US20080314142A1 - Fluid level indication system and technique - Google Patents
Fluid level indication system and technique Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080314142A1 US20080314142A1 US11/767,576 US76757607A US2008314142A1 US 20080314142 A1 US20080314142 A1 US 20080314142A1 US 76757607 A US76757607 A US 76757607A US 2008314142 A1 US2008314142 A1 US 2008314142A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fluid
- versus depth
- temperature versus
- depth profile
- well
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 144
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 17
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 7
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 5
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 238000010795 Steam Flooding Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 4
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009529 body temperature measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008398 formation water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000295 fuel oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010720 hydraulic oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002545 silicone oil Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01K—MEASURING TEMPERATURE; MEASURING QUANTITY OF HEAT; THERMALLY-SENSITIVE ELEMENTS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01K11/00—Measuring temperature based upon physical or chemical changes not covered by groups G01K3/00, G01K5/00, G01K7/00 or G01K9/00
- G01K11/32—Measuring temperature based upon physical or chemical changes not covered by groups G01K3/00, G01K5/00, G01K7/00 or G01K9/00 using changes in transmittance, scattering or luminescence in optical fibres
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/04—Measuring depth or liquid level
- E21B47/047—Liquid level
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/06—Measuring temperature or pressure
- E21B47/07—Temperature
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/10—Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements
- E21B47/103—Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements using thermal measurements
Definitions
- the invention generally relates to a fluid level indication system and technique.
- the depths of the interfaces between the fluid levels are determined using pressure measurements.
- one approach involves using a single pressure sensor, which makes a series of pressure measurements at multiple depths. The measured pressure is plotted against the depth.
- the pressure gradient is constant and proportional to the density of the fluid.
- the depths of the fluid layer interfaces, or boundaries, are identified by the intersections of the pressure gradient lines.
- the above-described technique of identifying the interface depths using a pressure sensor typically works well when carried out in an intervention in the well using, for example, a wireline-deployed tool.
- an array of pressure sensors may be placed across the gas, oil and water layers.
- the pressure gradients may be plotted and the analysis that is set forth above may be applied. If the depths of the interfaces change over time, a large number of pressure sensors may be required to accurately assess the interface depths. A large number of pressure sensors may also be required if the initial positions of the interfaces are unknown or uncertain.
- several challenges may arise with the use of a large number of pressure sensors, such as challenges related to compensating the pressure readings for sensor offset and drift.
- the cost of an array of pressure sensors can be high and prohibitive.
- DTS Downhole distributed temperature sensing
- DTS may be used to identify the permeable zones in a water injector well where injected fluid enters the formation.
- the permeable zones typically cannot be identified by DTS during normal injection.
- a heated “slug” may be created.
- the hot slug may be tracked versus time using the DTS measurements to identify the permeable zones.
- a technique that is usable with a well includes disposing a distributed temperature sensor in a conduit that traverses a region of the well.
- the region contains at least two different well fluid layers.
- the technique includes circulating a fluid through the conduit and using the distributed temperature sensor to observe at least one a temperature versus depth profile of the fluid. Based on the observation, the depth of a boundary of at least one of the well fluid layers is determined.
- a system that is usable with a well includes a distributed temperature sensor subsystem, a tubing and a pump.
- a distributed temperature sensor of the distributed temperature sensor subsystem is disposed in the tubing, and the tubing traverses a region of the well, which contains at least two different well fluid layers.
- the pump circulates a fluid through the tubing; and the distributed temperature subsystem observes at least one temperature versus depth profile of the fluid such that said at least one temperature versus depth profile indicates the depth of a boundary of at least one of the well fluid layers.
- a system in yet another embodiment, includes a tubing, a pump and a subsystem.
- the tubing traverses a region of a container, which contains at least two different fluid layers, and a distributed temperature subsystem is disposed in the tubing.
- the pump circulates a fluid through the tubing, and the subsystem observes a temperature versus depth profile of the fluid such that the temperature versus depth profile indicates a characteristic associated with at least one of the fluid layers.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram generally depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a characteristic of at least one well fluid layer according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a well according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to identify a characteristic of at least one well fluid layer based on temperature relaxation according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 are illustrations of temperature versus depth profiles obtained by the distributed temperature sensor at different times according to different embodiments of the invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a depth of a boundary of at least one well fluid layer using a steady state temperature measurement technique according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to identify a depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary using a combination of distributed temperature sensing and different flow rates according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a combination of relaxation and steady state distributed temperature sensing techniques to identify a depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a characteristic of at least one fluid layer that is present in a container according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the depths of different well fluid layer interfaces are determined using one or more distributed temperature sensing (DTS) measurements.
- DTS distributed temperature sensing
- Each DTS measurement reveals a temperature versus depth distribution, or profile, of a fluid that is contained in a conduit (pipe, tubing, or control line, as just a few examples of a “conduit”) that traverses the well fluid layers of interest.
- the temperature versus depth profile indicates the interface depths.
- the DTS measurements may be conducted in connection with two different types of tests: 1.) a first test (called a “relaxation test” herein) in which the measured temperature versus depth profile is used to observe the fluid's temperature relaxation after circulation of the fluid in the conduit has been halted; and 2.) a second test (called a “steady state test” herein) in which the temperature versus depth profile is used to observe the fluid's steady state temperature while the fluid is being continuously circulated in the conduit.
- the relaxation temperature versus depth profile and the steady state temperature versus depth profile each reveals the locations (i.e., depths) of the well fluid interfaces, as further described below.
- FIG. 1 depicts a technique 10 that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
- a distributed temperature sensor is deployed (block 14 ) in a conduit that traverses a region of interest of a well, and fluid is communicated through the conduit, as depicted in block 18 .
- the distributed temperature sensor is used to observe (block 22 ) the temperature versus depth profile of the fluid; and based on the observed temperature profile, the depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary in the region of interest may be identified, pursuant to block 26 .
- FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary well 50 , which uses a DTS-based system 100 (Sensa's DTS-800 system, for example) in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
- the well 50 includes a downhole DTS subsystem, which includes a distributed temperature sensor 87 (an optical fiber, for example) that is disposed in a conduit 80 (a control line, as an example).
- the distributed temperature sensor 87 may be placed inside a small control line (not depicted in FIG. 2 ), which extends downhole inside the conduit 80 .
- the small control line may be filled with an inert gas (nitrogen, for example) or fluid (silicone oil, for example) for purposes of protecting the distributed temperature sensor 87 .
- an inert gas nitrogen, for example
- fluid silicone oil, for example
- the conduit 80 extends downhole in a wellbore 60 and traverses a region of the well 50 , which contains various fluid layers 70 such as exemplary gas 70 a , oil 70 b and water 70 c layers. As shown in FIG. 2 , the conduit 80 is U-shaped in that the fluid flows through the conduit 80 downhole into the well 50 and returns uphole to the well surface. More specifically, the conduit 80 receives (at an inlet 82 ) a fluid flow, which is produced by a surface pump 96 . The fluid flows from the inlet 82 , through the fluid layers 70 and passes through a U-shaped bottom 84 of the conduit 80 .
- the fluid returns to the surface of the well 50 and thus, passes through the layers 70 back to an outlet 86 of the conduit 80 , which is located at the surface of the well.
- the fluid enters a reservoir 94 , and from the reservoir 94 the fluid returns via the pump 96 back into the well 50 .
- the conduit 80 forms a loop for circulating a fluid through the well fluid layers 70 .
- the fluid in the conduit 80 may be water, toluene or hydraulic oil, as just a few examples.
- the senor 87 may be retrievable from the well 50 .
- the fiber in which the sensor 87 is an optical fiber, the fiber may be pumped into position in the conduit 80 .
- the overall physical condition of the optical fiber may potentially degrade over time. Therefore, it may become desirable to remove the optical fiber from the conduit 80 (by pumping) and pump a replacement optical fiber into the conduit 80 .
- FIG. 2 depicts a vertical wellbore 60 , it is understood that the systems and techniques that are described herein may be applied to deviated, lateral, or horizontal wellbore sections.
- the wellbore 60 may be cased or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the well 50 may be a subterranean or subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the distributed temperature sensor 87 may be disposed in the downstream flowing portion of the conduit (as depicted in FIG. 2 ) or the upstream flowing portion of the conduit 80 , depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the distributed temperature sensor 87 of FIG. 2 may be installed in a double-ended configuration, in which the sensor 87 extends in a U configuration from the inlet 82 to the outlet 86 of the conduit 80 .
- the distributed temperature sensor 87 may be deployed with the conduit 80 (and thus, may be installed downhole with the conduit 80 ) or may be subsequently pumped into the conduit 80 after the conduit 80 is installed downhole, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the distributed temperature sensor 87 is an optical fiber
- the sensor 87 may be optically coupled to a DTS measurement system 100 , which may be located at the surface of the well 50 .
- the temperature profile of the fluid in the loop i.e., in the conduit 80
- the temperature of the fluid relaxes to the new local temperature. Since the efficiency of heat transfer is different for different fluids, the relaxation rates will differ from zone to zone.
- the distributed temperature profile will change with time and will have distinct regions that are separated by boundaries. These boundaries are located at the depths of the interfaces between the different fluids in the well.
- FIG. 3 depicts a technique 150 , which is an example of the relaxation test, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
- a distributed temperature sensor is used (block 152 ) to determine an initial steady state profile of region of interest prior to circulation of fluid.
- the fluid is circulated (block 154 ) in a conduit (e.g., the conduit 80 of FIG. 2 ), which traverses a region of the well that contains well fluid layers. Circulation of the fluid is then halted (block 158 ), e.g., the pump 96 is momentarily turned off.
- the temperature versus depth profile (as indicated by the DTS system) undergoes a temperature relaxation, in that the local temperature of the fluid in the conduit varies with the thermal properties (thermal capacity and thermal conductivity) of the surrounding environment.
- FIG. 4 depicts an illustration 200 of three exemplary temperature versus depth profiles 204 , 210 and 220 , which are associated with different stages of the relaxation test.
- the temperature versus depth profile Prior to the pumping of fluid, the temperature versus depth profile is similar to the profile 220 . While the fluid circulates in the conduit 80 ( FIG. 2 ) at a sufficiently fast rate, the temperature versus depth profile resembles the exemplary profile 204 , which is generally linear. After the pump is turned off, the relatively cool fluid is heated by the surrounding fluid layers, thereby changing the temperature versus depth profile, as the local temperatures rise. Because the well fluid layers 70 have different thermal conductivities and capacities, the rate of warming is locally different in the different layers 70 during the warming, or relaxation period, as illustrated by exemplary profile 210 .
- the profile 210 is discontinuous at each well fluid layer interface.
- the boundary between the upper gas layer 70 a and the middle oil layer 70 b , according to the temperature profile 210 occurs at depth D 1 ; and the interface between the middle oil layer 70 b and the lower water layer 70 c occurs at a depth D 2 .
- the arrows adjacent the profile 210 indicate the direction that the profile 210 moves over time.
- the temperature versus depth profile resembles the exemplary profile 220 , which is generally linear throughout all of the well fluid layers 70 and represents the geothermal gradient (unless secondary tertiary recovery schemes such as steam flooding is used in which case the profile is not linear).
- the above-described process may be repeated.
- Several relaxation temperature versus depth profiles may be stacked for purposes of improving the overall signal-to-noise ratio. The stacking of successive relaxation profiles is valid because the fluid levels in a well may vary relatively slowly with time.
- the well may not have a reservoir at the surface for purposes of storing the fluid that is circulated through the conduit 80 .
- relatively warmer fluid may be pumped through the loop across the reservoir.
- the warmer fluid may also be supplied, for example, by a surface heating system or from a downhole pump.
- FIG. 5 depicts an illustration 229 of exemplary temperature versus depth profiles 230 , 234 and 240 , which are associated with the fluid circulation, no fluid flow and end of relaxation stages, respectively, when the warmer fluid is circulated, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
- the temperature versus depth profile resembles the exemplary generally linear profile 230 .
- the localized fluid temperature is a function of the thermal properties of the local environment; and as such, the temperature versus depth profile resembles the exemplary profile 234 , which has discontinuities that identify the well fluid interfaces.
- the temperature versus depth profile transitions to the exemplary profile 240 , which is generally linear.
- the systems that are described herein may be used in applications in which steam is pumped into the reservoir to reduce the viscosity of the oil.
- the initial temperature versus depth profile may not be linear but instead may exhibit an increase in temperature higher up in the well. Nevertheless, a change in temperature on pumping the fluid and a relaxation to the initial profile are still revealed. Irrespective of the initial profile, the local rate of relaxation is dependent on the thermal properties of the well fluid at the particular depth.
- the relaxation of the local temperature measured by DTS depends on the local thermal conductivity (k) and the specific heat capacity (cp) of the material surrounding the pipe in which the sensor is contained. Faster relaxation occurs with higher thermal conductivity and higher specific heat capacity of the surrounding material; and therefore, in an approximation, the relaxation time decreases with their product (k*cp).
- Table 1 depicts typical values of thermal conductivity (k), specific heat capacity (cp) and their product (k*cp) for water, typical oil, methane, steam and air.
- the product k*cp is approximately an order of magnitude higher for water than for oil, which in turn is almost an order of magnitude higher than for any of the gases (methane, steam, air). This indicates that the location of the oil/water and gas/oil fluid interfaces in a well may be identified by changes or discontinuities in relaxation of the temperature versus depth profile after pumping hotter or colder fluid across the reservoir.
- FIG. 6 depicts a steady state technique 250 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention and may be used as an alternative to the relaxation test or may be used in conjunction with the relaxation test, as further described below.
- the steady state test involves taking a DTS measurement while the fluid is circulating in the conduit 80 .
- the rate at which the fluid is being circulated in the conduit 80 ( FIG. 2 ) is such that the observed temperature versus depth profile contains discontinuities at the well fluid interfaces.
- a distributed temperature sensor is deployed (block 254 ) in a well to observe a temperature versus depth profile in a region of interest.
- a distributed temperature sensor is used (block 255 ) to determine an initial steady state profile prior to the circulation of a fluid in the conduit that contains the sensor.
- the fluid is then circulated through a conduit that traverses a region of the well, which contains well fluid layers, pursuant to block 258 .
- the temperature versus depth profile is then allowed to reach steady state, pursuant to block 262 .
- the depth of at least one well fluid layer interface is determined, pursuant to block 266 .
- the pumping may instead be continuous.
- the temperature versus depth profile in the loop reaches steady state when the local flow of heat into and out of the loop is balanced. At steady state, there is a discontinuity in the temperature versus depth profile for each point where the loop crosses the boundary between two fluid layers.
- the advantages of the steady state test may include one or more of the following, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the steady state test allows data to be recorded over a longer period; and the data may be stacked and averaged over time, thereby giving greater temperature resolution and greater sensitivity.
- This steady state test may possibly be easier to automate than the relaxation test.
- the steady state test may provide a more reliable identification of the interface depths when there is a non-uniform temperature distribution with depth, such as, for example, in steam flood wells where a hot gas layer may overlay cooler oil and water zones. If there are conduction effects in the loop, which may degrade the DTS measurement, the steady state approach may be less susceptible to this degradation.
- steady state test may be performed in other embodiments of the invention. For example, several steady state tests may be performed, where a different circulation flow rate is used for each test.
- fluid may be circulated in a conduit at a first flow rate (block 304 ), and the steady state test may be used to obtain a corresponding temperature versus depth profile, pursuant to block 308 .
- the flow rate is changed (block 316 ) before the steady state test is used again to observe a corresponding temperature versus depth profile, pursuant to block 308 .
- the temperature versus depth profiles may be interpreted (block 320 ) to determine the depth of at least one well fluid layer interface.
- the generation of multiple temperature versus depth profiles may provide a better interpretation of the positioning of the well fluid layers and the corresponding interfaces.
- a technique 360 may include using both the relaxation (block 364 ) and steady state (block 368 ) tests to determine the depth of at least one well fluid interface. Results of the relaxation and steady state tests may then be combined to identify one or more of the characteristics, pursuant to block 372 . Depending on the geometry and the nature of the fluid and materials, the determination of different fluid interfaces may be more sensitive to one test than to the other. Thus, by using the combination of the steady state and relaxation tests, as outlined in FIG. 8 , the positioning of the well fluid layers and interfaces may be more accurately determined.
- a Layer of fresh water may be produced from condensed saline formation water.
- a fourth fluid layer may be in effect.
- Knowledge of the position of this layer may be useful.
- determining the boundaries of the fresh and saline water layers may be more difficult than the determination of the other boundaries because the fresh and saline water have very similar thermal conductivities and thermal capacities. Therefore, the use of a more sensitive technique (such as the technique 300 ( FIG. 7 ), for example) may be able to distinguish the fresh and saline layers and the interface in between.
- a technique 400 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention includes deploying a distributed temperature sensor in a container inside a conduit that extends through fluid layers present in the container, pursuant to block 404 .
- the distributed temperature sensor is used (block 413 ) to determine the initial steady state profile prior to the circulation of a fluid that is contained in the conduit.
- the fluid is then communicated (forced through by a pump, for example) through the conduit, pursuant to block 412 ; and the distributed temperature sensor is used to observe a temperature profile of fluid in the conduit, pursuant to block 414 .
- the particular profile observed depends on whether the relaxation test, the steady state test or a combination thereof is used.
- a characteristic of at least one of the fluid layers is identified, pursuant to block 416 .
- the DTS system described herein may be combined with other downhole sensor-based subsystems.
- one or more pressure sensors may be disposed downhole in the well to measure pressure(s) of the well fluid layer(s).
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Measuring Temperature Or Quantity Of Heat (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention generally relates to a fluid level indication system and technique.
- In oil fields it is typically important to know the levels of the fluids in the reservoir and around wells, and in particular, it may be important to know the depths of the interfaces between the gas, oil and water layers. Such knowledge is particularly important in secondary and tertiary recovery systems, for example, in steam flooding applications in heavy oil reservoirs.
- Traditionally, the depths of the interfaces between the fluid levels are determined using pressure measurements. For example, one approach involves using a single pressure sensor, which makes a series of pressure measurements at multiple depths. The measured pressure is plotted against the depth. In each of the gas, oil and water layers, the pressure gradient is constant and proportional to the density of the fluid. The depths of the fluid layer interfaces, or boundaries, are identified by the intersections of the pressure gradient lines. The above-described technique of identifying the interface depths using a pressure sensor typically works well when carried out in an intervention in the well using, for example, a wireline-deployed tool.
- For purposes of permanently monitoring the depths of the fluid interfaces, an array of pressure sensors may be placed across the gas, oil and water layers. In this regard, the pressure gradients may be plotted and the analysis that is set forth above may be applied. If the depths of the interfaces change over time, a large number of pressure sensors may be required to accurately assess the interface depths. A large number of pressure sensors may also be required if the initial positions of the interfaces are unknown or uncertain. However, several challenges may arise with the use of a large number of pressure sensors, such as challenges related to compensating the pressure readings for sensor offset and drift. Furthermore, the cost of an array of pressure sensors can be high and prohibitive.
- Downhole distributed temperature sensing (DTS) involves the use of a sensor that indicates a temperature versus depth distribution in the downhole environment. DTS typically is used to identify and quantify production from different injection/production zones of a well.
- For example, in a technique called “hot slug tracking,” DTS may be used to identify the permeable zones in a water injector well where injected fluid enters the formation. The permeable zones typically cannot be identified by DTS during normal injection. However, by shutting off injection and allowing the water in the tubing or casing above the injection zone to be heated up towards the geothermal gradient, a heated “slug” may be created. When the injection is re-started, the hot slug may be tracked versus time using the DTS measurements to identify the permeable zones.
- In an embodiment of the invention, a technique that is usable with a well includes disposing a distributed temperature sensor in a conduit that traverses a region of the well. The region contains at least two different well fluid layers. The technique includes circulating a fluid through the conduit and using the distributed temperature sensor to observe at least one a temperature versus depth profile of the fluid. Based on the observation, the depth of a boundary of at least one of the well fluid layers is determined.
- In another embodiment of the invention, a system that is usable with a well includes a distributed temperature sensor subsystem, a tubing and a pump. A distributed temperature sensor of the distributed temperature sensor subsystem is disposed in the tubing, and the tubing traverses a region of the well, which contains at least two different well fluid layers. The pump circulates a fluid through the tubing; and the distributed temperature subsystem observes at least one temperature versus depth profile of the fluid such that said at least one temperature versus depth profile indicates the depth of a boundary of at least one of the well fluid layers.
- In yet another embodiment of the invention, a system includes a tubing, a pump and a subsystem. The tubing traverses a region of a container, which contains at least two different fluid layers, and a distributed temperature subsystem is disposed in the tubing. The pump circulates a fluid through the tubing, and the subsystem observes a temperature versus depth profile of the fluid such that the temperature versus depth profile indicates a characteristic associated with at least one of the fluid layers.
- Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following drawing, description and claims.
-
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram generally depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a characteristic of at least one well fluid layer according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a well according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to identify a characteristic of at least one well fluid layer based on temperature relaxation according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIGS. 4 and 5 are illustrations of temperature versus depth profiles obtained by the distributed temperature sensor at different times according to different embodiments of the invention. -
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a depth of a boundary of at least one well fluid layer using a steady state temperature measurement technique according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to identify a depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary using a combination of distributed temperature sensing and different flow rates according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a combination of relaxation and steady state distributed temperature sensing techniques to identify a depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary according to an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to use a distributed temperature sensor to identify a characteristic of at least one fluid layer that is present in a container according to an embodiment of the invention. - In accordance with embodiments of the invention described herein, the depths of different well fluid layer interfaces (interfaces between oil, gas and water layers, as examples) are determined using one or more distributed temperature sensing (DTS) measurements. Each DTS measurement reveals a temperature versus depth distribution, or profile, of a fluid that is contained in a conduit (pipe, tubing, or control line, as just a few examples of a “conduit”) that traverses the well fluid layers of interest. The temperature versus depth profile, in turn, indicates the interface depths.
- As set forth by way of specific examples herein, the DTS measurements may be conducted in connection with two different types of tests: 1.) a first test (called a “relaxation test” herein) in which the measured temperature versus depth profile is used to observe the fluid's temperature relaxation after circulation of the fluid in the conduit has been halted; and 2.) a second test (called a “steady state test” herein) in which the temperature versus depth profile is used to observe the fluid's steady state temperature while the fluid is being continuously circulated in the conduit. The relaxation temperature versus depth profile and the steady state temperature versus depth profile each reveals the locations (i.e., depths) of the well fluid interfaces, as further described below.
- To generalize,
FIG. 1 depicts atechnique 10 that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Pursuant to thetechnique 10, a distributed temperature sensor is deployed (block 14) in a conduit that traverses a region of interest of a well, and fluid is communicated through the conduit, as depicted inblock 18. The distributed temperature sensor is used to observe (block 22) the temperature versus depth profile of the fluid; and based on the observed temperature profile, the depth of at least one well fluid layer boundary in the region of interest may be identified, pursuant to block 26. -
FIG. 2 depicts anexemplary well 50, which uses a DTS-based system 100 (Sensa's DTS-800 system, for example) in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For purposes of obtaining a temperature versus depth profile, thewell 50 includes a downhole DTS subsystem, which includes a distributed temperature sensor 87 (an optical fiber, for example) that is disposed in a conduit 80 (a control line, as an example). In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, thedistributed temperature sensor 87 may be placed inside a small control line (not depicted inFIG. 2 ), which extends downhole inside theconduit 80. In this regard, the small control line may be filled with an inert gas (nitrogen, for example) or fluid (silicone oil, for example) for purposes of protecting thedistributed temperature sensor 87. More specifically, if thedistributed temperature sensor 87 is an optical fiber, the fiber when placed in a fluid, such as water, may degrade relatively quickly. Therefore, by disposing the optical fiber inside a small control line that extends inside theconduit 80 and filling this conduit with the inert gas, the lifetime of the optical fiber is extended. - The
conduit 80 extends downhole in awellbore 60 and traverses a region of thewell 50, which containsvarious fluid layers 70 such asexemplary gas 70 a,oil 70 b andwater 70 c layers. As shown inFIG. 2 , theconduit 80 is U-shaped in that the fluid flows through theconduit 80 downhole into thewell 50 and returns uphole to the well surface. More specifically, theconduit 80 receives (at an inlet 82) a fluid flow, which is produced by asurface pump 96. The fluid flows from theinlet 82, through thefluid layers 70 and passes through aU-shaped bottom 84 of theconduit 80. At this point the fluid returns to the surface of thewell 50 and thus, passes through thelayers 70 back to anoutlet 86 of theconduit 80, which is located at the surface of the well. At the surface, the fluid enters areservoir 94, and from thereservoir 94 the fluid returns via thepump 96 back into thewell 50. - Thus, the
conduit 80 forms a loop for circulating a fluid through the well fluid layers 70. Depending on the particular embodiment of the invention, the fluid in theconduit 80 may be water, toluene or hydraulic oil, as just a few examples. - In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the
sensor 87 may be retrievable from thewell 50. For example, in embodiments of the invention, in which thesensor 87 is an optical fiber, the fiber may be pumped into position in theconduit 80. The overall physical condition of the optical fiber may potentially degrade over time. Therefore, it may become desirable to remove the optical fiber from the conduit 80 (by pumping) and pump a replacement optical fiber into theconduit 80. - It is noted that the well 50 is merely an example of one out of many different types of wells that may use the techniques and systems that are described herein. In this regard, although
FIG. 2 depicts avertical wellbore 60, it is understood that the systems and techniques that are described herein may be applied to deviated, lateral, or horizontal wellbore sections. Additionally, thewellbore 60 may be cased or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Furthermore, the well 50 may be a subterranean or subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, many variations are contemplated, all of which fall within the scope of the appended claims. - The distributed
temperature sensor 87 may be disposed in the downstream flowing portion of the conduit (as depicted inFIG. 2 ) or the upstream flowing portion of theconduit 80, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. As another variation, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the distributedtemperature sensor 87 ofFIG. 2 may be installed in a double-ended configuration, in which thesensor 87 extends in a U configuration from theinlet 82 to theoutlet 86 of theconduit 80. The distributedtemperature sensor 87 may be deployed with the conduit 80 (and thus, may be installed downhole with the conduit 80) or may be subsequently pumped into theconduit 80 after theconduit 80 is installed downhole, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. For embodiments of the invention in which the distributedtemperature sensor 87 is an optical fiber, thesensor 87 may be optically coupled to aDTS measurement system 100, which may be located at the surface of the well 50. - By activating the
pump 96, the temperature profile of the fluid in the loop (i.e., in the conduit 80) can be changed, as fluid from a region at one temperature is pumped to a region at a different temperature. When pumping ceases, the temperature of the fluid relaxes to the new local temperature. Since the efficiency of heat transfer is different for different fluids, the relaxation rates will differ from zone to zone. The distributed temperature profile will change with time and will have distinct regions that are separated by boundaries. These boundaries are located at the depths of the interfaces between the different fluids in the well. - As a more specific example,
FIG. 3 depicts atechnique 150, which is an example of the relaxation test, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. Pursuant to thetechnique 150, a distributed temperature sensor is used (block 152) to determine an initial steady state profile of region of interest prior to circulation of fluid. The fluid is circulated (block 154) in a conduit (e.g., theconduit 80 ofFIG. 2 ), which traverses a region of the well that contains well fluid layers. Circulation of the fluid is then halted (block 158), e.g., thepump 96 is momentarily turned off. At this point, the temperature versus depth profile (as indicated by the DTS system) undergoes a temperature relaxation, in that the local temperature of the fluid in the conduit varies with the thermal properties (thermal capacity and thermal conductivity) of the surrounding environment. - More specifically,
FIG. 4 depicts an illustration 200 of three exemplary temperature versus depth profiles 204, 210 and 220, which are associated with different stages of the relaxation test. Prior to the pumping of fluid, the temperature versus depth profile is similar to theprofile 220. While the fluid circulates in the conduit 80 (FIG. 2 ) at a sufficiently fast rate, the temperature versus depth profile resembles theexemplary profile 204, which is generally linear. After the pump is turned off, the relatively cool fluid is heated by the surrounding fluid layers, thereby changing the temperature versus depth profile, as the local temperatures rise. Because the wellfluid layers 70 have different thermal conductivities and capacities, the rate of warming is locally different in thedifferent layers 70 during the warming, or relaxation period, as illustrated byexemplary profile 210. - Due to the differences in the thermal properties, the
profile 210 is discontinuous at each well fluid layer interface. Thus, the boundary between theupper gas layer 70 a and themiddle oil layer 70 b, according to thetemperature profile 210, occurs at depth D1; and the interface between themiddle oil layer 70 b and thelower water layer 70 c occurs at a depth D2. The arrows adjacent theprofile 210 indicate the direction that theprofile 210 moves over time. - Eventually, the transient effects, which are present during the relaxation period pass so that the fluid in the loop warms up to the temperature of the surrounding fluid. At this point, the temperature versus depth profile resembles the
exemplary profile 220, which is generally linear throughout all of the wellfluid layers 70 and represents the geothermal gradient (unless secondary tertiary recovery schemes such as steam flooding is used in which case the profile is not linear). When thermal equilibrium around the loop has been established, the above-described process may be repeated. Several relaxation temperature versus depth profiles may be stacked for purposes of improving the overall signal-to-noise ratio. The stacking of successive relaxation profiles is valid because the fluid levels in a well may vary relatively slowly with time. - Many variations are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims. For example, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the well may not have a reservoir at the surface for purposes of storing the fluid that is circulated through the
conduit 80. In this regard, instead of pumping relatively colder fluid from the surface of the well, relatively warmer fluid may be pumped through the loop across the reservoir. The warmer fluid may also be supplied, for example, by a surface heating system or from a downhole pump. Thus, with circulation of the fluid through the loop being halted, the local temperature of the fluid cools (instead of being heated) as a function of the thermal conductivities and capacities of the surrounding fluid layers. - As a more specific example,
FIG. 5 depicts an illustration 229 of exemplary temperature versus depth profiles 230, 234 and 240, which are associated with the fluid circulation, no fluid flow and end of relaxation stages, respectively, when the warmer fluid is circulated, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. As shown, when the pumping first ceases, the temperature versus depth profile resembles the exemplary generallylinear profile 230. During the relaxation, the localized fluid temperature is a function of the thermal properties of the local environment; and as such, the temperature versus depth profile resembles theexemplary profile 234, which has discontinuities that identify the well fluid interfaces. Eventually at the end of the relaxation, the temperature versus depth profile transitions to theexemplary profile 240, which is generally linear. - It is noted that the systems that are described herein may be used in applications in which steam is pumped into the reservoir to reduce the viscosity of the oil. In this case, the initial temperature versus depth profile may not be linear but instead may exhibit an increase in temperature higher up in the well. Nevertheless, a change in temperature on pumping the fluid and a relaxation to the initial profile are still revealed. Irrespective of the initial profile, the local rate of relaxation is dependent on the thermal properties of the well fluid at the particular depth.
- The relaxation of the local temperature measured by DTS depends on the local thermal conductivity (k) and the specific heat capacity (cp) of the material surrounding the pipe in which the sensor is contained. Faster relaxation occurs with higher thermal conductivity and higher specific heat capacity of the surrounding material; and therefore, in an approximation, the relaxation time decreases with their product (k*cp). Table 1 depicts typical values of thermal conductivity (k), specific heat capacity (cp) and their product (k*cp) for water, typical oil, methane, steam and air.
-
TABLE 1 Water Oil Methane Steam Air Specific Heat capacity 4.18 1.6-2.4 2.2-2.8 2 1.01 (cp) J · g-1 · K-1 Average cp 4.18 2 2.5 2 1.01 J · g-1 · K-1 Thermal Conductivity 0.55-0.67 0.15 0.03 0.016 0.024 (k) W · K-1 · m-1 Average k 0.61 0.15 0.03 0.016 0.024 W · K-1 · m-1 Product (average 2.55 0.3 0.075 0.032 0.024 cp) * (average k) - The product k*cp is approximately an order of magnitude higher for water than for oil, which in turn is almost an order of magnitude higher than for any of the gases (methane, steam, air). This indicates that the location of the oil/water and gas/oil fluid interfaces in a well may be identified by changes or discontinuities in relaxation of the temperature versus depth profile after pumping hotter or colder fluid across the reservoir.
-
FIG. 6 depicts asteady state technique 250 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention and may be used as an alternative to the relaxation test or may be used in conjunction with the relaxation test, as further described below. Unlike the relaxation test, the steady state test involves taking a DTS measurement while the fluid is circulating in theconduit 80. The rate at which the fluid is being circulated in the conduit 80 (FIG. 2 ) is such that the observed temperature versus depth profile contains discontinuities at the well fluid interfaces. More specifically, pursuant to thetechnique 250, a distributed temperature sensor is deployed (block 254) in a well to observe a temperature versus depth profile in a region of interest. A distributed temperature sensor is used (block 255) to determine an initial steady state profile prior to the circulation of a fluid in the conduit that contains the sensor. The fluid is then circulated through a conduit that traverses a region of the well, which contains well fluid layers, pursuant to block 258. The temperature versus depth profile is then allowed to reach steady state, pursuant to block 262. Based on the observed temperature versus depth profile, the depth of at least one well fluid layer interface is determined, pursuant to block 266. - Thus, instead of pumping fluid from a hotter or colder zone and then stopping and measuring the temperature relaxation, the pumping may instead be continuous. The temperature versus depth profile in the loop reaches steady state when the local flow of heat into and out of the loop is balanced. At steady state, there is a discontinuity in the temperature versus depth profile for each point where the loop crosses the boundary between two fluid layers.
- The advantages of the steady state test may include one or more of the following, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. The steady state test allows data to be recorded over a longer period; and the data may be stacked and averaged over time, thereby giving greater temperature resolution and greater sensitivity. This steady state test may possibly be easier to automate than the relaxation test. The steady state test may provide a more reliable identification of the interface depths when there is a non-uniform temperature distribution with depth, such as, for example, in steam flood wells where a hot gas layer may overlay cooler oil and water zones. If there are conduction effects in the loop, which may degrade the DTS measurement, the steady state approach may be less susceptible to this degradation.
- Referring to
FIG. 7 , variations of the above-described steady state test may be performed in other embodiments of the invention. For example, several steady state tests may be performed, where a different circulation flow rate is used for each test. Thus, pursuant to atechnique 300, fluid may be circulated in a conduit at a first flow rate (block 304), and the steady state test may be used to obtain a corresponding temperature versus depth profile, pursuant to block 308. If another profile is desired (diamond 312), the flow rate is changed (block 316) before the steady state test is used again to observe a corresponding temperature versus depth profile, pursuant to block 308. After several temperature versus depth profiles have been obtained, the temperature versus depth profiles may be interpreted (block 320) to determine the depth of at least one well fluid layer interface. The generation of multiple temperature versus depth profiles may provide a better interpretation of the positioning of the well fluid layers and the corresponding interfaces. - As an example of another embodiment of the invention, referring to
FIG. 8 , atechnique 360 may include using both the relaxation (block 364) and steady state (block 368) tests to determine the depth of at least one well fluid interface. Results of the relaxation and steady state tests may then be combined to identify one or more of the characteristics, pursuant to block 372. Depending on the geometry and the nature of the fluid and materials, the determination of different fluid interfaces may be more sensitive to one test than to the other. Thus, by using the combination of the steady state and relaxation tests, as outlined inFIG. 8 , the positioning of the well fluid layers and interfaces may be more accurately determined. - In fields where steam flooding is employed, a Layer of fresh water may be produced from condensed saline formation water. Thus, there may be in effect, a fourth fluid layer. Knowledge of the position of this layer may be useful. However, determining the boundaries of the fresh and saline water layers may be more difficult than the determination of the other boundaries because the fresh and saline water have very similar thermal conductivities and thermal capacities. Therefore, the use of a more sensitive technique (such as the technique 300 (
FIG. 7 ), for example) may be able to distinguish the fresh and saline layers and the interface in between. - Other systems and techniques are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims. For example, referring to
FIG. 9 , atechnique 400 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention includes deploying a distributed temperature sensor in a container inside a conduit that extends through fluid layers present in the container, pursuant to block 404. The distributed temperature sensor is used (block 413) to determine the initial steady state profile prior to the circulation of a fluid that is contained in the conduit. The fluid is then communicated (forced through by a pump, for example) through the conduit, pursuant to block 412; and the distributed temperature sensor is used to observe a temperature profile of fluid in the conduit, pursuant to block 414. Thus, the particular profile observed depends on whether the relaxation test, the steady state test or a combination thereof is used. Based on the observed temperature profile, a characteristic of at least one of the fluid layers is identified, pursuant to block 416. - As another variation, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the DTS system described herein may be combined with other downhole sensor-based subsystems. In this regard, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, one or more pressure sensors (as an example) may be disposed downhole in the well to measure pressure(s) of the well fluid layer(s).
- While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/767,576 US7472594B1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
US11/940,367 US7731421B2 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-11-15 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
CA002633985A CA2633985A1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2008-05-28 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
CA002632636A CA2632636A1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2008-05-29 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
GB0809825A GB2450595B (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2008-05-30 | Fluid level indication method and system |
GB0809823A GB2450594B (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2008-05-30 | Fluid level indication method and system |
US12/768,085 US8128281B2 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2010-04-27 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
US12/768,110 US20100238971A1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2010-04-27 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/767,576 US7472594B1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/940,367 Continuation-In-Part US7731421B2 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-11-15 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080314142A1 true US20080314142A1 (en) | 2008-12-25 |
US7472594B1 US7472594B1 (en) | 2009-01-06 |
Family
ID=39637842
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/767,576 Expired - Fee Related US7472594B1 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Fluid level indication system and technique |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7472594B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2632636A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2450595B (en) |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100121580A1 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2010-05-13 | Total Sa | Method of estimating physical parameters of a geological formation |
US20100207019A1 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Optical monitoring of fluid flow |
US20110232377A1 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2011-09-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Bi-directional flow and distributed temperature sensing in subterranean wells |
US20140262244A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and Method for Determining Fluid Interface Proximate an Electrical Submersible Pump and Operating The Same in Response Thereto |
US8924158B2 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2014-12-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Seismic acquisition system including a distributed sensor having an optical fiber |
US20150120194A1 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2015-04-30 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | High Resolution Distributed Temperature Sensing For Downhole Monitoring |
CN108222919A (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2018-06-29 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Gas-water interface monitoring method applied to salt hole air reserved storeroom gas injection row's halogen stage |
US10422677B2 (en) * | 2014-05-08 | 2019-09-24 | Optasense Holdings Limited | Fluid inflow |
US10975687B2 (en) | 2017-03-31 | 2021-04-13 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors |
WO2021073740A1 (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-22 | Lytt Limited | Inflow detection using dts features |
US11053791B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2021-07-06 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
US11162353B2 (en) | 2019-11-15 | 2021-11-02 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores |
US11199085B2 (en) | 2017-08-23 | 2021-12-14 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
US11199084B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2021-12-14 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features |
US11333636B2 (en) | 2017-10-11 | 2022-05-17 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features |
US11466563B2 (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2022-10-11 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for subterranean fluid flow characterization |
US11473424B2 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2022-10-18 | Lytt Limited | Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid DAS/DTS measurements |
US11593683B2 (en) | 2020-06-18 | 2023-02-28 | Lytt Limited | Event model training using in situ data |
US11643923B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2023-05-09 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration |
US11859488B2 (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2024-01-02 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | DAS data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2472391A (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-02-09 | Sensornet Ltd | Method and apparatus for determining the location of an interface region |
US9213121B2 (en) | 2012-12-12 | 2015-12-15 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Acoustic sensing system for determining an interface between two materials |
CN109854230B (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2022-05-10 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Well testing method and device |
CN112287508B (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2022-11-04 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining oil-gas-water interface based on formation pressure equivalent density |
Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5582064A (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 1996-12-10 | Sensor Dynamics, Limited | Remotely deployable pressure sensor |
US6380534B1 (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 2002-04-30 | Sensornet Limited | Distributed strain and temperature sensing system |
US6618677B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2003-09-09 | Sensor Highway Ltd | Method and apparatus for determining flow rates |
US20030219190A1 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2003-11-27 | Pruett Phillip E. | Method and apparatus for calibrating a distributed temperature sensing system |
US20040134662A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2004-07-15 | Chitwood James E. | High power umbilicals for electric flowline immersion heating of produced hydrocarbons |
US6983796B2 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2006-01-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method of providing hydraulic/fiber conduits adjacent bottom hole assemblies for multi-step completions |
US7000696B2 (en) * | 2001-08-29 | 2006-02-21 | Sensor Highway Limited | Method and apparatus for determining the temperature of subterranean wells using fiber optic cable |
US20060191684A1 (en) * | 2003-06-09 | 2006-08-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Assembly for determining thermal properties of a formation while drilling or perforating |
US20060191683A1 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2006-08-31 | Masafumi Fukuhara | Systems and methods of downhole thermal property measurement |
US7126680B2 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2006-10-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for measuring and calibrating measurements using optical fiber distributed sensor |
US20060245469A1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2006-11-02 | Christian Koeniger | Subsea and landing string distributed temperature sensor system |
US20070110355A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-05-17 | Kari-Miko Jaaskelainen | Method for installing a double ended distributed sensing fiber optical assembly within a guide conduit |
US20070234788A1 (en) * | 2006-04-05 | 2007-10-11 | Gerard Glasbergen | Tracking fluid displacement along wellbore using real time temperature measurements |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6997256B2 (en) | 2002-12-17 | 2006-02-14 | Sensor Highway Limited | Use of fiber optics in deviated flows |
EP1515128A1 (en) | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-16 | GESO Gesellschaft für Sensorik, Geotechnischen Umweltschutz und Mathematische Modellierung mbH, Jena | Method and Apparatus for testing the sealing of underground cavern pipeworks |
US20050149264A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-07-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and Method to Interpret Distributed Temperature Sensor Data and to Determine a Flow Rate in a Well |
GB2416871A (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2006-02-08 | Schlumberger Holdings | Well characterisation using distributed temperature sensor data |
-
2007
- 2007-06-25 US US11/767,576 patent/US7472594B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-05-29 CA CA002632636A patent/CA2632636A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-05-30 GB GB0809825A patent/GB2450595B/en active Active
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5582064A (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 1996-12-10 | Sensor Dynamics, Limited | Remotely deployable pressure sensor |
US6380534B1 (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 2002-04-30 | Sensornet Limited | Distributed strain and temperature sensing system |
US6920395B2 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2005-07-19 | Sensor Highway Limited | Method and apparatus for determining flow rates |
US6618677B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2003-09-09 | Sensor Highway Ltd | Method and apparatus for determining flow rates |
US6983796B2 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2006-01-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method of providing hydraulic/fiber conduits adjacent bottom hole assemblies for multi-step completions |
US7000696B2 (en) * | 2001-08-29 | 2006-02-21 | Sensor Highway Limited | Method and apparatus for determining the temperature of subterranean wells using fiber optic cable |
US20040134662A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2004-07-15 | Chitwood James E. | High power umbilicals for electric flowline immersion heating of produced hydrocarbons |
US6807324B2 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2004-10-19 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calibrating a distributed temperature sensing system |
US20030219190A1 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2003-11-27 | Pruett Phillip E. | Method and apparatus for calibrating a distributed temperature sensing system |
US7126680B2 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2006-10-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for measuring and calibrating measurements using optical fiber distributed sensor |
US7215416B2 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2007-05-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Method for measuring using optical fiber distributed sensor |
US20060245469A1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2006-11-02 | Christian Koeniger | Subsea and landing string distributed temperature sensor system |
US20060191684A1 (en) * | 2003-06-09 | 2006-08-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Assembly for determining thermal properties of a formation while drilling or perforating |
US20070110355A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-05-17 | Kari-Miko Jaaskelainen | Method for installing a double ended distributed sensing fiber optical assembly within a guide conduit |
US20060191683A1 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2006-08-31 | Masafumi Fukuhara | Systems and methods of downhole thermal property measurement |
US20070234788A1 (en) * | 2006-04-05 | 2007-10-11 | Gerard Glasbergen | Tracking fluid displacement along wellbore using real time temperature measurements |
Cited By (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8583378B2 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2013-11-12 | Total Sa | Method of estimating physical parameters of a geological formation |
US20100121580A1 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2010-05-13 | Total Sa | Method of estimating physical parameters of a geological formation |
US20110232377A1 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2011-09-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Bi-directional flow and distributed temperature sensing in subterranean wells |
US9021875B2 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2015-05-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Bi-directional flow and distributed temperature sensing in subterranean wells |
US20100207019A1 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Optical monitoring of fluid flow |
US8924158B2 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2014-12-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Seismic acquisition system including a distributed sensor having an optical fiber |
US9316754B2 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2016-04-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Seismic acquisition system including a distributed sensor having an optical fiber |
US20140262244A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and Method for Determining Fluid Interface Proximate an Electrical Submersible Pump and Operating The Same in Response Thereto |
US9194220B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2015-11-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for determining fluid interface proximate an electrical submersible pump and operating the same in response thereto |
US20150120194A1 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2015-04-30 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | High Resolution Distributed Temperature Sensing For Downhole Monitoring |
US10316643B2 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2019-06-11 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | High resolution distributed temperature sensing for downhole monitoring |
US10422677B2 (en) * | 2014-05-08 | 2019-09-24 | Optasense Holdings Limited | Fluid inflow |
US11215049B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2022-01-04 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features |
US11199084B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2021-12-14 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole events using acoustic frequency domain features |
US11530606B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2022-12-20 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
US11053791B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2021-07-06 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
CN108222919A (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2018-06-29 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Gas-water interface monitoring method applied to salt hole air reserved storeroom gas injection row's halogen stage |
CN108222919B (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2021-08-03 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Gas-water interface monitoring method applied to gas injection and brine discharge stage of salt cavern gas storage |
US10975687B2 (en) | 2017-03-31 | 2021-04-13 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors |
US11199085B2 (en) | 2017-08-23 | 2021-12-14 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
US11333636B2 (en) | 2017-10-11 | 2022-05-17 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features |
US11859488B2 (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2024-01-02 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | DAS data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type |
US11643923B2 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2023-05-09 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration |
US11098576B2 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2021-08-24 | Lytt Limited | Inflow detection using DTS features |
US11473424B2 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2022-10-18 | Lytt Limited | Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid DAS/DTS measurements |
WO2021073740A1 (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-22 | Lytt Limited | Inflow detection using dts features |
US11162353B2 (en) | 2019-11-15 | 2021-11-02 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores |
US11466563B2 (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2022-10-11 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for subterranean fluid flow characterization |
US11593683B2 (en) | 2020-06-18 | 2023-02-28 | Lytt Limited | Event model training using in situ data |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2450595B (en) | 2011-11-23 |
GB0809825D0 (en) | 2008-07-09 |
US7472594B1 (en) | 2009-01-06 |
GB2450595A (en) | 2008-12-31 |
CA2632636A1 (en) | 2008-12-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7472594B1 (en) | Fluid level indication system and technique | |
US8128281B2 (en) | Fluid level indication system and technique | |
US11261725B2 (en) | Systems and methods for estimating and controlling liquid level using periodic shut-ins | |
Yoshioka et al. | A comprehensive model of temperature behavior in a horizontal well | |
WO2004076815A1 (en) | Determining an inflow profile of a well | |
US20140365130A1 (en) | Estimating flow rates from multiple hydrocarbon reservoir layers into a production well | |
Yoshioka et al. | Interpretation of temperature and pressure profiles measured in multilateral wells equipped with intelligent completions (SPE94097) | |
US20100163223A1 (en) | Method for determining reservoir properties in a flowing well | |
WO2005035943A1 (en) | System and method for determining flow rates in a well | |
US5415037A (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring downhole temperatures | |
US9021875B2 (en) | Bi-directional flow and distributed temperature sensing in subterranean wells | |
US20120323494A1 (en) | Identifying types of sensors based on sensor measurement data | |
RU2353767C2 (en) | Method of assessment of permeability profile of oil bed | |
CN114216930B (en) | Rock mass thermal conductivity test equipment and test system | |
Lavery et al. | Determining Produced Fluid Properties for Accurate Production Profiling During a Drill Stem Test Using Thermal Imaging Technology. | |
Maltsev et al. | Evaluating Efficiency of Multilateral Producing Wells in Bottom Water-Drive Reservoir with a Gas Cap by Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensors and Continuous Pressure Monitoring | |
RU2705683C2 (en) | Method for monitoring tightness of injection well (embodiments) | |
SU953196A1 (en) | Method of investigating oil wells | |
RU2741888C1 (en) | Method of evaluation of parameters of fractures of formation hydraulic fracturing for horizontal well | |
CA3147555A1 (en) | Methods and systems for identifying a liquid level within a reservoir being produced via a thermally-stimulated gravity drainage process | |
Zheng et al. | A non-isothermal wellbore model with complex structure and its application in well testing | |
Bixley | Downhole measurements in geothermal wells | |
Almulla et al. | Utilizing distributed temperature sensor data in predicting flow rates in multilateral wells | |
Yoshioka et al. | A Comprehensive Statistically-Based Method to Interpret Real-Time Flowing Measurements | |
Element et al. | The Use of Distributed Well Temperature Measurements in Waterflood Management |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DAVIES, DYLAN H.;REEL/FRAME:019748/0334 Effective date: 20070615 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20210106 |