US20050279430A1 - Sub-surface enhanced gear - Google Patents

Sub-surface enhanced gear Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050279430A1
US20050279430A1 US11/210,060 US21006005A US2005279430A1 US 20050279430 A1 US20050279430 A1 US 20050279430A1 US 21006005 A US21006005 A US 21006005A US 2005279430 A1 US2005279430 A1 US 2005279430A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gear
compressive residual
residual stress
stress
tooth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/210,060
Inventor
Steve Hoffman
Craig Bredeson
Daniel Manning
Robert Bringard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP Inc
Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Original Assignee
Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/965,162 external-priority patent/US20020078813A1/en
Application filed by Mikronite Tech Group Inc filed Critical Mikronite Tech Group Inc
Priority to US11/210,060 priority Critical patent/US20050279430A1/en
Assigned to MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. reassignment MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BREDESON, CRAIG, BRINGARD, ROBERT, HOFFMAN, STEVE E., MANNING, DANIEL
Publication of US20050279430A1 publication Critical patent/US20050279430A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23DPLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23D61/00Tools for sawing machines or sawing devices; Clamping devices for these tools
    • B23D61/02Circular saw blades
    • B23D61/021Types of set; Variable teeth, e.g. variable in height or gullet depth; Varying pitch; Details of gullet
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23DPLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23D61/00Tools for sawing machines or sawing devices; Clamping devices for these tools
    • B23D61/02Circular saw blades
    • B23D61/025Details of saw blade body
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23DPLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23D61/00Tools for sawing machines or sawing devices; Clamping devices for these tools
    • B23D61/02Circular saw blades
    • B23D61/04Circular saw blades with inserted saw teeth, i.e. the teeth being individually inserted
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23DPLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; LIKE OPERATIONS FOR WORKING METAL BY REMOVING MATERIAL, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23D65/00Making tools for sawing machines or sawing devices for use in cutting any kind of material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B31/00Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor
    • B24B31/02Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor involving rotary barrels
    • B24B31/0224Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor involving rotary barrels the workpieces being fitted on a support
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/32Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for gear wheels, worm wheels, or the like

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to gears and, more particularly, to an improved gear design with a sub-surface enhanced layer of compressive residual stress.
  • Residual stress is a stress that exists within a part without any external load, such as an applied force or thermal gradient. These stresses are induced during the manufacturing process, for example, due to working of the part, surface treatment of the part or temperature changes during part formation. Residual stresses within a part can be tensile or compressive. Most conventional manufacturing processes tend to induce residual tensile stresses into the component being fabricated.
  • tensile stress tends to reduce the mechanical performance of materials. For example, cracks that form within a part tend to propagate more readily under the influence of tensile residual stresses in the part. These stresses act upon the crack causing the crack tip to extend through the part. Fatigue or cyclic loading in the vicinity of the crack can accelerate the crack propagation, which could lead to catastrophic failure of the component. It is also known that residual tensile stresses can cause corrosion in a part to propagate into cracking. Thus, residual tensile stresses in a component are generally not favorable.
  • FIGS. 1A-1D illustrate the effect of conventional peening on a metallic surface.
  • FIG. 1A schematically illustrates the granular arrangement in a manufactured part. The grains are generally under a tensile residual stress. As a shot hits the surface, it deforms it locally, inducing compression into the material. See FIG. 1B . The force of the shot causes localized plastic deformation, resulting in a small area of subsurface residual compression.
  • the resulting product will generally include mixtures of tensile and compressive residual stresses at the surface. See FIG. 1C . In the event that a crack develops in between shot peened zones, those cracks can propagate.
  • Carburizing involves the addition of carbon to the surface of low-carbon steels at temperatures generally between 850° C. and 950° C. (1560° F. and 1740° F.). At this temperature, the material is in its austenite crystalline state, with a high solubility for carbon. Hardening is accomplished when the high-carbon surface layer is subsequently quenched to form martensite with a high-carbon martensitic outer surface. The result is a carburized layer 1 ⁇ 8 to 1 ⁇ 2 mm thick. This surface provides good wear and fatigue resistance. It is superimposed on a tough, low-carbon steel core.
  • a gear goes through multiple phases of loading as the gear teeth engage, transfer torque, and disengage.
  • the mating of the teeth may be through single or multiple points of contact (i.e., several pairs of mating teeth.)
  • This loading typically produces the highest stress concentration at the fillet located at the base of the teeth. This is typically where cracks initiate in gears.
  • the face of the tooth above the pitch circle is the initial contact point between the mating teeth.
  • the first contact is a sliding contact friction as the two mating gears engage at the involutes and begin rolling. This pure slide is unavoidable. In this area pitting, spalling, and case crushing are the typical failure mechanisms. The greatest forces that are applied to the teeth occur at the point of the involutes where the rolling contact occurs. This rolling contact produces rolling contact fatigue.
  • shot peening cannot be used to surface harden tight areas, such as splines, inside diameters, and deep roots. Additionally because the shot impacts the surface in a denting fashion, it distorts the surface. This deformity may relieve cyclical fatigue issues, but may exacerbate rolling contact fatigue by introducing pitting and void spaces which can facilitate tensile loads in areas where yielding may occur. Additionally even in areas of crack propagation that have been improved, the introduction of dents or the failure to remove pits can create a point where cracking can initiate.
  • Lapping of gear teeth is another process currently used to strengthen teeth. Lapping is achieved in two different ways. In one process, the gears are allowed to run against one another in a friable abrasive slurry. The abrasive gradually refines the tooth surface to reduce friction and failure origin points. However, the abrasive does nothing to change the residual tensile characteristics of the teeth at the fillet.
  • the second type of lapping occurs in a vibratory bowl with a wet media in an acidic bath rubbing against the teeth.
  • This type of lapping offers similar surface and wear benefits, and can provide some smoothing in the fillet area.
  • this form of lapping isn't nearly as controlled as intermeshing gear lapping, and therefore can only be applied to achieve limited improvement before exceeding reasonable time cycle constraints and permanently deforming the desirable shape of the tooth face and flank.
  • the present invention relates to the a gear having an improved layer of compressive residual stress.
  • the gear including a plurality of teeth extending outward from a body. Each tooth is spaced apart from an adjacent tooth with the portion of the body between adjacent teeth defining a bottom land. Each tooth having a tooth face and the top land. The tooth face forming a tooth fillet at the juncture with the bottom land. The top land, the bottom land and the tooth face in combination define a surface of the gear.
  • a plurality of the teeth have a substantially continuous subsurface stress layer which extends substantially under the tooth face and top land.
  • the subsurface stress layer has a thickness of compressive residual stress.
  • At least a portion of the layer of compressive residual stress is formed by a high energy finishing process.
  • the high energy finishing process is performed in a high speed centrifugal processing apparatus that has an outer housing with a central axis, and at least one inner vessel with a central axis.
  • the gears are placed into the inner vessel along with an abrasive media.
  • the inner vessel is rotated about its central axis and about the central axis of the outer housing.
  • the inner vessel is rotated at high speed relative to the outer vessel.
  • the high speed rotation causes the abrasive media to contact the surface of the gear thereby creating at least a portion of the compressive residual stress in the gear.
  • the speed of the vessel is designed to produce accelerations of the media within the vessel in excess of about 10 g's. In a preferred embodiment, the accelerations are in excess of 15 g's and more preferably about 30 g's.
  • the subsurface layer of compressive stress is at least about 0.005 inches.
  • the thickness is about 0.010 inches and more preferably about 0.012 inches.
  • the compressive residual stress created in the gear has a maximum of at least about 50 ksi.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress is at least about 100 ksi and more preferably at least about 175 ksi.
  • FIGS. 1A-1D schematically illustrate the application of conventional peening on a material surface.
  • FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the path of a media particle as it interacts with the surface of a work piece in a centrifugal processor.
  • FIGS. 2B and 2C schematically illustrate the resulting residual compressive stress profile produced in a work piece using a media mixture according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the resulting residual compressive stress profile produced in a gear tooth in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the surface roughness between an unprocessed bearing race and a processed bearing race.
  • the present invention relates to a method and resulting gear that has survival and operating benefits that have been established through metallurgical, topographical, tribological, thermal, chemical, and work translation evaluation. Each benefit is directly attributable to the invention.
  • centrifugal processors such as those available from Mikronite Technologies, Inc. and disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,638, 5,848,929, 6,599,176, 6,733,375 and PCT/US03/21218, afford an almost perfect slide relationship between the part being processed and the media in the processing vessel that is used to modify the surface of the part.
  • the forces imposed on the media within a centrifugal processor are such that the media contacts the work piece at an angle of incidence that is typically not perpendicular to the work piece surface. This produces a desirable slide relationship since it tends to reduce or eliminate cumulative and inconsistent impact forces that plague the uniformity of surface and sub-surface treatment in other high compression processes such as hammering or peening.
  • the sliding signature of the media along the part surface produces a short (as compared to the total length of the piece) substantially linear scratch on the surface.
  • the angle of incidence of the media results in applied forces that are not only normal to the surface of the part, but also parallel to the surface.
  • shot peening and hammering are designed to apply a perpendicular or normal force onto the material. Accordingly, these existing methods produce only impact forces with localized, essentially point compression induced in the part.
  • FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the surface layer compression that results in a part subjected to centrifugal processing.
  • An exemplary trajectory T of a media M is shown. The media skips off the surface at high speed, thus producing the highly desirable scratching and sub-surface compression.
  • the fluidized media environment created by the centrifugal processor produces multidirectional scratches across the entire surface of the work piece, which produces a substantially uniform surface finish and sub-surface compression, see FIG. 2B , and permits the application of compressive stress in many remote regions, see FIG. 2C .
  • the centrifugal machine includes processing vessels into which the gear is placed, along with a media material.
  • the media is preferably composed of a plurality of small granular or carrier pellets with a surface coating of comparatively tiny hard abrasive particles.
  • the carrier pellets preferably have a size that permits the largest inertial moment while at the same time not being too large that they fail to reach all the points of the gear that need to be processed. Testing has determined that the use of the abrasive coated grains in high energy centrifugal machines produces reduced depth penetration of the abrasive into the material (on the order of less than 1 ⁇ 2 of the abrasive's size). Instead, the motion created by the centrifugal processor creates a dynamic and continuous sliding relationship between the gear and the coated media.
  • the impingement is only a fraction of what it would be if the media were directed orthogonal to the surface of the gear.
  • the result is a lap scratch of the surface.
  • the size of the abrasive and its lapping movement inhibits cumulative errors and deep digs or depressions that typically result from shot peening.
  • the present invention reduces the problem of deformation that is produced by shot peening, while still imparting equal or greater compressive stress.
  • the depth of compressive stress at 16 g's energy has been observed using XRT (X-ray Depth Profiling) testing to be in excess of 0.012 inches, exceeding industry standards for shot peening.
  • the compressive residual stress also has been measured to over 175 k psi, again exceeding standards of shot peening.
  • the gear is agitated in the centrifugal processor for a sufficient time to remove topological anomalies.
  • the present invention produces similar benefits as lapping.
  • the present method does not require meshing gears, instead using slide motion and much smaller media, it easily reaches the root and imperfect fillet of the gear tooth and applies sufficient force to induce a compressive residual stress while removing fracture-inducing anomalies.
  • the use of a high speed centrifugal processor and media mixture discussed above produces a gear with sub-surface stress and surface roughness reduction in less time and completely different than conventional processes.
  • the small media does not deform the encoded shape of the involutes of the tooth and, thus, does not negatively impact the proper rolling tooth relationship, which is one of the major drawbacks to the use of peening on gears.
  • the harmonics of the gear are preferentially altered in a way unmatched by conventional processes.
  • the continuous compressive residual stress surface layer has the effect of equalizing the electrical forces that are common to distressed metals.
  • the electrical forces are essentially neutralized. Consequently, anodic corrosion is now relatively remote or non-existent in the gear. This translates into stability in impure environments, such as when the gear is exposed to less than pure or contaminated lubricants.
  • the present invention provides a unique pretreatment process which results in a more even application of plasma and similar coatings that are affected by electrical forces on the surface.
  • the isotropic surface has several benefits.
  • the nature of liquids is to find a condition of stable minimum surface tension, which is generally a droplet in shape. Fluid flowing over a surface tends to form a capillary or trough with the fluid achieving a hydrodynamic barrier layer.
  • the isotropic surface imparted by the present invention has many small linear segmented scratches corresponding to the abrasive size. These troughs cause the fluid to spread. However, since the depth of the troughs is consistent, there are no valleys in which the fluid gathers. Thus, the layer that is formed is continuous and very thin, resulting in a protective lubricated surface with minimum need to overcome hydraulic forces.
  • the present invention provides a gear that has a consistent layer of residual compressive stress on the surface of the gear tooth, including in the area of the fillet.
  • This compressive stress layer is at least about 50 ksi and more preferably is at least about 100 ksi. In one embodiment, the stress layer is at least about 175 ksi.
  • the thickness of the layer can also be varied depending on many different factors, including the length of the processing time. However, the layer is preferably at least about 0.005 inches in thickness and more preferably is at least about 0.010 inches thick. In one embodiment, the layer is at least about 0.012 inches thick.
  • the present invention has applicability to various forms of gears, including spur, helical, and herringbone.
  • a media mix is used in the centrifugal processor that provides the necessary mass, hardness and abrasion to form the residual compressive stress layer in the product.
  • Suitable abrasives and media mixes are described in co-pending application titled “Media Mixture for Improved Compressive Stress in a Product,” (Attorney Docket No. 9436-36 US1), filed on ______, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • a carburized pinion gear was measured before and after application of the high energy finishing process.
  • the pinion Prior to application, the pinion had a compressive residual stress at its surface of 122.7 ksi as measured using X-ray diffraction.
  • the compressive residual stress was up to 204.3 ksi. That is a 66% increase.
  • the increase in compressive residual stress was consistently measured down to a depth of 0.015 inches. On average, there was a 50% increase in compressive residual stress through the depth.
  • Table 1A shows that the present invention produces a 67% decrease in the surface roughness of the carburized pinion gear as measured in terms of Ra.
  • Ra is the Arithmetic Mean Deviation of the roughness profile. This is a tremendous improvement in the surface roughness of a conventional pinion gear.
  • the peaks on the surface of a conventional carburized pinion gear were on average 34 ⁇ in. When these high peaks break off during use of the pinion, they tend to cause damage within the gearbox.
  • the present invention addresses this problem by significantly reducing the height of the peaks, essentially evening out the surface. This minimizes damage to the pinion gear and the gearbox.
  • Test Protocols 2-5 (shown below) were conducted on cutting flutes made from different materials. These tests show similar beneficial results as Test Protocol 1 discussed above.
  • Test Protocol 6 was performed on a bearing race made from E52100 steel. Again there was an increase in the compressive residual stress from 4% to 72.2%. Also shown in FIG. 4 is a chart of the Ra on the surface of the bearing race. As can be readily seen, the unprocessed part had significant variations over the surface resulting in an Ra of 10.5 ⁇ in. These variations result in potential hot spots where faults (e.g. cracks) can start. Furthermore, the variations in the surface contour generate vibrations that result in vibratory loading on the race and increased acoustic noise. The processed bearing race according to the present invention had a significant decrease in the surface roughness producing an Ra of 0.91 ⁇ in.
  • the present invention has been applied to several specimens. The following summarizes the test results.
  • the present invention results in a gear that is significantly different from conventional gears.
  • the process according to the present invention produces parts that have an improved (increased) surface and sub-surface compressive residual stress. This increased compressive residual stress helps to prevent and/or reduce the propagation of cracking in the products. Also, as discussed above, the process produces a gear with a very low surface roughness. This results in reduced loading on the part, including thermal loads, as well as reduced vibrations.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Gears, Cams (AREA)

Abstract

An improved gear including a plurality of teeth defining a surface, the teeth each having a substantially continuous first subsurface stress layer located below the surface, and a second subsurface stress layer located below the first subsurface stress layer, the first subsurface stress layer comprising a thickness of compressive residual stress.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/965,162, filed Sep. 27, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to gears and, more particularly, to an improved gear design with a sub-surface enhanced layer of compressive residual stress.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Residual stress is a stress that exists within a part without any external load, such as an applied force or thermal gradient. These stresses are induced during the manufacturing process, for example, due to working of the part, surface treatment of the part or temperature changes during part formation. Residual stresses within a part can be tensile or compressive. Most conventional manufacturing processes tend to induce residual tensile stresses into the component being fabricated.
  • It is well known that tensile stress tends to reduce the mechanical performance of materials. For example, cracks that form within a part tend to propagate more readily under the influence of tensile residual stresses in the part. These stresses act upon the crack causing the crack tip to extend through the part. Fatigue or cyclic loading in the vicinity of the crack can accelerate the crack propagation, which could lead to catastrophic failure of the component. It is also known that residual tensile stresses can cause corrosion in a part to propagate into cracking. Thus, residual tensile stresses in a component are generally not favorable.
  • One known way of reducing crack propagation in a component is by inducing a compressive residual stress in the vicinity of a crack tip. The compressive stress tends to inhibit crack growth, thus improving the fatigue life of the component. However, to date, the processes for introducing compressive residual stress in a part have been limited to shot and hammer peening, and carburizing. The drawback with peening processes is that they produce relatively large, inconsistent compressive stress spots in the component. FIGS. 1A-1D illustrate the effect of conventional peening on a metallic surface. FIG. 1A schematically illustrates the granular arrangement in a manufactured part. The grains are generally under a tensile residual stress. As a shot hits the surface, it deforms it locally, inducing compression into the material. See FIG. 1B. The force of the shot causes localized plastic deformation, resulting in a small area of subsurface residual compression.
  • Due to the size of the shots used in conventional shot peening, the localized areas of compression are not consistent. As such, the resulting product will generally include mixtures of tensile and compressive residual stresses at the surface. See FIG. 1C. In the event that a crack develops in between shot peened zones, those cracks can propagate.
  • In products that have tight internal radii, for example at the root of a gear tooth and in notched materials (which is generically shown in FIG. 1D), it is generally not possible for the surface to be completely peened. As such, the very points where there are high stress concentrations (e.g., notches and radiused corners) are the same places where shot peening cannot reach and, thus, cannot assist in reducing crack propagation.
  • Carburizing involves the addition of carbon to the surface of low-carbon steels at temperatures generally between 850° C. and 950° C. (1560° F. and 1740° F.). At this temperature, the material is in its austenite crystalline state, with a high solubility for carbon. Hardening is accomplished when the high-carbon surface layer is subsequently quenched to form martensite with a high-carbon martensitic outer surface. The result is a carburized layer ⅛ to ½ mm thick. This surface provides good wear and fatigue resistance. It is superimposed on a tough, low-carbon steel core.
  • One of the problems with carburizing is that the high temperature required to cause the material to go into its absorptive austenite state also causes the steel to creep slightly. As such, the net shape of the material changes. In parts that have very critical size constraints carburizing may be unacceptable. In products that mesh, such as gears, the slight variation in sizing can produce noise and vibrations in the transmission.
  • Current gear manufacturing processes involve carefully machined, ground, or hobbed gear teeth profiles with an outer diameter known as an addendum circle, a pitch circle corresponding to the preferred rolling point of the involutes, a clearance circle, and a relief, with the base fillets of the teeth forming the lowest dedendum circle. Tooth thickness and corresponding face width (i.e., the flat face to flat face dimension), as well as the top land, are all used to offset fatigue loads. However, sizing of these components can be controlled only to a limited extent without adversely affecting the performance of the part.
  • During operation, a gear goes through multiple phases of loading as the gear teeth engage, transfer torque, and disengage. Depending on the gearing arrangement, the mating of the teeth may be through single or multiple points of contact (i.e., several pairs of mating teeth.) In order for there to be multiple sets of mating teeth engaging at the same time, there is, to at least some degree, bending occurring in the teeth. Thus, the repeated engagement and disengagement of the teeth causes fatigue loading on the teeth. This loading typically produces the highest stress concentration at the fillet located at the base of the teeth. This is typically where cracks initiate in gears.
  • The face of the tooth above the pitch circle is the initial contact point between the mating teeth. The first contact is a sliding contact friction as the two mating gears engage at the involutes and begin rolling. This pure slide is unavoidable. In this area pitting, spalling, and case crushing are the typical failure mechanisms. The greatest forces that are applied to the teeth occur at the point of the involutes where the rolling contact occurs. This rolling contact produces rolling contact fatigue.
  • As discussed above, shot peening cannot be used to surface harden tight areas, such as splines, inside diameters, and deep roots. Additionally because the shot impacts the surface in a denting fashion, it distorts the surface. This deformity may relieve cyclical fatigue issues, but may exacerbate rolling contact fatigue by introducing pitting and void spaces which can facilitate tensile loads in areas where yielding may occur. Additionally even in areas of crack propagation that have been improved, the introduction of dents or the failure to remove pits can create a point where cracking can initiate.
  • Lapping of gear teeth is another process currently used to strengthen teeth. Lapping is achieved in two different ways. In one process, the gears are allowed to run against one another in a friable abrasive slurry. The abrasive gradually refines the tooth surface to reduce friction and failure origin points. However, the abrasive does nothing to change the residual tensile characteristics of the teeth at the fillet.
  • The second type of lapping occurs in a vibratory bowl with a wet media in an acidic bath rubbing against the teeth. This type of lapping offers similar surface and wear benefits, and can provide some smoothing in the fillet area. However, this form of lapping isn't nearly as controlled as intermeshing gear lapping, and therefore can only be applied to achieve limited improvement before exceeding reasonable time cycle constraints and permanently deforming the desirable shape of the tooth face and flank.
  • A need, therefore, exists for an improved gear design that minimizes cracking due to fatigue loads without adversely affecting part performance.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the a gear having an improved layer of compressive residual stress. The gear including a plurality of teeth extending outward from a body. Each tooth is spaced apart from an adjacent tooth with the portion of the body between adjacent teeth defining a bottom land. Each tooth having a tooth face and the top land. The tooth face forming a tooth fillet at the juncture with the bottom land. The top land, the bottom land and the tooth face in combination define a surface of the gear.
  • A plurality of the teeth have a substantially continuous subsurface stress layer which extends substantially under the tooth face and top land. The subsurface stress layer has a thickness of compressive residual stress. At least a portion of the layer of compressive residual stress is formed by a high energy finishing process. The high energy finishing process is performed in a high speed centrifugal processing apparatus that has an outer housing with a central axis, and at least one inner vessel with a central axis. The gears are placed into the inner vessel along with an abrasive media. The inner vessel is rotated about its central axis and about the central axis of the outer housing. The inner vessel is rotated at high speed relative to the outer vessel. The high speed rotation causes the abrasive media to contact the surface of the gear thereby creating at least a portion of the compressive residual stress in the gear.
  • In one embodiment, the speed of the vessel is designed to produce accelerations of the media within the vessel in excess of about 10 g's. In a preferred embodiment, the accelerations are in excess of 15 g's and more preferably about 30 g's.
  • The subsurface layer of compressive stress is at least about 0.005 inches. Preferably the thickness is about 0.010 inches and more preferably about 0.012 inches.
  • The compressive residual stress created in the gear has a maximum of at least about 50 ksi. Preferably the maximum compressive residual stress is at least about 100 ksi and more preferably at least about 175 ksi.
  • The foregoing and other features of the invention and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying figures. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and the description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show a form of the invention which is presently preferred. However, it should be understood that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.
  • FIGS. 1A-1D schematically illustrate the application of conventional peening on a material surface.
  • FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the path of a media particle as it interacts with the surface of a work piece in a centrifugal processor.
  • FIGS. 2B and 2C schematically illustrate the resulting residual compressive stress profile produced in a work piece using a media mixture according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the resulting residual compressive stress profile produced in a gear tooth in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the surface roughness between an unprocessed bearing race and a processed bearing race.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention relates to a method and resulting gear that has survival and operating benefits that have been established through metallurgical, topographical, tribological, thermal, chemical, and work translation evaluation. Each benefit is directly attributable to the invention. The method uses a high-energy centrifugal system operating at about 16 g's or higher (multiples of gravitational force as calculated with the formula wr(n×n) 0.000341=g's where w=weight in pounds at sea level, r=radius in feet, n=rpm). This measurement is taken at the center of the operating vessel with total forces at the most distant radius point increasing in a direct linear correlation.
  • It has been determined that centrifugal processors, such as those available from Mikronite Technologies, Inc. and disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,638, 5,848,929, 6,599,176, 6,733,375 and PCT/US03/21218, afford an almost perfect slide relationship between the part being processed and the media in the processing vessel that is used to modify the surface of the part. The forces imposed on the media within a centrifugal processor are such that the media contacts the work piece at an angle of incidence that is typically not perpendicular to the work piece surface. This produces a desirable slide relationship since it tends to reduce or eliminate cumulative and inconsistent impact forces that plague the uniformity of surface and sub-surface treatment in other high compression processes such as hammering or peening. The sliding signature of the media along the part surface produces a short (as compared to the total length of the piece) substantially linear scratch on the surface. The angle of incidence of the media results in applied forces that are not only normal to the surface of the part, but also parallel to the surface. In contrast, shot peening and hammering are designed to apply a perpendicular or normal force onto the material. Accordingly, these existing methods produce only impact forces with localized, essentially point compression induced in the part.
  • The scratching of the surface of a material in a high energy centrifugal processor results in substantially entire surface contact. Furthermore, the lateral or sliding motion of the media on the surface produces molecular movement of the work piece material, as opposed to simple crushing that is produced by peening. It has been determined that when the movement of the media is highly accelerated, the result is that the scratching produces a substantially uniform and contiguous surface and sub-surface (i.e., layer) of residual compression in the work piece. FIG. 2A schematically illustrates the surface layer compression that results in a part subjected to centrifugal processing. An exemplary trajectory T of a media M is shown. The media skips off the surface at high speed, thus producing the highly desirable scratching and sub-surface compression. The fluidized media environment created by the centrifugal processor produces multidirectional scratches across the entire surface of the work piece, which produces a substantially uniform surface finish and sub-surface compression, see FIG. 2B, and permits the application of compressive stress in many remote regions, see FIG. 2C.
  • The centrifugal machine includes processing vessels into which the gear is placed, along with a media material. The media is preferably composed of a plurality of small granular or carrier pellets with a surface coating of comparatively tiny hard abrasive particles. The carrier pellets preferably have a size that permits the largest inertial moment while at the same time not being too large that they fail to reach all the points of the gear that need to be processed. Testing has determined that the use of the abrasive coated grains in high energy centrifugal machines produces reduced depth penetration of the abrasive into the material (on the order of less than ½ of the abrasive's size). Instead, the motion created by the centrifugal processor creates a dynamic and continuous sliding relationship between the gear and the coated media. As such, the impingement is only a fraction of what it would be if the media were directed orthogonal to the surface of the gear. The result is a lap scratch of the surface. The size of the abrasive and its lapping movement inhibits cumulative errors and deep digs or depressions that typically result from shot peening. Thus, the present invention reduces the problem of deformation that is produced by shot peening, while still imparting equal or greater compressive stress.
  • The depth of compressive stress at 16 g's energy has been observed using XRT (X-ray Depth Profiling) testing to be in excess of 0.012 inches, exceeding industry standards for shot peening. The compressive residual stress also has been measured to over 175 k psi, again exceeding standards of shot peening.
  • The gear is agitated in the centrifugal processor for a sufficient time to remove topological anomalies. In doing so, the present invention produces similar benefits as lapping. However, since the present method does not require meshing gears, instead using slide motion and much smaller media, it easily reaches the root and imperfect fillet of the gear tooth and applies sufficient force to induce a compressive residual stress while removing fracture-inducing anomalies. The use of a high speed centrifugal processor and media mixture discussed above produces a gear with sub-surface stress and surface roughness reduction in less time and completely different than conventional processes. In addition, the small media does not deform the encoded shape of the involutes of the tooth and, thus, does not negatively impact the proper rolling tooth relationship, which is one of the major drawbacks to the use of peening on gears.
  • The use of a high speed centrifugal processor applies far greater forces on the gear and is able to reach areas of the gear tooth that are not achievable by any conventional means. In addition, because of the universal immersion and applied forces to the gear, the processed gear becomes truly isotropic in nature. Heretofore, the term “isotropic” has been limited to describing regional areas where there was virtually identical surface anomalies. However, the present invention provides a truly isotropic gear since the loading and coverage of the abrasive media is consistent over substantially the entire product. The resulting compressive residual stress and refined topological surface extends over substantially the entire gear surface, from the tip to the root.
  • Also, because of the substantially continuous compressive residual stress surface layer in the part (i.e., elimination of tensile variations), the harmonics of the gear are preferentially altered in a way unmatched by conventional processes.
  • Furthermore, the continuous compressive residual stress surface layer has the effect of equalizing the electrical forces that are common to distressed metals. As a result, the electrical forces are essentially neutralized. Consequently, anodic corrosion is now relatively remote or non-existent in the gear. This translates into stability in impure environments, such as when the gear is exposed to less than pure or contaminated lubricants. As such, the present invention provides a unique pretreatment process which results in a more even application of plasma and similar coatings that are affected by electrical forces on the surface.
  • Even in lubricants that are specified correctly, when a part is subjected to a load, the compression of the liquid results in topical heat in the part. This issue is controlled by the gear having a more accurate surface, free of radical highs and compression zones. Additionally, forces of thermal behavior tend to follow lines of uniformity in surface and subsurface structure. Heat will conduct more evenly, and therefore with fewer tendencies to anneal or distort, if the heat has a natural path leading to its dissipation. The increased and consistent density in the gear made in accordance with the present invention maintains heat effects on the surface, thereby allowing the heat to disperse through conduction into the oil and radiation to adjacent materials, instead of propagating through the part. Accordingly, a gear made in accordance with the present invention runs at a lower temperature than conventional gears.
  • Tribologically, the isotropic surface has several benefits. The nature of liquids is to find a condition of stable minimum surface tension, which is generally a droplet in shape. Fluid flowing over a surface tends to form a capillary or trough with the fluid achieving a hydrodynamic barrier layer. The isotropic surface imparted by the present invention has many small linear segmented scratches corresponding to the abrasive size. These troughs cause the fluid to spread. However, since the depth of the troughs is consistent, there are no valleys in which the fluid gathers. Thus, the layer that is formed is continuous and very thin, resulting in a protective lubricated surface with minimum need to overcome hydraulic forces.
  • Thus, the present invention provides a gear that has a consistent layer of residual compressive stress on the surface of the gear tooth, including in the area of the fillet. This is schematically shown in FIG. 3. This compressive stress layer is at least about 50 ksi and more preferably is at least about 100 ksi. In one embodiment, the stress layer is at least about 175 ksi. The thickness of the layer can also be varied depending on many different factors, including the length of the processing time. However, the layer is preferably at least about 0.005 inches in thickness and more preferably is at least about 0.010 inches thick. In one embodiment, the layer is at least about 0.012 inches thick.
  • The present invention has applicability to various forms of gears, including spur, helical, and herringbone.
  • In order to produce gears and other toothed or irregularly shaped objects that cannot be traditionally hardened using peening, a media mix is used in the centrifugal processor that provides the necessary mass, hardness and abrasion to form the residual compressive stress layer in the product. Suitable abrasives and media mixes are described in co-pending application titled “Media Mixture for Improved Compressive Stress in a Product,” (Attorney Docket No. 9436-36 US1), filed on ______, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Testing has also established that use of the high energy centrifugal processors described above in combination with the media can enhance even conventionally processed gears. For example, as discussed above, one process for creating a layer of compressive residual stress in a gear is to carburize the surface of the gear. One drawback to carburizing is that the amount of compressive is not as high as would be desired. Using the processing system according to the present invention, conventionally carburized products, including pinion gears, were produced that have significantly increased compressive residual stress.
  • Referring to Test Protocol 1 shown below, a carburized pinion gear was measured before and after application of the high energy finishing process. Prior to application, the pinion had a compressive residual stress at its surface of 122.7 ksi as measured using X-ray diffraction. After application of the process according to the present invention, the compressive residual stress was up to 204.3 ksi. That is a 66% increase. As shown in the chart, the increase in compressive residual stress was consistently measured down to a depth of 0.015 inches. On average, there was a 50% increase in compressive residual stress through the depth.
  • Table 1A shows that the present invention produces a 67% decrease in the surface roughness of the carburized pinion gear as measured in terms of Ra. Ra is the Arithmetic Mean Deviation of the roughness profile. This is a tremendous improvement in the surface roughness of a conventional pinion gear. As shown the peaks on the surface of a conventional carburized pinion gear were on average 34 μin. When these high peaks break off during use of the pinion, they tend to cause damage within the gearbox. The present invention addresses this problem by significantly reducing the height of the peaks, essentially evening out the surface. This minimizes damage to the pinion gear and the gearbox.
  • Test Protocols 2-5 (shown below) were conducted on cutting flutes made from different materials. These tests show similar beneficial results as Test Protocol 1 discussed above.
  • Test Protocol 6 was performed on a bearing race made from E52100 steel. Again there was an increase in the compressive residual stress from 4% to 72.2%. Also shown in FIG. 4 is a chart of the Ra on the surface of the bearing race. As can be readily seen, the unprocessed part had significant variations over the surface resulting in an Ra of 10.5 μin. These variations result in potential hot spots where faults (e.g. cracks) can start. Furthermore, the variations in the surface contour generate vibrations that result in vibratory loading on the race and increased acoustic noise. The processed bearing race according to the present invention had a significant decrease in the surface roughness producing an Ra of 0.91 μin.
  • Test Results
  • The present invention has been applied to several specimens. The following summarizes the test results.
  • Test Protocol-1
    • Material—4140 Steel—Carburized Pinion Gear
    • Processing time—approximately 45 minutes at about 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface to 0.015 inches
  • Location—measurement at same point but at different depths
    TABLE 1
    Compressive Residual Stress v. Depth - Pinion Gear
    Stress (ksi)
    Depth Gear U Gear M Percentage
    (inches) (Unprocessed) (Processed) Delta Increase
    0 −122.7 −204.3 −81.6 66.5%
    0.0005 −86.2 −124.6 −38.4 44.5%
    0.001 −59.8 −95.7 −35.9 60.0%
    0.002 −32.3 −59.8 −27.5 85.1%
    0.004 −25.3 −37.6 −12.3 48.6%
    0.007 −32.1 −42.7 −10.6 33.0%
    0.01 −27 −43.3 −16.3 60.4%
    0.015 −49.1 −51.4 −2.3  4.7%
  • TABLE 1A
    Ra on Surface - Pinion Gear
    Gear U Gear M Percentage
    (Unprocessed) (Processed) Decrease
    34 μin 11 μin 67.6%
  • Test Protocol-2
    • Material—Imported High Strength Steel ½ End Mill 2 Flutes—Solid carbide
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 2
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −20 −40.48 39%
    45° −11.2 −32.66 190% 
    315°  −27.27 −39.36 44%
  • Test Protocol-3
    • Material—American High Strength Cobalt Steel ½ End Mill 2 Flutes—Square end
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 3
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −95.11 −115.01 20%
    45° −46.6 −94.71 104% 
    315°  −125.03 −130.41  4%
  • Test Protocol-4
    • Material—American Solid Carbide 7/16 End Mill 2 Flutes—Solid carbide
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location inside flute, 3 measurements at same point, but at different angles
    TABLE 4
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −79.89 −114.58 44%
    45° −114.48 −129.82 13%
    315°  −16.25 −68.53 325% 
  • Test Protocol-5
    • Material—American Hob Steel 2 Piece Test/(DP40PAZOWD, 057-1°21′), M42 Tin
    • Coated
    • Processing time—8 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface
  • Location-1 measurement
    TABLE 5
    Unprocessed Processed Percentage
    Location (ksi) (ksi) Increase
    90° −8.2 −17.7 115%
  • Test Protocol-6
    • Material—E52100 Steel—Bearing Race
    • Processing time—6 minutes at 30 g's
    • Depth reading—surface to 0.02 inches
  • Location—measurement at same point, but at different depths
    TABLE 6
    E52100 Steel - Bearing Race
    Unprocessed Processed
    Depth Stress Depth Stress Percentage
    (inches) (ksi) (inches) (ksi) Increase
    0 −37.18 0 −57.95 55.8%
    0.0005 −40.08 0.0006 −46.2 15.2%
    0.001 −37.79 0.001 −39.3   4%
    0.0019 −35.55 0.0021 −41.11 15.6%
    0.0042 −32.08 0.004 −40.62 26.6%
    0.0068 −29.4 0.0069 −30.81  4.8%
    0.0104 −16.85 0.0098 −29.02 72.2%
    0.0151 −14.79 0.015 −20.53 38.8%
    0.02 −9.27 0.021 −12.93 39.5%
  • Accordingly, the present invention results in a gear that is significantly different from conventional gears. The process according to the present invention produces parts that have an improved (increased) surface and sub-surface compressive residual stress. This increased compressive residual stress helps to prevent and/or reduce the propagation of cracking in the products. Also, as discussed above, the process produces a gear with a very low surface roughness. This results in reduced loading on the part, including thermal loads, as well as reduced vibrations.
  • Although the invention has been described and illustrated with respect to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and additions may be made therein and thereto, without parting from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (20)

1. A gear including a plurality of teeth extending outward from a body, each tooth being spaced apart from an adjacent tooth, the portion of the body between adjacent teeth defining a bottom land, each tooth having a tooth face and the top land, the tooth face forming a tooth fillet at the juncture with the bottom land, the top land, the bottom land and the tooth face defining a surface of the gear, the gear comprising:
a plurality of the teeth each having a substantially continuous subsurface stress layer which extends substantially under the tooth face and top land, the subsurface stress layer having a thickness of compressive residual stress, at least a portion of the layer of compressive residual stress being formed by a process comprising the steps of:
providing a high speed centrifugal processing apparatus having an outer housing with a central axis, and at least one inner vessel with a central axis;
placing the gear into the inner vessel;
placing abrasive media into the inner vessel; and
rotating the inner vessel about its central axis and about the central axis of the outer housing, the inner vessel rotating at high speed relative to the outer vessel, the high speed rotation causing the abrasive media to contact the surface of the gear, the contact by the abrasive creating at least a portion of the compressive residual stress in the gear.
2. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the thickness of the compressive residual stress is non-uniform.
3. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the thickness of the compressive residual stress is at least about 0.005 inches.
4. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the thickness of the compressive residual stress is at least about 0.010 inches.
5. A gear according to claim 4 wherein the thickness of the compressive residual stress is greater than about 0.012 inches.
6. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the subsurface stress layer extends substantially under the tooth fillet.
7. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the subsurface stress layer extends substantially under the tooth fillet and the bottom land.
8. A gear according to claim 1 wherein magnitude of the compressive residual stress is not uniform across the thickness.
9. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the compressive residual stress is at least about 50 ksi.
10. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the compressive residual stress is at least about 100 ksi.
11. A gear according to claim 1 wherein the compressive residual stress is at least about 175 ksi.
12. A gear including a plurality of teeth extending outward from a body, each tooth being spaced apart from an adjacent tooth, the portion of the body between adjacent teeth defining a bottom land, each tooth having a tooth face and the top land, the tooth face forming a tooth fillet at the juncture with the bottom land, the top land, the bottom land and the tooth face defining a surface of the gear, the gear comprising:
a plurality of the teeth each having a substantially continuous first subsurface stress layer located below the surface, and a second subsurface stress layer located below the first subsurface stress layer, the first subsurface stress layer comprising a thickness of compressive residual stress, at least a portion of the layer of compressive residual stress being formed by a process comprising the steps of:
providing a high speed centrifugal processing apparatus having an outer housing with a central axis, and at least one inner vessel with a central axis;
placing the gear into the inner vessel;
placing abrasive media into the inner vessel; and
rotating the inner vessel about its central axis and about the central axis of the outer housing, the inner vessel rotating at high speed relative to the outer vessel, the high speed rotation causing the abrasive media to contact the surface of the gear, the contact by the abrasive creating at least a portion of the compressive residual stress in the gear.
13. A gear according to claim 12 wherein the thickness residual compressive stress is at least about 0.005 inches.
14. A gear according to claim 12 wherein the thickness of the residual compressive stress is greater than about 0.012 inches.
15. A gear according to claim 12 wherein the subsurface stress layer decreases in magnitude through substantially the first layer from a maximum at the surface.
16. A gear according to claim 12 wherein the residual compressive stress is at least about 50 ksi.
17. A gear according to claim 12 wherein the gear includes a layer below the surface that is carburized, and wherein the compressive residual stress extends below the surface and the carburized layer.
18. A method of increasing the compressive residual stress in a gear comprising the steps of:
providing a high speed centrifugal processing apparatus having an outer housing with a central axis, and at least one inner vessel with a central axis;
placing a gear into the inner vessel;
placing abrasive media into the inner vessel; and
rotating the inner vessel about its central axis and about the central axis of the outer housing, the inner vessel rotating at a speed relative to the outer vessel so as to produce acceleration of the media within the vessel in excess of 10 g's, the high speed rotation causing the abrasive media to contact the surface of the gear, the contact by the abrasive creating at least a portion of the compressive residual stress in the gear.
19. A method of increasing the compressive residual stress according to claim 18 wherein the accelerations are in excess of 15 g's.
20. A method of increasing the compressive residual stress according to claim 18 wherein the inner vessel is rotated for at least 6 minutes.
US11/210,060 2001-09-27 2005-08-23 Sub-surface enhanced gear Abandoned US20050279430A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/210,060 US20050279430A1 (en) 2001-09-27 2005-08-23 Sub-surface enhanced gear

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/965,162 US20020078813A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2001-09-27 Saw blade
US11/210,060 US20050279430A1 (en) 2001-09-27 2005-08-23 Sub-surface enhanced gear

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/965,162 Continuation-In-Part US20020078813A1 (en) 2000-09-28 2001-09-27 Saw blade

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050279430A1 true US20050279430A1 (en) 2005-12-22

Family

ID=46205682

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/210,060 Abandoned US20050279430A1 (en) 2001-09-27 2005-08-23 Sub-surface enhanced gear

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20050279430A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7364803B1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2008-04-29 Keystone Investment Corporation High density dual helical gear and method for manufacture thereof
US20120132024A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2012-05-31 Miba Sinter Austria Gmbh Gear wheel
US20120209418A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2012-08-16 Liebherr-Verzahntechnik Gmbh Method of manufacturing a multiple of identical gears by means of cutting machining
US20120247249A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2012-10-04 Nippon Steel Corporation Gears and its process of manufacture
WO2016126456A1 (en) * 2015-02-04 2016-08-11 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Methods and processes of forming gears
CN108256241A (en) * 2018-01-23 2018-07-06 重庆大学 A kind of Forecasting Methodology of heavy-duty gear subsurface crack initiation
CN110023519A (en) * 2016-10-28 2019-07-16 Mvo奥斯塔尔博金属加工有限公司 Method for manufacturing gear strip and the rack gear according to the method processing
USRE47828E1 (en) * 2010-09-27 2020-01-28 Nsk Ltd. Outer ring for a shell-type radial needle bearing and manufacturing method thereof
CN115556005A (en) * 2022-10-21 2023-01-03 重庆大学 Gear high-surface integrity creation method based on novel composite process

Citations (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1512350A (en) * 1922-07-24 1924-10-21 William M Mccorkle Disk scouring and polishing apparatus
US2550630A (en) * 1946-04-15 1951-04-24 Wolverhampton Die Casting Comp Device for use in polishing articles
US3034378A (en) * 1961-05-18 1962-05-15 Do All Company Method of making carbide tipped saw blade and other tools
US3107706A (en) * 1960-08-12 1963-10-22 Heinemann Saw Corp Saw blade
US3233372A (en) * 1962-05-19 1966-02-08 Kobayashi Hisaminc Surface finishing in high speed gyrating barrels
US3513604A (en) * 1966-11-26 1970-05-26 Tipton Mfg Co High speed surface finishing method
US4073095A (en) * 1976-01-21 1978-02-14 Manfrid Dreher Centrifugal drum polishing machine
US4117748A (en) * 1976-07-28 1978-10-03 Wiltshire Cutlery Company Proprietary Limited Knife scabbard and sharpening device
US4280302A (en) * 1978-11-06 1981-07-28 Ietatsu Ohno Grinding method and apparatus
US4580371A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-04-08 Iolab Corporation Method for tumble grinding optical lens edge
US4586292A (en) * 1985-01-30 1986-05-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Machine imparting complex rotary motion for lapping a spherical inner diameter
US4967514A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-11-06 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Tumbling apparatus with double rotation
US5140783A (en) * 1990-06-26 1992-08-25 Hoffman Steve E Method for surface finishing of articles
US5355638A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-10-18 Hoffman Steve E Traction drive centrifugal finisher
US5454749A (en) * 1990-09-21 1995-10-03 Ohno; Ietatsu Grinding method and apparatus
US5458210A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-10-17 The Sollami Company Drill bits and blades therefor
US5471751A (en) * 1993-12-15 1995-12-05 Sandvik Windsor Corporation Low friction guide bar for a chain saw
US5477616A (en) * 1992-04-24 1995-12-26 Mcpherson's Limited Coated knife blades
US5492188A (en) * 1994-06-17 1996-02-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Stress-reduced superhard cutting element
US5555788A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-09-17 Credo Tool Company Saw blade
US5802932A (en) * 1994-04-18 1998-09-08 Braun Aktiengesellschaft Cutter for a cutting device of an electric shaving apparatus or beard trimmer
US5848929A (en) * 1997-03-24 1998-12-15 H Technology Centrifugal finisher with fixed outer vessel and rotatable inner vessel
US5873770A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-02-23 The Timken Company Vibratory finishing process
US5896800A (en) * 1995-09-26 1999-04-27 Black & Decker Inc. Circular saw blade
US5971087A (en) * 1998-05-20 1999-10-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US6035844A (en) * 1996-09-25 2000-03-14 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Cutting tool and method for making the same
US6067888A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-05-30 Black & Decker Inc. Surface treatment of circular saw blades
US6161634A (en) * 1997-09-04 2000-12-19 Minikus; James C. Cutter element with non-rectilinear crest
US6220375B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-04-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Polycrystalline diamond cutters having modified residual stresses
US6293020B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2001-09-25 Nitinol Technologies, Inc. Cutting instruments
US20020078813A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-27 Hoffman Steve E. Saw blade
US6511559B2 (en) * 1999-06-23 2003-01-28 Fraunhofer-Geselleschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for producing wear-resistant edge layers in precipitation-hardenable materials
US6599176B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-07-29 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. High speed centrifugal processor
US6708594B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2004-03-23 Kanefusa Kabushiki Kaisha Circular saw
US6733375B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-05-11 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Horizontal finishing machine
US6863207B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-03-08 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. System for high speed centrifugal welding
US6863600B2 (en) * 2002-12-17 2005-03-08 Edgecraft Corporation Apparatus for precision edge refinement of metallic cutting blades
US6875081B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-04-05 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Method of manufacturing a tool using a rotational processing apparatus

Patent Citations (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1512350A (en) * 1922-07-24 1924-10-21 William M Mccorkle Disk scouring and polishing apparatus
US2550630A (en) * 1946-04-15 1951-04-24 Wolverhampton Die Casting Comp Device for use in polishing articles
US3107706A (en) * 1960-08-12 1963-10-22 Heinemann Saw Corp Saw blade
US3034378A (en) * 1961-05-18 1962-05-15 Do All Company Method of making carbide tipped saw blade and other tools
US3233372A (en) * 1962-05-19 1966-02-08 Kobayashi Hisaminc Surface finishing in high speed gyrating barrels
US3513604A (en) * 1966-11-26 1970-05-26 Tipton Mfg Co High speed surface finishing method
US4073095A (en) * 1976-01-21 1978-02-14 Manfrid Dreher Centrifugal drum polishing machine
US4117748A (en) * 1976-07-28 1978-10-03 Wiltshire Cutlery Company Proprietary Limited Knife scabbard and sharpening device
US4280302A (en) * 1978-11-06 1981-07-28 Ietatsu Ohno Grinding method and apparatus
US4580371A (en) * 1983-10-17 1986-04-08 Iolab Corporation Method for tumble grinding optical lens edge
US4586292A (en) * 1985-01-30 1986-05-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Machine imparting complex rotary motion for lapping a spherical inner diameter
US4967514A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-11-06 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Tumbling apparatus with double rotation
US5140783A (en) * 1990-06-26 1992-08-25 Hoffman Steve E Method for surface finishing of articles
US5454749A (en) * 1990-09-21 1995-10-03 Ohno; Ietatsu Grinding method and apparatus
US5477616A (en) * 1992-04-24 1995-12-26 Mcpherson's Limited Coated knife blades
US5355638A (en) * 1992-09-08 1994-10-18 Hoffman Steve E Traction drive centrifugal finisher
US5458210A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-10-17 The Sollami Company Drill bits and blades therefor
US5471751A (en) * 1993-12-15 1995-12-05 Sandvik Windsor Corporation Low friction guide bar for a chain saw
US5802932A (en) * 1994-04-18 1998-09-08 Braun Aktiengesellschaft Cutter for a cutting device of an electric shaving apparatus or beard trimmer
US5492188A (en) * 1994-06-17 1996-02-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Stress-reduced superhard cutting element
US5555788A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-09-17 Credo Tool Company Saw blade
US5896800A (en) * 1995-09-26 1999-04-27 Black & Decker Inc. Circular saw blade
US5873770A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-02-23 The Timken Company Vibratory finishing process
US6035844A (en) * 1996-09-25 2000-03-14 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Cutting tool and method for making the same
US6293020B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2001-09-25 Nitinol Technologies, Inc. Cutting instruments
US5848929A (en) * 1997-03-24 1998-12-15 H Technology Centrifugal finisher with fixed outer vessel and rotatable inner vessel
US6067888A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-05-30 Black & Decker Inc. Surface treatment of circular saw blades
US6161634A (en) * 1997-09-04 2000-12-19 Minikus; James C. Cutter element with non-rectilinear crest
US6196341B1 (en) * 1998-05-20 2001-03-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US5971087A (en) * 1998-05-20 1999-10-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
US6220375B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-04-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Polycrystalline diamond cutters having modified residual stresses
US6708594B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2004-03-23 Kanefusa Kabushiki Kaisha Circular saw
US6511559B2 (en) * 1999-06-23 2003-01-28 Fraunhofer-Geselleschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for producing wear-resistant edge layers in precipitation-hardenable materials
US20020078813A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-27 Hoffman Steve E. Saw blade
US6599176B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-07-29 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. High speed centrifugal processor
US6733375B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-05-11 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Horizontal finishing machine
US6863207B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-03-08 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. System for high speed centrifugal welding
US6875081B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-04-05 Mikronite Technologies Group Inc. Method of manufacturing a tool using a rotational processing apparatus
US6863600B2 (en) * 2002-12-17 2005-03-08 Edgecraft Corporation Apparatus for precision edge refinement of metallic cutting blades

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7364803B1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2008-04-29 Keystone Investment Corporation High density dual helical gear and method for manufacture thereof
US20120132024A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2012-05-31 Miba Sinter Austria Gmbh Gear wheel
US9291248B2 (en) * 2009-05-20 2016-03-22 Miba Sinter Austria Gmbh Gear wheel
US20120247249A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2012-10-04 Nippon Steel Corporation Gears and its process of manufacture
US8733199B2 (en) * 2010-04-01 2014-05-27 Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. Gears and its process of manufacture
US20120209418A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2012-08-16 Liebherr-Verzahntechnik Gmbh Method of manufacturing a multiple of identical gears by means of cutting machining
US9440299B2 (en) * 2010-06-14 2016-09-13 Liebherr-Verzahntechnik Gmbh Method of manufacturing multiple identical gears using a gear cutting machine
USRE47828E1 (en) * 2010-09-27 2020-01-28 Nsk Ltd. Outer ring for a shell-type radial needle bearing and manufacturing method thereof
WO2016126456A1 (en) * 2015-02-04 2016-08-11 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Methods and processes of forming gears
US10494687B2 (en) 2015-02-04 2019-12-03 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Methods and processes of forming gears
US11041221B2 (en) 2015-02-04 2021-06-22 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Methods and processes of forming gears
CN110023519A (en) * 2016-10-28 2019-07-16 Mvo奥斯塔尔博金属加工有限公司 Method for manufacturing gear strip and the rack gear according to the method processing
CN108256241A (en) * 2018-01-23 2018-07-06 重庆大学 A kind of Forecasting Methodology of heavy-duty gear subsurface crack initiation
CN115556005A (en) * 2022-10-21 2023-01-03 重庆大学 Gear high-surface integrity creation method based on novel composite process

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20050279430A1 (en) Sub-surface enhanced gear
Zhang et al. A comparison of the effects of traditional shot peening and micro-shot peening on the scuffing resistance of carburized and quenched gear steel
AU2009202134B2 (en) Planetary gearbox
US8782902B2 (en) Method of making bearing using ultrasonic nano crystal surface modification technology
US7677070B2 (en) Shot-peening process
Zhang et al. Study on the relation between surface integrity and contact fatigue of carburized gears
Fernandez et al. Increase wind gearbox power density by means of IGS (Improved Gear Surface)
JPH02138554A (en) Highly strenghtened gear
Alban Failures of gears
Kratzer et al. Investigation of the effects of surface roughness and shot peening on the tooth root bending strength of case-carburized gears
Bull et al. The effect of the white layer on micro-pitting and surface contact fatigue failure of nitrided gears
Sroka et al. Superfinsihing gears-the state of the art.
US20060018782A1 (en) Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product
JP2000280120A (en) Manufacture of gear
Uzun et al. Pitting formation in concave-convex gears manufactured from AISI 8620 steel
Mallipeddi Surface Integrity of Case-hardened Gears-with Particular Reference to Running-in and Micropitting
Zhang et al. The evaluation of bending fatigue testing of austempered ductile iron spur gear
Lawerenz Shot peening and its effect on gearing
Jayaraman et al. LPB as a Crack Initiation Resistant Process for Case Hardened Steels
JP2003183808A (en) Mechanical structural part
Michaud et al. Chemically Accelerated Vibratory Finishing for the Elimination of Wear and Pitting of Alloy Steel Gears
Breen Fundamentals of Gear Stress/Strength Relationships—Materials
Yoshizaki Improvement in tooth surface strength of carburized transmission gears by fine particle bombarding process
Goman et al. Contact endurance of gearing teeth subjected to ion-beam nitriding
Yamanaka et al. Bending Strength of Carburized Forged Spur Gear

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MIKRONITE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOFFMAN, STEVE E.;BREDESON, CRAIG;MANNING, DANIEL;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016919/0989

Effective date: 20050630

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION