US20020110476A1

US20020110476A1 - Heat and corrosion resistant cast stainless steels with improved high temperature strength and ductility

Info

Publication number: US20020110476A1
Application number: US09/736,741
Authority: US
Inventors: Philip Maziasz; Tim McGreevy; Michael Pollard; Chad Siebenaler; Robert Swindeman
Original assignee: Caterpillar Inc
Current assignee: Caterpillar Inc; UT Battelle LLC
Priority date: 2000-12-14
Filing date: 2000-12-14
Publication date: 2002-08-15
Also published as: US20030056860A1; US20030084967A1; US7153373B2; EP1219720A2; USRE41504E1; KR100856659B1; ATE523610T1; USRE41100E1; EP2113581A1; US7255755B2; EP1219720B1; EP1219720A3; EP2113581B1; JP2002194511A; ES2503715T3; ES2369392T3; KR20020046988A

Abstract

A cast stainless steel alloy and articles formed therefrom containing about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % manganese, 0.02 wt. % to 0.50 wt. % N, and less than 0.15 wt. % sulfur provides high temperature strength both in the matrix and at the grain boundaries without reducing ductility due to cracking along boundaries with continuous or nearly-continuous carbides. Alloys of the present invention also have increased nitrogen solubility thereby enhancing strength at all temperatures because nitride precipitates or nitrogen porosity during casting are not observed. The solubility of nitrogen is dramatically enhanced by the presence of manganese, which also retains or improves the solubility of carbon thereby providing additional solid solution strengthening due to the presence of manganese and nitrogen, and combined carbon. Such solution strengthening enhances the high temperature precipitation-strengthening benefits of fine dispersions of NbC. Such solid solution effects also enhance the stability of the austenite matrix from resistance to excess sigma phase or chrome carbide formation at higher service temperatures. The presence of sulfides is substantially eliminated.

Description

[0001] This invention was made with U.S. Government support under U.S. Department of Energy Contract No.: DE-AC05-960R2264 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to cast steel alloys of the CF8C and CN-12 types with improved strength and ductility at high temperatures. More particularly, this invention relates to CN-12 and CF8C stainless steel alloys and articles made therefrom having excellent high temperature strength, creep resistance and aging resistance, with reduced niobium carbides, manganese sulfides, and chrome carbides along grain and substructure boundaries.

BACKGROUND ART

There is a need for high strength, oxidation resistant and crack resistant cast alloys for use in internal combustion engine components such as exhaust manifolds and turbo-charger housings and gas-turbine engine components such as combustor housings as well as other components that must function in extreme environments for prolonged periods of time. The need for improved high strength, oxidation resistant, crack resistant cast alloys arises from the desire to increase operating temperatures of diesel engines, gasoline engines, and gas-turbine engines in effort of increasing fuel efficiency and the desire to increase the warranted operating hours or miles for diesel engines, gasoline engines and gas-turbine engines.

Current materials used for applications such as exhaust manifolds, turbo-charger housings and combustor housings are limited by oxidation and corrosion resistance as well as by strength at high temperatures and detrimental effects of aging. Specifically, current exhaust manifold materials, such as high silicon and molybdenum cast ductile iron (Hi—Si—Mo) and austenitic ductile iron (Ni-resist) must be replaced by cast stainless steels when used for more severe applications such as higher operating temperatures or when longer operating lifetimes are demanded due to increased warranty coverage. The currently commercially available cast stainless steels include ferritic stainless steels such as NHSR-F5N or austenitic stainless steels such as NHSR-A3N, CF8C and CN-12. However, these currently-available cast stainless steels are deficient in terms of tensile and creep strength at temperatures exceeding 600° C., do not provide adequate cyclic oxidation resistance for temperatures exceeding 700° C., do not provide sufficient room temperature ductility either as-cast or after service exposure and aging, do not have the requisite long-term stability of the original microstructure and lack long-term resistance to cracking during severe thermal cycling.

Currently, the corrosion-resistant grade of cast austenitic stainless steel, CN-12, is in commercial use for automotive applications but is not optimized for extended service applications (e.g. diesel applications). CN-12 provides adequate strength and aesthetics for automobiles for the anticipated life in comparison to cast iron, but lacks the improved creep resistance that is optimal when mounting turbo chargers (70 lbs.) onto diesel exhaust manifolds. Currently commercially available CN-12 austenitic stainless steel includes about 25 wt. % chromium, 13 wt. % nickel, smaller amounts of carbon, nitrogen, niobium, silicon, manganese, molybdenum and sulfur. The addition of sulfur is considered essential or desirable for machineability from the cast material. The amount of added sulfur ranges from 0.11 wt. % to 0.15 wt. %.

Currently-available cast austenitic stainless CF8C steels include from 18 wt. % to 21 wt. % chromium, 9 wt. % to 12 wt. % nickel and smaller amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, phosphorous, sulfur and niobium. CF8C typically includes about 2 wt. % silicon, about 1.5 wt. % manganese and about 0.04 wt. % sulfur. CF8C is a niobium stabilized grade of austentic stainless steel most suitable for aqueous corrosion resistance at temperatures below 500° C. In the standard form CF8C has inferior strength compared to CN12 at temperatures above 600° C.

It is therefore desirable to have a steel alloy and articles made from a steel alloy that have improved strength-at high temperatures and improved ductility for engine component applications requiring severe thermal cycling, high operation temperatures and extended warranty coverage.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one example of the present invention, a stainless steel alloy is provided that contains from about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % manganese and less than about 0.10 wt. % sulfur.

In accordance with another example of the present invention, a stainless steel alloy is provided that contains from about 0.03 wt. % sulfur or less, from about 2 wt. % to about 5 wt. % manganese and niobium and carbon in a niobium:carbon wt. % ratio ranging from about 3.5 to about 5.0.

In accordance with another example of the present invention, a stainless steel is provided that contains from about 2 wt. % to about 5 wt. % manganese, less than about 0.03 wt. % sulfur and about 0.8 wt. % silicon or less.

Various advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and appended claims.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed toward alloys of both the CN-12 and CF8C types. Table 1 presents the optimal and permissible minimum and maximum ranges for the compositional elements of CN-12 and CF8C stainless steel alloys made in accordance with the present invention. Boron, aluminum and copper may also be added. However, it will be noted that allowable ranges for cobalt, vanadium, tungsten and titanium may not significantly alter the performance of the resulting material. Specifically, based on current information, that cobalt may range from 0 to 5 wt. %, vanadium may range from 0 to 3 wt. %, tungsten may range from 0 to 3 wt. % and titanium may range from 0 to 0.2 wt. % without significantly altering the performances of the alloys. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the inclusion of these elements in amounts that fall outside of the ranges of Table 1 would still provide advantageous alloys and would fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

TABLE 1


Composition by Weight Percent

OPTIMAL

PERMISSIBLE

PERMIS-

CN-

OPTIMAL

SIBLE

	12	12	12	12	CF8C	CF8C	CF8C	CF8C
Element	MIN	MAX	MIN	MAX	MIN	MAX	MIN	MAX

Chromium	22.0	25.0	18.0	25.0	18.0	21.0	18.0	25.0
Nickel	12.0	16.0	12.0	20.0	12.0	15.0	8.0	20.0
Carbon	0.30	0.45	0.2	0.5	0.07	0.1	0.05	0.15
Silicon	0.50	0.75	0.2	3.0	0.5	0.75	0.20	3.0
Manganese	2	5.0	0.5	10.0	2.0	5.0	0.5	10.0
Phosphorous	0	0.04	0	0.04	0	0.04	0	0.04
Sulfur	0	0.03	0	0.10	0	0.03	0	0.1
Molybdenum	0	0.3	0	0.5	0	0.5	0	1.0
Copper	0	0.3	0	3.0	0	0.3	0	3.0
Niobium	1.5	2.0	1.0	2.5	0.3	1.0	0	1.5
Nitrogen	0.1	0.5	0.1	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.02	0.5
Titanium	0	0.03	0	0.2	0	0.03	0	0.2
Cobalt	0	0.5	0	5.0	0	0.5	0	5.0
Aluminum	0	0.05	0	3.0	0	0.05	0	3.0
Boron	0	0.01	0	0.01	0	0.01	0	0.01
Vanadium	0	0.01	0	3.0	0	0.01	0	3.0
Tungsten	0	0.6	0	3.0	0	0.1	0	3.0
Niobium:	3.5	5.0	3	5.0	9	11	8	11
Carbon
Carbon +	0.5	0.75	0.4	1.0	0.15	0.4	0.1	0.5
Nitrogen

Unexpectely, the inventors have found that substantially reducing the sulfur content of austenitic stainless steels increases the creep properties. The inventors believe machineability is not significantly altered as they believe the carbide morphology controls machining characteristics in this alloy system. While sulfur may be an important component of cast stainless steels for other applications because it contributes significantly to the machineability of such steels, it severely limits the high temperature creep-life and ductility and low temperature ductility after service at elevated temperatures. [0013]
The inventors have found that removing or substantially reducing the presence of sulfur alone provides a four-fold improvement in creep life at 850° C. at a stress load of 110 MPa. [0014]

Further, the inventors have found that reducing the maximum carbon content in the alloys of the present invention reduces the coarse NbC and possibly some of the coarse Cr ₂₃C₆constituents from the total carbide content (V_FCarbide) in a near linear manner as shown in Table 2. Table 2 includes the compositions of ten experimental alloys A-J in comparison with a standard CN-12 and CF8C alloys

TABLE 2


Composition by Weight Percent

Element

CN-12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

CF8C

I

J

Chromium	24 53	24.87	23 84	23.92	23.84	24.28	23.9	24.00	23.96	19.16	19.14	19.08
Nickel	12.91	13.43	15.34	15.33	15.32	15.67	15.83	15.69	15.90	12.19	12.24	12.36
Carbon	0 40	0.43	0.31	0.31	0.20	0.41	0.37	0.40	0.29	0.08	0.09	0.08
Silicon	0 9	0.82	0.7	0.7	0.68	0.66	0.66	0.66	0.66	0.66	0.62	0.67
Manganese	0.82	0.90	1.83	1.85	1.84	1.86	4.87	4.86	4.82	1.89	1.80	4.55
Phosphorous	0.019	0.036	0.037	0.038	0.040	0.035	0.033	0.032	0.032	0.004	0.004	0.005
Sulfur	0.139	0.002	0.002	0.003	0.003	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.002	0.002	0.004
Molybdenum	0.49	0.26	0.52	0.52	0.52	0.31	0 31	0.30	0.30	0.31	0.31	0.31
Copper	0.15	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.00	0.01	0 01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01
Niobium	1.92	1.41	1.26	1.06	1.05	1.78	1 72	1.31	1.22	0.68	0.68	0.68
Nitrogen	0.27	0.25	0.13	0.2	0.17	0.28	0.44	0.31	0.34	0.02	0.11	0.23
Titanium	0	0.005	0.004	0 005	0.004	0.004	0.005	0.006	0.005	0.008	0.006	0.006
Cobalt	0.019	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02	0 02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01
Aluminum	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0	0	0	0	0.01	0.01	0.01
Boron	0	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001	0	0	0	0	0 001	0 001	0.001
Vanadium	0	0.01	0.008	0.008	0.008	0.011	0.012	0.012	0.011	0.004	0.007	0.001
Niobium:	4.8	3 28	4 06	3.42	5.25	4.34	4.64	3.28	4.21	8.40	7.82	8.52
Carbon
Carbon +	0.67	0.68	0.44	0.51	0.37	0.69	0.81	0.71	0.63	0.10	0.20	0.31
Nitrogen
V_FCarbide		11.4	8.0	7.5	3.7

The volume fraction of carbide shown in Table 2 was measured with a Clemex Image Analysis System. A near linear correlation is observed between carbon content and carbide content. However, by lowering the carbon content below 0.20 wt. %, δ ferrite is allowed to form. δ ferrite will eventually form sigma at operating temperatures, presumably causing premature failure. Sigma, is a hard brittle Fe—Cr intermetallic, which greatly reduces both strength and ductility when present. These observations did form the basis for further strategy of designing optimum high temperature microstructures based on smaller specific reductions in as-cast carbide content (mainly CR[0016] ₂₃C₆rather than NbC) and maximum stability of the austenite matrix against the formation of sigma phase during prolonged aging at 700° C. to 900° C. This improved austenite stability resulted in CN-12 alloys with more nickel, manganese and nitrogen while keeping carbon in the range of 0.30 wt. % to 0.45 wt. %.

The elevated tensile properties for alloys A-J, CN-12, and CF8C were measured at 850° C. and are displayed in Tables 3. Creep properties of alloys A-J, CN-12, and CF8C were measured at 850° C. and are displayed in Table 4.

TABLE 3


			Strain
		Temp	Rate	YS	UTS	Elong
Alloy	Condition	(° C.)	(1/sec)	(ksi)	(ksi)	(%)

CN-12	As-Cast	850	1E−05	19.1	21.7	8.4
A	As-Cast	850	1E−05	21.2	24.5	9.6
B	As-Cast	850	1E−05	19.1	20.75	14.2
C	As-Cast	850	1E−05	22.6	23.9	37.2
D	As-Cast	850	1E−05	20	21.9	29.5
E	As-Cast	850	1E−05	20.8	24.8	10.8
F	As-Cast	850	1E−05	24.5	27.5	6.10
G	As-Cast	850	1E−05	23.1	26.0	30.3
H	As-Cast	850	1E−05	22.9	25.8	30.0
CF8C	As-Cast	850	1E−05	11.7	12.6	31.2
I	As-Cast	850	1E−05	17.1	18.1	45.9
J	As-Cast	850	1E−05	21.5	22.1	35

TABLE 4


		Temp	Stress	Life	Elong
Heat	Condition	(° C.)	(ksi)	(Hours)	(%)

CN-12	As-Cast	850	110	10.7	6.5
A	As-Cast	850	110	53.5	6.2
B	As-Cast	850	110	51.3	37.7
C	As-Cast	850	110	26.7	26.7
D	As-Cast	850	110	17.5	25.1
E	As-Cast	850	110	93.9	11.6
F	As-Cast	850	110	113	9.6
G	As-Cast	850	110	103	15.5
H	As-Cast	850	110	72.5	18
CF8C	As-Cast	850	35	1824	7.2
I	As-Cast	850	35	5252*	2
J	As-Cast	850	35	6045*	0.4

The critical testing conditions for CN-12 of 850° C. and 110 MPa were chosen because 850° C. is approximately the highest exhaust temperature observed currently and this is the temperature at which the most harmful precipitates like sigma form rapidly. The stress, 110 MPa, was chosen to provide an accelerated test lasting from 10 to 100 hours that would equate to much longer durability at lower stresses and temperatures during engine service. Removing the sulfur improved the room and elevated temperature ductility, tensile strength, yield strength, creep life and creep ductility for the same carbon content. By lowering the carbon content to 0.30 wt. %, creep life and tensile strength were only slightly lowered while creep ductility was improved significantly. By lowering the carbon content further to 0.20 wt. %, room or elevated temperature strength did not decrease significantly, but creep life was reduced by 60 percent. [0019]
The critical test conditions for the CF8C of 850° C. and 35Mpa were again chosen because of expected operating temperatures and the harmful precipitates, which form readily. The stress of 35 MPa was chosen for accelerated test conditions that would again equate to much longer durability at lower stress levels during engine service. The increase in nitrogen results in a dramatic increase in room and elevated temperature strength and ductility with at least a three-fold improvement in creep life at 850° C. [0020]
A solution annealing treatment (SA) was applied to each alloy to analyze the effect of a more uniform distribution of carbon. The alloys were held at 1200° C. for one hour. They were then air cooled rather than quenched to allow the small niobium carbide and chromium carbide precipitates to nucleate in the matrix during cooling. The resulting microstructure was found to be very similar to the as-cast (AS) structure except for the formation of small precipitates. Unfortunately, the solution annealing treatment lowered creep life significantly while increasing creep ductility, therefore proving that the strategy to optimize the as-cast microstructures was best as well as most cost effective. [0021]

Alloys A-H and the unmodified CN-12 base alloy were aged at 850° C. for 1,000 hours to study the effects of aging on the microstructure and mechanical properties which are summarized in Table 5. The alloys with 0.3 wt. % carbon (alloys B and C) showed the presence of platelets near the grain boundary structure. The 0.2 wt. % carbon alloy (D) showed an even higher amount of the platelets. The platelets are identified as sigma in the ASM Handbook, Vol. 9, 9 ^thEd. (1986). SEM/XEDS/TEM analysis confirmed that the platelets had a concentration consistent with sigma. (FeCr). Alloys E, F, and G with more carbon and Nb showed good resistance to sigma phase embrittlement. Alloys I and J aged at 850° C. for 1000 hours showed improved strength compared to the commercially available CF8C.

TABLE 5


			Strain
		Temp	Rate	YS	UTS	Elong
Alloy	Condition	(° C.)	(1/sec)	(ksi)	(ksi)	(%)

CN-12	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	42.4	79.45	5.5
A	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	46.7	76.1	3.6
B	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	37.9	58.4	2.9
C	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	46.5	81	4.6
D	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	44.4	76.4	3
E	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	55.3	81.6	3.1
F	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	56	84.8	2.2
G	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	53.3	85.2	2.6
H	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	43	80.7	1.7
CF8C	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	28.3	67.5	27
I	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	34.4	82	25
J	Aged 1000 hr at 850° C.	22	1E−05	42.3	79.4	11.3

In order to improve upon the performance of alloys A-D, the inventors utilized a unique combination of higher manganese, higher nitrogen, combined with a reduced sulfur content, all in an alloy also containing substantial amounts of carbon and niobium. [0023]
Manganese is an effective austenite stabilizer, like nickel, but is about one tenth the cost of nickel. The positive austenite stabilizing potential of manganese must be balanced with its possible affects on oxidation resistance at a given chromium level relative to nickel, which nears maximum effectiveness around 5 wt. % and therefore addition of manganese in excess of 10 wt. % is not recommended. [0024]
Manganese in an amount of less than 2 wt. % may not provide the desired stabilizing effect. Manganese also dramatically increases the solubility of carbon and nitrogen in austenite. This effect is especially beneficial because dissolved nitrogen is an austenite stabilizer and also improves strength of the alloy when in solid solution without decreasing ductility or toughness. Manganese also improves strength ductility and toughness, and manganese and nitrogen have synergistic effects. [0025]
The dramatic reduction in the sulfur content to 0.1 wt. % or less proposed by the present invention substantially eliminates the segregation of free sulfur to grain boundaries and further eliminates MnS particles found in conventional CN-12 and CF8C alloys, both of which are believed to be detrimental at high temperatures. [0026]
With respect to the CN-12 alloys, the inventors have found that an appropriate niobium:carbon ratio reduces excessive and continuous networks of coarse niobium carbides (NbC) or finer chrome carbides (M[0027] ₂₃C₆) along the grain or substructure boundaries (interdentritic boundaries and cast material) that are detrimental to the mechanical performance of the material at high temperatures. Accordingly, by providing an optimum level of the niobium and carbon ratio ranging from about 3.5 to about 5 for CN-12 alloys and from about 9 to about 11 for CF8C alloys, niobium and carbon are present in amounts necessary to provide high-temperature strength (both in the matrix and at the grain boundaries), but without reducing ductility due to cracking along boundaries with continuous or nearly-continuous carbides. Carbon can be present in CN-12 alloys in an amount ranging from 0.2 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % and niobium can be present in CN-12 alloys in an amount ranging from about 1.0 wt. % to about 2.5 wt. %.
Strength at all temperatures is also enhanced by the improved solubility of nitrogen which is a function of manganese. Nitrogen can be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % in CN-12 alloys. The presence of nitride precipitates is reduced by adjusting the levels and enhancing the solubility of nitrogen while lowering the chromium:nickel ratio. [0028]
For alloys of the CN-12 type, the niobium to carbon ratio can range from about 3 to about 5, the nitrogen content can range from about 0.10 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. %, the carbon content can range from about 0.2 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. %, the niobium content can range from about 1.0 wt. % to about 2.5wt. %, the silicon content can range from about 0.2 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %, the chromium content can range from about 18 wt. % to about 25 wt. %, the molybdenum content can be limited to about 0.5 wt. % or less, the manganese content can range from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.0 wt. %, the sulfur content can range from about 0 wt. % to about 0.1 wt. %, the sum of the carbon and nitrogen content can range from 0.4 wt. % to 1.0 wt. %, and the nickel content can range from about 12 wt. % to about 20 wt. %. [0029]
For alloys of the CF8C type, the nitrogen content can range from 0.02 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. %, the silicon content can be limited to about 3.0 wt. % or less, the molybdenum content can be limited to about 1.0 wt. % or less, the niobium content can range from 0.0 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. %, the carbon content can range from 0.05 wt. % to about 0.15 wt. %, the chromium content can range from about 18 wt. % to about 25 wt. %, the nickel content can range from about 8.0 wt. % to about 20.0 wt. %, the manganese content can range from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.0 wt. %, the sulfur content can range from about 0 wt. % to about 0.1 wt. %, the niobium carbon ratio can range from about 8 to about 11, and the sum of the niobium and carbon contents can range from about 0.1 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. %. [0030]
For both CN-12 and CF8C alloys, the phosphorous content can be limited to about 0.04 wt. % or less, the copper content can be limited to about 3.0 wt. % or less, the tungsten content can be limited to about 3.0 wt. % or less, the vanadium content can be limited to about 3.0 wt. % or less, the titanium content can be limited to about 0.20 wt. % or less, the cobalt content can be limited to about 5.0 wt. % or less, the aluminum content can be limited to about 3.0 wt. % or less and the boron content can be limited to about 0.01 wt. % or less. [0031]
Because nickel is an expensive component, stainless steel alloys made in accordance with the present invention are more economical if the nickel content is reduced. [0032]
Industrial Applicability [0033]
The present invention is specifically directed toward a cast stainless steel alloy for the production of articles exposed to high temperatures and extreme thermal cycling such as air/exhaust-handling equipment for diesel and gasoline engines and gas-turbine engine components. However, the present invention is not limited to these applications as other applications will become apparent to those skilled in the art that require an austenitic stainless steel alloy for manufacturing reliable and durable high temperature cast components with any one or more of the following qualities: sufficient tensile and creep strength at temperatures in excess of 600° C.; adequate cyclic oxidation resistance at temperatures at or above 700° C.; sufficient room temperature ductility either as-cast or after exposure; sufficient long term stability of the original microstructure and sufficient long-term resistance to cracking during severe thermal cycling. [0034]
By employing the stainless steel alloys of the present invention, manufacturers can provide a more reliable and durable high temperature component. Engine and turbine manufacturers can increase power density by allowing engines and turbines to run at higher temperatures thereby providing possible increased fuel efficiency. Engine manufacturers may also reduce the weight of engines as a result of the increased power density by thinner section designs allowed by increased high temperature strength and oxidation and corrosion resistance compared to conventional high-silicon molybdenum ductile irons. Further, the stainless steel alloys of the present invention provide superior performance over other cast stainless steels for a comparable cost. Finally, stainless steel alloys made in accordance with the present invention will assist manufacturers in meeting emission regulations for diesel, turbine and gasoline engine applications. [0035]
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternative embodiments and various modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of the present invention. [0036]

Claims

1. A stainless steel alloy comprising:

from about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % manganese; and

less than about 0.15 wt. % sulfur.

2. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 wherein the alloy is a CN-12 alloy or a CF8C alloy.

3. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.2 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % carbon and from about 1 wt. % to about 2.5 wt. % niobium.

4. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 wherein the alloy is a CN-12 alloy wherein niobium and carbon are present in a weight ratio of niobium to carbon ranging from about 3 to about 5.

5. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 wherein the alloy is a CF8C alloy wherein niobium and carbon are present in a weight ratio of niobium to carbon ranging from about 8 to about 11.

6. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising from about 0.10 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % nitrogen.

7. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising less than about 0.04 wt. % phosphorous.

8. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising from about 0.2 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. % silicon.

9. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising from about 8 wt. % to about 25 wt. % nickel.

10. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising from about 18 wt. % to about 25 wt. % chromium.

11. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising about 0.5 wt. % molybdenum or less.

12. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising about 3.0 wt. % tungsten or less.

13. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising about 3.0 wt. % copper or less.

14. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.02 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % nitrogen.

15. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.8 wt. % silicon or less.

16. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 3.0 wt. % copper or less.

17. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.3 wt. % to about 1 wt. % niobium.

18. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.2 wt. % titanium or less.

19. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 5.0 wt. % cobalt or less.

20. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 3.0 wt. % aluminum or less.

21. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 0.01 wt. % boron or less.

22. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 further comprising from about 3.0 wt. % tungsten or less.

23. The stainless steel alloy of claim 3 further comprising about 3.0 wt. % vanadium or less.

24. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 wherein the alloy is a CN-12 alloy and wherein nitrogen and carbon are present in a cumulative amount ranging from 0.4 wt. % to 1.0 wt. %.

25. The stainless steel alloy of claim 1 wherein the alloy is a CF8C alloy and wherein nitrogen and carbon are present in a cumulative amount ranging from 0.1 wt. % to 0.5 wt. %.

26. A CN-12 stainless steel alloy comprising:

about 0.03% sulfur or less;

from about 2 wt. % to about 5 wt. % manganese;

niobium and carbon in a niobium:carbon wt. % ratio ranging from about 3.5 to 5.0.

27. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 wherein niobium is present in an amount ranging from about 1.5 wt. % to about 2.0 wt. %.

28. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising about 0.04 wt. % phosphorous or less.

29. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising from about 0.2 wt. % to about 1.4 wt. % silicon.

30. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising from about 12 wt. % to about 25 wt. % nickel.

31. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising from about 22 wt. % to about 25 wt. % chromium.

32. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising less than about 0.3 wt. % molybdenum or less.

33. The CN-12 alloy of claim 26 further comprising about 3 wt. % copper or less.

34. An article formed from the stainless steel alloy of claim 1.

35. An article formed from the stainless steel alloy of claim 26.

36. A stainless steel alloy comprising:

from about 2 wt. % to about 5 wt. % manganese;

less than about 0.03 wt. % sulfur; and

about 0.5 wt. % nitrogen or less.