US11228322B2 - Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding - Google Patents

Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11228322B2
US11228322B2 US16/570,657 US201916570657A US11228322B2 US 11228322 B2 US11228322 B2 US 11228322B2 US 201916570657 A US201916570657 A US 201916570657A US 11228322 B2 US11228322 B2 US 11228322B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
chunk
data
zone
coding
chunks
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US16/570,657
Other versions
US20210083693A1 (en
Inventor
Mikhail Danilov
Yohannes Altaye
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EMC Corp
Original Assignee
EMC IP Holding Co LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Assigned to EMC IP Holding Company LLC reassignment EMC IP Holding Company LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ALTAYE, YOHANNES, DANILOV, MIKHAIL
Priority to US16/570,657 priority Critical patent/US11228322B2/en
Application filed by EMC IP Holding Co LLC filed Critical EMC IP Holding Co LLC
Assigned to THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Assignors: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., EMC IP Holding Company LLC, SECUREWORKS CORP., WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
Assigned to CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH reassignment CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., EMC CORPORATION, EMC IP Holding Company LLC, SECUREWORKS CORP., WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
Assigned to THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. reassignment THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C., DELL MARKETING L.P., DELL PRODUCTS L.P., DELL USA L.P., EMC CORPORATION, EMC IP Holding Company LLC, FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC., WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
Assigned to THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., EMC CORPORATION, EMC IP Holding Company LLC
Publication of US20210083693A1 publication Critical patent/US20210083693A1/en
Assigned to SECUREWORKS CORP., EMC CORPORATION, EMC IP Holding Company LLC, DELL PRODUCTS L.P., WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C. reassignment SECUREWORKS CORP. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728 Assignors: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Publication of US11228322B2 publication Critical patent/US11228322B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to DELL PRODUCTS L.P., EMC IP Holding Company LLC, SECUREWORKS CORP., DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.) reassignment DELL PRODUCTS L.P. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (051302/0528) Assignors: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to EMC CORPORATION, EMC IP Holding Company LLC, DELL PRODUCTS L.P. reassignment EMC CORPORATION RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053311/0169) Assignors: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/29Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes combining two or more codes or code structures, e.g. product codes, generalised product codes, concatenated codes, inner and outer codes
    • H03M13/2906Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes combining two or more codes or code structures, e.g. product codes, generalised product codes, concatenated codes, inner and outer codes using block codes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/373Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35 with erasure correction and erasure determination, e.g. for packet loss recovery or setting of erasures for the decoding of Reed-Solomon codes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/08Error detection or correction by redundancy in data representation, e.g. by using checking codes
    • G06F11/10Adding special bits or symbols to the coded information, e.g. parity check, casting out 9's or 11's
    • G06F11/1076Parity data used in redundant arrays of independent storages, e.g. in RAID systems
    • G06F11/108Parity data distribution in semiconductor storages, e.g. in SSD
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/03Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
    • H03M13/05Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
    • H03M13/13Linear codes
    • H03M13/15Cyclic codes, i.e. cyclic shifts of codewords produce other codewords, e.g. codes defined by a generator polynomial, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem [BCH] codes
    • H03M13/151Cyclic codes, i.e. cyclic shifts of codewords produce other codewords, e.g. codes defined by a generator polynomial, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem [BCH] codes using error location or error correction polynomials
    • H03M13/154Error and erasure correction, e.g. by using the error and erasure locator or Forney polynomial

Definitions

  • the disclosed subject matter relates to data protection, more particularly, to addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse data storage system that can employ erasure coding to protect stored data.
  • erasure coding can protect data by generating data fragments and erasure coding fragments according to an erasure coding scheme in a manner that uses less space than storing the original data and full copies of the original data.
  • Erasure coding can allow for the recovery of a representation of the original data even where some of the original data or erasure coding fragments are lost, e.g., in a 10+2 erasure coding scheme providing two erasure coding fragments for every 10 data fragments, for a total of 12 fragments, the data can be accessible up to the loss of any two of the 12 fragments. This can make erasure coding an attractive protection mechanism, for example, in bulk data storage.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example system that can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of example states of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 5 is an illustration of example states of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example method enabling addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example method facilitating preferentially storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example method that enables preferentially storing data chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 9 depicts an example schematic block diagram of a computing environment with which the disclosed subject matter can interact.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an example block diagram of a computing system operable to execute the disclosed systems and methods in accordance with an embodiment.
  • data storage techniques can employ convolution and deconvolution to conserve storage space.
  • convolution can allow data to be packed or hashed in a manner that uses less space that the original data.
  • convolved data e.g., a convolution of first data and second data, etc.
  • One use of data storage is in bulk data storage. Examples of bulk data storage can include networked storage, e.g., cloud storage, for example ECS (formerly Elastic Cloud Storage) offered by Dell EMC.
  • Bulk storage can, in an aspect, manage disk capacity via partitioning of disk space into blocks of fixed size, frequently referred to as chunks, for example a 128 MB chunk, etc.
  • Chunks can be used to store user data, and the chunks can be shared among the same or different users, for example, one chunk may contain fragments of objects from several users.
  • a chunk's content can generally be modified in an append-only mode to prevent overwriting of data already added to the chunk. As such, when a typical chunk becomes full enough, it can be sealed so that the data therein is generally not able for further modification.
  • These chunks can be then stored in a geographically diverse manner to allow for recovery of the data, such as if a first copy of the data is destroyed, e.g., disaster recovery, etc.
  • Blocks of data hereinafter ‘data chunks’, or simply ‘chunks’, can be used to store user data.
  • Chunks from a data storage device e.g., ‘zone storage component’ (ZSC), ‘zone storage device’ (ZSD), etc., located in a first geographic location/area/region, hereinafter a ‘zone’, etc.
  • ZSC zone storage component
  • ZSD zone storage device
  • Chunks from a data storage device e.g., ‘zone storage component’ (ZSC), ‘zone storage device’ (ZSD), etc.
  • a first geographic location/area/region hereinafter a ‘zone’, etc.
  • This can enable recovery of data where the first zone storage device is damaged, destroyed, offline, etc., e.g., disaster recovery of data, by accessing the off-site data from the second zone storage device.
  • geographically diverse data storage can use data compression to store data.
  • a storage device in Topeka can store a backup of data from a first zone storage device in Houston, e.g., Topeka can be considered geographically diverse from Houston.
  • data chunks from Seattle and San Jose can be stored in Denver.
  • the example Denver storage can be compressed or uncompressed, wherein uncompressed indicates that the Seattle and San Jose chunks are replicated in Denver, and wherein compressed indicates that the Seattle and San Jose chunks are convolved, for example via an exclusive-or operation, hereinafter ‘XOR’, into a different chunk to allow recovery of the Seattle or San Jose data from the convolved chunk, but where the convolved chunk typically consumes less storage space than the sum of the storage space for both the Seattle and San Jose chunks individually.
  • XOR exclusive-or operation
  • compression can comprise convolving data and decompression can comprise deconvolving data
  • decompression can comprise deconvolving data
  • compress, compression, convolve, convolving, etc. can be employed interchangeably unless explicitly or implicitly contraindicated, and similarly, decompress, decompression, deconvolve, deconvolving, etc., can be used interchangeably.
  • Compression therefore, can allow original data to be recovered from a compressed chunk that consumes less storage space than storage of corresponding uncompressed data chunks. This can be beneficial in that data from a location can be backed up by redundant data in another location via a compressed chunk, wherein a redundant data chunk can be smaller than the sum of the data chunks contributing to the compressed chunk.
  • erasure coding can be employed to provide data protection.
  • erasure coding can protect data in distributed data storage systems and can be employed as an alternative to basic XOR data protect techniques.
  • erasure coding was created as a forward error correction method for binary erasure channels.
  • erasure coding has been applied to data protection in data storage systems. As is disclosed, it can also be applied to data storage and protection in a geographically diverse data storage system.
  • Erasure coding can comprise dividing some data into k data fragments of equal size.
  • the process of creating coding fragments is typically termed ‘encoding,’ and during encoding, m coding fragments can be generated from the k data fragments and can provide redundancy to the k data fragments.
  • the process of recovering data fragments using available data and coding fragments is typically termed ‘decoding.’
  • Erasure coding can assure that a loss of any m fragments of the m+k total fragments can be tolerated without loss of access to the information represented by the k data fragments.
  • four data fragments, A-D can be employed to generate two coding fragments, E1 and E1′, resulting in a protection set of [A, B, C, D, E1, E1′] that can allow access to the information in data fragments A-D up to the loss of more than any two fragments, e.g., [C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, etc.
  • erasure coding In a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding (ECGEO), it can be designated that the system is to be hardened against the loss of any m zones/clusters/chunks. As such, each zone can replicate each new chunk to at least m other zones. As a result, there can be m backup copies of each chunk, of which one of the m backup chunks can be designated as a primary backup copy, which can be used for encoding. Encoding can be performed by a zone employing primary backup chunks from other zones, e.g., once a first zone has k primary chunks replicated to it from other remote zones, the first zone can generate an encoded chunk.
  • chunks A-D can be received at zone E, such that zone E can generate EC chunk E1, and E1 can be replicated as E1′ into zone F to provide a distributed 4+2 protection set where chunks A-D, correspondingly from zones A-D, are protected by EC chunk E1 at zone E and E1′ at zone F.
  • Encoding at the chunk level can be performed because in the chunks in the disclosed geographically diverse data storage system can be of a fixed chunk size, and a less than full chunk can be padded, or filled via another data complement, on an as needed basis.
  • the result of encoding the k primary chunks is m data portions of chunk size, e.g., from the example, EC chunks E1 and E1′.
  • the k+m data and coding chunks provide better data protection where they are distributed across different zones. This can be illustrated in the previous example, where were E1 and E1′ to be stored on zone B, rather than on zones E and F, then the loss of zone B could result in the loss of three of the six fragments of the protection set, e.g., loss of B, E1, and E1′, which could result in a data loss event.
  • the primary backup chunks used for encoding and their peer backup chunks at other zones can be deleted where EC chunk E1 can now provide data protection, though typically this is delayed until E1′ is also generated at a distributed zone for the example 4+2 EC scheme.
  • a chunk, e.g., convolved chunk, EC chunk, etc., stored at a geographically diverse storage device, e.g., ZSC, ZSD, in a zone, etc., can comprise data from some or all storage devices of a geographically diverse storage system.
  • a first zone can comprise unconvolved chunks, convolved chunks, EC chunks, etc., from the other four storage devices to order to provide data protection.
  • the first storage device can, in an embodiment, create a backup chunk from chunks received from the other four storage devices.
  • this can result in generating copies of the four received chunks at the first storage device and, in some embodiments, then convolving the four chunks to generate a fifth chunk that is a backup of the other four chunks, in other embodiments generating an EC chunk from the four chunks, etc.
  • one or more other copies of the four chunks and/or the fifth chunk can be created at the first storage device for redundancy.
  • the first storage device can convolve or encode chunks from three of the other four storage devices, etc.
  • a first data chunk and a second data chunk corresponding to a first and second zone that are geographically diverse can be represented in a third data chunk stored at third zone that is geographically diverse from the first and second zones.
  • the third chunk can represent the data of the first and second data chunks in a compressed form, e.g., the data of the first data chunk and the second data chunk can be convolved, such as by an XOR function, into the third data chunk.
  • the third chunk can represent the data of the first and second data chunks as part of a protection set in an encoded form, e.g., the data of the first data chunk and the second data chunk can be employed to encode the third data chunk according to an EC scheme, for example a 2+1 EC scheme.
  • convolved or encoded chunks can be further convolved or further encoded with other chunks and/or other convolved/encoded chunks to yield a further convolved/encoded chunk.
  • chunk A can be convolved with chunk B to yield chunk AB, which can be convolved with chunk C to yield chunk ABC, which can be convolved with chunk DEF to yield chunk ABCDEF, etc.
  • chunk A and chunk B can be encoded to generate chunk F, which can be employed in re-encoding chunks A-C to yield chunk G, which in turn can be employed in re-encoding chunks A-E to yield chunk H, etc.
  • a convolved chunk can be de-convolved, partially or completely, to yield other chunks, e.g., the other chunks can represent the same data as the convolved chunk, but the other chunks can typically consume more storage space that the convolved chunk because these other chunks are ‘less highly convolved’.
  • the chunk (AB(CD)) which can be chunk A convolved with Chunk B convolved with a chunk that itself is a convolution of chunks C and D, can be deconvolved into chunks A to D, into chunks A, B, and (CD), into chunks A and B(CD), etc.
  • the convolution can be commutative, such as where an XOR function is used to convolve/deconvolve the data
  • the chunk (AB(CD)) can be deconvolved into, for example, chunks B and A(CD), chunks A, D, and (BC), etc.
  • the deconvolution can comprise transfer of other chunks to facilitate the deconvolution.
  • data for one or more of chunks A, B, and C can be replicated in the first zone from other zones to facilitate deconvolution, e.g., (AB(CD) XOR (ABC), where data for one or more of chunks A, B, and C, is replicated into the first zone, and can result in chunks (ABC) and D, such that chunk D can be deleted and leave just chunk (ABC) at the first zone.
  • it can consume less bandwidth to replicate Chunk (ABC) from a second zone to the example first zone as compared to replicating each of Chunk A, Chunk B, and Chunk C from the second zone to the first zone.
  • BCC Chunk
  • This can be accommodated, for example, by first, in the second zone, generating a compressed chunk (ABC), such as from chunks A, B, and C, from chunk AB and chunk C, from chunk AC and chunk B, etc., prior to replicating generated chunk ABC into the first zone.
  • the data chunk can simply be deleted.
  • a corresponding EC chunk can still regenerate the deleted data chunk.
  • the EC chunk can be re-encoded where more than m corresponding data chunks are to be deleted, otherwise where more than m data chunks are deleted, the remaining protected data chunks become vulnerable to a data loss event.
  • deleting chunk A still allows for recovery of chunks B, C or D in the event that any one of B, C, or D becomes less available, e.g., [B, D, E1, E1′] can be employed to recover C even after A has been deleted.
  • [B, D, E1, E1′] can be employed to recover C even after A has been deleted.
  • loss of C cannot be recovered from remaining [D, E1, E1′] where A and B have already been deleted.
  • the protection set can be re-encoded, for example, with other data of zones A and B, with a different EC scheme, etc.
  • compression/convolution of chunks can be performed by different compression/convolution technologies.
  • Logical operations can be applied to chunk data to allow compressed data to be recoverable, e.g., by reversing the logical operations to revert to an earlier form of chunk data.
  • data from chunk 1 can undergo an exclusive-or operation, hereinafter ‘XOR’, with data from chunk 2 to form chunk 3. This example can be reversed by XORing chunk 3 with chunk 2 to generate chunk 1, etc.
  • XOR exclusive-or operation
  • erasure coding can employ different types of erasure coding.
  • Reed-Solomon erasure coding Cauchy erasure coding, Tahoe-LAFS erasure coding, Parchive erasure coding, Erasure Resilient Systematic Code erasure coding, or other types of erasure coding, can be employed in creating erasure coding fragments from data fragments. While the details of employing different types of erasure coding is beyond the scope of the instant disclosure, these types of erasure coding can provide data protection in accord with the disclosed subject matter and, as such, all such types of erasure coding are to be considered within the scope of the instant disclosure, even where not explicitly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
  • Zones can correspond to a geographic location or region.
  • different zones e.g., where a zone can connote a group of ZSCs or ZSDs in a geographic area, etc., can be associated with different geographic locations or regions.
  • Zone A can comprise Seattle, Wash.
  • Zone B can comprise Dallas, Tex.
  • Zone C can comprise Boston, Mass.
  • a local chunk from Zone A is replicated in Zone C, or protected by an EC chunk in Zone C
  • an earthquake in Seattle can be less likely to damage the protection data in Boston.
  • a local chunk from Dallas can be convolved with the local Seattle chunk, or be included in encoding an EC chunk in Zone C, which can result in a chunk stored in Boston that can protect the Seattle and/or Dallas chunks.
  • either the local chunk from Seattle or Dallas can be used to de-convolve the chunk stored in Boston to recover the full set of both the Seattle and Dallas local data chunks.
  • the Boston EC chunk and the either the Seattle or Dallas chunk can be employed to recover a correspondingly less accessible chunk in either Seattle or Dallas.
  • the Boston chunk can consume less disk space than the sum of the separate Seattle and Dallas local chunks.
  • the disclosed subject matter can be employed in more or fewer zones, in zones that are the same or different than other zones, in zones that are more or less geographically diverse, etc.
  • the disclosed subject matter can be applied to data of a single disk, a memory, a drive, a data storage device, etc., without departing from the scope of the disclosure, e.g., the zones can represent different logical areas of the single disk, memory, drive, data storage device, etc.
  • a geographically diverse storage construct allows for addition or removal of zones, ZSCs, ZSDs, etc., to/from the construct.
  • a new zone can be added to a geographically diverse storage system.
  • a zone can be split into two or more zones by adding other zone storage devices and redefining the extents of corresponding zones, such as splitting a Washington state zone, having ZSCs in the Seattle area, into an Eastern zone and a Western zone by adding ZSCs to the Spokane area and directing storage accordingly.
  • Adding a new zone can comprise adding ZSCs, ZSDs, etc., that represent an ‘empty’ zone, which can indicate that the storage device(s) of the ZSC, etc., does not yet store data for the zone or other zones of the geographically diverse storage construct.
  • a new ZSC can be treated as an empty zone.
  • a new ZSC can be a non-empty ZSC, e.g., comprising storage device(s) that already comprise stored chunk(s), and all such embodiments are within the scope of the present disclosure even where not explicitly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
  • some data from other zones can be moved to the new ZSC.
  • this can be to redistribute data chunks to provide better geographic diversity.
  • this can be to alter available storage space on ZSCs of the geographically diverse storage construct.
  • this can be to utilize data store(s) having different attributes, e.g., monetary cost, energy consumption, space or size of the physical storage device(s), reliability of storage device(s), etc.
  • a scaling component can utilize information about the geographically diverse storage construct, the new ZSC, etc., network information, supplemental data, etc., to facilitate the scaling out of the geographically diverse storage construct.
  • a scaling component can be communicatively coupled to components of the geographically diverse storage construct, e.g., to ZSC(s), etc., and can be employed to determine data redistribution information.
  • a scaling component can rank moving data chunks from a nearly full ZSC to the new ZSC to allow more usable space on the nearly full ZSC.
  • a scaling component can rank moving data to the new ZSC from a ZSC having more expensive storage costs per unit data higher than moving data from a ZSC having less expensive storage costs, wherein storage costs can be monetary costs, such as equipment prices, dollars per unit energy, land/building costs, etc., or non-momentary costs, such as, energy consumption levels, environmental impacts, man hours of maintenance, availability of services/utilities/skilled workers, etc.
  • storage costs can be monetary costs, such as equipment prices, dollars per unit energy, land/building costs, etc., or non-momentary costs, such as, energy consumption levels, environmental impacts, man hours of maintenance, availability of services/utilities/skilled workers, etc.
  • Data from a first ZSC can be moved to a newly added ZSC.
  • data can be moved from several ZSCs to one or more newly added ZSCs.
  • the movement of data can comport with geographically diverse data storage techniques, e.g., moving data can result in data storage that comports with geographic diversity of the stored data.
  • this can comprise moving a primary backup chunk and a secondary backup chunk so that they end up in different zones to maintain protection of the backed up data. Similar considerations can be afforded other backups of the primary backup chunk, e.g., 3rd, 4th, etc., backup chunks replicating the primary backup chunk, can be moved to retain geographic diversity.
  • moving data between zones can comprise copying a primary chunk to a new zone and then deleting the primary chunk at the originating zone, thereby effectively “moving” the copy of the primary at the new zone.
  • moving can be accomplished bit-by-bit, e.g., a bit is copied and then the original bit is deleted, in effect moving the chunk at the bit level.
  • moving can be accomplished chunk by chunk, e.g., a whole chuck is copied before the original chunk is deleted.
  • other groups of data can be moved via the copy and delete technique, e.g., an entire storage device can be copied before the original is deleted, etc.
  • moving data to a new zone can be network intensive because the data being moved would typically be static in the corresponding resident zone and consume minimal, if any, inter-zone network resources, in contrast to large scale copying of data from one zone to another.
  • the writing of that data can be processor intensive and increases where the new zone can receive data from one or more zones all trying to distribute data to the new zone.
  • a scaling component can regulate data transfers by indicating when any zone can move data to another zone. In an aspect this can schedule data movement to a newly added zone to moderate network use, etc.
  • data movement can be scheduled to historically slow network use periods, e.g., late at night, on weekends, over holidays, etc.
  • this can schedule data movement to a newly added zone to moderate processor use, etc.
  • data movement can be scheduled to allow data influx from a limited number of zones, e.g., one other zone at a time, etc.
  • the data movement can be scheduled to moderate processor use at the third zone by, for example, scheduling data to move from the first zone before moving data from the second zone, to interleave data movement so that some data is moved from the first zone then some data form the second zone, then some more data from the first zone, then some more data form the second zone, etc.
  • originating zones can perform operations to combine data, process data, re-encode data, etc., before ‘moving data’ to alter network usage, processor usage at the new zone, etc.
  • the two chunks can be combined, e.g., convolved, re-encoded, etc., as disclosed herein, to consume less storage space prior to moving and, correspondingly, the movement of a combined chunk can consume less network resources and less new zone processor resources in the movement of the combined chunk.
  • the scaling component can indicate which chunks can be combined so as to coordinate data chunk movement to preserve data integrity in the geographically diverse storage construct.
  • a moving a primary chunk and a secondary chunk in a combined chunk e.g., the data of the primary and the secondary are combined in the combined chunk, from a first zone to a new zone can be coordinated with moving corresponding chunks from a second zone so that the integrity of the geographically diverse data storage scheme is preserved, e.g., it is generally undesirable to allow combining and/or moving data chunks where it results in data redundancy transitioning a threshold level of redundancy and/or geographic diversity.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of a system 100 , which can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage system, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • System 100 can comprise first zone storage component (ZSC) 110 that can store data in accord with a geographically diverse storage construct.
  • ZSC 110 can store data chunks 120 - 128 , etc.
  • data chunks 120 - 128 , etc. can comprise a data chunk, a redundant or backup data chunk, an erasure coding chunk, a redundant or backup erasure coding chunk, etc.
  • a redundant or backup data chunk can be a copy of a data chunk, e.g., a copy of a chunk of data of the same zone, a copy of a chunk of data from another zone, etc.
  • a redundant or backup erasure coding chunk can comprise a copy of a chunk of erasure coding data, wherein erasure coding data can enable recovery of data according to an erasure coding scheme.
  • data generated in Seattle can be backed up in a redundant data chunk in a Seattle zone ZSC, in a Dallas zone ZSC, etc.
  • erasure coding is employed for data protection
  • data generated in Seattle can be protected according to an erasure coding scheme that results in erasure coding data stored in an erasure coding chunk that can be replicated in a redundant erasure coding chunk in the Seattle zone ZSC, in the Dallas zone ZSC, etc.
  • other copies of the data chunk, the redundant data chunk, the erasure coding chunk, the redundant erasure coding chunk, etc. can be stored in the ZSCs of the geographically diverse data storage system.
  • These further redundant chunks, redundant erasure coding chunks, etc. can be regarded as primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.
  • a chunk can be backed up, for example, by a primary redundant data chunk, a secondary redundant data chunk, and a tertiary redundant data chunk, that can each represent the data of the corresponding data chunk.
  • an erasure coding chunk can be backed up, for example, by a primary redundant erasure coding chunk and a second redundant erasure coding chunk that can each represent the erasure coding data of the erasure coding chunk.
  • the term chunk can refer to a data chunk or erasure coding chunk, etc.
  • redundant or backup chunk can refer to a redundant chunk or redundant erasure coding chunk, etc.
  • the copies can be mirror images, for example, a secondary redundant chunk can be a copy of a primary redundant chunk, or the copy can provide redundancy even where the content of the ‘copied’ chunk is modified, e.g., not a mirror image, for example, a secondary redundant chunk can be a combined chunk allowing recreation of the primary redundant chunk data, e.g., via deconvolution, etc., as disclosed elsewhere herein.
  • the secondary redundant chunk can be stored on the same or a different zone, although generally, for geographic diversity, the secondary redundant chunk would typically be stored on another zone.
  • first ZSC 110 in an embodiment, can store chunks 120 - 128 , 131 - 139 , etc.
  • chunks 131 - 139 , etc. can comprise redundant chunks, e.g., as geographically diverse representations of data stored in other chunks, e.g., chunks 130 - 138 , etc., of second ZSC 140 , etc.
  • second ZSC 140 can store chunks 130 - 138 , 121 - 129 , etc.
  • chunks 130 - 138 , etc. can be chunks that correspond to the earlier example redundant chunks 131 - 139 , etc., of first ZSC 110 .
  • chunks 121 - 129 , etc. can be redundant chunks corresponding to the example chunks 120 - 128 , etc., of first ZSC 110 .
  • first ZSC 110 can have chunks 120 - 128 that are protected by redundant chunks 121 - 129 on second ZSC 140 .
  • second ZSC 140 can have chunks 130 - 138 that are protected by redundant chunks 131 - 139 on first ZSC 110 .
  • System 100 can comprise scaling component 190 that can be communicatively coupled to ZSCs of a geographically diverse data storage system, e.g., first ZSC 110 , second ZSC 140 , etc.
  • Scaling component 190 can determine which chunks to replicate, copy, move, etc., to preserve a threshold level of data redundancy, a threshold level of geographic diversity, a threshold level of network resource consumption, monetary cost, processor resource consumption, etc.
  • scaling component 190 can provide information, or an indication, related to adding a new zone, ZSC, ZSD, etc. As an example, where geographic diversity in a two zone system is determined to satisfy a diversity rule, scaling component 190 can indicate that third ZSC 160 should be added.
  • third ZSC 160 can be a dormant zone, e.g., a zone that is already comprised in the geographically diverse storage construct but has gone unused, was less used, etc., and that can be activated, brought into use, used more, etc., for example, in response to a determination by scaling component 190 , etc.
  • scaling component 190 can be located separate from a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , etc.
  • scaling component 190 can be located remotely from a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , etc., e.g., both separate from, and located far from, a ZSC.
  • scaling component 190 can be comprised in a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , etc., e.g., scaling component 190 can be part of one or more of the ZSC of the geographically diverse storage system.
  • scaling component 190 can be comprised in more than one ZSC, e.g., scaling component 190 can be a distributed component comprised in more than one ZSC of the geographically diverse storage system, each ZSC can comprise a separate scaling component 190 that can communicate with other scaling components to coordinate scaling, etc., although these embodiments are not illustrated for clarity and brevity, they are to be considered within the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter.
  • third ZSC 160 can be an empty ZSC that can be available to receive data moved, copied, replicated, etc., from other ZSCs of a geographically diverse data storage system, e.g., one or more of first ZSC 110 , second ZSC 140 , etc.
  • the movement of chunks, e.g., data chunks, redundant data chunks, erasure coding chunks, redundant erasure coding chunks, etc., into third ZSC 160 can result from determinations by scaling component 190 .
  • scaling component 190 can schedule movement, replication, etc., of one or more chunks from first ZSC 110 , and/or one or more chunks from second ZSC 140 , into third ZSC 160 in a manner that comports with the geographically diverse storage construct, satisfies cost/resource rules, etc.
  • scaling component 190 can indicate that all data transfers can occur in low network usage periods, that chunks 120 and 121 , e.g., a chunk and a corresponding redundant chunk, are not both moved to third ZSC 160 because it would limit geographic diversity, and that first ZSC 110 moves data at a different time than second ZSC 140 to reduce processor loading at third ZSC 160 .
  • Numerous other examples of scaling component 190 coordinating data movement will be readily appreciated and are all considered within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not expressly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a system 200 , which can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • System 200 can comprise first ZSC through sixth ZSC, correspondingly 210 - 260 , which can each comprise, among other data chunks, a first data chunk and a second data chunk, e.g., A1 and A2 for first ZSC 210 , B1 and B2 for second ZSC 220 , C1 and C2 for third ZSC 230 , etc.
  • the six ZSCs 210 - 260 can employ a 4+2 EC scheme that, for example, can result in a protection set of [A1, B1, C1, D1, A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2] where the coding chunk A1-D1_1 can be stored at fifth ZSC 250 and a copy of the coding chunk, e.g., A1-D1_2, can be stored at the sixth ZSC 260 .
  • coding chunks for other protection sets can be stored in among ZSCs 210 - 260 , e.g., a protection set of [C2, D2, E2, F2, C2-F2_1, C2-F2_2] can store coding chunk C2-F2_1 at first ZSC 210 and a copy of the coding chunk, C2-F2_2, can be stored at second ZSC 220 in accord with a best practice of keeping chunks comprising a protection set stored in a fully distributed manner.
  • System 200 can be scaled out, for example, by adding seventh ZSC 270 .
  • Utilization of scaled out system 200 can include altering the protection scheme, for example, from a 4+2 EC scheme to a 5+2 EC scheme, and then causing re-encoding of the protection sets.
  • performing the re-encoding as is presently disclosed can result in rebalancing of data stored in the ECGEO of system 200 .
  • data rebalancing can occur in conjunction with data re-protection in scaling out a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding, at least in part, because scaling out of a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can correspond to alteration of an erasure coding protection scheme.
  • the erasure coding protection scheme can be a 4+2 erasure coding scheme (EC scheme), wherein data from any four zones is protected by erasure code stored in the two other zones such that the system is hardened against the loss of any two zones.
  • the EC scheme can be altered from the 4+2 EC scheme to a 4+3 EC scheme, a 5+2 EC scheme, etc. It is noted that we discuss the 5+2 EC scheme, rather than all possible EC scheme changes, for clarity and brevity, but all EC scheme changes are considered within the scope of the disclosed subject matter even where not explicitly recited for reasons of clarity and brevity.
  • Erasure Coding can protect data in distributed data storage systems and can be employed as an alternative to basic XOR data protect techniques.
  • erasure coding was created as a forward error correction method for binary erasure channels.
  • erasure coding has been applied to data protection in data storage systems. As is disclosed, it can also be applied to data storage and protection in a geographically diverse data storage system.
  • Erasure coding can comprise dividing some data into k data fragments of equal size.
  • the process of creating coding fragments is typically termed ‘encoding,’ and during encoding, m coding fragments can be generated from the k data fragments and can provide redundancy to the k data fragments.
  • the process of recovering data fragments using available data and coding fragments is typically termed ‘decoding.’
  • Erasure coding can assure that a loss of any m fragments of the m+k total fragments can be tolerated without loss of access to the information represented by the k data fragments.
  • four data fragments, A-D can be employed to generate two coding fragments, E1 and E1′, resulting in a protection set of [A, B, C, D, E1, E1′] that can allow access to the information in data fragments A-D up to the loss of more than any two fragments, e.g., [C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, etc.
  • each zone can replicate each new chunk to at least m other zones.
  • there can be m backup copies of each chunk of which one of the m backup chunks can be designated as a primary backup copy, which can be used for encoding.
  • Encoding can be performed by a zone employing primary backup chunks from other zones, e.g., once a first zone has k primary chunks replicated to it from other remote zones, the first zone can generate an encoded chunk.
  • chunks A-D can be received at zone E, such that zone E can generate EC chunk E1, and E1 can be replicated as E1′ into zone F to provide a distributed 4+2 protection set where chunks A-D, correspondingly from zones A-D, are protected by EC chunk E1 at zone E and E1′ at zone F.
  • Encoding at the chunk level can be performed because in the chunks in the disclosed geographically diverse data storage system can be of a fixed chunk size, and a less than full chunk can be padded, or filled via another data complement, on an as needed basis.
  • the result of encoding the k primary chunks is m data portions of chunk size, e.g., from the example, EC chunks E1 and E1′.
  • the k+m data and coding chunks provide better data protection where they are distributed across different zones. This can be illustrated in the previous example, where were E1 and E1′ to be stored on zone B, rather than on zones E and F, then the loss of zone B could result in the loss of three of the six fragments of the protection set, e.g., loss of B, E1, and E1′, which could result in a data loss event.
  • the primary backup chunks used for encoding and their peer backup chunks at other zones can be deleted where EC chunk E1 can now provide data protection, though typically this is delayed until E1′ is also generated at a distributed zone for the example 4+2 EC scheme.
  • a 4+2 EC scheme can have an overhead of 0.5 chunk sizes, e.g., to four chunks of data can be protected in a total of six chunks comprising the four data chunks and two EC chunks.
  • overhead can be 0.2 chunk size. Accordingly, it can be appreciated that scaling out of a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can result in greater efficiency by reducing the overhead to protect against the loss of a fixed number of zones.
  • a 4+2 EC scheme can be employed in a six zone system hardened against the loss of any two zones. If the example system is scaled out to an eight zone system still hardened against the loss of any two zones, then a 6+2 EC scheme can be employed. This can result in overhead going from 50% in the 4+2 EC scheme to 33% in the 6+2 EC scheme while still providing protection against the loss of any two zones in either the six or eight zone geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding.
  • new EC chunks can generated, for example, in the 4+2 EC scheme, EC chunks E1 and E1′ can protect data chunks A-D, while in the 6+2 EC scheme, EC chunks G1 and G1′ can protect data chunks A-F and chunks E1 and E1′ can then be deleted.
  • re-protection can be highly burdensome on computing resources, including high processor demand, high network demand, etc.
  • EC chunks E1 and E1′ can be employed in generating G1 and G1′ with reduced burden on computing resources than might be experienced where G1 and G1′ are generated de novo.
  • a ‘coding matrix’ e.g., m ⁇ k, that can be used to produce m coding fragments out of k data fragments. Any sub-matrix mxl of the matrix m ⁇ k (l ⁇ k) will then be a proper coding matrix for a protection scheme l+m.
  • the following three coding matrices for the protection schemes 10+2, 6+2, and 4+2 can share values of coefficients X i,j with the same i and j.
  • re-encoding for a scaling event in an ECGEO can be performed via the example coding matrices with lower computational resource demands than copying all contributing data chunks to a new zone to allow brute force re-encoding.
  • a protection scheme can be designated for an ECGEO that can be mindful of potential system expansion in future, e.g., a 10+2 EC scheme can be initially selected to allow for future expansion of the ECGEO.
  • 10+2 (k f +m) can be a potential final protection scheme for a future fully expanded ECGEO system.
  • an initial protection scheme can be selected based on the less than fully expanded ECGEO system, e.g., an initial protection scheme can be selected for the initial number of zones, N 1 , in the ECGEO system.
  • the protection scheme k 1 +m can be used for all new data while the ECGEO system is not scaled out.
  • the coding matrix m ⁇ k 1 can be understood to be a sub-matrix of the coding matrix m ⁇ k f we have chosen for the potential final protection scheme k f +m, e.g., a 10+2 EC scheme.
  • all previously existing coding chunks e.g., those generated under the 4+2 EC scheme, can be treated as partial coding chunks because the number of data chunks they combine is fewer than k 2 , e.g., 4 ⁇ 6.
  • Data chunks created by the new zones, in conjunction with the existing partial coding chunks, can be used to re-encode the partial coding chunks, via the coding matrices, to result in coding chunks that are complete under the example 6+2 EC scheme. This can avoid needing to transfer all data chunks to a remote zone for brute force re-encoding. In contrast, new data chunks can be transferred/replicated to the zones with existing partial coding chunks. This can significantly reduce consumption of computing resources including network resources and processor resources.
  • the example 6+2 EC scheme can be similarly adapted to a 7+2 EC scheme, an 8+2 EC scheme, a 9+2 EC scheme, and eventually a 10+2 EC scheme.
  • further scaling out is also possible, for example, allowing expansion beyond the 10+2 EC scheme.
  • Further discussion of this aspect of data protection is beyond the scope of the instant disclosure. It is sufficient to observe that re-protection of data during a scaling out event in a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can occur, and that the disclosed technology can enable rebalancing to occur in conjunction with, rather than as a distinct process from, the re-protection.
  • rebalancing as a distinct process, can itself be demanding of computing resources, and where re-protection can similarly be demanding of computing resources, performing rebalancing in conjunction with re-protection can reduce the demand on computing resources, including processor demands, network demands, etc., over performing re-protection and rebalancing as separate processes.
  • adding seventh ZSC 270 can allow for storage of additional chunks, e.g., data chunks, erasure coding chunks, etc.
  • Seventh ZSC 270 can be added as an empty zone, e.g., contacting no chunks, or as a non-empty zone, e.g., already containing one or more chunks.
  • Re-encoding of erasure coding chunks can therefore take advantage of the additional storage space offered by newly added seventh ZSC 270 , e.g., the example 4+2 EC scheme can be changed to a 5+2 EC scheme and some chunk(s) can be stored at ZSC 270 .
  • This storage at seventh ZSC 270 can be accompanied by removing some other chunk(s) from other ZSCs of system 200 , resulting in both re-encoding to the new EC scheme and also providing rebalancing of chunk storage in system 200 .
  • This can be performed by selecting chunks for re-encoding in a manner that typically avoids copying of all participating chunks to a new zone before performing re-encoding at the new zone.
  • Selection of chunks can be performed via scaling component 290 that can be communicatively coupled with the ZSCs of system 200 .
  • Selection of chunks for re-encoding with rebalancing can be based on one or more selection rules provided to, or via, scaling component 290 .
  • example erasure coding chunk A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded based on data chunk E1 at fifth ZSC 250 , resulting in coding chunk A1-E1_1, which can be copied to seventh ZSC 270 .
  • This can be in contrast to first copying each of chunks A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1 to seventh ZSC 270 and then encoding A1-E1_1 at seventh ZSC 270 , which can consume more computing resources than the illustrated re-encoding at fifth ZSC 250 .
  • A1-E1_1 can be replicated, for diversity, at sixth ZSC 260 from seventh ZSC 270 , though this is not illustrated for clarity and brevity.
  • A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 can become redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 250 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 270 stores more chunks.
  • an alternative to generating A1-E1_1 can be via copying E1 from fifth ZSC 250 to Sixth ZSC 260 as E1′.
  • E1′ can then be used to re-encode A1-D1_2 at sixth ZSC 260 , resulting in A1-E1_2.
  • A1-E1_2 can then be replicated from sixth ZSC 260 into seventh ZSC 270 as A1-E1_1 for diversity, again this is not illustrated for clarity and brevity.
  • A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 250 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 270 stores more chunks.
  • A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 can be generated separately, though they can be equivalent, e.g., A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 and A1-E1_2 can be generated by replicating E1 as E1′ and re-encoding A1-D1_2 based on E1′, as illustrated.
  • A1-E1_2 as a copy of A1-E1_1, e.g., replicated from seventh ZSC 270 into sixth ZSC 260 , where A1-E1_1 is generated via re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1, or envisioning A1-E1_1 as a copy of A1-E1_2, e.g., replicated from sixth ZSC 260 into seventh ZSC 270 where A1-E1_2 is generated via re-encoding A1-D1_2 based on E1′.
  • either illustrated pathway, or a combination of both illustrated pathways can result in generating the redundant pair of coding chunks, e.g., A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2, as part of the 5+2 EC scheme protection set [A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, A1-E1_1, A1-E1_2] that can enable access to information represented in [A1, B1, C1, D1, E1] up to the loss of any two chunks of the 5+2 EC protection set, e.g., loss of, or reduced access to, any two zones of ZSCs 210 - 270 .
  • Scaling component 290 can communicate with one or more of the ZSCs of system 200 to orchestrate moving, copying, re-encoding, etc., chunks in an ECGEO, e.g., system 200 .
  • scaling component 290 can initiate chunk operations between ZSCs, e.g., copying E1 from fifth ZSC 250 to Sixth ZSC 260 as E1′, writing A1-E1_1 into seventh ZSC 270 in response to re-encoding of A1-D1_1 based on E1, copying A1-E1_1 as A1-E1_2 from seventh ZSC 270 into sixth ZSC 260 , enabling re-encoding of A1-D1_2 into A1-E1_2 based on E1′, etc.
  • the ZSCs in response to notification of the completion of a chunk operation can perform other actions, e.g., deleting a local chunk that has been copied into another zone, etc.
  • redundant chunks can be deleted, e.g., A1-D1_1, E1′_A1-D1_2, etc.
  • scaling component 290 can determine which technique to apply, e.g., based on one or more selection rules, to one or more chunk operations in regard to the disclosed subject matter.
  • scaling component 290 can determine that there are adequate network resources and that sixth ZSC 260 has a less burdened processor than fifth ZSC 250 and, based on a selection rule to least burden computing resources, can accordingly instruct fifth ZSC 250 to copy E1 to sixth ZSC 260 as E1′, so that the processor of sixth ZSC 260 is tasked with generating A1-E1_2 rather than the processor of fifth ZSC 250 being tasked with generating A1-E1_1.
  • scaling component 290 can determine that while there can be adequate network resources, sixth ZSC 260 can be a more burdened processor than fifth ZSC 250 and, accordingly, can instruct fifth ZSC 250 to generate A1-E1_1 rather than copying E1 to sixth ZSC 260 , etc.
  • scaling component 290 can determine that there can be adequate computing resources for seventh ZSC 270 to perform a brute force re-encoding, wherein A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1, can be copied to seventh ZSC 270 to facilitate encoding of A1-E1_1 at ZSC 270 , resulting in less computing resource demand on fifth ZSC 250 and sixth ZSC 260 .
  • Numerous other examples of rule based selection via scaling component 290 will be readily appreciated and all such examples are within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not recited explicitly for the sake of clarity and brevity.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of example states 300 - 306 of a system, e.g., system 200 , which can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • a first state e.g., example state 300
  • the ZSCs can comprise data chunks A1 through F2 and coding chunks A1-D1_1 and A1-D1_2 as illustrated.
  • the ECGEO can be scaled out at state 302 , e.g., adding ZSC 370 .
  • ZSC 310 - 340 can comprise data chunks A1-D2, although not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Further, ZSC 350 and ZSC 360 can still comprise the same chunks as in state 300 .
  • the ECGEO at state 304 , can generate A1-E1_1, e.g., re-encoding coding chunks according to changing from the example 4+2 EC scheme to an example 5+2 EC scheme, such as is disclosed for system 200 , etc.
  • A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 at ZSC 350 and writing A1-E1_1 into ZSC 370 .
  • A1-E1_1 can be generated by copying E1 and A1-D1_1 from ZSC 350 into ZSC 370 and then re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 at ZSC 370 , although this embodiment is not illustrated for clarity and brevity.
  • E1 can be copied into ZSC 360 as E1′ and A1-E1_2 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_2, e.g., as a redundant copy of A1-E1_1, based on E1′ at ZSC 360 and copying A1-E1_2 as A1-E1_1 into ZSC 370 .
  • A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 and A1-E1_2 can be separately generated by re-encoding A1-D1_2 with E1′.
  • re-encoding via the disclosed processes can result in more redundant chunks than are needed to provide data protection according to the example 5+2 EC scheme, e.g., A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be considered unnecessary in view of A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 having been generated via one or more of the disclosed pathways.
  • the ECGEO can remove unnecessary chunks, e.g., clean up the stored chunks, at 360 .
  • A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be deleted, released, etc.
  • ZSC 310 - 340 can still comprise chunks A1-D2
  • ZSC 350 can comprise fewer chunks than in state 300 , e.g., E1 and E2 rather than E1, E2, and A1-D1_1
  • ZSC 360 can now comprise F1, F2, and A1-E1_2 rather than F1, F2, and A1-D1_2
  • newly added ZSC 370 can now comprise A1-E1_1.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a system 400 , which can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • System 400 can comprise first ZSC through sixth ZSC, correspondingly 410 - 460 , which can each comprise, among other data chunks, a first data chunk and a second data chunk, e.g., A1 and A2 for first ZSC 410 , B1 and B2 for second ZSC 420 , C1 and C2 for third ZSC 430 , etc.
  • the six ZSCs 410 - 460 can employ a 4+2 EC scheme that, for example, can result in a protection set of [A2, B2, C2, D2, A2-D2_1, A2-D2_2] where the coding chunk A2-D2_1 can be stored at sixth ZSC 460 and a copy of the coding chunk, e.g., A2-D2_2, can be stored at the fifth ZSC 450 .
  • coding chunks for other protection sets can be stored in among ZSCs 410 - 460 , e.g., a protection set of [C1, D1, E1, F1, C1-F1_1, C1-F1_2] can store coding chunk C1-F1_1 at first ZSC 210 and a copy of the coding chunk, C1-F1_2, can be stored at second ZSC 420 in accord with a best practice of keeping chunks comprising a protection set stored in a fully distributed manner.
  • System 400 can be scaled out, for example, by adding seventh ZSC 470 .
  • Utilization of scaled out system 400 can include altering the protection scheme, for example, from a 4+2 EC scheme to a 5+2 EC scheme, and then causing re-encoding of the protection sets.
  • performing the re-encoding as is presently disclosed can again result in rebalancing of data stored in the ECGEO of system 400 .
  • adding seventh ZSC 470 can allow for storage of additional chunks, e.g., data chunks, erasure coding chunks, etc.
  • Seventh ZSC 470 can be added as an empty zone or as a non-empty zone. Re-encoding of erasure coding chunks can therefore take advantage of the additional storage space offered by newly added seventh ZSC 470 , e.g., the example 4+2 EC scheme can be changed to a 5+2 EC scheme and some chunk(s) can be stored at ZSC 470 .
  • This storage at seventh ZSC 470 can be accompanied by removing some other chunk(s) from other ZSCs of system 400 , resulting in both re-encoding to the new EC scheme and also providing rebalancing of chunk storage in system 400 .
  • This can be performed by selecting chunks for re-encoding in a manner that can avoid copying of all participating chunks to a new zone before performing re-encoding at the new zone.
  • Selection of chunks can be performed via scaling component 490 that can be communicatively coupled with the ZSCs of system 400 .
  • Selection of chunks for re-encoding with rebalancing can be based on one or more selection rules provided to, or via, scaling component 490 .
  • example erasure coding chunk A2-D2_1 can be re-encoded based on a data chunk E2, e.g., E2′, at sixth ZSC 460 , resulting in coding chunk A2-E2_1.
  • This process can be in contrast to first copying each of chunks A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2 to sixth ZSC 460 and then encoding A2-E2_1, which can consume more computing resources than the illustrated re-encoding at sixth ZSC 460 based on A2-D2_1 and E2′.
  • A2-E2_1 can then be copied to fifth ZSC 450 as A2-E2_2 to provide storage diversity of the coding chunk.
  • A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2 can be considered excessively redundant and can be deleted. Further, E2 can be safely moved to seventh ZSC 470 from fifth ZSC 450 . Accordingly, fifth ZSC 450 can now store fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 470 can now store more chunks.
  • an alternative to generating A2-E2_2 can be via re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 at fifth ZSC 450 , then copying A2-D2_2 to Sixth ZSC 460 as A2-D2_1.
  • A2-E2_2 can then be replicated from sixth ZSC 460 into seventh ZSC 470 as A2-E2_1 for chunk diversity, which is not illustrated for clarity and brevity.
  • E2 can then be safely moved to seventh ZSC 470 from fifth ZSC 450 .
  • A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 by this technique, A2-D2_1, E2′, and A2-D2_2 can be redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 450 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 470 stores more chunks.
  • A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 can be generated separately, though, as in system 200 , they can again be equivalent, e.g., A2-E2_2 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 and A2-E2_2 can be generated by replicating E2 as E2′ and re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′, as illustrated.
  • A2-E2_1 as a copy of A2-E2_2, e.g., replicated from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460 , where A2-E2_2 is generated via re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2, or envisioning A2-E2_2 as a copy of A2-E2_1, e.g., replicated from sixth ZSC 460 into fifth ZSC 450 where A2-E2_1 is generated via re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′.
  • either illustrated pathway, or a combination of both illustrated pathways can result in generating the redundant pair of coding chunks, e.g., A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2, as part of the example 5+2 EC scheme protection set [A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, A2-E2_1, A2-E2_2] that can enable access to information represented in [A2, B2, C2, D2, E2] up to the loss of any two chunks of the 5+2 EC protection set, e.g., loss of, or reduced access to, any two zones of ZSCs 410 - 470 .
  • Scaling component 490 can communicate with one or more of the ZSCs of system 400 to orchestrate moving, copying, re-encoding, etc., chunks in an ECGEO, e.g., system 400 .
  • scaling component 490 can initiate chunk operations between ZSCs, e.g., copying E2 from fifth ZSC 450 to Sixth ZSC 460 as E2′, re-encoding of A2-D2_2 based on E2, copying A2-E2_2 as A2-E2_1 from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460 , enabling re-encoding of A2-D2_1 into A2-E2_1 based on E2′, etc.
  • the ZSCs in response to notification of the completion of a chunk operation can perform other actions, e.g., deleting a local chunk that has been copied into another zone, etc.
  • redundant chunks can be deleted, e.g., A2-D2_1, E2′_A2-D2_2, E2 can be moved to another ZSC, etc.
  • scaling component 490 can determine which technique to apply, e.g., based on one or more selection rules, to one or more chunk operations in regard to the disclosed subject matter.
  • scaling component 490 can determine that there are adequate network resources and that sixth ZSC 460 has a less burdened processor than fifth ZSC 450 and, based on a selection rule to least burden computing resources, can accordingly instruct fifth ZSC 450 to copy E2 to sixth ZSC 460 as E2′, so that the processor of sixth ZSC 460 is tasked with generating A2-E2_1, then copying A2-E2_1 back to fifth ZSC 450 as A2-E2_2, rather than the processor of fifth ZSC 450 being tasked with generating A2-E2_2.
  • scaling component 490 can determine that while there can be adequate network resources, sixth ZSC 460 can be a more burdened processor than fifth ZSC 450 and, accordingly, can instruct fifth ZSC 450 to generate A2-E2_2 rather than copying E2 to sixth ZSC 460 , etc.
  • sixth ZSC 460 can be a more burdened processor than fifth ZSC 450 and, accordingly, can instruct fifth ZSC 450 to generate A2-E2_2 rather than copying E2 to sixth ZSC 460 , etc.
  • Numerous other examples of rule based process selection via scaling component 490 will be readily appreciated and all such examples are within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not recited explicitly for the sake of clarity and brevity.
  • FIG. 5 is an illustration of example states 500 - 506 of a system, e.g., system 400 , which can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • a first state e.g., example state 500
  • the ZSCs can comprise data chunks A1 through F2 and coding chunks A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2 as illustrated.
  • the ECGEO can be scaled out at state 502 , e.g., adding ZSC 570 .
  • ZSC 510 - 540 can comprise data chunks A1-D2, although not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Further, ZSC 550 and ZSC 560 can still comprise the same chunks as in state 500 .
  • the ECGEO can generate A2-E2_2, e.g., re-encoding coding chunks according to changing from the example 4+2 EC scheme to an example 5+2 EC scheme, such as is disclosed for system 400 , etc.
  • A2-E2_2 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 at ZSC 550 .
  • A2-E2_2 can be generated by copying E2 from ZSC 550 into ZSC 560 a s E2′, re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′ at ZSC 560 , then copying A2-E2_1 back to ZSC 550 as A2-E2_2.
  • A2-E2_1 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′ and A2-E2_2 can be separately generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 with E1.
  • E2 can be moved from ZSC 3550 to ZSC 570 .
  • re-encoding via the disclosed processes can result in more redundant chunks than are needed to provide data protection according to the example 5+2 EC scheme, e.g., A2-D2_1, E2′, and A2-D2_2 can be considered unnecessary in view of A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 having been generated via one or more of the disclosed pathways.
  • the ECGEO can remove unnecessary chunks, e.g., clean up the stored chunks, at state 508 .
  • A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be deleted, released, etc.
  • ZSC 510 - 540 can still comprise chunks A1-D2
  • ZSC 550 can comprise fewer chunks than in state 500 , e.g., E1 and A2-E2_2 rather than E1, E2, and A2-D2_2
  • ZSC 560 can now comprise F1, F2, and A2-E2_1 rather than F1, F2, and A2-D2_1, and newly added ZSC 570 can now comprise E2.
  • example method(s) that can be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter can be better appreciated with reference to flowcharts in FIG. 6 - FIG. 8 .
  • example methods disclosed herein are presented and described as a series of acts; however, it is to be understood and appreciated that the claimed subject matter is not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein.
  • one or more example methods disclosed herein could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram.
  • interaction diagram(s) may represent methods in accordance with the disclosed subject matter when disparate entities enact disparate portions of the methods.
  • FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example method 600 that can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • method 600 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to the ECGEO system. Where a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner.
  • the new erasure coding scheme e.g., the second erasure coding scheme
  • can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets as examples, a 4+2 EC scheme can have a 50% overhead as disclosed hereinabove, while a 5+2 EC scheme can have a lower 40% overhead, and a 10+2 EC scheme can have a mere 20% overhead.
  • Method 600 can cause re-encoding of a first coding chunk generated under the first erasure coding scheme.
  • the re-encoding according to the second erasure coding scheme can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk.
  • A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded based on E1 to generate A1-E1_1.
  • the second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_1 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_1 does provide data protection to E1.
  • method 600 can comprise storing a chunk, e.g., a data chunk, a coding chunk, etc., in a newly added zone of the geographically diverse storage system.
  • the newly added zone can be part of the scaling out event.
  • A1-E1_1 can be stored in seventh ZSC 270 that was added to the previous ZSCs, e.g., 210 - 260 , as part of scaling out system 200 .
  • E2 can be stored in seventh ZSC 270 that was added to the previous ZSCs, e.g., 410 - 460 , as part of scaling out system 400 .
  • storing of the chunk in the newly added zone can rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 200 deleting A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2, and E1′, in system 400 moving E2 and deleting A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2, etc., which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
  • FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example method 700 , which can facilitate preferentially storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • method 700 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to a group of old zones comprising in the ECGEO system before the scaling out event.
  • a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner.
  • the new erasure coding scheme can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets.
  • Method 700 can select a re-encoding path.
  • path one of method 700 can comprise re-encoding a first coding chunk, resulting in a second coding chunk.
  • the re-encoding can occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone.
  • the second coding chunk can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk.
  • A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded, at fifth ZSC 250 , based on E1 to generate A1-E1_1.
  • the second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_1 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_1 does provide data protection to E1.
  • path one of method 700 can comprise causing the second coding chunk to be stored in the new zone.
  • method 700 can end.
  • storing of the second coding chunk in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 200 deleting A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2, and E1′, in system 400 moving E2 and deleting A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2, etc., which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
  • method 700 at 750 can comprise generating a copy of a second data chunk that is not protected by a third coding chunk.
  • the copy can be located in a second old zone of the group of old zones.
  • E1 can be copied as E1′, from fifth ZSC 250 into sixth ZSC 260 .
  • path two of method 700 can comprise re-encoding the third coding chunk based on the copy of the second data chunk, resulting in a fourth coding chunk.
  • the re-encoding can again occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, e.g., the second old zone, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone.
  • A1-D1_2 can be re-encoded, at sixth ZSC 260 , based on E1′, e.g., a copy of E1 from fifth ZSC 250 , to generate A1-E1_2.
  • the fourth coding chunk e.g., A1-E1_2 can now additionally provide data protection to the second data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_2 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_2 does provide data protection to E1.
  • path two of method 700 can comprise causing the fourth coding chunk to be stored in the new zone.
  • method 700 can end.
  • storing of the fourth coding chunk can be equivalent to storing the second coding chunk, e.g., A1-E1_2 is redundant to, or a copy of, A1-E1_2.
  • storing of the fourth coding chunk in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO, which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
  • some embodiments of method 700 can select either path one or path two based on metrics of the ECGEO, e.g., portions of networks can perform differently, different ZSCs can be experiencing different processing burdens, etc., and accordingly it can be more or less beneficial to perform re-encoding at some ZSCs than other, it can be more or less beneficial to copy data chunks between some zones than other zones, etc.
  • scaling component 190 , 290 , 490 , etc. can enable selection of a path at 720 .
  • the newly added zone can store a re-encoded coding chunk, e.g., written to it by an older zone, copied to it from an older zone, etc., to preserve diversity according to the updated erasure coding scheme, e.g., in accord with the second erasure coding scheme of method 700 .
  • FIG. 8 is an illustration of an example method 800 , which can enable preferentially storing data chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • method 800 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to a group of old zones comprising in the ECGEO system before the scaling out event.
  • a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner.
  • the new erasure coding scheme can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets.
  • Method 800 can select a re-encoding path.
  • path one of method 800 can comprise re-encoding a first coding chunk, resulting in a second coding chunk.
  • the re-encoding can occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone.
  • the second coding chunk can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk.
  • A2-D2_2 can be re-encoded, at fifth ZSC 250 , based on E2 to generate A2-E2_2.
  • the second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A2-D2_2 did not provide data protection to E2, however, A2-E2_2 does provide data protection to E2.
  • path one of method 800 can comprise moving the data chunk to be stored in the new zone.
  • method 800 can end.
  • storing of the data chunk, e.g., E2 in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 400 deleting A2-D2_2, A2-D2_1, E2′, and moving E2, can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
  • method 800 at 850 can comprise generating a copy of a second data chunk that is not protected by a third coding chunk.
  • the copy can be located in a second old zone of the group of old zones.
  • E2 can be copied as E2′, from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460 .
  • path two of method 800 can comprise re-encoding the third coding chunk based on the copy of the second data chunk, resulting in a fourth coding chunk.
  • the re-encoding can again occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, e.g., the second old zone, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone.
  • A2-D2_1 can be re-encoded, at sixth ZSC 460 , based on E2′, e.g., a copy of E2 from fifth ZSC 450 , to generate A2-E2_1.
  • the fourth coding chunk e.g., A2-E2_1 can now additionally provide data protection to the second data chunk, e.g., A2-D2_1 did not provide data protection to E2, however, A2-E2_1 does provide data protection to E2.
  • path two of method 800 can comprise moving the data chunk to be stored in the new zone.
  • method 800 can end.
  • moving the data chunk can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO, which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
  • some embodiments of method 800 can select either path one or path two based on metrics of the ECGEO, e.g., portions of networks can perform differently, different ZSCs can be experiencing different processing burdens, etc., and accordingly it can be more or less beneficial to perform re-encoding at some ZSCs than other, it can be more or less beneficial to copy data chunks between some zones than other zones, etc.
  • scaling component 190 , 290 , 490 , etc. can enable selection of a path at 820 .
  • the older zones can store a re-encoded coding chunk while the new zone can receive copies of data chunks, e.g., moving a data chunk from old zone to new zone, which can facilitate preserving diversity according to the updated erasure coding scheme, e.g., in accord with the second erasure coding scheme of method 800 .
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a computing environment 900 with which the disclosed subject matter can interact.
  • the system 900 comprises one or more remote component(s) 910 .
  • the remote component(s) 910 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
  • remote component(s) 910 can be a remotely located ZSC connected to a local ZSC via communication framework 940 , etc.
  • ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , 210 , 220 , 230 , 240 , 250 , 260 , 270 , 310 - 370 , 410 - 470 , 510 - 570 , etc. can each be located remotely from other ZSCs, and thus can be regarded as remote component(s) 910 where located remotely from a local component.
  • scaling component 190 , 290 , 490 , etc. can be located remotely from, but communicate with, one or more of the ZSCs.
  • Communication framework 940 can comprise wired network devices, wireless network devices, mobile devices, wearable devices, radio access network devices, gateway devices, femtocell devices, servers, etc.
  • the system 900 also comprises one or more local component(s) 920 .
  • the local component(s) 920 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
  • local component(s) 920 can comprise a local ZSC connected to a remote ZSC via communication framework 940 .
  • the remotely located ZSC or local ZSC can be embodied in ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , 210 , 220 , 230 , 240 , 250 , 260 , 270 , 310 - 370 , 410 - 470 , 510 - 570 , etc.
  • One possible communication between a remote component(s) 910 and a local component(s) 920 can be in the form of a data packet adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes.
  • Another possible communication between a remote component(s) 910 and a local component(s) 920 can be in the form of circuit-switched data adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes in radio time slots.
  • the system 900 comprises a communication framework 940 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the remote component(s) 910 and the local component(s) 920 , and can comprise an air interface, e.g., Uu interface of a UMTS network, via a long-term evolution (LTE) network, etc.
  • LTE long-term evolution
  • Remote component(s) 910 can be operably connected to one or more remote data store(s) 950 , such as a hard drive, solid state drive, SIM card, device memory, etc., that can be employed to store information on the remote component(s) 910 side of communication framework 940 .
  • remote data store(s) 950 such as a hard drive, solid state drive, SIM card, device memory, etc.
  • local component(s) 920 can be operably connected to one or more local data store(s) 930 , that can be employed to store information on the local component(s) 920 side of communication framework 940 .
  • information corresponding to chunks stored on ZSCs can be communicated via communication framework 940 to other ZSCs of a storage network, e.g., to facilitate re-encoding of coding chunks, compression, storage in partial or complete chunks, deletion of chunks, etc.
  • FIG. 10 In order to provide a context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter, FIG. 10 , and the following discussion, are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable environment in which the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter can be implemented. While the subject matter has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions of a computer program that runs on a computer and/or computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosed subject matter also can be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules comprise routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that performs particular tasks and/or implement particular abstract data types.
  • nonvolatile memory can be included in read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, or flash memory.
  • Volatile memory can comprise random access memory, which acts as external cache memory.
  • random access memory is available in many forms such as synchronous random access memory, dynamic random access memory, synchronous dynamic random access memory, double data rate synchronous dynamic random access memory, enhanced synchronous dynamic random access memory, SynchLink dynamic random access memory, and direct Rambus random access memory.
  • the disclosed memory components of systems or methods herein are intended to comprise, without being limited to comprising, these and any other suitable types of memory.
  • the disclosed subject matter can be practiced with other computer system configurations, comprising single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, mini-computing devices, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices (e.g., personal digital assistant, phone, watch, tablet computers, netbook computers, . . . ), microprocessor-based or programmable consumer or industrial electronics, and the like.
  • the illustrated aspects can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network; however, some if not all aspects of the subject disclosure can be practiced on stand-alone computers.
  • program modules can be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 1000 operable to execute the disclosed systems and methods in accordance with an embodiment.
  • Computer 1012 which can be, for example, comprised in ZSC 110 , 140 , 160 , 210 , 220 , 230 , 240 , 250 , 260 , 270 , 310 - 370 , 410 - 470 , 510 - 570 , etc., or in other components, such as scaling component 190 , 290 , 490 , etc., can comprise a processing unit 1014 , a system memory 1016 , and a system bus 1018 .
  • System bus 1018 couples system components comprising, but not limited to, system memory 1016 to processing unit 1014 .
  • Processing unit 1014 can be any of various available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multiprocessor architectures also can be employed as processing unit 1014 .
  • System bus 1018 can be any of several types of bus structure(s) comprising a memory bus or a memory controller, a peripheral bus or an external bus, and/or a local bus using any variety of available bus architectures comprising, but not limited to, industrial standard architecture, micro-channel architecture, extended industrial standard architecture, intelligent drive electronics, video electronics standards association local bus, peripheral component interconnect, card bus, universal serial bus, advanced graphics port, personal computer memory card international association bus, Firewire (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1194 ), and small computer systems interface.
  • bus architectures comprising, but not limited to, industrial standard architecture, micro-channel architecture, extended industrial standard architecture, intelligent drive electronics, video electronics standards association local bus, peripheral component interconnect, card bus, universal serial bus, advanced graphics port, personal computer memory card international association bus, Firewire (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1194 ), and small computer systems interface.
  • System memory 1016 can comprise volatile memory 1020 and nonvolatile memory 1022 .
  • nonvolatile memory 1022 can comprise read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, or flash memory.
  • Volatile memory 1020 comprises read only memory, which acts as external cache memory.
  • read only memory is available in many forms such as synchronous random access memory, dynamic read only memory, synchronous dynamic read only memory, double data rate synchronous dynamic read only memory, enhanced synchronous dynamic read only memory, SynchLink dynamic read only memory, Rambus direct read only memory, direct Rambus dynamic read only memory, and Rambus dynamic read only memory.
  • Computer 1012 can also comprise removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates, for example, disk storage 1024 .
  • Disk storage 1024 comprises, but is not limited to, devices like a magnetic disk drive, floppy disk drive, tape drive, flash memory card, or memory stick.
  • disk storage 1024 can comprise storage media separately or in combination with other storage media comprising, but not limited to, an optical disk drive such as a compact disk read only memory device, compact disk recordable drive, compact disk rewritable drive or a digital versatile disk read only memory.
  • an optical disk drive such as a compact disk read only memory device, compact disk recordable drive, compact disk rewritable drive or a digital versatile disk read only memory.
  • a removable or non-removable interface is typically used, such as interface 1026 .
  • Computer-readable storage media can be any available storage media that can be accessed by the computer and comprises both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.
  • Computer-readable storage media can be implemented in connection with any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, program modules, structured data, or unstructured data.
  • Computer-readable storage media can comprise, but are not limited to, read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read only memory, digital versatile disk or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or other tangible media which can be used to store desired information.
  • tangible herein as may be applied to storage, memory or computer-readable media, is to be understood to exclude only propagating intangible signals per se as a modifier and does not relinquish coverage of all standard storage, memory or computer-readable media that are not only propagating intangible signals per se.
  • tangible media can comprise non-transitory media wherein the term “non-transitory” herein as may be applied to storage, memory or computer-readable media, is to be understood to exclude only propagating transitory signals per se as a modifier and does not relinquish coverage of all standard storage, memory or computer-readable media that are not only propagating transitory signals per se.
  • Computer-readable storage media can be accessed by one or more local or remote computing devices, e.g., via access requests, queries or other data retrieval protocols, for a variety of operations with respect to the information stored by the medium.
  • a computer-readable medium can comprise executable instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution, can cause a system comprising a processor to perform operations, comprising selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that a new zone storage component has been added to a geographically diverse storage system comprising an old zone storage component and employing a first erasure coding scheme, and re-encoding an old coding chunk generated under the first erasure coding scheme, based on a data chunk not protected by the old coding chunk, resulting in a new coding chunk, wherein the new coding chunk protects the data chunk according to the second erasure coding scheme, as disclosed herein.
  • Communications media typically embody computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other structured or unstructured data in a data signal such as a modulated data signal, e.g., a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and comprises any information delivery or transport media.
  • modulated data signal or signals refers to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in one or more signals.
  • communication media comprise wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media.
  • FIG. 10 describes software that acts as an intermediary between users and computer resources described in suitable operating environment 1000 .
  • Such software comprises an operating system 1028 .
  • Operating system 1028 which can be stored on disk storage 1024 , acts to control and allocate resources of computer system 1012 .
  • System applications 1030 take advantage of the management of resources by operating system 1028 through program modules 1032 and program data 1034 stored either in system memory 1016 or on disk storage 1024 . It is to be noted that the disclosed subject matter can be implemented with various operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
  • a user can enter commands or information into computer 1012 through input device(s) 1036 .
  • a user interface can allow entry of user preference information, etc., and can be embodied in a touch sensitive display panel, a mouse/pointer input to a graphical user interface (GUI), a command line controlled interface, etc., allowing a user to interact with computer 1012 .
  • Input devices 1036 comprise, but are not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, TV tuner card, digital camera, digital video camera, web camera, cell phone, smartphone, tablet computer, etc.
  • Interface port(s) 1038 comprise, for example, a serial port, a parallel port, a game port, a universal serial bus, an infrared port, a Bluetooth port, an IP port, or a logical port associated with a wireless service, etc.
  • Output device(s) 1040 use some of the same type of ports as input device(s) 1036 .
  • a universal serial bus port can be used to provide input to computer 1012 and to output information from computer 1012 to an output device 1040 .
  • Output adapter 1042 is provided to illustrate that there are some output devices 1040 like monitors, speakers, and printers, among other output devices 1040 , which use special adapters.
  • Output adapters 1042 comprise, by way of illustration and not limitation, video and sound cards that provide means of connection between output device 1040 and system bus 1018 . It should be noted that other devices and/or systems of devices provide both input and output capabilities such as remote computer(s) 1044 .
  • Computer 1012 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computer(s) 1044 .
  • Remote computer(s) 1044 can be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, cloud storage, a cloud service, code executing in a cloud-computing environment, a workstation, a microprocessor-based appliance, a peer device, or other common network node and the like, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described relative to computer 1012 .
  • a cloud computing environment, the cloud, or other similar terms can refer to computing that can share processing resources and data to one or more computer and/or other device(s) on an as needed basis to enable access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be provisioned and released readily.
  • Cloud computing and storage solutions can store and/or process data in third-party data centers which can leverage an economy of scale and can view accessing computing resources via a cloud service in a manner similar to a subscribing to an electric utility to access electrical energy, a telephone utility to access telephonic services, etc.
  • Network interface 1048 encompasses wire and/or wireless communication networks such as local area networks and wide area networks.
  • Local area network technologies comprise fiber distributed data interface, copper distributed data interface, Ethernet, Token Ring and the like.
  • Wide area network technologies comprise, but are not limited to, point-to-point links, circuit-switching networks like integrated services digital networks and variations thereon, packet switching networks, and digital subscriber lines.
  • wireless technologies may be used in addition to or in place of the foregoing.
  • Communication connection(s) 1050 refer(s) to hardware/software employed to connect network interface 1048 to bus 1018 . While communication connection 1050 is shown for illustrative clarity inside computer 1012 , it can also be external to computer 1012 .
  • the hardware/software for connection to network interface 1048 can comprise, for example, internal and external technologies such as modems, comprising regular telephone grade modems, cable modems and digital subscriber line modems, integrated services digital network adapters, and Ethernet cards.
  • processor can refer to substantially any computing processing unit or device comprising, but not limited to comprising, single-core processors; single-processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors; multi-core processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors with hardware multithread technology; parallel platforms; and parallel platforms with distributed shared memory.
  • a processor can refer to an integrated circuit, an application specific integrated circuit, a digital signal processor, a field programmable gate array, a programmable logic controller, a complex programmable logic device, a discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein.
  • processors can exploit nano-scale architectures such as, but not limited to, molecular and quantum-dot based transistors, switches and gates, in order to optimize space usage or enhance performance of user equipment.
  • a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing processing units.
  • a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
  • a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
  • an application running on a server and the server can be a component.
  • One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. In addition, these components can execute from various computer readable media having various data structures stored thereon. The components may communicate via local and/or remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems via the signal).
  • a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems via the signal).
  • a component can be an apparatus with specific functionality provided by mechanical parts operated by electric or electronic circuitry, which is operated by a software or a firmware application executed by a processor, wherein the processor can be internal or external to the apparatus and executes at least a part of the software or firmware application.
  • a component can be an apparatus that provides specific functionality through electronic components without mechanical parts, the electronic components can comprise a processor therein to execute software or firmware that confers at least in part the functionality of the electronic components.
  • any particular embodiment or example in the present disclosure should not be treated as exclusive of any other particular embodiment or example, unless expressly indicated as such, e.g., a first embodiment that has aspect A and a second embodiment that has aspect B does not preclude a third embodiment that has aspect A and aspect B.
  • the use of granular examples and embodiments is intended to simplify understanding of certain features, aspects, etc., of the disclosed subject matter and is not intended to limit the disclosure to said granular instances of the disclosed subject matter or to illustrate that combinations of embodiments of the disclosed subject matter were not contemplated at the time of actual or constructive reduction to practice.
  • the term “include” is intended to be employed as an open or inclusive term, rather than a closed or exclusive term.
  • the term “include” can be substituted with the term “comprising” and is to be treated with similar scope, unless otherwise explicitly used otherwise.
  • a basket of fruit including an apple is to be treated with the same breadth of scope as, “a basket of fruit comprising an apple.”
  • the terms “user,” “subscriber,” “customer,” “consumer,” “prosumer,” “agent,” and the like are employed interchangeably throughout the subject specification, unless context warrants particular distinction(s) among the terms. It should be appreciated that such terms can refer to human entities, machine learning components, or automated components (e.g., supported through artificial intelligence, as through a capacity to make inferences based on complex mathematical formalisms), that can provide simulated vision, sound recognition and so forth.
  • Non-limiting examples of such technologies or networks comprise broadcast technologies (e.g., sub-Hertz, extremely low frequency, very low frequency, low frequency, medium frequency, high frequency, very high frequency, ultra-high frequency, super-high frequency, extremely high frequency, terahertz broadcasts, etc.); Ethernet; X.25; powerline-type networking, e.g., Powerline audio video Ethernet, etc.; femtocell technology; Wi-Fi; worldwide interoperability for microwave access; enhanced general packet radio service; second generation partnership project (2G or 2GPP); third generation partnership project (3G or 3GPP); fourth generation partnership project (4G or 4GPP); long term evolution (LTE); fifth generation partnership project (5G or 5GPP); third generation partnership project universal mobile telecommunications system; third generation partnership project 2; ultra mobile broadband; high speed packet access; high speed downlink packet access; high speed up
  • a millimeter wave broadcast technology can employ electromagnetic waves in the frequency spectrum from about 30 GHz to about 300 GHz. These millimeter waves can be generally situated between microwaves (from about 1 GHz to about 30 GHz) and infrared (IR) waves, and are sometimes referred to extremely high frequency (EHF).
  • the wavelength ( ⁇ ) for millimeter waves is typically in the 1-mm to 10-mm range.
  • the term “infer” or “inference” can generally refer to the process of reasoning about, or inferring states of, the system, environment, user, and/or intent from a set of observations as captured via events and/or data. Captured data and events can include user data, device data, environment data, data from sensors, sensor data, application data, implicit data, explicit data, etc. Inference, for example, can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data.
  • Such inference results in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether the events, in some instances, can be correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources.
  • Various classification schemes and/or systems e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, and data fusion engines

Abstract

Rebalancing as a result of re-encoding a code chunk in response to scaling out of a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology is disclosed. After a scaling out event, a new erasure coding scheme can be selected. An old coding chunk generated according to an old erasure coding scheme can be re-encoded into a new coding chunk according to the new erasure coding scheme and based on a data chunk not previously protected by the old coding chunk. The re-encoding can be selected to diversify distribution of chunks, resulting in rebalancing occurring as part of re-encoding. In an embodiment, the new coding chunk can be generated in a new zone from the scaling out event. In another embodiment, the data chunk can be moved to the new zone from the scaling out event.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The disclosed subject matter relates to data protection, more particularly, to addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse data storage system that can employ erasure coding to protect stored data.
BACKGROUND
Conventional data storage techniques can employ erasure coding technology to conserve storage space for protection of data. As an example, erasure coding can protect data by generating data fragments and erasure coding fragments according to an erasure coding scheme in a manner that uses less space than storing the original data and full copies of the original data. Erasure coding can allow for the recovery of a representation of the original data even where some of the original data or erasure coding fragments are lost, e.g., in a 10+2 erasure coding scheme providing two erasure coding fragments for every 10 data fragments, for a total of 12 fragments, the data can be accessible up to the loss of any two of the 12 fragments. This can make erasure coding an attractive protection mechanism, for example, in bulk data storage.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example system that can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 2 is an illustration of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of example states of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of example states of a system that can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example method enabling addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example method facilitating preferentially storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 8 illustrates an example method that enables preferentially storing data chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
FIG. 9 depicts an example schematic block diagram of a computing environment with which the disclosed subject matter can interact.
FIG. 10 illustrates an example block diagram of a computing system operable to execute the disclosed systems and methods in accordance with an embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The subject disclosure is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject disclosure. It may be evident, however, that the subject disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the subject disclosure.
As mentioned, data storage techniques can employ convolution and deconvolution to conserve storage space. As an example, convolution can allow data to be packed or hashed in a manner that uses less space that the original data. Moreover, convolved data, e.g., a convolution of first data and second data, etc., can typically be de-convolved to the original first data and second data. One use of data storage is in bulk data storage. Examples of bulk data storage can include networked storage, e.g., cloud storage, for example ECS (formerly Elastic Cloud Storage) offered by Dell EMC. Bulk storage can, in an aspect, manage disk capacity via partitioning of disk space into blocks of fixed size, frequently referred to as chunks, for example a 128 MB chunk, etc. Chunks can be used to store user data, and the chunks can be shared among the same or different users, for example, one chunk may contain fragments of objects from several users. A chunk's content can generally be modified in an append-only mode to prevent overwriting of data already added to the chunk. As such, when a typical chunk becomes full enough, it can be sealed so that the data therein is generally not able for further modification. These chunks can be then stored in a geographically diverse manner to allow for recovery of the data, such as if a first copy of the data is destroyed, e.g., disaster recovery, etc. Blocks of data, hereinafter ‘data chunks’, or simply ‘chunks’, can be used to store user data. Chunks from a data storage device, e.g., ‘zone storage component’ (ZSC), ‘zone storage device’ (ZSD), etc., located in a first geographic location/area/region, hereinafter a ‘zone’, etc., can be stored in a second zone storage device that is located at a second geographic location different from the first geographic location. This can enable recovery of data where the first zone storage device is damaged, destroyed, offline, etc., e.g., disaster recovery of data, by accessing the off-site data from the second zone storage device.
In an aspect, geographically diverse data storage can use data compression to store data. As an example, a storage device in Topeka can store a backup of data from a first zone storage device in Houston, e.g., Topeka can be considered geographically diverse from Houston. As a second example, data chunks from Seattle and San Jose can be stored in Denver. The example Denver storage can be compressed or uncompressed, wherein uncompressed indicates that the Seattle and San Jose chunks are replicated in Denver, and wherein compressed indicates that the Seattle and San Jose chunks are convolved, for example via an exclusive-or operation, hereinafter ‘XOR’, into a different chunk to allow recovery of the Seattle or San Jose data from the convolved chunk, but where the convolved chunk typically consumes less storage space than the sum of the storage space for both the Seattle and San Jose chunks individually. In an aspect, compression can comprise convolving data and decompression can comprise deconvolving data, hereinafter the terms compress, compression, convolve, convolving, etc., can be employed interchangeably unless explicitly or implicitly contraindicated, and similarly, decompress, decompression, deconvolve, deconvolving, etc., can be used interchangeably. Compression, therefore, can allow original data to be recovered from a compressed chunk that consumes less storage space than storage of corresponding uncompressed data chunks. This can be beneficial in that data from a location can be backed up by redundant data in another location via a compressed chunk, wherein a redundant data chunk can be smaller than the sum of the data chunks contributing to the compressed chunk. As such, can be compressed via a convolution technique to reduce the amount of storage space used at a geographically distinct location.
In another aspect, erasure coding (EC) can be employed to provide data protection. In an aspect, erasure coding can protect data in distributed data storage systems and can be employed as an alternative to basic XOR data protect techniques. Generally, erasure coding was created as a forward error correction method for binary erasure channels. However, erasure coding has been applied to data protection in data storage systems. As is disclosed, it can also be applied to data storage and protection in a geographically diverse data storage system.
Erasure coding can comprise dividing some data into k data fragments of equal size. The process of creating coding fragments is typically termed ‘encoding,’ and during encoding, m coding fragments can be generated from the k data fragments and can provide redundancy to the k data fragments. The process of recovering data fragments using available data and coding fragments is typically termed ‘decoding.’ Erasure coding can assure that a loss of any m fragments of the m+k total fragments can be tolerated without loss of access to the information represented by the k data fragments. As an example, in a 4+2 EC scheme, four data fragments, A-D, can be employed to generate two coding fragments, E1 and E1′, resulting in a protection set of [A, B, C, D, E1, E1′] that can allow access to the information in data fragments A-D up to the loss of more than any two fragments, e.g., [C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, etc.
In a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding (ECGEO), it can be designated that the system is to be hardened against the loss of any m zones/clusters/chunks. As such, each zone can replicate each new chunk to at least m other zones. As a result, there can be m backup copies of each chunk, of which one of the m backup chunks can be designated as a primary backup copy, which can be used for encoding. Encoding can be performed by a zone employing primary backup chunks from other zones, e.g., once a first zone has k primary chunks replicated to it from other remote zones, the first zone can generate an encoded chunk. As an example, in a six zone system, chunks A-D can be received at zone E, such that zone E can generate EC chunk E1, and E1 can be replicated as E1′ into zone F to provide a distributed 4+2 protection set where chunks A-D, correspondingly from zones A-D, are protected by EC chunk E1 at zone E and E1′ at zone F. Encoding at the chunk level can be performed because in the chunks in the disclosed geographically diverse data storage system can be of a fixed chunk size, and a less than full chunk can be padded, or filled via another data complement, on an as needed basis. The result of encoding the k primary chunks is m data portions of chunk size, e.g., from the example, EC chunks E1 and E1′. Generally, the k+m data and coding chunks provide better data protection where they are distributed across different zones. This can be illustrated in the previous example, where were E1 and E1′ to be stored on zone B, rather than on zones E and F, then the loss of zone B could result in the loss of three of the six fragments of the protection set, e.g., loss of B, E1, and E1′, which could result in a data loss event. Upon generating E1, the primary backup chunks used for encoding and their peer backup chunks at other zones can be deleted where EC chunk E1 can now provide data protection, though typically this is delayed until E1′ is also generated at a distributed zone for the example 4+2 EC scheme.
A chunk, e.g., convolved chunk, EC chunk, etc., stored at a geographically diverse storage device, e.g., ZSC, ZSD, in a zone, etc., can comprise data from some or all storage devices of a geographically diverse storage system. As an example, where there are five storage devices corresponding to different storage zones of the geographically diverse storage system, a first zone can comprise unconvolved chunks, convolved chunks, EC chunks, etc., from the other four storage devices to order to provide data protection. In this example, the first storage device can, in an embodiment, create a backup chunk from chunks received from the other four storage devices. In an aspect, this can result in generating copies of the four received chunks at the first storage device and, in some embodiments, then convolving the four chunks to generate a fifth chunk that is a backup of the other four chunks, in other embodiments generating an EC chunk from the four chunks, etc. Moreover, one or more other copies of the four chunks and/or the fifth chunk can be created at the first storage device for redundancy. In another example, the first storage device can convolve or encode chunks from three of the other four storage devices, etc.
In an embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, a first data chunk and a second data chunk corresponding to a first and second zone that are geographically diverse can be represented in a third data chunk stored at third zone that is geographically diverse from the first and second zones. In an aspect the third chunk can represent the data of the first and second data chunks in a compressed form, e.g., the data of the first data chunk and the second data chunk can be convolved, such as by an XOR function, into the third data chunk. In another aspect the third chunk can represent the data of the first and second data chunks as part of a protection set in an encoded form, e.g., the data of the first data chunk and the second data chunk can be employed to encode the third data chunk according to an EC scheme, for example a 2+1 EC scheme. In some embodiments, convolved or encoded chunks can be further convolved or further encoded with other chunks and/or other convolved/encoded chunks to yield a further convolved/encoded chunk. As an example, chunk A can be convolved with chunk B to yield chunk AB, which can be convolved with chunk C to yield chunk ABC, which can be convolved with chunk DEF to yield chunk ABCDEF, etc. As a further example, chunk A and chunk B can be encoded to generate chunk F, which can be employed in re-encoding chunks A-C to yield chunk G, which in turn can be employed in re-encoding chunks A-E to yield chunk H, etc.
In an aspect, as data in chunks becomes stale, old, redundant, etc., it can be desirable to delete these chunks to free storage space for other uses. In an aspect, a convolved chunk can be de-convolved, partially or completely, to yield other chunks, e.g., the other chunks can represent the same data as the convolved chunk, but the other chunks can typically consume more storage space that the convolved chunk because these other chunks are ‘less highly convolved’. As an example, the chunk (AB(CD)), which can be chunk A convolved with Chunk B convolved with a chunk that itself is a convolution of chunks C and D, can be deconvolved into chunks A to D, into chunks A, B, and (CD), into chunks A and B(CD), etc. Moreover, in this example, because the convolution can be commutative, such as where an XOR function is used to convolve/deconvolve the data, the chunk (AB(CD)) can be deconvolved into, for example, chunks B and A(CD), chunks A, D, and (BC), etc. Where a chunk is to be deleted in a remote zone, the deconvolution can comprise transfer of other chunks to facilitate the deconvolution. As an example, where the chunk (AB(CD)) is at a first zone, and chunk D is to be deleted, data for one or more of chunks A, B, and C, can be replicated in the first zone from other zones to facilitate deconvolution, e.g., (AB(CD) XOR (ABC), where data for one or more of chunks A, B, and C, is replicated into the first zone, and can result in chunks (ABC) and D, such that chunk D can be deleted and leave just chunk (ABC) at the first zone. As such, it can be desirable to reduce the resource consumption in replicating chunks between zones to facilitate the deletion of a chunk from a convolved chunk. As an example, it can consume less bandwidth to replicate Chunk (ABC) from a second zone to the example first zone as compared to replicating each of Chunk A, Chunk B, and Chunk C from the second zone to the first zone. This can be accommodated, for example, by first, in the second zone, generating a compressed chunk (ABC), such as from chunks A, B, and C, from chunk AB and chunk C, from chunk AC and chunk B, etc., prior to replicating generated chunk ABC into the first zone.
In a similar aspect, where data in chunks becomes stale, old, redundant, etc., and it can be desirable to delete these chunks to free storage space for other uses, for an ECGEO, the data chunk can simply be deleted. In this aspect, a corresponding EC chunk can still regenerate the deleted data chunk. However, the EC chunk can be re-encoded where more than m corresponding data chunks are to be deleted, otherwise where more than m data chunks are deleted, the remaining protected data chunks become vulnerable to a data loss event. As an example, in a 4+2 EC scheme for zones A-F, e.g., data chunks A-D and EC chunks E1 and E1′, deleting chunk A still allows for recovery of chunks B, C or D in the event that any one of B, C, or D becomes less available, e.g., [B, D, E1, E1′] can be employed to recover C even after A has been deleted. However, continuing this example, where both A and B have been deleted, loss of C cannot be recovered from remaining [D, E1, E1′] where A and B have already been deleted. As such, where m data chunks of a procreation set are deleted, the protection set can be re-encoded, for example, with other data of zones A and B, with a different EC scheme, etc.
In an aspect, compression/convolution of chunks can be performed by different compression/convolution technologies. Logical operations can be applied to chunk data to allow compressed data to be recoverable, e.g., by reversing the logical operations to revert to an earlier form of chunk data. As an example, data from chunk 1 can undergo an exclusive-or operation, hereinafter ‘XOR’, with data from chunk 2 to form chunk 3. This example can be reversed by XORing chunk 3 with chunk 2 to generate chunk 1, etc. While other logical and/or mathematical operations can be employed in compression of chunks, those particular operation details are generally beyond the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter and, for clarity and brevity, only the XOR operator will be illustrated herein, however, it is noted that the disclosure is not so limited to just XOR operations and that those other operations or combinations of operations can be substituted without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As such, all logical and/or mathematical operations for compression germane to the disclosed subject matter are to be considered within the scope of the present disclosure even where not explicitly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
Similarly, erasure coding can employ different types of erasure coding. As examples, Reed-Solomon erasure coding, Cauchy erasure coding, Tahoe-LAFS erasure coding, Parchive erasure coding, Erasure Resilient Systematic Code erasure coding, or other types of erasure coding, can be employed in creating erasure coding fragments from data fragments. While the details of employing different types of erasure coding is beyond the scope of the instant disclosure, these types of erasure coding can provide data protection in accord with the disclosed subject matter and, as such, all such types of erasure coding are to be considered within the scope of the instant disclosure, even where not explicitly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
In an aspect, the presently disclosed subject matter can, as mentioned, include ‘zones’. A zone can correspond to a geographic location or region. As such, different zones, e.g., where a zone can connote a group of ZSCs or ZSDs in a geographic area, etc., can be associated with different geographic locations or regions. As an example, Zone A can comprise Seattle, Wash., Zone B can comprise Dallas, Tex., and, Zone C can comprise Boston, Mass. In this example, where a local chunk from Zone A is replicated in Zone C, or protected by an EC chunk in Zone C, an earthquake in Seattle can be less likely to damage the protection data in Boston. Moreover, a local chunk from Dallas can be convolved with the local Seattle chunk, or be included in encoding an EC chunk in Zone C, which can result in a chunk stored in Boston that can protect the Seattle and/or Dallas chunks. In an embodiment, either the local chunk from Seattle or Dallas can be used to de-convolve the chunk stored in Boston to recover the full set of both the Seattle and Dallas local data chunks. In another embodiment, the Boston EC chunk and the either the Seattle or Dallas chunk can be employed to recover a correspondingly less accessible chunk in either Seattle or Dallas. The Boston chunk can consume less disk space than the sum of the separate Seattle and Dallas local chunks. Of further note, the disclosed subject matter can be employed in more or fewer zones, in zones that are the same or different than other zones, in zones that are more or less geographically diverse, etc. As an example, the disclosed subject matter can be applied to data of a single disk, a memory, a drive, a data storage device, etc., without departing from the scope of the disclosure, e.g., the zones can represent different logical areas of the single disk, memory, drive, data storage device, etc.
In an aspect, a geographically diverse storage construct allows for addition or removal of zones, ZSCs, ZSDs, etc., to/from the construct. As an example, a new zone can be added to a geographically diverse storage system. As another example, a zone can be split into two or more zones by adding other zone storage devices and redefining the extents of corresponding zones, such as splitting a Washington state zone, having ZSCs in the Seattle area, into an Eastern zone and a Western zone by adding ZSCs to the Spokane area and directing storage accordingly. Adding a new zone can comprise adding ZSCs, ZSDs, etc., that represent an ‘empty’ zone, which can indicate that the storage device(s) of the ZSC, etc., does not yet store data for the zone or other zones of the geographically diverse storage construct.
In an embodiment, it can be desirable to redistribute stored data from some zone(s) into other zone(s) in conjunction with adding a zone, ZSC, etc., to a geographically diverse storage construct. For simplicity and clarity, a new ZSC, as discussed herein, will be treated as an empty zone. However, in some embodiments, a new ZSC can be a non-empty ZSC, e.g., comprising storage device(s) that already comprise stored chunk(s), and all such embodiments are within the scope of the present disclosure even where not explicitly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity. Where a new ZSC is added to a geographically diverse storage construct, some data from other zones can be moved to the new ZSC. In an aspect, this can be to redistribute data chunks to provide better geographic diversity. In another aspect, this can be to alter available storage space on ZSCs of the geographically diverse storage construct. In still another aspect, this can be to utilize data store(s) having different attributes, e.g., monetary cost, energy consumption, space or size of the physical storage device(s), reliability of storage device(s), etc. To enable adding of a new zone, ZSC, ZSD, etc., e.g., ‘scaling out’ a geographically diverse storage construct, a scaling component can utilize information about the geographically diverse storage construct, the new ZSC, etc., network information, supplemental data, etc., to facilitate the scaling out of the geographically diverse storage construct.
In an embodiment, a scaling component can be communicatively coupled to components of the geographically diverse storage construct, e.g., to ZSC(s), etc., and can be employed to determine data redistribution information. As an example, where a new ZSC is added, a scaling component can rank moving data chunks from a nearly full ZSC to the new ZSC to allow more usable space on the nearly full ZSC. As another example, a scaling component can rank moving data to the new ZSC from a ZSC having more expensive storage costs per unit data higher than moving data from a ZSC having less expensive storage costs, wherein storage costs can be monetary costs, such as equipment prices, dollars per unit energy, land/building costs, etc., or non-momentary costs, such as, energy consumption levels, environmental impacts, man hours of maintenance, availability of services/utilities/skilled workers, etc.
Data from a first ZSC can be moved to a newly added ZSC. In an aspect, data can be moved from several ZSCs to one or more newly added ZSCs. Moreover, the movement of data can comport with geographically diverse data storage techniques, e.g., moving data can result in data storage that comports with geographic diversity of the stored data. As an example, in an embodiment, this can comprise moving a primary backup chunk and a secondary backup chunk so that they end up in different zones to maintain protection of the backed up data. Similar considerations can be afforded other backups of the primary backup chunk, e.g., 3rd, 4th, etc., backup chunks replicating the primary backup chunk, can be moved to retain geographic diversity.
In an aspect, moving data between zones can comprise copying a primary chunk to a new zone and then deleting the primary chunk at the originating zone, thereby effectively “moving” the copy of the primary at the new zone. In some embodiments, moving can be accomplished bit-by-bit, e.g., a bit is copied and then the original bit is deleted, in effect moving the chunk at the bit level. In other embodiments, moving can be accomplished chunk by chunk, e.g., a whole chuck is copied before the original chunk is deleted. In still other embodiments, other groups of data can be moved via the copy and delete technique, e.g., an entire storage device can be copied before the original is deleted, etc.
As will be appreciated, moving data to a new zone can be network intensive because the data being moved would typically be static in the corresponding resident zone and consume minimal, if any, inter-zone network resources, in contrast to large scale copying of data from one zone to another. Additionally, where a new zone receives the moved data, the writing of that data can be processor intensive and increases where the new zone can receive data from one or more zones all trying to distribute data to the new zone. In an aspect, a scaling component can regulate data transfers by indicating when any zone can move data to another zone. In an aspect this can schedule data movement to a newly added zone to moderate network use, etc. As an example, data movement can be scheduled to historically slow network use periods, e.g., late at night, on weekends, over holidays, etc. In a further aspect, this can schedule data movement to a newly added zone to moderate processor use, etc. As an example, data movement can be scheduled to allow data influx from a limited number of zones, e.g., one other zone at a time, etc. In this example, where two zones are to move data into a newly added third zone, the data movement can be scheduled to moderate processor use at the third zone by, for example, scheduling data to move from the first zone before moving data from the second zone, to interleave data movement so that some data is moved from the first zone then some data form the second zone, then some more data from the first zone, then some more data form the second zone, etc.
Additionally, originating zones, e.g., zones moving data towards a newly added zone, etc., can perform operations to combine data, process data, re-encode data, etc., before ‘moving data’ to alter network usage, processor usage at the new zone, etc. In an aspect, if a first zone is to move data from two chunks to a new zone, the two chunks can be combined, e.g., convolved, re-encoded, etc., as disclosed herein, to consume less storage space prior to moving and, correspondingly, the movement of a combined chunk can consume less network resources and less new zone processor resources in the movement of the combined chunk. The scaling component can indicate which chunks can be combined so as to coordinate data chunk movement to preserve data integrity in the geographically diverse storage construct. As an example, a moving a primary chunk and a secondary chunk in a combined chunk, e.g., the data of the primary and the secondary are combined in the combined chunk, from a first zone to a new zone can be coordinated with moving corresponding chunks from a second zone so that the integrity of the geographically diverse data storage scheme is preserved, e.g., it is generally undesirable to allow combining and/or moving data chunks where it results in data redundancy transitioning a threshold level of redundancy and/or geographic diversity.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the disclosed subject matter, then, comprises one or more of the features hereinafter more fully described. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the subject matter. However, these aspects are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the subject matter can be employed. Other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the disclosed subject matter will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the provided drawings.
FIG. 1 is an illustration of a system 100, which can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage system, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. System 100 can comprise first zone storage component (ZSC) 110 that can store data in accord with a geographically diverse storage construct. In an embodiment, ZSC 110 can store data chunks 120-128, etc. In an embodiment, data chunks 120-128, etc., can comprise a data chunk, a redundant or backup data chunk, an erasure coding chunk, a redundant or backup erasure coding chunk, etc. In an aspect, a redundant or backup data chunk can be a copy of a data chunk, e.g., a copy of a chunk of data of the same zone, a copy of a chunk of data from another zone, etc. In an aspect, a redundant or backup erasure coding chunk can comprise a copy of a chunk of erasure coding data, wherein erasure coding data can enable recovery of data according to an erasure coding scheme. In an example scenario, data generated in Seattle can be backed up in a redundant data chunk in a Seattle zone ZSC, in a Dallas zone ZSC, etc. Where erasure coding is employed for data protection, in the example scenario, data generated in Seattle can be protected according to an erasure coding scheme that results in erasure coding data stored in an erasure coding chunk that can be replicated in a redundant erasure coding chunk in the Seattle zone ZSC, in the Dallas zone ZSC, etc. In an aspect, other copies of the data chunk, the redundant data chunk, the erasure coding chunk, the redundant erasure coding chunk, etc., can be stored in the ZSCs of the geographically diverse data storage system. These further redundant chunks, redundant erasure coding chunks, etc., can be regarded as primary, secondary, tertiary, etc. In this manner, a chunk can be backed up, for example, by a primary redundant data chunk, a secondary redundant data chunk, and a tertiary redundant data chunk, that can each represent the data of the corresponding data chunk. Similarly, an erasure coding chunk can be backed up, for example, by a primary redundant erasure coding chunk and a second redundant erasure coding chunk that can each represent the erasure coding data of the erasure coding chunk. For simplicity, the term chunk can refer to a data chunk or erasure coding chunk, etc., and similarly, the term redundant or backup chunk can refer to a redundant chunk or redundant erasure coding chunk, etc. In an aspect, the copies can be mirror images, for example, a secondary redundant chunk can be a copy of a primary redundant chunk, or the copy can provide redundancy even where the content of the ‘copied’ chunk is modified, e.g., not a mirror image, for example, a secondary redundant chunk can be a combined chunk allowing recreation of the primary redundant chunk data, e.g., via deconvolution, etc., as disclosed elsewhere herein. In an aspect, the secondary redundant chunk can be stored on the same or a different zone, although generally, for geographic diversity, the secondary redundant chunk would typically be stored on another zone. Accordingly, first ZSC 110, in an embodiment, can store chunks 120-128, 131-139, etc. In an embodiment, chunks 131-139, etc., can comprise redundant chunks, e.g., as geographically diverse representations of data stored in other chunks, e.g., chunks 130-138, etc., of second ZSC 140, etc.
Similarly, second ZSC 140 can store chunks 130-138, 121-129, etc. In an embodiment, chunks 130-138, etc., can be chunks that correspond to the earlier example redundant chunks 131-139, etc., of first ZSC 110. Further, in some embodiments, chunks 121-129, etc., can be redundant chunks corresponding to the example chunks 120-128, etc., of first ZSC 110. As such, as an example, first ZSC 110 can have chunks 120-128 that are protected by redundant chunks 121-129 on second ZSC 140. Correspondingly in this example, second ZSC 140 can have chunks 130-138 that are protected by redundant chunks 131-139 on first ZSC 110.
System 100 can comprise scaling component 190 that can be communicatively coupled to ZSCs of a geographically diverse data storage system, e.g., first ZSC 110, second ZSC 140, etc. Scaling component 190 can determine which chunks to replicate, copy, move, etc., to preserve a threshold level of data redundancy, a threshold level of geographic diversity, a threshold level of network resource consumption, monetary cost, processor resource consumption, etc. In an aspect, scaling component 190 can provide information, or an indication, related to adding a new zone, ZSC, ZSD, etc. As an example, where geographic diversity in a two zone system is determined to satisfy a diversity rule, scaling component 190 can indicate that third ZSC 160 should be added. In addition to adding a new zone, e.g., third ZSC 160, etc., in some embodiments, third ZSC 160 can be a dormant zone, e.g., a zone that is already comprised in the geographically diverse storage construct but has gone unused, was less used, etc., and that can be activated, brought into use, used more, etc., for example, in response to a determination by scaling component 190, etc. In an embodiment, scaling component 190 can be located separate from a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110, 140, 160, etc. In an embodiment, scaling component 190 can be located remotely from a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110, 140, 160, etc., e.g., both separate from, and located far from, a ZSC. In an embodiment, scaling component 190 can be comprised in a ZSC, e.g., ZSC 110, 140, 160, etc., e.g., scaling component 190 can be part of one or more of the ZSC of the geographically diverse storage system. In an embodiment, scaling component 190 can be comprised in more than one ZSC, e.g., scaling component 190 can be a distributed component comprised in more than one ZSC of the geographically diverse storage system, each ZSC can comprise a separate scaling component 190 that can communicate with other scaling components to coordinate scaling, etc., although these embodiments are not illustrated for clarity and brevity, they are to be considered within the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter.
As is illustrated in system 100, third ZSC 160, for example, can be an empty ZSC that can be available to receive data moved, copied, replicated, etc., from other ZSCs of a geographically diverse data storage system, e.g., one or more of first ZSC 110, second ZSC 140, etc. In an aspect, the movement of chunks, e.g., data chunks, redundant data chunks, erasure coding chunks, redundant erasure coding chunks, etc., into third ZSC 160 can result from determinations by scaling component 190. In an embodiment, scaling component 190 can schedule movement, replication, etc., of one or more chunks from first ZSC 110, and/or one or more chunks from second ZSC 140, into third ZSC 160 in a manner that comports with the geographically diverse storage construct, satisfies cost/resource rules, etc. As an example, scaling component 190 can indicate that all data transfers can occur in low network usage periods, that chunks 120 and 121, e.g., a chunk and a corresponding redundant chunk, are not both moved to third ZSC 160 because it would limit geographic diversity, and that first ZSC 110 moves data at a different time than second ZSC 140 to reduce processor loading at third ZSC 160. Numerous other examples of scaling component 190 coordinating data movement will be readily appreciated and are all considered within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not expressly recited for the sake of clarity and brevity.
FIG. 2 is an illustration of a system 200, which can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. System 200 can comprise first ZSC through sixth ZSC, correspondingly 210-260, which can each comprise, among other data chunks, a first data chunk and a second data chunk, e.g., A1 and A2 for first ZSC 210, B1 and B2 for second ZSC 220, C1 and C2 for third ZSC 230, etc. The six ZSCs 210-260 can employ a 4+2 EC scheme that, for example, can result in a protection set of [A1, B1, C1, D1, A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2] where the coding chunk A1-D1_1 can be stored at fifth ZSC 250 and a copy of the coding chunk, e.g., A1-D1_2, can be stored at the sixth ZSC 260. In an aspect, though not illustrated for clarity and brevity, other coding chunks for other protection sets can be stored in among ZSCs 210-260, e.g., a protection set of [C2, D2, E2, F2, C2-F2_1, C2-F2_2] can store coding chunk C2-F2_1 at first ZSC 210 and a copy of the coding chunk, C2-F2_2, can be stored at second ZSC 220 in accord with a best practice of keeping chunks comprising a protection set stored in a fully distributed manner. System 200 can be scaled out, for example, by adding seventh ZSC 270. Utilization of scaled out system 200 can include altering the protection scheme, for example, from a 4+2 EC scheme to a 5+2 EC scheme, and then causing re-encoding of the protection sets. In an aspect, performing the re-encoding as is presently disclosed can result in rebalancing of data stored in the ECGEO of system 200.
In an aspect, data rebalancing can occur in conjunction with data re-protection in scaling out a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding, at least in part, because scaling out of a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can correspond to alteration of an erasure coding protection scheme. As an example, in a geographically diverse data storage system having six zones and employing erasure coding, the erasure coding protection scheme can be a 4+2 erasure coding scheme (EC scheme), wherein data from any four zones is protected by erasure code stored in the two other zones such that the system is hardened against the loss of any two zones. Where the example six zone geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding is scaled out to a seven zone geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding, the EC scheme can be altered from the 4+2 EC scheme to a 4+3 EC scheme, a 5+2 EC scheme, etc. It is noted that we discuss the 5+2 EC scheme, rather than all possible EC scheme changes, for clarity and brevity, but all EC scheme changes are considered within the scope of the disclosed subject matter even where not explicitly recited for reasons of clarity and brevity. Altering the 4+2 EC scheme to a 5+2 EC scheme in conjunction with the scaling of the geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding, can result in different EC chunks, different redundant EC chunks, etc., because the erasure coding fragments correspond to five other data fragments rather than to four other data fragments, e.g., to five other ZSCs rather than to four other ZSCs.
In an aspect, Erasure Coding can protect data in distributed data storage systems and can be employed as an alternative to basic XOR data protect techniques. Generally, erasure coding was created as a forward error correction method for binary erasure channels. However, erasure coding has been applied to data protection in data storage systems. As is disclosed, it can also be applied to data storage and protection in a geographically diverse data storage system.
Erasure coding can comprise dividing some data into k data fragments of equal size. The process of creating coding fragments is typically termed ‘encoding,’ and during encoding, m coding fragments can be generated from the k data fragments and can provide redundancy to the k data fragments. The process of recovering data fragments using available data and coding fragments is typically termed ‘decoding.’ Erasure coding can assure that a loss of any m fragments of the m+k total fragments can be tolerated without loss of access to the information represented by the k data fragments. As an example, in a 4+2 EC scheme, four data fragments, A-D, can be employed to generate two coding fragments, E1 and E1′, resulting in a protection set of [A, B, C, D, E1, E1′] that can allow access to the information in data fragments A-D up to the loss of more than any two fragments, e.g., [C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1] can be used to recover A-D, [A, C, D, E1, E1′] can be used to recover A-D, etc.
In a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding, it can be designated that the system is to be hardened against the loss of any m zones/clusters/chunks. As such, each zone can replicate each new chunk to at least m other zones. As a result, there can be m backup copies of each chunk, of which one of the m backup chunks can be designated as a primary backup copy, which can be used for encoding. Encoding can be performed by a zone employing primary backup chunks from other zones, e.g., once a first zone has k primary chunks replicated to it from other remote zones, the first zone can generate an encoded chunk. As an example, in a six zone system, chunks A-D can be received at zone E, such that zone E can generate EC chunk E1, and E1 can be replicated as E1′ into zone F to provide a distributed 4+2 protection set where chunks A-D, correspondingly from zones A-D, are protected by EC chunk E1 at zone E and E1′ at zone F. Encoding at the chunk level can be performed because in the chunks in the disclosed geographically diverse data storage system can be of a fixed chunk size, and a less than full chunk can be padded, or filled via another data complement, on an as needed basis. The result of encoding the k primary chunks is m data portions of chunk size, e.g., from the example, EC chunks E1 and E1′. Generally, the k+m data and coding chunks provide better data protection where they are distributed across different zones. This can be illustrated in the previous example, where were E1 and E1′ to be stored on zone B, rather than on zones E and F, then the loss of zone B could result in the loss of three of the six fragments of the protection set, e.g., loss of B, E1, and E1′, which could result in a data loss event. Upon generating E1, the primary backup chunks used for encoding and their peer backup chunks at other zones can be deleted where EC chunk E1 can now provide data protection, though typically this is delayed until E1′ is also generated at a distributed zone for the example 4+2 EC scheme.
In an aspect, a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can provide data protection efficiently, with per chunk capacity overhead being generally described by: overhead=m/k*chunk_size. As an example, a 4+2 EC scheme can have an overhead of 0.5 chunk sizes, e.g., to four chunks of data can be protected in a total of six chunks comprising the four data chunks and two EC chunks. As another example, in a 10+2 EC scheme, overhead can be 0.2 chunk size. Accordingly, it can be appreciated that scaling out of a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can result in greater efficiency by reducing the overhead to protect against the loss of a fixed number of zones. As an example, in a six zone system hardened against the loss of any two zones, a 4+2 EC scheme can be employed. If the example system is scaled out to an eight zone system still hardened against the loss of any two zones, then a 6+2 EC scheme can be employed. This can result in overhead going from 50% in the 4+2 EC scheme to 33% in the 6+2 EC scheme while still providing protection against the loss of any two zones in either the six or eight zone geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding. In scaling out the system, new EC chunks can generated, for example, in the 4+2 EC scheme, EC chunks E1 and E1′ can protect data chunks A-D, while in the 6+2 EC scheme, EC chunks G1 and G1′ can protect data chunks A-F and chunks E1 and E1′ can then be deleted.
In an aspect, re-protection can be highly burdensome on computing resources, including high processor demand, high network demand, etc. However, it can be observed that EC chunks E1 and E1′ can be employed in generating G1 and G1′ with reduced burden on computing resources than might be experienced where G1 and G1′ are generated de novo. Generally, where there is a protection scheme k+m, there is also a ‘coding matrix’, e.g., m×k, that can be used to produce m coding fragments out of k data fragments. Any sub-matrix mxl of the matrix m×k (l<k) will then be a proper coding matrix for a protection scheme l+m. As an example, the following three coding matrices for the protection schemes 10+2, 6+2, and 4+2 can share values of coefficients Xi,j with the same i and j.
CM = X 1 , 1 X 1 , 2 X 1 , 3 X 1 , 4 X 1 , 5 X 1 , 6 X 1 , 7 X 1 , 8 X 1 , 9 X 1 , 10 X 2 , 1 X 2 , 2 X 2 , 3 X 2 , 4 X 2 , 5 X 2 , 6 X 2 , 7 X 2 , 8 X 2 , 9 X 2 , 10 ( 10 + 2 ) CM = X 1 , 1 X 1 , 2 X 1 , 3 X 1 , 4 X 1 , 5 X 1 , 6 X 2 , 1 X 2 , 2 X 2 , 3 X 2 , 4 X 2 , 5 X 2 , 6 ( 6 + 2 ) CM = X 1 , 1 X 1 , 2 X 1 , 3 X 1 , 4 X 2 , 1 X 2 , 2 X 2 , 3 X 2 , 4 ( 4 + 2 )
Accordingly, re-encoding for a scaling event in an ECGEO can be performed via the example coding matrices with lower computational resource demands than copying all contributing data chunks to a new zone to allow brute force re-encoding. As an example, a protection scheme can be designated for an ECGEO that can be mindful of potential system expansion in future, e.g., a 10+2 EC scheme can be initially selected to allow for future expansion of the ECGEO. Accordingly, in this example, 10+2 (kf+m) can be a potential final protection scheme for a future fully expanded ECGEO system. However, in this example, an initial protection scheme can be selected based on the less than fully expanded ECGEO system, e.g., an initial protection scheme can be selected for the initial number of zones, N1, in the ECGEO system. In this example, let N1=6, and m=2, then an initial k-value, k1, can be determined according to k1=N1−m, which in this example leads to k1=4, which can assure data recovery after m zone failures, e.g., a first protection scheme in this example can be a 4+2 EC scheme. The protection scheme k1+m can be used for all new data while the ECGEO system is not scaled out. The coding matrix m×k1 can be understood to be a sub-matrix of the coding matrix m×kf we have chosen for the potential final protection scheme kf+m, e.g., a 10+2 EC scheme.
In this example, when the ECGEO setup is later expanded, for example, by adding two more zones to the system, a new protection scheme can be chosen for the new number of zones, e.g., N2=8. A new k-value, k2, can be calculated using the formula k2=N2−m, which in this example leads to k2=6. Upon switching the ECGEO system to the new protection scheme, all previously existing coding chunks, e.g., those generated under the 4+2 EC scheme, can be treated as partial coding chunks because the number of data chunks they combine is fewer than k2, e.g., 4<6. Data chunks created by the new zones, in conjunction with the existing partial coding chunks, can be used to re-encode the partial coding chunks, via the coding matrices, to result in coding chunks that are complete under the example 6+2 EC scheme. This can avoid needing to transfer all data chunks to a remote zone for brute force re-encoding. In contrast, new data chunks can be transferred/replicated to the zones with existing partial coding chunks. This can significantly reduce consumption of computing resources including network resources and processor resources. The example 6+2 EC scheme can be similarly adapted to a 7+2 EC scheme, an 8+2 EC scheme, a 9+2 EC scheme, and eventually a 10+2 EC scheme. In some embodiments, further scaling out is also possible, for example, allowing expansion beyond the 10+2 EC scheme. Further discussion of this aspect of data protection is beyond the scope of the instant disclosure. It is sufficient to observe that re-protection of data during a scaling out event in a geographically diverse data storage system employing erasure coding can occur, and that the disclosed technology can enable rebalancing to occur in conjunction with, rather than as a distinct process from, the re-protection. Where rebalancing, as a distinct process, can itself be demanding of computing resources, and where re-protection can similarly be demanding of computing resources, performing rebalancing in conjunction with re-protection can reduce the demand on computing resources, including processor demands, network demands, etc., over performing re-protection and rebalancing as separate processes.
In system 200, adding seventh ZSC 270 can allow for storage of additional chunks, e.g., data chunks, erasure coding chunks, etc. Seventh ZSC 270 can be added as an empty zone, e.g., contacting no chunks, or as a non-empty zone, e.g., already containing one or more chunks. Re-encoding of erasure coding chunks can therefore take advantage of the additional storage space offered by newly added seventh ZSC 270, e.g., the example 4+2 EC scheme can be changed to a 5+2 EC scheme and some chunk(s) can be stored at ZSC 270. This storage at seventh ZSC 270 can be accompanied by removing some other chunk(s) from other ZSCs of system 200, resulting in both re-encoding to the new EC scheme and also providing rebalancing of chunk storage in system 200. This can be performed by selecting chunks for re-encoding in a manner that typically avoids copying of all participating chunks to a new zone before performing re-encoding at the new zone. Selection of chunks can be performed via scaling component 290 that can be communicatively coupled with the ZSCs of system 200. Selection of chunks for re-encoding with rebalancing can be based on one or more selection rules provided to, or via, scaling component 290.
In an aspect, example erasure coding chunk A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded based on data chunk E1 at fifth ZSC 250, resulting in coding chunk A1-E1_1, which can be copied to seventh ZSC 270. This can be in contrast to first copying each of chunks A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1 to seventh ZSC 270 and then encoding A1-E1_1 at seventh ZSC 270, which can consume more computing resources than the illustrated re-encoding at fifth ZSC 250. In an embodiment, A1-E1_1 can be replicated, for diversity, at sixth ZSC 260 from seventh ZSC 270, though this is not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Upon generating A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 by this technique, A1-D1_1 and A1-D1_2 can become redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 250 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 270 stores more chunks.
In an aspect, an alternative to generating A1-E1_1 can be via copying E1 from fifth ZSC 250 to Sixth ZSC 260 as E1′. E1′ can then be used to re-encode A1-D1_2 at sixth ZSC 260, resulting in A1-E1_2. A1-E1_2 can then be replicated from sixth ZSC 260 into seventh ZSC 270 as A1-E1_1 for diversity, again this is not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Upon generating A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 by this technique, A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 250 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 270 stores more chunks.
In some embodiments, A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 can be generated separately, though they can be equivalent, e.g., A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 and A1-E1_2 can be generated by replicating E1 as E1′ and re-encoding A1-D1_2 based on E1′, as illustrated. However, it can be easier to envision A1-E1_2 as a copy of A1-E1_1, e.g., replicated from seventh ZSC 270 into sixth ZSC 260, where A1-E1_1 is generated via re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1, or envisioning A1-E1_1 as a copy of A1-E1_2, e.g., replicated from sixth ZSC 260 into seventh ZSC 270 where A1-E1_2 is generated via re-encoding A1-D1_2 based on E1′. However, either illustrated pathway, or a combination of both illustrated pathways, can result in generating the redundant pair of coding chunks, e.g., A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2, as part of the 5+2 EC scheme protection set [A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, A1-E1_1, A1-E1_2] that can enable access to information represented in [A1, B1, C1, D1, E1] up to the loss of any two chunks of the 5+2 EC protection set, e.g., loss of, or reduced access to, any two zones of ZSCs 210-270.
Scaling component 290 can communicate with one or more of the ZSCs of system 200 to orchestrate moving, copying, re-encoding, etc., chunks in an ECGEO, e.g., system 200. In an embodiment, scaling component 290 can initiate chunk operations between ZSCs, e.g., copying E1 from fifth ZSC 250 to Sixth ZSC 260 as E1′, writing A1-E1_1 into seventh ZSC 270 in response to re-encoding of A1-D1_1 based on E1, copying A1-E1_1 as A1-E1_2 from seventh ZSC 270 into sixth ZSC 260, enabling re-encoding of A1-D1_2 into A1-E1_2 based on E1′, etc. Moreover, the ZSCs, in response to notification of the completion of a chunk operation can perform other actions, e.g., deleting a local chunk that has been copied into another zone, etc. As an example, in response to generating A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2, redundant chunks can be deleted, e.g., A1-D1_1, E1′_A1-D1_2, etc.
In an embodiment, scaling component 290 can determine which technique to apply, e.g., based on one or more selection rules, to one or more chunk operations in regard to the disclosed subject matter. In an example, scaling component 290 can determine that there are adequate network resources and that sixth ZSC 260 has a less burdened processor than fifth ZSC 250 and, based on a selection rule to least burden computing resources, can accordingly instruct fifth ZSC 250 to copy E1 to sixth ZSC 260 as E1′, so that the processor of sixth ZSC 260 is tasked with generating A1-E1_2 rather than the processor of fifth ZSC 250 being tasked with generating A1-E1_1. In another example, scaling component 290 can determine that while there can be adequate network resources, sixth ZSC 260 can be a more burdened processor than fifth ZSC 250 and, accordingly, can instruct fifth ZSC 250 to generate A1-E1_1 rather than copying E1 to sixth ZSC 260, etc. In a further example, scaling component 290 can determine that there can be adequate computing resources for seventh ZSC 270 to perform a brute force re-encoding, wherein A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1, can be copied to seventh ZSC 270 to facilitate encoding of A1-E1_1 at ZSC 270, resulting in less computing resource demand on fifth ZSC 250 and sixth ZSC 260. Numerous other examples of rule based selection via scaling component 290 will be readily appreciated and all such examples are within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not recited explicitly for the sake of clarity and brevity.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of example states 300-306 of a system, e.g., system 200, which can favor storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. A first state, e.g., example state 300, can represent an ECGEO that can comprise ZSC 310 through ZSC 360, e.g., employing a 4+2 EC scheme at state 300. At state 300, the ZSCs can comprise data chunks A1 through F2 and coding chunks A1-D1_1 and A1-D1_2 as illustrated. The ECGEO can be scaled out at state 302, e.g., adding ZSC 370. At state 302, ZSC 310-340 can comprise data chunks A1-D2, although not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Further, ZSC 350 and ZSC 360 can still comprise the same chunks as in state 300.
The ECGEO, at state 304, can generate A1-E1_1, e.g., re-encoding coding chunks according to changing from the example 4+2 EC scheme to an example 5+2 EC scheme, such as is disclosed for system 200, etc. In some embodiments, A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 at ZSC 350 and writing A1-E1_1 into ZSC 370. In some embodiments, A1-E1_1 can be generated by copying E1 and A1-D1_1 from ZSC 350 into ZSC 370 and then re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 at ZSC 370, although this embodiment is not illustrated for clarity and brevity. In some embodiments, E1 can be copied into ZSC 360 as E1′ and A1-E1_2 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_2, e.g., as a redundant copy of A1-E1_1, based on E1′ at ZSC 360 and copying A1-E1_2 as A1-E1_1 into ZSC 370. In some embodiments, A1-E1_1 can be generated by re-encoding A1-D1_1 based on E1 and A1-E1_2 can be separately generated by re-encoding A1-D1_2 with E1′.
As can be observed in FIG. 3, re-encoding via the disclosed processes can result in more redundant chunks than are needed to provide data protection according to the example 5+2 EC scheme, e.g., A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be considered unnecessary in view of A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 having been generated via one or more of the disclosed pathways. The ECGEO can remove unnecessary chunks, e.g., clean up the stored chunks, at 360. In an embodiment, where generating A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 provides data protection via the example 5+2 EC scheme, A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be deleted, released, etc. As such, at state 306, ZSC 310-340 can still comprise chunks A1-D2, ZSC 350 can comprise fewer chunks than in state 300, e.g., E1 and E2 rather than E1, E2, and A1-D1_1, ZSC 360 can now comprise F1, F2, and A1-E1_2 rather than F1, F2, and A1-D1_2, and newly added ZSC 370 can now comprise A1-E1_1. This can demonstrate that the selective re-encoding can provide rebalancing of the ECGEO without needing to perform rebalancing as a distinct process.
FIG. 4 is an illustration of a system 400, which can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. System 400 can comprise first ZSC through sixth ZSC, correspondingly 410-460, which can each comprise, among other data chunks, a first data chunk and a second data chunk, e.g., A1 and A2 for first ZSC 410, B1 and B2 for second ZSC 420, C1 and C2 for third ZSC 430, etc. The six ZSCs 410-460 can employ a 4+2 EC scheme that, for example, can result in a protection set of [A2, B2, C2, D2, A2-D2_1, A2-D2_2] where the coding chunk A2-D2_1 can be stored at sixth ZSC 460 and a copy of the coding chunk, e.g., A2-D2_2, can be stored at the fifth ZSC 450. In an aspect, though not illustrated for clarity and brevity, other coding chunks for other protection sets can be stored in among ZSCs 410-460, e.g., a protection set of [C1, D1, E1, F1, C1-F1_1, C1-F1_2] can store coding chunk C1-F1_1 at first ZSC 210 and a copy of the coding chunk, C1-F1_2, can be stored at second ZSC 420 in accord with a best practice of keeping chunks comprising a protection set stored in a fully distributed manner. System 400 can be scaled out, for example, by adding seventh ZSC 470. Utilization of scaled out system 400 can include altering the protection scheme, for example, from a 4+2 EC scheme to a 5+2 EC scheme, and then causing re-encoding of the protection sets. In an aspect, performing the re-encoding as is presently disclosed can again result in rebalancing of data stored in the ECGEO of system 400.
In system 400, adding seventh ZSC 470 can allow for storage of additional chunks, e.g., data chunks, erasure coding chunks, etc. Seventh ZSC 470 can be added as an empty zone or as a non-empty zone. Re-encoding of erasure coding chunks can therefore take advantage of the additional storage space offered by newly added seventh ZSC 470, e.g., the example 4+2 EC scheme can be changed to a 5+2 EC scheme and some chunk(s) can be stored at ZSC 470. This storage at seventh ZSC 470 can be accompanied by removing some other chunk(s) from other ZSCs of system 400, resulting in both re-encoding to the new EC scheme and also providing rebalancing of chunk storage in system 400. This can be performed by selecting chunks for re-encoding in a manner that can avoid copying of all participating chunks to a new zone before performing re-encoding at the new zone. Selection of chunks can be performed via scaling component 490 that can be communicatively coupled with the ZSCs of system 400. Selection of chunks for re-encoding with rebalancing can be based on one or more selection rules provided to, or via, scaling component 490.
In an aspect, example erasure coding chunk A2-D2_1 can be re-encoded based on a data chunk E2, e.g., E2′, at sixth ZSC 460, resulting in coding chunk A2-E2_1. This process can be in contrast to first copying each of chunks A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2 to sixth ZSC 460 and then encoding A2-E2_1, which can consume more computing resources than the illustrated re-encoding at sixth ZSC 460 based on A2-D2_1 and E2′. In some embodiments, although not illustrated for clarity and brevity, A2-E2_1 can then be copied to fifth ZSC 450 as A2-E2_2 to provide storage diversity of the coding chunk. Upon generating A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 by this technique, A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2 can be considered excessively redundant and can be deleted. Further, E2 can be safely moved to seventh ZSC 470 from fifth ZSC 450. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 450 can now store fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 470 can now store more chunks.
In an aspect, an alternative to generating A2-E2_2 can be via re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 at fifth ZSC 450, then copying A2-D2_2 to Sixth ZSC 460 as A2-D2_1. A2-E2_2 can then be replicated from sixth ZSC 460 into seventh ZSC 470 as A2-E2_1 for chunk diversity, which is not illustrated for clarity and brevity. E2 can then be safely moved to seventh ZSC 470 from fifth ZSC 450. Upon generating A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 by this technique, A2-D2_1, E2′, and A2-D2_2 can be redundant and can be deleted. Accordingly, fifth ZSC 450 now stores fewer chunks and seventh ZSC 470 stores more chunks.
In some embodiments, A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 can be generated separately, though, as in system 200, they can again be equivalent, e.g., A2-E2_2 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 and A2-E2_2 can be generated by replicating E2 as E2′ and re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′, as illustrated. However, it can be easier to envision A2-E2_1 as a copy of A2-E2_2, e.g., replicated from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460, where A2-E2_2 is generated via re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2, or envisioning A2-E2_2 as a copy of A2-E2_1, e.g., replicated from sixth ZSC 460 into fifth ZSC 450 where A2-E2_1 is generated via re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′. However, either illustrated pathway, or a combination of both illustrated pathways, can result in generating the redundant pair of coding chunks, e.g., A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2, as part of the example 5+2 EC scheme protection set [A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, A2-E2_1, A2-E2_2] that can enable access to information represented in [A2, B2, C2, D2, E2] up to the loss of any two chunks of the 5+2 EC protection set, e.g., loss of, or reduced access to, any two zones of ZSCs 410-470.
Scaling component 490 can communicate with one or more of the ZSCs of system 400 to orchestrate moving, copying, re-encoding, etc., chunks in an ECGEO, e.g., system 400. In an embodiment, scaling component 490 can initiate chunk operations between ZSCs, e.g., copying E2 from fifth ZSC 450 to Sixth ZSC 460 as E2′, re-encoding of A2-D2_2 based on E2, copying A2-E2_2 as A2-E2_1 from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460, enabling re-encoding of A2-D2_1 into A2-E2_1 based on E2′, etc. Moreover, the ZSCs, in response to notification of the completion of a chunk operation can perform other actions, e.g., deleting a local chunk that has been copied into another zone, etc. As examples, in response to generating A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2, redundant chunks can be deleted, e.g., A2-D2_1, E2′_A2-D2_2, E2 can be moved to another ZSC, etc.
In an embodiment, scaling component 490 can determine which technique to apply, e.g., based on one or more selection rules, to one or more chunk operations in regard to the disclosed subject matter. In an example, scaling component 490 can determine that there are adequate network resources and that sixth ZSC 460 has a less burdened processor than fifth ZSC 450 and, based on a selection rule to least burden computing resources, can accordingly instruct fifth ZSC 450 to copy E2 to sixth ZSC 460 as E2′, so that the processor of sixth ZSC 460 is tasked with generating A2-E2_1, then copying A2-E2_1 back to fifth ZSC 450 as A2-E2_2, rather than the processor of fifth ZSC 450 being tasked with generating A2-E2_2. In another example, scaling component 490 can determine that while there can be adequate network resources, sixth ZSC 460 can be a more burdened processor than fifth ZSC 450 and, accordingly, can instruct fifth ZSC 450 to generate A2-E2_2 rather than copying E2 to sixth ZSC 460, etc. Numerous other examples of rule based process selection via scaling component 490 will be readily appreciated and all such examples are within the scope of the instant disclosure even where not recited explicitly for the sake of clarity and brevity.
FIG. 5 is an illustration of example states 500-506 of a system, e.g., system 400, which can favor storing coding chunks on existing storage zones to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. A first state, e.g., example state 500, can represent an ECGEO that can comprise ZSC 510 through ZSC 560, e.g., employing a 4+2 EC scheme at state 500. At state 500, the ZSCs can comprise data chunks A1 through F2 and coding chunks A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2 as illustrated. The ECGEO can be scaled out at state 502, e.g., adding ZSC 570. At state 502, ZSC 510-540 can comprise data chunks A1-D2, although not illustrated for clarity and brevity. Further, ZSC 550 and ZSC 560 can still comprise the same chunks as in state 500.
The ECGEO, at state 504, can generate A2-E2_2, e.g., re-encoding coding chunks according to changing from the example 4+2 EC scheme to an example 5+2 EC scheme, such as is disclosed for system 400, etc. In some embodiments, A2-E2_2 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 based on E2 at ZSC 550. In some embodiments, A2-E2_2 can be generated by copying E2 from ZSC 550 into ZSC 560 a s E2′, re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′ at ZSC 560, then copying A2-E2_1 back to ZSC 550 as A2-E2_2. In some embodiments, A2-E2_1 can be generated by re-encoding A2-D2_1 based on E2′ and A2-E2_2 can be separately generated by re-encoding A2-D2_2 with E1. At state 506, E2 can be moved from ZSC 3550 to ZSC 570.
As can be observed in FIG. 5, re-encoding via the disclosed processes can result in more redundant chunks than are needed to provide data protection according to the example 5+2 EC scheme, e.g., A2-D2_1, E2′, and A2-D2_2 can be considered unnecessary in view of A2-E2_1 and A2-E2_2 having been generated via one or more of the disclosed pathways. The ECGEO can remove unnecessary chunks, e.g., clean up the stored chunks, at state 508. In an embodiment, where generating A1-E1_1 and A1-E1_2 provides data protection via the example 5+2 EC scheme, A1-D1_1, E1′, and A1-D1_2 can be deleted, released, etc. As such, at state 508, ZSC 510-540 can still comprise chunks A1-D2, ZSC 550 can comprise fewer chunks than in state 500, e.g., E1 and A2-E2_2 rather than E1, E2, and A2-D2_2, ZSC 560 can now comprise F1, F2, and A2-E2_1 rather than F1, F2, and A2-D2_1, and newly added ZSC 570 can now comprise E2.
In view of the example system(s) described above, example method(s) that can be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter can be better appreciated with reference to flowcharts in FIG. 6-FIG. 8. For purposes of simplicity of explanation, example methods disclosed herein are presented and described as a series of acts; however, it is to be understood and appreciated that the claimed subject matter is not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein. For example, one or more example methods disclosed herein could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram. Moreover, interaction diagram(s) may represent methods in accordance with the disclosed subject matter when disparate entities enact disparate portions of the methods. Furthermore, not all illustrated acts may be required to implement a described example method in accordance with the subject specification. Further yet, two or more of the disclosed example methods can be implemented in combination with each other, to accomplish one or more aspects herein described. It should be further appreciated that the example methods disclosed throughout the subject specification are capable of being stored on an article of manufacture (e.g., a computer-readable medium) to allow transporting and transferring such methods to computers for execution, and thus implementation, by a processor or for storage in a memory.
FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example method 600 that can facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage zones of a geographically diverse storage construct employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. At 610, method 600 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to the ECGEO system. Where a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner. Additionally, the new erasure coding scheme, e.g., the second erasure coding scheme, can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets, as examples, a 4+2 EC scheme can have a 50% overhead as disclosed hereinabove, while a 5+2 EC scheme can have a lower 40% overhead, and a 10+2 EC scheme can have a mere 20% overhead.
Method 600, at 620, can cause re-encoding of a first coding chunk generated under the first erasure coding scheme. The re-encoding according to the second erasure coding scheme can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk. As an example, in system 200 disclosed hereinabove, A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded based on E1 to generate A1-E1_1. The second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_1 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_1 does provide data protection to E1.
At 730, method 600 can comprise storing a chunk, e.g., a data chunk, a coding chunk, etc., in a newly added zone of the geographically diverse storage system. At this point method 600 can end. In an aspect, the newly added zone can be part of the scaling out event. As an example, in system 200, A1-E1_1 can be stored in seventh ZSC 270 that was added to the previous ZSCs, e.g., 210-260, as part of scaling out system 200. As another example, in system 400, E2 can be stored in seventh ZSC 270 that was added to the previous ZSCs, e.g., 410-460, as part of scaling out system 400. In an aspect, storing of the chunk in the newly added zone can rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 200 deleting A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2, and E1′, in system 400 moving E2 and deleting A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2, etc., which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example method 700, which can facilitate preferentially storing coding chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. At 710, method 700 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to a group of old zones comprising in the ECGEO system before the scaling out event. Where a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner. In an aspect, the new erasure coding scheme can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets.
Method 700, at 720, can select a re-encoding path. At 730, path one of method 700 can comprise re-encoding a first coding chunk, resulting in a second coding chunk. The re-encoding can occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone. The second coding chunk can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk. As an example, in system 200, as disclosed hereinabove, A1-D1_1 can be re-encoded, at fifth ZSC 250, based on E1 to generate A1-E1_1. The second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_1 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_1 does provide data protection to E1.
At 740, path one of method 700 can comprise causing the second coding chunk to be stored in the new zone. At this point, method 700 can end. In an aspect, storing of the second coding chunk in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 200 deleting A1-D1_1, A1-D1_2, and E1′, in system 400 moving E2 and deleting A2-D2_1 and A2-D2_2, etc., which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
Where at 720 path two is selected, method 700 at 750 can comprise generating a copy of a second data chunk that is not protected by a third coding chunk. The copy can be located in a second old zone of the group of old zones. As an example, in system 200, E1 can be copied as E1′, from fifth ZSC 250 into sixth ZSC 260.
At 760, path two of method 700 can comprise re-encoding the third coding chunk based on the copy of the second data chunk, resulting in a fourth coding chunk. The re-encoding can again occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, e.g., the second old zone, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone. As an example, in system 200, as disclosed hereinabove, A1-D1_2 can be re-encoded, at sixth ZSC 260, based on E1′, e.g., a copy of E1 from fifth ZSC 250, to generate A1-E1_2. The fourth coding chunk, e.g., A1-E1_2 can now additionally provide data protection to the second data chunk, e.g., A1-D1_2 did not provide data protection to E1, however, A1-E1_2 does provide data protection to E1.
At 770, path two of method 700 can comprise causing the fourth coding chunk to be stored in the new zone. At this point, method 700 can end. In an aspect, storing of the fourth coding chunk can be equivalent to storing the second coding chunk, e.g., A1-E1_2 is redundant to, or a copy of, A1-E1_2. Moreover, storing of the fourth coding chunk in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO, which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
In an aspect, some embodiments of method 700 can select either path one or path two based on metrics of the ECGEO, e.g., portions of networks can perform differently, different ZSCs can be experiencing different processing burdens, etc., and accordingly it can be more or less beneficial to perform re-encoding at some ZSCs than other, it can be more or less beneficial to copy data chunks between some zones than other zones, etc. In an embodiment, scaling component 190, 290, 490, etc., can enable selection of a path at 720. It is noted that in method 700, the newly added zone can store a re-encoded coding chunk, e.g., written to it by an older zone, copied to it from an older zone, etc., to preserve diversity according to the updated erasure coding scheme, e.g., in accord with the second erasure coding scheme of method 700.
FIG. 8 is an illustration of an example method 800, which can enable preferentially storing data chunks on an added storage zone to facilitate addition of a storage zone to geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure. At 810, method 800 can comprise selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that an ECGEO has undergone a scaling out event, e.g., a new zone has been added to a group of old zones comprising in the ECGEO system before the scaling out event. Where a new zone has been added, the additional storage space and location diversity of the new zone can allow for more diverse storage of data, e.g., data protection sets, etc., in a diverse manner. In an aspect, the new erasure coding scheme can allow for lower storage overhead in data protection sets.
Method 800, at 820, can select a re-encoding path. At 830, path one of method 800 can comprise re-encoding a first coding chunk, resulting in a second coding chunk. The re-encoding can occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone. The second coding chunk can be based on a data chunk that was not previously protected by the first coding chunk. As an example, in system 400, as disclosed hereinabove, A2-D2_2 can be re-encoded, at fifth ZSC 250, based on E2 to generate A2-E2_2. The second coding chunk can now additionally provide data protection to the data chunk, e.g., A2-D2_2 did not provide data protection to E2, however, A2-E2_2 does provide data protection to E2.
At 840, path one of method 800 can comprise moving the data chunk to be stored in the new zone. At this point, method 800 can end. In an aspect, storing of the data chunk, e.g., E2 in the new zone can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO. This can be more apparent after cleaning up excessively redundant chunks, e.g., in system 400 deleting A2-D2_2, A2-D2_1, E2′, and moving E2, can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
Where at 820 path two is selected, method 800 at 850 can comprise generating a copy of a second data chunk that is not protected by a third coding chunk. The copy can be located in a second old zone of the group of old zones. As an example, in system 400, E2 can be copied as E2′, from fifth ZSC 450 into sixth ZSC 460.
At 860, path two of method 800 can comprise re-encoding the third coding chunk based on the copy of the second data chunk, resulting in a fourth coding chunk. The re-encoding can again occur at an old zone of the group of old zones, e.g., the second old zone, thereby reducing a computing burden for the new zone. As an example, in system 400, A2-D2_1 can be re-encoded, at sixth ZSC 460, based on E2′, e.g., a copy of E2 from fifth ZSC 450, to generate A2-E2_1. The fourth coding chunk, e.g., A2-E2_1 can now additionally provide data protection to the second data chunk, e.g., A2-D2_1 did not provide data protection to E2, however, A2-E2_1 does provide data protection to E2.
At 870, path two of method 800 can comprise moving the data chunk to be stored in the new zone. At this point, method 800 can end. In an aspect, moving the data chunk can serve to rebalance chunk storage in the scaled out ECGEO, which can result in some older zones storing fewer chunks and new zones storing more chunks.
In an aspect, some embodiments of method 800 can select either path one or path two based on metrics of the ECGEO, e.g., portions of networks can perform differently, different ZSCs can be experiencing different processing burdens, etc., and accordingly it can be more or less beneficial to perform re-encoding at some ZSCs than other, it can be more or less beneficial to copy data chunks between some zones than other zones, etc. In an embodiment, scaling component 190, 290, 490, etc., can enable selection of a path at 820. It is noted that in method 800, the older zones can store a re-encoded coding chunk while the new zone can receive copies of data chunks, e.g., moving a data chunk from old zone to new zone, which can facilitate preserving diversity according to the updated erasure coding scheme, e.g., in accord with the second erasure coding scheme of method 800.
FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a computing environment 900 with which the disclosed subject matter can interact. The system 900 comprises one or more remote component(s) 910. The remote component(s) 910 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices). In some embodiments, remote component(s) 910 can be a remotely located ZSC connected to a local ZSC via communication framework 940, etc. ZSC 110, 140, 160, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 270, 310-370, 410-470, 510-570, etc., can each be located remotely from other ZSCs, and thus can be regarded as remote component(s) 910 where located remotely from a local component. Moreover, scaling component 190, 290, 490, etc., can be located remotely from, but communicate with, one or more of the ZSCs. Communication framework 940 can comprise wired network devices, wireless network devices, mobile devices, wearable devices, radio access network devices, gateway devices, femtocell devices, servers, etc.
The system 900 also comprises one or more local component(s) 920. The local component(s) 920 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices). In some embodiments, local component(s) 920 can comprise a local ZSC connected to a remote ZSC via communication framework 940. In an aspect the remotely located ZSC or local ZSC can be embodied in ZSC 110, 140, 160, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 270, 310-370, 410-470, 510-570, etc.
One possible communication between a remote component(s) 910 and a local component(s) 920 can be in the form of a data packet adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes. Another possible communication between a remote component(s) 910 and a local component(s) 920 can be in the form of circuit-switched data adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes in radio time slots. The system 900 comprises a communication framework 940 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the remote component(s) 910 and the local component(s) 920, and can comprise an air interface, e.g., Uu interface of a UMTS network, via a long-term evolution (LTE) network, etc. Remote component(s) 910 can be operably connected to one or more remote data store(s) 950, such as a hard drive, solid state drive, SIM card, device memory, etc., that can be employed to store information on the remote component(s) 910 side of communication framework 940. Similarly, local component(s) 920 can be operably connected to one or more local data store(s) 930, that can be employed to store information on the local component(s) 920 side of communication framework 940. As examples, information corresponding to chunks stored on ZSCs can be communicated via communication framework 940 to other ZSCs of a storage network, e.g., to facilitate re-encoding of coding chunks, compression, storage in partial or complete chunks, deletion of chunks, etc.
In order to provide a context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter, FIG. 10, and the following discussion, are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable environment in which the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter can be implemented. While the subject matter has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions of a computer program that runs on a computer and/or computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosed subject matter also can be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules comprise routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that performs particular tasks and/or implement particular abstract data types.
In the subject specification, terms such as “store,” “storage,” “data store,” data storage,” “database,” and substantially any other information storage component relevant to operation and functionality of a component, refer to “memory components,” or entities embodied in a “memory” or components comprising the memory. It is noted that the memory components described herein can be either volatile memory or nonvolatile memory, or can comprise both volatile and nonvolatile memory, by way of illustration, and not limitation, volatile memory 1020 (see below), non-volatile memory 1022 (see below), disk storage 1024 (see below), and memory storage 1046 (see below). Further, nonvolatile memory can be included in read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, or flash memory. Volatile memory can comprise random access memory, which acts as external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, random access memory is available in many forms such as synchronous random access memory, dynamic random access memory, synchronous dynamic random access memory, double data rate synchronous dynamic random access memory, enhanced synchronous dynamic random access memory, SynchLink dynamic random access memory, and direct Rambus random access memory. Additionally, the disclosed memory components of systems or methods herein are intended to comprise, without being limited to comprising, these and any other suitable types of memory.
Moreover, it is noted that the disclosed subject matter can be practiced with other computer system configurations, comprising single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, mini-computing devices, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices (e.g., personal digital assistant, phone, watch, tablet computers, netbook computers, . . . ), microprocessor-based or programmable consumer or industrial electronics, and the like. The illustrated aspects can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network; however, some if not all aspects of the subject disclosure can be practiced on stand-alone computers. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system 1000 operable to execute the disclosed systems and methods in accordance with an embodiment. Computer 1012, which can be, for example, comprised in ZSC 110, 140, 160, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 270, 310-370, 410-470, 510-570, etc., or in other components, such as scaling component 190, 290, 490, etc., can comprise a processing unit 1014, a system memory 1016, and a system bus 1018. System bus 1018 couples system components comprising, but not limited to, system memory 1016 to processing unit 1014. Processing unit 1014 can be any of various available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multiprocessor architectures also can be employed as processing unit 1014.
System bus 1018 can be any of several types of bus structure(s) comprising a memory bus or a memory controller, a peripheral bus or an external bus, and/or a local bus using any variety of available bus architectures comprising, but not limited to, industrial standard architecture, micro-channel architecture, extended industrial standard architecture, intelligent drive electronics, video electronics standards association local bus, peripheral component interconnect, card bus, universal serial bus, advanced graphics port, personal computer memory card international association bus, Firewire (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 1194), and small computer systems interface.
System memory 1016 can comprise volatile memory 1020 and nonvolatile memory 1022. A basic input/output system, containing routines to transfer information between elements within computer 1012, such as during start-up, can be stored in nonvolatile memory 1022. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory 1022 can comprise read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, or flash memory. Volatile memory 1020 comprises read only memory, which acts as external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, read only memory is available in many forms such as synchronous random access memory, dynamic read only memory, synchronous dynamic read only memory, double data rate synchronous dynamic read only memory, enhanced synchronous dynamic read only memory, SynchLink dynamic read only memory, Rambus direct read only memory, direct Rambus dynamic read only memory, and Rambus dynamic read only memory.
Computer 1012 can also comprise removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media. FIG. 10 illustrates, for example, disk storage 1024. Disk storage 1024 comprises, but is not limited to, devices like a magnetic disk drive, floppy disk drive, tape drive, flash memory card, or memory stick. In addition, disk storage 1024 can comprise storage media separately or in combination with other storage media comprising, but not limited to, an optical disk drive such as a compact disk read only memory device, compact disk recordable drive, compact disk rewritable drive or a digital versatile disk read only memory. To facilitate connection of the disk storage devices 1024 to system bus 1018, a removable or non-removable interface is typically used, such as interface 1026.
Computing devices typically comprise a variety of media, which can comprise computer-readable storage media or communications media, which two terms are used herein differently from one another as follows. Computer-readable storage media can be any available storage media that can be accessed by the computer and comprises both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media can be implemented in connection with any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, program modules, structured data, or unstructured data. Computer-readable storage media can comprise, but are not limited to, read only memory, programmable read only memory, electrically programmable read only memory, electrically erasable read only memory, flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read only memory, digital versatile disk or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or other tangible media which can be used to store desired information. In this regard, the term “tangible” herein as may be applied to storage, memory or computer-readable media, is to be understood to exclude only propagating intangible signals per se as a modifier and does not relinquish coverage of all standard storage, memory or computer-readable media that are not only propagating intangible signals per se. In an aspect, tangible media can comprise non-transitory media wherein the term “non-transitory” herein as may be applied to storage, memory or computer-readable media, is to be understood to exclude only propagating transitory signals per se as a modifier and does not relinquish coverage of all standard storage, memory or computer-readable media that are not only propagating transitory signals per se. Computer-readable storage media can be accessed by one or more local or remote computing devices, e.g., via access requests, queries or other data retrieval protocols, for a variety of operations with respect to the information stored by the medium. As such, for example, a computer-readable medium can comprise executable instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution, can cause a system comprising a processor to perform operations, comprising selecting a second erasure coding scheme in response to determining that a new zone storage component has been added to a geographically diverse storage system comprising an old zone storage component and employing a first erasure coding scheme, and re-encoding an old coding chunk generated under the first erasure coding scheme, based on a data chunk not protected by the old coding chunk, resulting in a new coding chunk, wherein the new coding chunk protects the data chunk according to the second erasure coding scheme, as disclosed herein.
Communications media typically embody computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other structured or unstructured data in a data signal such as a modulated data signal, e.g., a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and comprises any information delivery or transport media. The term “modulated data signal” or signals refers to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in one or more signals. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media comprise wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media.
It can be noted that FIG. 10 describes software that acts as an intermediary between users and computer resources described in suitable operating environment 1000. Such software comprises an operating system 1028. Operating system 1028, which can be stored on disk storage 1024, acts to control and allocate resources of computer system 1012. System applications 1030 take advantage of the management of resources by operating system 1028 through program modules 1032 and program data 1034 stored either in system memory 1016 or on disk storage 1024. It is to be noted that the disclosed subject matter can be implemented with various operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
A user can enter commands or information into computer 1012 through input device(s) 1036. In some embodiments, a user interface can allow entry of user preference information, etc., and can be embodied in a touch sensitive display panel, a mouse/pointer input to a graphical user interface (GUI), a command line controlled interface, etc., allowing a user to interact with computer 1012. Input devices 1036 comprise, but are not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, TV tuner card, digital camera, digital video camera, web camera, cell phone, smartphone, tablet computer, etc. These and other input devices connect to processing unit 1014 through system bus 1018 by way of interface port(s) 1038. Interface port(s) 1038 comprise, for example, a serial port, a parallel port, a game port, a universal serial bus, an infrared port, a Bluetooth port, an IP port, or a logical port associated with a wireless service, etc. Output device(s) 1040 use some of the same type of ports as input device(s) 1036.
Thus, for example, a universal serial bus port can be used to provide input to computer 1012 and to output information from computer 1012 to an output device 1040. Output adapter 1042 is provided to illustrate that there are some output devices 1040 like monitors, speakers, and printers, among other output devices 1040, which use special adapters. Output adapters 1042 comprise, by way of illustration and not limitation, video and sound cards that provide means of connection between output device 1040 and system bus 1018. It should be noted that other devices and/or systems of devices provide both input and output capabilities such as remote computer(s) 1044.
Computer 1012 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computer(s) 1044. Remote computer(s) 1044 can be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, cloud storage, a cloud service, code executing in a cloud-computing environment, a workstation, a microprocessor-based appliance, a peer device, or other common network node and the like, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described relative to computer 1012. A cloud computing environment, the cloud, or other similar terms can refer to computing that can share processing resources and data to one or more computer and/or other device(s) on an as needed basis to enable access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be provisioned and released readily. Cloud computing and storage solutions can store and/or process data in third-party data centers which can leverage an economy of scale and can view accessing computing resources via a cloud service in a manner similar to a subscribing to an electric utility to access electrical energy, a telephone utility to access telephonic services, etc.
For purposes of brevity, only a memory storage device 1046 is illustrated with remote computer(s) 1044. Remote computer(s) 1044 is logically connected to computer 1012 through a network interface 1048 and then physically connected by way of communication connection 1050. Network interface 1048 encompasses wire and/or wireless communication networks such as local area networks and wide area networks. Local area network technologies comprise fiber distributed data interface, copper distributed data interface, Ethernet, Token Ring and the like. Wide area network technologies comprise, but are not limited to, point-to-point links, circuit-switching networks like integrated services digital networks and variations thereon, packet switching networks, and digital subscriber lines. As noted below, wireless technologies may be used in addition to or in place of the foregoing.
Communication connection(s) 1050 refer(s) to hardware/software employed to connect network interface 1048 to bus 1018. While communication connection 1050 is shown for illustrative clarity inside computer 1012, it can also be external to computer 1012. The hardware/software for connection to network interface 1048 can comprise, for example, internal and external technologies such as modems, comprising regular telephone grade modems, cable modems and digital subscriber line modems, integrated services digital network adapters, and Ethernet cards.
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the subject disclosure, comprising what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosed embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments and examples are described herein for illustrative purposes, various modifications are possible that are considered within the scope of such embodiments and examples, as those skilled in the relevant art can recognize.
In this regard, while the disclosed subject matter has been described in connection with various embodiments and corresponding Figures, where applicable, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments can be used or modifications and additions can be made to the described embodiments for performing the same, similar, alternative, or substitute function of the disclosed subject matter without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the disclosed subject matter should not be limited to any single embodiment described herein, but rather should be construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the appended claims below.
As it employed in the subject specification, the term “processor” can refer to substantially any computing processing unit or device comprising, but not limited to comprising, single-core processors; single-processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors; multi-core processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors with hardware multithread technology; parallel platforms; and parallel platforms with distributed shared memory. Additionally, a processor can refer to an integrated circuit, an application specific integrated circuit, a digital signal processor, a field programmable gate array, a programmable logic controller, a complex programmable logic device, a discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. Processors can exploit nano-scale architectures such as, but not limited to, molecular and quantum-dot based transistors, switches and gates, in order to optimize space usage or enhance performance of user equipment. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing processing units.
As used in this application, the terms “component,” “system,” “platform,” “layer,” “selector,” “interface,” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity or an entity related to an operational apparatus with one or more specific functionalities, wherein the entity can be either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. As an example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration and not limitation, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. In addition, these components can execute from various computer readable media having various data structures stored thereon. The components may communicate via local and/or remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems via the signal). As another example, a component can be an apparatus with specific functionality provided by mechanical parts operated by electric or electronic circuitry, which is operated by a software or a firmware application executed by a processor, wherein the processor can be internal or external to the apparatus and executes at least a part of the software or firmware application. As yet another example, a component can be an apparatus that provides specific functionality through electronic components without mechanical parts, the electronic components can comprise a processor therein to execute software or firmware that confers at least in part the functionality of the electronic components.
In addition, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or.” That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from context, “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B, then “X employs A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. Moreover, articles “a” and “an” as used in the subject specification and annexed drawings should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form. Moreover, the use of any particular embodiment or example in the present disclosure should not be treated as exclusive of any other particular embodiment or example, unless expressly indicated as such, e.g., a first embodiment that has aspect A and a second embodiment that has aspect B does not preclude a third embodiment that has aspect A and aspect B. The use of granular examples and embodiments is intended to simplify understanding of certain features, aspects, etc., of the disclosed subject matter and is not intended to limit the disclosure to said granular instances of the disclosed subject matter or to illustrate that combinations of embodiments of the disclosed subject matter were not contemplated at the time of actual or constructive reduction to practice.
Further, the term “include” is intended to be employed as an open or inclusive term, rather than a closed or exclusive term. The term “include” can be substituted with the term “comprising” and is to be treated with similar scope, unless otherwise explicitly used otherwise. As an example, “a basket of fruit including an apple” is to be treated with the same breadth of scope as, “a basket of fruit comprising an apple.”
Furthermore, the terms “user,” “subscriber,” “customer,” “consumer,” “prosumer,” “agent,” and the like are employed interchangeably throughout the subject specification, unless context warrants particular distinction(s) among the terms. It should be appreciated that such terms can refer to human entities, machine learning components, or automated components (e.g., supported through artificial intelligence, as through a capacity to make inferences based on complex mathematical formalisms), that can provide simulated vision, sound recognition and so forth.
Aspects, features, or advantages of the subject matter can be exploited in substantially any, or any, wired, broadcast, wireless telecommunication, radio technology or network, or combinations thereof. Non-limiting examples of such technologies or networks comprise broadcast technologies (e.g., sub-Hertz, extremely low frequency, very low frequency, low frequency, medium frequency, high frequency, very high frequency, ultra-high frequency, super-high frequency, extremely high frequency, terahertz broadcasts, etc.); Ethernet; X.25; powerline-type networking, e.g., Powerline audio video Ethernet, etc.; femtocell technology; Wi-Fi; worldwide interoperability for microwave access; enhanced general packet radio service; second generation partnership project (2G or 2GPP); third generation partnership project (3G or 3GPP); fourth generation partnership project (4G or 4GPP); long term evolution (LTE); fifth generation partnership project (5G or 5GPP); third generation partnership project universal mobile telecommunications system; third generation partnership project 2; ultra mobile broadband; high speed packet access; high speed downlink packet access; high speed uplink packet access; enhanced data rates for global system for mobile communication evolution radio access network; universal mobile telecommunications system terrestrial radio access network; or long term evolution advanced. As an example, a millimeter wave broadcast technology can employ electromagnetic waves in the frequency spectrum from about 30 GHz to about 300 GHz. These millimeter waves can be generally situated between microwaves (from about 1 GHz to about 30 GHz) and infrared (IR) waves, and are sometimes referred to extremely high frequency (EHF). The wavelength (λ) for millimeter waves is typically in the 1-mm to 10-mm range.
The term “infer” or “inference” can generally refer to the process of reasoning about, or inferring states of, the system, environment, user, and/or intent from a set of observations as captured via events and/or data. Captured data and events can include user data, device data, environment data, data from sensors, sensor data, application data, implicit data, explicit data, etc. Inference, for example, can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data. Such inference results in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether the events, in some instances, can be correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources. Various classification schemes and/or systems (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, and data fusion engines) can be employed in connection with performing automatic and/or inferred action in connection with the disclosed subject matter.
What has been described above includes examples of systems and methods illustrative of the disclosed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every combination of components or methods herein. One of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the claimed subject matter are possible. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has,” “possesses,” and the like are used in the detailed description, claims, appendices and drawings such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory that stores executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising:
in response to determining, for a geographically diverse storage system comprising a first zone storage component and employing a first erasure coding scheme, that a second zone storage component has been added, selecting a second erasure coding scheme;
re-encoding a first coding chunk resulting in a second coding chunk, wherein the re-encoding is based on a representation of a data chunk not protected by the first coding chunk; and
deleting a stored chunk resulting in the geographically diverse storage system being balanced differently than before the deleting the stored chunk.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise moving the data chunk to the second zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise moving the second coding chunk to the second zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the representation of the data chunk not protected by the first coding chunk is the data chunk.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the representation of the data chunk not protected by the first coding chunk is a copy of the data chunk.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the second erasure coding scheme has a lower storage overhead than the first erasure coding scheme.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the deleting the stored chunk comprises deleting a redundant data chunk resulting in the geographically diverse storage system being balanced differently than before the deleting the redundant data chunk.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise deleting the stored chunk comprises deleting a redundant coding chunk resulting in the geographically diverse storage system being balanced differently than before the deleting the redundant data chunk.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the re-encoding is performed by a zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system other than the second zone storage component.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the re-encoding is performed by the first zone storage component.
11. A method, comprising:
determining, by a system comprising a processor and a memory, that a geographically diverse storage system, comprising a pre-existing zone storage component and employing a first erasure coding scheme, has undergone a scaling out event resulting in a new zone storage component being added to the geographically diverse storage system;
selecting, by the system, a second erasure coding scheme based on a count of storage zones of the geographically diverse storage system after the scaling out event;
generating, by the system, based on a pre-existing coding chunk from the first erasure coding scheme and a data chunk not protected by the pre-existing coding chunk, a new coding chunk according to the second erasure coding scheme, wherein the new coding chunk protects the data chunk; and
deleting, by the system, a stored chunk thereby altering a storage balance of the geographically diverse storage system.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:
moving, by the system, the data chunk to the second zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system; and
freeing, by the system, storage space associated with the pre-existing coding chunk.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the generating the new coding chunk results in the new coding chunk being stored, by the system, in the new zone storage component.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein, for the generating the new coding chunk, the data chunk is a copy of another data chunk that is not protected by the pre-existing coding chunk.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein the generating the new coding chunk occurs in the pre-existing zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the selecting the second erasure coding scheme comprises selecting a Reed-Solomon type erasure coding scheme.
17. A non-transitory machine-readable medium, comprising executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising:
in response to determining that a new zone storage component has been added to a geographically diverse storage system comprising a pre-existing zone storage component and employing a first erasure coding scheme, selecting a second erasure coding scheme;
re-encoding a pre-existing coding chunk generated under the first erasure coding scheme, based on a data chunk not protected by the pre-existing coding chunk, the re-encoding resulting in a new coding chunk, wherein the new coding chunk protects the data chunk according to the second erasure coding scheme; and
causing a storage balance of the geographically diverse storage system to be altered as a result of deleting a stored chunk; wherein protection of the stored chunk is via the first erasure coding scheme.
18. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise moving the data chunk to the new zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system.
19. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise moving the new coding chunk to the new zone storage component of the geographically diverse storage system.
20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein second erasure coding scheme has a lower storage overhead than the first erasure coding scheme.
US16/570,657 2019-09-13 2019-09-13 Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding Active US11228322B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/570,657 US11228322B2 (en) 2019-09-13 2019-09-13 Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/570,657 US11228322B2 (en) 2019-09-13 2019-09-13 Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20210083693A1 US20210083693A1 (en) 2021-03-18
US11228322B2 true US11228322B2 (en) 2022-01-18

Family

ID=74868798

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/570,657 Active US11228322B2 (en) 2019-09-13 2019-09-13 Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US11228322B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110866291B (en) * 2019-11-15 2023-03-24 北京工业大学 Waste electronic product information clearing method based on dual security mechanisms
US11804854B1 (en) * 2022-07-26 2023-10-31 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Changing error-correction configurations

Citations (234)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5675802A (en) 1995-03-31 1997-10-07 Pure Atria Corporation Version control system for geographically distributed software development
US5805788A (en) 1996-05-20 1998-09-08 Cray Research, Inc. Raid-5 parity generation and data reconstruction
US5950225A (en) 1997-02-28 1999-09-07 Network Appliance, Inc. Fly-by XOR for generating parity for data gleaned from a bus
US6240527B1 (en) 1997-09-05 2001-05-29 Roxio, Inc. Method software and apparatus for saving using and recovering data
US20020166026A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-11-07 Ulrich Thomas R. Data blocking mapping
US20020191311A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-12-19 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamically scalable disk array
US6502243B1 (en) 1998-11-10 2002-12-31 Lgerca, Inc. Method and system for locating a resource within a broadcasting environment
US20050080982A1 (en) 2003-08-20 2005-04-14 Vasilevsky Alexander D. Virtual host bus adapter and method
US20050088318A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Vehicle-to-vehicle communication protocol
US20050108775A1 (en) 2003-11-05 2005-05-19 Nice System Ltd Apparatus and method for event-driven content analysis
US20050140529A1 (en) 2003-12-27 2005-06-30 Byung-Sun Choi Variable length coding apparatus and variable length coding method
US20050234941A1 (en) 2004-04-20 2005-10-20 Naoki Watanabe Managing method for storage subsystem
US20060047896A1 (en) 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Lu Nguyen Storing parity information for data recovery
US20060075007A1 (en) 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for optimizing a storage system to support full utilization of storage space
US20060143508A1 (en) 2004-12-14 2006-06-29 Fujitsu Limited Storage controller and method for storage control
US7103884B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2006-09-05 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for maintaining consistency and performing recovery in a replicated data storage system
US20060265211A1 (en) 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring the quality of speech transmissions that use speech compression
US20070076321A1 (en) 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Fujitsu Limited Data storage system, data storage control device, and failure location diagnosis method thereof
US20070239759A1 (en) 2006-04-07 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Range and Cover Queries in Overlay Networks
US20070250674A1 (en) 2006-04-25 2007-10-25 Fineberg Samuel A Method and system for scaleable, distributed, differential electronic-data backup and archiving
US7389393B1 (en) 2004-10-21 2008-06-17 Symantec Operating Corporation System and method for write forwarding in a storage environment employing distributed virtualization
US20080222480A1 (en) 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Microsoft Corporation Erasure-resilient codes having multiple protection groups
US20080222481A1 (en) 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Microsoft Corporation Multiple protection group codes having maximally recoverable property
US20080244353A1 (en) 2005-11-13 2008-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method for creating an error correction coding scheme
US20080320061A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2008-12-25 Compellent Technologies Data storage space recovery system and method
US20090070771A1 (en) 2007-08-31 2009-03-12 Tom Silangan Yuyitung Method and system for evaluating virtualized environments
US20090113034A1 (en) 2007-10-30 2009-04-30 Nagendra Krishnappa Method And System For Clustering
US20090172464A1 (en) 2007-12-30 2009-07-02 Agere Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for repairing uncorrectable drive errors in an integrated network attached storage device
US20090183056A1 (en) 2008-01-16 2009-07-16 Bluearc Uk Limited Validating Objects in a Data Storage system
US20090204959A1 (en) 2008-02-07 2009-08-13 Anand Vaijayanthimala K Method and apparatus for virtual processor dispatching to a partition based on shared memory pages
US7577091B2 (en) 2004-02-04 2009-08-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Cluster-based network provisioning
US20090240880A1 (en) 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 Hitachi, Ltd. High availability and low capacity thin provisioning
US20090259882A1 (en) 2008-04-15 2009-10-15 Dot Hill Systems Corporation Apparatus and method for identifying disk drives with unreported data corruption
US7631051B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2009-12-08 Gene Fein Geolocation assisted data forwarding storage
US7653792B2 (en) 2003-11-27 2010-01-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Disk array apparatus including controller that executes control to move data between storage areas based on a data protection level
US20100031060A1 (en) 2008-02-15 2010-02-04 Yen Hsiang Chew Security for raid systems
US7664839B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2010-02-16 Symantec Operating Corporation Automatic device classification service on storage area network
US7680875B1 (en) 2002-04-01 2010-03-16 Novell, Inc. Markers for cached objects
US7694191B1 (en) 2007-06-30 2010-04-06 Emc Corporation Self healing file system
US20100094963A1 (en) 2008-10-15 2010-04-15 Patentvc Ltd. Methods and systems for broadcast-like effect using fractional-storage servers
US7721044B1 (en) 2005-10-20 2010-05-18 American Megatrends, Inc. Expanding the storage capacity of a virtualized data storage system
US20100174968A1 (en) 2009-01-02 2010-07-08 Microsoft Corporation Heirarchical erasure coding
US20100218037A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-08-26 File System Labs Llc Matrix-based Error Correction and Erasure Code Methods and Apparatus and Applications Thereof
US20100293348A1 (en) 2009-05-13 2010-11-18 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method of rearranging data and nonvolitile data storage apparatus
US20100332748A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Emc Corporation Distributed data storage system using local copy operations for raid-1 volumes
US20110029836A1 (en) 2009-07-30 2011-02-03 Cleversafe, Inc. Method and apparatus for storage integrity processing based on error types in a dispersed storage network
US20110106972A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Cleversafe, Inc. Router-based dispersed storage network method and apparatus
US20110107165A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Cleversafe, Inc. Distributed storage network for modification of a data object
US20110138148A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-06-09 David Friedman Dynamic Data Storage Repartitioning
US20110161712A1 (en) 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 International Business Machines Corporation Cooling appliance rating aware data placement
US20110196833A1 (en) 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Alexandre Drobychev Storage of Data In A Distributed Storage System
US20110246503A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Bender Michael A High-Performance Streaming Dictionary
US20110292054A1 (en) 2008-08-22 2011-12-01 University Of Virginia Patent Foundation System and Method for Low Bandwidth Image Transmission
US20120023291A1 (en) 2010-07-22 2012-01-26 Netgear, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Dynamically Adjusting Memory Capacity in Accordance with Data Storage
US8125406B1 (en) 2009-10-02 2012-02-28 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Custom, efficient optical distortion reduction system and method
US20120096214A1 (en) 2010-05-24 2012-04-19 Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd. Working Method for Information Security Device with CF Interface and Working System Thereof
US20120191675A1 (en) 2009-11-23 2012-07-26 Pspace Inc. Device and method for eliminating file duplication in a distributed storage system
US20120191901A1 (en) 2011-01-21 2012-07-26 John Peter Norair Method and apparatus for memory management
US20120204077A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-08-09 Sandisk Corporation Data recovery using additional error correction coding data
US8261033B1 (en) 2009-06-04 2012-09-04 Bycast Inc. Time optimized secure traceable migration of massive quantities of data in a distributed storage system
US20120233117A1 (en) 2011-03-08 2012-09-13 Rackspace Us, Inc. Higher Efficiency Storage Replication Using Compression
US20120311395A1 (en) 2011-06-06 2012-12-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Storing portions of data in a dispersed storage network
US20120317234A1 (en) 2011-06-09 2012-12-13 International Business Machines Corporation Managing data access in mobile devices
US20120321052A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2012-12-20 Morrill Robert J System and method for selecting a content delivery network
US8370542B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2013-02-05 Commvault Systems, Inc. Combined stream auxiliary copy system and method
US20130047187A1 (en) 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. Methods and Systems for Facilitating User Access to Media Content Programs Included in a Programming Block
US20130054822A1 (en) 2011-08-30 2013-02-28 Rajiv P. Mordani Failover Data Replication with Colocation of Session State Data
US20130067159A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2013-03-14 Microsoft Corporation Volatile memory representation of nonvolatile storage device set
US20130067187A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2013-03-14 Microsoft Corporation Allocation strategies for storage device sets
US20130088501A1 (en) 2011-10-05 2013-04-11 Arm Limited Allocating and deallocating portions of memory
US20130097470A1 (en) 2011-10-13 2013-04-18 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Encoding apparatus and encoding method in data communication system
US20130145208A1 (en) 2011-12-01 2013-06-06 Chih-Hung Yen Method for a Plurality of RAID Systems and Data Storage System Thereof
US8479037B1 (en) 2005-10-20 2013-07-02 American Megatrends, Inc. Distributed hot-spare storage in a storage cluster
US8495465B1 (en) 2009-10-15 2013-07-23 Apple Inc. Error correction coding over multiple memory pages
US8504518B1 (en) 2003-02-14 2013-08-06 Google Inc. Systems and methods for replicating data
US20130238932A1 (en) 2009-11-24 2013-09-12 Cleversafe, Inc. Rebuilding slices of a set of encoded data slices
US20130246876A1 (en) 2010-11-08 2013-09-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and Arrangement for Retransmission Control
US8540625B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2013-09-24 Olympus Medical Systems Corporation Endoscope
US20130290482A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2013-10-31 Cleversafe, Inc. Retrieving data in a dispersed storage network
US20130305365A1 (en) 2012-05-11 2013-11-14 Kaspersky Lab, Zao System and method for optimization of security traffic monitoring
US20140040417A1 (en) 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Storing a stream of data in a dispersed storage network
US20140064048A1 (en) * 2012-09-04 2014-03-06 Lsi Corporation Scalable Storage Protection
US8683205B2 (en) * 2010-05-19 2014-03-25 Cleversafe, Inc. Accessing data utilizing entity registration in multiple dispersed storage networks
US20140115182A1 (en) 2012-10-24 2014-04-24 Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Fibre Channel Storage Area Network to Cloud Storage Gateway
US20140149794A1 (en) 2011-12-07 2014-05-29 Sachin Shetty System and method of implementing an object storage infrastructure for cloud-based services
US8751897B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2014-06-10 Facebook Inc. Distributed system for fault-tolerant data storage
US8751740B1 (en) 2010-03-31 2014-06-10 Emc Corporation Systems, methods, and computer readable media for performance optimization of storage allocation to virtual logical units
US8751599B2 (en) 2000-09-25 2014-06-10 Aol Inc. Electronic information caching
US20140164694A1 (en) 2012-12-07 2014-06-12 Netapp, Inc. Decoupled reliability groups
US20140164430A1 (en) 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Managing A Distributed Database
US8799746B2 (en) 2012-06-13 2014-08-05 Caringo, Inc. Erasure coding and replication in storage clusters
US20140250450A1 (en) 2011-08-08 2014-09-04 Lei Yu System and method for auto content recognition
US8832234B1 (en) 2012-03-29 2014-09-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Distributed data storage controller
US20140281804A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2014-09-18 Cleversafe, Inc. Distributed storage network for modification of a data object
US20140280375A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Ryan Rawson Systems and methods for implementing distributed databases using many-core processors
US20140297955A1 (en) 2013-03-29 2014-10-02 Fujitsu Limited Storage control device and control method
US8856619B1 (en) 2012-03-09 2014-10-07 Google Inc. Storing data across groups of storage nodes
US8856624B1 (en) 2011-10-27 2014-10-07 Google Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically generating error correction
US20140331100A1 (en) 2009-11-24 2014-11-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Selecting storage units to rebuild an encoded data slice
US20140358972A1 (en) 2013-05-28 2014-12-04 Unisys Corporation Interconnect partition binding api, allocation and management of application-specific partitions
US20140359244A1 (en) 2013-06-03 2014-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation De-duplication with partitioning advice and automation
US20140380125A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Erasure coding across multiple zones
US20140380088A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Locally generated simple erasure codes
US20140380126A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Erasure coding across multiple zones and sub-zones
US20150006846A1 (en) 2013-06-28 2015-01-01 Saratoga Speed, Inc. Network system to distribute chunks across multiple physical nodes with disk support for object storage
US8972478B1 (en) 2012-05-23 2015-03-03 Netapp, Inc. Using append only log format in data storage cluster with distributed zones for determining parity of reliability groups
US20150074065A1 (en) 2013-09-11 2015-03-12 International Business Machines Corporation Data Access in a Storage Infrastructure
US9003086B1 (en) 2012-10-27 2015-04-07 Twitter, Inc. Dynamic distribution of replicated data
US20150112951A1 (en) 2013-10-23 2015-04-23 Netapp, Inc. Data management in distributed file systems
US9021296B1 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-28 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Independent data integrity and redundancy recovery in a storage system
US20150134626A1 (en) 2013-11-11 2015-05-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Partition-based data stream processing framework
US9037825B1 (en) 2012-11-20 2015-05-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Write horizon data management
US20150142863A1 (en) 2012-06-20 2015-05-21 Singapore University Of Technology And Design System and methods for distributed data storage
US9052942B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2015-06-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Storage object deletion job management
US20150160872A1 (en) 2013-12-09 2015-06-11 Hsun-Yuan Chen Operation method of distributed memory disk cluster storage system
US9063838B1 (en) 2012-01-23 2015-06-23 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Data storage device shifting data chunks of alignment zone relative to sector boundaries
US20150178007A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-06-25 Cloudifyd, Inc. Method and system for integrated cloud storage management
US20150186043A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2015-07-02 Google Inc. Hierarchical Chunking of Objects in a Distributed Storage System
US9098447B1 (en) 2013-05-20 2015-08-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recovery of corrupted erasure-coded data files
US20150269025A1 (en) 2014-03-24 2015-09-24 Lsi Corporation Write redirection in redundant array of independent disks systems
US20150303949A1 (en) 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 The Regents Of The University Of California [01] cost-efficient repair for storage systems using progressive engagement
US20150331766A1 (en) 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Netapp, Inc. Deferred Replication of Recovery Information At Site Switchover
US9208009B2 (en) 2011-11-01 2015-12-08 Cleversafe, Inc. Accessing a large data object in a dispersed storage network
US9218135B2 (en) 2010-06-16 2015-12-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Hierarchical allocation for file system storage device
US20150370656A1 (en) 2013-01-31 2015-12-24 Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited Management and recovery of distributed storage of replicas
US20150378542A1 (en) 2013-07-22 2015-12-31 Hitachi, Ltd. Management system for computer system
US20160011935A1 (en) 2014-07-09 2016-01-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and mehtods for reliably storing data using liquid distributed storage
US20160011936A1 (en) 2014-07-09 2016-01-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for reliably storing data using liquid distributed storage
US9268783B1 (en) 2012-06-13 2016-02-23 Emc Corporation Preferential selection of candidates for delta compression
US20160055054A1 (en) 2014-08-21 2016-02-25 Datrium, Inc. Data Reconstruction in Distributed Data Storage System with Key-Based Addressing
US9274903B1 (en) 2013-09-23 2016-03-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Disaster recovery service
US20160085645A1 (en) 2014-09-19 2016-03-24 Netapp Inc. Cluster-wide service agents
US20160169692A1 (en) 2014-12-11 2016-06-16 Here Global B.V. Method and apparatus for providing battery management in route navigation
US20160170668A1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-06-16 Software AG USA Inc. System, method, and medium of optimizing load reallocation in an in-memory data management grid
US20160217104A1 (en) 2015-01-27 2016-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation Host based non-volatile memory clustering using network mapped storage
US9405483B1 (en) 2014-03-11 2016-08-02 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Optimized write performance at block-based storage during volume snapshot operations
US20160232055A1 (en) 2015-02-05 2016-08-11 Netapp, Inc Methods for distributing erasure-coded fragments in a geo-distributed storage system and devices thereof
US20160253400A1 (en) 2009-10-26 2016-09-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Provisioning and managing replicated data instances
US20160277497A1 (en) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 Panzura, Inc. Facilitating access to remote cloud services
US20160294419A1 (en) 2013-11-15 2016-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Coding and decoding methods and apparatus
US20160292429A1 (en) 2015-03-31 2016-10-06 Emc Corporation Secure cloud-based storage of data shared across file system objects and clients
US9477682B1 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-10-25 Emc Corporation Parallel compression of data chunks of a shared data object using a log-structured file system
US20160328295A1 (en) 2010-01-28 2016-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Site-Based Namespace Allocation
US9495241B2 (en) 2006-12-06 2016-11-15 Longitude Enterprise Flash S.A.R.L. Systems and methods for adaptive data storage
US20160357443A1 (en) 2015-06-05 2016-12-08 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Incorporated Method and apparatus for big data cloud storage resource management
US20160357649A1 (en) 2015-06-05 2016-12-08 Dell Products, L.P. System and method for managing raid storage system having a hot spare drive
US20160371145A1 (en) 2014-09-30 2016-12-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Distributed storage system
US20160380650A1 (en) 2015-06-26 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Flexible erasure coding with enhanced local protection group structures
US20160378624A1 (en) 2015-06-29 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Erasure coding of data within a group of storage units based on connection characteristics
US20170003880A1 (en) 2015-06-30 2017-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Wear leveling of a memory array
US20170004044A1 (en) 2015-07-03 2017-01-05 Acronis International Gmbh System and method of reliable distributed data storage with controlled redundancy
US20170017671A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2017-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Deleting data in a dispersed storage network
US20170031945A1 (en) 2015-07-31 2017-02-02 Atlantis Computing, Inc. Method and apparatus for on-disk deduplication metadata for a deduplication file system
US20170097875A1 (en) 2015-10-06 2017-04-06 Netapp, Inc. Data Recovery In A Distributed Storage System
US9619256B1 (en) 2012-06-27 2017-04-11 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Multi site and multi tenancy
US20170102993A1 (en) 2015-10-08 2017-04-13 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Data encoding techniques for a device
US20170116088A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2017-04-27 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Virtual machine data protection
US9641615B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-05-02 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Allocating RAID storage volumes across a distributed network of storage elements
US20170187766A1 (en) 2014-09-09 2017-06-29 Tsinghua University Hybrid network system, communication method and network node
US20170187398A1 (en) 2015-12-25 2017-06-29 Emc Corporation Accelerated galois field coding for storage systems
US20170206025A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-07-20 Srinivasan Viswanathan Mapping systems and methods of an accelerated application-oriented middleware layer
US20170206135A1 (en) 2015-12-31 2017-07-20 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data Reconstruction Method in Distributed Storage System, Apparatus, and System
US20170212845A1 (en) 2016-01-25 2017-07-27 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Region migration cache
US20170212680A1 (en) 2016-01-22 2017-07-27 Suraj Prabhakar WAGHULDE Adaptive prefix tree based order partitioned data storage system
US20170235507A1 (en) 2016-02-12 2017-08-17 Nutanix, Inc. Virtualized file server backup to cloud
US9747057B1 (en) 2015-09-13 2017-08-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Storage auto delete
US20170262187A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 HGST Netherlands B.V. Storage cluster and method that efficiently store small objects with erasure codes
US20170268900A1 (en) 2014-12-02 2017-09-21 Tomtom Traffic B.V. Method and apparatus for providing point of interest information
US20170288701A1 (en) * 2016-04-05 2017-10-05 Netapp, Inc. Restoration of Erasure-Coded Data Via Data Shuttle in Distributed Storage System
US20170286009A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for reference tracking garbage collector
US20170286516A1 (en) 2010-12-23 2017-10-05 Eliot Horowitz Systems and methods for managing distributed database deployments
US20170286436A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Acronis International Gmbh System and method for fast parallel data processing in distributed storage systems
US20170285952A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for quasi-compacting garbage collection
US9817713B2 (en) * 2016-02-04 2017-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed cache system utilizing multiple erasure codes
US20170344285A1 (en) 2016-05-24 2017-11-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for tenant-aware storage sharing platform
US9864527B1 (en) 2014-05-05 2018-01-09 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Distributed data storage management
US20180052744A1 (en) 2016-08-18 2018-02-22 Red Hat, Inc. Tiered cloud storage for different availability and performance requirements
US20180063213A1 (en) 2016-08-29 2018-03-01 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Hypermedia Apparatus and Method
US20180074881A1 (en) 2016-09-13 2018-03-15 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Storage drive management
US9942084B1 (en) * 2012-05-07 2018-04-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing data stored in distributed buffer caches
US20180121286A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2018-05-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Efficient repair of erasure coded data based on coefficient matrix decomposition
US20180129417A1 (en) 2010-12-28 2018-05-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic data set replica management
US10001947B1 (en) 2015-05-08 2018-06-19 American Megatrends, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for performing efficient patrol read operations in a storage system
US10007561B1 (en) 2016-08-08 2018-06-26 Bitmicro Networks, Inc. Multi-mode device for flexible acceleration and storage provisioning
US20180181475A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Fast GEO Recovery Method for Elastic Cloud Storage
US20180181324A1 (en) 2016-12-26 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Data protection with erasure coding and xor
US20180181612A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for xor chain
US10055145B1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-08-21 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for load balancing with XOR star and XOR chain
US10061668B1 (en) 2016-03-28 2018-08-28 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Local storage clustering for redundancy coded data storage system
US20180246668A1 (en) 2015-10-08 2018-08-30 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage system
US20180267985A1 (en) 2015-02-05 2018-09-20 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Management of cloned objects in file systems
US20180267856A1 (en) 2016-01-07 2018-09-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Distributed storage system, data storage method, and software program
US10108819B1 (en) 2015-07-01 2018-10-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Cross-datacenter extension of grid encoded data storage systems
US20180306600A1 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-10-25 Tomtom Traffic B.V. Method and apparatus for providing point of interest information
US20180307560A1 (en) 2017-04-24 2018-10-25 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Storing data in a distributed storage system
US10127234B1 (en) 2015-03-27 2018-11-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Proactive optimizations at multi-tier file systems
US20180341662A1 (en) 2017-05-24 2018-11-29 3S International, LLC Hierarchical computing network and methods thereof
US20180375936A1 (en) 2017-06-27 2018-12-27 Red Hat, Inc. Containerized high-performance network storage
US20190028179A1 (en) 2016-03-18 2019-01-24 Amit Kalhan System and method for multiuser packets transmissions for relays
US20190034084A1 (en) 2017-07-28 2019-01-31 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Selecting controllers based on affinity between access devices and storage segments
US20190043201A1 (en) 2017-12-28 2019-02-07 Christina R. Strong Analytic image format for visual computing
US20190043351A1 (en) 2017-12-28 2019-02-07 Shao-Wen Yang Ubiquitous visual computing witness
US20190050301A1 (en) 2017-08-10 2019-02-14 Rubrik, Inc. Chunk allocation
US10216770B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2019-02-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Scaling stateful clusters while maintaining access
US20190065310A1 (en) 2017-08-25 2019-02-28 Datera, Inc. System and method to utilize larger block sizes for logical disk and further decompose into smaller physical block sizes for redundant encoding by utilizing erasure coding
US20190065092A1 (en) 2017-08-28 2019-02-28 Vmware, Inc. Flexible efficient runtime placement of data across multiple disks
US10242022B1 (en) 2016-08-10 2019-03-26 Veritas Technologies Llc Systems and methods for managing delayed allocation on clustered file systems
US20190114223A1 (en) * 2017-10-13 2019-04-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Accelerating erasure code replication in distributed systems
US10282262B2 (en) 2014-11-13 2019-05-07 Netapp Inc. Non-disruptive controller replacement in a cross-cluster redundancy configuration
US10289488B1 (en) 2017-04-27 2019-05-14 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for recovery of unrecoverable data with erasure coding and geo XOR
US20190188079A1 (en) 2017-12-11 2019-06-20 Fungible, Inc. Durable block storage in data center access nodes with inline erasure coding
US10331516B2 (en) 2016-12-23 2019-06-25 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Content-aware data recovery method for elastic cloud storage
US20190205437A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 Per-Ake Larson Systems and methods for database management using append-only storage devices
US20190215017A1 (en) 2017-07-19 2019-07-11 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Facilitation of data deletion for distributed erasure coding
US20190220207A1 (en) 2018-01-12 2019-07-18 Seagate Technology Llc Self-healing in a storage system
US10361810B2 (en) 2012-02-17 2019-07-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Data packet transmission/reception apparatus and method
US10387546B1 (en) 2013-06-07 2019-08-20 United Services Automobile Association Web browsing
US20190356416A1 (en) 2016-03-15 2019-11-21 Datomia Research Labs Ou Distributed storage system data management and security
US10496330B1 (en) 2017-10-31 2019-12-03 Pure Storage, Inc. Using flash storage devices with different sized erase blocks
US10503611B1 (en) 2016-12-23 2019-12-10 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Data protection management for distributed storage
US20190384500A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Deleting Data in a Geographically Diverse Storage Construct
US20190386683A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Disaster recovery with consolidated erasure coding in geographically distributed setups
US20200026810A1 (en) 2018-07-23 2020-01-23 Vmware, Inc. Automatic cluster consolidation for efficient resource management
US20200042178A1 (en) 2018-08-02 2020-02-06 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Scale-out storage system rebalancing
US20200050510A1 (en) 2018-08-13 2020-02-13 Quanta Computer Inc. Server hardware fault analysis and recovery
US10567009B2 (en) 2016-12-06 2020-02-18 Nutanix, Inc. Dynamic erasure coding
US20200104377A1 (en) 2018-09-28 2020-04-02 Oracle International Corporation Rules Based Scheduling and Migration of Databases Using Complexity and Weight
US10613780B1 (en) 2018-10-09 2020-04-07 Cohesity, Inc. Multi-node removal
US20200117556A1 (en) 2018-10-10 2020-04-16 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining storage array online
US10644408B2 (en) 2016-02-23 2020-05-05 Denso Corporation Antenna apparatus
US10733053B1 (en) * 2018-01-31 2020-08-04 Pure Storage, Inc. Disaster recovery for high-bandwidth distributed archives
US10740183B1 (en) 2019-04-01 2020-08-11 International Business Machines Corporation Recovering failed devices in distributed data centers
US10797863B2 (en) 2017-12-28 2020-10-06 Intel Corporation Multi-domain cascade convolutional neural network
US10846003B2 (en) 2019-01-29 2020-11-24 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Doubly mapped redundant array of independent nodes for data storage

Patent Citations (240)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5675802A (en) 1995-03-31 1997-10-07 Pure Atria Corporation Version control system for geographically distributed software development
US5805788A (en) 1996-05-20 1998-09-08 Cray Research, Inc. Raid-5 parity generation and data reconstruction
US5950225A (en) 1997-02-28 1999-09-07 Network Appliance, Inc. Fly-by XOR for generating parity for data gleaned from a bus
US6240527B1 (en) 1997-09-05 2001-05-29 Roxio, Inc. Method software and apparatus for saving using and recovering data
US6502243B1 (en) 1998-11-10 2002-12-31 Lgerca, Inc. Method and system for locating a resource within a broadcasting environment
US8751599B2 (en) 2000-09-25 2014-06-10 Aol Inc. Electronic information caching
US20020191311A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-12-19 Ulrich Thomas R. Dynamically scalable disk array
US20020166026A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-11-07 Ulrich Thomas R. Data blocking mapping
US7103884B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2006-09-05 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for maintaining consistency and performing recovery in a replicated data storage system
US7680875B1 (en) 2002-04-01 2010-03-16 Novell, Inc. Markers for cached objects
US8370542B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2013-02-05 Commvault Systems, Inc. Combined stream auxiliary copy system and method
US8504518B1 (en) 2003-02-14 2013-08-06 Google Inc. Systems and methods for replicating data
US20050080982A1 (en) 2003-08-20 2005-04-14 Vasilevsky Alexander D. Virtual host bus adapter and method
US20050088318A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Vehicle-to-vehicle communication protocol
US20050108775A1 (en) 2003-11-05 2005-05-19 Nice System Ltd Apparatus and method for event-driven content analysis
US7653792B2 (en) 2003-11-27 2010-01-26 Hitachi, Ltd. Disk array apparatus including controller that executes control to move data between storage areas based on a data protection level
US20050140529A1 (en) 2003-12-27 2005-06-30 Byung-Sun Choi Variable length coding apparatus and variable length coding method
US7577091B2 (en) 2004-02-04 2009-08-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Cluster-based network provisioning
US20050234941A1 (en) 2004-04-20 2005-10-20 Naoki Watanabe Managing method for storage subsystem
US7664839B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2010-02-16 Symantec Operating Corporation Automatic device classification service on storage area network
US20060047896A1 (en) 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Lu Nguyen Storing parity information for data recovery
US20060075007A1 (en) 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for optimizing a storage system to support full utilization of storage space
US7389393B1 (en) 2004-10-21 2008-06-17 Symantec Operating Corporation System and method for write forwarding in a storage environment employing distributed virtualization
US20060143508A1 (en) 2004-12-14 2006-06-29 Fujitsu Limited Storage controller and method for storage control
US20060265211A1 (en) 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring the quality of speech transmissions that use speech compression
US20070076321A1 (en) 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Fujitsu Limited Data storage system, data storage control device, and failure location diagnosis method thereof
US8479037B1 (en) 2005-10-20 2013-07-02 American Megatrends, Inc. Distributed hot-spare storage in a storage cluster
US7721044B1 (en) 2005-10-20 2010-05-18 American Megatrends, Inc. Expanding the storage capacity of a virtualized data storage system
US20080244353A1 (en) 2005-11-13 2008-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method for creating an error correction coding scheme
US20070239759A1 (en) 2006-04-07 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Range and Cover Queries in Overlay Networks
US20070250674A1 (en) 2006-04-25 2007-10-25 Fineberg Samuel A Method and system for scaleable, distributed, differential electronic-data backup and archiving
US20120321052A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2012-12-20 Morrill Robert J System and method for selecting a content delivery network
US9495241B2 (en) 2006-12-06 2016-11-15 Longitude Enterprise Flash S.A.R.L. Systems and methods for adaptive data storage
US20080222481A1 (en) 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Microsoft Corporation Multiple protection group codes having maximally recoverable property
US20080222480A1 (en) 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Microsoft Corporation Erasure-resilient codes having multiple protection groups
US20080320061A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2008-12-25 Compellent Technologies Data storage space recovery system and method
US7694191B1 (en) 2007-06-30 2010-04-06 Emc Corporation Self healing file system
US20090070771A1 (en) 2007-08-31 2009-03-12 Tom Silangan Yuyitung Method and system for evaluating virtualized environments
US20090113034A1 (en) 2007-10-30 2009-04-30 Nagendra Krishnappa Method And System For Clustering
US20090172464A1 (en) 2007-12-30 2009-07-02 Agere Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for repairing uncorrectable drive errors in an integrated network attached storage device
US20090183056A1 (en) 2008-01-16 2009-07-16 Bluearc Uk Limited Validating Objects in a Data Storage system
US20090204959A1 (en) 2008-02-07 2009-08-13 Anand Vaijayanthimala K Method and apparatus for virtual processor dispatching to a partition based on shared memory pages
US20100031060A1 (en) 2008-02-15 2010-02-04 Yen Hsiang Chew Security for raid systems
US20090240880A1 (en) 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 Hitachi, Ltd. High availability and low capacity thin provisioning
US20090259882A1 (en) 2008-04-15 2009-10-15 Dot Hill Systems Corporation Apparatus and method for identifying disk drives with unreported data corruption
US20110292054A1 (en) 2008-08-22 2011-12-01 University Of Virginia Patent Foundation System and Method for Low Bandwidth Image Transmission
US20100218037A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-08-26 File System Labs Llc Matrix-based Error Correction and Erasure Code Methods and Apparatus and Applications Thereof
US7631051B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2009-12-08 Gene Fein Geolocation assisted data forwarding storage
US20100094963A1 (en) 2008-10-15 2010-04-15 Patentvc Ltd. Methods and systems for broadcast-like effect using fractional-storage servers
US20100174968A1 (en) 2009-01-02 2010-07-08 Microsoft Corporation Heirarchical erasure coding
US20100293348A1 (en) 2009-05-13 2010-11-18 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method of rearranging data and nonvolitile data storage apparatus
US8261033B1 (en) 2009-06-04 2012-09-04 Bycast Inc. Time optimized secure traceable migration of massive quantities of data in a distributed storage system
US20100332748A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Emc Corporation Distributed data storage system using local copy operations for raid-1 volumes
US20110029836A1 (en) 2009-07-30 2011-02-03 Cleversafe, Inc. Method and apparatus for storage integrity processing based on error types in a dispersed storage network
US8125406B1 (en) 2009-10-02 2012-02-28 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Custom, efficient optical distortion reduction system and method
US8495465B1 (en) 2009-10-15 2013-07-23 Apple Inc. Error correction coding over multiple memory pages
US20160253400A1 (en) 2009-10-26 2016-09-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Provisioning and managing replicated data instances
US20140281804A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2014-09-18 Cleversafe, Inc. Distributed storage network for modification of a data object
US20110106972A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Cleversafe, Inc. Router-based dispersed storage network method and apparatus
US20110107165A1 (en) 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Cleversafe, Inc. Distributed storage network for modification of a data object
US20120191675A1 (en) 2009-11-23 2012-07-26 Pspace Inc. Device and method for eliminating file duplication in a distributed storage system
US20130238932A1 (en) 2009-11-24 2013-09-12 Cleversafe, Inc. Rebuilding slices of a set of encoded data slices
US20140331100A1 (en) 2009-11-24 2014-11-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Selecting storage units to rebuild an encoded data slice
US20110138148A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-06-09 David Friedman Dynamic Data Storage Repartitioning
US20110161712A1 (en) 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 International Business Machines Corporation Cooling appliance rating aware data placement
US20160328295A1 (en) 2010-01-28 2016-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Site-Based Namespace Allocation
US20110196833A1 (en) 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Alexandre Drobychev Storage of Data In A Distributed Storage System
US8751740B1 (en) 2010-03-31 2014-06-10 Emc Corporation Systems, methods, and computer readable media for performance optimization of storage allocation to virtual logical units
US20110246503A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Bender Michael A High-Performance Streaming Dictionary
US8683205B2 (en) * 2010-05-19 2014-03-25 Cleversafe, Inc. Accessing data utilizing entity registration in multiple dispersed storage networks
US20120096214A1 (en) 2010-05-24 2012-04-19 Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd. Working Method for Information Security Device with CF Interface and Working System Thereof
US9218135B2 (en) 2010-06-16 2015-12-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Hierarchical allocation for file system storage device
US20120023291A1 (en) 2010-07-22 2012-01-26 Netgear, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Dynamically Adjusting Memory Capacity in Accordance with Data Storage
US20130246876A1 (en) 2010-11-08 2013-09-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and Arrangement for Retransmission Control
US20170286516A1 (en) 2010-12-23 2017-10-05 Eliot Horowitz Systems and methods for managing distributed database deployments
US20180129417A1 (en) 2010-12-28 2018-05-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic data set replica management
US20120191901A1 (en) 2011-01-21 2012-07-26 John Peter Norair Method and apparatus for memory management
US20120204077A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-08-09 Sandisk Corporation Data recovery using additional error correction coding data
US20120233117A1 (en) 2011-03-08 2012-09-13 Rackspace Us, Inc. Higher Efficiency Storage Replication Using Compression
US8540625B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2013-09-24 Olympus Medical Systems Corporation Endoscope
US20120311395A1 (en) 2011-06-06 2012-12-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Storing portions of data in a dispersed storage network
US20120317234A1 (en) 2011-06-09 2012-12-13 International Business Machines Corporation Managing data access in mobile devices
US20140250450A1 (en) 2011-08-08 2014-09-04 Lei Yu System and method for auto content recognition
US20130047187A1 (en) 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. Methods and Systems for Facilitating User Access to Media Content Programs Included in a Programming Block
US20130054822A1 (en) 2011-08-30 2013-02-28 Rajiv P. Mordani Failover Data Replication with Colocation of Session State Data
US20130067187A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2013-03-14 Microsoft Corporation Allocation strategies for storage device sets
US20130067159A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2013-03-14 Microsoft Corporation Volatile memory representation of nonvolatile storage device set
US20130088501A1 (en) 2011-10-05 2013-04-11 Arm Limited Allocating and deallocating portions of memory
US20130097470A1 (en) 2011-10-13 2013-04-18 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Encoding apparatus and encoding method in data communication system
US8856624B1 (en) 2011-10-27 2014-10-07 Google Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically generating error correction
US9208009B2 (en) 2011-11-01 2015-12-08 Cleversafe, Inc. Accessing a large data object in a dispersed storage network
US20130145208A1 (en) 2011-12-01 2013-06-06 Chih-Hung Yen Method for a Plurality of RAID Systems and Data Storage System Thereof
US20140149794A1 (en) 2011-12-07 2014-05-29 Sachin Shetty System and method of implementing an object storage infrastructure for cloud-based services
US9063838B1 (en) 2012-01-23 2015-06-23 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Data storage device shifting data chunks of alignment zone relative to sector boundaries
US10361810B2 (en) 2012-02-17 2019-07-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Data packet transmission/reception apparatus and method
US8856619B1 (en) 2012-03-09 2014-10-07 Google Inc. Storing data across groups of storage nodes
US8832234B1 (en) 2012-03-29 2014-09-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Distributed data storage controller
US20170017671A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2017-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Deleting data in a dispersed storage network
US8751897B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2014-06-10 Facebook Inc. Distributed system for fault-tolerant data storage
US20130290482A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2013-10-31 Cleversafe, Inc. Retrieving data in a dispersed storage network
US9942084B1 (en) * 2012-05-07 2018-04-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing data stored in distributed buffer caches
US20130305365A1 (en) 2012-05-11 2013-11-14 Kaspersky Lab, Zao System and method for optimization of security traffic monitoring
US8972478B1 (en) 2012-05-23 2015-03-03 Netapp, Inc. Using append only log format in data storage cluster with distributed zones for determining parity of reliability groups
US8799746B2 (en) 2012-06-13 2014-08-05 Caringo, Inc. Erasure coding and replication in storage clusters
US9268783B1 (en) 2012-06-13 2016-02-23 Emc Corporation Preferential selection of candidates for delta compression
US20150142863A1 (en) 2012-06-20 2015-05-21 Singapore University Of Technology And Design System and methods for distributed data storage
US9619256B1 (en) 2012-06-27 2017-04-11 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Multi site and multi tenancy
US20140040417A1 (en) 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 Cleversafe, Inc. Storing a stream of data in a dispersed storage network
US20140064048A1 (en) * 2012-09-04 2014-03-06 Lsi Corporation Scalable Storage Protection
US20140115182A1 (en) 2012-10-24 2014-04-24 Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Fibre Channel Storage Area Network to Cloud Storage Gateway
US9003086B1 (en) 2012-10-27 2015-04-07 Twitter, Inc. Dynamic distribution of replicated data
US9037825B1 (en) 2012-11-20 2015-05-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Write horizon data management
US20140164430A1 (en) 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Managing A Distributed Database
US20140164694A1 (en) 2012-12-07 2014-06-12 Netapp, Inc. Decoupled reliability groups
US9052942B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2015-06-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Storage object deletion job management
US20150370656A1 (en) 2013-01-31 2015-12-24 Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited Management and recovery of distributed storage of replicas
US9477682B1 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-10-25 Emc Corporation Parallel compression of data chunks of a shared data object using a log-structured file system
US20150178007A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-06-25 Cloudifyd, Inc. Method and system for integrated cloud storage management
US20170206025A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-07-20 Srinivasan Viswanathan Mapping systems and methods of an accelerated application-oriented middleware layer
US20140280375A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Ryan Rawson Systems and methods for implementing distributed databases using many-core processors
US20140297955A1 (en) 2013-03-29 2014-10-02 Fujitsu Limited Storage control device and control method
US9098447B1 (en) 2013-05-20 2015-08-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recovery of corrupted erasure-coded data files
US20140358972A1 (en) 2013-05-28 2014-12-04 Unisys Corporation Interconnect partition binding api, allocation and management of application-specific partitions
US20140359244A1 (en) 2013-06-03 2014-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation De-duplication with partitioning advice and automation
US10387546B1 (en) 2013-06-07 2019-08-20 United Services Automobile Association Web browsing
US20140380125A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Erasure coding across multiple zones
US9244761B2 (en) 2013-06-25 2016-01-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Erasure coding across multiple zones and sub-zones
US20140380126A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Erasure coding across multiple zones and sub-zones
US20150186043A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2015-07-02 Google Inc. Hierarchical Chunking of Objects in a Distributed Storage System
US20140380088A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Locally generated simple erasure codes
US20150006846A1 (en) 2013-06-28 2015-01-01 Saratoga Speed, Inc. Network system to distribute chunks across multiple physical nodes with disk support for object storage
US20150378542A1 (en) 2013-07-22 2015-12-31 Hitachi, Ltd. Management system for computer system
US20150074065A1 (en) 2013-09-11 2015-03-12 International Business Machines Corporation Data Access in a Storage Infrastructure
US20160162378A1 (en) 2013-09-23 2016-06-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Disaster recovery service
US9274903B1 (en) 2013-09-23 2016-03-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Disaster recovery service
US9021296B1 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-28 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Independent data integrity and redundancy recovery in a storage system
US20150112951A1 (en) 2013-10-23 2015-04-23 Netapp, Inc. Data management in distributed file systems
US20150134626A1 (en) 2013-11-11 2015-05-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Partition-based data stream processing framework
US20160294419A1 (en) 2013-11-15 2016-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Coding and decoding methods and apparatus
US20150160872A1 (en) 2013-12-09 2015-06-11 Hsun-Yuan Chen Operation method of distributed memory disk cluster storage system
US9405483B1 (en) 2014-03-11 2016-08-02 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Optimized write performance at block-based storage during volume snapshot operations
US20150269025A1 (en) 2014-03-24 2015-09-24 Lsi Corporation Write redirection in redundant array of independent disks systems
US9641615B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-05-02 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Allocating RAID storage volumes across a distributed network of storage elements
US20150303949A1 (en) 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 The Regents Of The University Of California [01] cost-efficient repair for storage systems using progressive engagement
US9864527B1 (en) 2014-05-05 2018-01-09 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Distributed data storage management
US20150331766A1 (en) 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Netapp, Inc. Deferred Replication of Recovery Information At Site Switchover
US9280430B2 (en) 2014-05-13 2016-03-08 Netapp, Inc. Deferred replication of recovery information at site switchover
US20170116088A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2017-04-27 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Virtual machine data protection
US20160011936A1 (en) 2014-07-09 2016-01-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for reliably storing data using liquid distributed storage
US20160011935A1 (en) 2014-07-09 2016-01-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and mehtods for reliably storing data using liquid distributed storage
US20160055054A1 (en) 2014-08-21 2016-02-25 Datrium, Inc. Data Reconstruction in Distributed Data Storage System with Key-Based Addressing
US20170187766A1 (en) 2014-09-09 2017-06-29 Tsinghua University Hybrid network system, communication method and network node
US20160085645A1 (en) 2014-09-19 2016-03-24 Netapp Inc. Cluster-wide service agents
US20160371145A1 (en) 2014-09-30 2016-12-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Distributed storage system
US10216770B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2019-02-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Scaling stateful clusters while maintaining access
US10282262B2 (en) 2014-11-13 2019-05-07 Netapp Inc. Non-disruptive controller replacement in a cross-cluster redundancy configuration
US20170268900A1 (en) 2014-12-02 2017-09-21 Tomtom Traffic B.V. Method and apparatus for providing point of interest information
US20180306600A1 (en) 2014-12-02 2018-10-25 Tomtom Traffic B.V. Method and apparatus for providing point of interest information
US20160169692A1 (en) 2014-12-11 2016-06-16 Here Global B.V. Method and apparatus for providing battery management in route navigation
US20160170668A1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-06-16 Software AG USA Inc. System, method, and medium of optimizing load reallocation in an in-memory data management grid
US20160217104A1 (en) 2015-01-27 2016-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation Host based non-volatile memory clustering using network mapped storage
US9665428B2 (en) 2015-02-05 2017-05-30 Netapp, Inc. Distributing erasure-coded fragments in a geo-distributed storage system
US20180267985A1 (en) 2015-02-05 2018-09-20 Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK Limited Management of cloned objects in file systems
US20160232055A1 (en) 2015-02-05 2016-08-11 Netapp, Inc Methods for distributing erasure-coded fragments in a geo-distributed storage system and devices thereof
US20160277497A1 (en) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 Panzura, Inc. Facilitating access to remote cloud services
US10127234B1 (en) 2015-03-27 2018-11-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Proactive optimizations at multi-tier file systems
US20160292429A1 (en) 2015-03-31 2016-10-06 Emc Corporation Secure cloud-based storage of data shared across file system objects and clients
US10001947B1 (en) 2015-05-08 2018-06-19 American Megatrends, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for performing efficient patrol read operations in a storage system
US20160357443A1 (en) 2015-06-05 2016-12-08 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Incorporated Method and apparatus for big data cloud storage resource management
US20160357649A1 (en) 2015-06-05 2016-12-08 Dell Products, L.P. System and method for managing raid storage system having a hot spare drive
US20160380650A1 (en) 2015-06-26 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Flexible erasure coding with enhanced local protection group structures
US20160378624A1 (en) 2015-06-29 2016-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Erasure coding of data within a group of storage units based on connection characteristics
US20170003880A1 (en) 2015-06-30 2017-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Wear leveling of a memory array
US10108819B1 (en) 2015-07-01 2018-10-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Cross-datacenter extension of grid encoded data storage systems
US20170004044A1 (en) 2015-07-03 2017-01-05 Acronis International Gmbh System and method of reliable distributed data storage with controlled redundancy
US20170031945A1 (en) 2015-07-31 2017-02-02 Atlantis Computing, Inc. Method and apparatus for on-disk deduplication metadata for a deduplication file system
US9747057B1 (en) 2015-09-13 2017-08-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Storage auto delete
US20170097875A1 (en) 2015-10-06 2017-04-06 Netapp, Inc. Data Recovery In A Distributed Storage System
US20180246668A1 (en) 2015-10-08 2018-08-30 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage system
US20170102993A1 (en) 2015-10-08 2017-04-13 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Data encoding techniques for a device
US20170187398A1 (en) 2015-12-25 2017-06-29 Emc Corporation Accelerated galois field coding for storage systems
US20170206135A1 (en) 2015-12-31 2017-07-20 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data Reconstruction Method in Distributed Storage System, Apparatus, and System
US20180267856A1 (en) 2016-01-07 2018-09-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Distributed storage system, data storage method, and software program
US20170212680A1 (en) 2016-01-22 2017-07-27 Suraj Prabhakar WAGHULDE Adaptive prefix tree based order partitioned data storage system
US20170212845A1 (en) 2016-01-25 2017-07-27 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Region migration cache
US9817713B2 (en) * 2016-02-04 2017-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed cache system utilizing multiple erasure codes
US20170235507A1 (en) 2016-02-12 2017-08-17 Nutanix, Inc. Virtualized file server backup to cloud
US10644408B2 (en) 2016-02-23 2020-05-05 Denso Corporation Antenna apparatus
US20170262187A1 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-09-14 HGST Netherlands B.V. Storage cluster and method that efficiently store small objects with erasure codes
US20190356416A1 (en) 2016-03-15 2019-11-21 Datomia Research Labs Ou Distributed storage system data management and security
US20190028179A1 (en) 2016-03-18 2019-01-24 Amit Kalhan System and method for multiuser packets transmissions for relays
US10061668B1 (en) 2016-03-28 2018-08-28 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Local storage clustering for redundancy coded data storage system
US20170285952A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for quasi-compacting garbage collection
US20170286436A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Acronis International Gmbh System and method for fast parallel data processing in distributed storage systems
US20170286009A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for reference tracking garbage collector
US20170288701A1 (en) * 2016-04-05 2017-10-05 Netapp, Inc. Restoration of Erasure-Coded Data Via Data Shuttle in Distributed Storage System
US20170344285A1 (en) 2016-05-24 2017-11-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for tenant-aware storage sharing platform
US10007561B1 (en) 2016-08-08 2018-06-26 Bitmicro Networks, Inc. Multi-mode device for flexible acceleration and storage provisioning
US10242022B1 (en) 2016-08-10 2019-03-26 Veritas Technologies Llc Systems and methods for managing delayed allocation on clustered file systems
US20180052744A1 (en) 2016-08-18 2018-02-22 Red Hat, Inc. Tiered cloud storage for different availability and performance requirements
US20180063213A1 (en) 2016-08-29 2018-03-01 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Hypermedia Apparatus and Method
US20180074881A1 (en) 2016-09-13 2018-03-15 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Storage drive management
US20180121286A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2018-05-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Efficient repair of erasure coded data based on coefficient matrix decomposition
US10567009B2 (en) 2016-12-06 2020-02-18 Nutanix, Inc. Dynamic erasure coding
US10331516B2 (en) 2016-12-23 2019-06-25 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Content-aware data recovery method for elastic cloud storage
US10579490B2 (en) 2016-12-23 2020-03-03 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Fast geo recovery method for elastic cloud storage
US10503611B1 (en) 2016-12-23 2019-12-10 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Data protection management for distributed storage
US20180181612A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for xor chain
US20180181475A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Fast GEO Recovery Method for Elastic Cloud Storage
US20180181324A1 (en) 2016-12-26 2018-06-28 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Data protection with erasure coding and xor
US10705911B2 (en) 2017-04-24 2020-07-07 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Storing data in a distributed storage system
US20180307560A1 (en) 2017-04-24 2018-10-25 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Storing data in a distributed storage system
US10289488B1 (en) 2017-04-27 2019-05-14 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for recovery of unrecoverable data with erasure coding and geo XOR
US10055145B1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-08-21 EMC IP Holding Company LLC System and method for load balancing with XOR star and XOR chain
US20180341662A1 (en) 2017-05-24 2018-11-29 3S International, LLC Hierarchical computing network and methods thereof
US20180375936A1 (en) 2017-06-27 2018-12-27 Red Hat, Inc. Containerized high-performance network storage
US20190215017A1 (en) 2017-07-19 2019-07-11 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Facilitation of data deletion for distributed erasure coding
US20190034084A1 (en) 2017-07-28 2019-01-31 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Selecting controllers based on affinity between access devices and storage segments
US20190050301A1 (en) 2017-08-10 2019-02-14 Rubrik, Inc. Chunk allocation
US20190065310A1 (en) 2017-08-25 2019-02-28 Datera, Inc. System and method to utilize larger block sizes for logical disk and further decompose into smaller physical block sizes for redundant encoding by utilizing erasure coding
US20190065092A1 (en) 2017-08-28 2019-02-28 Vmware, Inc. Flexible efficient runtime placement of data across multiple disks
US20190114223A1 (en) * 2017-10-13 2019-04-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Accelerating erasure code replication in distributed systems
US10496330B1 (en) 2017-10-31 2019-12-03 Pure Storage, Inc. Using flash storage devices with different sized erase blocks
US20190188079A1 (en) 2017-12-11 2019-06-20 Fungible, Inc. Durable block storage in data center access nodes with inline erasure coding
US10797863B2 (en) 2017-12-28 2020-10-06 Intel Corporation Multi-domain cascade convolutional neural network
US20190043351A1 (en) 2017-12-28 2019-02-07 Shao-Wen Yang Ubiquitous visual computing witness
US20190043201A1 (en) 2017-12-28 2019-02-07 Christina R. Strong Analytic image format for visual computing
US20190205437A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 Per-Ake Larson Systems and methods for database management using append-only storage devices
US20190220207A1 (en) 2018-01-12 2019-07-18 Seagate Technology Llc Self-healing in a storage system
US10733053B1 (en) * 2018-01-31 2020-08-04 Pure Storage, Inc. Disaster recovery for high-bandwidth distributed archives
US20190386683A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Disaster recovery with consolidated erasure coding in geographically distributed setups
US20190384500A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Deleting Data in a Geographically Diverse Storage Construct
US20200026810A1 (en) 2018-07-23 2020-01-23 Vmware, Inc. Automatic cluster consolidation for efficient resource management
US20200042178A1 (en) 2018-08-02 2020-02-06 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Scale-out storage system rebalancing
US20200050510A1 (en) 2018-08-13 2020-02-13 Quanta Computer Inc. Server hardware fault analysis and recovery
US20200104377A1 (en) 2018-09-28 2020-04-02 Oracle International Corporation Rules Based Scheduling and Migration of Databases Using Complexity and Weight
US10613780B1 (en) 2018-10-09 2020-04-07 Cohesity, Inc. Multi-node removal
US20200117556A1 (en) 2018-10-10 2020-04-16 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining storage array online
US10846003B2 (en) 2019-01-29 2020-11-24 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Doubly mapped redundant array of independent nodes for data storage
US10740183B1 (en) 2019-04-01 2020-08-11 International Business Machines Corporation Recovering failed devices in distributed data centers

Non-Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Dell Technologies, "ECS Overview and Architecture", h14071.18, Feb. 2021, 21 Pages.
EMC; "EMC ECS (Elastic Cloud Storage) Architectural Guide v2.x;" EMC; Jun. 2015; available at: https://www.dell.com/community/s/vjauj58549/attachments/vjauj58549/solutions-ch/477 /1/h14071-ecs-architectural-guide-wp.pdf, Jun. 2015, 21 pages.
Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/024,314, 29 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,504 dated Sep. 18, 2019, 15 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,382 dated Apr. 6, 2020, 31 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/662,273 dated May 15, 2019, 33 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/791,390 dated Feb. 6, 2020, 29 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,714 dated Sep. 12, 2019, 43 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/952,179 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 53 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,246 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 33 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,255 dated Jul. 23, 2020, 36 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,278 dated Feb. 24, 2021, 109 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,285 dated Dec. 30, 2020, 61 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,285 dated Sep. 14, 2021, 65 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,486 dated Jan. 28, 2021, 55 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,486 dated Oct. 20, 2021, 46 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,624 dated Dec. 1, 2020, 63 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,272 dated Oct. 27, 2020, 42 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/511,161 dated Dec. 30, 2020, 61 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/670,715 dated Sep. 7, 2021, 35 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,096 dated Sep. 7, 2021, 24 pages.
Guo et al., "GeoScale: Providing Geo-Elasticity in Distributed Clouds" 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, 4 pages.
Guo et al., "Providing Geo-Elasticity in Geographically Distributed Clouds". ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, vol. 18, No. 3, Article 38. Apr. 2018. 27 pages.
Huang et al., "Scale-RS: An Efficient Scaling Scheme for RS-Coded Storage Clusters," in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 1704-1717, Jun. 1, 2015.
Martin Hosken, Developing a Hyper-Converged Storage Strategy for VMware vCloud Director with VMware vSAN, Jan. 2018 (Year: 2018).
Mohan et al., "Geo-aware erasure coding for high-performance erasure-coded storage clusters", Springer Link, URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s 12243-017-0623-2, Jan. 18, 2018.
Muralidhar et al. "f4: Facebook's Warm BLOB Storage System", USENIX. OSDI, Oct. 2014, pp. 383-398.
Natarajan, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 10 Explained with Diagrams, Aug. 10, 2010, thegeekstuff.com (18 pages).
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/024,314 dated Nov. 25, 2019, 42 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,167 dated Sep. 7, 2018, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,504 dated Dec. 31, 2019, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,504 dated Mar. 21, 2019, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,382 dated Nov. 1, 2019, 47 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/662,273 dated Nov. 16, 2018, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/791,390 dated Apr. 30, 2020, 48 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/791,390 dated Sep. 20, 2019, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,714 dated Apr. 4, 2019, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/794,950 dated Jul. 9, 2019, 29 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/952,179 dated Apr. 20, 2020, 68 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/952,179 dated Sep. 10, 2019, 42 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/965,479 dated Apr. 15, 2019, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,246 dated Dec. 5, 2019, 67 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,255 dated Jan. 9, 2020, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,255 dated Oct. 29, 2020, 65 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,278 dated Dec. 2, 2019, 55 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,285 dated Apr. 9, 2021, 41 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,285 dated Jul. 22, 2020, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,486 dated May 12, 2021, 50 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,185 dated Jun. 18, 2020, 22 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,612 dated Feb. 27, 2020, 49 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,612 dated Jun. 29, 2020, 62 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,624 dated Jun. 24, 2020, 65 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,272 dated Jun. 29, 2020, 64 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,547 dated Sep. 3, 2020, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,548 dated Aug. 21, 2020, 42 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,549 dated Apr. 15, 2020, 22 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,725 dated Aug. 19, 2020, 50 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,726 dated Jun. 2, 2020, 47 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/399,895 dated Jan. 4, 2021, 64 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/399,897 dated Feb. 19, 2021, 56 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/399,902 dated Oct. 28, 2020, 83 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/457,615 dated Jul. 20, 2020, 34 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/511,161 dated Jul. 10, 2020, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/526,142 dated Oct. 15, 2020, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/670,715 dated Mar. 31, 2021, 60 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/670,746 dated Feb. 16, 2021, 55 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/670,765 dated Jul. 20, 2021, 79 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,096 dated May 24, 2021, 62 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/745,855 dated May 13, 2021, 71 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,208 dated Apr. 20, 2021, 71 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/834,649 dated Jun. 24, 2021, 61 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,193, 24 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,193, 46 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/888,144, 71 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 10, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/745,855, 30 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/792,714 dated Nov. 8, 2019, 31 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/862,547 dated Mar. 29, 2019 27 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,549 dated Jul. 17, 2020, 40 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,726 dated Jan. 6, 2021, 56 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,726 dated Nov. 20, 2020, 78 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,428 dated Jun. 14, 2021, 34 pages.
Notice of Allowance received U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,612 dated Oct. 20, 2020, 84 pages.
Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/261,551, 30 pages.
Office Action dated May 11, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,278, 53 pages.
Office Action dated May 8, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,018, 78 pages.
Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/526,182, 83 pages.
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/010,246 dated Jul. 27, 2020 36 pages.
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,278, dated Aug. 21, 2020, 53 pages.
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,486, dated Aug. 13, 2020, 64 pages.
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/254,073, dated Aug. 18, 2020, 62 pages.
Qiang et al., "Dynamics Process of Long-running Allocation/Collection in Linear Storage Space", International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS 2007), Guilin, 2007, pp. 209-216.
Stonebreaker et al. "Distributed RAID—A New Multiple Copy Algorithm.", IEEE ICDE, 1990, pp. 430-437.
Thomasian et al., "Hierarchical RAID: Design, performance, reliability, and recovery", J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. vol. 72 (2012) pp. 1753-1769.
Wikipedia "Erasure code", URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20170908171158/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasure_code (Year: 2017), retrieved using the WayBackMachine, Sep. 8, 2017, 5 pages.
Wikipedia "Front and back ends" URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_and_back_ends (Year:2019), Sep. 6, 2019, 4 pages.
Wikipedia "Garbage Collection", URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_collection_(computer science) #Availability (Year: 2017) retrieved using the WayBackMachine, Sep. 8, 2017, 8 pages.
Wikipedia, "Standard Raid Levels—RAID 6", URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels#RAID_6, Oct. 18, 2019, 11 pages.
Y. Ma, T. Nandagopal, K. P. N. Puttaswamy and S. Banerjee, "An ensemble of replication and erasure codes for cloud file systems," 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2013, pp. 1276-1284, doi: 10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6566920. (Year: 2013). *
Zhou, et al. "Fast Erasure Coding for Data Storage: A Comprehensive Study of the Acceleration Techniques" Proceedings of the 17th Usenix Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '19), [https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast19/presentation/zhou], Feb. 2019, Boston, MA, USA. 14 pages.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20210083693A1 (en) 2021-03-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11023130B2 (en) Deleting data in a geographically diverse storage construct
US11349501B2 (en) Multistep recovery employing erasure coding in a geographically diverse data storage system
US11288139B2 (en) Two-step recovery employing erasure coding in a geographically diverse data storage system
US11119690B2 (en) Consolidation of protection sets in a geographically diverse data storage environment
US11349500B2 (en) Data recovery in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding technology and data convolution technology
US10936239B2 (en) Cluster contraction of a mapped redundant array of independent nodes
US11847141B2 (en) Mapped redundant array of independent nodes employing mapped reliability groups for data storage
US11228322B2 (en) Rebalancing in a geographically diverse storage system employing erasure coding
US10866766B2 (en) Affinity sensitive data convolution for data storage systems
US11113146B2 (en) Chunk segment recovery via hierarchical erasure coding in a geographically diverse data storage system
US10936196B2 (en) Data convolution for geographically diverse storage
US11119686B2 (en) Preservation of data during scaling of a geographically diverse data storage system
US11436203B2 (en) Scaling out geographically diverse storage
US11112991B2 (en) Scaling-in for geographically diverse storage
US20200133532A1 (en) Geological Allocation of Storage Space
US20210271645A1 (en) Log-Based Storage Space Management for Geographically Diverse Storage
US10936244B1 (en) Bulk scaling out of a geographically diverse storage system
US20210271655A1 (en) Geographically Diverse Data Storage System Employing a Replication Tree
US11693983B2 (en) Data protection via commutative erasure coding in a geographically diverse data storage system
US11354191B1 (en) Erasure coding in a large geographically diverse data storage system
US11347419B2 (en) Valency-based data convolution for geographically diverse storage
US11119683B2 (en) Logical compaction of a degraded chunk in a geographically diverse data storage system
US10942825B2 (en) Mitigating real node failure in a mapped redundant array of independent nodes
US10931777B2 (en) Network efficient geographically diverse data storage system employing degraded chunks
US11449399B2 (en) Mitigating real node failure of a doubly mapped redundant array of independent nodes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DANILOV, MIKHAIL;ALTAYE, YOHANNES;REEL/FRAME:050373/0116

Effective date: 20190906

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEXAS

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES);ASSIGNORS:DELL PRODUCTS L.P.;EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC;WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:051302/0528

Effective date: 20191212

AS Assignment

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:DELL PRODUCTS L.P.;EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC;WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:051449/0728

Effective date: 20191230

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., TEXAS

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.;DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.;DELL MARKETING L.P.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:053546/0001

Effective date: 20200409

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEXAS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DELL PRODUCTS L.P.;EMC CORPORATION;EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC;REEL/FRAME:053311/0169

Effective date: 20200603

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

AS Assignment

Owner name: EMC CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:058002/0010

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: SECUREWORKS CORP., DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:058002/0010

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:058002/0010

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:058002/0010

Effective date: 20211101

Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 051449 FRAME 0728;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:058002/0010

Effective date: 20211101

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP, ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053311/0169);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0742

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: EMC CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053311/0169);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0742

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053311/0169);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0742

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: SECUREWORKS CORP., DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (051302/0528);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0593

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.), TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (051302/0528);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0593

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (051302/0528);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0593

Effective date: 20220329

Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (051302/0528);ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:060438/0593

Effective date: 20220329