TWI758915B - Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof - Google Patents
Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWI758915B TWI758915B TW109136685A TW109136685A TWI758915B TW I758915 B TWI758915 B TW I758915B TW 109136685 A TW109136685 A TW 109136685A TW 109136685 A TW109136685 A TW 109136685A TW I758915 B TWI758915 B TW I758915B
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- risk
- accident
- module
- events
- factors
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本發明係有關一種行車風險分析技術,且特別係有關基於行車之風險因子及風險事件之行車風險分析設備及方法。 The present invention relates to a driving risk analysis technology, and particularly relates to a driving risk analysis device and method based on driving risk factors and risk events.
隨著行車安全的意識日益提高,在商用車輛的管理中,如何評估行車風險,甚至預測事故機率,已成為重要課題。因此,對於車隊中之眾多車輛及眾多駕駛員,亟需可行之系統或方法,以量化評估駕駛員的行車風險,或預估駕駛員的事故風險機率,以作為管理決策之輔助。 With the increasing awareness of driving safety, in the management of commercial vehicles, how to assess driving risks and even predict accident probability has become an important issue. Therefore, for many vehicles and many drivers in the fleet, there is an urgent need for a feasible system or method to quantitatively assess the driving risk of the driver, or estimate the driver's accident risk probability, as an aid for management decision-making.
為解決上述問題,本發明提供一種行車風險分析設備,包括:風險資料蒐集模組,用於設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子及蒐集至少一車輛之複數風險事件,其中,各該風險事件包括識別值、事件種類及風險等級,且各該風險事件之該事件種類及該風險等級均對應該等風險因子中之同一風險因子;風險係數調整模組,用於設定或調整各該風險因子之各該風險等級之比重 係數;以及風險運算模組,用於根據該等風險等級及該等比重係數,計算出各該識別值所對應之風險值。 In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides a driving risk analysis device, comprising: a risk data collection module for setting multiple risk factors related to driving safety and collecting multiple risk events of at least one vehicle, wherein each risk event includes identifying value, event type and risk level, and the event type and risk level of each risk event correspond to the same risk factor among the corresponding risk factors; the risk coefficient adjustment module is used to set or adjust the various risk factors of each risk factor. The proportion of the risk level coefficients; and a risk calculation module for calculating the risk values corresponding to the identification values according to the risk levels and the proportion coefficients.
本發明另提供一種行車風險分析設備,包括:風險資料蒐集模組,用於設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子,且蒐集至少一車輛之事故歷史、複數第一風險事件及複數第二風險事件;風險因子訓練模組,用於根據該事故歷史及該等第一風險事件進行資料訓練,計算出各該風險因子之事故機率值;以及事故預測模組,用於根據各該風險因子之該事故機率值及該等第二風險事件,預測該等第二風險事件所對應之事故風險機率。 The present invention further provides a driving risk analysis device, comprising: a risk data collection module for setting a plurality of risk factors related to driving safety, and collecting the accident history of at least one vehicle, a plurality of first risk events and a plurality of second risk events; A risk factor training module, used for data training based on the accident history and the first risk events, to calculate the accident probability value of each of the risk factors; and an accident prediction module, used for the accident based on each of the risk factors The probability value and the second risk events predict the accident risk probability corresponding to the second risk events.
本發明另提供一種行車風險分析方法,包括:設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子;蒐集至少一車輛之複數風險事件,其中,各該風險事件包括識別值、事件種類及風險等級,且各該風險事件之該事件種類及該風險等級均對應該等風險因子中之同一風險因子;設定或調整各該風險因子之各該風險等級之比重係數;以及根據該等風險等級及該等比重係數,計算出各該識別值所對應之風險值。 The present invention further provides a driving risk analysis method, comprising: setting a plurality of risk factors related to driving safety; collecting a plurality of risk events of at least one vehicle, wherein each risk event includes an identification value, an event type and a risk level, and each risk The event type and the risk level of the event all correspond to the same risk factor among the corresponding risk factors; set or adjust the weighting factor of each risk level of each of the risk factors; and calculate the Calculate the risk value corresponding to each identification value.
本發明另提供一種行車風險分析方法,包括:設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子;蒐集至少一車輛之事故歷史、複數第一風險事件及複數第二風險事件;根據該事故歷史及該等第一風險事件進行資料訓練,計算出各該風險因子之事故機率值;以及根據各該風險因子之該事故機率值及該等第二風險事件,預測該等第二風險事件所對應之事故風險機率。 The present invention further provides a driving risk analysis method, comprising: setting a plurality of risk factors related to driving safety; collecting the accident history, a plurality of first risk events and a plurality of second risk events of at least one vehicle; according to the accident history and the first risk events Perform data training on risk events to calculate the accident probability value of each risk factor; and predict the accident risk probability corresponding to the second risk events according to the accident probability value of each risk factor and the second risk events.
在一實施例中,係根據風險因子計算駕駛員的行車風險值,提供客觀量化數值,以判別高行車風險的司機而進行輔導改善,或判別低行車風 險的司機而給予鼓勵。此外,在另一實施例中,係採用機器學習方法並依據歷史資料進行資料訓練,以預測事故風險機率。 In one embodiment, the driving risk value of the driver is calculated according to the risk factor, and an objective quantitative value is provided, so as to identify drivers with high driving risk and provide guidance for improvement, or to identify drivers with low driving risk. encourage risky drivers. In addition, in another embodiment, a machine learning method is used and data training is performed according to historical data to predict the accident risk probability.
100,300,500:行車風險分析設備 100,300,500: Driving risk analysis equipment
110,310,510:風險資料蒐集模組 110, 310, 510: Risk Data Collection Module
112,312,512:風險因子設定模組 112,312,512: Risk Factor Setting Module
114,314,514:風險資料輸入模組 114,314,514: Risk Data Entry Module
116,316,516:資料庫模組 116,316,516:Database Module
120,520:風險係數調整模組 120,520: Risk factor adjustment module
130,530:風險運算模組 130,530: Risk calculation module
320,540:風險因子訓練模組 320,540: Risk Factor Training Module
330,550:事故預測模組 330,550: Accident Prediction Module
S210~S240,S410~S440:方法步驟 S210~S240, S410~S440: method steps
圖1為根據本發明第一實施例之一種行車風險分析設備的方塊圖。 FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a driving risk analysis device according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
圖2為根據本發明第一實施例之一種行車風險分析方法的流程圖。 FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a driving risk analysis method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
圖3為根據本發明第二實施例之一種行車風險分析設備的方塊圖。 3 is a block diagram of a driving risk analysis device according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
圖4為根據本發明第二實施例之一種行車風險分析方法的流程圖。 FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a driving risk analysis method according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
圖5為根據本發明第三實施例之一種行車風險分析設備的方塊圖。 FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a driving risk analysis device according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
以下藉由特定的具體實施例說明本發明之實施方式,在本技術領域具有通常知識者可由本說明書所揭示之內容輕易地瞭解本發明之其他優點及功效。 The embodiments of the present invention are described below by means of specific embodiments, and those skilled in the art can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present invention from the contents disclosed in this specification.
圖1為根據本發明第一實施例之一種行車風險分析設備100的方塊圖。行車風險分析設備100包括風險資料蒐集模組110、風險係數調整模組120、以及風險運算模組130,其中,風險資料蒐集模組110包括風險因子設定模組112、風險資料輸入模組114、以及資料庫模組116。圖1中之各模組均可為軟體、硬體或韌體;若為硬體,則可為具有資料處理與運算能力之處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器;若為軟體或韌體,則可包括處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器可執行之指令。此外,圖1中之各模組可整合於同一硬體裝置中,或分散建置於複數硬體裝置中。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a driving
圖2為行車風險分析設備100所執行之行車風險分析方法的流程圖。行車風險分析設備100與其所執行之方法可用於一車隊之行車風險之分析與管理,且該車隊可包括由至少一駕駛員所負責駕駛之至少一車輛。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a driving risk analysis method executed by the driving
首先,在步驟S210,風險資料蒐集模組110之風險因子設定模組112設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子,例如下列之表1所示的三個風險因子F1、F2及F3,其中,各該風險因子均包括其名稱及說明。
First, in step S210, the risk
每一個風險因子可根據該車隊之車輛之行駛速度設定複數風險等級,以表1之風險因子F1、F2及F3為例,風險因子F1可設定兩個風險等級L1及L2,風險因子F2及F3各可設定三個風險等級L1、L2及L3,如下列之表2所示。表2中之S及L分別為表1中與風險因子F3相關之車輛行駛速度及車輛所在之道路之速限。 Multiple risk levels can be set for each risk factor according to the speed of vehicles in the fleet. Taking the risk factors F 1 , F 2 and F 3 in Table 1 as an example, the risk factor F 1 can be set to two risk levels L 1 and L 2 , the risk factors F 2 and F 3 can each be set to three risk levels L 1 , L 2 and L 3 , as shown in Table 2 below. S and L in Table 2 are the vehicle speed and the speed limit of the road on which the vehicle is located in Table 1 related to the risk factor F3, respectively.
雖然表1及表2列示三個風險因子,且每一個風險因子設定有二或三個風險等級,但本發明不限於此。在其他實施例中,風險因子及風險等級之數量均可依實際需求而設定或調整。 Although Table 1 and Table 2 list three risk factors, and each risk factor is set with two or three risk levels, the present invention is not limited thereto. In other embodiments, the number of risk factors and risk levels can be set or adjusted according to actual needs.
接著,在步驟S220,風險資料蒐集模組110之風險資料輸入模組114蒐集該車隊之車輛之複數風險事件,例如下列之表3所示之十二個風險事件R1至R12。
Next, in step S220, the risk
該車隊之每一車輛均可安裝配合行車風險分析設備100之輔助系統,該輔助系統可為硬體、韌體或軟體。該輔助系統已事先儲存風險因子及風險等級之設定(例如表1及表2中之設定),用於即時偵測所屬車輛之行為是否符合任一風險因子之說明。每當該車隊之任一車輛的行為符合任一風險因子之說明,該車輛之輔助系統即根據所屬車輛之行駛速度判斷所屬車輛之行為所對應之風險等級,並產生一個對應之風險事件。該輔助系統可通過無線傳輸將所屬車輛之風險事件即時上傳至風險資料蒐集模組110之風險資料輸入模組114,或者,該輔助系統可將所屬車輛之風險事件儲存於一資料檔案,然後將該資料檔案匯入風險資料蒐集模組110之風險資料輸入模組114。資料庫模組116可儲存風險因子設定模組112所設定之風險因子及風險資料輸入模組114所接收之風險事件,以供其他模組(例如風險係數調整模組120及風險運算模組130)查詢。
Each vehicle in the fleet can be equipped with an auxiliary system that cooperates with the driving
如表3所示,每一個風險事件R1至R12均包括識別值、事件種類、行駛速度、道路速限、以及風險等級。在各該風險事件中,該識別值可為產生該風險事件之車輛之識別值,或為產生該風險事件之車輛的駕駛員之識別值,或包括產生該風險事件之車輛的識別值及其駕駛員之識別值;該事件種類為該風險事件產生時,其所屬車輛之行為所符合之風險因子;該行駛速度及該道路速限分別為該風險事件產生時其所屬車輛之行駛速度及該車輛所在道路之速限;該風險等級為該風險事件產生時,其所屬車輛之行駛速度所對應之風險等級。各該風險事件之該事件種類及該風險等級均對應上述風險因子中之同一風險因子。 As shown in Table 3, each of the risk events R 1 to R 12 includes an identification value, an event type, a travel speed, a road speed limit, and a risk level. In each of the risk events, the identification value may be the identification value of the vehicle that generated the risk event, or the identification value of the driver of the vehicle that generated the risk event, or the identification value of the vehicle that generated the risk event and its The identification value of the driver; the event type is the risk factor that the behavior of the vehicle he belongs to when the risk event occurs; the driving speed and the road speed limit are the driving speed of the vehicle he belongs to when the risk event occurs and the road speed limit, respectively The speed limit of the road where the vehicle is located; the risk level is the risk level corresponding to the speed of the vehicle it belongs to when the risk event occurs. The event type and the risk level of each risk event correspond to the same risk factor among the above risk factors.
接著,在步驟S230,風險係數調整模組120設定或調整各該風險因子之各該風險等級之比重係數,例如下列之表4所示。
Next, in step S230, the risk
一般而言,當車輛之行駛速度愈高,則其行車風險愈高,因此,同一風險因子中,風險等級之比重係數會形成車輛行駛速度之遞增函數。換言之,行駛速度愈高,則相對應之比重係數愈大。例如,表4中之風險因子F2之比重係數形成隨行駛速度遞增之等比數列,而表4中之風險因子F3之比重係數形成隨行駛速度遞增之等差數列。 Generally speaking, the higher the driving speed of the vehicle, the higher the driving risk. Therefore, in the same risk factor, the proportion coefficient of the risk level will form an increasing function of the driving speed of the vehicle. In other words, the higher the driving speed, the higher the corresponding specific gravity coefficient. For example, the specific gravity coefficient of the risk factor F2 in Table 4 forms an arithmetic sequence that increases with the travel speed, and the specific gravity coefficient of the risk factor F3 in Table 4 forms an arithmetic sequence that increases with the travel speed.
當各該風險等級之比重係數設定完成後,若有需要,風險係數調整模組120亦可調整各該風險等級之比重係數。例如,風險係數調整模組120可根據最近之事故統計,提高易於發生事故之車輛行為所對應之風險因子或風險等級之比重係數。或者,管理人員可通過風險係數調整模組120視應用需求而手動調整比重係數。
After the setting of the proportion coefficient of each of the risk levels is completed, if necessary, the risk
接著,在步驟S240,風險運算模組130根據風險因子之風險等級及其比重係數,計算風險事件中之各該識別值所對應之風險值,其中,對於各該識別值,該識別值所對應之風險值係為包括該識別值的該等風險事件中,各該風險等級之發生次數與相對應之比重係數的乘積之總和。
Next, in step S240, the
例如,根據表3所示之風險事件R1至R4,可計算識別值D 1之風險值F(D 1)。詳言之,包括識別值D 1之風險事件R1至R4中,發生次數大於零之風險等級分別為風險因子F1之L1及L2、風險因子F2之L2及風險因子F3之L1,該等風險等級之發生次數各為1次,且對應該等風險等級之比重係數分別為1.2、1、1.2及1.3,故識別值D 1之風險值F(D 1)為 For example, according to the risk events R 1 to R 4 shown in Table 3, the risk value F ( D 1 ) of the identification value D 1 can be calculated. Specifically, among the risk events R 1 to R 4 including the identification value D 1 , the risk levels with occurrence times greater than zero are L 1 and L 2 of the risk factor F 1 , L 2 of the risk factor F 2 , and risk factor F respectively For L 1 of 3 , the number of occurrences of these risk levels is 1, and the proportion coefficients corresponding to the corresponding risk levels are 1.2, 1, 1.2, and 1.3, respectively, so the risk value F ( D 1 ) of the identification value D 1 is
F(D 1)=1×1.2+1×1+1×1.2+1×1.3=4.7。 F ( D 1 )=1×1.2+1×1+1×1.2+1×1.3=4.7.
又例如,根據表3所示之風險事件R5至R12,可計算識別值D 2之風險值F(D 2)。詳言之,包括識別值D 2之風險事件R5至R12中,發生次數大於零之風險等級分別為風險因子F1之L2、風險因子F2之L1及L2、以及風險因子F3之L1及L2,該等風險等級之發生次數分別為2、1、1、3及1,且對應該等風險等級之比重係數分別為1、1.44、1.2、1.3及1.2,故識別值D 2之風險值F(D 2)為 For another example, according to the risk events R 5 to R 12 shown in Table 3, the risk value F ( D 2 ) of the identification value D 2 can be calculated. In detail, among the risk events R 5 to R 12 including the identification value D 2 , the risk levels with occurrence times greater than zero are L 2 of the risk factor F 1 , L 1 and L 2 of the risk factor F 2 , and risk factors, respectively. For L 1 and L 2 of F 3 , the occurrence times of these risk levels are 2, 1, 1, 3, and 1, respectively, and the proportion coefficients corresponding to these risk levels are 1, 1.44, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.2, respectively. Therefore, The risk value F ( D 2 ) of the identification value D 2 is
F(D 2)=2×1+1×1.44+1×1.2+3×1.3+1×1.2=10.94。 F ( D 2 )=2×1+1×1.44+1×1.2+3×1.3+1×1.2=10.94.
採用上述方法計算所得之風險值可用於評估駕駛員之表現,並可用於輔助車隊之管理。 The value at risk calculated using the above method can be used to evaluate driver performance and to assist fleet management.
圖3為根據本發明第二實施例之一種行車風險分析設備300的方塊圖。行車風險分析設備300包括風險資料蒐集模組310、風險因子訓練模組320、以及事故預測模組330,其中,風險資料蒐集模組310包括風險因子設定模組312、風險資料輸入模組314、以及資料庫模組316。風險因子設定模組312、風險資料輸入模組314、以及資料庫模組316分別包括第一實施例之風險因子設定模組112、風險資料輸入模組114、以及資料庫模組116之功能,且尚可包括第二實施例所需之功能。圖3中之各模組均可為軟體、硬體或韌體;
若為硬體,則可為具有資料處理與運算能力之處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器;若為軟體或韌體,則可包括處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器可執行之指令。此外,圖3中之各模組可整合於同一硬體裝置中,或分散建置於複數硬體裝置中。
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a driving
圖4為行車風險分析設備300所執行之行車風險分析方法的流程圖。行車風險分析設備300與其所執行之方法可用於一車隊之行車風險之分析與管理,該車隊可包括由至少一駕駛員所負責駕駛之至少一車輛。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a driving risk analysis method executed by the driving
首先,在步驟S410,風險資料蒐集模組310之風險因子設定模組312設定關於行車安全之複數風險因子,例如表1所示之三個風險因子F1、F2及F3。在此實施例中,風險因子不需要設定風險等級。
First, in step S410 , the risk
接著,在步驟S420,風險資料蒐集模組310之風險資料輸入模組314蒐集該車隊之車輛之事故歷史及複數第一風險事件。該事故歷史可由外部伺服器提供或直接匯入。該等第一風險事件可如第一實施例所述,由車輛之輔助系統即時上傳或直接匯入。
Next, in step S420, the risk
蒐集複數第一風險事件之後,風險資料輸入模組314可統計該事故歷史及該等第一風險事件,以產生複數第一樣本,如下列之表5所示之八個樣本S1至S8。
After collecting a plurality of first risk events, the risk
每一個樣本S1至S8均為風險資料輸入模組314統計於一時間段內產生的複數第一風險事件所產生,每一個樣本S1至S8各對應不同之時間段,且每一個樣本S1至S8所對應之第一風險事件可包括同一識別值或複數不同之識別值。每一個樣本S1至S8均包括事故資訊A,事故資訊A表示產生所屬樣本所對應之第一風險事件之車輛於所屬樣本對應之時間段內是否曾發生事故,例如車禍。風險資料輸入模組314可根據各該樣本之時間段查詢該事故歷史以產生事故資訊A。此外,每一個樣本S1至S8復包括風險因子F1、F2及F3之發生次數C 1、C 2及C 3。詳言之,發生次數C 1、C 2及C 3分別為風險因子F1、F2及F3於各該樣本所對應之時間段內的該等第一風險事件中之發生次數。例如,樣本S1中之發生次數C 1、C 2及C 3分別為風險因子F1、F2及F3於樣本S1所對應之時間段內的該等第一風險事件中之發生次數,依此類推。風險資料
輸入模組314可將其所產生之第一樣本儲存於資料庫模組316,以供風險因子訓練模組320及事故預測模組330查詢。
Each of the samples S1 to S8 is generated by the risk
在另一實施例中,可由資料庫模組316統計該事故歷史及該等第一風險事件以產生並儲存該等第一樣本。
In another embodiment, the accident history and the first risk events can be collected by the
在又一實施例中,可由風險因子訓練模組320統計該事故歷史及該等第一風險事件以產生該等第一樣本。
In yet another embodiment, the risk
接著,在步驟S430,風險因子訓練模組320根據該等第一樣本進行資料訓練,以計算各該風險因子之事故機率值,以及該等風險因子之整體機率值及複合機率值。在一實施例中,風險因子訓練模組320可執行一風險因子訓練方法,該風險因子訓練方法採用該等第一樣本,並運用機器學習方法中之多項樸素貝式分類器(multinomial Naive Bayes classifier)訓練風險因子機率值,其訓練公式分述如下。
Next, in step S430, the risk
各該風險因子之事故機率值P(C i|A)之公式如下,其中,A表示事故,C i為上述之風險因子之發生次數,i為整數且1<=i<=N,N為風險因子之數量。在本實施例中,N等於3。 The formula for the accident probability value P ( C i |A) of each risk factor is as follows, where A represents an accident, C i is the number of occurrences of the above risk factors, i is an integer and 1<=i<=N, N is The number of risk factors. In this embodiment, N is equal to three.
該等風險因子之整體機率值P(A)之公式如下。 The formula for the overall probability value P (A) of these risk factors is as follows.
該等風險因子之複合機率值P(C 1,C 2,C 3)=P(C 1)×P(C 2)×P(C 3),其中,P(C 1)、P(C 2)及P(C 3)分別為所有樣本中之各該風險因子之發生次數總和除以所有樣本中之所有風險因子之發生次數總和。例如,P(C 1)=所有 樣本中之風險因子F1的發生次數C 1之總和除以所有樣本中之所有風險因子的發生次數之總和,依此類推。 The composite probability value of these risk factors P ( C 1 , C 2 , C 3 ) = P ( C 1 ) × P ( C 2 ) × P ( C 3 ), where P ( C 1 ), P ( C 2 ) and P ( C 3 ) are the sum of occurrences of each risk factor in all samples divided by the sum of occurrences of all risk factors in all samples. For example, P ( C1 )=sum of occurrences C1 of risk factor F1 in all samples divided by the sum of occurrences of all risk factors in all samples, and so on.
若以表5中之第一樣本S1至S8為輸入資料,則各該風險因子之事故機率值P(C i|A)及該等風險因子之整體機率值P(A)之計算結果如下。 If the first samples S 1 to S 8 in Table 5 are used as input data, the calculation of the accident probability value P ( C i |A) of each risk factor and the overall probability value P (A) of these risk factors The results are as follows.
若以表5中之第一樣本S1至S8為輸入資料,則該等風險因子之複合機率值P(C 1,C 2,C 3)=P(C 1)×P(C 2)×P(C 3)之計算結果如下列之表6所示。 If the first samples S 1 to S 8 in Table 5 are used as input data, the composite probability value of these risk factors P ( C 1 , C 2 , C 3 ) = P ( C 1 ) × P ( C 2 ) × P ( C 3 ) calculation results are shown in Table 6 below.
風險資料輸入模組314除了蒐集上述之第一風險事件以外,還可蒐集該車隊之車輛於一時間段內所產生之複數第二風險事件,且風險資料輸入模組314、資料庫模組316或風險因子訓練模組320可統計該等第二風險事件以產生第二樣本,例如下列之表7所示之第二樣本S9。第二樣本類似上述之
第一樣本,例如,第二樣本S9包括各該風險因子F1、F2及F3於該等第二風險事件中之發生次數C 1、C 2及C 3。
In addition to collecting the above-mentioned first risk events, the risk
接著,在步驟S440,事故預測模組330根據上述訓練結果(包括各該風險因子之該事故機率值、該等風險因子之該整體機率值及該複合機率值)及該第二樣本預測該第二樣本所對應之事故風險機率P(A|C 1,C 2,C 3),計算公式如下。
Next, in step S440, the
例如,若預測第二樣本S9所對應之事故風險機率,則計算結果如下。 For example, if the accident risk probability corresponding to the second sample S9 is predicted, the calculation result is as follows.
在風險因子之上述訓練完成後,事故預測模組330可依照上述計算方式,為後續產生之第二樣本預測其所對應之事故風險機率。各該事故風險機率均為相對值,可呈現各該第二樣本所對應之車輛駕駛員之間的駕駛品質之區別。
After the above training of the risk factors is completed, the
在另一實施例中,事故風險機率之預測可增加年齡因素。詳言之,各該第二樣本可包括對應之第二風險事件所對應的車輛駕駛員之年齡,且上述預測所產生之事故風險機率可依照該年齡分群,以在各年齡層內呈現車輛駕駛員之間的駕駛品質之區別。在其他實施例中,事故風險機率之預測也可增 加其他因素,以進一步分群而在各分群內呈現車輛駕駛員之間的駕駛品質之區別。 In another embodiment, the prediction of accident risk probability may add an age factor. Specifically, each of the second samples may include the age of the vehicle driver corresponding to the corresponding second risk event, and the accident risk probability generated by the above prediction may be grouped according to the age, so as to present the vehicle driving in each age group. Differences in driving quality between drivers. In other embodiments, the prediction of accident risk probability may also increase Additional factors are added to further group the differences in driving quality among vehicle drivers within each group.
上述之第二實施例均以三個風險因子為範例,但本發明並不限於此,在其他實施例中,風險因子之數量可視應用需求而調整,且上述之計算公式可因應風險因子的數量隨之調整。 The above-mentioned second embodiment takes three risk factors as an example, but the present invention is not limited to this. In other embodiments, the number of risk factors can be adjusted according to application requirements, and the above calculation formula can be adjusted according to the number of risk factors Adjust accordingly.
圖5為根據本發明第三實施例之一種行車風險分析設備500的方塊圖。行車風險分析設備500包括風險資料蒐集模組510、風險係數調整模組520、風險運算模組530、風險因子訓練模組540、以及事故預測模組550,其中,風險資料蒐集模組510包括風險因子設定模組512、風險資料輸入模組514、以及資料庫模組516。圖5中之各模組均可為軟體、硬體或韌體;若為硬體,則可為具有資料處理與運算能力之處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器;若為軟體或韌體,則可包括處理單元、處理器、電腦或伺服器可執行之指令。此外,圖5中之各模組可整合於同一硬體裝置中,或分散建置於複數硬體裝置中。
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a driving
在本實施例中,風險因子設定模組512、風險資料輸入模組514、以及資料庫模組516分別包括第一實施例之風險因子設定模組112、風險資料輸入模組114、以及資料庫模組116之功能,且分別包括第二實施例之風險因子設定模組312、風險資料輸入模組314、以及資料庫模組316之功能。因此,風險資料蒐集模組510、風險係數調整模組520、以及風險運算模組530可執行如圖2所示之第一實施例之行車風險分析方法,且風險資料蒐集模組510、風險因子訓練模組540、以及事故預測模組550可執行如圖4所示之第二
實施例之行車風險分析方法,藉以計算駕駛員的行車風險值並預測事故風險機率。
In this embodiment, the risk
綜上所述,本發明之行車風險分析設備及方法係根據風險因子計算駕駛員的行車風險值,提供客觀量化數值,以判別高行車風險的司機而進行輔導改善,或判別低行車風險的司機而給予鼓勵。此外,本發明之行車風險分析設備及方法亦可採用機器學習方法並依據歷史資料進行資料訓練,以預測事故風險機率。 To sum up, the driving risk analysis device and method of the present invention calculates the driving risk value of the driver according to the risk factor, and provides objective quantitative values, so as to discriminate the driver with high driving risk and provide guidance for improvement, or discriminate the driver with low driving risk. And give encouragement. In addition, the driving risk analysis device and method of the present invention can also use a machine learning method and perform data training according to historical data, so as to predict the accident risk probability.
上述實施形態僅例示性說明本發明之原理及其功效,而非用於限制本發明。任何在本技術領域具有通常知識者均可在不違背本發明之精神及範疇下,對上述實施形態進行修飾與改變。因此,本發明之權利保護範圍,應如後述之申請專利範圍所列。 The above-mentioned embodiments are only used to illustrate the principle and effect of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the present invention. Anyone with ordinary knowledge in the technical field can modify and change the above-mentioned embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be as listed in the patent application scope described later.
500:行車風險分析設備 500: Driving Risk Analysis Equipment
510:風險資料蒐集模組 510: Risk Data Collection Module
512:風險因子設定模組 512: Risk Factor Setting Module
514:風險資料輸入模組 514: Risk Data Input Module
516:資料庫模組 516: Database Module
520:風險係數調整模組 520: Risk Factor Adjustment Module
530:風險運算模組 530: Risk Computing Module
540:風險因子訓練模組 540: Risk Factor Training Module
550:事故預測模組 550: Accident Prediction Module
Claims (9)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW109136685A TWI758915B (en) | 2020-10-22 | 2020-10-22 | Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW109136685A TWI758915B (en) | 2020-10-22 | 2020-10-22 | Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TWI758915B true TWI758915B (en) | 2022-03-21 |
TW202217723A TW202217723A (en) | 2022-05-01 |
Family
ID=81710763
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW109136685A TWI758915B (en) | 2020-10-22 | 2020-10-22 | Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TWI758915B (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWM570495U (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2018-11-21 | 關貿網路股份有限公司 | A system for prediction and warningof driving environment risk |
TWI646490B (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2019-01-01 | 元智大學 | Method and processing device for driving risk assessment based on multiple kernal learning |
CN111178452A (en) * | 2020-01-02 | 2020-05-19 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Driving risk identification method, electronic device and readable storage medium |
CN111612334A (en) * | 2020-05-20 | 2020-09-01 | 上海评驾科技有限公司 | Driving behavior risk rating judgment method based on Internet of vehicles data |
CN111785023A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-10-16 | 山东派蒙机电技术有限公司 | Vehicle collision risk early warning method and system |
-
2020
- 2020-10-22 TW TW109136685A patent/TWI758915B/en active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI646490B (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2019-01-01 | 元智大學 | Method and processing device for driving risk assessment based on multiple kernal learning |
TWM570495U (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2018-11-21 | 關貿網路股份有限公司 | A system for prediction and warningof driving environment risk |
CN111178452A (en) * | 2020-01-02 | 2020-05-19 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Driving risk identification method, electronic device and readable storage medium |
CN111612334A (en) * | 2020-05-20 | 2020-09-01 | 上海评驾科技有限公司 | Driving behavior risk rating judgment method based on Internet of vehicles data |
CN111785023A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-10-16 | 山东派蒙机电技术有限公司 | Vehicle collision risk early warning method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW202217723A (en) | 2022-05-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20240127636A1 (en) | In-vehicle monitoring and reporting apparatus for vehicles | |
CN111452799B (en) | Driving behavior evaluation method and system | |
CN110807930B (en) | Dangerous vehicle early warning method and device | |
JP6918137B2 (en) | Driving behavior evaluation method, device and computer-readable storage medium | |
Kusano et al. | Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases | |
US20140081675A1 (en) | Systems, methods, and apparatus for optimizing claim appraisals | |
US10990837B1 (en) | Systems and methods for utilizing machine learning and feature selection to classify driving behavior | |
EP3605433A1 (en) | Information processing device, information processing system, information processing method, and program | |
CN110001653A (en) | A kind of driving behavior appraisal procedure, server and computer-readable medium | |
Shannon et al. | Applying crash data to injury claims-an investigation of determinant factors in severe motor vehicle accidents | |
Xu et al. | Utilizing structural equation modeling and segmentation analysis in real-time crash risk assessment on freeways | |
Liu et al. | Predicting interstate motor carrier crash rate level using classification models | |
TWI758915B (en) | Driving risk analysis apparatus and method thereof | |
Chang et al. | Capturing long-memory properties in road fatality rate series by an autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average model with generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity: A case study of Florida, the United States, 1975–2018 | |
Babisch et al. | Leveraging the GIDAS Database for the Criticality Analysis of Automated Driving Systems | |
TW202015947A (en) | Intelligent driving method for passing intersections based on support vector machine and intelligent driving system thereof | |
Shuey et al. | The AAA approach to crash investigation reform-the perspective from road policing practitioners | |
CN106651133B (en) | Method for achieving user driving behavior scoring based on ADAS by using mobile phone | |
CN110751826B (en) | Vehicle queuing determination method and related device | |
CN115631002B (en) | Computer vision-based intelligent damage assessment method and system for vehicle insurance | |
US20230260342A1 (en) | Method and computer programmes for the management of vehicle fleets | |
Deflorio et al. | Safety systems and vehicle generations: Analysis of accident and travel data collected using event data recorders | |
CN111860661B (en) | Data analysis method and device based on user behaviors, electronic equipment and medium | |
Ziakopoulos et al. | Advanced driver monitoring using smartphone applications: The BeSmart project | |
Alvarado | The racial equity implications of road safety enforcement in Oakland, CA |