NZ535398A - Test of visual search - Google Patents

Test of visual search

Info

Publication number
NZ535398A
NZ535398A NZ535398A NZ53539804A NZ535398A NZ 535398 A NZ535398 A NZ 535398A NZ 535398 A NZ535398 A NZ 535398A NZ 53539804 A NZ53539804 A NZ 53539804A NZ 535398 A NZ535398 A NZ 535398A
Authority
NZ
New Zealand
Prior art keywords
test
subject
screen
stimuli
reaction
Prior art date
Application number
NZ535398A
Inventor
Innes Carrie Ruth Hardwick
Richard Darryl Jones
Original Assignee
Canterbury Distr Health Board
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Canterbury Distr Health Board filed Critical Canterbury Distr Health Board
Priority to NZ535398A priority Critical patent/NZ535398A/en
Priority to PCT/NZ2005/000242 priority patent/WO2006031131A1/en
Publication of NZ535398A publication Critical patent/NZ535398A/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/0091Fixation targets for viewing direction
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Psychiatry (AREA)
  • Psychology (AREA)
  • Social Psychology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
  • Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

A computerized test method for visual search speed and accuracy includes showing the test subject a series of different test screens. Each test screens contains a plurality of stimuli which include a target stimulus. The test subject is required to react in a specified manner to the target stimuli. The position of the target stimulus relative to the other stimuli is varied at random in the different test screens. Each test screen is shown to the test subject for a specified period. The specified reaction required from the subject may be instinctive or non-instinctive.

Description

New Zealand Paient Spedficaiion for Paient Number 535398 53539 New Zealand Patent Appn 535398 Filed: 17 September 2004 Patents Form No. 5 Patents Act 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION TEST OF VISUAL SEARCH We, CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD, a New Zealand Publicly-Owned Health & Disability Organisation of Private Bag 4710, Christchurch, New Zealand hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement: 1 (to be followed by 1a) Intellectual Property Office of N.Z. 14 SEP 2005 RECEIVED Title: Test of Visual Search Technical Field The present invention relates to a computerized test which is designed to assess the test subject's visual search speed and visual search accuracy. The ability to carry out a rapid visual survey, and to assess what is seen in that survey both rapidly and accurately, is important in a number of fields e.g., monitoring and controlling equipment, surveillance work of any kind, and driving. The test the subject of the present invention has been 10 developed with especial reference to detecting potential problems in drivers, and therefore will be described with particular reference to this application. However, it must be appreciated that the test in fact can be much more widely applied.
In computerized tests, the subject is required to react in one or more ways to symbols 15 appearing on a computer screen; the subject may be required to make a verbal response and/or take one or more physical actions e.g., turning a steering wheel or depressing an accelerator or brake pedal; any such physical controls are electrically connected to the computer so that appropriate movement of the controls affects the material shown on the computer screen. The test results may be recorded by the person administering the test 20 or may be automatically recorded by the computer.
Background Art A variety of computerized tests is available, to test for a range of different problems. For 25 example, UK patent 2,335,856, US patents 5,344,324 and 5,103408 all relate to tests for checking that a person about to undertake difficult or dangerous work is not impaired in any way compared to their previous performance. Such tests are specific to the test subject, as the objective is to check that that particular subject is not impaired relative to their previous level of performance, rather than testing whether the subject reaches a 30 specified general standard.
US patent 4,383,827 relates to a test which requires a complete driving simulator, with all of the car controls available to the test subject and a programme which generates a 1a simulation of a full road picture. The test of this type can be useful in assessing general driving ability, but is not really designed to pinpoint specific problems.
US patent 6,364,486 relates to a test of visual capabilities which requires the subject to 5 respond to various stimuli displayed on screen either directly to the test administrator or by using a keyboard, joystick or touch screen. This type of subject reaction fails to mimic the reaction required from the subject in reality, and therefore may inhibit the subject.
US patent 5,131,848 discloses a test in which images are projected onto the screen in a 10 random sequence, and the subject is required to react in a predetermined manner only to some of the images displayed; some of the test screens shown do not include any image requiring a reaction. The required reaction by the subject depends upon the type of images displayed, but the required reaction is always an instinctive reaction.
Disclosure of the Invention It is an object of the present invention to provide a test of the subject's visual search speed and visual search accuracy which is capable of testing the subject under a range of different conditions and which requires the subject to switch randomly between instinctive 20 and non-instinctive responses to the stimuli displayed.
The present invention provides a computerised test for visual search speed and accuracy, said test including: showing a test subject a series of different test screens each of which contains a plurality of stimuli which include a target stimulus to which the subject is 25 required to react in a specified manner; and recording the subject's reactions; wherein:- (a) the position of the target stimulus relative to the other stimuli is varied at random in the different test screens; (b) each test screen is shown to the subject for a specified period; (c) the specified reaction required from the subject may be instinctive or non-instinctive.
Preferably, the specified manner of reaction involves movement of physical equipment 2 (e.g., for a test of a vehicle driver's visual search speed and accuracy, turning a steering wheel or using a direction indicator) and a centring screen requiring the subject to "centre" the physical equipment in the sense of moving the equipment back to a neutral position, is shown to the subject between consecutive test screens.
The target stimulus may be any of a wide range of different stimuli e.g., turn right/turn left arrows, speed limit signs, stop/go signs; or any other international road sign/signal.
The physical equipment used is selected to correspond to the target stimulus:- in the case 10 of turn right/turn left arrows, the physical equipment used would be a steering wheel or direction indicators; in the case of speed limit signs or stop/go signs, the physical equipment would be a speedometer plus accelerator and brake pedals.
Brief Description of the Drawings By way of example only, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-Figure 1 shows the diagrammatic layout of the apparatus used; Figure 2 shows the centring screen used between the multiple stimuli screens of figure 1; 20 and Figure 3 shows a sample screen containing a plurality of visual stimuli; Figure 4 is a flow chart showing the sequence of a typical test.
Best Mode for Carrying out the Invention Referring to Figure 1, the apparatus used for the test of the present invention consists of a computer 2 with a screen 2a; the computer 2 is electrically connected by a cable 3 to a steering wheel 4 which is supported in front of the test subject by suitable supports (not shown). The test subject sits on a chair 5 behind the steering wheel and facing the screen 30 2a. The computer 2 and screen 2a may be separated; the tester administering the test may have a separate screen which also shows the test, for supervisory purposes.
The connection between the steering wheel 4 and the computer 2 is such that the 3 rotational position of the steering wheel 4 is automatically recorded by the computer. The computer also is programmed to record the time at which each test screen is shown, the delay between that time and the test subject's reaction, and the nature of that reaction.
Initially, the test subject sits on the chair 5 holding the steering wheel 4 in the normal driving position and is shown a centring screen on the computer screen 2a. The centring screen 6 is shown in Figure 2:- it consists of a screen with a central box 7 and a movable arrow 8. The arrow 8 can be moved by rotating the steering wheel in the appropriate direction and the object is to centre the steering wheel into a central (i.e., neutral) position by moving the arrow 8 to the position shown in broken lines in Figure 2. Once the computer 2 records that the steering wheel 4 has been centred for a predetermined period (typically 1-2 seconds), the subject is shown the first test screen.
A typical test screen 10 is shown in Figure 3. The test screen contains a large number of 15 stimuli (typically 60 to 70) but only one of the target stimuli (in this case a turn right arrow 11). A separate box 12 at the top of the test screen 10 shows the target stimuli to which the test subject is required to react:- in this case a turn left arrow and a turn right arrow. When either of these stimuli appears on the screen, then the test subject is required to react by turning the steering wheel 4 in the appropriate direction i.e. left for the turn left 20 arrow/ right for the turn right arrow.
The test subject's reaction may be instinctive or non-instinctive:- an instinctive reaction from the test subject is where the turn left arrow appears where it would frequently appear in real life i.e., on the left-hand side of the subject, or where the turn right arrow appears on the right-hand side of the screen. In the test screen 10, a non-instinctive reaction is required from the test subject:- the turn right arrow appears on the left-hand side of the screen, but nevertheless the test subject is required to turn right.
The test screen 10 is shown to the subject for a specified period, typically about 10 30 seconds. The subject is required to find and then react to the target stimuli as quickly as possible: the elapsed time between the first showing of the test screen and the subject's reaction is recorded by the computer 2, as is the nature of the reaction. For each test, three possible reactions may be recorded by the computer:- 4 a) correct reaction (where the steering wheel is turned in the correct direction); b) incorrect reaction (where the steering wheel is turned in the wrong direction); c) no reaction (where the subject fails to react at all).
As soon as the subject has moved the steering wheel 4 in either direction by more than 20°, the test screen disappears and is replaced by the centring screen of Figure 1; the subject then re- centres the steering wheel as described above. As soon as the steering wheel has been re-centred the centring screen disappears and the next test screen is displayed.
The target stimuli remain the same from one screen to the next, but their position on the screen is varied, so that the subject has to search for the target stimulus each time a new screen is displayed.
The above described sequence is repeated until a large number (typically 20) of different test screens have been displayed to the subject.
Before the start of the test, the test subject is given a practice run so that he or she is certain what is required.
As a result of the test, the criteria listed below are measured/calculated:- Measures of performance Mean response time The mean length of time from presentation of the screen until the subject turns the 25 steering wheel in either direction by more than 20°.
Correct left turns The number of times the steering wheel is turned towards the left following presentation of 'turn left arrow'.
Correct right turns The number of times the steering wheel is turned towards the right following presentation of 'turn right arrow'.
Total correct turns The total number of correct steering wheel turns.
No responses The number of times the subject does not make a steering wheel response within 10.0 s. Right/left bias The difference in response time between right-side and left-side peripherally presented target stimuli.
Central bias The difference in response time between central and peripheral presentation of target stimuli.
Table 1 below gives an example of typical test results Table 1 Sample results for the Test of Visual Search Trial Target Response time Steering wheel Trial 1 Left Time out No response Trial 2 Left .72 Left Trial 3 Right Time out No response Trial 4 Right Time out No response Trial 5 Right 4.57 Right Trial 6 Left 2.02 Left Trial 7 Right 4.60 Right Trial 8 Left 3.72 Left Trial 9 Right Time out No response Trial 10 Left 6.32 Left Trial 11 Left Time out No response Trial 12 Right Time out No response Trial 13 Right 8.40 Right Trial 14 Right 2.97 Right Trial 15 Left 1.73 Left Trial 16 Right 2.80 Right Trial 17 Left 4.38 Left Trial 18 Left 8.02 Left Trial 19 Right 2.02 Right Trial 20 Left 2.33 Left The summary of the results obtained from the test is set out in table 2: Table 2 Example summary for the Test of Visual Search Visual Search Test Mean response time 5445 ms Correct left turns 8/10 Correct right turns 6/10 Total correct turns 14/20 No responses 6 Mean right-side response time 3800ms (4/4) Mean left-side response time 7167 ms (2/4) Right/left bias 0.53 Mean central response time 4921 ms (4/8) Mean peripheral response time 3990 ms (10/12) Central bias 1.23 The subject's test performance is interpreted by considering each of the measures of performance in turn:- 1. Mean Response Time. This gives an indication of the subject's speed and efficiency of 10 visual search; all responses are included in the calculation of mean response time, whether correct or incorrect. 2. Correct Left and Right Turns The overall number of correct responses gives an indication of how well the subject is 15 able to locate the target stimulus and react appropriately, or whether they are guessing.
A close to 50/50 correct response rate for both left and right steering wheel turn responses indicates that the subject is probably guessing. A high number of correct responses in one direction in association with a low number of correct responses in the opposite direction may indicate that the subject has a bias toward making a particular 20 response, and they may be guessing. 8 A combination of a relatively long mean visual search and location time with high correct steering wheel turns may indicate that the subject is emphasising accuracy at the expense of speed. A combination of a relatively short mean visual search and location time with lower correct steering wheel responses may indicate that the subject is emphasising 5 speed at the expense of accuracy. 3. No responses A high number of no responses indicates a visual scanning and search deficit. 4. Right/left bias A bias toward right-sided peripheral target presentations (i.e., shorter reaction times 10 during trials when symbols are presented on the right side of the screen), may indicate neglect of the left hemispace or left visual field deficits, causing slowness in responding to target presented on the peripheral left side of the screen. A bias toward left-sided peripheral target presentations may indicate right visual field deficits, causing slowness in responding to targets presented on the peripheral right side of the screen. 5. Central bias This measure demonstrates any larger than average discrepancies between the mean response time for targets presented near the centre of the screen, versus those presented on the peripheral edges of the screen. A larger than normal discrepancy may indicate a lack of efficiency in visual search, which could be due to visual field deficits.
The subject's performance is compared to the performance of control subjects, to gauge whether the test subject has problems in one or more of the areas tested.
It should be noted that, because the present test requires some instinctive and some non-25 instinctive responses, the test involves the subject's higher cognitive factors in the visual search:- the subject cannot simply assume that if he or she sees a target stimulus one side of the screen, then the wheel must be turned to that side; instead, the subject has to find the target stimulus, recognise what it is, and then take appropriate action. Because the test is conducted under time pressure, subjects with cognitive impairments are more 30 likely to make incorrect instinctive responses to the non-instinctively positioned target stimuli. Errors of this kind draw attention to cognitive defects. Further, a subject's inability 9

Claims (11)

    to switch quickly between instinctive and non-instinctive responses may be a serious potential problem in on the road driving situations where this skill often is important. 10
  1. A computerised test for visual search speed and accuracy, said test including: showing a test subject a series of different test screens each of which contains a plurality of stimuli which include a target stimulus to which the subject is required to react in a specified manner; and recording the subject's reactions; wherein:- (a) the position of the target stimulus relative to the other stimuli is varied at random in the different test screens; (b) each test screen is shown to the subject for a specified period; (c) the specified reaction required from the subject may be instinctive or non-instinctive.
  2. The test as claimed in claim 1, wherein the specified reaction required from the subject includes physical movement of equipment.
  3. The test as claimed in claim 2, wherein between each test screen and the next test screen, the subject is shown a centring screen which requires the test subject to return said equipment to a neutral position.
  4. The test as claimed in claim 1, wherein said test is designed to detect potential problems in vehicle drivers, and wherein the stimuli shown on said test screens include driving instruction signs and the target stimulus is a driving instruction sign.
  5. The test as claimed in claim 4 wherein said stimuli and target stimulus are selected from the group consisting of international road signs and signals.
  6. The test as claimed in claim 4 or claim 5, wherein the specified reaction required from the subject includes physical movement of equipment.
  7. The test as claimed in Claim 6, wherein between each test screen and the next test screen, the subject is shown a centring screen which requires the test subject to return said equipment to a neutral position. 11
  8. 8. The test as claimed in claim 6 or claim 7, wherein said equipment is selected from the group consisting of: a vehicle steering wheel, vehicle direction indicators, vehicle speedometer in combination with accelerator and brake pedals. 5
  9. 9.
  10. 10 10.
  11. 11. 15 The test as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the time taken for the subject to react to the target stimulus is recorded each time the target stimulus appears on one of the test screens. The test as claimed in claim 9, wherein each time a target stimulus appears on one of the test screens, the subject's reaction is recorded as a correct reaction, an incorrect reaction, or no reaction. A computerised test for visual speed search and accuracy, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in the accompanying drawings. IntellQQtUii Property Offiot of N.Z. 1 h SEP 2005 12 1/4 2/4 4 3/4 4/4 Fig.4
NZ535398A 2004-09-17 2004-09-17 Test of visual search NZ535398A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ535398A NZ535398A (en) 2004-09-17 2004-09-17 Test of visual search
PCT/NZ2005/000242 WO2006031131A1 (en) 2004-09-17 2005-09-14 Test of visual search

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ535398A NZ535398A (en) 2004-09-17 2004-09-17 Test of visual search

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NZ535398A true NZ535398A (en) 2005-12-23

Family

ID=35875033

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NZ535398A NZ535398A (en) 2004-09-17 2004-09-17 Test of visual search

Country Status (2)

Country Link
NZ (1) NZ535398A (en)
WO (1) WO2006031131A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2948865A1 (en) * 2009-08-07 2011-02-11 Ct Hospitalier Universitaire De Clermont Ferrand Individual's e.g. brain injured child, data e.g. neurovisual function related data, collecting method, involves checking memory lapse and open ended statement of child and observing exploratory visual strategy during test
TR201009701A2 (en) 2010-11-25 2011-05-23 Co�Kun�Z Hold�Ng Anon�M ��Rket� Speed and distance estimation tester
WO2014158112A1 (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-02 Coşkunöz Holdi̇ng Anoni̇m Şi̇rketi̇ Visual awareness determination system

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3918176A (en) * 1974-05-22 1975-11-11 Us Transport Visual divided attention alcohol safety interlock system
US4057911A (en) * 1976-07-29 1977-11-15 Sack Thomas F Portable psycho-physical automobile driver testing device
US4058911A (en) * 1976-08-18 1977-11-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Transportation Road-runner alcohol safety interlock system
DE2926654C2 (en) * 1979-07-02 1982-08-26 Reiner Dr.-Ing. 5270 Gummersbach Foerst Driving simulator
ATE145491T1 (en) * 1989-04-07 1996-12-15 Doron Precision Syst TEST METHOD AND APPARATUS
US5103408A (en) * 1990-01-16 1992-04-07 Atlantic Richfield Company Apparatus and method for determining the ability of an individual to perform a task
US5911581A (en) * 1995-02-21 1999-06-15 Braintainment Resources, Inc. Interactive computer program for measuring and analyzing mental ability
US5888074A (en) * 1996-09-16 1999-03-30 Scientex Corporation System for testing and evaluating driver situational awareness
US5801810A (en) * 1996-10-11 1998-09-01 Visual Resources, Inc. Method and apparatus for testing visual attention capabilities of a subject

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006031131A1 (en) 2006-03-23
WO2006031131A8 (en) 2006-06-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5131848A (en) Testing method and apparatus
CA2073040C (en) Method for diagnosing deficiencies and expanding a person's useful field of view
US20200365049A1 (en) System, Method and Apparatus for Adaptive Driver Training
Scialfa et al. A hazard perception test for novice drivers
JP3787493B2 (en) Vehicle driver training system, vehicle driver evaluation method, and apparatus
CA2267619C (en) Method and apparatus for testing visual attention capabilities of a subject
US3918176A (en) Visual divided attention alcohol safety interlock system
Singh et al. Do experiments in the virtual world effectively predict how pedestrians evaluate electric vehicle sounds in the real world?
WO2006031131A1 (en) Test of visual search
CN109938757A (en) A kind of safe driving aptitude test device and method of commercial vehicle driver
JPH1165418A (en) Driving simulator and driving simulation method
Gugerty et al. Situation awareness: a validation study and investigation of individual differences
JP2005013713A (en) Measurement of attention function, and method and apparatus for learning attention function
AU2003281274B2 (en) Symbols-scanning test and symbols-and-tracking dual-task test
JP3917944B2 (en) Fatigue degree evaluation method and apparatus
Craig et al. Vigilance effects in complex inspection
Bian et al. Changes in extent of spatial attention with increased workload in dual-task driving
WO1993016637A1 (en) Reflex tester
WO2005023112A1 (en) Driver impairment test
US9299269B2 (en) System for evaluating driving competency of a subject
RU2131146C1 (en) Training device for driving education
US3704526A (en) Rc clutch stall circuit for a driver-trainer simulator
Flynn Effect of velocity on judgments of relative mass
Laxar et al. Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights
SU1043721A1 (en) Device for estimating psyhophysiological characteristics of control system operators

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PSEA Patent sealed
RENW Renewal (renewal fees accepted)
LAPS Patent lapsed