyondcore, Inc. Shuffling Documents Containing Restricted Information
US10726151B2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2020-07-28 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely displaying digital images
US20180089459A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2018-03-29 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely displaying digital images
US11301585B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2022-04-12 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely displaying digital images
US11195225B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2021-12-07 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of session tampering and fraud prevention
US11727471B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2023-08-15 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of session tampering and fraud prevention
US10535093B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2020-01-14 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of session tampering and fraud prevention
US20090019379A1 (en) * 2007-07-12 2009-01-15 Pendergast Brian S Document Redaction in a Web-Based Data Analysis and Document Review System
US11750584B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2023-09-05 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of sharing information through a tag-based consortium
US10616201B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2020-04-07 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of sharing information through a tag-based consortium
US11314838B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2022-04-26 Tapad, Inc. System and method for analyzing user device information
US10802687B2 (en) 2011-12-04 2020-10-13 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Displaying differences between different data sets of a process
US10796232B2 (en) 2011-12-04 2020-10-06 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Explaining differences between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes of a process
US11010468B1 (en) 2012-03-01 2021-05-18 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for fraud containment
US11886575B1 (en) 2012-03-01 2024-01-30 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for fraud containment
US10862889B2 (en) 2012-03-22 2020-12-08 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for persistent cross application mobile device identification
US11683306B2 (en) 2012-03-22 2023-06-20 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Methods and systems for persistent cross-application mobile device identification
US11301860B2 (en) 2012-08-02 2022-04-12 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods for accessing records via derivative locators
US11410179B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2022-08-09 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of global identification
US10853813B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2020-12-01 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of global identification
US11922423B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2024-03-05 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Systems and methods of global identification
DE102013207040A1 (en) * 2013-04-18 2014-10-23 Universität Rostock Transmission and processing of computer-readable data on a computer network
US10902327B1 (en) 2013-08-30 2021-01-26 The 41St Parameter, Inc. System and method for device identification and uniqueness
US11657299B1 (en) 2013-08-30 2023-05-23 The 41St Parameter, Inc. System and method for device identification and uniqueness
US11240326B1 (en) 2014-10-14 2022-02-01 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Data structures for intelligently resolving deterministic and probabilistic device identifiers to device profiles and/or groups
US10728350B1 (en) 2014-10-14 2020-07-28 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Data structures for intelligently resolving deterministic and probabilistic device identifiers to device profiles and/or groups
US11895204B1 (en) 2014-10-14 2024-02-06 The 41St Parameter, Inc. Data structures for intelligently resolving deterministic and probabilistic device identifiers to device profiles and/or groups
WO2016112377A1 (en) * 2015-01-09 2016-07-14 Intelemage, Llc Systems, methods, and computer program products for processing medical images to address privacy concerns
US11803661B1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2023-10-31 Imagesource, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for facilitating data security of documents

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7428701B1 (en) 2008-09-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7428701B1 (en) Method, system and computer program for redaction of material from documents
US8583637B2 (en) Coarse-to-fine navigation through paginated documents retrieved by a text search engine
US5960448A (en) System and method for displaying a graphically enhanced view of a region of a document image in which the enhanced view is correlated with text derived from the document image
US5689718A (en) System and method for processing document information using password protected icons that represent document content
US8179556B2 (en) Masking of text in document reproduction
US5428529A (en) Structured document tags invoking specialized functions
US7712016B2 (en) Method and apparatus for utilizing an object model for managing content regions in an electronic document
US6360236B1 (en) Computer product for integrated document development
US7568154B2 (en) System and method for adaptive document layout via manifold content
JP4290011B2 (en) Viewer device, control method therefor, and program
US20030229857A1 (en) Apparatus, method, and computer program product for document manipulation which embeds information in document data
US20130073942A1 (en) Method, System, and Computer-Readable Medium To Uniformly Render Document Annotation Across Different Comuter Platforms
US7921360B1 (en) Content-restricted editing
US20050183031A1 (en) Document display method and apparatus
JPH11282829A (en) Font sharing system and method, and storage medium storing program to execute the sharing method
KR20050052421A (en) Creative method and active viewing method for a electronic document
Rosenberg et al. Multi-media Document Translation: ODA and the EXPRES Project
JP2001337994A (en) Thumbnail display system and method and recording medium with processing program therefor recorded therein
JP3892626B2 (en) Document processing apparatus and storage medium
JP4542033B2 (en) System and method for providing multiple renditions of document content
US6023269A (en) Image processing system which stores a modified image as an unmodified source image and modifications thereto in separate files
JP2006276912A (en) Device, method, and program for editing document
US7613709B2 (en) System and method for editing operations of a text object model
JP4148029B2 (en) Document processing device
TWI249687B (en) On-line approval method of scalable vector graphics electronic document

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION